You are on page 1of 2

ASSET CLASSES & FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SECURITIES MARKET RISK AND RETURN CAPM AND APT

(1) Money Market (subset of debt) (1)Types of Orders (1) Rates of Return over Multiple Periods (1) Capital Asset Pricing Model
 Treasury Bills (Sg: SGS Bills)  Market: execute immediately at best price  Arithmetic Average Return (AAR) Assumptions of the Model
Usually with maturity < 52 weeks  Limit: Buy or sell at specific price or better  Individual Investors are "Price Taker"
Default risk is low (≈ 0)  Stop Loss: becomes a market sell order  No taxes and no transaction cost
No coupon payment when the trigger price is encountered Investors will never achieve AAR  People only care about mean and variance
Not callable  Stop Buy: becomes a market buy order Used in estimates (looks higher) of returns
Pricing when the trigger price is encountered  Geometric Average Return (GAR)  Homogeneous expectations
Priced according to 360 days/yr (2) Trading Costs  Perfect information on means and variance
Sold at discount to par  Commission fee paid to broker Better reflection of investors' true return of returns
Buyer → looks at ask price  Bid-Ask spread Reflects effects of compounding Implication of CAPM
Seller → looks at bid price (3) Margin Trading  Dollar Weighted Return  All investors will hold a combination of the
Price = Borrowing money to purchase stock. Find the internal rate of return for the cash Market Portfolio and risk-free
where r =ask % ( ) Interest will be paid on the loan. flows (i.e. Use CF to find IRR) o CML formed tangent to M
Bond equivalent yield = Buy on margin to magnify gains/reduce risks (2) Risk and Risk Premiums  Average investor has y=1 on CML
 Initial Margin Requirement: Minimum %  Market: highest Sharpe Ratio
of initial investor equity (IMR) o Consists of all assets in universe
 LIBOR (Sg: SIBOR)  Investor equity = Position value – o Market-value weighted
Average of interest rates that banks expect borrowed money + additional cash (e.g. o Optimal risky portfolio
to charge each other dividends) Expected Return & Risk (Individual)
Used as a basic reference rate  Maintenance Margin Requirement: Investors only hold M, look at β only
LIBOR as a financial barometer Minimum % of equity before additional Normal distribution:  Do not care about σ, no firm-specific
- Optimistic → lower LIBOR funds needed (MMR)
- Pessimistic → Higher LIBOR  Margin call occurs if (3) Equity Risk Premium In equilibrium,
Manipulation of LIBOR Extra return for investing in equity because SML: )
Occurred during the FC 2008  Margin call occur when of volatility and risk aversion Disequilibrium of SML: α would exist
To cover up the poor financial situation and  Price = MV/No. of shares held )
manipulate returns from contracts  Return on Investment (4) Inflation premium
 +ve α → undervalued/-ve α → overvalued
referencing LIBOR (2) Evaluating the CAPM
(2) Bond Market (5) Allocating Risky and Risk Free
Other factors such as firm size, B/M ratio can
 Private Issues: Corporate Bonds (4) Short Sales be better predictors
 Govt Issues: Treasury Bonds/ TIPS (TIPS 1. Borrow stock from a broker/dealer  Validity of CAPM assumptions
not available in Sg) 2. Broker sells sock and deposits proceeds y=weight in risky portfolio, =0  Untestable since true market portfolio can
TIPS have principal adjusted using CPI – and margin into account (can't withdraw) never be observed (Roll Critique)
inflation protected (real R/r) 3. Buy back a stock to return broker later (3) Multifactor Models and CAPM
How to read bond price Liable for any cashflows (e.g. dividends) Multi-factor models used when returns
Beyond y=1: leverage at risk-free rate
Smallest unit = 1/64 Required to post margin above proceeds respond to > 1 systematic factors.
102:20 = 102+20/64 (6) Risk Aversion and Allocation
pledged to broker (i.e. proceeds: 6k, pledge: High risk aversion → lower y Farma-French 3 Factor Model
YTM , Coupon Rate and Price 50%, Total Margin Account: 9K) Firm size and B/M ratio incorporated
YTM < Coupon → Price > Par Usually used in bearish markets Higher B/M → Higher risk (default)
YTM = Coupon → Price = Par  Short sale equity = TMA – MV Smaller firms → Higher risk (liquidity)
Computing Inflation Using TIPS for a given portfolio Q
 Margin call occurs if
Inflation = YTM (Treasury)-YTM (TIPS)
 Margin call occurs when
 Mortgage Backed Securities (4) Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Risk Aversion of investing fully in mkt ≈ 2.5
A security with cash-flows backed by a  Price = MV/No. of shares held Exploiting mispricing of two or more securities
stream of mortgage payments.  Rate of Return on Investment to achieve risk-free profits.
EFFICIENT DIVERSIFICATION
(E.g. of securitization: Creating a new Assumptions
(1) Diversification and Portfolio Risk
security by pooling together loans) Well diversified portfolio so there s no
Diversification reduces Firm-Specific (Unique
Why investors like MBS unsystematic risk
/Idiosyncratic) Risk
MBS diversifies risk as low risk mortgages MUTUAL FUNDS & OTHER INVESTMENT No arbitrage opportunities in an efficient
Remaining is Systematic/Market Risk
offset high risk ones so that (1) Mutual Funds market
final portfolio → lower risk Mutual Funds are priced at the end of the (2) Asset Allocation with 2 Risky Assets Implication
Why banks sell mortgages day (Exception: ETF traded on stock Alpha of well-diversified portfolio = 0
Primary reason: free up capital exchange) ∴
Why MBS led to FC 2008 Active Funds: Tries to beat the market APT vs. CAPM
Low quality (sub-prime) mortgages pooled Passive Funds: Mimics a benchmark APT applies to well-diversified only
Default in selected pool of mortgages (2) Investment Companies provide: APT has less restrictive assumptions
(3) Stocks and Bond Indexes  Administration & record keeping ρ = +1.0 → perfectly positively correlated APT assumes one or more sources of
Purpose of Index  Diversification & divisibility ρ = -1.0 → perfectly negatively correlated systematic risk (CAPM only market)
Track Average returns  Professional management  Benefits of Diversification decrease as Arbitrage: 1 systematic factor
Compare performance of managers  Reduced transaction costs correlation between assets increase 1. Set weight of greatest α asset (A)=1
Base of derivatives Disadvantage of Active Mutual Funds (3) Asset Allocation (Many Risky Assets) a. If α not given use ratio of RP to β
Construction of Indexes  Management Fees Q Q 2. Adjust weight of other asset such that βp=0
 Price Weighted Index (DJIA) σ p  [WI WJ Cov(rI , rJ )]
2
 Take time to learn ability of manager I 1 J 1
( )
Buy one share of each stock  Only one price per day 3. Borrow risk-free so total weight = 0
index value = (P1+P2+...+Pn)/n As more assets are included the efficient
(3) Net Asset Value (NAV) ≈ Price per share Return per $1 invested in A:
In case of stock split: frontier shifts to the North-West
 Efficient Frontier (EF) is the set of Equilibrium in the APT
Reconfigure denominator of last period If any of the 3 conditions hold, no arbitrage
(P1+P2,new+...+Pn)/Index = Denominatornew portfolios that has highest return for a
(4) Costs of Investing in Mutual Funds opportunities exist
given level of risk
where P1 – Pn: prices of previous period  Operating Expenses 1.
Assuming no risk-free assets, all investors
Index: Index value of previous period  Front End Load (as % of Offering Price)
P2, new: value of stock after stock split should want a portfolio on the EF 2.
 Back End Load
If 2 new for 1 old (2:1) → value is 1/2  Minimum variance: turning point
 12b-1 Charges (Only in US) 3.
If 1 new for 2 old (1:2) → value is 2x (4) Optimal Risky Portfolio with Risk-Free
Calculating offering price with FEL
 Market-Value Weighted (S&P/NASDAQ) Capital Market Line (CML) for any other well diversified portfolio
Offering Price = NAV/(1-Front End Load)
(P1  Q1 )  (P2  Q 2 )  ...  (Pn  Q n ) Tangent to EF with Rf as y-intercept Arbitrage: 2 systematic factors
indexV   100 (5) Mutual Fund R/r
(P1  Q1 )  (P2  Q 2 )  ...  (Pn  Q n ) Optimal CAL as it has highest Sharpe Ratio 1. Set portfolio weight as 1
Any combination on CML > returns on EF 2. Weight of systematic factors = –β
Q= quantity held (6) Comparing impact on performance  Adjust between tangency portfolio and 3. Borrow risk-free so total weight = 0
Numerator: t=1 risk-free asset according to aversion
Denominator: t=0 (5) Single-Index Asset Market
 Equally weighted
Invest the same amount in each  βi= sensitivity to market return
(P  Q1 )  (P2  Q 2 )  ...  (Pn  Q n ) (7) Mutual Fund Investment Performance  αi= Risk-adjusted excess returns
indexE  1  100
(P1  Q1 )  (P2  Q 2 )  ...  (Pn  Q n ) Evidence shows that average mutual fund  εi = idiosyncratic risk
performance < broad market
Q= Amt invested in each/price  mostly due to fees which magnify losses  : systematic risk
Numerator: t=1 Evidence that performance is consistent  : idiosyncratic risk
Denominator: t=0 from one period to the next is suggestive but Estimating idiosyncratic risk with SCL
inconclusive.  Compute epsilon of each plotted point
 unlikely for top performance to persist from SCL and compute variance of
 tendency of poor performance to persist epsilon
EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS BOND PRICES AND YIELDS MANAGING BOND PORTFOLIOS OPTION VALUATION
(1) Random Walk and EMH (1) Bond Characteristics (1) Interest Rate Sensitivity (1) Intrinsic Value of an Option
EMH proposes that prices accurately reflect  Fixed income/debt securities: claim on a  Long-term bonds are more price sensitive  Call Option/Put Option: Max(S0 – X,0)
all available information. specified periodic stream of income than short-term bonds  Time Value of Option: Difference between
If markets are efficient, investors cannot  Face or par value or principal value  Sensitivity of bond prices to changes in i/r option's price and intrinsic value
construct trading strategies that earn, on  Maturity date increases at a decreasing rate as maturity o Measures probability that option will be
average, a risk-adjusted positive profit.  Coupon rate: Variable/Fixed/Zero increase in-the-money
 Weak form: Prices reflect info in historical (2) Bond Price of Bond  Bond price sensitivity is inversely related o Time Value is highest when option is at-
price data and other trading data  Annual Coupon to coupon amount the-money (will never be negative)
 Semi-strong form: Prices reflect all N $C  Par  Sensitivity of bond price to change in i/r is  Determinants of Call Options Values
P   T 

publicly available information.
T 1 (1  YTM )  (1  YTM)
N inversely related to its current YTM o Stock Price ↑ Value of Call Option ↑
 Strong form: Prices reflect all information;  Increase in bond's YTM results in smaller o Exercise Price ↑ Value of Call Option ↓
 Semi-annual Coupon
both public and private/inside information  2N ½$C  price decline than the gain associated with o Volatility ↑ Value of Call Option ↑
Par
Random Walk: The idea that stock price P   T
 a decrease in yield o Time to expiration ↑ Value of Call Option↑
 T 1 (1  ½r)  (1  ½r)
2N

changes are random and unpredictable (2) Duration – effective maturity of bond o Interest Rate ↑ Value of Call Option ↑
 Bond Pricing Between Coupon Date
 If market efficient ⇒ changes in price has o Dividend Payout ↑ Value of Call Option ↓
Invoice Price = Flat Price + Accrued Interest
to be due to new info about the firm (2) Binomial model
Accrued Interest
 News unpredictable ⇒ returns random  Value of Call Option: Long H shares of Stock,
(2) Implications of EMH (Security Analysis)  Duration increases with maturity Short 1 Call Option (Find H such that
 Technical Analysis: uses prices and volume * if semi annual bond → annual coupon/2  Higher coupon ⇒ lower duration portfolio is riskless – same amt in the future)
information to predict (3) Alternative Measures of Yield  Duration is shorter at higher i/r
o Violation of all forms  Current Yield: Annual coupon/Price  Duration is shorter than maturity for all
 Fundamental Analysis: Identify over/  Yield to Call: Call price replaces par, call bonds except zero coupon bonds When returns of an option and stock are
under valued securities using firm's AR date replaces maturity  Duration=maturity for 0 coupon bonds modelled in a two-state binomial option
o Violates strong/semi-strong form  Holding Period Yield: Use actual re- Duration for fixed coupon to perpetuity model, H is the ratio of the range of option
 Passive vs Active Management investment rate instead of YTM outcomes to the range of stock outcomes
o Active: assumes inefficiency use TA/FA (3) Relationship between Price and Yield Price change is proportional to duration
o Passive: consistent with semi-strong Prices and yields have an inverse relationship
efficiency ⇒no point picking "winners"  High yield → Price low Modified Duration (D*) (3) Black-Scholes Option Pricing Formula
(3) Are markets efficient?  Relationship not linear (due to convexity)
Empirical Tests (4) Types of Risk
 Testing trading rules Reinvestment Risk: interest rate falls such (2) Interest Rate Risk
 Event Studies: Examine how quickly info is that investors are unable to reinvest Interest Rate Risk is the possibility that an
integrated into prices coupons earned at promised YTM investor does not earn the promised YTM δ: Dividend Payout r: Risk-free σ: Implied vol
 Assessing performance of fund managers Default Risk: risk that company defaults on because of changes in i/r T: Number of days to maturity/365
Patterns in stock returns bond payments (A) Price Risk: ↑ in i/r ↓ bond price ⇒ cannot  Implied volatility – std deviation of stock
 Short term returns: serial correlation  Can be negated by Credit Default Swap – sell at expected price returns consistent with option's MV
o Momentum effect ⇒EMH does not hold Insurance policy on default risk of bond (B) Reinvestment Risk: ↓ in i/r ↓ future value o What market expects volatility to be
 Long term reversal effects ⇒ EMH holds (Price approximates yield differences of reinvested coupon ⇒ will not be able to (4) Put-Call Parity
between different rated bonds) reinvest coupons at promised i/r  Payoff of long call + short put = buying stock
Abnormal Returns (excess returns εi)
If EMH holds, returns spike immediately at (5) Bond Price Over Time  Both types of risks are potentially using loan of face value X
announcement; no momentum effect  Premium Bond→Coupon>YTM→Price>Par offsetting if i/r ↑, sales price ↓ but  If there is no arbitrage opportunities,
reinvestment income ↑
Problems with these Empirical Tests  Discount Bond→Coupon<YTM→Price<Par
Selective bias: only know strategies that fail (3) Convexity If the PV of the two strategies are not equal
(6) Term Structure of Interest Rates
Duration asserts that price change is linearly - short more expensive portfolio
Lucky Event Issue  Long term rates are functions of expected
Possible Model Misspecification related to change in bond yield - long cheaper portfolio
future short term rates
 Underestimates ↑ in price when i/r ↓
(4) Mutual Fund and Analyst Performance  Liquidity preference results in upward bias
Mean mutual fund return statistically = 0  Overestimates ↓ in price when i/r ↑ FUTURES MARKETS
over expectations → long-term rate
Prediction model including convexity (1) Futures and Forwards
includes liquidity risk premium
PORTFOLIO EVALUATION  Forward rates implied in yield curves  Futures: Agreements to deliver (or take
(1) Evaluating a Single Fund delivery) of a fixed quantity of an asset at a
Pricing error if ignore convexity
Evaluation with a risk model fixed date in the future for a fixed price
Single index model: EQUITY VALUATION  Spot market – market where the actual
Jensen α: (1) Intrinsic Value Due to convexity, asset is trading for immediate delivery
if Jensen α > 0, fund is good :) Intrinsic Value (V0): PV of firm's future net  Price is more sensitive to ↓ in i/r Long Futures Short Futures
(2) Factors causing Abnormal Performance cash flows discounted by required R/r  Price is less sensitive to ↑ in i/r PT-F0 F0-PT
1. Allocation across broad asset class  If intrinsic value > market price → buy (2) Futures Contracts
2. Allocation within asset class (industry) (2) Dividend Discount Models OPTION MARKETS Both sides to a future contracts are required
3. Individual security selection (stocks)  Zero growth (e.g. Preferred Stock) (1) Option Contracts to post margin with exchange clearinghouse
(3) Decomposing Performance , k = required rate of return  Call Option – option to buy a fixed quantity  Balance in margin account is adjusted to
Comparing against a "bogey" portfolio  Constant growth model of an asset by a fixed date for a fixed price reflect daily settlement
Excess return of managed portfolio , g=growth rate  Put Option – option to sell a fixed quantity  Cash flow in buyer margin acc =
= return of manage – return of bogey Stocks under zero growth model and of an asset by a fixed date for a fixed price  Cash flow in seller margin acc =
1. Contribution of asset allocation (1) constant growth model will have the R/r (2) Option Payoffs Futures exhibit the property of convergence
Sum of: (Weight in managed – weight in  But constant growth will have higher Payoff of CALL BUYER: Max(ST-X, 0) because price discrepancies would open
bogey)*bogey returns valuation because of expectation of Payoff of CALL SELLER: -Max(ST-X, 0) arbitrage opportunities for investors
2. Contribution of selection (2) + (3) collecting higher future dividends Payoff of PUT BUYER: Max(X-ST, 0)  Hedging – using futures to manage risks
Sum of: (Return in managed – Return in (3) P/E and Growth Opportunities Payoff of PUT SELLER: -Max(X-ST, 0) (removes all excess loss and gains)
index)*weight in managed (3) Option Strategies o Protect against increase: long asset and
3.Contribution of security selection (3)  Protective Put: Long Stock and Long Put futures (when you want to buy asset)
Total equity selection derived from step 2 Where b = plowback ratio (if g=0, b=0) Strategy to limit risk of owning stock o Protect against decline: short asset and
Security =total equity-sector allocation  Covered Call: Long Stock and Short Call futures (when you want to sell asset)
(Note: 1 contribution basis point = 1/100 %) Value of growth opportunities = V0 with Limit losses in writing a call option (3) Basis Risk
(4) Evaluation of Complete Portfolios growth opportunities – V0 with zero growth Risk of unpredictable changes in basis
 Straddle: Long Call and Long Put with same
Entire Wealth Portfolio (M2) (4) P/E and Risk  Basis=Futures Price- Cash price
exercise price and expiration date
Riskier firms have higher k → lower P/E Expect volatile prices in both direction o Basis=0 at maturity
Rp*: complete portfolio consisting actively (5)Pitfalls in using P/E Ratios Hedgers bears risk if futures contract and
ST ≤ X ST ≥ X
managed and risk-free with same risk as M  Hard to estimate future earnings asset are liquidated before maturity but risk
Protective Put X ST
Creating P*:  High P/E implies high expected growth but still smaller than un-hedged position.
Weight in Managed fund = Covered Call ST X
not necessarily high stock return (4) Spots-Future Parity
Fund of Funds Treynor Ratio: Straddle X-ST ST-X
 Simplistic assumption that P/E only rise  Payoff of long asset for 1 yr = investing S0 in
Better than sharpe ratio as effect of residual  Bullish Spread: Long call at X1, Short Call at
 Better estimate: PEG Ratio → Ratio of P/E risk-free and long 1 unit of futures for 1 yr
risk can be ignored X2 OR Long put at X1, Short Put at X2
to growth in dividends should ≈ 1
Portfolio added to benchmark ST ≤ X1 X1 ≤ ST ≤ X2 ST ≥ X2 (5) Pricing Futures Contract
Information Ratio: X ST-X1 X2-X1 Futures price= Spot Price x (1+ cost of carry)
: σ of difference between portfolio and  Collar: Long asset, Long Put option at X1 Net Cost of Carry =
benchmark returns and Short Call option at X2
Limit downside losses and upside gain

You might also like