1

Management of Risks in Major Infrastructure Projects

Student name

Course name

Tutor

Institutional name

Assignment due date

 2

A risk management system enables a company or an individual to take actions to

comprehend and regulate particular harmful occurrences and overall risks, increase possibilities

or accomplishments, minimize problems, and achieve effectiveness. These goals can be

accomplished via the use of the system. It requires a sufficient amount of ambiguity to figure out

anything that does not go according to plan. Risks could be deemed beneficial, potential

expansion opportunities, or unfavorable conditions (Kaplan & Mikes, 2012). A situation or

occurrence is considered to be a risk whenever there is the possibility that it would obstruct the

achievement of specific goals.

According to the findings of this case study, the following are some of the risks

associated with the project, as well as four strategies that can be utilized to mitigate those risks

and increase the likelihood of the project's success.

Project Risks Faced:

1. Uncertainty in Regulatory Requirements: Major construction projects are usually

constrained by various regulatory requirements, which may change or evolve over time.

Because of the unpredictability of the situation, the project's timeline, budget, and overall

viability may all be jeopardized.

2. Stakeholder resistance and opposition: Several groups representing a range of objectives

are frequently involved in large-scale building projects. Client rejection and aversion can

result in execution interruptions, litigation, adverse publicity, and more significant

expenses for the project (Rodrigues-da-Silva & Crispim, 2014). Stakeholder opposition

and resistance might come from nearby residents or conservation groups.

 3

3. Cost Overruns and Budgetary Constraints: Major construction projects are susceptible to

price delays for various reasons, including but not limited to rising prices; unanticipated

technological challenges; alterations to magnitude; and inadequate initial cost predictions.

The project's progress could be impeded by budgetary constraints, which could put its

completion at risk.

4. Supply chain disruptions and construction delays: Massive construction projects

typically involve various vendors, craftspeople, and independent contractors. When work

is delayed or interruptions in the supply chain, such as insufficient supplies or arguments

over wages, it can have a detrimental impact on project schedules, leading to additional

expenses and legal concerns.

5. Environmental Risk: Performing thorough evaluations of the project's potential

environmental consequences, developing and implementing appropriate mitigation

strategies, and ensuring continued compliance with all applicable legal requirements are

required at this stage.

6. Technological Risk: Managing the technological risk requires a rigorous review, quality

assurance systems, the employment of seasoned professionals in the sector, and a

stringent adherence to regulatory regulations (Rodrigues-da-Silva & Crispim, 2014).

Risk Response Strategies and Implementation:

1. Risk Mitigation: Adopting precautions to lessen the chance or effect of recognized risks

is critical to reducing risks. For instance: by developing solid financial budgeting and

tracking procedures, carrying out routine cost analyses, and setting up money for

emergencies. Addressing issues and coordinating goals through frequent involvement in

 4

stakeholder meetings, defined duties and obligations, and successful means of contact.

Carrying out thorough environmental impact analyses, putting preventative measures into

place, and guaranteeing adherence to applicable laws throughout the project lifespan

(Thomas, 2022). And technological risk through implementing stringent adherence to

industry standards, using qualified technical specialists, and extensive evaluation

alongside quality assurance procedures.

2. Risk Transfer: Risk transfer strategies involve delegating the responsibility for mitigating

risk to another organization, typically via contracts or insurance policies. Instances

comprise: putting financial burdens on suppliers utilizing appropriate contract clauses,

such as restitution or accomplishment securities, which hold suppliers accountable for

increased prices or decreased productivity. Interpersonal coordination can be avoided by

providing customers with well-defined commercial obligations and accomplishment

goals, ensuring they are responsible, and fostering cooperative behavior. To shift the cost

of any potential adverse environmental repercussions, requiring subcontractors to obtain

ecological covering could be beneficial (Kaplan & Mikes, 2012). The practice of

transferring legal responsibility for technical inaccuracies or defects by relying on

guarantees or commitments made by the companies that supply the relevant technology.

3. Risk Acceptance: Risks might occasionally be viewed as reasonable or inescapable.

Surveillance and backup measures must exist to deal with any effects. Examples

comprise: Developing savings or emergency cash to reduce potential price delay or

unanticipated costs is one way to minimize the risk in finance. And checking

relationships with stakeholders frequently and resolving problems or disputes as soon as

they occur. Constantly monitor the effects on the surroundings, interact with authorities,
 5

and swiftly fill any requirements or remediation deficiencies. Setting up extensive testing

and quality control procedures to quickly spot and fix technical flaws.

4. Risk Avoidance: Adopting preventative actions to lessen or eliminate specific hazards is

one approach that is included in risk avoidance strategies (Thomas, 2022). Some

examples are: o Monetary Risk: Before launching the project, undertaking extensive

economic viability evaluations and engaging in intense financial scrutiny. The Risk of

Communicating with Customers: Engaging in Success.

In conclusion, any organization is exposed to various risks, which could be favorable or

harmful. However, to successfully complete any project, there must first be a plan to deal

with the potential complications that may arise along the road. Before beginning any project,

it is necessary to understand any potential problems completely (Kaplan & Mikes, 2012).
 6

References

Shibboleth Authentication Request. (n.d.). Login.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org. https://www-

sciencedirect-com.csuglobal.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0263786313001324

Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012, June). Managing Risks: A New Framework. Harvard Business

Review. https://hbr.org/2012/06/managing-risks-a-new-framework

Thomas, C. (2022, January 20). Five Steps of Digital Risk Management Process | 360factors.

360factors.com. https://www.360factors.com/blog/five-steps-of-risk-management-

process/

Rodrigues-da-Silva, L. H., & Crispim, J. A. (2014). The Project Risk Management Process, a

Preliminary Study. Procedia Technology, 16, 943–949. sciencedirect.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.10.047