Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professional Statement
Professional Statement
By Eric Chaney
Several decades ago, when I was trying to decide what my undergraduate major should
be, I was told that I could do only two things with a history degree – teach or become a lawyer –
so I became a journalist instead. I wish, though, that someone had told me then about public
history. When I told my friends and family that I was going back to school to become a public
historian, I was often asked what that meant, exactly. In my mind, public historians were people
who design museum exhibits, a link between the archivists in the back rooms and the visitors
who walk through the door. And while that is true, it is much too narrow of a definition for
public history, a field so broad that “even practitioners struggle to define it succinctly.”1 As one
of my graduate school professors put it, “Academic history is academic history and everything
else is public history,” including living history performances, smartphone apps, documentaries,
walking tours, historical markers, folk-art demonstrations, books, tv, and movies made for
popular audiences.2 In short, I was partially correct. A public historian is anyone who serves as a
link between the past and the public, someone who combines the scholastic rigor and historical
Public historians hold an “awesome power to shape historical narratives” with “an
equally awesome responsibility to create narratives that represent all groups within our society”
and “the conversation about diversity and inclusion within the history field has increased
1
Cherstin M. Lyon, Elizabeth M. Nix, and Rebecca K. Shrum, Introduction to Public History: Interpreting the Past,
Engaging Audiences (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017), 1.
2
Ibid, 2.
exponentially in the last decade.”3 Revisiting historic interpretations of slavery, for example, has
led to such efforts as the “1619 Project,” an ongoing digital initiative from The New York Times
Magazine that “aims to reframe the country’s history by placing the consequences of slavery and
the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative,” and the
Whitney Plantation, the country’s first museum to “design the visitor's entire experience around
In How the Word is Passed: A Reckoning with the History of Slavery Across America,
Clint Smith takes a critical look at the Whitney Plantation and six other sites “that offer an
intergenerational story of how slavery has been central in shaping our nation’s collective history
and memory.”5 Smith, an author and poet, says that we are at a turning point in our political and
social climate, where there is “a willingness to more fully grapple with the legacy of slavery and
how it shaped the world we live in today.”6 Yet, “it seems that the more purposefully some
places have attempted to tell the truth about their proximity to slavery and its aftermath, the more
This desire to present a whitewashed view of history is perhaps the biggest challenge
facing public historians in America today, a “pitched battle over public memory” that pits public
historians against the “exclusionary mythmaking of an elite few.” 8 Political leaders in at least 20
states have proposed legislation to limit the teaching of “divisive concepts” which, according to a
3
American Association for State and Local History and the National Council on Public History, “Diversity and
Inclusion,” The Inclusive Historian’s Handbook, published June 10, 2019, https://inclusivehistorian.com/diversity-
and-inclusion.
4
The 1619 Project,” The New York Times Magazine,
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html; Debbie Elliott, “New
Museum Depicts 'The Life Of A Slave From Cradle To The Tomb,'” NPR, “All Things Considered,” published
February 27, 2015, accessed July 26, 2023, https://www.npr.org/2015/02/27/389563868/new-museum-depicts-the-
life-of-a-slave-from-cradle-to-the-tomb.
5
Smith, front jacket.
6
Smith, 6.
7
Smith, 6.
8
Jake Silverstein, “The 1619 Project and the Long Battle Over U.S. History,” The New York Times Magazine,
November 9, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/09/magazine/1619-project-us-history.html.
joint statement from the American Association of University Professors, the American Historical
Association, the Association of American Colleges & Universities, and PEN America,
“These divisive concepts as defined in numerous bills are a litany of vague and indefinite
buzzwords and phrases, including, for example, ‘that any individual should feel or be made to
feel discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological or emotional distress on
account of that individual’s race or sex,” which, the statement says, is code for “the role of
We will likely never be able to truly agree “on a single historical narrative within the
confines of a pluralistic society,”10 and indeed we should not expect to. As historian Ari Kelman
notes, “the people of the United States are so various that they should not be expected to share a
single tale of a common past. Sometimes their stories complement one another; sometimes they
Yet, “Americans of all ages deserve nothing less than a free and open exchange about
history and the forces that shape our world today,” and I firmly believe that as public historians
we have a duty to examine every thread in the chaotic tapestry that is our past and present them
Rescuing Stories
This may seem like a tall order, but I am inspired by books such as Tiya Miles’ All That
She Carried: The Journey of Ashley's Sack, a Black Family Keepsake. Miles, a public historian
9
American Association of University Professors, the American Historical Association, the Association of American
Colleges & Universities, and PEN America, “Joint Statement on Legislative Efforts to Restrict Education about
Racism in American History,” American Historical Society website, published June 16, 2021, accessed July 26,
2023, https://www.historians.org/divisive-concepts-statement.
10
Kelman, 279.
11
Ibid.
12
Joint Statement.
who teaches at Harvard University, became entranced by a simple cotton sack she saw on display
mother and daughter, Rose and Ashley. When Ashley was sold away from her mother at the age
of 9, Rose, faced with the prospect of never seeing her child again, “gathered all of her resources
—material, emotional, and spiritual—and packed an emergency kit for the future.” The sack
contained a tattered dress, three handfuls of pecans, a lock of Rose’s hair, and, she told her
daughter “It be filled with my Love always.”13 In the 1920s, their descendant Ruth Middleton
embroidered the sack with a few lines telling the story and by doing so “preserved the memory
of her foremothers and also venerated these women, shaping their image for the next generations.
Without Ruth, there would be no record. Without her record, there would be no history.”14
I Want to Be Both
As a historian, I want to be both Ruth and Tiya. Like Ruth, I want to be someone who rescues
the seemingly “unimportant” stories from the black hole of the past and puts them in places
where they can be seen, whether that is a museum exhibit, a documentary, a website, a book.
Like Tiya, I want my material to be approachable and gripping and filled with heart. Many of the
books I read during my graduate studies were dense academic tomes that were difficult to read
let alone analyze, but I could not put Ashley’s Sack down. Maybe that’s because, as Miles herself
says, it is “not a traditional history. It leans toward evocation rather than argumentation, and is
rather more meditation than monograph.”15 Miles strikes “a delicate balance between two
13
Tiya Miles, “To Find the History of African American Women, Look to Their Handiwork,” The Atlantic, published
June 8, 2021, accessed July 27, 2023, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/06/history-african-
american-women-their-handiwork/619082/?utm_source=feed.
14
Ibid.
15
Jennifer Szalai, “In One Modest Cotton Sack, a Remarkable Story of Slavery, Suffering, Love and Survival,” The
New York Times, published June 9, 2021, accessed July 27, 2023,
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/09/books/review-all-that-she-carried-ashleys-sack-tiya-miles.html.
seemingly incommensurate approaches … fidelity to her archival material, as she coaxes out
facts grounded in the evidence; and her conjectures about this singular object, as she uses what is
known about other enslaved women’s lives to suppose what could have been.”16
This is the kind of history that I want to write. Though Ashley’s Sack details a shameful
part of our national history, its themes are near universal – a mother’s love, the loss of a child,
family tradition and memory. These can be entry points for those who might otherwise wish to
forget about this period of our history, personal connections that cross divides of color and
politics. I once heard a history teacher say, “Everyone should be able to see themselves in my
class,” and I wholeheartedly agree. Throughout my graduate studies, I found that the books and
articles I enjoyed the most were the ones I found most approachable, the ones with which I felt
some personal connection. And I have tried, in my writing, to keep that in mind. Nothing is
gained from historical interpretation if no one is reading it, and the more widely approachable
my work is, the more good it may do in starting civil discourse around the “divisive concepts” of
American history.
Bibliography
16
Ibid.
Kelman, Ari. A Misplaced Massacre: Struggling Over the Memory of Sand Creek. E-book,
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2015,
Lyon, Cherstin M., Elizabeth M. Nix, and Rebecca K. Shrum. Introduction to Public History:
Interpreting the Past, Engaging Audiences. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield,
2017.
Smith, Clint. How the Word Is Passed: A Reckoning with The History of Slavery Across
America. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2021.