Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IEEE 519 - 2014 Summary of Changes, Rev A
IEEE 519 - 2014 Summary of Changes, Rev A
The new IEEE 519-2014 Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems was adopted
on March 27, 2014. The IEEE 519-2014 version replaces the IEEE 519-1992 version in its entirety. The new version focuses on
and clarifies the definition for point of common coupling (PCC) and the recommended levels of current and voltage distortion for
electrical systems. A significant change is that the 2014 version defines that it is the responsibility of “all the users” to manage current
distortion at their interface with the public utility and that it is the utility’s responsibility to manage the voltage distortion in the power
being supplied to those customers. This underscores the need to have the point of common coupling clearly and consistently defined.
Impacts and Considerations for the Design Engineer and End Users
−− Review and Update specification language / references / requirements
− − Update older IEEE 519-1992 references to IEEE 519-2014.
− − Correct and effective definition of point of common coupling (PCC) per IEEE 519-2014.
− − System limit values for current distortion should be appropriate to the system PCC. Focus on total demand distortion, TDD,
limits appropriate to the system’s ISC/I L ratio in Table 2.
− − Calculate the ISC/IL ratio using the ISC (max. short-circuit current at the PCC) and the IL (max. demand load current,
fundamental frequency component). Typically at the primary side of the service transformer for dedicated systems or the
secondary side of the transformer serving multiple customers.
− − It is essential to understand that ISC refers to the utility’s power feed and not to the transformer that feeds power to the
individual facility. In most cases this is the short circuit rating on the medium voltage side of the transformer that feeds the
building.
−− Harmonic mitigation: solutions and strategies for systems with nonlinear loads
− − Mitigation strategies and solutions should be based on an analysis of the system’s harmonic distortion whenever possible.
− − Specification should define effective and cost appropriate harmonic mitigation.
− − Distinct/appropriate mitigation specified for larger, medium and smaller nonlinear loads.
− − Six pulse drives with Input impedance (5%) as the base VFD requirement.
− − Escalation of mitigation from the addition of input line reactance… to adding passive harmonic filters (or multipulse front
ends)… to using active front ends or active filters.
−− Service transformers and electrical system design
− − Appropriate sizing and loading of transformers.
− − Peak % loading of transformer is key factor in determining the current distortion limits.
− − Multiple and redundant transformer designs with tie breakers need to balance the placement of nonlinear loads.
− − Nonlinear loads on emergency generators can influence the harmonic mitigation strategy and the mitigation level of individual
nonlinear loads.
IEEE519 Revision 2014 Content / Page Comparison to 1992