You are on page 1of 2

LEYTE V ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

SWOT ANALYSIS

ISHIKAWA / FISHBONE DIAGRAM – 7M ANALYSIS

MANPOWER MATERIALS MACHINE


 Long Rationalization Period for Contractual  Delivery Time is affected due to geographical  Equipment is properly identified and sufficient for
Employees up for Regular Promotion location all the EC’s needs
 Succession Planning is existent in the Union  Material Specifications are very exclusive towards  New equipment/technological advancement
Regulations needed items making selection  Lack of Preventive Maintenance Protocols
 Outsourced Activities are allowed as a cost saving  Material Availability is consistently monitored
measure  Stable Financial Performance and Resources

MANAGEMENT
 Management undergoing turnover to newer
generation leaving an experience gap
 Middle Management Employees have ELECTRIC COOPERATIV
considerable field experience due to SERVICES
employee retention
 Management supportive of the QMS

METHODS MOTHER NATURE (ENVIRONMENT) MEASUREMENT


 Lack of coherent governmental policy and  Logistical accessibility  Lack of measurement results validity due to
strategy from different government agencies  Organized Regional EC Association leading to lacking calibration requirements
(conflicting requirements) uniform and unanimous decisions  Lack of in-process monitoring methods for
 Lengthy experience and highly coherent  Health and Security Threats due to COVID- operations personnel
network 19 and Neighbors  Synchronized Activities with other Regional ECs
 Methods can be synergized with other ECs

QM-4.1 00
07-03-21
LEYTE V ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.

SWOT ANALYSIS

Positive Issues Negative Issues

STRENGTHS (+)
WEAKNESSES (–)
Positive characteristics of the business
S# W# Things we can improve on that are internal to
tangible and intangible attributes, internal to
the company
organization

Middle Management Employees have considerable Management undergoing turnover to newer


S1 W1
field experience due to employee retention generation leaving an experience gap
Manning requirement is sufficient and fully 1st Lack of measurement results validity due to lacking
S2 W2
party calibration requirements
In1ternal
S3 Logistical accessibility W3 Lack of Preventive Maintenance Protocols
Issues
Lack of in-process monitoring methods for operations
S4 W4
Lengthy experience and highly coherent network personnel
S5 Material Availability is consistently monitored W5
S6 Management supportive of the QMS W6
Equipment is properly identified and sufficient for
S7 W7
all the EC’s needs
S8 W8
S9 W9
S10 W10

OPPORTUNITIES (+) THREATS (–)


O# Positive things outside the company that it T# Things outside the organization that could place
can take advantage of the organization’s mission or operation at risk

Limited skills pool due to travel restrictions of COVID-


O1 T1
New equipment/technological advancement 19
Lack of coherent governmental policy and strategy
O2 Organized Regional EC Association leading to T2 from different government agencies (conflicting
uniform and unanimous decisions requirements)
External
Health and Security Threats due to COVID-19 and
Issues O3 T3
Synchronized EC Activities with other regional ECs Neighbors
O4 T4
O5 T5
O6 T6
O7 T7
O8 T8
O9 T9
O10 T10

QM-4.1 00 07-03-21

You might also like