g FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ucsI’ MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT University LAB REPORT ASSESSMENT EK409 Fluid Power, Drives and Control Lab VI No Student Student ID Name 7 2 3 a 5 Criteria Unaceaptable | — Satisfactory Moderate Good Excellent Seore (0%) (25%) (60%) (75%) (100%) Experimental | No procedures | Procedures do nat | Procedures are sted, | Procedures are | Procedure are procedures | are writen in the properly but missing some | | listedincomplete | Iistedin clear 20% repor. demonstrate the | information; some | passive sentences, | steps; Each step PLOS: slop taken in the steps are not important is numbered and ‘experiment ‘numbered andlor are. | experimental details | ina complete Inincomplete passive | are covered, but | passive sentence. sentences, some minor details are missing. Results Notgures, | Figures, graphs, | ‘Most figures, oraphs, | Alfigures, graphs, | Allfgures, Data, figures, | graphs, tables | tables contain | tables OK, some sil | tables are corectly | graphs, tables are ‘graphs, tables, | are provided. | errors or are poorly | missing some ‘drawn, butsome | corecty drawn, atc. constructed, have | important or required | have minor | are numbered and 30% missing tiles, features. problems or could contain PLOS captions oF sil beimproved. | titlesicaptions. umber, units missing or incorrect, atc Discussion’ | Incomplete and | Incomplete? | Some ofthe resus | ~Amostal ofthe | Important rends Observation incorect incorect have been correcty | results have been and data 30% interpretation of | interpretation of interpreted and | correctly interpreted | comparisons have PLOS trends and trends and | discussed; Parialbut | and discussed; only | been interpreted comparison of | comparison of data incomplete minor correctly and data indicating a understanding of | improvements are | discussed; good lack of results s stl evident, needed Understanding of Understanding of results is the results conveyed. Conclusion | Incomplete and | Conclusions Major points are | Conclusions have _| Condusions have 10% incorrect | missing or missing | drawn, but many are | been drawn, could | been clearly PLOS conclusion. ‘the important misstated, be better stated. | made, student points Indicating a lack of shaws good understanding. understanding. Effective 19.06.2017‘Appearance | Appearance | Sections culof ] Sections in order, Tab reports Tab reports and and formatting | order, reportis not | Formatting is rougn | mostytyped/ | typed / written in formatting totally typed / written but readable witten using the | well formatted, 5% inappropriate. using the Appropriate format, | very readable PLoto appropriate format all sections in order, formatting generally good but could still be improved ‘Speling, Grammar? | Frequent grammar | Occasional grammar | _Lessihan3 | Allgrammar/ ‘grammar, speling error, | and orspeling | /speling erors, | grammar! speling | — speling are sentence ting style is errors. generally readable | ~erors, mature, | correct and very structure rough and with some rough | readable style. | wellriten 5% immature. spots in writing style, PLoto ‘Total Mark (100) ‘90 marks for PLOS Modern Tool Usage (Cognitive) 410 marks for PLO10 Communication (Cognitive) Effective 19.06.2017