Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ares(2020)7191594 - 30/11/2020
Deliverable
D10.4 Overview on existing standards and
standardization activities in the field of
biomechanical risk and HRC
Nature:
R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other
Dissemination level
PU = Public, PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services), RE = Restricted to a group specified by the
consortium (including the Commission Services), CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services)
Restraint UE = Classified with the classification level "Restraint UE" according to Commission Decision 2001/844 and amendments,
Confidential UE = Classified with the mention of the classification level "Confidential UE" according to Commission Decision 2001/844 and
amendments, Secret UE = Classified with the mention of the classification level "Secret UE" according to Commission Decision 2001/844 and
amendments
Document History
Issue Date Version Changes Made / Notes
Contents
Contents .................................................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Deliverable Description ..................................................................................................................................... 6
2. Fundamentals of standardization ...................................................................................................................... 7
2.1. Types of standards .................................................................................................................................... 7
2.1.1. Consortium standard ........................................................................................................................ 8
2.1.2. Standard ........................................................................................................................................... 8
2.1.3. Specification ..................................................................................................................................... 9
2.2. Levels of Standardization ........................................................................................................................ 10
2.2.1. International Standardization Work ............................................................................................... 10
2.2.2. European Standardization Work .................................................................................................... 11
2.2.3. National standardization work ....................................................................................................... 12
2.3. Development of standards ..................................................................................................................... 12
2.3.1. Development of an ISO standard ................................................................................................... 12
2.3.2. Development of a European Standard (EN) ................................................................................... 13
2.3.3. Development of CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA)....................................................................... 15
3. Research and analysis of current standardization activities in the field of biomechanical risk and HRC ....... 16
3.1. Relevant standardization committees .................................................................................................... 16
3.1.1. International Standardization Work ............................................................................................... 16
3.1.2. European standardization .............................................................................................................. 20
3.2. Research of standards............................................................................................................................. 23
3.3. Analysis of standards .............................................................................................................................. 24
3.3.1. WP 1 End-User and Core Technology Requirements, Design Specifications and Acceptability..... 26
3.3.2. WP 2 Human Dynamic Modelling and Online Calibration Tools .................................................... 27
3.3.3. WP 3 Anticipatory Models for Ergonomically Cooperative Human-Robot Interaction.................. 28
3.3.4. WP 4 Fellow-Feeling Wearables: Smart and Wearable Monitoring and Feedback Interfaces....... 30
3.3.5. WP 5 Multi-Modal Perception and Interpretation ......................................................................... 32
3.3.6. WP 6 Shared Intelligence and Social Interaction ............................................................................ 33
3.3.7. WP 7 Interaction-Assistive Control for Fellow-Assistant Robots .................................................... 35
3.3.8. WP 8 Fellow-Assistant Robot Bodies .............................................................................................. 37
Glossary
AMD Amendment
CD Committee draft
DE Germany
DKE German Commission for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies of DIN and VDE
EN European Standard
IX International
SC Subcommittee
TC Technical committee
TR Technical report
WD Working draft
WG Working group
WI Work item
List of figures
Figure 1 Types of standards and specifications ......................................................................................................... 8
Figure 2 National, European and International standardization landscape ............................................................ 10
Figure 3 DIN's involvement in European and international standards committees ............................................... 12
Figure 4 Development of an EN ............................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 5 Development of a CWA ............................................................................................................................. 15
Figure 6 Dashboard of the SOPHIA standard research ............................................................................................ 24
Figure 7 Assessment sheet of the SOPHIA standard research for each work package ........................................... 25
List of tables
Table 1 Types of standards as defined in EN 45020 .................................................................................................. 9
Table 2 Current standardization projects of ISO/TC 159 ......................................................................................... 17
Table 3 Current standardization projects of ISO/TC 199 ......................................................................................... 18
Table 4 Current standardization projects of ISO/TC 299 ......................................................................................... 19
Table 5 Current standardization projects of CEN/TC 114........................................................................................ 20
Table 6 Current standardization projects of CEN/TC 122........................................................................................ 21
Table 7 Current standardization projects of CEN/TC 310........................................................................................ 22
The following keywords were given by WP 1 (Table 8): .......................................................................................... 26
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 9): ............................................... 26
The following keywords were given by WP 2 (Table 10): ........................................................................................ 27
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 11): ............................................. 27
The following keywords were given by WP 3 (Table 12): ........................................................................................ 28
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 13): ............................................. 28
The following keywords were given by WP 4 (Table 14): ........................................................................................ 30
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 15): ............................................. 30
The following keywords were given by WP 5 (Table 16): ........................................................................................ 32
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 17): ............................................. 32
The following keywords were given by WP 6 (Table 18): ........................................................................................ 33
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 19): ............................................. 33
The following keywords were given by WP 7 (Table 20): ........................................................................................ 35
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 21): ............................................. 35
The following keywords were given by WP 8 (Table 22): ........................................................................................ 37
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 23): ............................................. 37
The following keywords were given by WP 9 (Table 24): ........................................................................................ 39
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 25): ............................................. 39
Table 26 ISO 9241 Ergonomics of human-system interaction standard series from ISO/TC 159/SC 4 Ergonomics of
human-system interaction ...................................................................................................................................... 41
Table 27 Standards that were rated with important by several WPs ..................................................................... 44
1. Deliverable Description
This deliverable reports on the research and analysis of standardization activities in the field of biomechanical risk
and HRC. It belongs to Work Package 10 Standardization and shows the results of the first task T10.1
Standardization activities.
There are numerous standardization activities especially on the international and European level that are related
to biomechanical risk and HRC. Especially the standardization activities of the international committees
ISO/TC 159 Ergonomics, ISO/TC 299 Robotics and the European committee CEN/TC 122 Ergonomics are to be
highlighted. These activities and the fact that DIN (German Institute for Standardization), as a standardization
body, is part of these activities will allow an easier transfer of project results into standards under development
or to give input to already existing standards to the respective technical standardization committees.
Outputs from the SOPHIA project should be compatible with the state-of-the-art in the field of biomechanical risk
and HRC, which is presented by standards and standardization documents. Thus, relevant documents for the
envisaged SOPHIA activities and innovations were searched and assessed during this task. All together nearly 1000
standards were found during the research process. The assessment by the WP members reduced this number to
about 150 standardization documents, which are a relevant input for the project’s work.
The list of standardization documents that is provided and recommended to be considered for each work package
gives indications that several standards are of relevance for the work of the different work packages and the
project in general. Therefore, this list builds the basis for the upcoming activities in WP 10 Standardization
Activities and furthermore it can support the implemantation of the activities of the other work packages. As it
shows the current state-of-the-art, this standards database will be the basis to identify standardization gaps that
might be filled in by SOPHIA results. The identification of gaps and the standardization potentials within SOPHIA
will be the next task within WP 10.
This report is structured into two main chapters: Chapter 2 – “Fundamentals of standardization” gives a summary
of the fundamentals of standardization. Types of documents, the levels of standardization, the development of
standards and the various possibilities of participation in the process of standardization will be explained.
Chapter 3 – “Research and analysis of current standardization activities in the field of biomechanical risk and HRC”
is the main chapter of this report. It contains an overview of relevant technical committees, their scopes and their
current standardization projects on international and European level. Furthermore, the process of the standards
research is elaborated and for each work package relevant standards are listed. In Annex I to IV additional
information, such as the keywords for the standards research, chosen ICS classes, an overview of the standards
that were rated with unsure of their importance, a conclusive list of all standards rated as important for WPs and
ISO stage codes are given.
2. Fundamentals of standardization
A standard is a consensus-based technical document that provides rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities
or their results, reflecting the state-of-the-art. It should be based in the consolidated results of science, technology
and experience, aiming at the promotion of the optimum community benefits. 1
The application of standards has many positive benefits for a range of stakeholders, such as consumers,
enterprises, policy makers and researchers and innovators: 2
- Standards enhance the safety of products
- Standards promote the interoperability of products and services
- Standards facilitate trade by diminishing trade barriers
- Standards promote common understanding
- Standards support environmental sustainability
- Standards facilitate the uptake of innovation in the marketplace
- Standards reflect the outcome of research and development
There are several ways to standardization on international, European and national level. In this section, a brief
overview of these opportunities is given.
There are three official standardization organizations on the international level: The International Organization
for Standardization (ISO), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU). They work on international standardization issues, which can be addressed to
them directly or via the European or national standardization bodies. On the European level, the European
Committee on Standardization (CEN), the European Committee on Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC)
and the European Telecommunication Standards Institute (ETSI) are in charge of the standardization work. On
national level many standardization organizations exist. Some countries have more than one organization, some
of them are financed by the government, and some are independent from them. They all work together under the
roof of the European and the international standardization bodies.
The focus of this report lies on the international and European standardization work, due to SOPHIA being a
European funded project and due to the fact that the standardization work is accumulating on the international
level.
1
CEN, “What is a standard”, https://www.cen.eu/work/ENdev/whatisEN/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 09 October
2020 and DIN, “A brief introduction to standards, https://www.din.de/en/about-standards/a-brief-introduction-to-
standards, accessed 09 October 2020; The formal definition of a standard by ISO and IEC,
https://www.iso.org/sites/ConsumersStandards/1_standards.html, accessed 09 October.
https://www.iso.org/sites/ConsumersStandards/1_standards.html
2
CEN, Information leaflet: “CEN Compass - The world of European Standards”,
https://www.cen.eu/news/brochures/brochures/Compass.pdf, accessed 09 October 2020 and European Commission,
“Benefits of standards”, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/policy/benefits_en,
accessed 09 October 2020.
2.1.2. Standard
The work of standardization organizations such as ISO/IEC, CEN-CENELEC and DIN focuses entirely on the
transparent development of standardization documents involving an open body of experts. According to
DIN EN 45020 a standard is defined as follows:
"A document, established by consensus and approved by a recognized body that provides, for common and
repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at the achievement of the
optimum degree of order in a given context”.
Consensus in this case means the general agreement of all interested parties, characterized by the absence of
sustained opposition to key content. The core objective of consensus is to take into account the views of all
interested parties concerned and to eliminate any counterarguments.
It is important to clarify that there are various types of existing standards, focusing on different topics of interest;
e.g. related to terminology or to testing. In EN 45020 “Standardization and related activities - General vocabulary”
some common types of standards are defined as shown in Table 1.
Basic standard Wide-ranging coverage or contains general provisions for one particular field.
2.1.3. Specification
A specification is a document agreed by the participants of a temporary workshop, which is designed to meet an
immediate need and form the basis for future standardization activities. The workshop is open to the direct
participation of anyone with an interest in the development of the agreement. There is no geographical limit on
participation. In other words, stakeholder involvement is limited to those who are directly interested in the topic.
The direct participation of interested parties and the rapid development opportunities offered by a specification
are considered to be particularly attractive for research projects which have to deliver results within the duration
of their project lifetime. The development of a specification is fast and flexible, on average between 10 and 12
months. Although a specification is developed outside the normal technical body structure, it is important to
ensure the coherence of all the standardization regulations in order to protect the credibility of international,
European and national standardization. A specification does not have the status of a standard. It involves no
obligation at national level. A specification shall not conflict with standards.
The different national standardization bodies have different names for within workshops generated specifications.
A national specification by DIN is called DIN SPEC (e.g. DIN SPEC 91392). Specifications can also be developed
within standards committees if, for example, no final consensus can be reached. These documents are then
referred to as CEN or ISO TS (Technical Specifications). 3
3
DIN, DIN SPEC, https://www.din.de/en/innovation-and-research/din-spec-en, accessed 13 October 2020 and CEN,
Technical Specifications, https://www.cen.eu/work/products/TS/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 13 October 2020.
An important aspect of standardization work is to ensure that the documents do not contradict each other. The
importance of European and international standardization has increased noticeably in recent years. For DIN as
example, around 90% of all standardization projects are nowadays carried out at European and international level.
Considering the international and European standardization landscape, the Vienna and Dresden Agreements are
highly relevant. Those agreements between CEN and ISO (Vienna), CENELEC and IEC (Dresden) have the objective
to carry out work at one level of standardization (where possible), and use parallel voting procedures to achieve
simultaneous adoption as ISO/IEC standards and European standards (EN). 4
4
CEN – CENELEC, “International cooperation”,
https://www.cencenelec.eu/intcoop/StandardizationOrg/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 09 October 2020.
5
ISO, https://www.iso.org/home.html, accessed 11 October 2020.
6
IEC, https://www.iec.ch/, accessed 11 October 2020.
Union (ITU) is the United Nations specialized agency in terms of information and telecommunication
technologies. 7
ISO and IEC are made up of the national standardization organizations, with DIN and DKE representing German
interests on an international level. The ITU, on the other hand, is a special unit of the United Nations, whose 191
member states develop recommendations together with companies from the private sector and other regional
and national organizations. Only when they are adopted by normative organizations such as ISO, ANSI (USA) or
ETSI as well as by national regulatory authorities such as the Federal Network Agency in Germany do they acquire
the character of standards.
ISO has recognized regional standardization organizations representing Africa, the Arab countries, the area
covered by the Commonwealth of Independent States, Europe, Latin America, the Pacific area, and the South-East
Asia nations. The national bodies commit themselves to adopt ISO standards unchanged as national standards and
to develop deviating standards only when there are no suitable ISO standards that can be adopted nationally. In
the case of IEC, similar agreements apply. 8
CEN and CENELEC are made up of the national standardization organizations, with for example DIN and DKE
representing German interests at European level. The other members are made up of the national standardization
organizations of the EU and EFTA (European Free Trade Association) member states as well as those states that
intend to become members. In addition, there is particularly strong cooperation between CEN and CENELEC. In
contrast, the members of ETSI are directly European companies, institutes and organizations. 13
7
ITU, https://www.itu.int/en/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 11 October 2020.
8
ISO, “National, regional and international standards and how they relate to regulatory regimes”,
https://www.iso.org/sites/ConsumersStandards/1_standards.html, accessed 11 October 2020.
9
EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on
European standardisation, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32012R1025, accessed
October 11 2020.
10
CEN, www.cen.eu, accessed 12 October 2020.
11
CENELEC, www.cenelec.eu, accessed 12 October 2020.
12
ETSI, www.etsi.org, accessed 12 October 2020.
13
CENELEC, FAQs, https://www.cenelec.eu/faq/faq_entry.htm.bak, accessed October 13 and ETSI, “Membership of
ETSI”, https://www.etsi.org/membership, accessed 12 October 2020.
International standardization work begins with a "new work item proposal". Such proposals can be submitted by:
- A member of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), or – in electro technical
standardization – by a member of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
- A working body of ISO or IEC
- An international organization that has liaison status
- The Technical Management Board of ISO or IEC
- The ISO or IEC Secretary General
A simple majority of national standardization organizations with an interest in the subject matter is required for
the proposal to be approved. In addition, a sufficient number of these organizations must also agree to participate
in the work. Only then the proposal will be accepted and the work on the standard can begin. Within two months
14
DIN, https://www.din.de/en, accessed 12 October 2020.
a "committee draft" is circulated for voting among the members of the responsible technical committee. A draft
is drawn up taking any comments received into consideration.
The draft standard is then made available to all ISO (or IEC) members, who have three months to submit their
national standpoint and comments. Within a two-month period, anyone may comment on this draft. The national
mirror committee discusses all comments received and submits the consolidated national viewpoint to ISO.
If the criteria for approval are fulfilled during the voting procedure, the draft is then published as an international
standard. If they are not fulfilled, or if the responsible working group decides so, a final draft is published. The ISO
or IEC members then have two months to decide whether or not to accept this as an international standard. No
comments are submitted during this voting period. Acceptance of the final draft requires a two-thirds majority of
all active members participating, and not more than a quarter of all votes may be negative. Ratification of an
international standard takes place following positive voting. There is no obligation for national standardization
bodies as part of ISO or IEC to adopt international standards as national standards. 15
In addition, a sufficient number of national standardization bodies must agree to participate, after having checked
with their stakeholders that there is sufficient need - and sufficient financing - for carrying out the necessary work
in the national mirror committees. Only then will the proposal be accepted and work on the standard can begin.
15
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, Procedures for the technical work,
https://www.iso.org/sites/directives/current/part1/index.xhtml, accessed October 16 2020.
If there is an existing international standard on the subject, it will be adopted unchanged as a European Standard.
If this is not the case, the responsible working body will draw up a manuscript for the draft standard (prEN). The
draft standard is distributed to the national standardization organizations for commenting in what is called the
"public enquiry" stage. National comments are to be submitted within three months. The national mirror
committee discusses all comments received and submits the consolidated national standpoint. On the basis of the
comments received, the responsible working group can either decide to publish the standard or to draw up and
issue a final draft. In a formal vote over a two-month period, the members then decide whether to accept this
final draft as a European Standard. There is no public enquiry for the final draft. Approval of the final draft requires
at least 65% of the weighted votes of CEN members and at least 71% of the weighted votes of CENELEC members.
Ratification of a European Standard takes place following positive voting.
After ratification the European Standard must be adopted unchanged as a national standard and any conflicting
national standards must be withdrawn. In addition, a standard that has been developed at international level can
be simultaneously adopted as a European Standard by means of parallel voting procedures in accordance with the
Vienna Agreement. Such standards are also to be automatically adopted by the national standards organizations. 16
Figure 4 Development of an EN
16
DIN, “How are European standards developed”, https://www.din.de/en/about-standards/din-standards, CEN,
“Developing a European Standard”, https://www.cen.eu/work/ENdev/how/Pages/default.aspx, CEN – CENELEC,
Internal Regulations Part 2, https://boss.cen.eu/ref/IR2_E.pdf, accessed 20 October 2020.
17
CEN, “CWA - CEN Workshop Agreement, https://www.cen.eu/work/products/CWA/Pages/default.aspx, accessed 21
October 2020.
18
CEN-CENELEC, CEN-CENELEC Guide 29 “CEN/CENELEC Workshop Agreements - A rapid way to standardization”,
ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/EN/EuropeanStandardization/Guides/29_CENCLCGuide29.pdf, accessed 22 October 2020.
For each TC current standardization projects are listed. Depending on the stage code, draft standards can be
commented on by the members of national standardization bodies. These draft standards are highlighted in green
in the following sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2. An overview of the ISO stage codes are given in Annex IV.
19
International Organization for Standardization, "ISO/TC 159 Ergonomics",
https://www.iso.org/committee/53348.html, accessed 21 September 2020.
20
International Organization for Standardization, "ISO/TC 199 Safety of machinery",
https://www.iso.org/committee/54604.html,accessed 21 September 2020.
21
ISO, "ISO/TC 299 Robotics", https://www.iso.org/committee/5915511.html,
https://committee.iso.org/home/tc299, accessed 21 September 2020.
ISO/IEC JTC 1 22
The joint technical committee of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) ISO/IEC JTC 1 is active in the standardization fields of information
technology (IT) and Information and Communications Technology (ICT). The standards research and analysis has
revealed that the following sub committees are especially of interest for SOPHIA:
22
ISO/IEC JTC 1, https://www.iso.org/committee/45020.html, accessed 22 September 2020.
23
European Committee for Standardization, " CEN/TC 114 Safety of machinery ",
https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:6096&cs=149351BC7EBFB63CC332FEC57AAAAEF2B
accessed 23 September 2020.
CEN/TC 122 is active in the standardization field of ergonomics principles and requirements for the design of work
systems and work environments, including machinery and personal protective equipment, to promote the health,
safety and well-being of the human operator and the effectiveness of the work systems. Among other
standardization projects, this TC mirrors the work of ISO/TC 159 Ergonomics and thus reflects internationally
developed standards on the European level. This TC has published 130 CEN standards so far and currently works
on 14 CEN standards. Table 6 gives an overview of the current standardization projects.
Table 6 Current standardization projects of CEN/TC 122
Highlighted in green: standard drafts that can be commented on
24
European Committee for Standardization, "CEN/TC 122 Ergonomics",
https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:6104&cs=17B26A46FEC153FA622114FF1C49C7C75,
accessed 23 September 2020.
CEN/TC 310 is active in the standardization field of automation systems and technologies and their application
and integration to ensure the availability of the standards required by industry for design, sourcing, manufacturing
and delivery, support, maintenance and disposal of products and their associated services. Areas of
standardization may include enterprise modelling and system architecture, information and its supporting
systems, robotics for fixed and mobile robots in industrial and specific non-industrial environments, automation
and control equipment and software, human and mechanical aspects, integration technologies and system
operational aspects. These standards may utilise other standards and technologies beyond the scope of CEN/TC
310, such as machines, equipment, information technologies, multi-media capabilities, and multi-modal
communications networks. This TC does currently not work on European standards but mirrors the international
work of for example ISO/TC 299 Robotics. This TC has published 6 CEN standards adapting ISO standards so far
and currently works on 2 CEN standards adapting ISO standards. Table 7 gives an overview of the current
standardization projects.
Table 7 Current standardization projects of CEN/TC 310
Highlighted in green: standard drafts that can be commented on
25
European Committee for Standardization, "CEN/TC 310 Advanced Manufacturing Technologies",
https://standards.cen.eu/dyn/www/f?p=204:7:0::::FSP_ORG_ID:6291&cs=1FB8DE3E2415169C5A629164496F80A52,
accessed 23 September 2020.
The research of existing standards started with the identification of relevant keywords in the field of
biomechanical risk and HRC. This was done by the members of each working group, who agreed on the keywords
shown in Annex I. The research was conducted by using the search engine Perinorm. Beside the standards of
European national organizations like DIN, NEN or BSI, and Non-European national organizations (e. g. from Brazil,
USA or South Africa), the database also includes standards from the European organizations CEN, CENELEC, ETSI
and international organizations such as ISO, IEC and ITU. In case of national standards, it has to be stated that due
to language barriers mostly those providing at least an English title are considered. Using a key word search option
a list of standards can be generated, which then can be downloaded in the form of an Excel file.
Based on the keywords given by the project partners approximately 40 000 standards, specifications and
standardization projects were found. To narrow down this number to a realistic amount of entries, the
international classification for standards (ICS) was chosen as additional criterion. The international classification
for standards (ICS) is intended to serve as a structure for catalogues of international, regional and national
standards and other normative documents, and as a basis for standing-order systems for international, regional
and national standards. 26 For SOPHIA relevant ICS classes are listed in Annex II. Applying these relevant ICS classes
narrowed down the number to 999 standards, specifications and standardization projects. Additional standards
from the following sources were added:
By deleting duplicate and outdated standards, specifications and standardization projects, the final database
contained 897 items.
An Excel template especially developed for the research of standards allows the presentation of a dashboard
which gives an overview of relevant information around the results of the standards research. See Figure 6 for the
dashboard, which has been distributed in the SOPHIA consortium.
26
ICS edition 7, publication by ISO, Purpose of the ICS, p.3.
https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/international_classification_for_standards.pdf,
accessed 28 August 2020. All ICS classes are listed here: https://www.iso.org/standards-catalogue/browse-by-ics.html
27
INBOTS, D4.1, http://inbots.eu/publications/public-documents/ , accessed 28 August 2020.
28
COVR, toolbox, https://toolkit.safearoundrobots.com/toolkit/home, accessed 28 August 2020.
The dashboard shows a list of general information (e. g. number of standards found or number of responsible TCs)
as well as Type of Standards, Level of Standards and Active Countries and it provides various graphics to support
those. Additionally, it is possible to use the key word search to receive a filtered list of suitable standards.
Figure 7 Assessment sheet of the SOPHIA standard research for each work package
The evaluation of the filled out assessment sheets has shown that so far no partner has been actively involved in
standardization. In the following chapters 3.3.1 to 3.3.9 the keywords stated by each WP and all matching
standards rated as important by that WP are listed. Standards rated with unsure are depicted in Annex III.
Furthermore, the table in Annex V shows all standards rated as important for all WPs. This table can be used to
further identify standards that are important for the whole project consortium regardless the specific focus of
each WP.
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 9):
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 11):
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 13):
ISO
WP3 anticipatory model would
Ergonomics - Evaluation of static ISO/TC 159
ISO 11226 inlcudes also the static load
working postures Ergonomics
condition.
Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 1: ISO/TC 159 Biomechanical risk assessment:
ISO 11228-1
Lifting and carrying Ergonomics lifting activities
Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 2: ISO/TC 159 Biomechanical risk assessment:
ISO 11228-2
Pushing and pulling Ergonomics pushing and pulling activities
Biomechanical risk assessment:
Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 3: ISO/TC 159
ISO 11228-3 handling low load at high
Handling of low loads at high frequency Ergonomics
frequency
Ergonomics - Application document for This Technical Report addresses
ISO/TC 159
ISO/TR 12295 International Standards on manual some aspects not not
Ergonomics
handling (ISO 11228-1, ISO 11228-2 and
ISO 11228-3) and evaluation of static considered within the ISO 11228
working postures (ISO 11226) series.
Ergonomics—Manual Handling of People ISO/TC 159
ISO/TR 12296
in the Healthcare Sector Ergonomics
Anthropometric requirements
Safety of machinery - Anthropometric
ISO 14738 + ISO/TC 159 are important in order to have
requirements for the design of
TC 2 Ergonomics an optimized flexible
workstations at machinery
workstation.
Ergonomics - General approach, ISO/TC 159 General ergonomics basis
ISO 26800
principles and concepts Ergonomics
Safety of machinery - General principles ISO/TC 199
ISO 12100 for design - Risk assessment and risk Safety of
reduction machinery
CEN
Safety of machinery - Human physical
CEN/TC 122
EN 1005-5 performance - Part 5: Risk assessment
Ergonomics
for repetitive handling at high frequency
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 15):
Standard Comment
Title TC
no.
ISO
Ergonomic principles related to mental workload ISO/TC 159
ISO 10075-2
- Part 2: Design principles Ergonomics
Ergonomics - General approach, principles and ISO/TC 159
ISO 26800
concepts Ergonomics
Ergonomics principles in the design of work ISO/TC 159
ISO 6385
systems Ergonomics
ISO 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part ISO/TC 159
112 112: Principles for the presentation of information Ergonomics
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part
ISO 9241- ISO/TC 159
304: User performance test methods for electronic
304 Ergonomics
visual displays
ISO 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part ISO/TC 159
410 + AMD 1 410: Design criteria for physical input devices Ergonomics
Ergonomics - Evaluation of static working ISO/TC 159
ISO 11226
postures Ergonomics
Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 1: Lifting ISO/TC 159
ISO 11228-1
and carrying Ergonomics
Probably this standard and
all on this field (those on
Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 2: Pushing ISO/TC 159 ergonomics in general) are
ISO 11228-2
and pulling Ergonomics more of interest for the
previous WPs, from which
the WP4 takes infos
Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 3: Handling ISO/TC 159
ISO 11228-3
of low loads at high frequency Ergonomics
ISO 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part ISO/TC 159
129 129: Guidance on software individualization Ergonomics
This may be more of
ISO 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part ISO/TC 159
interest about the results
143 143: Forms Ergonomics
of the testing for our
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 17):
ISO
Industrial automation systems and integration - ISO/TC 184 identification /
ISO/TS
Product data representation and exchange - Part Automation systems description of
10303-1438
1438: Application module: Work structure and integration human tasks
ISO/IEC
definition of
Information technology - User interface - Gesture- gestures -
ISO/IEC ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 35
based interfaces across devices and methods - Part interoperability
30113-1 User interfaces
1: Framework between
devices ?
Information technology - Gesture-based interfaces
ISO/IEC ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 35 classification of
across devices and methods - Part 11: Single-point
30113-11 User interfaces gestures
gestures for common system actions
A range of standards were rated with unsure regarding the relevance for WP 5. These standards, listed in Annex
III, will be assessed in more detail with progressing project duration as part of the standardization strategy that
will be elaborated.
Human robot collaboration Ergonomics (postures, excessive loadings and fatigue levels)
task decomposition Software architecture
contingency handling Shared control
Robot safety (collision avoidance, impact) productivity
Social interaction
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 19):
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 21):
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 23):
Based on these keywords the following relevant standards were found (Table 25):
ISO/TC 159 Ergonomics is one of the most relevant TCs for the SOPHIA consortium. Hereby, the sub committees
“SC 3 Anthropometry and biomechanics” and “SC 4 Ergonomics of human-system interaction” are of special
interest as reflected in the outcome of the analysis of standards.
For full detail, all standards of the standards series ISO 9241 Ergonomics of human-system interaction developed
by ISO/TC 159/SC 4 Ergonomics of human-system interaction are listed in Table 26. The standards from this series
were originally titled Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Some of these
standards still have this title.
Table 26 ISO 9241 Ergonomics of human-system interaction standard series from ISO/TC 159/SC 4 Ergonomics of
human-system interaction
The standards that were rated with important are highlighted in blue.
Impor-
Standard no. Standard title
tant for …
ISO 9241 Ergonomics of human-system interaction standard series from ISO/TC 159/SC 4 Ergonomics of human-
system interaction
ISO 9241-1 + Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
AMD 1 Part 1: General introduction
Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
ISO 9241-2
Part 2: guidance on task requirements
Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
ISO 9241-5 WP6
Part 5: Workstation layout and postural requirements
Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
ISO 9241-6 WP9
Part 6: Guidance on the work environment
Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
ISO 9241-11 WP1
Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts
Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
ISO 9241-13 WP4
Part 13: User guidance
Ergonomics requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -
ISO 9241-14 WP1
Part 14: Menu dialogues
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 20: Accessibility guidelines for
ISO 9241-20
information/communication technology (ICT) equipment and services
ISO/CD 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 20: An ergonomic approach to
20 accessibility within the ISO 9241 series
100 series: Software ergonomics
ISO/TR 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 100: Introduction to standards
WP1
100 related to software ergonomics
WP1,
ISO 9241-110 Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 110: Interaction principles
WP4
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 112: Principles for the
ISO 9241-112 WP4
presentation of information
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 125: Guidance on visual
ISO 9241-125
presentation of information
ISO/TS 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 126: Guidance on the
126 presentation of auditory information
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 129: Guidance on software
ISO 9241-129 WP4
individualization
WP1,
ISO 9241-143 Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 143: Forms
WP4
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 154: Interactive voice response
ISO 9241-154
(IVR) applications
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 161: Guidance on visual user-
ISO 9241-161 WP1
interface elements
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 171: Guidance on software
ISO 9241-171
accessibility
200 series: Human system interaction processes
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for
ISO 9241-210
interactive systems
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 220: Processes for enabling, WP1,
ISO 9241-220
executing and assessing human-centred design within organizations WP7
ISO/AWI 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 221: HCD Process Assessment
221 Model (PAM) and Process Reference Model (PRM)
300 series: Displays and display related hardware
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 300: Introduction to electronic
ISO 9241-300
visual display requirements
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 302: Terminology for electronic
ISO 9241-302
visual displays
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 303: Requirements for electronic
ISO 9241-303
visual displays
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 304: User performance test WP1,
ISO 9241-304
methods for electronic visual displays WP4
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 305: Optical laboratory test
ISO 9241-305
methods for electronic visual displays
Ergonomics of human-system interaction -Part 306: Field assessment methods for
ISO 9241-306
electronic visual displays
Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 307: Analysis and compliance test
ISO 9241-307
methods for electronic visual displays
ISO/TR 9241- Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 514: Guidance for the application
514 of anthropometric data in the ISO 9241-500 series
Other standards that were also rated with important from several WPs are listed in the following table 27.
Table 27 Standards that were rated with important by several WPs
Impor-
Standard no. Standard title tant for
…
ISO/TC 159 Ergonomics
WP3,
ISO 11228-1 Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 1: Lifting and carrying WP4,
WP9
WP3,
WP4
ISO 11228-2 Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 2: Pushing and pulling
WP6,
WP9
WP3,
ISO 11228-3 Ergonomics - Manual handling - Part 3: Handling of low loads at high frequency
WP4
WP6,
WP9
Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 5: Risk assessment for WP3,
EN 1005-5
repetitive handling at high frequency WP9
WP3,
ISO 26800 Ergonomics - General approach, principles and concepts WP4,
WP6
Ergonomics - Application document for International Standards on manual WP3,
ISO/TR 12295 handling (ISO 11228-1, ISO 11228-2 and ISO 11228-3) and evaluation of static WP6,
working postures (ISO 11226) WP9
WP3,
WP4,
ISO 11226 Ergonomics - Evaluation of static working postures
WP6,
WP9
WP3,
ISO/TR 12296 Ergonomics—Manual Handling of People in the Healthcare Sector
WP9
ISO/TC 299 Robotics
ISO/DIS Robotics - Safety requirements for robot systems in an industrial environment - WP7,
10218-1 Part 1: Robots WP8
ISO/DIS Robotics - Performance criteria and related test methods for service robots - WP7,
18646-3 Part 3: Manipulation WP8
Another standard, which was originally not considered in the standards research and was suggested by a project
partner as important for the project is the national German standard DIN 33402-2: Ergonomics - Human body
dimensions - Part 2: Values. 29 This standard will be presented and further discussed in the upcoming
standardization activities.
The outcome of the research and analysis of standards is the basis of the subsequent standardization strategy.
The next steps pursuing this strategy will be as follows: It will be determined which of the as important rated
standards are crucial in their application for the envisaged human-robot collaboration use cases to guarantee
design compliance with standards. These standards will be provided for all partners requiring this information.
Furthermore, the project’s results might show that the as important rated standards miss essential information,
aspects, etc. that can be provided by the SOPHIA consortium. In this case it must be decided whether it makes
more sense to initiate the development of a specification, such as a CWA, or get in contact with the respective
technical committees to give input based on the project results and suggest modifications. These further actions
will be performed fulfilling the subtasks “Recommendations for modification of existing standards in the field of
biomechanical risk and HRC” and “Standardization activities regarding SOPHIA HRC technologies” as part of T10.1
Standardization activities.
29
DIN Standards Committee Ergonomics, DIN 33402-2 Ergonomics - Human body dimensions - Part 2: Values,
https://www.din.de/en/getting-involved/standards-committees/naerg/publications/wdc-
beuth:din21:324499732?destinationLanguage=&sourceLanguage=, accessed 26 November 2020.
39.020
Precision mechanics
Including microsystems
53 Materials handling equipment
00 20 60 92 93 98 99
REGISTRATION START OF COMPLETION REPEAT AN REPEAT ABANDON PROCEED
MAIN ACTION OF MAIN EARLIER PHASE CURRENT
ACTION PHASE
30
https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/developing_standards/docs/en/stage_codes.pdf, Accessed October 29 2020.
SOPHIA Deliverable (Page xix)
Socio-Physical Interaction Skills for Cooperative Human-Robot Systems in
Agile Production (H2020-ICT-871237)
STAGE SUBSTAGE 90
DECISION
00 20 60 92 93 98 99
REGISTRATION START OF COMPLETION REPEAT AN REPEAT ABANDON PROCEED
MAIN ACTION OF MAIN EARLIER PHASE CURRENT
ACTION PHASE
60 60.00 60.60
PUBLICATION International International
Standard under Standard
publication published
STAGE SUBSTAGE 90
DECISION
00 20 60 92 93 98 99
REGISTRATION START OF COMPLETION REPEAT AN REPEAT ABANDON PROCEED
MAIN ACTION OF MAIN EARLIER PHASE CURRENT
ACTION PHASE