Presentation rubric

https://my.pblworks.org/resources
Rate the presentation in 5 scales:

5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor

Descriptors

Criteria 1 2 3 4 5

1. Organization

2. Explanation of ideas and information

3. Eyes and Body language

4. Voice

5. Visual aids

6. Response to audience questions

7. Participation in team presentation

Writing rubric
 https://www.aur.edu/sites/default/files/University-Writing-Rubric-Approved-by-
Curriculum-Committee-Feb-2010.pdf
Rate the writing in 3 scales:

3 – Good 2 – Average 1 – Poor

Criteria Descriptors

1 2 3

Ideas and Few details and no Some interesting ideas Fascinating topic
content new information with rich ideas
and clear focus

Organization No beginning, middle Missing some transitions A clear

and end and no and some ideas are out beginning, middle
transitions of order and end with
good transitions

Word choice Your words aren’t Still need and add more Vivid description
helping me to see and description and be more language. I can
feel what you are specific see what you are
describing writing.

Sentence Sentences are all the Need more variation of Varied and
fluency same length and lack sentence length and interesting
interest, all starting patterns. sentences that
the same way. begin in diverse
ways.

Convention Lots of error that it Some mistakes Correct spelling,

hard to read grammar and
punctuation

Product rubric
Rate the product in 5 scales:
5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor

Descriptors
Criteria
1 2 3 4 5
5. Goal-based
(How the product meets the goal)
2. Creativity
(How imaginative and creative the designers
are)
3. Aesthetics
(How beautiful and attractive the product is)
4. Effort
(How much effort I can feel the designer put on
this)

Self and peer assessment rubric

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1041&context=cehsgpirw
Rate your participation on a scale of 1-5 (points)
1 2 3 4 5
5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor
Rank your peer participation.
5 – Excellent 4 – Good 3 – Average 2 – Poor 1 – Very poor
Remember, all other grades for this project are group grades so if you don’t feel as
though a person contributed enough, this is the place to inform me.
Peer names and items for making Descriptors
assessment

Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

1. Helped with idea development and

problem solving

2. Gave positive (rather than negative)

comments or suggestions.

3. Accepted positive comments or

suggestions

4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

1. Helped with idea development and

problem solving

2. Gave positive (rather than negative)

comments or suggestions.

3. Accepted positive comments or

suggestions

4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

1. Helped with idea development and

problem solving
2. Gave positive (rather than negative)
comments or suggestions.

3. Accepted positive comments or

suggestions

4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

Peer name: 1 2 3 4 5

1. Helped with idea development and

problem solving

2. Gave positive (rather than negative)

comments or suggestions.

3. Accepted positive comments or

suggestions

4. Gave best effort in helping with the project

5. Overall: Was helpful and positive

Other comments:

…………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………