You are on page 1of 57

The origins of Sociology

A relatively new academic


discipline
The foundations of Sociology

• One of the youngest academic disciplines


• Auguste Comte coined the term Sociology
in 1838
• Comte used the term Sociology to
describe a new way of analysing and
understanding society
The foundations of Sociology

• 18th and 19th centuries in Europe were


characterised by two major social
transformations that changed society
- The French Revolution
- The Industrial Revolution
The foundations of Sociology

• These transformations in European


Societies changed the ways in which
society was organised in a number of
ways–for example
- The system of production changed
- Cities began to grow
- Political systems changed
The foundations of Sociology

• These transformations drove the


development of Sociology

• Unlike previous social thinkers Sociologists


were concerned with society as it existed
and not as it had existed in the past.
The Sociological Perspective –
Peter Berger

• Seeing the general in the particular


– Sociologists identify general social
patterns in the behavior of particular
individuals
• Individuals are unique but, society’s social
forces shape us into “kinds” of people
The Sociological Perspective –
Peter Berger

• Seeing the strange in the familiar


• Giving up the idea that human behavior is
simply a matter of what people decide to do
• Understanding that society shapes our lives
C. Wright Mills’ Sociological
Imagination
• The power of the sociological
perspective lies not just in
changing individual lives but in
transforming society
• Society, not people’s personal
failings is the cause of social
problems
C. Wright Mills’ Sociological
Imagination

• The sociological imagination


transforms personal problems into
public issues
Sociological Theory

• Theory: a statement of how and


why facts are related to each
other
Theoretical paradigm

• Theoretical paradigm: a set of


fundamental assumptions that
guides thinking
• An image / vision of society that
guides research and analysis
Sociological Theory

–Three major
approaches/theories
• Structural-functional/functionalism
• Social-conflict/conflict theory
• Symbolic-interaction/action theory
Functionalism

• The basics
– A macro-level orientation, concerned with
broad patterns that shape society as a
whole
– Views society as a complex system whose
parts work together to promote solidarity
and stability
Functionalism

• Key elements:
– Social structure refers to any relatively
stable patterns of social behavior found in
social institutions
– Social function refers to the
consequences for the operation of society
as a whole
Functionalists

• Auguste Comte
– Importance of social integration
during times of rapid change
• Emile Durkheim
– Helped establish sociology as a
university discipline
Functionalists

• Herbert Spencer
– Compared society to the human
body, organic approach
• Talcott parsons
– Sought to identify tasks that every
society must perform
Functionalists

• Robert K. Merton
– Manifest functions are recognized
and intended consequences
– Latent functions are unrecognized
and unintended consequences
– Social dysfunctions are undesirable
consequences
FUNCTIONALISM

• A Theoretical framework that views


society as a complex system whose parts
work together to promote solidarity and
stability
FUNCTIONALISM-MAIN FOCUS

• SOCIAL INTEGRATION
• SOCIAL SOLIDARITY
FUNCTIONALISM- KEY TERMS

• Social Structure – stable patterns of social


behaviour
• Social function
• Social integration
• Social solidarity
• Manifest functions = intended outcomes
• Latent functions = unintended outcomes
Conflict theory

The basics:
– A macro-oriented paradigm
– Views society as an arena of
inequality that generates conflict
and social change
Conflict theory

• Key elements:
– Society is structured in ways to
benefit a few at the expense of the
majority
– Factors such as race, sex, class, and
age are linked to social inequality
Conflict theory – key elements

– Dominant group vs. Minority group


relations
• Incompatible interests and major
differences
Conflict theorists
• Karl Marx
– The importance of social class in
inequality and social conflict

• W.E.B. DuBois
– Race as the major problem facing
the United States in the twentieth
century
Conflict theory

• A theoretical framework that views society


as a system characterised by social
inequality
• In essence conflict theory enables us to
see how inequality is rooted in the
organisation of society
Conflict theory

• It’s main focus:

- Social inequality
- Social conflict
- Social change
Conflict theory – key terms

• Social structure
• Social inequality
• Social institutions = sub-systems of
society
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• His main focus: - the economy as a social


institution that dominates all others in
directing society
• His main concern: - what he saw in the
early stages of industrial capitalism in
Europe
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• In his work Marx emphasised the impact


of economic factors in producing social
change and the nature of that change
• For Marx capitalism as an economic
system influences and shapes the modern
world
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• Two key concepts:


- the base – the economic base
- the superstructure – all other social
institutions built on and influenced by the
economic system/the base
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• For Marx the cause of social change is the


pressure experienced in society for
constant economic transformation and
change
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• For Marx society i.e. capitalist society is


divided into two groups or two social
classes:
• - the bourgeoisie – those who own the
means of production
• - the proletariate – the workers
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• Social conflict – is the struggle between


groups in society over valued resources
• - or the struggle between social classes
CONFLICT THEORY

• For all conflict theorists including Marx the


most significant type of social conflict is
between social classes and is caused by
the way in which society produces
material goods
CONFLICT THEORY – KARL MARX

• Historical materialism – which means that


how material goods are produced shapes
the rest of society
Conflict Theory and Functionalism

• Unlike the Functionalist approach conflict


theory highlights not social solidarity or
social integration but the existence of
divisions within society that are based on
inequalities
• Thus conflict theorists seek to isolate and
understand the causes of social inequality
in any one society
Conflict Theory and Functionalism

• The causes of social inequality lie in the


unequal distribution of a society’s
resources
• Examples of resources are:
- Money
- Power
- Education
- Social status and prestige
Conflict Theory and Functionalism

• Thus conflict theorists look at how the


unequal distribution of resources in any
society is linked to factors such as class,
ethnicity and gender in creating and
perpetuating social inequalities.
Conflict Theory and Functionalism

• Functionalism on the other hand identifies


the various social structures and the
functions of each one in society

- first the structure is recognized


- second it’s function is outlined
Conflict Theory and Functionalism

• Functionalism views society as a system of


inter-related parts that is relatively stable
and based on consensus (agreement) as
to what is morally desireable.
• Each part of society has a function / part /
role to play in the operation of society as a
whole
Critique of Functionalism

• The emphasis placed on social integration


means that no attention is paid to social
inequality
• How can society have a natural order
when social patterns vary from place to
place and change over time
Critique of conflict theory

• With its emphasis on social inequality and


conflict it fails to consider sets of shared
values and levels of interdependence
between individuals in society
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm

• The basics:
– A micro-level orientation, a close-up focus on
social interactions in specific situations
– Views society as the product of everyday
interactions of individuals
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm
• Key elements:
– Society is nothing more than the shared
reality that people construct as they interact
with one another
– Society is a complex, ever-changing mosaic of
subjective meanings
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm
• Considers how people orientate
themselves to each other and how they do
so on the basis of meanings
• Focus on how human meanings and action
shape society
• Notes that societies differ in the ways in
which their members think about the
world
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm

• Modern society is the product of


technological change but it is also the
product of new ways of thinking
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm
• Max Weber – founder of this perpsective
– Understanding a setting from the people
in it
- Considers how people orientate themselves to
each other and how they do so on the basis
of meanings
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm - Weber

• Focus on how human meanings and action


shape society
• Notes that societies differ in the ways in
which their members think about the
world
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm - Weber
• Weber’s ideal type:
- An abstract statement of the essential
though often exaggerated characteristics
of any social phenomenon
- Ideal types can be compared and
contrasted with actual empirical forms
found in society
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm
• George Herbert Mead
– How we build personalities from social
experience
– Focus on how we assemble our sense of
self over time based on our social
experience
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm - Mead
• Society emerges as a shared reality
that it’s members construct as they
interact with one another

• Through finding meaning in our


surroundings we define our identity,
rights and obligations towards others
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm - Mead

• Society is thus a mosaic of subjective


meanings
• His emphasis is largely on how individuals
experience society
Symbolic Interaction
Paradigm

• George Homans & Peter Blau


– Social-exchange analysis
Critical Evaluation

• Structural-Functional
– Too broad, ignores inequalities of social
class, race & gender, focuses on
stability at the expense of conflict
Critical Evaluation

• Social-Conflict
– Too broad, ignores how shared values
and mutual interdependence unify
society, pursues political goals
Critical Evaluation

• Symbolic-Interaction
– Ignores larger social structures, effects
of culture, factors such as class, gender
& race

You might also like