Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSESSMENT GUIDE
SAQA: 10135
1|Page
2|Page
CANDIDATE DETAILS
Candidate
Name:
Identity Number
Tel: Email:
Assessor Name:
Tel: Email:
Moderator
Name:
Tel: Email
Physical Address:
Tel:
Declaration:
Candidate
Date
signature
Assessor
Date
signature
Moderator
Date
signature
3|Page
4|Page
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework
are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and
reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or
quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the
source.
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text
(purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels
unless specifically stated otherwise.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1
Demonstrate an understanding of criteria for working as a member of a team.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Criteria for working as a member of a team are identified and explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Behaviours conducive to working as a member of a team are identified and explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Team dynamics are identified and explained.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2
Work autonomously and collaborate with other team members.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Team members are given sufficient support for them to achieve their work / project objectives.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Team members are consulted with.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Authority levels of all team members are identified and applied.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3
Contribute to building relations between team members and stakeholders.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. The importance of building relations between team members and stakeholders is explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Stakeholders are identified and their needs explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Communications with stakeholders encourages open and frank discussions.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Commitments to stakeholders are honoured and met.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4
Make a positive contribution to team coherence, image and spirit.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. The needs and objectives of team members are identified and explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2
2. Methods and techniques for building team coherence and spirit are identified and explained.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Team member actions are conducive to team coherence, spirit and image.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Trust and support of colleagues is gained through applicable behaviours.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5
5. Feedback is provided which leads to constructive working relationships.
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5
Respect personal, ethical, religious and cultural differences
OUTCOME NOTES
Respect personal, ethical, religious and cultural differences to enhance interaction between team
members.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1
1. Differences between team members are identified and acknowledged.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3
3. Team members are treated in ways which that demonstrate respect for individuals.
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4
4. Behaviours, which are of concern to individuals, are discussed promptly and openly with those
concerned.
Range Addressed
The range covered, refers to all the unit standards, specific
outcomes and assessment criteria as outlined by the
Qualification.
Assessment Approach
Assessment is focused on the applied competence of the learner and
the relevant unit standards determine the assessment criteria.
Summative Assessment
This is a summative assessment and assesses candidates
NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: END USER
COMPUTING
Rating
Learners are rated “Competent" or "Not Yet Competent”.
Types of
Assessment Method
Evidence
Knowledge Questionnaire:
Product Sampling:
Direct
All your documented evidence on completion of
the assessment process will be evaluated.
Assessment Conditions
Review the
Complete the “Assessment Review” documents and submit to
Assessment
the assessment co-ordinator.
Process
Dear :
We will discuss:
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any further queries.
Thank you
Learner’s Declaration
I…………………………………………………………………………………………….herewith declare
that I am ready for the assessment, that we have reviewed the assessment preparation
and plan, I understand the assessment process and I am happy that the assessment will be
conducted in a fair manner.
Learner Signature: Date: Assessor Signature: Date:
Candidate Assessor
Venue Date
EVIDENCE SUMMARY
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK REQUIREMENTS
EVIDENCE METHODS MET
YES NO
DIRECT KNOWLEDGE
QUESTIONNAIRE
The candidate has submitted evidence that is valid, relevant, current, sufficient and authentic against the listed specific
RE-ASSESSMENT DECISION: 1
The candidate has submitted additional evidence that was required. The evidence is valid, relevant, sufficient and authenti
RE-ASSESSMENT DECISION: 2
The candidate has submitted additional evidence that was required. The evidence is valid, relevant, sufficient and authenti
Declaration by candidate
Qualification
against which you
were assessed
Different Time
List any special needs you may
have.
The following will apply with reference to the (Insert company name) re-
assessment policy:
1. When a candidate has to undergo re-assessment, he/she will be given
specific feedback and guidance so as to concentrate on areas of
weakness.
2. The onus is on the candidate to communicate with the assessor to inform
him/her when he/she is ready for assessment
3. The re-assessment will take place in the same/similar situation or context and
under the same conditions
4. The same assessment methods and/or instruments may be used, but the task
and materials will be different but at the same level and complexity as the
previous task
5. Re-assessment can take place a maximum of 2 times per candidate, per unit
standard. Any further reassessment must be discussed with clients so as to
arrive at the best solution and advice for the learner.
6. A maximum of 3 months will be allowed in between each re-assessment,
unless otherwise discussed between the parties
7. Guidance will be given to those candidates who are unsuccessful after 3
attempts, and possible and more suitable learning avenues will be offered
to learners. Costs will be discussed with the SETA and client and any
costs incurred will be at a learners’ cost.
Candidate Assessor
Venue Review date
Qualification NATIONAL CERTIFICATE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: END USER
COMPUTING
Review Dimension ASSESSOR CANDIDATE ACTION
I am aware of the moderation process and understand that the moderator could declare
the assessment decision invalid
Summative Specific
Specific outcomes and Deliver Media Formative Formativ Date &
Assessment Outcome
assessment criteria y Aids, Assessment e signature
Strategy Referenc
Method Resources Strategy activities
e
s
P = Project Q = Questioning B = Brainstorming R = Role-play CS =
Formative Assessment Strategy Legend
Case Study W = Workplace Activity S = Self Assessment Checklist
O = Observation Q = Questioning PS = Product Sampling R = Role-play
Summative Assessment Strategy Legend
CS = Case Study T = Testimonial P = Project
Outcome Range
Specific Outcome 2 Work autonomously and collaborate with other team members.
Outcome Range
Specific Outcome 3 Contribute to building relations between team members and stakeholders.
Outcome Range Columns referred to here are not columns in a table (see definition in the notes section).
Specific Outcome 4 Make a positive contribution to team coherence, image and spirit.
Outcome Range
Outcome Range
Assessor’s name
Moderator’s name
Date of assignments
Date of feedback
Qualification
Assessor’s signature
Moderator’s signature
Assessor’s name
Moderator’s name
Date of feedback
Assessor’s signature
Moderator’s signature
Assessor’s name
Moderator’s name
Date of Observation
Date of feedback
Assessor’s signature
Moderator’s signature