Lawaspect.

com
PLAGIARISM 
FREE CASE LOG IN (HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/?LOGIN-

R)(/) CHEKER RESOURCES BRIEFS FIRST=1&UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIG

Volkswagen of America Managing it Priorities Case Analysis
(/PLAGIARISM- (/CASE- LOGIN&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UTM_TERM=LOGIN)
Case 7 – Volkswagen of America: Managing IT
1. What is your assessment of
CHECKER/) the new process for managing priorities at Volkswagen of
BRIEFS/)
America? Are the criticisms justified? Is it an improvement over the old process? The new
system of prioritizing IT projects to determine funding is a very efficient way of ensuring those
projects that are critical to business strategy meet their financial requirements. However, the
method of dropping entire goal portfolios simply because they ranked lowest in the list could
be deemed a flaw in the system, and one that could be detrimental to business unit integration
slowly over time.

This understandably frustrates those whose proposals are receiving no funding, and if this
prioritization system has any hope of future success, the business units being consistently
funded will need to work better at recognizing other priorities, or the system will need to be
restructured to allow for smaller projects to be phased in at the very least to maintain
integration.

2. Who controls the budgets from which IT projects are funded at Volkswagen of America? The
parent company of VWoA – VWAG – caps the IT budget at $60 million. However, the control of
this budget includes the involvement of several cross-functional teams (AKA – “several
organizational entities”, p. 5) that review project proposals before final approval – for instance,
during Phase I the DBC (Digital Business Council) reduced the initial $210 million project
proposals to $170 million (p. 6).

We will write a custom essay sample on

VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA MANAGING IT PRIORITIES CASE
ANALYSIS
or any similar topic specifically for you

ORDER NOW
(HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/ORDER?
UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIGN=SAMPLE_PAGE&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UT

This study source was downloaded by 100000805287858 from CourseHero.com on 07-11-2023 11:08:46 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/122808796/Volkswagen-of-America-Managing-it-Priorities-Case-Analysis-Law-Essayspdf/
 Ultimately the PMO (Project Management Office) subsection of the BPTO (Business Process,
Lawaspect.com
Technology andOrganization),
PLAGIARISM
FREE CASE LOG INestablished
which Matulovic (HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/?LOGIN-
as a new internal IT department
upon his arrival, approves projects prioritized by the IT steering committee (ITSC).

R)(/) Who should control

CHEKER these budgets?
RESOURCES ShouldFIRST=1&UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIG
BRIEFS the IT department have its own budget?

3. How should Matulovic respond to his fellow executives who are calling to ask him for special
treatment outside the new priority management system? Matulovic should tell the fellow
(/PLAGIARISM- (/CASE- LOGIN&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UTM_TERM=LOGIN)
executives the new priority management system was developed and implemented by ELT
members and senior management group. The process is now complete and not reversible. It
would be unfair for any ELT member to get a special treatment.
CHECKER/) BRIEFS/)
4. What should Matulovic do about the unfunded Supply Flow project? The unfunded project
was critically important to the company. Lack funding would delay globalization initiatives.
Since the project needed full funding to continue on track and the cost was a significant part of
the IT budget, funding should come from alternative sources. Matulovic should argue that the
project will have a large impact on the global integration and save costs for the company as
whole, rather than just VWoA.

5. On page 8 we see that $16 million of the $60 budget is for SIB projects, under the spending
direction of Matulovic; on page 1 we see that some people consider this unfair – is it? Should
budget be "set aside" for IT projects? Why? The budget allocated for SIB projects, under the
direction of Matulovic, is fair. Many individuals across the organization were involved in project
proposals and creating the process for managing the priorities and selection.

The head of each business unit was a member of Executive Leadership Team that helped
develop and rank the proposals for the projects. Senior business and IT members in the IT
steering committee guided and approved project selection and prioritization process. After the
process is implemented and executed, it is too late to voice an objection. 6. In general, what
characteristics should a process for deciding about funding of IT projects have?

The process of how to fund IT projects has to include the means to categorizing the projects
and relating them to company’s strategy. There has to be adequate guidance for developing
proposals. Since buy-in and trust by unit leaders is critical, they have be involved in developing
the process. The process has to be fair and transparent. It has to be based on what is best for
the company as whole. Summary

The Volkswagen of America: Managing IT Priorities case study describes the efforts of the US
subsidiary of Volkswagen AG (VWAG) – Volkswagen of America (VWoA) – to arrive at a new
process for setting IT funding priorities and deciding on what projects to fund. Dr. Uwe
Matulovic, the new Chief Information Officer (CIO) of VWoA, has a dilemma in that peers from
the  Executive Leadership Team (ELT) have been openly hostile and critical of the new

This study source was downloaded by 100000805287858 from CourseHero.com on 07-11-2023 11:08:46 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/122808796/Volkswagen-of-America-Managing-it-Priorities-Case-Analysis-Law-Essayspdf/
 prioritization process, particularly in regards to the lack of funding for high priorities for their
Lawaspect.com
PLAGIARISM 
FREEand have
areas of the company, CASE LOGhim
pressurized IN (HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/?LOGIN-
“to insert an unfunded project (or two) into
the IT department’s work plans” (p. 1).

R)(/) Dr. Matulovic position

CHEKER is particularly
RESOURCES BRIEFSchallenging as more than 40 projects have been proposed
FIRST=1&UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIG
for IT, with funding requirements totaling $240m, when a budget of only $60m has been
approved by VWAG. The new prioritization process that was implemented is complex. It
includes the involvement of several
(/PLAGIARISM- cross-functional
(/CASE- teams or “several organizational entities”
LOGIN&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UTM_TERM=LOGIN)
(p. 5) that review project proposals during three separate Phases before final approval.

For instance, during Phase I the DBC (Digital Business Council) reduced the initial $210 million
CHECKER/) BRIEFS/)
project proposals to $170 million (p. 6) by way of identifying dependencies among projects.
That is, removing those projects from the budget that required other projects to be completed
before they could start. Ultimately the PMO (Project Management Office) subsection of the
BPTO (Business Process, Technology and Organization), which Matulovic established as a new
internal IT department upon his arrival, approves projects prioritized by the IT Steering
Committee (ITSC). In conclusion, it became apparent to Dr.

Matulovic that the Supply Flow Project, which is viewed as critical to the company’s global
supply chain management objectives, was poorly served by the new prioritization process in
that it was left only partially funded. The process overlooked this project primarily because
much of its value was felt at the global level, and not at the VWoA importer level. Dr. Matulovic
found himself in a quandary and struggled with related decision-making as he understood that
the loss of funding for this project would constitute a major setback for globalization initiatives
based in Germany.

1. Who controls the budgets from which IT projects are funded at Volkswagen of America? The
budgets for IT projects were controlled through a process that involves several organizational
entities that establish priorities. There were four specific teams that were involved in this
process: the ELT (Executive Leadership Team), the ITSC (IT Steering Committee), the PMO
(Project Management Office), and the DBC (Digital Business Council.) The ELT was responsible
for executing the NRG (Next Round of Growth) strategy in which the IT governance is a part.

The ITSC consisted of business and IT managers and was  responsible for guiding and
approving the process of IT project selection and prioritization. The PMO administered the
project proposal and approval process. The DBC was responsible for the project filtering
process which decided which projects were most in line with the companies business strategy.

2. What is your assessment of the new process for managing priorities at Volkswagen of
America? Are the criticisms justified? Is it an improvement over the old process? The new IT
priority management process was driven by the new IT budget constraint given to VWoA by the
parent company VWAG. If the new budgetary constraint was not initiated, it is likely that

This study source was downloaded by 100000805287858 from CourseHero.com on 07-11-2023 11:08:46 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/122808796/Volkswagen-of-America-Managing-it-Priorities-Case-Analysis-Law-Essayspdf/
 elements of the former less organized and less centralized method would be maintained. In
Lawaspect.com
PLAGIARISM 
FREE
the end, this may CASE business
benefit the individual LOG INunits,
(HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/?LOGIN-
but be detrimental to the business as a
whole.

R)(/) In creating the new

CHEKER process, Matulovic
RESOURCES BRIEFS enabled the business unit managers to work together to
FIRST=1&UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIG
make the decisions that would effect their departments using the overall company strategy as
the driving element. In doing this, he succeeded in involving all of the managers that would be
affected by the prioritization (/CASE-
(/PLAGIARISM- system while maintaining the executive leadership team’s
LOGIN&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UTM_TERM=LOGIN)
strategic goals. This new system was a substantial improvement over the former system.

3. On page 8 we see that $16 million of the $60 budget is for SIB projects, under the spending
CHECKER/) BRIEFS/)
direction of Matulovic; on page 1 we see that some people consider this unfair – is it? Should
budget be "set aside" for IT projects? Why? The budget allocated for the SIB (Stay in Business)
projects (business continuity and legal) should receive the highest priority. As denoted by the
name, if any of these projects are incomplete or fail, the risk to the business is substantial
compared to business unit priorities.

However, the amount budgeted may be a point that could be questioned. Instead of
predetermining the amount required, he should have submitted the SIB to the same process
as all of the other projects which would have reduced or eliminated the business unit
manager’s perception that Matulovic was trying to control company strategy.

4. How should Matulovic respond to his fellow executives who are calling to ask him for special
treatment outside the new priority management system? What should Matulovic do about the
unfunded Supply Flow project? Matulovic created a well organized system that focused on
company goals. His fellow executives were involved in the IT priority decision making and the
company expectation is that business unit managers also support company goals.

If they think that these goals in relation to their requests does not make sense, then they had
the opportunity in this process to voice their concerns to the one of the process teams (the
ELT,ITSC,PMO, and/or the DBC), not to Matulovic himself. Because the Supply Flow project is
tied into global strategy, Matulovic should propose that the funding for this project come from
VWAG.

5. In general, what characteristics should a process for deciding about funding of IT projects
have? General characteristics that an IT funding process should have: – Involve all of those who
will be affected by the funding decisions in the process. – Align IT funding priorities with
company strategy. – Enable communication between business units depending on the funding
and between those units and executive management.

Related posts:

This study source was downloaded by 100000805287858 from CourseHero.com on 07-11-2023 11:08:46 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/122808796/Volkswagen-of-America-Managing-it-Priorities-Case-Analysis-Law-Essayspdf/
 Volkswagen of America: Managing It Priorities Paper Example
Lawaspect.com
PLAGIARISM 
FREE CASE LOG IN (HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/?LOGIN-
(https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-america-managing-priorities/)
Volkswagen of America (https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-of-america/)
Volkswagen of North America (https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-north-america/)
R)(/) CHEKERVolkswagen
RESOURCES BRIEFS It Priorities
of America: Managing FIRST=1&UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIG
Review Example
(https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-america-managing-priorities-2/)

(https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?
(/PLAGIARISM- (/CASE- LOGIN&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UTM_TERM=LOGIN)
mini=true&url=https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-
(https://twitter.com/home?
america-
CHECKER/)
managing/&title=Global BRIEFS/)
status=Global
political
political
change
(https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?
change
https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-
u=https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-
;source=https://lawaspect.com/volkswagen-
america-
america-
america-

managing/)
managing/)

managing/)

CATEGORIES
Law Essays (https://lawaspect.com/law-essays/)

RECENT POSTS
Stern v. Marshall (https://lawaspect.com/case-stern-v-marshall-2/)
Watts v. United States (https://lawaspect.com/case-watts-v-united-states-2/)
Schweiker v. Chilicky (https://lawaspect.com/case-schweiker-v-chilicky-2/)
Yarborough v. Alvarado (https://lawaspect.com/case-yarborough-v-alvarado-2/)
United States v. O’Brien (https://lawaspect.com/case-united-states-v-obrien/)
United States v. Seeger (https://lawaspect.com/case-united-states-v-seeger-2/)
Snepp v. United States (https://lawaspect.com/case-snepp-v-united-states/)
Waters v. Churchill (https://lawaspect.com/case-waters-v-churchill-2/)
Sabri v. United States (https://lawaspect.com/case-sabri-v-united-states-2/)

This study source was downloaded by 100000805287858 from CourseHero.com on 07-11-2023 11:08:46 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/122808796/Volkswagen-of-America-Managing-it-Priorities-Case-Analysis-Law-Essayspdf/
 Lawaspect.com
PLAGIARISM 
FREE CASE LOG IN (HTTPS://ESSAYS.LAWASPECT.COM/?LOGIN-

R)(/) CHEKER RESOURCES BRIEFS FIRST=1&UTM_SOURCE=LAWASPECT.COM&UTM_CAMPAIG

Plagiarism Contact us (/contact-us/) About (/about/) 47 Bergen St--Floor

Terms & Conditions (/terms- Disclaimer 3, Brooklyn, NY
(/PLAGIARISM-
Cheker (/CASE- LOGIN&UTM_MEDIUM=CH_Z&UTM_TERM=LOGIN) 11201, USA
conditions/) (https://lawaspect.com/disclaimer/)

(/plagiarism- Privacy Policy (/privacy-policy/) info@lawaspect.com

CHECKER/) BRIEFS/)
checker/)

Law Essays

(/law-

essays/)
Law

Schools (/law-

schools/)
Law

Notes (/law-

notes/)
Case

Briefs (/case-

briefs-2016/)

Search

© 2020 Law Essays and Papers

This study source was downloaded by 100000805287858 from CourseHero.com on 07-11-2023 11:08:46 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/122808796/Volkswagen-of-America-Managing-it-Priorities-Case-Analysis-Law-Essayspdf/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)