Professional Documents
Culture Documents
John Locke
• English philosopher whose works lie at the foundation of modern
philosophical empiricism and political liberalism.
• His writings are among the most important texts for epistemology,
metaphysics, politics, religion, and pedagogy.
• He is widely regarded as one of the most influential of Enlightenment
thinkers and commonly known as the "Father of Liberalism".
• His theory of mind is often cited as the origin of modern conceptions of identity
and the self, figuring prominently in the work of later philosophers such as
Jean-Jacques Rousseau, David Hume, and Immanuel Kant
Reporter Note:
Negative associations in Locke's terms mean any influence that deters a person to
develop good habits.
Toleration is allowing of any religion or belief for any person in the country.
John Locke – Just Government
• Rights-based Ethics (Natural Rights theory)
o Natural Rights – certain basic, important, inalienable entitlements that
SHOULD be respected and protected in any action.
o People are born with natural rights, and the Government exists to
protect those natural rights.
o Locke argues that a person entails having rights to:
✓ Life
✓ Liberty
✓ Property acquired from one’s own labour.
❖ His view of Rights and Politics have inspired the Declaration of
Independence by Thomas Jefferson (1776), and the French Revolution (1789).
Reporter Note:
- Declaration of Independence was originally named " The unanimous
Declaration of the thirteen united States of America".
- Rights based Ethics is now derived into the theory of Social Contract.
Summary:
John Locke is an English philosopher who has influenced a great deal of
succeeding philosophers.
He believed that a man is born with a blank slate (tabula rasa). And he believed
that to fill our blank slate, we experience things and sense phenomenon.
Locke also supported Rights-based Ethics in that each person has inalienable
rights (Natural Rights) that must be respected by the Government and that no ruler is
divinely ordained. He/she and his/her Government will be replaced if it has been found
that the Government does not respect the rights of the people.
• Principle of Benevolence
• Rational concern for the welfare of others
• Principle of Self-love
• Enables us to evaluate the desirability of specific actions within
the context of our long‐range happiness.
• Core of Butler’s rejection of psychological Egoism
• Principle of Reflection / Conscience
• The power to deliberate rationally over conflicting motives,
called conscience.
• When a person morally acts, he or she acts with a moral sense
of right and wrong.
Summary:
Moral Sense Theory is a moral theory that relies on feelings to determine right
from wrong. Also known as Moral Sentimentalism, it relies on personal experiences that
generate emotional responses to determine the morality of an action.
Anthony Ashley-Cooper (Lord Shaftesbury) was one of the first persons to use
the term "moral sense" and formulate what is now Moral Sense Theory. He
characterizes our moral sense similar to how we are attracted to beauty and repelled to
ugliness.
Joseph Butler on the other hand relates our moral sense to concern for others
(Benevolence), to Self-love, and to our power to deliberate rationally over conflicting
motives (Conscience).
Ethics in Politics
Political Ethics
(public morality or public ethics)
➔ The practice of making moral judgments into political action, and
also the study of that practice.
• Divided into two branches:
o Ethics of process
o deals with public officials and their methods.
o Ethics of policy
o concerns with judgments about policies and laws.
Reporter Note:
"The End Justifies the Means", for policy ethics. Value of the outcome justifies
the methods used.
Summary:
Political Ethics is an ethical approach to any political move.
It is divided into two types: the Ethics of Process, and Ethics of Policy.
Leaders and politicians may be forced to use immoral methods in order to solve
problems and maintain authority, that the end or outcome might justify the process that
made it happen.
There are many sectors in society that such valued-outcome-against-unethical-
process is observed, like in Criminal Punishment, Welfare, Education, Freedom of
Speech, Scientific Endeavors, etc.
References:
❖ Korab-Karpowicz, W. Julian (2010). A History of Political Philosophy: From
Thucydides to Locke. New York: Global Scholarly Publications. p. 291.
❖ Baird, Forrest E.; Walter Kaufmann (2008). From Plato to Derrida. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. pp. 527–29. ISBN 978-0-13-158591-1.
❖ Locke, John (1997b), Woolhouse, Roger (ed.), An Essay Concerning Human
Understanding, New York: Penguin Books
❖ The American International Encyclopedia, vol. 9, New York: JJ Little Co, 1954.
❖ https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Locke
❖ https://iep.utm.edu/locke-et
❖ https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-
and-press-releases/moral-sense
❖ https://www.britannica.com/topic/moral-sense
❖ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-sentimentalism/
❖ https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy/Machiavelli
❖ Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of. Characteristics of Men,
Manners, Opinions, Times. London, 1711. Reprint, edited by Lawrence E.
Klein. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
❖ http://www.iep.utm.edu/butler/
❖ Stephen L. Darwall, "Introduction" to Joseph Butler, Five Sermons.
Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983.
❖ https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/self-interest-social-order-classical-
liberalism-joseph-butler
❖ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/butler-moral
❖ https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/dft/files/political_ethics-revised_10-11.pdf
❖ Strauss, Leo (2014-07-04). Thoughts on Machiavelli. University of
Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226230979.
❖ Thompson, Dennis F. (2005). "The Problem of Many Hands". Restoring
Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business and Healthcare. Cambridge
University Press. pp. 11–32. ISBN 9780521547222
❖ https://www.scu.edu/government-ethics/resources/what-is-
government-ethics/conflicts-of-interest-in-government/
❖ Beitz, Charles. "Review Article: International Liberalism and Distributive
Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought," World Politics 51 (1999), pp. 269-296.