The three document summaries are:
1. The Court ruled that the death of a respondent in an administrative case before final resolution is cause for dismissal, and dismissed a complaint against a deceased judge, granting death benefits to his heirs.
2. The Court suspended a lawyer for conflict of interest, noting a lawyer-client relationship exists based on engagement, not a written agreement.
3. The Court granted survivorship benefits to the widow of a former Chief Justice who was removed from office through impeachment, considering it an involuntary retirement.
The three document summaries are:
1. The Court ruled that the death of a respondent in an administrative case before final resolution is cause for dismissal, and dismissed a complaint against a deceased judge, granting death benefits to his heirs.
2. The Court suspended a lawyer for conflict of interest, noting a lawyer-client relationship exists based on engagement, not a written agreement.
3. The Court granted survivorship benefits to the widow of a former Chief Justice who was removed from office through impeachment, considering it an involuntary retirement.
The three document summaries are:
1. The Court ruled that the death of a respondent in an administrative case before final resolution is cause for dismissal, and dismissed a complaint against a deceased judge, granting death benefits to his heirs.
2. The Court suspended a lawyer for conflict of interest, noting a lawyer-client relationship exists based on engagement, not a written agreement.
3. The Court granted survivorship benefits to the widow of a former Chief Justice who was removed from office through impeachment, considering it an involuntary retirement.
DEATH OF RESPONDENT PENDING FINAL RESOLUTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
CASE IS CAUSE FOR DISMISSAL
In the case of Re Alleged Extortion Activities of Judge Abul, the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, RECONSIDERED its earlier pronouncements and NOW holds that the death of a respondent in an administrative case before its final resolution is a cause for its dismissal. In the instant case, due to Judge Abul's death, the administrative complaint against was dismissed in accordance with the Constitutional principles of due process and presumption of innocence. Consequently, his heirs were granted the death benefits and survivorship pension benefits due to his death while in actual service.
For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST NECESSARILY REQUIRES EXISTENCE OF LAWYER-
CLIENT RELATIONSHIP In the case of Villamor v. Jumao-as, the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, suspended a lawyer from the practice of law for representing conflicting interests. To determine whether a conflict of interests exists, it is necessary to first ascertain the existence of a lawyer-client relationship. Here, such relationship existed between complainant and respondent despite the absence of any express or written agreement or arrangement as to attorney's fees. A lawyer-client relationship ensued when respondent was engaged by the complainant in the incorporation of the latter's lending business. For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests. REMOVAL THROUGH IMPEACHMENT AKIN TO INVOLUNTARY RETIREMENT In the case of In re Former Chief Justice Corona, the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, granted the claim of survivorship benefits of Ma. Cristina Roco Corona — the widow of the late former CJ Corona. Having been removed by the Congress from office with a lifetime ban from occupying any and all future public posts, but without a proper determination of or even a basis for any recoverable liability under the law due to causes beyond his control, CJ Corona may be considered involuntarily retired from public service. For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests.
MUNICIPALITIES CANNOT LEVY FRANCHISE TAX
In the case of Meralco v. City of Muntinlupa, the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, ruled that Section 25 of MO 93-35 of the then Municipality of Muntinlupa which was declared null and void for being ultra vires was NOT cured by Sec 56 of RA 7926 which converted the municipality into a highly urbanized city. For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests. VOID AB INITIO MARRIAGE NOW A VALID DEFENSE IN BIGAMY In the case of Pulido v. People, the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, acquitted Pulido from the criminal charge of bigamy. In the process, the Court reversed established precedence and now categorically rules that a void ab initio marriage is a VALID defense in the prosecution for bigamy even without a judicial declaration of absolute nullity. For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NATURE OF DISPUTE DETERMINES JURISDICTION In the case of Dayrit v. Norquillas, the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, ruled that the MCTC has no jurisdiction over the instant action for forcible entry. The DAR, through the DARAB, has jurisdiction over the instant case for forcible entry for being an agrarian dispute. For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FRANCHISE vis-a-vis DUE PROCESS In the case of Manila International Ports Terminal (MIPTI) v. Philippine Ports Authority (PPA), the Court En Banc, through Justice Hernando, ruled that EO 30 revoking MIPTI's franchise is unconstitutional for violating MIPTI's right to procedural due process. For the complete digest, visit https://bit.ly/edigests. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------