Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
Ethiopia is located in the horn of Africa and the East Africa Rift passes through the whole
length of the country covering 1,500 km. geothermal exploration activity in Ethiopia started
in 1969.This revealed the existence of both low and high enthalpy geothermal resources
which can be used for both electricity power generation and direct use both in the Ethiopian
Rift valley and Afar depression.
Preliminary geothermal exploration has identified more than 23 potential areas for
geothermal energy development (UNDP, (1973 and JICA, (2015). Most of these geothermal
resources have not yet been explored and evaluated in detail. The highly dependency on
Weldeyohannes Hadush Nega
hydropower energy sources and unclear geothermal policy, rules and regulations has caused
in exploration and development projects in the country. Currently the Geological Survey of
Ethiopian (GSE) and Ethiopian Electric Power (EEP) are collaborating with international
funding agencies such as World Bank, ICEADA, and JICA to develop the Auto Langano
geothermal previously, eight wells were drilled and 7.2 MWe pilot power plant was
constructed and installed. From 2009 to 2015, WEST JEC drilled two additional production
wells in Aluto field. The wells will be used in installing 5MWewellhead power plant.
Since 2014, EEP, GSE, World Bank and ICEADA have carried out intensive geoscientific
explorations such as geological, geophysical and geochemical works have been applyed used
to make new geothermal models in the Auto Langano and Allalobad geothermal fields. The
geophysical gravity, micro seismic, magneto telluric (MT) and transient electromagnetic
(TEM).
In Aluto, 40 MT soundings were done by WEST JEC in 2009 in the central part of the Aluto
volcano, 126 MT and 162 TEM surveys) were performed in 2015 to 2016 by electrocounsult
(ELC). Therefore, the objective of this paper is, to evaluate the subsurface resistivity structure
related to geothermal resource using 1-D, 2-D and 3-D MT inversions.
Figure 3.1: The geological map of the study area (ELC, 2016).
magmatic activities. Almost all authors agree these young axial (close to the eastern margin)
and marginal (Butajira-Debre Zeyt) faults.
Figure 4.2: The general resistivity structure of a high temperature geothermal system.
Considering these requirements, magnetotelluric (MT) survey was used to achieve the
objectives of this research work. The survey was carried out by EEP, GSE, and ELC
September 2015 to July 2016 to detect the location evaluate the geothermal reservoir.
Data was acquired 166 MT points (Figure 5.1(right). A 5-component MTU layout was used
for all survey. The maximum current electrode separation is 50 m from the MTU unit in east-
west and NS directions The induction coils (X, Y, and Z) were laid on the quadrants
separately. X- coil is laid in the N-S direction in one of the quadrant at 45o, Y-coil is laid E-
W direction in one of the other quadrant at 45o relative to the MTU and Z-coil is inserted
vertically in one of the other quadrant at 45o. All coils are away 15 m from the MTU. One
GB compact flash is inserted in the MTU and all the set up parameters are arranged in the
appropriate ways (see Figure 5.1 left) to record the necessary field data. In each case, the
period of the data recode was 19-24 hours, the electrode resistance was measured and
recorded. Figure 5.1 (left) shows the detail layout of the MT survey of the field.
model response and the observed data. Many such schemes exist, such as the nonlinear least
squares method, and the maximum likelihood inversion procedure (Mackie, Bennett et al.,
1988). The maximum likelihood solution is the solution that maximizes the joint probability
of fitting the observed data (subject to the data covariance) and adhering to an a priori model
(subject to the model covariance). One obtains this solution with the help of the sensitivity
matrix, which is the matrix that relates small changes in the model parameters to changes in
the observed data.
This section describes the codes used and software programs in the inversions applied to the
data from Aluto Langano field. For both 1-D and 2-D inversions, the Occam’s inversion
method was used The 1-D Occam’s inversion of electromagnetic sounding data was first
suggested by Constable et al., (1987) followed by the 2-D inversion introduced by Hedlin et
al. (1990). The Occam’s inversion produce a smooth model that fits data sets with a certain
tolerance. By using smoothness, an inverted model gives the best fit to the data. Surfer 13
software was used to plot the 1-D resistivity cross section.
Figure 6.1: MT sounding cures (left) and its 1-D Occam inversion result (right) of station AT021.
For the 3-D model, 3-D Grid software was used to prepare for processing the data in the
ModEM 3-D program. The result from the ModEM 3-D data was used in Voxler4 3-D
software program, to plot the 3-D MT resulted starting from mapping the surfaces resistivity
to the depth of 6,000 meter below the surface to clarify the resistivity of the subsurface cap
rock and depth of the geothermal reservoir. The results of the 1-D, 2-D, and 3-D inversion
models are presented below.
From all the MT resistivity inversion models below, the local resistivity anomalies are
recognized in both 1-D, 2-D and 3-D inversion models. The subsurface resistivity structures,
e.g. depth of the cap rock, faults and the reservoir of the field are clearly identifying. The cap
rock of the study area (below 10 Ωm) is located below the overburden shallow high
resistivity formations (and its depth is vary from west to east almost from 500 to 1,500 m.
This conductive layer is interpreted as the clay cap resulted from thermal alteration (low-
temperature zeolites and the clay minerals smectite formed as reflected in the existing wells
LA-90 D and 10 D (located between profiles 3 and 4).
A higher resistivity layer (11-100 Ωm) which is confirmed from the existing wells as high
temperature alteration minerals like chloride, epidote etc., underlies below the clay cap. It is
interpreted as the reservoir whose top boundaries is vary from east to west of the study area
between 1,000 m and 1,500 m below sea level. The subsurface resistivity structure and the
faults (especially in 2-D and 3-D inversion models (see Figure 7.3 and 7.4 respectively) is
clearly indicating).
The resistivity anomaly that shows the boundary of the cap rock and reservoir may be
represent the fault structure of the field area which is resemble with the regional and local
structural setups mainly (NNE-SSW Wonj Belt Fault, NE-SW of the main Ethiopian rift
trained) respectively.
From the inversion result, the subsurface resistivity structure model shows the high-low-high
resistivity model. The general outcome of the subsurface resistivity structure can be modeled
as high-low-high and the reservoir system is fault control system (EW profiles 2, 4 and 6). As
the model, Figure 7.4 shows the approximate depth of the reservoir is from 2,000 to 2,700m
below sea level and very localized with in the field following depth of the cap rock and the
fault structures.
Weldeyohannes Hadush Nega
Figure 7.2: 1-D Resistivity logs after Occam inversion along EW direction.
Weldeyohannes Hadush Nega
Figure 7.4: 2-D resistivity profile after Occam inversion along EW direction (profile’s 1-6 respectively)
Weldeyohannes Hadush Nega
The 3-D resistivity inversion model also developed in the center of the caldera near the
existing wells to see the subsurface structure. In this 3-D resistivity, the subsurface resistivity
is clearly visualized including the surface resistivity map. The depth of the cap rock and
reservoir are also indicated in the model that is similar to the 1-D, 2-D and the sub surface
information of the existing nearby wells.
Figure 7.5: 3-D resistivity model after inversion at the study area.
8. Conclusion
As the result of this study, I found new knowledge as follows,
Magnetotelluric method is an important method for delineation and clarification of
subsurface resistivity.
The location, and depth of the cap rock, reservoir and faults are clearly shown in the
inversion model
The central and eastern part of the caldera shows the best resistivity anomaly area
The reservoir is extends and becomes shallow towards the east part of the study area
with in the caldera.
The NNE-SSW Wonji Belt fault, NE-SW Main Ethiopian fault trained and other local
faults are recognized and clearly identified by the MT inversion model; thus, fault
systems are considered as the sources of the geothermal.
The depth of the reservoir in general from the inversion models is from 2,000 to
2,7000 m
The field in general represented as high - low - high in resistivity structure model
REFERENCE
1. Abbate,E. & Sagri, M.: Volcanites of Ethiopian and Somali Plateaus and major
tectonic lines. Atti convegni Lincei, 47 (1980), 219-227.
2. Árnason, K., Karlsdóttir, R., Eysteinsson, H., Flóvenz, Ó.G., and Gudlaugsson, S.Th.,
2000: The resistivity structure of high-temperature geothermal systems in Iceland.
Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2000, Kyushu-Tohoku, Japan, 923-
928.
3. Bendat, J.S., and Piersol, A.G., 1971: Random data analysis and measurement
procedures: New York, Wiley Interscience, 407 p.
Weldeyohannes Hadush Nega
4. Electroconsult (ELC), 2016: Geological map and conceptual model of Aluto Langano
geothermal field.
5. Hedlin, C. d., and Constable, S., Occam’s Inversion to Generate Smooth: Two
Dimensional Models from Magneto-Telluric Data. Geophysics, Vol. 55, No. 12,
1613-1624(1990).
6. Ethiopian geothermal master plan, JICA (2015).
7. Mackie, R. L., Bennett, B. R. & Madden, T. R., 1988. Long-period magneto telluric
measurements near the central California coast: a land-locked view of the
conductivity structure under the Pacific Ocean, Geophysics. J., 95, 181-194.
8. Kearey, P., and Brooks, M., 1994: An introduction to geophysical exploration (2nd
Ed.). Blackwell Scientific Publ., London, 236 pp.
9. Phoenix Geophysics, 2005: Data Processing User Guide, v.3.0.
10. Simpson, F. and Bahr, K. (2005): Practical Magneto telluric. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
11. UNDP, 1973: Geology, geochemistry and hydrology of hot springs of east Africa Rift
System within Ethiopia. UNDP, repot DD/SF/ON/11,NY(1973).
12. Vozoff, K., 1972: The magneto telluric method in the exploration of sedimentary
basins: Geophysics, v. 37, p. 980–1041.
13. Vozoff, K., 1991: The magneto telluric method, in Nabighian, M.N., Electromagnetic
methods in applied geophysics: Tulsa, Okla., Society of Exploration Geophysicists,
v.2, pt. B, p. 641–711.