Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S5 Handout
S5 Handout
• How can firms obtain cost leadership and what are its benefits? Strategic Strategy Competitive
Mission Objectives
Choice Implementation Advantage
Internal
Analysis
Business Level Corporate Level
Strategy Strategy
1 2
Cost Leadership:
•generate economic value by having lower costs
than competitors COST
t
duc ADVANTAGE
pro st
Example: Wal-Mart ilar o
Sim wer c
COMPETITIVE at lo
ADVANTAGE Pric
fro ep
Differentiation: mu
niq
ue
rem
ium
pro
du DIFFERENTIATION
•generate economic value by offering a product ct
ADVANTAGE
that customers prefer over competitors’ product
Example: Harley-Davidson
3 4
3 4
1
10/26/22
Firm Profits buyers, while promoting the added value aspects of the product.
The success of the hybrid strategy comes down to the balance between cost
and differentiation, attempting to maximise each while maintaining good
margins.
Position 4: Differentiation
5 6
Cost Leadership
buyers will pay more for a known brand, one that has emotions associated
to it, than one which is cheaper.
7 8
7 8
2
10/26/22
1. Economies of Scale • Average cost per unit falls as quantity increases—until the minimum efficient
scale is reached
2. Diseconomies of Scale
• are a cost advantage because competitors may not be able to match the
3. Learning Curve Economies scale because of capital requirements (barrier to entry)
9 10
COST ANALYSIS
Economies of Scale:
Sources of Cost Advantage The Long-Run Cost Curve for a Plant
Economies of Scale
Sources of scale economies:
• Economies of scale operate when: Cost per - technical input/output relationships
unit of
• activities are executed more efficiently at larger volume, output - indivisibilities
- specialization
• the cost of certain activities can be divided over large sales volume, or
• activities have less proportional cost increases compared with the output
growth
Minimum Units of output
Efficient Plant per period
Size: the point
where most
• Technology, specialization and minimum size are important factors scale economies
influencing the dynamics of economies of scale are exhausted
11 12
11 12
3
10/26/22
COST ANALYSIS
New Product Development Projects Scale Economies in Advertising: U.S. Soft Drinks
Cost Analysis Despite the massive advertising budgets of brand leaders Coke and Pepsi, their
main brands incur lower advertising costs per unit of sales than their smaller rivals.
Product Lead company Estimated Launch date
development cost
0.10 0.15
Tab
B-2 Spirit “stealth Northrup Grumman $23 billion December 1993 Diet Pepsi
Diet 7-Up
bomber”
Diet Rite
A380 “super-jumbo” Airbus Industrie $19 billion October 2007 Fresca
Seven Up
787 Dreamliner Boeing $16–18 billion 3rd Quarter 2010
0.05
Sprite Dr. Pepper
Windows Vista Microsoft $7 billion January 2007
Pepsi
PlayStation 3 Sony $7 billion November 2006 Coke
0.02
Iridium satellite Motorola/Iridium $6 billion July 1999
communication Satellite LLC 10 20 50 100 200 500 1,000
system Annual sales volume (millions of cases)
Ford Contour/Mondeo Ford Motor Company $6 billion October 1992
13 14
13 14
• Diseconomies of scale occur when the increase in the volume of an activity • The costs of activities may decline over time as the activity is performed more
creates complexity in its management and coordination costs efficiently due to learning process.
• are an advantage for those who do not have diseconomies of scale • Learning improves how processes are performed.
• occur when firms become too large and bureaucratic • Learning can occur due to the volume of activity, level of investment, or
simply time
• are a risk of international expansion
15 16
15 16
4
10/26/22
COST ANALYSIS
• The more complicated/technical the process, the greater the experience $3,000 1910 experience curve, i.e. unit costs
declined by approximately 15%
advantage. $2,500
1911
with each doubling of cumulative
$2,000 volume.
1912
• International expansion may propel a firm down the experience curve $1,500
1913
1914
1915
because of higher volumes. $1,000
1918 1920
$500
$0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 32
Cumulative units of production (millions)
17 18
17 18
Price Index
5 10
20K
ROS (%)
100
75%
15K
-2 0
70% slope
50
19 20
19 20
5
10/26/22
21 22
21 22
23 24
23 24
6
10/26/22
• If the competitive advantage arises from strongly linked activities (internally • Firms get to choose how they will serve the market.
and externally), then their costs depend on the performance of other
• We’ll offer level of quality that is inexpensive to produce.
activities.
• Firms can make policy choices that give people incentives to reduce cost at
• Therefore, it is necessary to undergo a systemic evaluation of the drivers by every opportunity.
considering all other activities connected.
• Firms ability to reduce “organizational slack” or x-inefficiency
• When linkages are external, external actors may be integrated into the
company (vertical integration) as a way of controlling costs for the activity
25 26
25 26
• Capacity Utilization • Timing implies enjoying low costs when the assets for the activity are
acquired in favorable conditions, e.g. business cycles, or generate more
• If an activity has fixed costs, the utilization of the activity will have an demand for an activity, e.g. being the first mover in a market
important impact on the production costs per unit.
• The configuration of the activity (internal factor), as well as demand • Economies of Scope
fluctuations (external factors), determine the utilization of the capacity.
• Multi-business companies have activities shared between business units.
• This type of activities provides the possibility of increasing its output (or
• Certain strategic choices can impact on the costs of the activities such as utilization) by sharing it among multiple business.
product configurations and variety, service, customer segments, technology,
location, human resources policies, and process efficiencies • Sharing an activity implies obtaining economies of scale and learning
27 28
27 28
7
10/26/22
29 30
29 30
Rare Imitability
• The rareness of a source of cost advantage depends heavily on the industry LOW COST CONDITIONS HIGH COST CONDITIONS
life cycle • Unbalanced Industry Capacity and • Balanced Industry Capacity and Demand
Demand
• Path Dependence (Historical Uniqueness)
• Non-Proprietary Technology
• Protected Technology
• Highly Observable Technology
• Highly Unobservable Technology (Causal
• Transactional Exchange Ambiguity)
(A cost advantage can be easily imitated) (A cost advantage cannot be easily imitated)
31 32
31 32
8
10/26/22
33 34
35 36
35 36
9
10/26/22
37 38
37 38
10