Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MISSION STATEMENT
Founded in 1933, the IRC is a global leader in emergency relief, rehabilitation, protection of human rights,
post-conflict development, resettlement services and advocacy for those uprooted or affected by conflict
and oppression.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The International Rescue Committee expresses its sincere thanks to all of the practitioners who participated
in the study. Special thanks go to the efforts of Jonathan Miller, Felix Mara, Yourfee Kamara, and Dr. Evelyn
Kandakai. Special thanks also go to Pearson Foundation for their editorial assistance and to the U.S. Bureau
of Population, Refugees, and Migration for funding the study.
This report was researched and written by Carl Triplehorn, an independent consultant hired by the
International Rescue Committee in 2001 to review and assess its Liberia Repatriation and Reintegration
Education Program. Rebecca Winthrop, Education Technical Advisor at the International Rescue Committee,
provided writing contributions, editorial assistance and project oversight. The report was finalized with con-
tributions from Jackie Kirk, Wendy Smith, David Walker, Jonathan Miller, Jane Warburton, Julian Watson and
Paul Taylor.
All statements of facts and expressions of opinion contained in this publication are the sole responsibility of
the author.
Executive Summary 1
Summary of IRC Program Achievements . 1
Lessons Learned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Methodology 5
Background 6
Liberian Educational System and the Impacts of the War . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
IRC Liberia’s Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Assessment Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Working Environment: Security and Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Program Impacts 45
Increased Access to Education . . . . . . . . 45
Increased Quality of Education . . . . . . . . 48
Supported the Development of an Educational System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Impacts on Repatriation 51
Repatriation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Return to their Homes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Reintegration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Conclusions 56
Recommendations for Future Programs . 56
Appendices 62
Appendix A: Methodology for Liberian Education Program Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Appendix B: Assessment of Children Not Attending School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Appendix C: Casual Pathway of Liberia Refugee Education Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
Appendix D: Matrix of IRC Trainings from 1998–2001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Appendix E: Percentage of Girls’ Attendance in Nimba County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Appendix F: Percentage of Girls’ Attendance in Bong County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Table 8 Selected Summary of Tools Distributed through PTA Table 37 Who Stayed During the Liberian War, Who Fled, Why
Programs and Why Do They Remain in Asylum?
This report documents the uniqueness of the Through the IRC’s multi-faceted support and
IRC’s program through an evaluation of the collaboration with the Liberian Ministry of
individual program components, as well as Education (LMOE), the quality of education
a discussion of its contribution to the larger increased in all schools. Over the course of the
Liberian repatriation and reintegration process. program, students in IRC-supported schools
It is hoped that this report will both contrib- increased their pass rate on the West Africa
ute to the growing repertoire of strategies for Exam Council (WAEC) yearly exam. Notably,
implementing education programs in emergen- high school pass rates increased from 9.5% in
cies and in early reconstruction contexts, and 1999 to 32% in 2000, and to 69.8% in 2001.
serve as a tribute to the Liberians, especially Interestingly, girls in both high school and
IRC Liberia staff, who worked on the project. middle school passed at a rate higher than
the boys and higher than the national aver-
The IRC’s training and payment of incentives Enhanced the role of communities in
to teachers kept the schools staffed and pre- school management and sustainability
vented the closure of schools due to teachers’ Through support and training of Parent Teacher
strikes. Prior to the IRC’s intervention, public Associations (PTAs), the IRC enhanced the
school teachers were migrating to the private role of the community in the management
schools that offered more consistent and higher of schools. Starting from focus groups with
pay. The IRC’s payment of teachers’ incentives, PTAs and government officials, the IRC’s train-
the opening of teacher training colleges, a ing clarified the relationship among the PTA,
teacher mentoring program and the provision the school and the government, as well as
of teachers’ packages provided an economic increased each PTA’s organizational capacity.
and morale boost for government schools to The impact of these trainings was multiplied
retain both trained and untrained teachers. by the attendance of government officials. A
support network for district and county PTAs
The consultant spent 30 days in Liberia follow- From the total of 126 IRC-supported schools,
ing the closure of the program in August 2001. 12 were selected for direct assessment. Two
One week was spent in the capital, Monrovia, members of the assessment team visited
compiling and reviewing program docu- each school for four to six hours. Prior to the
ments such as the original proposals, monthly visit, team members compiled and reviewed
field reports, IRC correspondence and train- documents related to the school to guide their
ing manuals. Additionally, while in Monrovia, discussion. Each visit typically began with a tour
interviews were conducted with IRC senior of the school conducted by the head teacher
staff, collaborating partners and the Liberian along with representatives from the Parent
Ministry of Education. The major activities of Teachers Association (PTA) and school staff.
the consultancy were conducted in Bong and This was then followed by the use of participa-
Nimba Counties. Three IRC staff assisted with tory methodologies in focus groups composed
the assessment: Jonathan Miller (IRC Education of PTA members, teachers and students around
Coordinator), Felix Mara (County Education the topics identified in the textbox.
Officer – Bong) and Yourfee Kamara (County
For more specific details of the methodology,
Education Officer – Nimba).
see Appendix A.
Ranking of IRC programs Ranking of IRC programs Ranking of IRC programs Ranking of IRC programs
“Given the fact that education is the brain of every nation and that no people can fully enjoy the sovereignty of
their country while the \dark cloud of illiteracy hangs over the larger portion of their citizenry,
Believing that parents and teachers have a large and inescapable responsibility in fashioning the ideas of
children and youth and that such responsibility requires the collective service of men and women of high and
profound understanding,
We, the teachers and parents,…establish these rules and regulations for the governance of Toweh Memorial
High School Parent Teachers Association.”
Rules and Regulations Governing
Parent Teachers Association of Toweh Memorial High School
April 5, 1999
1
Ministry of Education, Republic of Monrovia. Education Sector Review 2000: Vol. III. Education Sector Operations Manual. Guidelines on: Policy/Planning Strategies,
Programmes, Personnel, Facilities, Services, Administration and Management, Budgeting and FInance. Monrovia, December 2000. pg. 12.
2
Government of Liberia. (2000) Challenges and Opportunities for Fulfilling the Rights of the Child in War Torn Liberia: Situational Anaylsis. A report joingly commissioned by
the Government of Liberia, The Eminent Person’s Group on Advocacy for Children and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) pg. 68.
3
Government of Liberia. (2000) Challenges and Opportunities for Fulfilling the Rights of the Child in War Torn Liberia: Situational Anaylsis. A report joingly commissioned by
the Government of Liberia, The Eminent Person’s Group on Advocacy for Children and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) pg. 57.
4
These programmes are described in depth
IRC and UNHRCR refer to “The International Rescue Committee Education Programme for Refugee in Guinea, 1991–1998: A Best Practice Study”
5
Mauro de Lorenzo, Doug, Michael Dockrey, Art Hansen and Anna Schowengerdt. Field Report: Refugee Repatriation and Electoral Participation in Liberia. Refugee Policy
Group. June 1997. pg. 3.
6
Governement of Liberia. (2000) Challenges and Opportunities for Fulfilling the Rights of the Child in War Torn Liberia: Situational Analysis. A report joingly commissioned
by the Government of LIberia, The Eminent Person’s Group on Advocacy for Children and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) pg. 58.
11
Wendy Smith, IRC Education Technical Advisor, June 20, 2002.
12
David Walker, IRC communication, April 2002.
13
Governement of Liberia. (2000) Challenges and Opportunities for Fulfilling the Rights of the Child in War Torn Liberia: Situational Analysis. A report joingly commissioned
by the Government of LIberia, The Eminent Person’s Group on Advocacy for Children and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) pg. 15.
14
Ibid. pg. 15.
Resource centers
Parent Teacher Association
training and grants
Education Coordinator
Assistant Education
Coordinator
15
IRC [1999] BPRM [Bu . pg. 15.
16
Comments on Phase III Strategy Paper From Education Staff, November Base, To: David [Walker] and Mark [Merrell], September 1, 1999.
19
Interview with Sustainable Development Promoters, Monrovia.
20
Ibid.
21
When non-rice food aid was being provided, many piggeries were started. However, with the scaling down of food aid the piggeries are in a crisis and the price of bran is
rising.
22
Seed banks are special cement storage facilities for farmers to save rice for farming or await a better price. Typically farmers can “borrow” one bag for a growing season
of rice, returning 1.5 bags at harvest.
QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION: CAPACITY the IRC Guinea program. The focus instead
BUILDING OF TEACHERS would be on putting resources into and as close
to the schools as possible through the develop-
Part of the refugees’ decision to repatriate and ment of (1) a mentoring program for trained
resettle was based upon the quality of educa- and untrained teachers and (2) resource centers
tion being offered in Liberia. In this instance, for teachers and students.
the Liberian refugees had to choose between
a cost-free refugee education system of proven Mentor Program
quality and a fee-requiring government system
Based upon the Guinea program, the IRC
of dubious quality. While little could be done
established a teacher-mentoring program in
about the cost of schooling, quality could be
which professional teachers “mentored” trained
improved by providing support for the trained
and untrained teachers within their school to
and untrained teachers. Due to the large num-
improve their planning and classroom skills.
bers of teachers, the distance between schools
The mentor teachers were chosen from exist-
and difficulties in transportation, the IRC deter-
ing teachers within a school using the following
mined that it was not possible to hold trainings
criteria:
for all of the teachers, as was the hallmark of
23
IRC Bong County and Lower Lofa Field Office, EPM’s Report on Program Activities, June 1–30, 2000.
��������������������
sional training, as well as providing a means ���
for them to continue to learn and possibly be
chosen for training at the government training
institutes such as Zorzor Rural Teacher Training ���
Institute (ZRTTI). Interestingly, the schools in
more rural Bong County had a higher percent-
���
age of volunteers.
���
���������� ������������ ���������� ������������ ����������
24
BPRM Final Program Report, for Period June 1 1998 to August 31, 1999. International Rescue Committee. Liberia.
25
Education Program Report, June 2000. International Rescue Committee.
26
Internal IRC memo from Sue Dwyer [n.d.].
Improved Teaching and Students, teachers and schools were prepared for class and Lack of set literature books for secondary
Learning learning. students (Things Fall Apart, Animal Farm,
West African Poetry and Verse). Distribute
as classroom sets to the schools.
Reinforced Equity of Teachers stated that the distributions were important Include a human rights component to
Students and Teachers because they treated all students equally. distribution activities to reinforce equity
among children.
Negative Impact Indicator Strategies for Mitigation
Unsustainable and IRC staff stated that it was unsustainable and created a Identify strategies to decrease the cost
creates a feeling of feeling of dependency. of school materials. For example, PTAs
dependency could buy exercise books at cost from the
IRC to sell to students at a cheaper rate
than local shops. The IRC would provide
the transport costs, or connect schools
with UNICEF/ MOE/CREDO initiative to
distribute textbooks at cost to schools.
This should be done in a way that does
not provide further barriers for the most
vulnerable children to access school.
Negatively impacted sur- Students and teachers migrated from non-IRC schools, caus- Inequity among schools is unavoidable.
rounding schools ing some degree of overcrowding.
Utilization and need Students commented that they would have preferred more Assessment and subsequent modification
exercise books instead of pens, pencils and sharpeners. of student, teacher and school kits.
Significant lack of chalk for teachers and for preschool
students.
31
BPRM Final Program Report, For Period June 1998, to August 31, 1999. International Rescue Committee. Liberia
32
Girls Social Club Survey, October 2000.
33
FAWE (Forum for African Women Educationalists) Liberia. Results of the Girls’ Education Survey. Ministry of Education, Monrovia, Liberia.
34
Report on the Planning and Evaluation Workshop convened by IRC on March 29, 2000, in Ganta, Nimba County.
���� �����
���
���
�������������������
���
���
���
��� �� ������� ������� ������� ������� ������� ������� ������� ������� ������� �������� �������� ��������
�����������
����
����� ������� ����� ������� �����
���� ���� ���� ���� ����
TABLE 33: Indicators for Quality Education and the IRC’s Contribution
Type of Description The IRC’s contribution to quality
Quality
Inputs Provision of resources and The IRC provided adequate seating and blackboards for most schools, as well as
facilities furniture for teachers and school administrators.
Created resource centers including research materials and teaching materials.
Students, teachers and administrators had sufficient materials.
Process The use of the educational Students and teachers used all of the materials provided.
inputs Mentoring program increased classroom preparation and classroom performance of
teachers.
Contents Curriculum The IRC did not work directly with national student curriculum development.
Value Added Extent to which the school Input into national teacher training curriculum.
system has improved Re-opening of Zorzor Teacher Training College.
Training and reinforcement of the roles of CEOs and DEOs and subsequent training
of school administrators.
Improved community participation (PTAs) in the management and running of the
school.
Supported the LMOE to improve the coordination and management of educational
assistance.
Equity Students and teachers, Increase in girls’ attendance.
regardless of gender, ethnic- Increase in female teachers.
ity, religion, have access to
educational services Integrated multi-ethnic classes.
Outputs Consequences of educa- Students in IRC schools were passing above the national average.
tion: cognitive achievement, In some cases, IRC-supported schools passed higher than private schools.
employment, earning, etc.
Reputation Students’, Parents’ and IRC-supported schools in Liberia were viewed as better than non-supported LMOE
Community’s perception of schools due to material inputs, as well as teacher and administrative support.
quality The IRC had a reputation of implementing quality education programs.
Williams, James H. “On School Quality and Attainment” in Crisp, Jeff, and Christopher Talbot and Daiana Cipollone (eds), Learning for a Future: Refugee Education in
35
Impact Statement Extracted from IRC Proposals to repatriate is based upon refugees deciding
1998/1999: The goal of this project is to support the repatria-
whether it is in their best interests to return. In
tion and reintegration of Liberian refugees by transferring the Liberian situation, the refugees consistently
successful refugee education programs from Guinea to Liberia stated that they were eager to return home but
and linking them with a program to revitalize the school sys- the primary obstacles were security and lack of
tems in Liberia’s Bong, Lofa and Nimba Counties.
social services, such as education and health
1999/2000: The goal of this project is to support the repatria-
care.36 It is in this light that UNHCR, the initial
tion and reintegration of Liberian refugees while continuing the
process of transferring successful refugee education programs primary donor, supported rebuilding roads,
from Guinea to Liberia and linking them with an ongoing pro- agricultural support and the rehabilitation of
gram to revitalize the school system in target counties of return� schools and health clinics. Whether this support
Nimba, Bong and Lofa Counties.
was sufficient was up to the refugees, and three
2000/2001: The provision of high-quality education will contrib- years after the program it is difficult to ascertain
ute to the cognitive growth of students and increase their social
and economic development. In the final year of a three-year how influential education was in the repatriation
program, IRC will work with local communities and the Ministry process.
of Education to provide the necessary training in order to make
public schools functional and effective in Bong, Nimba and As seen in Figure 5, refugees could return in
Lofa Counties. These schools will support and encourage the two ways. One option was to register with
continued repatriation of Liberian refugees to their home com- UNHCR for “facilitated return” and be provided
munities.
with transportation back to their home village
To understand the IRC’s overall impact, it is and material support upon their arrival, or they
necessary to dissect the Liberian repatriation could “spontaneously return” using their own
and reintegration process. First, the decision money. From discussion with returnees, most
REINTEGRATION
REPATRIATION Refugees able to participate
RESETTLEMENT
Refugees make a in larger Liberian society
Refugees return to their home regardles of refugee/IDP
well-informed decision to
villages and towns. status, gender, reilgious or
return to Liberia.
ethnic group.
Became IDPs
Joined large numbers of IDPs in urban
areas such as Ganta and Obanga awaiting
improved security and infrastructure.
36
Mauro de Lorenzo, Doug, Michael Dockrey, Art Hansen and Anna Schowengerdt. Field Report: Refugee Repatriation and Electoral Participation in Liberia. Refugee Policy
Group. June 1997. pg. 2.
40
Mauro de Lorenzo, Doug, Michael Dockrey, Art Hansen and Anna Schowengerdt. Field Report: Refugee Repatriation and Electoral Participation in Liberia. Refugee Policy
Group. June 1997. pg. 3.
41
Ibid. pg. 3.
Repatriation: returning to one’s home or vil- c. Interviews with other agencies working in
lage of origin. the education sector
UPDATED CALENDAR
Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
Scheduling and Complete assessment tool Felix and Yourfee go Schools Closed
selection of Compiling school information/train- to inform schools, Finalize assessment
schools ing DEO/CEOs methodology for New
1 Carl meets with CEO York and IRC Liberia
and IRC Staff review
Ongoing review of
files
Training and trail Divide into two teams and assess six IRC schools a day in Assess information Schools closed
in a Bong school Bong County, including the rice mill being received and Review and compila-
Redesign of where necessary tion of data
assessment adjust methodology
2 Ongoing review of
instrument Yourfee to travel to files
inform schools in
Nimba Transfer to Nimba
County
Divide into two teams and assess six IRC schools Review of two Meet with Nimba CEO Review of data
Meeting with DEO and CEOs non-IRC schools/ and travel to Bong and formulation of
3 assess and com- findings
pile information
Resource Centers
INCLUSION
PTA training Refugees participate
Functioning Parent freely in the larger
Teacher Associations Liberian society
Support for PTA project without fear of
discrimination due to
School statistics and Monitoring of schools gender or ethnicity or
twice-monthly verification and communities violence
Equitable schools
Girls’ Tracking Form
Support for girls’
education
Girls’ Social Clubs
�������
�������
��� �������
�������
��
���
���
���������� ������������ ���������� ������������ ����������
����
��������
���� ��������
��������
����
�������
����
�������
���� �������
�������
����
���������� ������������ ���������� ������������ ����������
�������
���
�������
�������
�������
���
��
���
���
���������� ������������ ���������� ������������ ����������
����
��������
��������
����
��������
�������
�������
����
�������
�������
����
���������� ������������ ���������� ������������ ����������