Assignment

Unraveling the Impact of Microfinance

on Alleviating Poverty in Bangladesh:
An Analysis of the Theory Building Process

Course Name: Qualitative Approaches to the Study of Politics

Course Code: PS 204

Submitted To
Dr. S. M. Ali Reza
Professor
Department of Political Science
Faculty of Social Science
University of Dhaka

Submitted By
Rudra Das Apurba
Roll: 124
Section: B
Session: 2020-21 (3rd Semester)
Batch: 15th

Date of Submission: 07 May 2023

Introduction:
Microfinance has been widely touted as a tool for poverty reduction in developing countries, including
Bangladesh. However, the relationship between microfinance and poverty reduction is complex and
requires careful analysis. In this assignment, we will explore the theory building process in the context
of the role of microfinance in poverty reduction in Bangladesh, examining its different stages
:problemation, observation, generalization, confirmation, and application.
Poverty is a significant issue in Bangladesh, with over 20% of the population living below the poverty
line, and there is a need for effective strategies to reduce poverty levels. One such strategy is
microfinance, which involves providing small loans to low-income individuals to support their
entrepreneurial activities.Microfinance has been touted as a solution to poverty in Bangladesh, and it
has been widely adopted by the government and NGOs. Despite the widespread adoption of
microfinance in Bangladesh, there is limited understanding of its effectiveness in reducing poverty
levels. In this research project, I aim to analyze the theory building process that can shed light on the
role of microfinance in poverty reduction in Bangladesh.

Stage 1: Problemation
The first stage of theory building involves problemation. In this stage, we identify the problem or
phenomenon of interest and articulate its significance. In the case of microfinance and poverty
reduction in Bangladesh, the problem is the persistence of poverty despite the widespread availability
of microfinance services. We will also identify the factors contributing to the problem, such as limited
access to financial services, low levels of education, and poor health outcomes.
a. Identification of the research problem
The first stage in the theory building process is Problematization, which involves identifying the
research problem. In this case, the research problem is the role of microfinance in poverty reduction
in Bangladesh. The problem is that despite the widespread adoption of microfinance in Bangladesh,
poverty remains a significant issue. Therefore, the research aims to investigate the effectiveness of
microfinance in reducing poverty in Bangladesh.
b. Significance of the research problem
The significance of the research problem lies in the fact that Bangladesh is one of the poorest countries
in the world, with a poverty rate of over 20%. Microfinance has been touted as a solution to poverty
in Bangladesh, and it has been widely adopted by the government and NGOs. However, there is a lack
of empirical evidence on the effectiveness of microfinance in reducing poverty. Therefore, this
research is significant as it will provide insights into the role of microfinance in poverty reduction in
Bangladesh.
c. Research questions and hypotheses
The research questions and hypotheses are developed based on the research problem. The research
questions for this study are:
i. What is the impact of microfinance on poverty reduction in Bangladesh?
ii. What are the factors that contribute to the success of microfinance in poverty reduction?
iii. What are the limitations of microfinance in addressing poverty in Bangladesh?

The hypotheses for this study are:

i. Microfinance has a positive impact on poverty reduction in Bangladesh.
ii. The success of microfinance in poverty reduction is influenced by factors such as access to credit,
financial literacy, and social capital.
iii. Microfinance has limitations in addressing poverty in Bangladesh, such as high interest rates and
limited access to credit for the poorest segments of the population.
These research questions and hypotheses will guide the theory building process and help to answer the
research problem.

Stage 2: Observation
The second stage of theory building involves observation. In this stage, we gather data on the
phenomenon of interest through empirical research, such as surveys and interviews. We will examine
the patterns and prevalence of microfinance use among poor households in Bangladesh, as well as their
poverty outcomes. We will also explore the mechanisms through which microfinance may influence
poverty outcomes, such as increased income and improved access to credit.

a. Outline of the Microfinance Industry in Bangladesh

The microfinance industry in Bangladesh has experienced substantial expansion in recent decades.
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are the predominant players in the sector, comprising more
than 90% of microfinance institutions operating in the country. The government has also played a
significant role in promoting microfinance, with the establishment of the Microcredit Regulatory
Authority (MRA) in 2006. The MRA is responsible for regulating and supervising microfinance
institutions in Bangladesh.

b. Case studies of successful microfinance institutions

Several microfinance institutions in Bangladesh have been successful in reducing poverty. One such
institution is Grameen Bank, which was founded by Muhammad Yunus in 1983. Grameen Bank has
provided microcredit to over 9 million borrowers, the majority of whom are women. The bank has
been successful in reducing poverty and empowering women in rural areas.
Another successful microfinance institution is BRAC, which was founded in 1972. BRAC is the largest
NGO in the world and has provided microcredit to over 6 million borrowers. The organization has also
been successful in providing other services such as healthcare, education, and agriculture support to
the poor.
c. Challenges faced by microfinance institutions
Despite the success of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh, there are several challenges that they
face.Sustainability poses as a significant obstacle.Many microfinance institutions rely on donor
funding, which is not always reliable. Additionally, high interest rates and loan defaults can also affect
the sustainability of microfinance institutions.

Another challenge is the limited access to credit for the poorest segments of the population.
Microfinance institutions often require collateral or a good credit history, which many poor people do
not have. This limits their ability to access credit and improve their livelihoods.

d. Influence of Microcredit on poverty-alleviation

In Bangladesh, microfinance has played a crucial role in diminishing poverty. Studies have shown that
microfinance has helped to increase household income, improve access to healthcare and education,
and empower women. However, the impact of microfinance on poverty reduction is not uniform across
all segments of the population. The poorest segments of the population often have limited access to
credit and may not benefit from microfinance as much as others.

In conclusion, the Observation stage of the theory building process involves gathering information on
the microfinance sector in Bangladesh, including successful case studies, challenges faced by
microfinance institutions, and the impact of microfinance on poverty reduction. This information will
be used to develop generalizations and hypotheses in the next stage of the theory building process.
Stage 3: Generalization
The third stage of theory building involves generalization. In this stage, we develop theoretical
concepts and frameworks to explain the observed patterns and phenomena. We will identify the key
concepts and variables that explain the relationship between microfinance and poverty outcomes in
Bangladesh, such as access to credit, financial literacy, and social capital. We will also explore the
mechanisms through which these factors influence the relationship.
a.Analysis of the relationship between microfinance and poverty reduction
The relationship between microfinance and poverty reduction is complex and multifaceted. While
microfinance has been successful in reducing poverty in some cases, it is not a panacea for poverty
reduction. Studies have shown that the impact of microfinance on poverty reduction is not uniform
across all segments of the population. The poorest segments of the population often have limited access
to credit and may not benefit from microfinance as much as others.

b.Factors contributing to the success of microfinance in poverty reduction

Several factors contribute to the success of microfinance in poverty reduction. One of the main factors
is access to credit. Microfinance institutions that provide easy access to credit have been more
successful in reducing poverty. Financial literacy and education are also important factors. Borrowers
who are financially literate are more likely to use credit effectively and improve their livelihoods.
Another crucial element is civic goodwill. Microfinance organizations that are embedded in the
community and have strong social networks are more successful in reducing poverty. This is because
social networks can provide support and resources to borrowers, which can help them to overcome
challenges and improve their livelihoods.

c.Limitations of microfinance in addressing poverty

While microfinance has been successful in reducing poverty in some cases, it has limitations in
addressing poverty. One of the main limitations is the high interest rates charged by microfinance
institutions. High interest rates can make it difficult for borrowers to repay their loans and can lead to
a cycle of debt.
Another limitation is the limited access to credit for the poorest segments of the population.
Microfinance institutions often require collateral or a good credit history, which many poor people do
not have. This limits their ability to access credit and improve their livelihoods.
In conclusion, the Generalization stage of the theory building process involves analyzing the
relationship between microfinance and poverty reduction, identifying factors that contribute to the
success of microfinance in poverty reduction, and identifying limitations of microfinance in addressing
poverty. This information will be used to confirm or reject the hypotheses developed in the
Problematization stage and to develop recommendations for improving microfinance in Bangladesh.

Stage 4: Confirmation
The fourth stage of theory building involves confirmation. In this stage, we test the theoretical
frameworks against new data and evidence. We will examine existing studies on the relationship
between microfinance and poverty outcomes in Bangladesh and evaluate the extent to which our
theoretical frameworks explain the observed patterns. We will also explore the limitations of our
frameworks and identify areas for future research.
a.Affirmation of groundwork verdicts
The Confirmation stage involves validating the research findings through data analysis and testing the
hypotheses developed in the Problematization and Generalization stages. In this case, the research
findings will be validated through statistical analysis of the data collected and testing the hypotheses
developed in the earlier stages.
The statistical analysis will involve using appropriate statistical techniques to analyze the data
collected. For example, regression analysis can be used to test the relationship between microfinance
and poverty reduction. The results of the statistical analysis will be used to confirm or reject the
hypotheses developed in the earlier stages.

b. Parallels between current and previous probes

The research findings will also be compared with previous studies on microfinance and poverty
reduction in Bangladesh. This will help to confirm or reject the hypotheses developed in the earlier
stages and provide insights into the effectiveness of microfinance in poverty reduction in Bangladesh.

c.Implications for policy and practice

The Confirmation stage will also involve identifying the implications of the research findings for
policy and practice. The research findings will be used to develop recommendations for improving
microfinance in Bangladesh and to inform policy decisions related to poverty reduction.

The implications for policy and practice will be based on the research findings and the
recommendations developed in the Generalization stage. The recommendations may include
improving access to credit for the poorest segments of the population, reducing interest rates, and
providing financial literacy and education to borrowers. The implications for policy and practice will
be communicated to relevant stakeholders, such as policymakers, microfinance institutions, and
NGOs.
In conclusion, the Confirmation stage of the theory building process involves validating the research
findings through data analysis and testing the hypotheses developed in the earlier stages, comparing
the research findings with previous studies, and identifying the implications of the research findings
for policy and practice. The Confirmation stage is an important step in the theory building process as
it helps to ensure the validity and reliability of the research findings and provides insights into the
effectiveness of microfinance in poverty reduction in Bangladesh.

Stage 5: Application
The final stage of theory building involves application. In this stage, we apply our theoretical
frameworks to real-world problems and policy challenges. We will explore the implications of our
theoretical frameworks for policy-making and interventions aimed at reducing poverty in Bangladesh.
We will also examine the challenges of implementing such interventions and identify areas for future
research.
a.Recommendations for improving microfinance in Bangladesh
The Application stage involves applying the research findings to improve microfinance in Bangladesh.
Based on the research findings, recommendations will be developed for improving microfinance
institutions in Bangladesh. These recommendations may include improving access to credit for the
poorest segments of the population, reducing interest rates, and providing financial literacy and
education to borrowers.
b.Potential areas for future research
The Application stage will also involve identifying potential areas for future research. The research
findings may raise new questions or areas of inquiry that can be explored in future research.
c.Assumption
The Application stage will conclude the research assignment by summarizing the research findings,
recommendations, and potential areas for future research. The research assignment will end with a
conclusion that highlights the significance of the research problem, the contributions of the research,
and the implications for policy and practice.
Critical Analysis:
The theory building process is essential for understanding complex phenomena, such as the
relationship between microfinance and poverty outcomes in Bangladesh. However, it is not without its
challenges. One challenge is the potential for bias in the selection of data sources and analytical
frameworks. We must be mindful of potential biases and ensure that their research is rigorous and
objective.We evaluate the theoretical framework developed in the generalization stage by assessing its
internal and external validity. Internal validity pertains to the degree to which the conceptual
framework effectively reflects the connections among the variables under investigation. External
validity refers to the extent to which the theoretical framework can be generalized to other contexts or
populations.
Limitations and weaknesses:We must identify any limitations or weaknesses in the theoretical
framework and develop strategies to address these limitations. This involves assessing the extent to
which the framework can account for exceptions to the observed patterns and whether it can be
improved to better explain these exceptions.

In the case of microfinance and poverty outcomes in Bangladesh, we must identify any limitations or
weaknesses in the theoretical framework, such as its inability to account for cultural factors that
influence poverty outcomes or its failure to explain exceptions to the observed patterns.In addition to
evaluating the theoretical framework, the critical analysis also involves identifying areas for future
research.We might identify gaps in the existing theories or limitations in the theoretical framework,
and develop recommendations for future research that can address these gaps or limitations.
Another challenge is the complexity of the phenomenon being studied. Poverty in Bangladesh is
influenced by a multitude of factors, making it difficult to develop simple and straightforward
theoretical frameworks. Researchers must be prepared to engage with the complexity of the
phenomenon and be willing to revise their frameworks in response to new evidence.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the theory building process is a valuable tool for understanding complex phenomena in
the context of poverty reduction in Bangladesh. The theory building process has been analyzed as a
systematic approach to understanding the role of microfinance in poverty reduction in Bangladesh in
this assignment project.Through the stages of problemation, observation, generalization, confirmation
and application, we have developed a theoretical framework that can explain the effectiveness of
microfinance in reducing poverty levels in Bangladesh.Following the systematic and rigorous
approach, we can contribute to a better understanding of the role of microfinance in poverty reduction
and inform policy-making and interventions. However,we must also be mindful of potential biases and
challenges associated with the research process.By improving our grasp of the role of microfinance in
poverty reduction, we can develop more effective strategies to address poverty in Bangladesh and other
developing countries.
Reference:
1. Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation:
quantitative methods and practices (Vol. 1). The World Bank.
2. Morgan, D. L. (2018). Reconsidering the Role of Theory in Qualitative Research. Qualitative
Health Research, 28(2), 267–275.
3. Eugenee J. Meehan, “The Theory and Method of Political Analysis”,1965 , p. 114
4. Bateman, M., & Chang, H. J. (2012). Microfinance and the illusion of development: From
hubris to nemesis in thirty years. World Economic Review, p. 1-22
5. Tsoukas, H. (2021). Historical and phenomenological perspectives on organizational theory.
Academy of Management Review, 46(2), p.230-242.
6. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for
Qualitative Research. Routledge. (p. 1-19)
7. Barringtonn Moore, Political Power and Social Theory (New York: Harper Torchbooks,
1962), pp. 93-94.
8. Rahman, A. (1999) , World Development, 27(1), 67-82.
9. Mallick, D., & Nargis, N. (2019). The impact of microfinance on poverty alleviation in
Bangladesh. South Asia Economic Journal, 20(2), 237-256.
10. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In Explaining
Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1-37). Cambridge University Press.