Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract—In recent years, more and more SiC power due to the smaller gate capacitance and the higher switching
semiconductor switches have become available, showing their speed. Also, for SiC MOSFET, the threshold gate voltage is
superior behavior for power electronics. To fully exploit the usually lower, about 2.5V [2].
potential of the SiC MOSFET, conventional gate drivers for
silicon devices must be adapted to this device due to its special Therefore, in a phase-leg configuration, to fully utilize the
requirements. An isolated gate driver for SiC MOSFETs with potential advantages of fast SiC devices and guarantee the
constant negative off voltage is presented in this paper. Firstly, reliability of the power converter, crosstalk should be
the isolation and the floating ground driving are provided by a suppressed.
coupled transformer. Then a negative turn-off voltage is realized
by a voltage clamp circuit made up of resistors, capacitors and A typical method in the engineering field is designing a
diode. Moreover, a controllable voltage is introduced to level shift circuit, as shown in Fig. 1(a). An isolated gate-drive
compensate the variable duty ratio and constant off voltage is chip is employed to drive the 2 power MOSFETs, and the Cb1,
achieved. As a result, the spurious turn-on phenomena of SiC Dn1, Rgd1 are the components of the level shift circuit.
MOSFETs can be avoided. As isolation, floating ground and
constant negative voltage with variable duty ratio are obtained,
the proposed gate driver can be widespread utilized in lots of
topologies.
I. INTRODUCTION
Recently, switching device performance has been enhanced
with the development of wide band-gap materials, which allow
higher temperature operation, reduced switching times, and
low conduction losses [1]. Compared to the silicon power
MOSFETs, the SiC power MOSFETs have the advantage such
as low gate-drive loss, low switching loss and low RDS(on). Also,
the SiC power MOSFET can still be operating under 600ºC,
which is significantly high compared with conventional Si
power MOSFETs. However, compared to Si power MOSFETs,
disadvantages such as lower threshold voltage and negative
gate-source breakdown voltage limit the applications of SiC
power MOSFETs in bridge circuits.
Usually, the gate drive circuit of the SiC power MOSFETs
in single switch topologies such as flyback converter, Boost
converter and CCFL converter do not require a negative
shutdown voltage. However, due to the higher switching speed
and smaller gate capacitance, during a fast switching event, the
miller capacitor current of the complementary device in the
bridge-leg configuration can significantly alter the gate voltage
of the switch and thus creates undesirable conditions, which is Fig. 1. A typical gate drive circuit in phase leg configuration (a) the scheme
called “crosstalk” between the switches in the same phase leg of the circuit (b) test results under 1MHz
[2]. This phenomenon is much more severe for SiC devices
R2 R1
Vgs dVd kVM (4)
R1 R2 R1 R2
1 n1 dVc
Vgs ( R2 kR1 )dVd kR1 (5)
Fig. 2. Proposed gate driver with constant negative voltage. R1 R2 n2 n1 n2 n1
Meanwhile, there are some important differences to In (5), there are two items which would vary with the duty
improve the gate driver performance. First, the negative ratio d. Among them, the second item contains the controllable
voltage clamp circuit consists of two capacitors, C1 and C2, AC generator Vc. In contrary, the first item would
two resistors, R1 and R2 and one clamp diode D. It is shown in monotonously increase with larger duty ratio as the driver
Fig. 2. With the negative voltage clamp circuit, the SiC MOS signal Vd is constant. Therefore, it is necessary to eliminate the
can be turned off with negative voltage. As C2 is paralleled
1991
first item of (5) by selecting proper values of R1, R2, k, n1 and
n2. From (5), the first item can be eliminated with following Vgs1
equation. 5V/div
-2V
R2 kn1
(6)
R1 n2 n1 d=0.7 d=0.7
Thus, with (5) and (6), the negative voltage across the gate- d=0.3
to-source terminals during the turn off interval in the proposed
gate driver can be deduced as -2V Vgs2
5V/div
kR1
Vgs dVc dVc (7)
( R1 R2 )(n2 n1 )
Time(2µs/div)
In (7), ε is a constant decided by R1, R2, k, n1 and n2. By
considering the transient response of the circuit and (6), the Fig. 4. Gate-source voltage waveforms with proposed gate driver.
value of these parameters can be selected [4]. Therefore, the
variable negative voltage can be compensated by the AC Meanwhile, the switching performance of the gate driver
generator Vc. The value of Vc changes with the variable duty would not be influenced by the auxiliary circuits including the
ratio d and keeps the negative voltage constant. Besides, in negative voltage clamp circuit and the duty ratio compensation
order to avoid large extent of the change scope of the AC circuit. The experimental waveforms in Fig.5 show the
generator Vc, the constant ε should be selected properly. switching performance of the SiC MOSFET of the tested
converter. The turn-on and turn-off speed of proposed gate
driver would not be limited. The turn on and turn off time of
IV. VERIFICATION AND DISCUSSION
the gate voltage are 207ns and 193ns, respectively. What’s
The proposed gate driver is built and tested in an more, zero voltage switching can be realized.
asymmetric phase-shifted full-bridge converter [8] with SiC
MOSFETs. The topology of the test converter is shown in Fig. TABLE 1. Key parameters of the proposed gate driver.
3, which is used as a battery charger. The input voltage is
R1 R2 C1 C2 k n1 n2 Vc
fixed at 310Vdc, and the load varies from 5A to 15A.
15k 50 0.47μ 0.22μ 1~10
2 3/4 1
Ω kΩ F F V
DR1 Lf
Q1 Q3
LR Tr Cf VO
..
Vin
.
Vpri Lm . Battery
Vgs1 Vds1
Load
5V/div 100V/div
Q2 Q4
DR2
Fig. 3. The asymmetric phase-shifted full-bridge topology of the test ZVS is achieved
converter.
The key parameters of the built gate driver are shown in Toff=193ns Ton=207ns
Table 1. Fig.4 shows the gate-source voltage waveforms of the
MOSFETs in the same leg. The switching frequency is about Time(500ns/div)
80 kHz and the duty ratios of the MOSFETS are both not
equal to 0.5. Specifically, they are 0.3 and 0.7 separately. It Fig. 5. Switching performance of the SiC MOSFET of the tested converter.
can be seen that the negative turn-off voltage is almost
constant at -2V with different duty ratios. Additionally,
voltage spike and ringing are hardly observed. V. CONCLUSION
An isolated gate driver for the safe operation of the SiC
MOSFETs is presented. By introducing a duty ratio
1992
compensation circuit, the negative turn-off voltage can be [2] Zheyue Zhang, Fred Wang, Leon Tolbert, B. J. Blalock, ‘A gate
constant even with variable duty ratio. To be specific, the assist circuit for cross talk suppression of SiC devices in a phase-
leg configuration’, IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and
negative off voltage keeps at -2V when the duty ratio varies
Exposition 2013, pp.2536-2543.
from 0.1 to 0.9. As the threshold gate voltage is usually lower [3] Hwu K I, Yau Y T, ‘A gate driver with negative and double
and there is a limited amount of negative voltage one can positive output voltages under positive-voltage source’, Applied
apply on the gate, the constant negative voltage applied on the Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2008. APEC 2008.
SiC MOSFETs provided by the proposed gate driver could Twenty-Third Annual IEEE. IEEE, 2008:627-629.
avoid the spurious turn-on phenomena. Moreover, the negative [4] Wang J, Chung S H, ‘A novel Rcd level shifter for elimination of
spurious turn-on in the bridge-Leg configuration,’ IEEE
voltage is constant with variable duty ratio. Experimental Transactions on Power Electronics, 2015, 30, (2), pp: 976 - 984.
results confirm the switching speed, the constant negative off [5] Z. Zhang, F. Wang, L. M. Tolbert, and B. J. Blalock, ‘Active gate
voltage and the good waveform shape of the proposed gate driver for cross talk suppression of SiC power devices in a phase-
driver. Thus the proposed gate driver can be widespread leg configuration,’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 4, Apr.
2014, pp. 1986–1997.
utilized in lots of topologies, especially for bridge-leg [6] Q. Zhao and G. Stojcic, “Characterization of Cdv/dt induced power
configurations. loss in synchronous buck DC-DC converters,” IEEE Trans. Power
Electron., vol. 22, no. 4, Jul. 2007, pp. 1505–1513.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS [7] Jose A. Carrasco, Alan H. Weinberg, Esteban Sanchis and Enrique
J. Dede, “A Conductance-Controlled Variable Transformer Turns
This work was supported by the Qing Lan Project and Ratio Regulator for a Zero-Voltage–Zero-Current Power Switching
Suzhou Application Basic Research Project (SYG201450). Converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 14, no. 6, Nov. 1999,
pp. 1070–1077.
[8] P. Das, M. Pahlevaninezhad and G. Moschopoulos, “Analysis and
REFERENCES Design of a New AC–DC Single-Stage Full-Bridge PWM
Converter With Two Controllers,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,
[1] Biela, J., Schweizer, M., Waffler, S., and Kolar, J.W.: ‘SiC versus vol. 60, no. 11, Nov. 2013, pp. 4930–4946.
Si-evaluation of potentials for performance improvement of
inverter and DC-DC converter systems by SiC power
semiconductors’, IEEE Tran. Ind. Electron. , 2011, 58, (7), pp.
2872 – 2882
1993