Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ashish M. Joshi,1 David I. Blekhman,2 James D. Felske,3 John A. Lordi,3 and Joseph C. Mollendorf3
1 CD-adapco, 9401 General Drive, Plymouth, MI 48170, USA
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49504, USA
3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA
Copyright © 2006 Ashish M. Joshi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly
cited.
coupled with this study will be a valuable tool for designing Actual flow out Leakage flow in
similar Roots blowers.
2. BACKGROUND
For θ = [0, β1 ],
5θ x1 (i), y1 (i)
x1 = R1 cos π − + x0 ,
4
(1)
5θ
y1 = R1 sin π − .
4
x2 ( j), y2 ( j)
For θ = [β1 , β2 ],
x1 (θ) = R21 (ψ) cos − β1 + R22 (ψ) sin − β1 ,
(2)
y1 (θ) = R22 (ψ) cos − β1 − R21 (ψ) sin − β1 ,
where
Figure 4: Rotor-rotor clearance analysis.
R21 (ψ) = Rb {cos ψ + ψ · sin ψ },
(3)
R22 (ψ) = Rb {sin ψ − ψ · cos ψ }.
The angle “ψ” goes from 0◦ to 86.4708◦ when θ goes from For the “tip strip” a value of 0.055 is added for θ = 89.444◦ to
40◦ to 70◦ . The relation between ψ and θ is as follows: 90◦ . This is the angle where the tip strip starts and is obtained
from the machine drawing of the “design shape.”
sin ψ − ψ · cos ψ
θ = tan−1 . (4)
cos ψ + ψ · sin ψ 4. CLEARANCE ANALYSIS
For θ = [β2 , π/2], Since the Roots blower has two-lobe symmetrical impellers,
the rotor positions repeat themselves after 180◦ , and the
52.6π θ − β2 37.4π clearance data repeats itself after 90◦ and is symmetrical
x1 (θ) = R3 cos + ,
180 π/2 − β2 180 about 45◦ . The coordinates of rotors at any angle of rota-
(5) tion are found by a combined “rotational/translational” co-
52.6π θ − β2 37.4π
y1 (θ) = R3 · sin + + y0 . ordinate transformation. To find the minimum clearance as
180 π/2 − β2 180
a function of rotation angle from 0◦ to 45◦ , only single quad-
The values shown in Figure 3 are as follows (inches for lin- rants of rotor #1 and of rotor #2 need to be considered, as
ear dimensions and radians for angles): R1 = 1.44, Rb = shown in Figure 4.
0.8 ∗ R p = 1.787, R3 = 1.37, x0 = 2.255, y0 = R p = 2.239, To find the minimum clearance, the distance between
β1 = 4π/18, and β2 = 7π/18. By substituting the above val- each point on rotor #1 and each point on rotor #2 is found.
ues in (1)–(5), it is found that the lobe is 3.119 inches wide, This is done with the aid of two nested “for loops.” The min-
as shown in Figure 3. imum of all the distances is then the minimum clearance,
and the two points where it occurs, defines its position. With
the above algorithm, the minimum clearance between the ro-
3.2. Design shape
tors was found from 0◦ to 45◦ with an increment of 0.5◦ . As
The design shape is a modification of the base shape. To ad- one would expect, the exact minimum clearance will be ob-
join the “add-ons” to the involute curve, the normal to the tained when there are infinite number of grid points on the
involute curve has to be found. To find the normal to the in- impeller curve and the increments in the angle of rotation are
volute at any point, the gradient (slope) of the normal is first infinitesimally small. But for the purpose of numerical mod-
found out by taking negative reciprocal of d y/dx, eling, it is found that, with n = 1440, the oscillations in the
clearance data with n = 1440 are of the order of 10−5 inches.
−1 sin ψ · sin β1 − cos ψ · cos β1 A “clearance analysis” was performed for both the “base
=m= . (6)
d y/dx sin ψ · cos β1 + cos ψ · sin β1 shape” and the “design shape.” The graph of clearance versus
angle of rotation for the “base shape” and “design shape” is
The thickness of add-ons is “a” = 0.04115 in. Hence, the ex- shown in Figure 5. It is seen that the addition of the extra ma-
tra material added will be terial on the involute section results in a constant clearance
for a larger part of the cycle (from 1.5◦ –45◦ ) as compared
Xadd = a · cos tan−1 m ,
(7) to the “base shape” (from 9.5◦ –45◦ ). Also, the clearance for
Yadd = a · sin tan−1 m . the “design shape” is much smaller as compared to the “base
shape.”
We add this to the x and y coordinates of the “base shape.”
Hence, 5. CFD MODEL
xdesign = x1 (θ) + Xadd , The computational fluid dynamics study was performed us-
(8)
ydesign = y1 (θ) + Yadd . ing a commercial CFD code (Star-CD).
4 International Journal of Rotating Machinery
0.05
(self-filtered central differencing) were found to exhibit non-
physical spatial oscillations. These oscillations were caused
0.04
by equations, which were difficult to solve because of a large
0.03 stencil size. They also produced negative densities and nega-
0.02 tive turbulent kinetic energy.
0.01 The linear upwind differencing scheme is specially for-
0 mulated for nonstructured meshes and derived from a
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
scheme originally proposed for structured meshes [3]. This
Angle of rotation higher-order upwind differencing scheme approximates the
Base shape first derivative term (convective term) by fitting a parabola to
Design shape the point and its two upwind neighbors. It is conventional in
the sense that only function values are used; it does not give
Figure 5: Minimum clearance with base shape and design shape. rise to wiggles and has only a slight tendency for overshoots;
it is O (h2 ).
This scheme yields.
For u ≥ 0,
5.1. Assumptions
∂φ ∼ 3u 2u u
After steady state has been reached, rotation of the impellers u = φi − φi−1 + φi−2 . (9)
has little or no influence on the pressure ratio across the ma- ∂x 2h h 2h
chine. Thus, a quasi-steady state is assumed. The CFD sim-
The right-hand side of the above equation can be reduced to
ulation for the full machine is performed only for the base
a system of tridiagonal equations, which are diagonally dom-
shape and the effect of the tip strip on the rotor-casing leak-
inant and converge rapidly. Similarly, an expression for u ≤ 0
age path is studied separately. Also, the flow field is assumed
can be written.
to be the same at any cross-section along the rotor length ex-
cept for the leakage through the end plate clearances. Hence,
a two-dimensional analysis was performed and the results for 5.4. Solution algorithms
the flow rate were simply scaled with the rotor length to get
Star-CD employs implicit methods to solve the algebraic
the total leakage.
finite-volume equations resulting from discretization. This
procedure iterates to the steady state and eliminates the tem-
5.2. Turbulence model poral derivatives which give rise to stability issues. The al-
gorithm used to solve the set of finite-volume equations is
The flow exiting the gap experiences a strong adverse pres- called SIMPISO, which combines the elements of the SIM-
sure gradient (discussed later). The k − ω turbulence model PLE and PISO algorithms. The SIMPISO algorithm is used
was therefore adopted since it gives accurate results for wall- solely for steady-state calculations in an iterative mode.
bounded flows with adverse pressure gradients. The model All the above algorithms share the following features [4].
provides two additional equations for k and ω. More details
(i) They employ the predictor corrector strategy, (enabled
on the k − ω turbulence model may be found in [2].
by the use of operator splitting), to temporarily decou-
ple the flow equations so that they can be solved se-
5.3. Spatial discretization quentially.
(ii) Continuity is enforced with the aid of an equation set
Star-CD uses a finite-volume method to discretize the differ- for pressure, derived by combining the finite-volume
ential equations of mass, momentum, energy, k, and ω. The momentum and mass conservation equations.
use of higher-order schemes is often a balance between ac- (iii) The solution sequence involves a predictor stage,
curacy and ancillary requirements such as resistance to spu- which produces a provisional velocity field derived
rious numerical oscillations and ease of solution. The nu- from the momentum equations and a provisional pre-
merical oscillations, or “wiggles,” usually arise when the ra- ssure distribution. The provisional fields are then re-
tio of convection to diffusion in a cell is large, and this ra- fined in the corrector stages until both the momentum
tio is usually characterized by the mesh-Peclet number or and continuity balances are satisfied to some approxi-
mesh-Reynolds number. Lower-order schemes produce “nu- mation.
merical diffusion,” that is, smearing of gradients. This is a (iv) For iterative calculations, the above step is repetitively
form of truncation error that diminishes as the grid is re- executed until the solution is reached. Underrelaxation
fined, but at an increased cost of computation. Amongst the is used to stabilize the process. Thus lower values of “a”
Ashish M. Joshi et al. 5
φn = a · φn + (1 − a) · φn−1 . (10)
(v) With the sequence, the operator split equation sets in-
volve only one of the field variables.
The SIMPISO scheme borrows from the PISO scheme, a
more elaborate treatment of the pressure gradient terms aris-
ing from grid nonorthogonality. It is more robust for dis-
torted meshes. It employs another relaxation factor (set to
0.6) as it requires additional work per iteration.
r k
φ
Rkφ ≡ , (12)
Mφ
where the summation is over all the cells in the domain and
Mφ is a normalization factor. For this research, convergence
was determined by using a residual tolerance of 1.000E-06.
Figure 7: Mesh in rotor-rotor gap.
5.6. Mesh generation
of the 3D aspect ratio, and hence the single layer of cells can
be assigned an arbitrary thickness while extruding. The un-
specified boundaries are automatically assigned an “imper- Prostar 3.10
meable wall” boundary condition.
06-JUN.-06
The experimental procedure [1] prescribes lowering the Mach number
pressure on the actual inlet side by changing the position of ITER = 1940
a valve, and keeping the pressure on the actual outlet side as Local MX = 2.052
atmospheric (1.013E + 05 Pa) until the desired pressure ratio Local MN = 0.3308E 03
and/or temperature ratio is obtained. The experimental data
provides the temperature ratio Tout /Tin for a given pressure
ratio Pout /Pin . The inlet temperature of the gas is specified as
room temperature (293 K).
To effectively simulate the experimental procedure, the y
pressure of the “model inlet” has to be kept constant and z x
the pressure ratio adjusted by lowering the pressure at the Translation of IGES data
“model outlet.” The computation is started by specifying the File: inv 45.iges
density, inlet velocities, static temperature, and turbulence 0.5000
0.4643
parameters at the “model inlet,” and the static pressure and 0.4286
0.3929
turbulence parameters at the “model outlet.” When the so- 0.3572
0.3215
lution starts converging, the “model inlet” boundary condi- 0.2859
0.2502
tions are changed to stagnation quantities, that is, stagnation 0.2145
0.1788
pressure and temperature. The pressure in the interior is ex- 0.1431
0.1074
trapolated to the boundary plane; the velocity at the bound- 0.7171E 01
0.3602E 01
ary is then computed from the specified Pstag and the ex- 0.3308E 03
trapolated Pstat and applied as a boundary condition. Then
the momentum and mass equations are solved in succession. Figure 8: Mach number contours for full machine.
This switch in boundary conditions is necessary, as often-
times the computation fails because the extrapolated Pstat ex-
ceeds Pstag .
Note in Figure 6 that the “model outlet” boundary is combinations (RR = 0.014 & RC = 0.006 , RR = 0.014 &
a converging channel. In Star-CD, large outflow pressure RC = 0.011 , and RR = 0.013 & RC = 0.014 ). Rotor-case
boundaries [4] often cause flow reversals due to local pres- clearances vary in practice due to the tip strip manufacturing
sure gradients, and may lead to divergence due to nega- tolerances of ±0.005 as well as wear during operation. The
tive densities near the boundary. When the flow comes in CFD calculations are performed for 4 pressure ratios (1.24,
through outlet boundaries, the user-specified values for tur- 2.09, 3.11, and 4.18). The corresponding temperature ratios
bulence and temperature are applied causing local regions of are obtained from the experimental results of Blekhman [1].
large/small temperatures and turbulent viscosities. To avoid To visualize the flow field, the Mach number, static pres-
divergence, the flow has to be forced out of the domain sure, and temperature plots are presented for a pressure ratio
through the outlet boundary. Hence, the outflow boundary of 3.11, RR clearance = 0.013 , and RC clearance of 0.014 .
was reduced to half its size by tapering, thereby accelerat- Figure 8 shows the Mach number distribution for the entire
ing the flow. Reducing the size of the outlet does not affect flow field.
the quantity of interest, that is, leakage flow. The study of In general, it is seen that the flow velocities in the well
boundary conditions was done to simulate the experiments regions are significantly smaller than in the gaps. The rotor-
as closely as possible, within the quasi-steady nature of the rotor and rotor-casing clearances create flow passages simi-
CFD model. lar to converging diverging nozzles. Figure 9 is an expanded
view of the Mach number contours in the rotor-rotor gap.
It is observed that for a pressure ratio = 3.11, all gaps expe-
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION rience choked flow with the flow being sonic at the throat,
then supersonic, and finally decelerating to subsonic speeds
6.1. 2D results at 45◦ angle of rotation due to divergence of the nozzle area and friction.
The static pressure generally decreases through the ma-
After determining the effects of the tip strip and add-ons on chine. Figure 10 shows an expanded view of the pressure
the clearances and flow rates, a 2D simulation was performed contours in the rotor-rotor flow passage. It can be seen that
for the full machine. there is a gradual decrease in the pressure through the throat
The case study is performed at the 45◦ angle, because until the flow reaches its maximum Mach number. This is
the clearance remains constant for the “design shape” for consistent with the flow in a subsonic-supersonic converg-
more than 96% of the cycle, repeats itself after 90◦ , and is ing diverging nozzle [5]. As the nozzle continues to expand,
symmetrical about 45◦ as shown earlier. Case studies are the flow goes from supersonic to subsonic, with correspond-
done for the following rotor-rotor and rotor-casing clearance ing increase in the pressure. Then the pressure continues to
Ashish M. Joshi et al. 7
Prostar 3.10
Prostar 3.10
08-JUN.-06
Mach number 8-JUN.-06
ITER = 1940 Temperature
Local MX = 2.052 Absolute
Local MN = 0.3308E 03 Kelvin
ITER = 1940
Local MX = 561.0
y Local MN = 305.4
z x
Translation of IGES data y
File: inv 45.iges
z x
Translation of IGES data
1.832
1.736 File: inv 45.iges
1.639
1.543
1.446
1.350 560.4
1.254 548.3
1.157 536.2
1.061 524.1
0.9644 512.0
0.8680 500.0
0.7716 487.9
0.6752 475.8
0.5788 463.7
0.4823 451.6
0.3859 439.5
0.2895 427.4
0.1931 415.3
0.9673E 01 403.2
391.1
0.3308E 03 379.1
367.0
354.9
342.8
Figure 9: Mach number contours in rotor-rotor gap. 330.7
Prostar 3.10
8-JUN.-06 The static temperature field is uniform at the inflow
Static pressure boundary, which remains constant throughout the high-
Absolute pressure reservoir. The static temperature decreases in the
PA rotor-rotor and rotor-casing gaps, as shown in Figure 11
ITER = 1940 (rotor-rotor). It decreases gradually until the flow reaches the
Local MX = 0.1012E + 06
highest Mach number, and then increases to the temperature
Local MN = 0.1110E + 05
y in the low-pressure outflow reservoir.
The velocity vector plot in Figure 12 shows the direction-
z x ality of the flow through the different flow paths from the
Translation of IGES data high-pressure reservoir to the low-pressure reservoir.
File: inv 45.iges Flow recirculation is observed in the wells due to the high
0.1012E + 06 velocities near the casing which drag the neighboring fluid
0.9647E + 05
0.9172E + 05
0.8698E + 05
similar to a rotating flow in a cavity. It is observed that the
0.8224E + 05
0.7750E + 05
recirculation regions are stronger in the model outlet reser-
0.7275E + 05
0.6801E + 05 voir because of the higher velocities.
0.6327E + 05
0.5852E + 05
0.5378E + 05
0.4904E + 05
0.4430E + 05 6.2. Effects of the tip strip on rotor-casing clearance
0.3955E + 05
0.3481E + 05
0.3007E + 05
0.2532E + 05 The tip strip (Figure 13) has an interesting effect on the mass
0.2058E + 05
0.1584E + 05
0.1110E + 05
flow rate through the rotor-casing clearance. The tip strip
with a 0.006 clearance to the casing is shown on the right
Figure 10: Static pressure contours for rotor-rotor gap. in Figure 13. The same 0.006 clearance without the tip strip
is shown on the left.
To study the effects of the tip strip on the rotor-casing
increase and equalizes with the reservoir pressure. Thus, a leakage mass flow rates, the rotor-casing gap is simulated for
k − ω turbulence model is proper for simulating the effects several pressure ratios. The tangential velocity of the rotor at
of this adverse pressure gradient. (In the case of an unchoked the highest point with the tip strip is ≈ 33 m/s, which gives a
flow, the pressure also decreases until the throat and then in- Mach number of ∼ 0.1. The direction of this velocity (VT ) is
creases, resulting in an unfavorable pressure gradient.) against the leakage flow as shown in Figure 13. This position
8 International Journal of Rotating Machinery
0.030
0.028
0.006 VT = 33 m/s
Rotating wall
boundary 0.006 Figure 15: Mesh for 3D quasi-steady simulation.
Static wall
boundary
is simulated by specifying an angular velocity for the rotor 6.3. End plate leakage (quasi-steady, 3D)
boundary with a no-slip condition. Except for this “rotat-
ing boundary,” all other boundaries and the mesh are kept The above analysis neglects the leakage through the end plate
stationary. The motivation is to determine the difference in clearances. To estimate the effect of this leakage path, quasi-
flow rates between a rotating impeller with a tip strip and a steady analysis was performed with a three-dimensional
nonrotating impeller without a tip strip. mesh as shown in Figure 15. The blue-colored cells are the
It is observed that the leakage mass flow rates for the end plate cells, one cell thick. The case study is performed
rotor-case gap with the tip strip are significantly lower for with an angle of rotation of 45◦ and clearances of 0.011
PRs less than 1.89, which is the PR for choking of the flow. for rotor-casing and 0.014 for rotor-rotor. The end plate
After the flow chokes, the difference in mass flow rates is in- clearance is specified as 0.005 , which lies in the range spec-
significant because Mach number is always equal to 1.0 near ified by the Roots manual. The three-dimensional analysis
the throat. A comparison of leakage mass flow rates is shown is performed for 4 different pressure ratios. The results ob-
in Figure 14. tained are compared with the 2D mass flow rate results scaled
Consequently, in order to effectively simulate the 404J with rotor length. The comparison shows that the end plate
Whispair Roots blower using the base shape, mass flow rates leakage is smaller for lower pressure ratios (4.15% for PR
must be reduced by a factor proportional to the percent dif- = 1.24) and increases with increasing pressure ratio (to up to
ference in the flow rates with and without the tip strip. This 10.2% for PR = 4.18). These results are tabulated in Table 1.
Ashish M. Joshi et al. 9
0.030
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Pressure ratio
Experimental leakage RR = 0.014¼¼ , RC = 0.011¼¼
RR = 0.013¼¼ , RC = 0.014¼¼ RR = 0.014¼¼ , RC = 0.006¼¼
Figure 16: Comparison of computational and experimental leakage for different clearance combinations.
Table 1: Comparison of 3D and 2D leakage mass flow rate results steady analysis can now be performed with only one
scaled with rotor length (RR = 0.014 , RC = 0.011 ). angle of rotation. This angle was chosen to be 45◦ , as
2D leakage scaled 3D leakage End plate leakage
the clearance data is symmetrical about this angle, and
repeats itself after 90◦ of rotation.
PR ratio with rotor length (quasi-steady) mass flow rate
(ii) The tip strip is believed to be provided to reduce leak-
(Kg/s) ×103 (Kg/s) ×103 (Kg/s) ×103 age as well as allow for wear and tear during the ma-
1.24 18.403 19.167 0.0764 chine operation. The mass flow rates in the 2D com-
putations for unchoked flow were less with the tip
2.09 17.632 18.671 1.0390
strip, since it creates a pressure drop in the rotor-casing
3.11 15.743 17.035 1.2920 clearance, which is significant for lower pressure ratios.
4.18 14.693 16.194 1.5010 It was also found that the tip strip reduces leakage for
±10◦ angles of rotation around the 0◦ position by cre-
ating a pressure drop in the rotor-rotor clearance.
6.4. Resultant net leakage mass flow rate (iii) The three-dimensional quasi-steady analysis showed
that the leakage due to the end plates was less (4%)
The 2D leakage mass flow rates scaled with rotor length were for lower pressure ratios, and increases to up to 10%
reduced due to the effect of the tip strip and impeller rota- for higher pressure ratios.
tion, and the leakage through the end plate clearance was (iv) For the CFD analyses, a linear upwind differencing
added to compute the leakage under operating conditions. scheme suitable for elliptic problems was used, and
Figure 16 compares computed and experimental leak- found to give appropriate results. A k − ω turbulence
age mass flow rates for different combinations of rotor-rotor model was used to capture the effects of the adverse
and rotor-casing clearances. It is observed that the compu- pressure gradients in the flow exiting the gap. A very
tational and experimental results have the same behavior, fine mesh with a y+ ∼ 1 for the first cell was used to
that is, leakage increases with increase in pressure ratio un- make the mesh compatible to the turbulence model.
til PR = 1.89 and decreases thereafter for all clearance com- Considering all the effects of the clearances with spe-
binations. It is observed that the computational results for cial features on the design shape (tip strip and add-ons, end
RR = 0.013 and RC = 0.014 match very well with the ex- plate leakage), and physical effects of the impeller rotation,
perimental results. net leakage mass flow rates were obtained as a function of
pressure ratio (Figure 16). It was observed that the computa-
6.5. Conclusions and summary tional and experimental results match well for RR = 0.013
and RC = 0.014 . In addition to the analysis shown ear-
A comprehensive clearance analysis was done of the two-lobe lier, the tip strip is believed to further reduce the leakage
impeller geometry in the 404J Roots blower. mass flow rates for lower pressure ratios by pushing the fluid
(i) The clearance analysis shows that the material added to back into the high-pressure reservoir. This effect cannot be
the basic involute shape gives a constant clearance for captured in a quasi-steady analysis in Star-CD. A definitive
a larger part of the rotation (1.5◦ –90◦ ). This simplifies statement cannot be made unless an unsteady, moving mesh
the numerical procedure considerably, as the quasi- analysis is used to study this phenomenon. The influence of
10 International Journal of Rotating Machinery
REFERENCES
[1] D. I. Blekhman, “A theoretical and experimental study of high-
temperature compressive gas heating,” Dissertation, State Uni-
versity of New York at Buffalo, June 2003.
[2] D. C. Wilcox, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, DCW Industries,
La Canada, Calif, USA, 1998.
[3] N. S. Wilkes and C. P. Thompson, “An evaluation of higher-
order upwind differencing scheme for elliptic flow problems,”
in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Numerical
Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow, pp. 248–257, Seattle,
Wash, USA, August 1983.
[4] Star-CD methodology and user manual v3.15, CD-Adapco
Group.
[5] A. H. Shapiro, The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compress-
ible Fluid Flow, Ronald Press, New York, NY, USA, May 1953.
International Journal of
Rotating
Machinery
International Journal of
The Scientific
Engineering Distributed
Journal of
Journal of
Journal of
Control Science
and Engineering
Advances in
Civil Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
Journal of Electrical and Computer
Robotics
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
VLSI Design
Advances in
OptoElectronics
International Journal of
International Journal of
Modelling &
Simulation
Aerospace
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Volume 2014
Navigation and
Observation
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
in Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Engineering
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2010
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
International Journal of
International Journal of Antennas and Active and Passive Advances in
Chemical Engineering Propagation Electronic Components Shock and Vibration Acoustics and Vibration
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation Hindawi Publishing Corporation
http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014