Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HUMAN FIFTH
RESOURCE
EDITION
MANAGEMENT
B. SEBASTIAN REICHE | ANNE-WIL HARZING | HELENE TENZER
Contents
1. Introduction 530
2. Equal opportunities 531
3. Diversity management 538
4. Work–life balance: Practices and discourses 547
5. Summary and conclusions 550
Discussion questions 551
Case study: Managing diversity in a
Chinese-owned multinational IT firm 551
Further reading 555
Internet resources 556
Self-assessment questions 557
References558
529
Learning objectives
After reading this chapter you will be able to:
Chapter outline
This chapter provides an overview of the emergence of the concepts of equal oppor-
tunity, work–life balance (WLB) and diversity management. It describes how these
concepts gain popularity as part of strategic human resource management in firms
seeking competitive advantage. It critically analyses how different societal contexts
may influence the way these notions are sensitized. It discusses how issues related to
equality, diversity and work–life balance are dealt with in workplaces.
1 Introduction
Equal opportunity (EO) and diversity management (DM) have emerged as two impor-
tant issues for academic research and corporate practice in the field of employment
and human resource management. While differences exist in the foci and arguments
of these two notions, a shared concern is the need to create a level playing field in
an inclusive workplace so that employees with different backgrounds and attributes
can exert their work efforts and seek self-development. This chapter provides an over-
view of the international context in which the ideas of equal opportunity, diversity
management and work–life balance have emerged and been debated by some as part
of strategic HRM and a potential source of competitive advantage. Different societal
contexts may influence the way these ideas are understood and managed in work-
places. Informed by primary and secondary empirical data, the chapter presents
examples from different countries to demonstrate the complexity of these issues and
challenges that multinational corporations may encounter. The chapter also examines
the extent to which firms have shifted from an EO (compliance) approach to a value-
added (business case) approach to DM.
The chapter begins with a discussion of issues related to EO in employment legis-
lation and policy at the national level, and employers’ strategy and practices at the
2 Equal opportunities
found that transposing equal employment opportunities (EEO) initiatives from Western
countries to Muslim majority countries and across Muslim majority countries is fraught
with difficulties if they ignore due consideration of institutional and cultural condi-
tions, organizational processes and individual choices in each country. Özbilgin et al.’s
(2012: 364) study concluded that ‘employment practices are gendered in different
ways across national borders’, and that an ‘essentialist and deterministic’ approach to
gender, work and cross-national transfer of good practices does not work. This is
because ‘discourses of gender equality and the macro-national and cultural approaches
towards women’s status and roles’ in societies are distinctive, despite similar patterns
of gender disadvantages (Özbilgin et al., 2012: 364).
As mentioned above, gender equality constitutes a significant part of EO legisla-
tion, AA programmes and public debates. Unfortunately, despite the increasing
provisions of anti-discrimination legislation and espoused commitment from organiza-
tions to equality, gender inequality in various stages of the employment process
remains a salient feature in the labour market in most countries, and is more pro-
nounced in some than in others (e.g. Yukongdi and Benson, 2006; Davidson and
Burke, 2011; Tomlinson, 2011; Drolet and Mumford, 2012).
Numerous factors and reasons can contribute to the failure or only partial success
of legislative and policy interventions. Some national legal systems are impeded by
the complexity and multiplicity of employment-related laws, directive regulations and
administrative policies issued at different administrative levels. For example,
Forstenlechner et al.’s (2012) case study of a finance company in the UAE about the
success and failure of imposing a quota system to improve demographic diversity of
the workforce and employment equity found several main reasons that have led to the
normative failure of the quota system. These include competing ideologies and pri-
orities, as well as the lack of coordination and integration at various levels. Other
national legal systems lack clear enforcement channels and support through which
workers can seek to secure compliance with the law. In some cases, governments’
determination to advance social equality is compromised by competing demands from
their economic agendas.
Table 14.1 provides an overview of gender equality laws and other administrative
mechanisms adopted by the governments of four Asian countries – Japan, the Republic
of Korea (hereafter Korea), China and India – and their limited effects.
In Japan, it was reported that despite the establishment of the Equal Employment
Opportunity Law (EEOL) in 1986, the country had a much lower proportion of women
managers in government organizations than it had in its corporations in the early
1990s (Steinhoff and Tanaka, 1993). The introduction of EEOL was controversial
among the legislators, employers and the state from the outset and ‘produced few
gains in employment opportunities for women’ (Gelb, 2000: 385). There is a wide-
spread consensus among scholars in Japan that the government passed EEOL more as
a response to international pressure than as an acknowledgement of changing social
values in Japan (Gelb, 2000). EEOL has been criticized for its ‘over-reliance on voluntary
Table 14.1 Labour and EO laws in China, India, Japan and Korea
China Constitution (1954, latest version To ensure equal rights in Ineffective enforcement, little,
2004) employment between men and if any, punishment to non-
Labour Insurance Regulations of the women compliant employers
People’s Republic of China (1953) To protect married women from
Announcement on Female Workers’ being discriminated due to
Production Leave by the State Council their maternity status
(1955)
Female Employees Labour Protection
Regulations (1988)
Regulations of Prohibited Types
of Occupational Posts for Female
Employees (1990)
Law on the Protection of Women’s
Rights and Interests (1992, amended
2005)
Labour Law (1995)
Employment Promotion Law (2008)
restrictive and complex in the world’ and ‘have constrained the growth of the formal
manufacturing sector where these laws have their widest application’ (World Bank,
2006: 3). This discourages employers from creating employment with a better job
quality in the formal sector and forces millions to continue to be trapped in poor
quality jobs in the informal sector. Banning women from night shifts in India has also
led to a reduced scope of employment for women, ‘even though there is great poten-
tial for employment in information technology-related areas involving tele-work in call
centres, where round-the-clock work is the norm’ (Venkata Ratnam and Jain, 2002: 279).
Mandatory maternity leave and the requirement of breast-feeding breaks and crèches
at workplaces where the majority of workers are women are often perceived by
employers as liabilities and discourage them from employing women (Venkata Ratnam
and Jain, 2002).
The effective implementation of employment equity legislation may yield positive
psychological and employment outcomes to those who were previously disadvan-
taged. For example, in South Africa, the Constitution of South Africa (1996) and the
Employment Equity Act (1998) were introduced, through AA at workplace level, to
promote the constitutional right of equality, eliminate unfair discrimination in employ-
ment and achieve a diverse workforce broadly representative of its people. These
regulations are said to have led to positive outcomes for some employees. However,
this positive effect may simultaneously be accompanied by a higher level of turnover
or intention to quit of incumbents as a result of their improved labour market position
(e.g. Wöcke and Sutherland, 2008). Therefore, where employers’ efforts to build work-
force relationships are undermined by labour market conditions, as is the case where
employment laws are not effectively enforced, employers may have less incentive to
observe regulations and adopt EO policies that develop the psychological contract
with employees.
by employers that reinforced the core employment system privileging men ‘during a
period of heightened international competition, reduced growth rate, a rapidly aging
workforce and the inflexible hiring and firing system’ (Kucera, 1998: 28). Similarly,
women workers in China had been selected disproportionately and laid off or forced
into early retirement during the radical downsizing that took place in the state sector
during the mid-1990s and early 2000s (Cooke, 2010).
Employers in Japan and Korea are reported to exert pressure, albeit now more
implicitly following the introduction of EO laws in the late 1980s, persuading
women to resign when they get married and become pregnant. Age limits are
also used in recruitment and selection to screen out women (Gelb, 2000).
Although the ‘marriage bar’ is far less common in China, employers in private
and foreign-funded factories are known to impose an age limit on female work-
ers. In some ways, if the marriage bar for Japanese and Korean women aims
primarily at protecting men’s jobs and earnings, then age discrimination in China
is intended to increase labour productivity (Cooke, 2010). Since the full imple-
mentation of the Two-Child policy in 2016, recruitment discrimination against
young women, notably female university graduates, has been worsened because
employers are unwilling to bear the additional cost associated with maternity
and childcare (e.g., leave of absence during pregnancy, maternity leave, mater-
nity wage and benefits) (Cooke, 2017).
In addition to gender and race, age is another main source of labour market
discrimination. However, by comparison, age discrimination has received far less
research, policy and corporate attention than gender and race (e.g. Billett et al.,
2011; Fuertes et al., 2013). In spite of population ageing in many developed and
some developing economies and the growing pressure of staff shortage and recruit-
ment difficulties, older workers, commonly defined as those aged 45 or above,
often encounter institutionalized discrimination in selection for training and devel-
opment, promotion and displacement (e.g. Li et al., 2011; Cooke, 2012; Kunze
et al., 2013; Lazazzara et al., 2013). Drawing on experience from Australia, Billett et al.
(2011: 1248) argued that research and policy focusing on age discrimination needs to
de-emphasize ‘the term “older workers” and reconsider how human resource
A study by Kunze et al. (2013: 434) of 147 firms in Germany found that top man-
agers, especially their stereotypes with regard to older workers, are a significant
contextual factor that explains ‘if age diversity is inciting social-categorization
processes that lead to higher levels of a perceived negative age-discrimination cli-
mate’. Kunze et al. (2013: 433) also found that in organizations which carry out
diversity-related HR efforts, age diversity does not appear to ‘relate to heightened
levels of age discrimination climate and reduced levels of performance’. Backes-
Gellner and Veen’s (2013) study of age diversity and firm productivity in Germany
revealed that the benefit of age diversity outweighs the cost of managing age
diversity only in firms with innovative tasks, but not in work environments with
highly standardized routines. This is because the latter have limited opportunities
to apply new knowledge gained by the workers through interactions with col-
leagues in other age groups.
Similarly, Li et al.’s (2011) study in the Chinese context showed that a firm’s level
of market diversification influences the relationship between age diversity and firm
performance. Their study further revealed that there is a significant relationship and
positive effect between age diversity and firm profitability for firms from Western soci-
eties but not for firms from East Asian societies.
3 Diversity management
• values and utilizes individual and intergroup differences within its workforce
• cooperates with, and contributes to, its surrounding community
• alleviates the needs of disadvantaged groups in its wider environment
• collaborates with individuals, groups and organizations across national and
cultural boundaries.
The transition from a focus on EO to managing diversity signals a move away from
an emphasis on procedural justice to a utilitarian approach that views DM as a means
to an end which should be managed strategically. In other words, it is a shift away
from a negative perspective emphasizing disadvantaged and discriminated staff to a
positive and liberal perspective of celebrating and valuing the differences among all
employees and utilizing them in a creative way to benefit both the organization and
individuals (Maxwell et al., 2001). This has been advocated as being a strategic
approach to HRM informed by the resource-based view (Richard et al., 2013). At the
policy level, Özbilgin and Tatli (2011: 1247) have also observed that there is a discern-
ible trend where key actors in the EO and DM field are turning away from
‘regulation- and collectivism-oriented approaches’; instead, ‘voluntaristic and individu-
alistic discourses’ are increasingly adopted and ‘dominate the public debates on
workplace equality and diversity’ (also see Kramar, 2012).
Foster and Harris (2005) identified a number of key differences between managing
EO and DM (see Table 14.2).
However, the distinction between EO and DM may be far less clear in practice than
Table 14.2 implies (Foster and Harris, 2005). Organizations may find it awkward to
promote EO policies that tend to emphasize sameness and underplay differences on
the one hand, and promote diversity that aims to address individual differences on the
other. Conceptual ambiguity and confused organizational practices may create indif-
ference to EO and DM initiatives, resulting in managers and employees believing that
the latter is simply the former given a different name (Foster and Harris, 2005; Özbilgin
and Tatli, 2011).
According to the CIPD’s (2007) survey of 285 DM managers/officers in a wide
range of organizations based in the UK, only 17 per cent of survey respondents
believed that the business case was the most important driver stimulating their organ-
ization to adopt DM initiatives. There was a general feeling of lack of senior
management support among respondents and very few of the organizations participat-
ing in the survey undertook activities to mainstream diversity. Not surprisingly, there
is ‘little evidence of organizations mainstreaming diversity into operational practices
Existing studies have provided evidence to support the assumption that strategic
DM can lead to enhanced HR outcomes. For example, Ng and Burke’s (2005) survey
study of 113 MBA job seekers showed that women and ethnic minorities considered
DM to be important when accepting job offers. In addition, ‘high achievers and new
immigrants rated organizations with diversity management as more attractive as
potential employers’ (Ng and Burke, 2005: 1195). Scott et al.’s (2011) review of DM
practices of best companies suggests that organizations that emphasize inclusion and
integrate DM into all of their policies and practices may benefit more than companies
that deal with DM as a stand-alone practice. Similarly, Houkamau and Boxall’s (2011:
440) survey study of 500 New Zealand workers’ perceptions of, and responses to, DM
activities found a ‘widespread use of family-friendly employment practices and a
general perception of a good climate for diversity’. The study also found that employ-
ees who reported a higher level of family-friendly and proactive EO practices
appeared to show a high level of trust and commitment to their organization, as well
as enjoying a higher level of job satisfaction.
According to the CIPD (2007: 12), there is a wide range of measures that organiza-
tions may use to monitor the impact of DM. These include:
an ethical perspective, instead of the business case approach, may be more effective
because the ethical perspective aligns the values of the organization and the employ-
ees and sends a signal to the employees that ‘the organization cares about their
wellbeing’ ( Jones et al., 2013: 55).
Other studies have revealed that the benefits of DM rhetoric can be overstated (e.g.
Williams and O’Reilly, 1998; Wise and Tsehirhart, 2000), that DM initiatives may actu-
ally undermine efforts in EO programmes (e.g. Subeliani and Tsogas, 2005), and that
DM might be adopted as a new disguise to mask exploitation (Taylor et al., 1997).
Affirmative actions associated with DM are also found to meet with disapproval from
the workforce as those recruited or promoted under AA are perceived to be less com-
petent or qualified, thus violating the principle of merit (Ng and Burke, 2005). Studies
by Kochan et al. (2003) revealed that participation in a diversity education programme
does not foster a positive relationship between racial and gender diversity and perfor-
mance. Richard et al. (2004) offered a reconciling ‘third way’ perspective which
suggests that contextual factors (e.g. entrepreneurial orientation) play an important
moderating role for diversity to enhance organizational performance.
Kochan et al. (2003: 17) further observed that practitioners paid little attention to
analysing their organizational environment for managing diversity and that few com-
panies ‘are equipped to assess the impact of their diversity efforts on their performance’.
Kochan et al. (2003) questioned whether the business case rhetoric of managing diver-
sity has run its course. Nevertheless, they contended that while we may be sceptical
about the positive impact of DM on organizational performance, diversity is a labour
market imperative as well as a societal value and expectation. Therefore, ‘managers
should do their best to translate diversity into positive organizational, group and indi-
vidual outcomes’ (Kochan et al., 2003: 18).
It is apparent that DM is a poorly understood, increasingly slippery and controver-
sial concept that is used ‘in an all-embracing fashion to include not just the social
categories of AA such as race and sex but a wide range of personal characteristics’
(Ferner et al., 2005: 309). Consequently, the concept and moral soundness of DM
remains a contentious issue (see Lorbiecki and Jack, 2000, for an overview of the
conceptual premises and critique of DM; also see van Dijk et al., 2012, for a concep-
tual debate on the virtue ethics perspective versus business case perspective of DM).
In addition, the utility of this concept originating from the US for other societal con-
texts has been questioned by many researchers and resisted on the ground when DM
policy and practice were transplanted across national and organizational context (e.g.
Agocs and Burr, 1996; Ferner et al., 2005; Healy and Oikelome, 2007; Nishii and
Özbilgin, 2007). For example, Hennekam et al.’s (2017: 459) study that examined ‘the
clash between diversity policies as designed in the West and the challenges in imple-
menting these in MNCs in the Middle East and North Africa region’ revealed that the
HR managers’ understanding of the complexity of the DM contexts and strategy is
vital. The same study accentuates the importance of adopting a sensitive approach that
takes into account local context in transplanting the DM policy and strategy from the
West to the African subsidiaries. Similarly, Jonsen et al. (2011) argue that existing
knowledge of DM has been dominated by US-centric research studies and that future
research should look beyond North America and include more diversity themes and
forms of intervention specific to societal contexts. In the next section, we examine the
tensions and dynamics of societal patterns of diversity in different countries.
For example, caste, ethnicity, religion and gender are the main sources of diversity
in India, whereas age, gender, disability and place of origin (e.g. rural versus urban)
are the main causes of social inequality in China. India is the largest democratic
country in the world, albeit a fragile one compared to some, where the talk of
empowerment to the socially disadvantaged groups is often used as a powerful
weapon to connect political parties with their constituencies. By contrast, China is
In many less developed countries, employment insecurity is relatively high and the
provision of social security benefits is extended to few. Large groups of poor people
are fighting for the very right to a basic living through low paid employment with long
working hours and poor conditions. The fact that they are treated unfairly is much less
of a concern for some and inequality in the workplace and in society generally is often
accepted, internalized and unchallenged due to historically deep-rooted discrimina-
tion and the evident absence of remedial prospects.
It is perhaps not surprising then that studies on DM in MNCs have found that
attempts to roll out US domestic diversity programmes globally often fail to achieve
their objectives and/or meet with strong resistance in the host country operations (e.g.
Ferner et al., 2005; Nishii and Özbilgin, 2007). This is mainly because these US-specific
programmes fail to reflect the specific demographic profile and the legal, historical,
political and cultural contexts of equality in the host countries. Many US-owned MNCs
studied in fact made little attempt to adapt their US-designed diversity programmes to
capture local characteristics (Nishii and Özbilgin, 2007). As a result, MNCs may
encounter ‘regulatory, normative and cognitive challenges’ when designing and imple-
menting their global DM initiatives (Sippola and Smale, 2007: 1895). While the
philosophy of diversity might be acceptable globally within the corporation, a more
multi-domestic approach to implementing diversity programmes has been found to be
necessary, as was revealed in Sippola and Smale’s (2007) study.
Company-based case studies of DM in various countries have further revealed the
distance between reality and the inspiration projected in DM rhetoric. For instance,
Dameron and Joffre’s (2007: 2053) study of the integration team created to manage
the post-merger integration of France Telecom Mobile and Orange UK found that the
co-existence of the French and English cultures was ‘never seen as an opportunity, a
differentiation and a source of creativity’. Rather, ‘cultural diversity was always expe-
rienced by the members of the integration team as a difficulty to overcome’ (Dameron
and Joffre, 2007: 2053). Subeliani and Tsogas’s (2005) study of managing diversity in
a large bank in the Netherlands showed that the diversity initiative was designed and
implemented in large cities where a large ethnic market existed from which the bank
could benefit. Employees with immigrant backgrounds were mostly recruited for
lower positions, where they could be visible to customers, but promotion for them
was very difficult, if not impossible. They were trapped at the lower end of the
organizational hierarchy, with little freedom to express their cultural and religious
views. In this case of DM programme adoption, it is clear that business motives took
precedence over moral concerns.
Extant studies in various national and industrial contexts suggest that commitment
from organizational leaders is vital in the adoption of EO and DM policy and practice.
For instance, Ali and Konrad’s (2017: 440) study of 248 medium- to large-sized organ-
izations in the North American context found that ‘a gender-diverse top management
team is positively associated’ with diversity and equality management systems. By
contrast, Kirton et al.’s (2016) study of a UK-based multinational IT company showed
that despite the implementation of numerous DM initiatives, most managers have little
exposure to gender diversity in this white, male-dominant industry. They are indiffer-
ent to DM policy and hold an ‘identity-blind reasoning about managing teams’ (Kirton
et al., 2016: 334). Kirton et al. (2016) argued that managerial autonomy (e.g. team
selection) at the line management level typical of the team-based structure of the IT
industry prevents messages of DM commitment from the top leadership getting
through to the lower level, and sustains rather than bridges gender equality gaps.
Given the highly globalized nature of the IT industry and the growing offshore out-
sourcing of the IT businesses from developed to less developed countries which boast
a relatively developed IT business process outsourcing industry, such as India and
Philippines, how may the IT outsourcing client firms exercise influence to improve EO
and DM in the business process outsourcing supplier firms, if the former are under
pressure from international regulatory bodies to do so as part of the global supply
chain governance?
Emerging studies have pointed out the need for a more nuanced approach that
differentiates intra-group specificities in DM research and practice, which could have
even more complicated implications for a corporate DM strategy in an MNC context,
in part due to different national legal provisions and cultural norms. For example,
Köllen’s (2016: 1967) study of ‘the interrelation between sexual orientation diversity
management and the perceived organizational climate for gay and lesbian employees’
in the German context revealed that ‘companies including “sexual orientation” in their
diversity programs’ appear to have a ‘more supportive organizational climate for gay
men and lesbians’. The same study also found that ‘those organizational practices that
lessen the difference between homosexuality and heterosexuality within the organiza-
tion are more strongly related to positive psychological climates than those practices
that accentuate the difference’ (Köllen, 2016: 1967). Ozturk and Tatli’s (2016: 781)
study of ‘workplace experiences of transgender individuals in the UK employment
context’ revealed a range of workplace challenges experienced by this category of
employees, particularly the lack of organizational support to accommodate their
needs. Ozturk and Tatli (2016) argued for the need to conceptually expand on how
diversity and DM should be (re)framed to provide a more sophisticated approach to
DM research and organizational strategy. In a similar vein, Mahadevan and Kilian-
Yasin (2017) challenged the narrow, stereotypical conceptualization of Muslim as the
inferior Muslim others in the international HRM literature and called for a more con-
structive reflexive approach to examining issues related to managing migrant Muslim
talents in their own individual rights instead of being a collective group.
It is clear that EO and DM challenges and potential solutions are specific to societal,
industrial, organizational and individual contexts. While few studies have researched
on these matters from a cross-country comparative angle, existing research from spe-
cific country and MNC contexts has shed light on the complexity at the conceptual,
institutional and organizational level which calls for a more critical and differentiated
approach to examining these issues and formulating effective practical interventions.
organizational support for employee WLB satisfaction has a direct and moderating effect,
and that emotional support and instrumental support at the workplace have a comple-
mentary relationship. Similarly, Avgar et al.’s (2011) study of WLB practices and
organizational support in 172 hospitals in the UK and their direct and indirect effects on
three key stakeholders found that the greater use of WLB practices enhances outcomes
for hospitals, their employees and the patients they serve. In addition, the effective adop-
tion of WLB practices is often associated with the adoption of good HR practices. For
example, Wang and Verma’s (2012) analysis of the Workplace and Employee Survey of
3943 workplaces in Canada revealed that firms with a product leadership business strat-
egy are more likely to have WLB programmes in place than those with a cost leadership
strategy. In addition, firms that adopt WLB programmes also adopt high performance
work practices such as investment in training, employee involvement, and so forth.
Despite the strong political, social and economic case for WLB legislative interven-
tion and policy/HR initiatives, a common finding of the growing body of empirical
studies conducted in different societal contexts is that WLB policies and practices in
general have been less than effective, for various reasons (e.g. Pas et al., 2011; Xiao
and Cooke, 2012; Chou and Cheung, 2013).
Fundamental differences also exist between Western and Eastern countries in their
political ideologies, demographic and labour market characteristics, work–family values
and the resultant positions held by the government and employers towards WLC.
Typically, a laissez faire approach has been adopted in the East with no or little govern-
ment policy. The existence of WLB practices relies largely on employers’ discretion, and
the ability of individuals to demand the placement of work–life policy and practice in
the workplace. For example, according to Chou and Cheung (2013: 9), in Hong Kong
family-friendly policy as part of employment policy is predominantly voluntary and
implemented in only a few private sector organizations. Despite much policy effort to
promote family-friendly work and family values, the government adopts ‘a minimalist
market-based employer approach’ in which employers are given freedom to design and
implement their family-friendly measures based on the needs of the employees and the
feasibility and affordability of the firm. As a result, few employers have a family-friendly
policy in place. Where WLB initiatives exist in workplaces, they convey strong charac-
teristics of Eastern societal values. For instance, Chandra’s (2012) study comparing
Eastern and Western perspectives on WLB revealed that American MNCs focus on flex-
ible working practices, whereas Indian companies focus on employee welfare
programmes such as cultural, recreational, health and educational programmes (also
see Xiao and Cooke, 2012, for practices in China). In addition, sources of WLC are very
different between those employed in sweatshop and informal employment and the
professional/managerial categories – the former need to work long hours for a living
wage, the latter to gain promotion and remain in the elite middle class. Therefore, WLB
initiatives may not be well received by employees (Xiao and Cooke, 2012).
Academically, the WLB discourse and associated flexibility practices that have
emerged from the European and North American politico-socio-economic contexts
have attracted much critique (e.g. Abendroth and den Dulk, 2011; Özbilgin et al.,
2012). For example, based on a critical review of the work–life literature through the
lens of diversity, Tatli and Özbilgin (2012: 187) pointed out that work–life studies
should go beyond the narrow analytical framework of domestic and economic life to
incorporate a wide range of demands ‘placed on an individual’s temporal, spatial, and
relational commitments in the domestic and non-domestic spheres’. They cogently
argued that issues related to life, diversity and power need to be addressed by taking
into account ‘the intersectionality of social and historical factors in their relational
complexity in order to reveal the dynamics of power, disadvantage and privilege as
they relate to the work–life interface’ (Tatli and Özbilgin, 2012: 191).
Özbilgin et al.’s (2012) argument is echoed by Pocock et al. (2012: 391), who cri-
tiqued that the literature on work–life and work–family is mostly ‘under-conceptualized’,
focuses primarily on professional and managerial workers, and largely neglects the
wider ‘terrain of work, family and community’. Pocock et al. (2012: 391) argue:
It is vital to unpack the ‘black box’ of ‘work’ in a multi-layered way, to give appropriate
weight to various sources of power, and to avoid an individualistic approach to the rec-
onciliation of work, home and community life by locating analysis in a larger social and
political context.
(Continued)
(Continued)
and life stage carries profound analytical power. An implicit assumption of this
model, however, is that work, home and community of an individual worker, albeit
now examined in a broader terrain, are situated in relatively stable locales. This
may not always be the case for workers whose working site changes frequently,
such as consultants and auditors. Not only may these professional workers’ working
site change daily or weekly due to the need to perform tasks on the client’s site,
but also their rest place after work may be transient if the client’s site is far away
from home. For example, a management consultant working for a global firm based
in Europe may have to travel weekly to a different country in the continent to pro-
vide services. This exposes the consultant to different work environments and living
cultures to which he/she has to adapt. It may also create a sense of isolation and
displacement from the community due to frequent changes in dwelling as a result
of living in hotels and rental accommodation (also see Xiao and Cooke, 2012, on
the implications of external auditing work for female auditors in China). What can
the firm do to alleviate the potential negative impacts on their employees who are
required to make short trips frequently?
this goal needs to be achieved with employment ethics and corporate social respon-
sibility in mind. It is to these issues that we will turn in the next chapter.
Discussion questions
C ASE ST UDY
(Continued)
(Continued)
facilities. However, foreign employees, though only very small in number compared
with the Chinese employees, find it difficult to get used to this idea because of the
lack of privacy. Lenovo (China) has no special policy to accommodate their needs.
Different management style is another source of cultural shock to foreign employ-
ees. According to an HR manager, foreign employees all emphasize their cultural
shock when they come to China. However, Lenovo (China) has not developed a
formal policy to manage these cultural shocks. This has led to the turnover of a few
of the foreign employees and the company has made no effort to retain them.
Gender equalities
Prior to Lenovo’s acquisition of the IBM PC business unit, Lenovo had more women
at the senior management level. The proportion of women in senior management
has actually declined since the acquisition because it is now part of a bigger inter-
national operation. Two main reasons are attributed to this change. One is that
there is a lower proportion of women at senior management level in the acquired
(Continued)
(Continued)
business unit of IBM than in the Chinese operation. Another reason is that Lenovo
has been through successive rounds of senior management restructuring after the
acquisition, partly to do with the post-acquisition integration and partly to do with
the poaching of senior managers among IT firms in China. Cultural clashes trig-
gered by the post-acquisition integration have led to the departure of a number of
senior managers. When new managers are recruited, they tend to bring their own
people and HR initiatives with them, which will later be displaced by their succes-
sors when those managers depart. As an HR director observed, ‘It is organizational
politics, rather than equal opportunities, that we consider in the recruitment of
senior managers. You need to be competent as well as well connected to get the
senior management’s job, and men tend to be better connected than women in
the IT sector in general.’
workforce and leverage it to enhance the performance of the firm on the one
hand, and how to develop a strong corporate culture that all employees will
identify with on the other hand is their main HR concern, and a solution has
yet to be found.
According to all managerial informants, the corporate priority is talent manage-
ment. A new scheme called ‘Mobility Plan’ has been implemented at the interna-
tional level. The purpose of the plan is to give managers an opportunity to work
overseas to gain international experience to be able to lead at a global level. It is
not aimed at Chinese managers in principle, but in reality has mainly involved
sending Chinese managers to the US for development.
Source: compiled by the author based on information obtained from: Lenovo com-
pany website: www.lenovo.com (accessed 14 December 2008); China Business, 13
December 2004; and interviews by the author with HR directors, senior managers
and employees of Lenovo in China and US in 2007.
Further reading
Free downloadable PDFs of the SAGE journal articles related to this chapter are JOURNAL
available on the book’s website. Visit: ARTICLES
• Cukier, W., Gagnon, S., Roach, E., Elmi, M., Yap, M. and Rodrigues, S. (2016)
‘Trade-offs and disappearing acts: Shifting societal discourses of diversity in
Canada over three decades’, The International Journal of Human Resource
Management. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2015.1128459.
Applying Habermas’ discourse ethics framework and using the concept ‘ideal
speech situation’, this article critically examines how equity and diversity dis-
courses in Canada have been produced that shape the opportunities to emancipate
communicative actions in the public sphere. It demonstrates important trade-offs
in who is protected and promoted through the contrasting discourses, and in the
types of actors legitimizing these discourses, which ultimately shape the institu-
tional environments of organizations that inform their DM policy and practice.
• Tatli, A. and Özbilgin, M. (2012) ‘An emic approach to intersectional study of diver-
sity at work: a Bourdieuan framing’, International Journal of Management Reviews,
14(2): 180–200.
This article provides a comprehensive review of the DM literature and critiques its
predominantly etic nature. The authors propose an emic approach to researching
diversity at work, which helps identify emergent and situated categories of diversity
as embedded in a specific time and place. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of capitals,
they explain that relations and processes of power manifest themselves in the struggle
for and accumulation of different forms of capitals. An emphasis on intersectionality
is central to the authors’ argument and they offer a five-step research guide.
• Abendroth, A. and den Dulk, L. (2011) ‘Support for the work–life balance in
Europe: The impact of state, workplace and family support on work–life balance
satisfaction’, Work Employment & Society, 25(2): 234–256.
This article studies the relevance of different types of support for satisfaction with work–
life balance, using Esping-Andersen’s welfare regime typology as a benchmark. It focuses
particularly on the relevance of state, instrumental and emotional workplace and family
support based on a survey of 7867 service-sector workers in eight European countries.
The study examines the impact of the different support sources and found that emotional
support and instrumental support in the workplace have a complementary relationship.
Internet resources
WEBLINKS Visit this book’s website for direct links to the web resources listed below:
https://study.sagepub.com/IHRM5e > Student Resources > Chapter 14 >
Useful weblinks
Self-assessment questions
Visit this book’s website for indicative answers to these self-assessment questions: ANSWERS
Video
VIDEOS
insert video wording and critical thinking questions once confirmed that this
will have SAGE Video
References
Abendroth, A. and den Dulk, L. (2011) ‘Support for the work–life balance in Europe: The impact
of state, workplace and family support on work–life balance satisfaction’, Work, Employment
and Society, 25(2): 234–256.
Agocs, C. and Burr, C. (1996) ‘Employment equity, affirmative action and managing diversity:
Assessing the differences’, International Journal of Manpower, 17(4/5): 30–45.
Ali, M. and Konrad, A. (2017) ‘Antecedents and consequences of diversity and equality
management systems: The importance of gender diversity in the TMT and lower to mid-
dle management’, European Management Journal, 35: 440–453.
Avgar, A., Givan, R. and Liu, M.W. (2011) ‘A balancing act: Work–life balance and multiple stake-
holder outcomes in hospitals’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(4): 717–741.
Backes-Gellner, U. and Veen, S. (2013) ‘Positive effects of ageing and age diversity in innovative
companies – large-scale empirical evidence on company productivity’, Human Resource
Management Journal, 23(3): 279–295.
Benson, J., Yuasa, M. and Debroux, P. (2007) ‘The prospect for gender diversity in Japanese
employment’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(5): 890–907.
Billett, S., Dymock, D., Johnson, G. and Martin, G. (2011) ‘Overcoming the paradox of employ-
ers’ views about older workers’, International Journal of Human Resource Management,
22(6): 1248–1261.
Bozkurt, Ö. (2012) ‘Foreign employers as relief routes: Women, multinational corporations and
managerial careers in Japan’, Gender, Work and Organization, 19(3): 225–253.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Brough, P., Holt, J., Bauld, R., Biggs, A. and Ryan, C. (2008) ‘The ability of work–life balance
policies to influence key social/organizational issues’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human
Resources, 46(3): 261–274.
Burgess, J. and Connell, J. (2008) ‘Introduction to special issue: HRM and job quality: An over-
view’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(3): 407–418.
Casey, C., Skibnes, R. and Pringle, J. (2011) ‘Gender equality and corporate governance: Policy
strategies in Norway and New Zealand’, Gender, Work and Organization, 18(6): 613–630.
Chandra, V. (2012) ‘Work–life balance: Eastern and western perspectives’, International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 23(5): 1040–1056.
Cho, J. and Kwon, T. (2010) ‘Affirmative action and corporate compliance in South Korea’,
Feminist Economics, 16(2): 111–139.
Chou, K.L. and Cheung, K. (2013) ‘Family-friendly policies in the workplace and their effect on
work–life conflicts in Hong Kong’, International Journal of Human Resource Management,
DOI:10.1080/09585192.2013.781529.
Gelb, J. (2000) ‘The equal employment opportunity law: A decade of change for Japanese
women’, Law and Policy, 22(3–4): 365–407.
Ghosh, R. and Roy, K. (1997) ‘The changing status of women in India: Impact of urbanization
and development’, International Journal of Social Economics, 24(7/8/9): 902–917.
Greenhaus, J.H. (2008) ‘Innovations in the study of the work–family interface: Introduction to
the special section’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81: 343–348.
Gregory, A. and Milner, S. (2009) ‘Editorial: Work–life balance: A matter of choice?’, Gender,
Work and Organization, 16(1): 1–13.
Healy, G. and Oikelome, F. (2007) ‘A global link between national diversity policies? The case
of the migration of Nigerian physicians to the UK and USA’, International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 18(11): 1917–1933.
Hennekam, S., Tahssain-Gay, L. and Syed, J. (2017) ‘Contextualising diversity management in the
Middle East and North Africa: A relational perspective’, Human Resource Management
Journal, 27(3): 459–476.
Houkamau, C. and Boxall, P. (2011) ‘The incidence and impacts of diversity management: A
survey of New Zealand employees’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49(4): 440–460.
Jones, D., Pringle, J. and Shepherd, D. (2000) ‘“Managing diversity” meets Aotearoa/New
Zealand’, Personnel Review, 29(3): 364–380.
Jones, K., King, E., Nelson, J., Geller, D. and Bowes-Sperry, L. (2013) ‘Beyond the business case:
An ethical perspective of diversity training’, Human Resource Management, 52(1): 55–74.
Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M. and Schneider, S. (2011) ‘Diversity and its not so diverse literature: An
international perspective’, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 11(1): 35–62.
Kang, H.R. and Rowley, C. (2005) ‘Women in management in South Korea: Advancement or
retrenchment?’, Asia Pacific Business Review, 11(2): 213–231.
Kim, Y. (2005) ‘Issues and observations: For women leaders in Korea, gains but miles to go’,
Leadership in Action, 25(5): 20–22.
Kirton, J., Robertson, M. and Avdelidou-Fischer, N. (2016) ‘Valuing and value in diversity: The
policy-implementation gap in an IT firm’, Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3):
321–336.
Kochan, T., Bezrukova, K., Ely, R., Jackson, S., Joshi, A., Jehn, K., Leonard, J., Levine, D. and
Thomas, D. (2003) ‘The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity
research network’, Human Resource Management, 42(1): 3–21.
Köllen, T. (2016) ‘Lessening the difference is more – the relationship between diversity manage-
ment and the perceived organizational climate for gay men and lesbians’, The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(17): 1967–1996.
Kramar, R. (2012) ‘Diversity management in Australia: A mosaic of concepts, practice and
rhetoric’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(2): 245–261.
Kucera, D. (1998) ‘Foreign trade and men and women’s employment and earnings in Germany,
and Japan’, Centre for Economic Policy Analysis Working Paper 9. Available at: https://library.
newschool.edu//archives/findingaids/NS022301.html ref1 (accessed 29 June 2018).
Kunze, F., Boehm, S. and Bruch, H. (2013) ‘Organizational performance consequences of age
diversity: Inspecting the role of diversity-friendly HR policies and top managers’ negative age
stereotypes’, Journal of Management Studies, 50(3): 413–442.
Lau, D. and Murnighan, J. (1998) ‘Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional
dynamics of organizational groups’, Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 325–340.
Lazazzara, A., Karpinska, K. and Henkens, K. (2013) ‘What factors influence training opportuni-
ties for older workers? Three factorial surveys exploring the attitudes of HR professionals’,
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(11): 2154–2172.
Li, J., Chu, C., Lam, K. and Liao, S. (2011) ‘Age diversity and firm performance in an emerging
economy: Implications for cross-cultural human resource management’, Human Resource
Management, 50(2): 247–270.
Liff, S. (1996) ‘Two routes to managing diversity: Individual differences or social group charac-
teristics’, Employee Relations, 19(1): 11–26.
Lorbiecki, A. and Jack, G. (2000) ‘Critical turns in the evolution of diversity management’, British
Journal of Management, Special Issue, 11(3): S17–31.
Mahadevan, J. and Kilian-Yasin, K. (2017) ‘Dominant discourse, orientalism and the need for
reflexive HRM: Skilled Muslim migrants in the German context’, The International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 28(8): 1140–1162.
Maxwell, G., Blair, S. and McDougall, M. (2001) ‘Edging towards managing diversity in practice’,
Employees Relations, 23(5): 468–482.
Mor Barak, M. (2005) Managing Diversity: Towards a Globally Inclusive Workplace. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ng, E. and Burke, R. (2005) ‘Person-organization fit and the war for talent: Does diversity man-
agement make a difference?’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7):
1195–1210.
Nishii, L. and Özbilgin, F. (2007) ‘Global diversity management: Towards a conceptual frame-
work’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11): 1883–1894.
Özbilgin, M. and Tatli, A. (2011) ‘Mapping out the field of equality and diversity: Rise of indi-
vidualism and voluntarism’, Human Relations, 64(9): 1229–1253.
Özbilgin, M., Syed, J., Ali, F. and Torunoglu, D. (2012) ‘International transfer of policies and
practices of gender equality in employment to and among Muslim majority countries’,
Gender, Work and Organization, 19(4): 345–369.
Ozturk, M.B. and Tatli, A. (2016) ‘Gender identity inclusion in the workplace: Broadening diver-
sity management research and practice through the case of transgender employees in the
UK’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(8): 781–802.
Pas, B., Peters, P., Doorewaard, H., Eisinga, R. and Lagro-Janssen, T. (2011) ‘Feminisation of the
medical profession: A strategic HRM dilemma? The effects of family-friendly HR practices on
female doctors’ contracted working hours’, Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3):
285–302.
Patterson, L., Bae, S. and Lim, J.Y. (2013) ‘Gender equality in Korean firms: Recent evidence from
HR practitioners’, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 51(3): 364–381.
Pocock, B. (2005) ‘Work–life “balance” in Australia: Limited progress, dim prospects’, Asia
Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(2): 198–209.
Pocock, B., Williams, P. and Skinner, N. (2012) ‘Conceptualizing work, family and community:
A socio-ecological systems model, taking account of power, time, space and life stage’,
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(3): 391–411.
Richard, O.C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S. and Chadwick, K. (2004) ‘Cultural diversity in management,
firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions’,
Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 255–266.
Richard, O., Roh, H. and Pieper, J. (2013) ‘The link between diversity and equality management
practice bundles and racial diversity in the managerial ranks: Does firm size matter?’, Human
Resource Management, 52(2): 215–242.
Scott, K., Heathcote, J. and Gruman, J. (2011) ‘The diverse organization: Finding gold at the end
of the rainbow’, Human Resource Management, 50(6): 735–755.
Seguino, S. (2000) ‘Accounting for gender in Asian economic growth’, Feminist Economics, 6(3):
27–58.
Sippola, A. and Smale, A. (2007) ‘The global integration of diversity management: A longitudinal
case study’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11): 1895–1916.
Soni, V. (2000) ‘A twenty-first-century reception for diversity in public sector: A case study’,
Public Administration Review, 60(5): 395–408.
Steinhoff, P. and Tanaka, K. (1993) ‘Women managers in Japan’, International Studies of
Management and Organizations, 23(2): 25–48.
Stockman, N., Bonney, N., Sheng, X.W. (1995) Women’s Work in East and West: The Dual
Burden of Employment and Family Life. London: UCL Press Ltd.
Süß, S. and Kleiner, M. (2007) ‘Diversity management in Germany: Dissemination and design of
the concept’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(11): 1934–1953.
Subeliani, D. and Tsogas, G. (2005) ‘Managing diversity in the Netherlands: A case study of
Rabobank’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5): 831–885.
Tatli, A. and Özbilgin, M. (2012) ‘An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work:
A Bourdieuan framing’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(2): 180–200.
Taylor, P., Powell, D. and Wrench, J. (1997) The Evaluation of Anti-Discrimination Training
Activities in the United Kingdom. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Tomlinson, J. (2011) ‘Gender equality and the state: A review of objectives, policies and progress
in the European Union’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18):
3755–3774.
Tsui, A., Egan, T. and O’Reilly, C. (1992) ‘Being different: Relational demography and organiza-
tional attachment’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4): 549–579.
Van der Meulen Rodgers, Y. (1998) ‘A reversal of fortune for Korean women: Explaining the 1983
upward turn in relative earnings’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46(4): 727–748.
Van Dijk, H., van Engen, M. and Paauwe, J. (2012) ‘Reframing the business case for diversity: A
values and virtues perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics, 111: 73–84.
Venkata Ratnam, C. and Chandra, V. (1996) ‘Source of diversity and the challenge before human
resource management in India’, International Journal of Manpower, 17(4/5): 76–108.
Venkata Ratnam, C. and Jain, H. (2002) ‘Women in trade union in India’, International Journal
of Manpower, 23(3): 277–292.
Voydanoff, P. (2007) Work, Family, and Community: Exploring Interconnections, Applied
Psychology Series. New York: Psychology Press.
Wang, J. and Verma, A. (2012) ‘Explaining organizational responsiveness to work–life balance
issues: The role of business strategy and high performance work systems’, Human Resource
Management, 51(3): 407–432.
Williams, K. and O’Reilly, C. (1998) ‘Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40
years of research’, in B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational
Behaviour. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 77–140.
Wise, L.R. and Tsehirhart, M. (2000) ‘Examining empirical evidence on diversity effects: How
useful is diversity research for public sector managers?’, Public Administration Review, 60(5):
386–394.
Wöcke, A. and Sutherland, M. (2008) ‘The impact of employment equity regulations on psycho-
logical contracts in South Africa’, International Journal of Human Resource Management,
19(4): 528–542.
World Bank (2006) India Country Data 2014. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/country/
india (accessed 16 June 2014).
Xiao, Y.C. and Cooke, F.L. (2012) ‘Work–life balance in China? Social policy, employer strategy
and individual coping mechanisms’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(1): 6–12.
Yukongdi, V. and Benson, J. (eds) (2006) Women in Asian Management. London: Routledge.