The document appears to be pages from a legal publication or court opinion. It discusses legal protections for the text version of judgments. Specifically, it references a 2008 Supreme Court case that declared the law protecting the text of judgments from a legal publisher. However, as there are only page numbers and headers provided without any of the actual text of the case or opinion, no more specific summary can be given within 3 sentences.
The document appears to be pages from a legal publication or court opinion. It discusses legal protections for the text version of judgments. Specifically, it references a 2008 Supreme Court case that declared the law protecting the text of judgments from a legal publisher. However, as there are only page numbers and headers provided without any of the actual text of the case or opinion, no more specific summary can be given within 3 sentences.
The document appears to be pages from a legal publication or court opinion. It discusses legal protections for the text version of judgments. Specifically, it references a 2008 Supreme Court case that declared the law protecting the text of judgments from a legal publisher. However, as there are only page numbers and headers provided without any of the actual text of the case or opinion, no more specific summary can be given within 3 sentences.
Anthony Emma v. Dewitt C. Armstrong, Iii, Brigadier General, United States Army Commanding General, Fort Devens, Massachusetts, 473 F.2d 656, 1st Cir. (1973)