Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. H. Qiao
UM-SJTU Joint Institute
June 20, 2023
Outline
Basics
Minimax and Bayesian
Example
Extensions
Improper Prior
Nonparametric
Restricted Bayes Estimator
Basics
Recap
Lpθ, dq ě 0, @θ, d
and Lpθ, g pθqq “ 0, @θ. The risk function for estimator δpX q of g pθq is
We focus on the risk function which is more general than the variance.
Definition
An estimator δ M of θ, which minimizes the maximum risk:
2
Chap 4., TPE
Minimax and Bayesian Example
2
Minimax Estimator
2
Chap 4., TPE
Minimax and Bayesian Example
Minimax Estimation from a Bayesian Point of View
3
Condition for a Bayes estimator to be minimax
Suppose that Λ is a distribution on Θ such that
ż
r pΛ, δΛ q “ Rpθ, δΛ qdΛpθq “ sup Rpθ, δΛ q
θ
Then:
• δΛ is minimax
• If δΛ is the unique Bayes solution with respect to Λ, it is the unique
minimax procedure
• Λ is least favorable
3
Theorem 1.4, Chap. 4, TPE
Minimax and Bayesian Example
Minimax Estimation from a Bayesian Point of View
Corollary 1
If a Bayes solution δΛ has constant risk, then it is minimax.
Corollary 2
Let ωΛ be the set of parameter points at which the risk function of δΛ
takes on its maximum, that is
ΛpωΛ q “ 1
We now try a Beta prior distribution Λ “ Bpa, bq, the Bayes estimator
can be shown to be
a`x
δΛ pxq “
a`b`x
with risk
1 (
npp1 ´ pq ` rap1 ´ pq ´ bps2
pa ` b ` nq2
Minimax and Bayesian Example
Example
?
n
If we set a “ b “ 2 , the risk is constant. That is, the estimator
?
x ` 12 n
δpxq “ ?
n` n
is a minimax estimator.
1 1
rn “ ? , Rn “ pp1 ´ pq{n
4 p1 ` nq2
pd ´ pq2
Lpp, dq “
pp1 ´ pq
Such distribution is called the Jeffreys prior and not proper. There are
two ways to handle this situation
rΛ ď r “ lim rΛn
nÑ8
where
ż
rΛn “ Rpθ, δn qdΛn pθq
A Weaker Guarantee
Suppose that tΛn u is a sequence of prior distributions with Bayes risks
rn and that δ is an estimator for which
sup Rpθ, δq “ r
θ
Then,
• δ is minimax and
• the sequence tΛn u is least favorable.
VarF pXi q ď M ă 8
´8 ă a ă Xi ă b ă 8
nx̄{σ 2 ` µ{b 2
δΛb “
n{σ 2 ` 1{b 2
with risk
1
rΛb “
n{σ 2 ` 1{b 2
σ2
As b Ñ 8, rΛb Ò n and X̄ is minimax for any finite σ 2 .
is minimax over F1 .
The risk of δ on F1 is
„ ? 2
n 1
RpF , δq “ E ? X̄ ` ? ´θ
1` n 2p1 ` nq
„
1 1
RpF , δq “ ? 2 VarF pX q ` p ´ θq2
p1 ` nq 2
As 0 ď X ď 1, we know X 2 ď X and
VarF pX q “ EpX 2 q ´ θ2 ď θ ´ θ2
Then
1
RpF , δq ď ?
4p1 ` nq2
On the other hand, with some other prior distribution, the Bayes
estimator have have very high maximum risk. Then, we would like to
study the restricted Bayes estimator.
At p “ 1, the risk is rb{pn ` b ` 1qs2 , which for fixed n and large b can
be arbitrarily close to 1. The constant risk of the minimax estimator is
?
1{4p1 ` nq2 . However, for fixed b, we have
?
4p1 ` nq2 sup Rpp, δq Ñ 1 as n Ñ 8
Then the estimator δ will be a restricted Bayes estimator for large enough
sample size n.
Improper Prior Nonparametric Restricted Bayes Estimator
Restricted Bayes Estimator
nb 2
δb “ x̄
1 ` nb 2
The maximum risk of δb is unbounded (not the Bayes risk!) for all n
while the minimax risk is 1{n. Then no such Bayes estimator can be
restricted Bayes.
The maximum risk tends toward 1{n as M Ñ 0 while the Bayes estimator
as M Ñ 8
Improper Prior Nonparametric Restricted Bayes Estimator