Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B R I E F S
I N E C O N O M I C P O L I C Y
B
illions of people live in countries that ban self- The causal assessment of the effect of repealing this
service fueling at gasoline stations, including ban is essential for the ongoing policy debate on whether
some of the world’s largest countries by popula- Oregon and New Jersey should allow citizens to pump
tion, including China, India, and Brazil, among their own gasoline. In Oregon, House Bill 4151, proposed
many others. The impact of these bans is largely understud- in early 2022, would allow the self-service sale of gasoline
ied despite their prevalence presumably because this policy in all Oregon counties. In New Jersey, a bipartisan group
is often implemented at the national level and because there of legislators introduced the Motorist Fueling Choice and
have been no policy changes in these countries that allow for Convenience Act in March 2022. If passed, the self-service
an assessment of these bans on gasoline prices. sale of gasoline would be allowed in New Jersey. The recent
A policy change in Oregon in 2018, however, allows for rise of this debate has been largely associated with the
analysis of the causal impact of this regulation. Oregon and claim that repealing the self-service ban will lead to lower
New Jersey were the only states that banned the self-service gasoline prices, which could offset the large increase in
sale of gasoline from 1992 to 2017. In March 2017, however, gasoline prices that took place in the first quarter of 2022.
the Oregon House of Representatives voted to adjust the Sal Risalvato, former executive director of the New Jersey
ban. Effective January 1, 2018, the new legislation allowed Gasoline–Convenience Store–Automotive Association claims
self-service of gasoline in rural counties. My research esti- that “[repealing the ban] should bring a savings at the self-
mates the impact of the 2018 policy change in Oregon on serve pump [of] about 15 cents a gallon or more.” Yet there
gasoline prices. are no modern assessments of the effect of repealing this
The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and should not be attributed to the Cato Institute, its trustees,
its Sponsors, or any other person or organization. Nothing in this paper should be construed as an attempt to aid or hinder
the passage of any bill before Congress. Copyright © 2023 Cato Institute. This work by the Cato Institute is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.