Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It has been broadly accepted that without getting deeply into CSR practices,
growth and development is not possible. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is
broadly defined by McWilliams and Siegel (2001) as “actions that appear to
further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is
required by law”. While Carroll (1979) describes CSR: “The social responsibility
of business encompasses the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary
expectations that society has of organizations at a given point in time” (p. 500).
Stakeholders have forced the managers to spend their considerable amount of
resources on CSR practices. Whetten et al. (2002) defined CSR as “societal
expectations of corporate behavior; a behavior that is alleged by a stakeholder to be
expected by society or morally required and is therefore justifiably demanded of a
business”.
In order to survive in the international market, like other sectors textile industry of
Pakistan has also recognized the importance of CSR. Although Pakistan was not
very much indulged into CSR practices but increased level of textile exports and a
continuous demand by the international buyers put a lot of pressure on textile
industry to incorporate CSR practices. Securities and Exchange Commission of
Pakistan (SECP) was the first one to take the initiative with its code of corporate
governance and trade policy 2002. Pakistan is a country whose major part of the
GDP (8.5%) is earned from its textile sector. About 38% of the labor force of
Pakistan is being employed in this sector. With the passage of time, Pakistan’s
textile industry has gained a dominant position in the world market as it is the 8 th
largest exporter of textile products in Asia. According to express tribune the news
paper, out of total $12.5 billion revenues from 20 countries $10.2 billion are earned
from textile exports. And it is the impact of GSP+ that the textile exports have
been increased by 6.5% in the recent years. Federal Minister for textile industry of
Pakistan while giving the textile policy said, “The annual exports target of $ 26
billion by 2019 is ambitious but not beyond our potential”. Along with this
growth, Pakistan’s textile industry is also facing major challenges in order to
exploit this GSP+ status and to meet the changing needs of international business.
So far very little research has been done on the textile industry of Pakistan in terms
of CSR. So this study aims to explore how far the CSR practices are embedded in
the textile sector of Pakistan. Our main objectives of this research are
Pakistan’s textile sector earned US$5.77 billion during the 2003 year, compared
with US$5.577 BILLION OF 2000-2001 indicating a growth of 0.69%. The total
exports of textile sector in 2004 were US 5.7 billion which shows 2.5% growth it
increase to 4% growth in 2005 as compared to 2004.The textile sector shows 8%
negative growth in 2006.T he negative growth continue in 2007 also with the value
of 5%.The textile sector shows 15% growth in 2008. At present, there are 1,221
ginning units, 442 spinning units, 124 large spinning units and 425 small units
which produce textile products. Even with so many advantages, Pakistan’s total
share in global textile trade is less than 1%.
Literature Review:
In Pakistan CSR is frequently equated with corporate philanthropy, the terms being
often mistakenly used synonymously. Some consider CSR to be a simple consent
with law.This creates a difficulty because top management is still uncertain about
the true meanings of CSR. This indicates the need for a mass awareness campaign
supported by the government, targeting businessmen, entrepreneurs and customers
so that they are able to appreciate CSR and also the general hazards of
noncompliance in today’s environment. Frequent and open discussion defining and
understanding CSR, detailing its nature and promoting and developing
methodologies on how local businesses adopt and manage their CSR obligations
would be a useful first step.
Reference:
1-Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional
construct. Business & Society,38 (3) 68–295.
3-Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social
responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16 (2), 312–322