Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Virtual Care
Robert M. Vineet Shruti John D. Abraham
Opportunities Wachter, MD
Professor and
Arora, MD, MAPP
Herbert T. Abelson
Chandra, MD
Assistant Professor
Halamka, MD, MS
President, Mayo
Verghese, MD, MACP
Professor and Linda
Chair of the Tenured Professor of Emergency Clinic Platform
and Challenges in
R. Meier and Joan
Department of of Medicine, Medicine, F. Lane Provostial
Medicine, UCSF University of Thomas Jefferson Professor, Vice Chair
Red Paper
A McGraw Hill Red Paper
Telehealth and Virtual Care
Opportunities and Challenges in Graduate Medical Education
Executive Summary
The COVID-19 global pandemic propelled telehealth to the forefront of clinical care. How will graduate
medical education evolve to prepare clinicians for the “new normal” of telehealth and virtual medicine?
To address these and other topics, McGraw Hill Professional sponsored an exclusive telehealth roundtable
hosted by Dr. Robert Wachter, Professor and Chair of the Department of Medicine at the University of
California, San Francisco (UCSF). The event featured a panel of prominent medical educators and experts on
the vanguard of telemedicine, including:
Vineet Arora, MD, MAPP, Herbert T. Abelson Tenured Professor of Medicine at the University of Chicago
Shruti Chandra, MD, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine at Thomas Jefferson University
Abraham Verghese, MD, MACP, Professor and Linda R. Meier and Joan F. Lane Provostial Professor and
Vice Chair for the Theory and Practice of Medicine at the School of Medicine at Stanford University
A valuable resource for GME program directors, coordinators, faculty, and librarians, this red paper explores
the topics discussed in the roundtable, providing additional context and references. Coverage includes:
⊲⊲ Barriers to telehealth
⊲⊲ How GME leaders and institutions can adapt to an evolving clinical care environment
“There are very few things good things about pandemics, but one of them…is that they often spur
innovation,” said Dr. Wachter during the roundtable. “In the case of COVID-19, probably the main
digital innovation has been telehealth. In some ways, it’s not an innovation because it’s been around
for a while, but it certainly has had a very slow adoption curve until the last year.”
“At UCSF…we saw our use of telehealth skyrocket. We’ve all seen those curves going from 1% or 2% of
visits to 70%. That’s what happened for us. …[Telehealth] is clearly now going to be an enduring part of
the medical healthcare landscape,” said Dr. Wachter.
GME programs have not traditionally incorporated telehealth and virtual care into their formal curricula
or informal learning experiences. The acceleration of telehealth in 2020 presents new challenges for
GME programs as well as new educational and clinical opportunities.
Patient-centered care
⊲⊲ All levels of primary care E/M services may be provided by a resident through interactive
video or audio technology, under the direct supervision of the teaching physician.
Supervision Changes
⊲⊲ Direct supervision: The supervising physician is concurrently monitoring the resident-patient
virtual visit via audio or video.
⊲⊲ Indirect supervision: The attending physician is immediately available during the virtual visit,
if needed.
⊲⊲ Oversight: The supervising physician is available immediately following the virtual visit, should
a meeting with the resident be required.
Barriers to Telehealth
Patient Inequities
While many regulatory and payment barriers to virtual care have been lifted (at least for the time being),
other barriers to these services still exist, including lack of access to reliable broadband connections. Equity
and access to care are critical considerations when planning virtual patient care. Limited research has
been conducted to specifically examine how sociodemographic factors affect in-person versus telephone
versus video visits during the pandemic. This type of research is essential as it highlights healthcare delivery
differences and disparities that may impact access to quality care for certain populations.
Video virtual visits comprised the majority of outpatient clinical encounters during the study period.
There were notable sociodemographic differences between visits conducted in-person versus virtual,
and video versus telephone. Populations with decreased access to wi-fi and smart devices, and who
had limited knowledge about the digital environment were less likely to complete their outpatient visits
using video conferencing. Studies have shown that patients whose virtual visits used video instead of
telephone-only report higher satisfaction.
These findings are concerning, as the use of video visits may contribute to more inequalities between
patient populations. This divide could be exacerbated if telephone visits are no longer reimbursed, or if
there is a disproportionate reimbursement between telephone and video visits following the pandemic.
Clinician Barriers
During the roundtable, Dr. Vineet Arora described how UChicago Medicine surveyed 200 medicine
and pediatric faculty members about the process of seeing patients through video virtual visits. The
results showed that clinicians also experience barriers to video visits, including:
Guidance needs to be established for clinicians to understand when it is best to see a patient in
person versus virtually. The mechanics of how to conduct a physical exam virtually are unfamiliar
to many practitioners. Some are unaware of the sophisticated equipment available to support
virtual physical exams, such as electronic stethoscopes, video otoscopes, dermatoscopes,
intraoral scopes, and retinal imaging systems. Some patients wear fitness trackers that can monitor
a variety of body functions, including heart rate, blood pressure, blood oxygen levels, sleep
patterns, and EKG. These readings can be shared with clinicians via health applications or through
electronic health messaging systems.
Diagnostic Error
Research shows that clinicians diagnosing patients via virtual care often order more tests to collect
objective data than they would if seeing the same patient in a clinic.8 Some conditions are difficult
to diagnose via video because they present with subtle physical abnormalities that can be easily
missed on the screen, such as mild clubbing or changes in capillary refill.
Fragmented Care
Poor communication with the patient and other providers caring for the patient is a risk with any
type of clinical encounter, but perhaps more so with telehealth. This breakdown in communication
may lead to fragmentation, which may create gaps in care, lead to excessive use of care, cause
unnecessary or redundant care, or lead to medication error.8
Patient Rapport
The computer screen may inhibit the development of a trusting relationship with the provider for
some patients. This could become a major issue for patients with chronic or complex disease who
require frequent follow-up but may feel uncomfortable if a trusting patient-provider relationship
is not cultivated. “Webside manner” encompasses a set of key attributes with which providers
conducting telehealth visits must become comfortable, including, on-camera appearance, proper
eye contact, lighting, empathy, and the experience as a whole.9
Benefits of Telehealth
Research has shown that telehealth improves patient self-management and outcomes, decreases
healthcare costs, and increases continuity of care.10
Improved Access
Clinician shortages exist worldwide leaving many without healthcare services. Telehealth enables
people to receive medical attention even when there are no available providers in an area.
Diagnostic Error
Convenience is one of the primary reasons patients often prefer virtual over in-person visits.
Telehealth eliminates the need to commute to the clinic or take time away from work. During the
early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, many patients were able to meet their healthcare needs
safely through virtual care. Even as the pandemic begins to resolve, those who are vulnerable or
caring for vulnerable loved ones may choose to continue with telehealth visits to decrease the
threat of contracting the virus.8
Patients with chronic disease conditions such as heart failure may be easily managed through
telehealth services, which reduces hospital stays or keeps them out of the hospital entirely,
decreases time spent away from work for appointments, decreases travel time, and results in
lower healthcare costs to the patient and healthcare system.
Quality Outcomes
Much research has been conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) over the last decade to examine
patient outcomes using telehealth in the ICU.11 These programs have improved patient safety
through the use of off-site critical care providers and standardization of care processes, which has
had the added benefit of lowering costs to patients and the healthcare system.
Behavioral health is another sector of medicine in which telehealth has proven to be an effective
alternative to in-person patient care. Studies have consistently shown improved symptom
management, higher quality of life, and decreased costs in mental health patients receiving care
virtually.12 These results include a large population with a variety of mental health diagnoses.
Meaningful Opportunities
Ambulatory Care
There are many challenges to resolve in order to seamlessly deliver telehealth services, but there
are also unexpected opportunities that allow a deeper understanding of the patient’s life.
These unique discoveries allow for a different type of dialogue between the physician and patient
than would normally occur in a clinic office.
Inpatient Care
The inpatient setting has used telehealth services successfully to care for complex patients for
many years. Providers inside or outside the hospital monitor the patient’s clinical condition and
manage their care remotely.8
Dr. Chandra was part of the telehealth advisory committee established by the Association of
American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Through this committee, the AAMC has developed core
competencies for telehealth to guide virtual care delivery using six domains, and they have
included milestones within each domain for recent medical school graduates entering residency.
The following summary is based on the pre-publication version of the AAMC’s new cross-
continuum competencies in telehealth.13
Clinicians will understand when and why to use telehealth, as well as assess patient readiness,
patient safety, practice readiness, and end user readiness.
Clinicians will obtain and manage clinical information via telehealth to ensure appropriate
high-quality care.
Specific to telehealth, clinicians will effectively communicate with patients, families, caregivers,
and healthcare team members using telehealth modalities. They will also integrate both
the transmission and receipt of information with the goal of effective knowledge transfer,
professionalism, and understanding within a therapeutic relationship.
Clinicians will understand the federal, state, and local facility practice requirements to meet the
minimal standards to deliver healthcare via telehealth. Clinicians will maintain patient privacy while
minimizing risk to the clinician and patient during telehealth encounters, while putting the patient
interest first and preserving or enhancing the doctor-patient relationship.
Clinicians will have basic knowledge of technology needed for the delivery of high-quality
telehealth services.
Clinicians will have an understanding of telehealth delivery that addresses and mitigates cultural
biases as well as physician bias for or against telehealth, accounts for physical and mental
disabilities, and non-health related individual and community needs and limitations to promote
equitable access to care.
We need to integrate
[telehealth] better
into all aspects
of the clinical learning
environment.
—Dr. Vineet Arora
When thinking of the most suitable patients for virtual care, the serious and complex patient is
probably not front-of-mind. However, caring for such patients is possible with the right technical
equipment, trained healthcare staff, and infrastructure.
Mayo Clinic Platform is a large digital initiative led by John Halamka, M.D., MS. Its purpose is to deliver
quality healthcare through digital and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to people throughout the world.14
“It’s about seeing more patients in more geographies and ensuring we don’t worsen the digital
divide,” said Dr. Halamka during the roundtable.
According to Dr. Halamka, it is necessary to understand the journey patients have taken in the
past to advise future patient journeys. As part of their digital initiative, Mayo Clinic has taken 154
years of deidentified patient data and used an AI factory to identify patterns that can be used to
formulate new knowledge based on that data. Residents, faculty, researchers, and fellows are
using this data to create the tools and technologies that will assist patients in the future.
The AI factory has produced “30 algorithms that help us better diagnose patients based
on patterns of disease,” said Dr. Halamka. “As more and more care is going to be delivered
at a distance, understanding patterns of disease and being able to interpret the objective,
the subjective, and the telemetry and create for our clinicians delivering virtual care a set of
probabilities of disease is increasingly important,” he added.
Mayo Clinic now has a home hospital platform where providers care for patients with serious and
complex healthcare needs entirely from a distance. They outfit the patient’s home with cellular
technology so there is no dependence on reliable internet or technology literacy. Mayo Clinic
provides the monitoring tools, including electronic
wearables and devices that stay in the home.
These devices provide telemetry readings, vital We will need a whole
new cadre of caregivers
signs, and other pertinent data to inform clinicians
of their status. Care is managed and adjusted
based on these findings. able to deliver care at a
There have been approximately 350 patients distance and deliver
discharged from this program so far. Patient satisfaction
scores have been excellent, and safety and quality
care in a home setting.
metrics are equivalent to those of onsite care.15 —Dr. John Halamka
Virtual healthcare is going to require a new caliber of clinician – sometimes called a “virtualist” – who will have
the knowledge and skills of a hospitalist but will deliver comprehensive care to patients entirely from a distance.
Community paramedics or other non-physician providers will be needed to provide supply-chain support to
persons in non-traditional settings. AI enablement training will also be necessary.16 “We will need a whole new
cadre of caregivers able to deliver care at a distance and deliver care in a home setting,” said Dr. Halamka
Telehealth and virtual care are here to stay and will likely increase
even as the COVID-19 global pandemic subsides. Graduate
medical education will need to evolve to prepare tomorrow’s The locus of
clinicians for the “new normal” of telehealth and virtual medicine.
the training has
Reflecting on the future of medical care, Dr. Wachter commented, to change.
“The patients we see both in the hospital and the ambulatory
world will be a highly selected group of people who really need to —Dr. Robert Wachter
come in...(for) something we can only do in person. ...The locus
of the training has to change.”
Some recommendations gleaned from the roundtable event, Telehealth and Virtual Care Opportunities and
Challenges in Graduate Medical Education, include:
⊲⊲ Find ways to integrate telehealth education into GME training now, as opportunities arise.
⊲⊲ Create a formalized telehealth and virtual care training program for GME programs based on
the AAMC telehealth competencies.
⊲⊲ Establish guidance for physical examinations—when is an in-person visit preferred over a virtual one?
⊲⊲ Advocate to make permanent current policies that allow virtual visit reimbursement.
⊲⊲ Advocate to permanently implement current policies regarding residents, telehealth, and supervision.
⊲⊲ Develop new professional roles and training that will result in providers who solely function in virtual care
and support staff who provide virtual patient assistance.
2. “Physicians and Other Clinicians: CMS Flexibilities to Fight COVID-19.” CMS.gov. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
January 28, 2021. https://www.cms.gov/files/document/covid-19-physicians-and-clinicians.pdf.
3. Nasca, Thomas J. “ACGME Response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19).” ACGME, March 18, 2020. https://acgme.org/Newsroom/
Newsroom-Details/ArticleID/10111/ACGME-Response-to-the-Coronavirus-COVID-19.
4. Common Program Requirements (Residency).” ACGME. Accessed March 10, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/
PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRResidency2020.pdf.
5. Secretary, HHS Office of the, and Office for Civil Rights (OCR). “Notification of Enforcement Discretion for Telehealth.” HHS.
gov. US Department of Health and Human Services, January 20, 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-
topics/emergency-preparedness/notification-enforcement-discretion-telehealth/index.html.
6. Gilson SF, Umscheid CA, Laiteerapong N, Ossey G, Nunes KJ, Shah SD Growth of Ambulatory Virtual Visits and Differential Use
by Patient Sociodemographics at One Urban Academic Medical Center During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Analysis
JMIR Med Inform 2020;8(12):e24544
doi: 10.2196/24544
7. Kemp MT, Liesman DR, Williams AM, et al. Surgery Provider Perceptions on Telehealth Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic:
Room for Improvement [published online ahead of print, 2020 Nov 13]. J Surg Res. 2020;260:300-306. doi:10.1016/j.
jss.2020.11.034
8. Romanick-Schmiedl, S., Raghu, G. Telemedicine — maintaining quality during times of transition. Nat Rev Dis Primers 6, 45
(2020).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0185-x)
9. Smith, Timothy M. “To Succeed with Telehealth, Know Your ‘Webside Manner.’” American Medical Association,
September 28, 2020. https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital/succeed-telehealth-know-your-webside-
manner#:~:text=Just%20as%20bedside%20manner%20encompasses,the%20totality%20of%20the%20encounter.
10. Agboola, Stephen. “Telemedicine and Patient Safety.” PSNet, September 1, 2016. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/
telemedicine-and-patient-safety.
11. Clin Chest Med. 2015 Sep;36(3):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jun 27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.05.004
12. Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Bashshur N, Yellowlees PM. The Empirical Evidence for Telemedicine Interventions in Mental
Disorders. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(2):87-113. doi:10.1089/tmj.2015.0206
14. “At the Edge of Possible.” Mayo Clinic. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, June 2020. https://
mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2020/06/at-the-edge-of-possible/.
15. HealthLeaders. “John Halamka, MD, Launches Mayo Clinic’s ‘Digital Data Business’.” HealthLeaders Media. Accessed March
5, 2021. https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/innovation/john-halamka-md-launches-mayo-clinics-digital-data-business.
16. Oran, Daniel P, and Eric J Topol. “The Rise of the Virtualist.” The Lancet, July 6, 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(19)31498-9.