Designing of Building Readiness

Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Singapore, March 7-11, 2021
Designing of Building Readiness Assessment Instruments in

Accordance with the Covid-19 Protocol
Anny Maryani
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), Surabaya, Indonesia
annymaryani@ie.its.ac.id
Roosita Noor
roositanoor00@gmail.com
Sonia Novita Dewi

novitadewi939@gmail.com
Dianda Nurafifah
diandanurafifah@gmail.com
Azizah Tamma Syadza

azizahsyadza@gmail.com
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has led to the adaptation of new habits to prevent transmission of Covid-19 in the workplace.
In Indonesia, two work systems currently apply, namely working from home (WFO) and working from the office
(WFO) to minimize the spread of Covid-19. It is necessary to prepare office facilities and infrastructure to comply
with the Covid-19 protocol, and it is necessary to develop an instrument for assessing building readiness. In this study,
a building readiness assessment instrument was prepared according to the Covid-19 protocol using a questionnaire.
The methodology to design the questionnaire uses the literature study method, validation on three experts, and
reliability testing on 24 Covid-19 unit task forces.
Furthermore, the final questionnaire was used to assess the readiness of 83 buildings in ITS by using the safety culture
maturity level scoring. The result shows that 1.2% of buildings are at the reactive level, 12,05% of the buildings are
at the bureaucratic level, 44,58% of the buildings are at the proactive level, and 42.17% of the buildings are at the
generative level. At the end of the study, can concluded that the building at the proactive and generative level could
carry out work activities in the office. Meanwhile, buildings at the bureaucratic and reactive levels need to improve
the Covid-19 protocol before being reactivated.
Keywords
Covid-19 Protocol, questionnaire, literature study, safety maturity level, building assessment.
© IEOM Society International 2308

1 Introduction
The Coronavirus was detected in Wuhan, China starting at the end of December 2019. This virus causes the Corona
Virus disease (COVID-19), which has easy transmission through droplets (water droplets) originating from sneezing.
The spread of COVID-19 has reached five continents. Based on data submitted by WHO (2020), it was reported from
6 WHO Regions that during 207 days, 20,730,456 total positive cases of COVID-19 were detected, and 751,154 total
deaths (death rate 3.62%). Most cases were detected in America, with 11,109,443 positive cases of COVID-19.
Meanwhile, the highest death rate occurred in Europe, namely 5.91%. Meanwhile, in Southeast Asia data, up to August
14, 2020, there were 2,900,347 positive cases of COVID-19 and 57,756 deaths (death rate 1.99%). Although data in
Southeast Asia shows a fairly low mortality rate, this is not the case with Indonesian data.
In Southeast Asia, Indonesia ranks third in total COVID-19 cases after India and Bangladesh. May 31, 2020, the total
number of COVID-19 cases in Indonesia was recorded at 25,773 with 1,573 deaths (mortality rate 6.10%). Meanwhile,
as of August 14, 2020, 132,816 cases of COVID-19 were recorded, with 5,968 deaths (death rate 4.49%). Although
the recorded mortality rate has decreased, this figure is still the highest in Southeast Asia and is also higher than the
world's average death rate of 3.07%. Given the above conditions, COVID-19 in Indonesia is still at a dangerous level
and can continue to increase. So it is necessary to maintain the COVID-19 protocol in community social activities.
On March 2, 2020, the Indonesian government announced for the first time two patients tested positive for COVID-
19). Furthermore, the National Disaster Management Agency (BPNP) followed up by issuing the Decree of the Head
of BPNB Number 13A of 2020 concerning the Extension of the Status of Certain Disaster Emergency Conditions for
Corona Virus Outbreaks in Indonesia. This decree stated that Covid-19 is a disaster and has been declared a Covid-19
emergency status until May 29, 2020. They were following up on the Decree, the Republic of Indonesia's Minister of
Health Decree No. HK.01.07/MENKES/264/2020 was issued regarding the Stipulation of Large Scale Social
Restrictions in the City of Surabaya, Sidoarjo Regency, and Gresik Regency, East Java Province in the Context of
Accelerating the Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Governor of East Java Decree No.
188/202/KPTS/013/2020 concerning Enforcement of Large-Scale Social Restrictions in Handling Corona Virus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the City of Surabaya, Sidoarjo Regency and Gresik Regency. The two decrees stipulated
restrictions on social activities both for work, study, and other activities.
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya is one of the largest universities in Indonesia that organizes
education and research activities in science and technology. Based on its.ac.id, ITS has seven faculties and 39
departments, ten directorates, two offices, one library, and eight units. Each university/department/bureau/office at
ITS has a multi-story building where administration, education, research, and community service activities are carried
out. The multi-story building is equipped with various supporting facilities, including furniture, toilets, stairs, prayer
rooms, pantries, laboratory equipment and materials, electrical installations, etc. There are activities carried out by
lecturers, employees, students, and guests for almost 12 hours per day in this multi-story building.
ITS is one of the universities affected by the implementation of PSBB. The ITS Chancellor enforced the WFH starting
from March 16, 2020, in response to the government's decision. All lecturers and employees carry out their work from
home. However, ITS is still trying to carry out all the targets that have been previously set. In mid-July 2020, when
the Surabaya PSBB ended with a decrease in the positive number of Covid-19 and the need to work on campus, the
ITS Chancellor issued a policy through Circular Letter No T/44054/IT2/TU.00.08/2020 Regarding Employee Work
Systems at ITS Environment in the Context of Implementing Odd Semester 2020/2021 Activities on July 22, 2020.
This letter was followed up by the Deputy Chancellor's Letter for Human Resources, Organization and Technology
and Information Systems regarding Guidelines/Rules for Employee Work Systems in ITS Environment No
T/44762/IT2.III/TU.00.08/2020 dated July 24, 2020, which stated the need to conduct a building readiness assessment
at ITS.
Based on the above explanation, this research will compile a survey instrument used to assess the readiness of
buildings at ITS in the framework of WFO (work from the office) following the Covid-19 protocol. The survey
instrument's preparation was carried out through a study of previous research literature, namely the OSH risk
assessment of a multi-story building with five scoring categories. Furthermore, this survey instrument will be applied
to assess all ITS buildings through the Unit Task Force. The final results of this study are expected to obtain standard
survey instruments and the results of the ITS building readiness assessment according to the Covid-19 protocol to
protect lecturers and employees who pass WFO.
2 Research Methodology
2.1 Literature Study
In the process of drafting a building readiness assessment instrument in the framework of WFO following the Covid-
19 protocol, followed several literature studies :

1. Anon., 2020. COVID-19: FAQ for Residential and Commercial Buildings, s.l .: NYC health.
2. Anon., 2020. A Collection of Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Covid-19 and Best Practices
in the Workplace, s.l .: BetterWork.
3. Anon., 2020. A Collection of Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Covid-19 and Best Practices
in the Workplace, s.l .: BetterWork.
4. Schoen, L., 2020. Guidance for Building Operations During the Covid-19 Pandemic. ASHRAE Journal.
5. Regulation of the Mayor of Surabaya Number 28 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for the New Normal Order
in the Conditions of the 2019 Corona Virus Disease Pandemic (COVID -19) in the City of Surabaya.
6. East Java Governor Regulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Amendments to the Regulation of the
Governor of East Java Number 18 of 2020 concerning Guidelines for Large-Scale Social Restrictions in
Handling Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in East Java Province.
7. Circular of the Vice Chancellor for Human Resources, Organization and Technology and Information
Systems regarding Guidelines/Rules for Employee Work Systems in the ITS Environment No
T/44762/IT2.III/TU.00.08/2020 dated 24 July 2020.
8. ILO (International Labor Organization) and Ministry of Manpower of the Republic of Indonesia, 2021,
Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of COVID-19 in the Workplace.
In general, the literature study from research and regulations that become references informs what things need to be
considered when preparing a building to minimize the spread of Covid-19 and provide a sense of security to workers.
After studying the literature study's details, a proposal for a building readiness survey instrument was prepared, which
consists of 3 main aspects, namely systematics in dealing with Covid-19, Covid-19 prevention equipment, and
hierarchy of controlling the risk of Covid-19 transmission. The assessment is carried out using five levels of scores
that refer to the safety culture's maturity level. The five levels, according to Filho et al., 2020 are pathological, reactive,
bureaucratic, proactive, and generative, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Live levels scoring system.
2.2 Validation Process

According to the Covid-19 protocol, the next step is to validate the questionnaire after compiling the questionnaire
instrument for building readiness assessment. This validation was carried out to ensure that the questionnaire's
examination items were following the provisions of the Covid-19 protocol. Validation was carried out to 3 experts,
namely the chairman and members of the ITS Covid-19 task force and the Head of the ITS General Bureau and
Bureaucratic Reform. Based on the validation process, obtained input on several question items was according to
conditions at ITS. Details of the validation results are in the final questionnaire.
2.3 Reliability Test

The reliability test was conducted to obtain information on whether the questionnaire compiled could be understood
and filled properly by the respondent. Respondents are the Covid-19 task force unit at ITS. The Covid-19 task force
unit's task is to prepare buildings with facilities and infrastructure in accordance with the Covid-19 protocol. In the
reliability testing process, 24 Covid-19 task forces filled out questionnaires online. In the questionnaire, what needs
to be done is to answer each questionnaire question in accordance with the conditions of the facilities and infrastructure
as reflected in the choice of answers (score). Next, attach documentation that supports the predetermined answer
choices.

3 Data Collection
3.1 Final Questionnaire
The final questionnaire was obtained after the validation process and reliability testing. In the end, three aspects were
observed, namely:
a. Systematics in dealing with Covid-19 with 4 questions (Table 1)
b. Covid-19 prevention equipment with 14 questions (Table 2)
c. Hierarchy of controlling the risk of Covid-19 transmission with 5 questions (Table 3)
Details of the question items along with five answer choices following the safety maturity level are shown in the
attachment.
Table 1 Detailed questions about the aspects systematic of handling Covid-19.

E SYSTEMATICS IN DEALING WITH COVID-19
E.1 Has a Task Force Unit been appointed for handling COVID-19 in the Department/Unit?
E.2 Has there been any socialization on the prevention of COVID-19 through appeals, posters, etc.?
Do the COVID-19 Task Force Unit record and report close contact, suspected, and confirmed
E.3
positive?
Are the emergency telephone numbers (Surabaya call center or COVID-19 Task Force Unit)
E.4
and procedures installed?
Table 2 Detailed questions about the aspects Covid-19 prevention equipment.

F COVID-19 PREVENTION EQUIPMENT
F.1 Is there a thermometer measuring body temperature in the Department/Unit?
F.2 Is there a place for washing hands with water and soap in the Department/Unit?
F.3 Is there a place/station for the use of hand sanitizers in the Department/Unit?
F.4 Are medical gloves available in the Department/Unit?
F.5 Are there enough face shields in the Department/Unit?
F.6 Have you ever sprayed disinfectant in the Department/Unit building?
F.7 Is there air circulation, sunlight entering the workspace, and use of air conditioning?
F.8 Are masks provided for everyone in the Department/Unit?
Are there any posters informing you regarding the prevention of COVID-19 transmission in
F.9
the Department/Unit?
Is there a particular closed landfill for COVID-19 related waste (masks, used tissue) in the
F.10
Department/Unit?
Is there a Covid-19 protocol sign for shared facilities in the Department/Unit (prayer room,
F.11
toilet, waiting room, pantry)?
Are tools and materials provided for cleaning work areas, posters of SOPs, and PPE for
F.12
cleaning workers?
F.13 Are there any rules for bringing personal eating and drinking utensils (per worker)?
F.14 Are there any rules for bringing personal prayer equipment (per worker)?
Table 3 Detailed questions about the aspects hierarchy of controlling the risk of Covid-19 transmission.
G HIERARCHY OF CONTROLLING THE RISK OF COVID-19 TRANSMISSION
G.1 Are barriers available to provide contact distance (physical distancing) for public services?
G.2 Are there any work schedule arrangements (working hours, work shifts, WFH)?
Are there any arrangements for vulnerable age workers, comorbidities, and pregnant women
G.3
for WFO?
Are there any restrictions on the number of people in the facility (stickers in elevators, prayer
G.4
rooms) in the Department/Unit?
Is the layout of each public facility/station at a safe distance (1.5 m or 2 m) according to the
G.5
physical distancing protocol?

3.2 Assessment Process

The building readiness assessment process according to the Covid-19 protocol was carried out to 83
Units/Departments/Directorates in ITS. The filling process was carried out online using google form. The details of
the assessment procedure are depicted in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 Assessment and data calculation procedure.
3.3 Data Calculation

The implementation of building readiness assessments in accordance with the Covid-19 protocol was carried out
online because of the Covid-19 pandemic which limited gathering activities. To get the final score for the assessment,
verification is carried out on the answers chosen by the respondent and adjusted to the attached documents. The rating
scale used is 1 to 5 following the maturity level of the safety culture. The final score results are obtained after the
attached documents are verified by filling out the questionnaire. The final value of building readiness is represented
by five color levels, namely red, orange, yellow, light green and dark green as shown in Figure 2.
4 Results and Discussion

The results of filling out the building readiness questionnaire according to the Covid-19 protocol are processed
following the established procedure. Furthermore, the results are obtained as in table 4.
Table 4 Final score of ITS building assessment accordance to Covid-19 protocol.

Final Score Number of Building Percentage Status
0 < score ≤ 1 0 0,00% Pathological
1 < score ≤ 2 1 1,20% Reactive
2 < score ≤ 3 10 12,05% Bureaucratic
3 < score ≤ 4 37 44,58% Proactive
4 < score ≤ 5 35 42,17% Generative
83 100,00%
Based on table 4, it is found that one building (1.2%) in ITS is at the reactive level. In this building, not many inspection
items have been implemented, for example, not having installed protocol signs on shared facilities, not providing tools
and materials for cleaning work areas, and not providing masks for employees. A total of 10 buildings (12.05%) in
ITS are at the bureaucratic level. This building has implemented the Covid-19 protocol but at a danger prevention
level. For example, they already have a hand sanitizer area. However, the numbers are still insufficient, installing a
barrier on public services but not maintaining a distance, having regulations to bring a place to eat and drink, and
personal prayer equipment, but there is no control.
The proactive level status was obtained by 37 buildings (44,58%). Most of these buildings have met the Covid-19
protocol standards properly based on inspection items. For example, they provide masks and face shields for all
employees and guests, praying disinfectants in most building areas, and having a special bin for Covid-19 waste. A
total of 35 buildings (42.17%) are at the generative level. In buildings at this level, most of the Covid-19 protocols

have been appropriately implemented following applicable standards. In general, buildings at ITS have met building
standards according to the Covid-19 protocol so that it is possible to carry out work from the office, especially for
proactive and generative level buildings. Meanwhile, buildings at the bureaucratic and reactive levels still need repair
to increase their value.
5 Conclusion
The conclusion that can be drawn from this research is that a building readiness assessment instrument has been
produced according to the Covid-19 protocol that considers three aspects. The first aspect is systematic in dealing with
Covid-19, which discusses the Covid-19 unit task force, socialization of Covid-19 prevention, registration of Covid-
19 patients, and the availability of emergency telephone numbers. The second aspect is the Covid-19 prevention
equipment, which discusses temperature measuring devices (thermometers), hand washing stations, hand sanitizers,
availability of medical gloves, availability of face shields and masks, spraying disinfectants, air circulation, Covid-19
prevention posters, trash bins specifically for Covid-19 waste, protocols in shared facilities, tools and materials for
cleaning work areas, as well as rules for bringing cutlery and drinking tools independently.
The third aspect is the hierarchy of controlling the risk of Covid-19 transmission. This aspect discusses barriers for
physical distancing, setting WFH and WFO work schedules, managing comorbid and pregnant workers, limiting the
number of people in public facilities, and setting the layout of facilities with a distance of 1.5 - 2 m. A questionnaire
was conducted to assess the readiness of 83 buildings in ITS according to the Covid-19 protocol. The questionnaire
was able to function correctly and resulted in 44.58% of buildings at the proactive level and 42.17% of buildings at
the generative level.
6 References
Anon., 2020. COVID-19: FAQ for Residential and Commercial Buildings, s.l.: NYC health.
Anon., 2020. Kumpulan Panduan Pencegahan Penularan dan Penanganan Covid-19 Beserta Praktek-praktek
Terbaik di Tempat Kerja, s.l.: BetterWork.
Anon., 2020. Kumpulan Panduan Pencegahan Penularan dan Penanganan Covid-19 Beserta Praktek-praktek
Terbaik di Tempat Kerja, s.l.: BetterWork.
Schoen, L., 2020. Guidance for Building Operations During the Covid-19 Pandemic. ASHRAE Journal.
Peraturan Walikota Surabaya Nomor 28 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Tatanan Normal Baru pada Kondisi Pandemi
Corona Vorus Disease 2019 (COVID -19) di Kota Surabaya
Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Timur Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Gubernur Jawa Timur
Nomor 18 Tahun 2020 tentang Pedoman Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar dalam Penanganan Corona Virus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) di Provinsi Jawa Timur
Surat Edaran Wakil Rektor Bidang Sumber Daya Manusia, Organisasi dan Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi tentang
Pedoman/Aturan Sistem Kerja Pegawai di Lingkungan ITS No T/44762/IT2.III/TU.00.08/2020 tanggal 24 Juli
2020
Rahman, A. (2004). Pengukuran Tingkat Implementasi Program Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3). Seminar
Nasional Ergonomi: Aplikasi Ergonomi dalam Industri (p. 647). Yogyakarta: Forum Komunikasi Teknik
Industri Yogyakarta.
WHO, Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report – 207, https://www.who.int/docs/default-
source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200814-covid-19-sitrep-207.pdf?sfvrsn=2f2154e6_2
https://covid19.go.id/edukasi/apa-yang-harus-kamu-ketahui-tentang-covid-19/ketahui-dilarang-berdekatan-dan-
dilarang-berkumpul
7 Biography
Anny Maryani is a lecturer in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh
Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia. She earned an engineering degree from ITS Industrial Engineering. Furthermore, she
received a master's degree in engineering from ITS Industrial Engineering. She has research interests in occupational
safety and health, product design and development, and ergonomics. She has published in national and international
seminars and journals. Besides, she has also completed work projects in several companies as a consultant (PT PJB,
PT Unilever, PT Admedika, etc.). She is a member of IEA (International Ergonomics Association) and PEI
(Perhimpunan Ergonomi Indonesia).

Roosita Noor is a college student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi
Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia. She has research interests in Occupational Safety and Health and
Ergonomics. Besides, she has experience as a Quality Assurance Intern at PT Silateral Mitra Indonesia. She also has
experience as an HSE Intern at Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. She is a member of the Industrial Engineering
Student Organization at Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Sonia Novita Dewi is a college student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi
Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia. She is a fast learner, hard worker, and result-oriented person who is always
eager to accept a challenge for any new opportunity given to her. She has interests in Engineering Economy,
Physiology and Biomechanics Work, Occupational Safety and Health, and Ergonomics. She has experience as a
student ambassador for the company Cicil.co.id, a financial technology company that helps students get financing.
Besides, she has experience as an intern in the HSE Department of Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. She is a
member of the Industrial Engineering Student Organization at Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Dianda Nurafifah is a college student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi
Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia. She has experienced student organizations such as Technopreneur
Development Center as staff of Entrepreneur Challenge Department and Industrial Engineering Student organization
as welfare bureau head of Student Welfare Department. She has interests in Ergonomics, and Occupational Safety,
and Health. She has also experienced as an intern in HSE Department in ITS and completed the occupational safety
and health project.
Azizah Tamma Syadza is a college student in the Departement of Industrial and Systems Engineering of Institut
Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia. She has interests in occupational safety and health, ergonomics,
optimization, and statistics. Besides, she also has experience as an intern at HSE (Health, Safety, Environment) of
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember. She is a member and has become a committee of the Interest and Talent Unit
of Industrial Engineering Student Organization of Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

8 Appendix
Final Building Readiness Assessment Instruments in Accordance with the Covid-19 Protocol
No Inspection Item Scorecard Guideline
SYSTEMATICS IN
1 2 3 4 5
E DEALING WITH
Pathological Reactive Bureaucratic Proactive Generative
COVID-19
The Task Force Unit The Task Force Unit for

Has a Task Force Unit The Task Force Unit for The Task Force Unit for The Task Force Unit for
head for handling handling COVID-19
been appointed for handling COVID-19 handling COVID-19 handling COVID-19
E.1 COVID-19 has been has been established,
handling COVID-19 in has not been has been established but has been formed with
appointed, but there are but the number of
the Department/Unit? established. is not yet active. five members.
no members yet. members is insufficient.
The socialization of The socialization of
The socialization of
Has there been any The socialization of COVID-19 prevention COVID-19 prevention The socialization of
COVID-19 prevention
socialization on the COVID-19 prevention is carried out in the was carried out through COVID-19 prevention
was carried out through
E.2 prevention of COVID- has not been carried out form of an appeal posters, but there was was carried out through
posters and appeals and
19 through appeals, through any regarding the no appeal regarding the posters and appeals, but
socialized to all
posters, etc.? communication media. prevention of COVID- prevention of COVID- not to all employees.
employees.
19. 19.
Do the COVID-19 Task There is a recording of There is a recording of There are close contact, There is a recording of
There is no recording
Force Unit record and close contact, close contact, suspected suspected, and close contact, suspected
and reporting close
E.3 report close contact, suspected, and and confirmed positive, confirmed positive and confirmed positive,
contact, suspected, and
suspected, and confirmed positive, but but reporting but not records, but reporting is as well as routine
confirmed positive.
confirmed positive? no reporting is done. routine. not routine. reporting.
Are the emergency

There has been no There is an emergency
telephone numbers There is a limited There is a sufficient
installation of telephone, but there is There is a procedure for
(Surabaya call center or number of procedures number of procedures
E.4 procedures for handling no installation handling COVID-19
COVID-19 Task Force for handling COVID-19 for handling COVID-19
COVID-19 and procedure for handling but no emergency calls.
Unit) and procedures and emergency calls. and emergency calls.
emergency calls. COVID-19.
installed?

COVID-19
1 2 3 4 5
F PREVENTION
EQUIPMENT
There is a thermometer
There is a thermometer
Is there a thermometer There is no gun, and it functions
There was a There is a thermometer gun, and it works well,
measuring body thermometer measuring well, but body
F.1 thermometer gun, but it gun, but an insufficient as well as routine body
temperature in the the body temperature of temperature
didn't work properly. amount. temperature
Department/Unit? any kind. measurements are not
measurements.
routine.
The handwashing area's There is a place for
Is there a place for There is water, soap,
location exists, but the There is a place to wash washing hands, running
washing hands with There is no place to and alcohol-based hand
F.2 water does not flow, hands, running water water, there is soap, but
water and soap in the wash hands. washing liquid that is
and there is no soap or but no soap or soap out. no instructions for
Department/Unit? contactless.
soap out. washing hands.
There are
There are There are places/stations for using
There are
Is there a place/station places/stations for using places/stations for using hand sanitizers, easy to
There is no places/stations for using
for the use of hand hand sanitizers, easy to hand sanitizers, easy to find and routinely
F.3 place/station to use hand sanitizers, but they
sanitizers in the find, but routine find, and regularly refilled when they run
hand sanitizer. difficult to find, or the
Department/Unit? refilling is not done replenished when it out, and instructions for
location is not suitable.
when they run out. runs out. using hand sanitizers
are provided.
Medical gloves are
Medical gloves are Medical gloves are Medical gloves are
Are medical gloves There are no medical available, regularly
available, difficult to available, difficult to available, easy to find,
F.4 available in the gloves or other types recharging, easy to find,
find, do not routinely find, routine refilling routine refilling when
Department/Unit? available. contactless or sensor
refill when they run out. when it runs out. used up.
pick-up tools.
Faceshields are
Enough face shields are A sufficient amount of provided in sufficient
Are there enough face There is no face shield Employees use a face
provided for face shields is provided quantities for
F.5 shields in the that can be used by shield, which is held
employees, excluding for both employees and employees and guests
Department/Unit? employees or guests. independently.
guests. guests. and are replaced if
damaged.

COVID-19
1 2 3 4 5
F PREVENTION
EQUIPMENT
Spraying of
Have you ever sprayed Spraying of Spraying of
It has never been disinfectants has been They are spraying
disinfectant in the disinfectants has been disinfectants has been
F.6 sprayed with carried out regularly in disinfectant regularly
Department/Unit carried out for some carried out for all areas
disinfectant. some areas of the once a day.
building? areas of the building. of the building.
building.
There is no natural air There is no natural air There is natural air There is natural air There is natural air
circulation (doors and circulation (doors and circulation (doors and circulation (doors and circulation (doors and
Is there air circulation,
windows can't be windows can't be windows can be windows can be windows can be
sunlight entering the
F.7 opened), the air opened), the air opened), the air opened), the air opened), the air
workspace, and use of
conditioner is turned conditioner is turned conditioner is turned conditioner is turned conditioner is turned
air conditioning?
on, and sunlight can't on, and sunlight can off, and sunlight can on, and sunlight can off, and sunlight can
enter the workspace. enter the workspace. enter the workspace. enter the workspace. enter the workspace.
The Unit/Department Masks are provided by
The Unit/Department The Unit/Department provides masks, and the Unit/Department
Are masks provided for never provides masks, Employees use masks provides masks once, there are spare masks, and there are spare
F.8 everyone in the and there are no that are held and there is an but the location is masks that are easy to
Department/Unit? mandatory posters for independently. obligation to wear a unknown, and there is a spot and there are
wearing masks. mask. mandatory wearing posters of the obligation
mask poster. to wear masks.
The Unit/Department
Are there any posters There are posters
There are posters There are posters provides masks, and
informing you There are no posters related to Covid-19, but
related to Covid-19 related to Covid-19, in there are spare masks
regarding the related to the they are not in a
F.9 placed in strategic a strategic location, and that are easy to spot,
prevention of COVID- prevention of COVID- strategic location,
locations, but difficut to easy to read, but and there are posters of
19 transmission in the 19 transmission. difficult to read and to
read and to understand. difficult to understand. the obligation to wear
Department/Unit? apply.
masks.
All trash cans are used
Is there a particular There is a particular to dispose of COVID-
closed landfill for All trash cans get rid of There is a particular All trash cans are used trash can to dispose of 19 waste, and not all
COVID-19 related COVID-19 waste, and trash can for uprooting to dispose of COVID- COVID-19 waste, and trash cans are
F.10
waste (masks, used not all trash cans are COVID-19 waste, but 19 trash, and all trash all trash cans are covered.All trash cans
tissue) in the closed. an open trash can. cans are closed. closed, but there is no get rid of COVID-19
Department/Unit? SOP for disposal. waste and not all trash
cans are closed.

COVID-19
1 2 3 4 5
F PREVENTION
EQUIPMENT
Is there a Covid-19
There is a Covid-19 There is a relatively
protocol sign for shared There is a Covid-19 There is a complete
There is no Covid-19 protocol sign, but it is complete Covid-19
facilities in the protocol sign, but it is Covid-19 protocol sign,
F.11 protocol mark on not in a strategic protocol sign in a
Department/Unit incomplete and not in a in a strategic location
shared facilities. location and difficult to strategic location and is
(prayer room, toilet, strategic location. and easy to read.
read. easy to read.
waiting room, pantry)?
Tools and materials are Tools and materials are Tools and materials for
Are tools and materials Tools and materials are
provided for regular provided for regular cleaning the work area
provided for cleaning Tools and materials are provided for regular
cleaning of the work cleaning of the work are provided, SOP
F.12 work areas, posters of not provided for the cleaning of the work
area, poster SOP is area, posters of SOPs posters are available,
SOPs, and PPE for work area regularly. area, but there are no
available, but PPE is are available, and PPE and PPE is provided
cleaning workers? SOP posters and PPE.
not provided. is provided once. regularly.
There are formal
Are there any rules for There are no There is an informal There are formal rules There are formal and regulations,
bringing personal eating rules/regulations for rule for bringing for bringing personal socialized rules for socialization, and
F.13
and drinking utensils bringing personal eating personal eating and eating and drinking bringing personal eating monitoring regarding
(per worker)? and drinking utensils. drinking utensils. utensils. and drinking utensils. bringing personal eating
and drinking utensils.
There are formal
Are there any rules for There are no Some regulations Some regulations Some regulations regulations,
bringing personal regulations/instructions informally to bring formally conveyed to formally conveyed to socialization, and
F.14
prayer equipment (per to bring personal prayer personal prayer bring personal prayer bring personal prayer monitoring regarding
worker)? equipment. equipment. equipment. equipment. carrying personal
prayer equipment.


HIERARCHY OF
CONTROLLING
1 2 3 4 5
G THE RISK OF
COVID-19
TRANSMISSION
Are barriers available to There is no barrier to There is a There is no There is a screen/barrier
There is a screen/barrier
provide contact distance provide contact screen/barrier, but the screen/barrier, but there with a safe height and a
G.1 with a safe height to
(physical distancing) distance, especially screen height is only the is a safe distance when safe distance to perform
perform public services.
for public services? public services. neck's size (less safe). doing public services. public services.
There are work There is a work There are a work
Are there any work There is no work
schedule arrangements schedule arrangement schedule arrangement
schedule arrangements There is no work schedule arrangements
G.2 but still not WFH and and work a combination and a combination of
(working hours, work schedule arrangement. but using the WFH
inflexible working of WFH but not yet WFH work, and it is
shifts, WFH)? work system.
hours. implemented. carried out.
There are working There are working There are working
Are there any There are working
There is no regulation regulations for regulations for regulations for
arrangements for regulations for workers
for vulnerable age, vulnerable age workers, vulnerable age workers, vulnerable age workers,
vulnerable age workers, of vulnerable age,
G.3 comorbid and pregnant comorbidities, and comorbidities, and comorbidities, and
comorbidities, and comorbidity, and
women workers for pregnant women for the pregnant women for pregnant women for
pregnant women for pregnant women for
WFO. combined WHO and WFH, but without WFH with health
WFO? WFO.
WFH. health monitoring. monitoring.
There are restrictions
Are there any There are restrictions There are restrictions There are restrictions
on the number of
restrictions on the on the number of on the number of on the number of
There are no people in all public
number of people in the people in some public people in all public people in all public
restrictions on the facilities, and there are
G.4 facility (stickers in facilities, but there are facilities, but there are facilities, and there are
number of people in warning signs regarding
elevators, prayer no warning signs no warning signs warning signs regarding
public facilities. safe distances, but this
rooms) in the regarding safe regarding safe safe distances, which
has not been
Department/Unit? distances. distances. have been socialized.
disseminated.

The layout of public All public Each public All public

Is the layout of each Some public
facilities/workstations facilities/workstations facility/workstation has facilities/workstations
public facility/station at facilities/workstations
is not at a safe distance have been arranged at a been arranged at a safe have been arranged at a
a safe distance (1.5 m have been spaced, but it
G.5 (1.5 m - 2 m) and does safe distance (1.5 m - 2 distance (1,5 m - 2 m) safe distance (1.5 m - 2
or 2 m) according to the does not comply with
not comply with the m) and partly according and suitable with the m) and suitable with the
physical distancing the physical distancing
physical distancing to the physical physical distancing physical distancing
protocol? protocol.
protocol. distancing protocol. protocol. protocol.

Designing of Building Readiness

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Designing of Building Readiness

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management

Singapore, March 7-11, 2021

Designing of Building Readiness Assessment Instruments in

Sonia Novita Dewi

Azizah Tamma Syadza

© IEOM Society International 2308

© IEOM Society International 2309

Figure 1 Live levels scoring system.

2.2 Validation Process

2.3 Reliability Test

© IEOM Society International 2310

Table 1 Detailed questions about the aspects systematic of handling Covid-19.

Table 2 Detailed questions about the aspects Covid-19 prevention equipment.

© IEOM Society International 2311

3.2 Assessment Process

Figure 2 Assessment and data calculation procedure.

3.3 Data Calculation

4 Results and Discussion

Table 4 Final score of ITS building assessment accordance to Covid-19 protocol.

© IEOM Society International 2312

© IEOM Society International 2313

© IEOM Society International 2314

The Task Force Unit The Task Force Unit for

Are the emergency

© IEOM Society International 2315

No Inspection Item Scorecard Guideline

© IEOM Society International 2316

No Inspection Item Scorecard Guideline

© IEOM Society International 2317

No Inspection Item Scorecard Guideline

© IEOM Society International 2318

No Inspection Item Scorecard Guideline

© IEOM Society International 2319

The layout of public All public Each public All public

© IEOM Society International 2320

You might also like