FC307 Book review

Information removed for privacy ; include here relevant cover page

information as stated by the task instructions
 Awk.

1
 2

Awk.
3
FC307 Book review
GRADEMARK REPORT

FINAL GRADE GENERAL COMMENTS

91
Instructor

FIRST MARKER

Content 24/30 

/100 This is a really impressive and well-structured

review. However, your conclusion could've
related back to the main source.

Analysis 30/30 

Your analysis was interesting and convincing, and

it demonstrated your engagement with both the
source and the topic. 

Sources 12/15 

You make a good use of sources, although you

could've identified your primary source more
clearly. 

Academic Integrity 15/15 

You reference your sources and you provided a

bibliography. 

Presentation & Communication 10/10

You write clearly and convincingly. 

FIRST MARKER OVERALL: 91

SECOND MARKER 

Content 24/30 
 A solid review that takes into consideration
different historical perspectives. In the conclusion
you should have debated more clearly the validity
of this source, whether instead you focus on the
living experiences during the industrial revolution.

Analysis 30/30 

A comprehensive analysis that intersects with

different scholarly approaches (economic, social,
gender). Well done, I particularly enjoyed reading
about the gendered perspectives. 

Sources 12/15 

Good range of reputable secondary sources, but

your primary one is missing or not clearly
identified within the text. 

Academic Integrity 15/15 

All good with in text citations and bibliography. A

step up: when referencing precise passages of the
book, quote the page. This applies to all
referencing styles. 

Presentation & Communication 8/10 

Mostly well written, with

some cumbersome passages that might benefit
from being rewritten.

SECOND MARKER OVERALL: 89

PAGE 1

PAGE 2

QM Awk.
Awkward:
The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.

Comment 1
good structure
PAGE 3

Comment 2
no comment

QM Awk.
Awkward:
The expression or construction is cumbersome or difficult to read. Consider rewriting.

PAGE 4

PAGE 5

PAGE 6

PAGE 7

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

Comment 3
Routledge is a not a place of publication 

GRADING FORM: MARKING CRITERIA

91
CONTENT

24
This is a really impressive and well-structured
review. However, your conclusion could've related
back to the main source.

ANALYSIS
 30
Your analysis was interesting and convincing, and
it demonstrated your engagement with both the
source and the topic.

SOURCES

12
You make a good use of sources, although you
could've identified your primary source more
clearly.

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY

15
You reference your sources and you provided a
bibliography.

PRESENTATION AND COMMUNICATION

10
You write clearly and convincingly.