Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Novel Discharge Status Inspection Method For EDM of Thermal-barrier-Coated Nickel-Based Superalloy
A Novel Discharge Status Inspection Method For EDM of Thermal-barrier-Coated Nickel-Based Superalloy
com
ScienceDirect
Procedia CIRP 68 (2018) 40 – 45
19th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining, 23-27 April 2018,
2017, Bilbao, Spain
Abstract: The aircraft-engine hot end components were generally made of thermal-barrier-coated nickel-based superalloys(TBCs) that consist
of insulating ceramic coating, electrical conductive coating and metal superalloy substrate. The discharge status of insulating ceramics is
significantly different from that of metal materials, especially for the spark voltage. Existing discharge status inspection approaches have been
focusing on the machining of metal materials, and cannot effectively identify the discharge status of insulating ceramics. Hence, aim to the
EDM of TBCs, a novel inspection method, utilizing the prominent difference of the spark voltage and ignition delay of discharging pulse, is
proposed to distinguish the discharge status for both ceramic coating and metal substrate. In this paper, the discharge status both ceramic
coating and substrate material were analyzed and distinguished. A specialized inspection circuit based on field programmable gate array (FPGA)
is developed to realize the inspection of 15 typical discharge statuses. Finally, a confirmation experiment is employed to demonstrate the
validity and feasibility of this approach.
©©2018
2018TheTheAuthors. Published
Authors. by Elsevier
Published B.V. This
by Elsevier is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
B.V.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 19th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining.
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 19th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining
Keywords:EDM; Dishcharge status inspection; Thermal-barrier-coated Nickel-based superalloys; threshold voltage; ignition delay
2212-8271 © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the 19th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining
doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.019
Li Wang et al. / Procedia CIRP 68 (2018) 40 – 45 41
machining of ceramic materials depends on the generation of Discharge Status Analysis on EDM of TBCs
conductive layer, and its erosion mechanism is significantly
different from that of metal materials [4]. Compared to the During EDM of 3YSZ, it is observed using oscilloscope
EDMed machining of metal materials, one of prominent that the discharging statuses of 3YSZ are significantly varied
characteristics of ceramic materials is discharge status. For with those of superalloy substrate. The 11 typical discharge
instance, the spark voltage is varied with spark status in the statuses of 3YSZ are classified in Figure 2 a). Obviously, the
discharge gap. Therefore, in order to achieve an accurate spark voltage is varied within the range of 7 to 60V.
servo control of tool electrode and pulse power response. The Furthermore, it is interesting to note that discharging status
inspection device of discharge status is required to identify the can also be changed even in a single discharging pulse. As
discharge status from both ceramic and metal materials.
shown in Figure 2 a, in the discharge status of super high
However, existing EDM have been focusing on the machining
resistance discharge converting into high resistance discharge.
of metal materials, and cannot effectively identify the
In contrast, in the discharge status of high resistance short
discharge status of insulating ceramics, which can give rise a
inaccurate servo motion of tool electrode, and even the circuit converting into low resistance short circuit, a higher
failure for EDM of TBCs [5]. To address this issue, a novel discharge status is converted into a relatively lower one.
inspection method with combination of voltage threshold Furthermore, a relatively lower discharge status is converted
technology and ignition delay approach is proposed, utilizing into a higher one. Figure 2 b shows the typical discharge
the prominent difference of the spark voltages, is proposed to status. To the machining of Nickel-based superallys, there are
distinguish 15 discharge statuses for both ceramic coating and four discharge status including: open circuit, spark, arc, and
metal substrate, and confirmation experiments is carried out to short circuit. Therefore, to realize the discharge status
demonstrate the validity and feasibility of this approach. identification for EDM of TBCs, 15 typical discharge statuses
need to distinguish.
2. Discharge status inspection on EDM of TBCs
Fig.2. The typical discharging status for EDM of TBCs: (a) the typical
discharging status of ceramic coating, (b) the typical discharging status for
Nickel-based superalloys
Fig. 9.The flow plot for the inspection of HRD and HRS
Fig. 7. The flow plot for the inspection of open circuit and short circuit
44 Li Wang et al. / Procedia CIRP 68 (2018) 40 – 45
References
Fig. 18. Identification of spark and arc [1] Corcoran A, Sexton L,Seaman B, Ryan P, Byrne G. The laser drilling of
multi-layer aerospace material system, J. Mater. Process. Technol, 2002,
123,1:100-106Van der Geer J, Hanraads JAJ, Lupton RA. The art of
writing a scientific article. J Sci Commun 2000;163:51-9.
[2] McNally C.A, Folkes J, Pashby I.R. Laser drilling of cooling holes in
aeroengines: state of the art and future challenges, Mach. Sci. Technol,
2004;.20,7:805-813
[3] Antar M, Chantzis D,Marimuthu S, Hayward P, High speed EDM and
laser drilling of aerospace alloys, Procedia CIRP, 2016; 42: 526–531
[4] Wang L, Guo YF, Zhang GW, Investigation on conductive layer,
delamination, and recast layer characteristics of EDMed normal holes in
TBCs. J. Mater. Eng. Perform, 2017; 1:1-10
Fig. 19. Identification of SHRD/HRD and SHRD/LRD [5] Behrens A.W, Ginzel J. Bruhns FL. Threshold technology and its
application for gap status detection. J. Mater. Process. Technol,
2004;.149:310–315.