Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Beyond the critical parameter, Laminar flow is unstable a new flow regime turbulent
flow
Turbulent
Transition
Laminar
x
Characteristics
1) Disorder : not merely white noise but has spatial structure (Random variations)
2) Eddies : (or fluid packets of many sizes) Large & small varies continuously from shear –
layer thickness δ down to the Kolmogorov length scale , ν 3
δ 14
L=( )
U3
3) Enhanced mixing in laminar flow molecular action
Heat transfer & friction are greatly enhanced compared to Lam. Flow
5) Self-sustaining motion: Once trigged turbulent flow can maintain itself by producing
new eddies to replace those lost by viscous dissipation
Experimental measurement :
Hot-wire anemometer
measure fluctuations in velocity via heat transfer
Examine change in resistance associated with temperature (use wire ~ 0.0001” diameter)
Laminar B.L
Shedding cylinder
t
Turbulent B.L u
t
Mathematical Description
Problem: wide range of flow scales involved solutions requires supercomputers and
even then are limited to very low Reynolds numbers
At Red =
107 → requires 1022 numerical operatious ⇒ computation would
take thousand years to complete (for the fine details of the turbulent flow)
Direct numerical simulation DNS
Because of complexity of the fluctuations, a purely numerical computation of turbulent flow has
only been possible in a few special cases.
These eqs. can no longer be set up purely from the balances of mass momentum & energy
But, they are model eqs. which model relation between the fluctuations & mean motion
called turbulence modelling central problem in computing the mean motion of turbulent
flows
Mean Motion & Fluctuations
789,
u' u , time average value
u= u + u '
v= v + v ' In compressible turbulent flows
w= w + w ' ρ = ρ+ρ' ; T =
T +T '
p= p + p '
t +T
1 0
T t∫0
u= u dt ← integral is to be taken over a sufficently large time interval T so that u ≠ f (t )
Characterization of fluctuation ⇒ RMS
1
1 T 2 2
u ' = g (t )
=u ∫ (u − u ) d t u =u + u ' = f (t )
T
0
steady unsteady
u u steady unsteady
Turb. flow
Lam . flow
u
t
t
Fluctuations u ' , v ' , w ' influence the progrees of mean motion u , v , w , so that mean motion
exhibit an apparent increase in resistance aganist deformation. Increased apparent viscosity is
cenral of all theoretical considerations on turbulent flow
Rules of computation
=u u , =
u + v u +v ,=
u .v u . v
∂u ∂u
= , ∫ udx =
∫ udx ; uv =
u v + u 'v ' ; u 'v =
0
∂x ∂x
∂u
τ xy =τ xy lam + τ xy tur = µ − ρu 'v '
∂y
Additional shear stress
(Reynolds stress)
x
Ex : uv = (u
+ u ') ( v
+ v ')=uv + uv '+ vu '+ u ' v '
u v
uv =
uv + u ' v ' u 'v ' ≠ 0
Continuity equation
∂u ∂v ∂w
(1) + + u =u + u '
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂u ∂u ∂u '
Time − averaging of (1) = +
∂x ∂x ∂x
∂u ∂ v ∂ w
(2) + + =0
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂u ' ∂v ' ∂w '
(3) Also , using (1) + + = 0
∂x ∂y ∂z
Both time average values and fluctuations satisfy laminar flow continuity equation
∂u ' ∂ 2u '
=
0 =
0 ← terms which are linear in fluctuating quantities ⇒ 0
∂t ∂x 2
In general , Reynolds stresses dominate over viscous stresses, except for regions
directly at the wall
Closure problem
too few eqs : 4
too many unknowns : 10
Figure some way to approximate Reynolds stresses
Objective : Establish relationship between Reynolds stresses & mean motions, i.e u,v,w
Energy Equation
Consider the energy equation for incompressible flow with constant properties
DT
ρcp = k ∇ 2T + Φ
Dt
Taking the time-average of the energy eq. , we obtain following eq. for the average temp.
field T = ( x, y, z )
∂T ∂T ∂T
ρ c p (u +v + w ) convection
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂2T ∂2T ∂2T
=k( 2 + 2 + 2 ) molecular heat transport
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂u ' T ' ∂ v ' T ' ∂ w ' T '
-ρ cp ( + + ) turbulent heat transport("apparent" heat conduction)
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂u ∂v ∂w 2 ∂u ∂ v ∂u ∂ w 2 ∂ v ∂ w 2
+ µ 2( ) 2 + 2( ) 2 + 2( ) + ( + )2 + ( + ) +( + ) direct dissipation
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂y ∂x ∂z ∂x ∂z ∂y
+ { ρε } turbulent dissipation
The same eq.holds for the average temp. fields as for laminar temp. fields, apart from
two additional terms
"apparent" heat conduction ⇒ div(V 'T ')
"turbulent" dissipation , ρ ∈
∂u 2 ∂v 2 ∂w 2 ∂u ∂ v 2 ∂u ∂ w 2 ∂ v ∂ w 2
=ρ∈ µ 2( ) + 2( ) + 2( ) +( + ) +( + ) +( + )
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂y ∂x ∂z ∂ x ∂ z ∂ y
In turbulent flows mechanical energy is transformed into internal energy in two different ways:
Many attemps have been made to add “turbulence conservation” relations to the
time-averaged continuity, momentum and energy equations derived.
A relation for the turbulence kinetic energy K of fluctuations.
1
(
K ≡ u ′u ′ + v′v′ + w′w′ =
2
1
2
)
ui′ui′
DK ∂ ′ 1 ′ ′ p′ ∂u j′
=
− ui u j u j + − ui′u j′ +
Dt ∂xi 2 ρ ∂xi
I III
II
′ ′ ′ ∂u ′ ∂u j′
∂ ′ ∂ui ∂u ∂u
νuj +
j
−ν j
i +
∂xi ∂x j′ ∂xi′ ∂ x ′ ∂x j′ ∂xi′
i
V
IV
I. Rate of change of turbulent (kinetic) energy
II. Convective diffusion of turbulence energy
III. Production of turbulent energy
IV. Viscous diffusion (work done by turbulence viscous stresses)
V. Turbulent viscous dissipation
Reynolds stress equation: conservation equations for Reynolds stresses see F.
White pg. 406
2-D Turbulent Boundary Layer Equations
Just as laminar flows, turbulent flows at high Re also have boundary layer character,
i.e. large lateral changes and small longitudinal changes in flow properties.
δ(x)<<x
x
∂u ∂ v
Continuity: + =
0 (1)
∂x ∂y
∂u ∂u dU e 1 ∂τ
x-momentum: u +v ≈ Ue + (2)
∂x ∂y dx ρ ∂y
U e : free stream velocity
∂T ∂T ∂q ∂u
Thermal energy: ρ c p u +v ≈ + τ (3)
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂y
∂u
where τ = µ − ρ u ′v′
∂y
∂T
q k − ρ c p v′T ′ (4)
∂y
turbulent flux
molecular flux
Above equations closely resemble the laminar flow equations except that τ and q
contain turbulent shear stress and turbulent heat flux (Reynolds Stress) must be
modelled.
y-momentum equation reduces to
∂p ∂ v′2
≈ −ρ (5)
∂y ∂y
Integrating over the boundary layer yields:
p ≈ pe ( x) − ρ v ′ 2
Unlike laminar flow, p varies slightly across the boundary layer due to
velocity fluctuations normal to the the wall
p + ρ v′2 ≈ const.
but depend upon the Pr, as in laminar flow. Eqs. 1 and 2 can be solved for
The integral momentum equation has the identical form as laminar flow
dθ θ dU e τw cf
+ (2 + H ) = =
dx U e dx ρU e2
2
u u
∞
δ*
θ ∫0 U e U e dy
1 − , H=
θ
(momentum shape factor)
n=f(Re)
Vc
Turbulent profiles are much “flatter” than laminar profile
Flatness increases with Reynolds number (i.e., with n)
Inner layer: very narrow region near the wall (viscous sublayer)
viscous (molecular) shear dominates
laminar shear stress is dominant, random eddying nature of flow is absent
Outer layer: turbulent (eddy) shear (stress) dominates
Overlap layer: both types of shear important; profile smoothly connects
inner and outer regions.
u = f (τ w , ρ , µ , y ) (1 )
Velocity profile would not depend on free stream parameters.
Outer law:
dpe
Ue − u =g (τ w , ρ , y, δ , ) (2)
dx
Wall acts as a source of retardation, independent of μ.
Overlap law:
Dimensionless Profiles:
The functional forms in Eqs.(1)-(3) are determined from experiment after use
of dimensional analysis.
Primary Dimensions: (mass, length, time) : 3
Eq.(1) : 5 variables
Π groups : 5-3 = 2 (dimensionless parameters)
Proper dimensionless inner law:
1/2
u yv* τ
= f ; v* = w
ν ρ
*
v
Overlap law:
u δ v* y Ue y
f=
- g
v* ν δ v* δ
From functional analysis: both f and g must be logarithmic functions.
Thus, in overlap layer:
u 1 yv*
=
Inner variables: ln +B
v *
k ν
Ue − u 1 y
Outer variables: = − ln + A
v *
k δ
Where K and B are near-universal constants for turbulent flow past smooth,
impermeable walls.
K≈0.41 , B≈5.0 pipe flow measurements, data correlations
A varies with pressure gradient ξ (perhaps with other parameters also).
*
u yv
Let u + = , and y +
v* ν
Inner layer details, Law of the wall. MFM2 -834,835
At very small y, velocity profile is linear.
u
τw µ
y+ ≤ 5 : = u+ y+
or =
y
Example: Thickness of viscous sublayer
5ν ν
δ sub = : viscous length scale of a turbulent boundary layer
v* v *
+ +
y = u +e
+
− KB Ku +
e − 1 − Ku −
( Ku ) ( Ku )
+ 2
−
+ 3
2 6
Notes:
1
u r n
= 1 −
Vc R
1
−1 Power law profile cannot be valid near the wall.
du Vc r n 1
= 1 − − Power law profile cannot be precisely valid
dr n R R near the centreline.
du However, it does provide a reasonable
r= R = ∞
dr approximation to measured velocity profiles
du across most of the pipe.
=r 0 ≠0
dr
#The turbulent boundary layer
• In turbulent flow, the boundary layer is defined as the thin region on the
surface of a body in which viscous effects are important.
• The boundary layer allows the fluid to transition from the free stream velocity
Uτ to a velocity of zero at the wall.
• The velocity component normal to the surface is much smaller than the
velocity parallel to the surface: v << u.
• The gradients of the flow across the layer are much greater than the gradients
in the flow direction.
• The boundary layer thickness δ is defined as the distance away from the
surface where the velocity reaches 99% of the free-stream velocity.
δ = y, where u = 0.99
U
29
# The turbulent boundary layer
30
#The turbulent boundary layer
• Important variables:
– Distance from the wall: y.
– Wall shear stress: τw. The force exerted on a flat plate is the area times
the wall shear stress.
– Density: ρ.
– Dynamic viscosity: µ.
– Kinematic viscosity: ν.
– Velocity at y: U.
– The friction velocity: uτ = (τw/ρ)1/2.
• We can define a Reynolds number based on the distance to the wall using
the friction velocity: y+ = yuτ/ν.
• We can also make the velocity at y dimensionless using the friction
velocity: u+ = U/ uτ.
31
# Boundary layer structure
u+=y+
y+=1
32
Example:
Water at 20 °C (ρ=998 kg/m3), ν=1.004x10-6 m2/s
Q=0.04 m3/s
D=0.1m
dp
= 2.59kPa / m
dx
4lτ
∆p = w (Valid for both laminar & turbulent flow)
D
(Exercise: Obtain the above equation considering the force balance of a
fluid element)
D∆p (0,1)(2,59.103 )
τw =
= = Pa 64,8 N / m 2
4l 4(1m)
64,8 N / m 2
So, v* = 3
0, 255m / s
998kg / m
5.1, 004.10−6
δs = 1,97.10−5 m ≅ 0, 02mm
0, 255
Imperfections on pipe wall will protrude into this sublayer and affect some of
the characteristics of flow(i.e.,wall shear stres & pressure drop)
Q 0, 04 m3 / s
V= = = 5, 09 m / s
A π (0,1) / 4m
2 2
VD 5, 09.(0,1)
= =
Re = 5, 07.10 5
ν 1, 004.10−6
Re 5, 07.105 ⇒
= n 8, 4
Power-law profile
u r
≅ (1 − )1/ 8,4
Vc R
R
r 1/ n
= =
Q AV
. ∫ =
udA Vc∫
0
(1 −
R
) (2π r )dr
n2
Q = 2π R Vc 2
2τ w r
τ= (Valid for laminar or turbulent flow)
D
R=D/2 2(64,8).0, 025
τ (r 0,=
= 025) = 32, 4 N / m 2
r 0,1
τ =τ lam + τ turb = 32, 4
du r du V r
τ lam =
−µ ; u =−
Vc (1 )1/ n ⇒ − c (1 − )(1− n ) / n
=
dr R dr nR R
du 6, 04 0, 025 (1−8,4) / 8,4
=
− (1 − ) =
−26,5
dr r = 0,025
8, 4(0, 05) 0, 05
du du
τ lam =
−µ −(νρ )
= As expected
dr dr
Thus
τ
−(1, 004.10−6 ).(998).(−26,5) =
=
32, 4 − 0, 0266
0, 0266 N / m 2
τ turb >> τ lam
=turb
= 1220
τ lam 0, 0266
Turbulent Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate
Problem of flow past a sharp flat plate at high Re has been studied extensively,
numerous formulas have been proposed for friction factor.
-curve fits of data
-use of Momentum Integral Equation and/or law of the wall
-numerical computation using models of turbulent shear
Momentum Integral Analysis
dp dθ C f τw
= 0 (=
U const.) = =
dx dx 2 ρU 2
Momentum Interal Equation valid for either laminar or turbulent flow.
For turbulent flow u
a reasonable approximation to the velocity profile = f (y /δ )
U
Functional relationship describing the wall shear stress
Need to use some empirical relationship
∂u
For laminar flow τw = µ
∂y y =0
Example: Turbulent flow of an incompressible fluid past a flat plate
Boundary layer velocity profile is assumed to be
u y
( )1/ 7 ← power law profile suggested by Prandtl
U δ (taken From pipe data!)
Reasonable approximation of experimentally observed profiles,
except very near the plate,
∂u
= ∞!
∂y y =0
u y
1 = ( )1/ 7
U δ
Laminar Turbulent
y
η=
δ Assume shear stress aggrees with experimentally
determined formula
ν 1/ 4
0 = 045 Reδ−1/ 4 or τ w 0, 0225 ρU 2 (
C f 0,= )
0 1 Uδ
Determine; δ , δ * , θ and τ as a function of x. Uδ
w Re =
ν
What is the friction drag coefficient CD,f=?
Momentum Integral Equation (with U=constant)
dθ C f τw y u y 1/ 7
= = η
= ; = ( )= η 1/ 7
dx 2 ρU 2 δ U δ
∞
7δ
1 1
u u u u
θ = ∫ (1 − )dy = δ ∫ (1 − )dη = δ ∫ η 1/ 7 (1 − η 1/ 7 )dη =
0
U U o
U U 0
72
7 dδ ν 1/ 4
0225 Reδ−1/ 4 0, 0225(
0,= )
72 dx Uδ
δ
ν x
∫δ d δ = 0, 231( ) ∫ dx
1/ 4 1/ 4
0
U 0
ν δ 0,370
δ = 0,370( ) x 1/ 5 4/5
or in dimensionless form =
U x Re1/x 5
Boundary layer at leading edge of plate is laminar but in practice,laminar boundary layer
often exists over a relatively short portion of plate.
∴ error associated with starting turbulent boundary layer with δ =0 at x=0 can be negligible.
∞
u u
1
δ 1
δ =∫ (1 − )dy =δ ∫ (1 − )dη =δ ∫ (1 − η 1/ 7 )dη =
*
0
U 0
U 0
8
δ* 0, 0463
=
x Re1/x 5
7 ν
=θ = δ 0, 0360( )1/ 5 x 4 / 5
72 U
θ 0, 036
1/ 5
θ < δ *
<δ
x Re x
1/ 4
2 ν 0, 0288 ρU 2
τw 0225 ρU
0,= 1/ 5 4 / 5
U (0,37)(ν / U ) x Re1/ 5
x
0, 058
Cf =
Re1/x 5
Friction drag on one side of plate,Df
l l
ν
∫=
bτ w dx b(0, 0288 ρU ) ∫ ( 2
Df )1/ 5 dx
o 0
Ux
A
D f = 0, 0360 ρU 2 where A=b.l area of plate
Re1/l 5
Df 0, 0720 Note:Results presented in this example are
CDf =
1 Re 1/ 5 valid only in the range of validity of original
ρU A2 l
data, assumed velocity profile & shear stres.
2
The range covers smooth flat plates
Turbulent flow:δ ( x) ~ x 4 / 5 ;τ w ( x) ~ x −1/ 5 with 5x105<Rel<107
Laminar flow:δ ( x) ~ x1/ 2 ;τ w ( x) ~ x −1/ 2 See Fig 6-20 (White, page 432)