Fingerprint Report

As a result of the investigation I’ve performed, I conclude that the plain whorl and ulnar loop fingerprints I
gathered at the crime scene are not the same person. This is because they had different patterns when I
examined thier fingerprints after collecting them. Thier ridges are different, as thier cores and deltas. The
pattern of a plain whorl in which the ridge from the series of circles or spirals around the core axis, and has
two deltas, while the pattern of an ulnar loop, in which one or more ridges enter either side of the empression,
also has one delta. Therefore, I can prove that they are different people. While the witness states that the
suspect he saw performing a crime is the plain whorl. But when I examined the plain whorl the result came out
is the ulnar loop. So I conclude that the suspect who commits a crime is the ulnar loop and the alleged suspect
is the plain whorl because I based on my findings and the results of my investigations not the others opinions.