Cummins vs Perkins

Feature Cummins QSX15- Perkins 2506A-

G8 E15TAG2
Power output 500 kVA @ 1500 RPM 500 kVA @ 1500 RPM
Fuel consumption 13.5 gallons per hour 14.5 gallons per hour
Emissions EPA Tier 4 Final EPA Tier 3
Durability More durable Less durable
Engine design More advanced Less advanced
Materials Higher-quality materials Lower-quality materials
Manufacturing More rigorous manufacturing Less rigorous manufacturing
process process process
Reliability More reliable Less reliable
Customer support Stronger customer support Weaker customer support
network network
Brand reputation Better brand reputation Worse brand reputation
Weight 7,500 lbs 6,500 lbs
Dimensions 120" L x 72" W x 96" H 108" L x 60" W x 84" H

Conclusion:
The Cummins QSX15-G8 is the better engine for most applications. It is more powerful,
more fuel-efficient, and more durable. It also has a stronger customer support network and a
better brand reputation. The only real advantage that the Perkins engine has is that it is
slightly lighter and smaller. However, this advantage is not significant enough to outweigh
the advantages of the Cummins engine.

However, the extra weight and size of the Cummins engine are not a significant disadvantage.
In fact, the extra weight and size can actually be an advantage in some applications. For
example, the extra weight can help to dampen vibrations and reduce noise. The extra size can
also provide more space for additional components, such as a cooling system or a fuel tank.