Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leaf anatomical features were studied in the taxonomically controversial Alooideae genera, Chorto/irion
Berger and Poellnitzia Uitewaal (both monotypic), as well as the aberrant A/oe bowiea Schult. & J.H. Schult.
[= Chamaea/oe africana (Haw.) Berger]. Particular reference is made to the taxonomic significance of
epidermal characters in the subfamily. Previous claims that leaf cuticular sculpturing is under strong genetic
control, and thus rather invariant, are contradicted by some infraspecific variation in patterning observed in at
least Chorto/irion and A/oe bowiea. Anatomical characters diagnostic for a particular genus were
nevertheless evident in all samples of a species. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopic studies of both
leaf surfaces proved to be invaluable in assessing variation patterns. Of particular taxonomic significance are
the distribution and structure of the vascular bundles (presence/absence of enlarged parenchymatous cells in
the inner bundle sheath), presence of palisade cells and location of crystalliferous idioblasts. Leaf anatomical
data support the maintenance of Chortolirion and Poellnitzia as distinct genera, whereas A/oe bowiea falls
within the range of variation previously reported for the genus A/oe.
genus now included in the synonymy of Aloe (Smith 1990). cited therein) is used. Descriptors to indicate abundance and
The leaf anatomy of these three taxa is presented and its frequency are based on those proposed by Schmid (1982).
usefulness for diagnostic or taxonomic purposes is con-
sidered. Results
The general distribution of tissues in the leaf is rather
Materials and Methods similar to that described for other alooid genera (Figure 1).
Leaf material of all the species was obtained from plants However, there are several differences and it is mainly some
collected in the field and subsequently grown under uniform of these features which will be considered. A summary of
conditions. As shown previously by Cutler (1978a), glass- the main leaf anatomical differences between the investi-
house-grown plants retain their epidermal features unaltered gated species is given in Table 2. More detailed descriptions
when compared with samples collected from plants in the follow below.
wild. Fully expanded leaves were freshly collected, fixed
and stored in formalin-acetic acid-alcohol (FAA) (Johansen Aloe bowiea (Figures 1B, 2, 5,8, 11 and 12)
1940). All leaves were examined at a standard level, Leaf in transverse section. LM
halfway between the base and apex. Voucher specimens and Outline crescentiform with a shallow mid-adaxial groove;
locality details pertaining to the various samples studied are margins rounded, with scattered prickles. Cuticle relatively
listed in Table 1. thin (ca. 3 /-Lm), following outline of outer wall of
For light microscopy (LM), small portions of fixed mater- epidermal cells; outer part clear, inner part apparently
ial were dehydrated, infiltrated and embedded according to grading with cutinized outer-most part of epidermal cell
standard methods in glycol methacrylate (GMA) (Feder & wall. Lobes forming the suprastomatal cavity well devel-
O'Brien 1968). Transverse sections, 1 - 3 /-Lm thick, were oped, consisting in part of an extension of the wall of the
stained with the periodic acid/Schiff's (PAS) reaction, subsidiary cell. Epidermal cells usually slightly periclinally
counterstained with toluidine blue (TB) and mounted in elongated (rectangular); those on both surfaces similar.
Entellan (Feder & O'Brien 1968). For the detection of
Outer periclinal walls moderately cutinized (6 /-Lm thick).
calcium oxalate crystals, sections were stained with TB and Stomata sunken, suprastomatal cavity with parallel or
viewed under polarized light. Cuticular preparations were slightly overarching lobes. Guard cell walls slightly and
obtained after treatment with Jeffreys' solution, and stained evenly thickened; cuticular ledges bordering outer and inner
with safran in 0 (Kiger 1971). To elucidate epidermal cell pore very short and apparently containing some cell wall
shape and stomatal structure further, paradermal free-hand material (they stained dark pinkish purple with PAS{fB).
sections were prepared and stained with TB or safranin O. Hypodermis absent. Chlorenchyma several-layered; cells
Standard procedures were followed for scanning electron thin-walled; present to inner sides of both surfaces, as well
microscopic (SEM) studies of both adaxial and abaxial leaf as the margins; cells of 1 - 3 outermost layer(s) slightly and
surfaces. Leaf tissue fixed in FAA was infiltrated with liquid irregularly radially elongated, but not distinctly palisade-
CO2 and dried in a critical-point drier, sputter-coated with like; those of inner layers more or less isodiametric.
gold and viewed with the SEM. Vascular bundles arranged more or less equidistant from
Unless otherwise indicated, the descriptive terminology leaf surface at boundary between chlorenchyma and central
with regard to epidermal structure proposed for the Alooi- parenchymatous water storage tissue; more numerous (ca.
deae by Cutler and co-workers (Cutler 1982 and references 12) abaxially than adaxially (ca. 5); bundles of roughly
equal size; phloem poles directed outwards; no bundles dis-
Table 1 Origin of material and list of voucher tinctly positioned as groove or marginal ones (Figure IB).
specimensa Phloem pole more or less T-shaped in outline, the stalk of
the T directed outwards. Sieve tubes and companion cells
Locality Locality, Collection very narrow. Xylem composed of few (2 - 6) tracheids of
Species number grid reference number Figure
medium width. Bundle sheaths consisting of two layers of
Aloe bowiea Brakfontein, Kariega; 206 lIB parenchyma cells; outer layer sometimes difficult to
3325 AC Port Elizabeth distinguish from surrounding cells; inner layer forming a
2 Maasward, Coega; 173 1B,2,5 conspicuous cap of large, thin-walled cells at the phloem
3325 DC Port Elizabeth 8, lIA, 12 pole; sectional area of cap larger than that of phloem and
3 lachtvlalcte, Uitenhage; 1 (PEU) xylem together. Sclerenchyma absent. Central tissue com-
3325 CD Port Elizabeth
posed of large parenchymatous cells; more or less sharply
Poellnitzia 4 Langverwacht; 176 7
demarcated from chlorenchyma. Crystals present as raphide
rubrijlora 3320 CC Montagu
5 Sandberg, Robertson; 184 10 bundles in idioblasts; scattered amongst chlorenchyma cells,
3319 DD Robertson but not specifically associated with vascular bundles. Silica
6 5 km W of Bonnievale; 9 (PRU) 1C,4, bodies and tannins not observed.
3320 CC Montagu 15, 16
Chortolirion 7 Cachet rail way siding; 14 lA, 3, 6, Leaf epidermis/surjace,LM & SEM
angolense 2627 CA Potchefstroom 9, 13, 14
Stomata anomocytic, sunken; lobes nearly upright, fused;
• All collection numbers are those of the first author. Unless other· outer pore more or less square, occasionally longer than
wise indicated all specimens are deposited in PUC. One specimen wide. Primary sculpturing: epidermal cells mostly 5- or 6-
from each locality was studied. sided; as long as wide, or slightly longer; anticlinal walls
S.Afr.J.Bot.,1992,58(5) 351
D epidennis/
vascular-/central tissue
~ undifferentiated
L::J chlorenchyma
m palisade layer
Figure 1 Diagrammatic representation of transverse sections of leaves illustrating distribution of tissues in Chorlolirion angolense (A),
Aloe bowiea (B) and Poellnilzia rubriflora (C). Sources of material are given in Table 1.
indistinct or only slightly depressed. Secondary sculpturing: Chorto/irion ango/ense (Figures 1A, 3, 6, 9, 13 and 14)
outer periclinal walls of epidermal cells slightly convex; Leaf in transverse section. LM
papillae generally absent; a single centrally positioned Outline broadly triangular (plano-convex) in transverse
papilla present on most cells on the abaxial surface of the section; adaxial surface more or less plane; abaxial surface
convex; margins rounded, with scattered prickles. Cuticle
Kariega collection only (Figure lIB). Tertiary sculpturing:
relatively thin (up to 8 J..Lm), following outline of outer wall
micropapillae moderately coarse, many per cell, distributed
of epidermal cells, clear. Lobes forming the suprastomatal
over entire surface of each cell; those on subsidiary cells cavity well developed, without subsidiary cell wall exten-
more prominent. Wax present as amorphous deposits over sions. Epidermal cells slightly radially elongated (rect-
entire leaf surface, partly blocking some stomata. angular); those on both surfaces similar. Outer periclinal
352 S.-Afr .Tydskr .Plantk., 1992, 58(5)
Table 2 Summary of salient, mainly leaf anatomical, differences between A/oe bowiea, Chorto/irion and Poellnitzia
(LM, light microscopy; SEM, scanning electron microscopy)
Cuticular ledges very short; with cell well-developed; without minute; unstained
wall extensions cell wall extensions
Vascular bundles at boundary between chlorenchyma and central tissue in central tissue
Inner bundle sheath cap large sectional area absent small sectional area
(parenchymatous)
Cuticular lobes more or less upright strongly overarching more or less upright
Figures 2 - 10 Details of transverse leaf sections in Aloe bowiea (2, 5, 8), CJwrlolirion angolense (3, 6, 9) and Poellnilzia rubriflora
(4, 7, 10). Sources of material are given in Table 1. Sections of adaxial leaf segments (2 - 4), vascular bundles from mature leaves (5 - 7)
and adaxial stomata (8 - 10) are shown. Adaxial leaf surfaces point towards the top of the page. Scale bars: 50 IJ-m.
walls strongly cutinized (ca. 9 Il-m thick), others only lobes. Guard cell walls unevenly and heavily thickened,
slightly so; inner periclinal walls convex. Stomata sunken, particularly towards supra- and substomatal cavities; inner
suprastomatal cavity with parallel or slightly overarching cuticular ledges minute and darkly stained with PAS(fB,
354 S.-Afr.Tydskr.Plantk .• 1992.58(5)
Figures 11 - 16 Scanning electron micrographs of abaxial leaf surfaces of Aloe bowiea (11. 12). Chortolirion angolense (13. 14) and
Poellnitzia rubriflora (15. 16). Sources of material are given in Table 1. Long axes of leaves are vertical throughout. Scale bars: 100 fLm
in Figures 11. 13 and 15. and 20 fLm in Figures 12. 14 and 16.
outer ones minute and unstained. Hypodermis absent. outermost layer strongly and regularly radially elongated,
Chlorenchyma 1 - 4-1ayered; cells thin-walled; present to forming a distinct palisade layer; those of inner layer(s)
inner sides of both surfaces, as well as the margins; cells of more or less isodiametric. Vascular bundles ca. 10, evenly
S.Afr.J.Bot., 1992,58(5) 355
distributed ab- and adaxially, arranged in a single ring, more from leaf surface and on boundary between chlorenchyma
or less equidistant from leaf surface and towards inside of and central parenchymatous tissue; phloem poles directed
chlorenchyma in central parenchymatous water storage outwards; no bundles distinctly positioned as 'keel' or
tissue; bundles of alternating large and medium-sized ones; marginal ones. Phloem pole more or less T-shaped in
phloem poles directed outwards; no bundles distinctly outline, the stalk of the T directed outwards. Sieve tubes and
positioned as 'keel' or marginal ones. Phloem pole companion cells very narrow. Xylem composed of usually 1
represented by a single strand, parallel to outer leaf surface. - 5 tracheids of small diameter. Bundle sheath(s) consisting
Sieve tubes and companion cells very narrow; medium-sized of 1 or 2 layers of thin-walled parenchymatous cells; outer
bundles with few cells only. Xylem composed of few (1 - 4) layer usually clearly distinguishable from surrounding cells.
tracheids of medium width. Bundle sheaths consisting of 1 - Bundle caps of large thin-walled cells absent. Sclerenchyma
2 well-defined layers of thin-walled parenchymatous cells; present as a well-developed cap (more or less reniform in
inner layer forming a small cap of parenchymatous cells at
transverse section) at the phloem pole; sectional area of cap
the phloem pole; sectional area of cap smaller than that of
much larger than xylem and phloem together. Central tissue
phloem and xylem together. Sclerenchyma absent. Central
composed of large parenchymatous cells, merging impercep-
tissue composed of large, nearly isodiametric parenchym-
tibly with chlorenchyma. Crystals present as raphide
atous cells; merging rather imperceptibly with chloren-
chyma. Crystals present as raphide bundles in scattered idio- bundles in idioblasts; relatively few and mainly confined to
blasts immediately to the inside of the chlorenchyma; not the chlorenchyma on the adaxial side; not specifically
specifically associated with vascular bundles. Silica bodies associated with vascular bundles. Silica bodies and tannins
and tannins not observed. not observed.
Inner bundle sheath caps leaf surface patterns of this aberrant monotype. Clearly, any
This character has been extensively reviewed by Beaumont taxonomic changes proposed for a particular taxon on the
et al. (1985) and is not discussed in detail here. However, to basis of leaf anatomy alone should be based on a represen-
date the internal structure of Chortolirion leaves had not tative range of samples.
been investigated microscopically (see Table 1 in Beaumont Previous SEM work on leaves of the Alooideae has
et al. 1985). The present study showed that this genus, in focused mainly on the surface sculpturing of the adaxial
common with most other alooid taxa, including Aloe epidermis. The present study indicated different infraspecific
bowiea, has an inner bundle sheath cap consisting of thin- patterning on the ad- and abaxial leaf surfaces of some
walled parenchymatous cells only. In contrast, the bundle samples, especially in the case of Chortolirion and Aloe
sheath caps of Poellnitzia are large (sectional area), bowiea (Kariega specimen). This emphasizes the need for
reniform, and sclerenchymatous. The parenchymatous state future routine examination of both leaf surfaces. Further-
is generally regarded as derived since it is a unique feature more, some infraspecific variation exists in the abaxial leaf
in an otherwise advanced group of plants (Beaumont et al. surface patterning of specimens of A. bowiea collected from
1985; Smith & Van Wyk 1991). different localities (Figure l1A: Coega vs Figure lIB:
Kariega). The 'honeycomb' patterning on both the ad- and
Localization of crystalliferous idioblasts abaxial leaf surfaces of Poellnitzia is very distinctive and
Very little is known about the localization of crystalliferous should serve to characterize the genus on leaf anatomical
idioblasts in the leaves of representatives of the Alooideae, grounds alone. It is quite unlike any pattern previously
and the type(s) of crystals that they contain. For Chortolir- recorded for a member of the Alooideae.
ion (Table 2), idioblasts have not been found in the
chlorenchyma, whereas, in the case of Poellnitzia and Aloe Stomata
bowiea, they occur scattered in the chlorenchyma. This The leaves of all the species studied are amphistomatic with
character, too, requires more detailed investigation in a the guard cells very deeply sunken, and more or less over-
representative sample of alooid taxa. arched by prominent cuticular lobes. In addition, the guard
cells also have inner and outer cuticular ledges which may
Cutinized epidermal cell walls (Aloe bowiea; Figure 8) or may not (Chortolirion,
Although strongly cutinized outer periclinal cell walls are Poellnitzia; Figures 9 and 10) contain cell wall extensions.
not unique to the Alooideae, the presence of this type of Thus, two extensions of the stomatal pore are delimited: a
wall structure among the genera Astroloba, Chortolirion, front (outer) cavity and a back (inner) cavity (Stace 1965).
Gasteria, Haworthia and Poellnitzia might be phylo- Morphologically, stomata of the Alooideae have previous-
genetically significant (Cutler 1972). Although Baijnath ly been considered tetracytic (four subsidiary cells; two
(1980) did not mention this character when he investigated polar and two lateral) (Cutler 1972). However, the present
the leaf anatomy of Kniphofia Moench, reference to his authors are not convinced that the epidermal cells bordering
Figures 2A and 2C indicates its presence in at least some the guard cells are that different from the epidermal cells
species of the genus. which are not in direct contact with guard cells, to warrant
In a leaf anatomical study of the monocotyledonous referring to them as subsidiary cells. Pending ontogenetic
Gloriosa superba L., Littonia modesta Hook., Sandersonia studies of Alooideae stomata, these structures are best
aurantiaca Hook. and Hexacyrtis dickiana Dint. (lphigeni- referred to as anomocytic. Although in many alooid taxa the
eae: Colchicaceae), Baijnath (1988) found markedly thick- cells bordering the guard cell pair are furnished with
ened outer periclinal epidermal cell walls in Hexacyrtis distinctive micropapillae and/or conspicuous lobes, morpho-
only. Significantly, Baijnath (1988) suggested a correlation logically similar stomatal types can be developmentally
between the leaf anatomical characters of these species and dissimilar. Such non-homologous characters obviously
their growth forms and habitats. As would be expected, H. cannot be used to signify affinity, since different genetic
dickiana, a species from arid sandy places in the Namib mechanisms are involved (Tomlinson 1974; Patel 1978).
Desert, shares a number of anatomical features with xero- It is noteworthy that, as is the case with ·cuticle and
phytes (see also Cutler 1978b, 1982, on the correlation be- epidermal cell wall thickness (Cutler 1978b), stomatal
tween leaf surface sculpturing and habitat in Aloe and in elevation (sunken vs superficial) is not a reliable indication
general). of xeromorphy, habitat or climate. For example, Eggli
(1984) has shown that in most cases in the highly succulent
Leaf surface sculpturing Cactaceae, the stomata are superficial (but see Barthlott
The leaf surface sculpturing of Chortolirion angolense has 1990 on ecological aspects of surface sculpturing).
previously been investigated by Cutler (1979; Haworthia
angolense Baker). However, our results differ from those of Acknowledgements
Cutler (1979) in a number of respects. For example, we The financial support from the Foundation for Research
found the cuticular lobes to be fused (not free), the outline Development, South Africa, for one of us (A.E.v.W.) is
of the suprastomatal chamber to be square (not rectangular), gratefully acknowledged. Mr Martin Potgieter is thanked for
the micropapillae coalescing adaxially to form transverse technical services rendered.
ridges (not well-spaced), at least the longitudinal radial
walls distinctly depressed (not indistinct), and the wax References
present as amorphous deposits (not flaky particles). These BAIJNATH, H. 1980. A contribution to the study of leaf anatomy
discrepancies show that considerable variation exists in the of the genus Kniphojia Moench (Liliaceae). In: Petaloid mono-
S.AfrJ.Bot., 1992,58(5) 357
cotyledons, eds. C.D. Brickell, D.F. Cutler & M. Gregory. cuticle, eds D.F. Cutler, K.L. Alvin & C.E. Price, Linn. Soc.
Linn. Soc. Symp. SeT. 8, pp. 89 - 103. Academic Press, Symp. Ser. 10, pp. 425 - 444. Academic Press, London.
London. CUTLER, D.P. & BRANDHAM, P.E. 1977. Experimental
BAlJNATH, H. 1984. Studies in the genus Lomatophyllum L. evidence for the genetic control of leaf surface characters in
(Asphodelaceae). Proc. Ann. Congr. S. Afr. Assoc. Bot. 10: 16. hybrid Aloineae (Liliaceae). Kew Bull. 32: 23 - 32.
BAlJNATH, H. 1988. A contribution to the leaf anatomy of some CUTLER, D.F., BRANDHAM, P.E., CARTER, S. & HARRIS,
southern African Iphigenieae (Colchicaceae). S. Afr. I. Bot. 54: SJ. 1980. Morphological. anatomical, cytological and bio-
265 - 272. chemical aspects of evolution in east African shrubby species
BARTHLOTT, W. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy of the of Aloe L. (Liliaceae). Bot. II Linn. Soc. 80: 293 - 317.
epidermal surface in plants. In: Scanning electron microscopy DAHLGREN, R.M.T., CLIFFORD, H.T. & YEO, P.P. 1985. The
in taxonomy and functional morphology, ed. D. Claugher. Syst. families of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution and
Assoc. Special Vol. 41, pp. 69 - 94. Clarendon Press, Oxford. taxonomy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
BEAUMONT, J., CUTLER, D.F., REYNOLDS, T. & EGGLI, U. 1984. Stomatal types of Cactaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 146:
VAUGHAN, J.G. 1985. The secretory tissue of aloes and their 197 - 214.
allies. Israel I. Bot. 34: 265 - 282. FEDER, N. & O'BRIEN, T.P. 1968. Plant microtechnique: some
BERGER, A. 1908. Liliaceae - Asphodeloideae - Aloinae. Anato- principles and new methods. Am. I. Bot. 55: 123 - 142.
mische Verhliltnisse. In: Das Pflanzenreich, ed. A. Engler, FROLlCH, D. & BARTHLOTT, W. 1988. Mikromorphologie der
4.38.3.2. (Heft 33), pp. 7 - 13. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. epicuticularen Wachse und das System der Monokotylen. Trap.
BRANDHAM, P.E. 1977. The inheritance of leaf pigmentation in Subtrop. Pflanzenwelt 63: 279 - 402.
Gasteria (Liliaceae). Kew Bull. 32: 13 - 17. GLEN, H.F. & HARDY, D.S. 1986. A method for the non-
BRANDHAM, P.E. & CUTLER, D.P. 1978. Influence of chromo- destructive examination of leaves of Aloe species by SEM.
some variation on the organization of the leaf epidermis in a Bothalia 16: 25 - 34.
hybrid Aloe (Liliaceae). Bot. II Linn. Soc . 77: 1 - 16. JOHANSEN, D.A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill,
BRANDHAM, P.E. & CUTLER, D.F. 1981. Polyploidy, chromo- New York.
some interchange and leaf surface anatomy as indicators of KIGER, R.W. 1971. Epidermal and cuticular mounts of plant
relationships within Haworthia section Coarctatae Baker material obtained by maceration. Stain Technol. 46: 71 - 75.
(Liliaceae - Aloineae). II S. Afr. Bot. 47: 507 - 546. PATEL, J.D. 1978. How should we interpret and distinguish
CARTER, S., CUTLER, D.P., REYNOLDS, T. & BRANDHAM, subsidiary cells? Bot. II Linn. Soc. 77: 65 - 71.
P.E. 1984. A multidisciplinary approach to a revision of the ROBERTS REINECKE, P. 1965. The genus Astroloba Uitewaal
Aloe somaliensis complex (Liliaceae). Kew Bull. 39: 611 - (Liliaceae). M.Sc. thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape
633. Town.
CUTLER, D.F. 1969. Cuticular markings and other epidermal SCHMID, R. 1982. Descriptors used to indicate abundance and
features in Aloe leaves. Notes Iodrell Lab. 6: 21 - 27. frequency in ecology and systematics. Taxon 31: 89 - 94.
CUTLER, D.F. 1972. Leaf anatomy of certain Aloe and Gasteria SCHNEIDER, C. 1972. Anatomische Untersuchungen an den
species and their hybrids. In: Research trends in plant anatomy, BIlittern einiger Arten von Haworthia. Zulassungsarbeit zur
eds A.K.M. Ghouse & M. Yunus, pp. 103 - 122. Tata Wissenschaftlichen Priifung fiir das Lehramt an Hoheren
McGraw-Hill, New Delhi. Schulen, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbriicken.
CUTLER, D.P. 1978a. The significance of variability in epidermal SMITH, G.F. 1990. Nomenclatural notes on the subsection
cell wall patterns of Haworthia reinwardtii var. chalumnensis Bowieae in Aloe (Asphodelaceae: Alooideae). S. Afr. 1. Bot.
(Liliaceae). Revta Brasil. Bot. 1: 25 - 34. 56: 303 - 308.
CUTLER, D.F. 1978b. Applied plant anatomy. Longmans, SMITH, G.F. & VAN WYK, B.-E. 1991. Generic relationships in
London. the Alooideae (Asphodelaceae). Taxon 40: 557 - 581.
CUTLER, D.F. 1979. Leaf surface studies in Alai! and Haworthia STACE, C.A. 1965. Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy.
species (Liliaceae): taxonomic implications. Trap. Subtrop. Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot. 4: 1 - 78.
Pflanzenwelt 28: 449 - 471. TOMLINSON, P.B. 1974. Development of the stomatal complex
CUTLER, D.F. 1982. Cuticular sculpturing and habitat in certain as a taxonomic character in the monocotyledons. Taxon 23:
Aloe species (Liliaceae) from Southern Africa. In: The plant 109 - 128.