Professional Documents
Culture Documents
: 03 Archaeological Anthropology
Module : 05 Absolute dating methods
Development Team
Dr. M. K. Singh
Paper Coordinator
Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi
Dr. K. Polley
Content Writer Department of Anthropology, Haldia Government College
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
Description of Module
Module Id 05
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
1. Introduction
Absolute dating determines the age of an object in calendrical years. There are many such dating
methods such as C14 or Carbon 14 method of dating, U238 method of dating, K-Ar or Potassium-Argon
method of dating etc. Any of these methods is not applicable for all archaeological findings. Because
the age range of each method is applicable for a particular time span and any archaeological object is
not applicable for all methods of dating. Thus each method has its own time limit and object or
material specialty e.g. C14 method is applicable only on organic materials, while K-Ar method is
applicable on volcanic deposits.
When a number of geological samples are tested in any absolute dating method, such type of absolute
dating is known as ‘chronometric dating method’. The dates that result from such multiple testing, are
combined and expressed statistically. On the basis of basic principles or methods, used in a particular
dating the absolute dating methods can be divided into four basic categories: a) radio-isotopic methods,
which are based on the rate of atomic disintegration in a sample or its surrounding environment; (b)
paleomagnetic (correlation) methods, which rely on past reversals of the Earth's magnetic field and
their effects on a sample; (c) organic and inorganic chemical methods, which are based on time-
dependent chemical changes in the sample, or chemical characteristics of a sample; and (d) biological
methods, which are based on the growth of an organism to date the substrate on which it is found
(Bradley, 1999:47-48).
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
While there are many advantages to absolute-dating methods, all were developed outside the discipline
of archaeology and thus require rigorous bridging arguments that link the dated event obtained to the
archaeological event of interest. Furthermore, the technical sophistication of many absolute-dating
methods is costly in terms of specialized expertise and equipment. Even so, these methods offer
archaeologists the possibility to assess the age of archaeological events with greater precision and
accuracy than ever before (Truncer, 2008, cited in Pearsall, 2008).
Fig 1: Schematic Diagram showing Carbon cycle and cycle of C14 in nature (After, Bradley, 1999:52).
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
There are several ways to measure the amount of C14 in a sample. The most common technique is to
measure the emission of beta-rays when the C14 isotope decays into N14. However, since the decay
transition is a rare occurrence during the actual analysis of the sample, relatively large samples are
needed to obtain sufficient counting statistics, and limits analysis to samples less than 30, 000 years
old. Another technique uses atomic mass spectrometry (AMS) to separate out C 14 atoms by weight and
counts their occurrence. This more recent technique has reduced the sample size of charcoal to 5 mg,
and extended the age limit of radiocarbon dating back to about 55, 000 years. A major refinement in
the precision of radiocarbon dating has been the development of calibration curves that take into
account the fact that production of radiocarbon in the atmosphere has not been constant over time. For
the last several thousand years, calibration curves are obtained by C 14 dating samples from the annular
rings of trees, the true age of which is known through dendrochronology. The radiocarbon age
estimates in different years are then calibrated to fit the dendrochronological age, and the resulting
calibration curves can then be used to improve the precision of radiocarbon age estimates for samples
of unknown age. Beyond the limits of dendrochronology, radiocarbon calibration curves have been
produced through U/Th and TL dating (Truncer, 2008, cited in Pearsall, 2008).
As the abundance ratios of the isotopes of potassium are known, the K40 content can be derived from a
measurement of total potassium content, or by measurement of another isotope K 39. Because of the
relatively long half-life of K40, the production of argon is extremely slow. Hence, it is very difficult to
apply the technique to samples younger than -100,000 years and its primary use has been in dating
volcanic rocks formed over the last 30 million years (though, theoretically, rocks as old as 10 9 years
could be dated by this method) (Bradley, 1999).
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
2.3 Uranium Series Dating:
Uranium Series dating is based on the fact that when calcite (or other forms of calcium carbonate) are
formed they normally uranium but not thorium, because of the different chemical properties of these
two elements. However, as time passes the uranium undergoes radioactive decay producing thorium so
old calcite does contain thorium (Parkes, 1986).
Thus, if one knows the concentration of uranium in the newly formed calcite, one can work out how
old the calcite is by measuring the amount of thorium present today. The technique is thus, in some
ways, the reverse of C14 dating, since in it one measures the amount of the daughter nuclide that has
been produced rather than the amount of the parent that remains (Parkes, 1986). Uranium series dating
is the only method that can provide absolute dates in the period 30,000 to 100,000 years B.P when
neither conventional C14 nor K-Ar dating are possible.
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
annual dose rate. ‘Thermoluminescence dating’ (TL), ‘optically stimulated luminescence’ (OSL),
‘infrared stimulated luminescence’ (IRSL), and ‘electron spin resonance’ (ESR) are all examples of
dosimetric, or ‘trapped charge dating’ methods. All electrons in a mineral are in a ground state when it
is originally formed or reset due to subsequent light or heat energy. In dosimetrically sensitive minerals
(e.g., feldspars, quartz, and calcite), exposure to naturally occurring radiation will reposition some
electrons away from atoms in the ground state to a higher energy state known as a conduction band.
Over time, most electrons will return to their ground states, but some will become trapped at defect
sites in the lattice structures of the mineral. Electrons have the potential to accumulate in these lattice
defects with the passage of time until all defects are filled and saturation is reached. In the laboratory,
energy in the form of light (OSL, IRSL) or heat (TL) can be imparted on the sample to activate the
trapped electrons, which then either return to the ground state or recombine with luminescence centers
and emit light or luminescence. Luminescence is then measured fairly precisely using a photomultiplier
resulting in accurate estimates of total dose. ESR measures the number of trapped electrons differently
by bombarding the sample with microwaves in a magnetic field. An ESR spectrometer then records the
amount of microwave absorption which is proportional to the number of trapped electrons and holes,
which in turn produces the age estimate. The precision of ESR is far less than luminescence methods,
but an advantage lies in its nondestructive measurement process that allows multiple measurements to
be taken on the same sample (Truncer, 2008, cited in Pearsall, 2008).
Estimating the annual dose in using luminescence methods is complex and can be prone to substantial
error factors. Annual dose is received both from concentrations of radioactive elements in the sample
itself, as well as external environmental sources. Only the ionizing effects of gamma and cosmic rays
need to be considered in calculating the external dose rate since short range beta and alpha ray
contributions can be eliminated with the removal of the outer 2mm of the sample. Internal dose rate,
however, is primarily due to alpha and beta rays emitted from radioactive elements in the sample and
need to be measured. Dose rate is dependent on radioactivity originating from the U, Th, and K40 decay
chains with minor sediment contributions from Rb 87. One factor that can negatively affect the precision
of trapped charge dating is dis-equilibriumin the U-series decay chains, which complicates dose rate
calculations and may increase the uncertainty of age estimates. Other attenuating factors on radiation
such as moisture content and latitude also need to be accounted for. The overall precision of trapped
charge dating methods, however, can be as low as 6–7%, a rate that compares favorably with other
radiometric dating methods (Truncer, 2008, cited in Pearsall, 2008).
A central advantage of trapped charge dating methods is one of accuracy. The events dated are the
growth of a crystalline structure such as bone or tooth enamel (ESR), exposure to temperatures in
excess of 5000 C during manufacture or subsequent firing events, typically ceramics or heated lithics
(TL), or the last exposure of archaeologically relevant sediments to sunlight (OSL, IRSL). These
7
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
events are often of direct interest to archaeologists, and thus trapped charge dating methods possess the
potential to yield ‘archaeological chronologies’ of overall higher precision than other dating methods
with intrinsically high methodological precision such as radiocarbon dating (Truncer, 2008, cited in
Pearsall, 2008).
Fig 2: Microscopic view of fission tracks on natural glass surface (from http://www.ion-tracks.de/nuc/4/3/2.html last
accessed on 03.07.2015 at 08.15 pm.).
8
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
2.6 Archaeomagnetic or Paleomagnetic Dating:
Archaeomagnetism, or ‘archaeomagnetic dating’, is a method that pursues correlating an event of
archaeological interest with the position of Earth’s magnetic north (which is continually changing).
These magnetic positions can provide absolute dates during the time interval of the last few thousand
years once they are correlated with dates derived from other methods, such as radiocarbon. Magnetic
materials such as iron will tend to align themselves according to the direction of the Earth’s magnetic
field at any particular time and place. If these magnetic materials are in fired contexts, such as in
archaeological hearth or kiln features, the direction of magnetic north can be preserved to a degree that
dating the firing event is possible. Archaeomagnetic dating requires constructing reference curves, or a
master sequence of direction change in magnetic north, using the orientation of samples of known age
based on historical records or, more commonly, radiocarbon dating. These master sequences need to be
constructed for each region of study because secular variation in magnetic north is regionally specific.
Archaeomagnetic dating is often used in concert with other available dating methods, although it is
extensively used in some areas, such as the American Southwest. Another form of magnetic dating
documents reversal events of the Earth’s north and south magnetic poles by analyzing the magnetic
properties of minerals in preserved sediments. This dating method is sometimes known as
‘Paleomagnetism or Paleomagnetic Dating Method’. Documenting reversed polarity events has proved
to be a robust relative-dating method, but can only provide general age estimates and is restricted to
relatively old archaeological contexts (Truncer, 2008, cited in Pearsall, 2008).
Now a day a paleomagnetic time scale is established on the basis of the paleomagnetic dating of
volcanic rocks and sediments. In this scale dating has concentrated on three main boundaries, the
Brunhes/Matuyama (0.7 mya.), the Matuyama/Gauss (2.47 mya.) and the Gauss/Gilbert (3.4 mya.). In
each case the age of the boundary has been established on the basis of average of a number of K-Ar
dates (Walker and Lowe, 1984:264; Walker, 2005:216-217).
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
Fig 3: The Paleomagnetic timescale of last 3.5 million years. Black areas in the scale indicate the periods of normal
polarity; white areas show episodes of reversed polarity. K-Ar ages are shown on the left hand side; astronomically turned
ages from deep sea cores are on the right (after, Walker and Lowe, 1984; Walker, 2005:217)
2.7 Dendrochronology:
Dendrochronology or ‘Tree Ring Method of Dating’ uses the unique patterns of varying tree ring
widths in some tree species that are sensitive to climate and precipitation fluctuation. By linking
10
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
multiple tree samples of different ages, master sequences of this patterning have been built that extend
back thousands of years. Samples of unknown age can then be fitted against this master sequence to
derive an age estimate. One of the principal advantages of dendrochronology is its high precision, with
the potential to identify the exact year in which an event took place. The development of
dendrochronology was remarkable achievements that occurred well before the advent of radiometric
dating techniques such as radiocarbon dating, and both methods continue to be used today (Truncer,
2008, cited in Pearsall, 2008).
Fig 4: Glaciolacustrine varves exposed in southern Finland, These varved sediments were deposited in the Baltic Ice Lake
which formed during the northward retreat of last Fenoscandian Ice Sheet (after, Walker, 2005).
11
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
The potential of varves as a basis for dating was initially recognized by the Swedish geologist Gerard
de Geer who, in 1884, made the first attempt to count and correlate varve sequences in the Stockholm
area of Sweden. His aim was to use the varved sequences that had accumulated in front of the decaying
Fennoscandian ice sheet to establish a timescale for deglaciation. After this work varve chronology has
subsequently been applied in a range of other lacustrine contexts of Europe (Walker, 2005:132-133).
2.9 Lichenometry:
Lichens are composite plants consisting of algae and fungi. Lichens could be used as basis for dating
was first suggested by the Austrian scientist Roland Beschel in a paper published in 1950. Lichens are
rapid colonizers of bare surfaces and, once established, there is a progressive increase in size of the
thallus by slow marginal growth. Hence, the larger the thallus (in terms of its diameter), the older the
lichen, and the greater the time that has elapsed since colonization. Where a surface has been exposed
to lichen colonization (following glacier retreat, for example), provided that (a) the growth rates of the
lichens are known, and (b) no significant time interval has elapsed between surface exposure (in this
case deglaciation) and lichen colonization, an estimate can be made for the timing of substrate
exposure by measuring the size of the lichen thalli on that surface. It was on the basis of these two key
principles that Beschel developed the technique of lichenometry (Walker, 2005).
By measuring lichen thallus diameters (usually the largest lichen) on surfaces of known age, lichen
growth rates can be established and used to construct a growth curve showing the relationship between
lichen size and age. Surfaces of known age (referred to as fixed points) might include humanly
constructed features such as building walls or gravestones, or natural features such as rock surfaces
whose ages might be inferred from old photographs or historical records. Once the growth curve has
been developed, surfaces of unknown age can be dated by relating lichen diameters on those surfaces
to the growth-rate curve, thereby deriving a calendar age (Walker, 2005).
Fig 5: Rhizocarpon geographicum, a lichen that grows radially, efiables substrates to be dated if the growth rate of the
lichen is known.This specimen, growing on pyroxene-granulite gneiss in the glacier foreland of Hogvaglbreen
(jotunheimen, southern Norway) is growing at > I.I mm a -1 (based on measurements from 1981-1996).The calipers are
open at 10 cm (after, Bradley, 1999).
12
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
3. Major Absolute Dating Methods and Their Important Features
4. Summery
13
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods
Dendrochronology or ‘Tree Ring Method of Dating’ uses a master sequence of the unique patterns
of varying tree ring widths in some tree species to date ancient tree trunks used by prehistoric
people to make different objects.
In Varve chronology annually deposited horizontal bedded layers of lake sediments are used to
establish chronology of human activity and past climatic fluctuations in a region.
Lichenometry measures age of an object on the basis of the growth pattern of lichen on a particular
object.
14
Archaeological Anthropology
Anthropology
Absolute dating methods