Fingerprint Report

As a result of the investigation I’ve performed, I conclude that the plain whorl and ulnar loop fingerprints I
gathered at the crime scene are not the same person. This is because they had different patterns when I examined
thier fingerprints after collecting them. Their ridges are different, as their cores and deltas. The pattern of a plain
whorl in which the ridge from the series of circles or spirals around the core axis, and has two deltas, while the
pattern of an ulnar loop, in which one or more ridges enter either side of the empression, also has one delta.
Therefore, I can prove that they are different people. While the witness states that the suspect he saw performing a
crime is the plain whorl. But when I examined the plain whorl the result came out is the ulnar loop. So I conclude
that the suspect who commits a crime is the ulnar loop and the alleged suspect is the plain whorl because I based on
my findings and the results of my investigations not the others opinions.