Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Calculating The Loads For
A Liquid Cooling System 2
qL = ε • Cmin (TW2 − Ta )
(3)
Where:
(4)
Tw1 = qL ( 1 – 1 ) + Ta
ε • Cmin Cw
Tmod = qL (Rcp + ( 1
(5) – 1 ) ) + Ta
Figure1. Closed Loop Liquid Cooling System [1] . ε • Cmin Cw
© Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc. 3
Several factors must be known to effectively use this mechanical concerns for the heat exchanger dictate that
equation as a design guide. First, we must determine the it should be considered first. The cold plate and pump
cold plate’s thermal resistance. This can be obtained from are typically easier to optimize. For example, if a heat
a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis of the cold exchanger’s size is limited, a copper micro fin cold plate
plate using software such as CFDesign or Flotherm. It is
and a high volume pump may be needed. If a sufficiently-
also important to understand the manufacturing limits before
sized heat exchanger is available, a lower cost cold plate
starting the mechanical design. Typically a
cold plate’s design is driven by these limits,
which control the minimum width of its internal
channels and fins. A cold plate’s thermal
resistance is usually in the range of 0.05 to
0.25°C/W, depending on size and material.
As an example, consider the design of a liquid-cooled loop and pump may be used with sufficient results.
for cooling an Intel Xeon X5492 processor.
In summary, liquid cooling loops are an important part of
Where: the electronics industry, and their use will continue into the
qL= 150 W future.
Tmod, Max = 63°C It is important to understand the impact on performance
Ta = 25°C
of all three major parts of liquid cooling loops (cold plate,
Mw = 0.032 L/s (0.5 gpm)
heat exchanger and pump) to ensure an acceptable level of
Rcp = unknown
performance at the lowest cost. It is also critical to address
Heat exchanger performance = 16.7 W/°C
the design of the heat exchanger as it can be the limiting
Equation 5 is used to solve for the device temperature
(Tmod) as a function of cold plate resistance. Figure 2 shows factor in many systems.
designed as a group to ensure acceptable performance. Systems, Electronics Cooling, August 2008.
The heat exchanger is often the limiting factor in a compact 3. Whitenack, K., Demystifying Cold Plates, Electronic
system due to its relatively large size. Packaging and other Products, May 2003.
© Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc. 4
Introduction
In previous issues of Qpedia Thermal eMagazine [1,2], we Where,
covered some fundamental and practical aspects of heat
The Stanton number is defined as:
exchangers. In this issue, we will concentrate on compact
St = Nu
heat exchangers and how to use standard curves for heat
RePr
transfer analysis. Compact heat exchangers are a class
of heat exchangers which features at least one of the Nu, Re and Pr are Nusselt, Reynolds and Prandtl numbers,
fluids, on one side, as a gas. They generally have a very respectively.
large heat transfer area per unit volume (>700 m2/m3)
After considering all of the constraints and identifying
[3]. Most of the applications of compact heat exchangers
the heat exchanger type, the engineer must look at the
are in the area of electronics cooling, because space for a
graphs and match the heat exchanger configuration to the
cooling device is typically at a premium. Generally, the heat
available data, if it is available, and extract the information
exchangers used in electronics cooling are of the air-to-
liquid type. The heat transfer coefficient on the air side is from there.
significantly smaller than the liquid side, hence increasing The following example shows how to use curves to
the surface area on the air side can compensate for the solve a heat exchanger problem:
low value of the heat transfer coefficient. Compact heat
Consider a circular tube-circular fin compact heat
exchangers can come in different shapes and forms [3].
exchanger as shown in figure 1.
They can be made as:
The liquid water transfers the heat from hot components
• Flat tubes (liquid) – continuous plate (air)
through the aluminum tube. Ambient air is blown through
• Round tube (liquid) – continuous flat plate (air)
the fins attached to the tubes to remove the heat from hot
• Round tube (liquid) – round disks (air)
fluid. Calculating the overall heat transfer coefficient on the
• Flat plate (liquid) – folded fin (air) single pass
or multi-pass air side:
Flow passages are generally very small (hydraulic diameter The geometrical dimensions of this heat exchanger and
Dh < 5 mm) and the flow is considered laminar. Kays other information are as follows:
and London [4] have compiled a large volume of data for Tube outside diameter = 9.65 mm
different heat exchanger configurations. The data plotted is
Fin pitch = 343 per m
in the form of the Colburn factor (JH) and friction factor as
a function of Reynolds number (Re), as shown in figure 1. Flow passage hydraulic diameter = 3.929×10-3m
Aff
Free flow are/frontal area = α = 0.524 Di = inner diameter of the tube
Aff
Heat transfer area/total volume = α = 0.524 D0 = outer diameter of the tube
Af
Fin area/total area = = 0.91 The conduction resistance is calculated as:
A
The air side (cold side) heat transfer coefficient is then In future articles we will show analytical techniques for heat
calculated as: exchangers, with geometries that are not referenced in any
available literature, especially compact heat exchangers
with very dense fins on the air side. Also, the above
procedure simplified the analysis by ignoring the fouling
Where,
factor. Fouling is the process of accumulation of particles
G = Volumetric flow rate on the fins or inside the liquid tubes. It depends on the fluid
Cp = Heat capacity velocity, length of service and the type of fluid. In future
Calculate the fin effectiveness from Equation 2. articles, we will devote the topic to Fouling.
First we need the fin efficiency. Referring to figure 2: References
1. A
dvanced Thermal Solutions, Inc., Qpedia Thermal
eMagazine, May 2007, “Heat exchangers: theory and
selection”
2. Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc., Qpedia Thermal
eMagazine, Jan 2008, “Compact heat exchangers
for electronics cooling”
3. Incropera, F.P, Dewitt, D.P, “Introduction to heat transfer” 1985
4. Kays, M. and London, “Compact Heat Exchangers”, Third
Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1984.
Uc = 23.5W/m2.K
© Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc. 7
liquid can lead to poor heat transfer, clogging, and even properties. Some of the differences between fluids are less
system failure. A proper heat transfer fluid should provide relevant to optimizing cold plate performance, but many
compatibility with system’s metals, high thermal conductivity properties should be compared. Tables 2 and 3 show the
and specific heat, low viscosity, low freezing point, high flash properties of some common coolants.
point, low corrosivity, low toxicity, and thermal stability. [3]
The most commonly used coolants for liquid cooling in applications where toxicity might be a concern. PGW
applications today are: is generally recognized as safe for use in food or food
the manufacturing of electrical components where parts the heat transfer fluids most commonly used in high
must be electrically isolated. However, as water’s resistivity performance liquid cooling applications.
increases, its corrosivity increases as well. When using It is important to select a heat transfer fluid that is
deionized water in cold plates or heat exchangers, stainless compatible with your fluid path, offers corrosion protection
steel tubing is recommended. [5, 7] or minimal risk of corrosion, and meets your application’s
© Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc. 9
2. semi-therm.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/How-to- 7. www.amazon.co.uk/IONISED-WATER-Mineralised-
Deionised-Distilled/dp/B00X30JKGY/ref=pd_lpo_
design-liquid-cooled-system.pdf
vtph_263_tr_t_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=QNA
3. Mohapatra, Satish C., “An Overview of Liquid Coolants for M8H7J8R1AEDP8W5FF
Electronics Cooling,” ElectronicsCooling, May 2006.
8. www.rhomarwater.com/products/catalog/envirogard-heat-
4. www.calce.umd.edu/whats_new/2012/Presentations/ transfer-fluid-antifreeze
David%20Saums%20PPt.pdf 9. www.skygeek.com/anderol-royco-602-cooling-fluid.html
the system down to the junction temperature of the hottest displayed in Fig. 1.
devices. The use of cold plates in closed loop liquid cooling Several companies have introduced recirculating chillers to the
systems has become a common and successful means to market in recent years, including ThermoFisher, PolyScience,
insure those temperatures are managed. Laird, Lytron, and ATS. Each of the chiller lines has similarities
Cold plate technology has come a long way since the 1960s. but also unique features that fit different applications.
Liquid cooling with chillers are also being used for medical 12. h
ttps://www.qats.com/cms/2016/10/04/case-study-
imaging equipment and biotechnology testing in order to thermal-management-harvard-medical-school-tissue-
provide accurate results. analysis-instrumentation/
© Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc. 13
cold plate studied is illustrated in Figure 1. The cold plate Rconvection is the convection resistance between
has base size of 40 X 40 mm. The channel width is a and microchannel fins and water
channel height is b. The cold base thickness is t. The
Rcaloric is the liquid caloric thermal resistance due to
water is chosen as the working fluid.
temperature rise of water
The base conduction resistance is affected by material, of 15. All three fin configurations have similar fin surface
base size and base thickness, areas, but their hydraulic diameter Dh is different, which
portion of overall cold plate thermal resistance, even For cold plates made of silicon, the calculated thermal
for a silicon-made cold plate. resistance is shown in Table 5; all results are for 2 LPM
flow and 0.5 mm base thickness. The fin efficiency of the
silicon cold plate is relatively low (<40%) due to the low
conductivity of silicon. In the case of the 0.5 mm channel
(CP2), the convection thermal resistance is 81% of the
overall thermal resistance.
The convection thermal resistance is dictated by the and the overall thermal resistance is 13% lower than that of
following equation, the aluminum nitride cold plate. In the case of the 0.5 mm
channel (CP2), the convection thermal resistance is around
Rconvection = 1
79% of the overall thermal resistance.
ηhA
Where η is the fin efficiency, h is the heat transfer
coefficient of the fin, and A is the total fin surface area.
Three different fin configurations (CP1, CP2, and CP3)
are studied. The channel aspect ratio is kept at a constant Table 7 Thermal Resistance of Copper Plate
© Advanced Thermal Solutions, Inc. 15
The calculated thermal resistance for the diamond plate is Diamond is the best but there is no feasible way to justify
shown in Table 8. Its fin efficiency jumps to 86% and the its cost for cooling commercial products. Copper is a very
overall thermal resistance is 29% lower than that of the good choice for cold plates used to transfer heat from
copper cold plate. As for the 0.5 mm channel (CP2), the higher power chips to water.
convection thermal resistance is around 74% of the overall On the other hand, reducing the hydraulic diameter of
thermal resistance. In the case of the 0.25 mm channel the channel will dramatically decrease the convection
(CP3), the convection thermal resistance drops to 59% of the resistance. However, there are two drawbacks for reducing
overall thermal resistance. Here, the R_caloric starts to have a the hydraulic diameter of the channel. First, it will greatly
larger impact on the overall thermal resistance. increase the pressure drop across the channel, which leads
to more pumping power required for the pump. Second,
the smaller channel size will have more chance of clogging
due to particles inside the working fluid, which requires