You are on page 1of 1

WECHSLER INTELLIGENCE

SCALE FOR ADULTS


WAIS-IV
Types of the
Definition Wechsler Scale

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale WAIS-IV is The intelligence tests conceived
an individually administered clinical instrument and developed by David
designed to assess the general intellectual Wechsler have made an
aptitude of adults aged 16 years to 89 years 11 amazing journey through time
months (16:0-89:11). It is about version of the since the first one was
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. This scale published in 1939. The following
incorporates important modifications, among revisions of the scale are the
them the simplification of the scale structure and WAIS, the WAIS-R, the WAIS-
III, the WAIS-IV and finally the
the development of indices that reflect the
WISC V.
subject's performance in more precise domains
of cognitive functioning.

SCALE STRUCTURE
Processing and valuations
In a neuropsychological assessment, a
The general structure of the WAIS-iv qualitative interpretation of the results, analysis
is organized into 4 scales, verbal and error, as an assessment of the subject's
comprehension, perspectival limits, are as important as the quantitative
reasoning, working memory and assessments obtained. WAIS-IV offers an
processing speed. assessment of processing for cubes, six number
when the score obtained is a main test and letter accusations results, as well as
it is considered invalid, the score numbers.

obtained is an optional test that may


For this reason, it is impossible to replace not a
constitute an invalid test for
single straight or raise, or intervene in the
calculating composite scores.
curriculum according to any composite
assessment, 1.3 points of processing and
abbreviations of leadership are considered.

composite scores
Compared to the waish-iii, they must take
DESCRIPTION OF THE
into account the new terminology of this TESTS:
new update, this change seeks to improve
The WAIS-IV is composed of 15 tests, of which 12 tests come from the WAIS-
and have greater accuracy and the III.
These are:
cognitive skills evaluated by each index. Cubes: Here the evaluee must reproduce the cubes provided by the
examiner or by showing an image from the stimulus booklet.

for this reason the scores obtained by this Similarities: The task of the evaluator is to determine how the objects or
concepts are similar.
Digits: The evaluee reads the series of numbers indicated by the examiner.
index may artificially result in the total ci Matrices: The evaluee observes an incomplete matrix or series and must
select the option that completes the series.
score. Vocabulary: The evaluee must name a series of images represented in the
stimulus booklet.
Arithmetic: The evaluee must mentally solve a series of arithmetic problems
and give the answer orally.
Symbol search: The evaluee must observe two groups of symbols. A key
group and a search group

Visual puzzles: the evaluee must present a completed puzzle together with
the stimulus booklet.
Information: the examinee must orally answer a series of questions posed by
the examiner.
Number key: the test taker's task is to copy a series of symbols.
letters and numbers: the examinee must read a combination of letters and
numbers.
scales: the test taker observes a scale with two pans in the stimulus booklet.
comprehension: the test taker must orally answer a series of questions
related to daily life experiences.
cancellation: within a given time limit, the test taker must cross out two
geometric figures.
Incomplete figures: The evaluated must point out or say what is missing in
the images..

general rules of
application and Adequacy to the subject's needs
correction

Evaluation of 16-year-old subjects:


-General evaluation guidelines: For subjects between the ages of 16 years and zero months and 16 years 11 months the
The following indications are to carry out a standardized
examiner can use the WISC-IV or the WAIS-IV depending on which is more appropriate, for
application taking into account the well-being of the person
example if the subject has a below average cognitive attitude, has other psychological deficits,
being evaluated: familiarization with the materials, application
times, environmental conditions, establishing a good climate. it is more convenient to use the WISC-IV. If, on the other hand, it is suspected that the subject
to be evaluated has an above-average attitude, the examiner should use the WAIS-IV.
-General rules of application:
The general rules of the WAIS-IV must be mastered before
starting the application. The general rules deal with the order of Subjects with special needs:

application, selection and substitution of tests, starting points, Individuals with special needs, such as those with physical, linguistic or sensory limitations, are often
rules of return, and determination, application times, items and referred for psychological evaluation. Depending on the test applied, the type of limitation of the subject
demonstration and example, questions and repetition of items and the scores obtained may underestimate their actual intellectual aptitude if the test is applied in a
and forms of response recording. standardized manner without taking into account their abilities and limitations. When assessing people
with special needs, the examiner should use a comprehensive battery that includes the WAIS-IV,
-General scoring criteria:
They deserve special attention. This section includes some
indications for evaluating examples of multiple responses, as well
as for determining when a response should be overridden. Subjects who are deaf or hard of hearing:

-Completion of the annotation booklet:

It allows the recording of the subject's responses and is designed When assessing people with these characteristics, issues such as those
to facilitate the application and correction of the tests. It also related to educational history, the use of scales for special groups, the
indicates the starting point, the return and determination rule
lack of standardized translations of signs, convenience, verbal tests and
and the time limits for each itrm or test.
limitations in the analysis of the subject's profile must be assessed.
-

You might also like