Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org/wiki/Reality
Reality
Reality is the sum or aggregate of all that is real or existent within a system, as opposed to that
which is only imaginary, nonexistent or nonactual. The term is also used to refer to the ontological
status of things, indicating their existence.[1] In physical terms, reality is the totality of a system,
known and unknown.[2]
Philosophical questions about the nature of reality or existence or being are considered under the
rubric of ontology, which is a major branch of metaphysics in the Western philosophical tradition.
Ontological questions also feature in diverse branches of philosophy, including the philosophy of
science, of religion, of mathematics, and philosophical logic. These include questions about
whether only physical objects are real (i.e., physicalism), whether reality is fundamentally
immaterial (e.g. idealism), whether hypothetical unobservable entities posited by scientific theories
exist, whether a 'God' exists, whether numbers and other abstract objects exist, and whether
possible worlds exist. Epistemology is concerned with what can be known or inferred as likely and
how, whereby in the modern world emphasis is put on reason, empirical evidence and science as
sources and methods to determine or investigate reality.
World views
A common colloquial usage would have reality mean "perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes toward
reality", as in "My reality is not your reality." This is often used just as a colloquialism indicating
that the parties to a conversation agree, or should agree, not to quibble over deeply different
conceptions of what is real. For example, in a religious discussion between friends, one might say
(attempting humor), "You might disagree, but in my reality, everyone goes to heaven."
Reality can be defined in a way that links it to worldviews or parts of them (conceptual
frameworks): Reality is the totality of all things, structures (actual and conceptual), events (past
and present) and phenomena, whether observable or not. It is what a world view (whether it be
based on individual or shared human experience) ultimately attempts to describe or map.
Certain ideas from physics, philosophy, sociology, literary criticism, and other fields shape various
theories of reality. One such theory is that there simply and literally is no reality beyond the
perceptions or beliefs we each have about reality. Such attitudes are summarized in the popular
statement, "Perception is reality" or "Life is how you perceive reality" or "reality is what you can get
1 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
away with" (Robert Anton Wilson), and they indicate anti-realism – that is, the view that there is
no objective reality, whether acknowledged explicitly or not.
Many of the concepts of science and philosophy are often defined culturally and socially. This idea
was elaborated by Thomas Kuhn in his book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962). The
Social Construction of Reality, a book about the sociology of knowledge written by Peter L. Berger
and Thomas Luckmann, was published in 1966. It explained how knowledge is acquired and used
for the comprehension of reality. Out of all the realities, the reality of everyday life is the most
important one since our consciousness requires us to be completely aware and attentive to the
experience of everyday life.
Related concepts
In philosophy, potentiality and actuality[7] are a pair of closely connected principles which Aristotle
used to analyze motion, causality, ethics, and physiology in his Physics, Metaphysics,
Nicomachean Ethics, and De Anima.[8]
The concept of potentiality, in this context, generally refers to any "possibility" that a thing can be
said to have. Aristotle did not consider all possibilities the same, and emphasized the importance of
those that become real of their own accord when conditions are right and nothing stops them.[9]
Actuality, in contrast to potentiality, is the motion, change or activity that represents an exercise or
fulfillment of a possibility, when a possibility becomes real in the fullest sense.[10]
Belief
A belief is a subjective attitude that a proposition is true or a state of affairs is the case. A subjective
attitude is a mental state of having some stance, take, or opinion about something.[11] In
epistemology, philosophers use the term "belief" to refer to attitudes about the world which can be
either true or false.[12] To believe something is to take it to be true; for instance, to believe that
snow is white is comparable to accepting the truth of the proposition "snow is white". However,
holding a belief does not require active introspection. For example, few carefully consider whether
or not the sun will rise tomorrow, simply assuming that it will. Moreover, beliefs need not be
occurrent (e.g. a person actively thinking "snow is white"), but can instead be dispositional (e.g. a
person who if asked about the color of snow would assert "snow is white").[12]
There are various ways that contemporary philosophers have tried to describe beliefs, including as
representations of ways that the world could be (Jerry Fodor), as dispositions to act as if certain
2 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
things are true (Roderick Chisholm), as interpretive schemes for making sense of someone's
actions (Daniel Dennett and Donald Davidson), or as mental states that fill a particular function
(Hilary Putnam).[12] Some have also attempted to offer significant revisions to our notion of belief,
including eliminativists about belief who argue that there is no phenomenon in the natural world
which corresponds to our folk psychological concept of belief (Paul Churchland) and formal
epistemologists who aim to replace our bivalent notion of belief ("either we have a belief or we
don't have a belief") with the more permissive, probabilistic notion of credence ("there is an entire
spectrum of degrees of belief, not a simple dichotomy between belief and non-belief").[12][13]
Beliefs are the subject of various important philosophical debates. Notable examples include:
"What is the rational way to revise one's beliefs when presented with various sorts of evidence?",
"Is the content of our beliefs entirely determined by our mental states, or do the relevant facts have
any bearing on our beliefs (e.g. if I believe that I'm holding a glass of water, is the non-mental fact
that water is H2O part of the content of that belief)?", "How fine-grained or coarse-grained are our
beliefs?", and "Must it be possible for a belief to be expressible in language, or are there non-
linguistic beliefs?"[12]
Belief studies
There is research investigating specific beliefs, types of beliefs
and patterns of beliefs. For example, a study estimated
contemporary prevalence and associations with belief in
witchcraft around the world, which (in its data) varied between
9% and 90% between nations and is still a widespread element
in worldviews globally. It also shows associations such as with
lower "innovative activity", higher levels of anxiety, lower life
expectancy, and higher religiosity.[15][14] Other research is
investigating beliefs in misinformation and their resistance to
correction, including with respect to misinformation
countermeasures. It describes cognitive, social and affective
processes that leave people vulnerable to the formation of false Socio-demographic correlates of
beliefs. [16] A study introduced the concept of false social reality witchcraft beliefs[14]
which refers to widespread perceptions of public opinion that
are shown to be false, such as underestimated general public
support in the U.S. for climate change mitigation policies.[17][18] Studies also suggested some uses
of psychedelics can shift beliefs in some humans in certain ways, such as increasing attribution of
consciousness to various entities (including plants and inanimate objects) and towards
panpsychism and fatalism.[19][20]
Western philosophy
Philosophy addresses two different aspects of the topic of reality: the nature of reality itself, and
the relationship between the mind (as well as language and culture) and reality.
On the one hand, ontology is the study of being, and the central topic of the field is couched,
variously, in terms of being, existence, "what is", and reality. The task in ontology is to describe the
most general categories of reality and how they are interrelated. If a philosopher wanted to proffer
a positive definition of the concept "reality", it would be done under this heading. As explained
above, some philosophers draw a distinction between reality and existence. In fact, many analytic
philosophers today tend to avoid the term "real" and "reality" in discussing ontological issues. But
3 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
for those who would treat "is real" the same way they treat "exists", one of the leading questions of
analytic philosophy has been whether existence (or reality) is a property of objects. It has been
widely held by analytic philosophers that it is not a property at all, though this view has lost some
ground in recent decades.
On the other hand, particularly in discussions of objectivity that have feet in both metaphysics and
epistemology, philosophical discussions of "reality" often concern the ways in which reality is, or is
not, in some way dependent upon (or, to use fashionable jargon, "constructed" out of) mental and
cultural factors such as perceptions, beliefs, and other mental states, as well as cultural artifacts,
such as religions and political movements, on up to the vague notion of a common cultural world
view, or Weltanschauung.
Realism
The view that there is a reality independent of any beliefs, perceptions, etc., is called realism. More
specifically, philosophers are given to speaking about "realism about" this and that, such as realism
about universals or realism about the external world. Generally, where one can identify any class of
object, the existence or essential characteristics of which is said not to depend on perceptions,
beliefs, language, or any other human artifact, one can speak of "realism about" that object.
A correspondence theory of knowledge about what exists claims that "true" knowledge of reality
represents accurate correspondence of statements about and images of reality with the actual
reality that the statements or images are attempting to represent. For example, the scientific
method can verify that a statement is true based on the observable evidence that a thing exists.
Many humans can point to the Rocky Mountains and say that this mountain range exists, and
continues to exist even if no one is observing it or making statements about it.
Anti-realism
One can also speak of anti-realism about the same objects. Anti-realism is the latest in a long
series of terms for views opposed to realism. Perhaps the first was idealism, so called because
reality was said to be in the mind, or a product of our ideas. Berkeleyan idealism is the view,
propounded by the Irish empiricist George Berkeley, that the objects of perception are actually
ideas in the mind. In this view, one might be tempted to say that reality is a "mental construct";
this is not quite accurate, however, since, in Berkeley's view, perceptual ideas are created and
coordinated by God. By the 20th century, views similar to Berkeley's were called phenomenalism.
Phenomenalism differs from Berkeleyan idealism primarily in that Berkeley believed that minds,
or souls, are not merely ideas nor made up of ideas, whereas varieties of phenomenalism, such as
that advocated by Russell, tended to go farther to say that the mind itself is merely a collection of
perceptions, memories, etc., and that there is no mind or soul over and above such mental events.
Finally, anti-realism became a fashionable term for any view which held that the existence of some
object depends upon the mind or cultural artifacts. The view that the so-called external world is
really merely a social, or cultural, artifact, called social constructionism, is one variety of anti-
realism. Cultural relativism is the view that social issues such as morality are not absolute, but at
least partially cultural artifact.
Being
4 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
The nature of being is a perennial topic in metaphysics. For, instance Parmenides taught that
reality was a single unchanging Being, whereas Heraclitus wrote that all things flow. The 20th-
century philosopher Heidegger thought previous philosophers have lost sight the question of Being
(qua Being) in favour of the questions of beings (existing things), so that a return to the
Parmenidean approach was needed. An ontological catalogue is an attempt to list the fundamental
constituents of reality. The question of whether or not existence is a predicate has been discussed
since the Early Modern period, not least in relation to the ontological argument for the existence of
God. Existence, that something is, has been contrasted with essence, the question of what
something is. Since existence without essence seems blank, it associated with nothingness by
philosophers such as Hegel. Nihilism represents an extremely negative view of being, the absolute
a positive one.
"Why is there anything at all?" (or "why is there something rather than nothing?") is a question
about the reason for basic existence which has been raised or commented on by a range of
philosophers and physicists, including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz,[21] Ludwig Wittgenstein,[22] and
Martin Heidegger, the last of whom called it "the fundamental question of metaphysics".[23][24][25]
The question is posed totally and comprehensively, rather than concerning reasoning for the
existence of anything specific, such as the universe or multiverse, the Big Bang, God, mathematical
and physical laws, time or consciousness. It can be seen as an open metaphysical question, rather
than a search for an exact answer.[26][27][28][29]
Perception
Timothy Leary coined the influential term Reality Tunnel, by which he means a kind of
representative realism. The theory states that, with a subconscious set of mental filters formed
from their beliefs and experiences, every individual interprets the same world differently, hence
"Truth is in the eye of the beholder". His ideas influenced the work of his friend Robert Anton
Wilson.
In the philosophy of mathematics, the best known form of realism about numbers is Platonic
realism, which grants them abstract, immaterial existence. Other forms of realism identify
mathematics with the concrete physical universe.
5 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
Some approaches are selectively realistic about some mathematical objects but not others. Finitism
rejects infinite quantities. Ultra-finitism accepts finite quantities up to a certain amount.
Constructivism and intuitionism are realistic about objects that can be explicitly constructed, but
reject the use of the principle of the excluded middle to prove existence by reductio ad absurdum.
The traditional debate has focused on whether an abstract (immaterial, intelligible) realm of
numbers has existed in addition to the physical (sensible, concrete) world. A recent development is
the mathematical universe hypothesis, the theory that only a mathematical world exists, with the
finite, physical world being an illusion within it.
Properties
The problem of universals is an ancient problem in metaphysics about whether universals exist.
Universals are general or abstract qualities, characteristics, properties, kinds or relations, such as
being male/female, solid/liquid/gas or a certain colour,[35] that can be predicated of individuals or
particulars or that individuals or particulars can be regarded as sharing or participating in. For
example, Scott, Pat, and Chris have in common the universal quality of being human or humanity.
The realist school claims that universals are real – they exist and are distinct from the particulars
that instantiate them. There are various forms of realism. Two major forms are Platonic realism
and Aristotelian realism.[36] Platonic realism is the view that universals are real entities and they
exist independent of particulars. Aristotelian realism, on the other hand, is the view that
universals are real entities, but their existence is dependent on the particulars that exemplify them.
Nominalism and conceptualism are the main forms of anti-realism about universals.
A traditional realist position in ontology is that time and space have existence apart from the
human mind. Idealists deny or doubt the existence of objects independent of the mind. Some anti-
realists whose ontological position is that objects outside the mind do exist, nevertheless doubt the
independent existence of time and space.
Kant, in the Critique of Pure Reason, described time as an a priori notion that, together with other
a priori notions such as space, allows us to comprehend sense experience. Kant denies that either
space or time are substance, entities in themselves, or learned by experience; he holds rather that
both are elements of a systematic framework we use to structure our experience. Spatial
6 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
measurements are used to quantify how far apart objects are, and temporal measurements are
used to quantitatively compare the interval between (or duration of) events. Although space and
time are held to be transcendentally ideal in this sense, they are also empirically real, i.e. not mere
illusions.
Idealist writers such as J. M. E. McTaggart in The Unreality of Time have argued that time is an
illusion.
As well as differing about the reality of time as a whole, metaphysical theories of time can differ in
their ascriptions of reality to the past, present and future separately.
▪ Presentism holds that the past and future are unreal, and only an ever-changing present is
real.
▪ The block universe theory, also known as Eternalism, holds that past, present and future are all
real, but the passage of time is an illusion. It is often said to have a scientific basis in relativity.
▪ The growing block universe theory holds that past and present are real, but the future is not.
Time, and the related concepts of process and evolution are central to the system-building
metaphysics of A. N. Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne.
Possible worlds
The term "possible world" goes back to Leibniz's theory of possible worlds, used to analyse
necessity, possibility, and similar modal notions. Modal realism is the view, notably propounded by
David Kellogg Lewis, that all possible worlds are as real as the actual world. In short: the actual
world is regarded as merely one among an infinite set of logically possible worlds, some "nearer" to
the actual world and some more remote. Other theorists may use the Possible World framework to
express and explore problems without committing to it ontologically. Possible world theory is
related to alethic logic: a proposition is necessary if it is true in all possible worlds, and possible if
it is true in at least one. The many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is a similar idea in
science.
The philosophical implications of a physical TOE are frequently debated. For example, if
philosophical physicalism is true, a physical TOE will coincide with a philosophical theory of
everything.
The "system building" style of metaphysics attempts to answer all the important questions in a
coherent way, providing a complete picture of the world. Plato and Aristotle could be said to be
early examples of comprehensive systems. In the early modern period (17th and 18th centuries),
the system-building scope of philosophy is often linked to the rationalist method of philosophy,
that is the technique of deducing the nature of the world by pure a priori reason. Examples from
the early modern period include the Leibniz's Monadology, Descartes's Dualism, Spinoza's
Monism. Hegel's Absolute idealism and Whitehead's Process philosophy were later systems.
Other philosophers do not believe its techniques can aim so high. Some scientists think a more
mathematical approach than philosophy is needed for a TOE, for instance Stephen Hawking wrote
7 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
in A Brief History of Time that even if we had a TOE, it would necessarily be a set of equations. He
wrote, "What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to
describe?"[37]
Phenomenology
On a much broader and more subjective level, private experiences, curiosity, inquiry, and the
selectivity involved in personal interpretation of events shapes reality as seen by one and only one
person[38] and hence is called phenomenological. While this form of reality might be common to
others as well, it could at times also be so unique to oneself as to never be experienced or agreed
upon by anyone else. Much of the kind of experience deemed spiritual occurs on this level of
reality.
Phenomenology is a philosophical method developed in the early years of the twentieth century by
Edmund Husserl and a circle of followers at the universities of Göttingen and Munich in Germany.
Subsequently, phenomenological themes were taken up by philosophers in France, the United
States, and elsewhere, often in contexts far removed from Husserl's work.
The word phenomenology comes from the Greek phainómenon, meaning "that which appears",
and lógos, meaning "study". In Husserl's conception, phenomenology is primarily concerned with
making the structures of consciousness, and the phenomena which appear in acts of consciousness,
objects of systematic reflection and analysis. Such reflection was to take place from a highly
modified "first person" viewpoint, studying phenomena not as they appear to "my" consciousness,
but to any consciousness whatsoever. Husserl believed that phenomenology could thus provide a
firm basis for all human knowledge, including scientific knowledge, and could establish philosophy
as a "rigorous science".[39]
Husserl's conception of phenomenology has also been criticised and developed by his student and
assistant Martin Heidegger, by existentialists like Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre,
and by other philosophers, such as Paul Ricoeur, Emmanuel Levinas, and Dietrich von
Hildebrand.[40]
Skeptical hypotheses
8 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
Jain philosophy
Jain philosophy postulates that seven tattva (truths or fundamental principles) constitute
reality.[42] These seven tattva are:[43]
Physical sciences
Scientific realism
Scientific realism is, at the most general level, the view that the world (the universe) described by
science (perhaps ideal science) is the real world, as it is, independent of what we might take it to
be. Within philosophy of science, it is often framed as an answer to the question "how is the
success of science to be explained?" The debate over what the success of science involves centers
primarily on the status of entities that are not directly observable discussed by scientific theories.
Generally, those who are scientific realists state that one can make reliable claims about these
entities (viz., that they have the same ontological status) as directly observable entities, as opposed
to instrumentalism. The most used and studied scientific theories today state more or less the
truth.
Realism in the sense used by physicists does not equate to realism in metaphysics.[44] The latter is
the claim that the world is mind-independent: that even if the results of a measurement do not pre-
9 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
exist the act of measurement, that does not require that they are the creation of the observer.
Furthermore, a mind-independent property does not have to be the value of some physical variable
such as position or momentum. A property can be dispositional (or potential), i.e. it can be a
tendency: in the way that glass objects tend to break, or are disposed to break, even if they do not
actually break. Likewise, the mind-independent properties of quantum systems could consist of a
tendency to respond to particular measurements with particular values with ascertainable
probability.[45] Such an ontology would be metaphysically realistic, without being realistic in the
physicist's sense of "local realism" (which would require that a single value be produced with
certainty).
A closely related term is counterfactual definiteness (CFD), used to refer to the claim that one can
meaningfully speak of the definiteness of results of measurements that have not been performed
(i.e. the ability to assume the existence of objects, and properties of objects, even when they have
not been measured).
The transition from "possible" to "actual" is a major topic of quantum physics, with related theories
including quantum darwinism.
The quantum mind–body problem refers to the philosophical discussions of the mind–body
problem in the context of quantum mechanics. Since quantum mechanics involves quantum
superpositions, which are not perceived by observers, some interpretations of quantum mechanics
place conscious observers in a special position.
The founders of quantum mechanics debated the role of the observer, and of them, Wolfgang Pauli
and Werner Heisenberg believed that it was the observer that produced collapse. This point of
view, which was never fully endorsed by Niels Bohr, was denounced as mystical and anti-scientific
by Albert Einstein. Pauli accepted the term, and described quantum mechanics as lucid
mysticism.[47]
Heisenberg and Bohr always described quantum mechanics in logical positivist terms. Bohr also
took an active interest in the philosophical implications of quantum theories such as his
complementarity, for example.[48] He believed quantum theory offers a complete description of
nature, albeit one that is simply ill-suited for everyday experiences – which are better described by
classical mechanics and probability. Bohr never specified a demarcation line above which objects
cease to be quantum and become classical. He believed that it was not a question of physics, but
one of philosophy.
Eugene Wigner reformulated the "Schrödinger's cat" thought experiment as "Wigner's friend" and
proposed that the consciousness of an observer is the demarcation line which precipitates collapse
10 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
Multiverse
The multiverse is the hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including the historical
universe we consistently experience) that together comprise everything that exists: the entirety of
space, time, matter, and energy as well as the physical laws and constants that describe them. The
term was coined in 1895 by the American philosopher and psychologist William James.[51] In the
many-worlds interpretation (MWI), one of the mainstream interpretations of quantum mechanics,
there are an infinite number of universes and every possible quantum outcome occurs in at least
one universe, albeit there is a debate as to how real the (other) worlds are.
The structure of the multiverse, the nature of each universe within it and the relationship between
the various constituent universes, depend on the specific multiverse hypothesis considered.
Multiverses have been hypothesized in cosmology, physics, astronomy, religion, philosophy,
transpersonal psychology and fiction, particularly in science fiction and fantasy. In these contexts,
parallel universes are also called "alternative universes", "quantum universes", "interpenetrating
dimensions", "parallel dimensions", "parallel worlds", "alternative realities", "alternative
timelines", and "dimensional planes", among others.
In several theories, there is a series of, in some cases infinite, self-sustaining cycles – typically a
series of Big Crunches (or Big Bounces). However, the respective universes do not exist at once but
are sequential, with key natural constituents potentially varying between universes (see §
Anthropic principle).
Anthropic principle
The anthropic principle, also known as the "observation selection effect",[52] is the hypothesis, first
proposed in 1957 by Robert Dicke, that the range of possible observations that we could make
about the universe is limited by the fact that observations could only happen in a universe capable
of developing intelligent life in the first place.[53] Proponents of the anthropic principle argue that
it explains why this universe has the age and the fundamental physical constants necessary to
accommodate conscious life, since if either had been different, we would not have been around to
make observations. Anthropic reasoning is often used to deal with the notion that the universe
seems to be finely tuned for the existence of life.[54]
Each individual has a different view of reality, with different memories and personal history,
knowledge, personality traits and experience.[55] This system, mostly referring to the human brain,
affects cognition and behavior and into this complex new knowledge, memories,[56] information,
thoughts and experiences are continuously integrated.[57] The connectome – neural
11 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
A theory of everything (TOE) is a putative theory of theoretical physics that fully explains and links
together all known physical phenomena, and predicts the outcome of any experiment that could be
carried out in principle. The theory of everything is also called the final theory.[64] Many
candidate theories of everything have been proposed by theoretical physicists during the twentieth
century, but none have been confirmed experimentally. The primary problem in producing a TOE
is that general relativity and quantum mechanics are hard to unify. This is one of the unsolved
problems in physics.
Initially, the term "theory of everything" was used with an ironic connotation to refer to various
overgeneralized theories. For example, a great-grandfather of Ijon Tichy, a character from a cycle
of Stanisław Lem's science fiction stories of the 1960s, was known to work on the "General Theory
of Everything". Physicist John Ellis[65] claims to have introduced the term into the technical
literature in an article in Nature in 1986.[66] Over time, the term stuck in popularizations of
quantum physics to describe a theory that would unify or explain through a single model the
theories of all fundamental interactions and of all particles of nature: general relativity for
gravitation, and the standard model of elementary particle physics – which includes quantum
mechanics – for electromagnetism, the two nuclear interactions, and the known elementary
particles.
Current candidates for a theory of everything include string theory, M theory, and loop quantum
gravity.
12 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
Technology
Media
Media – such as news media, social media, websites including Wikipedia,[67] and fiction[68] –
shape individuals' and society's perception of reality (including as part of belief and attitude
formation)[68] and are partly used intentionally as means to learn about reality. Various
technologies have changed society's relationship with reality such as the advent of radio and TV
technologies.
Research investigates interrelations and effects, for example aspects in the social construction of
reality.[69] A major component of this shaping and representation of perceived reality is agenda,
selection and prioritization – not only (or primarily) the quality, tone and types of content – which
influences, for instance, the public agenda.[70][71] Disproportional news attention for low-
probability incidents – such as high-consequence accidents – can distort audiences' risk
perceptions with harmful consequences.[72] Various biases such as false balance, public attention
dependence reactions like sensationalism and domination by "current events",[73] as well as
various interest-driven uses of media such as marketing can also have major impacts on the
perception of reality. Time-use studies found that e.g. in 2018 the average U.S. American "spent
around eleven hours every day looking at screens".[74]
Virtual reality (VR) is a computer-simulated environment that can simulate physical presence in
places in the real world, as well as in imaginary worlds.
The virtuality continuum is a continuous scale ranging between the completely virtual, a virtuality,
and the completely real: reality. The reality–virtuality continuum therefore encompasses all
possible variations and compositions of real and virtual objects. It has been described as a concept
in new media and computer science, but in fact it could be considered a matter of anthropology.
13 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
On the Internet, "real life" refers to life in the real world. It generally references life or consensus
reality, in contrast to an environment seen as fiction or fantasy, such as virtual reality, lifelike
experience, dreams, novels, or movies. Online, the acronym "IRL" stands for "in real life", with the
meaning "not on the Internet".[86] Sociologists engaged in the study of the Internet have
determined that someday, a distinction between online and real-life worlds may seem "quaint",
noting that certain types of online activity, such as sexual intrigues, have already made a full
transition to complete legitimacy and "reality".[87] The abbreviation "RL" stands for "real life". For
example, one can speak of "meeting in RL" someone whom one has met in a chat or on an Internet
forum. It may also be used to express an inability to use the Internet for a time due to "RL
problems".
See also
▪ Alternate history
▪ Counterfactual history
▪ Derealization
▪ Consciousness
▪ Extended modal realism
▪ Modal realism
▪ Hyperreality
Notes
1. "reality | Definition of reality in English by Oxford Dictionaries" (https://web.archive.org/web/201
60926223327/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reality). Oxford Dictionaries | English.
Archived from the original (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reality) on September 26,
2016. Retrieved 2017-10-28.
2. Saridakis E. (2016). "Information, reality, and modern physics". International Studies in the
Philosophy of Science. 30 (4): 327–341. doi:10.1080/02698595.2017.1331980 (https://doi.org/
10.1080%2F02698595.2017.1331980). S2CID 126411165 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Cor
pusID:126411165).
14 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
15 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
18. Sparkman, Gregg; Geiger, Nathan; Weber, Elke U. (23 August 2022). "Americans experience a
false social reality by underestimating popular climate policy support by nearly half" (https://ww
w.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399177). Nature Communications. 13 (1): 4779.
Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.4779S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatCo..13.4779S).
doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32412-y (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41467-022-32412-y).
ISSN 2041-1723 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/2041-1723). PMC 9399177 (https://www.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9399177). PMID 35999211 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3599
9211).
19. Nayak, Sandeep M.; Griffiths, Roland R. (28 March 2022). "A Single Belief-Changing
Psychedelic Experience Is Associated With Increased Attribution of Consciousness to Living
and Non-living Entities" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995647). Frontiers in
Psychology. 13: 852248. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852248 (https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.20
22.852248). ISSN 1664-1078 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/1664-1078). PMC 8995647 (http
s://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8995647). PMID 35418909 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/35418909).
20. Timmermann, Christopher; Kettner, Hannes; Letheby, Chris; Roseman, Leor; Rosas, Fernando
E.; Carhart-Harris, Robin L. (23 November 2021). "Psychedelics alter metaphysical beliefs" (htt
ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611059). Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 22166.
Bibcode:2021NatSR..1122166T (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021NatSR..1122166T).
doi:10.1038/s41598-021-01209-2 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41598-021-01209-2).
ISSN 2045-2322 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/2045-2322). PMC 8611059 (https://www.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8611059). PMID 34815421 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3481
5421).
21. "Principles of Nature and Grace" (https://archive.org/details/philosophicalwor00leibuoft), 1714,
Article 7 (https://archive.org/stream/philosophicalwor00leibuoft#page/212/mode/2up/search/20
9).
22. "Not how the world is, is the mystical, but that it is." (https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5740/5740-
pdf.pdf)Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 6.44
23. Martin Heidegger, Introduction to Metaphysics, Yale University Press, New Haven and London
(1959), pp. 7–8.
24. "The Fundamental Question" (https://www.hedweb.com/witherall/existence.htm).
www.hedweb.com. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
25. Geier, Manfred (2017). Wittgenstein und Heidegger: Die letzten Philosophen (https://books.goo
gle.com/books?id=JUiFDQAAQBAJ&pg=PP166) (in German). Rowohlt Verlag. p. 166.
ISBN 978-3644045118.
26. "Metaphysics special: Why is there something rather than nothing?" (https://www.newscientist.c
om/article/mg23130890-400-metaphysics-special-why-is-there-something-rather-than-nothing/)
. New Scientist. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
27. Sorensen, Roy (2015). "Nothingness" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nothingness/). The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
28. Dascal, Marcelo (2008). Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist? (https://books.google.com/books?id
=Da_oP3sJs1oC&pg=PA452). Springer. p. 452. ISBN 978-1402086687.
29. Goldschmidt, Tyron (2014). The Puzzle of Existence: Why Is There Something Rather Than
Nothing? (https://books.google.com/books?id=3XDMAgAAQBAJ). Routledge.
ISBN 978-1136249228.
16 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
30. Lehar, Steve. (2000). The Function of Conscious Experience: An Analogical Paradigm of
Perception and Behavior (http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/~slehar/webstuff/consc1/consc1.html)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20151021061139/http://cns-alumni.bu.edu/~slehar/webst
uff/consc1/consc1.html) 2015-10-21 at the Wayback Machine, Consciousness and Cognition.
31. Lehar, Steve. (2000). Naïve Realism in Contemporary Philosophy (http://sharp.bu.edu/~slehar/
epist/naive-philos.html) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120811172229/http://sharp.bu.
edu/~slehar/epist/naive-philos.html) 2012-08-11 at the Wayback Machine, The Function of
Conscious Experience.
32. Lehar, Steve. Representationalism (http://sharp.bu.edu/~slehar/Representationalism.html)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20120905185905/http://sharp.bu.edu/~slehar/Represent
ationalism.html) 2012-09-05 at the Wayback Machine
33. Tegmark, Max (February 2008). "The Mathematical Universe". Foundations of Physics. 38 (2):
101–150. arXiv:0704.0646 (https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0646). Bibcode:2008FoPh...38..101T (htt
ps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008FoPh...38..101T). doi:10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9 (https://
doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10701-007-9186-9). S2CID 9890455 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Cor
pusID:9890455).
34. Tegmark (1998), p. 1.
35. Loux, Michael J. (2001). "The Problem of Universals" in Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings,
Michael J. Loux (ed.), N.Y.: Routledge, pp. 3–13, p. 4
36. Price, H. H. (1953). "Universals and Resemblance", Ch. 1 of Thinking and Experience,
Hutchinson's University Library, among others, sometimes uses such Latin terms
37. as quoted in [Artigas, The Mind of the Universe, p.123]
38. Present-time consciousness Francisco J. Varela Journal of Consciousness Studies 6
(2-3):111-140 (1999)
39. Joseph Kockelmans (2001). Edmund Husserl's phenomenology (2 ed.). Purdue University
Press. pp. 311–314. ISBN 1-55753-050-5.
40. Steven Galt Crowell (2001). Husserl, Heidegger, and the space of meaning: paths toward
transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press. p. 160. ISBN 0-8101-1805-X.
41. Mori, Shohei; Ikeda, Sei; Saito, Hideo (28 June 2017). "A survey of diminished reality:
Techniques for visually concealing, eliminating, and seeing through real objects". IPSJ
Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications. 9 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s41074-017-0028-1
(https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs41074-017-0028-1). ISSN 1882-6695 (https://www.worldcat.org/is
sn/1882-6695). S2CID 21053932 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:21053932).
42. S.A. Jain 1992, p. 6.
43. S.A. Jain 1992, p. 7.
44. Norsen, Travis (26 February 2007). "Against 'Realism' ". Foundations of Physics. 37 (3):
311–340. arXiv:quant-ph/0607057 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0607057).
Bibcode:2007FoPh...37..311N (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007FoPh...37..311N).
doi:10.1007/s10701-007-9104-1 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10701-007-9104-1).
S2CID 15072850 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15072850).
45. Thompson, Ian. "Generative Science" (http://www.generativescience.org/).
www.generativescience.org.
46. "Local realism and the crucial experiment" (http://bendov.info/eng/crucial.htm). bendov.info.
17 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
47. Juan Miguel Marin (2009). " 'Mysticism' in quantum mechanics: the forgotten controversy".
European Journal of Physics. 30 (4): 807–822. Bibcode:2009EJPh...30..807M (https://ui.adsab
s.harvard.edu/abs/2009EJPh...30..807M). doi:10.1088/0143-0807/30/4/014 (https://doi.org/10.
1088%2F0143-0807%2F30%2F4%2F014). S2CID 122757714 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/
CorpusID:122757714). link (http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0143-0807/30/4/014/ejp9_4_014.pdf?r
equest-id=9350419a-e5ea-42e2-b5f3-7878a09dfe42), summarized here [1] (http://www.physor
g.com/news163670588.html%7care/) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110606092933/
http://www.physorg.com/news163670588.html%7Care/) 2011-06-06 at the Wayback Machine
48. John Honner (2005). "Niels Bohr and the Mysticism of Nature". Zygon: Journal of Religion &
Science. 17–3: 243–253.
49. M. Schlosshauer; J. Koer; A. Zeilinger (2013). "A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes Toward
Quantum Mechanics". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History
and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 44 (3): 222–230. arXiv:1301.1069 (https://arxiv.org/abs/130
1.1069). Bibcode:2013SHPMP..44..222S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013SHPMP..44..
222S). doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.04.004 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.shpsb.2013.04.004).
S2CID 55537196 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:55537196).
50. Michael Esfeld, (1999), Essay Review: Wigner's View of Physical Reality (http://www.unil.ch/we
bdav/site/philo/shared/DocsPerso/EsfeldMichael/1999/SHPMP99.pdf), published in Studies in
History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 30B, pp. 145–154, Elsevier Science Ltd.
51. James, William, The Will to Believe, 1895; and earlier in 1895, as cited in OED's new 2003
entry for "multiverse": "1895 W. JAMES in Internat. Jrnl. Ethics 6 10 Visible nature is all
plasticity and indifference, a multiverse, as one might call it, and not a universe."
52. Bostrom, Nick (2008). "Where are they? Why I hope the search for extraterrestrial life finds
nothing" (https://www.nickbostrom.com/extraterrestrial.pdf) (PDF). Technology Review. 2008:
72–77. Archived (https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.nickbostrom.com/extr
aterrestrial.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
53. Bostrom, Nick (9 February 2020). "Was the Universe made for us?" (http://www.anthropic-princi
ple.com/). anthropic-principle.com. "The data we collect about the Universe is filtered not only
by our instruments' limitations, but also by the precondition that somebody be there to 'have'
the data yielded by the instruments (and to build the instruments in the first place)."
54. James Schombert. "Anthropic principle" (https://web.archive.org/web/20120428004546/http://a
byss.uoregon.edu/~js/cosmo/lectures/lec24.html). Department of Physics at University of
Oregon. Archived from the original (http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/cosmo/lectures/lec24.html) on
2012-04-28. Retrieved 2012-04-26.
55. Savin-Baden, Maggi; Burden, David (1 April 2019). "Digital Immortality and Virtual Humans" (ht
tps://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs42438-018-0007-6). Postdigital Science and Education. 1 (1):
87–103. doi:10.1007/s42438-018-0007-6 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs42438-018-0007-6).
ISSN 2524-4868 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/2524-4868). S2CID 149797460 (https://api.se
manticscholar.org/CorpusID:149797460).
56. van Kesteren, Marlieke T. R.; Rignanese, Paul; Gianferrara, Pierre G.; Krabbendam, Lydia;
Meeter, Martijn (16 March 2020). "Congruency and reactivation aid memory integration through
reinstatement of prior knowledge" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075880).
Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 4776. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.4776V (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/
abs/2020NatSR..10.4776V). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61737-1 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41
598-020-61737-1). ISSN 2045-2322 (https://www.worldcat.org/issn/2045-2322). PMC 7075880
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075880). PMID 32179822 (https://pubmed.nc
bi.nlm.nih.gov/32179822).
18 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
19 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
70. McCombs, Maxwell E.; Shaw, Donald L. (1972). "The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass
Media". Public Opinion Quarterly. 36 (2): 176. doi:10.1086/267990 (https://doi.org/10.1086%2F
267990).
71. McCombs, Maxwell; Reynolds, Amy (13 January 2009). "How the news shapes our civic
agenda and News Influence on Our Pictures of the World". Media Effects (https://www.taylorfra
ncis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203877111-7/news-shapes-civic-agenda-maxwell-mccom
bs-amy-reynolds). pp. 17–32. doi:10.4324/9780203877111-7 (https://doi.org/10.4324%2F9780
203877111-7).
72. van der Meer, Toni G L A; Kroon, Anne C; Vliegenthart, Rens (20 July 2022). "Do News Media
Kill? How a Biased News Reality can Overshadow Real Societal Risks, The Case of Aviation
and Road Traffic Accidents" (https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fsf%2Fsoab114). Social Forces. 101
(1): 506–530. doi:10.1093/sf/soab114 (https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fsf%2Fsoab114).
73. "How the news took over reality" (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/may/03/how-the-ne
ws-took-over-reality). The Guardian. 3 May 2019. Retrieved 6 November 2022.
74. Gorvett, Zaria. "How the news changes the way we think and behave" (https://www.bbc.com/fut
ure/article/20200512-how-the-news-changes-the-way-we-think-and-behave). BBC. Retrieved
6 November 2022.
75. Technopedia, Definition – What does Filter Bubble mean? (https://www.techopedia.com/definiti
on/28556/filter-bubble) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20171010210433/https://www.tec
hopedia.com/definition/28556/filter-bubble) 2017-10-10 at the Wayback Machine, Retrieved
October 10, 2017, "....A filter bubble is the intellectual isolation, that can occur when websites
make use of algorithms to selectively assume the information a user would want to see, and
then give information to the user according to this assumption ... A filter bubble, therefore, can
cause users to get significantly less contact with contradicting viewpoints, causing the user to
become intellectually isolated...."
76. Bozdag, Engin (September 2013). "Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization". Ethics and
Information Technology. 15 (3): 209–227. doi:10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6 (https://doi.org/10.1
007%2Fs10676-013-9321-6). S2CID 14970635 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1497
0635).
77. Huffington Post, The Huffington Post "Are Filter-bubbles Shrinking Our Minds?" (http://www.huff
ingtonpost.in/ishtiaque-hossain/filter-bubbles-are-shrinking-our-minds/) Archived (https://web.ar
chive.org/web/20161103235404/http://www.huffingtonpost.in/ishtiaque-hossain/filter-bubbles-ar
e-shrinking-our-minds/) 2016-11-03 at the Wayback Machine
78. Encrypt, Search (2019-02-26). "What Are Filter Bubbles & How To Avoid Them" (https://choose
toencrypt.com/search-engines/filter-bubbles-searchencrypt-com-avoids/). Search Encrypt Blog.
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20190225003801/https://choosetoencrypt.com/search-e
ngines/filter-bubbles-searchencrypt-com-avoids/) from the original on 2019-02-25. Retrieved
2019-03-19.
79. The term cyber-balkanization (sometimes with a hyphen) is a hybrid of cyber, relating to the
internet, and Balkanization, referring to that region of Europe that was historically subdivided by
languages, religions and cultures; the term was coined in a paper by MIT researchers Van
Alstyne and Brynjolfsson.
80. Van Alstyne, Marshall; Brynjolfsson, Erik (March 1997) [Copyright 1996]. "Electronic
Communities: Global Village or Cyberbalkans?" (http://web.mit.edu/marshall/www/papers/Cybe
rBalkans.pdf) (PDF). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20160405024307/http://web.mit.ed
u/marshall/www/papers/CyberBalkans.pdf) (PDF) from the original on 2016-04-05. Retrieved
2017-09-24.
20 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
81. Van Alstyne, Marshall; Brynjolfsson, Erik (November 1996). "Could the Internet Balkanize
Science?". Science. 274 (5292): 1479–1480. Bibcode:1996Sci...274.1479V (https://ui.adsabs.h
arvard.edu/abs/1996Sci...274.1479V). doi:10.1126/science.274.5292.1479 (https://doi.org/10.1
126%2Fscience.274.5292.1479). S2CID 62546078 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6
2546078).
82. Alex Pham; Jon Healey (September 24, 2005). "Systems hope to tell you what you'd like:
'Preference engines' guide users through the flood of content" (http://articles.chicagotribune.co
m/2005-09-24/business/0509240020_1_sociology-at-swarthmore-college-geoff-lester-preferen
ce-engines/2). Chicago Tribune. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20151208105644/http://
articles.chicagotribune.com/2005-09-24/business/0509240020_1_sociology-at-swarthmore-coll
ege-geoff-lester-preference-engines/2) from the original on December 8, 2015. Retrieved
December 4, 2015. "...if recommenders were perfect, I can have the option of talking to only
people who are just like me....Cyber-balkanization, as Brynjolfsson coined the scenario, is not
an inevitable effect of recommendation tools."
83. Weisberg, Jacob (June 10, 2011). "Bubble Trouble: Is Web personalization turning us into
solipsistic twits?" (http://www.slate.com/id/2296633/). Slate. Archived (https://web.archive.org/w
eb/20110612023233/http://www.slate.com/id/2296633/) from the original on June 12, 2011.
Retrieved August 15, 2011.
84. Lazar, Shira (June 1, 2011). "Algorithms and the Filter Bubble Ruining Your Online
Experience?" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shira-lazar/algorithms-and-the-filter_b_869473.ht
ml). Huffington Post. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20160413195524/http://www.huffin
gtonpost.com/shira-lazar/algorithms-and-the-filter_b_869473.html) from the original on April 13,
2016. Retrieved August 15, 2011. "a filter bubble is the figurative sphere surrounding you as
you search the Internet."
85. Milgram, Paul; H. Takemura; A. Utsumi; F. Kishino (1994). "Augmented Reality: A class of
displays on the reality-virtuality continuum" (https://web.archive.org/web/20061004044435/http
s://vered.rose.utoronto.ca/publication/1994/Milgram_Takemura_SPIE1994.pdf) (PDF).
Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. pp. 2351–34. Archived from
the original (http://vered.rose.utoronto.ca/publication/1994/Milgram_Takemura_SPIE1994.pdf)
(PDF) on 2006-10-04. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
86. "IRL - Definition by AcronymFinder" (https://www.acronymfinder.com/IRL.html).
www.acronymfinder.com.
87. Don Slater (2002). "Social Relationships and Identity On-line and Off-line". In Livingstone,
Sonia; Lievrouw, Leah (eds.). Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of
ICTs. Sage Publications Inc. pp. 533–543. ISBN 0-7619-6510-6.
References
▪ Berger, Peter L.; Luckmann, Thomas (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in
the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books. pp. 21–22.
▪ Jain, S. A. (1992). Reality (https://books.google.com/books?id=uRIaAAAAMAAJ). Jwalamalini
Trust. "Not in Copyright" Alt URL (https://archive.org/details/Reality_JMT)
Further reading
▪ George Musser, "Virtual Reality: How close can physics bring us to a truly fundamental
understanding of the world?", Scientific American, vol. 321, no. 3 (September 2019),
pp. 30–35.
21 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM
Reality - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality
▪ "Physics is... the bedrock of the broader search for truth.... Yet [physicists] sometimes seem
to be struck by a collective impostor syndrome.... Truth can be elusive even in the best-
established theories. Quantum mechanics is as well tested a theory as can be, yet its
interpretation remains inscrutable. [p. 30.] The deeper physicists dive into reality, the more
reality seems to evaporate." [p. 34.]
External links
▪ Miller, Alexander. "Realism" (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/realism/). In Zalta, Edward N.
(ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
▪ C.D. Broad on Reality (http://www.ditext.com/broad/reality.html)
▪ Phenomenology Online: Materials discussing and exemplifying phenomenological research (htt
p://phenomenologyonline.com/)
▪ The Matrix as Metaphysics by David Chalmers (http://consc.net/papers/matrix.html)
22 of 22 7/13/2023, 11:03 AM