Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BLA Course Numbering, Naming, Electives
BLA Course Numbering, Naming, Electives
COURSE NUMBERING
The Curriculum’s Course Numbers should follow, to the best degree possible, a more consistent format.
Typical formats is 1st year - 1xxx; 2nd year, 2xxx; etc.
In the .xls spreadsheet, the column with NEW CLASS # in Yellow Highlight gives a star ng point to nish
this discussion. Cross-lis ng is a powerful tool we should consider to establish our curriculum iden ty.
COURSE NAMING
I likely get too caught up in the names given to the courses, but for reasons above I feel it has value to
address and give thought to, IF it works within the guidelines/Senate approval red-tape which I am
unclear.
In the .xls spreadsheet, the column with REVISED COURSE TITLE in Yellow Highlight gives a star ng point
to develop this program within a more landscape architecture delivery. I focussed on ambiguous terms
and adding keywords but feel Climate Change, Sustainability and Ecosystems are terms which should be
included somewhere (I just did not nd the proper slot yet).
Perhaps we complete an exercise of cra ing the “Ideal BLA Delivery” (courses in best t loca on) as a
comparison to what we have now. Have we had direct feedback from LAAC on our current curriculum
delivery sequence with heavy HORT science stu early on? I know the LAAC has a list of courses, but
what about where/when they get delivered? This is likely a subject assessment but one which has direct
impact to learning outcomes within BLA programs.
GOAL - review and coordinate, fair for everyone (Preliminary course assignments for LAAC but will
change in future…)
r.lebrasseur@dal.ca Page 2 of 4
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
fi
ff
ti
ti
fi
ft
ti
ff
ti
ti
fi
ti
ti
fi
ti
From Gefu:
Propose integrated teaching model by making all three LA professionals to teaching courses in years 1, 2,
and 3. This issue has been standing out and being asked by many outsiders. If three of you do not teach
courses in years 1-3, it will not make a true accredited program.
COURSE ELECTIVES
Landscape Planning Course - Elec ve OR required course (on-line delivery).
As stated prior, if we deliver 20 - 40% of our gradua ng students to MUP program, great. THUS we
should ac vely seek integra on with them. As HB noted, we should allow/encourage/require course in
HFX.
I made contact with the Planning Department Summer 2020 and they did not know what, if any, courses
would be ‘permanently’ delivered on-line. But, this is a signi cant opportunity and IF we got our
students to HFX campus and back (i.e. bus), there is long-term economic sustainability and master’s/
research opportunity for us here.
I do not think we should develop a landscape planning course, BUT if we do - this would likely be urban?
or ? or ecological-based?
F of Ag Elec ves
I think we should list these courses in our material as a means to a ract prospec ve students as it
supports our BLA Program’s Mission and the College.
NOTE: CSLA indicated we should provide more opportuni es for students to explore the humani es.
r.lebrasseur@dal.ca Page 3 of 4
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
fi
tt
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
r.lebrasseur@dal.ca Page 4 of 4
ti
ti
ti
ti
ti
ff
ti
ti
tt
ti