(Final Report) Freepoint Sorting Center in Landfill Pre-Feasibility Study

Sorting Centre in Landfill
Pre-Feasibility Study
Final Report
March 2023
Overview
1 Executive Summary
Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved

2 Background 4 Longlisted Area Recapitulation
3 Area Selection 5 Conclusion and Recommendation
6 Appendix
2
Executive Summary
01
3
Research Area Coverage
While there are prioritized locations list based on the initial engagement, in the process locations can be added or written off the list
depending on the interest of the local government on the project, and the possibility of the facility to be built in the area.
At the end, 12 locations were approached for cooperation exploration, listed in the longlisted locations.
Initial Research Area Coverage Prioritized Locations Longlisted Locations

1. Galuga Landfill (Bogor Regency) 1. Galuga Landfill (Bogor Regency) 1. Sumur Batu Landfill (Bekasi City)
2. Burangkeng Landfill (Bekasi Regency) 2. Burangkeng Landfill (Bekasi Regency) 2. Cipayung Landfill (Depok City)
3. Sumur Batu Landfill (Bekasi City) 3. Sumur Batu Landfill (Bekasi City) 3. TPST Cipeucang (South Tangerang City)
4. Cipayung Landfill (Depok City) 4. Cipayung Landfill (Depok City) 4. Cilowong Landfill (Serang Regency)
5. Cimenteng Landfill (Sukabumi Regency) 5. Cimenteng Landfill (Sukabumi Regency) 5. Cibeureum Landfill (Sumedang Regency)
6. Bagendung Landfill (Cilegon City) 6. Bagendung Landfill (Cilegon City) 6. Cimenteng Landfill (Sukabumi Regency)
7. TPST Cipeucang (South Tangerang City) 7. Cilowong Landfill (Serang Regency) 7. Piyungan Regional Landfill (DIY)
8. Cilowong Landfill (Serang Regency) 8. Pecuk Landfill (Indramayu Regency) 8. Bantar Gebang Landfill (DKI Jakarta)
9. Gunung Santri Landfill (Cirebon Regency) 9. Pasir Bajing Landfill (Garut Regency) 9. Ciangir (Tasikmalaya City)
10. Ciangir Landfill (Tasikmalaya City) 10. Galuga Landfill (Bogor Regency)
11. Randukuning Landfill (Batang Regency) 11. Galuga Landfill (Bogor City)
12. Penujah Landfill(Tegal Regency) 12. Pasir Bajing Landfill (Garut Regency)
13. Candisari Landfill(Demak Regency)
14. Pecuk Landfill (Indramayu Regency)
15. Pasir Bajing Landfill (Garut Regency)
4
Three Categories of the longlisted locations
The cooperation exposure shows how the Government react to the Integrated Waste Management facility proposal.
Based on their interests and their capability to provide land for the facility, the locations are categorized into three types
1 2 3
High Interest High Interest Low Interest

with Land Availability without Land Availability without Land Availability
1. Serang City 1. Bekasi City 1. Depok City

Cilowong Landfill Sumur Batu Landfill Cipayung Landfill
2. Sumedang Regency 2. Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 2. South Tangerang City
Cibeureum Landfill Piyungan Regional Landfill TPST Cipeucang
3. Sukabumi Regency 3. Bogor Regency
Cimenteng Landfill Galuga Landfill
4. DKI Jakarta 4. Tasikmalaya City
Bantar Gebang Landfill Ciangir Landfill
5. Bogor City
Galuga Landfill
6. Garut Regency
Pasir Bajing Landfill
4
6 local governments show high interest and are supported by land that has the potential to be utilized
High Interest with Land Availability
Land Availability Waste Generation
Government Programmes with
City/Rege Other Parties Can Be
No Locations Potential To Landfill Government's Interest
Areas Location Notes ncy Waste Utilized
Capacity (tpd) (tpd)
Total (tpd) Requirement Collaborator (tpd)
(tpd)
• 100% waste management rate
5 ha* • Not all 19 ha of Rorotan land can be • More than 1000 tpd waste that are managed
used. A number around 5-6 ha was • A more interesting proposal compared to what
Rorotan, Bantar Gebang
Bantar Gebang *19 ha in total, mentioned, however further study BPDLH has to offer
1 exact number North ±800 8527 7500 3000 Landfill's RDF 4500
DKI Jakarta need to be instigated to determine • The development of the facility should not be
to be used Jakarta Plant
need to be the actual land requirement done near Bantar Gebang area as it is in Bekasi
discussed • Need land preparation City administratively
• Feasibility Study on the utilization of Rorotan Area
• Owned by Local Government
• Cooperation with other cities/regencies to get
• The ground is old waste pile
5 ha ±800 additional fund from the waste management
• Road access need to be improved
Cibereum • Feasibility study to really make the system based
• Need land preparation
Landfill on the real condition of the waste to ensure the
Cibeureum • Owned by Local Government
sustainability of the facility
Landfill 1 ha ±150 • No road access due to sand digging TPPAS Legok
2 450 200 20 180 • Be mindful with the informal sectors, especially
Sumedang around the area Nangka
the scavengers as they are living at the landfill
Regency • Owned by Village Government
• No tipping fee is an interesting offer, but make
Near • Divided by road into two areas
sure that the economic feasibility is assured
2 ha Cimalaka ±300 • Part of the land still need to be
• What are the additional benefits for the
Gate Toll prepared, while the other is more
government beside the reduction of waste
ready to be used
Near • Flat land, ready to be utilized
2400 m2 Galuga ±50 • Next to the main road, resistance • 100% waste management rate
Landfill from nearby citizen might arise
50 PlusTik • No burden to the regional budget
• Feasibility Study to capture the real condition of
• Inside of the Landfill area, low the waste and a developing a system that is
Galuga Landfill resistance from nearby citizen
3 736,65 650 200 suitable for the waste
Bogor City • The land is still a greenery, need
Galuga 400* • A proposal that is fixed and can be assured to be
10 ha ±1600 land leveling to be utilized running, since there are hundreds of proposals
Landfill
• Close to the wastewater treatment *there is flexibility in TPPAS Lulut coming to the City but currently only one of the
plant (WWTP), no need to build a the Nambo proposer proceed with the plan
new one amount of waste
thatneed
to be sent
Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 6

6 local governments shows high interest and are supported by land availability that has the potential to be utilized
High Interest with Land Availability
Land Availability Waste Generation
Government Programmes
Potential with Other Parties Can Be
No Locations City/Regency To Landfill Government's Interest
Areas Location Capacity Notes Waste Utilized
Total (tpd) (tpd)
(tpd) Requirement Collaborator (tpd)
(tpd)
• Uneven contour
• No tipping fee charged to the government
• Unstable as the ground is old
1 ha ±150 • Not burdening the regional budget
waste pile
• Adjustment of the system to include the current
Cilowong technology applied in the landfill to reach 100%
Cilowong • A leachate tank need to be
4 Landfill 800 300 - 400 - - 300 -400 waste management rate
3000 m2 Landfill ±50 moved from the area
Serang City • Three hangars are already established in the
landfill for their current technology, which the
• Still in the process of
possibility of utilization can be discussed
2 ha ±300 acquisition, the land need to
• Possibility in managing nearby areas’ waste
be prepared
• Other cooperation besides waste processing:
• Privately owned by the Agency o Cooperation on waste management
Pasir Bajing Secretary education for the people
Near Pasir
Landfill • Good accessibility due to using TPPAS Legok o Cooperation on rejuvenation of the waste
5 2 ha Bajing ±300 1100 220 – 250 120 - 140 100
Garut the same access to the landfill Nangka management fleet
Landfill
Regency • Still need to be explored to the o Possibility for landfill mining
government o Efforts on waste reduction
• Not burdening the regional budget
• The location is inside of • The facility is recommended to be built in
Kadaleman Ciletuh Geopark Jampang Kulon area, but the waste collection
• 50
2 ha Surade ±300 • Waste management service rate there is still low, 50 tpd.
(Kadaleman
Cimenteng Landfill area is still low, thus low in 333 • Cooperation not only for waste processing, but
Surade
Landfill waste generation (50 tpd) (from also waste collection since there are not enough
6 1045,82 Landfill) PT Semen Jawa 50
Sukabumi Cimenteng fleet to cover the whole area
• 200
Regency Landfill) • Lack of awareness within the people, so another
Legok • Still need to be explored to the (Cimenteng
not disclosed undetermined cooperation on waste management education is
Nyenang government Landfill)
appealing
• Not burdening the regional budget
Out of the six locations that show high interest and are supported by available land, two locations show low waste potential that can be utilized.
Therefore, they are not recommended to be pursued immediately considering the timeframe.

With no land availability, 4 local governments showed high interests
High Interest without Land Availability
Waste Generation
No Locations City/Regency To Landfill Government Programmes with Other Parties Can Be Utilized Government's Interest
Total (tpd) (tpd) Waste Requirement (tpd) Collaborator (tpd)
800* National Government’s • Proof of seriousness, can be shown through the development of
Sumur Batu Landfill, *the tender has not even been WtE Project through a pilot project
1 1800 1000 200 - 1000
Bekasi City commenced since the Presidential Decree no. • Give-and-take, what can be given back to the government if we
announcement of the presidential
decree 35 year 2018 take their waste that is considered as an asset?
• The development of several smaller scale facility in several
Piyungan Regional
regencies instead of one big facility
Landfill
2 600 - 900 600 - 900 - - 600 - 900 • Feasibility study of the system
Yogyakarta Special
• A detailed proposal with the technical and financial details
Region
• 100% waste management rate instead of 35%
• Interested in the cooperation, but no land can be provided by
the Government
Galuga Landfill, • The development can only be done outside of the landfill areas
3 971,75 900 700 TPPAS Lulut Nambo 200
Bogor Regency • Explanation of detailed system being used, e.g., how are the
waste flow, the detailed technology being used, what are the
cooperation terms
• An immediate solution to waste management problem is needed
40 Arun • While cooperation with other parties has been explored, none
has been running yet
• Cooperation not only on waste processing, but also waste
Ciangir Landfill,
4 316 210 - 220 - reduction
Tasikmalaya City
• Cooperation for educating the people on waste management
200 Sera • Possibility on landfill mining
• No land is available at the landfill or in the city, so it is best to
look for land in nearby areas
While Bekasi City was categorized with no land availability, Waste4Change has a 2600 m2 land equipped with a waste management permit that can
be utilized. The location will be used as the pilot plant which the development can start as soon as possible, and therefore must be considered as our
top priority location.

With no land availability, 2 local governments also showed low interests
Low Interest without Land Availability
Waste Generation
Government Programmes with Other
No Locations City/Regency To Landfill Parties Can Be Government's Interest
Total (tpd) (tpd) Waste Utilized (tpd)
Collaborator
Requirement (tpd)
• Interested with the concept of cooperation without
tipping fee
• A more detailed proposal to really assure the
government on the effectivity and sustainability of the
system
PT Indocement • Building a pilot plant first instead of immediately going
Cipayung Landfill
1 1300 900 - 1000 up to 500 Tunggal Prakarsa 400 - 500 for a full-scale facility
Depok City
Tbk. • Acquiring the land without any help from the
government as they don't have any available land and
no recommendation can be given
• A system that will not cause problem or stops in the
middle of development as the Head of the
Environmental Agency is soon to be retiring
• 100% waste management rate, willing to pay tipping
fee if it fits the budget
• No available land in the city
TPST Cipeucang • A visitation to Waste4Change's MRF Plant was
2 800 - 850 400 -450 100 - 200 TPPAS Lulut Nambo 200 - 250
South Tangerang City discussed to see an already running system and further
discussed the collaboration. However, they were
unresponsive to the planning of the visitation and
discussion
After the cooperation exposure, it can be seen that while there are urgent need for a waste problem solution in the area, it is still not a top priority within the
governmental bodies. Therefore, it is not recommended to pursue these two areas as our partners to build the MRF.

Recommended shortlisted locations and its plastic potentials
The requested plastic from Freepoint are the plastic
code 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7 which is around 10% out of the
Based on the study, the shortlisted locations that are recommended to be prioritized in approaching are: total mixed waste. Based the waste generated on the
shortlisted area, the plastic waste that can be utilized
can be categorized into four options:
Bekasi
1. BekasiCity
City DKI
2. DKIJakarta
Jakarta Sumedang
3. SumedangRegency
Regency 1. 450 tpd in one area by collecting waste from DKI
Jakarta only
● Close relationship between the ● Area available in Rorotan area for ● Area available in Cibeureum Landfill for
government and Waste4Change. around 19 ha in total, however, only around 5 ha and near Cimalaka Toll Gate 2. 250 tpd if there are minimum 80 tpd collected
● While there are no land available from around 5-6 ha are mentioned to be for around 2 ha from DKI Jakarta with the rest from the other
the government, Waste4Change allowed to be used. It is still a ● The current waste cthat can be utilized is cities/regencies
has 2600 m2 land for a pilot project flexible number depending on the 180 tpd, and there is a possibility to
with a maximum capacity of 100 tpd/2 result of feasibility study in the area increase the number by procuring waste 3. 178 tpd if after further discussion the
working shifts ● High waste generation to be utilized from surrounding cities/regencies cooperation with DKI Jakarta could not go
● Up to 1000 tpd of waste can be utilized in the future, up to 4500 tpd ● Currently there are no other investors through
depending on the clarity of the that have proposed to create waste
National Government’s WtE Project, 4. 193 tpd if Garut and Sukabumi Regencies are
management system in their area, so they
with the worst case of only 200 tpd. are very positive with the cooperation also included
4.Bogor
Bogor City
City Serang
5. SerangCity
City If option 3 or 4 are the one that go through, to fulfill
While Garut Regency and Sukabumi 250 tpd of plastic waste there are three
● Areas available in Galuga Landfill for ● Area available in Cilowong Landfill for Regency are listed as “High Interest with recommendations:
around 2400 m2 (near the landfill) and around 1 ha, 3000 m2, and 2 ha Land Availability”, the waste generated 1. Approaching new cities/regencies which
10 ha (in the landfill) ● Three hangars are already established in the area is still too low, i.e., 100 and 50
● One of the area is ready to be used, in the landfill for their current tpd, respectively. Thus, they are not potentially have big waste generated to the
however, it is next to the main road so technology, which a collaboration for recommended to be pursued landfill to built the sorting facility there.
some resistance might happen utilization can be discussed immediately 2. Approaching new cities/regencies which
● Up to 200 tpd of waste to be utilized ● Potential of waste to be utilized up to
400 tpd, and if possible, addition by surrounds the partner cities/regencies, to send
They can be approached in the future, if
procuring waste from nearby Waste4Change and Freepoint are willing their waste to our partner location
cities/regencies to increase the serviced area, e.g., by 3. Pursuing waste from private sectors in the
providing collection services
cities/regencies where the MRFs are built

Although most local governments are positive to the cooperation, solutions to the common obstacles
that also incorporate their interests need to be created
The Common Obstacles Solving the Obstacles The interest of The Local Government
1. No land availability, especially in the cities that have 1. For the first phase, it is better to focus on the area where the 1. 100% waste management rate that will not burden
high population density. While in the regencies, areas government can provide land, whether it is to be leased, or bought the regional budget and the current operational
might be available, but the vastness of the area 2. Create a cooperation scheme where the land preparation is imposed system.
might make the transport process more difficult. to the government. If it is not possible, then additional budget for land 2. Further intensive meetings with the related agencies
2. When a land is available, mostly it is still in an preparation needs to be calculated in the government to discuss the cooperation model
unusable state. Land preparation or even road 3. Developing a system where no regional budget is required for the that complies to the regulations
construction is needed and those might create a big plant to be running. The financial calculation in the current 35% waste 3. Feasibility Study to identify the real condition on-site
capital expenses in the calculation management rate system need to be assured, and the exact system and a more in-depth analysis, to propose a system
3. Most of the Government wants 100% waste used need to be explained. Since there will be residue that needs to be that gives the best fit for the on-site condition
management rate without burdening the regional handled by the cities/regencies, an appealing offer needs to be added 4. A detailed proposal that already include the financial
budget. However, a 100% waste management rate is so that they will not think of it as too much of a burden. plan, technological detail of the system, and detailed
not possible without tipping fee from the 4. Avoiding tender can be done in two ways: cooperation scheme
government. • Creating a cooperation agreement through Regional Cooperation 5. Send official letter to Mayor/Regent containing
4. If any regional budget is involved whether it is in the with Third Parties (KSDPK), that is shorter in the contract duration, administrative requirements:
form of tipping fee or usage of the government’s i.e., 5 years, with no regional budget is involved in the agreement a. Request for Cooperation Letter
fleets or human resources, a tender must be held for • Assuring the government that the offeror is the only one that can b. Feasibility Study Result
the project to move forward. Tender in Indonesia is a provide a running system, e.g., by first developing a pilot plant that c. Proposal
long process, it can take 3-4 years before the plant is running and sustainable d. Memorandum of Understanding Draft
can operate. e. Cooperation Agreement Draft
This project is only the initial stage to select potential areas and support the establishment of a Material Recovery Facility (MRF).
The implementation of the Integrated Waste Management Facility require long stages because it needs careful consideration from various stakeholders.

Timeframe for the Next Stages

02
Background
• Collaborative Background
• Objectives and Scope of Work
14
Collaborative Background
The collaboration between

Freepoint Commodities and
Waste4Change has been designed
to focus on:
Freepoint Commodities is a global Waste4Change is a social Assessing potential landfill locations

merchants of physical enterprise founded in 2014 which and/or landfill management that are
commodities and financer of upper gives services in waste open to collaborate in building a
and mid-stream commodity- management with an sorting centre facility with Freepoint
producing assets that provide environmental friendly and and Waste4Change.
physical supply responsible approach toward
services and related structured zero-waste Indonesia.
solutions for counterparties.

Objectives and Scope of Work
Assessing potential landfill locations and/or landfill management that are open to collaborate in
Main Objective
building a sorting centre facility with Freepoint and Waste4Change.

Scope of Work 01 Landfill Mapping
Mapping out the potential landfill area to be engaged and gathering necessary information up to 15
landfills (area, potential waste supply quantity, local regulations, contact information) through
internal and external secondary data.
02 Stakeholder Mapping
Mapping out significant stakeholders inside or surrounding the landfill area and their interests (existing
scheme).
03 Research Permit & Stakeholder Engagement

Obtain research permit and conduct stakeholder engagement. Conduct initial contact calls to 15 landfills
and carry out on–field in-depth interviews to 9 landfills locations mapped out in previous activity. The
interview include their involvement, current waste management scheme, land availability and conditions,
interests and openness for cooperation.
16
03
Area Selection
• Initial research area coverage

• Prioritized area
• Longlisted locations
• Map of longlisted locations
17
List of potential landfills to be engaged:
Initial Research Area Coverage 1 Galuga Landfill (Bogor Regency)
2 Burangkeng Landfill (Bekasi Regency)
3 Sumur Batu Landfill (Bekasi City)
4 Cipayung Landfill (Depok City)
5 Cimenteng Landfill (Sukabumi Regency)

6 Bagendung Landfill (Cilegon City)
7 TPST Cipeucang (South Tangerang City)
8 Cilowong Landfill (Serang Regency)
9 Gunung Santri Landfill (Cirebon Regency)
10 Ciangir Landfill (Tasikmalaya City)
11 Randukuning Landfill (Batang Regency)
The area coverage for pre-feasibility study is Java island. The list can change according to
secondary research that will be conducted during this study. 15 landfill managements will be 12 Penujah Landfill(Tegal Regency)
contacted via phone call/online means and 9 of them that show the most interest will be engaged
(through online/offline discussions). 13 Candisari Landfill(Demak Regency)
14 Pecuk Landfill (Indramayu Regency)
15 Pasir Bajing Landfill (Garut Regency) 4

Prioritized Area Based on Waste Generation, Area, and Distance
More Prioritized Area Less Prioritized Area
Rank Landfill Name City/Regency Rank Landfill Name City/Regency
1 Sumur Batu Landfill Bekasi City 10 TPST Cipeucang South Tangerang City
2 Cipayung Landfill Depok City 11 Penujah Landfill Tegal Regency
3 Bagendung Landfill Cilegon City 12 Ciangir Landfill Tasikmalaya City
4 Cilowong Landfill Serang City 13 Gunung Santri Landfill Cirebon Regency
5 Galuga Landfill Bogor Regency 14 Randukuning Landfill Batang Regency
6 Burangkeng Landfill Bekasi Regency 15 Candisari Landfill Demak Regency
7 Pecuk Landfill Indramayu Regency
8 Cimenteng Landfill Sukabumi Regency
9 Pasir Bajing Landfill Garut Regency
Based on the desk-based research and initial engagement, several prioritized areas are selected. However, in
the process, areas can be added or written off the list. It is depending on the interest of the local government
on the project, and the feasibility of the facility to be built in the area

Longlisted Locations
1 2 3 4 5 6
Sumur Batu Landfill Cipayung Landfill TPST Cipeucang Cilowong Landfill Cibeureum Landfill Cimenteng Landfill
(Bekasi City) (Depok City) ( South Tangerang City) (Serang City) (Sumedang Regency) (Sukabumi Regency)
7 8 9 10 11 12
Piyungan Regional Bantar Gebang Landfill Ciangir Landfill Galuga Landfill Galuga Landfill Pasir Bajing Landfill
Landfill (DIY) (DKI Jakarta) (Tasikmalaya City) (Bogor Regency) (Bogor City) (Garut Regency)

Map of Longlisted Locations

Longlisted Area Recapitulation
04
22
1. Sumur Batu Landfill, Bekasi City
2. Bantar Gebang Landfill, DKI Jakarta
3. Cibeureum Landfill, Sumedang Regency

List of Areas
4. Galuga Landfill, Bogor City
5. Cilowong Landfill, Serang City
6. Pasir Bajing Landfill, Garut Regency
7. Cimenteng Landfill, Sukabumi Regency
8. Piyungan Regional Landfill, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta
9. Galuga Landfill, Bogor Regency
10. Ciangir Landfill, Tasikmalaya City
11. Cipayung Landfill, Depok City
12. TPST Cipeucang, South Tangerang City
23
2.1
Sumur Batu Landfill,

Bekasi City
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
• Stakeholder Analysis
• Next Step Recommendations
24
Summary
Location : Jalan Pangkalan 2 Jalan Ciketing Udik No.10,
RT.004/RW.002, Sumur Batu, Kec. Bantar Gebang,
Kota Bekasi, Jawa Barat 17152
Coordinate : -6.342001204166102, 107.0019933461364
Waste Generation : 1800 tpd
(a) Sumur Batu Landfill (b) Engagement with (c) Google Maps location
Landfill Area : 20 ha local government
Ownership : Bekasi City Government
Waste Generation Regulation Land Government’s Interest
From 1800 tpd of waste, 800 The process in collecting waste utilizes Currently, there are no 1. An open tender is likely to be carried out due to
tpd will go to their future government’s assets such as human available land nor the the high amount of interested companies in
waste to energy (WtE) plant. resources and vehicles, and thus, waste budget to acquire new land managing Bekasi City's waste (53 companies) and
the long duration of the contract (20-25 years).
Therefore, there are 1000 is considered as an asset. Based on PP from the Government.
However, with a pilot plant development.
tpd of waste that can be No. 28 of 2018, the use of local However, Waste4Change 2. The government is waiting for the seriousness of
utilized by Waste4Change. government assets must be a given has 2600 m2 of land in the private parties who are interested in managing
Landfill mining of old back to the government in the form of Bekasi City area that can be Bekasi City’s waste.
waste is also a possibility to money or goods. However, this is still used for pilot project to 3. Securing land for the facility and developing a pilot
be done in the future in being discussed internally in the manage 50-100 tpd of waste, plant can be used as a way to show the seriousness
order to acquire more government to what extent it is to which it can be expanded 4. What can be given back to the government if we
take their waste that is considered as an asset.
waste. considered an asset. to 5000 m2.

Strengths (S) Weaknesses (W)
SWOT Analysis 1.
2.
Waste4change is experienced in building and operating MRF for sorting process
The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology which can process all plastics other than
The land owned
Waste4Change in Bekasi City is
by
PET and PVC. not enough to manage all the

waste of Bekasi City. 6 ha of land
3. Tipping fee is not required if only 35% of the waste entering the MRF is managed.
is required to manage 1000 tpd
4. Close relationship between Waste4Change and Bekasi City Government.
waste.
5. 2600 m2 of land is available to be used for a pilot plant to manage 50-100 tpd of waste, and
can be expanded to 5000 m2
Opportunities (O) S-O Analysis W-O Analysis
1. The potential of 1000 tpd of waste to be utilized. 1. Show the permits that is on Waste4Change’s 2600 m2 land, where it states that the land can 1. Waste4Change land
2. Possibility for landfill mining of old waste. be used as a waste management facility location, to the government and make sure that the expansion plan from 2400 m2
3. Waste management services can be done only at the development of the pilot plant could commence. to 5000 m2 for scale up pilot
allocated locations, which the lists can be provided by 2. Construction of a pilot plant with a capacity of 50 tpd for waste management in plant.
Bekasi City Government. Waste4Change’s land, as a proof of the system to be running and sustainable 2. Purchase or lease of land to
3. Procure the list of area that are allocated for waste management purposes and available for cover the rest of the waste
leasing or purchasing, in order to prepare for the scale-up facility that has not been managed
Threats (T) S-T Analysis W-T Analysis
1. There is no land available that is owned by Bekasi City 1. Continuous follow-up regarding the understanding of "waste is an asset" to the Bekasi City 1. Procure the list of area that
Government. The allocated locations for waste management government. are allocated for waste
are mostly privately-owned. 2. There are two fitted cooperation schemes based on the regulation. To avoid tender, these management purposes and
2. Bekasi City is one of the 12 cities that must develop WtE can be done: available for leasing or
plant according to Presidential Regulation No. 35. 800 tpd of a. Regional Cooperation with Third Parties (KSDPK), however, this cooperation period is purchasing, in order to
waste must be processed at the WtE plant to comply with only 5 years. The cooperation can be extended after an evaluation is done. A workaround prepare for the scale-up
the regulation. could be sought where the agreement is made for a contract duration of 20-25 years with facility
3. Differences in understanding of "waste is an asset". Based on an evaluation after every 5 years instead of a 5 years contract which can be extended
Government Regulation No. 28 of 2018, the procurement of after an evaluation, as per the Mayor’s suggestion. However, it still needs to be
regional assets must be returned in the form of money or confirmed whether this scheme is possible.
goods. b. Public Private Partnership (PPP) generally needs a tender to be proceeded, but IF the
4. An open tender is likely to be carried out due to the high selected technology can be developed ONLY by the offeror and no other competitors,
amount of interested companies in managing Bekasi City's then tender can be avoided.
waste (53 companies), and the long duration of our 3. Construction of a pilot plant to convince the government that the facility will be running and
proposed contract (20-25 years). sustainable, as well as to lessen the probability where we must go through a tender process.
4. Further discussion regarding regulations, whether on “waste is an asset” issue or WtE Plant
development

Stakeholder Analysis
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely
5 1
Support Ambivalent
11 3
4 2 Neutral
Netral Resistant
13 9
14 8 1. Mayor of Bekasi City
12
2. Head of Bekasi City Environmental Agency
6 10
7 3. Jakarta Provincial Government
Power
4. Head of Regional Technical Implementation Unit for
Monitor Keep Informed Cleanliness (UPTD)

(Minimum Effort) 5. Cooperation Department of Bekasi City Regional Secretariat
6. Regional Assistant 1
8. Regional Revenue Department (Bappeda)
9. Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD)
10. Trade and Industry Agency of Bekasi City (Disdagperin)
11. Head of sub-district of Sumur Batu
12. Non-governmental organization
13. Residents of Bekasi City
14. Scavenger
Low Interest High

No Stakeholder Position Details
Important points:
1 Mayor of Bekasi City Support - Manage closely The biggest decision maker in Bekasi City 1. Mayor has the biggest power as a policy
Head of Bekasi City Environmental Develop and stipulate policies/technical guidelines in the maker. Therefore, the mayor’s term of office
2 Support - Manage closely
Agency environmental sector
needs to be considered in the premise if the
3 Jakarta Provincial Government Ambivalent - Manage closely Bekasi local government partners in waste-to-energy development
cooperation is planned for 20-25 years. With
Head of Regional Technical
Carry out operational technical activities based on the Mayor's policy to 5 years term of office, the closest election
4 Implementation Unit for Cleanliness Support - Manage closely
become.
(UPTD) will be held in November 2024.
Head of Cooperation Department of 2. The Bekasi Government does not own land,
5 Neutral - Keep Satisfied Coordinating and controlling the implementation of cooperation
Bekasi City Regional Secretariat
so they suggest renting/buying land around
6 Regional Assistant 1 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare
the landfill area where the list can be
7 Regional Assistant 2 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating economic and development activities and plans.
acquired through the head of sub-district.
Regional Revenue Department
8
(Bappeda)
Neutral - Keep Satisfied Organizing the procurement of infrastructure and supporting facilities 3. Sumur Batu residents own most land around
the Sumur Batu Landfill.
Regional Financial and Asset
9 Neutral - Keep Satisfied Bekasi City financial and asset management
Management Agency (BPKAD) 4. The Jakarta provincial government partnered
Trade and Industry Agency of Bekasi City Formulation of regional government affairs policies in trade and with Sumur Batu Landfill in the pilot project
10 Neutral - Keep Satisfied
(Disdagperin) industry sector
of the WtE Plant.
Facilitating information on the location of land availability around the
11 Head of sub-district of Sumur Batu Neutral - Keep Satisfied
landfill
12 Non-governmental organization Resistant - Keep Satisfied Located around the landfill area.
Located around the landfill area, and the owner of some of the land
13 Residents of Bekasi City Resistant - Keep Satisfied
there.
14 Scavengers Resistant - Keep Satisfied Located around the landfill area and waste collectors in landfill.

Next Step Recommendations
1 2
Pilot Plant Scale-up
Developing pilot plant in
System Preparation
Waste4Change location to show
Preparing for a scale-up system in order to procure more waste in the future.
proof of a running system including:
• Evaluation of the pilot plant
• Clarifying all the permits
• Land procurement, preferably around the landfill area:
needed for the location
o Coordinate with the head of waste division in Bekasi City’s
• Securing the waste that are
Environmental Agency regarding which area is allocated for waste
going to the pilot plant
management.
• Constructing the plant
o Coordinate with sub-district head of Sumur Batu on the available land
• Evaluating the plant for a scale-
• Preparing proposal for a scale-up system to the government based on the
up system to manage 1000 tpd
pilot project evaluation and procured land
of Bekasi City’s waste
• MoU with the government on the scale-up system
• Action plan

2.2
Bantar Gebang
Landfill,
DKI Jakarta
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
30
Summary
Location : RT.002/RW.005, Ciketing Udik, Bantar Gebang,

Bekasi City, West Java 17153
Coordinate : -6.347934376917878, 106.99770232883535
Area : 104,7 ha (a) Bantar Gebang Landfill (b) Bantar Gebang Landfill (c) Google Maps location
Ownership : DKI Jakarta Government
Administrative Land Cooperation with Other Parties Government’s Interest
Administratively, Bantar Gebang DKI Jakarta has about 25 ha of land in BPDLH (Environmental Fund • 100% waste management rate rather than
landfill is located in Bekasi City. It is Rorotan, North Jakarta. 5-6 ha have Management Agency) offers just 35%, with more than 1000 tpd of waste
not advised by DKI Jakarta been used, and there are around 19 ha similar cooperation with a tipping to be managed.
• A more interesting proposal compared to
Environmental Agency to build of land available. Around 5 ha might fee. However, the cooperation of
what BPDLH has to offer
another waste management facility be able to be utilized after a detailed DLH DKI Jakarta and BPDLH is a • The development of the facility should not
for DKI Jakarta near Bantar Gebang study is done. They are planning to do G2G scheme cooperation and be done near Bantar Gebang area
Landfill. It might raise issue in the a Feasibility Study to build a waste therefore it will not go through a • Feasibility Study on the utilization of
future, whether it is on the financial management facility there, where we tender. Rorotan Area
issue or issue on the permits. can collaborate on the study.

SWOT Analysis Strengths (S) Weaknesses (W)
1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems

waste. do not own land in DKI Jakarta.
2. Only 35% of waste can be managed through
2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis
the no-tipping fee scheme. If 100% of waste
technology which is process all plastics is managed, tipping fee will be needed and a
other than PET and PVC. tender process might be required for us to
proceed with the system.
1. Waste generation in DKI Jakarta reaches 7500 tpd. 1. Planning of Material Recovery Facility 1. Further discussion with DKI Jakarta
2. DKI Jakarta has about 25 ha of land in Rorotan, North (MRF) establishment to manage DKI regarding the utilization of Rorotan Area
Jakarta 5-6 ha is already utilized, and the utilization for the Jakarta’s waste. 2. Study on the existing landfill and TPS3R in
rest of the land can be discussed. However, only part of the 2. Waste4Change and Freepoint can DKI Jakarta is needed to see whether it is
land and not all remaining lands can be utilized by collaborate with DKI Jakarta in the desirable to use smaller scale area for MRF
Waste4Change. feasibility study of waste management rather than the bigger one.
3. Landfill and TPS3R around DKI Jakarta can be utilized. facility in Rorotan area, especially
4. DKI Jakarta is planning to do a Feasibility Study to build a regarding the details of cost.
waste management facility in Rorotan, North Jakarta.
1. Administratively, Bantar Gebang Landfill land belongs to 1. Establishment of MRF outside Bantar 1. Further research on the feasibility of
the Bekasi City. It will be complicated in terms of permits Gebang landfill area. Rorotan area and landfill/TPS3R in DKI
and finances if the MRF is built there or on its surroundings. Jakarta.
2. The Environmental Fund Management Agency (BPDLH) 2. Explore what is being proposed by BPDLH
offers similar facility to Waste4Change's offer, but the level to DKI Jakarta, and create a proposal that is
of waste management reaches 100% with a tipping fee, comparably desirable to what BPDLH can
therefore being more desirable compared to offer.
Waste4Change and Freepoint’s offer

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely 13 8

1 Support Ambivalent
4 6 2
10 9 Neutral
Netral Resistant
1. Mayor of Bekasi City

5 2. DKI Jakarta Environmental Agency
3. Regional Berau Cooperation Jakarta Regional Secretariat
3
Power
4. Regional Planning (Bappeda) Jakarta

5. Regional Assistant 2 Jakarta
Monitor Keep Informed
(Minimum Effort) 11 6. Regional Assistant 2 Bekasi
7. Environmental Agency Bekasi
8. Governor DKI Jakarta
9. Regional Planning Bekasi
10. Residents
11. Scavengers
12
12. Other waste management parties
13. Regional Secretary of DKI Jakarta
Low Interest High

Important Points:
1 Bekasi Mayor Neutral - Manage closely Bantar gebang located in Bekasi City Territory. 1. Governor has biggest power and policy maker, but
DKI Jakarta Environmental DKI Jakarta Governor currently is Plt. and his
2 Support - Manage closely Has responsible to waste management in DKI Jakarta.
Agency Agency
power is limited (Consider UU Adm Pemerintahan
Cooperation Department of DKI Has responsibility to manage cooperation DKI Jakarta with the
3 Support - Manage closely and Permendagri).
Jakarta Regional Secretaria other stakeholders.
DKI Jakarta Regional Planning Has responsibility to making development plans for DKI 2. 2024 Political year will affect Jakarta as an
4 Neutral - Manage closely
(Bappeda) Jakarta. indonesia capital (every aspect of DKI Jakarta
5 Regional Assistant 2 DKI Jakarta Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating economic and development activities and plans. leader movement will be captured by the media).
6 Regional Assistant 2 Bekasi City Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating economic and development activities and plans.
3. After Environmental Agency, Regional Secretary of
DKI Jakarta is stakeholders which we should be
Environmental Agency Bekasi
7 Resistant - Manage closely Responsible to waste management in Bekasi City
cITY expected the support.
8 Governor of DKI Jakarta Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of DKI Jakarta. 4. Bekasi mayor has interest because Bantar Gebang
9 Regional Planning Bekasi City Resistant - Manage closely Has responsibility to making development plans for Bekasi City located in his territory.
5. Rorotan resident has serious issue with peace and
Learning from Covid-19 situation in 2021-2022 at Rorotan, their
10 Residents Resistant - Keep informed resident refuse ambulance siren in their area, a feasibility study security in their sub district (ormas; local public
should be carried out.
figures and etc). Feasibility Studies should be done
11 Scavengers Resistant - Minimum effort Has an interest in collecting waste at landfill.
before the cooperation between each parties .
Other waste management
12 Resistant - Keep informed Private company in cooperation with DKI Jakarta
parties
Regional Secretary of DKI Because Governor DKI Jakarta currently is PLT. Regional
Jakarta secretary has important position and power.

1 2 3
Rorotan Land Feasibility Follow-up
Analysis Study Discussion
• Discussion with DKI Jakarta on their Follow up discussion with DKI
• Follow up DKI Jakarta
Environmental Agency’s offer Feasibility Study plan, and where can Jakarta Environmental Agency
on land availability at we collaborate on the plan regarding the cooperation
Rorotan • Creating MoU for the Feasibility scheme and system based on
• Site visit and initial analysis Study the feasibility study to prepare
on Rorotan area • Commencing feasibility study at for the cooperation agreement.
Rorotan area to better understand
the condition of the land and the
composition of the waste that will
come to the area

2.3
Cibeureum
Landfill, Sumedang
Regency
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
36
Summary
Location : Legok Kaler, Kec. Paseh, Kabupaten
Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45381
Coordinate : -6.787742803731193, 107.97432349366429
Area : 11 ha
Ownership : Sumedang Regency Government (a) Cibeureum Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
government
Waste Generation Land Cooperation with Government’s Interest

Other Parties
1. Sumedang Regency's total 1. Cibeureum landfill has 10 ha of land and another 1 ha on 1. The available locations are near the toll road
waste is estimated to be 450 adjacent separate land. A total of 5 ha can be utilized for Sumedang Regency connected to Aerocity Kertajati, Bandung Raya,
tpd but Cibeureum Landfill the MRF, however the ground is old waste pile, which is need to send 20 tpd to Majalengka, Indramayu and Cirebon, and
has only accommodated 200 highly unstable if a facility is about to be built on top of TPPAS Legok Nangka. cooperation with other cities/regencies to get
tpd of waste. it. additional fund from the waste management might
2. Based on feasibility study 2. There is an available land owned by Village Government be considered
done by Ministry of Energy around 2 ha near Cimalaka Toll Gate. Around 200 m2 is 2. Feasibility study to really make the system based
and Mineral Resources in planned for Improvement of Solid Waste Management on the real condition of the waste to ensure the
December 2022, the Program (ISWMP), and the rest can be utilized. sustainability of the facility
composition of organic and 3. The locations are at the outskirts of the regency and far 3. Be mindful with the informal sectors, especially the
inorganic waste is 50:50. from residential area, therefore resistance from the scavengers as they are living at the landfill
public can be avoided. 4. No tipping fee is an interesting offer, but make sure
that the economic feasibility is assured
5. What are the additional benefits for the
government beside the reduction of waste

Site Visit Documentation
Cibeureum Landfill First Recommended Area
Road Access to the Landfill Second Recommended Area

SWOT Analysis 1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste. 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint

Eco-Systems do not own land
2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology
in Sumedang Regency.
which is process all plastics other than PET and 2. 1,2 ha of land is required to
PVC. manage 200 tpd of Sumedang
Regency’s waste while 2,7 ha is
required to manage 450 tpd of
waste.
1. The Regent of Sumedang Regency is eager to have waste management system that 1. There is a potential of 200 tpd of waste that can 1. There are two options of land
can manage the waste from Sumedang Regency and other nearby areas be managed to build Material Recovery
2. Sumedang Regency's total waste is estimated to be 450 tpd but Cibeureum Landfill 2. Due to its close proximity, the facility can be Facility (MRF): (1) on the
has only accommodated 200 tpd of waste. The composition of organic and inorganic used to offer waste management to available 5 ha land of
waste is 50:50. cities/regencies surrounding Sumedang such as Cibeureum Landfill; (2) on 8 ha
3. Cibeureum landfill has 10 ha and 1 ha of adjacent separate land. Only 5 ha out of a Aerocity Kertajati, Bandung Raya, Indramayu, land owned by the Village
total of 11 ha of land have been utilized. Cirebon and Majalengka. Government.
4. There is an available land owned by Village Government around 2 ha near Cimalaka 3. An option to also do waste collection can be 2. Further dialogue and
Toll Gate. Around 200 m2 is planned for Improvement of Solid Waste Management considered to maximize the amount of waste. feasibility study to discuss the
Program (ISWMP), and the rest can be utilized. land utilization is needed
5. Sumedang Regency is near the toll road connected to Aerocity Kertajati, Bandung
Raya, Majalengka, Indramayu and Cirebon and the transportation routes on the
outskirts of town, near industrial areas and far from residential areas.
Sumedang Regency need to send 20-22 tpd to TPPAS Legok Nangka which will start 1. After TPPAS Legok Nangka operates, Establishment of MRF on the
operation in 2026. Waste4Change only can manage 178 tpd of Sumedang Regency land assets.
waste. Waste4Change can compete with TPPAS
Legok Nangka in the future by charging a
slightly cheaper tipping fee.
2. Material Recovery Facility – Cibeureum Landfill
distance should be closer than TPA Cibeureum
– TPPAS Legok Nangka.

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely Support Ambivalent
8
1
Neutral
Netral Resistant
9 2 4
10 6
1. Head of Sumedang Regency
5
2. Sumedang Regency Environmental Agency
3. Cooperation Department of Sumedang Regional Secretariat
3 4. Regional Planning Agency (Bappeda) Sumedang Regency
Power
5. Regional Assistant 1 Sumedang

(Minimum Effort) 6. Regional Assistant 2 Sumedang
7. Environmental Agency West Java
12
8. Governor West Java
11 9. Regional Planning West Java

10. Residents
11. Scavengers and Trash Banks
Low Interest High

Important Points:
1 Head of Sumedang Regency Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of Sumedang Regency
1. Regent has the biggest power as a
Has responsible to waste management in Sumedang
2 Sumedang regency Environmental Agency Agency Support - Manage closely policy maker. Therefore, the regent’s
Regency
Cooperation Department of Sumedang regency Has responsibility to manage cooperation term of office needs to be
Regional Secretariat Sumedang regency with other stakeholder
considered in the premise if the
Has responsibility to making development plans for
4 Sumedang regency Regional Planning (Bappeda) Neutral - Manage closely cooperation is planned for 20-25
Sumedang Regency
5 Regional Assistant 1 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare years. With 5 years term of office,
6 Regional Assistant 2 Neutral - Manage closely

Coordinating economic and development activities and the closest election will be held in
plans
November 2024.
Has responsible to waste management in West Java
7 West Java Environmental Agency Agency Neutral - Manage closely
Province 2. After Environmental Agency,
8 Governor West Java Neutral - Manage closely

Has big power to influence city and regency at West Regional Secretary of Garut,
Java.
Sumedang Regional Planning and
Has responsibility to making development plans for West
9 West Java Regional Planning (Bappeda Neutral - Manage closely
Java Head of Sumedang regency is
10 Residents Resistant - Keep informed If there’s any resident around Landfill stakeholders which we should be
11 Scavengers and Trash Banks Resistant - Minimum effort Has an interest in collecting waste at landfill and other expected the support.
If there’s any private sector cooperation in waste 3. Sumedang has potential as an
12 Other waste management parties Resistant - Keep informed
management in Sumedang Regency
industrial area in the future that
Because head of Sumedang regency is PLT, Regional
13 Regional Secretary of Sumedang Neutral - Manage closely
secretary has important position and power requires waste management.

1 2 3
Follow-up Feasibility Decision
Meeting Study Making
Create decisions based on
Since a visitation to Cibeureum Feasibility Study is needed to understand
the result of the Feasibility
Landfill was already done, a the details on the condition of the
Study, whether it is desirable
follow-up meeting on deciding the available land and the waste. The result of
to continue with the
next steps need to be arranged. the study will then be used to create a
development of the MRF or
The meeting should discuss the more comprehensive proposal that
not.
plan for Feasibility Study of the includes the financial and technological
available areas, to understand and details, as well as the cooperation scheme
create a more solid data basis. between the parties.

2.4
Galuga Landfill,
Bogor City
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
• Recommendations
43
Summary
Location : Galuga, Cibungbulang, Bogor Regency, West
Java 16630
Coordinate : -6.565649918330708, 106.64328397301212
Waste Generation : 500 – 650 tpd
Area : 36 ha
Ownership : Bogor City Government (a) Galuga Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
government
Waste Generation Land Cooperation with Other Parties Government’s Interest
1. As much as 500 - 650 tpd of There are two recommended areas Bogor City has received 361 proposals, 1. 100% waste management rate
waste goes to Galuga landfill to be utilized in Bogor City: but only some company seems serious. 2. No burden to the regional budget
without segregation process, 1. 2400 m2 land next to the landfill. 1. PlusTik process 5 tpd of low- 3. Feasibility Study to capture the real
16% of it is plastic waste. It used to be a football field and value plastic into paving block. condition of the waste and a
2. Waste generation in Galuga located right next to the main 2. Plastic Energy proposed to developing a system that is suitable for
landfill also has a high-water road. Good accessibility since it process 100 tpd of single-plastic the waste
content. is on the main road. into diesel by pyrolysis process. 4. Proposal of a system that is fixed and
2. 10 ha land inside of the landfill They have signed the MoU, but can be assured to be running, since
area. Good accessibility, and less the proposal is still being there are hundreds of proposals coming
issue due to the operation might prepared. to the City but currently only one of the
arise in the future since it is proposer proceed with the plan
already inside of the landfill.

Site Visit Documentation
Galuga Landfill First Recommended Area
Road Access to the Landfill Second Recommended Area

SWOT Analysis 1.
2.
Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste.
The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology
1. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-
Systems do not own land in Bogor City.
2. 3,6 ha of land is required to manage
which is process all plastics other than PET and
600 tpd of Bogor City’s waste.
PVC.
1. The amount of waste that goes to the Galuga landfill is 500 - 650 1. The absence of a waste sorting process at the Feasibility study to see whether the MRF is
tpd. With around 50 tpd managed by PlusTik, around 600 tpd are Galuga landfill can be overcome by the possible to be built on Galuga Landfill’s
able to be utilized. establishment of Material Recovery Facility to available land with consideration of:
2. Currently there are no waste sorting process happening at the manage 600 tpd of waste. • The amount of waste to be managed
landfill. 2. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-System can • Possibility of landfill mining
3. Landfill mining is possible to be done if it is desired consider landfill mining for old waste. • Preparedness of the location and the
4. The Government of Bogor City have two available lands: possibility of social resistance based on it
• 2400 m2 land next to the landfill. It used to be a football field
and located right next to the main road. Good accessibility
since it is on the main road.
• 10 ha land inside of the landfill area. Good accessibility, and
less issue due to the operation might arise in the future since it
is already inside of the landfill.
1. The characteristics of the waste in the Galuga Landfill have a 1. Planning of Material Recovery Facility (MRF) 1. Feasibility study on the characteristic of
high-water content. establishment to manage 600 tpd of waste. the waste, whether the condition of the
2. Cooperation of Bogor City with PlusTik, where they are managing 2. A feasibility study is needed to ensure the waste fits our need or not
around 50 tpd of mixed waste to gain 5 tpd of low-value plastic characteristic of the waste match Waste4Change
and process it into paving block. and Freepoint Eco-Systems’ needs.
3. There was a discussion between Bogor City with Plastic Energy to 3. Planning a system that is inclusive to the
process 100 tpd of single-plastic into diesel, however it is not informal sectors, e.g., scavengers
clear whether Plastic Energy will proceed with the proposal or
not due to the unfavorable condition of the waste to them.
4. There are around 600 scavengers depending on Galuga Landfill as
their livelihood

Stakeholder Matrix
8 3 1
Support Ambivalent
6 4 2
Neutral
Netral Resistant
5
1. Mayor of Bogor City

2. Bogor City Environmental Agency
3. Head of Public Works and Spatial
Planning Office
Power
4. Regional Secretariat of Bogor City

Monitor Keep Informed 5. The Regional Cooperation Coordination
(Minimum Effort) Team
7 7. Other waste management parties
8. Scavengers
Low Interest High


Important Points:
1 Mayor of Bogor City Support - Manage closely The biggest decision maker in Bogor City
• Scavengers have a significant
Bogor City Environmental Develop and stipulate policies/technical
2 Neutral - Manage closely influence on waste management
Agency guidelines in the environmental sector
at the Galuga landfill, Bogor City.
Head of Public Works and has responsibility to making development
Spatial Planning Office plans for Bogor Regency
Regional Secretariat of Bogor Assist the Mayor in formulating policies and

City coordinating administration.
The Regional Cooperation Coordinating and controlling the

Coordination Team implementation of cooperation
Non-governmental
6 Resistant - Keep satisfied Located around the landfill area and
organization
The Regional Government of Bogor City has

Other waste management
7 Ambivalent – Monitor collaborated with companies, i.e., Plastic
parties
Energy, to process 100 tons of waste per day.
Located around the landfill area and waste

8 Scavengers Resistant - Keep satisfied
collectors in landfill

1 2 3
Follow-up Feasibility Decision
Meeting Study Making
Create decisions based on
Since a visitation to Galuga Landfill Feasibility Study is needed to understand
the result of the Feasibility
was already done, a follow-up the details on the condition of the
Study, whether it is desirable
meeting on deciding the next steps available land and the waste. The result of
to continue with the
need to be arranged. The meeting the study will then be used to create a
development of the MRF or
should discuss the plan for more comprehensive proposal that
not.
Feasibility Study of the available includes the financial and technological
areas, to understand and create a details, as well as the cooperation scheme
more solid data basis. between the parties.

2.5
Cilowong Landfill,
Serang City
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
50
Summary
Location : Jalan Raya, Cilowong, Taktakan, Serang City,
Banten 42162
Coordinate : -6.1385603833283815, 106.08612676041795
Area : 18,5 ha
(a) Cilowong Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
Ownership : Serang City Government government
Land Government’s Interest
1. There are two land options that can be utilized in Cilowong Landfill, 1. Serang city is open with the cooperation offered as there is available land
Serang City: and waste to be utilized
• 1 ha of land right next to the current waste pile in the landfill. The 2. They will have difficulty if this collaboration requires government budget.
ground is old waste pile that can be unstable if a facility is built on 3. Three hangars are already established in the landfill, which the utilization
top of it. In addition, it has an uneven contour that need to be can be discussed
leveled 4. As an existing technology is present in the landfill, the adjustment of our
• 3000 m2 of land. There is a leachate tank at the location which system to include the technology is preferred. It is to also reach 100% waste
needs to be moved if the land is going to be utilized. Additionally, management rate.
the road leading to the location is still under construction 5. There is a possibility to manage waste from nearby cities/regencies such as
2. Another 2 ha of land is in the process of clearing. While it can be Serang Regency and South Tangerang City
utilized as well, it might take a long time to actually be able to use it. 6. All points of cooperation must be explained in detail before the exposure
to the Mayor of Serang City

Site Visit Documentation – The Landfill
Cilowong Landfill Available Land
Option 1
Available area of 1 ha to be used, however:
1. The base of the land is waste pile, and
therefore the ground is not stable
2. The contour is uneven
Option 2
Available area of 3000 m² to be used, however:
1. There is a leachate tank at the location
and it needs to be moved if the land is
going to be utilized
2. The road leading to the location is still
under construction

Site Visit Documentation – Existing Technology
Facility
● Waste processing facility in 3 hangars, 1 for the waste processing, 1 for
parking area, and 1 for storage
● Total area of hangars is around 3000 m²
Technology
● Technology was provided by PT Indopower Internasional (IPI), with Advance
Waste Conversion System (AWS) technology
● The current technology can process 100 tpd of waste
AWS technology ● Combination of conveyor belt and 4 incinerators for fresh waste
● Combination of conveyor belt and trommel screen for landfill mining
Operationals
● 37 six-wheeled dump truck
● 60 units of waste container
● 13 operators
Inventory
● 4 heavy machinery (excavator)
● 2 weighbridge
Incinerator Trommel screen for landfill mining

SWOT Analysis 1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste.

2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis
1. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems do
not own land in Serang City.
technology which is process all plastics other 2. 2,2 - 2,4 ha of land is required to manage
than PET and PVC. 370 - 400 tpd of Serang City’s waste.
3. A tipping fee is not required if only 35% of the
waste entering the MRF is managed.
1. Serang City waste that goes into Cilowong landfill reaches 370-400 tpd. 1. Material Recovery Facility (MRF) establishment 1. Material Recovery Facility (MRF) can be built
2. There are 1 ha and 3000 m2 of available land that can be used in to manage 370 - 400 tpd of waste. on Cilowong landfill’s available land to
Cilowong Landfill. 2. Combining Waste4Change and Cilowong manage new waste or other land owned by
3. There is 2 ha of land which is in the process of being cleared and Landfill’s technology based on the site plan to Serang city government.
acquired by the City of Serang Environmental Agency. make a streamlined system that can manage 2. Considering the more readily available land,
4. Landfill mining can be added as an option. more than 35% of waste input. 1,3 ha can be used to manage around 200 tpd.
5. There is high possibility that Serang City will cooperate with 3. The adjustment of our system to be combined
Waste4Change if it does not use the Regional Revenue and Expenditure with the AWS technology might be needed
Budget (APBD). 4. A more detailed planning of the system that
6. Advanced Waste Conversion System (AWS) technology is already will not use regional budget
available in the landfill to manage maximum 100 tpd of waste.
7. The site plan of the landfill can be given to be analyzed.
1. The base of the 1 ha of land in the landfill is old waste pile, therefore it 1. Analysis on the condition of the ground is 1. If more waste need to be managed, a search
is highly unstable with uneven contours. needed to see whether it is possible to build a for another available land might be needed
2. The 3000 m2 of land in the landfill is located at where the leachate tank facility on top of the land with old waste
is, and the relocation of the tank must be done before proceeding with 2. The financial calculation of leachate tank
the land. In addition, the road leading to the area is still under relocation must be considered when doing the
construction. planning
3. There is Negative Impact Compensation (Kompensasi Dampak Negatif 3. It needs to be discussed to whom the KDN will
(KDN)) of Rp. 17.500/ton waste to the surrounding neighborhood. be imposed to if we are going to manage the
waste in the landfill

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely 1 8
Support Ambivalent
4
10 7 Neutral
Netral Resistant
12
2 9
6 1. Mayor of Serang City
5
2. Serang City Environmental Agency
3 3. Cooperation Department of Serang City Regional Secretariat
Power
4. Regional Planning (Bappeda)

(Minimum Effort) 5. Regional Assistant 1
7. Environmental Agency Banten
8. Governor Banten
9. Regional Planning Banten
11 10. Residents
11. Scavengers
12. Regional Secretary of Serang City
Low Interest High

Important Points:
1 Mayor of Serang City Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of Serang City
1. Mayor has biggest power and policy
Serang City Environmental Agency
2
Agency
Support - Manage closely Has responsible to waste management in Serang City. maker, but with cooperation plan for 20+
3
Cooperation Department of Serang City
Support - Manage closely
Has responsibility to manage cooperation south years, we should consider if mayor
Regional Secretariat tangerang with other stakeholder.
position is just only for 5 years (by the end
Has responsibility to making development plans for
4 Serang city Regional Planning (Bappeda) Neutral - Manage closely
Serang City. of 2023, the length of mayor service will
5 Regional Assistant 1 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare.
finished).
Coordinating economic and development activities
and plans. 2. After Environmental Agency, Regional
7
Environmental Agency Banten
Neutral - Manage closely
Interest in Waste Management Issue in Province of Secretary of Serang city is stakeholders
Banten
Governor Banten Biggest political power in the province of Banten

which we should be expected the
support.
Regional Planning Banten Holding Banten regional planning in waste
management 3. Banten is synonymous with strong family
10 Residents Resistant - Keep informed If any resident near the landfill politics at the regional leadership level.
11 Scavengers Resistant - Minimum effort Has an interest in collecting waste at landfill.
Because Serang City mayor finished his service by the

12 Regional Secretary of South Tangerang Neutral - Manage closely end of 2023. Regional secretary has important position
and power.

1 2 3 4
High-Level Task Feasibility Development of
Meeting Force Study Detailed Proposal
Planning an official If there is a positive sign Feasibility Study of the Further detailing of the proposal to
meeting with the Mayor from Serang City’s waste and landfill for the Serang City, regarding:
and Regional Secretary of decision maker, creating MRF’s development. It is • Financial details and calculation
Serang City as the highest a group or task force needed to understand the • Technological details, e.g., what
decision maker in the city. consisting of real-life condition of the technology will be used, how is
This meeting will result in Waste4Change, waste and the land, and to the waste flow in the system, etc.
whether the further Freepoint, and Serang do in-depth analysis • Type of cooperation scheme that
development of the system City Government is whether that condition will is proposed to the city
will be supported by recommended to ease be suitable for the
Serang City or not. the communication sustainability of the system
process, or not.

2.6
Pasir Bajing Landfill,

Garut Regency
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
58
Summary
Location : Kp Pasir Bajing, Sukaraja, Kec. Banyuresmi,
Kabupaten Garut, Jawa Barat 44191
Coordinate : -7.144160475385231, 107.88773107301212
Waste Generation : 220 - 250 tpd
Area : 19 ha
Ownership : Garut Regency Government (a) Pasir Bajing Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
government
Waste Generation Land Waste Management Government’s Interest
Garut Regency’s total waste 1. 70% from total 19 ha Pasir Bajing 1. 50 waste banks (only 25 of it are active) and 1. Garut Regency is open for this cooperation.
generation is 1100 tpd, with 220 - landfill already used (13,3 ha). Waste focused on selling sorted waste material. Central However, the government is pessimistic if it
250 tpd being sent to Pasir depth in Pasir Bajing Landfill is around waste bank will be built in collaboration with the needs the regional budget.
Bajing Landfill. Garut Regency 10 m. 2. The government suggested that the facility be
Barito foundation at the landfill due to the need
has limited number of fleet and 2. Private land area of 2 ha belonging to built for the management of the South Garut
its old condition. The existing 40 the Secretary of the Environmental for a unit waste bank. area which still has a low level of waste
trucks are only able to serve 13 Agency which is close to the landfill. 2. Garut Regency will send around 120-140 tpd of service
(downtown) of the 42 sub- 3. Garut Regency Environmental Agency waste to TPPAS Legok Nangka which will operate 3. Other cooperation besides waste processing
districts. has acquired 7 ha of land in Cibalong, in 2026 (a tipping fee of around 14 billion per are desired, e.g., cooperation on waste
South Garut for the construction of a year). management education for the people,
TPST with a capacity of 200 tpd. 3. Cooperation with Green Techno is currently cooperation on rejuvenation of the waste
ongoing; however, they ask for retribution fee management fleet, possibility for landfill
from the community, and it takes a long time for mining, and efforts on waste reduction
the request to get approved by the Government.

SWOT Analysis
1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste. 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint

2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology Eco-Systems do not own land
in Garut Regency.
2. 6000 m2 of land is required to
PVC. manage 100 tpd of Pasir Bajing
3. A tipping fee is not required if only 35% of the landfill’s waste
1. Garut Regency’s total waste generation is 1100 tpd, with 220 - 250 tpd 1. Analysis on the development of a MRF with 1. The Material Recovery Facility
being sent to Pasir Bajing Landfill capacity to manage 100 tpd of waste (MRF) can be analyzed to be
2. After TPPAS Legok Nangka operates, Waste4Change can manage 2. An option to also do waste collection can be built in between the options in
around 100 tpd of waste. considered to maximize the amount of waste. the privately owned 2 ha areas
3. Private land area of 2 ha belonging to the Secretary of the 2. Explore whether the acquired
Environmental Agency which is close to landfill. land for TPST on South Garut
4. The Garut Regency Environmental Agency has acquired 7 ha of land in can be cooperated with us or
South Garut for the construction of a TPST with a capacity of 200 tpd not
1. Limited number of fleet and its old condition. The existing 40 trucks are 1. Additional cooperation on waste collection can Material Recovery Facility – TPA
only able to serve 13 of the 42 sub-districts. be considered, whether it is by cooperating the Pasir Bajing distance should be
2. 50 waste banks (only 25 of it are active) and a central waste bank will whole waste collection system itself or by closer than TPA Pasir Bajing – TPPAS
be built in collaboration with the Barito foundation at the landfill. cooperating the rejuvenation of the fleets Legok Nangka to create vantage
3. Garut Regency will send around 120-140 tpd of waste to TPPAS Legok 2. Analyze the impact of the waste banks in the point of our scheme.
landfill, whether they will affect our business
Nangka which will operate in 2026 (a tipping fee of around 14 billion
negatively or become our offtaker instead.
per year). 3. Close monitoring to Green Techno’s cooperation,
4. Green Techno is ongoing cooperation with the government and asks for whether they succeed in gaining retribution fee or
retribution from the community. not. It is to analyze the possibility of gaining
retribution fee in our scheme as well.

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely 7 Support Ambivalent

8 1
Neutral
Netral Resistant
6 4
2
10
5 1. Regent of Garut Regency
9
2. Garut Regency Environmental Agency
3. Cooperation Department of Garut Regional
Secretariat
3 4. Regional Planning Agency (Bappeda) Garut
Power
Regency
Monitor Keep Informed 5. Regional Assistant 1 Garut
(Minimum Effort) 6. Regional Assistant 2 Garut
12 8. Governor West Java
9. Regional Planning West Java
10. Residents
11. Scavenger and Trash bank
11 12. Other waste management parties
Low Interest High

No Stakeholder Position Details Important Points:
1. Regent has biggest power and policy maker, but
1 Head of Garut Regency Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of Garut Regency.
with cooperation plan for 20+ years, we should
Garut regency Environmental
2 Support - Manage closely Has responsible to waste management in Garut Regency. consider if mayor position is just only for 5 years
Agency Agency
(by the end of 2024, the length of mayor service
Cooperation Department of
Has responsibility to manage cooperation Garut regency with will finished).
3 Garut regency Regional Support - Manage closely
other stakeholder.
Secretary 2. 70% Pasir Bajing Landfill has occupied. There’s
Garut regency Regional Has responsibility to making development plans for Garut land availability near the landfill but owned by
Planning (Bappeda) Regency.
Secretary Environmental Agency.
5 Regional Assistant 1 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare 3. Garut regency included in Provincial West Java
6 Regional Assistant 2 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating economic and development activities and plans Project Legok Nangka (Estimate operated in
Environmental Agency West 2026).
7 Resistant -Manage Closely Has Legok Nangka Project
Java 4. After Environmental Agency, Regional Secretary
8 Governor West Java Netral - Manage Closely Has big power to influence city and regency at West Java. of Garut, Secretary Environmental Agency and
West Java Regional Planning Has responsibility to making development plans for West Head of garut regency is stakeholders which we
(Bappeda Java should be expected the support.
10 Residents Resistant - Keep informed if there’s any resident around landfill 5. There were also additional stakeholder (DPRD)
Resistant - minimum if the project has recruitment to use APBD.
11 Scavenger and Trash bank Has an interest in collecting waste at landfill and other.
effort
Other waste management If there’s any private sector cooperation in waste

12 Resistant - Keep Informed
parties management in Garut Regency

1 2 3
Follow-up Meeting Responses More Detailed
Create responses based on
Proposal
• Follow-up to the Environmental
the follow-up meeting,
Agency regarding our intention to If the cooperation is decided to be
whether the cooperation is
further proceed with the cooperation proceeded further, a more
decided to be proceeded or
• Ask what are the requirements needed detailed proposal based on the
not and what are needed to
to meet with the regent follow-up meeting, visitation, and
proceed with the
• Set up follow-up meeting between the responses might be needed
cooperation, whether it is
with the Regent at their office,
feasibility study, or other
facilitated by the Environmental
methods.
Agency
• Visitation to the Landfill to further
understand the condition of their
landfill

2.7
Cimenteng Landfill,
Sukabumi Regency
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
• Recommendations
64
Summary
Location : Curugkembar District, Sukabumi Regency,
West Java
Area : 7,5
Ownership : Sukabumi Regency Government
(a) Cimenteng Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
government
Sukabumi Regency's total 1. Around 2 ha of land is 1. Signed an MoU with PT Sement Jawa • Sukabumi Environmental Agency offered to build a sorting facility in
waste is estimated to be available in Kadaleman (SCG) to supply 333 tpd of mixed waste the Kadaleman Surade Landfill, Jampang Kulon area, which is still
Surade Landfill, with an area of 5000 m2 at Cimenteng within the Geopark area, with 50 tpd of waste that goes to the landfill.
1045,82 tpd, but only 200 tpd
Jampang Kulon area,
of it went to Cimenteng that is inside of the
Landfill in 2023. The waste will be • They have limited Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) ,
Landfill and 50 tpd went to Geopark. processed into co-firing. and the lack of number of waste collection vehicles. In addition, The
Kadaleman Surade Landfill. 2. Sukabumi Regency also 2. Cooperation between Sukabumi contours of Sukabumi Regency are quite complicated for
The waste composition are has land assets in the Regency with the Ministry of transportation because there are mountains and seas which further
33,2% organic waste; 15,6% Legok Nyenang area. Environment and Forestry in maggot reduce the coverage of serviced area,
plastic waste; 2,8% residues cultivation to reduce waste. • Currently, there is lack of awareness on the people in regard to waste
and <2% others. management. An education might be needed to ease the cooperation
process.
• Additional cooperation to further cover the areas that have not been
serviced yet is desired, it can start from the education of the people to
promote waste reduction, to cooperation in waste collection

SWOT Analysis 1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste. 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-
Systems do not own land in
2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology which is
Sukabumi Regency.
process all plastics other than PET and PVC. 2. 3000 m2 of land is required to
3. A tipping fee is not required if only 35% of the waste manage 50 tpd of the waste that
entering the MRF is managed. goes to Kadaleman Surade Landfill
1. Sukabumi Regency total waste is estimated to be 1045,82 tpd; 200 tpd of 1. There is a potential of 50 tpd of waste in Cimenteng 1. Procuring list of assets in
it went to Cimenteng Landfill and 50 tpd went to Kadaleman Surade landfill that can be utilized, with an available land of Sukabumi Regency to see the
Landfill. around 2 ha. 2 ha of land can be used to manage around actual available land.
2. From the total waste, the composition of organic waste is 33,2% while 300 tpd of waste. Therefore, it is advised to look for a way 2. Analysis and coordination with
plastic waste is 15,6%. to gain more waste, in order maximize the capacity of the the Government on whether it is
3. Around 2 ha of land is available in Kadaleman Surade Landfill, Jampang land. possible to take over the
Kulon area, that is inside of the Geopark. It is recommended by the Regional Landfill in Cikidang
government to build the MRF in this area Area since it is still in an early
4. Sukabumi Regency has land assets in the Cikidang area, and the plan is to stage
set it aside to become a Regional Landfill. However, the infrastructure is
not yet supported because it is still in the form of a garden, and the road
still needs to be built.
1. Limited number of truck. The existing 52 trucks are only able to serve 36 1. Additional cooperation can be considered rather than just A detailed analysis and study, which
out of the 47 sub-districts, where the truck then goes to Cimenteng a waste processing cooperation: can be done through feasibility study,
Landfill • Cooperation on waste collection on the current variables in Sukabumi
2. The contour of Sukabumi Regency is quite complicated for transportation • Cooperation on waste management education to the Regency, and whether we can work
because there are mountains and seas. citizen of Sukabumi Regency around the variables to develop a
3. Cimenteng Landfill has signed an MoU with PT Sement Jawa (SCG) to • Cooperation on the rejuvenation of the fleets sustainable business.
supply 333 tpd of mixed waste that will be processed into co-firing. 2. Analysis on the Landfill at Legok Nyenang area, what
4. Sukabumi Regency also has land assets in Kadaleman, Legok Nyenang causes the landfill to be closed by the public and whether
area, Guruh Mountain, that used to be a landfill. However, it was closed we can work around the issue
by the public.

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely 1
5
Support Ambivalent
2
6
7 Neutral
Netral Resistant
3
9 8 4
10
1. Regent of Sukabumi
2. Head of Sukabumi Regency Environmental Agency
Power

Monitor Keep Informed Cleanliness (UPTD)
(Minimum Effort) 4. Cooperation Department of Bekasi City Regional
Secretariat
5. Office of Industry and Energy and Mineral Resources
6. Regional Secretary of Sukabumi Regency
7. Residents of Sukabumi Regency
9. Scavengers
Low Interest High

Important Points:
The biggest power and policy maker of Sukabumi
1 Regent of Sukabumi Support - Manage Closely
Regency
1. Regent has the biggest power as a
Develop and stipulate policies/technical guidelines in policy maker. Therefore, the regent’s
2 Head of Sukabumi Regency Environmental Agency Support - Manage Closely
the environmental sector
term of office needs to be considered
Head of Regional Technical Implementation Unit for Carry out operational technical activities based on the
3
Cleanliness (UPTD)
Support - Manage Closely
Mayor's policy to become. in the premise if the cooperation is
Cooperation Department of Sukabumi Regency Coordinating and controlling the implementation of planned for 20-25 years. With 5 years
4 Neutral - Manage Closely
Regional Secretariat cooperation
term of office, the closest election
Technical policies regarding industries, energy and
5 Office of Industry and Energy and Mineral Resources Neutral - Manage Closely
mineral resources. will be held in November 2024.
Neutral - Manage Closely Establishment of local government administration 2. Capital Expenditure (Capex) and
6 Regional Secretary of Sukabumi Regency
policies
Operating Expenditure (Opex) owned
7 Residents of Sukabumi Regency Resistant - Keep Satisfied Located around the landfill area
by Sukabumi Regency, are limited to
8 Non-governmental organization Resistant - Keep Satisfied Located around the landfill area
a portion of the Regional Revenue
Located around the landfill area and waste collectors in
9 Scavengers Resistant - Keep Satisfied
landfill and Expenditure Budget.
• PT Semen Jawa (SCG) will process 333 tpd of mixed 3. Sukabumi is constrained in terms of
Resistant - Keep Satisfied waste into co-firing.
10 Other waste management parties
• A pilot project with MASARO processes 40 tpd of transportation fleet and topography.
waste into fertilizer at the Cibadak Market.

1 2 3
Follow-up Meeting Responses More Detailed
Create responses based on
Proposal
• Follow-up or coordination to Mr. Deni
Alam as Head of Waste Management If the cooperation is decided to be
in Sukabumi Regency’s Environmental proceeded further, a more
Agency regarding our intention to detailed proposal based on the
not, and what are needed to
further proceed with the cooperation follow-up meeting, visitation, and
proceed with the
• Procuring government land asset’s list. the responses might be needed to
cooperation, whether it is
• Visitation to the Landfill to further then plan a meeting with the
feasibility study, or other
understand the condition of their higher-level decision makers.
methods.
landfill

2.8
Piyungan Regional
Landfill,
Yogyakarta Special Region
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
• Recommendations
70
Summary
Location : Ngablak, Sitimulyo, Kec. Piyungan, Kabupaten
Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55792
Coordinate : -7.868054430808177, 110.43105594067275
Area : 12,5 ha
Ownership : Yogyakarta Special Region (DIY) Government (a) Piyungan Regional (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
Landfill government
Land Cooperation with Other Parties Government’s Interest
It is hard to find enough The TPAS Regional Piyungan’s 1. Daerah istimewa Yogyakarta Government is open for the collaboration but they need
land to build one big facility Public Private Partnership (PPP) time to explore more. A WhatsApp Group has been created as a media to discuss
that can manage 600 - 900 market sounding has been carried between Waste4Change, Freepoint, and the government.
2. Alternative solution for waste reduction in each regencies is urgently needed
tpd of waste. It will be out on February 15th, 2023.
although a PPP for a regional landfill will commence. They suggest to build several
possible if the facility is MRFs in several areas if there is not enough land to build one large MRF.
divided into a smaller scale 3. Feasibility study of the system in DIY is needed before the cooperation can go further
for each regencies, further 4. A detailed proposal with financial and technical details is also needed before the
lessening the burden than cooperation discussion can proceed further
just in one area. 5. A 100% waste management rate is preferred instead of just 35%

SWOT Analysis Strengths (S) Weaknesses (W)
1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste. 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-

2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology Systems do not own land in DIY
Yogyakarta.
2. 3,6 - 5,4 ha of land is required to
PVC. manage 600 - 900 tpd of DIY’s waste
1. 600 - 900 tpd of waste available from several cities in 1. Planning Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Purchase or lease enough land in a strategic
the DIY. establishment to manage 600 - 900 tpd of waste. location that is affordable from
2. DIY government hopes that Waste4Change and 2. Develop an analysis of what are required to be cities/regencies in Yogyakarta Special
Freepoint Eco-Systems can process 100% of their waste. able to have 100% waste management rate Region to build Material Recovery Facilities
3. Alternative solution for waste reduction in each (MRF).
regencies is urgently needed although a Public-Private
Partnership (PPP) for a regional landfill will commence
1. It is difficult to find sufficient land to manage 600-900 1. It is needed to be considered whether it is better Building several smaller scale MRFs in
tpd of waste. for Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems to several areas instead of a big one in one
2. The DIY government does not yet understand and still in participate in the PPP for Piyungan Regional location
research process of which technologies are most Landfill or work separately by creating smaller
suitable for their waste problems. scale MRFs
3. PPP process to manage Piyungan Regional Landfill will
be carried out, opening up for auction in 2023. The
market sounding was done on February 15th, 2023.

Stakeholder Matrix
2 1
Support Ambivalent
7 4 Neutral
Netral Resistant
3
9
8 6
5 1. Governor of the Special Region of Yogyakarta
2. Head of Yogyakarta Special Region Environmental
Agency
Power
3. Regional Secretary of the Special Region of Yogyakarta

(Minimum Effort) 4. Head of Regional Technical Implementation Unit for
Cleanliness (UPTD)
5. Special Region of Yogyakarta Public-Private Partnership
Work Unit
6. Department of Public Works, Housing and Energy and
Mineral Resources of the Special Region of Yogyakarta
7. Residents of Special Region of Yogyakarta City
9. Scavenger
Low Interest High

Important points:
The biggest decision maker in Special
1 Governor of the Special Region of Yogyakarta Support - Manage closely
Region of Yogyakarta.
1. Governor has biggest power
Develop and stipulate

and policy maker, but with
2 Head of Yogyakarta City Environmental Agency Support - Manage closely policies/technical guidelines in the
cooperation plan for 20+
environmental sector.
Carry out operational technical

years, Waste4Change and
Head of Regional Technical Implementation Unit for
3 Neutral - Manage closely activities based on the Mayor's policy
Cleanliness (UPTD) Freepoint should consider if
to become.
Regional Secretary of the Special Region of Establishment of local government

governor position is just only
Yogyakarta administration policies for 5 years.
The service provider unit collaborates
Special Region of Yogyakarta Public-Private
5 Neutral - Manage closely with the Special Region of Yogyakarta
Partnership Work Unit
government and the private sector.
Arrange technical policies regarding

Department of Public Works, Housing and Energy
public works, housing, residential
6 and Mineral Resources of the Special Region of Neutral - Manage closely
areas, and energy and mineral
Yogyakarta
resources.
7 Residents of Special Region of Yogyakarta City Resistant - Keep satisfied Located around the landfill area.
8 Non-governmental organization Resistant - Keep satisfied Located around the landfill area and
Located around the landfill area and

waste collectors in landfill

1 2
Review of the Follow-up
Best Scheme Discussion
Review whether it is better to pursue waste management in DIY through the PPP If it is decided that pursuing smaller
or each regencies separately. scale facilities in each regencies is
• The PPP have an advantage where the amount of tipping fee and waste will be better, a follow-up discussion with
secured to be received by the winner of the tender in a definitive number. the Government can be arranged.
However, the PPP process might take a long time until the operation of the Before going commencing the
system can start, where it is predicted to start in 2026/2027. discussion, detailed proposal
• Pursuing each regencies, facilitated by the DIY Regional Government, by regarding the financial scheme,
building smaller-scale facilities is sought after by the regencies itself, as they
technological details, and
need an immediate solution to their waste problem. There is an advantage
cooperation scheme should be
where the development can start much earlier compared to PPP, however it is
prepared beforehand.
not certain whether we can get tipping fee nor use any regional budget.

2.9
Galuga Landfill,
Bogor Regency
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
76
Summary
Location : Galuga, Cibungbulang, Bogor Regency, West
Java 16630
Coordinate : -6.565649918330708, 106.64328397301212
Area : 3,8 ha
Ownership : Bogor Regency Government (a) Galuga Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
government
Waste Generation Existing Waste Condition Waste Regulation Government’s Interest
1. There are 971,75 tpd of waste in Bogor Regency is trying to divide There is no land • The government has interest in this cooperation. The
total in Bogor Regency, and 900 their waste management process into available in Galuga Head of Waste Division suggested that the facility can be
tpd are collected to the landfill. several zones. It is so that the waste Landfill but privately built in new areas (not in landfill area).
• Without MoU, they are open to any options of waste
2. Bogor Regency is obliged to send collection is not centralized in one owned land can be
management and do feasibility study together in Bogor
700 tpd of waste to TPPAS Lulut place, and the efficiency of the sought in the Bogor Regency where the initial data can be provided.
Nambo and cannot be canceled. operational resources can be Regency. • They are more interested in 100% waste management
The tipping fee paid is Rp. increased. rate
125,000/ton of waste. However, • No burden to the regional budget is preferable
the operational start time for • They has not been able to imagine the flow of waste
TPPAS Lulut Nambo cannot be management offered by Waste4Change.
• A proposal that is fixed and can be assured to be running,
ascertained.
since there are hundreds of proposals coming to the City
but currently only one of the proposer proceed with the
plan

SWOT Analysis
1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste. 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint

Besides waste collecting and processing Eco-Systems do not own land in
Bogor Regency.
Waste4Change experts also in education and
2. 5,4 ha of land is required to
research. manage 900 tpd of Bogor
2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology Regency’s waste.
PVC.
1. The amount of Bogor Regency waste that goes to Galuga Planning of Material Recovery Facility (MRF) Purchase or lease enough land in a
landfill is 900 tpd. establishment to manage 900 tpd of waste. strategic location to build Material
2. Bogor Regency Government can provide initial data Waste4Change can send research permits to Bogor Recovery Facilities (MRF).
without the need of a MoU. Regency to conduct research first, such as for types of
waste, etc.
1. There is no land available in Galuga Landfill. 1. The readiness time of TPPAS Lulut Nambo facility 1. Building facility in new areas (not
2. Bogor Regency is trying to divide their waste management to accommodate waste cannot be ascertained so in landfill area) as per the
process into several zones. It is so that the waste Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems can be suggestion of the Head of Waste
collection is not centralized in one place, and the present as a solution. Division.
efficiency of the operational resources can be increased. 2. Waste4Change can compete with TPPAS Lulut 2. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-
3. Bogor Regency is obliged to send 700 tpd of waste to Nambo in the future by charging a slightly cheaper System can consider landfill
TPPAS Lulut Nambo and cannot be canceled. The tipping tipping fee. However, a more detailed economic mining for old waste.
fee paid is Rp. 125,000/ton of waste. analysis is needed.
4. Bogor City government has not been able to imagine the 3. Provide a video or animation which visualize
flow of waste management offered by Waste4Change. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems's waste
management systems.

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely Support Ambivalent
13
2 1
Neutral
Netral Resistant
11 4 7 12
9 1. Head of Bogor Regency
10 3 6
2. Bogor City Mayor
8 3. Bogor City Environmental Agency
13
4. Bogor Regency Environmental Agency
5 14
Power
5. Cooperation Department of Bogor Regional Secretariat
Monitor Keep Informed 17 6. Regional Planning Agency (Bappeda) Bogor Regency

15 16
(Minimum Effort) 7. Regional Planning Agency Bogor City
8. Regional Assistant 1 Bogor Regency
9. Regional Assistant 1 Bogor City
10. Regional Assistant 2 Bogor Regency
11. Regional Assistant 2 Bogor City
13. Governor West Java
14. Regional Planning West Java
15. Residents
Low High 16. Scavengers

Interest

Important Points:
1 Head of Bogor Regency Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of Bogor Regency
2 Bogor City Mayor Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of Bogor City
maker, but with cooperation plan for 20+
3 Bogor City Environmental Agency Agency Support - Manage closely Has responsible to waste management in Bogor City
years, we should consider currently head
4 Bogor regency Environmental Agency Agency Support - Manage closely Has responsible to waste management in Bogor Regency
Cooperation Department of Bogor regency Has responsibility to manage cooperation Bogor regency with
of bogor regency iis Plt. and his power is
Regional Secretariat other stakeholder
limited (Consider UU Adm Pemerintahan
Has responsibility to making development plans for Bogor
6 Bogor regency Regional Planning (Bappeda) Neutral - Manage closely
Regency and Permendagri).
7 Bogor city Regional Planning (Bappeda) Neutral - Manage closely Has responsibility to making development plans for Bogor city 2. Galuga ownership is shared by the two
8 Regional Assistant 1 Bogor Regency Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare governments: Bogor regency and City.
9 Regional Assistant 1 Bogor city Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare Bogor City has 48 Ha and Bogor Regency
10 Regional Assistant 2 Bogor Regency Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating economic and development activities and plans has 4 ha.
11 Regional Assistant 2 Bogor City Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating economic and development activities and plans
3. Bogor regency and city included in
12 Environmental Agency West Java Resistant - Manage closely Has Nambo Project
Provincial West Java Project Nambo.
13 West Java Governor Neutral - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker in West Java Province
4. After Environmental Agency, Regional
Has responsibility to making development plans for West Java
14 Regional Planning West Java Resistant - Manage closely
included Nambo Project Secretary of Bogor regency is stakeholders
15 Residents Resistant - Keep informed If there’s any resident around landfill area which we should be expected the support.
16 Scavengers Resistant - Keep informed Located around the landfill area and waste collectors in landfill
The cooperation can minimize the amount of waste used by

17 Other waste management parties Resistant - Keep informed
Waste4Change.

1 2 3
More Detailed Follow-up Responses
Proposal Meeting Create responses based on
Prepare a more detailed proposal • Set up follow-up meeting
with additional data that can be between Waste4Change,
requested to the Bogor Regency Freepoint, and Bogor Regency
not.
Government Government at their office
This response can result in
• Visitation to the Landfill to
the Feasibility Study of the
further understand the
landfill, or other decision.
condition of their landfill

2.10
Ciangir Landfill,
Tasikmalaya City
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
82
Summary
Location : Tamansari, Kec. Tamansari, Kab. Tasikmalaya,
Jawa Barat 46196
Coordinate : -7.389713045970805, 108.26745004602422
Area : 12 ha
Ownership : Tasikmalaya City Government (a) Ciangir Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
government
Existing Waste Condition Waste Regulation Cooperation with Other Parties Government’s Interest
1. Tasikmalaya City's waste is 316 1. The Government of Tasikmalaya Memorandum of Understanding • As the waste condition in the landfill is
tpd, but only 210 - 220 tpd goes City is revising Regional for landfill waste management has already in an alarming state, an immediate
to Ciangir landfill. The height of Regulation No. 7 of 2012 on been explored with other two solution is urgently needed.
• The Mayor's concern is currently on reducing
the waste reach 30 meters and Waste Management. Waste companies:
and handling waste. He also formed a waste
urgently need solution to retribution fee is one of the main 1. Arun as a company that task force and want to improve the low level
manage the waste points to be revised. produces silica will manage 40 of public awareness about waste
2. Some waste management 2. Tasikmalaya City government tpd of mixed waste. management. Therefore, an additional
2. Sera as a company that cooperation on waste education, reduction,
through maggot cultivation issued a regulation regarding
manufactures furniture will and handling is preferable.
(BSF) at the housing level due restrictions on plastic and manage 200 tpd of mixed
to BSF business opportunities. styrofoam waste use. • No land is available at the landfill or in the
waste. city, so it is best to look for land in nearby
areas

Systems do not own land in
Besides waste collecting and processing
Tasikmalaya City.
Waste4Change experts also in education and 2. 1,3 - 1,8 ha of land is needed to manage
research. 210 - 220 tpd of Tasikmalaya City’s
2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology waste.
PVC
1. The Mayor of Tasikmalaya City is currently focusing on waste reduction 1. Planning of Material Recovery Facility (MRF) 1. Coordinate with the government to
and handling, he has also formed a waste officer unit. establishment to manage 210 - 220 tpd of waste. explore on their assets, whether there are
2. The total waste in Tasikmalaya City is 316 tpd, while Ciangir Landfill can 2. Analysis on whether the revision in retribution fee any areas that we can procure to build
only accommodate 210-220 tpd. could affect the financial calculation of our facility the facility
3. Tasikmalaya Government is revising Regional Regulation No. 7 of 2012 2. Purchase or lease enough land in a
about Waste Management in Tasikmalaya City Regulation. Waste strategic location near Ciangir Landfill to
retribution fee is one of the main points to be revised build Material Recovery Facilities (MRF).
4. Limited budget, infrastructure, and land in Ciangir Landfill and the
height of the waste reaches 30 meters. Thus, an immediate solution is
urgently needed.
5. The Tasikmalaya City Regional Financial and Asset Management
Agency coordinated land availability within the Ciangir Landfill.
1. Arun as a company that produces silica will manage 40 tpd of mixed 1. Planning a collaboration scheme that includes 1. Exploration on where are the areas that
waste. education regarding responsible waste are possible to be used for waste
2. Sera as a company that manufactures furniture will manage 200 tpd of management to the public. management purposes, that is located
mixed waste. 2. If the cooperation with Arun and Sera proceeds, an outside of the landfill
3. Tasikmalaya City government issued a regulation regarding restrictions option to also do waste collection can be
on plastic and styrofoam use, thus might reduce the amount of plastic considered to maximize the amount of waste.
waste being sent to the landfill. 3. Analysis on what are the impacts of the restriction
4. Low public awareness regarding waste management. on plastic and Styrofoam use to the waste
5. There are no land that could be utilized at the landfill yet composition, and whether it still fits our need

Stakeholder Matrix
High Keep Satisfied Manage Closely 1
2 Support Ambivalent
12 11 3 Neutral
Netral Resistant
4
10 5
6
1. Mayor of Tasikmalaya City
7 2. Head of Tasikmalaya City Environmental Agency
8
3. Head of Public Works and Spatial Planning Office
Power
4. Head of the Department of Housing and Settlement Areas

(Minimum Effort) 5. Head of One Stop Investment and Services Office
6. Head of Regional Research and Development Planning
9 Agency
7. Regional Secretariat of Tasikmalaya City
8. The Regional Cooperation Coordination Team
11. Residents
12. Scavengers
Low Interest High

Important Points:
1 Mayor of Tasikmalaya City Support - Manage closely Biggest power and policy maker of Tasikmalaya City
Head of Tasikmalaya City Environmental Develop and stipulate policies/technical guidelines in
2
Agency
Support - Manage closely
the environmental sector
maker, but with cooperation plan for
Head of Public Works and Spatial Planning Formulate policies for the management of public works
20+ years, Waste4Change and
Office affairs and spatial planning and land use Freepoint should consider if mayor
Head of the Department of Housing and Technical formulation in the field of housing and position is just only for 5 years.
Settlement Areas residential areas
2. Ciangir Landfill cooperates with Arun
Head of One Stop Investment and Services
5 Neutral - Manage closely Licensing application for issuance of documents
Office to produce silica by managing 40 tpd
6
Head of Regional Research and Development
Coordinate the preparation of regional development mixed waste, and with Sera to
Development Planning Agency planning documents.
produce furniture by managing 200
Assist the Mayor in formulating policies and
7 Regional Secretariat of Tasikmalaya City Neutral - Manage closely
coordinating administration. tpd mixed waste.
The Regional Cooperation Coordination Coordinating and controlling the implementation of
Team cooperation
Two investors have proposed cooperation with the

9 Other waste management parties Ambivalent - Monitor Ciangir landfill to make silica and Mabel sand with 40
tons per day and 200 tons per day.
10 Non-governmental organization Resistant - Keep satisfied Located around the landfill area.
11 Residents Resistant - Keep satisfied Located around the landfill area and
Located around the landfill area and waste collectors in

landfill

1 2 3
More Detailed Follow-up Responses
Proposal Meeting Create responses based on
• Coordinate with Mr. Feri (Head of the • Set up follow-up meeting
Tasikmalaya City Environmental between Waste4Change,
Agency) to explore more information Freepoint, and Tasikmalaya
not
on the waste in Tasikmalaya City and City Government at their
their landfill. office
• Prepare a more detailed proposal that • Visitation to the Landfill to
might include other type of further understand the
cooperation that are desired by condition of their landfill
Tasikmalaya City, and the additional
information gained from the
coordination

2.11
Cipayung Landfill,
Depok City
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
88
Summary
Location : Jl. Pertanian Cipayungjaya No.50, Cipayung,
Kec. Cipayung, Kota Depok, Jawa Barat 16437
Coordinate : -6.422515136787365, 106.78850489704608
Area : 19,3 ha
(a) Cipayung Landfill (b) Engagement with local (c) Google Maps location
Ownership : Depok City Government government
Waste Generation Regulation Land Government’s Interest
The total waste generation in Cooperation scheme can The government does not have any 1. The concept of the cooperation without tipping fee is interesting.
Depok reaches 1300 tpd. Out refer to PERMENDAGRI No. available land nor could recommend any. 2. They doubted the proposed facility and suggested to first build pilot
of 1300 tpd, 900-1000 tpd are 22 of 2020 on Procedures for They can only provide a 100 – 200 m2 plant.
collected to the landfill, with Regional Cooperation with land for a pilot plant. A pilot plant will 3. A more detailed proposal is needed to really assure the government
more organic waste than Other Regions and Regional also show that the system is proofed to on the effectivity and sustainability of the system
inorganic waste in the Cooperation with Third be running to the government, rather 4. The government can not provide any land recommendation for a full-
composition. Only 12-15% of Parties (KSDPK). than directly developing a large-scale scale MRF due to high price in the city (IDR 3 mio/m²) and limited
the total waste in Cipayung facility that is not proven to work yet. land availability.
Landfill is plastic. 5. A system that will not cause problem or stops in the middle of
development as the Head of the Environmental Agency is soon to be
retiring

SWOT Analysis 1. Waste4change is experienced in sorting waste. 1. Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems do
2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology not own land in Depok City.
which is process all plastics other than PET and 2. Around 3 ha of land is needed to develop a
facility that can manage 400-500 tpd of waste
PVC.
1. The total waste in Depok City is 1300 tpd, with the waste that 1. A development of MRF that can manage 400- 1. Pilot plant can be started in 100-200 m² of
goes to the Cipayung Landfill is 900-1000 tpd. Excluding the 500 tpd of waste, which need around 3 ha of land.
waste that are already cooperated with other party, there are land. The land can be procured on the area 2. Establishment of a Material Recovery Facility
around 400-500 tpd of waste that can be utilized. around Depok City (MRF) can be located around Jabodetabek so
2. 100-200 m² of land is available to be used in Depok City for a 2. An option to also do waste collection can be that Depok can send its waste to the facility.
pilot project considered to maximize the amount of waste. 3. Further research on any nearby available land
3. Cipayung Landfill is already overloaded, and they need 3. Pilot plant establishment as the immediate outside of Depok City
immediate solution to their waste problem solution to Depok City’s waste problem
4. They are interested in waste management cooperation without 4. Further detailing on the cooperation scheme
tipping fee. that will not involve any regional budget
1. There are no land recommendation that could be given as there 1. Self-procuring land without the help of Depok Pilot plant establishment to convince the
are limited land availability, and high land price (Rp 3.000.000,- City government especially on financial terms government about the sustainability of the
/m²) 2. Proving that the system can manage all the proposed facility.
2. They doubted the proposed facility will be able to manage all waste, by showing an example through pilot
the waste and recommended a pilot plant as proof and starter plant, or Waste4Change’s current MRF in
for managing waste in a smaller scale. Bekasi
3. Depok City already cooperate with PT Indocement Tunggal 3. Further analysis on whether the cooperation
Prakarsa Tbk to process waste into Refuse Derived Fuel for up to with PT Indocement will affect our system or
500 tpd of waste, with tipping fee of ±Rp.150.000/ton of waste. not

Stakeholder Matrix
2 1
Support Ambivalent
11
8 3 Neutral
Netral Resistant
10
4
12 6
1. Mayor of Depok City
7 2. Head of Depok City Environmental Agency

9 5
3. Cooperation Department of Depok City Regional Secretariat
Power
4. Regional Revenue Department (Bappeda)

5. Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD)
(Minimum Effort)
Cleanliness (UPTD)
9. Cooperation with other parties
11. Residents
12. Scavenger
Low Interest High

Important points:
1 Mayor of Depok City Support - Manage closely The biggest decision maker in Depok City. 1. Mayor has the biggest power as a
Head of Depok City Environmental Develop and stipulate policies/technical guidelines in policy maker. Therefore, the
Agency the environmental sector.
mayor’s term of office needs to
Head of Cooperation Department of Coordinating and controlling the implementation of
Depok City Regional Secretariat cooperation. be considered in the premise if
Regional Revenue Department Organizing the procurement of infrastructure and the cooperation is planned for
(Bappeda) supporting facilities.
20-25 years. With 5 years term of
Regional Financial and Asset
5 Neutral - Manage closely Depok City financial and asset management. office, the closest election will be
Management Agency (BPKAD)
held in November 2024.
6 Regional Assistant 1 Neutral - Manage closely Coordinating government affairs and people's welfare.
2. The Head of Depok City
Coordinating economic and development activities and
plans. Environmental Agency is soon to
Head of Regional Technical be retiring
Carry out operational technical activities based on the
8 Implementation Unit for Cleanliness Support - Manage closely
Mayor's policy. 3. Depok is working with PT
(UPTD)
PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk was handling Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa

9 Other waste management parties Ambivalent - Monitor
Refuse Derived Fuel in Cipayung Landfill. Tbk for Refuse Derived Fuel
10 Non-governmental organization Resistant - Keep satisfied Located around the landfill area. (RDF) project.
11 Residents Resistant - Keep satisfied Located near the landfill.
Located around the landfill area and waste collectors

12 Scavenger Resistant - Keep satisfied
in landfill.

1 2 3
Development of Visitation Follow-up
Detailed Proposal Planning Discussion
Further detailing of the proposal to Planning of site visitation As Depok City is still in high doubt on the
Depok City, regarding: from Depok City to system, an intensive follow-up discussion
• Financial details and calculation Waste4Change’s site plant is needed if the area is decided to be
• Technological details, e.g., what to lessen their doubt about pursued. After developing a more
technology will be used, how is the the proposed system, by detailed proposal and do a visitation,
waste flow in the system, etc. showing an existing MRF more proof of our proposed system will
• Type of cooperation scheme that is with a system that works in be clearer to the Agency and thus a
proposed to the city sorting and managing follow-up discussion for what is the best
waste. next step will need to be held.

2.12
TPST Cipeucang,
South Tangerang City
• Summary
• SWOT Analysis
94
Summary
Location : Jl. Kapling Nambo No.51, Serpong, Kec. Serpong,
Kota Tangerang Selatan, Banten 15310
Coordinate : -6.324996516810707, 106.6591044501788
Area : 13 ha
(b) Engagement with local
Ownership : South Tangerang City Government (a) TPST Cipeucang
government
(c) Google Maps location
The total waste in South Cipeucang landfill which has an area 1. The collaboration contract to send South 1. The Environmental Agency of South Tangerang City
Tangerang City is 800-850 of 13 ha will be full in a few months. Tangerang City’s waste to Cilowong wants 100% waste management without residue
tpd. Around 400-450 tpd of The location is close to residential landfill with Serang City is currently in re- back to the landfills. They are willing to pay a
the waste go to the landfill, areas, making it impossible to expand evaluation stage for the period of 2023 tipping fee if it fits the budget.
while the rest (400 tpd) are the land. It has uneven contour and onwards. 2. Detailed cooperation scheme and value of
self-managed by private hard to fully utilize the area, therefore 2. There is an agreement with TPPAS Lulut investment, especially if long-term cooperation is
sector such as BSD and no land can be recommended by the Nambo to send around 100-200 tpd of needed as the regional head changes every 5 years.
Bintaro. Government. waste there, but it is still waiting for the 3. A visitation to Waste4Change's MRF Plant was
facility to be ready. discussed as they were interested to see an already
running system and further discussed the
collaboration. However, they were unresponsive to
the planning of the visitation and discussion

2. The Freepoint Eco-Systems pyrolysis technology Systems do not own land in South
which is process all plastics other than PET and Tangerang City.
2. Around 1,5 ha of land is required to
PVC.
manage 200-250 tpd of South Tangerang
3. A tipping fee is not required if only 35% of the City’s waste.
1. Currently, TPST Cipeucang is only able to accommodate 400 - 450 1. The readiness time of TPPAS Lulut Nambo facility 1. Search for land that has the capacity to
tpd of waste out of a total municipal waste of 800 - 850 tpd and to accommodate waste cannot be ascertained so manage 250 tpd of waste
will be full in a few months. Excluding the waste that need to be Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems have 2. Consider tipping fee as one of the
sent to TPPAS Lulut Nambo, there are 200-250 tpd of waste that chance to manage 400 - 450 tpd South Tangerang variable in the financial calculation
can be utilized. City’s waste.
2. South Tangerang Government will consider tipping fee in the 2. An option to also do waste collection can be
hope that no residue will return to the landfill. considered to maximize the amount of waste.
3. TPPAS Lulut Nambo facility has not start its operation and it is not
sure when the delivery of 100 - 200 tpd could be carried out.
1. South Tangerang City can not provide land due to limited land 1. Self-procure land that is near South Tangerang City 1. Search for land that is located outside
and high population density. Moreover, TPST Cipeucang is near instead of right at the city of South Tangerang area, but still close
residential areas and has an uneven contour which is difficult to 2. Make sure whether the cooperation with Cilowong in distance
utilize. Landfill and TPPAS Lulut Nambo will affect the 2. Cooperation with areas surrounding
2. South Tangerang City is collaborating with Cilowong landfill, MRF cooperation or not South Tangerang, so they can send their
Serang City for waste management in 2023 as a short-term waste to the facility.
solution. 3. South Tangerang City government can
3. South Tangerang City is in an agreement with Provincial send waste to the Waste4Change
Government for TPPAS Lulut Nambo facility, where 100-200 tpd of facility if the location is reachable from
waste must be sent there. South Tangerang.

Stakeholder Matrix
11 1
Support Ambivalent
4 2 Neutral
Netral Resistant
5
6
1. Mayor of South Tangerang City
10
2. South Tangerang City Environmental Agency
3
Power
3. Cooperation Department of South

Monitor Keep Informed 9 Tangerang City Regional Secretariat
(Minimum Effort)
8 4. Regional Planning (Bappeda)
7. Residents
8. Scavengers
7
10. Land Developer
Low High 11. Regional Secretary of South Tangerang

Interest

Important Points:
Biggest power and policy maker of South 1. Mayor has the biggest power as a policy
1 Mayor of South Tangerang Neutral - Manage closely
Tangerang.
maker. Therefore, the mayor’s term of office
South Tangerang City Environmental Has responsible to waste management in South
Agency Tangerang. needs to be considered in the premise if the
Cooperation Department of South Has responsibility to manage cooperation south cooperation is planned for 20-25 years. With
Tangerang City Regional Secretariat tangerang with other stakeholder.
5 years term of office, the closest election
South Tangerang Regional Planning Has responsibility to making development plans for
4
(Bappeda)
South Tangerang.
will be held in November 2024.
2. Some biggest land developer have real
Coordinating government affairs and people's
welfare estate in South Tangerang. They contribute
Coordinating economic and development activities a lot of this city’s income.
and plans.
3. Political years 2024 will greatly affect the
7 Resident Resistant - Keep informed Located around the landfill area.
mayor.
8 Scavenger Resistant - minimum effort Has an interest in collecting waste at landfill.
4. After Environmental Agency, South
The cooperation can minimize the amount of waste
9 Other waste management parties Resistant – minimum effort Tangerang Regional Planning and Regional
used by Waste4Change
Has an interest with waste management to support

Secretary of South Tangerang is
10 Land Developer Support - Manage closely
housing area. stakeholders which we should be expected
Has important position and power to support the support.
11 Regional Secretary of South Tangerang Neutral - Manage Closely
Mayor.

1 2 3
Development of Visitation Follow-up
Detailed Proposal Planning Discussion
Further detailing of the proposal to Planning of site visitation After developing a more detailed
South Tangerang City, regarding: from South Tangerang proposal and do a visitation, more
• Financial details and calculation City Government to proof of our proposed system will
• Technological details, e.g., what Waste4Change’s site to be clearer to the Environmental
technology will be used, how is the show an existing MRF Agency. Afterwards, a follow-up
waste flow in the system, etc. with a system that works discussion for what is the best next
• Type of cooperation scheme that is in sorting and managing step is needed along with the
proposed to the city waste. discussion with Mayor of South
Tangerang City, Regional Secretary
and Regional Planning Agency

Conclusion & Recommendation
05
100
Conclusion
1. From the target of 15 landfills that will be invited to collaborate, Waste4Change managed to hold audiences with 12 relevant local
governments including additional regions as follows:as follows:
• Sumur Batu Landfill, Bekasi City • Bantar Gebang Landfill, DKI Jakarta • Galuga Landfill, Bogor City
• Cipayung Landfill, Depok City • Ciangir Landfill, Tasikmalaya City • Cimenteng Landfill, Sukabumi Regency
• TPST Cipeucang, South Tangerang City • Galuga Landfill, Bogor Regency • Pasir Bajing Landfill, Garut Regency
• Cilowong Landfill, City of Serang • Piyungan Regional Landfill, DIY • Cibeureum Landfill, Sumedang Regency
2. All cities/regencies are open to cooperation in municipal waste management with third parties, they are categorized as follows:
• Local governments that show high interest and are supported by land availability are Bantar Gebang Landfill, DKI Jakarta; Galuga Landfill,
Bogor City; Cibeureum Landfill, Sumedang Regency; Cilowong Landfill, Serang City; Pasir Bajing Landfill, Garut Regency; and Cimenteng
Landfill, Sukabumi Regency.
• Local governments that show high interest but have no land availability are Sumur Batu Landfill, Bekasi City; Galuga Landfill, Bogor Regency;
Ciangir Landfill, Tasikmalaya City; and Piyungan Regional Landfill, Yogyakarta Special Region.
• Local governments that show low interest and can not recommend land are Cipayung Landfill, Depok City and Cipeucang Landfill, South
Tangerang City. If later the facilities built are not in their city/regency but are still reachable, the city/regency government is open to sending
waste to this facility.
3. However, there are some common obstacle to implementing the cooperation such as:
• No land availability, especially in the cities that have high population density. While in the regencies, areas might be available, but the
vastness of the area might make the transport process more difficult.
• Most of the available land is still unusable state so land preparation or even road construction is required which incur large capital costs in
the calculations
• Most of the Government wants 100% waste management rate without burdening the regional budget. However, a 100% waste management
rate is not possible without tipping fee from the government.
• If any regional budget is involved whether it is in the form of tipping fee or usage of the government’s fleets or human resources, a tender
must be held for the project to move forward. Tender in Indonesia is a long process, it can take 3-4 years before the plant can operate.
10
1
Conclusion
4. This project is only the initial stage to select potential areas and support the establishment of a Material Recovery Facility (MRF). The
implementation of the Integrated Waste Management Facility requires a long stage because it requires careful consideration from
stakeholders. To carry out the cooperation, the governments suggested that the private sector to do the following:
• 100% waste management rate that will not burden the regional budget and the current operational system.
• Further intensive meetings with the related agencies in the government to discuss the cooperation model that complies to the regulations
• Feasibility Study to identify the real condition on-site and a more in-depth analysis, to propose a system that gives the best fit for the on-
site condition
• A detailed proposal that already include the financial plan, technological detail of the system, and detailed cooperation scheme
• Send official letter to Mayor/Regent containing administrative requirements:
a. Request for Cooperation Letter
b. Feasibility Study Result
c. Proposal
d. Memorandum of Understanding Draft
e. Cooperation Agreement Draft
10
2
Recommendation
1. For the first phase, it is better to focus on the area where the government can provide land, whether it is to be leased, or bought.
2. Create a cooperation scheme where the land preparation is imposed to the government. If it is not possible, then additional budget for land
preparation needs to be calculated
3. Developing a system where no regional budget is required for the plant to be running. The financial calculation in the current 35% waste
management rate system need to be assured, and the exact system used need to be explained. Since there will be residue that needs to be
handled by the cities/regencies, an appealing offer needs to be added so that they will not think of it as too much of a burden.
4. Avoiding tender can be done in two ways:
• Creating a cooperation agreement through Regional Cooperation with Third Parties (KSDPK), that is shorter in the contract duration, i.e., 5
years, with no regional budget is involved in the agreement
• Assuring the government that the offer is the only one that can provide a running system, e.g., by first developing a pilot plant that is running
and sustainable.
5. Based on the study, the shortlisted area that are recommended to be prioritized in approaching are as follows:
1) Bekasi City
2) DKI Jakarta
3) Bogor City
4) Sumedang Regency
5) Serang City
The list is decided based on the waste generation, land availability, high interest of the local government, strategic location, and municipal
solid waste service level. Even though Garut Regency and Sukabumi Regency are listed as “High Interest with Land Availability”, they are not
recommended to be pursued because the waste generated in the area is still too low, i.e., 100 and 50 tpd, respectively. They can be
approached in the future if Waste4Change and Freepoint Eco-Systems are willing to increase the serviced area, e.g., by providing collection
services.
10
3
Thank You
Say hello to us!
We’ll keep in touch!
021-293 72308 Instagram, Twitter, Linkedin,

contact@waste4change.com @waste4change
Vida Bumipala, Jl. Alun Alun Utara, Padurenan, Facebook, Youtube

Mustikajaya, Kota Bekasi, Jawa Barat 17156 Waste4Change
www.waste4change.co
m
06
Appendix
• Government’s Contact Number

• Cooperation Exposure Attendance List
• Glossary
• Documentation
• References Link
105 • Photo References Link
Governments’ Contact Number
No Landfill Name Area Position Name Phone Number
1 TPST Cipeucang South Tangerang City Jafung LH Akhmad Fahrudin 087887302299
2 TPAS Cilowong Serang City Kepala Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Farach Richi 08121203915
3 TPA Pasir Bajing Garut Regency CSR Fanny Fatimah 082126963544
4 TPA Galuga Bogor Regency Seksi Penanganan Sampah Asep 082124381159
Kasubag Tata Usaha UPTD TPAS

5 TPA Galuga Bogor City Beti 0818811902
DLH Kota Bogor
6 TPA Sumur Batu Bekasi City Kabid PSKM DLH Kota Bekasi Budi 081318451024
7 TPA Cimenteng Sukabumi Regency PIC backup Endang 0811115064
Kabid Pengelolaan Sampah DLH

8 TPA Ciangir Tasikmalaya City Feri 085322636111
Kota Tasikmalaya
Balai Prasarana Permukiman

9 TPA Regional Piyungan DI Yogyakarta Agung 081227823823
Wilayah D.I. Yogyakarta
10 TPA Cipayung Depok City DLHK Kota Depok Rolli Dalius 081219472094
11 TPA Cibeureum Sumedang Regency DLH Kabupaten Sumedang Iwan Gusti (Asep) 081320538275
12 TPA Bantar Gebang DKI Jakarta Kepala Seksi DLH DKI Jakarta Yogi Ikhwan 08111506638
10
6
Cooperation Exposure Attendance List
No Location Date and Place Waste4Change & Freepoint Eco-Systems Local Government
1 Cipayung Landfill, Tuesday, February 7th 2023 1. Winner Yousman Depok City Environmental and Hygiene Service:
Depok City by Zoom Meeting 2. Sandy Indriana 1. Ety Suryahati, Head of Environmental and Hygiene Service
3. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo 2. Rolli
4. Elina Sabella Ambari 3. Aldi
5. Asep Saepudin
2 Sumur Batu Landfill, Monday, February 6th 2023 1. M. Bijaksana Junerosano Bekasi City Government
Bekasi City at Bekasi Mayor Officer 2. Winner Yousman 1. Dr. H. Tri Adhianto Tjahyono, S.E., M.M as Mayor of Bekasi City
3. Sandy Indriana 2. Yudianto, A.Ks, M.Si as Head of Department of Environment
4. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo
3 Sumur Batu Landfill, Tuesday, February 14th 2023 1. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo Bekasi City Government:
Bekasi City at Bekasi City Environmental Agency 1. Ir. Kustantinah Puniwahyuni, M.Si.
4 Sumur Batu Landfill, Wednesday, February 15th 2023 1. Asep Saepudin Bekasi City Environmental Agency
Bekasi City at Bekasi City Environmental Agency 2. Fortuna Dewi C. 1. Dr. H. Tri Yudhianto Tjahyono, S.E., M.M.
Office 3. Elina Sabella A. 2. Andy Frengky
3. Kiswati Ningsih
5 TPST Cipeucang, South Friday, February 10th 2023 1. Winner Yousman South Tangerang City Environment and Sanitation Service :
Tangerang City by Zoom Meeting 2. Sandy Indriana 1. Fahrudin
3. Elina Sabella Ambari 2. Hadi
4. Asep Saepudin 3. Rani
5. Sandy Angga Wicaksono 4. Mitradamas
10
7
6 Cilowong Landfill, Wednesday, February 15th 2023 1. Winner Yousman Serang City Environmental Agency
Serang City at Serang City Environmental Agency 2. Sandy Indriana 1. Farach Richi, Head of Environmental Serang City
Office 3. Sandy Angga Wicaksono 2. Head of Regional Technical Implementation Unit for Cleanliness
(UPTD) Cilowong
3. Head of Waste Management, Hazardous Waste and Capacity
Building
7 Piyungan Regional Friday, February 17th 2023 1. Winner Yousman Yogyakarta Special Region Environmental Agency
Landfill, Yogyakarta by Zoom Meeting 2. Sandy Indriana 1. Rosdiana Puji Lestari, Dinas PUP-ESDM DIY
Special Region (DIY) 3. Asep Saepudin 2. Mifta, Secretary of Kartamantul (Yogyakarta, Sleman, and Bantul)
4. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo 3. Pungky
5. Elina Sabella Ambari
6. Sandy Angga Wicaksono
8 Bantar Gebang Tuesday, February 21st 1. M. Bijaksana Junerosano Department of Environment DKI Jakarta:
Landfill, DKI Jakarta at DKI Jakarta Environmental Agency 2. Sandy Indriana 1. Asep Kuswanto, Head of Environmental Department DKI Jakarta
Office 3. Sandy Angga Wicaksono 2. Yogi Ikhwan, Section Head of Public Relation
3. Rita Ningsih, Section Head of Waste Management
9 Ciangir Landfill, Thursday, March 2nd 2023 1. Winner Yousman Tasikmalaya City Government
Tasikmalaya City by Zoom Meeting 2. Asep Saepudin 1. Department of Public Housing and Residential Areas
3. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo 2. Public Works and Spatial Planning Officer
4. Elina Sabella Ambari 3. Head of Government Section
4. Regional Development Planning & Research Agency for Regional
Development (Bapelitbangda)
10
8
10 Galuga Landfill, Bogor Friday, March 3rd 2023 1. Winner Yousman Bogor Regency Environmental Agency
Regency at Bogor Regency Environmental Agency 2. Asep Saepudin 1. Trian Turangga, Head of Waste Division
Office 3. Elina Sabella Ambari 2. Syihabudin Acep, Waste Handling Section
11 Galuga Landfill, Bogor Monday, March 13th 1. Winner Yousman Bogor City Environmental Agency
City at Bogor City Environmental Agency 2. Asep Saepudin
3. Sandy Indriana
4. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo
12 Pasir Bajing Landfill, Friday, March 10th 2023 1. Winner Yousman Garut Regency Environmental Agency
Garut Regency by Zoom Meeting 2. Asep Saepudin 1. Jujun Juansyah, Head of Environmental Agency
3. Elina Sabella Ambari 2. Fany
4. Sandy Angga Wicaksono 3. Agus
13 Cibeureum Landfill, Friday, March 10th 2023 1. Winner Yousman Sumedang Regency Environmental Agency
Sumedang Regency by Zoom Meeting 2. Asep Saepudin 1. Iwan Gustiawan, Environmental Office
3. Sandy Indriana
4. Elina Sabella Ambari
14 Cimenteng Landfill, Monday, March 13th 2023 1. Winner Yousman Sukabumi Regency Environmental Agency
Sukabumi Regency by Zoom Meeting 2. Asep Saepudin 1. Trisda Filtra, Junior Expert Policy Analyst in Cooperation Section
3. Sandy Indriana 2. Siti Nurazizah, Analyst
4. Elina Sabella Ambari 3. Endang Suherman, Waste Transportation Sub-Coordinator
5. Fortuna Dewi Cahyo 4. Pandargama Setiadi, Waste Processing Sub-Coordinator
5. Deny Alam, Head of Waste Management
10
9
Glossary
● APBD (Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah) : Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget
● Bapelitbangda (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan, Penelitian Regional Development Planning & Research Agency for Regional
:
dan Pengembangan) Development
● Bappeda (Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah) : Development Planning Agency at City/Regency Level
● BPDLH (Badan Pengelola Dana Lingkungan Hidup) : The Environmental Fund Management Agency
● DIY (Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) : Yogyakarta Special Region
● DPRD (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah) : Regional People's Representative Assembly
● KSDPK (Kerjasama dengan Pihak Ketiga) : Cooperation with Third Parties
● KPBU (Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha) : Government Cooperation with Business Entities
● KSPI (Kerjasama Pembangunan Infrastruktur) : Infrastructure Development Cooperation
● MRF : Material Recovery Facility
● PLTSa (Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Sampah) : Waste Power Plant
● PUPR (Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat) : Public Works and Housing
● TPST (Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu) : Integrated Waste Processing Site
● TPPAS (Tempat Pengolahan dan Pemrosesan Akhir Sampah) : Waste Processing and Final Processing Site
● TPS3R (Tempat Pengelolaan Sampah Reuse, Reduce, dan
: Place for Reuse, Reduce and Recycle Waste Management
Recycle)
● tpd (unit) : tons per day
● UPTD (Unit Pelaksana Teknis Dinas) : Technical Implementation Unit
● UPS (Unit Pengolahan Sampah) : Waste Management Unit
● W4C : Waste4Change
11
0
Documentation
Meeting Audiences at Bekasi City Government Office Meeting Audiences with Depok City Environmental Agency by Zoom
Monday, February 6th 2023 Tuesday, February 7th 2023
11
1
Documentation
Meeting Audiences with South Tangerang City Government by Zoom Meeting Audiences with Special Region of Yogya by Zoom
Friday, February 10th 2023 Friday, February 17th 2023
11
2
Documentation
Meeting Audiences with Serang City Environmental Agency
Wednesday, February 15th 2023
Available area of 1 ha to be used, however the base Available area of 3000 m² to be used. However there
of the land is waste pile, the ground is not stable, is a leachate tank at the location and it needs to be
and the contour is uneven moved if the land is going to be utilized. The road
leading to the location is still under construction
11
3
Documentation
Meeting Audiences at Bogor Regency Environmental Agency Office Meeting Audiences at Bogor City Environmental Agency Office
Friday, March 3rd 2023 Monday, March 13th 2023
Meeting Audiences with Garut Regency Environmental Agency by Zoom

Friday, March 10th 2023
11
4
Documentation
Meeting Audiences with Sumedang Regency Government by Zoom Meeting Audiences with Sukabumi Regency by Zoom
Friday, March 10th 2023 Monday, March 13th 2023
Meeting Audiences with Tasikmalaya City by Zoom

Thursday, March 2nd 2023
11
5
Reference Link
Meeting Recording https://bit.ly/LocalGovernmentMeeting
Minutes of Meeting (MoM) https://bit.ly/MoMW4CFP
Cilowong Landfill Site Visit Documentation https://bit.ly/SiteVisitTPASCilowong
11
6
Photo References Link
Page 20:
Sumur Batu Landfill Photo (https://beritapublik.co.id/2019/06/16/pemkot-bekasi-targetkan-perluasan-tpa-sumur-batu-tahun-depan-rampung/)
Page 25:
Cipayung Landfill Photo (https://www.liputan6.com/photo/read/3858909/foto-gunung-sampah-tpa-cipayung-depok-capai-20-meter?page=1)
Page 26:
Cipayung Landfill Photo (https://www.liputan6.com/photo/read/3858909/foto-gunung-sampah-tpa-cipayung-depok-capai-20-meter?page=1)
Page 31:
TPST Cipeucang Photo (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200602165120-20-509100/sampah-tpa-cipeucang-serpong-longsor-bau-makin-
menyengat)
Page 32:
TPST Cipeucang Photo (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200602165120-20-509100/sampah-tpa-cipeucang-serpong-longsor-bau-makin-
menyengat)
Page 46:
Piyungan Regional Landfill Photo (https://www.merdeka.com/jateng/kembali-dibuka-begini-total-penumpukan-sampah-di-jogja-selama-tpa-piyungan-
ditutup.html)
Page 47:
Piyungan Regional Landfill (https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/bikin-2-tpa-pemkab-sleman-akan-kurangi-ketergantungan-dengan-tpa-piyungan-
1zAYgNnz7jz)
11
7
Page 52:
Bantar Gebang Landfill Photo (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220628123659-20-814459/timbunan-sampah-di-bantargebang-40-meter-setara-
gedung-16-lantai)
Page 53:
Bantar Gebang Landfill (https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5731837/kontrak-tpst-bantargebang-dengan-bekasi-berakhir-oktober-ini-kata-wagub-dki)
Page 58:
Ciangir Landfill Photo (https://www.inilahtasik.com/tpa-ciangir-overload-alat-berat-rusak-penanganan-sampah-tersendat)
Page 59:
Ciangir Landfill Photo (https://www.inilahtasik.com/tpa-ciangir-overload-alat-berat-rusak-penanganan-sampah-tersendat)
Page 65:
Galuga Landfill Photo (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220628123659-20-814459/timbunan-sampah-di-bantargebang-40-meter-setara-gedung-
16-lantai)
Page 71:
Galuga Landfill Photo (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220628123659-20-814459/timbunan-sampah-di-bantargebang-40-meter-setara-gedung-
16-lantai)
Page 76:
Pasir Bajing Landfill Photo (https://bandungkita.id/2019/09/10/pemkab-garut-akan-perluas-tpa-pasir-bajing/)
Page 77:
Pasir Bajing Landfill Photo (https://bandungkita.id/2019/09/10/pemkab-garut-akan-perluas-tpa-pasir-bajing/)
11
8
Page 82:
Cibeureum Landfill Landfill Photo (https://jabar.tribunnews.com/2021/02/22/sumedang-terancam-darurat-sampah-tpa-cibeureum-disebut-sudah-overload)
Page 83:
Cibeureum Landfill Landfill Photo (https://jabar.tribunnews.com/2021/02/22/sumedang-terancam-darurat-sampah-tpa-cibeureum-disebut-sudah-overload)
Page 88:
Cimenteng Landfill Photo (https://radarsukabumi.com/kabupaten-sukabumi/tpa-cimenteng-overload/)
Page 89:
Cimenteng Landfill Photo (https://radarsukabumi.com/kabupaten-sukabumi/tpa-cimenteng-overload/)
11
9

(Final Report) Freepoint Sorting Center in Landfill Pre-Feasibility Study

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

(Final Report) Freepoint Sorting Center in Landfill Pre-Feasibility Study

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sorting Centre in Landfill

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved

3 Area Selection 5 Conclusion and Recommendation

Initial Research Area Coverage Prioritized Locations Longlisted Locations

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved

1. Serang City 1. Bekasi City 1. Depok City

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 6

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 7

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 8

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 9

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 10

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 11

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 13

The collaboration between

Freepoint Commodities is a global Waste4Change is a social Assessing potential landfill locations

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 15

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved

03 Research Permit & Stakeholder Engagement

• Initial research area coverage

Initial Research Area Coverage 1 Galuga Landfill (Bogor Regency)

2 Burangkeng Landfill (Bekasi Regency)

3 Sumur Batu Landfill (Bekasi City)

4 Cipayung Landfill (Depok City)

5 Cimenteng Landfill (Sukabumi Regency)

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved

7 TPST Cipeucang (South Tangerang City)

8 Cilowong Landfill (Serang Regency)

9 Gunung Santri Landfill (Cirebon Regency)

10 Ciangir Landfill (Tasikmalaya City)

11 Randukuning Landfill (Batang Regency)

14 Pecuk Landfill (Indramayu Regency)

15 Pasir Bajing Landfill (Garut Regency) 4

More Prioritized Area Less Prioritized Area

Rank Landfill Name City/Regency Rank Landfill Name City/Regency

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 19

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 20

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 21

2. Bantar Gebang Landfill, DKI Jakarta

3. Cibeureum Landfill, Sumedang Regency

5. Cilowong Landfill, Serang City

6. Pasir Bajing Landfill, Garut Regency

7. Cimenteng Landfill, Sukabumi Regency

8. Piyungan Regional Landfill, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta

9. Galuga Landfill, Bogor Regency

10. Ciangir Landfill, Tasikmalaya City

11. Cipayung Landfill, Depok City

12. TPST Cipeucang, South Tangerang City

Sumur Batu Landfill,

• Next Step Recommendations

Ownership : Bekasi City Government

Waste Generation Regulation Land Government’s Interest

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 25

PET and PVC. not enough to manage all the

Opportunities (O) S-O Analysis W-O Analysis

Threats (T) S-T Analysis W-T Analysis

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 26

4. Head of Regional Technical Implementation Unit for

Monitor Keep Informed Cleanliness (UPTD)

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 27

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 28

Copyright © Waste4Change All Rights Reserved 29

• Next Step Recommendations