1.1 What are the components of the drafting of ROE? Explain with examples. Guidelines for Drafting Rules for the Use of Force Guidelines for answering the use of force are: Guidelines or orders issued by superiors that prescribe conditions environment and circumstances in which force may be used to accomplish the mission by explaining what subordinates can do and cannot be done in order to achieve the mission, and also determines the method of granting additional Level of use of force by The principle of using force must be in accordance with International law and law within the country, with The elements in drafting ROE are: 1. Policies: Policies will take into account national policy international relations and policies or commander's will 2. The law, taking into account national laws. and international law. 3. Military, with regard to whether it is the mission of the unit or not. capability of personnel, weapons equipment and operational areas As shown in the picture chart below. Examples of guidelines for drafting rules on the use of force Answer Because the use of force is a guideline or command of the commander. The consideration process will taking into account the following elements 1. Must consider the environment both physical and emotional areas of conflict people's thoughts 2. Must consider the mission, what kind of mission is it? such as military or enforcement missions. Laws, etc., and what threats does such a mission have? 3. International rules must be taken into account political environment and respect the right to protection myself The results of the action will be governed by the use of force within the framework of policy, law and the military. Consistent with the environment, mission, and social norms and in accordance with the rules of the use of force foreign countries in the same environment and mission as shown in the diagram below. 1.2 How does ROE affect mission accomplishment? Because of the use of force is a guideline for the use of force that the commander has set up to be A tool to control the use of force by hierarchical commanders when wanting to have military operations both in normal and abnormal situations It is useful for proper military operations specified scope It also makes it easy to make decisions. Hierarchical commanders in order to give orders when needed military action both as a guarantee to the practitioners that If done Such action will be according to the policy or intention of the responsible supervisors at all levels and the aforementioned is still within the framework of Law, both domestic law and international law and in accordance with the task and the mark the ability of the force armament and areas of operation in all respects to affect the right to self- defense Result : Easy to command, easy to understand, easy to execute. Collateral : Legitimate like the commander Countries that are not legal: military operations areas The use of military force in naval operations in the maritime area in the period in which armed arrangements are organized has rules and important laws involved and the student officers saw that such rules and laws were Does it support the practice or is it a limitation in naval operations? Laws: Military Operations Areas the use of military force in naval operations in maritime areas at times of armed conflict. 1. How are the rules and important laws involved? Answers: Main from World War I Many countries view war as an evil. Therefore, there is an effort to make War is forbidden. By mutually agreeing to settle any dispute by “peaceful means”, regardless of the nature of the dispute cause of anything According to the war or the use of military force between states cannot exist but the exception is use of force to maintain peace or use of force in self-defence however if necessary to usemilitary power, the state must respect the law of arm conflict by using Legitimate power must take into account the grounds in the rules on the state will use armed force and while using that force must respect the rules governing the use of armed force by the State and must respect humanitarian principles during War too, so it will be a just war and with that United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 It was born out of a common desire to settle all disputes concerning the law of the sea with the spirit of mutual understanding and cooperation The aforementioned law, in addition to being an international law It is also a customary international law. Even in the event of armed conflict between states, it did not cause Law of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 No Mandate and still in force with all states at all times In the event of armed conflict in the maritime area, the relevant legal principles are United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 and the law of armed conflict in the use of military force in naval operations that involve armed conflict. It is defined in San Remo Manual On International Law Applicable To Armed Conflicts At Sea, which sets out the rules and Areas for naval warfare are as follows: Article 10 can be done, article 11 accepts that it will not be done, article 12 takes into account neutral rights of the nation taking into account the principle that If there is an armed conflict at sea Two states prefer to use force against each other in the area, above or above the territorial sea, inland waters, the continental specific economic zone all the way to the islands of the Parties to the dispute, the high seas, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of a neutral state (Article 10). Parties must take into account fragile or scarce ecosystems. marine life (Article 11) and taking into account the rights of States also neutral (v. 12), and in combat in the exclusive economic zone or continental shelf of a neutral state must take into account what is planted Team islands of that neutral state are also built (Article 34), and the landing of mines must not endanger the island structures. The neutral state team (Article 35) and the battles on the high seas must take care that cables and pipes are not jeopardized. placed in that sea (v. 37), which all principles are Eliminate the badness of the conflict as well. Weapons Limit the extent of conflict to escalation. • Respect the rights of a neutral nation and protect victims from the battle. It also defines the scope of responsibility of the state for violating the rules to be responsible damage This is the main part that will effectively limit the war. 2. Student officers saw that the rules and laws as support for practice or as Limitations on naval operations? How?With regard to the concept of Just War, that war or conflict ends. Fairness of both parties The use of force and the use of weapons in military operations must be used to the full as efficient and effective as possible to achieve the objectives of the nation in making war, but shall be subject to the provisions of the Armed Conflict Act. which has been involved since Initiating the use of force during the use of force until the end of the use of force In armed conflict, the law With armed conflict being the key to keeping the state, political and military from being tempted to Driven by the verb of destruction natural law Armed conflicts include: Laws and tactics of armed conflict that bind warring parties to adhere to and practice in order to control The nature of war and its damage limits. It also determines on the role of neutrality in war along with the rights and obligations of the warring parties in armed conflict against each other and against a neutral nation that cannot be violated. The relevant legal principles Although it may be a hindrance to war operations. But considering The intent of the law for world peace Therefore, the determination of such rules is appropriate. II. Exams Preserving national interests by sea means the benefits that the country should receive from the sea Or in connection with the sea, including sea shores, islands, land or underground seabeds; or the air over the sea which covers all activities related to the use of the sea. that Thailand has made a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Thailand and Malaysia, 1979, stipulating the establishment of a joint development area on the continental shelf. By this agreement, there 50 years of age, but if no resolution can be reached on the continental shelf divide between the two countries, this Agreement shall remain in force. After the said period has expired. which from discussions with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs There is an opinion that both The two countries still have no intention of negotiating the demarcation of the border. due to the natural resources in the area Joint development can continue to exploit for a long time. (Law for the protection of national interests Marine 30 points) Answer the following questions. By considering and giving legal reasons, consisting of 1. Explain the meaning of “continental shelf” and the definition of the word “island” (5 points). 2. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Thailand and Malaysia has its essence and objectives. of the agreement for what? And Thailand can fish in the area or not and how? (10 points) 3. According to item 1 and item 2, because Losin Island is used as a baseline point of Thailand Analyze that after the specified period of 50 year, will it become a problem or not, and how? along with guidelines Laws related to the protection of national interests at sea. 1. Explain the meaning of “continental shelf” and the definition of “island”. 1.1 The meaning of "island" in UNCLOS 1958 and UNCLOS 1982, where the meaning is given. - UNCLOS 1958 An island means an area that is always above water even at high tide. which can be used can be defined as a maritime territory - UNCLOS 1982 An island means a natural area that is always above water even during high tide. Must have living things and be able to live on their own. Regardless of the size of the space. On the nautical chart, the area that is always above water, even at high tide, is shown with yellow, whether it's an island or a rock For areas above water only at low tide elevation is shown in green. That is, it can only be seen at low tide. But when the tide is high, it will not be visible, such as the area. The meaning of “continental shelf” - The continental shelf according to UNCLOS 1982 stipulates a continental shelf that is weaker than UNCLOS. 1958 is the portion of land that extends naturally (Natural Prolongation) to the outer edge of the continental slope. Or up to a distance of 200 nautical miles from the base line used to measure the territorial sea. If the continental shelf does not reach (UN, 1982, p. 53). The continental shelf is 200 nautical miles mandated to be consistent with the EEZ distance which has a distance of 200 nautical miles as well or if a coastal state with a continental shelf that is less than 200 nautical miles or is economically disadvantaged The physical continental shelf can not exceed 200 nautical miles, so the continental shelf (sea floor and subsoil) No declaration is required since every state can have a continental shelf by default within 200 nautical miles from the baseline (the continental shelf is the portion of the seafloor and the subsoil, excluding water masses; it must be imagined as a crust that the mass of water is a part and the seafloor and the subsoil are another. but are integrated together in the vertical section This layer of the seafloor and subsoil is known as the continental shelf.) 2. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Thailand and Malaysia contains the essence and objectives of the agreement. For what and whether Thailand can fish in the area or not and how? 2.1 Objectives of the MOU to formulate an agreement on mutual exploitation in overlapping areas by sea in the Gulf of Thailand (Continental shelf area), caused by both Thailand and Malaysia declaring marine boundaries of their own, thus resulting in overlapping marine areas continental shelf. 2.2 Essence of the MOU Thailand and Malaysia have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding Establishment of a joint organization to exploit the resources on the ground. under the sea in a defined area of the continental shelf of Both countries in the Gulf of Thailand on February 21, 1979 at Chiang Mai Province, which is the origin of the development area. Thai-Malaysia joint venture (Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Area: MT-JDA), in which the MOU is binding again 50 years (ends in 2029), the essence of the MOU is as follows: 2.2.1 Both countries mutually agree that there is a maritime overlapping area arising from the declaration of maritime zone unilaterally, acknowledging that as a result of overlapping claims on the continental shelf of the two countries in the Gulf of Thailand 2.2.2 If Thailand and Malaysia wish to negotiate a future maritime boundary according to the law and International practices must be negotiated under UNCLOS 1958, which requires that all natural materials be Any land that is always above water has the status of an island and can be referred to as a maritime territory. (using Losin Island as a line direct base to determine the maritime boundaries) 2.2.3 If Thailand and Malaysia are unable to reach a resolution on the maritime overlapping area within Term of 50 years. This existing agreement shall continue. 2.3 Can Thailand fish in the area or not and how? - Taking into account the sovereign rights as defined in UNCLOS 1982, coastal States have the right to survey and Exploitation over non-living natural resources above and below the surface (excluding water mass), including There are specific living natural resources attached to it. Therefore, the Thai state is unable to fish on the continental shelf where is an area overlapping with Malaysia. But because Thailand has announced the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The width is 200 miles from the base line based on the original agreement between Thailand and Malaysia. which happened before UNCLOS 1982 (including the continental shelf overlap with Malaysia) as an EEZ of Thailand to be The preservation of Thailand's sovereign rights over water bodies, seabeds and subsurface soils sovereignty in the EEZ area of Thailand, therefore, it is possible to fish in such overlapping areas. But be careful of arrest of Malaysia that may refer to the overlapping area as their own EEZ as well.
III. According to No. 1 and No. 2, because Koh Losin is used as a
baseline point of Thailand Analyze whether after the expiration of the 50-year period, will there be a problem or not and how? along with guidelines for solving future problems Answer: At the end of 50 years (2029), if Thailand and Malaysia are unable to reach a resolution on the overlapping area maritime overlap, then both countries shall proceed in accordance with the contents specified in this MOU as stated in paragraph 2, Article 6 of the Memorandum of Understanding states that “if a satisfactory solution cannot be reached on the issue of continental shelf demarcation within the said fifty years period This existing agreement shall continue to apply after the expiration of such period.” Therefore, even though the Memorandum of Agreement will end the obligations between Thailand and Malaysia in the year 2029 and make the area MT-JDA expired as well. But if Thailand and Malaysia are unable to agree on maritime boundaries in the area Such agreement will continue to be effective. which will not have any impact on Thailand and its status The maritime overlapping area between Thailand and Malaysia will remain the same as the maritime overlapping area. Guidelines for solving future problems 1. The two States will then continue to negotiate a solution to the maritime boundary issue. 2. People should be educated on maritime boundaries and maritime boundary problems It has been generally accepted that the status of Losin Island as part of the baseline at region 4 is valid in all respects under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982. 3. The problem of overlapping marine areas between Thailand and Malaysia When the Memorandum of Understanding about the area The joint development between Thailand and Malaysia ended. Both countries have established a way to resolve the issue peacefully. IV subjects Laws related to military operations and security laws 1. Three security laws of Thailand are the Martial Law Act, B.E. 2457 (1914), Phra Royal Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations B.E. 2548 and Security Act Within the Kingdom 2008 powers were given to government officials. and have legal measures in such a way Affecting the rights and liberties of the people or not? How? All three laws They all give government officials certain powers to act unlawfully. Violating the rights and liberties of the people, such as arrest, detention, search, seizure, attachment, as the case may be according to the above laws. However, all three laws They are all laws that have been reviewed by the legislature and enacted. laws for the management to apply in various situations which when there is an event that falls under the law already in force The management will have to take some steps in order to continue to promulgate it. 2. Do you think that Thailand needs to have all 3 security laws or not? Three laws Even though it is a law that affects the rights and liberties of the people to some extent, Such laws will be in force. There must be some situation and some kind of action taken by the commander administration for promulgation Having it as a guarantee to the public that Management actions, even in The situation is not normal. Management cannot act at will. but still have to proceed according to the law The legislature has prepared which is a process of balancing and checking the exercise of power according to the regime democracy considering the situation that may arise and conditions for law enforcement. Therefore, three copies are necessary for Thai society in the future. 3. How to prevent people in the area from having an attitude that the state and government officials use their powers according to the law. How does security restrict fundamental rights and freedoms and prevent movement? Laws are what the legislature has established. By any means that the management or staff The State as an Administrative Mechanism What authority do you have? will prescribe the power However, if the officer acts Going beyond the powers given to him would be against the law itself. It can be implied that government officials intending to prosecute Violators of the law, on the other hand, on the other hand, aim to punish government officials for violating the law. Scope of power provided by law which the aforementioned If one party is law enforcement the other party is a party subject to Attitudes towards the law are often different. But for people who are not directly involved, the Government officials operate in accordance with the legal framework. and public relations and give opportunities to the public Examine the power mechanism. It will strengthen the credibility of government officials and reduce the chances of Retaliation from the parties and misunderstandings of those who are not interested 4. Propose a way to check and balance law enforcement. to make the existence of the state and social order can coexist with people in society according to the basic principles of the regime Democracy, where the legislative branch makes laws management used It is a check and balance system according to the regime democracy already But public security will be even better. If there is an opportunity to check in the process. Practice of government officials as administrative mechanisms whether to operate within the scope of authority provided by law or not, which for transparency and verifiable in the exercise of government officials' powers can be done with set up a committee performance appraisal The said committee may have the public sector as well. and if it is found that the officer acts Violation of the law Serious punishment must be taken. There is no omission or discrimination whatsoever. In addition to strengthening the audit authority. It also controls officials to obey the law. On the one hand, the result will cause government officials to strictly follow the scope of the law.
International Law Is The Body of Legal Rules That Apply Between Sovereign States and Such Other Entities As Have Been Granted International Personality