Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0
QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE AND MIXED METHOD APPROACHES
Topic 4
PACKAGING RESEARCH ARTICLES FOR
JOURNAL PUBLICATION
June 23-25, 2023
La Carmela De Boracay Hotel
Station 2, Balabag, Boracay Island, Malay, Aklan, Philippines
TRANSMIT KNOWLEDGE
CREATE KNOWLEDGE
PACKAGING THE
INTRODUCTION SECTION
Present the Issue/ circumstance (national/ regional) The unmitigated changes in the earth’s
conditions have consistently brought about serious
concerns in various proportions. The persistent
Theory underpins the study
unpredictability of weather conditions makes both the
physical and social environment more and more
The Literature Gap vulnerable to climate change. The impacts of the drastic
changes in weather conditions are now being manifested
Contribution Statement of the research through destructive calamities. In a United Nations
Enviroment Programme (UNEP) Report by
Present the Local environment of the
Hagelberg (2020), extreme flooding brought about by
study (Gap Analysis/ the climate crisis will continuously persist as the
global climate continues to change rapidly.
Present your personal intention
(Authority in the field)
Contribution Statement of the research In the past decades, the Philippines experienced several
natural disasters that claimed the lives of thousands of people. To
date, Typhoon Yolanda (international name: Haiyan) has been the
Present the Local environment of the worst and most devastating typhoon that caused massive
study (Gap Analysis/ destruction in the southern provinces in 2013. This catastrophic
event placed the country under the state of national calamity
Present your personal intention
(Authority in the field)
(NDRRMC 2014).
http://prisma-statement.org/?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
Introduction and the Literature Review
• Refers to the following:
a) related researches that have been conducted, state-of-the-art or current
technologies from which the project will take off;
b) scientific/technical merit;
c) results of related research conducted by the same Project Leader, if any;
d) Prior Art Search, and;
e) other relevant materials.
•What is your
research problem?
•What is your
research gap?
Research Gap is found in the
Introduction Section
Empirical gap often Theoretical gap is the Population Gap This gap
addresses conflicts that type of gap that deals is the type of research
no study to date has with the gaps in theory regarding the population
directly attempted to with the prior research that is not adequately
Miles, D. (2017), A Taxonomy of Research Gaps: evaluate a subject or represented or under-
Identifying and Defining the Seven Research Gaps topic from an empirical researched in the
approach. evidence base or prior
research
https://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/
Methodological Approach to Problem
Diagnosis and Problem Sensing
• Gap Analysis- assessment Essential Questions
1. What is the prescribed standards or
of current practice/ performance behaviors?
2. What is the current/ actual behavior or
situation?
What Should What is Actual? What is the Gap 3. What is the difference between the
Be? standard/ current and the actual
60 pupils must be Only 45 pupils are 15 pupils are non- performance or situations?
readers readers readers
Writing Process
All pupils must have 58 pupils must have 2 pupils have good
1. Narrate how the gap analysis was
god eyesight good eyesight eyesight
conducted.
All 60 pupils must Only 50 pupils cope 10 pupils are poor in 2. Cite pieces of evidence
have 75% proficiency with Mathematics numeracy skills
in numerical skills
Reference: Bondoc, V et al (2014). Action Research Made Easy (A Practical Guided on the Preparation of Action Research in Education), Lorimar Academix
PROBLEM TREE
679 pupils from Grades III to VI who are
still non-readers
Use of old
Inability to sustain Poor word Dearth of reding Absence of remedial
strategies in
Absence of reading
focus or recognition and reading program
culture at home materials at home teaching reading
concentration vocabulary
Lack of commitment in
Illiterate/ busy Limited knowledge of
Lack of Word Poverty
remedial reading strategies adopting innovative
Poor nutrition parents/ and materials teaching strategies
Attack skills
guardian
Reference: Bondoc, V et al (2014). Action Research Made Easy (A Practical Guided on the Preparation of Action Research in Education), Lorimar Academix
Opportunity Tree
679 pupils from Grades III to VI who are
still
goodnon-readers
readers
Good Reading
Poor Reading Traditional
Innovative Reading
Weak Home Background
Strong Background
Comprehension Teachers
Implementation of UseUse
of of
Modern
old
Inability to sustain Good/ satisfactory
Poor word Appropriate Absence of remedial
Solid focus Presenceofofreading
Absence reading Dearth of reding Remedial Reading Strategies
strategies in
focus or or word recognition
recognition and cultureat
culture athome
home materials at home
reading program
Program Teaching
teaching Reading
reading
concentration
concentration and vocabulary
vocabulary
LackCommitment
of commitment in in
Good knowledge Illiterate/ busy
Literate/ Adequate
Limited knowledge
knowledgeofof
Lack of Word Sustainable job of remedial
remedial reading
reading strategies
strategies adopting innovative
adopting innovative
Proper nutrition
Poor nutrition of Word Attack parents/
concerned Poverty and
and materials
materials strategies in teaching
teaching strategies
Attack skills parents
skills supportive
guardianparents
Reference: Bondoc, V et al (2014). Action Research Made Easy (A Practical Guided on the Preparation of Action Research in Education), Lorimar Academix
Problem
Sensing/
Identificati
on
Statement
of the
Problem
Reference: Bondoc, V et al (2014). Action Research Made Easy (A Practical Guided on the Preparation of Action Research in Education), Lorimar Academix
Purposes of the Research
(Statement of the Problem)
https://scite.ai/
Supporting Claims
https://scite.ai/home
https://www.base-search.net/
https://www.ilovephd.com/chatgpt-write-scientific-research-paper/?fbclid=IwAR0Yl-FgGPygAj5N-
135ntGGnJkUjjk5JFmdX8IiXsfdTY2RKz7guuzzQ1w
Google Scholar through Citation Tracing
Crossref
NATIONAL TRAINING-WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS 2.0
QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE AND MIXED METHOD APPROACHES
PACKAGING THE
METHOD SECTION
Respondents and
Research Design Instrumentation
Sampling Technique
References
Structural Component of the Method Section
Methodological approaches
Begin by introducing your overall approach to the research.
• What research problem or question did you investigate?
• What kind of data did you need to answer it?
Quantitative Methods Qualitative Methods Mixed methods
(e.g. surveys) are best for (e.g. interviews) are best allow for a
measuring, ranking, for describing, interpreting, combination of
categorizing, identifying contextualizing, and numerical
patterns and making gaining in-depth insight measurement and in-
generalizations into specific concepts or depth exploration
phenomena
The need for
scientifically Faulty research methodology
sound method
https://jasp-stats.org/
Statistical tools online
https://www.jamovi.org/
Method Section
Research Instruments
• Validity and Reliability
• What is your research tool?
• Is it adapted from previous studies?
• How will you support the construct
validity of the instrument?
https://www.doaj.org/
Checklist for Method Section
Before you finish your manuscript, ask yourself the following
questions.
1. Is there sufficient detail so that the experiments can be
reproduced?
2. Is there excess information that could be removed without
affecting the interpretation of the results?
3. Are all the appropriate controls mentioned?
4. Are all appropriate citations included?
5. Is the source of each reagent/ instrument listed?
NATIONAL TRAINING-WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS 2.0
QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE AND MIXED METHOD APPROACHES
PACKAGING THE
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
SECTION
Documentary
Analysis
Mixed methods Observation
Functions of
Discussion of Results
Section (DRS)
1. To summarize and
discuss the result
2. To make link between
the results and the
literature
3. To discuss the
implications of the
results
4. To crosscheck the results
Results and
Discussion
• Results - This is where you indicate
what you found in your research.
You give the results of your research,
but do not interpret them.
• Discussion - This is where you
discuss the relevance of your results
and how your findings fit with other
research in the area. It will relate
back to your literature review and
your introductory thesis statement.
What is included in the Results?
• The Results section should include the findings of your study and
ONLY your research findings. The findings include:
1.Data presented in tables, charts, graphs, and other figures
(maybe placed among research text or on a separate page)
2.A contextual analysis of this data explaining its meaning in
sentence form
3.Report on data collection, recruitment, and participants
4.Data that corresponds to the central research question(s)
5.Secondary findings (secondary outcomes, subgroup analyses,
etc.)
Matthew Peacock (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. , 30(4), 0–
497. doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00050-7
Communicative Moves in Discussion Section
‘‘Discussion sections have a three-part framework involving a The three-part framework
series of move cycles combining two or more of these nine and move cycle series are
moves”
1. information move (background about theory/research aims/methodology) I. Introduction
2. statement of result (either a numerical value or reference to a graph or table) (moves 1, or 1+5, or 2/3)
3. finding (same as statement of result, but without a reference to a graph or
table) II. Evaluation
(the ‘‘key move cycles’’ here
4. (un)expected outcome (a comment on whether the result is expected or not)
are 2/3+5, 7+5, or 5+7)
5. reference to previous research
6. explanation (reasons for unexpected results) III. Conclusion
7. claim (a generalization arising from the results: contribution to research) (moves 3+7, or 9).
8. limitation
9. recommendation (suggestions for future research).
Matthew Peacock (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. , 30(4), 0–
497. doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00050-7
What is included in the Discussion?
• The discussion section is where you delve into the meaning,
importance and relevance of your results.
follow?
Sample Results and Discussion No. 1
Sample Discussion
Sample Result
This study explored the connections between emotional intelligence and
study habits through cognitive engagement among students in blended learning
In Table 8, the results indicate that cognitive engagement mediated the environments during COVID-19. Similar studies have been conducted on the same
association between self-awareness and study habits (β = 0.061, p < 0.05); therefore, issue in advanced countries (Boyatziz et al, 2017, Rabia et al, 2017, Iqbal et al, 2021
hypothesis H4.1 is accepted. Cognitive engagement mediated the relationship between , and only limited studies have been performed in emerging countries such as China
self-motivation and study habits (β = 0.049, p < 0.05), and approves hypothesis H4.2. (Zhoc, 2020). Furthermore, the studies that have been conducted in emerging
Cognitive engagement mediated the connection between regulation of emotion and countries reveal results only in pre-COVID-19 situations. As such, the authors claim
study habits (β = 0.122, p < 0.05), and approves hypothesis H4.3. Lastly, cognitive that the present study is the first to examine the influence of emotional intelligence
engagement mediated the connection between social skills and study habits (β = 0.093, p on the study habits of students studying in blended learning environments in Chinese
< 0.05). Thus, hypothesis H4.4 is approved. The results indicate that all the hypotheses universities, specifically as it focuses on cognitive engagement as a mediator
variable.
listed in Table 8 are approved
The study measured the association between emotional intelligence and study
habits. The results indicate that self-awareness and self-management positively and
significantly influence study habits, which approves hypotheses. Prior studies also
confirmed that self-awareness and self-motivation have a positive connection with
study habits (Magulod, 2018, Parker et al, 2006). The relationship between
emotional intelligence and study habits has been discussed in previous studies, and
their results confirmed that emotional intelligence promotes a positive relationship
with study habits (Thomas et al, 2017, Zeidner et al, 2005, Magulod, 2018).
However, in the research, the associations of emotional intelligence dimensions,
regulation of emotion, and social skills were found to be positive and insignificant
with regard to study habits. A plausible reason for these results could be that
universities did not fully prepare their students to develop emotional intelligence in
the area of regulation of emotion and social skills. There could be other reasons for
these results, such as the students’ weak social skills and poor regulation of emotion
owing to fewer face-to-face interactions in blended learning environments during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
Source: Iqbal, J., Asghar, M. Z., Ashraf, M. A., & Yi, X. (2022). The Impacts of Emotional Intelligence on Students’ Study Habits in
Blended Learning Environments: The Mediating Role of Cognitive Engagement during COVID-19. Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 14.
Sample Results and Discussion (IPRC Structure)
Discussion
This study explored the connections between emotional
intelligence and study habits through cognitive engagement among students in
blended learning environments during COVID-19. Similar studies have been
Introductory Statement
conducted on the same issue in advanced countries (Boyatziz et al, 2017, Rabia
et al, 2017, Iqbal et al, 2021 , and only limited studies have been performed in
emerging countries such as China (Zhoc, 2020). Furthermore, the studies that have
been conducted in emerging countries reveal results only in pre-COVID-19
situations. As such, the authors claim that the present study is the first to examine the
Presentation of the
influence of emotional intelligence on the study habits of students studying in Gap being Addressed
blended learning environments in Chinese universities, specifically as it focuses on
cognitive engagement as a mediator variable.
The results indicate that self-awareness and self-management
positively and significantly influence study habits, which approves hypotheses. Result of the Present Study
Prior studies also confirmed that self-awareness and self-motivation have a positive
connection with study habits (Magulod, 2018, Parker et al, 2006). The relationship
between emotional intelligence and study habits has been discussed in previous
studies, and their results confirmed that emotional intelligence promotes a positive Comparison of the findings
relationship with study habits (Thomas et al, 2017, Zeidner et al, 2005, Magulod,
2018). However, in the research, the associations of emotional intelligence
with the Previous Literature
dimensions, regulation of emotion, and social skills were found to be positive and
insignificant with regard to study habits.
A plausible reason for these results could be that universities did
not fully prepare their students to develop emotional intelligence in the area of
regulation of emotion and social skills. There could be other reasons for these Practical Implications
results, such as the students’ weak social skills and poor regulation of emotion owing
to fewer face-to-face interactions in blended learning environments during the
COVID-19 pandemic.
https://www.connectedpapers.com/
https://libgen.li/
https://libgen.li/
https://www.semanticscholar.org/
Publish or Perish (Harzing.com)
• Publish or Perish is
designed to
empower individual
academics to
present their case
for research impact
to its best
advantage.
https://harzing.com/resource
s/publish-or-perish
Citable Journal Articles
Anderson, L. M., Petticrew, M., Chandler, J., Grimshaw, J., Tugwell, P., O’Neill, J., ... &
Shemilt, I. (2013). Introducing a series of methodological articles on considering
complexity in systematic reviews of interventions. Journal of clinical
epidemiology, 66(11), 1205-1208.
Sample Results and Discussion No. 2
Sample Result Sample Discussion
Relationship between teachers' pedagogical orientations in integrating technology in the This study explored the relationship between teachers' pedagogical orientations in
online classroom and its effect on students' motivation and engagement integrating technology in the online classroom and its effect on students' motivation and
Table 4 shows that there is a significant relationship between the teachers’ pedagogical engagement. Results of the present study found out that teachers' pedagogical orientations in
orientations in integrating technology in the online classroom to students’ motivation and integrating technology in the online classroom is significantly correlated on students'
engagement. Hence, the study's null hypothesis stating no significant relationship between motivation and engagement. This means that the higher the teacher adhered to teacher-
pedagogical orientation and student motivation, is rejected. It can be seen in that table that centered beliefs, the lower the students’ felts motivated and engaged. The reasons behind this
student-centered belief (r value= 0.778, pvalue = 0.043), teacher preparation for computer finding are when students are empowered to explore and learn language lessons with the use
of student-centered teaching strategies in online learning. The higher students manifest
utilization (r-value = 0.698, p value= 0.012), integration of computer in the classroom (r value= motivation and engagement.
0.723, p value= 0.011), and attitude towards computer utilization) r value= 0.863, p value=
0.023) are positively related to the student's level of engagement. This suggests that the teachers' For emphasis, the teachers' beliefs on technology integration significantly influenced
belief in utilizing student-centered teaching to integrate technology in the language classroom, students learning motivation. It can be explained that when teachers have a positive attitude
the higher the students are motivated and engaged in learning. In like manner, it was also towards the use of technology in the classroom, the better they manifest a student-centered
revealed that teacher-centered belief (r value= -0.531, p value= 0.032) is negatively correlated to teaching approach which eventually influences students learning behavior. This study
students motivation and engagement in online language learning, which signifies that teacher- suggests the need for language teachers to adhere to student-centered language learning
approaches and strategies to allow students to appreciate language learning tasks and lessen
directed learning such as the use of one-way directed learning is found not appealing to the
student's language learning anxiety.
motivating characteristics of the language students.
The result of this study confirms previous investigations that teachers’ pedagogical
beliefs in technology integration influence student’s motivation (Chamorro & Rey, 2013,
Cheng et al., 2020, Cullen & Greene, B2011, Fryer & Bovee, H2016, Ottenbreit-Leftwich, et
al., 2020). These studies affirmed that the importance of immersive technologies for learning
is noteworthy because it promotes student engagement. Basing a pedagogical understanding
of what is essential in understanding student learning and teaching, it is necessary to know
teachers' diverse philosophies of learning and teaching concerning technology.
Further studies need to confirm this result so as they arrive at conclusive findings.
Hence, this correlation regarding beliefs relating to technology among language teachers on
online learning has been investigated on their self-perception and ideas only, limiting this
present study.
Sample Results and Discussion No. 2 (IRICL Structure)
Sample Discussion
This study explored the relationship between teachers' pedagogical orientations in
integrating technology in the online classroom and its effect on students' motivation and
engagement. Results of the present study found out that teachers' pedagogical orientations in
Introductory Statement
integrating technology in the online classroom is significantly correlated on students'
motivation and engagement. This means that the higher the teacher adhered to teacher-
centered beliefs, the lower the students’ felts motivated and engaged. The reasons behind this
finding are when students are empowered to explore and learn language lessons with the use
Result of the Present Study
of student-centered teaching strategies in online learning. The higher students manifest
motivation and engagement.
For emphasis, the teachers' beliefs on technology integration significantly influenced
students learning motivation. It can be explained that when teachers have a positive attitude
towards the use of technology in the classroom, the better they manifest a student-centered
Interpretation of the Present result of the study
teaching approach which eventually influences students learning behavior. This study
suggests the need for language teachers to adhere to student-centered language learning
approaches and strategies to allow students to appreciate language learning tasks and lessen
student's language learning anxiety.
The result of this study confirms previous investigations that teachers’ pedagogical
beliefs in technology integration influence student’s motivation (Chamorro & Rey, 2013,
Cheng et al., 2020, Cullen & Greene, B2011, Fryer & Bovee, H2016, Ottenbreit-Leftwich, et
Comparison with the Previous Literature
al., 2020). These studies affirmed that the importance of immersive technologies for learning
is noteworthy because it promotes student engagement. Basing a pedagogical understanding
of what is essential in understanding student learning and teaching, it is necessary to know
teachers' diverse philosophies of learning and teaching concerning technology.
Further studies need to confirm this result so as they arrive at conclusive findings.
Hence, this correlation regarding beliefs relating to technology among language teachers on
Limitations and Recommendations for future
online learning has been investigated on their self-perception and ideas only, limiting this
present study.
studies
De Souza, R., Parveen, R., Chupradit, S., Velasco, L. G., Arcinas, M., Tabuena, A. C., ... & Ventayen, R. J. M. (2021). Language teachers’
pedagogical orientations in integrating technology in the online classroom: Its effect on students motivation and engagement. Turkish
Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12.
Sample Results and Discussion No. 3
Sample Result Sample Discussion
Test of difference in the Students’ level of online language learning The portion of this study presents the Test of difference in the
engagement and motivation when Grouped According to Sex Students’ level of online language learning engagement and motivation when
Table 4 presents the test if differences of the students’ level of Grouped According to Sex. It shows that the gender of the students is not a
online language learning engagement and motivation when grouped factor of difference in the online language learning engagement and
according to sex as profile variable, it shows that no significant difference motivation.It can be inferred that in the context of this study, both groups of
students manifested a favorable attitude towards online language learning.
in the level of engagement of the students. It shows that the gender of the
This study confirms Abu-Radia (1997) finding out no significant
students is not a factor of difference in the online language learning difference in the language learning attitude of male and female students in the
engagement and motivation among the students. Hence, the null hypothesis Canadian context. Hence, this likewise contradicts further studies that female
of the study is accepted. This simply shows that both male and female students favor language learning motivation and engagement since they are
students have high intrinsic and extrinsic language learning engagement and naturally linguistically-inclined than the males (Yashima, Nishida, Mizumoto,
motivation. 2017, Torres & Alieto, 2019, Al-Dosari, 2016). Previous studies noted that
gender was a significant factor in second language motivation (Baker &
MacIntyre, 2000, Chaffee et al., 2020, Halimi, Daniel, C& AlShammari, 2020,
Namaziandost & Çakmak, 2020, Turner, Li, & Wei, 2021) where they
emphasized that females were more motivated than males in language
learning.
This study's present result showed that gender is not a factor in
language learning motivation since both male and female respondents are
capable of appreciating the role of online learning in their language learning.
This result of the study manifested that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to
learn language through online mode is closely related to the appreciation of the
male and female students to learn the language as part of their career
preparation.
Sample Results and Discussion No. 3 (IRCIP Structure)
Sample Discussion
The portion of this study presents the Test of difference in the
Students’ level of online language learning engagement and motivation when
Grouped According to Sex. It shows that the gender of the students is not a
Introductory Statement
factor of difference in the online language learning engagement and
motivation.It can be inferred that in the context of this study, both groups of
students manifested a favorable attitude towards online language learning. Result of the Present Study
This study confirms Abu-Radia (1997) finding out no significant
difference in the language learning attitude of male and female students in the
Canadian context. Hence, this likewise contradicts further studies that female
students favor language learning motivation and engagement since they are
naturally linguistically-inclined than the males (Yashima, Nishida, Mizumoto,
Comparison with the Previous Literature
2017, Torres & Alieto, 2019, Al-Dosari, 2016). Previous studies noted that
gender was a significant factor in second language motivation (Baker &
MacIntyre, 2000, Chaffee et al., 2020, Halimi, Daniel, C& AlShammari, 2020,
Namaziandost & Çakmak, 2020, Turner, Li, & Wei, 2021) where they
emphasized that females were more motivated than males in language Interpretation of the Result Presented
learning.
This study's present result showed that gender is not a factor in
language learning motivation since both male and female respondents are
capable of appreciating the role of online learning in their language learning.
This result of the study manifested that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to
learn language through online mode is closely related to the appreciation of the
Practical Implications of the Result
male and female students to learn the language as part of their career
preparation.
De Souza, R., Parveen, R., Chupradit, S., Velasco, L. G., Arcinas, M., Tabuena, A. C., ... & Ventayen, R. J. M. (2021). Language teachers’ pedagogical orientations in integrating
technology in the online classroom: Its effect on students motivation and engagement. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12.
Sample Article
https://ovcre.uplb.edu.ph/journals-
uplb/index.php/JESAM/article/view/86/67
NATIONAL TRAINING-WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS 2.0
QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE AND MIXED METHOD APPROACHES
PACKAGING THE
CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS,
IMPLICATIONS AND ABSTRACT
Magulod Jr, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino University students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. JOTSE: Journal of
Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184-198. https://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/504/391
Moves in Writing the Abstract
Moves Moves
Move 1. Situating the Research Setting the scene for the current research
(topic generalization)
Move 2. Presenting the Research Stating the purpose of the study, research
questions and/or hypotheses
Move 3. Describing the Describing the materials, subjects, variables,
Methodology procedures
Move 4. Summarizing the Findings Reporting the main findings of the study
Move 5. Discussing the Research Interpreting the results/findings and/or
giving recommendations,
implications/applications of study
Santos, M.B.D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in Applied Linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499
Moves in Writing the Abstract
Moves Moves
Move 1. Situating the Research Nutrition, Health, and Education are fundamental pillars of human resource development index. University
students are the future nation-builders hence investment in their health and education will actually lead to a strong
and developed nation.
Move 2. Presenting the Research The study generally investigated the interplay of anthropometric status, academic performance and eating
behavior of university students. It specifically investigated the students' anthropometric status, their academic
performance and their eating behavior on healthy eating habits, emotional and personal eating styles, and
consciousness in food safety.
Move 3. Describing the The descriptive correlational research design was utilized in the study with sixty randomly sampled
participants.
Methodology
Move 4. Summarizing the Results revealed that majority of the respondents were in normal weight, have good academic standing, and have
neutral eating behavior. Test of difference showed that males have higher weight than females, students with
Findings higher weekly allowance, and whose parents have higher level of educational attainment and family income have
higher BMI. Likewise, in terms of eating behaviors, those who have high academic performance, mothers are
professionals, and from teacher education department have the highest assessment on their healthy eating habits
while no significant difference was found on the academic performance of the respondents. Test of relationship
revealed that academic achievement is correlated to the students’ healthy eating habits. Moreover, regression
analysis showed that nutritional status and healthy eating habits predict the academic performance of the
university students at 16.5 percent strength of association.
Move 5. Discussing the Research Results of the study will serve as a basis for educational health intervention and promotion.
Santos, M.B.D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in Applied Linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499
WRITING THE ABSTRACT
❖ An Abstract is a mini-version of the paper (Day 1988). The American National Standards
Institute says ‘‘A well prepared abstract enables readers to identify the basic content of a
document quickly and accurately, to determine its relevance to their interests, and thus to decide
whether they need to read the document in its entirety’’ (ANSI 1979). Therefore, it is extremely
important that the Abstract be written clearly.
❖ Furthermore, to facilitate smooth reading, excessive quantitative data with statistical details
and long strings of plant names should be avoided in the Abstract.
WRITING THE ABSTRACT
❖ Follow instruction of Journal
❖Abstract should reflect content of paper
❖ Brief introduction-two sentences max
❖ Present result clearly and explicitly, and quantitatively.
❖Give reference for any literature/software cited (follow
instruction of journal)
❖ “Results will be presented’ is not acceptable
❖ Add important keywords
Writing the Recommendations
• They should use a “SMART” format (Specific, Measurable,
Attainable, Realistic, Timely). Each recommendation should be
followed by a few sentences of explanatory text.
Writing the Recommendations
1. Recommendations in the research paper should be the objective of the
research.
2. Recommendations in the research paper should come from your review and
analysis
3. Recommendations in the research paper should also come from the data you
have analysed.
4. Recommendations in the research paper should be written in the order of
priority.
5. The inclusion of an action plan along with recommendation adds more
weightage to your recommendation.
6. Recommendations should be clear and conscience and written using actionable
words.
7. Recommendations should display a solution-oriented approach and in some
cases should highlight the scope for further research.
Drawing out the general the Implications
1. Practical implication is the reality that would occur if certain
conditions are fulfilled.
2. Theoretical implication on the other hand, is a newly found
addition(s) to existing theories or building materials for new
theories.
3. To what extent does my findings align with those of other scholars,
in what precise ways, and if not why not?
4. If certain findings suggest a need for further research, what might
this consist of and how might such research extend or improve the
current state of knowledge in my field?
5. Are there any practical implications (e.g. policy implications) that I
need to specifically address?
Drawing out the Research Limitations
1. Describe each limitation in detailed but concise terms;
2. Explain why each limitation exists;
3. Provide the reasons why each limitation could not be overcome
using the method(s) chosen to gather the data [cite to other studies
that had similar problems when possible];
4. Assess the impact of each limitation in relation to the overall
findings and conclusions of your study; and,
5. If appropriate, describe how these limitations could point to the
need for further research.
NATIONAL TRAINING-WORKSHOP ON RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS 2.0
QUALITATIVE, QUANTITATIVE AND MIXED METHOD APPROACHES
PACKAGING THE
TITLE