Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concepts of
Decommissioning
PMod1
Presenter: Dr. G. Harvel
Energy Systems
& Nuclear Science
Safety Protocol: At OTU and where ever
you are…
• Fire
• Medical
• Security
2
Decommissioning
• No revenue generation
– Draw on funds placed in reserve specifically to
decommission.
• Phased approach
– Reduction in hazard by allowing for radiation decay
– Shutdown and Monitor, de-fuel
– Non-essential systems
– Shipment of wastes
– Remaining systems
• Return to Green Site
3
4
Pickering Today
Frenchman’s Bay
End State??
5
6
7
8
Definitions
• ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) — the principle
of optimization of protection (ALARA principle): the
likelihood of incurring exposures, the number of people
exposed, and the magnitude of their individual doses
should all be kept as low as reasonably achievable, taking
into account economic and societal factors.
[Source: 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on
Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 103)]
WR-1 G1 Pickering
Types of Facilities that may
require Decommissioning
• Uranium mining and milling facilities
• Fuel fabrication facilities
• Research reactors
• Power reactors
• Naval vessels
• Hot cell facilities
• Fuel enrichment/reprocessing facilities
• Waste management facilities
21
Types of Facilities that may
require Decommissioning
• Waste Management, refurbishment,
treatment and disposal facilities
• Other Facilities
– Medical facilities, scrap metal sites, landfills
(historical)
– Sealed sources, NORM/TENORM sites
– Storage, disposal, maintenance
22
Why Decommission?
• Reached End of Life
• Government Decisions
• Accidents
23
Decommissioning Strategies
• Mothballing
• Prompt Decontamination
• Immediate Dismantling
• Deferred Dismantling (Safe Storage an
Surveillance)
• Entombment (In-Situ)
• License to Abandon
• Release for unrestricted use or restricted
conditions
24
Decommissioning Process
• Who talks to whom:
– Who are the stakeholders?
• Plan Plan Plan
• What is the scope?
– Knowledge, Planning and Management, Surveys,
Decontamination, Dismantling, Waste Shipment,
Restoration of site, Licensing work
• The above will change depending upon the
project
25
Stakeholders
The obvious ones….
26
Stakeholders
The not so obvious…
27
Planning
• World experience has demonstrated that
successful planning leads to:
– Faster completion
– Lower cost
– Safer work
• Decommissioning planning is expected to
start when you decide to build the facility
and is expected to become more detailed as
you approach the final shutdown dates
28
The Scope: Knowledge
Facility layout
Historical Data
Knowledge Management
29
The Scope: Surveys/Characterization
CHARACTERIZATION CSA
N292
Origin, criticality;
chemical properties and
composition;
solubility;
Radiation surveys potential chemical hazard;
combustibility and flammability;
gas generation; Component Surveys
size, volume, and weight;
compactability;
dispersibility;
Hazard Surveys volatility
30
The Scope: Decontamination
Wash it
Clean up
31
The Scope: Dismantling
Rack ‘em, Pack ‘em, Stack ‘em
Cut it all up
32
The Scope: Waste Shipment
Choosing the right package
33
The Scope: Site Restoration
Obtaining the End State
34
The Scope: Licensing Work
Demonstration of Regulatory Compliance
Release of License
35
Safe Storage vs. Dismantle
Safe Storage and Surveillance is a period where the facility mostly waits
for the right time to decommission
PROS CONS
Decommissioning Plant continues to age
fund increases SO
Some hazards get worse WHERE IS
Radiation Levels – leaks THE
decrease
BALANCE
Public opinion does not
Can wait for plan to ???
necessarily improve
be optimal
May be costs to waiting
Can wait for
resources to be
optimal
36
And that is why we need a plan …..
37
What did we learn?
• High level issues of Decommissioning
such as end state and stakeholders
• Preliminary planning and scoping
information
HAVE FUN!!!
38