Ecr

FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science
VR 1.0
PT J
AU Botzen, WJW
Mol, JM
Robinson, PJ
Zhang, J
Czajkowski, J
AF Botzen, W. J. Wouter
Mol, Jantsje M.
Robinson, Peter J.
Zhang, Juan
Czajkowski, Jeffrey
TI Individual hurricane evacuation intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic:
insights for risk communication and emergency management policies
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; Evacuation; Hurricane preparedness; Pandemic; Risk perception
ID INFECTIOUS-DISEASES; DECISION-MAKING; OLDER-ADULTS; PERCEPTIONS; CHANCE;
IMPACT
AB The U.S. 2020 hurricane season was extraordinary because of a record number of
named storms coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. This study draws lessons on how
individual hurricane preparedness is influenced by the additional risk stemming
from a pandemic, which turns out to be a combination of perceptions of flood and
pandemic risks that have opposite effects on preparedness behavior. We conducted a
survey in early June 2020 of 600 respondents in flood-prone areas in Florida to
obtain insights into households' risk perceptions and preparedness for the upcoming
hurricane season under COVID-19. The results show that concerns over COVID-19
dominated flood risk perceptions and negatively impacted people's evacuation
intentions. Whereas hotel costs were the main obstacle to evacuating during
Hurricane Dorian in 2019 in the same geographic study area, the main evacuation
obstacle identified in the 2020 hurricane season is COVID-19. Our statistical
analyses investigating the factors influencing evacuation intentions show that
older individuals are less likely to evacuate under a voluntary order, because they
are more concerned about the consequences of becoming infected by COVID-19. We
observe similar findings based on a real-time survey we conducted in Florida with
another group of respondents under the threat of Hurricane Eta at the end of the
hurricane season in November 2020. We discuss the implications of our findings for
risk communication and emergency management policies that aim to improve hurricane
preparedness when dealing with additional health risks such as a pandemic, a
situation that may be exacerbated under the future climate.
C1 [Botzen, W. J. Wouter; Mol, Jantsje M.; Robinson, Peter J.] Vrije Univ, Inst
Environm Studies, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[Botzen, W. J. Wouter] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Univ Sch Econ USE, Utrecht,
Netherlands.
[Botzen, W. J. Wouter] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Risk Management & Decis Processes
Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
[Mol, Jantsje M.] Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Res Expt Econ & Polit Decis Making CREED,
Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[Zhang, Juan] Eastern Kentucky Univ, Coll Business, Richmond, KY 40475 USA.
[Czajkowski, Jeffrey] Natl Assoc Insurance Commissioners NAIC, Ctr Insurance
Policy & Res, Kansas City, KS USA.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Utrecht University; University of
Pennsylvania; University of Amsterdam; Eastern Kentucky University
RP Botzen, WJW (corresponding author), Vrije Univ, Inst Environm Studies, NL-1081
HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.; Botzen, WJW (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht,
Utrecht Univ Sch Econ USE, Utrecht, Netherlands.; Botzen, WJW (corresponding
author), Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Risk Management & Decis Processes Ctr,
Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA.
EM wouter.botzen@vu.nl
RI Mol, Jantsje/ACG-7465-2022; Botzen, Willem Jan Wouter/L-3123-2013
OI Botzen, Willem Jan Wouter/0000-0002-8563-4963; Robinson,
Peter/0000-0003-2833-8030; Mol, Jantsje/0000-0002-8833-5125
FU State of Florida Division of Emergency Management
FX This research was funded by the State of Florida Division of Emergency
Management.
CR ALAM S, 2021, HELIYON, V7
American Red Cross, 2020, PREP DIS COVID 19
[Anonymous], NATURAL HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119)
AON, 2020, GLOBAL CATASTROPHE R
Ashraf A, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2027, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04658-0
Baker E. J., 1991, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V9, P287, DOI DOI
10.1177/028072709100900210
Borowski Elisa, 2021, Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, V10, P100352, DOI
10.1016/j.trip.2021.100352
Botzen W.J., 2020, IMPROVING INDIVIDUAL
Botzen WJW, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P2143, DOI 10.1111/risa.13318
Botzen WJW, 2015, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V10, P365
Bubeck P, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P1481, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
Burnside R, 2007, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V27, P727, DOI 10.1080/02732170701534226
Cameron C., 2005, MICROECONOMETRICS ME
Cardil A, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104861
Cohen Sharon S, 2005, Disaster Manag Response, V3, P22, DOI
10.1016/j.dmr.2004.10.003
COLLINS J, 2021, B AM METEOR SOC
de Bruin WB, 2011, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V42, P145, DOI 10.1007/s11166-011-9113-5
Dostal PJ, 2015, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V9, P301, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.50
ENW, 2021, HOOGW 2021 FEIT DUID
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2020, COVID 19 PAND OP GUI
Fitzsimons GJ, 2008, J CONSUM RES, V35, P5, DOI 10.1086/589561
Hariri-Ardebili MA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13168713
Huang SK, 2016, ENVIRON BEHAV, V48, P991, DOI 10.1177/0013916515578485
IPCC, 2019, REPORT, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.024
Ivers LC, 2006, CURR OPIN INFECT DIS, V19, P408, DOI
10.1097/01.qco.0000244044.85393.9e
Jenkins P, 2007, GENERATIONS, V31, P49
Kunreuther H, 2018, GENEVA PAP R I-ISS P, V43, P335, DOI 10.1057/s41288-017-
0068-x
Lemonick D. M., 2011, AM J CHINESE MED, V8, P144, DOI DOI
10.1097/INF.0B013E318054E34C
Liddell TM, 2018, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V79, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009
Meng YF, 2020, PLOS PATHOG, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008520
Meyer MA, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1231, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
Morss RE, 2016, WEATHER FORECAST, V31, P395, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-15-0066.1
NAIC/CIPR Research Library, 2020, DISASTER PREPAREDNES
Nakanishi H, 2019, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100376
Pei S, 2020, GEOHEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1029/2020GH000319
Phillips CA, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P586, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0804-2
Quigley Mark C., 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, DOI 10.1007/s10669-
020-09772-1
Robinson PJ, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P2514, DOI 10.1111/risa.13361
Robinson PJ, 2018, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V13, P237
Rosenkoetter MM, 2007, PUBLIC HEALTH NURS, V24, P160, DOI 10.1111/j.1525-
1446.2007.00620.x
Shukla MA, 2018, CURR TROP MED REP, V5, P217, DOI 10.1007/s40475-018-0162-6
Shultz JM, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE506, DOI 10.1016/S2542-
5196(20)30250-3
Smith SM, 2009, INT J EMERG MANAG, V6, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJEM.2009.025170
Woloshin S, 2000, MED DECIS MAKING, V20, P298, DOI 10.1177/0272989X0002000306
NR 44
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 1
U2 16
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 111
IS 1
BP 507
EP 522
DI 10.1007/s11069-021-05064-2
EA OCT 2021
PG 16
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index
(SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA ZT3KN
UT WOS:000709224600001
PM 34690429
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Suwanno, P
Yaibok, C
Tsumita, N
Fukuda, A
Theerathitichaipa, K
Seefong, M
Jomnonkwao, S
Kasemsri, R
AF Suwanno, Piyapong
Yaibok, Chaiwat
Tsumita, Noriyasu
Fukuda, Atsushi
Theerathitichaipa, Kestsirin
Seefong, Manlika
Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj
Kasemsri, Rattanaporn
TI Estimation of the Evacuation Time According to Different Flood Depths
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE traffic behavior; evacuation time; flood water evacuation; road network
ID VARIATIONAL INEQUALITY FORMULATION; TSUNAMI EVACUATION;
SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; NETWORK; CHOICE; IMPACT; MODEL; RISK; CALIBRATION;
MANAGEMENT
AB This study focused on pre-flood measures to estimate evacuation times impacted
by flood depths and identify alternate routes to reduce loss of life and manage
evacuation measures during flood disasters. Evacuation measures, including traffic
characteristics, were reviewed according to different flood depths. Several
scenarios were constructed for different flooding situations and traffic volumes.
Evacuation times in the study area were evaluated and compared for all scenarios
with reference to dry conditions. Results of network performance indicators
compared to the dry situation showed that average speed dropped to 2 km/h, VHT rose
above 200%, and VKT rose above 30%. Cumulative evacuee arrival percentage increased
when flood levels were higher than 5 cm. Flood levels of 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, and
25-30 cm represented percentages of remaining evacuees at 9%, 19%, 49%, and 83%,
respectively. Time taken to evacuate increased according to flood level. For flood
depths of 5-30 cm, travel time increased by 40, 90, 260, and 670 min, respectively,
suggesting the need for early evacuation before the flood situation becomes
serious.
C1 [Suwanno, Piyapong; Yaibok, Chaiwat] Rajamangala Univ Technol Srivijaya Univ,
Res Unit Technol & Innovat Civil Engn, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80210, Thailand.
[Tsumita, Noriyasu; Fukuda, Atsushi] Nihon Univ, Dept Transportat Syst Engn,
Chiba 2748501, Japan.
[Theerathitichaipa, Kestsirin; Seefong, Manlika; Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj] Suranaree
Univ Technol, Sch Transportat Engn, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
[Kasemsri, Rattanaporn] Suranaree Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Nakhon
Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
C3 Nihon University; Suranaree University of Technology; Suranaree
University of Technology
RP Kasemsri, R (corresponding author), Suranaree Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn,
Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
EM kasemsri@sut.ac.th
RI Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj/AAM-6092-2020
OI Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj/0000-0002-9369-2741; Yaibok,
Chaiwat/0009-0008-7398-5740; Suwanno, Piyapong/0000-0001-7932-1840;
Fukuda, Atsushi/0000-0001-6588-0115
FU SUT Research and Development Fund [BRO7-712-65-12-05]
FX This research was funded by SUT Research and Development Fund (Grant No.
BRO7-712-65-12-05).
CR Alam MDJ, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P148, DOI 10.1177/0361198118799169
[Anonymous], DRIVE FLOODS
[Anonymous], 1965, TRAFFIC ENG CONTROL
[Anonymous], US COMMENTS PROPOSED
[Anonymous], EXPERT ADVICE DRIVIN
10.1177/028072709100900210
Balakrishna R, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P80, DOI 10.3141/2041-09
Boyce L., RAIN KEEPS FALLING W
Cascetta E, 2009, SPRINGER SER OPTIM A, V29, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75857-2
Cascetta E, 2007, PAP REG SCI, V86, P597, DOI 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00135.x
Chen X., 2014, AGENT BASED MODELING, P78, DOI [DOI 10.1057/9781137453648_6,
10.1057/9781137453648_6]
Chiu YC, 2008, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V5
Choo KS, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12040926
Chung Y, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V19, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.10.001
Dawson RJ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P167, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4
Di Gangi M., 2017, P INT C OPTIMIZATION, P547
Di Gangi M, 2022, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V23, P3613, DOI
10.1109/TITS.2020.3038478
Di Gangi M, 2011, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V12, P1157, DOI
10.1109/TITS.2011.2143408
Dressler G, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P2287, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-2287-
2016
Florian M., 2010, P TRANSP RES BOARD 8
Florian M, 2008, EUR J OPER RES, V189, P1381, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.054
Franzese O., 2002, P 81 ANN M TRANSP RE
Fraser SA, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2975, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2975-
2014
FRIESZ TL, 1993, OPER RES, V41, P179, DOI 10.1287/opre.41.1.179
Fujita I, 2014, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V7, P54, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12020
Galatioto F., 2014, P 2 INT C URB SUST R
Gallaway B.M., 1979, PAVEMENT GEOMETRIC D
Gangi M.D., 2009, GEOCOMPUTATION URBAN, P99
Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA), 2020, THAIL
FLOOD MON SYST
Gerber B.J., 2006, POTENTIAL UNCONTROLL, VVolume 81
Gissing A, 2016, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V31, P25
Griffith DA, 2007, REV REG STUD, V37, P28
Hall R., 2012, HDB TRANSPORTATION S, V23
Hat Yai City Municipality, 2022, BAS INF DEM
Hatyai (ASEAN Climate Change and Disaster Resilience Network Accredited Agency),
2014, TRAIN CREAT LOC COUR
He MN, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101622
Hilly G, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10010081
Jha M, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P40
Kalafatas G, 2009, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V15, P21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-
0342(2009)15:1(21)
Kim K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1177, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.025
Kramer M, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V17, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.04.003
Kwon E, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P149, DOI 10.3141/1922-19
Lammel G, 2010, PEDESTRIAN AND EVACUATION DYNAMICS 2008, P171, DOI 10.1007/978-
3-642-04504-2_13
Land Development Department (Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives), 2022,
LAND USE
Leon J, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P826, DOI 10.1177/0265813515597229
Li J, 2015, NETW SPAT ECON, V15, P677, DOI 10.1007/s11067-014-9241-y
Lieberman E., 2012, P TRANSP RES BOARD 9
Lim H., 2013, J E ASIA SOC TRANSP, V10, P147, DOI [10.11175/easts.10.147, DOI
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Lim HR, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2436-4
Liu M., 2010, J E ASIA SOC TRANSP, V8, P1
Luathep P., 2013, PROC E ASIA SOC TRAN, V9, P206
Luathep P., 2013, J E ASIA SOC TRANSP, V10, P178
Mahut M, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P101, DOI 10.3141/1876-11
Mahut M., 2003, P TRANSP RES BOARD 8
Mahut M., 2003, P 10 WORLD C INT TRA
Mahut M, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V145, P323, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6142-6_9
Marinov M, 2011, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V19, P516, DOI
10.1016/j.simpat.2010.08.009
Mas E., 2012, P JOINT C P 9 INT C
Mas E, 2015, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V172, P3409, DOI 10.1007/s00024-015-1105-y
Masuya A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1859, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1802-y
Meit M., 2008, URBAN RURAL EVACUATI
Mordvintsev A., 2014, PEDESTRIAN EVACUATIO, P485
Morris B, 2011, PROCD SOC BEHV, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.430
Musolino G, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V111, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.083
Naser M., 2010, MESOSCOPIC EVACUATIO
Newell GF, 2002, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V36, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
2615(00)00044-8
Ng M, 2010, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V46, P1086, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2010.04.001
Noh H, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P91, DOI 10.3141/2091-10
Ong G.P., 2008, P 7 INT C MANAGING P, P23
Pearson M, 2014, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V72, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.018
Pel A.J., 2008, P 10 INT TRAIL C NET
Pel AJ, 2012, TRANSPORTATION, V39, P97, DOI 10.1007/s11116-011-9320-6
Post J, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1075, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1075-2009
Pregnolato M, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V55, P67, DOI
10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020
Pyatkova K, 2019, LECT N MOBIL, P115, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33616-9_8
Ran B, 1996, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/0968-090X(95)00017-D
Reis L., 2021, EVACUATION ASSESSMEN
Russo F, 2008, WIT TRANS BUILT ENV, V101, P703, DOI 10.2495/UT080681
SAITO T., 2004, 13 WORLD C EARTHQ EN, P1
Setiadi N., 2010, P CORP K VIENN AUSTR, P1
Southern Regional Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Center, DEV FLOOD MOD HAT
MU
Spiess H, 1990, GRADIENT APPROACH OD
STERN E, 1989, PAP REG SCI ASSOC, V66, P87, DOI 10.1007/BF01954298
Suwanno P, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132011227
Tsumita Noriyasu, 2022, Proceedings of the Second International Conference of
Construction, Infrastructure, and Materials: ICCIM 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil
Engineering (216), P303, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-7949-0_27
Yazici A, 2010, TRANSPORT RES REC, P11, DOI 10.3141/2196-02
Yazici MA, 2007, TRANSP RES RECORD, P55, DOI 10.3141/2022-07
Yazici MA, 2008, TRANSPORT REV, V28, P757, DOI 10.1080/01441640802041812
Yin J, 2016, J HYDROL, V537, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.037
Yusoff M, 2008, INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2008, VOLS 1-
4, PROCEEDINGS, P1514
ZEIGLER DJ, 1984, PROF GEOGR, V36, P207, DOI 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1984.00207.x
Zou N, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P138, DOI 10.3141/1922-18
NR 92
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 8
U2 8
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 7
AR 6305
DI 10.3390/su15076305
PG 23
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
Environmental Studies
(SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA D7GJ4
UT WOS:000970370700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Mongold, E
Davidson, RA
Trivedi, J
DeYoung, S
Wachtendorf, T
Anyidoho, P
AF Mongold, Emily
Davidson, Rachel A.
Trivedi, Jennifer
DeYoung, Sarah
Wachtendorf, Tricia
Anyidoho, Prosper
TI Hurricane evacuation beliefs and behaviour of inland vs. coastal
populations
SO ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Coastal; evacuation; hurricane; inland
ID DECISION-MAKING; RISK; PRECIPITATION; INFORMATION; TOURISTS; MODELS
AB Although hurricanes can cause severe hazard effects well inland, little is known
about the evacuation behaviour of inland populations compared to coastal
populations. Using survey data collected in the United States after Hurricanes
Florence (2018), Michael (2018), Barry (2019), and Dorian (2019), we investigate
differences between coastal and inland populations in evacuation decisions and
timing, and their causes. The data indicate that coastal populations evacuated at a
higher rate than their inland counterparts (those not in coastal counties) in every
hurricane studied. Chi-square tests identified differences in characteristics of
coastal and inland populations, and a multiple logistic regression identified
variables associated with evacuation. Together they suggest multiple factors that
help explain the difference in evacuation rates. The most significant findings were
related to geographic differences in the issuance of evacuation orders and reported
receiving of orders (whether or not orders were actually issued). Most
interestingly, the analysis indicates that variance between inland and coastal
evacuation is not fully explained by the factors suggested in existing literature.
We suggest here that differences between inland and coastal evacuation may also
result from risk perception, in particular, a view that hurricanes are a coastal
phenomenon and therefore do not apply to inland populations.
C1 [Mongold, Emily; Davidson, Rachel A.; Anyidoho, Prosper] Univ Delaware, Dept
Civil & Environm Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA.
[Trivedi, Jennifer] Univ Delaware, Dept Anthropol, Newark, DE USA.
[DeYoung, Sarah; Wachtendorf, Tricia] Univ Delaware, Dept Sociol & Criminal
Justice, Newark, DE USA.
C3 University of Delaware; University of Delaware; University of Delaware
RP Davidson, RA (corresponding author), Univ Delaware, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Newark, DE 19716 USA.
EM rdavidso@udel.edu
OI Davidson, Rachel/0000-0002-6061-5985; Mongold, Emily/0000-0001-9374-7370
FU National Science Foundation [CMMI-1331269]
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant
CMMI-1331269.
CR Advocate Staff, 2019, AHEAD TROPICAL STORM
Agresti A., 2007, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA, V2nd ed.
Anderson M., 2019, DIGITAL DIVIDE PERSI
10.1177/028072709100900210
Beven II J., 2019, HURRICANE MICHAEL
Bowser GC, 2015, ENVIRONMENT, V57, P28, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2015.1089145
Breslin S, 2018, HURRICANE MICHAELS S
Cahyanto I, 2014, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V2, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.10.003
Cangialosi J. P., 2019, HURRICANE BARRY
Czajkowski J, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1513, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9849-x
Dash N., 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, V8, P69, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2007)8:3(69), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)]
DeYoung SE, 2016, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V15, P95, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2016.1140630
DeYoung SE, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101078
Farmer AK, 2019, ANTHROZOOS, V32, P419, DOI 10.1080/08927936.2019.1598661
FITZPATRICK C, 1991, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, V9, P137
Griffin RJ, 1999, ENVIRON RES, V80, pS230, DOI 10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
Huang SK, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000237
Huang SK, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P283, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000074
Karaye IM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16214268
Kyne D, 2018, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V37, P897, DOI 10.1007/s11113-018-9492-2
Lazo JK, 2010, WEATHER FORECAST, V25, P207, DOI 10.1175/2009WAF2222310.1
Leeper T., 2018, INTERPRETING REGRESS, P1
Lindell MK, 2018, COMMUNICATING IMMINE, P449, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-
4_22
Lu QC, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.006
Marchok T, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P726, DOI 10.1175/WAF1024.1
Matyas C, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P871, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9801-0
Matyas CJ, 2017, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/atmos8090165
Mei B., 2002, DEV TRIP GENERATION
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
Mileti D., 1988, MENTAL HLTH CARE MAS
Murray-Tuite P, 2013, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V27, P25, DOI
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
National Weather Service (NWS), 2019, HURR DOR
NCEI, 2020, US BILL DOLL WEATH C
Nowak J., 2019, NEW ORLEANS ADVOCATE
Prieger JE, 2008, INF ECON POLICY, V20, P150, DOI
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.01.001
R Core Team, 2022, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
Rappaport EN, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P341, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00074.1
Stein RM, 2010, SOC SCI QUART, V91, P816, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00721.x
Stewart S. R., 2019, HURRICANE FLORENCE
Thompson RR, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P812, DOI 10.1111/risa.12654
U.S. Census, 2017, ACS DEM HOUS EST AM
Webb G. R., 2018, HDB DISASTER RES, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_6, DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_6]
Wenger D. E., 1973, 9 U DELW DIS RES CTR
Whitehead J., 2000, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V2B, P133, DOI [10.1016/S1464-
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Williams R, 2012, STATA J, V12, P308, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1201200209
Xu KC, 2016, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V87, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.012
Yang H, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P63, DOI 10.3141/2599-08
Yang K, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P857, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03573-9
Yin WH, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P43, DOI 10.3141/2599-06
Zhang Q, 2018, J CLIMATE, V31, P1865, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0474.1
NR 52
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 10
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1747-7891
EI 1878-0059
J9 ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK
JI Environ. Hazards
PD AUG 8
PY 2021
VL 20
IS 4
BP 363
EP 381
DI 10.1080/17477891.2020.1829531
EA OCT 2020
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA TP8UB
UT WOS:000577921300001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhao, TT
Jia, MN
Tang, T
Sun, YS
AF Zhao, Tingting
Jia, Minna
Tang, Tian
Sun, Yanshuo
TI Perception of Hurricane and COVID-19 Risks for Household Evacuation and
Shelter Intentions
SO PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER
LA English
DT Article
DE evacuation; hurricane; natural hazards; risk perception; SARS-CoV-2
ID CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; FLORIDA TOURISTS; EXPERIENCE; RESPONSES; HAZARDS;
RETURN; BIAS
AB The COVID-19 pandemic presented new challenges for scholars and government
officials to predict people's evacuation decisions under a conflicting natural
disaster. In this study, we examined households' evacuation and shelter intentions
given the potential conflicts between the perceived risks from a hurricane and the
coexisting public health crisis. We surveyed households living inside hurricane
evacuation zones in Florida during the 2020 hurricane season. Data were first used
to examine the evacuation and shelter intentions before and during the pandemic. We
then measured respondents' hurricane and COVID-19 risk perception, respectively.
The impacts of both risk perceptions on respondents' hurricane evacuation
intentions were explored. We found that when people felt unsafe to stay home for a
Category 2, 3, or 4 hurricane, their intended evacuation was about the same before
and during the pandemic regardless of their COVID-19 risk perception. The COVID-19
risk perception, however, significantly lowered the evacuation intention for a
Category 1 hurricane. It also significantly influenced evacuees' preference for
nontraditional shelters such as government-contracted hotels. The results of our
study have practical implications for emergency management and public health
governance. Our study also provides insights into decision-making under the
conflict between natural hazards and infectious diseases.
C1 [Zhao, Tingting] Florida State Univ, Dept Geog, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
[Jia, Minna] Florida State Univ, Inst Sci & Publ Affairs, FSU Survey Foundry,
Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
[Tang, Tian] Florida State Univ, Askew Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Tallahassee, FL
32306 USA.
[Sun, Yanshuo] Florida State Univ, FAMU FSU Coll Engn, Ind Engn, Tallahassee, FL
32310 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida State University; State
University System of Florida; Florida State University; State University
System of Florida; Florida State University; State University System of
Florida; Florida State University
RP Zhao, TT (corresponding author), Florida State Univ, Dept Geog, Tallahassee, FL
32306 USA.
EM tzhao@fsu.edu; minna.jia@fsu.edu; ttang4@fsu.edu; y.sun@eng.famu.fsu.edu
FU Florida State University [36312]
FX This work was supported by Florida State University under Grant 36312.
CR AAA, 2020, 2020 AAA CONS PULS S
Action News Jax, 2017, ACTION NEWS JAX 0909
Allan JN, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2498, DOI 10.1111/risa.13569
[Anonymous], 2017, TAMPA BAY TIMES 0909
Baker, 2009, STATEWIDE REGIONAL E
10.1177/028072709100900210
BAKER EJ, 1995, PROF GEOGR, V47, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00137.x
Basolo V, 2017, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V16, P253, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2016.1277968
Bostrom A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P105, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.027
Botzen WJW, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05064-2
BURTON I, 1964, NAT RESOUR J, V3, P412
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2021, PEOPL INCR RISK PEOP
Chen XW, 2008, PROF GEOGR, V60, P160, DOI 10.1080/00330120701873645
Coleman N, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101875
Collins J, 2021, B AM METEOROL SOC, V102, pE836, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0229.1
Connolly JM, 2021, PUBLIC PERFORM MANAG, V44, P560, DOI
10.1080/15309576.2020.1818588
Cori L, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17093114
Cutter SL, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P819, DOI
10.1080/24694452.2020.1744423
Davidson RA, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P97, DOI 10.1111/risa.12990
Dryhurst S, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P994, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193
Farmer AK, 2019, ANTHROZOOS, V32, P419, DOI 10.1080/08927936.2019.1598661
FloridaDisaster.org, 2019, GOV RON DESANTIS ISS
Gotham KF, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P345, DOI 10.1111/risa.12830
GREEN PE, 1990, J MARKETING, V54, P3, DOI 10.2307/1251756
Hill S, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000506
Huang X, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P286, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1904819
IBM SPSS Statistics 27, 2020, CROSST STAT
Jiang YQ, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P1795, DOI
10.1080/24694452.2019.1592660
Kim J, 2015, J RISK RES, V18, P111, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2014.880728
Kocatepe A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1207, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.006
Korinek A, 2007, J ECONOMETRICS, V136, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.03.001
Kulkarni PA, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P720, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.21
Lazo JK, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P1837, DOI 10.1111/risa.12407
Li W, 2010, PROF GEOGR, V62, P103, DOI 10.1080/00330120903404934
Lindell MK, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x
LOUVIERE JJ, 1988, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V22, P93
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
Meyer RJ, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P1389, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00218.1
Morss RE, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P1620, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2020.1750456
Morss RE, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.023
Mulrooney T, 2022, PROF GEOGR, V74, P115, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2021.1933551
Murray-Tuite P., 2018, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI
National Weather Service, 2019, HURRICANE DORIA 0906
Nummela O, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P1418, DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.003
Palinkas LA, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18020425
Parida D, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102272
Paul BK, 2012, PROF GEOGR, V64, P401, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2011.609780
Peacock WG, 2005, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V73, P120, DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Prasad R., 2020, BBC 0714
Rickard LN, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P2334, DOI 10.1111/risa.12779
Saunders ME, 2017, METEOROL APPL, V24, P120, DOI 10.1002/met.1611
Shao WY, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P1389, DOI
10.1080/24694452.2018.1426436
Shultz JM, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, P494, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.243
Siebeneck LK, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P1468, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01781.x
Simonovic SP, 2021, WIRES WATER, V8, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1509
Tribby CP, 2021, PROF GEOGR, V73, P365, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2021.1895851
Trumbo CW, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P2233, DOI 10.1111/risa.12575
Villegas J, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P97, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0119-3
Weather.gov, 2016, HURR MATTH CAR
Whytlaw JL, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102386
Wootson C.R., 2020, WASHINGTON POST 0707
Xiu XL, 2021, J MED INTERNET RES, V23, DOI 10.2196/23400
Zhai W, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P2023, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1866489
Zou L, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P1422, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897
NR 69
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 4
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0033-0124
EI 1467-9272
J9 PROF GEOGR
JI Prof. Geogr.
PD MAY 4
PY 2023
VL 75
IS 3
BP 396
EP 414
DI 10.1080/00330124.2022.2103722
EA JUL 2022
PG 19
WC Geography
SC Geography
GA H9KX5
UT WOS:000862003700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ersing, RL
Pearce, C
Collins, J
Saunders, ME
Polen, A
AF Ersing, Robin L.
Pearce, Christianne
Collins, Jennifer
Saunders, Michelle E.
Polen, Amy
TI Geophysical and Social Influences on Evacuation Decision-Making: The
Case of Hurricane Irma
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricane Irma; evacuation decisions; geophysical vulnerability; social
vulnerability
ID VULNERABILITY; KATRINA; PREPAREDNESS; INFORMATION; NETWORKS; MODEL
AB Understanding the factors that influence evacuation decision-making among local
residents is of critical importance to those involved in monitoring and managing
weather-related hazards. This study examined both geophysical and social variables
that we believe influenced individual decision-making on whether to stay home, seek
out a public shelter, or leave the area entirely during Hurricane Irma. A 23-item
survey was administered to a convenience sample of adults (n = 234) who resided
within a coastal Florida county that received an evacuation warning during
Hurricane Irma in 2017. Results suggested sources of information relied on through
media, government, family, and social networks contributed to differences in
evacuation behavior. Moreover, potential exposure to weather-related conditions,
such as flooding and strong winds, along with the likelihood to use available
social resources, also influenced decisions to stay or leave the threatened area.
Finally, prior evacuation behavior was significantly associated with the decision
to evacuate during Hurricane Irma. The decision to evacuate for Hurricane Irma was
shown to impact decision-making to evacuate for major hurricanes in the future. If
these findings are applied to future storms, a broader conclusion can be made that
residents in vulnerable areas may be more likely to evacuate for major hurricanes
than they were in the past. Improved understanding of evacuation decision-making
can assist emergency managers in preparation and planning to reduce casualties
resulting from a hurricane or other weather-related hazard.
C1 [Ersing, Robin L.] Univ S Florida, Sch Publ Affairs, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Pearce, Christianne; Collins, Jennifer; Saunders, Michelle E.] Univ S Florida,
Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Polen, Amy] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; University of South Florida; State
University System of Florida; University of South Florida; State
University System of Florida; University of South Florida
RP Ersing, RL (corresponding author), Univ S Florida, Sch Publ Affairs, Tampa, FL
33620 USA.
EM rersing@usf.edu; cjordon@mail.usf.edu; collinsjm@usf.edu;
msaunders1@mail.usf.edu; amypolen@usf.edu
OI Collins, Jennifer/0000-0001-6780-8280; Polen, Amy/0000-0003-4560-1312
CR Adeola FO, 2009, ENVIRON BEHAV, V41, P459, DOI 10.1177/0013916508316651
Allen TD, 2007, J BLACK STUD, V37, P466, DOI 10.1177/0021934706296184
[Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[Anonymous], 2003, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
[Anonymous], 2013, COMMUNITY DISASTER V
[Anonymous], 2002, METHODS DISASTER RES
[Anonymous], 2005, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:1(23)
[Anonymous], 1997, NATURAL HAZARDS EXPL
Arrillaga P., 2008, HURRICANE IKE SPURS
Ash KD, 2014, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V6, P104, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00021.1
10.1177/028072709100900210
BAKER EJ, 1979, MASS EMERGENCIES, V4, P9
Brackenridge S, 2012, ANTHROZOOS, V25, P229, DOI
10.2752/175303712X13316289505503
Brinkley D., 2006, GREAT DELUGE HURRICA, P716
Buckle P., 2006, DISASTER RESIL INTEG, V88, P88
Collins J, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P459, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0119.1
Cuite CL, 2017, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V9, P155, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0076.1
Cutter SL, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P102, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285515
Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
Demuth JL, 2016, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V8, P327, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0074.1
Dow K, 1998, COAST MANAGE, V26, P237, DOI 10.1080/08920759809362356
Dynes R.R., 2002, U DEL DISASTER RES C, V327, P59
Fairchild AL, 2006, HEALTH AFFAIR, V25, P958, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.958
Haines VA, 2002, ADV MED SOC, V8, P269
HAINES VA, 1992, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V33, P254, DOI 10.2307/2137355
Hasan S, 2011, J TRANSP ENG, V137, P341, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000223
Hawkins RL, 2010, BRIT J SOC WORK, V40, P1777, DOI 10.1093/bjsw/bcp087
Jon I, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P274, DOI 10.1111/risa.12896
Jon I, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.035
Kusenbach M., 2013, DISASTER RESILIENCY, P61
Kusenbach M, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9358-3
Lindell M.K., 2005, NAT HAZARDS REV, V6, P171, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Mathbor GM, 2007, INT SOC WORK, V50, P357, DOI 10.1177/0020872807076049
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
Miller L. M., 2007, Southern Rural Sociology, V22, P45
Miran SM, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101345
Miran SM, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V94, P743, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3418-5
Miran SM, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.034
Moore S, 2004, FAM COMMUNITY HEALTH, V27, P204, DOI 10.1097/00003727-200407000-
00007
Morrow BH, 1999, DISASTERS, V23, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00102
Morss RE, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P2653, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0058.1
Morss RE, 2010, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V2, P174, DOI 10.1175/2010WCAS1041.1
Paton D., 2001, DISAS PREVEN MANAGE, V10, P270, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005930
Petrolia DR, 2010, COAST MANAGE, V38, P97, DOI 10.1080/08920751003605365
Radford L, 2013, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V22, P192, DOI 10.1108/DPM-06-2012-0064
Ran J, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V711, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134486
Riad J.K., 1998, U DEL DISASTER RES C, V271, P34
Senkbeil J., 2018, CLIM SOC, V11, P217, DOI [10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0019.1, DOI
10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0019.1]
Sherman-Morris K, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P623, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9405-0
Thiede BC, 2013, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V32, P803, DOI 10.1007/s11113-013-9302-9
Van Der Gaag M, 2005, SOC NETWORKS, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001
Widener MJ, 2013, J GEOGR SYST, V15, P193, DOI 10.1007/s10109-012-0170-3
Zane DF, 2011, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V5, P23, DOI 10.1001/dmp.2011.8
Zhang N, 2013, CHINESE SCI BULL, V58, P2387, DOI 10.1007/s11434-013-5835-x
NR 65
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 10
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD AUG
PY 2020
VL 11
IS 8
AR 851
DI 10.3390/atmos11080851
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
(SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA NL3LG
UT WOS:000567321000001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bian, RJ
Murray-Tuite, P
Trainor, J
Edara, P
Triantis, K
AF Bian, Ruijie
Murray-Tuite, Pamela
Trainor, Joseph
Edara, Praveen
Triantis, Konstantinos
TI Modeling Evacuees' Intended Responses to a Phased Hurricane Evacuation
Order
SO APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE hurricane evacuation; phased evacuation; warning responses; behavioral
intention; compliance
ID SHADOW EVACUATION; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS; BEHAVIOR; DISASTERS
AB Phased evacuation is an under-studied strategy, and relatively little is known
about compliance with the phased process. This study modelled households' responses
to a phased evacuation order based on a household behavioral intention survey.
About 66% of the evacuees reported that they would comply with a phased evacuation
order. A latent class logit model sorted evacuees into two classes ("evacuation
reluctant" and "evacuation keen") by their stakeholder perceptions (i.e., whether
government agencies have responsibility for the safety of individuals) and
evacuation perceptions (i.e., whether evacuation is an effective protective
action), while risk perception becomes non-significant in interpreting their
compliance behavior to a phased evacuation order. Those that evacuate to the home
of friends/relatives and/or bring more vehicles during evacuation are less likely
to follow phased evacuation orders. "Evacuation reluctant" individuals with a
longer housing tenure are more likely to follow phased evacuation orders.
"Evacuation keen" individuals with a longer travel delay expectation are more
likely to comply with phased evacuation orders. This study not only unveiled the
impacts of incorporating three psychological perceptions (i.e., risk, stakeholder,
and evacuation perceptions) in modeling compliance behavior (e.g., parameter
sign/significance shift) but also provides insights of evacuees' compliance
behavior to phased evacuation orders.
C1 [Bian, Ruijie] Louisiana State Univ, Louisiana Transportat Res Ctr, Baton Rouge,
LA 70808 USA.
[Murray-Tuite, Pamela] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, Clemson, SC 29634
USA.
[Trainor, Joseph] Univ Delaware, Biden Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Newark, DE 19716
USA.
[Edara, Praveen] Univ Missouri, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Columbia, MO 65211
USA.
[Triantis, Konstantinos] Virginia Tech, Grad Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Falls Church,
VA 22043 USA.
C3 Louisiana State University System; Louisiana State University; Clemson
University; University of Delaware; University of Missouri System;
University of Missouri Columbia; Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State
University
RP Murray-Tuite, P (corresponding author), Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn,
Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
EM rbian1@lsu.edu; pmmurra@clemson.edu; jtrainor@udel.edu;
edarap@missouri.edu; triantis@vt.edu
OI Bian, Ruijie/0000-0002-1781-1374
CR Ajzen I, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, P173
Ajzen I, 2012, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V640, P11, DOI 10.1177/0002716211423363
[Anonymous], 2000, GLOB ENV CHANGE PART, DOI [10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0, DOI
10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0]
[Anonymous], INT J MASS EMERGENCI
[Anonymous], 2001, INT J MASS EMERGENCI
[Anonymous], 2007, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, DOI DOI 10.1177/028072700702500302
[Anonymous], 2008, TTI HOUST VERS HURR
[Anonymous], 2019, CITY ROCKPORT
[Anonymous], 1997, HURRICANE ANDREW ETH, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203351628-13
Bahamonde-Birke FJ, 2021, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V17, P856, DOI
10.1080/23249935.2020.1817171
10.1177/028072709100900210
Bian RJ, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000557
Bish DR, 2014, J OPER RES SOC, V65, P124, DOI 10.1057/jors.2013.3
Cahyanto I, 2015, J TRAVEL RES, V54, P329, DOI 10.1177/0047287513517418
Cava D.L, 2017, HURRICANE IRMA REPOR
Chen X., 2014, AGENT BASED MODELING, P78, DOI [DOI 10.1057/9781137453648_6,
10.1057/9781137453648_6]
Chien SI, 2007, J TRANSP ENG, V133, P190, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
947X(2007)133:3(190)
Dash N., 2002, THESIS FLORIDA INT U
10.1080/17477891.2016.1140630
Dow K, 2002, NAT HAZARDS REV, V3, P12, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2002)3:1(12)
Dow K., 2000, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V2B, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1464-
2867(01)00014-6, 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
Ellis R., 2017, THE CNN
FESSENDENRADEN J, 1987, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V12, P94
Fu HQ, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P211
GOHSEP Louisiana, 2016, EM PREP GUID
Gray-Graves A, 2011, GERONTOL GERIATR EDU, V32, P107, DOI
10.1080/02701960.2011.572034
Greene WH, 2003, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V37, P681, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
2615(02)00046-2
Greene WH., 2012, NLOGIT VERSION 5 REF
Gudishala R, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, P134, DOI 10.3141/2312-14
Hasan S, 2013, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V27, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2011.06.005
Hsu YT, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V41, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.01.013
Hurtubia R, 2014, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V64, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.03.010
Johnson K., 2019, PATCH 0902
Jumadi J, 2019, GEOSCIENCES, V9, DOI 10.3390/geosciences9070317
Jungermann H, 1996, RISK ANAL, V16, P251
Krueger R, 2018, TRANSPORTATION, V45, P789, DOI 10.1007/s11116-016-9751-1
Lamb S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P272, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000070
Li J, 2011, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P2021, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2011.6082993
Lindell MK, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P18, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2007)133:1(18)
Lindell MK, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P1093, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9715-x
4_22
Lindell MK., 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P176, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2003)4:4(176), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176)]
LINDELL MK, 2019, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI
Ling L, 2021, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2675, P53, DOI 10.1177/0361198120962801
Liu Y, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P127, DOI 10.3141/1964-14
Marasco D, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2459, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04093-7
McFadden D., 1977, QUANTITATIVE METHODS, V707, P474
Mileti D., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN REA
Mileti D. S., 1990, COMMUNICATION EMERGE, DOI 10.2172/6137387
Mitchell SW, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P219, DOI 10.3141/1964-24
Monroe County Monroe County (FL), 2019, EV ZON
Motz A, 2021, ENERG ECON, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105179
NYC Emergency Management, 2019, KNOW YOUR ZON NYC EM
Pel A. J., 2010, 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent
Transportation Systems (ITSC 2010), P462, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2010.5625233
Pennington-Gray L, 2014, J TRAVEL RES, V53, P353, DOI 10.1177/0047287513496470
Perry Ronald., 1991, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, V9, P47, DOI DOI
10.1177/028072709100900103
PERRY RW, 1994, DISASTERS COLLECTIVE, P85
Riad JK, 1999, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P918, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Robinson RM, 2010, TRANSPORT RES REC, P168, DOI 10.3141/2196-18
1446.2007.00620.x
Rossetti T, 2023, TRANSPORTATION, V50, P913, DOI 10.1007/s11116-022-10266-z
Rossetti T, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V111, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.019
Sbayti H, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P238, DOI 10.3141/1964-26
SERT, 2017, FLOR STAT REG EV STU
Stein R, 2013, POLICY STUD J, V41, P319, DOI 10.1111/psj.12019
Subcommittee on Resilience Science and Technology (SRST) Resilience Science and
Technology, 2023, GRAND PATHW FRAM
Trettin L, 2000, ENVIRON BEHAV, V32, P410, DOI 10.1177/00139160021972595
Urata J, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P889, DOI 10.1111/risa.12931
Weather.gov, 2017, HURR IRM LOC REP SUM
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Wolshon B, 2009, TRANSPORTATIONS ROLE
Wong SD, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102227
Wu HC, 2012, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V15, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2012.03.005
Yin WH, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V42, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.015
ZEIGLER DJ, 1981, GEOGR REV, V71, P1, DOI 10.2307/214548
Zhang Z, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, P101, DOI 10.3141/2459-12
NR 84
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2076-3417
J9 APPL SCI-BASEL
JI Appl. Sci.-Basel
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 8
AR 5194
DI 10.3390/app13085194
PG 18
WC Chemistry, Multidisciplinary; Engineering, Multidisciplinary; Materials
Science, Multidisciplinary; Physics, Applied
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Chemistry; Engineering; Materials Science; Physics
GA F5ZC2
UT WOS:000983115100001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yang, Y
Metcalf, S
Mao, L
AF Yang, Yan
Metcalf, Sara
Mao, Liang
TI Modeling transit-assisted hurricane evacuation through socio-spatial
networks
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricane evacuation; socio-spatial network; public transit; on-road
traffic; agent-based simulation
ID AGENT-BASED SIMULATION; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; BEHAVIORS
AB Increasing intensity and frequency of hurricane events underscores the need for
efficient and inclusive evacuation plans, particularly for carless and disabled
populations. Hurricane evacuation intrinsically involves both social and spatial
processes. People's decision to evacuate spreads over social networks; once their
decisions are made, they flee through spatial transportation networks. This article
describes a novel effort to integrate socio-spatial networks into an agent-based
evacuation simulation model, taking the Florida Keys in the USA as a study area. In
the model, households, as agents, were synthesized from Census data, then connected
by a 'home-workplace-neighborhood' social network, and registered to a spatial road
network. A threshold decision model was used to simulate social contagion of
households' decision to evacuate. The resulting travel demands were input into the
TRANSIMS platform to generate on-road traffic. The model analyzed scenarios of
automobile-only and public transit-assisted evacuation. The results show that the
simulated traffic under the automobile-only scenario aligns with the observed
traffic dynamics, which validates our socio-spatially integrated model. Adding
public transportation capacity significantly reduces the traffic load and
evacuation time, and provides a practical, accessible, and equitable route to
safety for low mobility populations.
C1 [Yang, Yan; Metcalf, Sara] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Geog, Amherst, NY USA.
[Mao, Liang] Univ Florida, Dept Geog, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
C3 State University of New York (SUNY) System; State University of New York
(SUNY) Buffalo; State University System of Florida; University of
Florida
RP Mao, L (corresponding author), Univ Florida, Dept Geog, Gainesville, FL 32611
USA.
EM liangmao@ufl.edu
RI Metcalf, Sara S./I-8593-2019
OI Metcalf, Sara S./0000-0003-1263-1902; Mao, Liang/0000-0002-7363-0308
CR [Anonymous], 2000, GLOB ENV CHANGE PART, DOI [10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0, DOI
10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0]
Baggerly K., 1995, TRANSIMS TRANSPORTAT, DOI DOI 10.2172/88648
10.1177/028072709100900210
Beltran FS, 2006, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V9
Chakraborty J, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V226, P176, DOI
10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.039
Chen XW, 2006, NAT HAZARDS, V38, P321, DOI 10.1007/s11069-005-0263-0
Dash N., 2002, DECISION MAKING EXTR
Rezende PHD, 2019, SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYTICS: COMPUTATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS AND
TECHNIQUES, P109, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-815458-8.00006-2
FDOT, 2012, TRAFF VOL TEL REC DA
Fu HQ, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P19, DOI 10.3141/1882-03
Gehlot H, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P2419, DOI 10.1007/s11116-018-9958-4
Gehlot H, 2019, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V33, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000802
Gulyas L., 2003, N AM ASS COMP SOC OR
Hasan S, 2011, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V45, P1590, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.008
HORNER M, 2007, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2022
Irwin MD, 1995, BEHAV ANAL HURRICANE
6988(2003)4:4(176), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176)]
Maciejewski M, 2010, TRANSP PROBL, V5, P27
Madireddy M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V77, P199, DOI
10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.016
Mao L, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V50, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.02.005
Mao XJ, 2018, IEEE ANTENNAS PROP, P1013, DOI 10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8608968
Mesa-Arango R, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P11, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000083
MESSIAS D, 2012, DISASTERS, V36
Naghawi H., 2010, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, VVol. 2, P184, DOI DOI
10.1080/19439962.2010.488316
Paez A, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P1055, DOI 10.1068/b3320t
Pan XS, 2007, AI SOC, V22, P113, DOI 10.1007/s00146-007-0126-1
PEL A, 2012, TRANSPORTATION, V39
PEL A, 2010, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2196
Reference USA, 2003, DATA US BUSINESSES D
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Russell S, 2021, ARTIF INTELL, V4th
SADRI A, 2013, TRANSPORT RES C EMER, V32
SADRI A, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2532
SADRI A, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C EMER, V48
Sadri AM, 2017, J CHOICE MODEL, V25, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jocm.2017.02.002
Sadri AM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000244
Sadri AM, 2014, J TRANSP ENG, V140, P61, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000613
Swamy R, 2017, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V59, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2016.10.009
Tan L, 2015, INFORM SCIENCES, V295, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.029
UKKUSURI S, 2017, NETW SPAT ECON, V17
USDOT, 2009, TRANS TRANSP AN SIM
WIDENER M, 2013, J GEOGR SYST, V15
Yang Y, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V74, P13, DOI
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.11.010
Zhong SR, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P480, DOI
10.1080/00045608.2015.1113113
NR 47
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 37
PI ABINGDON
SN 1365-8816
EI 1362-3087
J9 INT J GEOGR INF SCI
JI Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.
PD DEC 2
PY 2021
VL 35
IS 12
SI SI
BP 2424
EP 2441
DI 10.1080/13658816.2020.1828590
EA OCT 2020
PG 18
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Geography; Geography, Physical;
Information Science & Library Science
(SSCI)
SC Computer Science; Geography; Physical Geography; Information Science &
Library Science
GA XE5QP
UT WOS:000574204000001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Parajuli, G
Neupane, S
Kunwar, S
Adhikari, R
Acharya, TD
AF Parajuli, Gaurav
Neupane, Shankar
Kunwar, Sandeep
Adhikari, Ramesh
Acharya, Tri Dev
TI A GIS-Based Evacuation Route Planning in Flood-Susceptible Area of
Siraha Municipality, Nepal
SO ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION
LA English
DT Article
DE flood; evacuation; AHP; map; flood susceptibility; network analysis;
evacuation route planning
ID ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; FREQUENCY RATIO; BIVARIATE; MODELS
AB Flood is one of the most frequently occurring and devastating disasters in
Nepal. Several locations in Nepal are at high risk of flood, which requires proper
guidance on early warning and safe evacuation of people to emergency locations
through optimal routes to minimize fatalities. However, the information is limited
to flood hazard mapping only. This study provides a comprehensive flood
susceptibility and evacuation route mapping in the Siraha Municipality of Nepal
where a lot of flood events have occurred in the past and are liable to happen in
the future. The flood susceptibility map was created using a Geographic Information
System (GIS)-based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) over nine flood conditioning
factors. It showed that 47% of the total area was highly susceptible to flood, and
the remaining was in the safe zone. The assembly points where people would gather
for evacuation were selected within the susceptible zone through manual
digitization while the emergency shelters were selected within a safe zone such
that they can host the maximum number of people. The network analysis approach is
used for evacuation route mapping in which the closest facility analysis proposed
the optimum evacuation route based on the walking speed of evacuees to reach the
emergency shelter place considering the effect of slope and flood on the speed of
the pedestrian. A total of 12 out of 22 suggested emergency shelters were within 30
min, 7 within 60 min, and 2 within 100 min walk from the assembly point. Moreover,
this study suggests the possible areas for further shelter place allocations based
on service area analysis. This study can support the authorities' decision-making
for the flood risk assessment and early warning system planning, and helps in
providing an efficient evacuation plan for risk mitigation.
C1 [Parajuli, Gaurav; Neupane, Shankar; Kunwar, Sandeep; Adhikari, Ramesh]
Tribhuvan Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, Pashchimanchal Campus, Lamachaur 33700, Pokhara,
Nepal.
[Acharya, Tri Dev] Univ Calif Davis, Inst Transportat Studies, Davis, CA 95616
USA.
C3 Tribhuvan University; University of California System; University of
California Davis
RP Acharya, TD (corresponding author), Univ Calif Davis, Inst Transportat Studies,
Davis, CA 95616 USA.
EM pas074bge019@wrc.edu.np; pas074bge041@wrc.edu.np;
pas074bge037@wrc.edu.np; pas074bge031@wrc.edu.np; tdacharya@ucdavis.edu
FU University of California Davis Open Access Fund (UCD-OAF)
FX This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by the
University of California Davis Open Access Fund (UCD-OAF).
CR Adhakari B. R., 2013, Hydro Nepal: Journal of Water, Energy and Environment,
V12, P59
Ajin R. S., 2013, Advances in Applied Science Research, V4, P263
Alahacoon N, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10030448
Ali K., 2016, INT J ENV AGR BIOTEC, V1, P1065, DOI [10.22161/ijeab/1.4.62, DOI
10.22161/IJEAB/1.4.62]
[Anonymous], 2022, P ASIA PACIFIC MINIS
[Anonymous], CLIM CHANG KNOWL POR
Aryal D, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020540
Basnet K., 2019, TECH J, V1, P41, DOI [10.3126/tj.v1i1.27591, DOI
10.3126/TJ.V1I1.27591]
Beven K.J., 1979, HYDROLOG SCI J, V24, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834,
10.1080/02626667909491834]
Bonilauri E.M., 2021, J APPL VOLCANOL, V10, P4, DOI [10.1186/s13617-021-00104-9,
DOI 10.1186/S13617-021-00104-9]
Campos V, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V54, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.768
Centre for Disaster Management Studies (CDMS), 2023, REP ASS GEND SENS EM
Chandrappa R, 2011, COPING WITH CLIMATE CHANGE: PRINCIPLES AND ASIAN CONTEXT,
P201, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19674-4_13
Chen J, 2013, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V40-4-W3, P47, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-
4-W3-47-2013
Chen PZ, 2018, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V56, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.08.006
Dahri N, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6619-4
Dano UL, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11030615
Danumah J.H., 2016, GEOENVIRONMENTAL DIS, V3, P10, DOI [10.1186/s40677-016-0044-
y, DOI 10.1186/S40677-016-0044-Y]
Devkota R. P., 2013, Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, V4, P132
Dewan TH, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.11.001
Dewi R.S., 2012, J INTEGR DISASTER RI, V2, P108, DOI [10.5595/idrim.2012.0023,
DOI 10.5595/IDRIM.2012.0023]
Dhital YP, 2013, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V6, P253, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12013
Dijkstra E. W., 1959, NUMER MATH, V1, P269, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01386390
Elkhrachy I, 2015, EGYPT J REMOTE SENS, V18, P261, DOI
10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.06.007
Elsheikh R. F. A., 2015, Journal of Geographic Information System, V7, P348, DOI
10.4236/jgis.2015.74027
EM-DAT, INT DIS DAT
Febrianto H, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND
INTELLIGENT COMPUTING (KCIC), P148, DOI 10.1109/KCIC.2016.7883639
Gacu JG, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12199456
Gebre SL G.Y., 2015, J CIV ENV ENG, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4172/2165-784X.1000179,
10.4172/2165-784X.1000179]
Gonzalez-Riancho P, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P3249, DOI 10.5194/nhess-
13-3249-2013
Hammami S, 2019, ARAB J GEOSCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s12517-019-4754-9
Jamrussri S, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10121871
Jing-jing Li, 2018, Procedia Engineering, V211, P365, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.024
Khosravi K, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V83, P947, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2357-2
Lee HK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101198
Lee YH, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12082271
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Lin JY, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103812
Liu J, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11010098
MoHA (The Government of Nepal-Ministry of Home Affairs), NEP DIS RISK RED POR
Msabi MM, 2021, REMOTE SENS APPL, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100445
Musolino G, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P1941, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05251-9
National Statistics Office, 2023, NAT POP HOUS CENS 20, VVolume 39
Negese A, 2022, APPL WATER SCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s13201-022-01772-7
No W, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9070432
NRCS, 2019, PRECR MARK ASS SIR D
Nsangou D, 2022, SCI AFR, V15, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e01043
Ouma YO, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P1515, DOI 10.3390/w6061515
Palash W, 2023, CLIMATE, V11, DOI 10.3390/cli11010018
Park S, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9040207
Qin CZ, 2011, PRECIS AGRIC, V12, P32, DOI 10.1007/s11119-009-9152-y
Rijal S, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7020060
Rincon D, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8080275
SAATY RW, 1987, MATH MODELLING, V9, P161, DOI 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Samanta S, 2016, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/hydrology3030029
Samir KC, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05095-180108
Seejata K, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P340, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.044
Shen Y, 2015, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V33, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.11.008
Shreevastav BB, 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100260
Shrestha MS, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2008.00011.x
Shrestha MS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102118
Siahkamari S, 2018, GEOCARTO INT, V33, P927, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2017.1316780
Siddayao Generino P., 2014, International Journal of Machine Learning and
Computing, V4, P450, DOI 10.7763/IJMLC.2014.V4.453
Smith PJ, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P423, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-423-2017
Stepanov A, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V198, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.025
Swain KC, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9120720
Tehrany MS, 2014, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V72, P4001, DOI 10.1007/s12665-014-3289-3
Thapa S, 2020, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100704
Tripathi P., 2023, USING EARTH OBSERVAT, DOI [10.53055/ICIMOD.1021, DOI
10.53055/ICIMOD.1021]
UNDRR, 2019, DISASTER RISK REDUCT
Vilasan RT, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P1767, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05248-4
Vojtek M, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P1153, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2021.1912835
Vojtek M, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020364
Watik N, 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-3, P455, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-
XLII-3-W8-455-2019
Wood NJ, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V62, P275, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9994-2
Yang Q, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11020110
Yang Q, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020546
Yosritzal, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V140, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/140/1/012090
Youssef AM, 2011, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V62, P611, DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0551-1
Yu J, 2018, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V32, P1884, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1463442
Zehra S., 2016, J GEOSCI ENV PROT, V4, P54, DOI [10.4236/gep.2016.44008, DOI
10.4236/GEP.2016.44008]
Zhu Y, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141610250
NR 82
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2220-9964
J9 ISPRS INT J GEO-INF
JI ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 12
IS 7
AR 286
DI 10.3390/ijgi12070286
PG 21
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Geography, Physical; Remote
Sensing
SC Computer Science; Physical Geography; Remote Sensing
GA N7KD5
UT WOS:001038747100001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Harris, A
Roebber, P
Morss, R
AF Harris, Austin
Roebber, Paul
Morss, Rebecca
TI An agent-based modeling framework for examining the dynamics of the
hurricane-forecast-evacuation system
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Agent-based model; Hurricane; Evacuation; Traffic; Decision making;
Forecast
ID EVACUEE PERCEPTION; DECISION-MAKING; RISK PERCEPTION; COMMUNICATION;
HAZARDS; STORM; RESPONSES; TEXAS; INFORMATION; SIMULATION
AB Hurricane evacuations involve many interacting physical-social factors and
uncertainties that evolve with time as the storm approaches and arrives. Because of
these complex and uncertain dynamics, improving the hurricaneforecast-evacuation
system remains a formidable challenge for researchers and practitioners alike. This
article introduces a modeling framework built to holistically investigate the
complex dynamics of the hurricaneforecast-evacuation system i.e., to determine
which factors are most important and how they interact across a range of real or
synthetic scenarios. The modeling framework, called FLEE, includes models of the
natural hazard (hurricane), the human system (information flow, evacuation
decisions), the built environment (road infrastructure), and connections between
systems (forecasts and warning information, traffic). In this paper, we describe
FLEE's conceptualization and implementation and present proof-of-concept
experiments illustrating its behaviors when key parameters are modified. In doing
so, we show how FLEE is capable of examining the dynamics of the hurricane-
forecast-evacuation system from a new perspective that is informed-by and builds-
upon empirical work. This information can support researchers and practitioners in
hazard risk management, meteorology, and related disciplines, thereby offering the
promise of direct applications to mitigate hurricane losses.
C1 [Harris, Austin; Roebber, Paul] Univ Wisconsin, 3200 N Cramer Ave,EMS Room,403
Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA.
[Morss, Rebecca] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, 3090 Ctr Green Dr, Boulder, CO 80301
USA.
C3 University of Wisconsin System; University of Wisconsin Milwaukee;
National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - USA
RP Harris, A (corresponding author), Univ Wisconsin, 3200 N Cramer Ave,EMS Room,403
Univ Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53211 USA.
EM harri377@uwm.edu; roebber@uwm.edu; morss@ucar.edu
FU University of Wisconsin-Milwau-kee's (UWM) Distinguished Dissertator
Fellowship; National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Advanced
Study Program's Graduate Student Fellowship; National Science Foundation
(NSF) HDBE Award [2100801]; UWM; NCAR; NSF; National Science Foundation;
Directorate For Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
[2100801] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX This work was supported by the University of Wisconsin-Milwau-kee's
(UWM) Distinguished Dissertator Fellowship, the National Center for
Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Advanced Study Program's Graduate Student
Fellowship, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) HDBE Award
2100801. The authors thank UWM, NCAR, and NSF for their support, the
reviewers for their helpful comments, and Drs Jon Kahl and Clark Evans
for their feedback in the projects' early stages. Author contributions:
A.H, P.R., and R.M designed the research; A.H and P.R created the built
environment components of the model; R.M and A.H. built the human system
elements of the model; A.H, P.R., and R.M analyzed the data; A.H wrote
the paper with R.M and P.R providing edits. The National Center for
Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
CR Alfieri L, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V21, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.008
[Anonymous], 2018, UNDERSTANDING EVACUE
[Anonymous], 2011, INT J RES MARK, DOI [DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002,
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002]
10.1177/028072709100900210
Ballard AJ, 2006, RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
Barton CM, 2014, J ARCHAEOL METHOD TH, V21, P306, DOI 10.1007/s10816-013-9187-2
Bazghandi A., 2012, INT J COMPUT SCI, V9, P115
Blanton B, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P117, DOI 10.1111/risa.13004
Bo Zhang, 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC 2009),
P2778, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2009.5429248
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.027
Bostrom A, 2016, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V8, P111, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-15-0033.1
Brommer DM, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P353, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9532-7
Cangialosi J.P., 2019, NATL HURRICANE CTR F, P7
Cangialosi JP, 2018, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Cava D.L., 2018, HURRICANE IRMA EMERG
Chen X, 2008, J OPER RES SOC, V59, P25, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602321
Chen X., 2004, 83 ANN M TRANSP RES
Chen XW, 2008, PROF GEOGR, V60, P160, DOI 10.1080/00330120701873645
Cutter S.L., 2019, CONVERSATION
Demuth JL, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1133, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00150.1
Demuth JL, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1614, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2787.1
Dixit V.V., 2009, 88 ANN M TRANSP RES, DOI [10.3141/1964-26, DOI 10.3141/1964-
26]
Dixon DS, 2017, NETW SPAT ECON, V17, P645, DOI 10.1007/s11067-017-9339-0
Dow K., 2000, NAT HAZARDS REV, V3, P12, DOI [10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6, DOI
10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
Dye KC, 2014, ORGAN SCI, V25, P1009, DOI 10.1287/orsc.2013.0890
Fang L, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, P37, DOI 10.3141/2459-05
FDEM, 2018, REG EM MAN LIAIS TEA
Feng KR, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102788
Flanagan BE, 2011, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V8, DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1792
Florida Statewide Regional Evacuation Study Program Regional Evacuation
Transportation Analysis, 2019, REG EV TRANSP AN TEC
Fossell KR, 2017, MON WEATHER REV, V145, P5103, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0051.1
Gehlot H, 2019, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V33, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000802
Grimm V, 2020, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V23, DOI 10.18564/jasss.4259
Hammond RA, 2015, ASSESSING USE AGENT
6996.0000074
Keim BD, 2007, J CLIMATE, V20, P3498, DOI 10.1175/JCLI4187.1
KNABB RD, 2006, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Liang W, 2015, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V12, P407, DOI 10.1515/jhsem-2014-0057
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Long EF, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abb7906
Madireddy M, 2011, WINT SIMUL C PROC, P222, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2011.6147753
McGhee C.C., 2006, OPERATIONAL ANAL HAM
Mileti D.S., 1990, COMMUNICATION EMERGE, P166
Miller JH, 2007, PRINC STUD COMPLEX, P1, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-5602-8_1
Mongold E, 2021, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V20, P363, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2020.1829531
Morss RE, 2005, B AM METEOROL SOC, V86, P181, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-86-2-181
Morss RE, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P1620, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2020.1750456
MURPHY AH, 1993, WEATHER FORECAST, V8, P281, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(1993)008<0281:WIAGFA>2.0.CO;2
Murray-Tuite P., 2019, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI, V1st
NOAA,, 2021, WHAT IS STORM SURG S
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Petrolia DR, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P117, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000038
Rezapour M, 2014, WEATHER FORECAST, V29, P1319, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-14-00014.1
Robinson R.M., 2009, TRANSPORTATION RES B
Roebber PJ, 1996, WEATHER FORECAST, V11, P544, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(1996)011<0544:TCRBFS>2.0.CO;2
Sbayti H, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P238, DOI 10.3141/1964-26
Senkbeil J, 2019, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V11, P217, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0019.1
Sun ZL, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V86, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.006
Trainor JE, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P151, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000105
Ukkusuri SV, 2017, NETW SPAT ECON, V17, P197, DOI 10.1007/s11067-016-9323-0
Watts J, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104524
Widener MJ, 2013, J GEOGR SYST, V15, P193, DOI 10.1007/s10109-012-0170-3
Wilhelmi O., 2020, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V38, P89
Wolshon B., 2001, NAT HAZARDS REV, V2, P105, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2001)2:3(105), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:3(105)]
Wolshon B., 2004, NCHRP SYNTHESIS HIGH, V340, DOI [10.17226/23331, DOI
10.17226/23331]
Xuwei Chen, 2012, International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, V4,
P22, DOI 10.1504/IJAIP.2012.046964
Yi WQ, 2017, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V95, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2016.10.008
Zhan FB, 2008, GEOJOURNAL LIB, V94, P189, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8507-9_9
Zhang FQ, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P1177, DOI 10.1175/2007WAF2006118.1
Zhu YJ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102334
NR 92
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 67
AR 102669
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102669
EA NOV 2021
PG 25
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA WZ8OS
UT WOS:000720221800002
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Sakib, N
Hyer, K
Dobbs, D
Peterson, L
Jester, DJ
Kong, N
Li, MY
AF Sakib, Nazmus
Hyer, Kathryn
Dobbs, Debra
Peterson, Lindsay
Jester, Dylan J.
Kong, Nan
Li, Mingyang
TI A GIS enhanced data analytics approach for predicting nursing home
hurricane evacuation response
SO HEALTH INFORMATION SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Nursing home; Hurricane evacuation; Predictive analytics; GIS data;
Vulnerable population
ID RESIDENTS; LESSONS; KATRINA; CARE
AB Nursing homes (NHs) are responsible for caring for frail, older adults, who are
highly vulnerable to natural disasters, such as hurricanes. Due to the influence of
highly uncertain environmental conditions and varied NH characteristics (e.g., geo-
location, staffing, residents' health conditions), the NH evacuation response,
namely evacuating or sheltering-in-place, is highly uncertain. Accurate prediction
of NH evacuation response is important for emergency management agencies to
accurately anticipate the NH evacuation demand surge with healthcare resources
proactively planned. Existing hurricane evacuation research mainly focuses on the
general population. For NH evacuation, existing studies mainly focus on conceptual
studies and/or qualitative analysis using a single source of data, such as surveys
or resident health data. There is a lack of research to develop analytics-based
method by fusing rich environmental data with NH data to improve the prediction
accuracy. In this paper, we propose a Geographic Information System (GIS) data
enhanced predictive analytics approach for forecasting NH evacuation response by
fusing multi-source data related to storm conditions, geographical information, NH
organizational characteristics as well as staffing and residents characteristics of
each NH. In particular, multiple GIS features, such as distance to storm
trajectory, projected wind speed, potential storm surge and NH elevation, are
extracted from rich GIS information and incorporated to improve the prediction
performance. A real-world case study of NH evacuation during Hurricane Irma in 2017
is examined to demonstrate superior prediction performance of the proposed work
over a large number of predictive analytics methods without GIS information.
C1 [Sakib, Nazmus; Li, Mingyang] Univ S Florida, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn,
Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Hyer, Kathryn; Dobbs, Debra; Peterson, Lindsay] Univ S Florida, Sch Aging
Studies, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Jester, Dylan J.] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
[Jester, Dylan J.] Univ Calif San Diego, Sam & Rose Stein Inst Res Aging, La
Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
[Kong, Nan] Purdue Univ, Weldon Sch Biomed Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
University System of Florida; University of South Florida; University of
California System; University of California San Diego; University of
California System; University of California San Diego; Purdue University
System; Purdue University; Purdue University West Lafayette Campus
RP Li, MY (corresponding author), Univ S Florida, Dept Ind & Management Syst Engn,
Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
EM mingyangli@usf.edu
RI Sakib, Nazmus/HKF-4816-2023
OI Jester, Dylan/0000-0001-9878-9633
FU National Institute on Aging [R01AG060581]; Division of Civil, Mechanical
and Manufacturing Innovation [1825761, 1825725]; Directorate For
Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1825725] Funding
Source: National Science Foundation; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, &
Manufact Inn; Directorate For Engineering [1825761] Funding Source:
National Science Foundation
FX This study was supoorted by National Institute on Aging (Grant No.
R01AG060581) and Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing
Innovation (Grant Nos. 1825761 and 1825725).
CR Baker E. J., 1991, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V9, P287, DOI DOI
10.1177/028072709100900210
Barua D.K., 2005, ENCY COASTAL SCI, P186, DOI [10.1007/1-4020-3880-1_45, DOI
10.1007/1-4020-3880-1_45]
Bishop CM, 2006, PATTERN RECOGN, P462
Blanchard G, 2009, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V10, P639, DOI
10.1016/j.jamda.2009.06.010
Breiman L, 2004, RANDOM FOREST MANUAL
Brown LM, 2007, BEHAV SCI LAW, V25, P655, DOI 10.1002/bsl.785
Brown LM, 2012, AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS, V27, P406, DOI 10.1177/1533317512454709
Castle NG, 2008, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V98, P1235, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107532
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 2017, CERT SURV PROV ENH R
Chawla N., 2004, ACM SIGKDD EXPLORATI, V6, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1007730.1007733,
10.1145/1007730.1007733]
Chawla NV, 2002, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V16, P321, DOI 10.1613/jair.953
Claver M, 2013, ARCH GERONTOL GERIAT, V56, P205, DOI
10.1016/j.archger.2012.07.010
COWLES CM, 2002, NURSING HOME STAT YB
Dosa D, 2012, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V13, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.07.011
Dosa D, 2010, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V4, pS28, DOI 10.1001/dmp.2010.11
Dosa DM, 2008, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V9, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.05.007
ESRI, 2010, ARCGIS DESKT
Fernandez Lauren S, 2002, Prehosp Disaster Med, V17, P67
Florida Agency for Healthcare Administration, 2021, US
Florida Health Care Association, 2008, NAT CRIT EV DEC MAK
Harris G., 2005, NEW YORK TIMES, V7, pA1
Hastie T., 2017, ELEMENTS STAT LEARNI, V2nd
Hyer K, 2011, GERONTOLOGIST, V51, P610, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnr050
Jelesnianski C. P., 1992, SLOSH SEA LAKE OVERL, V48
Jester DJ, 2021, J AM GERIATR SOC, V69, P2298, DOI 10.1111/jgs.17220
Konetzka RT, 2008, HEALTH SERV RES, V43, P1025, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
6773.2007.00803.x
Laditka SB, 2008, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V98, P1288, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107748
LaVito A., 2017, CNBC
Lindell M.K., 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, V8, P50, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2007)8:3(50
Natarajan N., 2013, COASTAL STORM PLANNI
National Hurricane Center (NHC), 2021, NHC DAT GIS FORM
National Weather Service (NWS), 2017, HURR IRM LOC REP SUM
Natural Resources Canada, 2012, CAN DIG EL MOD MOS C
SHAUGHNESSY PW, 1990, NEW ENGL J MED, V322, P21, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199001043220105
Thomas KS, 2012, J AM GERIATR SOC, V60, P1895, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-
5415.2012.04146.x
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Wolshon B., 2005, NAT HAZARDS REV, V6, P129, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2005)6:3(129), 10.1061/ASCE1527-698820056:3129, DOI 10.1061/ASCE1527-
698820056:3129]
NR 41
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 7
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2047-2501
J9 HEALTH INF SCI SYST
JI Health Inf. Sci. Syst.
PD SEP 14
PY 2022
VL 10
IS 1
AR 28
DI 10.1007/s13755-022-00190-y
PG 20
WC Medical Informatics
SC Medical Informatics
GA 4N2LC
UT WOS:000853850000001
PM 36120113
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lee, YH
Kim, HI
Han, KY
Hong, WH
AF Lee, Yoon Ha
Kim, Hyun Il
Han, Kun Yeun
Hong, Won Hwa
TI Flood Evacuation Routes Based on Spatiotemporal Inundation Risk
Assessment
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE spatiotemporal flood fluctuations; inundation risk assessment;
evacuation route; artificial neural network; geographic information
system
ID SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT; MODEL; LIFE
AB For flood risk assessment, it is necessary to quantify the uncertainty of
spatiotemporal changes in floods by analyzing space and time simultaneously. This
study designed and tested a methodology for the designation of evacuation routes
that takes into account spatial and temporal inundation and tested the methodology
by applying it to a flood-prone area of Seoul, Korea. For flood prediction, the
non-linear auto-regressive with exogenous inputs neural network was utilized, and
the geographic information system was utilized to classify evacuations by walking
hazard level as well as to designate evacuation routes. The results of this study
show that the artificial neural network can be used to shorten the flood prediction
process. The results demonstrate that adaptability and safety have to be ensured in
a flood by planning the evacuation route in a flexible manner based on the
occurrence of, and change in, evacuation possibilities according to walking hazard
regions.
C1 [Lee, Yoon Ha] Hanyang Univ, Sustainable Bldg Mat & Construct Lab, Erica
Campus,55 Hanyangdaehak Ro, Ansan 15588, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea.
[Kim, Hyun Il; Han, Kun Yeun] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 80 Daehak
Ro, Daegu 41566, South Korea.
[Hong, Won Hwa] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architectural Civil Environm & Energy
Engn, 80 Daehak Ro, Daegu 41566, South Korea.
C3 Hanyang University; Kyungpook National University; Kyungpook National
University
RP Hong, WH (corresponding author), Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architectural Civil
Environm & Energy Engn, 80 Daehak Ro, Daegu 41566, South Korea.
EM dldbsgk123@naver.com; hyuun228@gmail.com; kshanj@knu.ac.kr;
hongwonhwa@gmail.com
FU Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)
FX This research was funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE).
CR Ahmad SS, 2013, URBAN WATER J, V10, P26, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2012.690437
Arabani AB, 2012, COMPUT IND ENG, V62, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2011.09.018
Atmojo PS, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V171, P1478, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.475
CHANG LC, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI DOI 10.3390/w10091283
Chen HL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1513, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2495-6
Choi SuMin, 2015, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, V48, P719, DOI
10.3741/JKWRA.2015.48.9.719
DEFRA and the Environment Agency, 2006, R D OUTP FLOOD RISKS
Granata F, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8030069
Hu CH, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111543
Huang HB, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P394, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.358
Hwang K, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12030918
Ishigaki T, 2008, P 11 ICUD ED UK 31 A
Ishigaki T. Y., 2005, P KOR WAT RES ASS C, P261
Jha AK, 2012, CITIES AND FLOODING: A GUIDE TO INTEGRATED URBAN FLOOD RISK
MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2
Jhong BC, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4247, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1418-3
Jonkman SN, 2008, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V44, P1208, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2008.00217.x
Jonkman SN, 2008, NAT HAZARDS, V46, P353, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9227-5
Kairupan I, 2016, P 2016 INT C COMM PR, P1
Kang Sanghyeok, 2003, [Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers B,
대한토목학회 논문집 B], V23, P561
Kim HI, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020293
Kim J, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1561, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9852-2
Krajewski WF, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P539, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00243.1
Krytska Y, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
INTELLIGENT DATA ACQUISITION AND ADVANCED COMPUTING SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGY AND
APPLICATIONS (IDAACS), VOL 2, P955, DOI 10.1109/IDAACS.2017.8095228
Kubisch S., 2019, P 16 INT C INF SYST
Lee B., 2006, WATER FUTURE, V39, P50
Li MH, 2019, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V33, P922, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1564315
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Liu X., 2015, SPATIAL ANAL APPROAC
Mayunga JS, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P82, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000055
Mosavi A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111536
Na L, 2012, SYSTEMS ENG PROCEDIA, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SEPRO.2012.04.001
O Shea T, 2019, NAT HAZARDS EARTH SY, P1, DOI [10.5194/nhess-2019-370, DOI
10.5194/NHESS-2019-370]
OFEE OFAT OFEFP, 1997, PRIS COMPT DANG CRUE
Penning-Rowsell E, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V36, P43, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-4538-7
Rahman M, 2019, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V3, P585, DOI 10.1007/s41748-019-00123-y
Shekhar S, 2012, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V26, P2253, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2012.719624
Shen HY, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P935, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-935-2013
Tehrany MS, 2015, CATENA, V125, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
Yin L, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P964, DOI 10.1177/2399808319874805
Zhang P, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9865, P241, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45835-
9_21
Zhou JZ, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050628
Zualkernan IA, 2019, 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS
AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM (IOTAIS), P62, DOI [10.1109/IoTaIS47347.2019.8980381,
10.1109/iotais47347.2019.8980381]
NR 44
TC 9
Z9 10
U1 2
U2 19
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD AUG
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 8
AR 2271
DI 10.3390/w12082271
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA NH4PT
UT WOS:000564654500001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yang, K
Davidson, RA
Blanton, B
Colle, B
Kolar, R
Nozick, LK
Wachtendorf, T
Leonardo, N
Vergara, H
Dresback, K
AF Yang, Kun
Davidson, Rachel A.
Blanton, Brian
Colle, Brian
Kolar, Randall
Nozick, Linda K.
Wachtendorf, Tricia
Leonardo, Nicholas
Vergara, Humberto
Dresback, Kendra
TI Evaluation of Hurricane Evacuation Order Plans: Hurricane Florence Case
Study
SO NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
AB This paper introduces an approach to evaluate the performance of a previously
implemented or proposed hurricane evacuation plan that describes where and when
official evacuation orders are issued. The approach involves use of the new
integrated scenario-based evacuation (ISE) decision support tool to define a best
track evacuation plan as a reference point and measure the performance of other
plans in relation to that according to their ability to meet multiple stated
objectives: minimizing risk to the population, travel time, and time people are
away from their homes. Using North Carolina in Hurricane Florence (2018) as a case
study, we demonstrate the process by evaluating performance of both the actual set
of orders as executed and the orders that would have been recommended if the new
ISE decision support tool had been used during the event. All three plans were
evaluated for two cases-assuming the hurricane unfolds as it actually did, and if
the hurricane had instead evolved like one of 21 other realistic scenarios. Results
suggest the actual evacuation was quite good, and the ISE tool could have resulted
in improved evacuation performance. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
C1 [Yang, Kun] Lafayette City Ctr, Extreme Event Solut, Ver Analyt, 2nd Floor,
Boston, MA 02111 USA.
[Davidson, Rachel A.] Univ Delaware, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Newark, DE
19716 USA.
[Blanton, Brian] Univ N Carolina, Renaissance Comp Inst, Earth Data Sci, Chapel
Hill, NC 27514 USA.
[Colle, Brian; Leonardo, Nicholas] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci,
Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
[Kolar, Randall; Dresback, Kendra] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci,
Norman, OK 73019 USA.
[Nozick, Linda K.] Cornell Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ithaca, NY 14850
USA.
[Wachtendorf, Tricia] Univ Delaware, Sociol & Criminal Justice, Newark, DE 19716
USA.
[Vergara, Humberto] Univ Oklahoma, Cooperat Inst Severe & High Impact Weather
Res Op, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
C3 University of Delaware; University of North Carolina; University of
North Carolina Chapel Hill; State University of New York (SUNY) System;
State University of New York (SUNY) Stony Brook; University of Oklahoma
System; University of Oklahoma - Norman; Cornell University; University
of Delaware; University of Oklahoma System; University of Oklahoma -
Norman
RP Davidson, RA (corresponding author), Univ Delaware, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Newark, DE 19716 USA.
EM kunyang@udel.edu; rdavidso@udel.edu; bblanton@renci.org;
brian.colle@gmail.com; kolar@ou.edu; lkn3@cornell.edu;
twachten@udel.edu; nicholas.leonardo@stonybrook.edu; humber@ou.edu;
dresback@ou.edu
OI Colle, Brian/0000-0002-4546-5472; Davidson, Rachel/0000-0002-6061-5985
FU National Science Foundation [CMMI-1331269]
FX This research was supported in part through the use of information
technology (IT) resources at the University of Delaware, specifically
the high-performance computing resources. We thank Stephen Powers and
Dianne Curtis of the North Carolina Division of Emergency Management for
insights on the practice of hurricane evacuation management. We also
thank the National Science Foundation (CMMI-1331269) for financial
support of this research. The statements, findings, and conclusions are
those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
National Science Foundation, the University of Delaware, or the North
Carolina Division of Emergency Management.
CR [Anonymous], 2005, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Birge JR, 2011, SPRINGER SER OPER RE, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0237-4
Blanton B, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P117, DOI 10.1111/risa.13004
Dietrich JC, 2011, COAST ENG, V58, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2010.08.001
FEMA, 2016, N CAR HURR EV STUD
Hamill TM, 2013, B AM METEOROL SOC, V94, P1553, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00014.1
Herrera-Restrepo O, 2016, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V60, P45, DOI
10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.019
Hurrevac, 2021, HURR DEC SUPP TOOL G
KNABB RD, 2006, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Levin M., 2017, HURRICANE RITA ANXIE
Li ACY, 2013, J TRANSP ENG, V139, P822, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000518
NHC (National Hurricane Center), 2017, NAT HURR CTR FOR VER
NOAA, 2020, TROP CYCL CLIM
NOAA NSSL (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Severe
Storms Laboratory), 2022, MULT MULT SYST MRMS
NWS (National Weather Service), 2018, MET OC DAT COLL NAT
Skamarock W.C., 2021, NOTE NCAR TN 4751STR, DOI [10.5065/D68S4MVH, 10.5065/1dfh-
6p97, DOI 10.5065/D68S4MVH]
Stewart S.R., 2019, HURRICANE FLORENCE A
Urbina E, 2003, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V37, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(02)00015-
0
van Oldenborgh GJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9ef2
Wang JH, 2011, HYDROLOG SCI J, V56, P84, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2010.543087
Watts J, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104524
Westerink JJ, 2008, MON WEATHER REV, V136, P833, DOI 10.1175/2007MWR1946.1
6988(2005)6:3(129), 10.1061/ASCE1527-698820056:3129, DOI 10.1061/ASCE1527-
698820056:3129]
Yang K, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P857, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03573-9
Yang K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101093
Yang K, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000236
NR 28
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 4
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
JI Nat. Hazards Rev.
PD NOV 1
PY 2022
VL 23
IS 4
AR 05022010
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000589
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil; Environmental Studies; Geosciences,
Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
(SSCI)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology &
Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA 4N3PN
UT WOS:000853931000014
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Li, Y
Hu, BS
Zhang, D
Gong, JH
Song, YQ
Sun, J
AF Li, Yi
Hu, Bisong
Zhang, Dong
Gong, Jianhua
Song, Yiquan
Sun, Jun
TI Flood evacuation simulations using cellular automata and multiagent
systems -a human-environment relationship perspective
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood evacuation; urban flood; cellular automata; multi-agent systems;
human-environment relationship
ID MODEL; FLOWS; LIFE
AB A flood evacuation represents a complex geographic phenomenon that includes
comprehensive interactions among humans, the flood and urban environments; thus,
the simulation of flood evacuations requires crowd simulation models to be coupled
with flood models. This paper studies the human-environment relationship during
flooding and promotes a simulation model that combines cellular automata and a
multiagent system to simulate crowd evacuations in flood disasters. A case study of
Niaodao Island was used to evaluate the performance of flood evacuation
experiments, and real-participant experiments based on the virtual reality (VR)
environment were employed for bench-mark comparisons. The integrated model can
provide a comprehensive solution to assist flood risk analysis.
C1 [Li, Yi; Zhang, Dong; Gong, Jianhua; Sun, Jun] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote
Sensing & Digital Earth, Natl Engn Res Ctr Geoinformat, Beijing, Peoples R China.
[Li, Yi; Sun, Jun] Zhejiang CAS Applicat Ctr Geoinformat, Jiaxing, Zhejiang,
Peoples R China.
[Hu, Bisong] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Poyang Lake Wetland &
Watershed Res, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
[Zhang, Dong] Tianjin Chengjian Univ, Sch Geol & Geomat, Tianjin, Peoples R
China.
[Song, Yiquan] Tianjin Normal Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Tianjin, Peoples
R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; The Institute of Remote Sensing & Digital
Earth, CAS; Jiangxi Normal University; Tianjin Chengjian University;
Tianjin Normal University
RP Li, Y; Sun, J (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing &
Digital Earth, Natl Engn Res Ctr Geoinformat, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Li, Y;
Sun, J (corresponding author), Zhejiang CAS Applicat Ctr Geoinformat, Jiaxing,
Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
EM li_yi81@126.com; sjunme@126.com
OI Hu, Bisong/0000-0003-3875-8792
CR [Anonymous], 2011, 5 INT C FLOOD MANAGE
[Anonymous], 2014, TOPICS GEO NATURAL C
Bernardini G, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V96, P14, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.007
Blue VJ, 1998, TRANSPORT RES REC, P29, DOI 10.3141/1644-04
Chanson H., 2014, P 5 INT S HYDR STRUC
Chen M, 2018, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V11, P329, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2017.1419452
Dottori F, 2011, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V36, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2011.02.004
[龚建华 GONG Jianhua], 2006, [武汉大学学报. 信息科学版, Geomatics and Information
Science of Wuhan University], V31, P704
HELBING D, 1995, PHYS REV E, V51, P4282, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282
Herrera-Restrepo O, 2016, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V60, P45, DOI
10.1016/j.omega.2015.04.019
Horney JA, 2010, RISK ANAL, V30, P501, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01341.x
Hua K, 2009, INT J MOD PHYS C, V20, P1945, DOI 10.1142/S0129183109014849
Hughes RL, 2002, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V36, P507, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
2615(01)00015-7
Ishigaki T, 2009, ADV WATER RESOURCES
Jonkman SN, 2009, RISK ANAL, V29, P676, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01190.x
Kim J, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1561, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9852-2
Knyazkov K, 2014, INT MULTI SCI GEOCO, P883
Kolen B, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1312, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01932.x
[李伟超 Li Weichao], 2012, [计算机仿真, Computer Simulation], V29, P405
Li Y, 2015, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V29, P523, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2014.977292
Li Y, 2013, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V27, P2043, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2013.786081
LIN H, 2001, ANN GIS, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/10824000109480550
Lin H, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P465, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.689234
Miller H, 2007, GEOGR COMPASS, V1, P503, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00025.x
Parsons JA, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P2189, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6587
Railsback SF, 2006, SIMUL-T SOC MOD SIM, V82, P609, DOI 10.1177/0037549706073695
Rastogi R, 2011, J TRANSP ENG, V137, P687, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-
5436.0000251
Rinaldi PR, 2007, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V15, P315, DOI
10.1016/j.simpat.2006.11.003
Robin T, 2009, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V43, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2008.06.010
Seenath A, 2016, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V120, P99, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.019
Simonovic SP, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V34, P25, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-0785-x
Song WG, 2006, PHYSICA A, V371, P658, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2006.03.027
Sun B., 2007, JILIN WATER RESOURCE, V8, P26
Tobler W., 1993, NATL CTR GEOGRAPHIC
Torrens PM, 2014, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V28, P964, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2013.835816
Xiong MZ, 2013, NEW GENERAT COMPUT, V31, P211, DOI 10.1007/s00354-013-0304-2
Zhou M, 2016, INFORM SCIENCES, V360, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.018
Zhu KJ, 2017, INT J MOD PHYS C, V28, DOI 10.1142/S0129183117500346
NR 39
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 16
U2 138
PI ABINGDON
SN 1365-8816
EI 1362-3087
J9 INT J GEOGR INF SCI
JI Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.
PD NOV 2
PY 2019
VL 33
IS 11
BP 2241
EP 2258
DI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1622015
PG 18
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Geography; Geography, Physical;
Information Science & Library Science
(SSCI)
SC Computer Science; Geography; Physical Geography; Information Science &
Library Science
GA IU5JB
UT WOS:000483621900006
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wang, D
Ozbay, K
Bian, ZL
AF Wang, Ding
Ozbay, Kaan
Bian, Zilin
TI Modeling and Analysis of Optimal Strategies for Leveraging Ride-Sourcing
Services in Hurricane Evacuation
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE hurricane; evacuation; ride-sourcing; shared mobility; pricing strategy;
subsidy; demand and supply; social equity
ID EMERGENCY EVACUATION; UNITED-STATES; TRANSIT; CHOICE; DEMAND;
RESILIENCE; ALLOCATION; DISASTERS; LESSONS; TRIPS
AB In many large-scale evacuations, public agencies often have limited resources to
evacuate all citizens, especially vulnerable populations such as the elderly and
disabled people, and the demand for additional transportation means for evacuation
can be high. The recent development of ride-sourcing companies can be leveraged in
evacuations as an additional and important resource in future evacuation planning.
In contrast to public transit, the availability of ride-sourcing drivers is highly
dependent on the price, since surge pricing will occur when the demand is high and
the supply is low. The key challenge is thus to find the balance between evacuation
demand and driver supply. Based on the two-sided market theory, we propose
mathematical modeling and analysis strategies that can help balance demand and
supply through a pricing mechanism designed for ride-sourcing services in
evacuation. A subsidy is considered in the model such that lower-income and
vulnerable individuals could benefit from ride-sourcing services. A hypothetical
hurricane evacuation scenario in New York City in the case study showed the
feasibility of the proposed method and the applicability of subsidies for ride-
sourcing services in evacuation. The methodology and results given in this research
can provide useful insights for modeling on-demand ride-sourcing for future
evacuation planning.
C1 [Wang, Ding; Ozbay, Kaan; Bian, Zilin] NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, C2SMART Univ
Transportat Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
C3 New York University; New York University Tandon School of Engineering
RP Wang, D (corresponding author), NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, C2SMART Univ Transportat
Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
EM dw2283@nyu.edu; kaan.ozbay@nyu.edu; zb536@nyu.edu
RI Wang, Ding/ABC-3600-2020; Bian, Zilin/EPT-7411-2022
OI Wang, Ding/0000-0002-2398-1409; Bian, Zilin/0000-0003-3514-9369
FU Connected Cities for Smart Mobility towards Accessible and Resilient
Transportation (C2SMART), a Tier 1 University Center - U.S. Department
of Transportation [69A3351747124]
FX This research and APC were funded by the Connected Cities for Smart
Mobility towards Accessible and Resilient Transportation (C2SMART), a
Tier 1 University Center awarded by U.S. Department of Transportation
under contract 69A3351747124.
CR Aalami S, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V23, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.023
ACS, 2018, AM COMMUNITY SURVEY
Akbarzadeh M, 2015, NAT HAZARDS REV, V16, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000159
Akter S, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V283, P939, DOI 10.1007/s10479-017-2584-2
[Anonymous], 2016, SHARED MOBILITY CURR
[Anonymous], 2018, UNDERSTANDING EVACUE
[Anonymous], 2018, HURR MICH REL EFF
[Anonymous], 2017, UBER LYFT CARS NOW O
[Anonymous], 2007, HDB DISASTER RES, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_11
[Anonymous], 2016, 22776 NAT BUR EC RES
[Anonymous], 2012, UBER NYC SANDY SURGE
Armstrong M, 2006, RAND J ECON, V37, P668, DOI 10.1111/j.1756-
2171.2006.tb00037.x
Barron J., 2011, HURRICANE IRENE NEAR
Bayram Vedat, 2016, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, V21,
P63, DOI 10.1016/j.sorms.2016.11.001
Bian RJ, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1143, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.005
Bian RJ, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P691, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2598-0
Bikhchandani S, 2020, J ECON MANAGE STRAT, V29, P31, DOI 10.1111/jems.12332
Blumenthal E., 2020, STAYING CONNECTED WO
Borowski E, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101406
Boyd E., 2009, PUBLIC PERFORM MANAG, V32, P437, DOI DOI 10.2753/PMR1530-
9576320304
Cachon GP, 2017, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V19, P368, DOI 10.1287/msom.2017.0618
Cahalan C., 2007, EMERGENCY EVACUATION
Carnegie J., 2010, P TRANSP RES BOARD 8
Castillo J.C., 2017, P 2017 ACM C EC COMP
Chan ND, 2012, TRANSPORT REV, V32, P93, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2011.621557
Department of Homeland Security, 2018, PLANN CONS EV SHELT
Diaz J., 2019, Need a ride to a hurricane shelter? Uber and Lyft will take you
there for free during Dorian
Ding Wang, 2021, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology,
V10, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.01.003
Edelman B, 2017, AM ECON J-APPL ECON, V9, P1, DOI 10.1257/app.20160213
Fothergill A, 1999, DISASTERS, V23, P156, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00111
Furuhata M, 2013, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V57, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.012
Goerigk M, 2014, OR SPECTRUM, V36, P923, DOI 10.1007/s00291-014-0365-8
Hess L.S., 2009, EMERGENCY EVACUATION
Kulshrestha A, 2014, J ADV TRANSPORT, V48, P721, DOI 10.1002/atr.1221
Li J, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, P1, DOI 10.3141/2376-01
Li MH, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124862
Lindell M.K., 2013, HDB EMERGENCY RESPON, P156
Lindell M.K., 2018, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI
Lipschultz B., 2017, GIVES FREE RIDES SHE
Litman T, 2006, J TRANSP ENG, V132, P11, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
947X(2006)132:1(11)
Lyft, 2017, LYFT OFF HELP DUR HU
Lyft, 2018, LYFT HELP HURR FLOR
Martin K.W., 2011, YOUR BIKE THE COOLES
6996.0000083
Morgul EF, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, P45, DOI 10.3141/2376-06
MTA, 2018, RID TRENDS NEW YORK
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Ozbay K, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, P89, DOI 10.3141/2312-09
Pew Research Center, 2021, DEM MOB DEV OWN AD U
Rauch Daniel E., 2015, OHIO STATE LAW J, V76, P901
Rayle L, 2016, TRANSPORT POLICY, V45, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004
Renne J. L., 2009, NATL STUDY CARLESS S
Renne J.L., 2018, P 97 TRANSP RES BOAR
Renne JL, 2011, J PLAN LIT, V26, P420, DOI 10.1177/0885412211412315
Rochet JC, 2006, RAND J ECON, V37, P645, DOI 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
Russo F., 2012, WIT T INF COMMUN TEC, VVolume 44, P491, DOI DOI
10.2495/RISK120411
Russo F., 2011, WIT T BUILT ENV, V116, P639
Rysman M, 2009, J ECON PERSPECT, V23, P125, DOI 10.1257/jep.23.3.125
Sadri AM, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P164, DOI 10.3141/2532-18
Sadri AM, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V48, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.008
Sanchez TW, 2008, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V1, P73, DOI 10.1089/env.2008.0510
Sarwar MT, 2018, TRANSPORTATION, V45, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11116-016-9722-6
Schneider TW, 2019, TAXI RIDEHAILING USA
Shaheen S., 2017, TRAVEL BEHAV SHARED, VPL-18-007
Shaheen SA, 2013, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V7, P5, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2012.660103
Solis D., 2010, J DEV AGR EC, V2, P188, DOI DOI 10.5897/JDAE.9000010
TLC, 2019, TLC TRIP RECORD DATA
Uber, 2017, UB HURR HARV REL EFF
USACE, 2000, AL HURR EV STUD TECH
Weiner J, 2014, IS UBERS SURGE PRICI
Weyl EG, 2010, AM ECON REV, V100, P1642, DOI 10.1257/aer.100.4.1642
Wolshon B, 2002, ITE J, V72, P44
Wong, 2019, CURRENT STATE SHARIN
Wong S.D., 2020, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V5, DOI [10.1016/j.trip.2020.100131, DOI
10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100131]
Wong SHD, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P1409, DOI 10.1007/s11116-020-10101-3
Wu T, 2020, INT J PROD ECON, V219, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.007
Xie K., 2016, LNCS T LARGE SCALE D, P190
Xie K, 2015, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V74, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.015
Xu JH, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V20, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.009
Yazici MA, 2008, TRANSPORT REV, V28, P757, DOI 10.1080/01441640802041812
Zha LT, 2018, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V92, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.015
Zhu Y, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, P9, DOI 10.3141/2604-02
NR 91
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 8
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 8
AR 4444
DI 10.3390/su13084444
PG 22
(SSCI)
GA RU7MO
UT WOS:000645328000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Whytlaw, JL
Hutton, N
Yusuf, JE
Richardson, T
Hill, S
Olanrewaju-Lasisi, T
Antwi-Nimarko, P
Landaeta, E
Diaz, R
AF Whytlaw, Jennifer L.
Hutton, Nicole
Yusuf, Juita-Elena (Wie)
Richardson, Tihara
Hill, Saige
Olanrewaju-Lasisi, Taiwo
Antwi-Nimarko, Pamela
Landaeta, Eduardo
Diaz, Rafael
TI Changing vulnerability for hurricane evacuation during a pandemic:
Issues and anticipated responses in the early days of the COVID-19
pandemic
LA English
DT Article
DE Vulnerability; Hurricane plus pandemic event; Sheltering; Evacuation
ID SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; DECISION-MAKING; UNITED-STATES; BEHAVIOR; COUNTY;
PEOPLE; RISK
AB Hurricane evacuations during a pandemic require a revised understanding of
vulnerabilities within communities and the development of different strategies and
policies to accommodate the needs of populations vulnerable to the combined
hurricane-pandemic threat. The prolonged COVID-19 pandemic has added economic,
psychological, social, health, and workforce stressors to communities across the
United States. Using original research data from workshops held in May 2020
involving emergency management, public health, and related experts to support
planning efforts for hurricane evacuation and sheltering, we analyze two key
issues: (1) shifting sources of vulnerability in a COVID-19 environment and (2)
solutions proposed during the post-lockdown/pre-vaccine time frame. We discuss
findings in the context of policy integration options to solidify and expand
protections for populations in need of evacuation and sheltering assistance.
Findings show that vulnerabilities associated with underlying health conditions and
socio-economic disparities were of increased concern to evacuation and shelter
planners. Non-congregate options were of interest but were not expected to
accommodate all populations in need of public assistance. Registries used in some
states offer means with which to evaluate vulnerabilities and align individuals and
families with appropriate resources and facilities. There remains a need to expand
and standardize existing policies based on COVID-19 operating protocols to ensure
inclusivity of socio-economically disadvantaged and disabled individuals in
hurricane preparation efforts.
C1 [Whytlaw, Jennifer L.; Hutton, Nicole] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Arts & Letters,
Dept Polit Sci & Geog, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
[Yusuf, Juita-Elena (Wie); Richardson, Tihara; Hill, Saige; Olanrewaju-Lasisi,
Taiwo] Old Dominion Univ, Sch Publ Serv, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
[Antwi-Nimarko, Pamela; Landaeta, Eduardo] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Arts &
Letters, Grad Program Int Studies, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
[Diaz, Rafael] Old Dominion Univ, Virginia Modeling Anal & Simulat Ctr, Norfolk,
VA 23529 USA.
C3 Old Dominion University; Old Dominion University; Old Dominion
University; Old Dominion University
RP Whytlaw, JL (corresponding author), 7036 Batten Arts & Letters, Norfolk, VA
23529 USA.
EM jwhytlaw@odu.edu
RI ; Yusuf, Juita-Elena/F-6482-2011
OI /0000-0001-8263-141X; Yusuf, Juita-Elena/0000-0003-3599-1417;
Antwi-Nimarko, Pamela/0000-0002-9088-7236; Whytlaw,
Jennifer/0000-0002-1612-8805; Richardson, Tihara/0000-0001-9853-2715
FU National Science Foundationfunded Social Science Extreme Events Research
(SSEER) Network; CONVERGE facility at the Natural Hazards Center at the
University of Colorado Boulder (NSF) [1841338]
FX This research was supported by the National Science Foundationfunded
Social Science Extreme Events Research (SSEER) Network and the CONVERGE
facility at the Natural Hazards Center at the University of Colorado
Boulder (NSF Award #1841338) . Any opinions, findings, and conclusions
or recomTmendations expressed in this material are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF, SSEER, or CONVERGE.
CR Alcantara-Ayala I, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101892
Allinovia Luca, 2009, EC FAO FOOD SEC PROG, P1
[Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING GLOBAL
[Anonymous], 2004, MAPPING VULNERABILIT
[Anonymous], 2005, WORLD C DIS RED KOB
Benson C., 2004, MAPPING VULNERABILIT
Birkmann J., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P20, DOI
10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002
Birkmann J, 2006, MEASURING VULNERABIL, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6975.2010.01389.X
Blaikie P., 2014, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
Blumenshine P, 2008, EMERG INFECT DIS, V14, P709, DOI 10.3201/eid1405.071301
Bouye K, 2009, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V99, pS287, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.165134
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, HLTH EQUITY CONSIDER
Chambers R, 2006, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V37, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-
5436.2006.tb00284.x
City of Danville, 2020, HEADS UP SPECIAL NEE
Comfort L., 1999, ENV HAZARDS, V1, P39, DOI DOI 10.3763/EHAZ.1999.0105
Correa-Agudelo E, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18084021
Cutter SL, 1996, PROG HUM GEOG, V20, P529, DOI 10.1177/030913259602000407
Cutter SL, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P713, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00219
Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
Dai MY, 2020, CANCER DISCOV, V10, P783, DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0422
Dasgupta S, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P1535, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6942a3
Deslatte A, 2020, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V80, P827, DOI 10.1111/puar.13257
DOW K, 1992, GEOFORUM, V23, P417, DOI 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90052-6
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2019, PLANN CONS EV SHELT
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2020, COVID 19 PAND OP GUI
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2011, BEST PRACT SPEC NEED
Gray DM, 2020, NAT REV GASTRO HEPAT, V17, P520, DOI 10.1038/s41575-020-0330-8
Heath SE, 2001, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V153, P659, DOI 10.1093/aje/153.7.659
6996.0000074
Hutton NS, 2020, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V12, P805, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0064.1
Hyer K., 2013, HEALTH PROG, V94, P43
Kako M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101497
Karaye IM, 2019, HEALTH SERV RES MANA, V6, DOI 10.1177/2333392819848885
Kelman, 2012, ROUTLEDGE HDB HAZARD
MCLEOD JD, 1990, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V31, P162, DOI 10.2307/2137170
Millett GA, 2020, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V47, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.003
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2020, BUS ATL HURR SEAS PR
Ng M, 2014, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V64, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.03.015
NJ Register Ready, 2019, REG READ NEW JERS SP
Old Dominion University Social Science Research Center (ODU SSRC), 2020, LIF
HAMPT ROADS SURV
Phelan JC, 2015, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V41, P311, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-
112305
Price-Haywood EG, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P2534, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa2011686
Sabin JA, 2009, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V20, P896, DOI 10.1353/hpu.0.0185
Shultz JM, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V324, P935, DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.15398
Shultz JM, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, P494, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.243
Smith N, 2020, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V110, P648, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305618
Snyder BF, 2020, HEALTH PLACE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102471
Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
United States Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), 2020, FEMAS
FUNCT NEEDS SU
Utah Special Needs Registry, 2020, WELC UT SPEC NEEDS R
V asquez W.F., 2015, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17
Vink K, 2014, J DISASTER RES, V9, P887, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0887
Webb Hooper M, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V323, P2466, DOI
10.1001/jama.2020.8598
Weichselgartner J, 2000, MANAG INFORMAT SYST, V3, P3
Weichselgartner J., 2001, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V10, P85, DOI
[10.1108/09653560110388609, DOI 10.1108/09653560110388609]
Whytlaw Jennifer L, 2020, J Emerg Manag, V18, P373, DOI 10.5055/jem.2020.0486
Woolhandler S, 2020, ANN INTERN MED, V173, P63, DOI 10.7326/M20-1491
Wu SY, 2002, CLIM RES, V22, P255, DOI 10.3354/cr022255
Yusuf Juita-Elena (Wie)., 2020, INT J POLICY STUDIES, V11, P149
NR 67
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 3
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 61
AR 102386
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102386
EA JUN 2021
PG 9
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA SW0GS
UT WOS:000664195600001
PM 36569576
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Vicario, SA
Mazzoleni, M
Bhamidipati, S
Gharesifard, M
Ridolfi, E
Pandolfo, C
Alfonso, L
AF Alonso Vicario, S.
Mazzoleni, M.
Bhamidipati, S.
Gharesifard, M.
Ridolfi, E.
Pandolfo, C.
Alfonso, L.
TI Unravelling the influence of human behaviour on reducing casualties
during flood evacuation
SO HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE flood evacuation; human evacuation behaviour; agent-based modelling;
flood modelling; socio-hydrology; unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH);
UPH #21
ID SIMULATION; MODEL; RAINFALL; TSUNAMI; RISK; CITY; DAMAGE
AB Floods are the natural hazards that are causing the most deaths worldwide. Flood
early warning systems are one of the most cost-efficient methods to reduce death
rates, triggering decisions about the evacuation of exposed population. Although
previous studies have investigated the effect of human behaviours on evacuation
processes, studies analysing a combination of behaviours, flood onset and warning
timing are limited. Our objective is to explore how changes on the aforementioned
factors can affect casualties. This is done within a modelling framework that
includes an agent-based model, a hydraulic model, and a traffic model, which is
implemented for the case study of Orvieto (Italy). The results show that the number
of casualties is most impacted by people's behaviour. Besides, we found that a
delay of 30 min in releasing the warning can boost the number of casualties up to
six times. These results may help managers to propose effective emergency plans.
C1 [Alonso Vicario, S.; Gharesifard, M.; Alfonso, L.] IHE Delft, Inst Water Educ,
Dept Hydroinformat & Sociotech Innovat, Delft, Netherlands.
[Mazzoleni, M.; Ridolfi, E.] Uppsala Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Uppsala, Sweden.
[Mazzoleni, M.; Ridolfi, E.] Ctr Nat Hazards & Disaster Sci CNDS, Uppsala,
Sweden.
[Bhamidipati, S.] Delft Univ Technol, Energy & Ind, TBM, Delft, Netherlands.
[Gharesifard, M.] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Water Resources, Delft, Netherlands.
[Pandolfo, C.] Umbria Civil Protect Author, Ctr Funz, Foligno, Italy.
C3 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education; Uppsala University; Centre of
Natural Hazards & Disaster Science (CNDS); Delft University of
Technology; Delft University of Technology
RP Vicario, SA (corresponding author), IHE Delft, Inst Water Educ, Delft,
Netherlands.
EM saralonsovicario@gmail.com
RI Mazzoleni, Maurizio/O-2566-2016; Bhamidipati, Srirama/ABC-4403-2020;
Mazzoleni, Maurizio/F-5362-2018; Gharesifard, Mohammad/AAH-9090-2021;
Alfonso, Leonardo/B-5164-2011; Vicario, Sara Alonso/N-9846-2017
OI Mazzoleni, Maurizio/0000-0002-0913-9370; Bhamidipati,
Srirama/0000-0002-3869-8999; Mazzoleni, Maurizio/0000-0002-0913-9370;
Gharesifard, Mohammad/0000-0002-9553-0340; Alfonso,
Leonardo/0000-0002-8471-5876; Vicario, Sara Alonso/0000-0003-2481-1732;
Pandolfo, Claudia/0000-0003-4570-4717; Ridolfi,
Elena/0000-0002-4714-2511
FU Ground Truth 2.0 project - Environmental knowledge discovery of human
sensed data under the programme H2020-EU.3.5.5. - Developing
comprehensive and sustained global environmental observation and
information systems [689744, L 347 -2013-12-11]; H2020 Societal
Challenges Programme [689744] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges
Programme
FX This work was supported by the Ground Truth 2.0 project - Environmental
knowledge discovery of human sensed data [Grant agreement ID: 689744]
under the programme H2020-EU.3.5.5. - Developing comprehensive and
sustained global environmental observation and information systems (L
347 -2013-12-11).
CR ABEBE Y, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V111
Auld J, 2012, TRANSP LETT, V4, P41, DOI 10.3328/TL.2012.04.01.41-53
Banos A, 2017, AGENT-BASED SPATIAL SIMULATION WITH NETLOGO: ADVANCED CONCEPTS,
VOL 2, P37
BECKER J, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7
Bernardini G, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V134, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.549
Bhamidipati S, 2016, EUR J TRANSP INFRAST, V16, P254
Bloschl G, 2019, HYDROLOG SCI J, V64, P1141, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507
Bonabeau E, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P7280, DOI 10.1073/pnas.082080899
Brocca L, 2009, J HYDROL, V364, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.10.007
Brocca L, 2009, J HYDROL ENG, V14, P153, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-
0699(2009)14:2(153)
Buttner G, 2017, 172007 ETC SIA ENV A
Camici S, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009298
Cheng Y, 2018, PHYSICA A, V492, P2069, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.124
Cowpertwait PSP, 1996, J HYDROL, V175, P17, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)80004-7
Dijkstra E. W., 1959, NUMER MATH, V1, P269, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01386390,
10.1007/BF01386390]
Doocy Shannon, 2013, PLoS Curr, V5, DOI
[10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a,
10.1371/currents.dis.67bd14fe457f1db0b5433a8ee20fb833]
Du EH, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P9164, DOI 10.1002/2017WR021192
Garcia C, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P123, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.609877
Hardy M., 2007, EVACUATION MANAGEMEN
Hofinger G, 2014, TRANSP RES PROC, V2, P603, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.101
IMAN RL, 1982, COMMUN STAT B-SIMUL, V11, P311, DOI 10.1080/03610918208812265
Leach J., 1994, SURVIVAL PSYCHOL, DOI 10.1057/9780230372719
League C. E., 2009, THESIS
Liu XF, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V94, P53, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3373-1
Liu XF, 2016, J SPAT SCI, V61, P283, DOI 10.1080/14498596.2016.1147393
Liu Y., 2009, J NAT DISASTER SCI, V31, P69, DOI 10.2328/jnds.31.69
Mao XJ, 2018, IEEE ANTENNAS PROP, P1013, DOI 10.1109/APUSNCURSINRSM.2018.8608968
Mard J, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar5779
Mas E, 2015, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V172, P3409, DOI 10.1007/s00024-015-1105-y
Mazzoleni M, 2017, HYDROLOG SCI J, V62, P892, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2016.1246800
Medina N, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V154, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.581
Menoni S, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P2783, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-2783-2016
Michaelis T, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P1458, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1750617
Molinari D, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P901, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-901-2014
Mordvintsev A.S., 2014, P 6 INT C PED EV DYN
Ren CJ, 2009, L N INST COMP SCI SO, V5, P1451
Ridolfi E, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P12, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1677907
Rogers D., 2010, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE
Saadi I, 2018, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V41, P724, DOI
10.1080/03081060.2018.1504182
SCOLOBIG A, 2017, RESOURCES BASEL, V6
Solis IA, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P503, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2876-5
Taillandier P, 2019, GEOINFORMATICA, V23, P299, DOI 10.1007/s10707-018-00339-6
Tarpanelli A, 2012, J HYDROL, V472, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.010
Thomas F, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P2785, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1323-9
Toledo T, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1366, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
Uno K., 2008, TSINGHUA SCI TECHNOL, V13, P348, DOI [10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70173-
1, DOI 10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70173-1]
VORST H, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3
Wallemacq P., 2015, HUMAN COST WEATHER R
Wang HZ, 2016, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V64, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.010
Weyman G., 2013, ANAL NATL TRAVEL STA
Zheng Y, 2019, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V94, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2019.03.001
NR 54
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 6
U2 34
PI ABINGDON
SN 0262-6667
EI 2150-3435
J9 HYDROLOG SCI J
JI Hydrol. Sci. J.
PD OCT 25
PY 2020
VL 65
IS 14
BP 2359
EP 2375
DI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1810254
EA OCT 2020
PG 17
WC Water Resources
SC Water Resources
GA OF3TX
UT WOS:000574992700001
OA Green Submitted, Bronze
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Si, YR
Li, JL
Si, YB
AF Si, Yunrui
Li, Junli
Si, Youbin
TI Urban Flood Loss Estimation and Evacuation Design Based on a 500-Year
Extreme Flood Event in Syracuse City
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood loss estimation; depth-damage function; emergency shelters;
evacuation route; geographic information system (GIS); urban flood
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SHORTEST-PATH; POPULATION; ALGORITHM; MODELS; HAZARD
AB To understand the potential risk of flooding in Syracuse City, New York State,
USA, this research attempted to accomplish the flood hazard assessment for a
simulated 500-year flood event in the downstream floodplain of Onondaga Creek
within Syracuse. Based on the commonly used category of flood damages, the flood
damage of Syracuse was divided into loss of buildings and loss of population. The
results showed that the city's center would have the highest damage rate for
buildings and a total of 1139 buildings would be inundated, of which 326 buildings
would be severely damaged by more than 80%. Furthermore, about 7390 people would be
directly affected by the flood event, among which approximately 900 people might
lose their lives. Communities near Onondaga Creek were assigned designated
evacuation shelters based on the accessibility and distance to the shelters. The
shortest available evacuation routes were calculated. More shelters should be
provided in the central downtown area, with its large population, and distributed
along the western bank of Onondaga Creek. This research offered a first approximate
flood loss estimation that might lead to more attention and studies concerning a
potential flood hazard in the future. It also provided science-based guidelines for
city authorities to refer to in practical flood hazard mitigation.
C1 [Si, Yunrui] Syracuse Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA.
[Li, Junli; Si, Youbin] Anhui Agr Univ, Sch Resources & Environm, Hefei 230036,
Peoples R China.
C3 Syracuse University; Anhui Agricultural University
RP Si, YB (corresponding author), Anhui Agr Univ, Sch Resources & Environm, Hefei
230036, Peoples R China.
EM youbinsi@ahau.edu.cn
CR Alaeddine H, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P687, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-687-
2015
[Anonymous], 2013, CLIM RISK INF 2013 O
Arabani AB, 2012, COMPUT IND ENG, V62, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2011.09.018
Betancourt-Suarez V, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13010102
Blessing R, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000242,
10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000242]
Borzi G, 2021, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V193, DOI 10.1007/s10661-021-08988-1
Boyd E., 2005, P US BANGL WORKSH IN
Dano UL, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11030615
Darabi H, 2019, J HYDROL, V569, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002
DeGaetano Arthur T., 2017, Climate Services, V5, P23, DOI
10.1016/j.cliser.2017.03.003
Deng Y, 2012, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V12, P1231, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.11.011
Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, 2016, ONONDAGA CREEK FLOOD
Downton MW, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V35, P211, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-4808-4
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2017, RISK MAPPING ASSESSM
Feng BY, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V100, P1089, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03850-7
Gao P, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P1047, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04868-6
Ghimire E, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000430
Gong J, 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6070227
Guerreiro SB, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9040296
Huang HB, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102115
Jato-Espino D, 2018, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V144, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-
5452.0000874, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000874]
Jonkman SN, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V34, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-8891-3
Kablan MKA, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9040292
Karamouz M, 2016, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-
4774.0001017
Kebede AS, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P81, DOI 10.1007/s10113-011-0239-4
Komolafe AA, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000278
Kreibich H, 2010, HYDROLOG SCI J, V55, P1302, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2010.529815
Li LY, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103703
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Lim J, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10071036
Lindenschmidt K.E., 2006, ADV GEOSCI, V9, P15, DOI [10.5194/adgeo-9-15-2006, DOI
10.5194/ADGEO-9-15-2006]
Merz B, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1697, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
Misra J, 2001, INFORM PROCESS LETT, V77, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0020-0190(00)00202-7
Moftakhari HR, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P214, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000494
Mohamed SA, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P2739, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04799-2
Molinari D, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P381, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.009
Nascimento N., 2007, URBAN WATER J, V4, P195
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2010, US
Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC), 2021, US
Northwest Alliance for Computational Science & Engineering, 2020, PRISM CLIM DAT
Papilloud T, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101548
Patrick L, 2015, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1336, P45, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12590
Pralle S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V152, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2287-y
Roccati A, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103727
Rojas R, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1737, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.006
Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
Saksena S, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2019WR025769
Samela C, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061514
Sanyal J, 2009, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V2, P262, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2009.01043.x
Seenu PZ, 2020, SPAT INF RES, V28, P459, DOI 10.1007/s41324-019-00306-9
Shrestha BB, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102602
Skilodimou HD, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084455
Squier-Babcock M, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061535
Stefanidis S, 2022, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/hydrology9080145
Tanaka T, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124706
Trindade A, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P169, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3152-4
US Geological Survey, 2020, STREAMSTATS
Velasco M, 2016, URBAN WATER J, V13, P426, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.994005
Wang GP, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13040637
Wang ZQ, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17020560
Williams JB, 2021, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100462
Wu QS, 2019, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V55, P354, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12689
Zhai P., 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021
Zhou Q, 2012, J HYDROL, V414, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.031
Zhou QQ, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13111483
NR 69
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 10
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 1
AR 3
DI 10.3390/w15010003
PG 22
GA 7P8FQ
UT WOS:000908934900001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Saha, SK
Pittock, J
AF Saha, Sebak Kumar
Pittock, Jamie
TI Responses to Cyclone Warnings: The Case of Cyclone Mora (2017) in
Bangladesh
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Cyclone Mora; cyclone warnings; sources of cyclone warnings; reception
of cyclone warnings; evacuation; cyclone shelter; Bangladesh
ID TROPICAL CYCLONES; EVACUATION ORDERS; AILA; SIDR; LESSONS
AB Effective disaster warning systems prevent deaths and injuries and protect
livelihoods. We examined why people at risk do not move to safe places despite
warnings and evacuation orders, by looking at responses to warnings for Cyclone
Mora (2017) in Bangladesh in two villages of the Khulna District. Qualitative and
quantitative data showed that almost all respondents received warnings before the
cyclone, most from more than one source. However, only 21.6% of households took
shelter in any place other than their own house. Most of these households did so
with all members of their household, and most used a cyclone shelter. Almost all
non-evacuee households had more than one reason for not moving to another place.
The most important reasons were that they thought the weather was good despite
warnings, thought the cyclone would not occur in their area, had a fatalistic
attitude, were a long distance from the nearest cyclone shelter, had poor road
networks to go to the cyclone shelter, considered their own house to be a safe
place, were scared of burglary, recalled that nothing happened during previous
warnings, and were worried about overcrowded cyclone shelters. Our findings can
help develop more effective warning systems in cyclone-prone regions globally.
C1 [Saha, Sebak Kumar] Shahjalal Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Sociol, Sylhet 3114,
Bangladesh.
[Pittock, Jamie] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Acton, ACT
2600, Australia.
C3 Shahjalal University of Science & Technology (SUST); Australian National
University
RP Saha, SK (corresponding author), Shahjalal Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Sociol,
Sylhet 3114, Bangladesh.
EM sebak.kumar@gmail.com; jamie.pittock@anu.edu.au
RI Saha, Sebak Kumar/AAD-6792-2022; Pittock, Jamie/N-1541-2018
OI Saha, Sebak Kumar/0000-0002-6999-3085; Pittock,
Jamie/0000-0001-6293-996X
FU Australian Government; Australian National University (ANU), Australia;
School of Culture, History and Language, the Australian National
University, Australia
FX The first author was awarded an Endeavour Postgraduate Scholarship (PhD)
by the Australian Government and a Postgraduate Research Scholarship by
the Australian National University (ANU), Australia. He was also awarded
Fieldwork and Discretionary funding as a PhD student from the School of
Culture, History and Language, the Australian National University,
Australia.
CR Ahsan MN, 2016, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V15, P16, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2015.1114912
[Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
[Anonymous], 2015, PAR AGR
[Anonymous], 2013, SIT REP
[Anonymous], 2021, CYCLONE PREPAREDNESS
[Anonymous], 2016, EM PLAN ACT EPOA BAN
[Anonymous], 2015, CYCL STORM KOM SIT
Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD), 2014, SIGNALS
Bangladesh Meteorological Department (BMD), 2017, SPEC WEATH B SI NO 1
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
CHOWDHURY AMR, 1993, DISASTERS, V17, P291, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
7717.1993.tb00503.x
Creswell J., 2013, QUALITATIVE QUANTITA
Creswell J. W., 2017, DESIGNING CONDUCTING, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1753-
6405.2007.00096.X
Daily Star, 2017, CYCL MOR GREAT DANG
Daily Star, 2020, WAT DEV BOARD AUT GO
Daily Star, 2017, 7 CYCL MOR CROSS COA
HAQUE CE, 1992, DISASTERS, V16, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1992.tb00400.x
HAQUE CE, 1995, ENVIRON MANAGE, V19, P719, DOI 10.1007/BF02471954
Harries T., 2017, OXFORD RES ENCY NATU
Harries T, 2008, HEALTH RISK SOC, V10, P479, DOI 10.1080/13698570802381162
Hong Kong Red Cross, 2017, BANGL CYCL MOR 2017
Ikeda Keiko, 1995, INDIAN J GEND STUD, V2, P171
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRCRCS),
2009, WORLD DISASTERS REPO
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRCRCS),
2017, INFORM B
Mallick B, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P654, DOI 10.1111/disa.12062
Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief (MoDRM), 2019, STAND ORD DIS 2019
Paul BK, 2010, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V9, P89, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2010.SI04
Paul BK, 2010, GEOGR REV, V100, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00040.x
Paul KS., 2014, ORIENT GEOGRAPHER, V55, P57
Paul SK, 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE DISAS, P15, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-31110-9_2, DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-31110-9_2]
Roy C, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V12, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.02.004
Saha S., 2017, SPACE CULTURE INDIA, V5, P12, DOI [10.20896/saci.v5i1.234, DOI
10.20896/SACI.V5I1.234]
Saha S.K., 2020, THESIS AUSTR NATL U
Saha SK, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13158604
Saha SK, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.009
Saha SK, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P505, DOI 10.1111/disa.12214
Tatham P, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P54, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01249.x
United Nations, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
United Nations (UN), 2005, REP WORLD C DIS RED
World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2021, 2 MULT HAZ EARL WARN
Zinn JO, 2008, HEALTH RISK SOC, V10, P439, DOI 10.1080/13698570802380891
NR 42
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 6
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 19
AR 11012
DI 10.3390/su131911012
PG 20
(SSCI)
GA WL2UE
UT WOS:000710265800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Jiang, F
Meng, SS
Halim, N
Mozumder, P
AF Jiang, Fan
Meng, Sisi
Halim, Nafisa
Mozumder, Pallab
TI Departure Timing Preference during Extreme Weather Events: Evidence from
Hurricane Evacuation Behavior
SO TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
LA English
DT Article
DE sustainability and resilience; transportation systems resilience;
disaster response; recovery; and business continuity; emergency
evacuation; natural hazards and extreme weather events
ID SAMPLE SELECTION; RISK; MODEL; DISASTERS
AB Hurricane evacuation has become an increasingly complicated activity in the U.S.
as it involves moving many people who live along the Atlantic coast and Gulf coast
within a very limited time. A good deal of research has been conducted on hurricane
evacuation, but only a limited number of studies have looked into the timing aspect
of evacuation. This paper intends to contribute to the literature on evacuation
timing decisions by investigating what factors influence the time preference at the
household level. Two hurricane survey data sets were used to analyze household
evacuation behaviors across the Gulf coast as well as the Northeast and Mid-
Atlantic coast in a comparative perspective. Using the Heckman selection model, we
examined various factors identified in the literature on the two possible outcomes
(evacuation and early evacuation). We found that the most important determinants of
evacuation were prior evacuation experience, evacuation orders, and risk
perceptions, while the most important determinants of early evacuation were prior
evacuation experiences, days spent at the evacuation destination, and the cost of
evacuation. Socioeconomic factors also influenced the two decisions but
differently. These results provide implications for future hurricane evacuation
planning and for improving emergency management practices.
C1 [Jiang, Fan] Shanghai Univ Int Business & Econ, Dept Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R
China.
[Meng, Sisi] Univ Notre Dame, Keough Sch Global Affairs, Notre Dame, IN 46556
USA.
[Halim, Nafisa] Boston Univ, Dept Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA.
[Mozumder, Pallab] Florida Int Univ, Inst Environm, Dept Earth & Environm,
Miami, FL 33199 USA.
[Mozumder, Pallab] Florida Int Univ, Dept Econ, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
C3 Shanghai University of International Business & Economics; University of
Notre Dame; Boston University; State University System of Florida;
Florida International University; State University System of Florida;
Florida International University
RP Meng, SS (corresponding author), Univ Notre Dame, Keough Sch Global Affairs,
Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
EM smeng@nd.edu
RI Meng, Sisi/AHD-6194-2022
OI Meng, Sisi/0000-0003-0677-2717
FU National Science Foundation [1832693, 2122135]; Directorate For
Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1832693] Funding
Source: National Science Foundation; Division Of Behavioral and
Cognitive Sci; Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [2122135]
Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: We
acknowledge the support from the National Science Foundation (Award
#1832693 and #2122135).
CR Abdellaoui M, 2008, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V36, P245, DOI 10.1007/s11166-008-9039-8
10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0]
[Anonymous], 2002, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2002)3:3(107)
10.1177/028072709100900210
Ballard AJ, 2007, TRANSP RES RECORD, P195, DOI 10.3141/2035-22
Barrett B, 2000, TRANSPORT RES REC, P115
Berardelli J., 2020, CBS NEWS
Berger RJ, 2009, CONTEMP SOCIOL PERSP, P1
Blake ES, 2013, HURRICANE SANDY OCTO
Callen M, 2015, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V118, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.019
Cameron A. C., 2010, MICROECONOMETRICS US
Cassar A, 2017, WORLD DEV, V94, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.042
Congleton RD, 2006, PUBLIC CHOICE, V127, P5, DOI 10.1007/s11127-006-7729-9
6988(2007)8:3(69), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)]
6988(2002)3:1(12)
Florido A., 2018, WHY STAY HURRICANE B
Gladwin C.H., INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V19, P117
Greene W. H., 2018, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, V8th
Halim N., 2019, COMPLEX NETWORKS, P519
Halim N, 2021, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2675, P1000, DOI 10.1177/03611981211014529
HECKMAN JJ, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P153, DOI 10.2307/1912352
HECKMAN JJ, 1976, ANN ECON SOC MEAS, V5, P475
Herring, 2013, BILLION DOLLAR WEATH
6996.0000074
Irwin MD, 1995, BEHAV ANAL HURRICANE
Jiqun Liu, 2020, SIGIR '20: Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P1141, DOI
10.1145/3397271.3401085
Johnson K.J., 2020, NCST ADV COMM M JUN
KAHNEMAN D, 1990, J POLIT ECON, V98, P1325, DOI 10.1086/261737
KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185
Kang JE, 2007, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V37, P887, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.2007.00191.x
Koszegi B, 2006, Q J ECON, V121, P1133, DOI 10.1093/qje/121.4.1133
6988(2003)4:4(176), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176)]
Meng S., 2021, EC DISASTERS CLIMATE, V5, P223, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S41885-021-
00082-7, 10.1007/s41885-021-00082-7]
Meyer R, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1532, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01935.x
Mozumder P, 2018, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V71, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10640-017-0163-2
Mozumder P, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P81, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1828-1
PEACOCK WG, 1997, HURRICANE ANDREW ETH
Perry R.W., 1980, IMPLICATIONS NATURAL
Pham EO, 2020, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V12, P235, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0030.1
Riad J.K., 1997, HURRICANE THREAT EVA
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Sarwar MT, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P97, DOI 10.3141/2589-11
Smith AB, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V77, P1829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1678-x
Snaiki R, 2020, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2674, P23, DOI 10.1177/0361198120917671
Sobanjo JO, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, P60, DOI 10.3141/2360-08
Sorensen J.H., 1991, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, V9, P153
Ting MF, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-44252-w
U.S. Department of Transportation, CAT HURR EV PLAN EV
Weller SC, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000217
Whitehead J, 2005, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V32, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10640-005-4679-5
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Wilmot CG, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P129
Wong S., 2018, UNDERSTANDING EVACUE, V1
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 15
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0361-1981
EI 2169-4052
J9 TRANSPORT RES REC
JI Transp. Res. Record
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 2676
IS 5
BP 358
EP 372
AR 03611981211066901
DI 10.1177/03611981211066901
EA JAN 2022
PG 15
WC Engineering, Civil; Transportation; Transportation Science & Technology
SC Engineering; Transportation
GA 1Y5HG
UT WOS:000749564100001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Tripathy, SS
Bhatia, U
Mohanty, M
Karmakar, S
Ghosh, S
AF Tripathy, Shrabani S.
Bhatia, Udit
Mohanty, Mohit
Karmakar, Subhankar
Ghosh, Subimal
TI Flood evacuation during pandemic: a multi-objective framework to handle
compound hazard
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE flood evacuation; pandemic; optimization model; max– min approach
AB The evacuation of the population from flood-affected regions is a non-structural
measure to mitigate flood hazards. Shelters used for this purpose usually
accommodate a large number of flood evacuees for a temporary period. Floods during
a pandemic result in a compound hazard. Evacuations under such situations are
difficult to plan as social distancing is nearly impossible in the highly crowded
shelters. This results in a multi-objective problem with conflicting objectives of
maximizing the number of evacuees from flood-prone regions and minimizing the
number of infections at the end of the shelter's stay. To the best of our
knowledge, such a problem is yet to be explored in literature. Here we develop a
simulation-optimization framework, where multiple objectives are handled with a
max-min approach. The simulation model consists of an extended Susceptible-Exposed-
Infectious-Recovered-Susceptible model. We apply the proposed model to the flood-
prone Jagatsinghpur district in the state of Odisha, India. We find that the
proposed approach can provide an estimate of people required to be evacuated from
individual flood-prone villages to reduce flood hazards during the pandemic. At the
same time, this does not result in an uncontrolled number of new infections. The
proposed approach can generalize to different regions and can provide a framework
to stakeholders to manage conflicting objectives in disaster management planning
and to handle compound hazards.
C1 [Tripathy, Shrabani S.; Karmakar, Subhankar; Ghosh, Subimal] Indian Inst
Technol, Interdisciplinary Program Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra,
India.
[Bhatia, Udit] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Palaj 382355, Gandhinagar,
India.
[Mohanty, Mohit; Karmakar, Subhankar] Indian Inst Technol, Environemntal Sci &
Engn Dept, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
[Karmakar, Subhankar; Ghosh, Subimal] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn,
Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
[Ghosh, Subimal] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076,
Maharashtra, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT
System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) - Gandhinagar; Indian
Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT
System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Indian Institute
of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)
- Bombay
RP Ghosh, S (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Program
Climate Studies, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
EM subimal@civil.iitb.ac.in
RI Ghosh, Subimal/E-8247-2010; Mohanty, Mohit/GOK-1672-2022
OI Ghosh, Subimal/0000-0002-5722-1440
FU Department of Science and Technology Swarnajayanti Fellowship Scheme
[DST/SJF/EASA-01/2018-19, SB/SJF/2019-20/11]; Strategic Programs, Large
Initiatives and Coordinated Action Enabler (SPLICE); Climate Change
Program [DST/CCP/CoE/140/2018]
FX The authors would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology
Swarnajayanti Fellowship Scheme, through Project No.
DST/SJF/E&ASA-01/2018-19; SB/SJF/2019-20/11, and Strategic Programs,
Large Initiatives and Coordinated Action Enabler (SPLICE) and Climate
Change Program through Project No. DST/CCP/CoE/140/2018. The authors
woultrategic Programs, Large Initiatives d also like to acknowledge the
district magistrate of Jagatsinghpur, Shri Sangram Keshari Mahapatra,
sub-Collector/District emergency officer Shri. Saswat Ranajn Dash and
Ms. Devjani Bhuyan (Odisha Administrative Services) for helping us with
the data and insight of the real situation. The authors thank the editor
and reviewers whose valuable feedbacks have improved the quality and
readability of the manuscript.
CR Alaeddine H, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P687, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-687-
2015
Aronica GT, 2012, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V42-44, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2011.04.001
Barabasi AL, 2003, SCI AM, V288, P60, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60
Borowska-Stefanska M, 2019, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V18, P335, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2019.1593816
Census of India, 2011, PROVISIONAL POPULATI
Chen Q, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12486
Dottori F, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P781, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z
Dottori M, 2015, PHYSICA A, V434, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2015.04.007
Fowler HJ, 2010, EXTREMES, V13, P241, DOI 10.1007/s10687-010-0101-y
Ghosh S, 2006, ADV WATER RESOUR, V29, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.06.001
Ghosh S, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JD013548
Haghpanah F., 2018, OPTIMAL SHELTER LOCA
Hochrainer-Stigler S, 2019, EC DISASTERS CLIMATE, V3, DOI [10.1007/s41885-018-
0032-7, DOI 10.1007/S41885-018-0032-7]
Ishiwatari M, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100096
Karmakar S, 2006, ADV WATER RESOUR, V29, P1088, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.04.003
Kongsomsaksakul S., 2014, J E ASIA SOC TRANSP, V6, P4237
Landeg O, 2019, J HEALTH SERV RES PO, V24, P219, DOI 10.1177/1355819619840672
Lebel L, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0118-4
Lim H. Jr., 2013, J E ASIA SOC TRANSPO, V10, P147, DOI DOI 10.11175/EASTS.10.147
Malhotra C, 2013, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V28, P197, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czs051
Mani P, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P1553, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0891-8
Mirajkar AB, 2016, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-
5452.0000682
Mohanty MP, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8092
Mohanty MP, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109733
Moorthi PVP, 2018, APPL WATER SCI, V8, DOI 10.1007/s13201-018-0777-8
Odisha State Disaster Management Authority (OSDMA), 2012, HDB MAN MAINT MULT C
Ozdamar L, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V244, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.030
Pel AJ, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.011
Piatyszek E, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P1443, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0079-z
Raphael B, 2003, APPL MATH COMPUT, V146, P729, DOI 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00629-X
Rehana S, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P3653, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.007
Ren CF, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10040488
Sorensen JH, 2004, J HAZARD MATER, V109, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.004
Tayfur G, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P3205, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1694-6
Taylor MAP, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.003
Vojinovic Z, 2009, URBAN WATER J, V6, P183, DOI 10.1080/15730620802566877
Wang D, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005490
Xie C, 2010, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V46, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2009.11.004
NR 42
TC 19
Z9 19
U1 2
U2 17
PU IOP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 16
IS 3
AR 034034
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/abda70
PG 11
GA QM6MC
UT WOS:000621890400001
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Musolino, G
Ahmadian, R
Xia, JQ
Falconer, RA
AF Musolino, Giovanni
Ahmadian, Reza
Xia, Junqiang
Falconer, Roger A.
TI Mapping the danger to life in flash flood events adopting a mechanics
based methodology and planning evacuation routes
SO JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE flash floods; flood evacuation route; flood risk management; flood
hazard; flood modelling; human stability in floods; shock capturing
models
ID HUMAN STABILITY; RISK; HAZARD; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; INSTABILITY;
SIMULATION; AREA
AB Extreme flood events are becoming more frequent and challenging due to climate
change. Key objectives of this study are to evaluate different criteria used in
assessing the hazard to people during flood events and, once determined, the most
suitable method is then used to assess the hazard and the safest route(s) for
evacuation during a flood event and for a particular case study. The results of the
application of two criteria are analysed in terms of the flood hazard assessment
with the two criteria being based on a widely used empirical approach and a
mechanics based approach. Both criteria are used to assess the flood hazard to
people during an extreme flash flood, which occurred on 16th August 2004 in
Boscastle (UK). Results obtained for this study have highlighted that the mechanics
based criteria are preferable in identifying the ideal escape routes, when
considering the flood characteristics and the corresponding response of a human
body. The main novelty of this study lies in linking the flood hazard rating with
the human body characteristics, when determining the safest route and with a
revised formula being developed, which includes the effects of ground slope in the
application to a real case study.
C1 [Musolino, Giovanni; Ahmadian, Reza; Falconer, Roger A.] Cardiff Univ,
Hydroenvironm Res Ctr, Sch Engn, Cardiff CF24 3AA, Wales.
[Xia, Junqiang] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S,
Wuhan, Peoples R China.
C3 Cardiff University; Wuhan University
RP Musolino, G (corresponding author), Cardiff Univ, Hydroenvironm Res Ctr, Sch
Engn, Cardiff CF24 3AA, Wales.
EM musolinogd@cardiff.ac.uk
RI Ahmadian, Reza/AAC-9113-2019; Falconer, Roger/A-3714-2008
OI Ahmadian, Reza/0000-0003-2665-4734; Falconer, Roger/0000-0001-5960-2864;
Musolino, Giovanni/0000-0002-6273-5630; Xia,
Junqiang/0000-0001-7613-3457
FU Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, through the Centre
for Doctoral Training in Water Informatics: Science and Engineering
(WISE CDT) [EP/L016214/1]; Royal Academy of Engineering through Urban
Flooding Research Policy Impact Programme [UUFRIP\100031]
FX The research reported herein has been funded by The Engineering and
Physical Sciences Research Council, through the Centre for Doctoral
Training in Water Informatics: Science and Engineering (WISE CDT), via
Grant Number: EP/L016214/1 and The Royal Academy of Engineering through
Urban Flooding Research Policy Impact Programme, via Grant Number:
UUFRIP\100031. The authors want to thank the anonymous reviewers and the
editor for their helpful and constructive comments which contribute to
improve the manuscript.
CR ABT SR, 1989, WATER RESOUR BULL, V25, P881
Ahmadian R, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS314, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12208
Arrighi C, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P515, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-515-2017
Bodoque JM, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.005
Borowska-Stefanska M, 2019, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V18, P335, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2019.1593816
COX RJ, 2010, AUSTR RAINFALL RUNOF, P1
*ENV AG, 2004, LIV RISK FLOODS BOSC
Falcone R., 2012, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)
FerroLuzzi A, 1995, WHO TECH REP SER, V854, P1
FOSTER DN, 1973, STABILITY CHILDREN R, P12
13-3249-2013
Guo P, 2018, J HYDROINFORM, V20, P1310, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2018.161
*HR WALL, 2005, FLOOD BOSC N CORNW A
Hunter NM, 2008, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V161, P13, DOI 10.1680/wama.2008.161.1.13
1688.2008.00217.x
Jonkman SN, 2005, DISASTERS, V29, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00275.x
Karvonen RA., 2000, USE PHYS MODELS DAM
Koks EE, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
Kvocka D, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9090705
Kvocka D, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1569, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2501-z
Kvocka D, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1791, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1926-0
Liang DF, 2007, J HYDROL, V332, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.002
Liang DF, 2007, INT J NUMER METH FL, V53, P811, DOI 10.1002/fld.1305
Lind N, 2004, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V40, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2004.tb01012.x
LOVE DJ, 1989, TECHNICAL REPORT
Marchi L, 2010, J HYDROL, V394, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.017
MARIANI S, 2011, WORKS GROUP F THERM
Martinez-Gomariz E, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P1259, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2242-z
Milanesi L, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P182, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016172
Modrick TM, 2015, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V3, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.02.003
Neelz S., 2013, SC120002 ENV AG
*ONS, 2010, AV BRIT ED UN WORLD
Ramsbottom D., 2003, FLOOD RISK PEOPLE PH
RAMSBOTTOM D, 2006, FLOOD RISK PEOPL PHA
Roca M, 2010, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V3, P63, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01055.x
ROWE D, 2004, BOSCASTLE AUGUST 16
Russo B, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P251, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0702-2
Shu CW, 2016, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V39, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/39/1/012038
Soon JJ, 2018, INT J EMERG SERV, V7, P134, DOI 10.1108/IJES-05-2017-0031
Svetlana D, 2015, PROC ECON FINANC, V34, P649, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01681-0
Takahashi S., 1992, REPORT PORT HARBOUR, V34, P4
Teng J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V90, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006
Trigg MA, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/094014
XIA J, 2014, STABILITY CRITERION
Xia JQ, 2014, J HYDRAUL RES, V52, P93, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2013.875073
Xia JQ, 2011, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V164, P267, DOI 10.1680/wama.2011.164.6.267
Xia JQ, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.02.017
Zhang W, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P1283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2134-7
NR 52
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 7
U2 23
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1753-318X
J9 J FLOOD RISK MANAG
JI J. Flood Risk Manag.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 13
IS 4
AR e12627
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12627
EA MAY 2020
PG 19
GA OY6ZV
UT WOS:000535286800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lee, YH
Keum, HJ
Han, KY
Hong, WH
AF Lee, Yoon-Ha
Keum, Ho-Jun
Han, Kun-Yeun
Hong, Won-Hwa
TI A hierarchical flood shelter location model for walking evacuation
planning
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood hazard; flood shelter planning; GIS; hierarchical location model;
multi-criteria decision analysis
ID MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; TEMPORARY SHELTER; GIS; VULNERABILITY;
FATALITIES; DISASTERS; HAZARD; AREAS
AB Prior planning of shelters and evacuation routes is the foundation of effective
and safe post flood management. In this study, a hierarchical model for emergency
shelter location selection in preparation for immediate, short-term, and long-term
floods was developed. To ensure the safety of evacuation routes, levels of walking
evacuation risk were classified based on inundation depth and flow rate, and high-
risk areas were set as barriers in the network analysis. Accessibility, safety from
inundation, service accessibility, and facility capacity were set as criteria for
location selection to ensure evacuation safety and the capacity to provide the
services necessary to maintain the lives of evacuees in shelters. Candidate
locations in a flood shelter case study area were selected, and their
characteristics compared with those of existing designated shelters via a grading
system. The candidate shelters were found to be preferable in terms of safety and
service capacity. The model presented here considers the viability of walking
evacuation on flooded roads and a selection of methodologies for each type of flood
shelter, thereby providing insight into the design of an integrative model to
address the complex decision-making processes involved in flood shelter selection
and post-flood management.
C1 [Lee, Yoon-Ha] Hanyang Univ, Innovat Durable Bldg & Infrastruct Res Ctr, Seoul,
South Korea.
[Keum, Ho-Jun] Natl Disaster Management Res, Disaster Prevent Res Div, Pretoria,
South Africa.
[Han, Kun-Yeun] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Daegu, South Korea.
[Hong, Won-Hwa] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architectural Civil Environm & Energy
Engn, Daegu, South Korea.
C3 Hanyang University; Kyungpook National University; Kyungpook National
University
RP Hong, WH (corresponding author), Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architectural Civil
Environm & Energy Engn, Daegu, South Korea.
EM hongwonhwa@gmail.com
FU Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) though Water
Management Research Program - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)
[79609]
FX This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology
Institute (KEITI) though Water Management Research Program, funded by
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (79609).
CR Akay AE, 2017, ISPRS ANN PHOTO REM, V4-4, P25, DOI 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-
25-2017
Alcada-Almeida L, 2009, GEOGR ANAL, V41, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-
4632.2009.00745.x
[Anonymous], 2011, 5 INT C FLOOD MANAGE
ARE OFEG OFEFP, 2005, AM TERR DANG NAT REC
Ashley ST, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P805, DOI 10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1
Boonmee C., 2017, J EATERN ASIA SOC TR, V12, P251
Chen W, 2017, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V23, P441, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2016.1185692
Chen Z, 2013, ASIA PAC J PUBLIC HL, V27, pNP58
Cheng C, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V20, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.011
Coates L, 1999, AUST GEOGR, V30, P391, DOI 10.1080/00049189993657
Cutter SL, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P102, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285515
De Buck E, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0126395
Doerner KF, 2009, OR SPECTRUM, V31, P651, DOI 10.1007/s00291-008-0126-7
10.4236/jgis.2015.74027
Gama M, 2016, EURO J COMPUT OPTIM, V4, DOI 10.1007/s13675-015-0058-3
Ghanbarpour MR, 2013, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V6, P319, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12017
Haynes K, 2009, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V8, P291, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2009.0022
주승민, 2012, [Regional Policy Review, 地域政策硏究(충북연)], V23, P99
임준홍, 2016, [Journal of Korea Planning Association, 국토계획], V51, P63
Ishigaki T., 2008, 11 ICUD SCOTL UK 31
Ishigaki T., 2005, P KOR WAT RES ASS C
1688.2008.00217.x
Li B, 2012, PEDOSPHERE, V22, P122, DOI 10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60198-7
Li H., 2017, MOLECULES, V22
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Ma YJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020399
Malczewski J, 2006, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V20, P703, DOI
10.1080/13658810600661508
Melgarejo LF, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P147, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.002
Moradi M, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V87, P1377, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2822-6
Nebot Sanz E., FORENSIC SCI INT GEN, V41, P3141, DOI
[10.1016/j.watres.2007.04.008, DOI 10.1016/J.FSIGEN.2007.03.003,
10.1016/j.anucene.2007.02.013]
OFAT OFEE OFEFP, 1997, REC 1997 PRIS COMPT
Paquette J., 2012, The South Pacific Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences,
V30, P33
Paul NR, 2017, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V66, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2016.02.006
Perez-Galarce F, 2017, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V59, P56, DOI
10.1016/j.seps.2016.12.001
Rahmati O, 2016, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V7, P1000, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
Rehman S, 2017, INT J ADV COMPUT SC, V8, P128
Reiter P., 2000, INT METHODS RISK ANA
Rikalovic A, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V69, P1054, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.090
Sanyal J, 2009, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V2, P262, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2009.01043.x
Scheuer S, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P731, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9666-7
Senturk E, 2017, INT J ENG GEOSCI, V2, P84, DOI 10.26833/ijeg.317314
Solin L, 2012, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V5, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2012.01153.x
Wallingford H., 2005, FLOOD RISK PEOPLE PH, P384
Xu W., 2006, ANNUALS DISASTER PRE, V49, P181
Zhang Y., 2012, BMC GENOMICS S1, V13, pS7
Zhao LJ, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112098
NR 53
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 2
U2 39
PI ABINGDON
SN 1747-7891
EI 1878-0059
JI Environ. Hazards
PD AUG 8
PY 2021
VL 20
IS 4
BP 432
EP 455
DI 10.1080/17477891.2020.1840327
EA NOV 2020
PG 24
GA TP8UB
UT WOS:000589537900001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bloemendaal, N
de Moel, H
Mol, JM
Bosma, PRM
Polen, AN
Collins, JM
AF Bloemendaal, Nadia
de Moel, Hans
Mol, Jantsje M.
Bosma, Priscilla R. M.
Polen, Amy N.
Collins, Jennifer M.
TI Adequately reflecting the severity of tropical cyclones using the new
Tropical Cyclone Severity Scale
LA English
DT Article
DE Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale; hurricane risk communication;
multiple hazards; tropical cyclone classification method; risk
perception
ID EVACUATION DECISION-MAKING; STORM-SURGE; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION;
HURRICANE; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; FRAMEWORK; BENEFITS
AB For decades, meteorologists and governments have been warning communities in
coastal areas for an imminent tropical cyclone (TC) using the Saffir-Simpson
Hurricane Wind Scale (SSHWS). The SSHWS categorizes a TC based on its maximum wind
speed, and is used in defining evacuation strategies and humanitarian response.
However, the SSHWS considers only the wind hazard of a TC, whereas a TC can also
cause severe conditions through its high storm surges and extreme rainfall,
triggering coastal and inland flooding. Consequently, the SSHWS fails to mirror the
TC's total severity. This becomes evident when looking at past events such as
Hurricane Harvey (2017), which was classified as a Tropical Storm while it caused
widespread flooding in the Houston (TX) area, with precipitation totals exceeding
1.5 m. Without including storm surge and rainfall information, adequate risk
communication with the SSHWS can be challenging, as the public can (mistakenly)
perceive a low-category TC as a low-risk TC. To overcome this, we propose the new
Tropical Cyclone Severity Scale (TCSS) that includes all three major TC hazards in
its classification. The new scale preserves the categorization as used in the
SSHWS, to maintain familiarity amongst the general public. In addition, we extend
the scale with a Category 6, to support communication about the most extreme TCs
with multiple hazards. The TCSS is designed to be applied on a local-scale, hereby
supporting local-scale risk communication efforts and evacuation strategies prior
to a TC landfall. The scale can be used for risk communication on both the total TC
risk and on the categories of the separate hazards, which can be valuable
especially in cases when one hazard is the predominant risk factor, such as excess
rainfall triggering flooding.
C1 [Bloemendaal, Nadia; de Moel, Hans; Mol, Jantsje M.; Bosma, Priscilla R. M.]
Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[Polen, Amy N.] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Collins, Jennifer M.] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; State University System of Florida;
University of South Florida; State University System of Florida;
University of South Florida
RP Bloemendaal, N (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm
Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM nadia.bloemendaal@vu.nl
RI Bloemendaal, Nadia/IWE-0919-2023; Mol, Jantsje/ACG-7465-2022
OI Mol, Jantsje/0000-0002-8833-5125; de Moel, Hans/0000-0002-6826-1974;
Polen, Amy/0000-0003-4560-1312; Bloemendaal, Nadia/0000-0002-3418-8692
FU VICI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
(NWO) [453-13-006]
FX The authors declare no competing interests. This research has been
funded by a VICI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific
Research (NWO) (Grant Number 453-13-006).
CR AMS, 2020, AMERICAN METEOROLOGI
[Anonymous], 2006, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Bakkensen LA, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aad056
Bean H, 2016, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V24, P136, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12108
Bell H. M., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P302, DOI
10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.08.004
Bourque LB, 2013, ENVIRON BEHAV, V45, P615, DOI 10.1177/0013916512437596
Brandon CM, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep07366
Broad K, 2007, B AM METEOROL SOC, V88, P651, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-88-5-651
Caduff C, 2010, BIOSOCIETIES, V5, P199, DOI 10.1057/biosoc.2010.1
Cangialosi J. P., 2019, NATL HURRICANE CTR F
Celsi R, 2005, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V21, P987, DOI 10.1193/1.2099047
ECMWF, 2020, CONT DAT ASS IFS
Forbes C, 2014, J MAR SCI ENG, V2, P437, DOI 10.3390/jmse2020437
Glahn B., 2009, NATL WEATHER DIGEST, V33, P3
Goldstein DG, 2014, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V9, P1
Hagen A., 2019, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Hebert C G, 2010, 29 C HURR TROP MET T
Irish JL, 2010, OCEAN ENG, V37, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.07.012
Jelesnianski C.P., 1984, OCEANS, V1984, P314, DOI DOI
10.1109/OCEANS.1984.1152341
Jones G, 2007, PUBLIC HEALTH NUTR, V10, P238, DOI 10.1017/S1368980007258513
Kantha L., 2006, EOS, V87, P3, DOI DOI 10.1029/2006EO010003
Kantha L, 2008, B AM METEOROL SOC, V89, P219, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-89-2-219
Kantha L, 2013, OCEAN ENG, V70, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.007
Kasperson RE, 1996, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V545, P95, DOI
10.1177/0002716296545001010
Knapp KR, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P363, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1
Lindner BL, 2019, J COASTAL RES, V35, P130, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-17-00223.1
Luitel B, 2018, J HYDROL, V556, P1026, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.019
Mase AS, 2015, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V41, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.004
Morrow B, US VIRGIN ISLANDS HU
Morrow B, PUERTO RICO HURRICAN
National Hurricane Center (NHC), 2019, NHC TRACK INT MOD
Neumann JE, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V129, P337, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1304-z
NHC, 2017, PROP CHIANG NHC TROP
NHC, 2020, TROP CYCL REP
NHC, 2019, SAFFIR SIMPSON HURRI
NHC, 2020, SEA LAK OV SURG HURR
NHC, NHC TROP CYCL GRAPH
NOAA, 2020, COSTL US TROP CYCL
NOAA, 2020, COSTL US TROP CYCL M
NOAA, 2020, GLOB DAT ASS SYST GD
NOAA, 2009, TECHN SUMM NAT HURR
Okan Y, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P929, DOI 10.1111/risa.12895
Perry R. W., 2006, WILEY PATHWAYS EMERG
Petrova DG, 2014, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V27, P191, DOI 10.1002/bdm.1803
Powell MD, 2007, B AM METEOROL SOC, V88, P513, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-88-4-513
Rappaport EN, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P341, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00074.1
Senkbeil JC, 2006, J COASTAL RES, V22, P1025, DOI 10.2112/05-0532.1
Simpson R. H., 1974, WEATHERWISE, V27, P169, DOI [DOI
10.1080/00431672.1974.9931702, 10.1080/00431672.1974.9931702]
Song JY, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab875f
Thomas K, 2001, HURRICANES HAVE SHAP
van den Hurk B, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/3/035001
van der Bles AM, 2019, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V6, DOI 10.1098/rsos.181870
Zelinsky D.A., 2018, HURRICANE HARVEY
NR 59
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 3
U2 8
PI BRISTOL
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 16
IS 1
AR 014048
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd131
PG 12
(SSCI)
GA PR1HV
UT WOS:000606994000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chelariu, OE
Iatu, C
Minea, I
AF Chelariu, Oana-Elena
Iatu, Corneliu
Minea, Ionut
TI A GIS-Based Model for Flood Shelter Locations and Pedestrian Evacuation
Scenarios in a Rural Mountain Catchment in Romania
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood hazard; spatial analysis; evacuation; vulnerability; shelter
location
ID RISK-MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; DISASTERS; ROUTES
AB Shelter and evacuation-route planning represents the core of safe and efficient
flood management. The methodology detailed in the present study includes an
analysis of the suitability of areas for evacuation points, as well as an
assessment of the degree of accessibility of those points during evacuation
scenarios in small mountainous drainage basins. The analysis is based on water
distribution and water-flow increase during the historic 2010 flooding of the
Sucevit,a basin, when the discharge increased in merely 40 min. The proposed model
considers the viability of pedestrian evacuation of the local population, as well
as the degree of accessibility of nearby evacuation points. Thus, according to the
results obtained for the mountain-based locality, 91.68% of the vulnerable
population can be evacuated in 30 min, while 8.32% of the inhabitants require up to
54 min to reach an evacuation point. In the case of Marginea, located in a plateau
area, the population under analysis can reach one of the evacuation points in
approximately 36 min. The present study can support the implementation of non-
structural flood management measures and decrease casualties through evacuation
optimization.
C1 [Chelariu, Oana-Elena; Iatu, Corneliu; Minea, Ionut] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ,
Fac Geog & Geol, Dept Geog, Iasi 700505, Romania.
C3 Alexandru Ioan Cuza University
RP Chelariu, OE; Minea, I (corresponding author), Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Fac
Geog & Geol, Dept Geog, Iasi 700505, Romania.
EM oana.chelariu@uaic.ro; ionutminea1979@yahoo.com
RI Chelariu, Oana-Elena/GVU-4572-2022; Minea, Ionut/AAC-7564-2020;
Chelariu, Oana Elena/O-4753-2016
OI Minea, Ionut/0000-0002-4866-6421; Chelariu, Oana
Elena/0000-0003-4468-0688
FU Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitisation, CNCS/CCCDI-UEFISCDI
within PNCDI III [PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-0577]
FX This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research,
Innovation and Digitisation, CNCS/CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number
PN-III-P1-1.1-PD-2019-0577, within PNCDI III.
CR Alam MJ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102016
Allafta H, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P2087, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2021.1955755
Anamaria-Ioana T, 2016, INT MULTI SCI GEOCO, P431
[Anonymous], 2020, COPERNICUS LAND MONI
[Anonymous], ORDER NO 459 2019 AP
[Anonymous], DIRECTIVE 2007 60 EC
Bernardini G, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12051316
Boguslawski P, 2018, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V94, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.032
Bunea G, 2016, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V30, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000575
Chang HS, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P1551, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1557-x
Coles AR, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101597
Conitz F, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8040167
de Brito MM, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P1019, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-1019-
2016
Dieperink C, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4467, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
Dobre, 2015, P INT C DYN DIS KAL, P57
Amideo AE, 2021, NETWORKS, V78, P46, DOI 10.1002/net.22058
Fekete A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212587
Fekete A, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13213016
Gan HS, 2016, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V67, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2016.07.001
13-3249-2013
Grover H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102728
Han D, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14071031
Hapciuc O.E., 2015, AIR WATER COMPON ENV, V1, P201, DOI [10.17378/AWC2015_27,
DOI 10.17378/AWC2015_27]
Hapciuc O.E., 2016, P 3E C LAFGP LA G OG
Hapciuc OE, 2016, INTL SCI CONF GEOBAL, P177, DOI 10.18509/GBP.2016.24
Hapciuc OE, 2015, INT MULTI SCI GEOCO, P301
Hsiao CC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102048
Hubbard S, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V52, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.05.006
Iosub M, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12588
Kubal C, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1881, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1881-2009
Lasage R, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P1441, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-1441-2014
Lee YH, 2021, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V20, P432, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2020.1840327
Leon F., 2015, P 7 BALKAN C INFORMA, P1
9488(2007)133:1(18)
Lumbroso D, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P341, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9671-x
Melgarejo LF, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P147, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.002
Miksa K, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104924
Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
Nicoara E.M., 2012, THESIS BABES BOLYAI
Nicoara E.M., 2011, P INT S GEOGRAPHIC I, P36
Nicoara ME, 2011, GEOGR TECH, V6, P81
Pathak S, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P2175, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04267-3
Popa MC, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12624
Post J, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1075, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1075-2009
Romanescu G, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS502, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12249
Rossello J, 2020, TOURISM MANAGE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104080
Sritart H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187355
Stalhult S., 2014, HOSP EXPOSED FLOODIN, V1, P67
Sugimoto T, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V29, P585
Trindade A, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P169, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3152-4
Zelenakova M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.008
NR 56
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 8
U2 15
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 19
AR 3074
DI 10.3390/w14193074
PG 18
GA 5G7XJ
UT WOS:000867206900001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Samany, NN
Sheybani, M
Zlatanova, S
AF Samany, Najmeh Neysani
Sheybani, Mahdi
Zlatanova, Sisi
TI Detection of safe areas in flood as emergency evacuation stations using
modified particle swarm optimization with local search
SO APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood; Safe areas; Emergency evacuation station; MPSO; LMPSO
ID VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; IN-PLACE; ALGORITHM; NETWORK; RELEVANCY;
SELECTION; MODEL
AB Emergency evacuation throughout and after the flood is a crucial task to
mitigating more instantaneous impacts, whilst refining social resilience for
longer-term recovery. To enhance the evacuation process, the determination and
prediction of safe areas before a flood is necessary. Indeed, the safe area or
shelter in place could play two roles during the flood; as temporary shelters and
as meeting points (station) for gathering before evacuation. This paper aims to
determine the safe area according to the spatial and environmental characteristics
of the urban extent (accessibility, topography, congestion, and land use). The main
contribution is finding safe areas using modified particle swarm optimization
(MPSO) with local search (LMPSO). The proposed method recognizes the optimal
location of temporary shelters as evacuation stations. It has been implemented in
Districts 3, 6, and 7 of Tehran, the capital of Iran. The comparison between the
achieved results of MPSO and LMPSO demonstrated that the LMPSO is more efficient
than the modified version. Since LMPSO is less sensitive to local minima and
converged to minimum cost faster than MPSO, and the distribution of optimum
locations of safe areas has been balanced, so all the population could benefit from
these stations. The comparison among the results of MPSO, LMPSO, GA, ACO and
genetic simulated annealing algorithms justified the efficiency of LMPSO too. (C)
2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Samany, Najmeh Neysani; Sheybani, Mahdi] Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Remote
Sensing & GIS, Tehran, Iran.
[Zlatanova, Sisi] Univ New South Wales, Sch Built Environm, GRID, Sydney,
Australia.
C3 University of Tehran; University of New South Wales Sydney
RP Samany, NN (corresponding author), Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Remote Sensing &
GIS, Tehran, Iran.
EM nneysani@ut.ac.ir
CR AIDR, 2009, FLOOD PREP MAN 20, P124
Amideo AE, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V279, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.009
[Anonymous], 2010, COMPUT OPTIM APPL
Ardaya AB, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P227, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.006
Asadi Y, 2019, J MT SCI-ENGL, V16, P677, DOI 10.1007/s11629-017-4802-4
Avrim B., 2020, P 24 INT C ART INT S
Aygun B, 2021, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106870
Bandrova T, 2016, INT CONF CARTOGR GIS, P770
Basta C, 2007, J HAZARD MATER, V145, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.032
Boloorani AD, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116859
Creach A., 2019, MAR POLICY, V117, P103
Bui DT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V668, P1038, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.422
Docherty B, 2009, HARVARD ENVIRON LAW, V33, P349
Gao H, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101839
Gao H, 2013, INFORM SCIENCES, V250, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.005
Goerigk M, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V71, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.08.007
Gou J, 2017, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V57, P468, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.025
Haynes K, 2009, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V8, P291, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2009.0022
Haynes K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P781, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.011
He YY, 2019, MATH PROBL ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/9132315
Helderop E., 2019, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V3, DOI [DOI
10.1016/J.TRIP.2019.100022, 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100022]
Hermas ES., 2020, J REMOTE SENS SPACE
Ibrahim D, 2016, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V102, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.366
Jahangir MH, 2019, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100215
Jahromi MN, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P7854, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-
11089-0
Jelokhani-Niaraki M, 2021, J AMB INTEL HUM COMP, V12, P2387, DOI 10.1007/s12652-
020-02364-6
Jing XY, 2019, INFORM FUSION, V51, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.10.013
Khosravi K, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V627, P744, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
Kundu R, 2014, NEUROCOMPUTING, V129, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.09.026
Kusumo ANL, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V88, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.07.002
Lakshay, 2020, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2019.100756
Lechowska E, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V94, P1341, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z
Li JW, 2014, CHIN CONT DECIS CONF, P1310, DOI 10.1109/CCDC.2014.6852369
Lim MBB, 2019, ASIA PAC MANAG REV, V24, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.01.001
Liu DL, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.008
MAY RM, 1976, NATURE, V261, P459, DOI 10.1038/261459a0
Mollah AK, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1187, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.018
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Neisany Samany N, 2009, LECT NOTES GEOINFORM, P271
Ogato GS, 2020, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100659
Ohyver M, 2019, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V157, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.231
Oliveto PS, 2015, THEOR COMPUT SCI, V605, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.tcs.2015.01.002
Omidipoor M, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10010012
Pourghasemi HR, 2020, J HYDROL, V582, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124536
Qureshi S, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13050949
Saaty Thomas L., 2008, International Journal of Services Science, V1, P83, DOI
10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
Samanta S, 2016, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/hydrology3030029
Samany NN, 2019, CITIES, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.012
Samany NN, 2014, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V33, P116, DOI
10.1016/j.engappai.2014.04.004
Samany NN, 2013, MOB INF SYST, V9, P189, DOI 10.1155/2013/284904
Shorabeh SN, 2020, LIBR INFORM SCI RES, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101017
Singh P, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.017
Sudholt D, 2012, J DISCRET ALGORITHMS, V10, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.jda.2011.06.002
Suparta W, 2014, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V20, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/20/1/012057
Tanweer MR, 2015, INFORM SCIENCES, V294, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.053
Tehrany MS, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P1149, DOI 10.1007/s00477-015-1021-
9
Thompson RJ., 2011, INT ARCH ISPRS 38 7
Tian D., 2017, INTELL AUTOM SOFT CO, DOI 10.1080/10798587.2017
Tian DP, 2018, SWARM EVOL COMPUT, V41, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.swevo.2018.01.011
Trivedi A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P722, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.019
Veeraswamy A, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V102, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.015
Wang KP, 2021, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107404
Wang ZX, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.010
Wang ZY, 2020, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V21, P1044, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2019.2900858
Xian SY, 2017, J HYDROL, V548, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.057
Yang G, 2011, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V11, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.059
Yang X, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V23, P1038, DOI [10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.037,
10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.057]
Yin D., 2020, ENV URBAN SYST, V80
Zhan ZH, 2011, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V15, P832, DOI 10.1109/TEVC.2010.2052054
Zhang DF, 2020, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106397
Zhang F, 2013, INT C COMP SUPP COOP, P576, DOI 10.1109/CSCWD.2013.6581025
Zhang X, 2018, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/math6120287
Zlatanova S, 2014, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V40-8, P147, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-
XL-8-147-2014
NR 75
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 2
U2 16
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 1568-4946
EI 1872-9681
J9 APPL SOFT COMPUT
JI Appl. Soft. Comput.
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 111
AR 107681
DI 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107681
EA JUL 2021
PG 20
WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Computer Science,
Interdisciplinary Applications
(SSCI)
SC Computer Science
GA WR6LV
UT WOS:000714610400003
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Fraser, T
AF Fraser, Timothy
TI Fleeing the unsustainable city: soft policy and the dual effect of
social capital in hurricane evacuation
SO SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Social capital; Policy toolkits; Disaster; Evacuation; Mobility;
Networks
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; DISASTER RECOVERY;
VULNERABILITY; DECISIONS; STRATEGY; LINKING; FLOOD; RACE; HOME
AB Why do citizens evacuate and where do they go once they have left disaster
zones? Using Facebook data aggregated to the neighborhood level, this mixed methods
study analyses the movement of Facebook users to and from cities struck by storms
and floods. This study examines why evacuation varied among cities during Hurricane
Dorian, a major hurricane which struck the US southeast in 2019. This study
examines the intersecting roles of evacuation orders, policy tools, bonding,
bridging, and linking social capital, and social vulnerability. The author combines
mobility network analysis and geographic information systems with statistical
matching models and geospatial case studies of affected communities. This study
highlights how linking social capital and "soft" community-oriented preparedness
policies boosted evacuation between cities, while bonding social capital was
associated with less evacuation. By clarifying community-level factors in
evacuation, this study aims to open a research agenda for analyzing the politics of
human mobility during crises.
[GRAPHICS]
.
C1 [Fraser, Timothy] Northeastern Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 960A Renaissance Pk,360
Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
C3 Northeastern University
RP Fraser, T (corresponding author), Northeastern Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 960A
Renaissance Pk,360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
EM timothy.fraser.1@gmail.com
OI Fraser, Timothy/0000-0002-4509-0244
CR Adalja AA, 2014, ANN EMERG MED, V64, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.12.010
Ahmed M.A., 2020, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V7, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100180
Aldrich D.P., 2012, BUILDING RESILIENCE
Aldrich D.P., 2018, IRGC RESOURCE GUIDE, V2
Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
Aldrich Daniel P, 2019, BLACK WAVE NETWORKS
[Anonymous], 2007, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.x
[Anonymous], 1977, IMPLEMENTATION GAME
[Anonymous], 2002, HEAT WAVE
[Anonymous], 1973, IMPLEMENTATION GREAT
[Anonymous], 2013, ANLDIS1301
[Anonymous], 2019, TIME
Bakema MM, 2019, DISASTERS, V43, P431, DOI 10.1111/disa.12322
Boudet H, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P69, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0641-3
Carr J, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V77, P1551, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1664-3
Chamlee-Wright E, 2009, RATION SOC, V21, P429, DOI 10.1177/1043463109337097
COLEMAN JS, 1988, AM J SOCIOL, V94, pS95, DOI 10.1086/228943
Cova TJ, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P601, DOI 10.1111/risa.12651
Cutter SL, 2006, ENVIRONMENT, V48, P8, DOI 10.3200/ENVT.48.2.8-20
Das S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V152, P291, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2292-1
Roque AD, 2020, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V11, P204, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12187
Deng HF, 2021, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1057/s41599-021-00824-8
10.1080/17477891.2016.1140630
Dominey-Howes D, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V16, P1, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.004
Elliott JR, 2010, SOCIOL QUART, V51, P624, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01186.x
Enarson E, 1998, DISASTERS, V22, P157, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00083
Fazey I, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P1731, DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-00950-x
Flint CG, 2010, NAT HAZARDS REV, V11, P118, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000014
Fraser T, 2022, SCAND J OCCUP THER, V29, P325, DOI 10.1080/11038128.2021.1933172
Fraser T, 2022, ECOL SOC, V27, DOI 10.5751/ES-13097-270203
Fraser T, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102342
Fraser T, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100320
Fraser T, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101965
Fraser T, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-81001-4
Fussell E, 2010, POPUL ENVIRON, V31, P20, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0092-2
Hamideh S, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P1629, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3371-3
Hawkins RL, 2010, BRIT J SOC WORK, V40, P1777, DOI 10.1093/bjsw/bcp087
Hood C.C., 2007, TOOLS GOVT DIGITAL A
Johnson Alex, 2019, NBC NEWS
Keogh DU, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P699, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9791-y
Kyne D, 2020, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V11, P61, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12183
Lieberman ES, 2005, AM POLIT SCI REV, V99, P435, DOI 10.1017/S0003055405051762
Lipsky M, 2010, STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRACY: DILEMMAS OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN PUBLIC
SERVICES, 30TH EDITION, P1
Lucero E, 2022, J URBAN AFF, V44, P1168, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2020.1785303
Maas Paige, 2019, KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International
Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, DOI 10.1145/3292500.3340412
Manuell ME, 2011, DISASTERS, V35, P417, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01219.x
Martin Y, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181701
Martini A, 2020, ENCOUNTERING EXTREMISM, P1
McPherson M, 2001, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V27, P415, DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Metaxa-Kakavouli Danae, 2018, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer
Interaction, V2, DOI 10.1145/3274391
Michel-Kerjan EO, 2010, J ECON PERSPECT, V24, P165, DOI 10.1257/jep.24.4.165
Mouw T, 2006, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V32, P79, DOI
10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123150
Murray-Tuite P., 2018, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI
Na HS, 2015, IIE TRANS, V47, P1287, DOI 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1040929
Nakai H, 2016, J COMMUN HEALTH NURS, V33, P196, DOI
10.1080/07370016.2016.1227213
Nath S, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P1169, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00818-6
National Centers for Environmental Information, 2019, BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
NWS Birmingham [@NWSBirmingham], 2019, TWITTER
Nye JS, 2008, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V616, P94, DOI 10.1177/0002716207311699
Orchard S, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P1665, DOI 10.1007/s11625-019-00768-8
Partelow S, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P203, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00854-2
Perrin A., 2019, SHARE US ADULTS USIN
PERRY RW, 1991, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V9, P47
Pierson P., 1994, DISMANTLING WELFARE
Popovski V, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P5, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0138-0
Raker EJ, 2018, SOC SCI QUART, V99, P1200, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12498
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Salamon L. M., 1989, PRIVATIZATION TOOLS, P23
Salvati P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P867, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.064
Schattschneider E.E., 1960, SEMISOVEREIGN PEOPLE
Small, 2009, UNANTICIPATED GAINS
Smiley KT, 2018, POPUL ENVIRON, V40, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11111-018-0304-8
Smith JG, 2016, SUSTAIN SCI, V11, P441, DOI 10.1007/s11625-015-0348-y
Szreter S, 2004, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V33, P650, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyh013
Tidball KG, 2018, SUSTAIN SCI, V13, P797, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0506-5
Trainor JE, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P151, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000105
Uscher-Pines L, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V37, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.028
Varshney A, 2001, WORLD POLIT, V53, P362, DOI 10.1353/wp.2001.0012
Village A, 2017, J ETHN MIGR STUD, V43, P1943, DOI 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1240027
Virapongse A, 2019, SUSTAIN SCI, V14, P1161, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0612-z
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Wilson SN, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P194, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.649711
Yabe T, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0211375
Ye MX, 2019, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100403
NR 92
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 9
PU SPRINGER JAPAN KK
PI TOKYO
PA SHIROYAMA TRUST TOWER 5F, 4-3-1 TORANOMON, MINATO-KU, TOKYO, 105-6005,
JAPAN
SN 1862-4065
EI 1862-4057
J9 SUSTAIN SCI
JI Sustain. Sci.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 17
IS 5
SI SI
BP 1995
EP 2011
DI 10.1007/s11625-022-01098-y
EA FEB 2022
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
GA 4L1XW
UT WOS:000752805000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Medina, N
Sanchez, A
Vojinovic, Z
AF Medina, Neiler
Sanchez, Arlex
Vojinovic, Zoran
TI Emergency Evacuation Behavior in Small Island Developing States:
Hurricane Irma in Sint Maarten
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE evacuation; predictors of evacuation; hurricanes Irma; binomial logistic
regression; risk management
ID DECISION-MAKING; DISASTERS; MODEL; RISK
AB Disasters triggered by natural hazards are becoming more frequent and more
intense, causing damage to infrastructure and causing loss of life. One way to
reduce disaster risk is by evacuating the hazardous area. However, despite the
amount of literature that exists on evacuation behavior, there is still a lack of
agreement on which variables can be used as predictors for individuals (or
households) to actually evacuate. This lack of agreement can be related to the many
variables that can affect the evacuation decision, from demographics, geographic,
the hazard itself, and also local or cultural differences that may influence
evacuation. Hence, it is essential to analyze and understand these variables based
on the specifics of a case study. This study aims to find the most significant
variables to be used as predictors of evacuation on the island of Sint Maarten,
using data collected after the disaster caused by Hurricane Irma in September 2017.
The results suggest that the variables gender, homeownership, percentage of
property damage, quality of information, number of storeys of the house, and the
vulnerability index are the most significant variables influencing evacuation
decisions on the island. We believe the results of this paper offer a clear view to
risk managers on the island as to which variables are most important in order to
increase evacuation rates on Sint Maarten and to plan more efficiently for future
evacuations. In addition, the variables found in this study have the potential to
be the base information to set up, validate, and calibrate evacuation models.
C1 [Medina, Neiler] Univ Antioquia, Escuela Ambiental Fac Ingn, Calle 67 53-108,
Medellin 050010, Colombia.
[Medina, Neiler] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Biotechnol, Maasweg 9, NL-2629 HZ
Delft, Netherlands.
[Sanchez, Arlex; Vojinovic, Zoran] IHE Delft Inst Water Educ, Dept Environm Engn
& Water Technol, POB 3015, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands.
[Vojinovic, Zoran] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Ctr Water Syst,
Exeter EX4 4QF, England.
[Vojinovic, Zoran] Univ Belgrade, Fac Civil Engn, Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 73,
Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
[Vojinovic, Zoran] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, POB 4, Klongluang
12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
C3 Universidad de Antioquia; Delft University of Technology; IHE Delft
Institute for Water Education; University of Exeter; University of
Belgrade; Asian Institute of Technology
RP Medina, N (corresponding author), Univ Antioquia, Escuela Ambiental Fac Ingn,
Calle 67 53-108, Medellin 050010, Colombia.; Medina, N (corresponding author),
Delft Univ Technol, Dept Biotechnol, Maasweg 9, NL-2629 HZ Delft, Netherlands.
EM neiler.medina@udea.edu.co; a.sanchez@un-ihe.org; z.vojinovic@un-ihe.org
FU European Union [603663, 776866]; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia,
Tecnologia e Innovacion
FX The research leading to these results has received funding from the
European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant
agreement No. 603663 for the research project PEARL (Preparing for
Extreme and Rare events in coastaL regions), and from the European
Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant
agreement No. 776866 for the research project RECONECT. The study
reflects only the authors' views and the European Union is not liable
for any use that may be made of the information contained herein. In
addition, this work was partially supported by the Colombian government
through the Administrative Department of Science, Technology and
Innovation COLCIENCIAS. (Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia,
Tecnologia e Innovacion) by providing extra funding to a Ph.D.
researcher.
CR [Anonymous], 2000, GLOB ENV CHANGE PART, DOI [10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0, DOI
10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0]
[Anonymous], 2012, SPECIAL REPORT WORKI
6988(2002)3:3(107)
10.1177/028072709100900210
Brown Shakara, 2016, PLoS Curr, V8, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.692664b92af52a3b506483b8550d6368
Cangialosi J.P., 2018, HURRICANE IRMA 30 AU
CRED, NAT DIS 2017
Cutter S, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P291
Das J, 2022, HYDROLOG SCI J, V67, P477, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2021.2023157
Department of Statistics Sint Maarten [STAT], 2017, STAT YB
Giannaros C, 2022, METEOROL APPL, V29, DOI 10.1002/met.2079
Hoeppe P, 2016, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V11, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.10.002
6996.0000074
Husson F., 2017, EXPLORATORY MULTIVAR, DOI DOI 10.1201/B21874
Kundzewicz ZW, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
Lee D, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103818
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Medina N., 2019, J EXTREM EVENTS, V6, P1950001, DOI [10.1142/S2345737619500015,
DOI 10.1142/S2345737619500015]
Medina N, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041452
6996.0000083
Meteorological Department Curacao [MDC], 2015, HURR TROP STORMS DUT
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), EXTR ACT 2017 ATL HU
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Smith SK, 2009, DEMOGRAPHY, V46, P127, DOI 10.1353/dem.0.0048
Sterzel T, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220936
UNFCCC, 2005, CLIM CHANG SMALL ISL
UNISDR, 2018, EC LOSS POV DIS 1998
Vojinovi Z., 2007, URBAN WATER J, V4, P211, DOI DOI 10.1080/15730620701464190
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Wilson SN, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P194, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.649711
Yazdani M, 2022, SAFETY SCI, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105867
Yazdani M, 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V13, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100218
NR 41
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN 2
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 11
AR 2117
DI 10.3390/w15112117
PG 22
GA I9FF4
UT WOS:001005758600001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Thapa, B
Watanabe, T
Regmi, D
AF Thapa, Bhabana
Watanabe, Teiji
Regmi, Dhananjay
TI Flood Assessment and Identification of Emergency Evacuation Routes in
Seti River Basin, Nepal
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE flood inundation map; hydrologic engineering center river analysis
system; unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry; evacuation route; flood
hazard; socioeconomic survey; combined approach
ID HEC-RAS; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POSTDISASTER
RESETTLEMENT; NATURAL HAZARDS; AMERICAN-SAMOA; FLASH FLOODS; RISK;
INUNDATION; ADAPTATION
AB Sudden floods frequently occur in the Himalayas under changing climates. Rapid
glacial melt has resulted in the formation of glacial lakes and associated hazards.
This research aimed to (1) identify flood-prone houses, (2) determine pedestrian
emergency evacuation routes, and (3) analyze their relationships to socioeconomic
status in the Seti River Basin. Detailed hazard maps were created using field
survey results from unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry and the Hydrologic
Engineering Center River Analysis System. Questionnaire, focus-group, and key-
informant surveys helped identify the socioeconomic situation. Inundation maps
revealed that most residents are exposed to future flooding hazards without proper
evacuation routes. Highly impoverished and immigrant households were at the highest
risk in terms of income inequality and migration rate (p < 0.001) and were located
on the riverside. The locations of 455 laborers' houses were significantly
correlated with inundation hazards (p < 0.001). Governmental and associated
agencies must develop adequate plans to relocate low-income households. Group
discussions revealed the need for stronger adaptive capacity-building strategies
for future risk management. Pokhara requires better systematic and scientific land-
use planning strategies to address this issue efficiently. A similar approach that
combines flood modeling, proper evacuation route access, and socioeconomic survey
is suggested for this river basin.
C1 [Thapa, Bhabana] Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Environm Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido
0600810, Japan.
[Watanabe, Teiji] Hokkaido Univ, Fac Environm Earth Sci, Sapporo, Hokkaido
0600810, Japan.
[Regmi, Dhananjay] Himalayan Res Ctr, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.
[Regmi, Dhananjay] Nepal Tourism Board, Kathmandu 44600, Nepal.
C3 Hokkaido University; Hokkaido University
RP Thapa, B (corresponding author), Hokkaido Univ, Grad Sch Environm Sci, Sapporo,
Hokkaido 0600810, Japan.
EM bhabana@ees.hokudai.ac.jp; twata@ees.hokudai.ac.jp; ceo@ntb.org.np
OI Watanabe, Teiji/0000-0002-1783-3186
CR Abarquez I., 2004, COMMUNITY BASED DISA, V150, P1
Acharya B.R., 2008, FIG FAO CNG INT SEM, P1
Aggett GR, 2009, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V113, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.034
Aksha SK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V10, P103, DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-0192-7
Alias NE, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12552
Aljehani Maher, 2016, 2016 IEEE 5th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics,
DOI 10.1109/GCCE.2016.7800524
[Anonymous], 2015, NEP DIS REP 2015
Apatu EJI, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P779, DOI 10.1111/disa.12170
Backes D., 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, V42, P181
Bang HN, 2012, J RISK RES, V15, P1141, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2012.705315
Barba S, 2019, DRONES-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/drones3040079
Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT
A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX
Bashawri A, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P924, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01019-3
Becker HA, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V128, P311, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00074-6
Ben Khalfallah C, 2018, J AFR EARTH SCI, V142, P44, DOI
10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.03.004
Bhandary N.P., 2012, ISSMGE B, V6, P8
Bi CK, 2019, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105741
Boero R, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V8, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.04.002
Brouwer R, 2004, ECOL ECON, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.020
Busato L, 2016, ENG GEOL, V211, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.06.023
Buylova A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101442
Campion BB, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P1895, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0452-6
CBS Nepal, 2019, STAT YB 2019
CBS Nepal, 2020, MULT IND CLUST SURV, P96
Chen Y, 2017, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V26, P65, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2016-0130
Chow V.T., 2010, MLW APPL HYDROLOGY
Dankers R, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009719
De Marchi B, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01252.x
Demir V, 2016, ADV METEOROL, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/4891015
Dwivedi S., 2013, J NEPAL GEOL SOC, V46, P11
Dwivedi S., 2012, REPORT SUBMITTED COM
Elalem S, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V8, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.12.001
Evans S.G., 2015, SNOW ICE RELATED DIS, P563, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-394849-
6.00016-0
Fort M., 1987, Z GEOMORPH S, V63, P9
Fraser SA, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V16, P123, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.008
Garrett B, 2018, T I BRIT GEOGR, V43, P341, DOI 10.1111/tran.12232
Gentle P, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V21, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007
Ghosh S, 2012, J EARTH SYST SCI, V121, P637, DOI 10.1007/s12040-012-0181-y
Government of Nepal, 2018, NAT PLANN COMM CENTR, V199
Guhathakurta P, 2011, J EARTH SYST SCI, V120, P359, DOI 10.1007/s12040-011-0082-
5
Halgamuge MN, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V24, P1, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.011
Hameed LK, 2013, JORDAN J CIV ENG, V7, P44
Hanisch J., 2013, J NEPAL GEOLOGICAL S, V46, P1
Hildmann H, 2019, DRONES-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/drones3030059
Hirabayashi Y, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P816, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1911,
10.1038/nclimate1911]
Hummell BMD, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P111, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0090-9
Hutanu E, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061624
Imai K.S., 2019, HDB POVERTY
Islam AMT, 2021, GEOSCI FRONT, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006
Jones S, 2014, GEOFORUM, V57, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.07.011
Kargel J., ONE SCI SEARCH CAUSE
Kargel J.S., 2013, GLACIAL FLOODING DIS, P1
Katayama K, 2018, IEEE GLOB CONF CONSU, P221, DOI 10.1109/GCCE.2018.8574602
Kathmandu University, 2012, FLOOD IN MAPP SET RI
Khanal NR, 2015, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V31, P219, DOI
10.1080/07900627.2014.994116
Khattak MS, 2016, ARAB J SCI ENG, V41, P1375, DOI 10.1007/s13369-015-1915-3
Kim SS, 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-3, P209, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-
3-W8-209-2019
Kochar, 2015, GLOBAL MIDDLE CLASS
Kumar N, 2020, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V6, P397, DOI 10.1007/s40808-019-00687-8
Kumar N, 2017, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V3, P1463, DOI 10.1007/s40808-017-0390-0
Kumar P. P., 2013, OPEN J MOD HYDROL, V3, P97, DOI DOI 10.4236/OJMH.2013.33013
Langhammer J, 2018, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V175, P3223, DOI 10.1007/s00024-018-1874-
1
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Lim MBB, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P1539, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2038-6
Lindell MK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P129, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.011
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.03.003
Liu QA, 2011, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V40, P926, DOI 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.07.014
Maher A., 2016, P 10 SEATUC S E AS T, P22
Makinoshima F, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100113
Mavhura E, 2017, GEOFORUM, V86, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.008
Miceli R, 2008, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V28, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006
Mirza MMQ, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, pS95, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0184-7
Mohapatra PK, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P131, DOI 10.1023/A:1021178000374
Mondino E, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P1049, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1729361
Mool P. K., 2011, GLACIAL LAKES GLACIA
Morss RE, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.047
Morss RE, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P2009, DOI 10.1111/risa.12403
Nagatani K., 2017, FIELD SERVICE ROBOTI, V5, P163, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-67361-
5_11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-67361-5_11]
Pappenberger F, 2005, J HYDROL, V302, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036
Park S, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9040207
Patel DP, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2956-6
Pathak S, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P2175, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04267-3
Penning-Rowsell EC, 2012, AREA, V44, P152, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01085.x
Petley D, UNDERSTANDING SETI R
Quiroga VM, 2016, RIBAGUA-REV IBEROAM, V3, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.riba.2015.12.001
Rangari Vinay Ashok, 2019, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India):
Series A (Civil, Architectural, Environmental and Agricultural Engineering), V100,
P49, DOI 10.1007/s40030-018-0345-0
Rangari VA, 2019, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V5, P1839, DOI 10.1007/s40808-019-00641-
8
Remondino F, 2011, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V38-1, P25
Restas A, 2015, WORLD J ENG TECHNOL, V3, P316, DOI [DOI
10.4236/WJET.2015.33C047, 10.4236/wjet.2015.33c047]
Restas A., 2018, WORLD J ENG TECHNOL, V6, P116
Ridolfi E, 2017, SENSORS-BASEL, V17, DOI 10.3390/s17081777
Rufat S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013
Sarhadi A, 2012, J HYDROL, V458, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.039
Scolobig A, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P499, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0161-1
Serede I.J., 2014, INT J ENG RES TECHNO, V2, P1, DOI DOI
10.11648/J.HYD.20140201.11
Serede IJ., 2015, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V3, P55, DOI [10.11648/j.hyd.20150306.11, DOI
10.11648/J.HYD.20150306.11]
Shekhar S, 2012, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V26, P2253, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2012.719624
Smith PJ, 2014, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V7, P265, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12055
Smith PJ, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P423, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-423-2017
Somonovic S. P., 1999, URBAN WATER, V1, P167, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-
0758(99)00017-5
Sridarran P, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P125, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.017
Statista, MOB NETW COV SHAR PO
Tate EC, 2002, J HYDROL ENG, V7, P100, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:2(100)
Tingsanchali T, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V32, P25, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1233
Tuladhar G., 2015, GEOENVIRONMENTAL DIS, V2, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40677-014-0011-4,
DOI 10.1186/S40677-014-0011-4]
Wagemann E, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P828, DOI 10.1111/disa.12228
Walch C, 2018, GEO-GEOGR ENVIRON, V5, DOI 10.1002/geo2.51
Wei HL, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.011
Xiong MZ, 2016, IEEE VTS VEH TECHNOL, DOI 10.1109/VTCSpring.2016.7504062
Yamanaka H., 1982, J NEPAL GEOL SOC, V2, P113, DOI [10.3126/jngs.v2i0.36232, DOI
10.3126/JNGS.V2I0.36232]
NR 117
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 13
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 1
AR 82
DI 10.3390/land11010082
PG 33
GA YP8HA
UT WOS:000748859600001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yusuf, JE
Whytlaw, JL
Hutton, N
Olanrewaju-Lasisi, T
Giles, B
Lawsure, K
Behr, J
Diaz, R
McLeod, G
AF Yusuf, Juita-Elena (Wie)
Whytlaw, Jennifer L. L.
Hutton, Nicole
Olanrewaju-Lasisi, Taiwo
Giles, Bridget
Lawsure, Kaleen
Behr, Joshua
Diaz, Rafael
McLeod, George
TI Evacuation behavior of households facing compound hurricane-pandemic
threats
SO PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
ID DECISION-MAKING; COVID-19; HEALTH; MODEL
AB This study examines households' prospective evacuation behavior during a
hurricane-pandemic compound threat. Data from a 2020 survey of coastal Virginia
households help answer two questions: (1) What factors associated with the threat
and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and hurricanes influence the prospective
evacuation behavior of households during a compound hurricane-pandemic event? (2)
What are the equity implications for emergency management policies and practices to
support evacuation and sheltering during a compound hurricane-pandemic event?
Households in the sample were split between those who stated they would evacuate
away from the at-risk region and those who would stay. Greater household
vulnerability to hurricanes and COVID-19 and having sufficient financial resources
increase the likelihood of evacuation. Higher-income households were more likely to
have resources to evacuate and were less likely to suffer financial consequences
from a hurricane or pandemic. Racial minorities are more vulnerable to the pandemic
and face greater resource challenges when evacuating.
C1 [Yusuf, Juita-Elena (Wie)] Old Dominion Univ, Sch Publ Serv, 2137 Constant Hall,
Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
[Whytlaw, Jennifer L. L.; Hutton, Nicole] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Polit Sci &
Geog, Norfolk, VA USA.
[Olanrewaju-Lasisi, Taiwo] Carnegie Mellon Univ Lib, Community Data Literacy,
Pittsburgh, PA USA.
[Giles, Bridget; Lawsure, Kaleen; Behr, Joshua; Diaz, Rafael] Old Dominion Univ,
Virginia Modeling Anal & Simulat Ctr, Suffolk, VA USA.
[McLeod, George] Old Dominion Univ, Ctr Geospatial Sci Educ & Analyt, Norfolk,
VA USA.
C3 Old Dominion University; Old Dominion University; Carnegie Mellon
University; Old Dominion University; Old Dominion University
RP Yusuf, JE (corresponding author), Old Dominion Univ, Sch Publ Serv, 2137
Constant Hall, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
EM jyusuf@odu.edu; jwhytlaw@odu.edu; nhuttons@odu.edu;
tlasisi@andrew.cmu.edu; bgiles@odu.edu; klawsure@odu.edu; jbehr@odu.edu;
rdiaz@odu.edu; gmcleod@odu.edu
RI ; Yusuf, Juita-Elena/F-6482-2011
OI Whytlaw, Jennifer/0000-0002-1612-8805; Yusuf,
Juita-Elena/0000-0003-3599-1417; Diaz, Rafael/0000-0002-8637-5967; Behr,
Joshua/0000-0002-0472-3068
CR Anderson CJ, 2023, EUR J POLIT RES, V62, P571, DOI 10.1111/1475-6765.12524
[Anonymous], WATER, DOI [10.3390/w13172328, DOI 10.3390/W13172328]
[Anonymous], 2006, HOMELAND SECURITY AF
[Anonymous], 2007, J DISABIL POLICY STU
[Anonymous], 2010, J REGIONAL ANAL POLI
[Anonymous], ACHIEVING SOCIAL EQU
10.1177/028072709100900210
Botzen WJW, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05064-2
Brennan Virginia M., 2009, NATURAL DISASTERS PU, P5
Bricker Jesse., 2011, SURVEYING AFTERMATH
Cegan JC, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00045-7
Census Bureau U. S., 2021, 94 7M AM LIV COASTL
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2018, CDCS SOC VULN IND
Connolly Jennifer M., 2020, J PUBLIC POLICY, V3, DOI [10.30636/jbpa.32.99, DOI
10.30636/JBPA.32.99]
Dargin JS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102560
DAVIS HL, 1976, J CONSUM RES, V2, P241, DOI 10.1086/208639
de Jonge Patricia, 2018, BEHAV PUBLIC POLICY, V13, P1, DOI [10.1017/bpp.2018.23,
DOI 10.1017/BPP.2018.23]
Deslatte A, 2020, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V80, P827, DOI 10.1111/puar.13257
Doorn N, 2019, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V4, P112, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2018.1428162
Dulebenets Maxim A., 2021, HDB DISASTER EMERGEN, P150, DOI
[10.5281/zenodo.5553076, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.5553076]
Dunlop CA, 2020, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V35, P365, DOI 10.1177/0952076720939631
Elliott JR, 2006, SOC SCI RES, V35, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.02.003
Emrich CT, 2020, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V19, P228, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2019.1675578
Gaynor TS, 2020, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V80, P832, DOI 10.1111/puar.13264
GHR Connects, 2022, COMMUNITY INDICATORS
Gray DM, 2020, NAT REV GASTRO HEPAT, V17, P520, DOI 10.1038/s41575-020-0330-8
Jacobs F, 2019, PLAN THEOR, V18, P24, DOI 10.1177/1473095218763221
1816.2007.00191.x
Killerby ME, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P790, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e1
Lee IJ, 2021, J NATL MED ASSOC, V113, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.11.015
Leong C, 2022, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V37, P203, DOI 10.1177/0952076720977588
Mozumder P, 2018, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V71, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10640-017-0163-2
Rivera JD, 2022, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, DOI 10.1111/puar.13574
Rosemberg MAS, 2021, J OCCUP ENVIRON HYG, V18, P169, DOI
10.1080/15459624.2021.1901905
Sanders Michael, 2018, BEHAV PUBLIC POLICY, V2, P144, DOI [10.1017/bpp.2018.17,
DOI 10.1017/BPP.2018.17]
The New York Times, 2021, NY TIMES
Vermeulen F, 2002, J ECON SURV, V16, P533, DOI 10.1111/1467-6419.00177
Vigo D, 2021, BJPSYCH OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1192/bjo.2021.24
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Zhao TT, 2023, PROF GEOGR, V75, P396, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2022.2103722
NR 51
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0033-3352
EI 1540-6210
J9 PUBLIC ADMIN REV
JI Public Adm. Rev.
PD 2023 APR 24
PY 2023
DI 10.1111/puar.13634
EA APR 2023
PG 16
WC Public Administration
SC Public Administration
GA E3TY1
UT WOS:000974815300001
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ghorbanzadeh, M
Burns, S
Rugminiamma, LVN
Ozguven, EE
Huang, WR
AF Ghorbanzadeh, Mahyar
Burns, Simone
Rugminiamma, Linoj Vijayan Nair
Ozguven, Eren Erman
Huang, Wenrui
TI Spatiotemporal Analysis of Highway Traffic Patterns in Hurricane Irma
Evacuation
LA English
DT Article
ID SIMULATION; DISASTERS; LESSONS; KATRINA; MODEL
AB The State of Florida is significantly vulnerable to catastrophic hurricanes that
cause widespread infrastructural damage and claim lives annually. In 2017,
Hurricane Irma, a Category 4 hurricane, took on the entirety of Florida, causing
the state's largest evacuation ever as 7 million residents fled the hurricane.
Floridians fleeing the hurricane faced the unique challenge of where to go, since
Irma made an unusual landfall from the south, enveloping the entire state, forcing
evacuees to drive farther north, and creating traffic jams along Florida's
evacuation routes that were worse than during any other hurricane in Florida's
history. This study aimed to assess the spatiotemporal traffic impacts of Irma on
Florida's major highways based on real-time traffic data before, during, and after
the hurricane made landfall. First, we conducted a time-series-based analysis to
evaluate the temporal evacuation patterns of this large-scale evacuation. Second,
we developed a metric, namely the congestion index (CI), to assess the
spatiotemporal evacuation patterns on I-95, I-75, I-10, I-4, and turnpike (SR-91)
highways with a focus on both evacuation and returning traffic. Third, we employed
a geographic information system-based analysis to visually illustrate the CI values
of corresponding highway sections with respect to different dates and times.
Findings clearly showed that imperfect forecasts and the uncertainty surrounding
Irma's predicted path resulted in high levels of congestion and severe delays on
Florida's major evacuation routes.
C1 [Ghorbanzadeh, Mahyar] Florida State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
[Burns, Simone; Rugminiamma, Linoj Vijayan Nair; Ozguven, Eren Erman; Huang,
Wenrui] Florida A&M Univ Florida State Univ Coll Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Tallahassee, FL USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida State University; State
University System of Florida; Florida A&M University
RP Ghorbanzadeh, M (corresponding author), Florida State Univ, Dept Civil &
Environm Engn, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
EM mg17x@my.fsu.edu
OI Vijayan Nair Rugminiamma, Linoj/0000-0001-5510-6257
FU U.S. National Science Foundation [1832068]; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, &
Manufact Inn; Directorate For Engineering [1832068] Funding Source:
National Science Foundation
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
project was sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation (award no.
1832068).
CR [Anonymous], ASS PRESS
Archibald E, 2012, IATSS RES, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.06.002
Cutter S.L, 2012, HAZARDS VULNERABILIT, P385, DOI [10.4324/9781849771542, DOI
10.4324/9781849771542]
Edara P, 2010, NAT HAZARDS REV, V11, P127, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000015
Etters, TALLAHASSEE DEMOCRAT
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), STATISTICS-ABINGDON
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), FDOT TRAFF REP
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13051098
International Coral Reef Initiative, 2018, NAT OC ATM ADM INT Y
Kocatepe A., 2017, THESIS FLORIDA STATE
Lindell MK, 2019, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI
947X(2006)132:1(11)
Lowery W., WASH POST
Marasco D, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2459, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04093-7
Maul, 2018, PREPAREDNESS RESPONS
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Murray-Tuite P, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, P98, DOI 10.3141/2312-10
National Weather Service, RAD IM REFL
National Weather Service, NEW RAD LAND PAG
Neppalli VK, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P213, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.011
NOAA, HURR COSTS
So SD, 2019, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106402
Tanaka K, 2007, PHYSICA A, V376, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2006.10.023
Ulak MB, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V92, P1489, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3260-9
6988(2001)2:3(105), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:3(105)]
6988(2005)6:3(143), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:3(143)]
Wolshon B, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V52, P908, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.164
Wolshon B, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000026
Wolshon B, 2009, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V15, P12, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-
0342(2009)15:1(12)
Yang H, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P63, DOI 10.3141/2599-08
Zou QL, 2020, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000524
NR 39
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 4
PI THOUSAND OAKS
SN 0361-1981
EI 2169-4052
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 2675
IS 9
BP 321
EP 334
AR 03611981211001870
DI 10.1177/03611981211001870
EA MAR 2021
PG 14
GA WL1RH
UT WOS:000684619800001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Renne, JL
Mayorga, E
AF Renne, John L.
Mayorga, Estefania
TI What has America learned Since Hurricane Katrina? Evaluating evacuation
plans for carless and vulnerable populations in 50 large cities across
the United States
LA English
DT Article
DE Carless and vulnerable populations; Evacuation planning; Evacuation
preparedness; Disaster planning; Special needs evacuation planning
AB This study reveals that only marginal improvements have occurred with respect to
evacuation planning in America's 50 largest cities since Hurricane Katrina struck
New Orleans in 2005. The hurricane revealed a lack of preparedness, specifically to
evacuate carless and vulnerable populations. This paper analyzes the state of
evacuation planning in America's fifty largest cities in the twenty-teens and
compares plans to those in the same cities a decade earlier. The paper also
introduces an Evacuation Preparedness Rating System, which includes five
dimensions, identified as best practices in evacuation planning for vulnerable
populations. The dimensions examine each plan regarding 1. Special needs
registries, 2. Specialized transportation plans for individuals with specific
needs, 3. Pick-up location plan, 4. Multimodal evacuation plan, and 5. Pedestrian
evacuation plan. The paper reports scores for each dimension and then presents a
composite score for each city. This research lays the groundwork to guide
practitioners and scholars on benchmarking and tracking the effectiveness of
emergency evacuation plans across cities and over time with respect to evacuation
plans for the most vulnerable members of society.
C1 [Renne, John L.] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Boca Raton,
FL 33431 USA.
[Mayorga, Estefania] Toothaker Org, Boca Raton, FL USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida Atlantic University
RP Renne, JL (corresponding author), Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Urban & Reg
Planning, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA.
EM jrenne@fau.edu
CR Bian RJ, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1143, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.005
Cameron Carl T., 2007, CENT DISABIL SPEC NE
Hess DB, 2007, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V4
Hess DB, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, P11, DOI 10.3141/2376-02
Holmes TJ, 2022, SOC SCI MED, V306, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115108
Kailes JI, 2007, J DISABIL POLICY STU, V17, P230, DOI DOI
10.1177/10442073070170040601
Kaisar EI, 2012, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V15, P45, DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.15.2.3
Kiefer John, 2009, CITY ASSISTED EVACUA
Kuhl L, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V127, P493, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1273-2
947X(2006)132:1(11)
Litman T, 2006, LESSONS KATRINA RITA
Mace Sharon E, 2018, Am J Disaster Med, V13, P195, DOI 10.5055/ajdm.2018.300
Mathelry Deborah, 2014, 777 NCHRP
Matherly Deborah, 2013, 740 NCHRP
Matherly Deborah, 2011, 150 TCRP
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
10.1080/19439962.2010.488316
Naghawi H, 2015, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V42, P81, DOI 10.1139/cjce-2014-0177
Renne J., 2022, CREATING RESILIENT T
Renne John, 2006, PLANNING, V72, P33
Renne John, 2013, MOBILIZING YOUR COMM
Renne JL, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P36, DOI 10.3141/2119-05
1446.2007.00620.x
Shirley T, 2021, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/2156964
Transportation Research Board, 2008, 294 TRANSP RES BOARD, DOI [10.17226/12445,
DOI 10.17226/12445]
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2006, NAT PLAN REV PHAS 2
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, 2007, MAN PED
EV METR AR
Wolshon Brian, 2009, NCHRP SYNTHESIS 392
Wong S.D., 2020, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V5, DOI [10.1016/j.trip.2020.100131, DOI
10.1016/J.TRIP.2020.100131]
NR 35
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 9
U2 9
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD OCT 1
PY 2022
VL 80
AR 103226
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103226
PG 13
Water Resources
GA 5V9LM
UT WOS:000877545700002
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Calgaro, S
Borellini, M
Seni, AHA
Tirzi, MC
Gimo, AMD
Cebola, BR
Putoto, G
Trevisanuto, D
AF Calgaro, Serena
Borellini, Martina
Seni, Amir Hussein Abubacar
Tirzi, Maria Concetta
Gimo, Antonio Marcos Dias
Cebola, Bonifacio Rodriguez
Putoto, Giovanni
Trevisanuto, Daniele
TI Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Evacuation and Care During a Natural
Disaster: The Experience of Cyclone Idai in Beira, Mozambique
SO FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS
LA English
DT Article
DE NICU; neonatology; cyclone; natural disaster; Mozambique
ID HURRICANE-KATRINA; LESSONS; NICU
AB Global warming has increased the frequency of natural disasters, such as
cyclones. Mozambique is considered one of the most vulnerable countries to extreme
weather events. Natural disasters particularly affect vulnerable people, including
preterm and critical ill infants of Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs).
Literature on NICU evacuations in the case of a natural disaster has been reported
in high-resource settings, but it is lacking in low-resource settings. On the 14th
of March 2019, a tropical cyclone (Idai) hit Mozambique. This report is a
descriptive analysis of the experience of the NICU evacuation and care during and
after cyclone Idai at Beira Central Hospital, Beira, Mozambique.
C1 [Calgaro, Serena; Borellini, Martina; Trevisanuto, Daniele] Univ Padua, Dept
Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua, Italy.
[Calgaro, Serena; Borellini, Martina; Tirzi, Maria Concetta; Putoto, Giovanni]
Doctors Africa CUAMM, Padua, Italy.
[Seni, Amir Hussein Abubacar; Gimo, Antonio Marcos Dias; Cebola, Bonifacio
Rodriguez] Cent Hosp Beira, Dept Pediat, Beira, Mozambique.
C3 University of Padua
RP Calgaro, S (corresponding author), Univ Padua, Dept Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua,
Italy.; Calgaro, S (corresponding author), Doctors Africa CUAMM, Padua, Italy.
EM serena.calgaro@gmail.com
RI Putoto, Giovanni/ABG-2069-2020
CR Barfield WD, 2017, PEDIATRICS, V139, DOI 10.1542/peds.2017-0507
Barkemeyer BM, 2006, PEDIATRICS, V117, pS369, DOI 10.1542/peds.2006-0099F
Barkemeyer BM, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V128, pS8, DOI 10.1542/peds.2010-3724E
Espiritu M, 2014, PEDIATRICS, V134, pE1662, DOI 10.1542/peds.2014-0936
International Organization for Migration, 2019, 3 INT ORG MIGR
Iwata O, 2017, NEONATOLOGY, V112, P92, DOI 10.1159/000466681
Kouadio IK, 2012, EXPERT REV ANTI-INFE, V10, P95, DOI [10.1586/eri.11.155,
10.1586/ERI.11.155]
NR 7
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 5
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 2296-2360
J9 FRONT PEDIATR
JI Front. Pediatr.
PD OCT 22
PY 2020
VL 8
AR 584281
DI 10.3389/fped.2020.584281
PG 6
WC Pediatrics
SC Pediatrics
GA OL3MQ
UT WOS:000585246100001
PM 33194918
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wang, D
Ozbay, K
AF Wang, Ding
Ozbay, Kaan
TI Multi-Stage Equitable Bus-Based Hurricane Evacuation Model With a
Stochastic Driver Availability Component
LA English
DT Article
DE public transportation; buses; sustainability and resilience; disaster
response; recovery; and business continuity; emergency evacuation
ID DISASTERS; LOCATION
AB Transportation planning before the actual landfall of a hurricane can save lives
by allowing evacuees to be transferred from the affected area to shelters in a safe
and timely manner. This paper aims to fill an important research gap by proposing a
detailed framework for bus-based evacuation planning with fair resource allocation
in dense urban areas. We deconstruct the bus-based evacuation problem into multiple
stages. Firstly, we identify a subset of existing bus stops to serve as bus pickup
locations during the evacuation through the use of an integer programming model.
The objective is to minimize the total number of pickup locations while ensuring
full coverage of the demand. Secondly, the selected bus pickup locations are
assigned to shelters where safe shelters are provided by the government. An equity
component was introduced in the shelter assignment stage to ensure fair evacuation
resource allocation. Finally, a bus driver management model was proposed that can
be used to determine the optimal crew size in bus-based evacuation planning. A
hypothetical hurricane evacuation scenario in New York City was used to evaluate
the performance of the proposed methodology and the impact of model parameters. The
results can provide feasible decisions on identifying bus pickup locations, shelter
assignment, as well as the number of drivers needed for transit-based evacuation
planning. The equity component shows a noticeable increase in equity index despite
it only adding a small cost to the average travel distance.
C1 [Wang, Ding; Ozbay, Kaan] NYU, C2SMART Ctr, Tandon Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Urban
Engn, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
C3 New York University; New York University Tandon School of Engineering
RP Wang, D (corresponding author), NYU, C2SMART Ctr, Tandon Sch Engn, Dept Civil &
Urban Engn, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
EM dw2283@nyu.edu
OI ozbay, kaan/0000-0001-7909-6532
FU C2SMART, a Tier 1 University Transportation Center at New York
University
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work
in this paper is funded by C2SMART, a Tier 1 University Transportation
Center at New York University.
CR Aalami S, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102760
Achterberg T, 2009, MATH PROGRAM COMPUT, V1, P1, DOI 10.1007/s12532-008-0001-1
Ahmed S, 2008, STATE OF THE ART DEC, P261, DOI DOI 10.1287/EDUC.1080.0048
P63, DOI 10.1016/j.sorms.2016.11.001
Caldera H.J., 2016, RESILIENT INFRASTRUC
Ceder A, 2015, PUBLIC TRANSIT PLANNING AND OPERATION: MODELING, PRACTICE AND
BEHAVIOR, 2ND EDITION, P1
Chen CC, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P40, DOI 10.3141/2091-05
DeAnnuntis CP, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P110, DOI 10.3141/2072-12
Deka D., 2010, P 89 ANN M TRANSP RE
Diab EI, 2014, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V66, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.019
DRAGO R, 1992, IND LABOR RELAT REV, V45, P764, DOI 10.2307/2524592
FEMA, 2013, HURR SAND FEMA ACT R
Gupta D., 2017, EXTRABOARD DRIVER WO
Hardy M., 2009, EVACUATION MANAGEMEN
He S., 2009, P 88 ANN M TRANSP RE
Hess DB, 2007, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V4
Hobeika AG, 1998, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V45, P192, DOI 10.1109/17.669768
947X(2006)132:1(11)
LONG L, 1985, TRANSPORT REV, V5, P247, DOI 10.1080/01441648508716602
6996.0000083
Morgul EF, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, P45, DOI 10.3141/2376-06
Mostajabdaveh M, 2019, IISE TRANS, V51, P809, DOI 10.1080/24725854.2018.1496372
MTA , 2012, BUS EMPL LOST TIM DA
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
10.1080/19439962.2010.488316
New Jersey Office of Homeland Security and Preparedness, URB AR SEC INT UASI
Ng M, 2010, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V25, P547, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8667.2010.00669.x
Osterman C., 2012, REUTERS
Pillac V, 2016, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V83, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2015.09.008
Prekopa A, 1998, APPL OPTIMIZAT, V13, P235
PREKOPA A, 1990, OPER RES, V38, P227, DOI 10.1287/opre.38.2.227
Rabbani M, 2018, INT T OPER RES, V25, P157, DOI 10.1111/itor.12331
Read the Docs, FACILITY LOCATION PR
Russo F., 2011, WIT T BUILT ENV, V116, P639
SFRPC , 2010, S FLOR REG PLANN COU
Strathman J.G., 2009, EVALUATION SHORT DUR
Wang D, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084444
Wirasinghe S., 2013, P 9 ANN C INT I NFR
Wong S., 2018, UNDERSTANDING EVACUE, DOI DOI 10.7922/G2FJ2F00
Xie K., 2016, LNCS T LARGE SCALE D, P190
Zhang X, 2014, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V17, P129, DOI 10.5038/2375-0901.17.3.9
Zhang XC, 2016, INT J TRANSP, V4, P47, DOI 10.14257/ijt.2016.4.2.04
Zhu G., 2016, PREPRINT
NR 65
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 11
U2 13
PI THOUSAND OAKS
SN 0361-1981
EI 2169-4052
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 2677
IS 2
BP 1619
EP 1632
DI 10.1177/03611981221109158
EA JUL 2022
PG 14
GA 9U6UJ
UT WOS:000833838600001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bernardini, G
Quagliarini, E
AF Bernardini, Gabriele
Quagliarini, Enrico
TI How to Account for the Human Motion to Improve Flood Risk Assessment in
Urban Areas
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood risk assessment; flood evacuation; evacuation modelling;
behavioral design; urban built environment at risk; human motion in
floodwaters
ID HAZARD RISK; EVACUATION; SIMULATION; RESILIENCE; PERCEPTION; MODEL;
RIVER
AB Floods are critical disasters affecting urban areas and their users.
Interactions with floodwater spreading and built environment features influence the
users' reaction to the emergency, especially during immediate disaster phases
(i.e., evacuation). Recent studies tried to define simulation models to evaluate
such exposure-related criticalities, assess individuals' flood risk, and propose
risk-mitigation strategies aimed at supporting the community's proper response.
Although they generally include safety issues (e.g., human body stability), such
tools usually adopt a simplified approach to individuals' motion representation in
floodwaters, i.e., using input from non-specialized databases and models. This
study provides general modelling approaches to estimate evacuation speed variations
depending on individual's excitement (walking, running), floodwaters depths and
individuals' features (age, gender, height, average speed on dry surfaces). The
proposed models prefer a normalized evacuation speeds approach in respect of
minimum motion constraint conditions to extend their applicability depending on the
individuals' characteristics. Speed data from previous experiments are organized
using linear regression models. Results confirm how individuals' speed reduces when
depth and age increase. The most significant models are discussed to be implemented
in evacuation simulation models to describe the evacuees' motion in floodwaters
with different confidence degree levels and then assess the community's flood risk
and risk-reduction strategies effectiveness.
C1 [Bernardini, Gabriele; Quagliarini, Enrico] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Construct
Civil Engn & Architecture, Via Brecce Bianche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.
C3 Marche Polytechnic University
RP Bernardini, G (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Construct Civil
Engn & Architecture, Via Brecce Bianche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.
EM g.bernardini@univpm.it; e.quagliarini@staff.univpm.it
RI Bernardini, Gabriele/S-6283-2017
OI Bernardini, Gabriele/0000-0002-7381-4537; quagliarini,
enrico/0000-0002-1091-8929
FU scientific project "Building Resilience to Flood Impact Deriving from
Global Warming in Europe (BRIDGE)"; Polytechnic University of Marche
FX This research was funded by the scientific project "Building Resilience
to Flood Impact Deriving from Global Warming in Europe (BRIDGE)" funded
by the Polytechnic University of Marche internal program 2017/2018.
CR [Anonymous], 2011, 5 INT C FLOOD MANAGE
Arrighi C, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P1010, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.191
Bernardini G, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104563
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.007
Birkholz S, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V478, P12, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
Bosina E, 2017, PHYSICA A, V468, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2016.09.044
Chanson H, 2014, P 5 INT S HYDR STRUC
Chen KF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040830
Confederation of Fire Protection Associations, 2012, EUR EUR GUID CFPA EN
Cox R.J., 2010, AUSTR RAINFALL RUNOF
Fan Q, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10101369
Haer T, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V60, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.006
Hamilton K, 2016, SAFETY SCI, V89, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.004
Herman I.P., 2016, BIOL MED PHYS BIOMED
Hissel F, 2014, COAST ENG, V87, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2013.11.015
Hu P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V643, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.197
Ishigaki T., 2006, P HYDR ENG, V50, P583, DOI 10.2208/prohe.50.583
Ishigaki T, 2008, 11 INT C URB DRAIN, V7
Kawasaki A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101348
Kolen B, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10101429
Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI
10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
Lammel G, 2010, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V18, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.020
Lakoba TI, 2005, SIMUL-T SOC MOD SIM, V81, P339, DOI 10.1177/0037549705052772
Lakshay, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V111, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.07.007
Lin J, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104540
Lu XZ, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V114, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.028
Melo R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V712, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136452
Milman A, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V36, P46, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.007
Morelli S, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V34, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.020
Opper ESMS, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.017
Paquier A, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V115, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.352
Parisi DR, 2005, PHYSICA A, V354, P606, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2005.02.040
Ronchi E., 2015, STUD FIRE SAF, V5, P11, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CSFS.2015.12.002
Takagi H, 2016, COAST ENG, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.11.002
Wang Y, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P6404, DOI 10.3390/w7116404
Weidmann U., 1993, IVT SCHR, VVolume 90, DOI [10.3929/ethz-a-000687810, DOI
10.3929/ETHZ-A-000687810]
Wood N, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.009
Wu JD, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11040971
Xia JQ, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.02.017
Zlateski A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101392
NR 48
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 8
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 5
AR 1316
DI 10.3390/w12051316
PG 23
(SSCI)
GA MU8KA
UT WOS:000555915200095
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Islam, S
Parr, S
Prazenica, R
Liu, DH
Namilae, S
AF Islam, Sabique
Parr, Scott
Prazenica, Richard
Liu, Dahai
Namilae, Sirish
TI Predictive modelling of fuel shortages during hurricane evacuation: An
epidemiological approach
SO IET INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
ID FILTERS
AB High-volume evacuations, disruptions to the supply chain, and fuel hoarding from
non-evacuees have led to localized fuel shortages lasting several days during
recent hurricanes. While news reports mention fuel shortages in past hurricanes,
the crowdsource platform Gasbuddy has quantified the fuel shortages in the recent
hurricanes. The analysis of this fuel shortage data suggested fuel shortages
exhibited characteristics of an epidemic. Here, a Susceptible- Infected-Recovered
(SIR) epidemic model is developed to study the evolution of fuel shortage during a
hurricane evacuation. Additionally, we apply optimal control theory to identify an
effective intervention strategy. The study found a linear correlation between
traffic demand during the evacuation of Hurricane Irma and the resulting fuel
shortage data. This correlation is used in conjunction with the Statewide Regional
Evacuation Study Program (SRESP) surveys to estimate the evacuation traffic and
fuel shortages for potential hurricanes affecting south Florida. Results indicate
that evacuation of Miami-Dade County in the event of a Category-3 hurricane
landfall in the region, could lead to fuel shortages in up to 90% of the local
refuelling stations. The model indicates that this reduces to 28% by providing
relief to 75% of the gas stations during the first two days of the evacuation.
C1 [Islam, Sabique; Prazenica, Richard; Namilae, Sirish] Embry Riddle Aeronaut
Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, 1 Aerosp Blvd, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 USA.
[Parr, Scott] Embry Riddle Aeronaut Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Daytona Beach, FL
USA.
[Liu, Dahai] Embry Riddle Aeronaut Univ, Coll Aviat, Daytona Beach, FL USA.
C3 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
University; Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
RP Namilae, S (corresponding author), Embry Riddle Aeronaut Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn,
1 Aerosp Blvd, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 USA.
EM namilaes@erau.edu
FU Department of Transportation, Center for Advanced Transportation
Mobility, NC AT University
FX Department of Transportation, Center for Advanced Transportation
Mobility, NC A&T University
CR [Anonymous], 2018, US CENSUS BUREAU QUI
Baker E., 2010, STATEWIDE REGIONAL E, V2
Bliss L., 2017, WHY FLORIDA RAN OUT
Brauer F., 2017, MATH EPIDEMIOLOGY
Centola D, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P1269, DOI 10.1126/science.1207055
Cheng G., 2008, TRANSP RES BOARD 200
Christakis NA, 2007, NEW ENGL J MED, V357, P370, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa066082
Dong S, 2018, PHYSICA A, V492, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2017.09.077
6988(2002)3:1(12)
Downs P., 2010, STATEWIDE REGIONAL E, V3
FDOT, 2018, HURR IRM EFF FLOR FU
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, 2017 HURR SEAS FEMA
Fu F, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep43634
Gao L, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep38220
Hansen E, 2011, J MATH BIOL, V62, P423, DOI 10.1007/s00285-010-0341-0
Islam S, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0229957
Julier S, 2000, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, V45, P477, DOI 10.1109/9.847726
Kalman Rudolf E., 1960, J BASIC ENG-T ASME, V82, P35
Khare A., 2019, PREDICTING GASOLINE, DOI 10.1007/s00291-019-00559-8
Lewis F. L., 2012, OPTIMAL CONTROL
Li J, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P2081, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1820-9
Li J, 2015, NAT HAZARDS REV, V16, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000154
9488(2007)133:1(18)
National Hurricane Center, 2017, IRM GRAPH ACH 5 DAY
Sabet MT, 2014, OCEAN ENG, V91, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.09.013
Sider A., 2017, GASBUDDY APP SCORES
Sprague DA, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0180802
Towers S, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0129179
Watts DJ, 2007, J CONSUM RES, V34, P441, DOI 10.1086/518527
Wolshon B, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P38, DOI 10.3141/2041-05
Yang K, 2015, KYBERNETES, V44, P475, DOI 10.1108/K-05-2014-0103
Yang W, 2014, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003583
NR 36
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 4
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1751-956X
EI 1751-9578
J9 IET INTELL TRANSP SY
JI IET Intell. Transp. Syst.
PD AUG
PY 2021
VL 15
IS 8
BP 1064
EP 1075
DI 10.1049/itr2.12083
EA JUN 2021
PG 12
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Transportation Science &
Technology
GA TD5UK
UT WOS:000658741300001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bernardini, G
Finizio, F
Postacchini, M
Quagliarini, E
AF Bernardini, Gabriele
Finizio, Fiorenza
Postacchini, Matteo
Quagliarini, Enrico
TI Assessing the flood risk to evacuees in outdoor built environments and
relative risk reduction strategies
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood risk; Flood evacuation; Risk assessment and planning; Behavioural
design; Risk reduction strategies; Flood hydrodynamics
ID EVACUATION; MODEL; SIMULATION; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; SYSTEM;
VULNERABILITY; DISASTERS; BEHAVIOR
AB Climate-change induced disasters, like floods, are expected to increase in the
future. In outdoor built environments, flood risk to evacuees depends on
interactions between floodwater spreading, built environment features, flood-
induced modifications, and individuals' reaction in emergency phases. Disaster risk
reduction strategies should mitigate the immediate flood impacts and improve the
community resilience, while being easy-toimplement and effectively supporting
evacuees during the initial phases of the emergency. Simulation-based methodologies
could support safety planners in evaluating the effectiveness of such strategies,
especially if basing on a micro-scale-oriented approach that represents emergency
interactions between each individual and the surrounding outdoor built environment.
This study adopts an existing micro-scale simulator (FlooPEDS) reproducing
experimental-based flood evacuation behaviours. According to a behavioural design-
based approach, simulation results focus on individual responses in the outdoor
built environment through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) aimed at providing
evidence of critical interactions between evacuees, floodwaters and the outdoor
built environment. A case study is selected by considering different flood
scenarios to test such KPIs. Risk reduction solutions are then provided, and their
effectiveness is checked by simulations. Results show the micro-scale and
behavioural design-based approach capabilities in proposing multi-scenarios
solutions (e.g.: architectural elements to support evacuees; emergency planning).
C1 [Bernardini, Gabriele; Finizio, Fiorenza; Postacchini, Matteo; Quagliarini,
Enrico] Univ Politecn Marche, DICEA Dept, Via Brecce Manche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.
C3 Marche Polytechnic University
RP Quagliarini, E (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Marche, DICEA Dept, Via
Brecce Manche, I-60131 Ancona, Italy.
EM g.bernardini@staff.univpm.it; m.postacchini@staff.univpm.it;
e.quagliarini@univpm.it
RI Postacchini, Matteo/H-6922-2019; Bernardini, Gabriele/S-6283-2017
OI Postacchini, Matteo/0000-0002-3208-9922; Bernardini,
Gabriele/0000-0002-7381-4537
FU "Building Resilience to flood Impact Deriving from Global warming in
Europe - BRIDGE" project
FX This work was supported by the "Building Resilience to flood Impact
Deriving from Global warming in Europe - BRIDGE" project, developedat
Universit`a Politecnica delle Marche.
CR [Anonymous], 2010, MODELLING MASS EVACU
[Anonymous], 2005, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470011815.B2A4A002
[Anonymous], 2013, 1822 NIST
[Anonymous], 2010, FIRE DYNAMICS SIMULA
[Anonymous], 2009, ENCYCL COMPLEX SYST, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3187,
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_187, 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_187]
[Anonymous], 2010, ENCY COMPLEXITY SYST, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_382
Baba Y, 2017, J JSCE, V5, P269, DOI DOI 10.2208/JOURNALOFJSCE.5.1_269
Bae H.U., 2016, INT J APPL ENG RES, V11, P111
Balakhontceva M, 2016, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V80, P2455, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.547
Bernardini G, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V116, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.023
10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.007
Briganti R, 2016, COAST ENG, V115, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.05.001
Brocchini M, 2017, MAR GEOL, V385, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.margeo.2016.12.005
Cere G, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.018
Chanson H., 2014, ISHS 2014 HYDRAULIC, P1, DOI [10.14264/uql.2014.48, DOI
10.14264/UQL.2014.48]
Chanson H, 2015, J HYDRAUL RES, V53, P540, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2015.1054321
Chu H, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030795
Cools J, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V58, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.006
Cox R.J., 2010, AUSTR RAINFALL RUNOF, DOI [10.1038/103447b0, DOI
10.1038/103447B0]
D'Orazio M, 2015, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V52, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.015
Di Mauro M., 2008, FLOOD RISK MANAG RES, P1117, DOI
[10.1201/9780203883020.ch131, DOI 10.1201/9780203883020.CH131]
Dottori F, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P2577, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-2577-
2016
Emori N., 2016, T ENG TECHNOLOGIES, P15
Fakhruddin SHM, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P323, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.08.004
Fan Q, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10101369
French EL, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001
Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
Haghani M, 2018, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V107, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2017.06.017
Hashemi M, 2011, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V31, P1607, DOI
10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.003
Hu P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V643, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.197
Ishigaki T, 2008, 11 INT C URB DRAIN, V7
Ishigaki T, 2009, ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-
6, P141, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_27
Jia XJ, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.018
Johansson A, 2008, ADV COMPLEX SYST, V11, P497, DOI 10.1142/S0219525908001854
Kazantzidou-Firtinidou D., 2017, EU PROJECT WIT T BUI, V173, P43
Klupfel t, 2014, REV AMBIENTE AGUA, P445, DOI DOI 10.4136/1980-993X
10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
Kotani, 2012, P NETW ERG SOC C SEA, DOI [10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299592, DOI
10.1109/SEANES.2012.6299592]
Lammel G, 2010, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V18, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2009.04.020
Leskens JG, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V53, P53, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.11.003
Lumbroso D, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS419, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12230
Lumbroso D, 2012, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V20, P149, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
5973.2012.00665.x
Lyu HM, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102103
Lyu HM, 2019, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V84, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.019
Lyu HM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P1012, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
Marana P, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101531
Melito L, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050550
Mens M.J.P., 2008, FLOOD RISK MANAG RES, P1109
Ministry of Interior (Italy), 2015, DM03082015 FIRE SAFE
Mishima N, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V8, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.003
Molinari D, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P381, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.009
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.018
Nara A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.020
Opper ESMS, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.017
Oubennaceur K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P44, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.09.007
Paquier A, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V115, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.352
Park K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101192
Pillac V, 2016, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V83, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2015.09.008
Postacchini M, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105153
Qi HH, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P817, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.006
Quagliarini E, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P698, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.010
Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
Sasabe M, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P759, DOI 10.1177/2399808318802940
Scheuer S, 2013, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V37, P82, DOI
Schreider SY, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V47, P91, DOI 10.1023/A:1005621523177
Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
Shah MAR, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.006
Shayannejad A, 2014, INT REV SPAT PLAN SU, V2, P39, DOI 10.14246/irspsd.2.2_39
Shirvani M, 2020, J HYDROINFORM, V22, P1078, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2020.031
Soares-Frazao S, 2008, J HYDRAUL RES, V46, P45, DOI
10.1080/00221686.2008.9521842
Taneja L, 2018, APPL MATH MODEL, V53, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2017.08.030
UNISDR, 2002, GUIDELINES REDUCING
Wu JD, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11040971
Yamashita S, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.027
Zhu RH, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104691
Zhuo L, 2020, J HYDROL, V591, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125600
Zlateski A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101392
NR 87
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 5
U2 24
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 64
AR 102493
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102493
EA AUG 2021
PG 21
Water Resources
GA UY6TJ
UT WOS:000701653600003
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhu, Y
Li, H
Wang, ZH
Li, QH
Dou, Z
Xie, W
Zhang, ZR
Wang, RJ
Nie, W
AF Zhu, Yang
Li, Hong
Wang, Zhenhao
Li, Qihang
Dou, Zhan
Xie, Wei
Zhang, Zhongrong
Wang, Renjie
Nie, Wen
TI Optimal Evacuation Route Planning of Urban Personnel at Different Risk
Levels of Flood Disasters Based on the Improved 3D Dijkstra's Algorithm
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Dijkstra's algorithm; shelter selection; evacuation time; road factor;
optimal evacuation route
ID DAM; DISTANCE; DENSITY; CHOICE
AB In the event of a flood, the choice of evacuation routes is vital for personnel
security. This is particularly true when road factors play an important role in
evacuation time. In this study, the traditional Dijkstra algorithm for route
planning is improved, and the evacuation model is improved from 2D to 3D. At the
same time, the Lasso regression method is adopted to take the road factors into
account in the pedestrian speed, and the location of shelter is selected and
optimized through the calculation results, and then based on the improved 3D
Dijkstra's algorithm, an optimal evacuation route method in different flood
disasters risk levels is proposed, which can make pedestrians reach the shelters
within the shortest time. After taking into account road factors (road width,
slope, non-motorized lane width, and pedestrian density), through the calculation
of the pedestrian speed formula, the estimated evacuation time of pedestrians is
obtained. By combining available shelters with evacuation routes, the optimized
algorithm improves the evacuation efficiency facing different risk levels of flood
disasters. The results show that when residents are confronted with flood disasters
of once-in-20-year, once-in-50-year, and once-in-100-year, the proposed
optimization algorithm can save 7.59%, 11.78%, and 17.78% of the evacuation time.
Finally, according to the verification of the actual effect in Meishan Town, the
proposed method of optimal evacuation route planning can effectively reduce the
evacuation time of pedestrians, evaluate, and optimize the location of existing
shelter, and provide suggestions for urban road reconstruction.
C1 [Zhu, Yang; Zhang, Zhongrong; Wang, Renjie] Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ, Sch Math &
Phys, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.
[Zhu, Yang; Li, Hong; Wang, Zhenhao; Xie, Wei; Nie, Wen] Chinese Acad Sci,
Quanzhou Inst Equipment Mfg, Haixi Inst, Quanzhou 362000, Peoples R China.
[Li, Hong] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Adv Mfg, Jinjiang 362200, Peoples R China.
[Li, Qihang; Nie, Wen] Jiangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Resources & Environm
Engn, Ganzhou 341000, Peoples R China.
[Dou, Zhan] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Dept Safety Engn,
Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
[Nie, Wen] State Key Lab Safety & Hlth Met Mines, Maanshan 243000, Peoples R
China.
C3 Lanzhou Jiaotong University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Fuzhou
University; Jiangxi University of Science & Technology; Beijing
University of Chemical Technology
RP Zhang, ZR (corresponding author), Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ, Sch Math & Phys,
Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.; Nie, W (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci,
Quanzhou Inst Equipment Mfg, Haixi Inst, Quanzhou 362000, Peoples R China.; Nie, W
(corresponding author), Jiangxi Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Resources & Environm Engn,
Ganzhou 341000, Peoples R China.; Nie, W (corresponding author), State Key Lab
Safety & Hlth Met Mines, Maanshan 243000, Peoples R China.
EM zhangzhr2021@126.com; wen.nie@vip.tom.com
RI Li, Hong/C-4643-2008
OI Li, Hong/0000-0002-8659-086X; Xie, Wei/0000-0001-5689-2157; Li,
Qihang/0000-0002-1303-2621; zhang, zhongrong/0000-0002-8176-7144; Zhu,
Yang/0000-0002-6888-8865
FU Major Science and Technology Projects of Anhui Province
[202003a0702002]; National Key Research and Development Program of China
[2021YFC3001304]
FX This research was funded by theMajor Science and Technology Projects of
Anhui Province (No. 202003a0702002), and the National Key Research and
Development Program of China (2021YFC3001304).
CR Aghabayk K, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105012
Bohannon RW, 2011, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V97, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004
Coutinho-Rodrigues J, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V22, P206, DOI
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.006
Dijkstra E. W., 1959, NUMER MATH, V1, P269, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01386390
Fan D, 2017, RES PEDESTRIAN NON M
Grumbly SM, 2019, J GEOVIS SPAT ANAL, V3, DOI 10.1007/s41651-019-0026-1
Hallegatte S., 2012, COST EFFECTIVE SOLUT, DOI [10.1596/1813-9450-6058, DOI
10.1596/1813-9450-6058]
Hougardy S, 2010, INFORM PROCESS LETT, V110, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ipl.2010.02.001
Hsiao CC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102048
Ishigaki T, 2009, ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-
6, P141, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_27
Jiang ZW, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105436
Kang DH, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13060756
Lemperiere F, 2017, ENGINEERING-PRC, V3, P144, DOI 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.018
Li X, 2018, STAT MED, V37, P473, DOI 10.1002/sim.7526
Li Z, 2021, INTERMETALLICS, V139, DOI 10.1016/j.intermet.2021.107361
Liu Y., 2003, WATER CONSERV SCI TE, V1, P17
Mateo C.M, 2011, P 9 INT S SE ASIAN W
Maynard D, 2007, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V115, P751, DOI 10.1289/ehp.9537
National Bureau of Statistics, 2020, CHIN STAT YB
Nugraheni IL, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09889
Roy S., 2021, ENV CHALLENGES, V4, P100194, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100194,
10.1016/j.envc.2021.100194]
Salunkhe SS, 2018, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V46, P915, DOI 10.1007/s12524-018-0749-3
Scarf P, 2007, J SPORT SCI, V25, P719, DOI 10.1080/02640410600874906
Shatu F, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V74, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.005
Sun YC, 2017, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V83, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2015.10.018
Takabatake T, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101532
Tresilian J., 2012, SENSORIMOTOR CONTROL
Van den Hove A, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108619
Vinet F, 2017, CIV ENG GEOMECH SER, P3
Wang HL, 2019, OCEAN ENG, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106131
Wang JY, 2022, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104733
Wang M., 2021, CHINA COUNTY STAT YB, DOI [10.42517/y.cnki.yxsku.2022.000058, DOI
10.42517/Y.CNKI.YXSKU.2022.000058]
Wang X., 2022, MODELING BOUNDEDLY R, V147, DOI [10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105590, DOI
10.1016/J.SSCI.2021.105590]
Weibing Ma, 2021, 2021 2nd International Conference on Urban Engineering and
Management Science (ICUEMS), P36, DOI 10.1109/ICUEMS52408.2021.00015
Wu JB, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V694, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133586
Yeo K.D, 2003, THESIS INHA U INCHEO
Yu S, 2021, ENG FAIL ANAL, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105441
Zacharias J, 2021, J URBAN MANAG, V10, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2021.05.003
Zhang JD, 2016, OPTIK, V127, P2579, DOI 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.006
NR 41
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 18
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD AUG
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 16
AR 10250
DI 10.3390/su141610250
PG 17
(SSCI)
GA 4A7FS
UT WOS:000845262900001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lin, ZY
Hu, SB
Zhou, TZ
Zhong, YX
Zhu, Y
Shi, L
Lin, H
AF Lin, Zhiyu
Hu, Shengbin
Zhou, Tianzhong
Zhong, Youxin
Zhu, Ye
Shi, Lei
Lin, Hang
TI Numerical Simulation of Flood Intrusion Process under Malfunction of
Flood Retaining Facilities in Complex Subway Stations
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE subway station; flood disaster prevention; VOF model; flood flow;
computational fluid dynamics
ID EVACUATION; RESILIENCE; DYNAMICS
AB In recent years, heavy rain and waterlogging accidents in subway stations have
occurred many times around the world. With the comprehensive development trend of
underground space, the accidents caused by flood flow intruding complex subway
stations and other underground complexes in extreme precipitation disasters will be
lead to more serious casualties and property damage. Therefore, it is necessary to
conduct numerical simulation of flood intrusion process under malfunction of flood
retaining facilities in complex subway stations. In order to prevent floods from
intruding subway stations and explore coping strategies, in this study, the
simulation method was used to study the entire process of flood intrusion into
complex subway stations when the flood retaining facilities fail in extreme rain
and flood disasters that occur once-in-a-century. The three-dimensional numerical
simulation model was constructed by taking a subway interchange station with a
property development floor in Nanning as a prototype. Based on the Volume of Fluid
(VOF) model method, the inundated area in the subway station during the process of
flood intrusion from the beginning to the basic stability was simulated, and it was
found that the property development floor has serious large-scale water
accumulation under extreme rainfall conditions. Through the dynamic monitoring of
the flood water level depth at important positions such as the entrances of the
evacuation passages, and the analysis of the influence of the design structure and
location distribution of different passages on the personnel evacuation plan, it
was found that the deep water accumulation at the entrances of the narrow, long,
and multi-run emergency safety passages are not conducive to the evacuation of
personnel. Finally, the flow of flood water into the subway tunnel through the
subway station was calculated. The research results provide certain reference and
guidance for the safety design of subway stations under extreme rainfall climatic
conditions.
C1 [Lin, Zhiyu; Lin, Hang] Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha
[Hu, Shengbin; Zhou, Tianzhong; Zhong, Youxin; Zhu, Ye; Shi, Lei] Nanning Rail
Transit Co Ltd, Nanning 530028, Peoples R China.
C3 Central South University
RP Lin, H (corresponding author), Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn,
Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
EM 215511010@csu.edu.cn; hqcsut2000@163.com; zhoutianzhong@nngdjt.com;
zyx@nngdjt.com; zhuye@nngdjt.com; shil@nngdjt.com; hanglin@csu.edu.cn
RI Lin, Hang/E-3318-2013
OI Lin, Hang/0000-0002-5924-5163
FU Science and Technology Hunan Civil Air Defense Research Project
[HNRFKJ-2021-07]; Project (2021) of Study on Flood Disaster Prevention
Model of Nanning Rail Transit; Science and Technology Progress and
Innovation Plan of Hunan Provincial Department of Transportation
[201003, 202120]
FX Science and Technology Hunan Civil Air Defense Research Project
(HNRFKJ-2021-07); Project (2021) of Study on Flood Disaster Prevention
Model of Nanning Rail Transit; Science and Technology Progress and
Innovation Plan of Hunan Provincial Department of Transportation
(201003); Science and Technology Progress and Innovation Plan of Hunan
Provincial Department of Transportation(202120).
CR [Anonymous], 2020, HUM COST DIS OV LAST
Baba Y., 2011, J JPN SOC CIV ENG, V67, P12, DOI [10.2208/jscejusr.67.12, DOI
10.2208/JSCEJUSR.67.12]
Barroca B., 2013, BARRIERS RESILIENCE
Chen YF, 2022, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V81, DOI 10.1007/s12665-022-10411-y
Dutta D, 2003, P 2 INT S NEW TECHNO
Gholami A, 2014, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V8, P447, DOI
10.1080/19942060.2014.11015528
Gonzva M, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P183, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2680-7
Gotoh H, 2005, P MPMD 2005, P185
Guo PP, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104027
Han K.Y., 2008, P 4 INT S FLOOD DEFE, P398
Heinzlef C, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102762
Higo E, 2017, EXPERT SYST APPL, V83, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.034
HIRT CW, 1981, J COMPUT PHYS, V39, P201, DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
Inoue K., 2003, KYOTO DAIGAKU B SAI, VVolume 46, P263
Ishigaki T, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V62, P1807, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.455
Ishigaki T., 2003, P URB RUR WAT SYST S
Ishigaki T., 2006, P HYDR ENG, V50, P583, DOI 10.2208/prohe.50.583
Ishigaki T., 2013, P INT C FLOOD RESILI
Jiang LJ, 2014, J FLUID STRUCT, V46, P17, DOI
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.12.011
Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
Li W, 2017, J CENT SOUTH UNIV, V24, P819, DOI 10.1007/s11771-017-3484-y
Liang P, 2017, ADV ATMOS SCI, V34, P321, DOI 10.1007/s00376-016-6120-0
Martinez E, 2018, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT
2018: PLANNING, SUSTAINABILITY, AND INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, P223
Metros CAO, 2022, URB RAIL TRANS 2021
Mo W., 2010, NUMERICAL SIMULATION
Oertel M, 2008, RIVER FLOW 2008, P595
Robert B, 2008, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V4, P392, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2008.020158
Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
Shao WY, 2015, J ZHEJIANG UNIV-SC A, V16, P117, DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1400154
Shao WY, 2014, J HYDRAUL ENG, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000872
Shen R, 2012, THESIS TIANJIN U TIA
Shi YJ, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16040618
Toda K, 2009, ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-6,
P166, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_31
TODA K, 2004, J HYDROSCIENCE HYDRA, V22, P47, DOI DOI
10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Toda K., 2004, DISASTER PREV RES I, V47, P293
Toda K., 2013, ED ACTIVITIES URBAN
Xie SJ, 2021, J CENT SOUTH UNIV, V28, P1448, DOI 10.1007/s11771-021-4708-8
Xing J, 2020, J CENT SOUTH UNIV, V27, P2763, DOI 10.1007/s11771-020-4497-5
Xu WT, 2017, J TRANSP LAND USE, V10, P743, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2017.922
Yang HT, 2022, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V81, DOI 10.1007/s10064-021-02550-6
Yoneyama N, 2009, ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-
6, P107, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_21
Zelin Ding, 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V14, DOI 10.1007/s12517-021-
06467-y
Zhang CY, 2019, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V78, P5087, DOI 10.1007/s10064-018-01439-1
Zhao YL, 2021, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104822
Zhu H, 2018, THESIS CAPITAL U EC
NR 46
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 31
U2 65
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 6
AR 853
DI 10.3390/buildings12060853
PG 18
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA 2N1DN
UT WOS:000818129000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhu, Y
Ozbay, K
Xie, K
Yang, H
Morgul, EF
AF Zhu, Yuan
Ozbay, Kaan
Xie, Kun
Yang, Hong
Morgul, Ender Faruk
TI Network Modeling of Hurricane Evacuation Using Data-Driven Demand and
Incident-Induced Capacity Loss Models
SO JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION
LA English
DT Article
ID SIMULATION; SYSTEM; DURATION; IMPACT
AB The development of a hurricane evacuation simulation model is a crucial task in
emergency management and planning. Two major issues affect the reliability of an
evacuation model: one is estimations of evacuation traffic based on socioeconomic
characteristics, and the other is capacity change and its influence on evacuation
outcome due to traffic incidents in the context of hurricanes. Both issues can
impact the effectiveness of emergency planning in terms of evacuation order
issuance, and evacuation route planning. The proposed research aims to investigate
the demand and supply modeling in the context of hurricane evacuations. This
methodology created three scenarios for the New York City (NYC) metropolitan area,
including one base and two evacuation scenarios with different levels of traffic
demand and capacity uncertainty. Observed volume data prior to Hurricane Sandy is
collected to model the response curve of the model, and the empirical incident data
under actual evacuation conditions are analyzed and modeled. Then, the modeled
incidents are incorporated into the planning model modified for evacuation.
Simulation results are sampled and compared with observed sensor-based travel times
as well as O-D-based trip times of NYC taxi data. The results show that the
introduction of incident frequency and duration models can significantly improve
the performance of the evacuation model. The results of this approach imply the
importance of traffic incident consideration for hurricane evacuation simulation.
C1 [Zhu, Yuan] Inner Mongolia Univ, Inner Mongolia Ctr Transportat Res, Rm
A357c,Transportat Bldg,Inner Mongolia Univ Sou, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia,
Peoples R China.
[Ozbay, Kaan] New York Univ NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Urban Engn,
C2SMART Ctr A Tier 1 USDOT UTC, 15 MetroTech Ctr 6th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
[Ozbay, Kaan] New York Univ NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Ctr Urban Sci & Progress CUSP,
15 MetroTech Ctr 6th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
[Xie, Kun; Yang, Hong] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 135
Kaufman Hall, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
[Morgul, Ender Faruk] Polytechn Inst New York Univ NYU Poly, Apple Inc, Dept
Civil & Urban Engn, New York, NY USA.
C3 Inner Mongolia University; Old Dominion University; Apple Inc
RP Zhu, Y (corresponding author), Inner Mongolia Univ, Inner Mongolia Ctr
Transportat Res, Rm A357c,Transportat Bldg,Inner Mongolia Univ Sou, Hohhot 010020,
Inner Mongolia, Peoples R China.
EM zhuyuan@imu.edu.cn; kaan.ozbay@nyu.edu; kxie@odu.edu; hyang@odu.edu;
enderfaruk@gmail.com
RI Xie, Kun/HPI-2333-2023
OI Xie, Kun/0000-0002-8191-2786; Zhu, Yuan/0000-0002-8133-2941; ozbay,
kaan/0000-0001-7909-6532; Yang, Hong/0000-0003-2808-8852
FU Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of
China [61903205]; Young Scientists Fund of Natural Science of Inner
Mongolia [2019BS07002]; New York State Resiliency Institute for Storms
AMP; Emergencies (NYSRISE); NSF CRISP; NYU Provost Global Seed Fund
Grants; C2SMART, a Tier 1 UTC at New York University - U.S. Department
of Transportation
FX This study was partially supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 61903205) and
Young Scientists Fund of Natural Science of Inner Mongolia (Grant no.
2019BS07002). The work was partially funded by New York State Resiliency
Institute for Storms & Emergencies (NYSRISE) and NSF CRISP: Type 1:
Reductionist and Integrative Approaches to Improve the Resiliency of
Multi-Scale Interdependent Critical Infrastructure and the project on A
Decision-Support System for Resilient Transportation Networks funded by
NYU Provost Global Seed Fund Grants. It was also partially supported by
C2SMART, a Tier 1 UTC at New York University funded by U.S. Department
of Transportation. The authors would like to acknowledge TRANSCOM for
providing incident data.
CR Andrews S., 2010, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, V2, P352, DOI
[10.1080/19439962.2010.517743, DOI 10.1080/19439962.2010.517743]
[Anonymous], CALIPER TRANSCAD TRA
10.1177/028072709100900210
Cheng GX, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P163, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000107
Chiu YC, 2007, IIE TRANS, V39, P83, DOI 10.1080/07408170600946473
City of New York, MAYOR BLOOMB ISS MAN
Collins A.J., P TRANSP RES BOARD 9
de Silva FN, 2000, J OPER RES SOC, V51, P423, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600879
Edara P, 2010, NAT HAZARDS REV, V11, P127, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000015
Fonseca DJ, 2013, MOD SIMUL ENG, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/168126
Garib A, 1997, J TRANSP ENG-ASCE, V123, P459, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
947X(1997)123:6(459)
GOLOB TF, 1987, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V19, P375, DOI 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90023-6
HOBEIKA AG, 1994, INTERFACES, V24, P22, DOI 10.1287/inte.24.5.22
Li J., P TRANSP RES BOARD 9
Lu X., P TRANSP RES BOARD A
MIAOU SP, 1993, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V25, P689, DOI 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90034-T
Mooney CZ, 1997, MONTE CARLO SIMULATI
Moynihan GP, 2009, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V6
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, BEST PRACT MOD
Ozbay K., P TRANSP RES BOARD 8
Poch M, 1996, J TRANSP ENG-ASCE, V122, P105, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
947X(1996)122:2(105)
Robinson R.M., P TRANSP RES BOARD 8
Robinson RM, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1159, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.013
Tang H., P TRANSP RES BOARD 9
University of South Florida, STAT AV PRIV VEH OCC
Urbanik T, 2000, J HAZARD MATER, V75, P165, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00178-3
6988(2005)6:3(143), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:3(143)]
Yazici A., P TRANSP RES BOARD 9
Yazici M.A., P INT S TRANSP NETW
Yazici M.A., P INT SEC INF MAY 20, P370, DOI [10.1109/isi.2007.379504, DOI
10.1109/ISI.2007.379504]
Yazici MA, 2007, TRANSP RES RECORD, P55, DOI 10.3141/2022-07
Zhu Y., 2016, NETWORK MODELING HUR
Zhu Y, 2019, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P613, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2019.8917250
Zou N, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P138, DOI 10.3141/1922-18
NR 43
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 14
PU WILEY-HINDAWI
PI LONDON
PA ADAM HOUSE, 3RD FL, 1 FITZROY SQ, LONDON, WIT 5HE, ENGLAND
SN 0197-6729
EI 2042-3195
J9 J ADV TRANSPORT
JI J. Adv. Transp.
PD SEP 3
PY 2021
VL 2021
AR 6620254
DI 10.1155/2021/6620254
PG 14
WC Engineering, Civil; Transportation Science & Technology
(SSCI)
GA UP4FV
UT WOS:000695338600003
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Alam, MJ
Habib, MA
Pothier, E
AF Alam, Md Jahedul
Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul
Pothier, Emilie
TI Shelter locations in evacuation: A Multiple Criteria Evaluation combined
with flood risk and traffic microsimulation modeling
LA English
DT Article
DE Shelters; Multiple-criteria evaluation; Flood risk model; Traffic
microsimulation model; Traffic congestion and Clearance time
ID SYSTEM
AB This study presents a framework for systematic identification and evaluation of
potential shelter locations for a mass evacuation due to a hurricane and its
associated flooding. The sequential process involves identifying candidate
facilities for use as shelters, developing a site selection process for shelter
locations, and applying the site selection process to evaluate candidates. The
shelter site selection process follows three stages: candidateselection, candidate-
screening, and candidate-evaluation using a Multiple Criteria Evaluation (MCE). The
criteria fall into four categories: Environmental Considerations, Structural
Attributes, Access to Emergency Services, and Transportation Considerations. A
combined flood risk and traffic microsimulation model informs the MCE with
information regarding the environmental and traffic flow-related impacts, including
traffic congestion. Six weight schemes are tested, one of which is based on expert
consultation. The results reveal that candidates that score the highest according
to the MCE are approximately 3-20 km away from the affected area, and the lowest
scoring candidates are in distant rural areas immediately adjacent to the coast.
The scoring scheme emphasizing on transportation considerations suggest that some
candidates that are closer to the Peninsula score higher. Four of the top five
highest scoring candidates are among those that had been identified by
stakeholders. Recommendations are made for shelters to be used in time-pressing
evacuations, shelters that have a high-capacity, and shelters that are municipally
owned. The proposed method in this study can be used in future research on
evacuation planning, particularly in relation to traffic modeling as well as by
emergency professionals.
C1 [Alam, Md Jahedul] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Civil & Resource Engn, 1360 Barrington
St,B105,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
[Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Planning, 1360 Barrington
St,B105,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
[Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Civil & Resource Engn Cross, 1360
Barrington St,B105,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
C3 Dalhousie University; Dalhousie University; Dalhousie University
RP Habib, MA (corresponding author), Dalhousie Univ, Sch Planning, 1360 Barrington
St,B105,POB 15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.; Habib, MA (corresponding author),
Dalhousie Univ, Dept Civil & Resource Engn Cross, 1360 Barrington St,B105,POB
15000, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
EM jahed.alam@dal.ca; ahsan.habib@dal.ca; em611050@dal.ca
OI Pothier, Emilie/0000-0003-4244-8412; Habib, Muhammad
Ahsanul/0000-0003-1461-9552
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery
Grant; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
Partnership Development Grant; Marine Environmental Observation,
Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR)
FX The authors would like to thank Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant, Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council (SSHRC) Partnership Development Grant, and Marine
Environmental Observation, Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR) for
their financial support.
CR Alam MDJ, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P148, DOI 10.1177/0361198118799169
Alcada-Almeida L, 2009, GEOGR ANAL, V41, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-
4632.2009.00745.x
Anarde KA, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI [10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000265,
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000265]
[Anonymous], HALIFAX OPEN DATA
[Anonymous], 2010, REGIONAL URBAN GIS D
[Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES
[Anonymous], HALIFAX OP DAT CONT
Bayram V, 2015, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V72, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2014.11.010
Bela P.L., 2018, P 97 ANN M TRANSP RE
Charles J., 2009, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NA, V6346
DMTI Spatial, 2017, TRANSP FEAT DAT CAMP
Douglas A., 2006, CANADIAN CLIMATE IMP
Hadiguna RA, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P38, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.004
Halifax Open Data, BUILD DET
Kar B, 2008, T GIS, V12, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01097.x
Nappi MML, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P2421, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1437-4
Li ACY, 2012, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V48, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2011.12.004
Liu H, 2016, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V12, P500, DOI 10.1002/ieam.1705
Nigg JM, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P113, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285889
Nova Scotia Topographic Database (NSTDB), DES AR
Xu W, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P125, DOI 10.1111/disa.12033
NR 23
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 8
U2 31
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD FEB 1
PY 2021
VL 53
AR 102016
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102016
EA JAN 2021
PG 10
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA QE6GW
UT WOS:000616304900001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Mavhura, E
AF Mavhura, Emmanuel
TI Learning from the tropical cyclones that ravaged Zimbabwe: policy
implications for effective disaster preparedness
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Cyclone; Disaster; Evacuation; Preparedness; Zimbabwe
ID FLOOD RISK-MANAGEMENT; EVACUATION; RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; NETWORK;
SENDAI
AB In view of increasing cyclonic activity in the Indian Ocean, nations in southern
Africa should prepare well for flood-related disasters. This paper critically
examined the level of preparedness of the government of Zimbabwe to cyclonic
disasters using the country's three most disastrous cyclones during the past two
decades: (a) Cyclone Eline of 2000, (b) Cyclone Dineo of 2017 and (c) Cyclone Idai
of 2019. In-depth qualitative interviews, post-disaster lessons learned workshops
and a review of disaster policies provided data on five key preparedness measures:
(a) prepositioning of resources, (b) early warnings, (c) evacuation, (d) citizen
participation and (e) effective response. The findings demonstrate that the
government of Zimbabwe remains in the disaster-response-disaster cycle instead of a
proactive preventive approach to cyclones. Limited financial and material resources
constrain effective preparedness to disasters. These problems stem from a weak
legislation governing disaster risk reduction. This study therefore proposes five-
policy implications for effective disaster preparedness.
C1 [Mavhura, Emmanuel] Bindura Univ Sci Educ, Dept Geog, Private Bag 1020, Bindura,
Zimbabwe.
RP Mavhura, E (corresponding author), Bindura Univ Sci Educ, Dept Geog, Private Bag
1020, Bindura, Zimbabwe.
EM edmavhura@gmail.com
RI MAVHURA, EMMANUEL/N-6989-2013
OI MAVHURA, EMMANUEL/0000-0003-3037-601X
CR [Anonymous], 2012, CASE STUDY RES APPL
[Anonymous], 2017, NEXT FRONTIER DISAST
[Anonymous], 2015, TECH REP NO AUGUST
Arifah AR, 2019, INT J PUBLIC HLTH CL, V6, P1
Berariu R, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P649, DOI 10.1108/DPM-04-2016-0081
Cheema AR, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P449, DOI 10.1108/DPM-10-2015-0243
Cretney RM, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P27, DOI 10.1108/DPM-02-2015-0043
DCP, 2019, TORP CYCL ID VIS A V
Donovan AR, 2015, GEOFORUM, V58, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.005
Driessen PPJ, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111595
Dube E, 2015, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V7, DOI [10.4102/jamba.v7i1.143,
10.4102/jamba.v7i1.224]
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2017, PREP HURR
Bou ASF, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1239, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1903-7
Haigh R, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P566, DOI 10.1108/DPM-04-2016-0070
Hesselman M, 2017, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V26, P526, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2017-0174
10.1080/24694452.2019.1592660
Kanakis K, 2016, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V31, P18
Keating A, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P77, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-77-2017
Kolen B, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10101429
Kolen B, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P610, DOI 10.1111/disa.12059
Kyne D, 2018, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V15, DOI 10.1515/jhsem-2017-0010
Mabuku MP, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P284, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.014
Malalgoda C., 2015, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V6, P102, DOI DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-
2014-0071
Manyena B, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P41, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0084-7
Manyena SB, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1786, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.027
Mavhura E, 2019, S AFR GEOGR J, V101, P72, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2018.1541020
Mavhura E, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P605, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1986-1
Megan A, 2009, DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Meteorological Service Department, 2019, TROP CYCL ID REP LES
Mohapatra Sanket, 2012, Environment Development and Sustainability, V14, P365,
DOI 10.1007/s10668-011-9330-8
Nakanishi H, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P788, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.008
Nakaya N, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.037
Nquot I, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P81, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00916-2
Oktari RS, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V29, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.009
Parayiwa C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P768, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.005
Percy WH, 2015, QUAL REP, V20, P76
Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V264, P978, DOI
10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.021
Schuller M, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12053
Taylor R, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P255, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00938-1
Terti G, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1481, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1910-8
Tim P, 2016, INT CIVIL PROTECTION, DOI [10.3929/ethz-a-010819210, DOI
10.3929/ETHZ-A-010819210]
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SEND FRAM DIS RISK R
van Niekerk D, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P858, DOI 10.1111/disa.12081
Vasquez A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P165, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.001
Wahlstrom M, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P200, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0057-2
Wehn U, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V48, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.017
Yadav DK, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V97, P683, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03668-3
NR 49
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 4
U2 21
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 104
IS 3
BP 2261
EP 2275
DI 10.1007/s11069-020-04271-7
EA SEP 2020
PG 15
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA OK4DD
UT WOS:000566312000004
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Han, D
Kim, D
Kim, K
Wang, WJ
Jung, J
Kim, HS
AF Han, Daegun
Kim, Deokhwan
Kim, Kyunghun
Wang, Won-Joon
Jung, Jaewon
Kim, Hung Soo
TI Mega Flood Inundation Analysis and the Selection of Optimal Shelters
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE mega rainfall; mega flood; flood inundation map; evacuation shelter
ID MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; CALIBRATION; ALGORITHM
AB In recent decades, extreme storm events due to climate change have frequently
occurred worldwide, a few of which have even occurred consecutively; we class such
rainfall events as mega events. That is to say, if the inter-arrival time between
rainfall events with a 100-year frequency is less than the IETD (Inter-Event Time
Definition), the event can be considered a mega event. Therefore, the aim of this
study was to implement flood inundation analysis using the hypothetical mega event
from two consecutively occurring events of 100-year frequency, and select the
optimal shelters using a developed method for minimizing casualties from floods.
The Gyeongan stream basin, which is a tributary of the Namhan River in Korea, was
selected as the study area. This study calculates mega flood discharge using the
SSARR (Stream Synthesis and Reservoir Regulation) model, and conducts a flood
inundation analysis of mega floods via the level pool method and the HEC-GeoRAS
model. An inundation map was constructed, and the inundated area was classified
into three zones and five administrative districts. Sixteen shelters were selected
as candidates based on the criteria of the local government safety management plans
and the Guidelines for Establishing the Disaster Relief Plan of 2013. To evaluate
the candidates for evacuation in each district, we selected seven evaluation
indicators from the shelter criteria of several countries, and calculated the
weights of the indicators using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. As a
result, four optimal shelters were selected in the study area. The results of the
study can be used as the basic information for analyzing mega natural disaster
events and inundation, and for establishing evacuation shelters, which are one of
the non-structural flood protection measures.
C1 [Han, Daegun] Korea Res Inst Climate Change KRIC, Div Climate Policy Res,
Chunchon 24239, South Korea.
[Kim, Deokhwan; Jung, Jaewon] Korea Inst Civil Engn & Bldg Technol KICT, Dept
Hydro Sci & Engn Res, Goyang 10223, South Korea.
[Kim, Kyunghun; Kim, Hung Soo] Inha Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Incheon 22201, South
Korea.
[Wang, Won-Joon] Inha Univ, Dept Smart City Engn, Incheon 22201, South Korea.
C3 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering & Building Technology (KICT); Inha
University; Inha University
RP Kim, HS (corresponding author), Inha Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Incheon 22201, South
Korea.
EM hdg5871@kric.re.kr; kimdeokhwan@kict.re.kr; tgb611@naver.com;
makelest@naver.com; jaewonjung@kict.re.kr; sookim@inha.ac.kr
OI Kim, Hung Soo/0000-0001-8345-0610; Kim, Deokhwan/0000-0002-0968-3827;
Jung, Jaewon/0000-0002-6366-5099; Kim, Kyunghun/0000-0002-1844-502X
FU National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT)
[2017R1A2B3005695]
FX This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea
(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.
2017R1A2B3005695).
CR Ahn JM, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V478, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.038
Alam MJ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102016
Bae Junsu, 2019, [JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF
SURVEY,GEODESY,PHOTOGRAMMETRY, AND CARTOGRAPHY, 한국측량학회지], V37, P157, DOI
10.7848/ksgpc.2019.37.3.157
CDEMA, 2013, OV CDEMA CAR DIS EM
Cetinkaya C, 2021, TRANSPORT J, V60, P70, DOI 10.5325/transportationj.60.1.0070
Chen HW, 2006, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V42, P725, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2006.tb04488.x
Chen RS, 2005, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V41, P389, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2005.tb03743.x
Cheng CT, 2002, J HYDROL, V268, P72, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00122-1
Confesor RB, 2007, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V43, P981, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2007.00080.x
Cook A, 2009, J HYDROL, V377, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.015
DUAN QY, 1992, WATER RESOUR RES, V28, P1015, DOI 10.1029/91WR02985
Eastaff R., 2014, REDUCING DISASTER EA, P185
Her Majesty's Government, 2014, EV SHELT GUID
Hong Yoo， Su, 2018, [JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF
SURVEY,GEODESY,PHOTOGRAMMETRY, AND CARTOGRAPHY, 한국측량학회지], V36, P573, DOI
10.7848/ksgpc.2018.36.6.573
Jo E, 2020, ASIA-PAC J ATMOS SCI, V56, P77, DOI 10.1007/s13143-019-00128-7
Joo J, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P45, DOI 10.3390/w6010045
최종호, 2012, [JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF SURVEY,GEODESY,PHOTOGRAMMETRY,
AND CARTOGRAPHY, 한국측량학회지], V30, P503
Kadam P., 2012, J HYDRAULIC ENG, V18, P129, DOI [10.1080/09715010.2012.695449,
DOI 10.1080/09715010.2012.695449]
Kang B, 2007, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V1, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2007.07.003
Kang M, 2014, AGR WATER MANAGE, V143, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.003
Kim D., 2018, THESIS INHA U INCHEO
송재현, 2006, [Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers B, 대한토목학회
논문집 B], V26, P27
Kim J, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050614
Kim SE, 2018, J COASTAL RES, P991, DOI 10.2112/SI85-199.1
Kumar M., 2018, ANN PLANT SOIL RES, V20, P130
Kwak J.W., 2009, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V11, P107
김범준, 2008, [Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers B, 대한토목학회
논문집 B], V28, P21
Madsen H, 2002, J HYDROL, V261, P48, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00619-9
Ministry of Land, 2011, INFR TRANSP IMPR PLA
Mohan S, 1997, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V123, P137, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1997)123:2(137)
Myungjin Lee，, 2017, [Journal of Wetlands Researh, 한국습지학회지], V19, P423
Nardo M., 2008, HDB CONSTRUCTING COM, DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-en
Noh SJ, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V103, P131, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.008
O'Brien K., 2018, FISHES-BASEL, V3, P1575
Patro S, 2009, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V37, P107, DOI 10.1007/s12524-009-0002-1
Sakaki A, 2013, JPN J POLIT SCI, V14, P155, DOI 10.1017/S1468109913000017
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Redcution (UNISDR), 2008, UN INT STRAT
DIS RED
Wei X., 2006, NAT COMMUN, V49B, P181
Windhouwer C.J., 2005, P 2 INT ISCRAM C 200, P171
Yu PS, 2000, J HYDROL, V238, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00317-6
NR 43
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 12
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD APR
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 7
AR 1031
DI 10.3390/w14071031
PG 20
GA 0L0BK
UT WOS:000781150000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Arabi, M
Hyun, KK
Mattingly, SP
AF Arabi, Mehrdad
Hyun, Kate Kyung
Mattingly, Stephen P.
TI Identifying the Most Critical Evacuation Links Based on Road User
Vulnerabilities
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricane; Evacuation; Critical links; Vulnerability; Performance
measure
ID TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS; DECISION-MAKING; HURRICANE; MODEL; RISK;
ROBUSTNESS; BEHAVIOR
AB As one of the principal lifeline systems, transportation networks are crucial
for evacuation during extreme weather events like hurricanes, and critical network
links must remain intact. The conventional evaluation measures prioritize to
achieve the maximum system efficiencies, and therefore they estimate the functional
criticality of a road network using measures such as travel time increase or
throughput reduction caused by a link disruption. This study asks a fundamental
question on equity achievement of such measures and develops a new framework to
incorporate road users' vulnerabilities in identifying critical network links. This
study introduces new evaluation measures that integrate the most vulnerable zones
for evacuation prioritization based on social, environmental, and economic
vulnerabilities. Results show that the critical links for the vulnerable population
during an evacuation are not always identified by conventional link-based measures
that emphasize overall system efficiencies. Among the links selected as critical
using the throughput measure, only 25% serve socially vulnerable communities and
38% serve environmentally vulnerable populations. This highlights the importance of
considering road users' vulnerability when prioritizing resources to strengthen the
links since a link disruption may cause more significant consequences for
vulnerable road users. Decision-making to identify critical links and minimize the
impact of disruptions remains critical to distribute resources more effectively
during an emergency and support the timely and safe evacuation of vulnerable
populations that should be prioritized to achieve more equitable evacuation and
disaster responses. An online interactive map is developed based on the results of
this study to show the exact location of the critical links and other important
metrics.
C1 [Arabi, Mehrdad; Hyun, Kate Kyung; Mattingly, Stephen P.] Univ Texas Arlington,
Dept Civil Engn, 425 Nedderman Hall, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
C3 University of Texas System; University of Texas Arlington
RP Arabi, M (corresponding author), Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn, 425
Nedderman Hall, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
EM mehrdad.arabi@mavs.uta.edu; kate.hyun@uta.edu; mattingly@uta.edu
FU USDOT University Transportation Center [20PUTA28]
FX AcknowledgmentsThis project was funded by the TranSET (20PUTA28), a
USDOT University Transportation Center.
CR Alawadi R, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000553
[Anonymous], 2007, CRITICAL INFRASTRUCT
Arce RSC, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.005
Arctur D., 2018, HARVEY FLOOD DATA CO
Bagheri P, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2110.09694
Bian RJ, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000557
Bian R, 2019, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V99, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.009
Bish DR, 2011, OR SPECTRUM, V33, P629, DOI 10.1007/s00291-011-0256-1
Bowser G., 2013, DETERMINING DIFFEREN
Burnside R., 2006, J PUBLIC MANAGE SOC, V12, P49
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), 2022, CDC ATSDR SVI DAT DO
Cheng G., 2008, PROCEEDING 87 ANN M, P13
Cheng GX, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, P125, DOI 10.3141/2234-14
10.1080/17477891.2016.1140630
6988(2002)3:1(12)
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, 2022, GLOB WARM HURR OV CU
Goodie AS, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101320
Helderop E., 2019, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V3, DOI [DOI
10.1016/J.TRIP.2019.100022, 10.1016/j.trip.2019.100022]
Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
Horney J. A., 2009, HURRICANE EVACUATION
6996.0000074
Jenelius E, 2006, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V40, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.003
Jiang YQ, 2021, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V14, P1004, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2021.1915396
Kharazi BA, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V88, DOI
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101628
Kim S, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V218, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.04.006
Land Parcels, 2019, STRAT MAPP PROGR STR
Lim GJ, 2015, IIE TRANS, V47, P50, DOI 10.1080/0740817X.2014.905736
9488(2007)133:1(18)
Lu QC, 2015, J TRANSP ENG, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000743
Maiwald M., 2019, OPERATIONS RES P 201, P23
6996.0000083
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
Qiang Q., 2007, P POMS 18 ANN C DALL
Scott DM, 2006, J TRANSP GEOGR, V14, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.10.003
Stamos I., 2013, ARQ BRAS CARDIOL, V1, P153, DOI [10.12720/jtle.1.2.153-158, DOI
10.12720/JTLE.1.2.153-158]
Sullivan JL, 2010, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V44, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.003
Taylor MAP, 2006, NETW SPAT ECON, V6, P267, DOI 10.1007/s11067-006-9284-9
Urbanik T, 2000, J HAZARD MATER, V75, P165, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00178-3
Wang DZW, 2016, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V12, P346, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2015.1137373
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Zachry BC, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7, P109, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00049.1
NR 56
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PI RESTON
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
PD MAY 1
PY 2023
VL 24
IS 2
DI 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1667
PG 13
(SSCI)
GA A0TM8
UT WOS:000952342200006
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Collins, J
Polen, A
McSweeney, K
Colon-Burgos, D
Jernigan, I
AF Collins, Jennifer
Polen, Amy
McSweeney, Killian
Colon-Burgos, Delian
Jernigan, Isabelle
TI Hurricane Risk Perceptions and Evacuation Decision-Making in the Age of
COVID-19
SO BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Atmosphere; Social Science; Emergency preparedness; Societal impacts
ID INFECTIOUS-DISEASES; MEGASHELTER; RESPONSES; OUTBREAK; DISASTER;
EVACUEES; HOUSTON; TEXAS
AB The COVID-19 pandemic increases the complexity of planning for hurricanes as
social distancing is in direct conflict with human mobility and congregation.
COVID-19 presents not only urgent challenges for this hurricane season due to the
likeliness of continued or heightened COVID-19 threat, but also challenges with the
next hurricane season with additional waves of the pandemic. There is severe
urgency to understand the impact of COVID-19 risk perceptions and the extent people
are willing to risk their lives by sheltering in place rather than evacuating
during severe hurricanes. In June 2020, a survey (in both English and Spanish) of
40 questions was disseminated through regional planning councils, emergency
management, and the media to Florida residents. A total of 7,072 people responded
from over 50 counties. Most data obtained were ordinal or categorical in nature,
encouraging usage of nonparametric analysis and chi-square tests. Almost half the
respondents view themselves as vulnerable to COVID-19 due to preexisting health
conditions, and 74.3% of individuals viewed the risk of being in a shelter during
the COVID-19 pandemic as more dangerous than enduring hurricane hazards.
Additionally, there was a significant number of individuals who would choose to not
utilize a public shelter during COVID-19 when they would have previously. Officials
can use the results of this study regarding how household evacuation plans change
with social distancing to better inform strategies of shelter preparedness and
COVID-19 risk mitigation to minimize risk to those in harm's way of storm surge and
other hurricane effects during a mandatory evacuation order.
C1 [Collins, Jennifer] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Polen, Amy] Univ S Florida, Coll Publ Hlth, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[McSweeney, Killian] Univ Georgia, Dept Geog, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
[Colon-Burgos, Delian; Jernigan, Isabelle] Penn State Univ, Dept Meteorol &
Atmospher Sci, State Coll, PA USA.
University System of Florida; University of South Florida; University
System of Georgia; University of Georgia; Pennsylvania Commonwealth
System of Higher Education (PCSHE); Pennsylvania State University
RP Collins, J (corresponding author), Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL 33620
USA.
EM collinsjm@usf.edu
FU NSF Research Experience for Undergraduate program in "Weather, Climate
and Society" [1659754]; Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences; Directorate
For Geosciences [1659754] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX We would like to acknowledge Marshall Flynn, our partner at the Tampa
Bay Regional Planning Council, for his tremendous efforts at
distributing this survey at a rapid pace. Other critical collaborators
to this project's success include Elizabeth Dunn, University of South
Florida College of Public Health; Joseph Borries, Pinellas County
Emergency Operations Center; Maria Robles, Tampa Bay Regional Planning
Council; and Andrea Tristan, Hillsborough County Department of Emergency
Management for their feedback and assistance with the survey design,
Spanish translation, and distribution. In addition, we would like to
acknowledge students of the NSF Research Experience for Undergraduate
program in "Weather, Climate and Society" (NSF Award 1659754, PIs:
Collins and Ersing) for their assistance in cleaning and analyzing the
data. Additional thanks to the people in the field of emergency
management who provided feedback on the survey instrument before and
during distribution.
CR Aldrich Nancy, 2008, Prev Chronic Dis, V5, pA27
Amadeo K., 2020, HURRICANE IRMA FACTS
[Anonymous], 2004, COMMUNICATING ENV RI
10.1177/028072709100900210
Barro R.J., 2020, 26866 NAT BUR EC RES 26866 NAT BUR EC RES
BISSELL R A, 1983, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V1, P59, DOI 10.1016/0736-
4679(83)90010-0
Bousquet S., 2017, MIAMI HERALD
Brinkley D., 2006, GREAT DELUGE HURRICA
Cangialosi J. P., 2018, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Chandra S, 2013, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V12, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-12-9
2867(01)00014-6, 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
Dynes R.R., 2002, U DEL DISASTER RES C, V327, P59
Eisenman David P, 2007, Am J Public Health, V97 Suppl 1, pS109, DOI
10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335
Elder K, 2007, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V97, P2122, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100867e
Florida Department of Health, 2020, 2020 FLOR COVID 19 D
Haines V., 2002, ADV MED SOCIOLOGY, V8, P271
Hutchins SS, 2009, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V99, pS261, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161505
Ivers LC, 2006, CURR OPIN INFECT DIS, V19, P408, DOI
10.1097/01.qco.0000244044.85393.9e
Kilbourne ED, 2006, EMERG INFECT DIS, V12, P9, DOI 10.3201/eid1201.051254
Klotzbach P. J., 2020, FORECAST ATLANTIC SE
Lemonick D. M., 2011, AM J CHINESE MED, V8, P144, DOI DOI
10.1097/INF.0B013E318054E34C
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
9488(2007)133:1(18)
Liu L, 2019, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V13, P97, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2018.159
Maness LR, 2019, J ENVIRON HEALTH, V81, P16
Manuell ME, 2011, DISASTERS, V35, P417, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01219.x
Miller L. M., 2007, Southern Rural Sociology, V22, P45
Moore S, 2004, FAM COMMUNITY HEALTH, V27, P204, DOI 10.1097/00003727-200407000-
00007
Murray KO, 2009, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V124, P364, DOI 10.1177/003335490912400304
NOAA, 2020, COAST ZON MAN
Perry R. W., 2007, EMERGENCY PLANNING
020-09772-1
Riad J.K., 1998, U DEL DISASTER RES C, V271, P34
Sherman-Morris K, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P975, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3053.1
Shukla MA, 2018, CURR TROP MED REP, V5, P217, DOI 10.1007/s40475-018-0162-6
Shultz JM, 2005, EPIDEMIOL REV, V27, P21, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxi011
Simonsen L, 2013, PLOS MED, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001558
Spillard S, 2018, INT J QUANTUM INF, V16, DOI 10.1142/S0219749918400026
Travers M., 2020, FORBES 0521
U.S. Census Bureau, 2019, QUICK FACTS FLOR
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Yee EL, 2007, CLIN INFECT DIS, V44, P1032, DOI 10.1086/512195
NR 55
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 1
U2 6
PU AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
PI BOSTON
PA 45 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA 02108-3693 USA
SN 0003-0007
EI 1520-0477
J9 B AM METEOROL SOC
JI Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc.
PD APR
PY 2021
VL 102
IS 4
BP E836
EP E848
DI 10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0229.1
PG 13
WC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
(SSCI)
SC Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA SD6QA
UT WOS:000651498500012
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU La Greca, AM
Burdette, ET
Brodar, KE
AF La Greca, Annette M.
Burdette, Evan T.
Brodar, Kaitlyn E.
TI Climate change and extreme weather disasters: evacuation stress is
associated with youths' somatic complaints
SO FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE somatic complaints; adolescents; children; evacuation; climate change;
disasters
ID POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS; HURRICANE-ANDREW; PHYSICAL HEALTH; PTSD SYMPTOMS;
CHILD ANXIETY; DEPRESSION; RISK; ADOLESCENTS; EXPERIENCES; EXPOSURE
AB ObjectiveClimate-change has brought about more frequent extreme-weather events
(e.g., hurricanes, floods, and wildfires) that may require families to evacuate,
without knowing precisely where and when the potential disaster will strike. Recent
research indicates that evacuation is stressful for families and is associated with
psychological distress. Yet, little is known about the potential impact of
evacuation stressors on child health. After Hurricane Irma, which led to a mass
evacuation in Florida, we examined whether evacuation stressors and hurricane
exposure were uniquely associated with youth somatic complaints, and whether youth
psychological distress (i.e., symptoms of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and
depression) served as a potential mediating pathway between evacuation stressors,
hurricane experiences, and somatic complaints. MethodThree months after Irma, 226
mothers of youth aged 7-17 years (N=226; M age = 9.76 years; 52% boys; 31%
Hispanic) living in the five southernmost Florida counties reported on evacuation
stressors, hurricane-related life threat and loss/disruption, and their child's
psychological distress and somatic complaints using standardized measures.
ResultsStructural equation modeling revealed a good model fit (& chi;(2) = 32.24, p
= 0.003, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.08, SRMR = 0.04). Even controlling for life-
threatening hurricane experiences (& beta; = 0.26) and hurricane loss and
disruption (& beta; = 0.26), greater evacuation stressors were associated with
greater symptoms of youth psychological distress (& beta; = 0.34; p's < 0.001), and
greater psychological distress was associated with more somatic complaints (& beta;
= 0.67; p < 0.001). Indirect effects revealed that evacuation stressors (p <
0.001), actual life-threatening events (p < 0.01), and loss and disruption (p <
0.01) were all uniquely and indirectly associated with youths' somatic complaints
via youth psychological distress. DiscussionFindings suggest that even coping with
the threat of a disaster may be sufficient to prompt psychological and physical
health symptoms in youth. Due in part to climate change, threats of disaster occur
much more often than actual disaster exposure, especially for areas that are prone
to hurricanes or wildfires. Preparing youth and families residing in vulnerable
areas for potential disaster evacuation or sheltering-in-place appears critical.
Encouraging families to develop Disaster Plans and teaching stress management
skills may reduce both youth distress and somatic health problems.
C1 [La Greca, Annette M.; Burdette, Evan T.; Brodar, Kaitlyn E.] Univ Miami, Coll
Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA.
C3 University of Miami
RP La Greca, AM (corresponding author), Univ Miami, Coll Arts & Sci, Dept Psychol,
Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA.
EM alagreca@miami.edu
FU College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Miami, Coral Gables,
FL; College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Miami; Department
of Psychology Flipse Funds
FX & nbsp;Funding for the initial project was supported by a small grant
from the College of Arts and Sciences at the University of Miami, Coral
Gables, FL. Open access publication fees were supported by several
sources, including: the College of Arts and Sciences at the University
of Miami; Department of Psychology Flipse Funds; and the Distinguished
Professorship Funds for the AL.
CR Achenbach T M, 1991, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev, V56, P1
Achenbach TM, 2003, J ABNORM CHILD PSYCH, V31, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1021700430364
Allen G., 2018, NATL PUBLIC RADIO
American Psychological Association, 2023, STRESS EFF BOD
6988(2002)3:3(107)
Arcaya MC, 2017, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V36, P411, DOI 10.1037/hea0000433
Archibald E, 2012, IATSS RES, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.06.002
Arlinghaus KR, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V17, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.308
Bathi JR, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13020239
Bell J. E., 2016, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN, P99, DOI 10.7930/JOBZ63ZV
Bernstein GA, 1997, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V36, P661, DOI 10.1097/00004583-
199705000-00017
Birmaher B, 1997, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V36, P545, DOI 10.1097/00004583-
199704000-00018
Bonanno George A, 2010, Psychol Sci Public Interest, V11, P1, DOI
10.1177/1529100610387086
Brown TH, 2011, J TRAUMA STRESS, V24, P575, DOI 10.1002/jts.20680
Campo JV, 1999, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V38, P1093, DOI 10.1097/00004583-199909000-
00012
Caserta MT, 2008, BRAIN BEHAV IMMUN, V22, P933, DOI 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.01.007
Cave D., 2021, NEW YORK TIMES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022, PREP HURR OTH TROP S
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023, ANXIETY DEPRESSION C
Cerutti R, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171867
Chokshi N., 2017, NEW YORK TIMES
Chorpita BF, 2005, BEHAV RES THER, V43, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.004
COHEN S, 1991, NEW ENGL J MED, V325, P606, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199108293250903
Crimmins A., 2016, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
Cutright NL, 2019, MINDFULNESS, V10, P1760, DOI 10.1007/s12671-019-01135-5
Dodgen D., 2016, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335
Federal Emergency Management Association, HURR EV
Felix E, 2016, J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, V41, P73, DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv038
Felix ED, 2020, J ABNORM CHILD PSYCH, V48, P1511, DOI 10.1007/s10802-020-00688-7
Furr JM, 2010, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V78, P765, DOI 10.1037/a0021482
Grinsted A, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P23942, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1912277116
Hallegatte S., 2020, Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, V4, P223, DOI
10.1007/s41885-020-00060-5
Hankin BL, 1998, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V107, P128, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.107.1.128
HARDIN SB, 1994, J TRAUMA STRESS, V7, P427, DOI 10.1007/BF02102787
Havik T, 2015, SCAND J EDUC RES, V59, P316, DOI 10.1080/00313831.2014.904424
Heimann P, 2018, CHILD ADOL PSYCH MEN, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13034-018-0239-y
Hensley L, 2008, J CLIN CHILD ADOLESC, V37, P542, DOI 10.1080/15374410802148186
Henson B., 2022, YALE CLIMATE CONNECT
Holland G, 2014, CLIM DYNAM, V42, P617, DOI 10.1007/s00382-013-1713-0
Jankowski K., 2023, PTSD PHYS HLTH
Jones LC, 2017, ACAD PEDIATR, V17, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.acap.2017.02.002
Kalmakis KA, 2015, J AM ASSOC NURSE PRA, V27, P457, DOI 10.1002/2327-6924.12215
Kamin D., 2023, NEW YORK TIMES
Kaplow JB, 2020, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V59, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.019
Kelly M, 2018, CURR OPIN PEDIATR, V30, P748, DOI 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000688
Khoury EL, 1997, J TRAUMA STRESS, V10, P71, DOI 10.1023/A:1024808413887
Kulkarni PA, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P720, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.21
La Greca A. M., 2019, TREATMENT CHILDHOOD, V4th Ed.
La Greca A. M., 2023, YOUTH STRONG HELPING
La Greca A. M., 2017, HURRICANE RELATED TR
La Greca AM, 2022, PSYCHOL TRAUMA-US, V14, pS13, DOI 10.1037/tra0001052
La Greca AM, 2019, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V13, P63, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2019.9
La Greca AM, 2016, J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, V41, P1, DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv087
La Greca AM, 2013, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V151, P860, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.024
La Greca AM, 2013, CHILD YOUTH CARE FOR, V42, P351, DOI 10.1007/s10566-013-9206-
1
La Greca AM, 2010, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V78, P794, DOI 10.1037/a0020775
LaGreca AM, 1996, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V64, P712, DOI 10.1037/0022-
006X.64.4.712
Lai BS, 2020, J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, V45, P1016, DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa061
Lai BS, 2014, PSYCHOL TRAUMA-US, V6, P280, DOI 10.1037/a0033331
Lai BS, 2013, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V146, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2012.08.041
Li A, 2021, PSYCHOSOM MED, V83, P715, DOI 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000956
Lyyra N, 2018, SCAND J PUBLIC HEALT, V46, P87, DOI 10.1177/1403494817743901
McLennan J, 2019, FIRE TECHNOL, V55, P487, DOI 10.1007/s10694-018-0753-8
Muthen K., 2017, MPLUS USERS GUIDE, V8th ed.
National Weather Service, DET MET SUMM HURR IR
Neria Y, 2008, PSYCHOL MED, V38, P467, DOI 10.1017/S0033291707001353
Newman Caren L, 2007, Int J Emerg Ment Health, V9, P133
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2021, 2020 ATL HURR SEAS
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2018, ANN 2017 TROP CYCL R
Norris FH, 2002, PSYCHIATRY, V65, P207, DOI 10.1521/psyc.65.3.207.20173
Paul LA, 2014, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V70, P322, DOI 10.1002/jclp.22026
Pfefferbaum B, 2014, CURR PSYCHIAT REP, V16, DOI 10.1007/s11920-014-0464-x
Pfefferbaum B, 2013, CHILD YOUTH CARE FOR, V42, P285, DOI 10.1007/s10566-013-
9211-4
Rankin J, 2020, GUARDIAN
Ready.gov, 2023, MAKE PLAN
Saunders NR, 2020, JAMA NETW OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11295
Seiler A, 2020, STRESS CHALLENGES AND IMMUNITY IN SPACE: FROM MECHANISMS TO
MONITORING AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES, 2ND EDITION, P71, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-
16996-1_6
Smith A., 2023, 2022 US BILLION DOLL
Smith A., 2022, 2021 US BILLION DOLL
Steffen W., 2021, DEADLY COSTS CLIMATE
Thompson RR, 2019, JAMA NETW OPEN, V2, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6228
Tremblay MS, 2011, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V8, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-98
U.S. Census Bureau, 2023, MEAS AM PEOPL PLAC E
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2023, WILDFIRES
WALKER LS, 1995, J PEDIATR PSYCHOL, V20, P233, DOI 10.1093/jpepsy/20.2.233
Waszczuk MA, 2017, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V36, P429, DOI 10.1037/hea0000472
West S. G., 2012, HDB STRUCTURAL EQUAT, P209
6988(2005)6:3(129), 10.1061/ASCE1527-698820056:3129, DOI 10.1061/ASCE1527-
698820056:3129]
6988(2005)6:3(143), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:3(143)]
NR 93
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PI LAUSANNE
SN 1664-1078
J9 FRONT PSYCHOL
JI Front. Psychol.
PD JUN 22
PY 2023
VL 14
AR 1196419
DI 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196419
PG 13
WC Psychology, Multidisciplinary
SC Psychology
GA L4AJ5
UT WOS:001022698700001
PM 37425189
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Burger, J
Gochfeld, M
Lacy, C
AF Burger, Joanna
Gochfeld, Michael
Lacy, Clifton
TI Concerns and future preparedness plans of a vulnerable population in New
Jersey following Hurricane Sandy
SO DISASTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster preparedness; environmental justice; evacuation; Hurricane
Sandy; personal disaster impact
ID RISK PERCEPTION; DISASTER PREPAREDNESS; MEDICAL NEEDS; HEALTH;
RESPONSES; ACCESS; CARE; EVACUATION; KATRINA
AB Knowing how people prepare for disasters is essential to developing resiliency
strategies. This study examined recalled concerns, evacuation experiences, and the
future preparedness plans of a vulnerable population in New Jersey, United States,
following Hurricane Sandy in 2012. Understanding the responses of minority
communities is key to protecting them during forthcoming disasters. Overall, 35 per
cent of respondents were not going to prepare for an event. Intended future
preparedness actions were unrelated to respondents' ratings of personal impact.
More Blacks and Hispanics planned on preparing than Whites (68 versus 55 per cent),
and more Hispanics planned on evacuating than did others who were interviewed. A
higher percentage of respondents who had trouble getting to health centres were
going to prepare than others. Respondents' concerns were connected to safety and
survival, protecting family and friends, and having enough food and medicine,
whereas future actions included evacuating earlier and buying sufficient supplies
to shelter in place.
C1 [Burger, Joanna] Rutgers State Univ, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst, Div Life
Sci, Biol, Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Burger, Joanna] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Gochfeld, Michael] Rutgers State Univ, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst,
Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Gochfeld, Michael] Rutgers State Univ, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Piscataway,
NJ USA.
[Lacy, Clifton] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Commun & Informat, Profess Practice,
Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Lacy, Clifton] Rutgers State Univ, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Med,
Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Lacy, Clifton] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Emergency Preparedness Infrastruct &
Commun, Piscataway, NJ USA.
C3 Rutgers State University New Brunswick; Rutgers State University New
Brunswick; Rutgers State University New Brunswick; Rutgers State
University New Brunswick; Rutgers State University Medical Center;
Rutgers State University New Brunswick; Rutgers State University New
Brunswick; Rutgers State University Medical Center; Rutgers State
University New Brunswick
RP Burger, J (corresponding author), Rutgers State Univ, Sch Arts & Sci, Nelson
Hall,Room B218,Busch Campus, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA.
EM burger@biology.rutgers.edu
CR Abramson D.M., 2015, 20151 COL U NAT CTR
Alexander KS, 2012, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V55, P409, DOI
10.1080/09640568.2011.604193
American National Red Cross, 2019, PREP EM
Bandura A., 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI, DOI DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
Barnegat Bay Partnership, 2012, SPEC REP SAND REC SE, P20
Barone DA, 2014, SHORE BEACH, V82, P3
Basher R, 2006, PHILOS T R SOC A, V364, P2167, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2006.1819
Borough of Mantoloking, 2012, MANT SUP SAND
Bukvic A, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P101, DOI 10.1111/disa.12186
Burger J, 2019, J TOXICOL ENV HEAL A, V82, P128, DOI
10.1080/15287394.2019.1568329
Burger J, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P1261, DOI 10.1007/s11252-017-0678-x
10.1080/15287394.2017.1297275
Burger J, 2014, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V13, P200, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2014.902801
Burger J, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V481, P611, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.048
Burke S, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P3115, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9093115
Carlisle A., 2006, DORCHESTER COUNTY IN
Collini K, 2008, COASTAL COMMUNITY RE
Crosset K.M., 2013, COASTAL TRENDS REPOR
2867(01)00014-6, 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
Dreary D.S., 2013, P HUM FACT ERG SOC A, V57, P329
10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335
*FEMA, 2004, AR YOU READ IN DEPTH
Flynn T., 2012, J PROFESS COMMUN, V2, P43
Freedman A., 2013, CLIMATE CENTRAL 1013
Freedman A., 2013, CLIMATE CENTRAL 0430
Genovese E, 2013, J RISK RES, V16, P825, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2012.737826
Gibbons SJA, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P40, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.10.002
Grannis J., 2011, ADAPTATION TOOL KIT
Greenberg MR, 2013, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, pE85, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301198
Hall TM, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P2312, DOI 10.1002/grl.50395
Halpin S. H, 2013, IMPACT SUPERSTORM SA
Hamama-Raz Y, 2015, PSYCHIAT QUART, V86, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11126-014-9333-3
Karl T. R., 2009, Global climate change impacts in the United States
Keller J., 2017, PACIFIC STANDAR 0901
Kessler RC, 2008, INT J METH PSYCH RES, V17, pS6, DOI 10.1002/mpr.269
Laczko F., 2009, Migration, environment and climate change: assessing the
evidence
Lane K, 2013, J ENVIRON PUBLIC HEA, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/913064
Leighton M., 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE MIGRA
Murakami N, 2015, CLIN J AM SOC NEPHRO, V10, P1389, DOI 10.2215/CJN.10181014
Neria Y, 2012, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V308, P2571, DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.110700
NJPCA (New Jersey Primary Care Association), 2017, US NEW JERS PRIM CAR
Nordstrom KF, 2001, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V44, P545, DOI 10.1016/S0964-
5691(01)00065-5
North CS, 2012, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V102, pE40, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300689
NPCC2 (New York City Panel on Climate Change), 2013, CLIM CHANG INF 2013
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Plant NG., 2010, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V91, P65, DOI [10.1029/2010EO070001, DOI
10.1029/2010EO070001, DOI 10.1029/2010E0070001]
Powell T, 2012, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V308, P2569, DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.108940
Pries AJ, 2008, J COASTAL RES, V24, P168, DOI 10.2112/06-0799.1
Psuty NP, 2002, COASTAL HAZARD MANAG
Reynolds B, 2005, J HEALTH COMMUN, V10, P43, DOI 10.1080/10810730590904571
1816.1999.tb00132.x
SAS (Statistical Analysis System), 2005, STAT ANAL
Schwartz R, 2016, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V10, P325, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.157
Sharp MJ, 2016, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V10, P472, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2016.75
State of New Jersey Office of Emergency Management, 2017, YOUR KIT YOUR PLAN B
State of New Jersey Office of Emergency Management, 2017, HURR TROP STORMS
Swerdel JN, 2016, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V10, P188, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.169
Trento L., 2016, NUTR CLIN PRACT, V29, P576
Trumbo C, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P1907, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01633.x
U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2010, IMP PRED COAST CHANG
WEINSTEIN ND, 1989, SCIENCE, V246, P1232, DOI 10.1126/science.2686031
Williams BL, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P1019, DOI 10.1023/A:1007095808381
NR 68
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 17
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0361-3666
EI 1467-7717
J9 DISASTERS
JI Disasters
PD JUL
PY 2019
VL 43
IS 3
BP 658
EP 685
DI 10.1111/disa.12350
PG 28
WC Environmental Studies; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA ID6VN
UT WOS:000471818400010
PM 30990925
OA Green Accepted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Logan, M
Bradley, BM
Chen, BD
Kruger, J
Van Meter, J
Paetznick, B
Smith, MJ
Romero-Steiner, S
AF Logan, Marinda
Bradley, Belen Moran
Chen, Brenda
Kruger, Judy
Van Meter, Jessica
Paetznick, Brandon
Smith, Michael J.
Romero-Steiner, Sandra
TI A Policy Analysis of Preparedness for Hurricane Evacuations in the
United States, 1990 to 2019: Implementation in Coastal States
SO HEALTH SECURITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricanes; Mortality; Mandatory evacuation; Public health preparedness;
response; Policy
ID SHELTER-IN-PLACE; ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH; HOSPITAL-EVACUATION; DISASTERS;
COSTS
AB Hurricane or typhoon evacuations in the United States are typically managed by
state, territorial, or tribal emergency management officials with federal, state,
and local agency operational support. The evacuation process may involve issuing
mandatory or "voluntary" evacuation orders to alert the community and mitigate loss
of life and injury. We conducted an analysis of state and local hurricane
evacuation policies identified through a literature review (January 1990 to June
2019) and key informant interviews with state public health and emergency
management officials in Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, and Texas in October and November 2019. Findings from the
literature review show that most gaps in hurricane evacuation preparedness-based on
44 policy-related publications identified in the review-could be categorized into 4
themes: shelters, evacuation decisionmaking, at-risk populations, and
transportation. Findings from key informant interviews for 7 states revealed that
coastal states have been able to address most of these gaps since Hurricane Katrina
in 2005. However, an important remaining gap in preparedness is providing timely
warnings to at-risk populations during hurricane evacuations.
C1 [Logan, Marinda; Bradley, Belen Moran; Chen, Brenda; Kruger, Judy; Van Meter,
Jessica; Paetznick, Brandon; Smith, Michael J.; Romero-Steiner, Sandra] Ctr Dis
Control & Prevent, Publ Hlth Ethics & Strategy Unit PHESU, 1600 Clifton Rd NE,MS
H21-8, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.
C3 Centers for Disease Control & Prevention - USA
RP Logan, M (corresponding author), Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Publ Hlth Ethics &
Strategy Unit PHESU, 1600 Clifton Rd NE,MS H21-8, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA.
EM mlogan@cdc.gov
CR Adderly SA, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V112, P437, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.030
[Anonymous], POSTKATRINA EMERGENC
Baker EJ, 2008, COAST MANAGE, V36, P294, DOI 10.1080/08920750801968694
Baxter Megan, 2017, J Emerg Manag, V15, P195, DOI 10.5055/jem.2017.0328
Bea K., 2006, DISASTER EVACUATION
10.2752/175303712X13316289505503
Chadwin R, 2017, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V107, P1413, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303877
10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335
Erickson W., 2019, 2017 DISABILITY STAT
FloridaDisaster.org, KNOW YOUR ZON
Greenberg MR, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P83, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00861.x
Hunt Melissa G., 2012, Animals, V2, P529, DOI 10.3390/ani2040529
Kirkpatrick DV, 2007, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V18, P299, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2007.0037
Kruger J, 2020, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V69, P1233, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a1
Lewis DC, 1990, ANN M I TRANSP ENG A
Lichtveld M, 2020, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V110, P1478, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305739
Lichtveld M, 2020, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V110, P1485, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305759
Lindsay BR., 2011, FEDERAL EVACUATION P
Mace Sharon E, 2018, Am J Disaster Med, V13, P207, DOI 10.5055/ajdm.2018.0301
McGinty MD, 2016, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V10, P320, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2016.86
McGinty MD, 2017, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V23, P29, DOI
10.1097/PHH.0000000000000404
Moynihan Gary P., 2016, Electronic Government, V12, P47
National Governor's Association (NGA), 2014, GOV GUID MASS EV
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Centers for
Environmental Information, BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
Ready.gov, READY
Renne JL, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1254, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.016
Ricci KA, 2015, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V30, P233, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X15000229
Robert T., 2019, STAFFORD DISASTER RE
Shao WY, 2017, WATER RES, V122, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.072
Smith DA, 2017, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V18, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.004
Texas Department of State Health Services, TEX READ
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2018, PUBL HLTH EM PREP RE
US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), HHS EMPOWER MAP
US Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 2021, NAT HURR PROGR PREIM
Wang A, 2017, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V66, P145, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6605a3
Weiss Rachel I, 2007, Am J Public Health, V97 Suppl 1, pS73, DOI
10.2105/AJPH.2006.104240
Whitehead JC, 2003, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V46, P1069, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2003.11.001
Wilson MT, 2018, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V15, DOI 10.1515/jhsem-2016-0008
World Vision, 2005 HURR KATR FACTS
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 10
PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
PI NEW ROCHELLE
PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA
SN 2326-5094
EI 2326-5108
J9 HEALTH SECUR
JI Health Secur.
PD FEB 1
PY 2022
VL 20
IS 1
BP 65
EP 73
DI 10.1089/hs.2021.0125
EA DEC 2021
PG 9
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA ZH2NJ
UT WOS:000732960600001
PM 34935495
OA Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhou, ZC
Zhang, YZ
Gou, JJ
Kan, N
Zhao, FD
Yao, LL
Hou, SK
AF Zhou, Zichen
Zhang, Yongzhong
Gou, Jianjun
Kan, Nan
Zhao, Feida
Yao, Lulu
Hou, Shike
TI Successful Large Hospital Evacuation With 11 350 Patients Transferred in
the 2021 Zhengzhou Flood
SO DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS
LA English
DT Article
DE disasters; emergency preparedness; floods; hospital administration;
patient transfer
AB Objectives:This is a case report of a huge hospital evacuation with 11 350
inpatients in the 2021 Zhengzhou flood in China, using a mixed methods analysis.
Methods:The qualitative part was a content analysis of semi-structured interviews
of 6 key hospital staff involved in evacuation management. The evacuation
experience was reviewed according to the 4 stages of disaster management:
prevention, preparation, response, and recovery. Results:Because of unprecedented
torrential rain, the flood exceeded expectations, and there was a lack of local
preventive measures. In preparation, according to the alert, the evacuation was
planned to reduce the workload on inpatients and to accept the surge of medical
needs by the flood. In response, the prioritization of critically ill patients and
large-scale collaboration of hospital staff, rescue teams, and accepting branch
made it possible to successfully transfer all 11 350 inpatients. In recovery,
restoring medical services and a series of activities to improve the hospital's
vulnerability were carried out. Conclusions:A hospital evacuation is one of the
strategies of the business continuity plan of a hospital. For the evacuation,
leadership and collaboration were important. Challenges such as prolonged roadway
flooding and the infrastructure issues were needed to be addressed throughout the
evacuation process.
C1 [Zhou, Zichen] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
[Zhang, Yongzhong; Zhao, Feida; Yao, Lulu] Tianjin Univ, Inst Disaster &
Emergency Med, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
[Gou, Jianjun; Kan, Nan] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Zhengzhou, Henan,
Peoples R China.
[Hou, Shike] Tianjin Univ, Inst Disaster & Emergency Med, Asia Pacific Div
Disaster Med & Publ Hlth Prepared, Disaster Med Chinese Med Assoc, Tianjin, Peoples
R China.
C3 Tianjin University; Tianjin University; Zhengzhou University; Tianjin
University
RP Hou, SK (corresponding author), Tianjin Univ, Inst Disaster & Emergency Med,
Asia Pacific Div Disaster Med & Publ Hlth Prepared, Disaster Med Chinese Med Assoc,
Tianjin, Peoples R China.
EM houshike@tju.edu.cn
CR [Anonymous], RANKING 2020 CHINAS
[Anonymous], 2021, QIANLONG NEWS
Bagaria J, 2009, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V24, P461, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X00007329
Few R., 2004, FLOODS HLTH CLIMATE
Flynn SE., 2018, HIGHER GROUND SOPHIS
Graneheim UH, 2004, NURS EDUC TODAY, V24, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Hines E, 2021, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V17, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2021.146
med.china, NATL HOSP OUTPATIENT
Rattanakanlaya K, 2016, AUSTRALAS EMERG NURS, V19, P191, DOI
10.1016/j.aenj.2016.07.003
Teo WL, 2017, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V25, P136, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12179
Upton L, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P637, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.141
Ybarra N, 2019, J PERINAT NEONAT NUR, V33, P246, DOI
10.1097/JPN.0000000000000424
NR 12
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI NEW YORK
PA 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10013-2473 USA
SN 1935-7893
EI 1938-744X
J9 DISASTER MED PUBLIC
JI Dis. Med. Public Health Prep.
PD JUL 24
PY 2023
VL 17
AR e434
DI 10.1017/dmp.2023.94
PG 6
(SSCI)
GA M6WU8
UT WOS:001031608600001
PM 37485830
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yang, JY
Vijayan, L
Ghorbanzadeh, M
Alisan, O
Ozguven, EE
Huang, WR
Burns, S
AF Yang, Jieya
Vijayan, Linoj
Ghorbanzadeh, Mahyar
Alisan, Onur
Ozguven, Eren Erman
Huang, Wenrui
Burns, Simone
TI Integrating storm surge modeling and accessibility analysis for planning
of special-needs hurricane shelters in Panama City, Florida
SO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Storm surge; accessibility; special needs shelters; hurricane evacuation
ID AGING POPULATION; EVACUATION; LOCATION; FACILITIES; LEVEL
AB We investigated the transportation accessibility of special needs populations to
Special Needs Shelters (SpNS) by incorporating storm surge modeling into hurricane
shelter planning in Panama City, a medium-sized city located close to the landfall
location of Hurricane Michael. The storm surge model validated for Hurricane
Michael was used to predict the coastal inundation. Using this model, A
Geographical Information Systems (GIS)-based optimization methodology was developed
for evaluating the accessibility to special needs shelters and repurposing existing
regular hurricane shelters for special needs populations. With the proposed
optimization approach, the average travel time per person-trip decreased from 28.5
minutes to 7.4 minutes after repurposing one regular shelter and to 4.3 minutes
when three regular shelters converted to SpNS. Emergency plans can be improved by
the proposed methodology, which can estimate the inundation zones by storm surge
modeling and allocate the emerging shelter demand by accessibility analysis and
location modeling.
C1 [Yang, Jieya; Vijayan, Linoj; Alisan, Onur; Ozguven, Eren Erman; Huang, Wenrui]
Florida A&M Univ Florida State Univ Coll Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Tallahassee, FL USA.
[Ghorbanzadeh, Mahyar] HNTB Corp, Tallahassee, FL USA.
[Burns, Simone] Kimley Horn Associates, Orlando, FL USA.
[Yang, Jieya] Florida A&M Univ Florida State Univ Coll Engn, Dept Civil &
Environm Engn, 2525 Pottsdamer St, Tallahassee, FL 32310 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida A&M University; State
University System of Florida; Florida A&M University
RP Yang, JY (corresponding author), Florida A&M Univ Florida State Univ Coll Engn,
Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 2525 Pottsdamer St, Tallahassee, FL 32310 USA.
EM jy19j@fsu.edu
RI alisan, onur/N-5158-2019
OI alisan, onur/0000-0001-9311-3984; Vijayan Nair Rugminiamma,
Linoj/0000-0001-5510-6257; Yang, Jieya/0000-0002-6444-8977
CR American Community Survey, 2018, DP05 ACS DEM HOUS ES
[Anonymous], 2022, 2022 STAT EM SHELT P
[Anonymous], 2022, FLOR TRAFF ONL
[Anonymous], 2018, FSUTMSONLINE 0624
[Anonymous], 2021, COMMUNICATION 0310
Associated Press, 2018, HURR MICH DESTR NUMB
Ayudhya WSN, 2020, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P11, DOI 10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309860
Balomenos Georgios, 2020, IMPACT COASTAL HAZAR
Baray J, 2013, J BUS RES, V66, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.003
Berry J, 2006, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V132, P218, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9496(2006)132:4(218)
Beven, 2019, AL142018 NAT HURR CT
Blain C., 1994, 4 US ENG RES DEV CTR, P68
Bureau US Census, 2022, AM COMM SURV ACS
Burns, 2022, ASSESSING VULNERABIL
Chen YD, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000504
Coulbourne William., 2002, SOLUTIONS COASTAL DI, V2, P972, DOI
[10.1061/40605(258)83, DOI 10.1061/40605(258)83]
Daskin M. S., 2013, NETWORK DISCRETE LOC, DOI [10.1002/9781118537015, DOI
10.1002/9781118537015]
Dzator M, 2013, OPSEARCH, V50, P60, DOI 10.1007/s12597-012-0098-x
Farhana B, 2008, COMPUT OPER RES, V35, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2006.03.009
FDEM, 2020, STAT EM SHELT PLAN 2
Fries R, 2011, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V34, P139, DOI 10.1080/03081060.2011.554706
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10100661
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2021, PUBLIC LIBR Q, V40, P310, DOI
10.1080/01616846.2020.1772027
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102278
Horner MW, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P169, DOI 10.1111/disa.12233
Hua JY, 2015, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V38, P777, DOI 10.1080/03081060.2015.1059123
Huang WR, 2021, FRONT STRUCT CIV ENG, V15, P1301, DOI 10.1007/s11709-021-0765-1
Islam Mohammed Shariful, 2011, World Health Popul, V12, P33
Jia HZ, 2007, IIE TRANS, V39, P41, DOI 10.1080/07408170500539113
Jia T, 2014, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V13, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-13-42
Karatas M, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V272, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.017
Kocatepe A, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V95, P615, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3507-5
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.006
Li CY, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103369
Marcelin JM, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V15, P61, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.12.006
Ndiaye F., 2012, AM J OPER RES, P253, DOI [10.4236/ajor.2012.22030, DOI
10.4236/AJOR.2012.22030]
NEFRC, 2021, STAT REG EV STUD PRO
Niedzielski MA, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V75, P106, DOI
10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.021
Ozguven EE, 2016, TRANSPORT REV, V36, P383, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2015.1082516
Pathak A, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000400
Pelegrin M, 2019, LOCATION SCI, P25
Sanusi F, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000802
Serra D., 1998, Location Science, V6, P383, DOI 10.1016/S0966-8349(98)00049-7
Svensson Johan., 2010, STATE SCI UNIVERSAL, DOI
[10.2174/978160805063511001010122, DOI 10.2174/978160805063511001010122]
Tan Hui-fang, 2017, Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and
Development (English Edition), V11, P97
Ulak MB, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V92, P1489, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3260-9
Ulak MB, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, P90, DOI 10.3141/2635-11
Unal M, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-2, P95, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-
2-W1-95-2016
Vijayan L, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P2003, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04525-y
Xie Dexiang, IMPROVED DIJKSTRA AL, P3
Yang Jieya, 2022, EFFECTS UNCERTAINTY, DOI [10.18178/ijscer.11.4.99-107, DOI
10.18178/IJSCER.11.4.99-107]
Yin K, 2017, OCEAN ENG, V136, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.03.016
Zhou YH, 2021, J PHARM HEALTH SERV, V12, P69, DOI 10.1093/jphsr/rmaa022
Zhu XM, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072180
NR 55
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 4
PI ABINGDON
SN 0308-1060
EI 1029-0354
J9 TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN
JI Transp. Plan. Technol.
PD FEB 17
PY 2023
VL 46
IS 2
BP 241
EP 261
DI 10.1080/03081060.2022.2162053
EA DEC 2022
PG 21
WC Transportation Science & Technology
SC Transportation
GA 9B2AY
UT WOS:000905946100001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Fraser, T
AF Fraser, Timothy
TI The Road More Traveled: Evacuation Networks in the US and Japan
SO ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR
LA English
DT Article
DE evacuation; networks; social capital; disaster; resilience
ID SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; HURRICANE EVACUATION; MIGRATION; MODEL; FLOWS;
FLOOD; POWER; HOME
AB When crisis strikes, where do evacuees go? This question affects how
policymakers and first responders allocate their time, funds, and resources after
disaster. While past research compared evacuation rates of cities within the same
disaster, evacuation among different types of disasters remain under-examined. This
mixed methods study compares evacuation patterns from 7,631 cities among 10 major
disasters in the US and Japan between 2019 and 2020, combining social network
analysis, modeling, and visualization. This study highlights that evacuation from
some hazards is more alike than others; large, sprawling disasters, including some
storms, fires, and power outages trigger both clustered and dispersed evacuation
networks, while smaller, focused disaster result in mainly dispersed evacuation
networks. Further, cities with similar levels of social capital tend to see greater
evacuation between them. By uncovering the different shapes and drivers of
evacuation networks across different disasters, scholars can clarify where evacuees
go and which kinds of cities need additional support after crisis.
C1 [Fraser, Timothy] Northeastern Univ, Polit Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
C3 Northeastern University
RP Fraser, T (corresponding author), Northeastern Univ, Polit Sci Dept, 960A
Renaissance Pk,360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
EM timothy.fraser.1@gmail.com
OI Fraser, Timothy/0000-0002-4509-0244
CR Aldrich D.P., 2012, BUILDING RESILIENCE
Aldrich D.P., 2018, IRGC RESOURCE GUIDE, V2
Aldrich D.P., 2019, BLACK WAVE CONNECTIO
Aldrich DP, 2008, POLIT RES QUART, V61, P379, DOI 10.1177/1065912907312983
[Anonymous], 2017, ZELIG EVERYONES STAT
Bailey M, 2018, J ECON PERSPECT, V32, P259, DOI 10.1257/jep.32.3.259
Bankoff G, 2001, DISASTERS, V25, P19, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00159
Basellini U, 2021, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100799
Burnside R., 2006, J PUBLIC MANAGE SOC, V12, P49
Burt RS, 2004, AM J SOCIOL, V110, P349, DOI 10.1086/421787
Cahyanto I, 2016, TOURISM MANAGE, V52, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.014
Cutter SL, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P2301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710375105
Danchev V, 2018, SOC NETWORKS, V53, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.06.003
Dominey-Howes D, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V16, P1, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.02.004
Eagle N, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1029, DOI 10.1126/science.1186605
Enarson E, 1998, DISASTERS, V22, P157, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00083
Facebook, 2020, FAC DAT GOOD PROJ
Farmer AK, 2016, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V13, DOI 10.1515/jhsem-2016-0051
Fraser T., 2022, SCI REP-UK
Fraser T, 2022, ECOL SOC, V27, DOI 10.5751/ES-13097-270203
Fraser T, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100320
Fraser T, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V21, P54, DOI 10.1162/glep_a_00588
Fraser T, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101965
HONG I, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14
Hu HB, 2009, EPL-EUROPHYS LETT, V86, DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/86/18003
Kakimoto R, 2016, INT J URBAN SCI, V20, P25, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2016.1185958
KING G, 2000, AM J POLIT SCI, V0044
Kyne D, 2020, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V11, P61, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12183
Lazer D, 2017, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V43, P19, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053457
Leung CC, 2007, PHYSICA A, V378, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2006.12.022
Long EF, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abb7906
Maas Paige, 2019, KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International
Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, DOI 10.1145/3292500.3340412
McGinty MD, 2017, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V23, P29, DOI
10.1097/PHH.0000000000000404
McMillan C, 2022, SOC NETWORKS, V68, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2021.06.003
McPherson M, 2001, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V27, P415, DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Metaxa-Kakavouli Danae, 2018, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer
Interaction, V2, DOI 10.1145/3274391
Mills BJ, 2018, ANTIQUITY, V92, P922, DOI 10.15184/aqy.2018.86
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, 2019, SURV TIM INF BEH INF
Moussaid M, 2016, J R SOC INTERFACE, V13, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2016.0414
Na HS, 2015, IIE TRANS, V47, P1287, DOI 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1040929
Nakai H, 2016, J COMMUN HEALTH NURS, V33, P196, DOI
10.1080/07370016.2016.1227213
Newman M., 2018, NETWORKS INTRO, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001
Newman MEJ, 2003, PHYS REV E, V67, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126
Putnam R.D., 2000, BOWLING ALONE COLLAP
Putnam Robert., 1993, MAKING DEMOCRACY WOR
Qi W, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P2432, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17718375
Raker EJ, 2018, SOC SCI QUART, V99, P1200, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12498
Ren YH, 2014, NAT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1038/ncomms6347
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Salganik MJ, 2018, BIT BY BIT: SOCIAL RESEARCH IN THE DIGITAL AGE, P1
Salvati P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P867, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.064
Saramaki J, 2007, PHYS REV E, V75, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.027105
Shannon C.E., 2001, BELL SYST TECH J, V5, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1002/J.1538-
7305.1948.TB01338.X, 10.1145/584091.584093]
Shoji M, 2021, J DEV STUD, V57, P790, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2020.1806245
Simini F, 2012, NATURE, V484, P96, DOI 10.1038/nature10856
Smiley KT, 2018, POPUL ENVIRON, V40, P115, DOI 10.1007/s11111-018-0304-8
Stefanouli M, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V24, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.069
Szreter S, 2004, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V33, P650, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyh013
Tsai LL, 2007, AM POLIT SCI REV, V101, P355, DOI 10.1017/S0003055407070153
Uscher-Pines L, 2009, AM J PREV MED, V37, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.04.028
Uzzi B, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P35, DOI 10.2307/2393808
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Windzio M, 2018, SOC NETWORKS, V53, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.08.006
Yabe T, 2019, APPL NETW SCI, V4, DOI 10.1007/s41109-019-0221-5
Zahran S, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1265, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01920.x
Zhao HT, 2020, J R SOC INTERFACE, V17, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2020.0116
NR 84
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 13
PI THOUSAND OAKS
SN 0013-9165
EI 1552-390X
J9 ENVIRON BEHAV
JI Environ. Behav.
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 54
IS 4
BP 833
EP 863
AR 00139165221090159
DI 10.1177/00139165221090159
EA APR 2022
PG 31
WC Environmental Studies; Psychology, Multidisciplinary
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Psychology
GA 0V2KQ
UT WOS:000782463700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Mohajervatan, A
Tavakoli, N
Khankeh, H
Raeisi, AR
Atighechian, G
AF Mohajervatan, Ali
Tavakoli, Nahid
Khankeh, Hamidreza
Raeisi, Ahmad Reza
Atighechian, Golrokh
TI Identifying flood response experiences in Iranian health system: A
qualitative study
LA English
DE emergency response and evacuation; flood damages; health impacts
ID IMPACTS; ADAPTATION
AB One of the most essential purposes of the health system is to ensure that people
affected by various disastrous events, such as floods, have access timely to basic
health services. Therefore, enhancing the preparedness and response plans for such
events should be a national priority. Because of the complexity and devastating
impacts of floods on public health, it is a crucial to understand the various
aspects of flood experience in the country. The experiences of managers and
operational staff from various units of the Iranian health system are a valuable
source for understanding flood complexities. These experiences were explored using
19 semi-structured interviews with people who had firsthand experience of this
phenomenon. Based on the results, in order to provide a flood response plan, it is
necessary to adhere to the principles and foundations that can meet the needs
arising from the flood. Our study showed that the health system's response to
flooding can be divided into two categories: initial and specific functions. A
comprehensive response requires an initial function to prevent flood impacts, and
specific functions are needed to prevent and treat flood-related diseases. These
results could form the basis for the health system's response to future floods.
C1 [Mohajervatan, Ali] Golestan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed Sci, Dept Anesthesia &
Prehosp Emergency, Gorgan, Iran.
[Tavakoli, Nahid; Raeisi, Ahmad Reza; Atighechian, Golrokh] Isfahan Univ Med
Sci, Hlth Management & Econ Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran.
[Khankeh, Hamidreza] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Res Ctr Emergency &
Disaster Hlth, Tehran, Iran.
[Tavakoli, Nahid] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Hlth Management & Econ Res Ctr, Esfahan,
Iran.
C3 Golestan University of Medical Sciences; Isfahan University Medical
Science; Isfahan University Medical Science
RP Tavakoli, N (corresponding author), Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Hlth Management & Econ
Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran.
EM tavakoli@mng.mui.ac.ir
RI Atighechian, Golrokh/AAC-4877-2019
FU Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [399504]; Fund for Support of
Researchers and Technologists of Iran [99021449]
FX The researcher would like to thank all of the managers and staff from
the health system who participated in the interviews and shared their
experiences with the study team. Ethical consideration: This article is
a part of the result of a Ph.D. thesis from Isfahan University of
Medical Sciences with the approved number 399504 and is supported by the
Fund for Support of Researchers and Technologists of Iran with the
approved number 99021449. I would like to thank them for their support
of this student dissertation.
CR Abaya SW, 2009, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V2, DOI 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2019
Ahern M, 2005, EPIDEMIOL REV, V27, P36, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxi004
Aitsi-Selmi A, 2015, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V93, P362, DOI 10.2471/BLT.15.157362
Alderman K, 2012, ENVIRON INT, V47, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003
Ardalan A., 2015, IRAN NATL HLTH DISAS
Austin SE, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V220, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.002
Austin SE, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P623, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120100623
Bayntun Claire, 2012, PLoS Curr, V4, pe5028b6037259a, DOI 10.1371/5028b6037259a
Carroll B, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P1045, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01182.x
Crunch C., 2019, 58 DISASTER YEAR REV
Cvetkovic VM, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15122761
Dizaji RA, 2019, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V13, P842, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2018.94
Doocy S., 2013, PLOS CURR-TREE LIFE, V5
Du WW, 2010, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V25, P265, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X00008141
Gale NK, 2013, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Ghazanfarpour H., 2019, GEOGRAPHY ENV SUSTAI, V9, P107
HANSSON RO, 1982, ENVIRON BEHAV, V14, P171, DOI 10.1177/0013916584142003
Hoang Van Minh, 2014, Global Health Action, V7, P23007
IRC, 2019, IR FLOODS 2 MILL PEO
JICA, 2014, NAT DIS RESP PLAN JU
Khan H., 2008, J MANAG MARK, V6, P43
Mahmood MI, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V601, P1031, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.260
Malalgoda C., 2011, BUILDING EC
Matsuyama A., 2020, BANGLADESH PUBLIC HL, P115
McKinney N, 2011, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V55, P533, DOI 10.1007/s00484-010-0370-9
Memarian Khalil Abad H., 2018, J WATER SOIL CONSERV, V25, P35
Menne B., 2014, FLOODS HLTH FACT SHE, P1
Mirhagi A., 2010, SCI J RESCUE RELIEF, V3, P4
Mirzaei S, 2021, EARTH SCI INFORM, V14, P51, DOI 10.1007/s12145-020-00530-0
Mohajervatan A., 2017, INT J HLTH SYSTEM DI, V5, P41
Mohajervatan A, 2021, ENV HEALTH ENG MANAG, V8, P169, DOI 10.34172/EHEM.2021.20
Ng J, 2011, DIABETIC MED, V28, P519, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03228.x
Nojavan M., 2016, J ENV SCI TECHNOLOGY, P129
Paterson DL, 2018, CLIN INFECT DIS, V67, P1450, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciy227
Pilon P. J., 2002, GUIDELINES REDUCING
Rattanakanlaya K, 2018, AUSTRALAS EMERG CARE, V21, P87, DOI
10.1016/j.auec.2018.07.002
Robinson B, 2011, RESPIROLOGY, V16, P386, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01923.x
Ryan Benjamin, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.62e9286d152de04799644dcca47d9288
Tavakoli N, 2018, TRAUMA MON, V23, DOI 10.5812/traumamon.15844
Tavakoli N, 2017, WORLD J EMERG MED, V8, P91, DOI 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-
8642.2017.02.002
ten Brinke W. B., 2008, P I CIV ENG MUN ENG
Waite TD, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-4000-2
Watts N, 2015, LANCET, V386, P1861, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6
WHO, 2017, EM RESP FRAM ERF
WHO, 2019, FLOOD MAN HLTH RISKS
World Health Organization, 2014, FLOODS HLTH FACT SHE
Yadollahie M, 2019, INT J OCCUP ENV MED, V10, P54, DOI 10.15171/ijoem.2019.1681
Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2008.00010.x
NR 48
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1753-318X
PD 2023 JUL 18
PY 2023
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12932
EA JUL 2023
PG 12
GA M5OI0
UT WOS:001030705700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Morss, RE
Lazrus, H
Bostrom, A
Demuth, JL
AF Morss, Rebecca E.
Lazrus, Heather
Bostrom, Ann
Demuth, Julie L.
TI The influence of cultural worldviews on people's responses to hurricane
risks and threat information
SO JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricanes; cultural theory; worldviews; hazards; risk; evacuation
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLITICAL-IDEOLOGY; ORIENTING DISPOSITIONS; PERCEPTION;
FEAR; COMMUNICATION; MODEL; TRUST; KNOWLEDGE; BEHAVIOR
AB This article explores whether and how cultural worldviews influence people's
responses to approaching natural hazard threats, using data from a survey that
asked residents of coastal Florida, USA, about a scenario of a hurricane forecasted
to affect their region. The analysis finds that stronger individualist worldview is
associated with lower hurricane-related evacuation intentions, cognitive risk
perception, negative affect, response and self-efficacy, perceptions of government
preparedness, and information seeking. It is also associated with greater hurricane
information avoidance, perceptions of bias in key hurricane information sources,
and negative reactance to hurricane threat information. Mediation analysis
indicates that stronger individualists' lower evacuation intentions are explained
by their lower cognitive risk perception, negative affect, and response efficacy
related to the hurricane threat. Their greater negative reactance to the hurricane
threat information is partly explained by their lower cognitive risk perception,
but not by their lower efficacy; both are counter to the predictions of the
Extended Parallel Process Model. These results demonstrate that worldviews can
interact with how people perceive and respond to near-term hazard risks and risk
information, and they suggest that hazard risk communication should consider
cultural theory when designing and conveying forecasts, warnings, and other risk
messages. The authors recommend further research to investigate in greater depth
the roles of cultural theory in these contexts.
C1 [Morss, Rebecca E.; Lazrus, Heather; Demuth, Julie L.] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res,
POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
[Bostrom, Ann] Univ Washington, Daniel J Evans Sch Publ Affairs, Seattle, WA
98195 USA.
C3 National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - USA; University of
Washington; University of Washington Seattle
RP Morss, RE (corresponding author), Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO
80307 USA.
EM morss@ucar.edu
OI Morss, Rebecca/0000-0001-6267-3436
FU National Science Foundation; (National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration) [0729302]
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grants
0838702 (which was jointly funded by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration) and 0729302. The National Center for
Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
CR [Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(87)
[Anonymous], 1999, ANGRY EARTH DISASTER
[Anonymous], 1985, MEASURING CULTURE PA
[Anonymous], RISK GOVERNANCE COPI
[Anonymous], HLTH RISK SOC
[Anonymous], 2009, SOC EPISTEMOL
[Anonymous], 1986, RISK EVALUATION MANA, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-2103-3_1
10.1177/028072709100900210
Bandura A, 2001, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V52, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bellamy R, 2011, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V3, P48, DOI 10.1175/2011WCAS1081.1
Benjamin D, 2017, ENVIRON BEHAV, V49, P745, DOI 10.1177/0013916516664382
Brewer NT, 2007, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V26, P136, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
Cornia A, 2016, J RISK RES, V19, P288, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2014.961520
Coughlin RM, 1998, J THEOR POLIT, V10, P33, DOI 10.1177/0951692898010001002
DAKE K, 1992, J SOC ISSUES, V48, P21, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x
DAKE K, 1991, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V22, P61, DOI 10.1177/0022022191221006
6988(2007)8:3(69), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)]
Douglas 34Mary, 1966, PURITY DANGER ANAL C
Douglas M., 1982, RISK CULTURE ESSAY S
Earle TC, 2010, RISK ANAL, V30, P541, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x
Eiser JR, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V1, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002
FREUDENBURG WR, 1993, SOC FORCES, V71, P909, DOI 10.2307/2580124
Gastil J, 2011, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V44, P711, DOI 10.1017/S1049096511001326
Goebbert K, 2012, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V4, P132, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1
Grendstad G, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P27, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.00003
Hamilton LC, 2013, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V5, P112, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1
Harrell FE., 2001, REGRESSION MODELING, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1, DOI
10.2147/]
Hayes A. F., 2018, PROCESS MACRO SPSS S, V2nd
Hayes AF., 2017, INTRO MEDIATION MODE, V2, DOI DOI 10.1111/JEDM.12050
Johnson BB, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P429, DOI 10.1111/risa.13299
Kahan D., 2012, HDB RISK THEORY EPIS, P725, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_28
Kahan DM, 2011, J RISK RES, V14, P147, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
KASPERSON RE, 1988, RISK ANAL, V8, P177, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Kim HK, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P1071, DOI 10.1111/risa.13231
Kuttschreuter M, 2006, RISK ANAL, V26, P1045, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-
6924.2006.00799.x
Lacroix K, 2018, ENVIRON BEHAV, V50, P749, DOI 10.1177/0013916517715296
Lazrus H, 2016, HUM ECOL, V44, P595, DOI 10.1007/s10745-016-9840-y
Lazrus H, 2015, HUM ORGAN, V74, P52, DOI 10.17730/humo.74.1.q0667716284749m8
Leiserowitz A, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V77, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
Leiserowitz AA, 2013, AM BEHAV SCI, V57, P818, DOI 10.1177/0002764212458272
Loewenstein GF, 2001, PSYCHOL BULL, V127, P267, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.267
Lofstedt Ragnar., 2005, RISK MANAGEMENT POST, DOI 10.1057/9780230503946
Marris C, 1998, RISK ANAL, V18, P635
McComas KA, 2006, J HEALTH COMMUN, V11, P75, DOI 10.1080/10810730500461091
McNeeley SM, 2014, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V6, P506, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00027.1
Michaud KEH, 2009, POLIT PSYCHOL, V30, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00679.x
Mileti D. S., 1990, COMMUNICATION EMERGE, DOI 10.2172/6137387
Paton Douglas, 2008, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, V8,
P2, DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017256
Pendergraft CA, 1998, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V39, P643, DOI 10.1023/A:1005323809980
Peters E, 1996, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V26, P1427, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.1996.tb00079.x
Price JC, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V37, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.10.001
RAYNER S, 1987, RISK ANAL, V7, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00963.x
RAYNER S, 1992, SOCIAL THEORIES OF RISK, P83
Ripberger JT, 2012, SOC SCI QUART, V93, P713, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6237.2012.00884.x
Rippl S., 2002, J RISK RES, V5, P147, DOI DOI 10.1080/13669870110042598
Roberto A. J., 2009, HDB RISK CRISIS COMM, P285
Rogers R. W., 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOPHYSIOL, P153, DOI DOI 10.1093/DEAFED/ENT031
Ruiter RAC, 2001, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V16, P613, DOI 10.1080/08870440108405863
Ruiter RAC, 2014, INT J PSYCHOL, V49, P63, DOI 10.1002/ijop.12042
Schwarz M., 1990, DIVIDED WE STAND RE
Shi J, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P2183, DOI 10.1111/risa.12406
Siegrist M, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P195, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.202020
Slovic P, 2004, RISK ANAL, V24, P311, DOI 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
Slovic P, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P689, DOI 10.1023/A:1007041821623
Smith N, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P937, DOI 10.1111/risa.12140
Smith RA, 2007, HEALTH COMMUN, V21, P55, DOI 10.1080/10410230701283389
Steg L, 2000, ENVIRON BEHAV, V32, P250, DOI 10.1177/00139160021972513
Tannenbaum MB, 2015, PSYCHOL BULL, V141, P1178, DOI 10.1037/a0039729
Tansey J, 2004, J RISK RES, V7, P17, DOI 10.1080/1366987042000151188
Tansey J, 2004, J RISK RES, V7, P361, DOI 10.1080/1366987042000178152
Thomas SA, 2007, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V27, P679, DOI 10.1080/02732170701534200
Thompson M., 1990, CULTURAL THEORY
Tumlison C, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P511, DOI 10.1111/risa.13197
Wachinger G, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1049, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
WILDAVSKY A, 1990, DAEDALUS, V119, P41
WITTE K, 1992, COMMUN MONOGR, V59, P329, DOI 10.1080/03637759209376276
NR 93
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 1
U2 25
PI ABINGDON
SN 1366-9877
EI 1466-4461
J9 J RISK RES
JI J. Risk Res.
PD DEC 1
PY 2020
VL 23
IS 12
BP 1620
EP 1649
DI 10.1080/13669877.2020.1750456
EA MAY 2020
PG 30
WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
SC Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA PE8JH
UT WOS:000534892400001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Houston, D
Ball, T
Werritty, A
Black, AR
AF Houston, Donald
Ball, Tom
Werritty, Alan
Black, Andrew R.
TI Social Influences on Flood Preparedness and Mitigation Measures Adopted
by People Living with Flood Risk
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood vulnerability; flood resilience; social inequality
ID VULNERABILITY; HEALTH; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; INEQUALITY; INSURANCE;
ENGLAND; IMPACTS; POLICY; PLACE
AB This paper aims to analyse evidence, based on one of the largest and most
representative samples of households previously flooded or living with flood risk
to date, of social patterns in a range of flood resilience traits relating to
preparedness prior to a flood (e.g., property adaptations, contents insurance,
etc.) and mitigations enacted during and immediately following a flood (e.g.,
receiving a warning, evacuation into temporary accommodation, etc.). The data were
collected from a 2006 survey of 1223 households from a variety of locations across
Scotland between one and twelve years after major local floods. Our analysis
identifies remarkably few social differences in flood preparedness and mitigation
measures, although some aspects of demography, housing and length of residence in
an area, as well as personal flood history, are important. In light of this
finding, we argue that social differences in vulnerability and resilience to
flooding arise from deep-seated socio-economic and socio-spatial inequalities that
affect exposure to flood risk and ability to recover from flood impacts. The
engrained, but well-meaning, assumption in flood risk management that impoverished
households and communities are lacking or deficient in flood preparedness or
mitigation knowledge and capabilities is somewhat pejorative and misses
fundamental, yet sometimes invisible, social stratifications play out in subtle but
powerful ways to affect households' and communities' ability to avoid and recover
from floods. We argue that general poverty and inequality alleviation measures,
such as tax and welfare policy and urban and community regeneration schemes, are
likely to be as, if not more, important in alleviating social inequalities in the
long-term impacts of floods than social targeting of flood risk management policy.
C1 [Houston, Donald] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Environm Geog & Geosci, Portsmouth PO1
3HE, Hants, England.
[Ball, Tom] Univ Winchester, Dept Archaeol Anthropol & Geog, Anthropol & Geog,
Winchester SO22 4NR, Hants, England.
[Werritty, Alan; Black, Andrew R.] Univ Dundee, Geog & Environm Sci, Dundee DD1
4HN, Scotland.
C3 University of Portsmouth; University of Winchester; University of Dundee
RP Houston, D (corresponding author), Univ Portsmouth, Sch Environm Geog & Geosci,
Portsmouth PO1 3HE, Hants, England.
EM donald.houston@port.ac.uk; tom.ball@winchester.ac.uk;
a.werritty@dundee.ac.uk; a.z.black@dundee.ac.uk
OI Houston, Donald/0000-0002-7178-9630; Black, Andrew/0000-0001-9292-1146
CR [Anonymous], 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE JUSTI
[Anonymous], 2007, EXPLORING SOCIAL IMP
[Anonymous], 2006, HAZARDS VULNERABILIT
[Anonymous], 2008, DEV EVIDENCE BASE FL
Ball T, 2013, AREA, V45, P266, DOI 10.1111/area.12038
Black AR, 2002, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V294, P169, DOI 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00062-1
Browning S., 2021, 8751 HOUS COMM
Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Davidson JL, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08450-210227
Fielding J, 2005, LOCAL ENVIRON, V10, P379, DOI 10.1080/13549830500160875
Finch C, 2010, POPUL ENVIRON, V31, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8
Geddes A., 2017 ASSESSING EFFEC
Glencross K., 2021, UNDERSTANDING BARRIE, DOI [10.7488/era/947, DOI
10.7488/ERA/947]
Greene G, 2015, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V105, P1792, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302709
Houston D., 2011, PLUVIAL FLOOD RISK U
Houston D, 2021, T I BRIT GEOGR, V46, P102, DOI 10.1111/tran.12408
Johnson C, 2007, GEOGR J, V173, P374, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00256.x
Kazmierczak A., 2015, MAPPING FLOOD DISADV
Kazmierczak A, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P185, DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.008
Lamond JE, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V140, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.008
MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
Masozera M, 2007, ECOL ECON, V63, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013
McCarthy J, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P301, DOI
10.1080/24694452.2018.1554393
Medd W, 2015, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V8, P315, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12098
Penning-Rowsell E, 2006, T I BRIT GEOGR, V31, P99, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
5661.2006.00200.x
Penning-Rowsell EC, 2019, SCOT GEOGR J, V135, P33, DOI
10.1080/14702541.2019.1572918
Pitt M., 2007, LEARNING LESSONS 200, P32
Rozer V, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abec04
Sayers P, 2017, PRESENT FUTURE FLOOD
Sayers P, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P339, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1252-z
Scottish Government, 2019, LIV FLOOD ACT PLAN D
Sims R, 2009, SPACE CULT, V12, P303, DOI 10.1177/1206331209337077
Tapsell SM, 2008, HEALTH PLACE, V14, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.05.006
Tapsell SM, 2002, PHILOS T R SOC A, V360, P1511, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2002.1013
Thrush D., 2005, SW5C01811 ENV AG SCI
Tunstall Sylvia, 2006, Journal of Water and Health, V4, P365, DOI
10.2166/wh.2006.031
Walker G, 2011, CRIT SOC POLICY, V31, P216, DOI 10.1177/0261018310396149
Watkiss P., 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
Watson N., 2009, FLOOD RISK MANAGEMEN, P911, DOI [10.1201/9780203883020.ch105,
DOI 10.1201/9780203883020.CH105]
WATTS MJ, 1993, PROG HUM GEOG, V17, P43, DOI 10.1177/030913259301700103
NR 42
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 5
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 21
AR 2972
DI 10.3390/w13212972
PG 16
GA XE1XJ
UT WOS:000723188300001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Rufat, S
Howe, PD
AF Rufat, Samuel
Howe, Peter D.
TI Small-Area Estimations from Survey Data for High-Resolution Maps of
Urban Flood Risk Perception and Evacuation Behavior
SO ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS
LA English
DE evacuation behavior; mapping; risk perception; small-area estimations;
survey data
ID PUBLIC-OPINION; MULTILEVEL REGRESSION; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY;
CLIMATE-CHANGE; GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION; MITIGATION BEHAVIOR; US STATES;
POSTSTRATIFICATION; COMMUNICATION; RESILIENCE
AB "Behavior-blind" risk assessments, mapping, and policy do not account for
individual responses to risks, due to challenges in collecting accurate information
at scales relevant to decision-making. There is useful spatial information in
social survey data that is sometimes analyzed for spatial patterns despite
potential biases. This article explores whether risk perception and adaptive
behavior can be inferred from census and hazard exposure data with a specifically
designed survey. An underlying question is what precautions surveys should take
before mapping the results. We find that a hybrid multilevel regression and
(synthetic) poststratification (MRP-MRSP) model can facilitate the transition from
individual survey data to small-area estimations at different scales, including
200-m grid cells. We demonstrate this model using municipal-level survey data
collected in the Paris region, France. We find that model accuracy is not decreased
at finer scales provided there is a strong spatial predictor such as hazard
exposure. Our findings show that a wide range of flood risk perception and
evacuation behavior can be estimated with such downscaling techniques. Although
this type of modeling is not yet commonly used among geographers, our study
suggests that it can improve mapping of survey results and, in particular, can
provide spatially explicit behavioral information for risk assessment and policy.
C1 [Rufat, Samuel] Inst Univ France, Paris, France.
[Rufat, Samuel] CY Cergy Paris Univ, Geog Dept, F-95011 Paris, France.
[Howe, Peter D.] Utah State Univ, Dept Environm & Soc, Geog, Logan, UT 84322
USA.
C3 Institut Universitaire de France; CY Cergy Paris Universite; Utah System
of Higher Education; Utah State University
RP Rufat, S (corresponding author), Inst Univ France, Paris, France.; Rufat, S
(corresponding author), CY Cergy Paris Univ, Geog Dept, F-95011 Paris, France.
EM samuel.rufat@u-cergy.fr; peter.howe@usu.edu
RI Rufat, Samuel/ABG-5119-2021
OI Rufat, Samuel/0000-0001-6356-1233
FU French National Research Agency [ANR20-CE03-0009]; Institut
Universitaire de France [IUF-2016-5296]; Mobile Lives Forum [498C02-A0];
U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF BCS-1753082]
FX This research was partially supported by funds from the French National
Research Agency (ANR20-CE03-0009), the Institut Universitaire de France
(IUF-2016-5296), the Mobile Lives Forum (498C02-A0), and the U.S.
National Science Foundation (NSF BCS-1753082).
CR Aerts JCJH, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
Allan JN, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2498, DOI 10.1111/risa.13569
Bamberg S, 2017, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V54, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.08.001
Bates D, 2015, J STAT SOFTW, V67, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Baubion C, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P156, DOI 10.2166/wp.2015.008
Beccari Benjamin, 2016, PLoS Curr, V8, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970
Begg C, 2017, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V33, P591, DOI [10.1080/07900627.2016.1200,
10.1080/07900627.2016.1200961]
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
Bloeschl G, 2019, NATURE, V573, P108, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6
Botzen WJW, 2015, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V10, P365
Buttice MK, 2013, POLIT ANAL, V21, P449, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpt017
Caughey D, 2019, J POLIT, V81, P352, DOI 10.1086/700723
Coronese M, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P21450, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1907826116
De Dominicis S, 2015, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V43, P66, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
de Sherbinin A, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.600
Debionne S, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.064
Downes M, 2018, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V187, P1780, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwy070
Fekete A, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6
Fowler L, 2016, ENVIRON POLIT, V25, P315, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2015.1102351
Fuchs S., 2018, VULNERABILITY RESILI, DOI 10.1017/978136651148
Ge Y, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P3119, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04458-y
Groves RM., 2011, SURV METHODOL
Haer T, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P1977, DOI 10.1111/risa.12740
Hamilton K, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101561
Hamilton LC, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P704, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2720
Hartmann T, 2017, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V10, P145, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12077
Hoppner C, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1753, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0356-5
Howe PD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P6743, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1813145116
Howe PD, 2018, PROF GEOGR, V70, P491, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2017.1416301
Howe PD, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P596, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2583
Hudson P, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1387
IFRC, 2018, 2018 WORLD DIS REP L
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), 2017, REV
PAUVR NIV VIE 20
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), 2017, REC
POP 2017 BAS INF
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), 2015,
DONN CARR 200M FIL 2
Institution Interdepartementale des Barrages Reservoirs du Bassin de la Seine
(IIBRBS), 2013, CRUES REF ZON IN
Kellens W, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
Kreibich H, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P2075, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-2075-
2017
Kuhlicke C., 2019, OXFORD RES ENCY NATU, P1, DOI
[10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.299, DOI
10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389407.013.299]
Kuhlicke C, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1418
Kwan MP, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15091841
Lax JR, 2009, AM J POLIT SCI, V53, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00360.x
Lazrus H, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P411, DOI 10.1111/risa.12480
Lee TM, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P1014, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2728
Leemann L, 2017, AM J POLIT SCI, V61, P1003, DOI 10.1111/ajps.12319
Marlon J. P.D., 2020, YALE CLIMATE OPINION
Mendelsohn J., 2021, DEVELOPING METRICS S, DOI [10.7249/RRA377-1, DOI
10.7249/RRA377-1]
Michel-Kerjan E, 2015, NATURE, V524, P389, DOI 10.1038/524389a
Mildenberger M, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0159774
O'Neill E, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P1573, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), 2018, PREV FLOOD
SEIN PAR
Pacheco J, 2011, STATE POLIT POLICY Q, V11, P415, DOI 10.1177/1532440011419287
Park DK, 2004, POLIT ANAL, V12, P375, DOI 10.1093/pan/mph024
Poussin JK, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V31, P74, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.007
Poussin JK, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V40, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013
Reghezza-Zitt M, 2019, CYBERGEO, DOI 10.4000/cybergeo.32917
Reghezza-Zitt Magali., 2019, ANN G OGRAPHIE, V726, P5, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.726.0005, DOI 10.3917/AG.726.0005]
ReghezzaZitt M, 2015, RESILIENCE IMPERATIVE: UNCERTAINTY, RISKS AND DISASTERS,
P1
Richert C, 2017, ECOL ECON, V131, P342, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.014
Rufat S, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102465
Rufat S, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1462
Rufat S, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P1131, DOI
10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887
Rufat S, 2015, CYBERGEO, DOI 10.4000/cybergeo.27010
Rufat S, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P505, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.702485
Ruin I., 2007, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V7, P235, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.07.005,
DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.07.005]
Siegrist M, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2191, DOI 10.1111/risa.13599
Slavikova L, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, P95, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12265
Tausanovitch C, 2013, J POLIT, V75, P330, DOI 10.1017/S0022381613000042
Wang W, 2015, INT J FORECASTING, V31, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001
Wang Y, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102254
Wang ZY, 2019, APPL GEOGR, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.05.001
Ward PJ, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1069, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1069-2020
Warshaw C, 2012, J POLIT, V74, P203, DOI 10.1017/S0022381611001204
Zhang XY, 2015, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V182, P127, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwv002
Zhang XY, 2014, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V179, P1025, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwu018
Zou L, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P1422, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897
NR 85
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 7
PI ABINGDON
SN 2469-4452
EI 2469-4460
J9 ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR
JI Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.
PD 2022 AUG 6
PY 2022
DI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2105685
EA AUG 2022
PG 23
WC Geography
SC Geography
GA 5D9FJ
UT WOS:000865239000001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chand, CP
Ali, MM
Himasri, B
Bourassa, MA
Zheng, YX
AF Chand, C. Purna
Ali, M. M.
Himasri, Borra
Bourassa, Mark A.
Zheng, Yangxing
TI Predicting Indian Ocean Cyclone Parameters Using an Artificial
Intelligence Technique
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE cyclone prediction; artifical neural networks; land crossing point; mean
distance error; scatter index
ID PRESSURE FIELDS; SEA-SURFACE
AB Precise prediction of a cyclone track with wind speed, pressure, landfall point,
and the time of crossing the land are essential for disaster management and
mitigation, including evacuation processes. In this paper, we use an artificial
neural network (ANN) approach to estimate the cyclone parameters. For this purpose,
these parameters are obtained from the International Best Track Archive for Climate
Stewardship (IBTrACS), from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA). Since ANN benefits from a large number of data points, each cyclone track
is divided into different segments. We use past information to predict the
geophysical parameters of a cyclone. The predicted values are compared with the
observations.
C1 [Chand, C. Purna; Ali, M. M.; Himasri, Borra] Andhra Pradesh State Disaster
Management Author, Kunchanapalli 522501, Andhra Pradesh, India.
[Ali, M. M.; Bourassa, Mark A.; Zheng, Yangxing] Florida State Univ, Ctr Ocean
Atmospher Predict Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32310 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida State University
RP Ali, MM (corresponding author), Andhra Pradesh State Disaster Management Author,
Kunchanapalli 522501, Andhra Pradesh, India.; Ali, MM (corresponding author),
Florida State Univ, Ctr Ocean Atmospher Predict Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32310 USA.
EM purnachandch@gmail.com; mmali@coaps.fsu.edu; sri.himaborra@gmail.com;
bourassa@coaps.fsu.edu; yzheng@fsu.edu
OI , Ali/0000-0002-3821-6099; Bourassa, Mark/0000-0003-3345-9531; Zheng,
Yangxing/0000-0003-2039-1494; chand, purna/0000-0001-6968-0698
FU NASA Physical Oceanography via the Jet Propulsion Laboratory [1419699];
Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing Program, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, through the
Northern Gulf of Mexico Institute (NGI) [100007298, 20-NGI3-106]; NASA
physical oceanography through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory [1419699]
FX This research was funded at Florida State University in part by NASA
Physical Oceanography via the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Contract
#1419699) and in part by the Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing
Program (Fund #100007298), National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, through the Northern Gulf
of Mexico Institute (NGI grant number 20-NGI3-106), and partially funded
by NASA physical oceanography through the Jet Propulsion Laboratory
(Contract #1419699).
CR Ali MM, 2016, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V13, P821, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2547969
Ali MM, 2015, IEEE J-STARS, V8, P5317, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437896
Ali MM, 2013, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V10, P841, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2226138
Ali MM, 2012, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V9, P1114, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2190491
Ali MM, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2006GL028353
Ali M.M., 2007, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V88, P93, DOI [10.1029/2007-o080001, DOI
10.1029/2007-O080001, DOI 10.1029/2007EO080001]
Ali MM, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2004GL021192
[Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(45),
DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(45)]
Bell G.J, 1979, AUST METEOROL MAG, V27, P249
Chand CP, 2014, ATMOS SCI LETT, V15, P65, DOI 10.1002/asl2.473
Gupta A., 2006, MAUSAM, V57, P151
Jain S, 2006, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V3, P467, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2006.876221
Jain S, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL030577
Krasnopolsky VM, 2003, NEURAL NETWORKS, V16, P321, DOI 10.1016/S0893-
6080(03)00027-3
Liu QH, 1997, J APPL METEOROL, V36, P919, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0450(1997)036<0919:ELNRAS>2.0.CO;2
Mohanty U.C., 1997, MAUSAM, V48, P257, DOI [10.54302/mausam.v48i2.4008, DOI
10.54302/MAUSAM.V48I2.4008]
Mohapatra M, 2015, J EARTH SYST SCI, V124, P861, DOI 10.1007/s12040-015-0581-x
MURPHY AH, 1988, MON WEATHER REV, V116, P2417, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0493(1988)116<2417:SSBOTM>2.0.CO;2
Neumann C. J., 1978, Indian Journal of Meteorology Hydrology & Geophysics, V29,
P487
NEUMANN CJ, 1976, MON WEATHER REV, V104, P76, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0493(1976)104<0076:SPOTCM>2.0.CO;2
Patoux J, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P813, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0450(2003)042<0813:GPFFSW>2.0.CO;2
Rao AD, 2015, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8964, P79, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25138-7_8
Shaji C, 2014, INDIAN J GEO-MAR SCI, V43, P125
Sharma N, 2013, ATMOS SCI LETT, V14, P187, DOI 10.1002/asl2.438
Sharma N, 2013, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V10, P34, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2012.2191763
Swain D, 2006, J MAR RES, V64, P745, DOI 10.1357/002224006779367285
Tolman HL, 2005, OCEAN MODEL, V8, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.12.008
NR 28
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 4
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD JUL
PY 2022
VL 13
IS 7
AR 1157
DI 10.3390/atmos13071157
PG 13
GA 3K9JB
UT WOS:000834388500001
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Cass, E
Shao, WY
Hao, F
Moradkhani, H
Yeates, E
AF Cass, Evan
Shao, Wanyun
Hao, Feng
Moradkhani, Hamid
Yeates, Elissa
TI Identifying trends in interpretation and responses to hurricane and
climate change communication tools
LA English
DT Article
DE Hazard mitigation; Climate change; Hurricane communication; Hurricane
graphics; Structural equation modeling
ID RISK PERCEPTIONS; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; EXPERIENCE;
HAZARDS; WEATHER; DAMAGE; MODEL
AB Coastal regions such as the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts are highly vulnerable
to extreme coastal hazards such as tropical cyclones and major hurricanes. The
effects of these hazards pose a threat now and are expected to increase in the
future, which highlights the need for coastal communities to receive and understand
information regarding risks involved with these hazards. Through this study, we
identify points of improvement in the tools used to communicate the short and
longterm risk associated with hurricane hazards through three surveys in Mobile,
AL, Savannah, GA, and Houston TX. These surveys identify public response to
hurricane descriptions, Cone of Uncertainty graphics, and long-term trend graphics.
Analysis of trends in responses to these communication tools identifies
relationships between risk perceptions and existing factors in each study location.
Further, public response to these tools is identified and analyzed using structural
equation models for each location with a "response" latent variable containing
information from endogenous variables in the survey. Response was measured as
action intent, concern for the scenario, reported evacuation likelihood, and
interpretation of long-term trends. We identify points of improvement for all three
communication tools to aid in public comprehension of the information provided as
well as to increase response to hurricane hazards by more effectively communicating
risk information. These would help to improve comprehension and increase different
responses to tropical storm and hurricane damage from high winds and storm surge
with the intent to improve resident response to hazards along the U.S. Atlantic and
Gulf Coasts.
C1 [Cass, Evan; Shao, Wanyun] Univ Alabama, Dept Geog, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
[Cass, Evan; Shao, Wanyun; Moradkhani, Hamid] Univ Alabama, Ctr Complex
Hydrosyst Res, Tuscaloosa, AL USA.
[Shao, Wanyun] Univ Alabama, Alabama Water Inst, Tuscaloosa, AL USA.
[Hao, Feng] Univ S Florida, Dept Sociol, Tampa, FL USA.
[Moradkhani, Hamid] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn,
Tuscaloosa, AL USA.
[Yeates, Elissa] US Army Corps Engineers, Coastal & Hydraul Lab, Washington, DC
USA.
C3 University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa;
University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa;
University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; State
Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; United States
Department of Defense; United States Army; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers;
U.S. Army Engineer Research & Development Center (ERDC); Field Research
Facility (FRF)
RP Cass, E (corresponding author), Univ Alabama, Dept Geog, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
USA.
EM eycass@crimson.ua.edu
RI Moradkhani, Hamid/B-1571-2012
OI Moradkhani, Hamid/0000-0002-2889-999X; Hao, Feng/0000-0002-0930-8461;
Shao, Wanyun/0000-0002-1609-7383
FU Coastal Compound Flooding work unit of the USACE Regional Sediment
Management Program award [A20-0545-001]
FX Funding for this study was provided by the Coastal Compound Flooding
work unit of the USACE Regional Sediment Management Program award
#A20-0545-001.
CR Adjei E, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103247
Alipour A, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002635
Bica M, 2020, COMPUT SUPP COOP W J, V29, P587, DOI 10.1007/s10606-020-09380-2
Bossak BH, 2014, SOUTHEAST GEOGR, V54, P323, DOI 10.1353/sgo.2014.0027
Camelo J, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100335
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Dinan T, 2017, ECOL ECON, V138, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.034
Emrich CT, 2011, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V3, P193, DOI 10.1175/2011WCAS1092.1
Evans S.D., 2022, B AM METEOROL SOC
Goldenberg SB, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P474, DOI 10.1126/science.1060040
Harlan SL, 2019, ANTHROPOCENE, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100217
6996.0000074
Karimiziarani M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103577
Kim YC, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P470, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01138.x
Leiserowitz AA, 2005, RISK ANAL, V25, P1433, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6261.2005.00690.x
Logan JR, 2015, GEOGR REV, V105, P133, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12064.x
Marsooli R, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-11755-z
McCright AM, 2011, SOCIOL QUART, V52, P155, DOI 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
McGill S., 2021, SHORE BEACH, V89, P1
Millet Barbara, 2021, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Annual Meeting, P606, DOI 10.1177/1071181321651142
Millet B., 2020, BEAUTIFUL VISUALIZAT
Millet B, 2022, INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, DOI 10.1080/10447318.2022.2121036
Morrow BH, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P35, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00197.1
Morss RE, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.023
Needham HF, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P2108, DOI 10.1002/joc.2425
Osberghaus D., 2010, ZEW CTR EUROPEAN EC, P10
Radford L., 2013, DISASTER PREV MANAG
Rahmstorf S, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P11806, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1715895114
Ruginski IT, 2016, SPAT COGN COMPUT, V16, P154, DOI
10.1080/13875868.2015.1137577
Semenza JC, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V35, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
Senkbeil JC, 2010, PAPERS OF THE APPLIED GEOGRAPHY CONFERENCES, VOL 33, P128
Shao W., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V748, P1
Shao WY, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V163, P317, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02893-1
Shao WY, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P1716, DOI 10.1002/joc.4805
Shao W, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P2136, DOI 10.1111/risa.12571
Shao WY, 2014, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V6, P119, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00029.1
SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507
Song J., 2022, EARTHS FUTURE
Spence A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P656, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
Tarka P., 2017, ARCH DATA SCI, V2, P1, DOI 10.5445/KSP/1000058749/10
Tate E, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P435, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04470-2
Vecchi GA, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-24268-5
Weber EU, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V77, P103, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
Welford M.R., 2017, HURRICANES CLIMATE C, P35
Witt Jessica K., 2021, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Annual Meeting, P596, DOI 10.1177/1071181321651208
Xia Y, 2019, BEHAV RES METHODS, V51, P409, DOI 10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2
Zhang W, 2018, NATURE, V563, P384, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0676-z
NR 55
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 93
AR 103752
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103752
EA JUN 2023
PG 16
Water Resources
GA K8MU9
UT WOS:001018932100001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Feng, YY
Cao, Y
Yang, SH
Yang, LL
Wei, TJ
AF Feng, Yuanyuan
Cao, Yi
Yang, Shuanghua
Yang, Lili
Wei, Tangjian
TI A two-step sub-optimal algorithm for bus evacuation planning
SO OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Bus evacuation problem; Network flow model; Pseudo-polynomial time;
Large-scale disaster
ID BUSHFIRE EMERGENCY EVACUATION; PROGRAMMING-MODEL; OPTIMIZATION
AB In large-scale disasters, as an important part of the rescue management, buses
are often used to evacuate carless people. Timing is always the main concern in any
evacuation planning. Hence, not only is minimizing evacuation time the primary goal
of bus evacuation problems (BEPs), but computation time to solve a BEP is also
crucial. Nevertheless, BEP is NP-hard which makes optimization of the BEP for
large-scale disasters within an acceptable time intractable. Practically, sub-
optimal but efficient algorithms for bus evacuation planning are desired. In this
work a two-step sub-optimal algorithm, called network flow planning (NFP) algorithm
is proposed. In the NFP, firstly, an aggregated network flow model, which minimizes
the total travel time of all the buses, is adopted. It is proven that the model can
be solved as a linear programming problem. The minimum total travel time solution
is then converted to approximate the minimum evacuation time solution by assigning
evacuation tasks to all buses as equally as possible in the second step. To verify
the effectiveness of the NFP algorithm, a greedy algorithm inspired by NFP is
presented, and several numerical case studies are presented in this paper. In a
Monte Carlo simulation study, randomized cases are used to demonstrate the
superiority of the proposed algorithm over the presented greedy algorithm, a
genetic algorithm, an approximation algorithm and CPLEX. Furthermore, a real-world
large-scale flood disaster case in Xingguo, China is studied, which illustrates the
efficiency and practical value of the proposed algorithm in large-scale
evacuations.
C1 [Feng, Yuanyuan] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou
310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
[Cao, Yi; Yang, Shuanghua] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Chem & Biol Engn, Yuhangtang Rd,
Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
[Cao, Yi; Yang, Shuanghua] Inst Zhejiang Univ Quzhou, Jiuhua North Rd, Quzhou
324003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
[Yang, Shuanghua] Univ Reading, Dept Comp Sci, Reading RG6 6AH, Berks, England.
[Yang, Lili] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Shenzhen 518055,
Guangdong, Peoples R China.
[Wei, Tangjian] East China Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Transportat Engn, Nanchang
330013, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
[Wei, Tangjian] Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds LS2 9JT, England.
C3 Zhejiang University; Zhejiang University; University of Reading;
Southern University of Science & Technology; East China Jiaotong
University; N8 Research Partnership; White Rose University Consortium;
University of Leeds
RP Yang, SH (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ, Coll Chem & Biol Engn,
Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.; Yang, SH (corresponding
author), Inst Zhejiang Univ Quzhou, Jiuhua North Rd, Quzhou 324003, Zhejiang,
Peoples R China.; Yang, SH (corresponding author), Univ Reading, Dept Comp Sci,
Reading RG6 6AH, Berks, England.
EM fengyy@zju.edu.cn; caoyi2018@zju.edu.cn; yangsh@zju.edu.cn;
yangll@sustech.edu.cn; weitangjian@ecjtu.edu.cn
CR Aalami S, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102760
Ahmadi G, 2022, OPER RES-GER, V22, P1039, DOI 10.1007/s12351-020-00591-5
Bederina H, 2018, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V71, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.07.014
Chubanov S, 2012, MATH PROGRAM, V134, P533, DOI 10.1007/s10107-011-0445-3
Dikas G, 2016, COMPUT OPER RES, V70, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2015.12.012
Feng Y, 2023, GREEDY ALGORITHM LAR
Feng Y, 2023, GA LARGE SCALE BUS E
Feng Y, 2023, NETWORK FLOW PLANNIN
Goerigk M, 2014, TRANSP RES PROC, V2, P783, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.088
Goerigk M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V78, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2015.04.008
Goerigk M, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V71, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.08.007
Goerigk M, 2013, COMPUT OPER RES, V40, P3010, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2013.07.006
Heydar M, 2016, J ADV TRANSPORT, V50, P1314, DOI 10.1002/atr.1403
Huang ZM, 2021, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V51, P5559, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3013271
Korte B, 2012, ALGORITHMS COMB, V21, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24488-9
Krasko V, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V263, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.004
Liu ZG, 2021, OPER RES-GER, V21, P745, DOI 10.1007/s12351-019-00481-5
Mohammadi S, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106734
Nemhauser G, 1988, INTEGRAL POLYHEDRA, P533, DOI [10.1002/9781118627372.ch14,
DOI 10.1002/9781118627372.CH14]
Niendorf M, 2018, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V48, P583, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2647440
Oh BH, 2018, J AEROSP INFORM SYST, V15, P382, DOI 10.2514/1.I010589
Ozbaygin G, 2018, EURO J COMPUT OPTIM, V6, P85, DOI 10.1007/s13675-017-0089-z
Ozdamar L, 2012, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V48, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2011.11.003
Pedrosa LLC, 2018, J COMB OPTIM, V36, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10878-018-0290-x
Pereira VC, 2015, TRANSPORT SCI, V49, P853, DOI 10.1287/trsc.2014.0555
Pourrahmani E, 2015, NAT HAZARDS REV, V16, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000183
Sabouhi F, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V283, P643, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2807-1
Shahparvari S, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V67, P703, DOI
10.1016/j.trd.2016.11.015
Shahparvari S, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V104, P32, DOI
10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.036
Shahparvari S, 2017, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V72, P96, DOI
10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.007
Sheu JB, 2014, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V67, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2014.05.011
Wang JW, 2010, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V11, P277, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2010.2040276
Wang JH, 2016, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V46, P582, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2409837
Wang ZY, 2020, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V21, P1044, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2019.2900858
Yi W, 2007, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V43, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2006.05.004
Yin WH, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1245, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.013
Yusoff M, 2015, NEUROCOMPUTING, V148, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.12.083
Zhao X, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V137, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2020.05.008
Zheng H, 2014, J ADV TRANSPORT, V48, P734, DOI 10.1002/atr.1224
NR 43
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 1109-2858
EI 1866-1505
J9 OPER RES-GER
JI Oper. Res.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 23
IS 2
AR 36
DI 10.1007/s12351-023-00781-x
PG 35
WC Operations Research & Management Science
SC Operations Research & Management Science
GA H9VX3
UT WOS:000999366900001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Shimoto, M
Cho, K
Kurata, M
Hitomi, M
Kato, Y
Aida, S
Sugiyama, O
Maki, N
Ohtsuru, S
AF Shimoto, Manabu
Cho, Kosai
Kurata, Masahiro
Hitomi, Mayu
Kato, Yoichi
Aida, Shinji
Sugiyama, Osamu
Maki, Norio
Ohtsuru, Shigeru
TI Hospital Evacuation Implications After the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake
SO DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS
LA English
DE hospital evacuation; earthquakes; vulnerability analysis; emergency
preparedness; disaster medicine
AB During the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, 10 hospitals took responsibility for
complete evacuation, in what has become regarded as one of the largest evacuations
of patients in 1 seismic disaster. We aimed to examine the reasons for evacuation
and to assess hospital vulnerability as well as preparedness for the earthquake. A
multidisciplinary team conducted semi-structured interviews with the hospitals 6
months after the earthquake. The primary reasons for the decision to evacuate
hospitals were categorized into 3: 1) Concern for structural safety (4 facilities),
2) Damage to the facility water system (7 facilities), and 3) Cessation of regional
water supply (5 facilities). All hospitals decided on immediate evacuation within
30 hours and could not wait for structural engineers to inspect the affected
buildings. Damage to sprinklers or water facilities caused severe water shortages
and flood, thus requiring weeks to resume inpatient care. The earthquake revealed
the vulnerability of rapid building-inspection systems, aging buildings, and water
infrastructure.
C1 [Shimoto, Manabu; Cho, Kosai; Ohtsuru, Shigeru] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept
Primary Care & Emergency Med, Kyoto, Japan.
[Kurata, Masahiro; Maki, Norio; Ohtsuru, Shigeru] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent
Res Inst, Sect Hlth Emergency & Reg Disaster Risk Managemen, Kyoto, Japan.
[Kurata, Masahiro] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Res Div Earthquake
Hazards, Kyoto, Japan.
[Hitomi, Mayu] Takenaka Corp, Engn Dept, Tokyo, Japan.
[Kato, Yoichi] Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Kumamoto,
Japan.
[Aida, Shinji] Kyoto Univ Hosp, Dept Med Equipment, Kyoto, Japan.
[Sugiyama, Osamu] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Real World Data Res & Dev,
Kyoto, Japan.
[Maki, Norio] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Res Div Disaster Management
Safe & Secure Soc, Kyoto, Japan.
C3 Kyoto University; Kyoto University; Kyoto University; Takenaka
Corporation; Kyoto University; Kyoto University; Kyoto University
RP Shimoto, M (corresponding author), Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Primary Care &
Emergency Med, Kyoto, Japan.
EM mshimoto@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
OI Shimoto, Manabu/0000-0001-5884-2305; Ohtsuru,
Shigeru/0000-0002-6747-9859
FU Disaster Prevention Research Institute of Kyoto University [28U-04,
29G-02]; Mitsubishi Foundation
FX This paper is based on the achievements of the DPRI special research
program on Kumamoto Earthquake (28U-04) and the DPRI collaborative
research program (29G-02) of the Disaster Prevention Research Institute
of Kyoto University, and was supported in part by grant from the
Mitsubishi Foundation to Dr. Kurata and Prof. Ohtsuru.
CR Hicks Jarred, 2015, J Healthc Risk Manag, V34, P26, DOI 10.1002/jhrm.21162
Rojek A, 2013, EMERG MED AUSTRALAS, V25, P496, DOI 10.1111/1742-6723.12160
Schultz CH, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V348, P1349, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa021807
Suginaka H, 2014, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V29, P561, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X14001022
NR 4
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 7
PU CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
PI NEW YORK
PA 32 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, NEW YORK, NY 10013-2473 USA
SN 1935-7893
EI 1938-744X
J9 DISASTER MED PUBLIC
JI Dis. Med. Public Health Prep.
PD 2022 APR 13
PY 2022
AR PII S1935789322000258
DI 10.1017/dmp.2022.25
EA APR 2022
PG 3
(SSCI)
GA 0M6ZC
UT WOS:000782298600001
PM 35414371
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wang, ZX
Sun, Y
Li, CH
Jin, L
Sun, XG
Liu, XL
Wang, TX
AF Wang, Zixiong
Sun, Ya
Li, Chunhui
Jin, Ling
Sun, Xinguo
Liu, Xiaoli
Wang, Tianxiang
TI Analysis of Small and Medium-Scale River Flood Risk in Case of Exceeding
Control Standard Floods Using Hydraulic Model
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE small and medium-scale river; flood risk; submerged area; submerged
depth; evacuation plan
ID LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT; GIS; DESIGN;
BASIN; OVERFLOW; REGION; EVENT; CHINA
AB Exceeding control standard floods pose threats to the management of small and
medium-scale rivers. Taking Fuzhouhe river as an example, this paper analyzes the
submerged depth, submerged area and arrival time of river flood risk in the case of
exceeding control standard floods (with return period of 20, 50, 100 and 200 years)
through a coupled one- and two-dimensional hydrodynamic model, draws the flood risk
maps and proposes emergency plans. The simulation results of the one-dimensional
model reveal that the dikes would be at risk of overflowing for different
frequencies of floods, with a higher level of risk on the left bank. The results of
the coupled model demonstrate that under all scenarios, the inundation area
gradually increases with time until the flood peak subsides, and the larger the
flood peak, the faster the inundation area increases. The maximum submerged areas
are 42.73 km(2), 65.95 km(2), 74.86 km(2) and 82.71 km(2) for four frequencies of
flood, respectively. The change of submerged depth under different frequency floods
shows a downward-upward-downward trend and the average submerged depth of each
frequency floods is about 1.4 m. The flood risk maps of different flood frequencies
are created by GIS to analyze flood arrival time, submerged area and submerged
depth to plan escape routes and resettlement units. The migration distances are
limited within 4 km, the average migration distance is about 2 km, the vehicle
evacuation time is less than 20 min, and the walking evacuation time is set to
about 70 min. It is concluded that the flood risk of small and medium-scale rivers
is a dynamic change process, and dynamic flood assessment, flood warning and
embankment modification scheme should be further explored.
C1 [Wang, Zixiong; Liu, Xiaoli] Anhui Agr Univ, Sch Engn, Hefei 230036, Peoples R
China.
[Wang, Zixiong; Li, Chunhui; Wang, Tianxiang] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Ocean Sci
& Technol, Panjin 124221, Peoples R China.
[Wang, Zixiong] Guangzhou Pearl River Water Resources Protect Tec, Minist Water
Resources, Pearl River Water Resources Commiss, Guangzhou 510635, Peoples R China.
[Sun, Ya] Dalian Maritime Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Dalian 116026, Peoples
R China.
[Jin, Ling] Hydrol & Water Resources Survey Bur Zhumadian, Zhumadian 463000,
Peoples R China.
[Sun, Xinguo; Wang, Tianxiang] Huaiyin Inst Technol, Jiangsu Smart Factory Engn
Res Ctr, Huaian 223003, Peoples R China.
C3 Anhui Agricultural University; Dalian University of Technology; Dalian
Maritime University; Huaiyin Institute of Technology
RP Liu, XL (corresponding author), Anhui Agr Univ, Sch Engn, Hefei 230036, Peoples
R China.; Wang, TX (corresponding author), Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Ocean Sci &
Technol, Panjin 124221, Peoples R China.; Wang, TX (corresponding author), Huaiyin
Inst Technol, Jiangsu Smart Factory Engn Res Ctr, Huaian 223003, Peoples R China.
EM zxwang0817@163.com; 13322246994@163.com;
lichunhui123123@mail.dlut.edu.cn; evan_cools@163.com;
sunxinguo48144562@163.com; xl.liu@ahau.edu.cn; tianxiang@dlut.edu.cn
RI Li, Chun/HKW-1738-2023; liu, xiao/HMD-7454-2023; Liu,
Xiaoli/HGE-7614-2022; liu, xiao/HKE-9880-2023
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809032]; Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20RC(3)059]; Natural
Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
[BK20191050]; Jiangsu Smart Factory Engineering Research Center
[JSSFER2019A5, JSSFER2019A6]; Natural Science Foundation of Anhui
Province of China [1808085ME158]; Natural Science Research Project of
Jiangsu Province Colleges and Universities [18KJD560001]; Philosophy and
Social Science Project of Jiangsu Province Colleges and Universities
[2019SJA1659]
FX This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (Grant No. 51809032), the Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities (Grant No. DUT20RC(3)059), the Major Basic Research
Project of the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher
Education Institutions (Grant No. BK20191050) and the Opening Foundation
of Jiangsu Smart Factory Engineering Research Center (Grant No.
JSSFER2019A5, No. JSSFER2019A6), Foundation of Natural Science
Foundation of Anhui Province of China (1808085ME158), Natural Science
Research Project of Jiangsu Province Colleges and Universities (Grant
No. 18KJD560001), Philosophy and Social Science Project of Jiangsu
Province Colleges and Universities (Grant No. 2019SJA1659).
CR Ahiablame L, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V171, P81, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.036
Ahmad SS, 2015, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V13, P443, DOI
10.1080/15715124.2015.1016954
Ahn J, 2019, KSCE J CIV ENG, V23, P3968, DOI 10.1007/s12205-019-1586-9
Akbari R, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P3291, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02613-5
Ali SA, 2019, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V5, P1083, DOI 10.1007/s40808-019-00593-z
Amil TA, 2018, INT J ENG GEOSCI, V3, P80, DOI 10.26833/ijeg.412348
Arinta RR, 2020, INT J ENG PEDAGOG, V10, P108, DOI 10.3991/ijep.v10i4.13145
Bhola PK, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P2647, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-2647-2020
Bouska KL, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08620-210312
Bozorg-Haddad O, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P2677, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-
02247-2
Butera I, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125382
Byun K, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124575
Chen J, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125264
Chinnarasri C, 2016, ARAB J SCI ENG, V41, P4879, DOI 10.1007/s13369-016-2166-7
Dubea T, 2017, J FRESHWATER ECOL, V32, P1, DOI 10.1080/02705060.2016.1230562
Fan J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135357
Gericke OJ, 2012, J S AFR INST CIV ENG, V54, P2
Handayani W, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9100343
Hartman J, 2001, CIVIL ENG, V71, P27
Hawker L, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abc216
Hossain MK, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104829
Houston D, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13212972
Hsu TW, 2015, J HYDROL ENG, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001069
Huang CL, 2018, J HYDROL, V564, P542, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.044
Huang JC, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V80, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.051
Jahandideh-Tehrani M, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-
8049-0
Jakovljevic G, 2019, GEOSCIENCES, V9, DOI 10.3390/geosciences9070323
Jato-Espino D, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12533
Jones DK, 2013, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V6, P70, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2012.01155.x
Kiedrzynska E, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P955, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1529-1
Kyuka T, 2020, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V31, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2020.05.003
Lee JY, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13131805
Li F, 2019, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V33, P3271, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02300-0
Li JZ, 2016, J EARTH SYST SCI, V125, P795, DOI 10.1007/s12040-016-0688-8
Li WJ, 2019, J HYDROL, V572, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.002
Manopiniwes W, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P1743, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04374-1
Ministry of Construction of the People's Republic of China, 1994, STAND FLOOD
CONTR, P1
Morita M, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P253, DOI 10.3390/w6020253
Mostafazadeh R, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V87, P1827, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2851-1
Movahedinia M, 2019, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V80, P1591, DOI 10.2166/wst.2019.412
Nagumo N, 2016, J DISASTER RES, V11, P1112, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2016.p1112
Naser A., 2021, GEOCARTO INT, V11, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2016.06.001
Nigussie TA, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P1031, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03794-y
Olson KR, 2014, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V69, p104A, DOI 10.2489/jswc.69.4.104A
Oost J, 2009, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V2, P315, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01050.x
Rosello MJP, 2018, CIUDAD TERRIT-ESTU, V50, P417
Rauter M, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105017
Sattar A, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V97, P535, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03657-6
Skilodimou HD, 2019, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V78, DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-8003-4
Thaler T, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V114, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.001
Thumerer T, 2000, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V14, P265, DOI 10.1080/136588100240840
Verbeke S, 2017, HOUILLE BLANCHE, P20, DOI 10.1051/lhb/2017027
Villuri VGK, 2018, MAUSAM, V69, P523
Yalcin E, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12499
Yin C, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V100, P535, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03824-9
Yoo C, 2017, J HYDROL ENG, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001507
[喻君杰 Yu Junjie], 2013, [灌溉排水学报, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage], V32,
P57
Zhang YY, 2020, J GEOGR SCI, V30, P2053, DOI 10.1007/s11442-020-1827-3
NR 60
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 8
U2 26
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 1
AR 57
DI 10.3390/w14010057
PG 19
GA ZE9UK
UT WOS:000759222200001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kubo, S
Yoshida, H
Ichimura, T
Wijerathne, MLL
Hori, M
AF Kubo, Shiori
Yoshida, Hidenori
Ichimura, Tsuyoshi
Wijerathne, M. L. L.
Hori, Muneo
TI Study on influence of prior recognition of flooding state on evacuation
behavior
LA English
DT Article
DE Evacuation simulation; Multi-agent system; Flooding analysis; Storm
surge; Prior recognition of flooding state
AB In recent years, disasters have caused extensive water damage in various parts
of Japan. Flooded evacuation routes and ineffective hazard maps commonly constrain
evacuees' behavior, which results in casualties. In this study, storm surge
flooding analysis was carried out using OpenFOAM, which is a computational fluid
dynamics software that monitors flooding state as a function of time, and
evacuation simulations using a multi-agent system that considers evacuation
behavior knowing the flooding state established by the flooding analysis. In some
of the scenarios, many residents were caught in the flooding and could not be
evacuated. Additional evacuation simulations revealed that evacuation behavior is
more effective if residents have advance knowledge of the area expected to flood.
Identifying these flood hazard areas and recognizing these areas in advance as
impassable enables evacuees to avoid flood hazard areas; consequently, there is a
decrease in the number of evacuees who get caught in the flooding. Anticipating the
area expected to be flooded suggests the best evacuation locations and routes.
Using these simulation results with useful hazard maps and disaster education,
residents will correctly recognize the risk of a storm surge disaster and prepare
for it, which will assist recovery. Finally, our analytical and simulation approach
to disaster management is amenable to long-term planning for disaster-resistant
cities.
C1 [Kubo, Shiori] Univ Tokyo, Inst Ind Sci, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba
2778574, Japan.
[Yoshida, Hidenori] Kagawa Univ, Fac Engn & Design, 2217-20 Hayashi Cho,
Takamatsu, Kagawa 7610396, Japan.
[Ichimura, Tsuyoshi; Wijerathne, M. L. L.] Univ Tokyo, Earthquake Res Inst,
Bunkyo Ku, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Tokyo 1130032, Japan.
[Hori, Muneo] Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Res Inst Value Added
Informat Generat, Kanazawa Ku, 3173-25 Showa Machi, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2360001,
Japan.
C3 University of Tokyo; Kagawa University; University of Tokyo; Japan
Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC)
RP Kubo, S (corresponding author), Univ Tokyo, Inst Ind Sci, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha,
Kashiwa, Chiba 2778574, Japan.
EM shiori_kubo@metall.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
RI kubo, shiori/GVU-8969-2022
OI Hori, Muneo/0000-0002-0642-6753
FU JSPS [19J14428]; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19J14428]
Funding Source: KAKEN
FX This work was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows Grant
Number 19J14428.
CR Aguilar L, 2017, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V108, P937, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.284
Aguilar Melgar Leonel Enrique, 2013, PRIMA 2013: Principles and Practice of
Multi-Agent Systems. 16th International Conference. Proceedings: LNCS 8291, P388,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-44927-7_26
[Anonymous], 2013, 2 TAK CENTR CIT AR R, P114
[Anonymous], 2018, PORT PLANN MAP TAK
[Anonymous], 2018, POPULATION CLASSIFIE
[Anonymous], 2014, AREA EXPECTED BE FLO
[Anonymous], 2018, HIST REC IN FLOOD DA
Blackman D, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P89, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.018
Futagami T., 2015, J JAPAN SOC CIV ENG, V71
Henry KD, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1665, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2655-8
Hori M., 2005, SOCIOTECHNICA, V3, P138
Inukai Y., 2005, J APPL MECH, V8
KATADA T., 2006, T JAPAN SOC CIVIL D, V62, P250, DOI DOI 10.2208/JSCEJD.62.250
Kato F., 2005, COASTAL DISASTER 200, V273, P9
Kawasaki K., 2013, J JPN SOC CIVIL ENG, V3, P69
Kubo S., 2018, J STRUCT ENG, V64, P155
Lindell MK, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102457
Mas E, 2012, J NAT DISASTER SCI, V34, P41, DOI DOI 10.2328/JNDS.34.41
Minami M., 2005, 32 RES M CIV ENG PLA
Ministry of Land; Infrastructure and Transport, 2015, GUID MAK FIG EXP INL, P11
Motohashi H., 2014, J JPN SOC CIVIL ENG, V70
Nakanishi H, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101657
Nonomura A., 2019, J JPN SOC NAT DISAST, V37, P407
OBERG T, 1993, J REHABIL RES DEV, V30, P210
Oikawa Y., 2005, RES M CIV ENG PLANN, V31
Suzuki T., 2005, TECHNICAL NOTE NATL, V268, P1
Tanaka A., 2009, SURVEY RESIDENTS BEH
Tomihara D., 2012, 14 S JAP SOC FLUID M, V31, P175
Tomita T., 2005, P COAST ENG, V52, P1326
Ushiyama M., 2004, J JPN SOC HYDROL WAT, V17, P150
Wijerathne MLL, 2013, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V18, P1515, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.319
NR 31
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 14
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 63
AR 102437
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102437
EA JUL 2021
PG 12
Water Resources
GA UF5OZ
UT WOS:000688624600006
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Nguyen, L
Yang, Z
Li, J
Pan, ZH
Cao, GF
Jin, F
AF Nguyen, Long
Yang, Zhou
Li, Jia
Pan, Zhenhe
Cao, Guofeng
Jin, Fang
TI Forecasting People's Needs in Hurricane Events from Social Network
SO IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIG DATA
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster relief; needs forecasting; concern flow; LSTM; hurricane
events; sequence to sequence model
ID MEDIA
AB Social networks can serve as a valuable communication channel for asking for
help, offering assistance, and coordinating rescue activities in disaster because
it allows users to continuously update critical information in the fast-changing
disaster environment. This paper presents a novel sequence to sequence based
framework for forecasting people's needs during disasters using social media and
weather data. It consists of two Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models, one of which
encodes input sequences of weather information and the other plays as a conditional
decoder that decodes the encoded vector and forecasts the survivors' needs. Case
studies using data collected during Hurricane Sandy in 2012, Hurricane Harvey and
Hurricane Irma in 2017 demonstrate that the proposed approach outperformed the
statistical language model n-gram, LSTM generative model, and convolutional neural
network (CNN) based model. This research indicates its great promise for enhancing
disaster management such as evacuation planning and commodity delivery.
C1 [Nguyen, Long; Yang, Zhou; Jin, Fang] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Lubbock,
TX 79409 USA.
[Li, Jia] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Construct Engn, Lubbock, TX
79409 USA.
[Pan, Zhenhe] Kinet DB Inc, Arlington, VA 22203 USA.
[Cao, Guofeng] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Geosci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA.
C3 Texas Tech University System; Texas Tech University; Texas Tech
University System; Texas Tech University; Texas Tech University System;
Texas Tech University
RP Jin, F (corresponding author), Texas Tech Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409
USA.
EM long.nguyen@ttu.edu; zhou.yang@ttu.edu; jia.li@ttu.edu;
zhenhepan@gmail.com; guofeng.cao@ttu.edu; fang.jin@ttu.edu
RI Yang, Zhou/GON-8509-2022; Cao, Guofeng/HCI-4257-2022
OI Nguyen, Hoang Long/0000-0001-7673-7955; Cao, Guofeng/0000-0003-4827-1558
FU U.S. National Science Foundation [CNS-1737634]
FX This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under
Grant CNS-1737634.
CR [Anonymous], 2011, SOCIAL MEDIA DISASTE
[Anonymous], NEURAL COMPUT, DOI DOI 10.1162/NECO.1997.9.8.1735
[Anonymous], 2017, TROP STORM HARV
[Anonymous], 2003, DISASTER PREV MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560310480686
Austin L, 2012, J APPL COMMUN RES, V40, P188, DOI 10.1080/00909882.2012.654498
Bayleyegn Tesfaye, 2006, Disaster Manag Response, V4, P12, DOI
10.1016/j.dmr.2005.10.001
Castillo C, 2016, BIG CRISIS DATA: SOCIAL MEDIA IN DISASTERS AND TIME-CRITICAL
SITUATIONS
Cho K., 2014, ARXIV14061078, V1406, P1078, DOI DOI 10.3115/V1/D14-1179
Du HX, 2019, P INT COMP SOFTW APP, P207, DOI 10.1109/COMPSAC.2019.10208
Dufty N, 2012, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V27, P40
Fraustino Julia Daisy, 2012, SOCIAL MEDIA USE DIS
Gao H, 2011, IEEE INTELL SYST, V26, P10, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2011.52
Gers FA, 1999, IEE CONF PUBL, P850, DOI [10.1049/cp:19991218,
10.1162/089976600300015015]
Graves A, 2013, ARXIV
Houston JB, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, P1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12092
Imran M, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE
WEB (WWW'13 COMPANION), P1021
Jurafsky D., 2014, SPEECH LANGUAGE PROC, V3
Kim Y., 2014, C EMPIRICAL METHODS
Klein D, 2003, 41ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL
LINGUISTICS, PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONFERENCE, P423, DOI 10.3115/1075096.1075150
Kryvasheyeu Y, 2016, SCI ADV, V2, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500779
Lipton Z.C., 2015, COMPUT SCI, V1506, P19
Lu YF, 2015, WWW'15 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
ON WORLD WIDE WEB, P1211, DOI 10.1145/2740908.2741720
Luong T., 2015, ARXIV, P1412
Mandel B., 2012, P 2 WORKSH LANG SOC, P27
Masten AS, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
MILLER GA, 1995, COMMUN ACM, V38, P39, DOI 10.1145/219717.219748
Nazer, 2017, SIGKDD EXPLORATIONS, V19, P46, DOI DOI 10.1145/3137597.3137602
Oswal B. V., 2016, CNN TEXT CLASSIFICAT
Reuter C, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P41, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12196
Srivastava N, 2015, PR MACH LEARN RES, V37, P843
Sutskever I., 2014, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, P3104
Varga I, 2013, P 51 ANN M ASS COMP, P1619
Williams R., 2012, USE SOCIAL MEDIA DIS
Yang Z, 2017, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P2177, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2017.8258166
NR 34
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 5
U2 11
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 2332-7790
J9 IEEE T BIG DATA
JI IEEE Trans. Big Data
PD FEB 1
PY 2022
VL 8
IS 1
BP 229
EP 240
DI 10.1109/TBDATA.2019.2941887
PG 12
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory &
Methods
SC Computer Science
GA YG8HU
UT WOS:000742723200019
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Afrin, T
Aragon, LG
Lin, ZB
Yodo, N
AF Afrin, Tanzina
Aragon, Lucy G.
Lin, Zhibin
Yodo, Nita
TI An Integrated Data-Driven Predictive Resilience Framework for Disaster
Evacuation Traffic Management
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; data-driven; LSTM; traffic; transportation; disaster;
management; evacuation
ID NETWORKS; SYSTEMS
AB Maintaining smooth traffic during disaster evacuation is a lifesaving step.
Traffic resilience is often used to define the ability of a roadway during disaster
evacuation to withstand and recover its functionality from disturbances in terms of
traffic flow caused by a disaster. However, a high level of variances due to system
complexity and inherent uncertainty associated with disaster and evacuation risks
poses great challenges in predicting traffic resilience during evacuation. To fill
this gap, this study aimed to propose a new integrated data-driven predictive
resilience framework that enables incorporating traffic uncertainty factors in
determining road traffic conditions and predicting traffic performance using
machine learning approaches and various space and time (spatiotemporal) data
sources. This study employed an augmented Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based
approach with correlated spatiotemporal traffic data to predict traffic conditions,
then to map those conditions to traffic resilience levels: daily traffic, segment
traffic, and overall route traffic. A case study of Hurricane Irma's evacuation
traffic was used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The
results indicated that the proposed method could effectively predict traffic
conditions and thus help to determine traffic resilience. The data also confirmed
that the traffic infrastructures along the US I-75 route remained resilient despite
the disturbances during the disaster evacuation activities. The findings of this
study suggest that the proposed framework is applicable to other disaster
management scenarios to obtain more robust decisions for the emergency response
during disaster evacuation.
C1 [Afrin, Tanzina; Yodo, Nita] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn,
Fargo, ND 58102 USA.
[Aragon, Lucy G.] Pontif Catholic Univ Peru, Dept Engn, Lima 15088, Peru.
[Lin, Zhibin; Yodo, Nita] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Civil Construct &
Environm Engn, Fargo, ND 58102 USA.
C3 North Dakota State University Fargo; Pontificia Universidad Catolica del
Peru; North Dakota State University Fargo
RP Afrin, T; Yodo, N (corresponding author), North Dakota State Univ, Dept Ind &
Mfg Engn, Fargo, ND 58102 USA.; Yodo, N (corresponding author), North Dakota State
Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Fargo, ND 58102 USA.
EM tanzina.afrin@ndsu.edu; nita.yodo@ndsu.edu
FU National Science Foundation (NSF) EPSCoR RII Track-2 Program
[OIA-2119691]
FX This research was partially funded by the National Science Foundation
(NSF) EPSCoR RII Track-2 Program under the NSF award # OIA-2119691.
CR Abudayyeh D, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V22, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.08.005
Afrin T, 2022, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107755
Afrin T, 2022, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V28, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000670
Afrin T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114660
Ahmed S., 2020, J INFRASTRUCT PRESER, V1, P4272, DOI [10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766,
DOI 10.1186/S43065-020-00008-9]
Akhtar M, 2021, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/8878011
[Anonymous], 1994, HIGHWAY CAPACITY MAN
[Anonymous], 1995, P SIGGRAPH COURS
Berkoune D, 2012, SOC EC PLANN SCI, V46, P23, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2011.05.002
Calvert SC, 2018, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V14, P130, DOI
10.1080/23249935.2017.1363315
Dey A., 2021, P IISE ANN C EXPO 20, P908
Dowling R.G., 2013, FHWAHOP13042 OFF OP
Faturechi R, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000212
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), TRAFF DAT
Fraser MS, 2020, AFR J EMERG MED, V10, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.afjem.2019.12.003
Graves A, 2012, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V385, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2,
10.1162/neco.1997.9.1.1]
Jiang YP, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16050779
Ma XL, 2015, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V54, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.014
Mahmood Y, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15064953
National Research Council, 2007, IMPROVING DISASTER M
Nogal M, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V156, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.020
Olah C., 2015, UNDERSTANDING LSTM N
Perez-Ortiz JA, 2003, NEURAL NETWORKS, V16, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0893-
6080(02)00219-8
Rahman MA, 2022, LECT NOTE INFORM, VP-329, DOI 10.1109/BIOSIG55365.2022.9897041
Rahman R, 2022, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2202.12505, 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104126, DOI
10.1016/J.TRC.2023.104126]
Rahman R, 2018, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P1291, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569443
Roy KC, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103339
Sherstinsky A, 2020, PHYSICA D, V404, DOI 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132306
Tang JQ, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190616
Walker W.E., 2013, INTEGR ASSESS, V4, P5, DOI [10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466, DOI
10.1076/IAIJ.4.1.5.16466]
Wan CP, 2018, TRANSPORT REV, V38, P479, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
Wang ZM, 2021, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V22, P6561, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2020.2995546
Yao KS, 2022, J TRANSP ENG A-SYST, V148, DOI 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000671
Yazdani M, 2023, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110629
Yodo N, 2017, IEEE T RELIAB, V66, P761, DOI 10.1109/TR.2017.2722471
Yodo N, 2016, J MECH DESIGN, V138, DOI 10.1115/1.4034223
Zhang Z, 2021, J MANAGE SCI ENG, V6, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.009
NR 37
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2076-3417
J9 APPL SCI-BASEL
JI Appl. Sci.-Basel
PD JUN 5
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 11
AR 6850
DI 10.3390/app13116850
PG 17
GA I8US2
UT WOS:001005485300001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Rahman, MM
Arif, MSI
Hossain, MT
Almohamad, H
Al Dughairi, AA
Al-Mutiry, M
Abdo, HG
AF Rahman, Md Mostafizur
Arif, Md. Saidul Islam
Hossain, Md. Tanvir
Almohamad, Hussein
Al Dughairi, Ahmed Abdullah
Al-Mutiry, Motrih
Abdo, Hazem Ghassan
TI Households' vulnerability assessment: empirical evidence from
cyclone-prone area of Bangladesh
SO GEOSCIENCE LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Cyclone; Risk assessment; Exposure; Vulnerability; Bangladesh
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; DISASTER
MANAGEMENT; TROPICAL CYCLONES; RISK; IMPACT; ADAPTATION; PEOPLE;
PERCEPTION
AB Despite Bangladesh being vulnerable to cyclones, there is a dearth of research
on cyclone vulnerability assessment. Assessing a household's vulnerability is
considered a crucial step in avoiding the adverse effects of catastrophe risks.
This research was conducted in the cyclone-prone district of Barguna, Bangladesh.
This study's purpose is to evaluate this region's vulnerability. A questionnaire
survey was conducted using a convenience sample technique. A door-to-door survey of
388 households in two Unions of Patharghata Upazila, Barguna district, was
conducted. Forty-three indicators were selected to assess cyclone vulnerability.
The results were quantified using an index-based methodology with a standardized
scoring method. Where applicable, descriptive statistics have been obtained. In
terms of vulnerability indicators, we also utilized the chi-square test to compare
Kalmegha and Patharghata Union. When appropriate, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U
test was employed to evaluate the relationship between the Vulnerability Index
Score ( VIS) and the union. According to the results, the environmental
vulnerability (0.53 +/- 0.17) and the composite vulnerability index (0.50 +/- 0.08)
were significantly greater in Kalmegha Union than in Patharghata Union. They faced
inequity in government assistance (71%) and humanitarian aid (45%) from national
and international organizations. However, 83% of them underwent evacuation
practices. 39% were satisfied with the WASH conditions at the cyclone shelter,
whereas around half were dissatisfied with the status of the medical facilities.
Most of them (96%) rely only on surface water for drinking. National and
international organizations should have a comprehensive plan for disaster risk
reduction that encompasses all individuals, regardless of race, geography, or
ethnicity.
C1 [Rahman, Md Mostafizur; Arif, Md. Saidul Islam] Bangladesh Univ Profess, Fac
Arts & Social Sci, Dept Disaster Management & Resilience, Dhaka 1216, Bangladesh.
[Hossain, Md. Tanvir] Khulna Univ, Social Sci Sch, Sociol Discipline, Khulna
9208, Bangladesh.
[Almohamad, Hussein; Al Dughairi, Ahmed Abdullah] Qassim Univ, Coll Arab
Language & Social Studies, Dept Geog, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia.
[Al-Mutiry, Motrih] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Coll Arts, Dept Geog,
Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
[Abdo, Hazem Ghassan] Tartous Univ, Fac Arts & Humanities, Geog Dept, Tartous,
Syria.
C3 Khulna University; Qassim University; Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman
University
RP Abdo, HG (corresponding author), Tartous Univ, Fac Arts & Humanities, Geog Dept,
Tartous, Syria.
EM hazemabdo@tartous-univ.edu.sy
RI Almohamad, Hussein/CAI-1039-2022; Hossain, Md. Tanvir/AAS-3339-2021
OI Almohamad, Hussein/0000-0001-8887-915X; Hossain, Md.
Tanvir/0000-0003-0315-6900; Abdo, Hazem/0000-0001-9283-3947; Islam Arif,
Md. Saidul/0000-0003-3372-6548
FU Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[PNURSP2022R241]
FX This project was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University
Research Supporting Project Number PNURSP2022R241, Princess Nourah bint
Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
CR Adger W., 2004, 7 TYND CTR CLIM CHAN
Ahmed B, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080805
Ahmed I, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P907, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1586638
Ahsan MN, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100065
Ahsan MN, 2016, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V15, P16, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2015.1114912
Ahsan MN, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V8, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.009
Marin-Monroy EA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041575
Akoglu H, 2018, TURK J EMERG MED, V18, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
Akter A, 2021, J COAST CONSERV, V25, DOI 10.1007/s11852-020-00788-y
Alam A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V704, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135360
Alam E, 2022, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V14, P191, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2021-0019
Alam E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102220
Alam E, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P801, DOI 10.1002/joc.4035
Aleksandrova M, 2021, WORLDRISKREPORT 2021
Alipour F, 2015, INT SOC WORK, V58, P689, DOI 10.1177/0020872815584426
[Anonymous], 2021, BANGL CYCL YAAS
[Anonymous], CYCL PREP PROGR CPP
[Anonymous], 2013, HEALTH BULL
[Anonymous], 2013, TROP STORM MAH HCTT
[Anonymous], 2009, 2009 UNISDR TERM DIS
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 2018, DIS PRON AR ATL BANG
BBS, 2013, DISTR STAT 2011 BARG
Birkmann J, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P193, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
Birkmann J, 2006, MEASURING VULNERABIL, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6975.2010.01389.X
Boero R, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V8, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2015.04.002
BRIGUGLIO L, 1995, WORLD DEV, V23, P1615, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00065-K
BROOKS G, 1992, SIGPLAN NOTICES, V27, P1, DOI 10.1145/143103.143108
Das S, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101983
Dastagir MR, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.10.003
Davidson S., 2008, REV IFRC LED SHELTER
Dintwa KF, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102788
Phung D, 2016, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V60, P857, DOI 10.1007/s00484-015-1078-7
Edmonds DA, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18531-4
ESCAP, 2021, AS PAC DIS REP 2021
Faruk M, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P1099, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.142
Fields JR, 2014, STUD SECUR INT AFF, P1
GREEN BL, 1991, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V30, P945, DOI 10.1097/00004583-199111000-
00012
Habiba U, 2015, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55411-0_1
Hahn MB, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P74, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.002
Ho MC, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P635, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01040.x
Hoque MA, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P198, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2020.1867652
Hoque MAA, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P345, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.008
Hossain B, 2020, GEOENVIRONMENTAL DIS, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40677-020-00167-7
Hossain MN, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P66, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.04.003
Huq S, 1999, VULNERABILITY AND ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE FOR BANGLADESH, P1
Islam F, 2022, LOCAL ENVIRON, V27, P671, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2022.2068139
Islam M., 2015, INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE
Islam MA, 2016, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V127, P1, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.03.012
Islam MN, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P2083, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0796-6
Jalal MJE, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07990
Jamshed A, 2017, J EXTREME EVENTS, V4, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737617500130
Jia ZB, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-172
Kabir R, 2016, J ENVIRON PUBLIC HEA, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/9654753
Kar N, 2009, WORLD J PEDIATR, V5, P5, DOI 10.1007/s12519-009-0001-x
Kawyitri N, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101986
Kelman I, 2012, GEOGRAPHY, V97, P12
KREJCIE RV, 1970, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V30, P607, DOI 10.1177/001316447003000308
Lin MR, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P379, DOI 10.1023/A:1015543113448
Lopez-Martinez F, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V76, P29, DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.004
Maghfiroh MFN, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100095
Mallick B, 2017, ENVIRONMENTS, V4, DOI 10.3390/environments4010013
Masud-All-Kamal M, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P1547, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3367-z
Mazumdar J, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P1621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2261-9
McAneney J, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V15, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.11.004
McNutt M, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P905, DOI 10.1126/science.aad2209
Miah M. Y., 2004, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, V7, P1322, DOI
10.3923/pjbs.2004.1322.1326
Miyaji M, 2020, JPN ARCHIT REV, V3, P590, DOI 10.1002/2475-8876.12177
Munoz PT., 2021, DISASTER RISK REDUCT, P37
Nasir MJ, 2022, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V6, P237, DOI 10.1007/s41748-022-00292-3
Noerhidajati S, 2021, ECON MODEL, V96, P433, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.028
Pagneux E, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P269, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9665-8
Panthi J, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P1121, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0833-y
Papathoma-Kohle M, 2017, EARTH-SCI REV, V171, P272, DOI
10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
Paul BK, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V50, P289, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9340-5
Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
Pilkington S, 2017, PALGR COMMUN, V3, DOI 10.1057/s41599-017-0016-1
R Core Team, 2022, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
Rahim MA, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.020
Rahman MM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103449
Rahman MM, 2022, FIRE TECHNOL, DOI 10.1007/s10694-022-01340-0
Rahman MM, 2021, COGENT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.1080/23311908.2020.1860186
Rahman MA, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.12.004
Rana IA, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V9, P359, DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-0179-4
Rana IA, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.028
Rana MS, 2010, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V38, P122
Reddy NM, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15091701
Rendana M., 2023, GEOL ECOL LANDSC, DOI [10.1080/24749508.2023.2205717, DOI
10.1080/24749508.2023.2205717]
Rezwana N, 2021, DISASTERS, V45, P741, DOI 10.1111/disa.12441
RHD, 2007, DIST MATR
Sattar MA, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100138
Sattar MA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101283
SDGs, 2015, 17 GOALS SUST DEV
SFDRR, 2015, SEND FRAM DIS RISK R
Shultz JM, 2018, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V2, pE103, DOI 10.1016/S2542-
5196(18)30021-4
Soane E, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P3023, DOI 10.1068/a43238
Stratton SJ, 2021, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V36, P373, DOI
10.1017/S1049023X21000649
Tamima U., 2009, J BANGLADESH I PLANN, V2, P145, DOI DOI 10.3329/JBIP.V2I0.9575
Tate E, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P325, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2
Thouret JC, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V73, P1771, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1172-x
Tribune Desk, 2021, DHAKA TRIBUNE
Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
Uddin MJ, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10110699
Ullah F, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101967
Usher K, 2013, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V28, P272, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X13000204
Willroth P, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P753, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9635-1
Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
WMA, 2018, WMA WORLD MED ASS WM
Woodruff JD, 2013, NATURE, V504, P44, DOI 10.1038/nature12855
Yamin F, 2005, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V36, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-
5436.2005.tb00231.x
Yoon DK, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P823, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0189-2
Younus MAF, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P1437, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3027-8
Zaman S., 2023, COASTAL DISASTER RIS, P171, DOI [10.4324/9781003253495-12, DOI
10.4324/9781003253495-12]
Zhou Y, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P257, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1713-y
NR 116
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2196-4092
J9 GEOSCI LETT
JI Geosci. Lett.
PD JUN 6
PY 2023
VL 10
IS 1
AR 26
DI 10.1186/s40562-023-00280-z
PG 21
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA I7GS5
UT WOS:001004439600001
PM 37305781
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Parida, D
Moses, S
Rahaman, KR
AF Parida, Debadutta
Moses, Sandra
Rahaman, Khan Rubayet
TI Analysing media framing of cyclone Amphan: Implications for risk
communication and disaster preparedness
LA English
DT Article
DE Cyclone; Amphan; Communication; Policy; Media
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; NATURAL DISASTERS; FLOOD RISK;
MASS-MEDIA; NEWS MEDIA; GOVERNANCE; COVERAGE; REDUCTION; PERCEPTIONS
AB The role of media framing is drawing significant scholarly attention among
disaster and climate scholars in recent times, in terms of its short and long-term
impacts on risk preparedness and climate change adaptation. In this paper, we
explore the connections between media framing of disasters, and risk communication
and preparedness. Through the case of media coverage of eleven newspapers
(international and national publications) around the event of Cyclone Amphan in
South Asia, we portray a strong media framing around the event. Our findings are
three-fold. Firstly, the response system in India and Bangladesh could not follow
pre-determined disaster action plans and protocols for a coordinated response, due
to the risks and restrictions associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Secondly, the
journalistic response to cyclone Amphan framed the disaster event as 'natural',
thus reinforcing the reliance on a short-term Response & Recovery centric approach
(evacuation, rescue, and relief), over long-term approaches such as disaster
preparedness and prevention (adaptation, mitigation, and resilience). Finally, we
find that media framing focused on personal stories of individuals helps advance
the needs of vulnerable groups; yet at the same time concretizes a relief-centric
approach that ignores questions around disaster infrastructure, resilience, and
climate change adaptation. We contend that an integrated risk communication
approach that is adaptive, takes into account multiple risks and complexities while
allowing coordinated efforts between actors and institutions is necessary to
develop an effective response policy for disasters and climate-induced extreme
events in the future.
C1 [Parida, Debadutta] Univ Alberta, Sch Urban & Reg Planning, Edmonton, AB,
Canada.
[Moses, Sandra] BMS Sch Architecture, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
[Rahaman, Khan Rubayet] St Marys Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Halifax, NS
B3H 3C3, Canada.
C3 University of Alberta; Saint Marys University - Canada
RP Rahaman, KR (corresponding author), St Marys Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies,
Halifax, NS B3H 3C3, Canada.
EM dparida@ualberta.ca; sandra.moses2712@gmail.com; khan.rahaman@smu.ca
OI Rahaman, Khan/0000-0002-8018-2355
CR Adger W.N., 1999, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V4, P253, DOI [10.1023/a:1009601904210,
DOI 10.1023/A:1009601904210, 10.1023/A:1009601904210]
[Anonymous], 2010, ENV MEDIA COMMUNICAT
[Anonymous], 2009, PAC JOURNAL REV
[Anonymous], 2013, SUCCESS ADAPT CLIM C
Aram A., 2011, CURR SCI INDIA, V100
Aram A., 2017, J MEDIA COMMUN STUD, V9, P1, DOI 10.5897/JMCS2016.0536
Ashlin A., 2011, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V7, P330
Bansal K., 2003, INT NEWS COVERAGE 4, V30, P31, DOI
[10.1080/01296612.2003.11726699, DOI 10.1080/01296612.2003.11726699]
Barnes MD, 2008, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V98, P604, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2007.112235
Baumer EPS, 2017, ENVIRON COMMUN, V11, P289, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2015.1084015
BBC, 2020, AMPH CYCL WREAKS DEA
BCC, 2020, AMPH IND BANGL EV MI
Bhunia GS, 2013, BMC INFECT DIS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-64
Biggs EM, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V82, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.003
Billett S, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V99, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9605-3
Bogdan EA, 2022, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V20, P153, DOI
10.1080/15715124.2020.1723604
Boholm A, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.025
Boykoff M, 2019, CREATIVE (CLIMATE) COMMUNICATIONS: PRODUCTIVE PATHWAYS FOR
SCIENCE, POLICY AND SOCIETY, DOI 10.1017/9781108164047
Boykoff M.T., 2011, WHO SPEAKS CLIMATE M
Boykoff M, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V99, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9807-8
Boykoff MT, 2007, GEOFORUM, V38, P1190, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
Bruggemann M, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P58, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004
Campbell V, 2014, ENVIRON COMMUN, V8, P58, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2013.848222
Carpenter S, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P411, DOI 10.1111/disa.12164
Chacowry A, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P303, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.007
Chan EYY, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V8, P107, DOI 10.1007/s13753-017-0131-z
Choudhury MU, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P236, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0980-7
CNN, 2020, IND BANGL BRAC STRON
Corfee-Morlot J, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9980-
9
Covello VincentT., 1986, RISK ABSTR, V3, P172
Covello VT, 2003, J HEALTH COMMUN, V8, P5, DOI 10.1080/10810730390224802
Culwick C., 2018, GEOGR S AFRICA CONT, P295
Cunitz G, 1982, INHALATION ANAESTHES, P151, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-39944-6_17
D'Angelo P, 2002, J COMMUN, V52, P870, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x
de Vreese C. H., 2005, INFORM DESIGN J DOCU, V13, P51, DOI DOI
10.1075/IDJDD.13.1.06VRE
Dzigbede KD, 2020, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V80, P634, DOI 10.1111/puar.13249
ENTMAN RM, 1993, J COMMUN, V43, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Evans HC, 2018, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P107, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_7
Garai J, 2018, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_15
Gigerenzer G, 1996, PSYCHOL REV, V103, P592, DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592
Goidel R, 2009, J CONTINGENCIES CRIS, V17
Govt. of India, 2011, CENS IND 2011
Grundmann R, 2007, ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P414, DOI 10.1080/09644010701251656
Hajer M., 1993, ARGUMENTATIVE TURN P, P43, DOI DOI 10.1215/9780822381815
Hasan Z, 2018, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V61, P1204, DOI
10.1080/09640568.2017.1339026
Hulme M, 2009, WHY WE DISAGREE ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE: UNDERSTANDING CONTROVERSY,
INACTION AND OPPORTUNITY, P1
IMD, 2020, SUO CYCL STORM AMPH
Islam MM, 2011, POVERTY MOSAICS: REALITIES AND PROSPECTS IN SMALL-SCALE
FISHERIES, P71, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1582-0_5
Iyengar S., 1991, IS ANYONE RESPONSIBL
Izadkhah YO, 2010, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V19, P345, DOI 10.1108/09653561011052510
Johnson RM, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P2073, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1326-6
Joye S, 2010, CATAL J COMMU CUL ST, V2, P253, DOI 10.1386/cjcs.2.2.253_1
Knight A., 2006, COVERING DISASTERS M, V33, P47, DOI
[10.1080/01296612.2006.11726810, DOI 10.1080/01296612.2006.11726810]
Lakoff G, 2010, ENVIRON COMMUN, V4, P70, DOI 10.1080/17524030903529749
Lejano RP, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2360, DOI 10.1111/risa.13541
Lin KHE, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101556
Maestas CD, 2008, PUBLIUS J FEDERALISM, V38, P609, DOI 10.1093/publius/pjn021
Maxwell J. A., 2005, QUALITATIVE RES DESI
McComas KA, 2006, J HEALTH COMMUN, V11, P75, DOI 10.1080/10810730500461091
Meltzer M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051411
Miah Md Danesh, 2011, Environmentalist, V31, P67, DOI 10.1007/s10669-010-9305-6
Miles B, 2007, ECOL ECON, V63, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.007
Murthy D, 2013, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V16, P1176, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2011.611815
Nerlich B, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P97, DOI 10.1002/wcc.002
NIDM, 2014, REEX PRINC DIS REP T
Ogie R., 2018, PROCEEDINGS, V2, P1, DOI [10.3390/PROCEEDINGS2191256, DOI
10.3390/PROCEEDINGS2191256]
Ogie RI., 2018, 2018 5 INT C INF COM, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICT-DM.2018.8636380
Painter J, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102119
Pal I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.002
Pelling M., 2003, Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world
Pelling M, 2010, PROG HUM GEOG, V34, P21, DOI 10.1177/0309132509105004
Prashar S, 2018, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P261, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-3310-0_14
Rahman A, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V273, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/273/1/012040
Rautela P, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V15, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.12.005
Rebich-Hespanha S, 2015, ENVIRON COMMUN, V9, P491, DOI
10.1080/17524032.2014.983534
Rios CC, 2021, FRONT COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.3389/fcomm.2020.593939
Romsdahl RJ, 2017, ENVIRON COMMUN, V11, P515, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2016.1275732
Rosan C.D, 2012, PLAN IDEAS MATTER LI
Saier MH, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V181, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9372-6
Scheufele DA, 1999, J COMMUN, V49, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Schlichting I, 2013, ENVIRON COMMUN, V7, P493, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2013.812974
Schmidt-Thome P, 2007, THESIS U HELSINKI
Schon Donald A., 1994, FRAME REFLECTION RES
Seddiky MA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101580
SLOVIC P, 1992, SOCIAL THEORIES OF RISK, P117
Solman P, 2019, JOURNALISM, V20, P1648, DOI 10.1177/1464884918762363
Soltani F., 2015, INT J HEAL SYST DISA, V3, P12, DOI [DOI 10.4103/2347-
9019.168565, 10.4103/2347-9019.168565]
Soroka S., 2012, ROUTLEDGE HDB
Stock PV, 2007, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V27, P705, DOI 10.1080/02732170701534218
Tekeli-Yesil S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P284, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.014
Thistlethwaite J., 2019, LEVERAGING MEDIA COV, P8
Thistlethwaite J, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P2597, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-
01576-7
THROGMORTON JA, 1991, POLICY SCI, V24, P153, DOI 10.1007/BF00138058
Tirtana A., 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV
TNIE, 2020, CLIM CHANG MAK CYCL
Tong JR, 2014, ENVIRON COMMUN, V8, P345, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2014.898675
Topno PN, 2018, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P127, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-3310-0_7
TVERSKY A, 1974, SCIENCE, V185, P1124, DOI 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
van Hulst M, 2016, AM REV PUBLIC ADM, V46, P92, DOI 10.1177/0275074014533142
Volenzo TE, 2019, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V11, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.703
Walch C, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P238, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1442794
Whitmarsh Whitmarsh L. L., 2011, ENGAGING PUBLIC CLIM
NR 105
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 4
U2 24
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JUN 1
PY 2021
VL 59
AR 102272
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102272
EA APR 2021
PG 11
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA SJ6KZ
UT WOS:000655642900005
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Sharma, R
Faruk, MO
El-Urfali, A
AF Sharma, Rakesh
Faruk, Md Omar
El-Urfali, Alan
TI Operational and Safety Impact Analysis of Implementing Emergency
Shoulder Use (ESU) for Hurricane Evacuation
LA English
DT Article
AB The emergency shoulder use (ESU) was implemented in Florida in September 2017 to
facilitate mass evacuation before Hurricane Irma made landfall on the shores of
Florida. ESU was implemented on the northbound I-75 for about 39 h and eastbound I-
4 for about 6 h when the left shoulders were opened for use as travel lanes. This
study discusses the operational and safety effects of ESU. The operational effects
of ESU were studied and compared with other alternatives including one-way
operation (contraflow) and both left and right shoulder use. The findings showed
the left shoulder ESU could be an effective alternative to one-way operation. The
one-way operation was not a preferred method as it can only be operated during the
day time, requires massive resource allocation, and hampers emergency services
reaching to different parts of the state. However, ESU on the left shoulder offers
minimal disturbance to traffic and is easy to deploy. The safety impact analysis
was performed by conducting a descriptive statistical comparison of crash types,
severity, and other relevant factors during ESU operations. The crash analysis
showed that the observed number of crashes on an urban I-75 segment during ESU
operation is commensurate with normal operation with saturated traffic conditions,
in contrast a rural segment experienced a higher observed crash rate than the
predicted rate with saturated traffic conditions. The predictive analysis of ESU
crashes also showed that ESU implementation helped to reduce the expected number of
crashes significantly.
C1 [Sharma, Rakesh; Faruk, Md Omar] HNTB Corp, Transportat Syst Management &
Operat, Tallahassee, FL 32312 USA.
[El-Urfali, Alan] Florida Dept Transportat, Tallahassee, FL USA.
RP Sharma, R (corresponding author), HNTB Corp, Transportat Syst Management &
Operat, Tallahassee, FL 32312 USA.
EM rsharma@hntb.com
CR Ahmed MM, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P41, DOI 10.3141/2515-06
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2010,
HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUA
[Anonymous], 2000, HIGHWAY CAPACITY MAN
Aron M, 2010, P 13 INT C INT TRANS, P230
Aron M, 2013, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V28, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.006
Barrett B, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1733, P115
Bauer KM, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P71
Bonneson JA., 2012, NATL COOPERATIVE HIG, V7, P17
Dixit V. V, 2011, 149 TRANSP RES BOARD
Dixon K, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P89, DOI 10.3141/2588-10
6988(2002)3:1(12)
Federal Highway Administration, 2014, FHWAHOP14017
Geistefeldt J, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, P67, DOI 10.3141/2278-08
Helleman B, 2006, HARD SHOULDER RUNNIN
Jenior P, 2016, USITC PUBL
Kononov J, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, P10, DOI 10.3141/2280-02
Kuhn B., 2010, EFFICIENT USE HIGHWA
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Ma JQ, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P120, DOI 10.3141/2554-13
Murray-Tuite PM, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P150, DOI 10.3141/1894-16
Neudorff L. G, 2016, USITC PUBL
Nezamuddin N., 2011, FHWATX12065761 U TEX
Robinson R.M., 2009, TRANSPORTATION RES B
Sadri A.M., 2013, ASCE J TRANSP ENG, V140, P61
Sparman J, 2006, P 1 INT S FREEW TOLL
Wilmot CG., 2004, NAT HAZARDS REV, V5, P170, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2004)5:4(170), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(170)]
6988(2005)6:3(129), 10.1061/ASCE1527-698820056:3129, DOI 10.1061/ASCE1527-
698820056:3129]
6988(2005)6:3(143), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:3(143)]
NR 31
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 1
PI THOUSAND OAKS
SN 0361-1981
EI 2169-4052
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 2674
IS 1
BP 282
EP 293
AR 0361198119900502
DI 10.1177/0361198119900502
EA JAN 2020
PG 12
GA LB3GN
UT WOS:000509996000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Moug, K
Jia, HW
Shen, SQ
AF Moug, Kati
Jia, Huiwen
Shen, Siqian
TI A shared-mobility-based framework for evacuation planning and operations
under forecast uncertainty
SO IISE TRANSACTIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Stochastic programming; evacuation planning; ridesharing;
chance-constrained programming; conditional value at risk (CVaR)
ID OPTIMIZATION; DELIVERY; QUALITY; PICKUP
AB To meet evacuation needs from carless populations who need personalized
assistance to evacuate safely, in this article we propose a ridesharing-based
evacuation program that recruits volunteer drivers before a disaster strikes, and
then matches volunteer drivers with evacuees once demand is realized. We optimize
resource planning and evacuation operations under uncertain spatiotemporal demand,
and construct a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer program to ensure high demand
fulfillment rates. We consider three formulations to improve the number of evacuees
served, by minimizing an expected penalty cost, imposing a probabilistic
constraint, and enforcing a constraint on the conditional value at risk of the
total number of unserved evacuees, respectively. We discuss the benefits and
disadvantages of the different risk measures used in the three formulations, given
certain carless population sizes and the variety of evacuation modes available. We
also develop a heuristic approach to provide quick, dynamic and conservative
solutions. We demonstrate the performance of our approaches using five different
networks of varying sizes based on regions of Charleston County, South Carolina, an
area that experienced a mandatory evacuation order during Hurricane Florence, and
utilize real demographic data and hourly traffic count data to estimate the demand
distribution.
C1 [Moug, Kati; Jia, Huiwen; Shen, Siqian] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan
RP Shen, SQ (corresponding author), Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann
Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
EM siqian@umich.edu
OI Jia, Huiwen/0000-0002-2633-9278
FU U.S. National Science Foundation; U.S. Department of Engineering (DoE)
[1727618]; [DE-SC0018018]
FX The authors are grateful for the partial support from the U.S. National
Science Foundation grant #1727618 and U.S. Department of Engineering
(DoE) grant #DE-SC0018018.
CR Arpon S, 2018, MATH PROGRAM, V170, P327, DOI 10.1007/s10107-018-1298-9
P63, DOI 10.1016/j.sorms.2016.11.001
Bertsimas D, 2022, OPER RES, DOI 10.1287/opre.2022.2265
Caunhye AM, 2012, SOC EC PLANN SCI, V46, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2011.04.004
CHARNES A, 1959, MANAGE SCI, V6, P73, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73
Cordeau JF, 2007, ANN OPER RES, V153, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10479-007-0170-8
Deng Y, 2021, INFORMS J COMPUT, V33, P757, DOI 10.1287/ijoc.2020.0970
Goerigk M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V78, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2015.04.008
Jia H., 2021, INFORMS J OPTIMIZATI, V3, P278, DOI DOI 10.1287/IJOO.2019.0050
Keutchayan J., 2021, ARXIV
Khalil EB, 2016, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P724
Kleywegt AJ, 2001, SIAM J OPTIMIZ, V12, P479, DOI 10.1137/S1052623499363220
Kruber M, 2017, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V10335, P202, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59776-
8_16
Lim GJ, 2019, IISE TRANS, V51, P589, DOI 10.1080/24725854.2018.1533675
947X(2006)132:1(11)
Liu C, 2018, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V10848, P412, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-93031-
2_30
Lu MS, 2018, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V20, P162, DOI 10.1287/msom.2017.0644
Lu WK, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V114, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.020
Luedtke J, 2008, SIAM J OPTIMIZ, V19, P674, DOI 10.1137/070702928
Mak WK, 1999, OPER RES LETT, V24, P47, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00054-6
Manno A., 2018, EVACUATIONS I 26 LAN
Naoum-Sawaya J, 2017, INFOR, V55, P339, DOI 10.1080/03155986.2017.1302773
Rockafellar R.T., 2000, J RISK, P21, DOI DOI 10.21314/JOR.2000.038
Rockafellar RT, 2002, J BANK FINANC, V26, P1443, DOI 10.1016/S0378-
4266(02)00271-6
Rujeerapaiboon N, 2022, MATH PROGRAM, V191, P207, DOI 10.1007/s10107-018-1269-1
Saadatseresht M, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V198, P305, DOI
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.032
SAVELSBERGH MWP, 1995, TRANSPORT SCI, V29, P17, DOI 10.1287/trsc.29.1.17
Tanaka A, 2017, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P3368, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2017.8258322
Toth P, 2002, SIAM MONOG DISCR MAT, P29
Urbina E, 2003, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V37, P257, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(02)00015-
0
Wang L, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106458
Wang L, 2016, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V69, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2016.05.022
Wong RT, 2008, OPER RES COMPUT SCI, V43, P475, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-77778-8_21
Yu M, 2020, IISE TRANS, V52, P151, DOI 10.1080/24725854.2019.1628377
Zhang YL, 2021, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V23, P488, DOI 10.1287/msom.2019.0855
NR 43
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 7
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
PI PHILADELPHIA
PA 530 WALNUT STREET, STE 850, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 USA
SN 2472-5854
EI 2472-5862
J9 IISE TRANS
JI IISE Trans.
PD OCT 3
PY 2023
VL 55
IS 10
BP 971
EP 984
DI 10.1080/24725854.2022.2140367
EA NOV 2022
PG 14
WC Engineering, Industrial; Operations Research & Management Science
SC Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science
GA M6LR8
UT WOS:000894420700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Izumi, T
Das, S
Abe, M
Shaw, R
AF Izumi, Takako
Das, Sangita
Abe, Miwa
Shaw, Rajib
TI Managing Compound Hazards: Impact of COVID-19 and Cases of Adaptive
Governance during the 2020 Kumamoto Flood in Japan
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; flood; compound hazards; evacuation; volunteerism; adaptive
governance
ID DISASTERS
AB Japan experienced natural hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic as some other
countries did. Kumamoto and Kagoshima prefectures, including many other parts of
southern Japan, experienced record-breaking heavy rain on 4th July 2020. While many
countries were affected by compound hazards, some cases such as the Kumamoto flood
did not cause a spike of the COVID-19 cases even after going through massive
evacuation actions. This study aims to understand how COVID-19 made an impact on
people's response actions, learn the challenges and problems during the response
and recovery phases, and identify any innovative actions and efforts to overcome
various restrictions and challenges through a questionnaire survey and interviews
with the affected people. With an increase in the risk of compound hazards, it has
become important to take a new, innovative, and non-traditional approach. Proper
understanding and application of adaptive governance can make it possible to come
up with a solution that can work directly on the complex challenges during
disasters. This study identified that a spike of COVID-19 cases after the disaster
could be avoided due to various preventive measures taken at the evacuation
centers. It shows that it is possible to manage compound hazard risks with
effective preparedness. Furthermore, during emergencies, public-private-partnership
as well as collaboration among private organizations and local business networks
are extremely important. These collaborations generate a new approach, mechanism
and platform to tackle unprecedented challenges.
C1 [Izumi, Takako] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci IRIDeS, Sendai, Miyagi
9808572, Japan.
[Abe, Miwa] Kumamoto Univ, Kumamoto Innovat Dev Org KIDO, Kumamoto 8608555,
Japan.
[Shaw, Rajib] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Media & Governance, Tokyo 1088345, Japan.
C3 Tohoku University; Kumamoto University; Keio University
RP Izumi, T (corresponding author), Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci IRIDeS,
Sendai, Miyagi 9808572, Japan.
EM izumi@irides.tohoku.ac.jp; sangita.r.das@gmail.com;
m-abe@kumamoto-u.ac.jp; shaw@sfc.keio.ac.jp
OI Shaw, Rajib/0000-0003-3153-1800
FU Fukuzawa Research Fund of Keio University; JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K02035]
FX Fukuzawa Research Fund of Keio University; JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number
JP19K02035.
CR [Anonymous], 2020, JAPAN TIMES KUMAMOTO
Atsumi T., 2021, DISASTER SYMBIOSIS, V4, P95
Barnett R. V., 2005, INT J VOL ADM, V23, P52
Catto JL, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100313
CDC, 2021, CDCS INT GUID GEN PO
Daimon H., 2018, DISASTER SYMBIOSIS, V2, P25
Das S., 2020, DISASTER PANDEMIC LE
Djalante R, 2011, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V2, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13753-011-0015-6
Furukawa T., NISHINIHON NEWSPAPER
Haraoka T, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0047203
Hashimoto T., 2020, KOKUSHIKAN DISASTER, V6, P59
Holley C., 2010, COLUMBIA J ENVIRON L, V36, P1211
Ishiwatari M., 2020, MULTIHAZARD APPROACH
Johansson R, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P519, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12228
JVOAD, 2020, DIS RESP GUID VOL NO
Kawata Y., 2020, RES SOC SAF STUDY, V11, P37
Kruczkiewicz A, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2106795118
Lawes JC, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18105314
Nakai H, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100183
Noguchi Y., 2021, J ARCHIT PLAN, V86, P761, DOI [10.3130/aija.86.761, DOI
10.3130/AIJA.86.761]
Potutan G, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18063137
Prem K, 2020, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, pE261, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6
020-09772-1
Sakurai M., 2018, POLICY SCI
Sawano T, 2021, QJM-INT J MED, V114, P445, DOI 10.1093/qjmed/hcab044
Shi Peijun, 2014, Journal of Natural Disasters, V23, P1, DOI
10.13577/j.jnd.2014.0601
Silva V, 2021, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V37, P73, DOI 10.1177/8755293020950328
Simonovic SP, 2021, WIRES WATER, V8, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1509
Steins N. A., 1999, Agriculture and Human Values, V16, P241, DOI
10.1023/A:1007591401621
Suga M., 2005, REG SAF ASS, V7, P405
Tashiro A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135250
Tsuchizaki Y., 2019, CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT, V6, P63
Uchiyama S., 2020, PRELIMINARY REPORT, V1st
Waldman S, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P394, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12206
Whittaker J, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P358, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.010
World Health Organization, 2020, DIS EV SHELT CONT CO
Yamori K., 2020, CORONA CORONA SCI FI
NR 39
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 5
U2 15
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD FEB
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 3
AR 1188
DI 10.3390/ijerph19031188
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
(SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
Health
GA ZF9JZ
UT WOS:000759885400001
PM 35162212
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Terui, T
Kunii, Y
Hoshino, H
Kakamu, T
Hidaka, T
Fukushima, T
Anzai, N
Gotoh, D
Miura, I
Yabe, H
AF Terui, Toshihiro
Kunii, Yasuto
Hoshino, Hiroshi
Kakamu, Takeyasu
Hidaka, Tomoo
Fukushima, Tetsuhito
Anzai, Nobuo
Gotoh, Daisuke
Miura, Itaru
Yabe, Hirooki
TI Post-evacuation return of psychiatric hospital inpatients evacuated to
hospitals outside the Fukushima prefecture after the nuclear accident: A
Retrospective Cohort Study: Post-evacuation return of psychiatric
inpatients
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY
LA English
DT Article
DE Fukushima nuclear disaster; Hospital evacuation; post-evacuation return;
psychiatric inpatients
ID PSYCHOLOGICAL SYMPTOMS; CHALLENGING BEHAVIOR; HURRICANE-KATRINA;
RISK-FACTORS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; INTERVENTIONS; INDIVIDUALS; MORTALITY;
LESSONS; JAPAN
AB Background: Post-evacuation return after mandatory hospital evacuation due to
complicated disasters is often overlooked and not well-discussed. Aims: In this
study, we explored the factors which are related to the ease or difficulty of the
post-evacuation return to Fukushima prefecture of psychiatric inpatients who had
been evacuated to hospitals outside the prefecture because of the Great East Japan
Earthquake (GEJE) and subsequent Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP)
accident. Method: This retrospective cohort study included evacuated psychiatric
hospital inpatients who were registered in the Matching Project for Community
Transition (MPCT) and had been traced until July 31, 2019. A total of 531 patients
were included for the analyses. Univariable and multivariable analysis were
conducted to detect the patients' traits including their psychiatric/physical
backgrounds which were associated with their outcome - the time from GEJE to the
date of return to Fukushima. Results: Over half of the patients returned to
Fukushima. In the multivariable analysis, the patients' gender (male), age (older),
and psychiatric diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders
(ICD-10, F20-29) showed lower hazard ratio (HR) and statistically significant
association with the difficulties of post-evacuation return. Meanwhile, disorders
of psychological development (F80-89), diseases of the nervous (G00-99, except G40-
41) and genitourinary (N00-99) systems showed higher HR and statistically
significant association with the ease of return. Conclusions: The specific
characteristics of the psychiatric inpatients including their psychiatric and
physical status are associated with their post-evacuation return to their hometown.
These results indicated that the evacuated hospitals' practitioners and staffs from
the MPCT understood the necessity of the earlier return of inpatients to their
hometown. Moreover, clinicians should pay more attention to some symptoms unique to
psychiatric patients which contributed to their difficulties in returning safely or
expressing their hope to return.
C1 [Terui, Toshihiro; Hoshino, Hiroshi; Gotoh, Daisuke; Miura, Itaru; Yabe,
Hirooki] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Fukushima, Japan.
[Kunii, Yasuto] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Dept Disaster Psychiat,
Aoba Ku, Sendai, Japan.
[Kakamu, Takeyasu; Hidaka, Tomoo; Fukushima, Tetsuhito] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch
Med, Dept Hyg & Prevent Med, Fukushima, Japan.
[Anzai, Nobuo] Teikyo Heisei Univ, Grad Sch Clin Psychol, Toshima Ku, Tokyo,
Japan.
[Terui, Toshihiro] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Hikarigaoka
1, Fukushima 9601295, Japan.
C3 Fukushima Medical University; Tohoku University; Fukushima Medical
University; Fukushima Medical University
RP Terui, T (corresponding author), Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept
Neuropsychiat, Hikarigaoka 1, Fukushima 9601295, Japan.
EM toshihiro62823@gmail.com
OI Terui, Toshihiro/0000-0001-6247-8083
CR Ando R., 2021, JAPANESE J CLIN DIAL, V37, P795, DOI [10.19020/CD.0000001803, DOI
10.19020/CD.0000001803]
Araki T., 2016, OSAKA MEDICAL COLL J, V6, P113
Carpiniello B, 2012, SCHIZOPHR RES TREAT, V2012, DOI 10.1155/2012/576369
Davis TN, 2018, BEHAV MODIF, V42, P307, DOI 10.1177/0145445518763851
Fernando E, 2017, PHYSIOTHER CAN, V69, P161, DOI 10.3138/ptc.2016-14
Fujii S, 2021, TOHOKU J EXP MED, V255, P183, DOI 10.1620/tjem.255.183
Gotoh D, 2021, PSYCHIAT CLIN NEUROS, V75, P29, DOI 10.1111/pcn.13158
Hicks Jarred, 2015, J Healthc Risk Manag, V34, P26, DOI 10.1002/jhrm.21162
Igarashi Y, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0195684
Inoue M, 2019, YONAGO ACTA MED, V62, P169, DOI 10.33160/yam.2019.06.001
International Research Institute of Disaster Science, 2019, DISASTER PREVENTION
Japan Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 2015, DIS CAR HDB NURS
Japanese Association of Autism Support, 2008, CURR SURV PEOPL AUT
Kitamura T, 2013, DEMENT GER COGN D EX, V3, P86, DOI 10.1159/000350028
Kitamura T, 2012, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V73, P1548, DOI 10.4088/JCP.11m07614
Kreinin A, 2014, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V8, P288, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2014.53
Kutner NG, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V76, P760, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.268
Liberakis E A, 1981, Acta Psychiatr Scand, V63, P357
Maeyama K., 2017, JAPANESE J PSYCHIATR, V48, P58
Markowitz M, 2013, ANN GEN PSYCHIATR, V12, DOI 10.1186/1744-859X-12-22
Matsumoto S, 2014, SLEEP, V37, P137, DOI 10.5665/sleep.3324
McGuire K, 2018, INT REV PSYCHIATR, V30, P110, DOI 10.1080/09540261.2018.1433134
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare, 2009, DEAL PHYS COMPL STAT
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare, 2020, CURR SIT MENT HLTH M
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare, 2014, CURR SIT LONG TERM I
Nakamura Y, 2020, TOHOKU J EXP MED, V251, P207, DOI 10.1620/tjem.251.207
Nomura S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060192
Okumura Tetsu, 2015, Disaster Mil Med, V1, P19, DOI 10.1186/s40696-015-0009-9
Onaga K., 2018, ISHIKAWA J NURSING, V15, P83
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2014, OECD REV HLTH CAR
QU
Sugawara Y, 2020, BMC PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.1186/s40359-020-00436-y
Tanigawa K, 2012, LANCET, V379, P889, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60384-5
Terui T, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102600
Terui T, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-94152-1
Thomas J, 2008, J PSYCHOSOC NURS MEN, V46, P35, DOI 10.3928/02793695-20080101-13
Tsukinoki R, 2018, BMJ OPEN, V8, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023435
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SEND FRAM DIS RISK R
Urizaki T., 2017, OSAKA MEDICAL COLL J, V7, P146
Verma P.K., 2017, OPEN ACCESS J TRANSL, V1, P44, DOI
[10.15406/oajtmr.2017.01.00010, DOI 10.15406/OAJTMR.2017.01.00010]
Wei CW, 2020, TRANSL PSYCHIAT, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41398-020-0717-x
Weiden PJ, 2017, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V78, pE813, DOI 10.4088/JCP.16m11308
Xiang YT, 2010, PSYCHIAT RES, V177, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.03.014
Yabe H., 2013, SEISHIN IGAKU, V55, P681
Yanagawa Y, 2011, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V26, P391, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X11006418
Zhang W, 2020, SLEEP MED, V68, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.09.004
NR 48
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 2
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0020-7640
EI 1741-2854
J9 INT J SOC PSYCHIATR
JI Int. J. Soc. Psychiatr.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 69
IS 4
BP 875
EP 884
DI 10.1177/00207640221141019
EA DEC 2022
PG 10
WC Psychiatry
SC Psychiatry
GA J0SJ6
UT WOS:000893549600001
PM 36464861
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Linning, SJ
Silver, IA
AF Linning, Shannon J.
Silver, Ian A.
TI Crime Fluctuations in Response to Hurricane Evacuations: Understanding
the Time-Course of Crime Opportunities during Hurricane Harvey
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricanes; Crime; Emergency preparedness; Time-course framework;
Guardianship
ID CONSEQUENCES; REGRESSION
AB Research regarding how natural disasters impact crime is largely mixed. Most
studies focus on whether aggregate postdisaster crime levels differ from
predisaster ones and pay less attention to how emergency procedures impact the
timing of crime fluctuations. A recent study of Hurricane Rita in Houston, Texas,
uncovered a surge in burglary prior to the storm, suggesting that the prestorm
evacuation increased the opportunities for burglary by reducing guardianship. This
suggests that researchers should examine crime fluctuations that may occur before,
during, and after natural disasters. Using nonparametric kernel regression models,
we examined crime trends surrounding Hurricane Harvey that occurred in Houston 12
years later where no prestorm evacuation was ordered. We observed no crime surge
prior to the storm. Instead, we observed substantial increases for some crime types
after the hurricane made landfall that coincided with poststorm evacuations. This
supports previous findings that evacuations may create certain crime opportunities.
C1 [Linning, Shannon J.] Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Criminol, 8888 Univ Dr,Saywell Hall
10223, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
[Silver, Ian A.] Rowan Univ, Law & Justice Dept, 201 Mullica Hill Rd, Glasboro,
NJ 08028 USA.
[Silver, Ian A.] Univ Cincinnati, Correct Inst, 2600 Clifton Ave, Cincinnati, OH
45221 USA.
C3 Simon Fraser University; Rowan University; University System of Ohio;
University of Cincinnati
RP Linning, SJ (corresponding author), Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Criminol, 8888 Univ
Dr,Saywell Hall 10223, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
EM shannon_linning@sfu.ca; silveria@rowan.edu
OI Silver, Ian/0000-0001-8233-4378; Linning, Shannon/0000-0002-3027-1667
CR Andone D., 2017, HOUSTON KNEW IT WAS
Andresen M.A., 2015, CRIME SCI, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40163-015-0024-7,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-015-0024-7]
[Anonymous], 2017, NEW YORK TIMES
[Anonymous], 1995, EUR J CRIM POLICY RE, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02242928
[Anonymous], CRIME PREVENTION COM
[Anonymous], 2017, DELIBERATE FLOODING
[Anonymous], 2002, CRIME PREVENTION STU
Baker K, 2018, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V12, P115, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.27
BRANTINGHAM PL, 1993, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V13, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0272-
4944(05)80212-9
Brezina T, 2008, JUSTICE Q, V25, P701, DOI 10.1080/07418820802290504
Carpender SK, 2006, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V121, P775, DOI
10.1177/003335490612100620
Clarke RV., 2005, CRIME ANAL PROBLEM S
COHEN LE, 1979, AM SOCIOL REV, V44, P588, DOI 10.2307/2094589
Cornish D.B., 2003, THEORY PRACTICE IN S, V16, P41, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.JCRIMIJUS.2018.11.003
Drabek T., 2003, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V12, P97, DOI [DOI 10.1108/096535603,
10.1108/09653560310474214, DOI 10.1108/09653560310474214]
Du P, 2013, STAT SINICA, V23, P1347, DOI 10.5705/ss.2012.024
Felson M., 1995, CRIME PLACE, V4, P53, DOI DOI 10.1525/9780520930902-008
Hayfield T, 2008, J STAT SOFTW, V27, P1
Hipp JR, 2004, SOC FORCES, V82, P1333, DOI 10.1353/sof.2004.0074
HPD (Houston Police Department), 2018, CRIM STAT 2017
Hurvich CM, 1998, J ROY STAT SOC B, V60, P271, DOI 10.1111/1467-9868.00125
Jacoby WG, 2000, ELECT STUD, V19, P577, DOI 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00028-1
Jonkman SN, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P1073, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-1073-
2018
Lederer E.M., 2020, CRIME RATES PLUMMET
Leitner M, 2011, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V38, P214, DOI 10.1559/15230406382214
Leitner M, 2011, PROF GEOGR, V63, P244, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2010.547156
Linning SJ, 2019, J EXP CRIMINOL, V15, P593, DOI 10.1007/s11292-019-09367-0
Linning SJ, 2018, BRIT J CRIMINOL, V58, P309, DOI 10.1093/bjc/azx019
McCausland P, 2017, HURRICANE HARVEY EVA
O'Brien G, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P64, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00307.x
QUARANTELLI EL, 1970, PHYLON, V31, P168, DOI 10.2307/273722
Roman CG., 2007, KATRINA WASHED AWAY
Rotton J, 2003, ENVIRON BEHAV, V35, P802, DOI 10.1177/0013916503255565
Roy S., 2010, THESIS U VIRGINIA
Settles T, 2011, DISASTERS, V35, P200, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01200.x
SHERMAN LW, 1990, CRIME JUSTICE, V12, P1, DOI 10.1086/449163
Soika K., 2006, HOUSE RES ORGAN TEXA, V79, P1
Spencer NO, 2017, J CRIME JUSTICE, V40, P417, DOI 10.1080/0735648X.2016.1168749
Tierney K, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P57, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285589
Varano SP, 2010, J CRIM JUST, V38, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.11.006
NR 44
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PI RESTON
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
PD AUG 1
PY 2021
VL 22
IS 3
AR 04021023
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000466
PG 17
(SSCI)
GA WQ9RX
UT WOS:000714148100018
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yore, R
Walker, JF
AF Yore, Rebekah
Walker, Joanna Faure
TI Early warning systems and evacuation: rare and extreme versus frequent
and small-scale tropical cyclones in the Philippines and Dominica
SO DISASTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster; Dominica; early warning; evacuation; hazard; Hurricane Maria;
Philippines; preparedness; resilience; risk; Super Typhoon Yolanda;
Typhoon Haiyan
ID DISASTER PREPAREDNESS; TORNADO; COMMUNICATION
AB Survey questionnaires were administered among populations affected by Super
Typhoon Yolanda in the Philippines in 2013 and Hurricane Maria in Dominica in 2017
to test the efficacy of early warning systems in prompting residents to take
appropriate action ahead of severe hazards. Both events were rare and extreme but
occurred in locations that regularly experience less severe tropical cyclones. The
research assessed if, how, and when residents received warnings, what instructions
were given, and where and when people decided to seek safety. In both of the cases
under review, residents were aware of the approaching storms, but critical
information on their severity and potential impacts was either not received in time
or not understood fully, resulting in low levels of evacuation and safety-seeking
behaviour. This paper suggests that planning and public communication need to focus
on the uncertainty surrounding the severity and multifaceted nature of tropical
cyclones and accompanying hazards and their consequences.
C1 [Yore, Rebekah; Walker, Joanna Faure] UCL, Inst Risk & Disaster Reduct, Gower
St, London WC1E 6BT, England.
C3 University of London; University College London
RP Yore, R (corresponding author), UCL, Inst Risk & Disaster Reduct, Gower St,
London WC1E 6BT, England.
EM rebekah.yore.14@ucl.ac.uk
RI Walker, Joanna Faure/M-7665-2016
OI Walker, Joanna Faure/0000-0001-8386-9403; Yore,
Rebekah/0000-0003-1062-8240
CR ADRC, 2019, INF DIS RISK RED MEM
Aguirre B. E., 1991, SARAGOSA TEXAS TORNA
Aguirre BE, 1998, SOCIOL FORUM, V13, P301, DOI 10.1023/A:1022145900928
ANDERSON WA, 1969, J COMMUN, V19, P92, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1969.tb00834.x
[Anonymous], 1998, J CLIN ONCOL, DOI DOI 10.1177/028072709801600303
[Anonymous], 2009, KNOWLEDGE ACTION LEA
[Anonymous], INT J MASS EMERG DIS
[Anonymous], 2000, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.00143,
10.1111/1468-5973.00143]
[Anonymous], 2018, TELEGRAPH
Balluz L, 2000, DISASTERS, V24, P71, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00132
BARON RC, 1988, DISASTERS, V12, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1988.tb00688.x
Buchanan-Smith M., 1995, FAMINE EARLY WARNING
CARTER AO, 1989, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V130, P1209, DOI
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115449
CREWS (Climate Risk and Early Warning Systems), 2018, CLIM RISK EARL WARN
Disasters Emergency Committee, 2015, PHIL TYPH FACTS FIG
Drabek TE, 1986, HUMAN SYSTEMS RESPON
Faure Walker J., 2014, 201401 IRDR U COLL L
Glantz M.H., 2004, US SCI WORKSH SHANGH
GOLDSTEEN R, 1982, DISASTERS, V6, P50, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1982.tb00744.x
GRUNTFEST E, 1989, ENVIRON MANAGE, V13, P279, DOI 10.1007/BF01874906
Gruntfest E., 1997, FLOOD HAZARD MANAGEM, P191
Hammer B, 2002, WEATHER FORECAST, V17, P577, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(2002)017<0577:RTWDTM>2.0.CO;2
Hamza M., 2006, HUMAN DIMENSIO UNPUB
Hiroaki Y., 1992, DISASTER MANAGEMENT, V4, P207
Hoffmann R, 2017, WORLD DEV, V96, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.016
Kelman I, 2018, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V27, P370, DOI 10.1108/DPM-12-2017-0318
KILPATRICK FP, 1957, HUM ORGAN, V16, P20, DOI
10.17730/humo.16.2.f8338g3t7327uv37
Kitteridge A-M, 1998, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V16, P119
LACHMAN R, 1961, SCIENCE, V133, P1405, DOI 10.1126/science.133.3462.1405
Lindell M.K., 2005, HURR FOR SOC WORKSH
Liu S, 1996, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V86, P87, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.86.1.87
Mason LR, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P561, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0114.1
Mercy Corps, 2013, FACTS WHAT YOU NEED
Mileti D. S., 2006, ANNOTATED BIBLIO PUB
MILETI DS, 1992, SOC PROBL, V39, P40, DOI 10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0062j
MILETI DS, 1975, COMMUN RES, V2, P24, DOI 10.1177/009365027500200102
Mitchem J.D., 2003, 161 U COL NAT HAZ CT
National Hurricane Center, 2018, UPD NAT HURR CTR PRO
National Research Council, 2013, PUBL RESP AL WARN US
National Weather Service, 2017, MAJ HURR MAR SEPT 20
Naylor A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.022
Nelson C.E, 1988, POSTHURRICANE SURVEY
Parr A.R., 1998, AUSTR J EMERGENCY MA, V12, P2
Pasch R.J., 2019, HURRICANE MARIA AL15
Philippine Statistics Authority, 2013, POP TACL CIT ROS MOR
Pomonis A., 2011, MW9 0 THOKU EARTHQUA
Powell N, 2003, TLS-TIMES LIT SUPPL, P4
Reid K., 2018, 2013 TYPHOON HAIYAN
Rogers D., 2010, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE
Salter J., 1996, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V10, P8
SCHMIDLIN TW, 1998, 106 U COL NAT HAZ CT
Sorensen N, 2006, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE MOUNTAIN WORKSHOP ON ADAPTIVE AND
LEARNING SYSTEMS, P183, DOI 10.1109/SMCALS.2006.250713
Steiner A., 2018, THOMSON REUTERS 0503
Tehusijarana, 2018, JAKARTA POST
Thomalla F, 2004, DISASTERS, V28, P373, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00264.x
Twigg J, 2000, EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS FOR NATURAL DISASTER REDUCTION, P19
UNDP, 2009, I LEG SYST EARL WARN
WMO (World Meteorological Organization), 2018, 1 MULT EARL WARN C C
Yabes C., 2013, GMA NEWS ONLINE
NR 68
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 3
U2 22
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0361-3666
EI 1467-7717
J9 DISASTERS
JI Disasters
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 45
IS 3
BP 691
EP 716
DI 10.1111/disa.12434
EA NOV 2020
PG 26
GA SO8MP
UT WOS:000591388900001
PM 32129911
OA Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Senkbeil, J
Reed, J
Collins, J
Brothers, K
Saunders, M
Skeeter, W
Cerrito, E
Chakraborty, S
Polen, A
AF Senkbeil, Jason
Reed, Jacob
Collins, Jennifer
Brothers, Kimberly
Saunders, Michelle
Skeeter, Walker
Cerrito, Emily
Chakraborty, Saurav
Polen, Amy
TI Perceptions of Hurricane-Track Forecasts in the United States
SO WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Communications; decision making; Emergency preparedness; Geographic
information systems (GIS); Risk assessment; Societal impacts
ID EVACUATION DECISIONS; EVACUEE PERCEPTION; IMPACT BIAS; HAZARDS;
COMMUNICATION; UNCERTAINTY; JUDGMENTS; RESPONSES; TWITTER; FLORIDA
AB Hurricanes Isaac (2012), Harvey (2017), and Irma (2017) were storms with
different geophysical characteristics and track forecast consistencies. Despite the
differences, common themes emerged from the perception of track forecasts from
evacuees for each storm. Surveys with a mixture of closed and open-ended responses
were conducted during the evacuations of each storm while the storm characteristics
and decision-making were fresh in the minds of evacuees. Track perception accuracy
for each evacuee was quantified by taking the difference between three metrics:
perceived track and official track (PT - OT), perceived track and forecast track
(PT - FT), and home location and perceived track (HL - PT). Evacuees from
Hurricanes Isaac and Harvey displayed a tendency to perceive hurricane tracks as
being closer to their home locations than what was forecast to occur and what
actually occurred. The large sample collected for Hurricane Irma provided a chance
to statistically verify some of the hypotheses generated from Isaac and Harvey.
Results from Hurricane Irma confirmed that evacuees expected a storm to be closer
to their home locations after controlling for regional influences. Furthermore,
participants with greater previous hurricane experience perceived a track as being
closer to their home locations, and participants residing in zip codes
corresponding with nonmandatory evacuation zones also perceived tracks as being
closer to their home locations. These findings suggest that most evacuees from
hurricanes in the United States appear to perceive storms as being closer to their
home locations than they are and overestimate wind speeds at their homes, thus
overestimating the true danger from landfalling hurricanes in many storms.
C1 [Senkbeil, Jason; Reed, Jacob; Brothers, Kimberly] Univ Alabama, Dept Geog,
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
[Collins, Jennifer; Saunders, Michelle; Cerrito, Emily; Chakraborty, Saurav;
Polen, Amy] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Skeeter, Walker] Univ Delaware, Dept Geog, Newark, DE USA.
C3 University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; State
Delaware
RP Senkbeil, J (corresponding author), Univ Alabama, Dept Geog, Tuscaloosa, AL
35487 USA.
EM jcsenkbeil@ua.edu
OI Reed, Jacob/0000-0001-5089-8005
FU National Science Foundation RAPID Grant [BCS-1760235]
FX The Hurricane Irma research was sponsored by National Science Foundation
RAPID Grant BCS-1760235.
CR [Anonymous], 2002, METHODS DISASTER RES
10.1177/028072709100900210
Berg R., 2013, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.027
Cangialosi JP, 2018, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Cox J, 2013, INT J UNCERTAIN QUAN, V3, P143, DOI
10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2012003966
Drake L, 2012, WEATHER FORECAST, V27, P462, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-11-00041.1
Duenas-Osorio L, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P45, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000053
Florida Department of Transportation, 2018, HURR IRM EM EV REP R
Held A., 2017, IRMA SHIFTS W POWERF
Huang SK, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P533, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2877-4
Klockow KE, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9518-6
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Meyer V, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P1351, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
Morewedge CK, 2013, EMOTION, V13, P1023, DOI 10.1037/a0033797
National Hurricane Center, 2017, HURR HARV ADV ARCH
Ripberger JT, 2014, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V6, P520, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00028.1
Saunders ME, 2017, METEOROL APPL, V24, P120, DOI 10.1002/met.1611
Senkbeil JC, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V54, P141, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9457-1
Sevdalis N, 2009, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V4, P287
Sherman-Morris Kathleen, 2018, J Emerg Manag, V16, P137, DOI
10.5055/jem.2018.0363
Sherman-Morris K, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P1523, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2931-2
Stewart AE, 2015, J MAR SCI ENG, V3, P630, DOI 10.3390/jmse3030630
Stewart AE, 2011, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V3, P116, DOI 10.1175/2011WCAS1077.1
Stokes C, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P194, DOI 10.1111/disa.12192
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2003.11.001
Wu HC, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P355, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1846-z
Wu HC, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P1025, DOI 10.1111/risa.12128
NR 44
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 0
U2 10
PI BOSTON
SN 1948-8327
EI 1948-8335
J9 WEATHER CLIM SOC
JI Weather Clim. Soc.
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 1
BP 15
EP 29
DI 10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0031.1
PG 15
WC Environmental Studies; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
(SSCI)
GA JQ8WY
UT WOS:000499220200001
OA Bronze
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Senkbeil, J
Collins, J
Reed, J
AF Senkbeil, Jason
Collins, Jennifer
Reed, Jacob
TI Evacuee Perception of Geophysical Hazards for Hurricane Irma
LA English
DT Article
DE Communications/decision making; Emergency preparedness; Risk assessment;
Societal impacts
ID LANDFALL; FORECAST; MODEL; RISK
AB Hurricane Irma was one of the strongest Atlantic hurricanes in history before
landfall and caused a large evacuation. A total of 155 evacuees at interstate rest
areas were asked to rank their concern about damage at their residence for six
different geophysical hurricane hazards. Additionally, they were asked about their
perceived maximum wind speeds (PMWS) and the wind speeds at which they thought
damage would occur (DW) at their residence. These wind speeds were then compared to
the actual peak wind gusts (APG) nearest to each resident's location. Results show
a significantly greater concern for wind and storm size, compared to other hazards
(tornadoes, rainfall/flooding, storm surge, falling trees). The mean PMWS of
evacuees was greater than the mean APG, suggesting widespread misperception of wind
speeds. Furthermore, the mean APG was less than the mean DW, and the mean PMWS was
also higher than the DW. Additional tests found no significant differences in wind
perception between residents with previous storm experiences and no experience, and
no significant differences between those who resided in mandatory evacuation zip
codes and those who did not. These results suggest that wind speed risk is poorly
understood, even though it is a high concern for evacuees from hurricanes. The
communication of wind speed risk in forecasts should possibly be modified by
placing greater emphasis on postlandfall impacts, wind speed decay after landfall,
and wind speeds that cause damage to different types of residences.
C1 [Senkbeil, Jason; Reed, Jacob] Univ Alabama, Dept Geog, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
USA.
[Collins, Jennifer] Univ S Florida, Sch Geosci, Tampa, FL USA.
C3 University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa; State
University System of Florida; University of South Florida
RP Senkbeil, J (corresponding author), Univ Alabama, Dept Geog, Tuscaloosa, AL
35487 USA.
EM jcsenkbeil@ua.edu
OI Reed, Jacob/0000-0001-5089-8005
FU NSF RAPID [BCS-1760235]
FX The Hurricane Irma research was sponsored by NSF RAPID Grant
BCS-1760235. We also would like to acknowledge members of the USF
hurricane team, especially Emily Cerrito, Amy Polen, Michelle Saunders,
and Saurav Chakraborty, for their field work in Hurricane Irma.
CR Agdas D, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0049944
Andersen TK, 2013, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V52, P2797, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-13-035.1
[Anonymous], 2018, AM FACT FIND
Barnes LR, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P1140, DOI 10.1175/WAF1031.1
Dillon RL, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P1907, DOI 10.1111/risa.12209
Duenas-Osorio L, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P45, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000053
Florida DBPR, 2014, FBC WIND MAPS RES
Florida DBPR, 2013, FLOR BUILD COD
Florida DOT, 2018, HURR IRM EM EV REP R
Held A., 2017, NATL PUBLIC RADIO
Irish JL, 2008, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V38, P2003, DOI 10.1175/2008JPO3727.1
Joslyn S, 2010, METEOROL APPL, V17, P180, DOI 10.1002/met.190
KAPLAN J, 1995, J APPL METEOROL, V34, P2499, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0450(1995)034<2499:ASEMFP>2.0.CO;2
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Moore TW, 2017, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/atmos8090160
National Hurricane Center, 2017, HURR IRM LOC REP SUM
National Hurricane Center Data Archive, 2018, TROP CYCL ADV ARCH
Petrolia DR, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P117, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000038
Rego JL, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2008GL036953
Rhodes CL, 2014, METEOROL APPL, V21, P940, DOI 10.1002/met.1437
Siebeneck L., 2008, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V26, P91
Sparks P. R., 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P27, DOI 10.1061/(asce)1527-
6988(2003)4:1(27)
Tinsley CH, 2012, MANAGE SCI, V58, P1596, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1517
Vickery PJ, 2005, J APPL METEOROL, V44, P1807, DOI 10.1175/JAM2310.1
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2003.11.001
NR 39
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 1
U2 10
PI BOSTON
SN 1948-8327
EI 1948-8335
J9 WEATHER CLIM SOC
PD JAN
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 1
BP 217
EP 227
DI 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0019.1
PG 11
(SSCI)
GA HJ5YQ
UT WOS:000457260200001
OA Bronze
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ahmad, I
Wang, XQ
Waseem, M
Zaman, M
Aziz, F
Khan, RZN
Ashraf, M
AF Ahmad, Ijaz
Wang, Xiuquan
Waseem, Muhammad
Zaman, Muhammad
Aziz, Farhan
Khan, Rana Zain Nabi
Ashraf, Muhammad
TI Flood Management, Characterization and Vulnerability Analysis Using an
Integrated RS-GIS and 2D Hydrodynamic Modelling Approach: The Case of
Deg Nullah, Pakistan
SO REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE HEC-RAS 2D model; flood characterization; flood vulnerability; flood
hazard maps; Deg Nullah
ID HAZARD ASSESSMENT; FLASH-FLOOD; RIVER; RISK; SIMULATION; SAR; REDUCTION;
IMPACT; BREACH; ZONES
AB One-dimensional (1D) hydraulic models have been extensively used to conduct
flood simulations for investigating flood depth and extent maps. However, the 1D
models cannot simulate many other flood characteristics, such as flood velocity,
duration, arrival time and recession time when the flow is not restricted within
the channel. These flood characteristics cannot be disregarded as they play an
important role in developing flood mitigation and evacuation strategies. This study
formulates a two-dimensional (2D) hydrodynamic model combined with remote sensing
(RS) and geographic information system (GIS) approach to generate additional flood
characteristic maps that cannot be produced with 1D models. The model was applied
to a transboundary river of Deg Nullah in Pakistan to simulate an extreme flood
event experience in 2014. The flood extent images from the moderate resolution
imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) and observed flood extents were used to evaluate
the model performance. Moreover, an entropy distance-based approach was proposed to
facilitate the integrated multivariate flood vulnerability classification. The
simulated 2D flood modeling results showed a good agreement with the flood extents
registered by MODIS and the observed ones. The northwest parts of Deg Nullah near
Seowal, Dullam Kahalwan and Zafarwal were the most vulnerable areas due to high
flood depths and prolonged flooding duration. Whereas high flood velocities, short
flood arrival time, prolonged flood duration and recession times were observed in
the upper reach of Deg Nullah thereby making it the most susceptible, critical and
vulnerable region to flooding events.
C1 [Ahmad, Ijaz; Waseem, Muhammad; Khan, Rana Zain Nabi] Univ Engn & Technol, Ctr
Excellence Water Resources Engn, Lahore 54890, Pakistan.
[Wang, Xiuquan; Aziz, Farhan] Univ Prince Edward Isl, Sch Climate Change &
Adaptat, 550 Univ Ave, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
[Zaman, Muhammad] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Irrigat & Drainage, Faisalabad
38000, Pakistan.
[Ashraf, Muhammad] Khwaja Fareed Univ Engn & Informat Technol, Dept Agr Engn,
Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan.
[Ashraf, Muhammad] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res, Org Land & Water, Canberra, ACT
2601, Australia.
C3 University of Engineering & Technology Lahore; University of Prince
Edward Island; University of Agriculture Faisalabad; Khwaja Fareed
University of Engineering & Information Technology, Pakistan;
Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
RP Wang, XQ (corresponding author), Univ Prince Edward Isl, Sch Climate Change &
Adaptat, 550 Univ Ave, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
EM dr.ijaz@uet.edu.pk; xxwang@upei.ca; waseem.jatoi@cewre.edu.pk;
muhammad.zaman@uaf.edu.pk; faziz@upei.ca; znk@cewre.edu.pk;
dr.ashraf@kfueit.edu.pk
RI Ahmad, Ijaz/AAX-8015-2021; Aziz, Farhan/ADL-2988-2022; Waseem,
Muhammad/AAF-3658-2019; Zaman, Muhammad/ITT-3200-2023; Wang,
Xander/Q-9659-2018
OI Ahmad, Ijaz/0000-0002-7219-8533; Aziz, Farhan/0000-0002-4308-4414;
Waseem, Muhammad/0000-0001-7860-3037; Zaman,
Muhammad/0000-0003-1105-2343; Wang, Xander/0000-0002-3718-3416
FU Higher Education Commission of Pakistan [SRGP-1593]
FX This research was funded funded by the Higher Education Commission of
Pakistan (grant: SRGP-1593). The authors also thank the Punjab
Irrigation Department for providing the data required for this research
without any cost.
CR Ahmadisharaf E, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P2543, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-
0956-4
Al Amin MB, 2017, MATEC WEB CONF, V101, DOI 10.1051/matecconf/201710105023
Al Baky MA, 2020, EARTH SYST ENVIRON, V4, P225, DOI 10.1007/s41748-019-00141-w
Albu LM, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041090
Alivio MBT, 2019, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V5, P1, DOI 10.22034/gjesm.2019.01.01
Asare-Kyei D, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P3531, DOI 10.3390/w7073531
Awadallah MOM, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14010227
Balijepalli C, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V39, P145, DOI
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.06.025
Bathrellos GD, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V575, P119, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.025
Bhandari M., 2017, P WORLD ENV WATER RE, V292, P303
Bhandari S, 2018, WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2018: WATER,
WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER; URBAN WATERSHED MANAGEMENT; MUNICIPAL WATER
INFRASTRUCTURE; AND DESALINATION AND WATER REUSE, P52
Citeau J.M., 2003, P FIG WORKING WEEK 2
Coumou D, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P491, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1452
Dasallas L, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102048
Dewan TH, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.11.001
Di Baldassarre G, 2009, J HYDROL, V367, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.020
Elkhrachy I, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14030440
Faisal M., 2015, SCI INT, V27, P6459
Faisal M., 2015, ASSESSMENT FLOOD INU
FFC, 2011, ANN FLOOD REP 2010
FFC (Federal Flood Commission), 2017, ANN FLOOD REP 2017
Garcia M, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12082259
Gilles D, 2012, WATER-SUI, V4, P85, DOI 10.3390/w4010085
Gronewold N, IS FLOOD PAK CLIM CH
Hagen E, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P841, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9750-7
Hashmi H. N., 2012, African Journal of Agricultural Research, V7, P1054
Horritt MS, 2007, HYDROL PROCESS, V21, P2745, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6486
Horritt MS, 2002, J HYDROL, V268, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00121-X
Hussain MS, 2013, ASIA-PAC J ATMOS SCI, V49, P421, DOI 10.1007/s13143-013-0039-5
Jansen E., 2007, PHYS SCI BASIS CONTR
Kreibich H, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1679, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009
Liu Z, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12347
Ruiz-Bellet JL, 2015, J HYDROL, V524, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.023
Merz B, 2007, ADV NAT TECH HAZ RES, V25, P231
Mitchell J., 2002, P S DISASTER REDUCTI
Naeem B, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13050604
Nguyen MD, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P169, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9558-x
Ohlsson L, PAKISTAN IRIN SPECIA
Panagopoulos GP, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P1347, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-
9962-3
Papaioannou G, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112328
Pistrika A, 2014, ENVIRON PROCESS, V1, P553, DOI 10.1007/s40710-014-0038-2
Psomiadis E, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12233980
Sajjad A, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12040714
Salami RO, 2017, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V9, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v9i1.371
Santillan JR, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-4, P315, DOI 10.5194/isprs-
archives-XLII-4-W1-315-2016
Santillan JR, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V41, P1271, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-
XLI-B8-1271-2016
Saunders WSA, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P244, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.002
Schober B, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, pS33, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0880-y
Shustikova I, 2019, HYDROLOG SCI J, V64, P1769, DOI
10.1080/02626667.2019.1671982
Sidek LM, 2021, APPL SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/app11199300
Smith D.I., 1999, FLOODS PHYS PROCESSE
Su X, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13193924
Tahsin S, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9060527
Tariq MAUR, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10238752
Tayyab M, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13101864
Thakur B., 2017, P WORLD ENV WATER RE
Toosi AS, 2020, ECOL ENG, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105765
USACE-HEC, 2016, HEC RAS RIVER ANAL S
Yalcin E, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12499
Yang LP, 2011, INT J REMOTE SENS, V32, P3875, DOI 10.1080/01431161003786016
NR 65
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 6
U2 11
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2072-4292
J9 REMOTE SENS-BASEL
JI Remote Sens.
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 9
AR 2138
DI 10.3390/rs14092138
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Remote Sensing;
Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Remote Sensing; Imaging
Science & Photographic Technology
GA 1F9PE
UT WOS:000795490800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Dobbs, D
Skarha, J
Gordon, L
Jester, DJ
Peterson, LJ
Dosa, DM
AF Dobbs, Debra
Skarha, Julianne
Gordon, Lily
Jester, Dylan J.
Peterson, Lindsay J.
Dosa, David M.
TI Mortality among Nursing Home Residents Enrolled in Hospice and Hospice
Utilization Post-Hurricane Irma
SO JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
LA English
DT Article
DE disasters; hospice utilization; hurricane; mortality; nursing homes
ID EVACUATION
AB Background: Nursing home (NH) residents are vulnerable to increased mortality
after a natural disaster such as hurricanes but the specific vulnerability of NH
residents on hospice and the impact on admission to hospice are unknown.Objectives:
Exposure to Hurricane Irma (2017) was used to evaluate increased mortality among
Florida NH residents by hospice status compared with the same time period in a
nonhurricane year. Difference in hospice utilization rates poststorm for short- and
long-stay NH residents was also examined.Setting/Subjects: Subject were all Florida
NH residents of age 65 years and older utilizing fee-for-service Medicare claims
data exposed to Hurricane Irma in 2017 compared with a control group of residents
residing at the same NHs in 2015.Analysis: Mortality rates were calculated by
hospice status, rates of hospice enrollment, and the corresponding odds ratios
(ORs).Results: Hurricane exposure was associated with an increase in mortality 30
days poststorm (OR = 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.26) but not 90 days
poststorm (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.95-1.10) for residents on hospice. For the rate of
hospice enrollment poststorm among residents previously not on hospice, there was
an increase in odds of enrollment among long-stay residents in 30 days (OR = 1.15,
95% CI: 1.02-1.23) and 90 days (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20) but not short-stay
residents within 30 (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.91-1.15) and 90 days (OR = 1.07, 95% CI:
0.99-1.15).Conclusion: Mortality in NH residents on hospice care increased in the
aftermath of Hurricane Irma. In addition, NH residents not on hospice were more
likely to be referred to hospice in the 30 days after the storm.
C1 [Dobbs, Debra; Jester, Dylan J.; Peterson, Lindsay J.] Univ S Florida, Sch Aging
Studies, 4202 E Fowler Ave,MHC 1325, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Dobbs, Debra; Jester, Dylan J.; Peterson, Lindsay J.] Univ S Florida, Florida
Policy Exchange Ctr Aging, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
[Skarha, Julianne; Gordon, Lily; Dosa, David M.] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth,
Providence, RI 02912 USA.
[Dosa, David M.] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA.
[Dosa, David M.] Providence VAMC, Ctr Innovat Long Term Serv & Supports,
Providence, RI USA.
University System of Florida; University of South Florida; Brown
University; Brown University
RP Dobbs, D (corresponding author), Univ S Florida, Sch Aging Studies, 4202 E
Fowler Ave,MHC 1325, Tampa, FL 33620 USA.
EM ddobbs@usf.edu
OI Jester, Dylan/0000-0001-9878-9633
FU National Institutes of Aging [RO1 AG060581]
FX This study is funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Aging
(Grant No. RO1 AG060581).
CR Adams CE, 2009, HOME HLTH CARE MAN P, V21, P109, DOI 10.1177/1084822308323440
[Anonymous], 2018, NATL HOSPICE PALLIAT, P1
[Anonymous], 2017, FLORIDA HLTH FLORIDA
Arya A, 2020, CAN MED ASSOC J, V192, pE400, DOI 10.1503/cmaj.200465
Brown Lauren, 2012, Home Healthc Nurse, V30, pE1, DOI
10.1097/NHH.0b013e31825b11d5
Castle NG, 2011, RES AGING, V33, P661, DOI 10.1177/0164027511412197
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, INFL FLU FLU SEAS
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, STAT LOC READ LONG T
Dosa DM, 2020, JAMA NETW OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19460
Kates J, 2021, PUBLIC HEALTH NURS, V38, P459, DOI 10.1111/phn.12827
Lendon JP, 2019, VITAL HLTH STAT, V3, P1
Mayo Clinic, 2021, HOSP CAR COMF TERM I
MCDONNELL S, 1995, DISASTERS, V19, P338, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1995.tb00354.x
McGrady E, 2014, AM J HOSP PALLIAT ME, V31, P260, DOI 10.1177/1049909113481401
Miller SC, 2004, J AM GERIATR SOC, V52, P1284, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-
5415.2004.52357.x
Mupamombe C, 2021, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V61, P697
National Institute on Aging, 2017, WHAT ARE PALLIATIVE
National Weather Service, HURR IRM LOC REP SUM
O'Donnell M, 1993, Caring, V12, P18
Pop-Vicas A, 2015, J AM GERIATR SOC, V63, P1798, DOI 10.1111/jgs.13617
Saliba D., 2008, DEV VALIDATION REVIS, P1
Stys John C, 2010, Home Healthc Nurse, V28, P375, DOI
10.1097/NHH.0b013e3181df5ea8
Thomas KS, 2012, J AM GERIATR SOC, V60, P1895, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-
5415.2012.04146.x
Unroe KT, 2015, J GEN INTERN MED, V30, P193, DOI 10.1007/s11606-014-3080-x
Zheng NT, 2015, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V16, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.08.010
NR 28
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 1
PU MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
PI NEW ROCHELLE
PA 140 HUGUENOT STREET, 3RD FL, NEW ROCHELLE, NY 10801 USA
SN 1096-6218
EI 1557-7740
J9 J PALLIAT MED
JI J. Palliat. Med.
PD SEP 1
PY 2022
VL 25
IS 9
BP 1355
EP 1360
DI 10.1089/jpm.2021.0475
EA MAR 2022
PG 6
WC Health Care Sciences & Services
SC Health Care Sciences & Services
GA 6F8JX
UT WOS:000775803900001
PM 35325566
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Munawar, HS
Mojtahedi, M
Hammad, AWA
Ostwald, MJ
Waller, ST
AF Munawar, Hafiz Suliman
Mojtahedi, Mohammad
Hammad, Ahmed W. A.
Ostwald, Michael J.
Waller, S. Travis
TI An AI/ML-Based Strategy for Disaster Response and Evacuation of Victims
in Aged Care Facilities in the Hawkesbury-Nepean Valley: A Perspective
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE Hawkesbury-Nepean valley; flood event; early warning system; artificial
intelligence; image processing; machine learning
ID LAND USE/LAND COVER; FLOOD DISASTER; BIG DATA; MANAGEMENT; AREAS;
SYSTEM; IMPACT; MODEL; LIDAR; RISK
AB The Hawkesbury-Nepean Valley, Australia's longest coastal catchment, is spanned
by a river system of more than 470 km, that runs from Goulburn to Broken Bay,
covering a total area of over 2.2 million hectares. This region has remained prone
to flood events, with considerable mortalities, economic impacts and
infrastructural losses occurring quite regularly. The topography, naturally
variable climatic conditions and the 'bathtub' effect in the region are responsible
for the frequent flood events. In response, the Government at the national/federal,
state and local level has focused on the design of efficient flood risk management
strategies with appropriate evacuation plans for vulnerable communities from
hospitals, schools, childcare and aged care facilities during a flood event.
Despite these overarching plans, specialized response and evacuation plans for aged
care facilities are critical to reducing the loss incurred by flood events in the
region. This is the focus of this present paper, which reviews the history of flood
events and responses to them, before examining the utilization of artificial
intelligence (AI) techniques during flood events to overcome the flood risks. An
early flood warning system, based on AI/Machine Learning (ML) strategy is being
suggested for a timely decision, enhanced disaster prediction, assessment and
response necessary to overcome the flood risks associated with aged care facilities
within the Hawkesbury-Nepean region. A framework entailing AI/ML methods for
identifying the safest route to the destination using UAV and path planning has
been proposed for timely disaster response and evacuation of the residents of aged
care facilities.
C1 [Munawar, Hafiz Suliman; Mojtahedi, Mohammad; Hammad, Ahmed W. A.; Ostwald,
Michael J.] Univ New South Wales, Sch Built Environm, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
[Waller, S. Travis] Univ New South Wales, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sydney, NSW
2052, Australia.
C3 University of New South Wales Sydney; University of New South Wales
Sydney
RP Munawar, HS (corresponding author), Univ New South Wales, Sch Built Environm,
Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
EM h.munawar@unsw.edu.au; m.mojtahedi@unsw.edu.au; a.hammad@unsw.edu.au;
m.ostwald@unsw.edu.au; s.waller@unsw.edu.au
RI ; Ostwald, Michael/G-7356-2013
OI Mojtahedi, Mohammad/0000-0001-6942-0650; Hammad, Ahmed
WA/0000-0001-6190-0078; Ostwald, Michael/0000-0001-6210-6984; Munawar,
Hafiz Suliman/0000-0001-8492-0274
FU CDRI
FX The authors would like to acknowledge CDRI for the guidance and support
CR Abdelkader M, 2014, INT CONF UNMAN AIRCR, P64, DOI 10.1109/ICUAS.2014.6842239
Ahmad D, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03743-9
Akay SS, 2022, ENG SCI TECHNOL, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.jestch.2021.05.020
Albano R, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061834
Anbarasan M, 2020, COMPUT COMMUN, V150, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.022
Anusha N, 2020, EGYPT J REMOTE SENS, V23, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrs.2019.01.001
Arrowsmith J, 2013, NAT REV DRUG DISCOV, V12, P568, DOI 10.1038/nrd4090
Bahrawi J, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P795, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04190-7
Bakula K., 2018, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, VXLII-3/W4, P101, DOI [10.5194/isprs-
archives-XLII-3-W4-101-2018, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-3-W4]
10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.08.004
Bhadra T., MACHINE LEARNING IMA, V1240, P294
Pham BT, 2021, J HYDROL, V592, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125815
Cao C., 2021, ENV REMOTE SENSING F, P29, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-8202-8_3, DOI
10.1007/978-981-15-8202-8_3]
Casado MR, 2020, J WATER SUPPLY RES T, V69, P807, DOI 10.2166/aqua.2020.093
Chang DL, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12123552
Chang FJ, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061819
Chen W, 2019, J HYDROL, V575, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.089
Chen Y, 2021, EUR J REMOTE SENS, V54, P77, DOI 10.1080/22797254.2020.1758962
Dawson DA, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0205
Dhara S, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061543
Donratanapat N, 2020, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V133, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104828
Dos Reis AA, 2019, INT J REMOTE SENS, V40, P2683, DOI
10.1080/01431161.2018.1530808
Elhag M, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P3401, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04135-0
Elsafi SH, 2014, ALEX ENG J, V53, P655, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2014.06.010
Erdelj M, 2017, COMPUT NETW, V124, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2017.05.021
Esteban J, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11161944
Ezequiel CAF, 2014, INT CONF UNMAN AIRCR, P274, DOI 10.1109/ICUAS.2014.6842266
Fu GT, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061789
Gan J.L., 2019, P 11 NATL TECHNICAL, P299, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-5281-6_21,
DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-5281-6_21]
Gautam A., ARXIV200300826
Gimenez-Maranges M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120191
Guikema S, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1117, DOI 10.1111/risa.13476
Gupta K, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0211
Hakdaoui S, 2020, ADV SCI TECHNOL INN, P15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-24974-8_2
Handayani W, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9100343
Hildmann H, 2019, DRONES-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/drones3030059
Hong HY, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V625, P575, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.256
Hong HY, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V621, P1124, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114
Houston N., 2021, J STOMAL THER AUST, V41, P10, DOI [10.33235/jsta.41.2.10-16,
DOI 10.33235/JSTA.41.2.10-16]
Hussein K, 2020, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V11, P112, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2019.1707718
Iqbal U, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102030
Ishak EH, 2013, J HYDROL, V494, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.021
Jacinth Jennifer J., 2018, ISH J HYDRAULIC ENG, DOI
[10.1080/09715010.2020.1791265, DOI 10.1080/09715010.2020.1791265]
Jahangir MH, 2019, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100215
Juan A, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12604
Kagohashi K, 2019, ENRGY PROCED, V156, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.155
Kankanamge N, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101360
Karamuz E, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12622
Karunarathne AY, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V125, DOI [10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102274,
10.1016/j.apgeog.102274]
Khalilpourazari S, 2021, J COMB OPTIM, V41, P640, DOI 10.1007/s10878-021-00699-0
Khosravi K, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
Langhammer J, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V98, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.001
Li XC, 2016, SCI BULL, V61, P1460, DOI 10.1007/s11434-016-1167-y
Lioi B., 2020, P INT C COMPUTATIONA
Lutjens B., ARXIV201008103
Makker M., P 2019 4 INT C COMP, P1, DOI [10.1109/CSITSS47250.2019.9031042, DOI
10.1109/CSITSS47250.2019.9031042]
Masud S, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P1126, DOI
10.1080/09640568.2015.1056339
Matgen P, 2007, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V9, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2006.03.003
Maya Sintha E.O., 2020, SCH INT J LAW CRIME, V3, P458, DOI
[10.36348/sijlcj.2020.v03i12.006, DOI 10.36348/SIJLCJ.2020.V03I12.006]
Mel RA, 2020, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100702
Mirijovsky J, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P8586, DOI 10.3390/rs70708586
Mishra A, 2020, WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2020: WATER,
WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER AND WATER DESALINATION AND REUSE, P60
Mohammadi A, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/4271376
Mohan Pooja, 2020, International Journal of Information Technology, V12, P955,
DOI 10.1007/s41870-020-00468-y
Mohanty MP, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125523
Moles-Cases V., 2019, P 27 EUR SIGN PROC C, P1, DOI
[10.23919/EUSIPCO.2019.8903068, DOI 10.23919/EUSIPCO.2019.8903068]
Montasari Reza, 2021, DIGITAL FORENSIC INV, P47
Munawar HS, 2022, DRONES-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/drones6010005
Ofli F., 2020, AI ROBOTICS DISASTER, P63, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-4291-6_5
Ofli F, 2016, BIG DATA-US, V4, P47, DOI 10.1089/big.2014.0064
Oktari RS, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101881
Ortiz B., ARXIV200514212
Pan Z., 2015, T EDUTAINMENT, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-48247-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-
662-48247-6]
Panagoulia D, 2017, GLOBAL NEST J, V19, P49
Pouyanfar S, 2019, IEEE IMAGE PROC, P155, DOI 10.1109/ICIP.2019.8802923
Pradeep R.M.M., 2020, ARRAY, V8, P100037, DOI [10.1016/j.array.2020.100037, DOI
10.1016/J.ARRAY.2020.100037]
Puno GR, 2021, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V7, P225, DOI 10.22034/gjesm.2021.02.06
Razali N., 2020, IAES INT J ARTIFICIA, V9, P73, DOI DOI
10.11591/IJAI.V9.I1.PP73-80
Riza H., 2020, J SAINS TEKNOL MITIG, V15, P1, DOI [10.29122/jstmb.v15i1.4145,
DOI 10.29122/JSTMB.V15I1.4145]
Robins L, 2018, AUSTRALAS J ENV MAN, V25, P385, DOI
10.1080/14486563.2018.1487342
Ruslan F.A., P 2013 IEEE 4 CONTR, P116
Said Abdullah, 2020, Advances in Visual Computing. 15th International Symposium,
ISVC 2020. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS 12509), P696, DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-64556-4_54
Santato S., 2013, EUROPEAN FLOODS DIRE
Saravi S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050973
Schumann G, 2008, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V63, P283, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004
Sermet Y, 2019, EARTH SCI INFORM, V12, P541, DOI 10.1007/s12145-019-00398-9
Shah SA, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P54595, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913340
Shahabi H, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12020266
Sharples JJ, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V139, P85, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1811-1
Shi Y., P 24 GIS RES UK GISR
Simmons B, 2016, WATER SCI TECHNOL LI, V72, P539, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28112-
4_32
Singh G., 2021, HYDROLOGICAL EXTREME, P75, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-59148-9_5, DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-59148-9_5]
Smith K, 2020, GEOGR J, V186, P171, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12323
Steinfuhrer A, 2008, FLOOD RISK MANAGEMEN, P945
Stylianidis E, 2020, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V13, P854, DOI
10.1080/17538947.2019.1585975
Sun WJ, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2631, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3
Syifa M, 2019, J COASTAL RES, P197, DOI 10.2112/SI90-024.1
Tamminga AD, 2015, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V40, P1464, DOI 10.1002/esp.3728
Twumasi Y. A., 2020, Journal of Geographic Information System, V12, P141, DOI
10.4236/jgis.2020.122009
Ullah K, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0229153
Venturini F, 2021, IEEE T COGN COMMUN, V7, P955, DOI 10.1109/TCCN.2021.3063170
Vidal S., 2020, ADV HYDROINFORMATICS, P427, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-5436-0_34,
DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-5436-0_34]
Wagenaar D, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1149, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1149-
2020
NR 105
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 6
U2 17
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 1
AR 80
DI 10.3390/buildings12010080
PG 23
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
(SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA ZE0KL
UT WOS:000758581100001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ji, XH
Fu, SC
AF Ji, Xuehua
Fu, Shaochuan
TI Modeling Multi-Objective Optimization with Updating Information on
Humanitarian Response to Flood Disasters
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood disaster; road network; information updates; optimal scheduling;
emergency rescue
ID LOGISTICS NETWORK DESIGN; ROUTING PROBLEM; RELIEF; TIME; EVACUATION;
FACILITIES
AB Unpredictable natural disasters brought by extreme climate change compound
difficulties and cause a variety of systemic risks. It is thus critical to provide
possibilistic scheduling schemes that simultaneously involve emergency evacuation
and relief allocation. But the existing literature seldom takes emergency
evacuation and relief supplies as a joint consideration, nor do they explore the
impact of an unpredictable flood disaster on the scheduling scheme. A multi-stage
stochastic programming model with updating information is constructed in this
study, which considers the uncertainty of supply and demand, road network, and
multiple types of emergency reliefs and vehicles. In addition, a fuzzy algorithm
based on the objective weighting of two-dimensional Euclidean distance is
introduced, through moderating an effect analysis of the fuzzy number.
Computational results show that humanitarian equity for allocating medical supplies
in the fourth period under the medium and heavy flood is about 100%, which has the
same as the value of daily and medical supplies within the first and third period
in the heavy scenarios. Based on verifying the applicability and rationality of the
model and method, the result also presents that the severity of the flood and the
fairness of resources is not a simple cause-and-effect relationship, and the
consideration of survivor is not the only factor for humanitarian rescue with
multi-period. Specifically, paying more attention to a trade-off analysis between
the survival probability, the timeliness, and the fairness of humanitarian service
is essential. The work provides a reasonable scheme for updating information and
responding to sudden natural disasters flexibly and efficiently.
C1 [Ji, Xuehua; Fu, Shaochuan] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management,
C3 Beijing Jiaotong University
RP Ji, XH (corresponding author), Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management,
EM 20113037@bjtu.edu.cn
FU Social Science Foundation of Beijing [21JCB091]
FX This study was supported by the Social Science Foundation of Beijing
(21JCB091).
CR Ahmadi M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V75, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.008
Ajam M, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V277, P1098, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.024
Akbari V, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102854
Akbari V, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V257, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.043
Alem D, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V255, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.041
Annis A, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061717
Baskaya S, 2017, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V57, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2016.09.001
P63, DOI 10.1016/j.sorms.2016.11.001
Belfiore P, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V199, P750, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.003
Chanta S, 2014, ANN OPER RES, V221, P133, DOI 10.1007/s10479-011-0972-6
Duan YB, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11111921
Elci O, 2018, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V108, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2017.12.002
EM-DAT, INT DIS DAT
Ertem MA, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102828
Fiedrich F, 2000, SAFETY SCI, V35, P41, DOI 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00021-7
henan, US
Huang K, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V75, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.11.007
Iloglu S, 2018, OPER RES PERSPECT, V5, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.orp.2018.08.001
Li SL, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106506
Liebig T, 2017, INFORM SYST, V64, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.is.2016.01.007
Liu ZQ, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15040673
Duque PAM, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V248, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.026
Moreno A, 2020, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V141, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2020.09.002
Moreno A, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V275, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.004
Muzamil SAHB, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14074088
Peng M, 2014, COMPUT OPER RES, V42, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2013.03.003
Qiu BJ, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0139132
Rajakaruna S, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V24, P58, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.009
Renkli C, 2015, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V21, P1169, DOI
10.1080/10807039.2014.957940
Rennemo SJ, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V62, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2013.12.006
Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P1241, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-
1544-2
10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.007
Shao JF, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101343
Sharkey TC, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V244, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.051
Tofighi S, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V250, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.059
Vahdani B, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P290, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.015
Wang JY, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12071870
Wu ZN, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11174548
Xu GY, 2018, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V19, P1827, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2017.2740438
Yanez-Sandivari L, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101952
Yao S, 2023, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V37, P1315, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2023.2181351
Zhang B, 2018, APPL MATH COMPUT, V333, P506, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.071
Zhao X., 2021, SSRN ELECT J, V4, P3303
NR 45
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN 2
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 11
AR 2122
DI 10.3390/w15112122
PG 22
GA I7SW4
UT WOS:001004758000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Iroume, JYA
Onguene, R
Koffi, FD
Colmet-Daage, A
Stieglitz, T
Sone, WE
Bogning, S
Olinga, JMO
Ntchantcho, R
Ntonga, JC
Braun, JJ
Briquet, JP
Etame, J
AF Iroume, Junior Yves-Audrey
Onguene, Raphael
Koffi, Francis Djanna
Colmet-Daage, Antoine
Stieglitz, Thomas
Sone, Willy Essoh
Bogning, Sakaros
Olinga, Joseph Magloire Olinga
Ntchantcho, Romaric
Ntonga, Jean-Claude
Braun, Jean-Jacques
Briquet, Jean-Pierre
Etame, Jacques
TI The 21st August 2020 Flood in Douala (Cameroon): A Major Urban Flood
Investigated with 2D HEC-RAS Modeling
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood hazard assessment; HEC-RAS; hydraulic modeling; Tongo Bassa
watershed; urban floods
ID RIVER; VULNERABILITY; RAINFALL; GIS
AB A major flood event occurred on 21 August 2020 in the densely populated Makepe
Missoke neighborhood in the city of Douala (Cameroon, Africa). Nearly 2210
buildings and 12,376 victims spread over 82 hectares were affected. A 2D HEC-RAS
model is applied to simulate and characterize this event. A cross analysis of flood
depth and flow velocity is used to classify the flood risk and identify areas
exposed from low to high hazard. The simulations provide detailed information on
the flood characteristics (extent, depth, velocity, arrival time, and duration).
The simulated maximum water surface profiles are consistent with the floods marks
with differences ranging from 0.02 m to 0.44 m, indicating a good agreement between
the observed and simulated water levels at the peak flow (NSE = 0.94, Erel = 0.92,
RMSE = 0.21 m). The maximum inundation level is 4.48 m and the flow velocity is
globally low at less than 1 m/s. The average flood arrival time and duration are 5
h and 26 h, respectively, for a threshold height of 0.5 m. These results indicate a
fast mobilization of the major river channel for the evacuation of this flood. The
level of accuracy of the developed model of the 21 August 2020 flood event is
appropriate for flood hazard assessment in the city of Douala and is designed to
find operational application in future events.
C1 [Iroume, Junior Yves-Audrey; Onguene, Raphael; Koffi, Francis Djanna; Etame,
Jacques] Univ Douala, Univ Inst Technol, Technol & Appl Sci Lab, POB 8698, Douala,
Cameroon.
[Iroume, Junior Yves-Audrey; Bogning, Sakaros; Ntchantcho, Romaric; Ntonga,
Jean-Claude] Inst Geol & Min Res, Vogt St,POB 4110, Yaounde, Cameroon.
[Iroume, Junior Yves-Audrey; Onguene, Raphael; Bogning, Sakaros; Braun, Jean-
Jacques] Inst Rech Dev, Lab Mixte Int Dynam Ecosyst Continentaux Afrique, POB 1857,
Yaounde, Cameroon.
[Colmet-Daage, Antoine] Philia Ingn, 193 Ave Jean Rieux, F-31500 Toulouse,
France.
[Stieglitz, Thomas] Aix Marseille Univ, Coll France, CEREGE, CNRS,IRD,INRAE, F-
13100 Aix En Provence, France.
[Sone, Willy Essoh] Univ Douala, Inst Fisheries & Aquat Sci, Ecosyst & Fishery
Resources Lab, POB 2701, Douala, Cameroon.
[Olinga, Joseph Magloire Olinga] Douala Urban Council DUC, POB 1857, Douala,
Cameroon.
[Braun, Jean-Jacques] Univ Toulouse, CNRS, Geosci & Environm, IRD, 14 Ave
Edouard Berlin, F-31400 Toulouse, France.
[Briquet, Jean-Pierre] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, HydroSci Montpellier, IRD, 300 Av
Pr E Jeanbrau, F-34090 Montpellier, France.
C3 Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD); Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); INRAE; Institut de Recherche pour le
Developpement (IRD); UDICE-French Research Universities; Aix-Marseille
Universite; Universite PSL; College de France; Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Institut de Recherche pour le
Developpement (IRD); Universite de Toulouse; Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Institut de Recherche pour le
Developpement (IRD); Universite de Montpellier
RP Iroume, JYA (corresponding author), Univ Douala, Univ Inst Technol, Technol &
Appl Sci Lab, POB 8698, Douala, Cameroon.; Iroume, JYA (corresponding author), Inst
Geol & Min Res, Vogt St,POB 4110, Yaounde, Cameroon.; Iroume, JYA (corresponding
author), Inst Rech Dev, Lab Mixte Int Dynam Ecosyst Continentaux Afrique, POB 1857,
Yaounde, Cameroon.
EM iroumejunior21@outlook.fr; ziongra@yahoo.fr; djannaj@gmail.com;
antoine.colmet-daage@philia-ingenierie.fr; stieglitz@cerege.fr;
pharellwilly2@yahoo.fr; sakarosb@gmail.com; joseph_olinga87@yahoo.fr;
ntchantcho@yahoo.fr; ntonga_jc@yahoo.fr; jbraun1@gmail.com;
jean-pierre.bricquet@ird.fr; etame.jacques@yahoo.fr
RI IROUME, Junior/GPX-2434-2022; Bogning, Sakaros/HCI-0307-2022; BRAUN,
Jean-Jacques/ABI-7098-2020
OI BRAUN, Jean-Jacques/0000-0003-2979-6164; IROUME, JUNIOR YVES -
AUDREY/0000-0003-0561-8478; Stieglitz, Thomas/0000-0002-2946-391X;
Bogning Dongue, Sakaros/0000-0002-9697-6133
FU Interdisciplinary Research Program on Climate and Urban Environment
(PRInCE) [CCM 1362.01K]; French Global Environment Facility (FGEF);
French Development Agency (FDA); Douala City Council (DCC); French
Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD); Laboratory of
Technology and Applied Science, University Institute of Technology of
the University of Douala; ANR @RAction chair of excellence medLOC
[ANR-14-ACHN-0007-01-T]; Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
[ANR-14-ACHN-0007] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche
(ANR)
FX This work was carried out with the scientific, technical, and financial
support of the Interdisciplinary Research Program on Climate and Urban
Environment (PRInCE), within the framework of the AFD Convention CCM
1362.01K of the project "Douala, Sustainable City: Sustainable
development and valorization of the Makepe Missoke site", co-funded by
the French Global Environment Facility (FGEF), the French Development
Agency (FDA), and the Douala City Council (DCC). The PRInCE was
conducted under the scientific auspices of the French Research Institute
for Sustainable Development (IRD) and the Laboratory of Technology and
Applied Science, University Institute of Technology of the University of
Douala. However, the DCC, FGEF, and the FDA do not intend to give any
approval or disapproval to the opinions expressed in this paper; these
must be considered as specific to the authors. Additional funding for
equipment (DGPS) was provided by the ANR @RAction chair of excellence
medLOC (ANR-14-ACHN-0007-01-T. Stieglitz).
CR Akoachere JFTK, 2014, BMC INFECT DIS, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-421
[Anonymous], IS NEW ORLEANS SAFER
[Anonymous], 2015, OPEN J MAR SCI, DOI DOI 10.4236/ojms.2015.51008
Arseni M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12166588
Assako R.J.A., 2008, GABONICA, V2, P5
Bang H, 2019, FORESIGHT, V21, P266, DOI 10.1108/FS-06-2018-0068
Bang HN, 2013, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V5, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v5i2.77
Bang HN, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P562, DOI 10.1111/disa.12061
Ben Khalfallah C, 2018, J AFR EARTH SCI, V142, P44, DOI
10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.03.004
Blade E, 2014, REV INT METOD NUMER, V30, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rimni.2012.07.004
Bogning S., 2021, RALISATION DUN MODLE
Bruckmann L, 2019, PHYSIO-GEO, V13, P91, DOI 10.4000/physio-geo.8038
Chen YH, 2020, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V354, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107035
Chomba IC, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8010044
Chow V. T., 1959, MCGRAW HILL CIVIL EN
Coeur D, 2000, HOUILLE BLANCHE, P79, DOI 10.1051/lhb/2000020
CUD, 2012, PLAN DIR URB DOUAL H
Mai DT, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9110879
Di Baldassarre G, 2009, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V13, P913, DOI 10.5194/hess-13-
913-2009
Diaconu DC, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13040474
Dimitriadis P, 2016, J HYDROL, V534, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020
Din N, 2017, COAST RES LIBR, V21, P81, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56179-0_3
Djuikom E, 2009, INT J BIOL CHEM SCI, V3, P967, DOI 10.4314/ijbcs.v3i5.51076
Dysarz T, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9030168
Farr TG, 2007, REV GEOPHYS, V45, DOI 10.1029/2005RG000183
Fernandez A, 2016, J HYDROL, V539, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.026
Fogwe Z.N., 2007, P ACTES JOURN ES SCI, P6
Fogwe Zephania Nji, 2010, Journal of Human Ecology, V30, P187
Fonteh M., 2009, COASTLINE REP, V13, P47
Fute E, 2019, THESIS U BUEA BUEA, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.15435.34083, DOI
10.13140/RG.2.2.15435.34083]
Hutanu E, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061624
Jamali B, 2020, WATER RES, V171, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115372
Ketchemen-Tandia B., 2017, J GEOSCI ENV PROT, V5, P99, DOI DOI
10.4236/GEP.2017.58010
Knebl MR, 2005, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V75, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.024
Knutson TR, 2010, NAT GEOSCI, V3, P157, DOI 10.1038/NGEO779
Legates DR, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P233, DOI 10.1029/1998WR900018
Manfreda S, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P735, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1869-5
Mann M.E., 2006, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V87, P233, DOI [DOI 10.1029/2006EO240001,
10.1029/2006EO240001]
Mbaha J.P., 2013, ACTES C CINQUANTENAI, P13
Mbaha J.P., 2020, ESPACE G OGR SOC MAR, V33-34, P215, DOI
[10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/EGSM/20419, DOI 10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/EGSM/20419]
Metzger A., 2018, D V DURABLE TERRIT C, V9, P28, DOI
[10.4000/developpementdurable.12937, DOI 10.4000/DEVELOPPEMENTDURABLE.12937]
Meva'a Abomo D., 2015, ANN RECH URB, V110, P164, DOI [10.3406/aru.2015.3177, DOI
10.3406/ARU.2015.3177]
Mevaa A.D., 2010, P C SUSTAINABLE TECH, P1
Mihu-Pintilie A, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11091832
Munji CA, 2014, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V140, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.017
Munji CA, 2013, ENVIRON DEV, V5, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2012.10.002
Naeem B, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13050604
Napi Wouapi H., 2018, FRAMEWORK MUNICIPAL
Nasiri V, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14091977
Ndille R, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V5, P147, DOI 10.1007/s13753-014-0019-0
Ndo C, 2011, PARASITE VECTOR, V4, DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-4-181
Ndongo B., 2015, AFR SCI REV INT SCI, V11, P173, DOI [10.4314/afsci, DOI
10.4314/AFSCI]
Nematchoua MK, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100486
Ngoran SD, 2015, J URBAN MANAG, V4, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2015.05.001
Nguh B.S, 2018, MOD CONCEPTS DEV AGR, V2, P155, DOI
[10.31031/MCDA.2018.02.000538, DOI 10.31031/MCDA.2018.02.000538]
Niba M.L.F., 2021, OALIB, V8, pe7427, DOI [10.4236/oalib.1107427, DOI
10.4236/OALIB.1107427]
Njueya A. K., 2012, International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences,
V6, P1874
Nkot S., 2015, RES J ENV EARTH SCI, V7, P29, DOI 10.19026/rjees.7.5267
Nkwunonwo UC, 2020, SCI AFR, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00269
Nojang EN, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P333, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00258-x
Sharma TPP, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10040247
Patel DP, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2956-6
Psomiadis E, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13030364
Rangari Vinay Ashok, 2019, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India):
Series A (Civil, Architectural, Environmental and Agricultural Engineering), V100,
P49, DOI 10.1007/s40030-018-0345-0
Reistad S.K., 2007, J KOREA WATER RESOUR, V3, P20
Saha F., 2018, NAT SCI SOC, V26, P418, DOI [10.1051/nss/2019003, DOI
10.1051/NSS/2019003]
Schneider V.R., 1989, 2339 US GEOL SURV
Spada E., 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, P288, DOI [10.3390/w9040288, DOI
10.3390/W9040288]
Tanessong RS, 2017, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V3, P924, DOI 10.1007/s40808-017-0343-
7
Tarar ZR, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081716
Tchiadeu G., 2012, CLIMATS REGIONAUX OB, P727
Tchindjang M, 2019, AFRIQUE ATLANTIQUE A, P30
The Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience, 2017, MAN FLOODPL GUID BES
Tsalefac M., 2003, PUBLICATION LASSOCIA, V15, P359
URBAT Ghardaia, 2011, RAPPORT PLAN PERMANA
Urzica A, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13010057
Vedeld T., 2015, URBAN VULNERABILITY, P287, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03982-4_9
Wambo E.M.N., 2008, VISAGES D FIS PRINCI, V7
Yalcin E, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V101, P995, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03906-z
Yan K, 2013, J HYDROINFORM, V15, P849, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2013.137
Yengoh GT, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P204, DOI
10.1080/09640568.2016.1149048
Zeiger SJ, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112125
Zelenakova M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.008
Zhang Y, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P967, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04345-6
Zogning M.M.O., 2012, P UN INT C SPACE BAS
NR 87
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 12
U2 18
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 11
AR 1768
DI 10.3390/w14111768
PG 19
GA 2A9ZW
UT WOS:000809855700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kim, HI
Han, KY
AF Kim, Hyun Il
Han, Kun Yeun
TI Linking Hydraulic Modeling with a Machine Learning Approach for Extreme
Flood Prediction and Response
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE extreme flooding; DAMBRK; random forest; flood prediction; flood risk
estimation
ID DAM
AB An emergency action plan (EAP) for reservoirs and urban areas downstream of dams
can alleviate damage caused by extreme flooding. An EAP is a disaster action plan
that can designate evacuation paths for vulnerable districts. Generally,
calculation of dam-break discharge in accordance with dam inflow conditions,
calculation of maximum water surface elevation as per hydraulic channel routing,
and flood map generation using topographical data are prepared for the purposes of
creating an EAP. However, rainfall and flood patterns exhibited in the context of
climate change can be extremely diverse. In order to prepare an efficient flood
response, techniques should be considered that are capable of generating flood maps
promptly while taking dam inflow conditions into account. Therefore, this study
aims to propose methodology that is capable of generating flood maps rapidly for
any dam inflow conditions. The proposed methodology was performed by linking a
dynamic numerical analysis model (DAMBRK) with a random forest regression
technique. The previous standard method of drawing flood maps often requires a
significant amount of time depending on accuracy and personnel availability;
however, the technique proposed here is capable of generating a flood map within
one minute. Through use of this methodology, the time taken to prepare flood maps
in large-scale water-disaster situations can be reduced. Moreover, methodology for
estimating flood risk via use of flood mapping has been proposed. This study would
provide assistance in establishing disaster countermeasures that take various flood
scenarios into account by promptly providing flood inundation information to
disaster-related agencies.
C1 [Kim, Hyun Il] Korea Inst Civil Engn & Bldg Technol, 283 Goyangdae Ro, Goyang
10223, South Korea.
[Han, Kun Yeun] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 80 Daehak Ro, Daegu 41566,
South Korea.
C3 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering & Building Technology (KICT);
Kyungpook National University
RP Han, KY (corresponding author), Kyungpook Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 80 Daehak
Ro, Daegu 41566, South Korea.
EM hyunn228@gmail.com; kshanj@knu.ac.kr
FU Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) though the
Water Management Research Program - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)
[79609]
FX This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology
Institute (KEITI) though the Water Management Research Program, funded
by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (79609).
CR Alvarez M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060432
[Anonymous], 1988, NWS DAMBRK MODEL THE
Bruijn K.M., 2019, WATER, V11, P517, DOI [10.3390/w11030517, DOI
10.3390/W11030517]
Cho JeaWoong, 2018, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, V51, P1, DOI
10.3741/JKWRA.2018.51.1.1
Choi Changhyun, 2017, [Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation,
한국방재학회논문집], V17, P443, DOI 10.9798/KOSHAM.2017.17.6.443
Coles D, 2017, J HYDROL, V546, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.013
Dang C, 2012, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V594-597, P2262, DOI
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.594-597.2262
Feng QL, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P1437, DOI 10.3390/w7041437
Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co. Ltd, 2016, REP PALD DAM EM ACT
Lodhi MS, 2012, J MT SCI-ENGL, V9, P214, DOI 10.1007/s11629-012-2148-5
Mao J, 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6060162
Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT), 2020, HAN RIV BAS PLAN
Munoz P, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111519
National Territory Information Platform (NTIP), 2020, GEOGR DAT
Sachdeva S., 2017, 8 INT C COMPUTING CO, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICCCNT.2017.8204182
Tyralis H, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050910
김병현, 2011, [Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation,
한국방재학회논문집], V11, P227
Zhou JZ, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050628
NR 19
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 4
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 11
IS 9
AR 987
DI 10.3390/atmos11090987
PG 15
GA OI5UJ
UT WOS:000583342900001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Cheong, SM
Babcock, M
AF Cheong, So-Min
Babcock, Matthew
TI Attention to misleading and contentious tweets in the case of Hurricane
Harvey
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Social Media; Disaster management; Hurricane Harvey; Misinformation
ID NEWS
AB The spread of false and misleading information through online social media is an
elevated concern in emergency contexts such as natural disasters, where the on-the
ground decision-making window is shorter, and the stakes can be particularly high.
Misinformation that gets attention and is drawn out longer during and after such
disasters potentially puts the affected population at additional risk. This
research focuses on popular but ambiguous and contentious narratives transmitted
via Twitter during Hurricane Harvey. Two most talked about contentious narratives
consisted of (1) government agencies putting undocumented immigrants at risk and
(2) decisions about evacuation. They depict the process of debunking, competing
narratives, and political ideology that have kept the stories alive. Our findings
suggest the following: that government and reporters play important roles in
stemming the spread of contentious or false information; ambiguous and contentious
narratives remain in the conversation longer, specific debunking works faster and
reaches a larger audience than general or confused debunking; and the lack of
coordination of messaging online and on the ground as well as among different
government agencies may threaten the timely and accurate delivery of disaster
responses.
C1 [Cheong, So-Min] Univ Kansas, Dept Geog & Atmospher Sci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.
[Babcock, Matthew] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Inst Software Res, 5000 Forbes Ave,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
C3 University of Kansas; Carnegie Mellon University
RP Cheong, SM (corresponding author), Univ Kansas, Dept Geog & Atmospher Sci,
Lawrence, KS 66045 USA.
EM somin@ku.edu; mbabcock@andrew.cmu.edu
CR Alam F, 2018, ARXIV180505144CS
Andrews C, 2016, ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND
SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW 2016), P452, DOI 10.1145/2818048.2819986
[Anonymous], 2017, HURR HARV PREP
[Anonymous], 2009, INTRO INFORM RETRIEV
[Anonymous], 2018, NOAA TECHNICAL MEMOR, V6
Arif A, 2016, ACM CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL
COMPUTING (CSCW 2016), P466, DOI 10.1145/2818048.2819964
Babcock M, 2019, ACM J DATA INF QUAL, V11, DOI 10.1145/3339468
Bovet A, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
Chen RJ, 2013, P ANN HICSS, P2033, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2013.447
Chen SJ, 2020, TELEMAT INFORM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101326
CNN, 2017, CNN
Conroy N., 2016, P ASS INF SCI TECHN, V52, P1
Dailey D, 2014, ISCRAM
Darr JP, 2019, SOC SCI QUART, V100, P2581, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12633
Ghenai A, 2017, ARXIV170703778CS
Grinberg N, 2019, SCIENCE, V363, P374, DOI 10.1126/science.aau2706
Guess A, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
Huang B., 2020, DISINFORMATION MISIN
Hughes AL, 2014, 32ND ANNUAL ACM CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING
SYSTEMS (CHI 2014), P1505, DOI 10.1145/2556288.2557227
Hunt K, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P861, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04016-6
Lazer DMJ, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P1094, DOI 10.1126/science.aao2998
Liu WL, 2018, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V44, P807, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.009
Liu Xiaomo, 2015, P 24 ACM INT C INFOR, P1867, DOI DOI 10.1145/2806416.2806651
Mosinzova V., 2019, CONSPIRACIES MYTH DE, P1
Mourao RR, 2019, JOURNALISM STUD, V20, P2077, DOI 10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871
Mumtaz S, 2017, J PHYS D APPL PHYS, V50, DOI 10.1088/1361-6463/aa5bf6
*NOAA, 2019, BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
Shin J, 2018, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V83, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008
Sobel RS, 2006, PUBLIC CHOICE, V127, P55, DOI 10.1007/s11127-006-7730-3
Starbird K, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN
COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), DOI 10.1145/3173574.3173679
Vosoughi S, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P1146, DOI 10.1126/science.aap9559
Zannettou S, 2019, ACM J DATA INF QUAL, V11, DOI 10.1145/3309699
Zeng L, 2016, P ANN HICSS, P1969, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2016.248
Zubiaga A, 2014, SOC NETW ANAL MIN, V4, DOI 10.1007/s13278-014-0163-y
NR 34
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 15
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 105
IS 3
BP 2883
EP 2906
DI 10.1007/s11069-020-04430-w
EA NOV 2020
PG 24
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA QB5XF
UT WOS:000592542000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Jiang, SH
Zhi, HL
Wang, ZZ
Zhang, S
AF Jiang, Shui-Hua
Zhi, Huan-Le
Wang, Ze Zhou
Zhang, Shuai
TI Enhancing Flood Risk Assessment and Mitigation through Numerical
Modeling: A Case Study
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood detention basin; Dike breach; Flood routing simulation; Inundation
pattern; Risk assessment; Mitigation measure
ID DETENTION BASIN; DIKE; DAM
AB Evaluation of dike-break-induced flood risk has been a worldwide concern due to
its enormous economic, environmental, and societal importance. The mitigation of
flood risk in detention basins is a complex decision making process that could span
multiple engineering and scientific disciplines. In this paper, an integrated dike-
break-induced flood modeling, analysis, and management framework is proposed. The
MIKE21-based numerical approach is first adopted to model the flood routing process
in detention basins. With the physical behavior of the flood well understood,
physics-informed approaches are proposed to better quantify the dike-break-induced
flood risks, e.g., human life, economic and environmental losses, offering valuable
information for engineers and policymakers to formulate targeted contingency plans.
The Zhuhu detention basin in the Poyang Lake district in China is investigated
using the proposed framework. The flood movement in the detention basin is first
numerically simulated using the MIKE21-based model. Based on the results, i.e.,
inundation area, water depth, flow velocity, and arrival time of flood peak, the
detention basin is divided into several flood disaster zones. The induced flood
risks are then estimated for the different zones. Customized emergency evacuation
plans are also formulated for the different flood disaster zones. The study of the
Zhuhu detention basin confirms that the proposed framework effectively fuses
numerical modeling, physics-informed analysis, and management of flood events,
providing an integrated and enhanced decision making process for flood warning and
risk mitigation in flood detention basins or at other places.
C1 [Jiang, Shui-Hua] Nanchang Univ, Sch Infrastructure Engn, 999Xueu Rd, Nanchang
[Zhi, Huan-Le] China Railway Water Conservancy & Hydropower Plann, 1038 East
Beijing Rd, Nanchang 330029, Peoples R China.
[Wang, Ze Zhou] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Block E1A, 07-
03, 1 Engn Dr 2, Singapore 117576, Singapore.
[Zhang, Shuai] Zhejiang Univ, MOE Key Lab Soft Soils & Geoenvironm Engn, 866
Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanchang University; National University of Singapore; Zhejiang
University
RP Wang, ZZ (corresponding author), Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm
Engn, Block E1A, 07-03, 1 Engn Dr 2, Singapore 117576, Singapore.
EM sjiangaa@ncu.edu.cn; 1944714039@qq.com; wangzz@u.nus.edu;
zhangshuaiqj@zju.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Shuai/G-5629-2017
OI Zhang, Shuai/0000-0002-9003-2879; WANG, Ze-Zhou/0000-0002-9907-0193
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41867036, 41972280,
52179103, 52222905, 42272326]; Open Research Fund of Jiangxi Academy of
Water Science and Engineering [2021SKSG02]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (Project Nos. 41867036, 41972280, 52179103, 52222905, 42272326)
and Open Research Fund of Jiangxi Academy of Water Science and
Engineering (Project No. 2021SKSG02). The financial supports are
gratefully acknowledged.
CR Blade E, 2012, ADV WATER RESOUR, V42, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.021
BROWN CA, 1988, WATER RESOUR BULL, V24, P1303
Danka J, 2015, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-
5606.0001335
DHI (Danish Hydraulic Institute), 2007, MIKE21 MOD SYST RIV
Fahad MGR, 2022, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V221, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108388
Fahad MGR, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P1123, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02490-y
Fahad MGR, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.024
Graham W.J., 1999, DSO9906 US BUR RECL
Guo F., 2016, RES APPL RISK ANAL A, P1
Guo Fengging, 2013, Water Resources and Power, V31, P34
HANEMANN M, 1991, AM J AGR ECON, V73, P1255, DOI 10.2307/1242453
Islam F, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P353, DOI 10.5194/nhess-19-353-2019
Ji W, 2017, POYANG LAKE TOPOGRAP
Khalafzai MAK, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102443
Kristrom B, 1997, AM J AGR ECON, V79, P1013, DOI 10.2307/1244440
Li D.X., 2011, THESIS HUAZHONG U SC
Li L., 2006, ADV SCI TECHNOL WATE, V26, P76
Liu Q, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1303, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1373-3
Motamedi MH, 2018, ENG STRUCT, V172, P700, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.050
Nazari R, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000531
Pathan AI, 2021, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V7, P1133, DOI 10.1007/s40808-020-00961-0
Piers M, 1998, TECH RISK S, V12, P166
Qiang Z, 2019, WATER SUPPLY, V19, P1619, DOI 10.2166/ws.2019.034
Roger S, 2009, J HYDRAUL RES, V47, P349, DOI 10.3826/jhr.2009.3472
Shi G., 1998, J CATASTROPHOLOGY, V13, P28
Shui-Hua Jiang, 2020, Dam Breach Modelling and Risk Disposal. Proceedings of the
First International Conference on Embankment Dams (ICED 2020). Springer Series in
Geomechanics and Geoengineering (SSGG), P295, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-46351-9_31
Sidek LM, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su131810259
Song JaiWoo, 2004, [Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers B,
[宋敬衖 SONG Jingxiang], 2008, [河海大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of Hohai
University. Natural Sciences], V36, P628
Suk-Hwan Jang, 2012, 2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics
(ICSAI 2012), P167, DOI 10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223369
Vorogushyn S, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1383, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1383-
2009
Vorogushyn S, 2012, J HYDROL, V436, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.006
Zhang SR, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P717, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1207-3
Zhang W, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P1283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2134-7
Zhang X., 2018, PEOPLES YANGTZE RIVE, V49, P21
Zhou K.F., 2006, THESIS NANJING HYDRA
[朱世云 Zhu Shiyun], 2018, [水资源与水工程学报, Journal of Water Resources and Water
Engineering], V29, P132
Zolghadr M., 2010, Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources
Congress 2010, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 16-20 May, 2010, P2683
Zolghadr M, 2011, IJST-T CIV ENG, V35, P247
NR 39
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 20
U2 24
PI RESTON
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
PD FEB 1
PY 2023
VL 24
IS 1
AR 04022046
PG 18
(SSCI)
GA 7B7VG
UT WOS:000899336200017
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Mirzaei-Zohan, SA
Gheibi, M
Chahkandi, B
Mousavi, S
Khaksar, RY
Behzadian, K
AF Mirzaei-Zohan, Seyed Ali
Gheibi, Mohammad
Chahkandi, Benyamin
Mousavi, SeyedehNiloufar
Khaksar, Reza Yeganeh
Behzadian, Kourosh
TI A new integrated agent-based framework for designing building emergency
evacuation: A BIM approach
LA English
DT Article
DE Agent-based modeling; Building information models; Decision tree;
Emergency evacuation; System safety
AB Today, safety control is considered one of the most important pillars of
building construction processes due to maintaining security in major incidents such
as fire, earthquake, and flood, and placing a basis of mutual trust between
builders and residents for building design and con-struction. The evacuation
process is a key aspect of safety control in case of an emergency such as a fire.
This study develops a new integrated agent-based framework for designing building
emergency evacuation by using Building Information Model (BIM). Three main steps of
the framework include data collection, building model development, and evacuation
simulation with a combination of Revit-MassMotion. The methodology is demonstrated
through its application to a real case of a multi-story commercial building located
in Iran. The building model is simulated through three scenarios with a different
number of floors (i.e., one, two, and three floors). In each scenario, the safety
of evacuation is evaluated for three designs of stairs in the building. The results
show the best performance of the building evacuation in all scenarios can be
achieved when two individual stairs are designed for each floor. Other influential
factors including the maximum density, vision time, and agent count are more
acceptable compared to other design factors. These parameters can also be used to
design a control system by using smart conceptual models based on both decision
tree and auto-work break structure methods.
C1 [Mirzaei-Zohan, Seyed Ali; Khaksar, Reza Yeganeh] Sadjad Univ Technol, Dept
Civil Engn, Mashhad, Iran.
[Gheibi, Mohammad] Assoc Talent Liberty Technol TULTECH, EE-10615 Tallinn,
Estonia.
[Gheibi, Mohammad] Tech Univ Liberec, Inst Nanomat Adv Technol & Innovat,
Studentsk 1402-2, Liberec 46117, Czech Republic.
[Chahkandi, Benyamin] Univ Tehran, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran.
[Mousavi, SeyedehNiloufar] Tecnol Monterrey, Escuela Ingn & Ciencias, Ave
Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, NL, Mexico.
[Behzadian, Kourosh] Univ West London, Sch Comp & Engn, London W5 5RF, England.
[Behzadian, Kourosh] UCL, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, Gower St, London
WC1E 6BT, England.
C3 Technical University Liberec; University of Tehran; Tecnologico de
Monterrey; University of London; University College London
RP Khaksar, RY (corresponding author), Sadjad Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn,
Mashhad, Iran.; Behzadian, K (corresponding author), UCL, Dept Civil Environm &
Geomat Engn, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England.
EM alimirzaee1995@gmail.com; mohamadgheibi@ymail.com; beniaminch@gmail.com;
a00829487@exatec.tec.mx; rezayeganeh@sadjad.ac.ir;
kourosh.behzadian@uwl.ac.uk
RI Behzadian, Kourosh/IVU-6500-2023; Behzadian, Kourosh/GXW-2721-2022
OI Behzadian, Kourosh/0000-0002-1459-8408; Gheibi,
Mohammad/0000-0003-1987-5790
CR Abir IM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103083
Adjei E., 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE
Alam MJ, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103164
Aleksandrov M, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11100445
Aleksandrov M, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V115, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.017
Anvari B., 2017, ACCURATE MICROSCOPIC
Barten D.G., 2022, INT J DISASTER RISK
Bohannon J, 2005, SCIENCE, V310, P219, DOI 10.1126/science.310.5746.219
Cao SC, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103203
Chethan R, 2022, MATER TODAY-PROC, V52, P1537, DOI 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.231
Elliott D., 1993, IND ENV CRISIS Q, V7, P205
Eom S, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103159
Gao DL, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102904
Ghafoori H.R., 2022, INT J DISASTER RISK
Gonzalez-Mendez M, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V101, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105110
Guo K, 2022, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104010
Haghani M, 2023, TRANSP LETT, DOI 10.1080/19427867.2022.2160294
Haghani M, 2022, SCIENCE, V378, P1060, DOI 10.1126/science.adf5949
Haghani M, 2021, PHYSICA A, V580, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126145
Hassanpour S, 2022, ADV ENG INFORM, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101531
Lee CS, 2022, ADV DECISION SCI, V26, P1
Li J, 2020, KSCE J CIV ENG, V24, P1330, DOI 10.1007/s12205-020-1374-6
Li JC, 2022, BUILD SIMUL-CHINA, V15, P669, DOI 10.1007/s12273-021-0858-8
Lovreglio R, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2110.11577
Lovreglio R, 2022, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104452
Makinoshima F, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102810
Marzouk M, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V109, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.023
Miao G., 2011, BUILDING PRELIMINARY
Mousavi S, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113111
Ren XX, 2022, PHYSICA A, V604, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127833
Song YQ, 2022, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V31, P452, DOI 10.1177/1420326X21997547
Wang ZQ, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P2045, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04389-8
Xiao M., 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, P1
Xie Xinyu, 2022, 2022 4th International Conference on Frontiers Technology of
Information and Computer (ICFTIC), P604, DOI 10.1109/ICFTIC57696.2022.10075305
Xiong Q, 2017, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6040104
Zarnke M., 2015, MASSMOTION FLOW USER
NR 36
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 6
U2 6
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 93
AR 103753
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103753
EA MAY 2023
PG 19
Water Resources
GA K0AL3
UT WOS:001013159900001
OA hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Sritart, H
Miyazaki, H
Kanbara, S
Hara, T
AF Sritart, Hiranya
Miyazaki, Hiroyuki
Kanbara, Sakiko
Hara, Takashi
TI Methodology and Application of Spatial Vulnerability Assessment for
Evacuation Shelters in Disaster Planning
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE evacuation shelters; spatial distribution; spatial accessibility; GIS;
vulnerability assessment; shelter demand and resources; disaster risk
reduction
ID URBAN EMERGENCY SHELTERS; ODA RIVER; POPULATION; ACCESSIBILITY; DESIGN;
JAPAN
AB Evacuation shelters are the most important means for safeguarding people in
hazardous areas and situations, and thus minimizing losses, particularly those due
to a disaster. Therefore, evacuation shelter assignment and evacuation planning are
some of the critical factors for reducing vulnerability and increasing resilience
in disaster risk reduction. However, an imbalance of shelter distribution and
spatial heterogeneity of a population are the critical issues limiting the
accessibility of evacuation shelters in real situations. In this study, we propose
a methodology for spatial assessment to reduce vulnerability and evaluate the
spatial distribution of both shelter demand and resources, considering spatial
accessibility. The method was applied to the case study of Mabi, in the context of
a disaster caused by the 2018 flooding. We applied this approach to evaluate the
area and identified the vulnerability of the evacuation shelters and the residents.
The proposed method revealed that 54.55% of the designated evacuation shelters and
59% of the total population were physically vulnerable to the flood. The results
highlight, using GIS maps, that the total shelter capacity was significantly
decreased to 43.86%. The outcome assessment addressed specific vulnerable shelters
and the imbalance between the demand for and resources of each shelter.
Accordingly, this study provides practical information and a valuable reference for
supporting local governments and stakeholders to improve future disaster planning,
prevention, and preparedness.
C1 [Sritart, Hiranya; Miyazaki, Hiroyuki] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol,
Dept Informat & Commun Technol, Post Box 4, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
[Miyazaki, Hiroyuki] Univ Tokyo, Ctr Spatial Informat Sci, Chiba 2778568, Japan.
[Kanbara, Sakiko] Kochi Univ, Fac Nursing, Ike Kochi 2751-1, Kochi, Japan.
[Hara, Takashi] Data Cradle, 1-7-2 Achi, Kurashiki, Okayama 7100055, Japan.
C3 Asian Institute of Technology; University of Tokyo; Kochi University
RP Sritart, H (corresponding author), Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Dept
Informat & Commun Technol, Post Box 4, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand.
EM st119886@ait.asia; miyazaki@ait.asia; kanbara@cc.u-kochi.ac.jp;
iknow@d-cradle.or.jp
RI Kanbara, Sakiko/GSO-0260-2022; Miyazaki, Hiroyuki/H-6919-2012
OI Miyazaki, Hiroyuki/0000-0001-7262-4566; Kanbara,
Sakiko/0000-0003-1274-1685; Sritart, Hiranya/0000-0003-2617-647X
FU JSPS KAKENHI [18K19695]; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research
[18K19695] Funding Source: KAKEN
FX The research leading to these results has received funding from JSPS
KAKENHI, grant number 18K19695.
CR Abioye OF, 2020, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100878
Akiyama N, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190392
[Anonymous], 2015, DISASTER RISK REDUCT
[Anonymous], BBC
6988(2002)3:3(107)
[Anonymous], ASAHI SHIMBUN DIGITA
Ashik FR, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2019.11.004
10.1177/028072709100900210
Bandaru S, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03942
Bashawri A, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P924, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01019-3
Birkmann J., 2006, I ENV HUMAN SECURITY, V5, P7
Cardona OD, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE
Chou JS, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P2031, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0461-5
Cruz MA, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P11, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2016.72
Dijkstra E. W., 1959, NUMER MATH, V1, P269, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01386390,
10.1007/BF01386390]
Djalante R, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100001
Dostal PJ, 2015, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V9, P301, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.50
Emrich CT, 2011, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V3, P193, DOI 10.1175/2011WCAS1092.1
Faruk M, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P1099, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.142
FEMA, PLANN CONS EV SHELT
Fuchs S, 2007, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V7, P495, DOI 10.5194/nhess-7-495-2007
Gao J, 2020, PHYSICA A, V545, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123554
Horner MW, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P169, DOI 10.1111/disa.12233
INGRAM DR, 1971, REG STUD, V5, P101, DOI 10.1080/09595237100185131
Isahak A, 2018, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V10, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v10i1.501
Kako M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101497
Karaye IM, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1079, DOI 10.1111/risa.13448
Karaye IM, 2019, HEALTH SERV RES MANA, V6, DOI 10.1177/2333392819848885
Kojima G, 2017, J EPIDEMIOL, V27, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.je.2016.09.008
Kotani H, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101286
Li X, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN B, V35, P593, DOI 10.1068/b33089
Li ZN, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.008
Ma YJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020399
Nguyen DT, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000350
Nihei Y, 2019, J DISASTER RES, V14, P874, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0874
Okada Yasusei, 2013, Nihon Rinsho, V71, P953
Parvin GA, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100032
Pimanmas A, 2010, J EARTHQ TSUNAMI, V4, P269, DOI 10.1142/S1793431110000868
Requia WJ, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V119, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.021
Rossello J, 2020, TOURISM MANAGE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104080
Sangita D., 2019, 6 MONTHS W JAPAN FLO, P16
Santos-Reyes J, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101661
Shakti PC, 2019, ENG J-THAIL, V23, P477, DOI 10.4186/ej.2019.23.6.477
Statistics of Japan, W STAT PORT SIT OFF
Unal M, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-2, P95, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-
2-W1-95-2016
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), FLOOD HAZ MAP MAN TE
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), LESS LEARN WAY FORW
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), REP OP END INT EXP W
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Wilbanks TJ, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, pS147, DOI 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.013
Ye MX, 2019, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100403
Ye MW, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P881, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9803-y
Yu J, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P413, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0111-8
Zhang WT, 2019, HABITAT INT, V83, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.002
NR 63
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 11
U2 33
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 18
AR 7355
DI 10.3390/su12187355
PG 22
(SSCI)
GA OJ9XL
UT WOS:000584307000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Christianson, AC
McGee, TK
AF Christianson, Amy Cardinal
McGee, Tara K.
CA Whitefish Lake First Nation 459
TI Wildfire evacuation experiences of band members of Whitefish Lake First
Nation 459, Alberta, Canada
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Wildfire; Natural hazard; Evacuation; Health; First Nation; Canada
ID MENTAL-HEALTH; INTERFACE COMMUNITIES; HURRICANE KATRINA; UNITED-STATES;
DISASTERS; DECISIONS; HAZARD; BUSHFIRE; RECOVERY; VOLCANO
AB This paper presents results of a study which examined how a mandatory wildfire
evacuation affected members of Whitefish Lake First Nation 459, in Alberta, Canada.
A qualitative case study approach was used, and semi-structured interviews were
completed with 45 band members to learn about their evacuation experiences during
the wildfire evacuation in May 2011 and explore the factors that complicated the
evacuation process and put further strain on the evacuees and First Nation. This
evacuation caused considerable distress for evacuees and had negative effects for
the First Nation. Factors that affected evacuation experiences included: (1)
transportation issues compounded by cultural land-use activities, (2) fear of home
loss compounded by existing housing shortages, (3) information and lack of media
interest, (4) language, (5) poverty, (6) large multi-generational families, (7)
health concerns, and (8) reimbursement of evacuation-related expenses to the
community. An overarching factor that affected the entire evacuation was
jurisdiction. Based on these findings, recommendations are provided for emergency
managers on improving wildfire evacuation experiences for Indigenous peoples.
C1 [Christianson, Amy Cardinal] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv,
Northern Forestry Ctr, 5320 122 St, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada.
[McGee, Tara K.] Univ Alberta, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, 1-26 Earth Sci Bldg,
Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
[Whitefish Lake First Nation 459] Gen Delivery, Atikameg, AB T0G 0C0, Canada.
C3 Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta
RP Christianson, AC (corresponding author), Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest
Serv, Northern Forestry Ctr, 5320 122 St, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada.
EM Amy.Christianson@canada.ca
OI Christianson, Amy/0000-0002-6072-9456
FU PolicyWise for Children Families
FX We thank all participants who shared their stories with us. We
specifically thank the community research assistants, Sharon Sahlin and
Sheila Laboucan. We thank Councillor Darren Auger, former Chief Robert
Grey, current Chief Albert Thunder, and Paul Thunder for their valuable
advice and support. We acknowledge Winston Delorme (Alberta Emergency
Management Agency) who provided details on the response in High Prairie,
and John Little (Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada) who
assisted in creating the figures used in this article. This research was
funded by a grant from the Alberta Centre for Child, Family, and
Community research (now PolicyWise for Children & Families).
CR Afifi WA, 2012, ANXIETY STRESS COPIN, V25, P329, DOI
10.1080/10615806.2011.603048
Agyapong VIO, 2018, INT J MENTAL HLTH AD
[Anonymous], 1998, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNE
[Anonymous], 2011, US FOR SERV GEN TECH
[Anonymous], 2004, J ABORIGINAL HLTH
Berube A, 2006, EARLIER FACULTY RES, P197
Beverly JL, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P571, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9777-9
Bond T, 2014, GEOGR RES-AUST, V52, P6, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12040
Botey AP, 2014, J CHILD FAM STUD, V23, P1471, DOI 10.1007/s10826-013-9802-6
Butler C, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V216, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.024
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2013, POVERTY PROSPERITY I
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
(CIHR NSERC and SSHRC), 2014, TRIC POL STAT ETH CO
Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC), 2011, NAT WILDL FIR SIT RE
Carroll MS, 2006, RURAL SOCIOL, V71, P261, DOI 10.1526/003601106777789701
Carroll MS, 2011, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V24, P672, DOI 10.1080/08941921003681055
Cohn PJ, 2006, WEST J APPL FOR, V21, P39, DOI 10.1093/wjaf/21.1.39
Cote DW, 2014, FOREST CHRON, V90, P498, DOI 10.5558/tfc2014-100
Cova TJ, 2013, GEOJOURNAL, V78, P273, DOI 10.1007/s10708-011-9419-5
Cova TJ, 2009, NAT HAZARDS REV, V10, P151, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2009)10:4(151)
Creswell JW., 2017, QUAL INQ, V4th ed
Curtis A, 2010, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V1, P63, DOI 10.2202/1944-4079.1027
Eriksen C, 2010, GEOFORUM, V41, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.05.004
Felix ED, 2015, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V43, P156, DOI 10.1002/jcop.21671
Fothergill A, 2004, NAT HAZARDS, V32, P89, DOI
10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9
Garner R, 2010, HLTH INUIT METIS FIR
Haynes K, 2014, APPL STUDIES CLIMATE, P206
Hodgson RW, 2007, HUM ECOL REV, V14, P233
6996.0000074
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), 2016, 1 NAT PROF WHIT LAK
Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), 2011, EV INACS RES HOUS SU
Kent B., 2003, RMRSGTR114 USDA FOR, P315
King M, 2010, CHRONIC DIS CAN, V31, P2
Kusenbach M, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9358-3
Legerski JP, 2012, COMMUNITY MENT HLT J, V48, P729, DOI 10.1007/s10597-011-9446-
1
Leon J, 2016, INT PLANN STUD, V22, P1
Li DP, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V54, P56, DOI
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
McCaffrey S, 2010, P 2 C HUMAN DIMENSIO
McCaffrey S, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P1390, DOI 10.1111/risa.12944
McCaffrey S, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P170, DOI 10.1071/WF13050
McCool SF, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V37, P437, DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0054-0
McGee TK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.012
McLennan J, 2013, FIRE SAFETY J, V61, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.09.003
Mercer J, 2010, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V19, P412, DOI 10.1108/09653561011070349
Mozumder P, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P81, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1828-1
Munro A, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE134, DOI [10.1016/S2542-
5196(17)30047-5, 10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30047-5]
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Mutch RW, 2011, FIRE TECHNOL, V47, P357, DOI 10.1007/s10694-010-0171-z
National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health, SOC DET HLTH POV SOC
Paveglio T, 2008, J FOREST, V106, P65
Paveglio TB, 2016, FOREST SCI, V62, P59, DOI 10.5849/forsci.15-021
Public Health Agency of Canada, 2011, DIAB CAN FACTS FIG P
Public Health Agency of Canada, 2006, HUM FAC MENT HLTH ME
Ronchi E, 2017, PROJECT REPORT
Scharbach J, 2016, HUM ORGAN, V75, P59, DOI 10.17730/0018-7259-75.1.59
Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples, 2015, HOUS 1 NAT RES CHALL
Tally S, 2013, ADM POLICY MENT HLTH, V40, P348, DOI 10.1007/s10488-012-0425-9
Taylor JG, 2007, HUM ECOL REV, V14, P198
Tobin GA, 2002, DISASTERS, V26, P28, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00189
Toman E, 2013, GEN TECHNICAL REPORT, VNRS-111
Veland S, 2011, ENV HAZARDS, V9, P197
Whittaker J, 2013, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V22, P841, DOI 10.1071/WF12010
Wolshon B, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P73, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2007)133:1(73)
NR 73
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 0
U2 23
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD AUG
PY 2019
VL 98
IS 1
SI SI
BP 9
EP 29
DI 10.1007/s11069-018-3556-9
PG 21
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA IY2LT
UT WOS:000486222500003
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU DeYoung, SE
Jackson, V
Callands, TA
AF DeYoung, Sarah E.
Jackson, Victoria
Callands, Tamora A.
TI Maternal stress and social support during Hurricane Florence
SO HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
ID PREGNANCY-SPECIFIC STRESS; PRETERM BIRTH; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH; RISK;
DISASTERS; INFANT; WOMEN; CARE; VULNERABILITY
AB In theoretical research on disaster vulnerability, access to resources is
critical for optimal outcomes. Studying the impact of a hurricane on maternal
stress can expand theories of disaster vulnerability. This is a cross-sectional
mixed-methods prospective study of maternal stress during Hurricane Florence in the
United States. Results from chi-squares compared the proportion of respondents who
reported having support for a financial emergency were significant, specifically
that higher income respondents indicated the ability to rely on someone in case of
an emergency. A regression analysis indicated that social support was significant
and negatively related to stress as a dependent variable, while evacuation status
and pregnancy status were not significant predictors of stress. Five themes emerged
from the overall qualitative data: concerns about infant feeding, evacuation
logistics, general stress, family roles, and 'other' issues.
C1 [DeYoung, Sarah E.] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA.
[Jackson, Victoria; Callands, Tamora A.] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
[Jackson, Victoria] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA.
C3 University of Delaware; University System of Georgia; University of
Georgia; University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin
Cities
RP DeYoung, SE (corresponding author), Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA.
EM sedeyoun@udel.edu
OI Callands, Tamora/0000-0001-5317-6155
CR Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
[Anonymous], 2006, CONTEMP NURSE, DOI [10.5172/conu.2006.23.2.145, DOI
10.5172/CONU.2006.23.2.145]
Blake D, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101588
Callaghan WM, 2007, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V11, P307, DOI 10.1007/s10995-007-0177-
4
Chinn JJ, 2021, J WOMENS HEALTH, V30, P212, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2020.8868
Cole-Lewis HJ, 2014, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V33, P1033, DOI 10.1037/a0034586
Cornman J.C., 2001, PERCEPTION ELDERLY T
Davies IP, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205825
Davis-Floyd R, 2021, BIRTH DISRUPTIVE TIM, P261
DeYoung SE, 2021, FRONT SOCIOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2021.611212
DeYoung SE, 2018, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V22, P1826, DOI 10.1007/s10995-018-2585-z
Dinan T, 2017, ECOL ECON, V138, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.034
Duarte CS, 2006, J TRAUMA STRESS, V19, P301, DOI 10.1002/jts.20120
Ehrlich M, 2010, J WOMENS HEALTH, V19, P877, DOI 10.1089/jwh.2009.1693
Enarson E., 2004, INT J SOCIOL SOC POL, V24, P49, DOI DOI
10.1108/01443330410791064
Feaster T D, 2018, PRELIMINARY PEAK STA
Fiscella K, 2004, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V8, P45, DOI
10.1023/B:MACI.0000025726.53515.65
FULLERTON CS, 1992, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V62, P371, DOI 10.1037/h0079363
Gabbe PT, 2017, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V21, P1130, DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2211-x
Gavin NI, 2004, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V8, P113, DOI
10.1023/B:MACI.0000037645.63379.62
Gennaro S, 2008, JOGNN-J OBST GYN NEO, V37, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-
6909.2008.00278.x
Gennaro S, 2016, MCN-AM J MATERN-CHIL, V41, P147, DOI
10.1097/NMC.0000000000000227
Ghosh JKC, 2010, ARCH WOMEN MENT HLTH, V13, P327, DOI 10.1007/s00737-009-0135-9
Giarratano G, 2015, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V19, P819, DOI 10.1007/s10995-014-1579-
8
Giarratano Gloria Peel, 2019, Health Care Women Int, V40, P259, DOI
10.1080/07399332.2018.1535600
Giurgescu C, 2018, AIMS PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, P89, DOI
10.3934/publichealth.2018.1.89
Grabich SC, 2016, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V20, P2474, DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2069-y
Gribble K, 2018, J HUM LACT, V34, P40, DOI 10.1177/0890334417741469
Harville E, 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL SURV, V65, P713, DOI
10.1097/OGX.0b013e31820eddbe
Hoffman S, 1996, PAEDIATR PERINAT EP, V10, P380, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-
3016.1996.tb00063.x
Joseph KS, 2021, OBSTET GYNECOL, V137, P763, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004361
Khan A, 2019, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, P362, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2018.1516796
Kildea S., 2012, J PAEDIATR CHILD H, V48, P116
Kilpatrick D.G., 2013, NATL STRESSFUL EVENT
King S, 2015, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0539-7
La Marca-Ghaemmaghami P, 2015, EUR PSYCHOL, V20, P102, DOI
10.1027/1016-9040/a000195
Laditka SB, 2010, HEALTH CARE WOMEN IN, V31, P1013, DOI
10.1080/07399332.2010.508294
Lalor J, 2021, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V128, P1720, DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.16844
Lobel M, 2008, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V27, P604, DOI 10.1037/a0013242
McDonald CR, 2020, FRONT GLOB WOMEN HLT, V1, DOI 10.3389/fgwh.2020.564560
Moseson H, 2018, CONTRACEPTION, V98, P275, DOI
10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.009
Negron R, 2013, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V17, P616, DOI 10.1007/s10995-012-1037-4
Nomura Y, 2019, INFANT MENT HEALTH J, V40, P204, DOI 10.1002/imhj.21766
Pfeiffer J, 2008, NURS CLIN N AM, V43, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.cnur.2008.04.008
Qobadi M, 2016, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V20, pS164, DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2028-7
Ramya H.S., 2018, INT J CONT PEDIAT, V5, P928
Saldana Johnny, 2015, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
Schetter CD, 2012, CURR OPIN PSYCHIATR, V25, P141, DOI
10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680
Schwartz RM, 2019, J TRAUMA STRESS, V32, P677, DOI 10.1002/jts.22445
SHERBOURNE CD, 1991, SOC SCI MED, V32, P705, DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B
Stapleton LRT, 2012, J FAM PSYCHOL, V26, P453, DOI 10.1037/a0028332
Thomas DSK, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101828
Wouk K, 2017, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V21, P636, DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-2150-6
Zahran S, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P61, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0065-5
NR 55
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 4
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
PI PHILADELPHIA
PA 530 WALNUT STREET, STE 850, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 USA
SN 0739-9332
EI 1096-4665
J9 HEALTH CARE WOMEN IN
JI Health Care Women Int.
PD FEB 1
PY 2023
VL 44
IS 2
BP 198
EP 215
DI 10.1080/07399332.2022.2046750
EA MAY 2022
PG 18
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Women's Studies
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Women's Studies
GA 8O1JO
UT WOS:000805613000001
PM 35616344
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Tang, Y
Zhou, TZ
Zhong, YX
Hu, SB
Lin, J
Lin, ZY
Liu, HW
Liu, BH
Zhao, YL
Wang, YX
Lin, H
AF Tang, Yi
Zhou, Tianzhong
Zhong, Youxin
Hu, Shengbin
Lin, Jing
Lin, Zhiyu
Liu, Hongwei
Liu, Baohua
Zhao, Yanlin
Wang, Yixian
Lin, Hang
TI Risk Assessment for Critical Flood Height of Pedestrian Escape in Subway
Station
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE Monte Carlo method; 3D simulation; maximum pedestrian capacity; minimum
speed of safe escape; critical escape flood level height
ID EVACUATION DYNAMICS; SIMULATION
AB The escape of pedestrians in the subway station is hampered by floods created by
heavy rain. In order to explore the critical flood level in a subway station so
that pedestrians can escape safely, the case study of the Mingxiu Road subway
station in Nanning, China, was conducted using numerical simulation techniques. In
total, 30 groups of sample pedestrians with different walking speeds and numbers
were randomly generated by the Monte Carlo method, and 3D simulation software was
used for escape simulation. The simulated escape data were put into the SVM model,
and the maximum pedestrian capacity and minimum speed of pedestrians were solved
successfully with different conditions of the Mingxiu Road subway station. Then, a
1:1 contour model of the pedestrian was constructed to simulate the flood
resistance of the pedestrian escaping at the minimum speed. The flood resistance
and the friction force between the pedestrian and the ground were compared to
calculate the critical escape flood level height, and the critical escape flood
level height of an adult, child, and elder was 87.4 cm,75.5 cm, and 83.0 cm,
respectively.
C1 [Tang, Yi; Lin, Zhiyu; Liu, Hongwei; Liu, Baohua; Lin, Hang] Cent South Univ,
Sch Resources & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
[Zhou, Tianzhong; Zhong, Youxin; Hu, Shengbin; Lin, Jing] Nanning Rail Transit
Co Ltd, Nanning 530028, Peoples R China.
[Zhao, Yanlin] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Safety Engn, Xiangtan
[Wang, Yixian] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R
China.
C3 Central South University; Hunan University of Science & Technology;
Hefei University of Technology
RP Lin, H (corresponding author), Cent South Univ, Sch Resources & Safety Engn,
Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
EM hanglin@csu.edu.cn
RI Lin, Hang/E-3318-2013; Zhao, Yanlin/M-8882-2013
OI Lin, Hang/0000-0002-5924-5163; Wang, Yixian/0000-0002-2346-3097
FU Science and Technology Hunan Civil Air Defense Research Project
[HNRFKJ-2021-07]; Project (2021) of Study on Flood Disaster Prevention
Model of Nanning Rail Transit
FX The Science and Technology Hunan Civil Air Defense Research Project
(HNRFKJ-2021-07); Project (2021) of Study on Flood Disaster Prevention
Model of Nanning Rail Transit.
CR Cheng H, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V43, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.107
Cui JQ, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103726
Dou FF, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104052
Feng JR, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105039
Gonzalez-Navarro M, 2018, J URBAN ECON, V108, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.002
Han G, 2021, MICROPROCESS MICROSY, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103601
Herrmann CR, 2021, EUR J CRIM POLICY RE, V27, P415, DOI 10.1007/s10610-020-
09476-x
Kikuchi T, 2005, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V26, P1937, DOI
10.1016/j.patrec.2005.03.014
Li XY, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108375
Lin ZY, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12060853
Liu BH, 2022, LITHOSPHERE-US, V2022, DOI 10.2113/2022/7227330
Liu SC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
Lowe R, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101546
Qin JW, 2020, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2020.100677
Qu YC, 2014, SAFETY SCI, V70, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.016
Shao Z.-G., 2021, J QINGDAO U TECHNOL, V42, P143
Tan F, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103743
1, DOI 10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70173-1]
van der Wal CN, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105121
Wang HB, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102500
Wang HY, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107339
Wang JH, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V135, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.091
Xu WZ, 2022, GEOFLUIDS, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/5675173
Yang Y.-Q., 2000, P CHINA BUILDING MAT, P66
Yi JX, 2020, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102147
YOON YEO KYUNG, 2018, [Journal of Cultural Product & Design, 상품문화디자인학연구],
V53, P89, DOI 10.18555/kicpd.2018.53.9
Yukawa S., 2011, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, V67, P177
Zhan S.-Y., 2009, CHINA PUBLIC HLTH, V25, P441
Zhang YH, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2021.103933
Zhao J.-P., 2020, CONT SPORT SCI TECHN, V10, P242
Zhou M, 2020, PHYSICA A, V556, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124779
NR 35
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 21
U2 27
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD NOV
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 21
AR 3409
DI 10.3390/w14213409
PG 19
GA 6C0MH
UT WOS:000881717700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Quang, MP
Tallam, K
AF Minh Pham Quang
Tallam, Krti
TI Predicting Flood Hazards in the Vietnam Central Region: An Artificial
Neural Network Approach
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE flood risk assessment; artificial neural networks; natural hazards;
machine learning; flood forecasting
ID SUSCEPTIBILITY; CLASSIFICATION; VULNERABILITY
AB Flooding as a hazard has negatively impacted Vietnam's agriculture, economy, and
infrastructure with increasing intensity because of climate change. Flood hazards
in Vietnam are difficult to combat, as Vietnam is densely populated with rivers and
canals. While there are attempts to lessen the damage through hazard mitigation
policies, such as early evacuation warnings, these attempts are made heavily
reliant on short-term traditional statistical models and physical hydrology
modeling, which provide suboptimal results. The current situation is caused by the
fragmented approach from the Vietnamese government and exacerbates a need for more
centralized and robust flood predictive systems. Local governments need to employ
their own prediction models which often lack the capacity to draw key insights from
limited flood occurrences. Given the robustness of machine learning, especially in
low data settings, in this study, we attempt to introduce an artificial neural
network model with the aim to create long-term forecast and compare it with other
machine learning approaches. We trained the models using different variables
evaluated under three characteristics: climatic, hydrological, and socio-economic.
We found that our artificial neural network model performed substantially better
both in performance metrics (91% accuracy) and relative to other models and can
predict well flood hazards in the long term.
C1 [Minh Pham Quang] VNU HCM High Sch Gifted, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam.
[Tallam, Krti] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
C3 Stanford University
RP Quang, MP (corresponding author), VNU HCM High Sch Gifted, Ho Chi Minh City
70000, Vietnam.; Tallam, K (corresponding author), Stanford Univ, Dept Biol,
Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
EM minhquangpham6@gmail.com; ktallam7@stanford.edu
OI T, Krti/0000-0002-4509-4157; Pham Quang, Minh/0000-0001-9693-2408
CR Ab Razak NH, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS794, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12258
Abadi M, 2016, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1605.08695, 10.48550/arXiv.1605.08695, DOI
10.48550/ARXIV.1605.08695]
Ali N, 2019, SN APPL SCI, V1, DOI 10.1007/s42452-019-1356-9
[Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
Avand M, 2022, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V40, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2021.10.002
Awad M., 2015, EFFICIENT LEARNING M, P39
Bayazit Y, 2021, HYDROLOG SCI J, V66, P118, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2020.1851031
Blaikie P., 2005, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS, DOI [10.4324/9780203974575, DOI
10.4324/9780203974575]
Cao YF, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9120748
Chau KW, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9030186
Chawla NV, 2002, J ARTIF INTELL RES, V16, P321, DOI 10.1613/jair.953
Chen AF, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12598
Choubin B, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V651, P2087, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064
Chinh DT, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P753, DOI 10.1111/disa.12171
Dobbin KK, 2011, BMC MED GENOMICS, V4, DOI 10.1186/1755-8794-4-31
Elsafi SH, 2014, ALEX ENG J, V53, P655, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2014.06.010
Feng S, 2019, MATER DESIGN, V162, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.060
Ferdous MR, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01600-1
Gauhar N., 2021, P 2021 2 INT C ROBOT
GoV (Government of Vietnam), 2013, ORD NO 07 2013 CTN P
Guha-Sapir D., MOVING HARMONIZATION
Hamzah FB, 2020, COGENT ENVIRON SCI, V6, DOI 10.1080/23311843.2020.1745133
Han D, 2007, J HYDROINFORM, V9, P267, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2007.027
Hicks SA, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-09954-8
Ikirri M, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11081178
IYENGAR NS, 1982, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V17, P2047
Javid A.M., 2021, P ICASSP 2021 2021 I
Kamangir H, 2020, METEOROL APPL, V27, DOI 10.1002/met.1905
Kunzel V., 2020, GLOBAL CLIMATE RISK
Kuyuk HS, 2018, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V140, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.316
Huynh LTM, 2018, CLIM RISK MANAG, V20, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2018.02.003
Malik S, 2020, REMOTE SENS APPL, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100343
Ha MC, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14101617
Mosavi A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111536
Nachappa TG, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275
Ngo H, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13213131
Nguyen HD, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P11281, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2022.2048904
Nguyen MT, 2021, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V14, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12689
Nwankpa C, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1811.03378
Olson M., 2018, P 32 C NEURAL INFORM
Prasad P, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P4571, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2021.1892209
Rahman M, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V295, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113086
Rehman S, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P975, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-03567-z
Schoppa L, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125531
Smith M.P., 2021, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT CU
Sofia G, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-61533-x
Souissi D, 2020, GEOCARTO INT, V35, P991, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2019.1566405
Srivastava N, 2014, J MACH LEARN RES, V15, P1929
Tabari H, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2
Tansar H, 2020, ARAB J GEOSCI, V13, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-05891-w
Dang VH, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061555
Xu ZZ, 2020, J BIOMED INFORM, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103465
Yariyan P, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P3037, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02603-7
NR 57
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 5
U2 8
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 19
AR 11861
DI 10.3390/su141911861
PG 18
(SSCI)
GA 5G9FG
UT WOS:000867295200001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Terui, T
Kunii, Y
Hoshino, H
Kakamu, T
Hidaka, T
Fukushima, T
Anzai, N
Gotoh, D
Miura, I
Yabe, H
AF Terui, Toshihiro
Kunii, Yasuto
Hoshino, Hiroshi
Kakamu, Takeyasu
Hidaka, Tomoo
Fukushima, Tetsuhito
Anzai, Nobuo
Gotoh, Daisuke
Miura, Itaru
Yabe, Hirooki
TI Determinants of the evacuation destination for psychiatric hospital
inpatients following the Fukushima nuclear disaster
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster psychiatry; Hospital evacuation; Psychiatric hospitals;
Fukushima nuclear disaster
ID EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE; HURRICANE KATRINA; MORTALITY; LESSONS; TSUNAMI;
MIYAGI; DEATH
AB Psychiatric inpatients in the Fukushima prefecture were immediately evacuated
from hospitals following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident
in 2011. Whereas the psychiatric status and physical condition of these patients
have been considered as factors related to triage during hospital evacuation, few
studies show how this background affects the evacuation destination. Thus, the
study objective was to reveal associations between hospital evacuation destinations
among psychiatric inpatients and their characteristics. This retrospective study
enrolled psychiatric inpatients who had been evacuated by the Fukushima prefectural
government following the FDNPP accident (N = 783). Patients were classified into
two groups based on their evacuation destination (within/outside the Fukushima
prefecture). Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to investigate
the associations between evacuation destination and patients' traits, including
psychiatric/physical backgrounds. Three-quarters of inpatients were evacuated to
hospitals outside the prefecture. Multivariable analysis showed that patients
diagnosed with mental retardation (ICD-10 F70-79) and psychiatric patients with
respiratory diseases (J00-99), genitourinary diseases (N00-99) as comorbidities
tended to have been evacuated to hospitals within the prefecture. By contrast,
patients with nervous system diseases (G00-99) as comorbidity tended to have been
evacuated to hospitals outside the prefecture. In psychiatric patients, specific
psychiatric diagnoses and several types of physical comorbidities were associated
with the evacuation destination. Prospective follow-up studies are necessary to
reveal how the presumed triage strategy has improved the outcomes in evacuated
psychiatric patients.
C1 [Terui, Toshihiro; Kunii, Yasuto; Hoshino, Hiroshi; Gotoh, Daisuke; Miura,
Itaru; Yabe, Hirooki] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Hikarigaoka
1, Fukushima 9601295, Japan.
[Kunii, Yasuto] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Dept Disaster Psychiat,
Aoba Ku, 2-1 Seiryo Machi, Sendai, Miyagi 9808573, Japan.
[Kakamu, Takeyasu; Hidaka, Tomoo; Fukushima, Tetsuhito] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch
Med, Dept Hyg & Prevent Med, Hikarigaoka 1, Fukushima 9601295, Japan.
[Anzai, Nobuo] Teikyo Heisei Univ, Grad Sch Clin Psychol, Toshima Ku, 2-51-4
Higashi Ikebukuro, Tokyo 1708445, Japan.
C3 Fukushima Medical University; Tohoku University; Fukushima Medical
University
RP Terui, T (corresponding author), Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept
Neuropsychiat, Hikarigaoka 1, Fukushima 9601295, Japan.
EM toshihiro62823@gmail.com
RI TERUI, Toshihiro/GZN-2565-2022
OI Hidaka, Tomoo/0000-0003-2987-4804; Yabe, Hirooki/0000-0003-2668-129X;
Terui, Toshihiro/0000-0001-6247-8083
FU Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
[17K19826]; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K19826] Funding
Source: KAKEN
FX The work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Explor-atory
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan [grant number 17K19826] .
CR Anderson AH, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V75, P1202, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.5
[Anonymous], 2012, J J DISAST MED
[Anonymous], 2013, INT J POSITIVE BEHAV
[Anonymous], 2014, OECD REV HLTH CAR QU
Aoki T, 2012, EUR HEART J, V33, P2796, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs288
Daito H, 2013, THORAX, V68, P544, DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202658
Fukunaga H, 2015, TOHOKU J EXP MED, V237, P41, DOI 10.1620/tjem.237.41
Gotoh D, 2021, PSYCHIAT CLIN NEUROS, V75, P29, DOI 10.1111/pcn.13158
Greenspan S, 2011, J INTELLECT DEV DIS, V36, P242, DOI
10.3109/13668250.2011.626759
Hicks Jarred, 2015, J Healthc Risk Manag, V34, P26, DOI 10.1002/jhrm.21162
Igarashi Y, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0195684
Japan Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,, 2015, DIS CAR HDB NURS
Kilcommons AM, 2012, J APPL RES INTELLECT, V25, P433, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
3148.2012.00684.x
Kutner NG, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V76, P760, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.268
Matsuda Y, 2016, PSYCH NURSING SOC, V59, P23
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare., 2018, CURRENT STATUS ISSUE
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare., 2014, EM MED INF SYST
Morganstein JC, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00001
Nissen JMJF, 1997, J INTELL DISABIL RES, V41, P252, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-
2788.1997.tb00704.x
Nomura S, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060192
Okumura Tetsu, 2015, Disaster Mil Med, V1, P19, DOI 10.1186/s40696-015-0009-9
Rasanen S, 2003, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V38, P297, DOI 10.1007/s00127-003-0635-2
Salcedo VV, 2014, SALUD MENT, V37, P343, DOI [10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2014.043,
DOI 10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2014.043]
Shibata Y, 2016, BMJ OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009190
Society for Dialysis Therapy, 2013, SURV IMP GREAT E JAP
Sofia S, 2012, AM J HYPERTENS, V25, P556, DOI 10.1038/ajh.2012.4
Tanigawa K, 2012, LANCET, V379, P889, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60384-5
Tomita K, 2005, J MED INVESTIG, V52, P80, DOI 10.2152/jmi.52.80
Tsukinoki R, 2018, BMJ OPEN, V8, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023435
Vanholder RC, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V76, P687, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.279
Yabe H., 2013, SEISHIN IGAKU, V55, P681
Yamanda S, 2013, BMJ OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000865
Yamanouchi S, 2015, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V30, P145, DOI
10.1017/S1049023X15000114
Yanagawa Y, 2011, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V26, P391, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X11006418
Zhao YJ, 2016, BJPSYCH OPEN, V2, P59, DOI 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002576
NR 38
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 66
AR 102600
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102600
EA SEP 2021
PG 7
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA WD0QJ
UT WOS:000704652100013
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Xu, DD
Zhou, WF
Deng, X
Ma, ZX
Yong, ZL
Qin, C
AF Xu, Dingde
Zhou, Wenfeng
Deng, Xin
Ma, Zhixing
Yong, Zhuolin
Qin, Cheng
TI Information credibility, disaster risk perception and evacuation
willingness of rural households in China
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Information credibility; Disaster risk perception; Risk communication;
Evacuation willingness; Earthquake; China
ID GORGES RESERVOIR AREA; DECISION-MAKING; MEDIA EXPOSURE; FLOOD RISK;
PREPAREDNESS; BEHAVIOR; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; PREVENTION; MITIGATION
AB Information credibility is important for effective disaster communication, and
its strength affects the evacuation willingness of residents. However, few reports
have studied the correlation of information credibility and disaster risk
perception with residents' willingness to evacuate during earthquake threats. Using
survey data of 327 rural households located in four counties within earthquake-
affected areas in Sichuan Province, this study systematically analyzed the
credibility of public and private information about rural households, disaster risk
perception and residents' evacuation willingness. After creating an ordinary least
square regression model (OLS) to investigate the correlations of the above factors,
the results showed that: (1) Both positive public information and negative private
information were positively correlated with residents' evacuation willingness, and
negative public information and positive private information were negatively
correlated with residents' evacuation willingness; (2) the perceived severity of
disaster was significantly correlated with residents' evacuation willingness, and
the perceived probability of disaster was not significantly correlated with
residents' evacuation willingness; and (3) both positive and negative public
information indirectly affected residents' evacuation willingness through the
perception of disaster severity. This study contributed to our understanding of the
correlation of information credibility and disaster risk perception with evacuation
willingness and provided important information for effective communication and
disaster risk management.
C1 [Xu, Dingde] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Sichuan Ctr Rural Dev Res,
Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
[Xu, Dingde; Zhou, Wenfeng; Ma, Zhixing; Yong, Zhuolin; Qin, Cheng] Sichuan Agr
Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
[Deng, Xin] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
C3 Sichuan Agricultural University; Sichuan Agricultural University;
Sichuan Agricultural University
RP Xu, DD (corresponding author), Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Sichuan Ctr
Rural Dev Res, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.; Xu, DD (corresponding author),
Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
EM dingdexu@sicau.edu.cn
RI Xu, Dingde/GNP-8560-2022; Deng, Xin/AAU-5244-2020; Xu,
Dingde/A-2084-2013
OI Xu, Dingde/0000-0001-6359-6540
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41801221]; Dual Support
Plan of Sichuan Agricultural University [1921993045, 2019106226105];
Undergraduate research interest cultivation program in 2020 of Sichuan
agricultural university [2020466, 2020465]
FX We gratefully acknowledge financial support from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (No. 41801221), the Dual Support Plan of
Sichuan Agricultural University (Grant No. 1921993045), the innovation
training program of Sichuan Agricultural University in 2019 (No.
2019106226105) and Undergraduate research interest cultivation program
in 2020 of Sichuan agricultural university (Nos. 2020466; 2020465). The
authors also extend great gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and
editors for their helpful review and critical comments.
CR [Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)
[Anonymous], 2018, CHINA YB HOUSEHOLD S
Bang HN, 2012, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V21, P489, DOI 10.1108/09653561211256189
Brenkert-Smith H, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P800, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-
6924.2012.01917.x
Bunce S, 2012, AUST LIBR J, V61, P34, DOI 10.1080/00049670.2012.10722300
Chou JS, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V12, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.002
CRED (Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters), 2019, DAT DAT
Durage SW, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V71, P1495, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0958-6
FISKE ST, 1992, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V63, P877, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.877
Godschalk DR, 2009, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V52, P739, DOI
10.1080/09640560903083715
Hajito KW, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P350, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.012
Hirose Y, 2008, INTERNET RES, V18, P142, DOI 10.1108/10662240810862202
Hong YX, 2019, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V63, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.005
Lee K, 2011, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V31, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.08.004
Lindell MK, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P85, DOI 10.1111/disa.12133
Lindell MK, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P13, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.00002
Liu TZ, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V90, P1461, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3111-0
Lo AY, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1979, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1815-6
Lovreglio R, 2016, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V66, P226, DOI
10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.006
McNeill IM, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1829, DOI 10.1111/risa.12037
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
MILETI DS, 1992, RISK ANAL, V12, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00691.x
Oloruntoba R, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P541, DOI 10.1111/disa.12268
Paek HJ, 2010, J HEALTH COMMUN, V15, P428, DOI 10.1080/10810731003753083
Parady GT, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P797, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2457-z
Paton D, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V54, P765, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9500-2
Peng L, 2019, SUSTAIN DEV, V27, P885, DOI 10.1002/sd.1948
Peng L, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P469, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1445613
Peng L, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P777, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2604-6
Rozin P, 2001, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V5, P296, DOI 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
Slovic P., 1982, RISK ANAL, V2, P83, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6924.1982.TB01369.X
Solberg C, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1663, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1663-
2010
Steelman TA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P615, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1512-x
Sun YY, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15010091
Sun YY, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2562-z
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
Xu DD, 2017, FARMERS ABILITY PERC, P2017
Xu DD, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17093246
Xu DD, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V9, P167, DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-0170-0
Xu DD, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.001
Xu DD, 2016, HABITAT INT, V58, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.09.003
Xu DD, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P4850, DOI 10.3390/su7054850
Zhu DQ, 2011, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V31, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005
Zhu WW, 2019, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V25, P1531, DOI
10.1080/10807039.2018.1471340
NR 60
TC 31
Z9 31
U1 9
U2 35
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 103
IS 3
BP 2865
EP 2882
DI 10.1007/s11069-020-04106-5
EA JUN 2020
PG 18
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA NI5RY
UT WOS:000551420900001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Shah, AM
Rana, IA
Lodhi, RH
Najam, FA
Ali, A
AF Shah, Abdul Muqeet
Rana, Irfan Ahmad
Lodhi, Rida Hameed
Najam, Fawad Ahmed
Ali, Ather
TI Evacuation decision making and risk perception: flooded rural
communities in Pakistan
LA English
DE Climate change; community resilience floods; hazard proximity; risk
communication
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; DISASTER RISK; VULNERABILITY; PREPAREDNESS; INFORMATION;
MANAGEMENT; LEVEL; MODEL; ADAPTATION; BENEFITS
AB Evacuation is considered an essential aspect of flood risk reduction. It is
important to identify the factors affecting the decision-making process during
evacuation. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors that influence
evacuation decision-making in flood-prone rural communities along the Indus River
in Dera Ismail Khan. A total of 465 household surveys were conducted in high flood-
risk areas along the river to gather data on evacuation characteristics and risk
perception. Pearson's correlation technique was utilised to determine the
relationship between flood risk perception indicators and the likelihood of
evacuation, while a binary logistic regression test was implemented to identify the
socio-economic factors that influence evacuation. The results of the study
indicated that socio-economic conditions and risk perceptions can have a direct or
indirect effect on evacuation decisions. It was found that those living in closer
to the river tended to have a lower risk perception. However, respondents in the
study reported experiencing high levels of fear in regard to floods. Age and
proximity to hazards were identified as significant factors that impact willingness
to evacuate. These findings suggest the need for urgent implementation of awareness
campaigns in settlements located near the river in order to promote evacuation.
C1 [Shah, Abdul Muqeet; Rana, Irfan Ahmad; Lodhi, Rida Hameed] Natl Univ Sci &
Technol NUST, Sch Civil & Environm Engn SCEE, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Islamabad
44000, Pakistan.
[Najam, Fawad Ahmed] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[Ali, Ather] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, NUST Inst Civil Engn, Sch Civil &
Environm Engn SCEE, Islamabad, Pakistan.
C3 National University of Sciences & Technology - Pakistan; University of
British Columbia; National University of Sciences & Technology -
Pakistan
RP Rana, IA (corresponding author), Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Sch Civil &
Environm Engn SCEE, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.
EM irfanrana90@hotmail.com
CR Abid M, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V547, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.125
Adelekan IO, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9564-z
Ali A, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V316, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115309
6988(2004)5:3(115)
6988(2002)3:3(107)
[Anonymous], 2006, MEASURING VULNERABIL
[Anonymous], 2017, FINAL RESULTS CENSUS
Atta-ur-Rahman, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P887, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0528-3
Atta-ur-Rahman, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1239, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9830-8
Botzen WJW, 2009, WATER RESOUR RES, V45, DOI 10.1029/2009WR007743
Bradford RA, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2299, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2299-
2012
Bunce S, 2012, AUST LIBR J, V61, P34, DOI 10.1080/00049670.2012.10722300
EM-DAT, 2020, DIS PROF
Fahad S, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V79, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.018
Fair C. C., 2016, PAKISTAN NATL REGION
Godschalk DR, 2009, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V52, P739, DOI
10.1080/09640560903083715
Hajito KW, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P350, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.012
Heitz C, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.008
Hong YX, 2019, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V63, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.005
Huang DP, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0323-1
6996.0000074
Islam MN, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P2083, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0796-6
Jamshed A, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141462
Jamshed A, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106704
Jamshed A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101601
Khan H., 2008, NATURAL HAZARDS DISA
Lin SY, 2008, NAT HAZARDS, V44, P305, DOI 10.1007/s11069-007-9136-z
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.006
Ludy J, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6
Masson-Delmotte V, 2021, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, DOI 10.1017/9781009325844
McLennan J, 2013, FIRE SAFETY J, V61, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.09.003
Mileti DS, 2000, J HAZARD MATER, V75, P181, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00179-5
Paton D, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V54, P765, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9500-2
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Quarantelli E. L., 1985, DISASTERS MENTAL HLT, P122
Rafiq L, 2012, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V3, P324, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2011.626083
Rana IA, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100893
Rana IA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101624
1816.1999.tb00132.x
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.032
Shah AA, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14060992
Solberg K, 2010, LANCET, V376, P1039, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61469-9
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
6988(2004)5:4(170), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(170)]
Winsemius HC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P381, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2893,
10.1038/nclimate2893]
Xu DD, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2865, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04106-5
Zhu WW, 2019, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V25, P1531, DOI
10.1080/10807039.2018.1471340
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PI ABINGDON
SN 1747-7891
EI 1878-0059
JI Environ. Hazards
PD 2023 JUN 9
PY 2023
DI 10.1080/17477891.2023.2220947
EA JUN 2023
PG 18
GA I9JS4
UT WOS:001005876200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wong, SD
Yu, MQ
Kuncheria, A
Shaheen, SA
Walker, JL
AF Wong, Stephen D.
Yu, Mengqiao
Kuncheria, Anu
Shaheen, Susan A.
Walker, Joan L.
TI Willingness of Hurricane Irma evacuees to share resources: a
multi-modeling approach
SO TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Joint Choice modeling; multi-choice latent class choice model; portfolio
choice model; Hurricane evacuations; sharing economy
ID NESTED LOGIT MODEL; LATENT CLASS MODEL; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; TRAVEL
MODE; PREFERENCE HETEROGENEITY; STATED PREFERENCE; SOCIAL NETWORKS;
CHOICE ANALYSIS; JOINT ANALYSIS; CAR OWNERSHIP
AB Recent technological improvements have expanded the sharing economy (e.g.
Airbnb, Lyft, and Uber), coinciding with a growing need for evacuation resources.
To understand factors that influence sharing willingness in evacuations, we
employed a multi-modeling approach using three model types: (1) four binary logit
models that capture sharing scenario separately; (2) a portfolio choice model (PCM)
that estimates dimensional dependency, and (3) a multi-choice latent class choice
model (LCCM) that jointly estimates multiple scenarios via latent classes. We
tested our approach by employing online survey data from Hurricane Irma (2017)
evacuees (n=368). The multi-model approach uncovered behavioral nuances
undetectable with one model. For example, the multi-choice LCCM and PCM models
uncovered scenario correlation and the multi-choice LCCM found three classes -
transportation sharers, adverse sharers, and interested sharers - with different
memberships. We suggest that local agencies consider broader sharing mechanisms
across resource types and time (i.e. before, during, and after evacuations).
C1 [Wong, Stephen D.] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB,
Canada.
[Wong, Stephen D.; Shaheen, Susan A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Transportat
Sustainabil Res Ctr, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
[Wong, Stephen D.; Shaheen, Susan A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Inst Transportat
Studies, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
[Wong, Stephen D.; Yu, Mengqiao; Kuncheria, Anu; Shaheen, Susan A.; Walker, Joan
L.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
C3 University of Alberta; University of California System; University of
California Berkeley; University of California System; University of
California Berkeley
RP Wong, SD (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Edmonton, AB, Canada.
EM stephenwong@ualberta.ca
RI Kuncheria, Anu/CAA-0428-2022
OI Kuncheria, Anu/0000-0003-4975-2425
FU National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program; Dwight
D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship Program
FX We thank emergency and transportation agencies, cities, planning
councils, and news sources across Florida who distributed the survey.
This research was made possible by the National Science Foundation
Graduate Research Fellowship Program and the Dwight D. Eisenhower
Transportation Fellowship Program. We thank the two anonymous reviewers
for their helpful insights on improving this paper.
CR Airbnb.org, 2021, AIRBNB ORG AB
6988(2004)5:3(115)
[Anonymous], 1997, TRANSPORT RES REC, DOI DOI 10.3141/1606-03
Atasoy B., 2011, MODE CHOICE ATTITUDI
Bhat CR, 2008, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V42, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2007.06.002
Bhat CR, 2005, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V39, P679, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2004.08.003
Bian, 2017, DEV MODE DESTINATION, P94
Brathwaite T, 2018, J CHOICE MODEL, V29, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.01.002
Brodar KE, 2020, J FAM ISSUES, V41, P2251, DOI 10.1177/0192513X20933931
Cahalan C., 2007, EMERGENCY EVACUATION, P9
Campbell N. M., 2021, EMERGENCY EVACUATION
Carrel A., 2011, TRANSP RES BOARD 90
Chen VC, 2012, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V18, P241, DOI 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822d4beb
Damera A, 2020, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V17, DOI 10.1515/jhsem-2018-0071
Deka, 2010, TRANSP RES BOARD 89
Dellaert BGC, 1997, LEISURE SCI, V19, P31, DOI 10.1080/01490409709512238
Ding C, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V60, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2016.08.004
Edelman B.G., 2014, SOCIAL SCI RES NETWO, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.2377353
Edelman B, 2017, AM ECON J-APPL ECON, V9, P1, DOI 10.1257/app.20160213
El Zarwi F, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.004
Eluru N, 2010, TRANSPORTATION, V37, P603, DOI 10.1007/s11116-010-9271-3
Fang HA, 2008, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V42, P736, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2008.01.004
Feng KR, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102788
Ferguson M, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V58, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.006
Ge Y., 2016, RACIAL GENDER DISCRI, DOI 10.3386/w22776
Golob TF, 2003, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V37, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0191-2615(01)00046-7
Golshani N, 2019, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V15, P896, DOI
10.1080/23249935.2018.1546778
Greene WH, 2003, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V37, P681, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
2615(02)00046-2
Greene WH, 2013, APPL ECON, V45, P1897, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2011.650325
Grigolon AB, 2012, TOURISM MANAGE, V33, P1174, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.11.013
Guo J, 2020, CITIES, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102448
Haghani M, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P67, DOI 10.3141/2560-08
Hamari J, 2016, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V67, P2047, DOI 10.1002/asi.23552
Hensher DA, 2002, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
2615(00)00035-7
Hensher DA, 2010, EMPIR ECON, V39, P413, DOI 10.1007/s00181-009-0310-x
Hess S, 2012, TRANSPORTATION, V39, P593, DOI 10.1007/s11116-011-9366-5
Hetrakul P, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V61, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2013.10.005
6996.0000074
Klein NJ, 2017, TRANSPORT POLICY, V53, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.010
Koppelman FS, 1998, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V32, P289, DOI 10.1016/S0191-
2615(98)00003-4
Kuligowski E, 2021, FIRE SAFETY J, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103129
Lee BHY, 2010, TRANSPORTATION, V37, P587, DOI 10.1007/s11116-010-9270-4
Liao FH, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P314, DOI 10.1177/0042098014527138
Lindell M., 2019, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI, V1, P1
Liu SR, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P107, DOI 10.1111/mice.12008
Lovreglio R, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101274
10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.016
Mason-Dixon Polling and Research, 2017, HURR IRM 2017
Maul, 2018, PREPAREDNESS RESPONS
McFadden D., 1981, STRUCTURAL ANAL DISC
Menon N., 2020, U S FLORIDA, DOI 10.5038/CUTR-NCTR-RR-2020-30
6996.0000083
Tran MT, 2016, J TRANSP GEOGR, V54, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.003
Molin E, 2016, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V83, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.11.001
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
National Hurricane Center, 2018, NATL HURRICANE CTR T
Ouyang Y, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, P143
Paleti R, 2013, TRANSPORT RES REC, P162, DOI 10.3141/2382-18
Pei S., 2020, COMPOUND RISKS HURRI, DOI 10.1101/2020.08.07.20170555
Polydoropoulou A, 2001, TRANSPORT RES REC, P38, DOI 10.3141/1771-05
Prater C., 2000, HURRICANE BRET POSTS, P1
Renne J., 2006, PLANNING, V72
Renne J.L., 2008, NATL STUDY CARLESS S, P111
Renne J.L., 2018, TRANSP RES BOARD 97
Renne JL, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P36, DOI 10.3141/2119-05
Rincon E, 2001, AM J EMERG MED, V19, P276, DOI 10.1053/ajem.2001.22668
Rodriguez H., 2017, HDB DISASTER RES, V1, P1
Sadri AM, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V90, P1377, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0
Sanchez TW, 2008, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V1, P73, DOI 10.1089/env.2008.0510
Shaheen, 2021, FUTURE PUBLIC TRANSI, DOI 10.7922/G2NC5ZGR
Shen JY, 2009, APPL ECON, V41, P2915, DOI 10.1080/00036840801964633
Siebeneck LK, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P2267, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0474-0
U.S. Census Bureau, 2019, 2015 2019 AM COMM SU
Van Acker V, 2010, J TRANSP GEOGR, V18, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.006
van Cranenburgh S, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V43, P105, DOI
10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.022
van Cranenburgh S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, P64, DOI 10.3141/2449-07
Vance C, 2007, TRANSPORTATION, V34, P575, DOI 10.1007/s11116-007-9128-6
Vega A, 2009, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V43, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.011
Vij A, 2013, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V54, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2013.07.008
Walker J.L., 2001, EXTENDED DISCRETE CH
Walker JL, 2007, J GEOGR SYST, V9, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10109-006-0030-0
Wen CH, 2001, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V35, P627, DOI 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00045-X
Wen CH, 2010, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V46, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2009.08.004
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2003.11.001
Wilmot C., 2013, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADM, V1, P1
Wong S., 2020, UC I TRANSPORTATION, V1, P1, DOI [10.7922/G25H7DJT, DOI
10.7922/G25H7DJT]
Wong S., TRANSP RES BOARD 97
Wong S., 2018, TRANSPORTATION SUSTA, V1, P1, DOI [10.7922/G2FJ2F00, DOI
10.7922/G2FJ2F00]
Wong S.D., 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100131
Wong S.D., 2020, ROLE TRUST COMPASSIO
Wong S.D., 2021, UNDERSTANDING CALIFO
Wong SD, 2020, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V20, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.003
Wong SHD, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P1409, DOI 10.1007/s11116-020-10101-3
Wu H.-C., 2013, LOGISTICS PERSPECTIV, P127
Xu KC, 2016, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V87, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2016.02.012
Yang LY, 2013, HABITAT INT, V38, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.06.002
Yang Y, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V70, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.004
Ye X, 2007, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V41, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2006.03.004
Yin WH, 2014, J TRANSP ENG, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000713
NR 132
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 9
U2 25
PI ABINGDON
SN 2324-9935
EI 2324-9943
J9 TRANSPORTMETRICA A
JI Transportmetrica A
PD MAR 15
PY 2023
VL 19
IS 2
DI 10.1080/23249935.2021.2017064
EA FEB 2022
PG 36
WC Transportation; Transportation Science & Technology
(SSCI)
SC Transportation
GA C4RP5
UT WOS:000758121600001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Li, B
Mostafavi, A
AF Li, Bo
Mostafavi, Ali
TI Location intelligence reveals the extent, timing, and spatial variation
of hurricane preparedness
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
ID MOBILITY; WILMA
AB Hurricanes are one of the most catastrophic natural hazards faced by residents
of the United States. Improving the public's hurricane preparedness is essential to
reduce the impact and disruption of hurricanes on households. Inherent in
traditional methods for quantifying and monitoring hurricane preparedness are
significant lags, which hinder effective monitoring of residents' preparedness in
advance of an impending hurricane. This study establishes a methodological
framework to quantify the extent, timing, and spatial variation of hurricane
preparedness at the census block group level using high-resolution location
intelligence data. Anonymized cell phone data on visits to points-of-interest for
each census block group in Harris County before 2017 Hurricane Harvey were used to
examine residents' hurricane preparedness. Four categories of points-of-interest,
grocery stores, gas stations, pharmacies and home improvement stores, were
identified as they have close relationship with hurricane preparedness, and the
daily number of visits from each CBG to these four categories of POIs were
calculated during preparation period. Two metrics, extent of preparedness and
proactivity, were calculated based on the daily visit percentage change compared to
the baseline period. The results show that peak visits to pharmacies often occurred
in the early stage of preparation, whereas the peak of visits to gas stations
happened closer to hurricane landfall. The spatial and temporal patterns of visits
to grocery stores and home improvement stores were quite similar. However,
correlation analysis demonstrates that extent of preparedness and proactivity are
independent of each other. Combined with synchronous evacuation data, CBGs in
Harris County were divided into four clusters in terms of extent of preparedness
and evacuation rate. The clusters with low preparedness and low evacuation rate
were identified as hotspots of vulnerability for shelter-in-place households that
would need urgent attention during response. Hence, the research findings provide a
new data-driven approach to quantify and monitor the extent, timing, and spatial
variations of hurricane preparedness. Accordingly, the study advances data-driven
understanding of human protective actions during disasters. The study outcomes also
provide emergency response managers and public officials with novel data-driven
insights to more proactively monitor residents' disaster preparedness, making it
possible to identify under-prepared areas and better allocate resources in a timely
manner.
C1 [Li, Bo; Mostafavi, Ali] Texas A&M Univ, Urban Resilience AI Lab, Zachry Dept
Civil & Environm Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station
RP Li, B (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Urban Resilience AI Lab, Zachry
Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
EM libo@tamu.edu
FU National Science Foundation [CMMI1846069]; Texas AM University [699];
Microsoft Azure AI for Public Health
FX This material is based in part upon work supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant CMMI1846069 (CAREER), Texas A&M
University X-Grant 699, and the Microsoft Azure AI for Public Health
grant. The authors also would like to acknowledge the data support from
Spectus. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation, Texas
A&M University, Microsoft Azure, or Spectus.
CR Aleta A, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, P964, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9
Arya Vibhuti, 2016, Am J Disaster Med, V11, P21, DOI 10.5055/ajdm.2016.0221
Baker EJ, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.002
Chatterjee C, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P395, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.005
Chen H, 2011, WEATHER FORECAST, V26, P885, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-11-00001.1
Clay LA, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17030762
Cohen L., 2013, PRACTICAL STAT FIELD
Coleman N, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101875
Comes T., 2014, P 11 P INT C INF SYS, V11, P195
Dargin J, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102366
Darzi A., 2021, CONSTRUCTING EVACUAT
Der Sakissian R., 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V67
Esmalian A., 2022, CHARACTERIZING EQUIT
Esmalian A, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P2336, DOI 10.1111/risa.13738
Fan C, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103367
Farahmand H, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1893, DOI
10.1177/23998083211069990
Flood R, 2017, HURRICANE IRMA PANIC
Gao X., 2020, EARLY INDICATORS COV
Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
Josephson A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P25, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.013
Kakareko G, 2020, INT J REMOTE SENS, V41, P9039, DOI
10.1080/01431161.2020.1797219
Khare A, 2020, OR SPECTRUM, V42, P693, DOI 10.1007/s00291-019-00559-8
Kim YC, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P470, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01138.x
Kwasinski A, 2009, IEEE SYST J, V3, P277, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2026783
Lee C. -C., 2021, COMMUNITY SCALE BIG
Lee C.-C., 2022, SPECIFYING EVACUATIO
Lu X, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P11576, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1203882109
Ma CY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101953
Mayer B.W., 2008, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V16, P14, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-
5973.2008.00531.X
Nande A, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22521-5
NOAA, HURR COSTS
Pastor-Escuredo D, 2014, IEEE GLOB HUMANIT C, P279, DOI
10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970293
Pinelli JP, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P190, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000051
Podesta C, 2021, J R SOC INTERFACE, V18, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2021.0158
Reed DA, 2010, J ENERG ENG, V136, P95, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000028
Romolt CE., 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC
Roy KC, 2019, EPJ DATA SCI, V8, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0196-6
Ruskin Julia, 2018, Prev Med Rep, V10, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.04.014
Song X, 2017, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, V8, DOI 10.1145/2970819
Wang FL, 2019, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V105, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.028
Wei Z., 2021, NEW MODEL RAIN INDUC
Yamada T, 2014, COGENT ECON FINANC, V2, DOI 10.1080/23322039.2014.920271
Yue L, 2006, ENG STRUCT, V28, P1009, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005
Zeng W, 2017, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V18, P2271, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2016.2639320
NR 46
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 5
U2 6
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD SEP 27
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 1
AR 16121
DI 10.1038/s41598-022-20571-3
PG 13
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA 4X4YW
UT WOS:000860850600024
PM 36168037
OA gold, Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Konami, T
Koga, H
Kawatsura, A
AF Konami, Takahiro
Koga, Hirohisa
Kawatsura, Akihiko
TI Role of pre-disaster discussions on preparedness on consensus-making of
integrated flood management (IFM) after a flood disaster, based on a
case in the Abukuma River Basin, Fukushima, Japan
LA English
DT Article
DE Integrated water resources management; Integrated flood management;
Disaster preparedness; Abukuma river; Typhoon Hagibis
AB In October 2019, Typhoon Hagibis struck wide areas of Japan, including the
Abukuma River Basin and caused a serious flood disaster. Four months later, based
on the challenges of the disaster, relevant national and local authorities have
agreed to carry out an integrated flood management (IFM) project, towards enhanced
flood protection, "no one left behind" evacuation, and less socio-economic damage.
The authors provide a brief report on the disaster with the preparedness and on
this project with its consensus-making process, and then discuss the role of pre-
disaster discussions on preparedness on consensus-making of IFM, in addition to
their primary function.
C1 [Konami, Takahiro; Koga, Hirohisa; Kawatsura, Akihiko] Minist Land Infrastruct
Transport & Tourism Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
[Konami, Takahiro] Minist Land Infrastruct Transport & Tourism Japan, Int
Cooperat & Projects, Chiyoda Ku, 2-1-3 Kasumigaseki, Tokyo 1008918, Japan.
RP Konami, T (corresponding author), Minist Land Infrastruct Transport & Tourism
Japan, Tokyo, Japan.; Konami, T (corresponding author), Minist Land Infrastruct
Transport & Tourism Japan, Int Cooperat & Projects, Chiyoda Ku, 2-1-3 Kasumigaseki,
Tokyo 1008918, Japan.
EM konami-t2fx@mlit.go.jp; koga-h85aa@mlit.go.jp;
kawatsura-a84cj@mlit.go.jp
CR APFM/WMO, 2009, INTEGRATED FLOOD MAN
Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM)/World Meteorological
Organization (WMO), 2008, URBAN FLOOD RISK MAN
Bark RH, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.009
Becker M., 2018, ROLE INTERMEDIARIES, DOI
[10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.318, DOI
10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389407.013.318]
Cabinet Office of Japan, 2018, BASIC ACT DISASTER M
Cabinet Office of Japan, 2017, COMM DIS PREP INS MU
Department for Communities and Local Government the United Kingdom (UK), 2009,
PLANNING POLICY STAT
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs UK, 2004, MAKING SPACE WATER D
Dutch Water Sector, 2019, ROOM RIVER PROGRAMME
European Parliament, 2007, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, VL288, P27
Fukushima Prefecture, 2020, DAMAGE REPORT FLOOD
JMA, 2019, TROPICAL CYCLONE TRA
MLIT, 2020, ABUKUMA RIVER MEGA F
MLIT, 2017, REVISION FLOOD CONTR
MLIT, 2012, ABUKUMA RIVER IMPROV
MLIT, 2004, BASIC POLICY ABUKUMA
MLIT, 2019, UPPER ABUKUMA RIVER
MLIT, 2019, ACTIVITIES 20 ANNIVE
MLIT, 2020, ABUKUMA RIVER INTEGR
O'Donnell EC, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P1, DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.013
The General Insurance Association of Japan, 2020, INS PAYM MAJ DIS 201
Thieken AH, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08547-210251
NR 23
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 8
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD FEB 1
PY 2021
VL 53
AR 102012
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102012
PG 10
Water Resources
GA QE6GW
UT WOS:000616304900007
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Billman, M
Atoba, K
Thompson, C
Brody, S
AF Billman, Matthew
Atoba, Kayode
Thompson, Courtney
Brody, Samuel
TI How about Now? Changes in Risk Perception before and after Hurricane
Irma
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE hurricanes; risk perception; resilience; mitigation
ID NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANT; SITUATIONAL THEORY; WILDFIRE RISK; FLOOD RISK;
SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; PUBLIC RESPONSE; PERCEIVED RISK; SELF-EFFICACY;
HAZARDS; COMMUNICATION
AB Risk reduction behaviors are often voluntary and influenced by how at-risk an
individual personally feels, known as risk perception. This paper examines how risk
perception changed from before and six months after Hurricane Irma, a Category 3
storm that narrowly missed Sarasota County, FL. Both surveys asked about residents'
hurricane risk perceptions, evacuation behaviors, mitigation plans, and attitudes
about self-efficacy. For each question found in both surveys, the research used t-
tests (alpha = 0.05) to assess whether significant changes in risk perceptions
occurred between responses. The results suggest that Hurricane Irma had a notable
impact on risk perception. The changes were most evident in reported levels of
self-efficacy as residents were less likely to feel able to sufficiently prepare
for or recover from hurricane impacts after Hurricane Irma. Respondents were also
more likely to believe individuals are responsible for preparing for hurricane
impacts. The findings have implications for public risk communicators, who may find
it effective and sustainable to appeal to residents' lowered self-efficacy or sense
of responsibility for the dangers of hurricanes while implementing policies and
communication strategies.
C1 [Billman, Matthew; Thompson, Courtney] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, College Stn,
TX 77843 USA.
[Atoba, Kayode; Brody, Samuel] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Disaster Resilient Texas,
College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
[Brody, Samuel] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Marine & Coastal Environm Sci, Galveston,
TX 77554 USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas
A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas A&M
University System
RP Atoba, K (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Inst Disaster Resilient Texas,
College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
EM matthew.billman.168@gmail.com; kayodeatoba@tamu.edu;
Cthompson24@tamu.edu
OI Atoba, Kayode/0000-0003-4616-7917
FU National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's Gulf
Research Early-Career
FX This research was funded by the National Academies of Sciences,
Engineering, and Medicine's Gulf Research Early-Career Fellowship
Program.
CR Adelekan IO, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P445, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1977-2
Ajzen I., 1985, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
ANDERSON WA, 1969, J COMMUN, V19, P92, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1969.tb00834.x
[Anonymous], 2017, SAR COUNT HURR IRM A
[Anonymous], J PUBLIC RELATIONS R
[Anonymous], 2006, MEASURING VULNERABIL
[Anonymous], 2002, DISASTER PREV MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1108/DPM.2002.11.3.222.1
[Anonymous], 2013, REGULATION TOXIC SUB
6988(2002)3:3(107)
[Anonymous], SAR COUNT GIS EXPL S
[Anonymous], 2021, SARASOTA COUNTY POST
Armas I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.018
Avvisati G, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101164
Babcicky P, 2017, J RISK RES, V20, P1017, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2016.1147489
BACHRACH KM, 1985, J HEALTH SOC BEHAV, V26, P127, DOI 10.2307/2136602
Bin O, 2004, LAND ECON, V80, P490, DOI 10.2307/3655805
Botzen WJW, 2009, LAND ECON, V85, P265, DOI 10.3368/le.85.2.265
Bradley GL, 2020, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101410
Brenkert-Smith H, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P800, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-
6924.2012.01917.x
Brenkert-Smith H, 2012, ENVIRON MANAGE, V50, P1139, DOI 10.1007/s00267-012-9949-
8
Bronfman NC, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2057, DOI 10.1111/risa.13526
Bronfman NC, 2009, SAFETY SCI, V47, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.09.006
Conway D., 2017, SARASOTA COUNTY ISSU
Daellenbach K, 2018, J NONPROFIT PUBLIC S, V30, P413, DOI
10.1080/10495142.2018.1452830
de Groot A. D., 1965, THOUGHT CHOICE CHESS
Earle T. C., 1995, SOCIAL TRUST COSMOPO
FISCHHOFF B, 1978, POLICY SCI, V9, P127, DOI 10.1007/BF00143739
GREEN CH, 1991, DISASTERS, V15, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00456.x
Grothmann T, 2006, NAT HAZARDS, V38, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
Grunig J.E., 1983, ORG ENV MODELS PUBLI
Hall TE, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P95, DOI 10.1080/08941920802392187
Halpern-Felsher BL, 2001, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V20, P120, DOI 10.1037/0278-
6133.20.2.120
Harvatt J, 2011, J RISK RES, V14, P63, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2010.503935
Heitz C, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.008
Howe PD, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P711, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.02.001
Huang L, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P19742, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1313825110
Illia L, 2013, J PUBLIC RELAT RES, V25, P93, DOI 10.1080/1062726X.2013.758581
Johnston D, 1999, DISASTER PREVENTION, V8, P118, DOI [DOI
10.1108/09653569910266166, 10.1108/09653569910266166]
Kim JN, 2011, J COMMUN, V61, P120, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
KINGSTON PW, 1983, CONTEMP SOCIOL, V12, P414, DOI 10.2307/2067477
KRAUS NN, 1988, RISK ANAL, V8, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb00508.x
Kulp S, 2017, THESE US CITIES ARE
Lemee C, 2019, FRONT PSYCHOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00499
Liu BF, 2019, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101831
Major AM, 1998, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V24, P489, DOI 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80113-1
Marceron JE, 2019, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V24, P83, DOI
10.1080/13548506.2018.1492730
Marris C, 1997, RISK ANAL, V17, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00868.x
Martin H., 2016, W INDIAN J ENG, V39, P32
Mcgee TK, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P308, DOI 10.1080/08941920801910765
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
Mileti D.S., 1993, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, V1553, P31
Miller CH, 2013, DISASTERS, V37, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01290.x
Najafi Mehdi, 2017, PLoS Curr, V9, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.4da18e0f1479bf6c0a94b29e0dbf4a72
Paton D, 2005, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V20, P25
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
PERRY RW, 1982, J SOC PSYCHOL, V116, P199, DOI 10.1080/00224545.1982.9922771
Plapp T, 2006, PROC MONOGR ENG WATE, P101
Rodriguez N., 2018, HURRICANE IRMA ONE Y
Rogers GO, 1997, RISK ANAL, V17, P745, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01280.x
Ross AD, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000544
Rundmo T, 2004, EVALUATION PSYCHOMET, V10, P665
RUSSELL LA, 1995, ENVIRON BEHAV, V27, P744, DOI 10.1177/0013916595276002
Simon H A, 1990, UTILITY PROBABILITY, P15
SIVACEK J, 1982, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V43, P210, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.210
SJOBERG L, 1991, RISK ANAL, V11, P607, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00650.x
STARR C, 1969, SCIENCE, V165, P1232, DOI 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232
Stern PC, 2000, J SOC ISSUES, V56, P407, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Visschers VHM, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P333, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x
Weinstein ND, 2000, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V19, P372, DOI
10.1521/jscp.2000.19.3.372
Wong-Parodi G, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P747, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0138.1
Zeng JJ, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17051750
NR 89
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD MAY 7
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 9
AR 7680
DI 10.3390/su15097680
PG 19
(SSCI)
GA G2WH6
UT WOS:000987816800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Abdulrahman, KZ
Faris, MR
Ibrahim, HM
Yousif, OSQ
Ghafoor, AA
Othman, LS
Karakouzian, M
AF Abdulrahman, Kawa Z.
Faris, Mariwan R.
Ibrahim, Hekmat M.
Yousif, Omed S. Q.
Ghafoor, Alan Abubaker
Othman, Luqman S.
Karakouzian, Moses
TI Hypothetical failure of the Khassa Chai dam and flood risk analysis for
Kirkuk, Iraq
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood simulation; Dam failure; 2D Flow modeling; HEC-RAS; Flood risk
assessment
ID HEC-RAS; BREACH; MODELS
AB Many of Iraqi's high-hazard dams lack an Emergency Action Plan, which should
include a flood inundation map to show which downstream areas would be flooded if
the dams were to fail. This article presents the results of the simulation of a
hypothetical 2D dam break for the 58 m high Khassa Chai dam in Kirkuk, Iraq, using
HEC-RAS 2D 5.0.7 software. The Khassa Chai dam is situated 7.4 km north of Kirkuk.
The simulations revealed that the dam-break flood will affect eight major bridges
and the majority of Kirkuk city's metropolitan neighborhoods. Within an hour, the
floodwaters will reach the city's center. The flood hazard map revealed that if the
Khassa Chai dam fails, many people, vehicles, and structures will be at danger. The
findings of this paper can be used to identify evacuation routes and refuge sites
as well as build suitable warning systems in order to limit the risk for fatalities
if the Khassa Chai dam fails. Moreover, as the effect of modeling bridges
downstream of failed dams has not been explored yet, to the knowledge of the
authors, eight bridges have been modeled. It was concluded that ignoring bridges in
such a large dam break model will not affect the results significantly, which saves
the time of data collection and model development.
C1 [Abdulrahman, Kawa Z.; Ibrahim, Hekmat M.; Yousif, Omed S. Q.; Ghafoor, Alan
Abubaker] Univ Sulaimani, Coll Engn, Dept Water Resources Engn, Sulaymaniyah 46002,
Kurdistan Regio, Iraq.
[Faris, Mariwan R.] Univ Kirkuk, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Kirkuk 36001, Iraq.
[Othman, Luqman S.; Karakouzian, Moses] Univ Halabja, Dept Civil Engn, Halabja
46018, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq.
[Abdulrahman, Kawa Z.; Faris, Mariwan R.; Ibrahim, Hekmat M.; Yousif, Omed S.
Q.; Ghafoor, Alan Abubaker; Othman, Luqman S.; Karakouzian, Moses] Univ Nevada,
Civil & Environm Engn & Construct, 4505 Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA.
C3 University of Sulimanyah; University of Kirkuk; Nevada System of Higher
Education (NSHE); University of Nevada Las Vegas
RP Abdulrahman, KZ (corresponding author), Univ Sulaimani, Coll Engn, Dept Water
Resources Engn, Sulaymaniyah 46002, Kurdistan Regio, Iraq.; Abdulrahman, KZ
(corresponding author), Univ Nevada, Civil & Environm Engn & Construct, 4505
Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA.
EM kawa.abed@univsul.edu.iq
OI Zaidan, kawa/0000-0002-9455-3858
CR Abdulrahman K., 2014, J ENG RES APPL, V4, P109
AEMH, 2014, TECHN FLOOD RISK MAN
Albu L-M, 2019, GIS IMPLEMENTATION D, P6575, DOI [10.24193/AWC2019_07, DOI
10.24193/AWC2019_07]
Altinakar M., 2010, RIVER FLOW, V2010, P547
Altinakar M, 2008, P CD ROM INT S UNC H
Alvarez M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060432
Association of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO), 2020, INC SEARCH ASS STAT
Awal R, 2011, EXPT STUDY PIPING FA, V67
Brunner GW, 2016, HEC RAS RIVER ANAL S, P1171
Cannata M, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P1143, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9974-6
Cracknell J, 2008, BASIC PLANNING CITY
Bui DT, 2016, J HYDROL, V540, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.027
DRIP, 2018, GUID MAPP FLOOD RISK
Froehlich D. C., 2016, EMPIRICAL MODEL EMBA, DOI [10.1201/9781315644479-285, DOI
10.1201/9781315644479-285]
Froehlich DC, 2008, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V134, P1708, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2008)134:12(1708)
Froehlich DC, 2016, J HYDROL ENG, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001424
FROEHLICH DC, 1995, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9496(1995)121:1(90)
Gee DM, 2009, COMP DAM BREACH PARA, P110
Gee DM, 2012, DAM BREACH MODELING, DOI [10.1061/41114(371)144, DOI
10.1061/41114(371)144]
Ghose DK, 2019, P 2 INT C DAT ENG C, P7585, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-1610-4_8,
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-1610-4_8]
Graham L, 1999, PROCEDURE ESTIMATING
ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams), 2011, SMALL DAMS DES SURV, V157
Kilania S, 2019, DAM BREAK ANAL USING, DOI [10.1061/9780784482353.036, DOI
10.1061/9780784482353.036]
Kyaw PPSS., 2020, AM SCI RES J ENG TEC, V69, P59
Li C, 2014, GEOL RESOUR ENG, DOI [10.17265/2328-2193/2014.04.001, DOI
10.17265/2328-2193/2014.04.001]
Maijala T., 2001, DEV RESCUE ACTIONS B
Mandlburger G, 2009, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V13, P1453, DOI 10.5194/hess-13-1453-
2009
Mignot E, 2006, J HYDROL, V327, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.026
National Dam Safety, 2009, SIMPL IN MAPS EM ACT
Niipele JN, 2019, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V21, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.11.003
Pierce MW, 2010, J HYDROL ENG, V15, P338, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000197
Pilotti M, 2006, P 7 INT C HYDR, P62283
Pilotti M, 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG, V137, P480, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000327
Raman A, 2019, ARXIV
Rangari VA, 2019, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V5, P1839, DOI 10.1007/s40808-019-00641-
8
Reed S, 2011, P ASS STAT DAM SAF O, V2, P1877
Sahoo Abinash, 2020, Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications. Proceedings
of the Third International Conference on Smart Computing and Informatics. Smart
Innovation, Systems and Technologies (SIST 159), P733, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-9282-
5_70
Schubert JE, 2012, ADV WATER RESOUR, V41, P49, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.012
Shawky M, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11030235
Shih M, 2018, UNCERTAINTY ANAL DAM
Shustikova I, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12040942
Smith GP, 2014, 201407 WRI, P59
US Army Corps of Engineers, 2014, US HEC RAS DAM BREAK
Vionnet CA, 2006, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V4, P301, DOI
10.1080/15715124.2006.9635299
Von Thun J.L., 1990, GUIDANCE BREAC UNPUB, P17
Wahl TL, 2004, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V130, P389, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2004)130:5(389)
Wahl TL, 1997, PREDICTING EMBANKMEN, P4853
Wahl TL, 2001, UNCERTAINTY EMBANKME, V116
Xiong Y., 2011, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V3, P370, DOI
10.4236/jwarp.2011.36047
Xu Y, 2009, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V135, P1957, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-
5606.0000162
Yochum SE, 2008, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V134, P1285, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2008)134:9(1285)
Zhong DH, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P129, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9743-6
NR 54
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 9
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 113
IS 3
BP 1833
EP 1851
DI 10.1007/s11069-022-05371-2
EA MAY 2022
PG 19
Water Resources
GA 4P7DM
UT WOS:000790611000003
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Huang, L
Yu, ZC
Wang, W
Song, Y
Wang, YQ
AF Huang, Li
Yu, Zhicheng
Wang, Wei
Song, Yue
Wang, Yunqing
TI Multiobjective programming model for a class of flood disaster emergency
material allocation
LA English
DE direct economic losses; emergency material allocation; multiobjective
planning; supply satisfaction; urban flood control
ID RESOURCE-ALLOCATION; RELIEF DISTRIBUTION; OPTIMIZATION MODEL; LOGISTICS;
RISK; EVACUATION; MANAGEMENT; ALGORITHM; SELECTION
AB Flood disasters are a hot topic in the field of disaster prevention and control.
To reduce the high-density economic losses caused by floods, it is necessary to
effectively and reasonably distribute emergency supplies to disaster sites during
the emergency cycle. This article describes setting up a comprehensive multirescue
site, multidisaster site, and multiobjective programming model to measure the total
amount of time taken to transport supplies and economic losses endured in the
response and recovery. Moreover, we use the evolutionary algorithm based on the
Pareto concept and simulate the calculation using computer simulation. Finally, a
case study is carried out based on various supply data of the historical flood
disaster and the flood control supply reserves in the Jiangsu Province. The
optimization results are discussed using the sorting method that approaches the
ideal solution, and three feasible emergency plans are given, which can provide a
reference for emergency supply transportation for urban flood control.
C1 [Huang, Li] Hohai Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
[Huang, Li; Wang, Wei] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat &
Safety, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
[Yu, Zhicheng; Wang, Wei; Song, Yue; Wang, Yunqing] Hohai Univ, Coll Harbour
Coastal & Offshore Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
[Wang, Wei] Hohai Univ, Nantong Ocean & Coastal Engn Res Inst, Nantong, Peoples
R China.
[Wang, Wei] Hohai Univ, Coll Harbour Coastal & Offshore Engn, Nanjing 210098,
Peoples R China.
C3 Hohai University; Tianjin University; Hohai University; Hohai
University; Hohai University
RP Wang, W (corresponding author), Hohai Univ, Coll Harbour Coastal & Offshore
Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China.
EM 13813826667@hhu.edu.cn
FU National Key RD Project [2021YFC3001002]; National Natural Science
Foundation of China [71974052]; Fundamental Research Funds for the
Central Universities [B210205012]; Nantong Municipal Social Livelihood
Science and Technology Key Project [MS22021002]
FX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was funded by National Key R&D Project (no.
2021YFC3001002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (no.
71974052), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
(no. B210205012), and the Nantong Municipal Social Livelihood Science
and Technology Key Project (No. MS22021002).
CR Abdolhamid Z., 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48
Abounacer R, 2014, COMPUT OPER RES, V41, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2013.08.001
Amalnicka M. S., 2016, APPL MATH ENG MANAGE, V4, P88
[Anonymous], TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V75
Baharmand H, 2019, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V127, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.05.002
Banomyong R., 2010, REGIONAL VIEWS, V1, P1
Chai G, 2018, NEUROCOMPUTING, V275, P1567, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.086
Chang MS, 2007, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V43, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2006.10.013
[陈波 CHEN Bo], 2008, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V17, P92
Chen FJ, 2022, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V34, P3537, DOI 10.1007/s00521-021-05883-1
[陈湉 Chen Tian], 2019, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V34, P194
Chiu YC, 2007, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V43, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2006.11.006
de Leeuw S, 2012, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V20, P166, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
5973.2012.00667.x
Diehlmann F, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105301
Feng JR, 2020, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.104032
Feng JR, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V120, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.011
Fiedrich F, 2000, SAFETY SCI, V35, P41, DOI 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00021-7
Gabriele B., 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70
Garrido RA, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V75, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.002
Guo JN, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107678
10.1038/nclimate1911]
Hu H, 2019, J TRAFFIC TRANSP ENG, V6, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.07.001
[胡忠君 Hu Zhongjun], 2019, [控制与决策, Control and Decision], V34, P1571
Huang M, 2013, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V50, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2013.01.005
Huang ZW, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P3810, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.039
Kamyabniya A, 2021, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102371
Li KZ, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P737, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0180-y
[刘传正 Liu Chuanzheng], 2018, [中国地质灾害与防治学报, The Chinese Journal of
Geological Hazard and Control], V29, P1
Ma SQ, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100974
Duque PAM, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V248, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.026
Vieira YEM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102193
Mostafa N. Z., 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V145
Murphy RR, 2012, J FIELD ROBOT, V29, P819, DOI 10.1002/rob.21435
Najmeh N. S., 2021, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V111
National Disaster Reduction Center of China (NDRCC), 2020, CHIN HIST FLOOD DAT
Nolz PC, 2011, OR SPECTRUM, V33, P543, DOI 10.1007/s00291-011-0258-z
Ozguven EE, 2015, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V57, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.021
Pando V, 2014, APPL MATH COMPUT, V237, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.122
Rawls CG, 2010, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V44, P521, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2009.08.003
Rebeeh Y, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V117, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.020
Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V264, P978, DOI
10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.021
Schroter K, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V105, P118, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.032
Seyed R. A., 2021, SOCIOECONOMIC PLANNI, V74
Sheu JB, 2007, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V43, P655, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2007.01.001
Sheu JB, 2010, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2009.07.005
Shi XL, 2022, SAFETY SCI, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105492
Si H, 2012, SAFETY SCI, V50, P1452, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.011
Sun T., 2021, ENVIRON RES, V196
Wan SP, 2021, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107757
Wang BC, 2021, ADV ENG INFORM, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101278
Wang HJ, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V69, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.006
Wang HM, 2018, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V129, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.043
[王绍仁 WANG Shaoren], 2011, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory &
Practice], V31, P1497
Wang WQ, 2021, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102332
Wang Y, 2021, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107041
Wisetjindawat W, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V25, P1198, DOI
10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.138
Wu MM, 2021, J HYDROL, V599, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126393
Doan XV, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V274, P687, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.015
[杨恩缘 Yang Enyuan], 2016, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V31, P200
Yinzhen Zhong, 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V14, DOI 10.1007/s12517-
021-07179-z
Yuan Y, 2009, COMPUT IND ENG, V56, P1081, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.033
Zhao HP, 2017, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V23, P457, DOI
10.1080/10807039.2016.1185693
Zheng YJ, 2013, SOFT COMPUT, V17, P1301, DOI 10.1007/s00500-012-0968-4
Zhong SP, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102015
Zhou YW, 2017, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V99, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.011
NR 65
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 10
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1753-318X
PD 2023 MAY 11
PY 2023
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12918
EA MAY 2023
PG 20
GA F8HB9
UT WOS:000984693100001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ogawa, K
Inoue, T
Hiramatsu, Y
Mishra, J
AF Ogawa, Kohei
Inoue, Takuya
Hiramatsu, Yuki
Mishra, Jagriti
TI A Route Search System to Avoid the Danger to Life in Dynamic Inundation
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood; evacuation; route search; levee breech; shelter
ID INSTABILITY
AB In recent years, the frequency of torrential rains has increased due to abnormal
weather conditions. Torrential rains have caused extensive flooding damage in many
areas. As delays in evacuation can pose a threat to life, a quick search for safe
evacuation routes has become more important than ever before. In this study, we
constructed a new system for searching evacuation routes that incorporates a
function that varies the weight of each road in the route search depending on the
distance from the flooded area D and the distance that the flood area extends in 10
min D' (i.e., the flood's inundation speed). We conducted multiple hypothetical
flood simulations with different locations of levee breaches and shelters in the
study site (Obihiro City, Japan). Then, we compared the results with the
conventional system that does not include the proposed function. The results showed
that the system proposed in this study increased the number of successful evacuees
by up to 2.16 times compared to the conventional system. In our system, the weight
function is set to the C-d power of D/D'; increasing the model parameter C-d
selects a route that detours more of the flooded area. The model parameter C-d that
maximizes the number of successful evacuees is roughly constant, regardless of the
locations of the levee breaches or shelters in the study site.
C1 [Ogawa, Kohei; Inoue, Takuya] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn,
Higashihiroshima 7398551, Japan.
[Hiramatsu, Yuki] Civil Engn Res Inst Cold Reg, Sapporo 0628602, Japan.
[Mishra, Jagriti] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, Sch Environm Sci, New Delhi 110067,
India.
C3 Hiroshima University; Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
RP Inoue, T (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn,
Higashihiroshima 7398551, Japan.
EM inouetakuya@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
OI Inoue, Takuya/0000-0003-1423-8186
FU Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP); JSPS
KAKENHI [22H01602]; Ramanujan Fellowship [RJF/2021/000168]
FX This work was supported by Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation
Promotion Program (SIP) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22H01602.
Participation in Jagriti Mishra was made possible by Ramanujan
Fellowship no. RJF/2021/000168.
CR Amideo AE, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V279, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.009
[Anonymous], 2022, SEK URB IN PRED SYST
[Anonymous], 2022, RIV DAT BOOK
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), 2021, 2021 DIS NUMB
Chelariu OE, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14193074
Chiu YC, 2008, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V9, P264, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2008.922878
6988(2007)8:3(69), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)]
Huang WR, 2009, J WATERW PORT COAST, V135, P164, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
950X(2009)135:4(164)
Inoue T., 2018, J JPN SOC CIV ENG B1, V74, pI_1291, DOI
[10.2208/jscejhe.74.I_1291, DOI 10.2208/JSCEJHE.74.I_1291]
Inoue T, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12071881
Inoue T, 2020, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V45, P2897, DOI 10.1002/esp.4938
Johnson PA, 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V137, P1248, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000443
1688.2008.00217.x
Kievik M, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1475, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9845-1
Krytska Y, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 9TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
INTELLIGENT DATA ACQUISITION AND ADVANCED COMPUTING SYSTEMS: TECHNOLOGY AND
APPLICATIONS (IDAACS), VOL 2, P955, DOI 10.1109/IDAACS.2017.8095228
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Ming XD, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2019WR025583
Musolino G, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12627
Nelson JM, 2016, ADV WATER RESOUR, V93, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.017
Nishikawa S., 2019, J JPN SOC CIV ENG, V75, P1327
Notti D, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10111673
Pizarro A, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020374
Robinson RM, 2010, TRANSPORT RES REC, P168, DOI 10.3141/2196-18
Sekine M., 2020, P 22 IAHR APD C SAPP
Shimizu Y, 2020, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V45, P11, DOI 10.1002/esp.4653
Sumner T., 2019, J JSCE, V7, P15, DOI [10.2208/journalofjsce.7.1_15, DOI
10.2208/JOURNALOFJSCE.7.1_15]
Van Ackere S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112275
Xie C, 2010, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V46, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2009.11.004
NR 30
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 7
AR 1417
DI 10.3390/w15071417
PG 12
GA D7BF7
UT WOS:000970235800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kelly, FE
Bailey, CR
Aldridge, P
Brennan, PA
Hardy, RP
Henrys, P
Hussain, A
Jenkins, M
Lang, A
McGuire, N
McNarry, A
Osborn, M
Pittilla, L
Ralph, M
Sarkar, S
Taft, D
AF Kelly, F. E.
Bailey, C. R.
Aldridge, P.
Brennan, P. A.
Hardy, R. P.
Henrys, P.
Hussain, A.
Jenkins, M.
Lang, A.
McGuire, N.
McNarry, A.
Osborn, M.
Pittilla, L.
Ralph, M.
Sarkar, S.
Taft, D.
TI Fire safety and emergency evacuation guidelines for intensive care units
and operating theatres: for use in the event of fire, flood, power cut,
oxygen supply failure, noxious gas, structural collapse or other
critical incidents Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and
the Intensive Care Society
SO ANAESTHESIA
LA English
DT Article
DE fire; evacuation; intensive care; anaesthesia
AB The need to evacuate an ICU or operating theatre complex during a fire or other
emergency is a rare event but one potentially fraught with difficulty: Not only is
there a risk that patients may come to harm but also that staff may be injured and
unable to work. Designing newly-built or refurbished ICUs and operating theatre
suites is an opportunity to incorporate mandatory fire safety features and improve
the management and outcomes of such emergencies: These include well-marked manual
fire call points and oxygen shut off valves (area valve service units); the ability
to isolate individual zones; multiple clear exit routes; small bays or side rooms;
preference for ground floor ICU location and interconnecting routes with operating
theatres; separate clinical and non-clinical areas. ICUs and operating theatre
suites should have a bespoke emergency evacuation plan and route map that is
readily available. Staff should receive practical fire and evacuation training in
their clinical area of work on induction and annually as part of mandatory
training, including 'walk-through practice' or simulation training and location of
manual fire call points and fire extinguishers, evacuation routes and location and
operation of area valve service units. The staff member in charge of each shift
should be able to select and operate fire extinguishers and lead an evacuation.
Following an emergency evacuation, a network-wide response should be activated,
including retrieval and transport of patients to other ICUs if needed. A full
investigation should take place and ongoing support and follow-up of staff
provided.
C1 [Kelly, F. E.; Hardy, R. P.] Royal United Hosp Bath NHS Fdn Trust, Dept
Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Bath, Avon, England.
[Bailey, C. R.] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia, London,
England.
[Aldridge, P.] Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Secur & Corp Affairs, Leeds, W
Yorkshire, England.
[Aldridge, P.; Hussain, A.] Natl Assoc Healthcare Fire Officers, Daventry,
England.
[Brennan, P. A.] Portsmouth Hosp Univ Trust, Portsmouth, Hants, England.
[Henrys, P.] BOC Ltd, Guildford, Surrey, England.
[Henrys, P.] British Compressed Gas Assoc Med Gas Comm, Derby, England.
[Hussain, A.] AH Fire Ltd, Derby, England.
[Hussain, A.] Royal United Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Intens Care Unit, Bath, Avon,
England.
[Jenkins, M.] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Human Factors Res Grp, Nottingham,
England.
[Lang, A.] Devices Med & Healthcare Prod Regulatory Ag, London, England.
[McGuire, N.] Western Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Edinburgh, Midlothian,
Scotland.
[McNarry, A.] Royal United Hosp Bath NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Oncol, Bath, Avon,
England.
[Osborn, M.] North England Paediat Crit Care Network & Paediat, London, England.
[Pittilla, L.] NHS Improvement Dept Hlth, London, England.
[Ralph, M.] Med Gas Assoc, London, England.
[Ralph, M.] Sherwood Forest Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care
Med, Sutton In Ashfield, Notts, England.
[Sarkar, S.] Intens Care Soc, London, England.
C3 Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; N8 Research Partnership; White
Rose University Consortium; University of Leeds; University of
Nottingham; University of Edinburgh
RP Kelly, FE (corresponding author), Royal United Hosp Bath NHS Fdn Trust, Dept
Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Bath, Avon, England.
EM fiona.kelly@doctors.org.uk
RI McNarry, Alistair/ABC-5143-2020; Bailey, Craig R/E-8907-2010
OI McNarry, Alistair/0000-0003-3429-0299; Bailey, Craig/0000-0002-7084-3842
CR ADA National Network, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
Association for Perioperative Practice, 2020, CASE PREVENTION MANA
Association of Anaesthetists, 2018, QUICK REFERENCE HDB
BOC, 2019, MEDICAL GAS DATA SHE
Cowles CE, 2019, BJA EDUC, V19, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.007
Department of Health, 2006, MEDICAL GASES HLTH T
Department of Health, 2017, HLTH TECHNICAL MEMOR
Department of Health and Social Care, 2015, FIRE SAFETY DESIGN H
Department of Health and Social Care, 2013, MANAGING HEALTHCARE
Department of Health and Social Care, 2008, FIRE SAFETY MEASURES
Department of Health and Social Care, 2007, HEATING VENTILATION
Fire Safety Advice Centre, EMERGENCY LIGHTING
Flach S, 2019, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V44, P871, DOI 10.1111/coa.13398
General Medical Council, 2021, GMC THRESHOLDS
General Medical Council, GOOD MEDICAL PRACTIC
Greenberg N, 2008, J R Army Med Corps, V154, P124
Health and Safety Executive, 2011, OC 3342
Health Service Executive, 2017, YORKSHIRE CONTRIBUTO
HM Government, 2019, BUILDING REGULATIONS, V2
HM Government, 2006, FIRE SAFETY RISK ASS
Intensive Care Society, GUIDELINES PROVISION
Johnson TJ, 2021, ANAESTHESIA, V76, P1001, DOI 10.1111/anae.15437
Kelly FE, 2021, ANAESTHESIA, V76, P1137, DOI 10.1111/anae.15479
Kelly FE., 2014, J INTENSIVE CARE SOC, V15, P283
Kim TJ, 2018, A A PRACT, V11, P348, DOI 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000825
London Fire Brigade, SPRINKLERS
MHRA, 2020, CENTRAL ALERTING SYS
Ministry of Housing Communities & Local Government, 2020, FIRE SAFETY APPROVED
Mir F, 2018, BRIT J ANAESTH, V121, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.006
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2018, POST TRAUM STRESS DI
Nekhendzy V, 2020, LARYNGOSCOPE, V130, pE874, DOI 10.1002/lary.28562
NHS, POST TRAUMATIC STRES
NHS England, 2014, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNE
Onwochei D, 2017, ANAESTHESIA, V72, P781, DOI 10.1111/anae.13873
Palme, 2019, AUST J OTOLARYNGOL, V2, P22, DOI [10.21037/ajo.2019.07.02, DOI
10.21037/AJO.2019.07.02]
Salaria ON, 2018, A A PRACT, V10, P5, DOI 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000620
Ward P, 2017, ANAESTHESIA, V72, P1035, DOI 10.1111/anae.13993
Welsh Health Estates, 2009, GUIDANCE NOTE SPRINK
Wigmore T, 2014, J INTENSIVE CARE SOC, V15, P281
NR 42
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 1
U2 11
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0003-2409
EI 1365-2044
J9 ANAESTHESIA
JI Anaesthesia
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 76
IS 10
BP 1377
EP 1391
DI 10.1111/anae.15511
EA MAY 2021
PG 15
WC Anesthesiology
SC Anesthesiology
GA UL6IA
UT WOS:000649851900001
PM 33984872
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Socas, RAM
Gonzalez, MA
Marin, YR
Castillo-Garcia, CL
Jimenez, J
das Dores de Jesus da Silva, L
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, L
AF Martinez Socas, Rolando Ariel
Alvarez Gonzalez, Michael
Marin, Yoandy Rodriguez
Lazaro Castillo-Garcia, Carlos
Jimenez, Jorge
das Dores de Jesus da Silva, Luciana
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Lisdelys
TI Simulating the Flood Limits of Urban Rivers Embedded in the Populated
City of Santa Clara, Cuba
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE hydraulic simulation; river flood; HEC-RAS model
AB Floods are a natural phenomenon that cause damage to structures and property as
well as negatively affect human life. Assessing the extent, speed, power, and depth
of flooding has always been a challenge for water resource planners. This research
developed a hydraulic simulation model for the Cubanicay and Belico urban rivers
embedded in the city of Santa Clara, Cuba. The methodology was based on a one-
dimensional model of the Hydrological Engineering River Analysis System (HEC-RAS)
and GIS-based methods. The HEC-RAS model (Beta) and three modeling flood tests for
scenarios of 1% (100 years), 2% (50 years), and 10% (10 years) of probability for
hydrometeorological events were analyzed. Bank lines, flow path lines, and cross-
section cut lines were extracted from Digital Elevation Models. Manning's roughness
coefficients were considered for the channel morphology and soil typology. The
flood Beta model results were accurate with a difference of +/- 0.10 m considering
the water footprint found in the field. The results showed that the areas near the
control section 2 + 87 presented a high risk of flooding. The flood limit map for
urban areas could be an important tool for researchers, planners, and local
governments for risk assessment and to develop evacuation plans and flood
mitigation strategies in order to reduce human and economic losses during a flood.
C1 [Martinez Socas, Rolando Ariel; Marin, Yoandy Rodriguez; Lazaro Castillo-Garcia,
Carlos] Univ Cent Marta Abreu Las Villas, Fac Construcc, Carretera CamajuaniKm 9 1-
2, Santa Clara 50100, Cuba.
[Alvarez Gonzalez, Michael] Empresa Invest & Proyectos Hidraul Villa Clara, Ave
Libertadores 201 E Jesus Menendez & Danielito, Santa Clara, Cuba.
[Jimenez, Jorge] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ingn, Concepcion 4030000, Chile.
[das Dores de Jesus da Silva, Luciana] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias
Ambientales, Concepcion 4030000, Chile.
[Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Lisdelys] Univ Las Amer, Fac Ingn & Negocios, Sede
Concepcion, Concepcion 4030000, Chile.
[Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Lisdelys] Univ Las Amer, Fac Ingn & Negocios, Nucleo Invest
Data Sci NIDS, Santiago 7500000, Chile.
C3 Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas; Universidad de
Concepcion; Universidad de Concepcion; Universidad de Las Americas -
Chile; Universidad de Las Americas - Chile
RP Gonzalez-Rodriguez, L (corresponding author), Univ Las Amer, Fac Ingn &
Negocios, Sede Concepcion, Concepcion 4030000, Chile.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, L
(corresponding author), Univ Las Amer, Fac Ingn & Negocios, Nucleo Invest Data Sci
NIDS, Santiago 7500000, Chile.
EM rolandoarielms@gmail.com; michaelalvarezglez@gmail.com;
yoandy1998@gmail.com; ccgarcia@uclv.cu; jorgejimenez@udec.cl;
lucisilva@udec.cl; lgonzalezr@udla.cl
OI Castillo Garcia, Carlos Lazaro/0000-0002-6430-2775; Gonzalez Rodriguez,
Lisdelys/0000-0002-7892-4604; Martinez Socas, Rolando
Ariel/0000-0002-0185-4302
FU Empresa de Investigaciones y Proyectos Hidraulicos, Villa Clara, Cuba;
Universidad de Las Americas, Chile
FX This research was funded by Empresa de Investigaciones y Proyectos
Hidraulicos, Villa Clara, Cuba and Universidad de Las Americas, Chile
and the APC was funded by Program to Support Publication in Open Access
Journals 2023 of Universidad de Las Americas, Chile.
CR Alvarez Gonzalez M., 2014, CROQUIS TECNOLOGICO
[Anonymous], 2017, HDB APPL HYDROLOGY
Castillo García Carlos Lázaro, 2021, Enfoque UTE, V12, P51, DOI
10.29019/enfoqueute.729
Castillo García Carlos Lázaro, 2022, Ing. hidrául. ambient., V43, P44
Castillo-Garcia C., 2022, TECNOLGLAS CIENC AGU, DOI [10.24850/j-tyca-15-1-9, DOI
10.24850/J-TYCA-15-1-9]
Castillo-Garcia C., 2022, TECNOLGIAS CIENC AGU, DOI [10.24850/j-tyca-14-4-4, DOI
10.24850/J-TYCA-14-4-4]
Chen L, 2004, J COMPUT MATH, V22, P299
Chow V., 1994, HIDROLOGIA APLICADA
Cui P, 2021, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V2, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.09.001
de Beurs KM, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V229, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.028
Dhungel S., 2019, INT J SUSTAIN DEV PL, V14, P356, DOI [10.2495/SDP-V14-N4-356-
366, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V14-N4-356-366]
Dyhouse G., 2003, FLOODPLAIN MODELING
Gary W., 2016, HYDROL ENG CENT, P547
Ghimire Ekaraj, 2022, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, V28, P110, DOI
10.1080/09715010.2020.1824621
Her Y.G., 2018, AGR BIOL ENG TROP RE, V2018, P1, DOI [10.32473/edis-ae523-2018,
DOI 10.32473/EDIS-AE523-2018]
Ibacache V., 2016, ANALISIS COMPARATIVO
Ibrahim H., 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, P902
IFRCRCS DREF, 2021, FIN REP CUB FLOODS
Ikirri M, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11081178
Imanudin M. S., 2021, IOP Conference Series : Earth and Environmental Science,
V871, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/871/1/012035
Iturralde-Vinent M.A., 2018, AN ACAD CIENCIAS CUB, V11, P16
Kastridis A, 2020, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/hydrology7010012
Kim J, 2019, TROP CYCLONE RES REV, V8, P27, DOI 10.6057/2019TCRR01.05
Garcia C, 2023, ENFOQUE UTE, V14, P77, DOI 10.29019/enfoqueute.888
Membele GM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102766
Messina W.A., 2008, CUBAN AGR IMPACTS TR
Mokhtar ES, 2018, ARAB J GEOSCI, V11, DOI 10.1007/s12517-018-4040-2
Muller A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P2107, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011
Pinos J, 2019, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V14, P341, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2019.018
Popescu C, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15030483
Quesada-Roman A, 2019, LANDSLIDES, V16, P1539, DOI 10.1007/s10346-019-01209-4
Ramos-Scharron CE, 2022, PHYS GEOGR, V43, P163, DOI
10.1080/02723646.2020.1801121
Samanta RK, 2018, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V4, P395, DOI 10.1007/s40808-018-0427-z
Sen S, 2023, GEOJOURNAL, V88, P711, DOI 10.1007/s10708-022-10637-0
Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI
10.1017/cbo9781107415324
Stoleriu CC, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12572
Stucchi L, 2021, CLIMATE, V9, DOI 10.3390/cli9020023
Surya Putri I. H., 2022, Sustainability and Climate Change, V15, P446, DOI
10.1089/scc.2022.0098
Syarifudin A, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14244094
Tikul N, 2022, CLIM SERV, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100279
USGS, 1989, 2339 USGS WAT SUPPL, V2339
Yao L, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P656, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1497-6
Zakrison TL, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, P10, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2019.71
NR 45
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAY 9
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 10
AR 1805
DI 10.3390/w15101805
PG 18
GA H7MS6
UT WOS:000997766700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yilmaz, K
Darama, Y
Oruc, Y
Melek, AB
AF Yilmaz, Kutay
Darama, Yakup
Oruc, Yunus
Melek, A. Berhan
TI Assessment of flood hazards due to overtopping and piping in Dalaman
Akkopru Dam, employing both shallow water flow and diffusive wave
equations
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DE Dam breach; Flood; Overtopping; Piping; Hydraulic modeling; Flood
mitigation measures; Shallow water equations; Diffusive wave equations
ID NUMERICAL-MODEL; BREAK FLOWS; PROPAGATION; RIVER; RISK
AB This study was carried out to determine flood propagation using shallow water
equations (SWEs) and diffusive wave equations (DWEs) to reveal how the flood
modeling results differ in terms of flow depth, flow velocity, and hazard level.
The solution methods were tested based on the hypothetical failure of the Dalaman
Akkopru Dam resulting from two failure mechanisms: overtopping (OT) and piping
(PP). A 2D hydraulic model was constructed using HEC-RAS to determine the
propagation of flood waves due to the failure of the dam by the mechanisms
selected. Froehlich equations were applied to predict the breaching parameters of
the dam. After calibration, the hydraulic model was run to determine the possible
flooding magnitude in the towns of Ortaca, Dalaman, and Dalyan. The flood arrival
times, maximum flow depths, flow velocities, and hazard classes were obtained for
the Dalaman, Ortaca, and Dalyan city centers, and the Dalaman International Airport
from the hydraulic model results. The modeling results showed that the inundated
area is similar for both the SWEs and DWEs solutions, while the flow depth and
velocity results are significantly different due to the neglected convective
acceleration terms of the SWEs when deriving the DWEs. Considering the modeling
results, even though the DWEs provide a computational cost advantage, the
reliability of the solutions should be examined against the SWEs. Hazard maps were
generated for both solution methods and failure mechanisms. The results revealed
that most of the settlements in the basin have H5 and H6 hazard classes with a high
risk of structural damage. Therefore, the installation of early warning systems and
evacuation of district centers were suggested as mitigation measures. A feasible
evacuation plan for the neighborhoods, taking into account the flood arrival time
of the failure scenarios, is needed.
C1 [Yilmaz, Kutay; Oruc, Yunus] Alter Int Engn & Consultancy Co, Ankara, Turkiye.
[Darama, Yakup] Atilim Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkiye.
[Melek, A. Berhan] Middle East Tech Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkiye.
C3 Atilim University; Middle East Technical University
RP Darama, Y (corresponding author), Atilim Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Ankara, Turkiye.
EM yakup.darama@atilim.edu.tr
OI Oruc, Yunus/0000-0002-8929-1419; Yilmaz, Kutay/0000-0001-5529-9239;
Darama, Yakup/0000-0003-0066-2621
CR Al-Aloosi A, 2019, FLOODS CA
Alfieri L, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P171, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000485
[Anonymous], 1999, SEDIMENTATION RIVER
[Anonymous], 2016, DAM FAILURE MECH RIS, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118558522.CH8
Ashraf A, 2022, PHD THESI
Aslan A, 2011, TURK J ZOOL, V35, P481, DOI 10.3906/zoo-0812-2
BELLOS CV, 1987, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V113, P1510, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1987)113:12(1510)
Bosa S, 2013, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V27, P1763, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0162-6
Bozkus Z., 2009, 4 NATL WATER ENG S, P89
Bozkus Z., 2003, INT J PHYS ENG SCI, V53, P58
Bozkus Z., 2011, TEK DERGI, V22, P1537
Brufau P, 2002, INT J NUMER METH FL, V39, P247, DOI 10.1002/fld.285
Costa JE, 1985, FLOODS DAM FAILURES
DSI, 2015, ASAGI DALAMAN PROJES
FEMA, 2013, FED GUID IN MAPP FLO
Froehlich DC, 2008, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V134, P1708, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2008)134:12(1708)
9496(1995)121:1(90)
Haltas I, 2013, PROCEEDING 6 INT PER
Haltas I, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P2103, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2175-6
Ingles O.G., 1984, CIVIL ENG SYSTEMS J, V1, P190, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.1080/02630258408970342, DOI 10.1080/026302584089703422-S2.0-
0021445616, DOI 10.1080/02630258408970342]
Kostecki S., 2020, WATER-SUI, V2020, P1
Kreibich H, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P953, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000606
Mahdizadeh H, 2012, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V138, P247, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000515
Marangoz HO, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V110, P429, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04953-w
Mitsopoulos G, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14152356
Moradi M, 2014, APPROXIMATE EQUATION, V19
Moramarco T, 2014, J HYDROL ENG, V19, P1264, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-
5584.0000890
Moussa R, 2009, J HYDROL, V374, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.006
Natale L, 2008, P INT C FLUVIAL HYDR, V1, P601
Papaioannou G, 2018, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/hydrology5020024
Pilotti M, 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG, V137, P480, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000327
Qi HH, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1125, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9822-8
Singh J, 2011, ADV WATER RESOUR, V34, P1366, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.07.007
Sivakumar S, 2015, INT J SCI ENG RES, V6
Slater LJ, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P12428, DOI 10.1002/2016GL071199
Smith GP, 2014, 201407 WRI, P59
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2014, US HEC RAS DAM BREAK
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 2015, GUID EST LIF LOSS DA
Von Thun JL, 1990, GUIDANCE BREACH PARA
Wang JJ, 2014, HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN EARTH-ROCK FILL DAMS, P1, DOI
10.1002/9781118725542
Xiong Y., 2011, Journal of Water Resource and Protection, V3, P370, DOI
10.4236/jwarp.2011.36047
Xu Y, 2009, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V135, P1957, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-
5606.0000162
Yanmaz A. M., 2005, Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences,
V29, P309
Yilliklari Akim, SAYFADETAY
Yilmaz K., 2022, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V2022, P1
Ying XY, 2009, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V3, P184, DOI 10.1080/19942060.2009.11015264
Zhai R, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001398
Zhang LM, 2009, GEORISK, V3, P184, DOI 10.1080/17499510902831759
NR 48
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 5
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD 2023 MAR 9
PY 2023
DI 10.1007/s11069-023-05891-5
EA MAR 2023
PG 25
Water Resources
GA 9S2NX
UT WOS:000946183700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Tsuda, H
Tebakari, T
AF Tsuda, Hinako
Tebakari, Taichi
TI A macroscopic analysis of the demographic impacts of flood inundation in
Thailand (2005-2019)
SO PROGRESS IN EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Demographics; Flood; Inundation; Thailand
ID NATURAL DISASTERS; EVACUATION
AB In Thailand, floods are occurring more frequently due to climate change, and
recent economic development and population growth may have altered the way in which
people interact with floods, including migration to other regions. In this study,
we analyzed the relationship between flooding and population distribution across
Thailand from 2005 to 2019 to improve measures for minimizing flood damage. We used
population distribution point data from 2009 to 2019 produced by Oak Ridge National
Laboratory to analyze trends in population movement and distribution, by examining
whether population sizes were greater than, less than, or equal to estimated values
in regions throughout Thailand. The results suggest that floods in 2011 and 2017
caused temporary migration to areas that were not inundated or to the metropolitan
Bangkok area. Flood responses changed after the 2011 floods, which have been
described as the worst flood in Thai history. Next, we examined the relationship
between the number of regions with lower than estimated population and flood data
for the previous year including precipitation, inundated area, and deaths caused by
flooding. Inundation area had a significant impact on population decline, with
correlation coefficients of 0.426 and 0.501 for the north and northeast,
respectively. The number of deaths caused by flooding in a given year also led to a
population decline in the following year. However, precipitation did not exhibit
the same trend. Therefore, population demographics after floods have shown regional
characteristics in recent years, with Thai people shifting from a flood-tolerance
lifestyle to a flood-avoidance lifestyle, mainly in local urban areas and the
metropolitan Bangkok area.
C1 [Tsuda, Hinako; Tebakari, Taichi] Chuo Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Civil Human &
Environm Sci & Engn Course, 1-13-27 Kasuga,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
C3 Chuo University
RP Tsuda, H (corresponding author), Chuo Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Civil Human &
Environm Sci & Engn Course, 1-13-27 Kasuga,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
EM a18.84hf@g.chuo-u.ac.jp
FU Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)/Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA) Science and Technology Research Partnership
for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) program; Strategic International
Collaborative Research Program East Asia Joint Research Program (SICORP
e-ASIA JRP) [21338544, 15543675]
FX This study was supported by the Japan Science and Technology Agency
(JST)/Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Science and
Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS)
program (PI: Prof.Taik an OKI) and the Strategic International
Collaborative Research Program East Asia Joint Research Program (SICORP
e-ASIA JRP; PI: Prof.Taik an OKI) (Grant nos. 21338544, 15543675).
CR ADRC, 2019, MEMB COUNTR DIS PREV
Bengtsson L, 2011, PLOS MED, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001083
Bhula-or R, 2020, J DISASTER RES, V15, P599
Bright E, 2006, LANDSCAN GLOBAL 2005, DOI [10.48690/1524201, DOI
10.48690/1524201]
Climate Bonds Initiative, 2022, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
GISTDA, 2019, THAIL FLOOD MON SYST
Gray CL, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P6000, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115944109
Inoue T., 2021, NATURAL DISASTERS PO, P187
Iwaki Y., 2013, THAI SOC REFLECTED F, P23
Karacsonyi D., 2021, DEMOGRAPHY DISASTERS, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-49920-4, DOI
10.1007/978-3-030-49920-4]
Kawasaki A., 2012, J SOC SAF SCI, V17, P109
Kiguchi M, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abce80
Kobayashi S, 2015, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V93, P5, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001
Komori D, 2013, THAILAND 2011 FLOODS, V22, P13
Loc HH, 2020, J HYDROL, V589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125368
Mizutani T., 1989, GEOGR REV JPN, V62A-3, P208, DOI [10.4157/grj1984a.62.3_208,
DOI 10.4157/GRJ1984A.62.3_208]
Official statistics registration system, 2019, POPULATION
Park E, 2021, J HYDROL, V594, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125643
Phanthuwongpakdee N, 2016, THESIS NATL U SINGAP
Tahira Y., 2015, J SOC SAF SCI, V27, P167
Tamada Y, 2013, THAILAND 2011 FLOODS, V22, P123
Tsuda H, 2022, 49 JSCE KANT BRANCH
Tsuda H, 2022, AS OC GEOSC SOC 19 A
Wang CH, 2019, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V62, P21, DOI 10.1007/s00168-018-0878-1
Yabe Takahiro, 2020, J R Soc Interface, V17, P20190532, DOI
10.1098/rsif.2019.0532
Yamazaki D, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P5844, DOI 10.1002/2017GL072874
NR 27
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2197-4284
J9 PROG EARTH PLANET SC
JI Prog. Earth Planet. Sci.
PD JUL 13
PY 2023
VL 10
IS 1
AR 36
DI 10.1186/s40645-023-00569-9
PG 13
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
SC Geology
GA M4ME7
UT WOS:001029955700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Gacu, JG
Monjardin, CEF
Senoro, DB
Tan, FJ
AF Gacu, Jerome G.
Monjardin, Cris Edward F.
Senoro, Delia B.
Tan, Fibor J.
TI Flood Risk Assessment Using GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process in
the Municipality of Odiongan, Romblon, Philippines
LA English
DT Article
DE AHP; digital elevation model; flood; GIS; risk assessment
ID URBAN AREA; MODELS; BASIN; AHP
AB The archipelagic Romblon province frequently experiences typhoons and heavy
rains that causes extreme flooding, this produces particular concern about the
severity of damage in the Municipality of Odiongan. Hence, this study aimed to
assess the spatial flood risk of Odiongan using the analytical hierarchy process
(AHP), considering disaster risk factors with data collected from various
government agencies. The study employed the geographic information system (GIS) to
illustrate the spatial distribution of flooding in the municipality. Sendai
Framework was the basis of risk analysis in this study. The hazard parameters
considered were average annual rainfall, elevation, slope, soil type, and flood
depth. Population density, land use, and household number were considered
parameters for the exposure assessment. Vulnerability assessments considered gender
ratio, mean age, average income, number of persons with disabilities, educational
attainment, water usage, emergency preparedness, type of structures, and distance
to evacuation area as physical, social, and economic factors. Each parameter was
compared to one another by pairwise comparison to identify the weights based on
experts' judgment. These weights were then integrated into the flood risk
assessment computation. The results led to a flood risk map which recorded nine
barangays (small local government units) at high risk of flooding, notably the
Poblacion Area. The results of this study will guide local government units in
developing prompt flood management programs, appropriate mitigation measures,
preparedness, and response and recovery strategies to reduce flood risk and
vulnerability to the population of Odiongan.
C1 [Gacu, Jerome G.; Monjardin, Cris Edward F.; Senoro, Delia B.; Tan, Fibor J.]
Mapua Univ, Sch Grad Studies, Masters Program Civil Engn, Manila 1002, Philippines.
[Gacu, Jerome G.; Monjardin, Cris Edward F.; Senoro, Delia B.; Tan, Fibor J.]
Mapua Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Geol Engn, Manila 1002, Philippines.
[Gacu, Jerome G.] Romblon State Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Coll Engn & Technol,
Odiongan 5505, Romblon, Philippines.
[Monjardin, Cris Edward F.; Senoro, Delia B.; Tan, Fibor J.] Mapua Univ,
Yuchengco Innovat Ctr, Resiliency & Sustainable Dev Ctr, Manila 1002, Philippines.
C3 Mapua University; Mapua University; Mapua University
RP Monjardin, CEF (corresponding author), Mapua Univ, Sch Grad Studies, Masters
Program Civil Engn, Manila 1002, Philippines.; Monjardin, CEF (corresponding
author), Mapua Univ, Sch Civil Environm & Geol Engn, Manila 1002, Philippines.;
Monjardin, CEF (corresponding author), Mapua Univ, Yuchengco Innovat Ctr,
Resiliency & Sustainable Dev Ctr, Manila 1002, Philippines.
EM cefmonjardin@mapua.edu.ph
RI Gacu, Jerome Gabutero/HSG-1224-2023; SENORO, DELIA/GSI-9890-2022
OI Gacu, Jerome Gabutero/0000-0003-1577-7552; Tan,
Fibor/0000-0002-2240-2612; Monjardin, Cris Edward/0000-0003-3688-4402;
Senoro, Delia/0000-0002-5255-9979
FU Department of Science and Technology-Engineering Research and
Development for Technology; Mapua University
FX The study was funded by the Department of Science and
Technology-Engineering Research and Development for Technology and Mapua
University.
CR Abe Y, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100020
Alfonso CDQ, 2019, INT J GEOMATE, V17, P201, DOI 10.21660/2019.64.17155
Ali K., 2016, INT J ENV AGR BIOTEC, V1, P1065, DOI [10.22161/ijeab/1.4.62, DOI
10.22161/IJEAB/1.4.62]
├astr├Am H.L.A., 2015, URBAN FLOOD RISK ASS
BALLENGER AP, 2017, P N AM POW S, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107300
Bera R, 2021, REG STUD MAR SCI, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101766
Bo Chen, 2010, 2010 International Conference on Computer Application and System
Modeling (ICCASM 2010), P90, DOI 10.1109/ICCASM.2010.5622400
Boroushaki S, 2010, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V36, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.05.011
Cabrera JS, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12607
Cabrera JS, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112203
Cai SY, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12050623
Cai T, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101077
Chen YR, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1261, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9831-7
Clark C., 2007, INT WATER POWER DAM, V59, P1, DOI [10.3390/books978-3-03936-939-
3, DOI 10.3390/BOOKS978-3-03936-939-3]
y, DOI 10.1186/S40677-016-0044-Y]
Davies R., PHILIPPINES 1000S HI
Dodgson J.S., 2009, MULTICRITERIA ANAL M, V11, P1
Eleuterio J, 2010, RISK ANALYSIS VII: SIMULATION AND HAZARD MITIGATION &
BROWNFIELDS V: PREVENTION, ASSESSMENT, REHABILITATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BROWNFIELD
SITES, pPI381, DOI 10.2495/RISK100331
Engay-Gutierrez KG, 2015, J ENVIRON SCI MANAG, V18, P34
ESCAP IDD, 2015, DIS AS PAC 2015 YEAR
Febrianto H, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND
INTELLIGENT COMPUTING (KCIC), P148, DOI 10.1109/KCIC.2016.7883639
Feloni E, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12563
Gigovic L, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060360
Hawker L, 2018, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/feart.2018.00233
HEC-HMS, HEC HMS
HEC-RAS, HEC RAS
Jeon YW, 2013, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P2517, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723333
Juneja P., WHAT IS ANAL HIERARC
Kia MB, 2012, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V67, P251, DOI 10.1007/s12665-011-1504-z
Kittipongvises S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101612
Kokangul A, 2017, SAFETY SCI, V91, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.015
Lagmay AMFA, 2017, J ENVIRON SCI-CHINA, V59, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.014
LGU Odiongan, 2017, COMPR LAND US PLAN C
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
Malhotra S., FLOODED CITIES MILLI
Monjardin CEF, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12073527
Monjardin CEF, 2020, IEEE CONF TECH SUST, DOI 10.1109/sustech47890.2020.9150518
National Disaster Management Office (NDMO), 2016, REP VAN NAT GUID SEL
Noamen B., 2020, INT J WATER SCI ENV, V2, P139
Nunez C., FLOODS FACTS INFORM
Osei B.K., 2021, ENV CHALL, V3, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100028
pagasa.dost, PAGASA CLIMATOLOGICA
Pornasdoro K.P., 2014, J URBAN REG PLAN, V1, P51
Prasetyo YT, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101831
PUNO GR, 2018, J BIODIVERS ENVIRON, V12, P294
pwc, EMPLOYMENT PWDS
Rahadianto H, 2015, 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA AND SOFTWARE
ENGINEERING (ICODSE), P195, DOI 10.1109/ICODSE.2015.7436997
Rahman M.Z.A., 2006, GIS DEV MALAYSIA, P1
region4b.mgb, GEOHAZARD MAPS
Robielos RAC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218815
Santillan JR, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V41, P149, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-
XLI-B4-149-2016
Shrestha B.B., 2014, 6 INT C FLOOD MAN, VVolume ii, P1
Shrestha BB, 2016, J DISASTER RES, V11, P1137, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2016.p1137
Siddayao Generino P., 2015, International Journal of Information and Education
Technology, V5, P748, DOI 10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.604
Siddayao Generino P., 2014, International Journal of Machine Learning and
Computing, V4, P450, DOI 10.7763/IJMLC.2014.V4.453
Stefanidis S, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V68, P569, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0639-5
Sugumaran R, 2000, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P334, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2000.860510
Talisay BAM, 2019, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V5, P139, DOI 10.22034/gjesm.2019.02.01
Tehrany MS, 2013, J HYDROL, V504, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.034
Ternate JR, 2017, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V216, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/216/1/012044
Teves C., ROMBLON WATERWAYS RI
un-spider, FLOOD UN SPIDER KNOW
Weerasinghe KM, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P503, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.065
Wilkins A, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100167
NR 70
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 6
U2 9
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2076-3417
J9 APPL SCI-BASEL
JI Appl. Sci.-Basel
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 19
AR 9456
DI 10.3390/app12199456
PG 31
GA 5G0RR
UT WOS:000866715800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Edgeley, CM
Colavito, MM
AF Edgeley, Catrin M.
Colavito, Melanie M.
TI Characterizing Divergent Experiences with the Same Wildfire: Insights
from a Survey of Households in Evacuation, Postfire Flood Risk, and
Unaffected Areas After the 2019 Museum Fire
SO JOURNAL OF FORESTRY
LA English
DT Article
DE Survey; forest management; wildfire; public support; risk communication
ID WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE; FUELS MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY;
COMMUNITY RECOVERY; SELF-EVACUATION; FOREST; TRUST; PERCEPTIONS;
VULNERABILITY; KNOWLEDGE
AB Households can experience the same wildfire event differently depending on the
kinds of risks posed to them, among other factors. These experiences can influence
support or opposition for local forest management. We administered a mixed-mode
survey to households across three distinct groups with different sources of risk
associated with the 2019 Museum Fire in Flagstaff, Arizona: houses in the wildfire
evacuation areas, houses in the postfire flood-risk area, and unaffected houses
within the city limits. Survey responses from 787 respondents confirmed that
households experienced the Museum Fire and its associated risks differently and
revealed continued support for active forest management in the Flagstaff area.
Experiences, trustworthiness of information, and support for specific forest
management outcomes varied across our sample populations, indicating that tailored
communication may be needed for households who experience different risk associated
with the same event. We conclude with considerations for communicating with the
public in postfire environments. Study Implications There are significant
differences in perspectives and attitudes between directly and indirectly affected
households that experienced the same wildfire, including varied trust in
information sources and engagement in communication about wildfire and flood risk.
Therefore, more targeted communication about wildfire and postfire risk and forest
management that tailors outreach based on different household experiences is
needed. Future efforts to investigate populations affected by wildfire should
account for potentially diverse household experiences and consider how that may
affect communication about forest management during windows of opportunity after
wildfire events. Differentiating approaches to risk communication is particularly
important during compound disasters (e.g., a flood that occurs within a wildfire-
affected area) to ensure information is shared by the right outlet for a given
population as risk sources begin to layer temporally.
C1 [Edgeley, Catrin M.] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA.
[Colavito, Melanie M.] No Arizona Univ, Ecol Restorat Inst, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
USA.
C3 Northern Arizona University; Northern Arizona University
RP Edgeley, CM (corresponding author), No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ
86011 USA.
EM catrin.edgeley@nau.edu
RI Colavito, Melanie/AAB-9224-2020
OI Colavito, Melanie/0000-0003-2089-5158; Edgeley,
Catrin/0000-0002-7283-9812
FU Arizona Board of Regents through the Technology, Research and Innovation
Fund (TRIF)
FX This research was supported by funding provided by the Arizona Board of
Regents through the Technology, Research and Innovation Fund (TRIF).
CR [Anonymous], 2011, US FOR SERV GEN TECH
ARMSTRONG JS, 1977, J MARKETING RES, V14, P396, DOI 10.2307/3150783
Ascher TJ, 2013, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V22, P267, DOI 10.1071/WF12026
Birkland T.A., 1997, DISASTER AGENDA SETT, P192
Blanchard B, 2007, NORTH J APPL FOR, V24, P203, DOI 10.1093/njaf/24.3.203
Brenkert-Smith H, 2020, FIRE-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/fire3010002
Brenkert-Smith H, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI [10.5751/ES-09471-220307, 10.5751/es-
09471-220307]
Brunson MW, 2005, J FOREST, V103, P134
Brunson MW, 2004, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V17, P661, DOI 10.1080/08941920490480688
Burns M, 2007, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V20, P245, DOI 10.1080/08941920601117348
Byerly H, 2020, FIRE-BASEL, V3, DOI 10.3390/fire3040066
Carroll MS, 2006, RURAL SOCIOL, V71, P261, DOI 10.1526/003601106777789701
Carroll MS, 2011, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V24, P672, DOI 10.1080/08941921003681055
Christianson AC, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V98, P9, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3556-9
Colavito M, 2020, FIRE ECOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s42408-020-00078-w
Cortner HJ, 1998, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V40, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0169-
2046(97)00108-4
Diaz JM, 2016, J FOREST, V114, P58, DOI 10.5849/jof.14-026
Dillman D. A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL, VFourth, P528
Edgeley C.M., 2020, LOCAL EXPERIENCES 20, P40
Edgeley CM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102772
Edgeley CM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101182
Edgeley CM, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P137, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.009
Eisenman D, 2015, ECOHEALTH, V12, P602, DOI 10.1007/s10393-015-1052-1
Fleming CJ, 2015, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V75, P445, DOI 10.1111/puar.12353
Hamilton M, 2020, FRONT FOR GLOB CHANG, V3, DOI 10.3389/ffgc.2020.00075
Kooistra C, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P85, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0962-9
Kumagai Y, 2004, J FOREST, V102, P28
Larsen LND, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V207, DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104005
Lidskog R, 2019, SCAND J FOREST RES, V34, P319, DOI
10.1080/02827581.2019.1598483
Loomis JB, 2001, J FOREST, V99, P18
McCaffrey S., 2009, FIRE MANAGEMENT TODA, V69, P9
McCaffrey S. M., 2006, General Technical Report - Northern Research Station,
USDA Forest Service, P192
McCool SF, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V37, P437, DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0054-0
Meldrum JR, 2018, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V31, P1132, DOI
10.1080/08941920.2018.1456592
Mockrin MH, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V62, P210, DOI 10.1007/s00267-018-1030-9
Mottek-Lucas A.M., 2015, FLAGSTAFF WATERSHED, P28
Neary DG, 2019, NATURAL RESOURCES MA, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.87203, DOI
10.5772/INTECHOPEN.87203]
Olsen CS, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09054-220121
Olsen CS, 2013, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V22, P822, DOI 10.1071/WF12086
Olsen CS, 2010, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V19, P137, DOI 10.1071/WF08168
Paveglio T, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V87, P1083, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2810-x
Paveglio TB, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V213, P425, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.068
Paveglio TB, 2016, ENVIRON MANAGE, V58, P534, DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0719-x
Paveglio TB, 2015, J RURAL STUD, V41, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.07.006
Paveglio TB, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P212, DOI 10.1071/WF14091
Paveglio TB, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V43, P1085, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9282-z
Rasch R, 2019, FOREST SCI, V65, P652, DOI 10.1093/forsci/fxz027
Ryan RL, 2008, J FOREST, V106, P370
Schumann RL, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101354
Sharp EA, 2013, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V56, P1246, DOI
10.1080/09640568.2012.717052
Shindler B, 2003, J FOREST, V101, P8
Shindler BA, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P157, DOI 10.1071/WF07135
Steelman TA, 2011, J FOREST, V109, P454
Stern M.J., 2019, NEW ERA COLLABORATIV, P45, DOI 10.4324/9781351033381-3
Strahan K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P307, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.016
Strahan KW, 2019, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V18, P146, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2018.1512468
Toman E.B., 2004, J ENVIRON EDUC, V35, P13, DOI DOI 10.3200/JOEE.35.3.13-33
US Census Bureau, 2019, QUICKFACTS FLAGST CI
USDA Forest Service,, 2019, FPLRP701 USDA FOR SE
Vogt C., 2002, ANTECEDENTS ATTITUDE, P74
Weible C, 2005, J FOREST, V103, P5
Winter G, 2004, J FOREST, V102, P8
Winter GJ, 2002, J FOREST, V100, P15
NR 69
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 8
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
PI CARY
PA JOURNALS DEPT, 2001 EVANS RD, CARY, NC 27513 USA
SN 0022-1201
EI 1938-3746
J9 J FOREST
JI J. For.
PD NOV 2
PY 2022
VL 120
IS 6
BP 660
EP 675
DI 10.1093/jofore/fvac018
EA JUN 2022
PG 16
WC Forestry
SC Forestry
GA 5W2SO
UT WOS:000814809200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lee, CC
Chou, C
Mostafavi, A
AF Lee, Cheng-Chun
Chou, Charles
Mostafavi, Ali
TI Specifying evacuation return and home-switch stability during short-term
disaster recovery using location-based data
LA English
DT Article
ID COMMUNITY RECOVERY; NATURAL DISASTERS; FLOOD INSURANCE; MOBILITY
AB The objectives of this study are: (1) to specify evacuation return and home-
switch stability as two critical milestones of short-term recovery during and in
the aftermath of disasters; and (2) to understand the disparities among
subpopulations in the duration of these critical recovery milestones. Using
privacy-preserving fine-resolution location-based data, we examine evacuation and
home move-out rates in Harris County, Texas in the context of the 2017 Hurricane
Harvey. For each of the two critical recovery milestones, the results reveal the
areas with short- and long-return durations and enable evaluating disparities in
evacuation return and home-switch stability patterns. In fact, a shorter duration
of critical recovery milestone indicators in flooded areas is not necessarily a
positive indication. Shorter evacuation return could be due to barriers to
evacuation and shorter home move-out rate return for lower-income residents is
associated with living in rental homes. In addition, skewed and non-uniform
recovery patterns for both the evacuation return and home-switch stability were
observed in all subpopulation groups. All return patterns show a two-phase return
progress pattern. The findings could inform disaster managers and public officials
to perform recovery monitoring and resource allocation in a more proactive, data-
driven, and equitable manner.
C1 [Lee, Cheng-Chun; Mostafavi, Ali] Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil & Environm
Engn, Urban Resilience AI Lab, 199 Spence St, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
[Chou, Charles] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, 435 Nagle St, College Stn,
TX 77843 USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas
A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station
RP Lee, CC (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Zachry Dept Civil & Environm
Engn, Urban Resilience AI Lab, 199 Spence St, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
EM ccbarrylee@tamu.edu
OI Lee, Cheng-Chun/0000-0002-9441-9229
FU National Science Foundation [CMMI-1846069]; Texas A M University [699]
FX This material is based in part upon work supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant CMMI-1846069 (CAREER), and the Texas A &M
University X-Grant 699. The authors also would like to acknowledge the
data support from Spectus. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation,
Texas A &M University, or Spectus.
CR Aleta A, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, P964, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9
[Anonymous], 2013, QUALITATIVE RES HLTH
Arrighi C, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P1010, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.191
Atreya A, 2015, ECOL ECON, V117, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.024
Bonaccorsi G, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P15530, DOI
10.1073/pnas.2007658117
Browne MJ, 2000, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V20, P291, DOI 10.1023/A:1007823631497
Coleman N, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2107.06705
Coronese M, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P21450, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1907826116
Deria A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101608
Esmalian A, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2201.00745
Esmalian A, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102347
Fan C, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2110.12371
Fan C, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103367
Fan C, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70524-x
Fussell E, 2014, SOC SCI QUART, V95, P1086, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12114
Galeazzi A, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-92399-2
Horney J, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P124, DOI 10.1111/disa.12190
Hsu CW, 2021, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2109.03873
Johnson L.A., 2012, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V30, P212, DOI [DOI
10.1177/028072701203000205, DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2]
Kapucu N., 2014, DISASTER RECOVERY, P41, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-54255-1_3,
10.1007/978-4-431-54255-1_3]
Lane K, 2013, J ENVIRON PUBLIC HEA, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/913064
Lee Cheng-Chun., 2021, COMMUNITY SCALE BIG
Mitsova D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020516
Nande A, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22521-5
Olshansky RB, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P293, DOI
10.1080/01944363.2014.967710
Pastor-Escuredo D, 2014, IEEE GLOB HUMANIT C, P279, DOI
10.1109/GHTC.2014.6970293
Platt S, 2018, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V44, P369, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62099-2_19
Rouhanizadeh B, 2019, COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2019: SMART CITIES,
SUSTAINABILITY, AND RESILIENCE, P41
Roy KC, 2019, EPJ DATA SCI, V8, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0196-6
Sheykhmousa M, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11101174
Sledge D, 2019, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V109, P437, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304895
Song X, 2017, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, V8, DOI 10.1145/2970819
Stocker TF, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1, DOI
10.1017/cbo9781107415324
Suzuki T, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-00913-3
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
Wang FL, 2019, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V105, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.028
Wang Q, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0112608
Wang Y, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0188734
Yabe T, 2019, APPL NETW SCI, V4, DOI 10.1007/s41109-019-0221-5
Yabe T, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102260
Yabe Takahiro, 2020, J R Soc Interface, V17, P20190532, DOI
10.1098/rsif.2019.0532
Yuan FX, 2022, IEEE ACCESS, V10, P1138, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3137651
NR 50
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 4
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD SEP 26
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 1
AR 15987
DI 10.1038/s41598-022-20384-4
PG 13
GA 4W3VW
UT WOS:000860095400024
PM 36163362
OA gold, Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lee, J
Kockelman, KM
AF Lee, Jooyong
Kockelman, Kara M.
TI Strategic Evacuation for Hurricanes and Regional Events with and without
Autonomous Vehicles
LA English
DT Article
ID SOCIAL NETWORKS; DECISIONS; MODEL
AB A scheduling algorithm is developed for optimal planning of large-scale, complex
evacuations to minimize total delay plus travel time across residents. The
algorithm is applied to the eight-county Houston-Galveston region and land use
setting under the 2017 Hurricane Harvey scenario with multiple destinations.
Autonomous vehicle (AV) use under central guidance is also tested, to demonstrate
the evacuation time benefits of AVs. Higher share of AVs delivers more efficient
evacuation performance, thanks to greater reliability on evacuation order
compliance, lower headways, and higher road capacity. Furthermore, 100% AV use
delivers lower overall evacuation costs and network clearance times and less
uncertainty in travel times (via lower standard deviation in). Based on evaluations
of different evacuation schedules, a 50% compressed evacuation time span resulted
in longer travel times and network congestion. A 50% longer evacuation time span
reduced residents' total travel time and network congestion, but increased the
evacuation cost. As expected, evacuation efficiency falls when evacuees do not
comply with evaucation schedules. Large shares of AVs will not be possible in the
near future, so methods to enhance evacuees' compliance behavior (e.g., enforced
and prioritized evacuation orders) should be considered until a meaningful level of
AV technical maturity and penetration rate is available. This paper demonstrates
the benefits of scheduled departure times, AV use, and evacuation order compliance,
which help balance conflicting objectives during emergencies.
C1 [Lee, Jooyong; Kockelman, Kara M.] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural &
Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
C3 University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin
RP Kockelman, KM (corresponding author), Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil
Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
EM kkockelm@mail.utexas.edu
RI Kockelman, Kara/ABF-7223-2021
FU Planet Texas 2050, a research grand challenge initiative of The
University of Texas at Austin
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work
is supported in part by Planet Texas 2050, a research grand challenge
initiative of The University of Texas at Austin, with editing and
administrative support from Jade (Maizy) Jeong.
CR Abdelgawad H, 2010, TRANSPORT RES REC, P21, DOI 10.3141/2196-03
Afkham, 2020, INT J IND ENG PRODUC, V31, P259
Apivatanagul P, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V60, P567, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0029-9
Census, 2019, QUICK FACTS BRAZ CHA
Chien SI, 2007, J TRANSP ENG, V133, P190, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
947X(2007)133:3(190)
DAGANZO CF, 1994, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V28, P269, DOI 10.1016/0191-
2615(94)90002-7
Fagnant DJ, 2018, TRANSPORTATION, V45, P143, DOI 10.1007/s11116-016-9729-z
HART PE, 1968, IEEE T SYST SCI CYB, VSSC4, P100, DOI 10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136
Houston-Galveston Area Council, 2020, EV ROUT MAP
HydroShare, 2018, FEMA HARV FLOOD DEPT, DOI
[10.4211/hs.165e2c3e335d40949dbf501c97827837, DOI
10.4211/HS.165E2C3E335D40949DBF501C97827837]
Kl?pfel, 2012, P INT C EV MOD MAN C, P11
Krajzewicz D., 2012, INT J ADV SYSTEMS ME, V5, P128
Lee J, 2019, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2673, P536, DOI 10.1177/0361198119839981
Liu Y, 2012, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V27, P731, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8667.2012.00778.x
Lopez PA, 2018, IEEE INT C INTELL TR, P2575, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2018.8569938
Lv NC, 2010, KYBERNETES, V39, P1227, DOI 10.1108/03684921011063501
10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.016
Morando MM, 2018, J ADV TRANSPORT, DOI 10.1155/2018/6135183
National Water Information System: Web Interface, 2020, NATL WATER INFORM SY
Pyakurel U, 2017, ANN OPER RES, V254, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10479-017-2427-1
Takabatake T, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P1, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.003
Takagi H, 2016, COAST ENG, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2015.11.002
Tamminga G, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, P89, DOI 10.3141/2234-10
U.S. Department of Transportation, 2017, 2017 NAT HOUS TRAV S
6988(2001)2:3(105), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:3(105)]
Yuan H, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P111232, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2934473
Zelinsky D.A., 2018, AL092017
NR 35
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 12
PI THOUSAND OAKS
SN 0361-1981
EI 2169-4052
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 2675
IS 9
BP 1398
EP 1409
AR 03611981211007482
DI 10.1177/03611981211007482
EA APR 2021
PG 12
GA WL1RH
UT WOS:000684317100001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Severson, E
Olson, JK
Hyde, AS
Bremault-Phillips, S
Spiers, J
King, S
Bick, J
Lipschutz, R
Verstraeten, BSE
Olson, DM
AF Severson, Emily
Olson, Joanne K.
Hyde, Ashley
Bremault-Phillips, Suzette
Spiers, Jude
King, Suzanne
Bick, Johanna
Lipschutz, Rebecca
Verstraeten, Barbara S. E.
Olson, David M.
TI Experiencing Trauma During or Before Pregnancy: Qualitative Secondary
Analysis After Two Disasters
SO MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL
LA English
DE Pregnancy; Trauma; Stress; Evacuation; Qualitative analysis; Hurricane;
Wildfire
ID POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; PRENATAL MATERNAL STRESS
AB BackgroundDespite the existing knowledge about stress, trauma and pregnancy and
maternal stress during natural disasters, little is known about what types of
trauma pregnant or preconception women experience during these disasters. In May
2016, the worst natural disaster in modern Canadian history required the evacuation
of nearly 90,000 residents of the Fort McMurray Wood Buffalo (FMWB) area of
northern Alberta. Among the thousands of evacuees were an estimated 1850 women who
were pregnant or soon to conceive. In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey devastated
areas of the United States including Texas, with 30,000 people forced to flee their
homes due to the intense flooding.ObjectiveTo explore immediate and past traumatic
experiences of pregnant or preconception women who experienced one of two natural
disasters (a wildfire and a hurricane) as captured in their expressive writing.
Research questions were: (1) What trauma did pregnant or preconception women
experience during the fire and the hurricane? (2) What past traumatic experiences,
apart from the disasters, did the women discuss in their expressive writing?
MethodsA qualitative secondary analysis of expressive writing using thematic
content analysis was conducted on the expressive writing of 50 pregnant or
preconception women who experienced the 2016 Fort McMurray Wood Buffalo Wildfire (n
= 25) and the 2017 Houston Hurricane Harvey (n = 25) Narrative data in the form of
expressive writing entries from participants of two primary studies were
thematically analyzed. One of the expressive writing questions was used in this
analysis: "What is the most traumatic, upsetting experience of your entire life,
especially that you have never discussed in great detail with others?" NVivo 12
supported thematic content analysis.ResultsFor some women, the disasters elicited
immense fear and anxiety that surpassed previous traumatic life events. Others,
however, disclosed significant past traumas that continue to impact them, including
betrayal by a loved one, abuse, maternal health complications, and
illness.ConclusionWe recommend a strengths-based and trauma-informed care approach
in both maternal health and post-disaster relief care.
C1 [Severson, Emily; Olson, Joanne K.; Spiers, Jude] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing,
[Hyde, Ashley] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
[Bremault-Phillips, Suzette] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Dept Occupat
Therapy, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
[King, Suzanne] McGill Univ, Douglas Hosp Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
[King, Suzanne] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
[Bick, Johanna] Univ Houston, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX USA.
[Lipschutz, Rebecca] Univ Houston, Dept Clin Psychol, Houston, TX USA.
[Verstraeten, Barbara S. E.] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
[Olson, David M.] Univ Alberta, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
[Olson, David M.] Univ Alberta, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
[Olson, David M.] Univ Alberta, Dept Physiol, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
C3 University of Alberta; University of Alberta; University of Alberta;
McGill University; McGill University; University of Houston System;
University of Houston; University of Houston System; University of
Houston; University of Alberta; University of Alberta; University of
Alberta; University of Alberta
RP Olson, DM (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Edmonton,
AB, Canada.; Olson, DM (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Dept Pediat, Edmonton,
AB, Canada.; Olson, DM (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Dept Physiol,
EM david.olson@ualberta.ca
OI Hyde, Ashley/0000-0001-6356-1209
FU Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta; Women and
Children's Health Research Institute; O'Brien Institute for Public
Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research [151029]
FX This study was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health
Research (No.151029) and support from the Faculty of Medicine and
Dentistry, University of Alberta, The Women and Children's Health
Research Institute, and the O'Brien Institute for Public Health.
CR [Anonymous], 2001, USING TRAUMA THEORY
[Anonymous], 2009, ESSENTIALS QUALITATI
[Anonymous], 2007, FDN HLTH PSYCHOL
BBC, 2017, BBC 0829
Birnbaum S, 2019, ISSUES MENT HEALTH N, V40, P476, DOI
10.1080/01612840.2018.1563256
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Bremault-Phillips S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101730
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Reproductive Health &
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2020, EM RESP
TOOLS RES
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, 2017 HURR SEAS FEMA
Galea S, 2005, EPIDEMIOL REV, V27, P78, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxi003
Giarratano G, 2014, NURS INQ, V21, P259, DOI 10.1111/nin.12049
Harris PA, 2009, J BIOMED INFORM, V42, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Harville E, 2010, OBSTET GYNECOL SURV, V65, P713, DOI
10.1097/OGX.0b013e31820eddbe
Hinds PS, 1997, QUAL HEALTH RES, V7, P408, DOI 10.1177/104973239700700306
Hopper EK, 2010, OPEN HLTH SERVICES P, V3, P80, DOI [DOI
10.2174/1874924001003010080, DOI 10.2174/1874924001003020080]
Huckshorn K., 2013, MODERN COMMUNITY MEN, P65
Kulig, 2017, PSYCHOSOCIAL RESPONS
Laplante DP, 2018, EARLY HUM DEV, V116, P84, DOI
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.11.012
Machtinger EL, 2019, WOMEN HEALTH ISS, V29, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.whi.2018.11.003
Martin U, 2015, COGENT PSYCHOL, V2, DOI 10.1080/23311908.2015.1053741
Moss KM, 2017, DEV PSYCHOL, V53, P629, DOI 10.1037/dev0000272
Olson DM, 2019, J DEV ORIG HLTH DIS, V10, P108, DOI 10.1017/S2040174418001113
Olson DM, 2015, INT J MOL SCI, V16, P29856, DOI 10.3390/ijms161226209
PENNEBAKER JW, 1986, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V95, P274, DOI 10.1037/0021-843X.95.3.274
Reeves E, 2015, ISSUES MENT HEALTH N, V36, P698, DOI
10.3109/01612840.2015.1025319
School of Public Affairs University of Houston, 2018, IMP HURR HLTH SURV 2
Stokes Y, 2017, GLOB QUALIT NURS RES, V4, DOI 10.1177/2333393617734510
United States Census Bureau, 2018, TABL S0101 AM COMM S
Van den Bergh BRH, 2020, NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV R, V117, P26, DOI
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.003
Xiong X, 2008, AM J MED SCI, V336, P111, DOI 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318180f21c
NR 30
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
SN 1092-7875
EI 1573-6628
J9 MATERN CHILD HLTH J
JI Matern. Child Health J.
PD 2023 MAR 10
PY 2023
DI 10.1007/s10995-023-03625-4
EA MAR 2023
PG 10
GA 9T2CB
UT WOS:000946838700001
PM 36897470
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Nomura, S
Murakami, M
Ozaki, A
Sawano, T
Leppold, C
Nishikawa, Y
Saito, H
Oikawa, T
Tsubokura, M
AF Nomura, Shuhei
Murakami, Michio
Ozaki, Akihiko
Sawano, Toyoaki
Leppold, Claire
Nishikawa, Yoshitaka
Saito, Hiroaki
Oikawa, Tomoyoshi
Tsubokura, Masaharu
TI Comparative risk assessment of non-communicable diseases by evacuation
scenario- a retrospective study in the 7 years following the Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power plant accident
SO GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Japan; Fukushima; evacuation; non-communicable diseases
ID POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE; INVERSE
PROBABILITY; METABOLIC SYNDROME; HURRICANE-KATRINA; CLINICAL-PRACTICE;
PROPENSITY SCORE; HEART-FAILURE; HEALTH-CARE; DISASTER
AB Background: As a result of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident,
many residents evacuated and were exposed to changes in their living environment
and socioeconomic status, and to persistent stressors. Past studies have suggested
the potential for these circumstances to contribute to long-term changes to
population health.
Objective: The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of
long-term health effects of evacuation, by evaluating the risk of non-communicable
diseases among evacuees from Minamisoma City (one of the closest municipalities to
the power plant) until 2017.
Methods: The study evaluated data from annual health check-ups for residents
aged 40-74 years covered by National Health Insurance (who are largely self-
employed) from 2010 to 2017 administered by Minamisoma City. Diabetes,
hyperlipidemia, and hypertension were defined from the results of blood sampling.
Annual changes in age-adjusted prevalence were estimated by evacuation scenario. We
also performed an inverse-probability weighting (IPW) analysis to adjust for
baseline covariates in 2010 and estimated the differences in the risk of diabetes,
hyperlipidemia, and hypertension by evacuation scenario as of the 2017 health
check-up in reference to the no-evacuation group.
Results: A total of 1,837 individuals were considered in this study. Regardless
of evacuation scenario, there was statistical evidence suggesting an upward and a
downward trend in diabetes and hypertension from 2010 to 2017, respectively, while
hyperlipidemia showed no remarkable change. IPW analyses demonstrated that disease
risks in 2017 did not differ significantly among people with different evacuation
scenarios.
Conclusions: Region-specific factors played an important role in the health
effects of the evacuation. Our findings have important implications for the need of
an assessment of the health effects of evacuations in more localized manner.
Further research in this area will strengthen the communities' preparedness for
future disasters that require mass evacuation.
C1 [Nomura, Shuhei; Ozaki, Akihiko; Sawano, Toyoaki; Tsubokura, Masaharu]
Minamisoma Municipal Gen Hosp, Res Ctr Community Hlth, Fukushima, Japan.
[Nomura, Shuhei] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Global Hlth Policy, Tokyo,
Japan.
[Nomura, Shuhei] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Tokyo,
Japan.
[Murakami, Michio] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Risk Commun,
Fukushima, Japan.
[Ozaki, Akihiko] Tokiwa Fdn, Jyoban Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Fukushima, Japan.
[Sawano, Toyoaki] Tokiwa Fdn, Jyoban Hosp, Dept Surg, Fukushima, Japan.
[Sawano, Toyoaki; Saito, Hiroaki; Tsubokura, Masaharu] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch
Med, Dept Radiat Hlth Management, Fukushima, Japan.
[Leppold, Claire] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global
Hlth, Child & Community Wellbeing Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
[Nishikawa, Yoshitaka] Soma Cent Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Fukushima, Japan.
[Nishikawa, Yoshitaka] Kyoto Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Informat, Kyoto,
Japan.
[Saito, Hiroaki] Sendai Kousei Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
[Oikawa, Tomoyoshi] Minamisoma Municipal Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Fukushima,
Japan.
C3 University of Tokyo; Keio University; Fukushima Medical University;
Fukushima Medical University; University of Melbourne; Kyoto University;
Sendai Kousei Hospital
RP Nomura, S (corresponding author), Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy &
Management, Shinjuku Ku, 35 Shinanomachi, Tokyo 1608582, Japan.
EM s-nomura@keio.jp
RI Tsubokura, Masaharu/AAV-4364-2021; Nomura, Shuhei/HCH-5356-2022;
Nishikawa, Yoshitaka/GLV-3579-2022; SAITO, HIROAKI/HLH-2447-2023
OI Tsubokura, Masaharu/0000-0001-8027-202X; Nomura,
Shuhei/0000-0002-2963-7297; Nishikawa, Yoshitaka/0000-0003-3313-1990;
SAITO, HIROAKI/0000-0002-0824-454X; Ozaki, Akihiko/0000-0003-4415-9657
FU Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [KAKEN JP20H04354]; Research
project on the Health Effects of Radiation by Ministry of the
Environment, Japan; Ministry of the Environment
FX The present work was supported in part by a grant from the Japan Society
for the Promotion of Science (KAKEN JP20H04354), and by Research project
on the Health Effects of Radiation organized by Ministry of the
Environment, Japan; Ministry of the Environment.
CR Ahmed A, 2007, EUR HEART J, V28, P1334, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm091
Ahmed A, 2007, HEART, V93, P1584, DOI 10.1136/hrt.2006.113522
Ahmed MI, 2009, EUR HEART J, V30, P2029, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp222
[Anonymous], 2012, OFF REP FUK NUCL ACC
[Anonymous], 2010, CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
[Anonymous], 2019, THE JAPAN TIMES
Austin PC, 2011, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V46, P119, DOI 10.1080/00273171.2011.540480
Bartoli F, 2013, METAB SYNDR RELAT D, V11, P301, DOI 10.1089/met.2013.0010
Bender AM, 2015, PREV MED, V81, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.004
Chan E. Y. Y., 2018, BUILDING BOTTOM UP H
Chung YS, 2020, ENVIRON HEALTH PREV, V25, DOI 10.1186/s12199-020-00852-x
Curtis LH, 2007, MED CARE, V45, pS103, DOI 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806518ac
Ebner DK, 2016, BMJ OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011641
FLURY BK, 1986, AM STAT, V40, P249, DOI 10.2307/2684560
Fonseca VA, 2009, DIABETES CARE, V32, P1632, DOI 10.2337/dc09-0670
Frontino Giulio, 2013, Eur Endocrinol, V9, P6, DOI 10.17925/EE.2013.09.01.21
Fukushima Prefecture, CHANGES EVACUATION A
Fukushima Prefecture, TRANSITION EVACUATIO
Gautam S, 2009, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V3, P144, DOI 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181b9db91
Giselher B, 2018, CURRENT SITUATION IS
Gohardehi F, 2020, ETHIOP J HEALTH SCI, V30, P439, DOI 10.4314/ejhs.v30i3.15
Haneda M, 2018, DIABETOL INT, V9, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13340-018-0345-3
Hasegawa A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P479, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61106-0
Ikegami N, 2011, LANCET, V378, P1106, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60828-3
Inoue M, 2006, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-6-2
Inui A, 1998, ARCH INTERN MED, V158, P274, DOI 10.1001/archinte.158.3.274
Jenkins JL, 2009, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V3, pS24, DOI
10.1097/DMP.0b013e31819f1afc
Kario K, 2012, CIRC J, V76, P553, DOI 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1510
Kinoshita M, 2018, J ATHEROSCLER THROMB, V25, P846, DOI 10.5551/jat.GL2017
Krousel-Wood MA, 2008, AM J MED SCI, V336, P99, DOI 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318180f14f
Lorenzoni N, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17176251
Lucchini RG, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3939-3
Patino CM, 2016, J BRAS PNEUMOL, V42, P240, DOI 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000225
Miller AC, 2008, PREHOSPITAL DISASTER, V23, P185, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X00005835
Minamisoma City, RESIDENCE STATUS EVA
Minamisoma City, 2020, POPULATION REGISTERE
Muller CJ, 2014, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V43, P962, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyu029
Murakami A, 2018, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V12, P396, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.63
Murakami M, 2019, J RADIOL PROT, V39, pN27, DOI 10.1088/1361-6498/ab4e5a
Murphy Barbara, 2005, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V25, P135, DOI 10.1097/00008483-
200505000-00002
Nagai M, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4247-2
Nagayama Y, 2018, J RADIAT RES, V59, DOI 10.1093/jrr/rrx054
Nomura S., 2017, INT J ENV RES PUBLIC, V14, P4
Nomura Shuhei, 2020, J Radiol Prot, V40, P1, DOI 10.1088/1361-6498/ab49ba
Nomura S, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14060656
Nomura S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V16, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.01.013
Nomura S, 2016, BMJ OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010080
Normand SLT, 2001, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V54, P387, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00321-
8
Ohba T, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-60453-0
Ohira T, 2016, HYPERTENSION, V68, P558, DOI 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07499
Oloruntoba R, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P541, DOI 10.1111/disa.12268
Reich MR, 2015, LANCET, V386, P498, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61030-3
ROBINS JM, 1995, J AM STAT ASSOC, V90, P106, DOI 10.2307/2291134
ROBINS JM, 1994, J AM STAT ASSOC, V89, P846, DOI 10.2307/2290910
ROSENBAUM PR, 1983, BIOMETRIKA, V70, P41, DOI 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Rosenbaum S, 2015, METABOLISM, V64, P926, DOI [10.1016/j.metabol.2015.04.009,
10.1016/j.metabol.2015.01.016]
Sanderson SC, 2009, PATIENT EDUC COUNS, V74, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.003
Satoh H, 2015, J DIABETES RES, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/627390
Sugihara M, 2010, PHARM STAT, V9, P21, DOI 10.1002/pst.365
Takahashi A, 2017, J EPIDEMIOL, V27, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.je.2016.05.006
Takahashi S., 2020, METABOL OPEN, V7
Takahashi S, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-71759-4
Toda H, 2017, BMJ OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018502
Tomio J, 2014, OPEN ACCESS EMERG M, V6, P69, DOI 10.2147/OAEM.S48532
Tsubokura M, 2019, J RADIOL PROT, V39, P854, DOI 10.1088/1361-6498/ab280e
Tsubokura M, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0129114
Tsubokura M, 2013, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V13, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-267
Umemura S, 2019, HYPERTENS RES, V42, P1235, DOI 10.1038/s41440-019-0284-9
UNISDR, 2015, SEND FRAM DIS RISK R
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2013,
ANN A LEV EFF RAD EX
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2021,
UNSCEAR 2020 REP ANN
Vancampfort D, 2016, PSYCHOSOM MED, V78, P465, DOI 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000297
Wahle C, 2009, ARCH GERONTOL GERIAT, V49, P165, DOI
10.1016/j.archger.2008.06.009
WHO, 2019, HLTH EM DIS RISK MAN
Yasutaka T, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0075308
Yoon S, 2020, J ROY STAT SOC A, V183, P3, DOI 10.1111/rssa.12482
NR 76
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 2
U2 4
PI ABINGDON
EI 1654-9880
J9 GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION
JI Glob. Health Action
PD JAN 1
PY 2021
VL 14
IS 1
AR 1918886
DI 10.1080/16549716.2021.1918886
PG 13
(SSCI)
GA SL1OB
UT WOS:000656687700001
PM 34058969
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Adjei, E
Benedict, BC
Murray-Tuite, P
Lee, S
Ukkusuri, S
Ge, Y
AF Adjei, Emmanuel
Benedict, Bailey C.
Lee, Seungyoon
Ukkusuri, Satish
Ge, Yue Gurt
TI Effects of risk perception and perceived certainty on evacuate/stay
decisions
LA English
DT Article
DE Risk perception; Perceived certainty; Evacuate/stay decision; Structural
equation modeling; Hurricane matthew
ID HURRICANE EVACUATION EXPECTATIONS; MOBILIZATION TIME; MODEL; FLORIDA;
UNDERSTAND; DYNAMICS; BEHAVIOR; KATRINA; COMMUNICATION; UNCERTAINTY
AB In hurricane evacuation studies, the extant literature has extensively explored
the effect of risk perception on evacuate/stay decisions. However, less attention
has been paid to how perceived certainty affects households' evacuate/stay
decisions. The objectives of this paper are to explore the effects of (1) perceived
certainty about location of impact on both risk perception and perceived certainty
about evacuation logistics; (2) risk perception on perceived certainty about
evacuation logistics; and (3) perceived certainty about evacuation logistics on
evacuate/stay decisions. Survey data gathered from households in the Jacksonville,
Florida metropolitan area after Hurricane Matthew (2016) were analyzed using
structural equation modeling (SEM). In addition, SEM allowed us to identify the
factors that could be used to predict risk perception, perceived certainty about
location of impact, and perceived certainty about evacuation logistics. The results
showed that perceived certainty about location of impact had a non-significant
effect on risk perception. Perceived certainty about location of impact had a
positive effect on perceived certainty about evacuation logistics. However, the
effect of risk perception on perceived certainty about evacuation logistics was
non-significant. Both risk perception and perceived certainty about evacuation
logistics had positive effects on households' evacuation decision while perceived
certainty about location of impact had a negative effect on households' likelihood
of evacuating. Overall, the findings can be used to improve on the prediction of
households' evacuation behavior.
C1 [Adjei, Emmanuel; Murray-Tuite, Pamela] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, 109
Lowry Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
[Benedict, Bailey C.] Calif State Univ San Bernardino, Dept Management, San
Bernardino, CA 92407 USA.
[Lee, Seungyoon] Purdue Univ, Brian Lamb Sch Commun, 100 North Univ St, W
Lafayette, IN 47909 USA.
[Ukkusuri, Satish] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, 550 Stadium Mall Dr, W
[Ge, Yue Gurt] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Publ Adm, 528 W Livingston St,DPAC 448J,
Orlando, FL 32816 USA.
C3 Clemson University; California State University System; California State
University San Bernardino; Purdue University System; Purdue University;
Purdue University West Lafayette Campus; Purdue University System;
Purdue University; Purdue University West Lafayette Campus; State
University System of Florida; University of Central Florida
RP Adjei, E (corresponding author), Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, 109 Lowry
Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA.
EM eadjei@g.clemson.edu; bailey.benedict@csusb.edu; pmmurra@clemson.edu;
seungyoon@purdue.edu; sukkusuri@purdue.edu; yue.ge@ucf.edu
OI Adjei, Emmanuel/0000-0003-4176-1044
FU National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI-1520338]
FX This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF)
under Grant CMMI-1520338, for which the authors are grateful. However,
the authors are solely responsible for the findings of this study.
CR Action News Jax, 2021, EVACUATION ZONE MAPS
Adjei E, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103235
Alawadi R, 2022, NAT HAZARDS REV, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000553
Alawadi R, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102313
Allen J, 2020, ARCHAEOL OCEAN, V55, P1, DOI 10.1002/arco.5207
[Anonymous], 2016, FIT INDICES STRUCTUR
6988(2002)3:3(107)
[Anonymous], 2011, ANAL EVALUATION HOUS
[Anonymous], 2007, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, DOI DOI 10.1177/028072700702500302
Arlikatti S, 2006, ENVIRON BEHAV, V38, P226, DOI 10.1177/0013916505277603
Asparouhov T., 2018, SRMR MPLUS
10.1177/028072709100900210
Basolo V, 2017, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V16, P253, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2016.1277968
Bell SA, 2021, BMC GERIATR, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12877-021-02159-0
Bolduc D, 2010, CHOICE MODELLING: THE STATE-OF-THE-ART AND THE STATE-OF-
PRACTICE, P259
Bolduc D, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P63, DOI 10.3141/2082-08
Bollen KA, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P15639, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1010661108
Cahyanto I, 2015, J TRAVEL RES, V54, P329, DOI 10.1177/0047287513517418
Cohen P, 1999, MULTIVAR BEHAV RES, V34, P315, DOI 10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
Dillman D.A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL
Dixit VV, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P49, DOI 10.3141/2041-06
Dixon D.S, 2013, IMPORTANCE NEIGHBORH, P1
6988(2002)3:1(12)
Ezer T, 2017, DYNAM ATMOS OCEANS, V80, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2017.10.006
Finch W.H., 2015, LATENT VARIABLE MODE, DOI 10.4324/9781315869797
FITZPATRICK C, 1991, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, V9, P137
Florida Division of Emergency Management, 2017, EVACUATION ORDERS
Gladwin H, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P25, DOI 10.1175/2008BAMS2606.1
Heath RL, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P333, DOI 10.1111/risa.12845
Hodge D., 1981, VOLCANIC ACTIVITY HU, P185
Horney J.A., 2011, RECENT HURRIC RES CL, DOI [10.5772/15299, DOI 10.5772/15299]
Hoyle R.H., 1995, STRUCTURAL EQUATION, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/0047287513478503
Hoyle R.H., 2012, HDB STRUCTURAL EQUAT
6996.0000074
1816.2007.00191.x
Kinateder Max T, 2015, Fire Sci Rev, V4, P1
Kline R. B., 2005, METHODOLOGY SOCIAL S, V2nd ed.
Lee EKO, 2009, J BLACK PSYCHOL, V35, P5, DOI 10.1177/0095798408323354
Lee S, 2021, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V72, P885, DOI 10.1002/asi.24456
Lindell MK, 2020, FRONT COMP SCI-SWITZ, V2, DOI 10.3389/fcomp.2020.00027
Lindell MK, 2000, ENVIRON BEHAV, V32, P461, DOI 10.1177/00139160021972621
Lindner B.L., 2013, COASTAL HAZARDS, P185
Ling L, 2021, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2675, P53, DOI 10.1177/0361198120962801
Liu DL, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.008
Losee JE, 2022, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101726
MacCallum RC, 2000, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V51, P201, DOI
10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201
Maghelal P, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000226
Merlhiot G, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0201942
Messias DKH, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P101, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01243.x
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.003
MILETI D, 1985, EVACUATION DECISION
MILETI DS, 1975, COMMUN RES, V2, P24, DOI 10.1177/009365027500200102
MOORE HE, 1963, WIND STUDY RESPONSE
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
MUTHEN B, 1984, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V49, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF02294210
Nateghi R, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P1129, DOI 10.1111/risa.13337
National Hurricane Center, 2012, TOP 10 MOST HURRICAN
National Weather Service, 2017, PROBABILISTIC TROPIC
Ooms K, 2015, CARTOGR J, V52, P3, DOI 10.1179/1743277413Y.0000000068
Pablo AL, 1996, J MANAGE, V22, P723, DOI 10.1177/014920639602200503
Parry S., 2018, FIT INDICES COMMONLY
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Peng Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031287
PERRY RW, 1979, MASS EMERGENCIES, V4, P25
Postigo Y, 2004, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V245, P623, DOI [10.1080/0144341042000262944,
DOI 10.1080/0144341042000262944]
Qiang Y, 2016, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V30, P1832, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2016.1144886
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Sadri A.M., 2021, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V9
Sarmento R.P., 2019, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
Schumacker RE, 2010, BEGINNERS GUIDE STRU
Shapira S, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.001
Shaw WD, 2010, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V28, P87
Smith K., 1999, ESTIMATING COSTS HUR
Solis D., 2009, J DEV AGR EC, V2, P188
Sorensen JH, 1987, EVACUATION ASSESSMEN
Stein R.M., 2010, ROLE RISK INFO, V91, P816
Stewart, 2017, NATL HURRICANE CTR T
TAHERDOOST H, 2016, SSRN ELECT J
Trumbo C, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P1013, DOI 10.1111/risa.12149
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2005, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20
United States Census Bureau, 2018, 2016 AM COMM DEM HOU
United States Census Bureau, 2017, 2016 URB RUR AR AM F
Us Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, PREPAREDNESS SAFETY
Wang A., 2017, NOTES FIELD, V66, P2016
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Whitehead John, 2001, REPORT PREPARED N CA
Williams DJ, 2007, THEOR ISS ERGON SCI, V8, P1, DOI 10.1080/14639220500484419
6988(2004)5:4(170), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(170)]
Wood MM, 2018, ENVIRON BEHAV, V50, P535, DOI 10.1177/0013916517709561
Wu HC, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P2202, DOI 10.1111/risa.12423
Zhang FQ, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P1177, DOI 10.1175/2007WAF2006118.1
Zhang Z, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102295
Zheng LY, 2020, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, V12, P892, DOI 10.1080/19439962.2018.1549643
NR 125
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 7
U2 9
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD OCT 1
PY 2022
VL 80
AR 103247
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103247
PG 18
Water Resources
GA 5V9LM
UT WOS:000877545700006
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ling, L
Murray-Tuite, P
Lee, S
Ge, Y
Ukkusuri, SV
AF Ling, Lu
Lee, Seungyoon
Ge, Yue Gurt
Ukkusuri, Satish V.
TI Role of Uncertainty and Social Networks on Shadow Evacuation and
Non-Compliance Behavior in Hurricanes
LA English
DT Article
AB Shadow evacuation and non-compliance are among undesirable behaviors during
hurricane events. Based on a post-Hurricane Matthew household survey, this study
aims to understand the combined effects of information source and uncertainty on
individual-level evacuate-stay decisions from the Jacksonville, Florida
metropolitan area. A random parameter logit model is developed to capture the
heterogeneous effects among individuals. The combined effects are substantial and
distinct in the two cases and the study reveals several significant findings.
First, consistent and sufficient warning information leads to better alignment with
recommended actions. Second, larger social networks encourage compliance and induce
shadow evacuation. Third, a highly diverse network induces compliance with the
recommended actions, and isolated individuals should be provided with more
information. Fourth, risk information from traditional media should be clearly
delineated between the high-risk and low-risk areas for effective compliance.
However, information from social media has a nonsignificant effect.
C1 [Ling, Lu; Ukkusuri, Satish V.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette,
IN 47907 USA.
[Murray-Tuite, Pamela] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, Clemson, SC USA.
[Lee, Seungyoon] Purdue Univ, Brian Lamb Sch Commun, W Lafayette, IN USA.
[Ge, Yue Gurt] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Publ Adm, Orlando, FL USA.
C3 Purdue University System; Purdue University; Purdue University West
Lafayette Campus; Clemson University; Purdue University System; Purdue
University; Purdue University West Lafayette Campus; State University
System of Florida; University of Central Florida
RP Ukkusuri, SV (corresponding author), Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W
EM sukkusur@purdue.edu
FU National Science Foundation [CMMI 1520338]
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: National
Science Foundation grant CMMI 1520338 provided funding for this work.
CR [Anonymous], 1981, STRUCTURAL ANAL DISC
[Anonymous], SOCIOLOGICAL METHODO, DOI [10.2307/270810, DOI 10.2307/270810]
10.1177/028072709100900210
BOZDOGAN H, 1987, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V52, P345, DOI 10.1007/BF02294361
Caplan D, ABC NEWS
Czajkowski J, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P72, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000037
Gibbs L., 2013, HURRICANE SANDY ACTI, P36
Halgin D., 2008, INTRO EGO NETWORK AN
Halgin D.S., 2012, CONNECTIONS, VVol. 32, P37
Jaeger C.C., 2013, RISK UNCERTAINTY RAT
KRACKHARDT D, 1988, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V51, P123, DOI 10.2307/2786835
Lamb S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P272, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000070
9488(2007)133:1(18)
Mei B., 2002, THESIS LOUISIANA STA
Mercer Andrew., 2018, WEIGHTING ONLINE OPT
6996.0000083
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Reininger BM, 2013, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V7, P46, DOI 10.1001/dmp.2012.57
Revelt D, 1998, REV ECON STAT, V80, P647, DOI 10.1162/003465398557735
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Sadri AM, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V90, P1377, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0
Stein R, 2013, POLICY STUD J, V41, P319, DOI 10.1111/psj.12019
Stewart S.R, 2017, NATL HURRICANE CTR T, P12
Sun DA, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112152
Train KE, 2009, DISCRETE CHOICE METHODS WITH SIMULATION, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI
10.1017/CBO9780511805271
Washington S., 2020, STAT ECONOMETRIC MET, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429244018
Wei H.L., 2013, BEHAV STUDY
Zhang Z., 2018, EFFECT SHADOW EVACUA
NR 37
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 8
PI THOUSAND OAKS
SN 0361-1981
EI 2169-4052
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 2675
IS 3
BP 53
EP 64
DI 10.1177/0361198120962801
PG 12
(SSCI)
GA RG1AZ
UT WOS:000635268400006
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yang, JY
Alisan, O
Ma, MD
Ozguven, EE
Huang, WR
Vijayan, L
AF Yang, Jieya
Alisan, Onur
Ma, Mengdi
Ozguven, Eren Erman
Huang, Wenrui
Vijayan, Linoj
TI Spatial Accessibility Analysis of Emergency Shelters with a
Consideration of Sea Level Rise in Northwest Florida
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE spatial accessibility; hurricane evacuation; sea level rise; floating
catchment area; storm surge
ID HEALTH-CARE
AB Hurricane-induced storm surge and flooding often lead to the closures of
evacuation routes, which can be disruptive for the victims trying to leave the
impacted region. This problem becomes even more challenging when we consider the
impact of sea level rise that happens due to global warming and other climate-
related factors. As such, hurricane-induced storm surge elevations would increase
nonlinearly when sea level rise lifts, flooding access to highways and bridge
entrances, thereby reducing accessibility for affected census block groups to
evacuate to hurricane shelters during hurricane landfall. This happened with the
Category 5 Hurricane Michael which swept the east coast of Northwest Florida with
long-lasting damage and impact on local communities and infrastructure. In this
paper, we propose an integrated methodology that utilizes both sea level rise (SLR)
scenario-informed storm surge simulations and floating catchment area models built
in Geographical Information Systems (GIS). First, we set up sea level rise
scenarios of 0, 0.5, 1, and 1.5 m with a focus on Hurricane Michael's impact that
led to the development of storm surge models. Second, these storm surge simulation
outputs are fed into ArcGIS and floating catchment area-based scenarios are created
to study the accessibility of shelters. Findings indicate that rural areas lost
accessibility faster than urban areas due to a variety of factors including shelter
distributions, and roadway closures as spatial accessibility to shelters for
offshore populations was rapidly diminishing. We also observed that as inundation
level increases, urban census block groups that are closer to the shelters get
extremely high accessibility scores through FCA calculations compared to the other
block groups. Results of this study could guide and help revise existing strategies
for designing emergency response plans and update resilience action policies.
C1 [Yang, Jieya; Alisan, Onur; Ma, Mengdi; Ozguven, Eren Erman; Huang, Wenrui]
Florida State Univ, Florida Agr & Mech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn,
[Vijayan, Linoj] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Baton Rouge,
LA 70808 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida A&M University; Florida
State University; Louisiana State University System; Louisiana State
University
RP Yang, JY (corresponding author), Florida State Univ, Florida Agr & Mech Univ,
Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn, Tallahassee, FL 32310 USA.
EM jy19j@fsu.edu; oalisan@fsu.edu; mma4@fsu.edu; eozguven@eng.famu.fsu.edu;
whuang@eng.famu.fsu.edu; linojr@lsu.edu
RI alisan, onur/N-5158-2019
OI alisan, onur/0000-0001-9311-3984; Yang, Jieya/0000-0002-6444-8977
FU National Science Foundation [1832068]
FX This research was funded by National Science Foundation Award #1832068.
CR [Anonymous], 2022, 2022 STATEWIDE EMERG
[Anonymous], 2022, FED REG
Bauer J, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0159148
Bevin J.L., 2019, NATL HURRICANE CTR T, P1
Blain C., 1994, 4 US ENG RES DEV CTR, P68
Download NBI, DOWNLOAD NBI ASCII F
Dwivedi AK, 2017, STAT MED, V36, P2187, DOI 10.1002/sim.7263
FDOT FSUTMSOnline, FSUTMSONLINE MOD DOW
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10100661
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2021, PUBLIC LIBR Q, V40, P310, DOI
10.1080/01616846.2020.1772027
Ghorbanzadeh M, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V24, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.03.004
Guagliardo Mark F, 2004, Int J Health Geogr, V3, P3
Hart LG, 2005, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V95, P1149, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042432
Houghton J, 2001, INTERDISCIPL SCI REV, V26, P247, DOI 10.1179/030801801679485
Hurricanes and Climate Change Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, US
Jorg R, 2023, HEALTH PLACE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.102974
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.006
Langford M, 2016, HEALTH PLACE, V38, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.11.007
Luo W, 2004, HEALTH PLACE, V10, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1353-8292(02)00067-9
Luo W, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN B, V30, P865, DOI 10.1068/b29120
Luo W, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P1100, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.06.002
Mann M.E., 2006, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V87, P233, DOI [DOI 10.1029/2006EO240001,
10.1029/2006EO240001]
MASSEY FJ, 1951, J AM STAT ASSOC, V46, P68, DOI 10.2307/2280095
McGrail MR, 2015, GEOSPATIAL HEALTH, V10, P138, DOI 10.4081/gh.2015.358
Mousavi ME, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P575, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9790-0
NOAA, H MICHAEL ADV ARCH
Olea RA, 2009, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V23, P749, DOI 10.1007/s00477-008-0255-1
Paez A, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0218773
PENCHANSKY R, 1981, MED CARE, V19, P127, DOI 10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
Pinzan D., 2018, P TRANSPORTATION RES
Riffenburgh R.H., 2006, STAT MED, V2nd, P281, DOI [10.1016/b978-012088770-
5/50056-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-012088770-5/50056-3]
Sava GN, 2014, 2014 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING (ISFEE), DOI 10.1109/ISFEE.2014.7050541
Scheff S.W, 2016, FUNDAMENTAL STAT PRI, P157, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-12-804753-
8.00008-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-804753-8.00008-7, 10.1016/B978-0-12-804753-
8.00008-7]
Shatnawi N, 2022, INT J HEALTHCARE MAN, V15, P347, DOI
10.1080/20479700.2022.2063597
SWAN|Coastal & Computational Hydraulics Team, US
Tali J.A., 2022, SUSTAINABLE NATURAL, P255, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-06443-2_14,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-06443-2_14]
Tao ZL, 2020, INT J EQUITY HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12939-020-01280-7
Tao ZL, 2018, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12913-018-3132-8
U.C. Bureau, 2020 CENS URB AR WAL
US Census Bureau, 2020 CENS
US Department of Commerce, HURR MICH 2018
Vierra A., 2023, HDB DESIGNING CONDUC, P165, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-323-90300-
4.00045-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-90300-4.00045-8]
Vijayan L, 2023, OCEAN ENG, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114044
Wan N, 2012, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V26, P1073, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2011.624987
Whitnall Carolyn, 2011, Smart Card Research and Advanced Applications. 10th IFIP
WG 8.8/11.2 International Conference. CARDIS 2011. Revised Selected Papers, P234,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-27257-8_15
Widener MJ, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V42, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.11.004
Yang JY, 2022, IEEE INT CONF MOB DA, P99, DOI 10.1109/MDM55031.2022.00035
Yang JY, 2023, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V46, P241, DOI
10.1080/03081060.2022.2162053
NR 48
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 13
AR 10263
DI 10.3390/su151310263
PG 22
(SSCI)
GA M5ZL1
UT WOS:001030996200001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Karpouza, M
Bathrellos, GD
Kaviris, G
Antonarakou, A
Skilodimou, HD
AF Karpouza, Maria
Bathrellos, George D.
Kaviris, George
Antonarakou, Assimina
Skilodimou, Hariklia D.
TI How could students be safe during flood and tsunami events?
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood and tsunami hazard assessment; AHP; GIS; Safe routes; Safe
locations; Schools
ID ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CORINTH RIFT; QUATERNARY EVOLUTION;
GREECE; GULF; SUSCEPTIBILITY; VULNERABILITY; HAZARD; RISK; GIS
AB Reduction of the impact of natural hazards and enhancement of the resilience of
population in-volves access to straightforward information about safe and non-safe
areas during the occurrence of a natural phenomenon. The present study focusses on
the drainage basin of the Xerias River, at northeastern Peloponnese, Greece, an
area highly prone to flooding, while tsunami inundation has also been documented.
Firstly, the hazard assessment of the study area to the two phenomena was evaluated
by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Geographical Information System along
with geological, geomorphological, and meteorological data. A sensitivity analysis
was used to calculate the uncertainties of both produced geohazard maps, while
validation procedure was carried out to determine their accuracy. This study
focused on the settlements that host pri-mary and secondary schools to identify
safe locations, as well as safe routes from schools to these locations. To this
end, the hazard maps were used as input that estimated and divided the settle-ments
into safe and non-safe areas concerning flooding and tsunami inundation. Then, safe
loca-tions and routes were defined for the evacuation of the population in case of
occurrence of these two natural hazards and incorporated all aforementioned
information into an open access appli-cation. Regarding flood hazard, the most
prone areas are distributed at the northern part of the study area. The analysis
for the hazard to tsunami inundation indicated that the most susceptible area is a
narrow coastal zone across the city of Corinth. The proposed method appears to be
quite accurate, and both geohazard maps is of excellent quality, according to the
uncertainty analysis and validation findings. & tau;he northern part of city of
Corinth along with the nearby schools is threatened by both geohazards. The
recommended safe locations for flood hazard are distant from the northern part of
the city, while the recognized safe areas for tsunami hazard are not close to the
coast. The schools of Athikia and Chiliomodi are located in non-safe areas
regarding flooding and authorities should ensure the construction of flood shelter
near schools. In the settle-ments of Solomos and Examilia, the school buildings are
located in safe areas regarding flooding. This study highlights the importance of
scientific analysis in safe location and route planning, brings together science
and society, and provides useful information that can save human lives.
C1 [Karpouza, Maria; Kaviris, George; Antonarakou, Assimina] Natl & Kapodistrian
Univ Athens, Fac Geol & Geoenvironm, Univ Campus, Athens 15784, Greece.
[Bathrellos, George D.; Skilodimou, Hariklia D.] Univ Patras, Dept Geol, Patras
26500, Greece.
C3 National & Kapodistrian University of Athens; University of Patras
RP Bathrellos, GD (corresponding author), Univ Patras, Dept Geol, Patras 26500,
Greece.
EM mkarpouza@geol.uoa.gr; gbathrellos@upatras.gr; gkaviris@geol.uoa.gr;
aantonar@geol.uoa.gr; hskilodimou@upatras.gr
CR Aitsi-Selmi A, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0081-x
Armijo R, 1996, GEOPHYS J INT, V126, P11, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb05264.x
Aslam B, 2020, ARAB J GEOSCI, V13, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-05916-4
Atillah A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P3397, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-3397-
2011
Avallone A, 2004, CR GEOSCI, V336, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2003.12.007
Barredo J., 2000, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V2, P9, DOI [10.1016/S0303-
2434(00)85022-9, DOI 10.1016/S0303-2434(00)85022-9]
Basili R., 2018, NEAM TSUNAMI HAZARD, DOI [10.13127/tsunami/neamthm18, DOI
10.13127/TSUNAMI/NEAMTHM18]
Basirat A., 2018, J CIV ENG MAT APPL, V2, P75, DOI [10.22034/JCEMA.2018.92048,
DOI 10.22034/JCEMA.2018.92048]
Bathrellos GD, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-5157-1
Bathrellos G.D., 2017, REMOTE SENSING HYDRO, V24, P493, DOI [10.1201/b20993, DOI
10.1201/B20993]
Bathrellos GD, 2022, Z GEOMORPHOL, V63, P313, DOI 10.1127/zfg/2021/0674
Bathrellos GD, 2021, Z GEOMORPHOL, V63, P95, DOI 10.1127/zfg/2021/0670
Bathrellos GD, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8090128
Bathrellos GD, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V575, P119, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.025
Bathrellos GD, 2013, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V27, P573, DOI 10.1007/s00477-012-
0602-0
Bathrellos GD, 2012, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V66, P537, DOI 10.1007/s12665-011-1263-x
Bera S, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103435
Biswas S, 2023, KSCE J CIV ENG, V27, P1270, DOI 10.1007/s12205-023-1493-y
Bornovas I., 1971, GEOLOGICAL MAP GREEC
Botzen WJW, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P229, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9359-5
Bretschneider C.L., 1976, COAST ENG P, V1, P59, DOI [10.9753/icce.v15.59, DOI
10.9753/ICCE.V15.59]
Briole P, 2000, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V105, P25605, DOI 10.1029/2000JB900148
Cankaya ZC, 2016, EARTH PLANETS SPACE, V68, DOI 10.1186/s40623-016-0507-0
Cels J, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103473
Chousianitis K, 2013, J GEODYN, V71, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jog.2013.06.004
Copernicus Land Monitoring Service European Environment Agency (EEA), 2021, COP
LAND MON SERV CO
Dahri N, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6619-4
y, DOI 10.1186/S40677-016-0044-Y]
ECI, 2004, US
Eckert S, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V32, P714, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.003
El-Barmelgy H.M., 2017, INT J DEV SUSTAIN, V6, P1048
Eleni K, 2015, J EARTH SYST SCI, V124, P587, DOI 10.1007/s12040-015-0551-3
Francini M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P121, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.020
Geist EL, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V107, DOI 10.1029/2000JB000139
Geist EL, 1999, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V154, P485, DOI 10.1007/s000240050241
Ghadamode V, 2022, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V81, DOI 10.1007/s12665-022-10548-w
Goel NK, 2000, J HYDROL, V228, P56, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00145-1
Harada T, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103505
IMAMURA F, 1995, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V144, P555, DOI 10.1007/BF00874383
Kappes MS, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V32, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
Karpouza M, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P637, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04852-0
Karymbalis E, 2012, Z GEOMORPHOL, V56, P45, DOI 10.1127/0372-8854/2012/S-00072
Kaviris G., 2021, SEISM REC, V1, P85, DOI [10.1785/0320210021, DOI
10.1785/0320210021]
Khosravi K, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
Kitamura F, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101519
Kolaiti E, 2017, MAR GEOL, V392, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.margeo.2017.08.004
Konrad CP, 2005, AM FISH S S, V47, P157
Kontoes C, 2013, SENSORS-BASEL, V13, P11146, DOI 10.3390/s130811146
Legg MR, 2004, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V20, P917, DOI 10.1193/1.1773592
Li Q, 2012, SAFETY SCI, V50, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.01.007
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Mahmoud SH, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P152, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.282
Makropoulos K, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1425, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-
1425-2012
Markantonis K., 2012, THESIS NATL TU ATHEN, DOI [10.12681/eadd/29351, DOI
10.12681/EADD/29351]
Mavrikos A., 2009, HYDROGEOLOGICAL COND
Mishima N, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V8, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.003
Pandey CL, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103535
Papadopoulos GA, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V29, P437, DOI 10.1023/A:1024703531623
Papazachos B.C., 2003, EARTHQUAKES GREECE, P273
Pearson L., 2015, J EXTREME EVENTS, DOI [DOI 10.1142/S2345737615710013,
10.1142/S2345737615710013]
Perissoratis C, 2000, MAR GEOL, V167, P391, DOI 10.1016/S0025-3227(00)00038-4
Piatanesi A, 1996, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V23, P37, DOI 10.1029/95GL03606
PIRAZZOLI PA, 1994, TECTONOPHYSICS, V229, P201, DOI 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90029-9
Pourghasemi HR, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P965, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2
Poursaber M.R., 2016, OPEN ACCESS LIBR, V2016, P1, DOI [10.4236/oalib.1102212,
DOI 10.4236/OALIB.1102212]
Predick KI, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P91, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01329.x
10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
Reager JT, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P589, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2203, 10.1038/NGEO2203]
Regmi NR, 2010, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V115, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.10.002
Rozalis S, 2010, J HYDROL, V394, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.021
Rozos D, 2011, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V63, P49, DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0687-z
Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, Vsecond
SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
SAATY TL, 1986, MANAGE SCI, V32, P841, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
Sachdeva S, 2017, INT CONF COMPUT
Sakurai A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V29, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.08.005
Sakya AE, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103567
Satake K, 1999, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V154, P467, DOI 10.1007/s000240050240
Segond ML, 2007, J HYDROL, V347, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.040
Skilodimou H, 2003, GEOGR ANN A, V85A, P197, DOI 10.1111/1468-0459.00198
Skilodimou HD, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13152135
Skilodimou HD, 2014, GEOGR FIS DIN QUAT, V37, P43, DOI 10.4461/GFDQ.2014.37.5
Song JL, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102866
Stucchi M, 2013, J SEISMOL, V17, P523, DOI 10.1007/s10950-012-9335-2
Suna RR, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103344
Tataris A., 1970, GEOLOGICAL MAP GREEC
Tehrany MS, 2019, PEERJ, V7, DOI 10.7717/peerj.7653
Tselentis GA, 2006, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V96, P1649, DOI 10.1785/0120050119
Westaway R, 2002, TECTONOPHYSICS, V348, P269, DOI 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00032-X
Yilmaz OS, 2022, ACTA GEOPHYS, V70, P2747, DOI 10.1007/s11600-022-00882-9
Yoshitsugu N., 2020, J INF PROCESS, V28, P1065, DOI [10.2197/ipsjjip.28.1065,
DOI 10.2197/IPSJJIP.28.1065]
Zheng JX, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103568
NR 100
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 95
AR 103830
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103830
EA JUL 2023
PG 27
Water Resources
GA N9SM6
UT WOS:001040325200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Oh, WS
Yu, DJ
Muneepeerakul, R
AF Oh, Woi Sok
Yu, David J.
Muneepeerakul, Rachata
TI Efficiency-fairness trade-offs in evacuation management of urban floods:
The effects of the shelter capacity and zone prioritization
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID AGENT-BASED MODEL; SIMULATION; LOCATION; LIFE; ALLOCATION; BENEFITS;
HAZARDS; SYSTEMS; RISK; TIME
AB With increasing flood risk, evacuation has become an important research topic in
urban flood management. Urban flood evacuation is a complex problem due to i) the
complex interactions among several components within a city and ii) the need to
consider multiple, often competing, dimensions/objectives in evacuation analysis.
In this study, we focused on the interplay between two such objectives: efficiency
and fairness. We captured the evacuation process in a conceptual agent-based model
(ABM), which was analyzed under different hard infrastructure and institutional
arrangement conditions, namely, various shelter capacity distributions as a hard
infrastructure property and simultaneous/staged evacuation as an institutional
arrangement. Efficiency was measured as the time it takes for a person to evacuate
to safety. Fairness was defined by how equally residents suffered from floods, and
the level of suffering depended on the perceived risk and evacuation time. Our
findings suggested that efficiency is more sensitive to the shelter capacity
distribution, while fairness changes more notably according to the evacuation
priority assigned to the divided zones in staged evacuation. Simultaneous
evacuation generally tended to be more efficient but unfairer than staged
evacuation. The efficiency-fairness trade-off was captured by Pareto-optimal
strategies, among which uniform capacity cases led to a higher efficiency while
prioritizing high-risk residents increases fairness. Strategies balancing
efficiency and fairness featured a uniform capacity and prioritized high-risk
residents at an intermediate time delay. These findings more clearly exposed the
interactions between different factors and could be adopted as benchmarks to inform
more complicated evacuation ABMs.
C1 [Oh, Woi Sok; Muneepeerakul, Rachata] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn,
Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
[Yu, David J.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
[Yu, David J.] Purdue Univ, Dept Polit Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
[Yu, David J.] Purdue Univ, Ctr Environm, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; University of Florida; Purdue
University System; Purdue University; Purdue University West Lafayette
Campus; Purdue University System; Purdue University; Purdue University
West Lafayette Campus; Purdue University System; Purdue University;
Purdue University West Lafayette Campus
RP Muneepeerakul, R (corresponding author), Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn,
Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
EM rmuneepe@ufl.edu
RI Oh, Woi Sok/AAA-1823-2022
OI Yu, David J./0000-0001-9929-1933; Oh, Woi Sok/0000-0003-1666-0700
FU Army Research Office/Army Research Laboratory (Multidisciplinary
University Research Initiative) [W911NF1810267]; U.S. Department of
Defense (DOD) [W911NF1810267] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense
(DOD)
FX WO and RM were supported by the Army Research Office/Army Research
Laboratory (https://www.arl.army.mil/) under award no. W911NF1810267
(Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative). The views and
conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and
should not be interpreted as representing the official policies either
expressed or implied by the Army Research Office or the US Government.
CR Abebe YA, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109317
Abebe YA, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V111, P483, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.015
Alsnih R, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P89, DOI 10.3141/1865-13
[Anonymous], 2010, MODELLING MASS EVACU
[Anonymous], 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3188-6_12
Baer RD, 2019, HUM ORGAN, V78, P133
Bin O, 2008, J RISK INSUR, V75, P63, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2007.00248.x
Brisset S., 2015, ECO FRIENDLY INNOVAT, P83
CRAWFORD SES, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P582, DOI 10.2307/2082975
de Koning K, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V59, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101981
Di Mauro M., 2008, FLOODRISK 2008
Du E, 2017, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V53, P316, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12475
Flotterod G., 2010, P INT C EVOL COMPUT
Ghorbani A, 2013, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V16, DOI 10.18564/jasss.2166
Hu X., 2004, AUTOMATIC ROAD EXTRA, P320
Johnstone WM., 2012, LIFE SAFETY MODELLIN, DOI [10.14288/1.0073328, DOI
10.14288/1.0073328]
Jun Xie, 2014, Annals of GIS, V20, P159, DOI 10.1080/19475683.2014.942363
Kakinuma K, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abc586
Kazancioglu E., 2003, P ASME DES ENG TECHN, DOI [10.1115/detc2003/dac-48714, DOI
10.1115/DETC2003/DAC-48714]
Kongsomsaksakul S., 2005, J E ASIA SOC TRANSP, V6
Kulshrestha A, 2011, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, V3, P272, DOI DOI
10.1080/19439962.2011.609323
Li ACY, 2012, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V48, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2011.12.004
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
947X(2006)132:1(11)
Lumbroso D, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS419, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12230
Lumbroso D., 2011, DAMS RESERVOIRS J BR, V21, P21, DOI
[10.1680/dare.2011.21.1.31, DOI 10.1680/DARE.2011.21.1.31]
Lumbroso D, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P21, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-21-2021
Miyagawa M, 2009, ANN OPER RES, V172, P349, DOI 10.1007/s10479-009-0630-4
NAGEL K, 1992, J PHYS I, V2, P2221, DOI 10.1051/jp1:1992277
Ng M, 2010, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V25, P547, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8667.2010.00669.x
North D. C., 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511606892.012, DOI
10.1017/CBO9780511606892.012]
Nygren A, 2016, J LAT AM STUD, V48, P335, DOI 10.1017/S0022216X15001170
Pareto V., 1964, COURS EC POLITIQUE, P299, DOI [10.3917/droz.paret.1964.01, DOI
10.3917/DROZ.PARET.1964.01]
Perez I, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P82, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.005
Quader MA, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14080831
RESNICK M, 1997, TURTLES TERMITES TRA
SHERALI HD, 1991, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V25, P439, DOI 10.1016/0191-
2615(91)90037-J
Shirvani M., PHYS SOC
Sima RJ., EOS, V2021, P102, DOI [10.1029/2021EO154550, DOI 10.1029/2021EO154550]
Struebig MJ, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-05983-y
Suffian S, 2020, WOOD PUBL SER CIVIL, P63, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-102704-2.00003-
2
Tate Eric., 2021, EOS, V102, DOI [10.1029/2021EO154548, DOI
10.1029/2021EO154548]
Thaler T, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P353, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1229-y
Wang F, 1998, ENVIRON PLANN B, V25, P265, DOI 10.1068/b250265
Wang HZ, 2016, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V64, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.010
Wang M, 2015, RISK ANAL FLOOD EVEN
Wang Y., 2014, ICCSS 2014 P 2014 IN, DOI [10.1109/ICCSS.2014, DOI
10.1109/ICCSS.2014]
Watanabe D, 2010, LECT NOTES OPER RES, V12, P112
Wilensky U., 2015, INTRO AGENT BASED MO
Xie C, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P79, DOI 10.3141/2091-09
Xin Q, 2011, DIESEL ENGINE SYSTEM DESIGN, P1, DOI 10.1533/9780857090836
Yamori K, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P751, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00319-1
Yan XD, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207916
Yao XH, 2012, J CENT SOUTH UNIV T, V19, P586, DOI 10.1007/s11771-012-1043-0
Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2008.00010.x
Zhang L, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P28, DOI 10.3141/1898-04
Zhao X, 2016, MATH PROBL ENG, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/1273508
NR 66
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 20
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD JUN 22
PY 2021
VL 16
IS 6
AR e0253395
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0253395
PG 15
GA TG9BH
UT WOS:000671691200006
PM 34157044
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wang, XH
Hou, JM
Li, BY
Chai, J
Wang, J
Zhang, WQ
AF Wang, Xinghua
Hou, Jingming
Li, Bingyao
Chai, Jie
Wang, Jian
Zhang, Wenqing
TI Study for Underpass Inundation Process Caused by Heavy Storm Using
High-resolution Urban Flood Model
SO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE High-resolution simulation; Heavy storm; Inundation process;
Inundation-sensitive zones; Urban flood model
ID UNSTRUCTURED GRIDS
AB Pluvial inundations in urban area are caused by localized, heavy rainstorm
events, which lead to the severe disaster risks in inundation-sensitive zones. The
paper focuses on different rainfalls in analyzing urban underpass inundation
process based on high-resolution urban flood model combined with linear blocking
boundary method. Included in this study are the construction of high-resolution
urban flood model and the method of rainstorm scenarios simulation in a series of
different return periods (50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 years) and peak coefficients
(0.35, 0.5, 0.75). The profiles on water depth and rapidity of water level rising
in underpass are obtained to analyze the inundation process referring to cumulative
precipitation and rainfall time, besides, the variations of warning time and
rainfall for vehicle and human are analyzed consequently. The results indicate that
the variations of inundation are determined by the common effects of rainfall
intensity and the time for most runoff travel to underpass. Specifically, the
variation of inundation in Jinhua underpass is generally dependent on the rainfall
intensity 10 min ago. Besides, it takes much less time for the water rising from
0.4 m to 1.2 m than the time from 0 to 0.4 m, which means when the vehicle is in
danger, it needs evacuating without hesitation. The research, therefore, highlights
the importance of high-resolution urban flood model in inundation process
simulation and the necessity of predicting the inundation process of underpass
based on real-time gauge to guide traffic controlling and emergency evacuation.
C1 [Wang, Xinghua; Hou, Jingming; Li, Bingyao; Zhang, Wenqing] Xian Univ Technol,
State Key Lab Ecohydraul Northwest Arid Reg China, Xian 710048, Peoples R China.
[Chai, Jie] Northwest A&F Univ, Yangling 610400, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
[Wang, Jian] Space Star Technol CO LTD, Beijing 110000, Peoples R China.
C3 Xi'an University of Technology; Northwest A&F University - China
RP Hou, JM (corresponding author), Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Ecohydraul
Northwest Arid Reg China, Xian 710048, Peoples R China.
EM Jingming.hou@xaut.edu.cn
RI Zhang, wen/ITT-1192-2023; zhang, wenqing/GYA-0786-2022
OI HOU, JINGMING/0000-0002-9097-3804
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52079106]; National Key
Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0402704]
FX This work is partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (52079106), National Key Research and Development Program of
China (2016YFC0402704).
CR Ball J, 2019, GUIDE AUSTR RAINFALL
Bruwier M, 2020, J HYDROL, V582, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124493
Burgan HI, 2019, TEK DERGI, V30, P9029, DOI 10.18400/tekderg.416067
Chang LC, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.036
Chang LC, 2010, J HYDROL, V385, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.028
Chen GZ, 2020, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.545612
Costabile P, 2020, J HYDROL, V580, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231
Fewtrell TJ, 2011, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V36, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.011
Gomez M, 2019, J HYDROL, V568, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.063
Guo KH, 2021, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V25, P2843, DOI 10.5194/hess-25-2843-2021
Hou JM, 2020, J HYDROL, V589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125100
Hou JM, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124176
Hou JM, 2013, COMPUT METHOD APPL M, V257, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.cma.2013.01.015
Hou JM, 2013, ADV WATER RESOUR, V52, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.08.003
Jhong BC, 2017, J HYDROL, V547, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.057
Kendon EJ, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P5791, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00562.1
Li BY, 2021, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V35, P1433, DOI 10.1007/s11269-021-02783-w
Li XH, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2019WR025128
Mejia-Morales MA, 2021, J HYDROL, V602, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126715
Paul S, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-22322-9
Ren HC, 2022, J HOHAI U NAT SCI, P1
Rozer V, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001851
Wang K, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P969, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0601-6
Wojcik OP, 2013, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V141, P1756, DOI 10.1017/S0950268812002038
Zhang S, 2021, ZHENGZHOU, V31, P5, DOI [10.16867/j.issn.1673-9264.2021260, DOI
10.16867/J.ISSN.1673-9264.2021260]
Zheng, 2021, CHINA BUS J
NR 29
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 11
U2 22
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0920-4741
EI 1573-1650
J9 WATER RESOUR MANAG
JI Water Resour. Manag.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 36
IS 11
BP 3965
EP 3980
DI 10.1007/s11269-022-03182-5
EA JUL 2022
PG 16
WC Engineering, Civil; Water Resources
SC Engineering; Water Resources
GA 4G9EM
UT WOS:000829692000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Gehlot, H
Zhan, XY
Qian, XW
Thompson, C
Kulkarni, M
Ukkusuri, SV
AF Gehlot, Hemant
Zhan, Xianyuan
Qian, Xinwu
Thompson, Christopher
Kulkarni, Milind
Ukkusuri, Satish V.
TI A-RESCUE 2.0: A High-Fidelity, Parallel, Agent-Based Evacuation
Simulator
SO JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
ID NETWORK MANAGEMENT; MODEL
AB Effective evacuation of residents in hurricane-affected areas is essential in
reducing the overall damage and ensuring public safety. However, traffic flow
patterns in evacuation contexts is far more complex than normal traffic and is
usually accompanied with severe congestion due to the presence of evacuees. In such
scenarios, agent-based simulation can accurately capture evacuation traffic
patterns, which can be extremely useful in evacuation management. However, existing
simulators are not fully capable of simultaneously handling highly detailed
household behaviors as well as large-scale traffic in evacuation contexts. In this
study, we develop a parallelizable, large-scale version of A-RESCUE (an agent-based
regional evacuation simulator coupled with user-enriched behavior) called A-RESCUE
2.0. Detailed household evacuation behaviors are modeled using a comprehensive
decision-making module. Computation loads induced by the large number of evacuation
vehicles are distributed by a parallelization scheme that involves partitioning the
road network into subnetworks such that traffic updates in each subnetwork are
simultaneously updated in parallel. Dynamic load balancing among different
subnetworks is ensured by periodically repartitioning the network using a mutilevel
graph partitioning algorithm. A predictive network-weighing scheme is developed
that assigns weights (reflecting computational load) to the roads of a network
based on current and predicted future network traffic loadings. An on-demand
routing strategy is also developed that allows effective rerouting computation
based on changing traffic patterns. A-RESCUE 2.0 is capable of representing
nonevacuee background traffic, as well as uncertain events on the network like road
closures. In addition, real-time monitoring of traffic patterns is made possible
using a visualization module that is connected to the simulator through an
efficient data communication layer. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on the
Miami-Dade County network to validate the applicability of the developed simulator
on real-world networks. Findings from experimental tests confirm that the
parallelization scheme is effective in improving computational performance.
C1 [Gehlot, Hemant; Qian, Xinwu; Ukkusuri, Satish V.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil
Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
[Zhan, Xianyuan] JD Intelligent City Res, Beijing 101111, Peoples R China.
[Thompson, Christopher] Purdue Univ, ITaP Res Comp, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
[Kulkarni, Milind] Purdue Univ, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907
USA.
Lafayette Campus; Purdue University System; Purdue University; Purdue
University West Lafayette Campus; Purdue University System; Purdue
University; Purdue University West Lafayette Campus
EM hgehlot@purdue.edu; zhanxianyuan@jd.com; qian39@purdue.edu;
thompscs@purdue.edu; milind@purdue.edu; sukkusur@purdue.edu
RI Zhan, Xianyuan/AAG-4773-2021; Qian, Xinwu/I-7364-2019
OI Zhan, Xianyuan/0000-0002-3683-0554; Qian, Xinwu/0000-0001-8001-2164;
Gehlot, Hemant/0000-0002-1356-2390
FX The authors are grateful to National Science Foundation for the award
CMMI 1520338 to support the research presented in the paper. However,
the authors are solely responsible for the findings presented in this
study. The authors also thank Wenbo Zhang for his help in the
development of background traffic part.
CR [Anonymous], 2000, ARCHITECTURAL STYLES
[Anonymous], 1999, THESIS
[Anonymous], 2005, P AGENT 2005 C GENER
Balakrishna R, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P80, DOI 10.3141/2041-09
Balmer M., 2009, MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS T, P57, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-60566-226-
8.CH003
Blake E. S., 2013, AL182012 NAT HURR C
Cova TJ, 2003, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V37, P579, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00007-7
Franzese O., 2001, P 80 ANN M TRB WASH
GIPPS PG, 1986, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V20, P403, DOI 10.1016/0191-2615(86)90012-
3
Han L. D., 2005, 84 ANN M TRANSP RES, P2401
Hansen M, 2016, GEOL SURV DEN GREENL, P99
HERMAN R, 1959, OPER RES, V7, P86, DOI 10.1287/opre.7.1.86
Hobeika A. G., 1985, MASSVAC MODEL CALCUL, P23
Hobeika AG, 1998, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V45, P192, DOI 10.1109/17.669768
Jha M, 2004, TRANSPORT RES REC, P40
Karypis G., 1995, METIS UNSTRUCTURED G
Klefstad R, 2005, 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference
(ITSC), P813
Klunder G., 2009, LARGE SCALE EVACUATI
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
Luke S, 2005, SIMUL-T SOC MOD SIM, V81, P517, DOI 10.1177/0037549705058073
Macal CM, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4,
P2, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574234
6996.0000083
Murray-Tuite P, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P9, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2007)133:1(9)
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Noh H, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P91, DOI 10.3141/2091-10
PIDD M, 1993, 1993 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P1319
Pingali K, 2011, ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, V46, P12, DOI 10.1145/1993316.1993501
RATHI AK, 1993, 1993 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P1250
Richmond P., 2011, CS1103 U SHEFF
Sheffi Y., 1980, NETVAC1 TRANSPORTATI
SHERALI HD, 1991, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V25, P439, DOI 10.1016/0191-
2615(91)90037-J
Smith L., 1995, LAUR951641 LOS AL NA
Soares G., 2013, SUMO2013, P15
Steiniger S, 2013, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V39, P136, DOI
Svennerberg G., 2010, BEGINNING GOOGLE MAP
Wessels A., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Eighth International Conference on
Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), P1050, DOI 10.1109/ITNG.2011.182
Williams BM, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P61, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2007)133:1(61)
Yang Q, 2000, TRANSPORT RES REC, P122
[No title captured]
NR 46
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 1
U2 17
PI RESTON
SN 0887-3801
EI 1943-5487
J9 J COMPUT CIVIL ENG
JI J. Comput. Civil. Eng.
PD MAR 1
PY 2019
VL 33
IS 2
AR 04018059
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000802
PG 15
WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering, Civil
(SSCI)
SC Computer Science; Engineering
GA HJ6CW
UT WOS:000457272200008
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chitwatkulsiri, D
Miyamoto, H
Weesakul, S
AF Chitwatkulsiri, Detchphol
Miyamoto, Hitoshi
Weesakul, Sutat
TI Development of a Simulation Model for Real-Time Urban Floods Warning: A
Case Study at Sukhumvit Area, Bangkok, Thailand
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE urban flood management; flood forecasting; weather radar; integrated
hydraulic modeling; and evacuation lead time
ID SPONGE CITIES; PREDICTION; RESOLUTION; WATER; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT
AB Increasingly frequent, high-intensity rain events associated with climatic
change are driving urban drainage systems to function beyond their design discharge
capacity. It has become an urgent issue to mitigate the water resource management
challenge. To address this problem, a real-time procedure for predicting the
inundation risk in an urban drainage system was developed. The real-time procedure
consists of three components: (i) the acquisition and forecast of rainfall data;
(ii) rainfall-runoff modeling; and (iii) flood inundation mapping. This real-time
procedure was applied to a drainage system in the Sukhumvit area of Bangkok,
Thailand, to evaluate its prediction efficacy. The results showed precisely that
the present real-time procedure had high predictability in terms of both the water
level and flood inundation area mapping. It could also determine hazardous areas
with a certain amount of lead time in the drainage system of the Sukhumvit area
within an hour of rainfall data. These results show the real-time procedure could
provide accurate flood risk warning, resulting in more time to implement flood
management measures such as pumping and water gate operations, or evacuation.
C1 [Chitwatkulsiri, Detchphol; Miyamoto, Hitoshi] Shibaura Inst Technol, Dept Civil
Engn, Koto Ku, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Tokyo 1358548, Japan.
[Weesakul, Sutat] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Water Engn &
Management, Klongluang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
C3 Shibaura Institute of Technology; Asian Institute of Technology
RP Chitwatkulsiri, D (corresponding author), Shibaura Inst Technol, Dept Civil
Engn, Koto Ku, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Tokyo 1358548, Japan.
EM na20109@shibaura-it.ac.jp; miyamo@shibaura-it.ac.jp; sutat@ait.ac.th
OI Miyamoto, Hitoshi/0000-0003-3368-5715
CR Abdelrahman YT, 2018, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V26, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C454
[Anonymous], DRAINAGE SEWERAGE DE
[Anonymous], WEATHER BANGKOK
Babovic V, 2004, HYDROINFORMATICS, P1907
Chang ChewHung, 2014, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V4,
P328
Chang FJ, 2014, J HYDROL, V517, P836, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.013
Chingnawan S, 2003, REAL TIME MODELLING
Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
Henonin J, 2013, J HYDROINFORM, V15, P717, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2013.132
Hilly G, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10010081
Irvine K, 2021, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V29, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C476
Irvine KN, 2013, J WATER MANAG MODELL, P177, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.R246-11
Jeong J, 2010, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V24, P4505, DOI 10.1007/s11269-010-9670-4
Kang N, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8070268
Kim HI, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020293
Laeni N, 2019, CITIES, V90, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.002
Larsen, 2005, WATER ENCYCL, P121, DOI [10.1002/047147844x.mw463, DOI
10.1002/047147844X.MW463]
Lashford C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010213
Leandro J, 2009, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V135, P495, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000037
Lim HS, 2016, J HYDROL, V538, P842, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.063
Loc HH, 2020, J HYDROL, V589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125368
Mark O., 2002, GLOB SOLUT URBAN DRA, P1, DOI [10.1061/40644(2002)274, DOI
10.1061/40644(2002)274]
Marvin JT, 2016, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V25, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C404
Mason DC, 2014, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V28, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2013.12.002
Mike, FLOOD
Nabangchang O, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P58, DOI 10.1002/2014WR015982
Nazari B, 2016, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V25, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C408
Notaro V, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P1984, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.435
Oladunjoye OA, 2019, INT J BUILD PATHOL, V38, P423, DOI 10.1108/IJBPA-12-2018-
0105
Postacchini M, 2019, J FLUID STRUCT, V88, P48, DOI
Rafieeinasab A, 2015, J HYDROL, V531, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.045
Rene JR, 2014, URBAN WATER J, V11, P573, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.795237
Ruangpan L, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P243, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020
Shah R, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P707, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-707-2017
Ngo TT, 2019, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001084
Toth E, 2000, J HYDROL, V239, P132, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00344-9
Vojinovic Z, 2009, URBAN WATER J, V6, P183, DOI 10.1080/15730620802566877
Weesakul S, 2014, MANAG WATER RESOUR C, P89, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-10467-6_5,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10467-6_5]
Weesakul S., DEV RAINFALL FORECAS
Zevenbergen C, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091230
NR 40
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 2
U2 22
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 11
AR 1458
DI 10.3390/w13111458
PG 17
GA SR1YW
UT WOS:000660841100001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ngui, YD
Najafi, MR
de Souza, C
Sills, DML
AF Ngui (Ted), Yeu Deck
Najafi, Mohammad Reza
de Souza, Camila
Sills, David M. L.
TI Probabilistic assessment of concurrent tornado and storm-related flash
flood events
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Canada; concurrent events; copula; flash flood; multivariate analysis;
TORFF; Tornado
ID EXTREME PRECIPITATION; RETURN PERIODS; RISK; DESIGN
AB The concurrent occurrence of extreme events can significantly impact societies
and infrastructure systems, especially when the instructions provided to the
exposed communities demand conflicting responses. In this study, a probabilistic
assessment of concurrent tornado and storm-related flash flood (TORFF) events is
performed across southern Canada. We quantify the interdependencies between
tornadoes and flash floods (extreme precipitation as proxy) using ground-based and
reanalysis datasets. Windspeed values corresponding to tornado events, categorized
based on the recorded Fujita rating, are derived through a resampling approach. The
TORFF events are clustered and the corresponding bivariate probability
distributions of the resampled windspeed and associated precipitation are
characterized based on Copula framework. The individual and joint return periods of
concurrent tornadoes and flash floods are then assessed under the AND (when both
variables exceed predefined thresholds), OR (when either one of the two variables
exceeds predefined thresholds), and conditional hazard scenarios across Canada.
Results show positive strong dependencies between resampled windspeed and
associated precipitation in Saskatchewan, and weaker dependencies followed by
Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. The Saskatchewan region shows the highest
risk underestimation considering the independence scenario compared to the other
regions. Higher precipitation is also expected during extreme windspeed, as
observed in the conditional assessment of precipitation given windspeed. This study
provides insights for more robust recurrence interval estimation for tornadoes and
flash floods to aid in emergency planning of evacuation decision-making process.
C1 [Ngui (Ted), Yeu Deck; Najafi, Mohammad Reza; Sills, David M. L.] Western Univ,
Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON, Canada.
[de Souza, Camila] Western Univ, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, London, ON, Canada.
C3 Western University (University of Western Ontario); Western University
(University of Western Ontario)
RP Najafi, MR (corresponding author), Western Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
London, ON, Canada.
EM mnajafi7@uwo.ca
FU Multi-hazard Risk and Resilience Interdisciplinary Development
Initiative (IDI) at Western University
FX Multi-hazard Risk and Resilience Interdisciplinary Development
Initiative (IDI) at Western University
CR Abebe Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P1629, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.066
AghaKouchak A, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P8847, DOI 10.1002/2014GL062308
AKAIKE H, 1974, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, VAC19, P716, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Alves I.F., 2011, INT ENCY STAT SCI, P493, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_246,
DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_205330]
[Anonymous], 2011, 6 SIGMA DEMYSTIFIED
Azam M, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10040359
Bouwer LM, 2011, B AM METEOROL SOC, V92, P39, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS3092.1
Brunner MI, 2016, WIRES WATER, V3, P819, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1173
Canada Environment., 2017, CAN NAT TOM DAT VER
Dyrrdal AV, 2016, HYDROLOG SCI J, V61, P483, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2014.947289
Favre AC, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002456
Feng S, 2007, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V85, P599, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.85.599
Feuerstein J., 2021, THIS IS EXTREMELY RA
FISHER NI, 1985, BIOMETRIKA, V72, P253
Ganguli P, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P3301, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0073-6
Garry FK, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100282
Genest C, 2003, AM STAT, V57, P275, DOI 10.1198/0003130032431
Genest C, 2006, SCAND J STAT, V33, P337, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00470.x
Graler B, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P1281, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-1281-2013
Hanel M, 2010, J HYDROL, V393, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.08.024
Ingrosso R, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11030301
Insurance Bureau of Canada, 2021, BARR AND AR TORN INS
Pirani FJ, 2023, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V37, P1943, DOI 10.1007/s00477-022-02374-
0
Karson M., 1968, J AM STAT ASSOC, V63, P1047, DOI
[10.1080/01621459.1968.11009335, DOI 10.1080/01621459.1968.11009335]
Leahy T.P., 2021, ADV STAT CLIMATOL ME, V7, P1, DOI [10.5194/ascmo-7-1-2021, DOI
10.5194/ASCMO-7-1-2021]
Madsen H, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P3634, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.003
Mahmoudi MH, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V165, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03037-9
Masud MB, 2017, CLIM DYNAM, V48, P2685, DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3232-2
Mccarthy P., 2008, 24 AMS C SEVERE LOCA
Mesbahzadeh T, 2019, ADV METEOROL, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/6848049
Moazami S, 2022, ADV WATER RESOUR, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2022.104300
Naz S, 2019, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/hydrology6030079
Nazemi A, 2012, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V26, P189, DOI 10.1007/s00477-011-0467-7
Nielsen ER, 2015, WEATHER FORECAST, V30, P1673, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-15-0084.1
Owen LE, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100342
Pandey PK, 2018, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V4, P867, DOI 10.1007/s40808-018-0454-9
Pirani FJ, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2020WR027785
Pirani FJ, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2022EF002655
Public Safety Canada, 2019, HAZ EM
Raymond C, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P611, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0790-4
Requena AI, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P3023, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-3023-
2013
Rogash JA, 2000, WEATHER FORECAST, V15, P416, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(2000)015<0416:MOOAVT>2.0.CO;2
Salvadori G, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2004WR003133
Salvadori G, 2014, COAST ENG, V88, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.01.011
Salvadori G, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P3293, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-3293-
2011
Serinaldi F, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P1179, DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-
0916-1
Sills D., 2012, 26 AMS C SEV LOC STO, VPaper P. 59, P1
Singh H, 2021, CLIM DYNAM, V56, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s00382-020-05538-2
Singh H, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124673
Sorboni N.G., 2022, PREPRINT, DOI [10.21203/rs.3.rs-1984196/v1, DOI
10.21203/RS.3.RS-1984196/V1]
Tosic I, 2013, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V111, P97, DOI 10.1007/s00704-012-0647-5
Vandenberghe S, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008388
Wang SY, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13131774
Willems P, 2007, J HYDROL, V338, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.02.035
Zhang YQ, 2021, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100322
Zhao PP, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9050334
Zhou P, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aade9e
Zscheischler J, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P333, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-0060-z
Zscheischler J, 2021, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V12, P1, DOI 10.5194/esd-12-1-2021
Zscheischler J, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P469, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0156-3
NR 61
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0899-8418
EI 1097-0088
J9 INT J CLIMATOL
JI Int. J. Climatol.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 9
BP 4231
EP 4247
DI 10.1002/joc.8084
EA MAY 2023
PG 17
GA L3IB0
UT WOS:000982294300001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Rivera, JD
AF Rivera, Jason D.
TI Returning to normalcy in the short term: a preliminary examination of
recovery from Hurricane Harvey among individuals with home damage
SO DISASTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Hurricane Harvey; poverty; short-term disaster recovery; social capital
ID SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; DECISION-MAKING; UNITED-STATES; DISASTERS; RISK;
INFORMATION; EVACUATION; POVERTY; COUNTY; FLOODS
AB This study focuses on coastal counties in Texas, United States, affected by
Hurricane Harvey in 2017 to gauge the influence of individual and contextual
characteristics on people's ability to return to normalcy in the short term. Data
from a survey conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Episcopal Health
Foundation between October and November 2017 were utilised in the analysis. The
paper observes, based on the results of an ordered logistic regression, and
contrary to previous work, that age, gender, levels of poverty, and social capital
are not significant predictors of a return to normalcy. However, indicators such as
whether a person evacuated, if he/she identified as Hispanic/Latino, the extent of
damage sustained to one's home, and if one's automobile was damaged or destroyed
are shown to affect recovery. A discussion of the potential reasons for these
findings is provided as a means of informing future research on disaster recovery.
C1 [Rivera, Jason D.] SUNY Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Ave, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA.
C3 State University of New York (SUNY) System; Buffalo State College
RP Rivera, JD (corresponding author), SUNY Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Ave,
Buffalo, NY 14222 USA.
EM riverajd@buffalostate.edu
CR Aldrich D.P., 2012, BUILDING RESILIENCE
Aldrich Daniel P., 2016, SOCIAL CAPITAL CLIMA
[Anonymous], HURRICANE ANDREW ETH
[Anonymous], 2009, WOMEN GENDER DISASTE
[Anonymous], 2018, HDB DISASTER RES, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319- 63254-4_10., DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_10]
[Anonymous], 2012, DISPLACED LIFE KATRI
[Anonymous], 1970, ORG BEHAV DISASTER
[Anonymous], 2004, RESIDENTIAL RECOVERY
[Anonymous], 2008, HURRICANE KATRINA RE
[Anonymous], 2004, HEADS WATER GENDER C
[Anonymous], 1973, 9 U DEL DIS RES CTR
[Anonymous], 2011, NAT DIS REC FRAM STR
Ardalan A, 2010, AGEING SOC, V30, P11, DOI 10.1017/S0144686X09990122
Arendt LA., 2015, LONG TERM COMMUNITY
BARNSHAW J, 2010, ETHNICALLY MARGINALI, P191
Barrios RE, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P329, DOI 10.1111/disa.12044
Benjamin E, 2011, MT SINAI J MED, V78, P306, DOI 10.1002/msj.20251
Blaikie P., 1994, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
Bourdieu P., 1984, DISTINCTION SOCIAL C
BRANT R, 1990, BIOMETRICS, V46, P1171, DOI 10.2307/2532457
Brouwer R, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x
Cannon T., 1994, DISASTERS DEV ENV, V1, P13, DOI DOI 10.1108/
Chen WF, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V4, P169, DOI 10.1007/s13753-013-0018-6
Consoer M, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P155, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2412-z
Faas AJ, 2017, SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF DISASTER RESPONSE, RECOVERY, AND
ADAPTATION, P11, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805196-2.00002-9
Fatemi F, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.006
*FEMA, 2018, TEX HURR HARV DR 433
10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9
GIDDENS A, 1994, RIGHT LEFT FUTURE RA
Godschalk D.R., 1991, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, P131
Hamel L., 2018, ONE YEAR STORM TEXAS
HANEY TJ, 2010, SOCIOLOGY KATRINA PE, P77
Hoffman Suzanna M., 2002, CATASTROPHE CULTURE, P3
JARGOWSKY PA, 2005, ENCY SOCIAL MEASUREM, V1, P715
Kamel N, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P3211, DOI 10.1177/0042098011433490
Kousky C, 2013, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V5, P332, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00059.1
Long J. S., 2006, REGRESSION MODELS CA
Long J. S., 1997, REGRESSION MODELS CA
Maddala G. S., 1977, ECONOMETRICS
Moravec ER, 2017, WASHINGTON POST
Morrow B. H., 2008, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
Morrow Betty H., 2000, HURRICANE ANDREW ETH, P141
*NAT WEATH SERV, 2018, HURR HARV INF
Newton K, 1997, AM BEHAV SCI, V40, P575, DOI 10.1177/0002764297040005004
Nummi Josephine., 2017, RESPONSES DISASTERS, P173
Oyedele Akin, 2017, BUSINESS INSIDER
Peacock W., 2000, HURRICANE ANDREW RES
Peguero AA, 2006, HISPANIC J BEHAV SCI, V28, P5, DOI 10.1177/0739986305284012
Penner SJ, 2008, PUBLIC ADM PUBLIC PO, V138, P427
Phillips BrendaD., 2016, DISASTER RECOVERY
Putnam R.D., 2000, BOWLING ALONE COLLAP
RIVERA JD, 2010, ETHNICALLY MARGINALI, P1
RIVERA JD, 2017, RESPONSES DISASTERS, P60
Robinson WS, 1950, AM SOCIOL REV, V15, P351, DOI 10.2307/2087176
Rofi A, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00324.x
1446.2007.00620.x
ROVAI E, 1994, YEARB ASS PAC COAST, V56, P49, DOI DOI 10.1353/PCG.1994.0002
RUPASINGHA A, 2006, J SOCIOECONOMICS, V0035
SALAMAN LM, 1999, GLOBAL CIVIL SOC DIM
Tierney K, 1988, EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, V4, P11, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1585460
Tierney K, 2006, ON RISK AND DISASTER: LESSONS FROM HURRICANE KATRINA, P109
TVERSKY A, 1991, Q J ECON, V106, P1039, DOI 10.2307/2937956
Van Deth J., 2008, HDB SOCIAL CAPITAL, P150
Wagle U, 2002, INT SOC SCI J, V54, P155, DOI 10.1111/1468-2451.00366
Walker G, 2011, CRIT SOC POLICY, V31, P216, DOI 10.1177/0261018310396149
Wu SY, 2002, CLIM RES, V22, P255, DOI 10.3354/cr022255
Yoon DK, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P823, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0189-2
Zahran S, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P537, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01054.x
Zhang Y, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P5, DOI 10.1080/01944360903294556
NR 82
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 9
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0361-3666
EI 1467-7717
J9 DISASTERS
JI Disasters
PD JUL
PY 2020
VL 44
IS 3
BP 548
EP 568
DI 10.1111/disa.12387
EA DEC 2019
PG 21
GA LW1FJ
UT WOS:000504370100001
PM 31270841
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Cotugno, A
Smith, V
Baker, T
Srinivasan, R
AF Cotugno, Angela
Smith, Virginia
Baker, Tracy
Srinivasan, Raghavan
TI A Framework for Calculating Peak Discharge and Flood Inundation in
Ungauged Urban Watersheds Using Remotely Sensed Precipitation Data: A
Case Study in Freetown, Sierra Leone
SO REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE urban flood mapping; remotely sensed precipitation; peak discharge;
HEC-RAS
ID LAND-USE CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SENSING DATA; URBANIZATION; CATCHMENT;
RUNOFF; FUTURE; COVER; MODEL; INTEGRATION
AB As the human population increases, land cover is converted from vegetation to
urban development, causing increased runoff from precipitation events. Additional
runoff leads to more frequent and more intense floods. In urban areas, these flood
events are often catastrophic due to infrastructure built along the riverbank and
within the floodplains. Sufficient data allow for flood modeling used to implement
proper warning signals and evacuation plans, however, in least developed countries
(LDC), the lack of field data for precipitation and river flows makes hydrologic
and hydraulic modeling difficult. Within the most recent data revolution, the
availability of remotely sensed data for land use/land cover (LULC), flood mapping,
and precipitation estimates has increased, however, flood mapping in urban areas of
LDC is still limited due to low resolution of remotely sensed data (LULC, soil
properties, and terrain), cloud cover, and the lack of field data for model
calibration. This study utilizes remotely sensed precipitation, LULC, soil
properties, and digital elevation model data to estimate peak discharge and map
simulated flood extents of urban rivers in ungauged watersheds for current and
future LULC scenarios. A normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) analysis was
proposed to predict a future LULC. Additionally, return period precipitation events
were calculated using the theoretical extreme value distribution approach with two
remotely sensed precipitation datasets. Three calculation methods for peak
discharge (curve number and lag method, curve number and graphical TR-55 method,
and the rational equation) were performed and compared to a separate Soil and Water
Assessment Tool (SWAT) analysis to determine the method that best represents urban
rivers. HEC-RAS was then used to map the simulated flood extents from the peak
discharges and ArcGIS helped to determine infrastructure and population affected by
the floods. Finally, the simulated flood extents from HEC-RAS were compared to
historic flood event points, images of flood events, and global surface water
maximum water extent data. This analysis indicates that where field data are
absent, remotely sensed monthly precipitation data from Integrated Multi-satellitE
Retrievals for GPM (IMERG) where GPM is the Global Precipitation Mission can be
used with the curve number and lag method to approximate peak discharges and input
into HEC-RAS to represent the simulated flood extents experienced. This work
contains a case study for seven urban rivers in Freetown, Sierra Leone.
C1 [Cotugno, Angela; Smith, Virginia] Villanova Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Villanova, PA 19085 USA.
[Baker, Tracy] Nat Conservancy Africa Program, Highland, NY 12528 USA.
[Srinivasan, Raghavan] Texas A&M Agrilife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr,
Temple, TX 76502 USA.
[Srinivasan, Raghavan] Texas A&M Agrilife Res, Dept Ecol & Conservat Biol,
Temple, TX 76502 USA.
[Srinivasan, Raghavan] Texas A&M Univ, Temple, TX 76502 USA.
C3 Villanova University; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University
College Station; Texas A&M AgriLife Research; Texas A&M University
System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas A&M AgriLife
Research; Texas A&M University System
RP Smith, V (corresponding author), Villanova Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Villanova, PA 19085 USA.
EM acotugn1@villanova.edu; virginia.smith@villanova.edu;
tracy.baker@TNC.org; srinivasan@tamu.edu
OI Smith, Virginia/0000-0002-5640-8692
FU Catholic Relief Services for the development of a Water Fund; Villanova
University College of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering
FX This research was funded by Catholic Relief Services for the development
of a Water Fund for the Peninsula in partnership with The Nature
Conservancy and the Villanova University College of Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering as well as
contributions from an anonymous donor.
CR Abbaspour KC, 2007, MODSIM 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND
SIMULATION, P1603
Abdrabo KI, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12213548
Abdulkareem JH, 2019, ARAB J GEOSCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s12517-019-4253-z
Abujayyab S.K.M., 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42, P9, DOI [10.5194/isprs-
archives-XLII-4-W19-9-2019, DOI 10.5194/ISPRSARCHIVESXLII-4-W19-9-2019]
Aggett GR, 2009, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V113, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.034
Ahiablame LM, 2012, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V223, P4253, DOI 10.1007/s11270-012-
1189-2
Ahmad R, 2023, INT T OPER RES, V30, P2025, DOI 10.1111/itor.12887
Akbar TA, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11020105
Allen A., REMAPRISK FREETOWN
[Anonymous], 1990, SURF WATER HYDROL GE
[Anonymous], 2019, NASAACCESS DOWNLOADI
[Anonymous], 2016, HEC RAS RIVER ANAL S
Apel H, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V49, P79, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
Arnold JG, 2005, HYDROL PROCESS, V19, P563, DOI 10.1002/hyp.5611
Baker T., 2020, SWAT SOIL WATER ASSE
Bates PD, 2006, J HYDROL, V328, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.028
Belayneh A, 2020, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V6, P2015, DOI 10.1007/s40808-020-00792-
z
Blair A, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P559, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9616
Blumenfeld J., TRMM GPM EVOLUTION N
Boongaling CGK, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V72, P116, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.042
BOSCH JM, 1982, J HYDROL, V55, P3, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(82)90117-2
Brivio PA, 2002, INT J REMOTE SENS, V23, P429, DOI 10.1080/01431160010014729
Brocca L, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-69343-x
Chin DA, 2019, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001387
Chow V.T., 1953, FREQUENCY ANAL HYDRO, P50
Cronshey R., 1986, ASCE, P1268
Cui YF, 2019, LANDSLIDES, V16, P1167, DOI 10.1007/s10346-019-01167-x
DeFries R, 2004, HYDROL PROCESS, V18, P2183, DOI 10.1002/hyp.5584
Dezfuli AK, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P2817, DOI [10.1175/JHM-D-17-0139.1,
10.1175/jhm-d-17-0139.1]
Dile YT, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V743, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140702
Ducthien Tran, 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
V384, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/384/1/012150
Ebrahimian A, 2018, HYDROLOG SCI J, V63, P513, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2018.1440562
Elaji A, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102715
Eleuterio J, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P983, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-983-
2013
Elmer N.J., 2021, HYDROLOGIC MODEL PAR
Emberson R, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P3413, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-3413-
2020
Engel B., HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROU
Villanueva JRE, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19143205
Gassman PW, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P1211, DOI 10.13031/2013.23637
Gbanie SP, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10010129
Gilroy KL, 2012, J HYDROL, V414, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.009
Glas H, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P2529, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-2529-2016
Gumbel EJ, 1941, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V22, P836
Guo JCY, 2001, J HYDROL ENG, V6, P352, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:4(352)
Ha L.T., 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, P1, DOI [10.5194/hess-2017-251, DOI
10.5194/HESS-2017-251, 10.5194/hess]
Hayward D, 1996, HYDROLOG SCI J, V41, P377, DOI 10.1080/02626669609491509
Hengl T., 2019, PREDICTIVE SOIL MAPP
Hong Y, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005739
1688.2008.00217.x
Kent K.M., 2010, NATL ENG HDB TIME CO, VVolume 15
Khan SI, 2011, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V49, P85, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2057513
Klemas V, 2015, J COASTAL RES, V31, P1005, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00160.1
Larry W, 2009, WATER RESOURCES ENG
Leopold LB, 1968, HYDROLOGY URBAN LAND
Li LY, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8080625
Li LZ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031293
Liu Z, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12347
Liu Z, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1317, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00152.1
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.282
Masser I, 2001, HABITAT INT, V25, P503, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00021-2
Melesse AM, 2004, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V40, P863, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2004.tb01051.x
Meresa H, 2019, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V5, P257, DOI 10.1007/s40808-018-0532-z
Mockus V., 2004, NATL ENG HDB ESTIMAT, V10
Mockus V., 2004, NATL ENG HDB HYDROLO, V9
Mohamed SA, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V102, P707, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03571-x
MONTZ B, 1986, APPL GEOGR, V6, P325, DOI 10.1016/0143-6228(86)90034-2
Moriasi DN, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P885, DOI 10.13031/2013.23153
Mu QZ, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019
Muhadi NA, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12142308
Nagy RC, 2011, J ENVIRON QUAL, V40, P867, DOI 10.2134/jeq2010.0365
National Employee Development Center (NEDC), 2005, HYDR TRAIN SER PEAK
National Research Council, 2007, EL DAT FLOODPL MAPP, P11829
Neitsch S.L., 2011, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN, V406, P1, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2015.11.063
Ntelekos AA, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V103, P597, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9789-6
Pang JZ, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P3603, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-3603-2020
Papaioannou G, 2018, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/hydrology5020024
Pekel JF, 2016, NATURE, V540, P418, DOI 10.1038/nature20584
Pettorelli N, 2013, NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX, P1, DOI
10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199693160.001.0001
Proag V, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P369, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00952-6
Psomiadis E, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12233980
Radwan F, 2018, ARAB J GEOSCI, V11, DOI 10.1007/s12517-018-4067-4
Ramirez J.A., INTENSITY DURATION F
Ramoelo A, 2014, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V6, P7406, DOI 10.3390/rs6087406
Rogger M, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P5209, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020723
Salami RO, 2017, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V9, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v9i1.370
Saldarriaga J, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092491
Sardooi ER, 2019, APPL GEOGR, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102071
Schneider A, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V124, P689, DOI
10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.006
Sharif HO, 2016, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V7, P702, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2014.945101
Sheng JF, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V48, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9241-7
Snider D., 2007, NATL ENG HDB HYDROGR, V16
Statistics Sierra Leone, 2016, 2015 POP HOUS CENS S
Stepchenko A., 2015, INT J SCI ENV TECHNO, VVolume 3, P180, DOI
[10.17770/etr2015vol3.167, DOI 10.17770/ETR2015VOL3.167]
Sumarauw J.S.F., 2012, INT J CIVIL ENV ENG, V12, P17
Suriya S, 2012, J HYDROL, V412, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.008
Tong XW, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8050357
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2020, WORLD SOC REP 2020 C
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affair Population Division,
2022, WORLD POPULATION PRO
van Dijk AIJM, 2012, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V16, P3461, DOI 10.5194/hess-16-3461-
2012
Wadsworth R, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7120144
Walega A, 2020, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100645
Wang Y, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P6404, DOI 10.3390/w7116404
Weerasinghe I, 2020, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V24, P1565, DOI 10.5194/hess-24-1565-
2020
Weng QH, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V28, P737, DOI 10.1007/s002670010258
WILLIAMS GJ, 1965, GEOGRAPHY, V50, P163
Wilson J.P., 2000, TERRAIN ANAL PRINCIP
World Bank Group, 2018, GENOTOXICITY A PREDI
NR 107
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 18
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2072-4292
J9 REMOTE SENS-BASEL
JI Remote Sens.
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 19
AR 3806
DI 10.3390/rs13193806
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Remote Sensing;
Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
(SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Remote Sensing; Imaging
Science & Photographic Technology
GA WI2YM
UT WOS:000708232400001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ebrahimnejad, S
Harifi, S
AF Ebrahimnejad, Sadoullah
Harifi, Sasan
TI An optimized evacuation model with compatibility constraints in the
context of disability: an ancient-inspired Giza Pyramids Construction
metaheuristic approach
SO APPLIED INTELLIGENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE People with disabilities; Evacuation model; Intelligent system; Giza
Pyramids Construction (GPC); Simulated Annealing (SA); Invasive Weed
Optimization (IWO); Differential Evolution (DE); Emperor Penguins Colony
(EPC)
ID A-RIDE PROBLEM; BUSHFIRE EMERGENCY EVACUATION; BEE COLONY ALGORITHM;
NATURAL DISASTERS; HURRICANE EVACUATION; NEIGHBORHOOD SEARCH; DELIVERY
PROBLEM; ROUTING PROBLEM; TRANSPORTATION; PICKUP
AB In recent years, the number and severity of natural disasters have increased.
These disasters always carry the risks of mortality and injury. But its mortality
risks are much higher for people with disabilities than for normal people. One of
the most important issues during natural disasters is to pay attention to the
provision of accommodation and the possibility of evacuating people with
disabilities. In this paper, a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model is
proposed for shelter locations, evacuation routing, compatibility constraints in
the context of disability, and time windows to picking up people with disabilities
from different locations and transporting them to shelters. This study considers
the time required for the movement of people with disabilities, heterogeneous
vehicles, different capacities, several depots, and several shelters. The intended
objective functions are the total distance traveled by vehicles, the maximum
distance of a tour, and a hybrid objective function created by the weighted
combination of both mentioned objective functions. A new Giza Pyramids Construction
(GPC) algorithm is used to solve the model. Using the approach of the GPC
algorithm, which is one of the soft computing methods, greatly reduces the
computation complexity. To examine the performance of the proposed algorithm,
thirty instances at different scales are generated with and without time window
constraints. For validation, the results obtained from the proposed algorithm are
compared with the results obtained from four algorithms including SA, IWO, DE, and
EPC. The results show that the GPC algorithm performed better than other algorithms
in solving the model. According to the results, the proposed GPC algorithm is 5%,
44%, 10%, and 4% better than SA, IWO, DE, and EPC, respectively. Furthermore,
considering the time window significantly increases the total network evacuation
time. Based on our experiments the proposed model and solution approach can be
helpful in solving the real problems related to the evacuation of people with
disabilities during natural disasters.
C1 [Ebrahimnejad, Sadoullah] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Karaj Branch, Karaj,
Iran.
[Harifi, Sasan] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran.
C3 Islamic Azad University; Islamic Azad University
RP Ebrahimnejad, S (corresponding author), Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Karaj
Branch, Karaj, Iran.
EM ibrahimnejad@kiau.ac.ir; s.harifi@kiau.ac.ir
RI Harifi, Sasan/HHM-4300-2022
OI Ebrahimnejad, Sadoullah/0000-0003-4886-5348
CR Alam MJ, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102946
ALEXANDER D, 1991, DISASTERS, V15, P209, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00455.x
Arik OA, 2020, PROMET-ZAGREB, V32, P585
Baou E, 2018, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V8, P447, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-11-2017-0066
P63, DOI 10.1016/j.sorms.2016.11.001
Bean J. C., 1994, ORSA Journal on Computing, V6, P154, DOI 10.1287/ijoc.6.2.154
Bian RJ, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1143, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.005
Bilal, 2020, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103479
Ceberio J, 2012, PROG ARTIF INTELL, V1, P103, DOI 10.1007/s13748-011-0005-3
Christie N, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P244, DOI 10.1108/DPM-11-2015-0254
Cicirello VA, 2016, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V20, P434, DOI
10.1109/TEVC.2015.2477284
Coutinho-Rodrigues J, 2012, J TRANSP GEOGR, V22, P206, DOI
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.006
Dhamala T.N., 2018, INT J OPER RES, VVol. 15, P29
Dulebenets MA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101114
Ebrahimnejad S., 2021, SCI IRAN, V3
Feng L, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P118, DOI 10.3141/2532-14
Gao XH, 2019, MEASUREMENT, V145, P713, DOI 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.067
Harifi Sasan, 2020, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer
and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE 2020), P256, DOI 10.1109/ICCKE50421.2020.9303653
Harifi S, 2021, EVOL INTELL, V14, P1743, DOI 10.1007/s12065-020-00451-3
Harifi S, 2021, J INTELL MANUF, V32, P1361, DOI 10.1007/s10845-020-01616-8
Harifi S, 2019, EVOL INTELL, V12, P211, DOI 10.1007/s12065-019-00212-x
Ji SF, 2008, ICNC 2008: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION,
VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, P212, DOI 10.1109/ICNC.2008.97
Karabulut K, 2021, COMPUT OPER RES, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2020.105192
Kiran MS, 2013, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V23, P9, DOI 10.1007/s00521-011-0794-0
KIRKPATRICK S, 1983, SCIENCE, V220, P671, DOI 10.1126/science.220.4598.671
Konstantakopoulos GD, 2022, OPER RES-GER, V22, P2033, DOI 10.1007/s12351-020-
00600-7
Lehuede F, 2014, J OPER RES SOC, V65, P983, DOI 10.1057/jors.2013.17
Mace SE., 2018, AM J DISASTER MED, V13, P195
Malpass A, 2019, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V34, P60
MILLER CE, 1960, J ACM, V7, P326, DOI 10.1145/321043.321046
Mohamed AW, 2019, INT J MACH LEARN CYB, V10, P253, DOI 10.1007/s13042-017-0711-7
Molenbruch Y, 2017, COMPUT OPER RES, V77, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2016.07.020
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Parragh SN, 2012, OR SPECTRUM, V34, P593, DOI 10.1007/s00291-010-0229-9
Parragh SN, 2011, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V19, P912, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2010.06.002
Parragh SN, 2010, COMPUT OPER RES, V37, P1129, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2009.10.003
Peng ZH, 2019, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V85, P99, DOI
10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.006
Pourrahmani E, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P357, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.002
Quintanilla S, 2020, OR SPECTRUM, V42, P43, DOI 10.1007/s00291-019-00565-w
Radianti J, 2015, APPL INTELL, V42, P3, DOI 10.1007/s10489-014-0583-4
Rais A, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V235, P530, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.038
Reinhardt LB, 2013, EUR J OPER RES, V225, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.008
Riedler M, 2018, COMPUT OPER RES, V96, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2018.03.008
Roy KC, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103339
Shahparvari S, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V104, P32, DOI
10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.036
10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.007
Song MX, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106561
Soylu B, 2015, COMPUT IND ENG, V90, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2015.10.010
Stough LM, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P140, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0051-8
Szeto WY, 2011, EUR J OPER RES, V215, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.06.006
Tan F, 2021, EARLY CHILD EDUC J, V49, P869, DOI 10.1007/s10643-021-01217-x
Tellez O, 2018, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V91, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2018.03.020
That Ton K., 2021, ENV HAZARD, V20, P1
Uzun, 2019, INT J ENG SCI, V9, P19585
Vahdanjoo M, 2020, AGRONOMY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/agronomy10101608
Venkatesh P, 2015, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V26, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.029
Yildirim U, 2021, INT J IND ENG COMP, V12, P441, DOI 10.5267/j.ijiec.2021.4.002
Yu SH, 2022, EUR J OPER RES, V298, P894, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.009
Zeng MH, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105166
Zhang HG, 2020, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103517
Zhao X, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V137, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2020.05.008
Zhao XJ, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V8, P457, DOI 10.1007/s13753-017-0157-2
Zhao Y, 2021, APPL INTELL, V51, P100, DOI 10.1007/s10489-020-01711-6
NR 69
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 5
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
SN 0924-669X
EI 1573-7497
J9 APPL INTELL
JI Appl. Intell.
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 52
IS 13
BP 15040
EP 15073
DI 10.1007/s10489-021-03079-7
EA MAR 2022
PG 34
WC Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence
SC Computer Science
GA 5C1NG
UT WOS:000767072900004
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lim, HR
Lim, MBB
Rojas, AWM
AF Lim, Hector R., Jr.
Lim, Ma Bernadeth B.
Rojas, Ann Wendy M.
TI Towards modelling of evacuation behavior and planning for emergency
logistics due to the Philippine Taal Volcanic eruption in 2020
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Correlation analysis; Departure timing; Destination choice; Mode choice;
Emergency planning
ID HURRICANE-EVACUATION; DECISION-MAKING; CHOICE; HOUSEHOLDS; DETERMINANTS;
UNDERSTAND; LUZON; AREA
AB Emergency evacuation is the immediate escape of people away from a place of an
imminent threat to a place of safety. The ability of the households to evacuate is
a crucial component in reducing disaster risks. Logistical issues such as a lack of
resources during and after the evacuation, as well as road congestion, might arise,
especially in short and no-notice calamities such as a volcanic eruption. This
study examines the relationship of variables of evacuation logistics of Barangay
Banga, Talisay, Batangas, in the context of the 2020 Taal Volcanic eruption. A
survey was conducted based on the evacuation experience of the households at the
onset of the eruption. First, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed for
all the variables on household evacuation logistics to understand the evacuation
behavior of households. These variables include the type of evacuation, departure
timing, evacuation mode, and destination type choice. Additionally, a pairwise
correlaton analysis was employed to identify the influential factors related to
household evacuation logistics such as socio-demographic and household
characteristics, their experience with Taal Volcano's recurring activities and
relationship with other evacuation-related decisions. The results of this study aim
to provide insights into a better understanding of the evacuation behavior of
households in the context of a volcanic eruption and be useful in the evacuation
logistics planning of the country.
C1 [Lim, Hector R., Jr.; Lim, Ma Bernadeth B.] Univ Philippines Los Banos, Coll
Engn & Agroind Technol, Laguna, Philippines.
[Rojas, Ann Wendy M.] Univ Philippines Los Banos, Coll Econ & Management,
Laguna, Philippines.
C3 University of the Philippines System; University of the Philippines Los
Banos; University of the Philippines System; University of the
Philippines Los Banos
RP Lim, MBB (corresponding author), Univ Philippines Los Banos, Coll Engn & Agroind
Technol, Laguna, Philippines.
EM hrlim@up.edu.ph; mblim4@up.edu.ph; amrojas@up.edu.ph
FU University of the Philippines System Enhanced Creative Work and Research
Grant [ECWRG-2020-226R]
FX This study was funded by the University of the Philippines System
Enhanced Creative Work and Research Grant (ECWRG-2020-226R).
CR Aalami S, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V23, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.023
Alawadi R, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102313
Andreastuti S, 2019, J VOLCANOL GEOTH RES, V382, P298, DOI
10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.01.022
[Anonymous], 2006, IMPACT ASSESSMENT EU
BARCLAY J, 2019, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ
Borowski E, 2021, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100352
Calumba SR, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13115783
Caunhye AM, 2012, SOC EC PLANN SCI, V46, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2011.04.004
Cheng G., 2008, P 87 ANN M TRANSP RE
Delos Reyes PJ, 2018, EARTH-SCI REV, V177, P565, DOI
10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.11.014
Duan ZH, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11247023
Golshani N, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102713
Golshani N, 2019, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V15, P896, DOI
10.1080/23249935.2018.1546778
Gumasing MJJ, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102759
6996.0000074
Iuchi K, 2019, OXFORD RES ENCY NATU, DOI 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.233
Jumadi,, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8060196
Jumadi, 2017, SYSTEMS, V5, DOI 10.3390/systems5040053
Jumadi, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V227, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.092
Kurata YB, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102670
Lechner HN, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101160
10.11175/EASTS.10.147]
Lim HR, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2436-4
Lim M.B., 2016, UNDERSTANDING EVACUA
Lim MBB, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102137
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.03.003
Lowe PA, 1999, ARCH CLIN NEUROPSYCH, V14, P303, DOI 10.1016/S0887-6177(98)00029-
8
Makinoshima F, 2017, GEOSCIENCES, V7, DOI 10.3390/geosciences7040112
Malawani MN, 2021, GEOSCIENCES, V11, DOI 10.3390/geosciences11030109
Medina MAP, 2016, INT LETT NAT SCI, V50, P70, DOI
10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.50.70
6996.0000083
Mostafizi A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2673, P480, DOI 10.1177/0361198119837511
Municipal Planning and Development Office Talisay (MPDO), 2020, MUN SOC PHYS
PROF, P130
Nagarajan M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102083
Ong AKS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102467
Paek H.-J., 2017, OXFORD RES ENCYCLOPE, DOI
[10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-283, DOI
10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228613.013.283, 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.283, DOI
10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228613.001.0001/ACREFORE-9780190228613-E-283]
Pan AP, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101522
PERRY RW, 1983, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V11, P36, DOI 10.1002/1520-
6629(198301)11:1<36::AID-JCOP2290110104>3.0.CO;2-2
Siebeneck LK, 2008, RISK PERCEPTION ASS
Sorensen J.H., 1991, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, V9, P153
Strakova J, 2016, NASE MORE, V63, P217, DOI 10.17818/NM/2016/SI26
Sugiarto S., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
V523, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/523/1/012032
Sun YY, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102512
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
Wang Y, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102254
Witham CS, 2005, J VOLCANOL GEOTH RES, V148, P191, DOI
10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.04.017
Wong SD, UNDERSTANDING CALIFO
Wong SD, 2020, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V20, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.003
Wu H-C, 2013, LOGISTICS PERSPECTIV
Zlotnicki J, 2018, EARTH PLANETS SPACE, V70, DOI 10.1186/s40623-018-0925-2
NR 73
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 26
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 114
IS 1
BP 553
EP 581
DI 10.1007/s11069-022-05401-z
EA JUN 2022
PG 29
Water Resources
GA 4X4VL
UT WOS:000804537100001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bilskie, MV
Asher, TG
Miller, PW
Fleming, JG
Hagen, SC
Luettich, RA
AF Bilskie, M. V.
Asher, T. G.
Miller, P. W.
Fleming, J. G.
Hagen, S. C.
Luettich Jr., R. A.
TI Real-Time Simulated Storm Surge Predictions during Hurricane Michael
(2018)
SO WEATHER AND FORECASTING
LA English
DT Article
DE Forecast pdfs; skill; Hindcasts; Operational forecasting; Model errors;
Model evaluation; performance; Ocean models
ID SHALLOW-WATER; EVACUATION DECISIONS; MODEL; SCALE; WAVES; ATLANTIC;
TIDES; SWAN
AB Storm surge caused by tropical cyclones can cause overland flooding and lead to
loss of life while damaging homes, businesses, and critical infrastructure. In
2018, Hurricane Michael made landfall near Mexico Beach, Florida, on 10 October
with peak wind speeds near 71.9 m s(-1) (161 mph) and storm surge over 4.5 m
NAVD88. During Hurricane Michael, water levels and waves were predicted near-real
time using a deterministic, depth-averaged, high-resolution ADCIRC+SWAN model of
the northern Gulf of Mexico. The model was forced with an asymmetrical parametric
vortex model [generalized asymmetric Holland model (GAHM)] based on Michael's
National Hurricane Center (NHC) forecast track and strength. The authors report
errors between simulated and observed water level time series, peak water level,
and timing of peak for NHC advisories. Forecasts of water levels were within 0.5 m
of observations, and the timing of peak water levels was within 1 h as early as 48
h before Michael's eventual landfall. We also examined the effect of adding far-
field meteorology in our TC vortex model for use in real-time forecasts. In
general, we found that including far-field meteorology by blending the TC vortex
with a basin-scale NWP product improved water level forecasts. However, we note
that divergence between the NHC forecast track and the forecast track of the
meteorological model supplying the far-field winds represents a potential
limitation to operationalizing a blended wind field surge product. The approaches
and data reported herein provide a transparent assessment of water level forecasts
during Hurricane Michael and highlight potential future improvements for more
accurate predictions.
C1 [Bilskie, M. V.] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens,
Georgia.
[Asher, T. G.; Luettich Jr., R. A.] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Marine
Sci, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
[Miller, P. W.] Louisiana State Univ, Coll Coast & Environm, Baton Rouge, LA
USA.
[Fleming, J. G.] Scimaritan, Baton Rouge, LA USA.
[Hagen, S. C.] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Coastal Resiliency, Baton Rouge, LA
USA.
[Hagen, S. C.] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Baton Rouge, LA
USA.
[Hagen, S. C.] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Computat & Technol, Baton Rouge, LA
USA.
C3 University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill;
University of North Carolina School of Medicine; Louisiana State
University System; Louisiana State University; Louisiana State
University System; Louisiana State University
RP Bilskie, MV (corresponding author), Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech
Engn, Athens, Georgia.
EM mbilskie@uga.edu
OI Bilskie, Matthew/0000-0002-7697-7403; Miller, Paul/0000-0002-0512-8295
FU U.S. Department of Homeland Security [2015-ST-061-ND0001-01]; National
Oceanic Partnership Program Award [5120731]; National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Ecological Effects of Sea Level Rise
(EESLR) Program [NA10NOS4780146, NA16NOS4780208]; Louisiana Sea Grant
Laborde Chair
FX This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security under Grant Award 2015-ST-061-ND0001-01 and the
National Oceanic Partnership Program Award 5120731. The views and
conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and
should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official
policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S Department of Homeland
Security. This research was also funded in part under the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Ecological Effects of Sea
Level Rise (EESLR) Program (Awards NA10NOS4780146 and NA16NOS4780208),
and the Louisiana Sea Grant Laborde Chair. This work used High
Performance Computing at the University of Georgia's (UGA) Georgia
Advanced Computing Research Center, Louisiana State University (LSU),
and the Louisiana Optical Network Initiative (LONI). The statements and
conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
views of DHS, NOAA, Louisiana Sea Grant, UGA, LSU, or LONI. The authors
also wish to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their invaluable
input into this manuscript.
CR Anarde KA, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI [10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000265,
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000265]
[Anonymous], 1978, COASTAL ENG 1978, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780872621909.034
Asher TG, 2019, OCEAN MODEL, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101483
Bertin X, 2015, CONT SHELF RES, V96, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2015.01.005
Beven J.L., 2019, AL142018 NHC
Bilskie MV, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V121, P3625, DOI 10.1002/2015JC011400
Bilskie MV, 2020, COAST ENG, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103622
Bilskie MV, 2016, EARTHS FUTURE, V4, P177, DOI 10.1002/2015EF000347
Bilskie MV, 2015, ADV WATER RESOUR, V86, P102, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.020
Blanton B, 2012, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V9, P1677, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.185
Boukhanovsky AV, 2012, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V9, P1704, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2012.04.188
Bunya S, 2010, MON WEATHER REV, V138, P345, DOI 10.1175/2009MWR2906.1
Byrne M.J., 2019, USGS OPEN-FILE REP, DOI [10.3133/ofr20191059, DOI
10.3133/ofr20191059]
Cangialosi J. P., 2020, NATL HURRICANE CENTE
CAVALERI L, 1981, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V86, P961, DOI 10.1029/JC086iC11p10961
Cloke HL, 2009, J HYDROL, V375, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.005
Czajkowski J, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P72, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000037
Dale M, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P159, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0483-z
Davis JR, 2010, MON WEATHER REV, V138, P2953, DOI 10.1175/2010MWR3136.1
Dawson C, 2006, INT J NUMER METH FL, V52, P63, DOI 10.1002/fld.1156
DeLorme DE, 2020, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V28, P158, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12291
DeMaria M, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P387, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00240.1
Dietrich JC, 2018, J WATERW PORT COAST, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-
5460.0000419
Dietrich JC, 2011, MON WEATHER REV, V139, P2488, DOI 10.1175/2011MWR3611.1
Dietrich JC, 2011, COAST ENG, V58, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2010.08.001
Egbert GD, 2002, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V19, P183, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2
EGBERT GD, 1994, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V99, P24821, DOI 10.1029/94JC01894
Emanuel K, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P495, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0134.1
Fleming J.G., 2007, P 10 INT C ESTUARINE, P893
Flowerdew J, 2010, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V136, P1444, DOI 10.1002/qj.648
Funakoshi Y, 2008, J WATERW PORT COAST, V134, P321, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
950X(2008)134:6(321)
Gall R, 2013, B AM METEOROL SOC, V94, P329, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00071.1
Gao J., 2018, SURFACE WIND STRESS
Golding BW, 2009, METEOROL APPL, V16, P3, DOI 10.1002/met.123
Hamill TM, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P209, DOI 10.1175/2011BAMS3106.1
Hazelton AT, 2020, MON WEATHER REV, V148, P2009, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0275.1
Hu KL, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P1029, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9960-z
Kaplan J, 2010, WEATHER FORECAST, V25, P220, DOI 10.1175/2009WAF2222280.1
Kennedy AB, 2019, OCEAN MODEL, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101491
Kerr PC, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V118, P4633, DOI 10.1002/jgrc.20305
Kinnmark I., 1986, SHALLOW WATER WAVE E
KOLAR RL, 1994, COMPUT FLUIDS, V23, P523, DOI 10.1016/0045-7930(94)90017-5
KOMEN GJ, 1984, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V14, P1271, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0485(1984)014<1271:OTEOAF>2.0.CO;2
Landsea CW, 2018, B AM METEOROL SOC, V99, P2237, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0136.1
Lin N, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P8606, DOI 10.1002/2014JD021584
Luettich R.A., 2004, FORMULATION NUMERICA, V20, P74
Madsen O. S., 1988, THEORY, P492, DOI [10.1061/9780872626874.035, DOI
10.9753/ICCE.V21.34]
Morales-Hernandez M, 2020, J HYDROINFORM, V22, P1217, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2020.163
Morey SL, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL027021
Mori N, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P5106, DOI 10.1002/2014GL060689
Morrow BH, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P35, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00197.1
Munroe R, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P813, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0074.1
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2010, COAST CHANG AN
PROGR
NHC, 2019, TROP CYCL STORM SURG
Plumlee M, 2021, ANN APPL STAT, V15, P460, DOI 10.1214/20-AOAS1398
Pugh D.T., 1996, TIDES SURGES MEAN SE
Ramos MH, 2010, METEOROL APPL, V17, P223, DOI 10.1002/met.202
Rappaport EN, 2010, WEATHER FORECAST, V25, P1380, DOI 10.1175/2010WAF2222369.1
Rappaport EN, 2009, WEATHER FORECAST, V24, P395, DOI 10.1175/2008WAF2222128.1
Rappaport EN, 2000, B AM METEOROL SOC, V81, P2065, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0477(2000)081<2065:LOLITU>2.3.CO;2
Reed DA, 2010, NAT HAZARDS REV, V11, P102, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000012
Regnier E, 2008, MANAGE SCI, V54, P16, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0764
Resio DT, 2008, PHYS TODAY, V61, P33, DOI 10.1063/1.2982120
Resio DT, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P1423, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2924-1
Rey AJM, 2021, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V126, DOI 10.1029/2020JC016489
Rhome J.R., 2006, 27 C HURR TROP MET M
Roberts KJ, 2021, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105045
Rogers R, 2006, B AM METEOROL SOC, V87, P1523, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-87-11-1523
Rogers WE, 2003, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V33, P366, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0485(2003)033<0366:IOWGAD>2.0.CO;2
Rucker CA, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P1341, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04634-8
Tanaka S, 2011, J SCI COMPUT, V46, P329, DOI 10.1007/s10915-010-9402-1
Thomas A, 2021, OCEAN MODEL, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2021.101820
Torn RD, 2012, WEATHER FORECAST, V27, P715, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-11-00085.1
Wada A, 2010, SOLA, V6A, P13, DOI 10.2151/sola.6A-004
Weisberg RH, 2006, ESTUAR COAST, V29, P899, DOI 10.1007/BF02798649
Westerink JJ, 2008, MON WEATHER REV, V136, P833, DOI 10.1175/2007MWR1946.1
6988(2005)6:3(129), 10.1061/ASCE1527-698820056:3129, DOI 10.1061/ASCE1527-
698820056:3129]
Wu LG, 2019, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V19, P2477, DOI 10.5194/acp-19-2477-2019
Xie L, 2006, MON WEATHER REV, V134, P1355, DOI 10.1175/MWR3126.1
Zambon JB, 2014, OCEAN DYNAM, V64, P1535, DOI 10.1007/s10236-014-0777-7
Zijlema M, 2010, COAST ENG, V57, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.10.011
NR 81
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 6
PI BOSTON
PA 45 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA 02108-3693, UNITED STATES
SN 0882-8156
EI 1520-0434
J9 WEATHER FORECAST
JI Weather Forecast.
PD JUL
PY 2022
VL 37
IS 7
BP 1085
EP 1102
DI 10.1175/WAF-D-21-0132.1
PG 18
GA 4X7HZ
UT WOS:000861010100001
OA Green Submitted, Bronze
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Karunarathne, AY
AF Karunarathne, Ananda Y.
TI Geographies of the evolution of social capital legacies in response to
flood disasters in rural and urban areas in Sri Lanka
LA English
DT Article
DE Evolution of social capital; Social networks; Reciprocal support;
Geographies of social capital; Sri lankan floods; Flood disaster risk
reduction; Sri Lanka
ID RISK REDUCTION; COMMUNITY; NETWORKS; RESILIENCE; PREPAREDNESS;
MANAGEMENT
AB Social capital is increasingly recognized as an instrumental aspect of disaster
mitigation and management. The purpose of this research is to examine the empirical
evidence of the evolution of social capital as well as their geographies during
past flood disasters in rural and urban areas in Sri Lanka. For the case study, 405
affected households were surveyed through simple random sampling in 21 local
administrative divisions in Sri Lanka. Focus group interviews and field
observations were also carried out. The research is based on the mixed-research
method approach and mainly relied on the qualitative data analyzing mechanism.
Significant findings reveal that social capital evolved at different flood
inundation phases (e.g. before, during, and after) and played a pivotal role in
revivifying village livelihoods affected in past flooding events. In addition,
bonding, bridging, and linking social capital strongly helped to reduce the adverse
effects of past floods. Reciprocal support and resource mobilization have greatly
helped secure and revive flood-affected livelihoods; examples include providing
information, food, water, shelter, and other basic needs; helping with evacuation,
including the recovery, transport, and return of belongings; cleaning up
contaminated households and public places; and providing emotional and financial
support. Moreover, geographical diversity is observed in social capital legacies
and the evolution of reciprocal support.
C1 [Karunarathne, Ananda Y.] Univ Colombo, Dept Geog, 94 Cumaratunga Munidasa
Mawatha, Colombo 00700 3, Sri Lanka.
C3 University of Colombo
RP Karunarathne, AY (corresponding author), Univ Colombo, Dept Geog, 94 Cumaratunga
Munidasa Mawatha, Colombo 00700 3, Sri Lanka.
EM ananda@geo.cmb.ac.lk
CR Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Adger WN, 1999, WORLD DEV, V27, P249, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3
Agrawal S., 2006, General Technical Report - USDA Forest Service, P163
Atanga RA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101358
Bandaralage JS, 2009, S ASIA, V32, P110, DOI 10.1080/00856400802709300
Bene C, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101431
Bhandari RB, 2014, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V23, P314, DOI 10.1108/DPM-06-2013-0105
Bihari M, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P253, DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.011
Buckland J, 1999, DISASTERS, V23, P174, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00112
Burt RS, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P339, DOI 10.2307/2393923
Chmutina K, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P10, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.03.002
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
Disaster Management Centre, 2017, SIT REP SRI LANK 17
Faas AJ, 2017, SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF DISASTER RESPONSE, RECOVERY, AND
ADAPTATION, P11, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805196-2.00002-9
Faivre N, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V32, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.015
Farley JM, 2017, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V10, DOI 10.1080/16549716.2017.1331539
Grootaert C., 2004, MEASURING SOCIAL CAP
Grootaert C, 2002, UNDERSTANDING MEASUR
Guarnacci U, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V16, P180, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.001
Hicks A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.015
Hsueh HY, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101199
Hurlbert JS, 2000, AM SOCIOL REV, V65, P598, DOI 10.2307/2657385
Jamshed A, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101109
Jayawardana J, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P356, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.005
Jovita HD, 2019, J HUM BEHAV SOC ENVI, V29, P519, DOI
10.1080/10911359.2018.1556143
Karunarathna Ananda, 2018, [Journal of South Asian Studies, 남아시아연구], V24,
P57, DOI 10.21587/jsas.2018.24.1.003
Karunarathne A, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8040166
Karunarathne AY, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V125, DOI [10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102274,
10.1016/j.apgeog.102274]
Karunarathne AY, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101679
Karunarathne AY, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101279
Koh H.K., 2008, SOCIAL CAPITAL HLTH
Lee K., 1999, CORPORATE SOCIAL CAP
Li Linna, 2010, International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response
and Management, V2, P48, DOI 10.4018/jiscrm.2010100104
Li XW, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101421
Lin N., 2004, SOCIAL CAPITAL THEOR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511815447
Manawadu L, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102076
Minamoto Y, 2010, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V19, P548, DOI 10.1108/09653561011091887
Misra S, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.017
Mohanty A, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.012
Moreno J, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.024
Nakagawa Y., 2004, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V22, P5, DOI DOI
10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI
10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
Pacoma AJU, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101250
Patankar A., 2017, WORLD BANK POLICY RE
Pathirage J, 2011, ETHNOGRAPHY, V12, P315, DOI 10.1177/1466138110362013
Perkins JM, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V125, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.019
Pour SH, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102373
Putnam R. D., 1993, MAKING DEMOCRACY WOR
Rand K, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101310
Reininger BM, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V83, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.037
Sabatini F., 2009, J SOCIO-ECON, V38, P429, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2008.06.001]
Sam AS, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101436
Sampling Raosoft, 2004, SAMPL SIZ CALC
Sanyal S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.010
Senapati AK, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101351
Setten G., 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38
Spaliviero M., 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44
Uphoff N, 2000, WORLD DEV, V28, P1875, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00063-2
Waters J, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P42, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.011
NR 62
TC 5
Z9 7
U1 6
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD AUG
PY 2021
VL 62
AR 102359
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102359
EA JUL 2021
PG 15
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA TS0WP
UT WOS:000679378400004
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Festa, N
Throgmorton, KF
Heaphy, N
Canavan, M
Gill, TM
AF Festa, Natalia
Throgmorton, Kaitlin F.
Heaphy, Nora
Canavan, Maureen
Gill, Thomas M.
TI Association of Nursing Home Exposure to Hurricane-Related Inundation
With Emergency Preparedness
SO JAMA NETWORK OPEN
LA English
DT Article
ID RISK; EVACUATION; KATRINA
AB IMPORTANCE Whether US nursing homes are well prepared for exposure to hurricane-
related inundation is uncertain.
OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of nursing homes exposed to hurricane-
related inundation and evaluate whether exposed facilities are more likely to meet
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) emergency preparedness standards.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study included CMS-
certified nursing homes in Coastal Atlantic and Gulf Coast states from January 1,
2017, to December 31, 2019. The prevalence of facilities exposed to at least 2 feet
of hurricane-related inundation used models from the National Hurricane Center
across coastal areas overseen by 5 CMS regional offices: New England, New York
metropolitan area, Mid-Atlantic region, Southeast and Eastern Gulf Coast, and
Western Gulf Coast. Critical emergency preparedness deficiencies cited during CMS
life safety code inspections were identified.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The analysis used generalized estimating equations
with binomial and negative binomial distributions to evaluate associations between
exposure status and the presence and number of critical emergency preparedness
deficiencies. Regionally stratified associations (odds ratios [ORs]) and rate
ratios [RRs]) with 95% CIs, adjusted for state-level fixed effects and nursing home
characteristics, were reported.
RESULTS Of 5914 nursing homes, 617 (10.4%) were at risk of inundation exposure,
and 1763 (29.8%) had a critical emergency preparedness deficiency. Exposed
facilities were less likely to be rural, were larger, and had similar CMS health
inspection, quality, and staffing ratings compared with unexposed facilities.
Exposure was positively associated with the presence and number of emergency
preparedness deficiencies for the nursing homes within the Mid-Atlantic region
(adjusted OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.15-3.20]; adjusted RR, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.41-4.47]).
Conversely, exposure was negatively associated with the number of emergency
preparedness deficiencies among facilities within the Western Gulf Coast (aRR, 0.55
[95% CI, 0.36-0.86]). The associations for the number of emergency preparedness
deficiencies remained after correction for multiple comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest
that the association between exposure to hurricane-related inundation and nursing
home emergency preparedness differs considerably across the Coastal Atlantic and
Gulf regulatory regions. These findings further suggest that there may be
opportunities to reduce regional heterogeneity and improve the alignment of nursing
home emergency preparedness with surrounding environmental risks.
C1 [Festa, Natalia] Yale Univ, Natl Clinician Scholars Program, 333 Cedar St,POB
208088, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.
[Festa, Natalia; Gill, Thomas M.] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT
USA.
[Throgmorton, Kaitlin F.] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Harvey Cushing John Hay Whitney
Med Lib, New Haven, CT USA.
[Heaphy, Nora] Yale Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, New Haven, CT USA.
[Canavan, Maureen] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med Canc Outcomes & Publ Policy &
E, New Haven, CT USA.
C3 Yale University; Yale University; Yale University; Yale University; Yale
University
RP Festa, N (corresponding author), Yale Univ, Natl Clinician Scholars Program, 333
Cedar St,POB 208088, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.
EM natalia.festa@yale.edu
RI Festa, Natalia/GQP-7354-2022; Gill, Thomas M./H-7043-2019
OI Festa, Natalia/0000-0003-4487-6832; Gill, Thomas M./0000-0002-6450-0368;
Heaphy, Nora/0000-0002-5315-7154; Throgmorton,
Kaitlin/0000-0001-6333-5199
FU National Institute on Aging [T32 AG019134, P30AG021342]; Clinical and
Translational Science Awards Program from the National Center for
Advancing Translational Sciences [TL1 TR001864]
FX This study was supported by training grant T32 AG019134 from the
National Institute on Aging (Dr Festa), Clinical and Translational
Science Awards Program TL1 TR001864 from the National Center for
Advancing Translational Sciences (Dr Festa), and grant P30AG021342 from
the National Institute on Aging to the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older
Americans Independence Center, where the study was performed.
CR [Anonymous], 2008, RET AG AM BUILD HLTH
[Anonymous], 2006, LOUISIANA ACT NO 540
Bates PD, 2021, WATER RESOUR RES, V57, DOI 10.1029/2020WR028673
Benjamini Y, 2006, BIOMETRIKA, V93, P491, DOI 10.1093/biomet/93.3.491
Black J, 2010, LAW POLICY, V32, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00318.x
Blanchard G, 2009, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V10, P639, DOI
10.1016/j.jamda.2009.06.010
Bradley EH, 2009, IMPLEMENT SCI, V4, DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-25
Castle NG, 2008, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V98, P1235, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107532
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2018, STAT OP MAN CHAPT 7
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2021, UPD GUID EM PREP APP
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, PROV INF PROV DAT CA
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2021, LIF SAF COD HLTH CAR
Chiedi JM., 2019, OIG FINAL REPORT CAL
Dean RG., 2018, HDB COASTAL OCEAN EN, P21
Dosa DM, 2020, JAMA NETW OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19460
Florida Health Care and Development Foundation, 2008, NAT CRIT EV DEC MAK
Hayhoe K., 2018, 4 NATL CLIMATE ASSES, Vll, DOI [DOI 10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH2,
10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH2]
Health Resources and Services Administration, 2018, LIST RUR COUNT DES E
Hyer K, 2010, HEALTH AFFAIR, V29, P1961, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0665
Jester DJ, 2021, J AM MED DIR ASSOC, V22, P1317, DOI 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.010
Jester DJ, 2021, J AM GERIATR SOC, V69, P2298, DOI 10.1111/jgs.17220
Kossin James P, 2020, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, V117, P11975, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1920849117
Levinson DR., 2006, OFFICE INSPECTOR GEN
Levinson DR., 2012, OFFICE INSPECTOR GEN
LTCFocus, AS
Montgomery J., 2015, SHELTER PLACE PLANNI
Mukamel DB, 2012, HEALTH SERV RES, V47, P1791, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
6773.2012.01459.x
National Hurricane Center, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7, P109
National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2022,
SAF FLOOD
Ouslander JG, 2019, J AM GERIATR SOC, V67, P2225, DOI 10.1111/jgs.16127
Peterson LJ, 2021, J APPL GERONTOL, V40, P582, DOI 10.1177/0733464820946673
Ranger N, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P703, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.03.009
Saliba D, 2004, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V94, P1436, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1436
Skarha J, 2021, JAMA-HEALTH FORUM, V2, DOI 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3900
Studholme J, 2022, NAT GEOSCI, V15, P14, DOI 10.1038/s41561-021-00859-1
United States Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, 2018 INT BUILD COD C
van Heerden IL, 2007, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V67, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6210.2007.00810.x
Walshe K, 2001, HEALTH AFFAIR, V20, P128, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.128
Wasserman M, 2022, HEALTH AFFAIR, V41, P831, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01839
Zachry BC, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7, P109, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00049.1
NR 43
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
PI CHICAGO
PA 330 N WABASH AVE, STE 39300, CHICAGO, IL 60611-5885 USA
SN 2574-3805
J9 JAMA NETW OPEN
JI JAMA Netw. Open
PD JAN 6
PY 2023
VL 6
IS 1
AR e2249937
DI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49937
PG 12
WC Medicine, General & Internal
SC General & Internal Medicine
GA 8F5LD
UT WOS:000919704000007
PM 36607635
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chen, P
Zhang, S
Bao, JH
Zhao, HY
AF Chen, Peng
Zhang, Shuo
Bao, Jianhua
Zhao, Hongyang
TI Evaluation of evacuation difficulty of urban resident during storm
water-logging based on walking experiment
LA English
DT Article
DE difficulty; refuge; travel; water-logging disaster
AB Frequent water-logging disasters in cities are serious threats to urban
residents. When a water-logging disaster occurs, it is essential for residents to
evacuate, taking refuge to reduce losses and to ensure safety. This project studied
evacuation difficulty for residents in the Daoli District of Harbin during storm
water-logging. Starting from external factors and internal factors influencing
resident evacuation, the study screened indicators for assessing the difficulty of
evacuation during urban rainstorm water-logging, constructed an evaluation index
system and evaluation models to assess the difficulty of evacuation of residents.
Results showed that residents in the vicinity of the three streets, Xinyang Road
and Minqing Street, Zhaolin Street and Anfeng Street in the study area have
difficulty in evacuation in the case of a 5-year torrential rain disaster. Other
areas had little impact. In a 100-year torrential rain situation, it is more
difficult for residents in Stone Road Bridge, the intersection of Market Street and
Toulong Street, the intersection of Touloing Street and Zhaolin Street, the
intersection of Anfa Street and JingweiErdao Street, and Anguo Street, while other
areas were not seriously affected. The research results can provide new ideas for
the study of evacuation of residents during urban water-logging, and can also
provide decision-making basis for disaster prevention and mitigation for urban
emergency departments.
C1 [Chen, Peng; Zhang, Shuo; Bao, Jianhua; Zhao, Hongyang] Jilin Normal Univ, Coll
Tourism & Geog Sci, Siping 136000, Peoples R China.
C3 Jilin Normal University
RP Chen, P (corresponding author), Jilin Normal Univ, Coll Tourism & Geog Sci,
Siping 136000, Peoples R China.
EM pp11290@163.com
FU Project of Education Department of Jilin Province [JJKH20200428KJ];
Project of Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province
[20200403074SF]
FX Project of Education Department of Jilin Province, Grant/Award Number:
JJKH20200428KJ; Project of Science and Technology Department of Jilin
Province, Grant/Award Number: 20200403074SF
CR Chen P, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P2057, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9062057
[胡蓓蓓 Hu Beibei], 2012, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V32, P846
Kohei M., 2010, SEISAN KENKYU, V62, P149
Li N., 2002, J NAT DIS, V11, P113
Musolino G, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12627
Peng C., 2014, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V10, P9964
Shinji I., 2002, RIVER TECH PAP, V8, P15
Shinji I., 2002, J HYDROSCI HYDRAUL E, V8, P25
Sun Y., 2007, J XINJIANG ED INSTIT, V23, P120
[解以扬 Xie Yiyang], 2005, [水科学进展, Advances in Water Science], V16, P384
Xu H., 2014, 30 YEAR TEMPORAL SPA, V4, P30
Yasuda K., 2008, J CATASTROPHOL, V2, P47
NR 13
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 11
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1753-318X
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 15
IS 4
AR e12850
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12850
EA SEP 2022
PG 12
GA 6A4YC
UT WOS:000852965200001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Koyama, N
Yamada, T
AF Koyama, Naoki
Yamada, Tadashi
TI A Proposed Simultaneous Calculation Method for Flood by River Water,
Inland Flood, and Storm Surge at Tidal Rivers of Metropolitan Cities: A
Case Study of Katabira River in Japan
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE simultaneous calculation method; flood by river water; inland flood;
storm surge; tidal river; mitigation measures; inundation; metropolitan
Japanese cities
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBANIZATION; RISK
AB All metropolitan cities in Japan are located in low-lying areas that surround
ports. Accordingly, significant floods that occur in these cities will trigger the
simultaneous occurrence of flooding by river water and inland flooding. However,
existing studies have focused on the impact of flooding by river water, inland
flooding, and high tide in tidal rivers, and disaster mitigation measures focused
on detailed flooding processes in such flooding areas have not been conducted thus
far. This study focused on a tidal river, i.e., Katabira River of Yokohama city,
one of Japan's metropolitan cities, to construct a simultaneous occurrence model of
flooding by river water and inland flooding, including the impact of a high tide.
Numerical analysis was conducted using this model, and the results show that the
flooded area significantly changed from 0.004 to 0.149 km(2)according to the tide
level of the estuary. Moreover, by simultaneously solving the calculation of
flooding by river water and inland flooding, we found that there was a difference
of 50 min between the occurrences of these floods. Therefore, we found that there
is a possibility that, if evacuation is not conducted at the time of occurrence of
inland flooding, evacuation during subsequent river-water flooding may not be
possible. Based on these results, our proposed method was found to be useful for
tidal rivers of metropolitan cities.
C1 [Koyama, Naoki] Chuo Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Civil Human & Environm Engn
Course, Bunkyo Ku, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Tokyo 1128551, Japan.
[Yamada, Tadashi] Chuo Univ, Fac Sci & Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Bunkyo
Ku, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Tokyo 1128551, Japan.
C3 Chuo University; Chuo University
RP Koyama, N (corresponding author), Chuo Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Civil Human &
Environm Engn Course, Bunkyo Ku, 1-13-27 Kasuga, Tokyo 1128551, Japan.
EM koyama@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp; yamada@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp
FU Unit for Research and Application Solution of Water-Related Disaster
Science and Information of Research and Development Initiative (RDI),
Chuo University
FX This research was supported by Unit for Research and Application
Solution of Water-Related Disaster Science and Information of Research
and Development Initiative (RDI), Chuo University.
CR [Anonymous], FLOOD DAM STAT STUD
Cabinet Office (Disaster prevention section), DIS PREV SECT GUID E
Cavallaro L, 2017, J MAR SCI ENG, V5, DOI 10.3390/jmse5040058
Church JA., 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
European Environmental Agency (EEA), 132010 EEA
Galloway G. E., 2018, GROWING THREAT URBAN
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, BAS MAP INF DOWNL SE
Hanayama M., 2000, COLLECT COAST ENG PA, V47, P206
Hashino M., 1985, J JSCE, V357, P141
HOLLIS GE, 1975, WATER RESOUR RES, V11, P431, DOI 10.1029/WR011i003p00431
Konishi T., 1985, NRCDP NIED IB JAP, P13
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.282
Meteorological Agency, YEARL OCC RAIN MOR T
Milner AM, 2018, ECOL EVOL, V8, P8354, DOI 10.1002/ece3.4300
Ministry of Land, GUID ANT MEAS UND SP
Morita S., 1985, PROC JPN C HYDRAUL, V29, P19
Muis S, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V538, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management, 2012, FLOOD LAB
NILIM2 URB
Oliveira H, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112209
Pinheiro JP, 2020, CONT SHELF RES, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2020.104132
Public Works Research Institute, 1996, GUID SIM VER NEW MOD
Sekine M., 2018, J JPN SOC CIV ENG, DOI [10.2208/jscejhe.74.I_1543, DOI
10.2208/JSCEJHE.74.I_1543]
Stocker TF, 2013, CONTRIBUTION WORKING, P1535
Suzuki T., 2012, ANN J CIV ENG OCEAN, V68, pI, DOI [10.2208/jscejoe.68.I_870,
DOI 10.2208/JSCEJOE.68.I_870]
Technical Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC) Technical Mapping Advisory Council
(TMAC), 2015, ANN REP SUMM
Teng F, 2017, PROC IUTAM, V25, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.piutam.2017.09.009
Ullman DS, 2019, GEOSCIENCES, V9, DOI 10.3390/geosciences9060265
Wallemacq P., 2015, TECHNICAL REPORT
Wang SY, 2008, OCEAN MODEL, V25, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.06.009
Wang W, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P8277, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020871
Watanabe A., 2012, J JPN SOC CIV ENG, Vl67, DOI [10.2208/jscejhe.68.I_499, DOI
10.2208/JSCEJHE.68.I_499]
Watanabe M., 1989, J JPN SOC CIV ENG, V8, P46
Ye S, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P1997, DOI [10.1175/jhm-d-16-0207.1,
10.1175/JHM-D-16-0207.1]
Yokohama City Disaster Prevention Council, 2020, YOK CIT DIS PREV PLA
Yoneda H., 2018, J JPN SOC CIV ENG, DOI [10.2208/jscejhe.74.5_I_1387, DOI
10.2208/JSCEJHE.74.5_I_1387]
NR 36
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 5
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 6
AR 1769
DI 10.3390/w12061769
PG 18
GA ML4RR
UT WOS:000549455600001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Jiang, X
Meng, J
Fan, BJ
Zhao, CX
Zheng, YS
Xiao, QL
Zhang, CJ
Ma, DF
AF Jiang, Xun
Meng, Jie
Fan, Bingjie
Zhao, Chongxu
Zheng, Yanshuang
Xiao, Qianlu
Zhang, Chunjin
Ma, Dongfang
TI Comparative analysis and risk assessment of dam-break floods: taking
Pingshuijiang Reservoir as an example
SO HYDROLOGY RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE dam-break discharge; dam-break flood; dam-break scenario; flood routing;
Pingshuijiang Reservoir
ID RIVER
AB Due to the huge potential energy associated with water storage in reservoirs,
dam-break floods are often catastrophically destructive for people and structures
downstream. This study aims to simulate and compare floods generated under various
dam-break scenarios and their downstream impacts, taking Pingshuijiang Reservoir in
southeastern China as an example. A two-dimensional hydrodynamic model is used to
simulate the downstream evolution of floods under three dam-break scenarios, and
the breach flood and downstream inundation process are analyzed. Gradual failure of
the main dam leads to near-total inundation of the nearby town over c. 1 h,
allowing time for warning and evacuation. Instantaneous failure of the main dam
results in larger peak flow, greater submergence depth and faster inundation (20
min), leaving little time for warning/evacuation. Instantaneous failure of the
auxiliary dam generates a much lower peak flow magnitude and, although the town is
still largely submerged within 45 min, the shallow water depth and low velocity are
conducive to rescue/evacuation. The results show significant variation in flood
process and submergence due to dam size and failure mode that provide guidance for
dam-break flood risk assessment and disaster avoidance planning.
C1 [Jiang, Xun] Zhejiang Design Inst Water Conservancy & Hydroelec, 66 Funing Lane,
Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China.
[Meng, Jie] Zhejiang Yugong Informat Technol Co Ltd, T2-3A,Horui Sci Pk,Changhe
St, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China.
[Fan, Bingjie] Shanxi Yellow River Flexible Flood Proofing Emerge, 4738 Sushui
East St, Yuncheng 044000, Peoples R China.
[Zhao, Chongxu; Zheng, Yanshuang; Xiao, Qianlu; Zhang, Chunjin; Ma, Dongfang]
Yellow River Conservancy Commiss, Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, 45 Shunhe Rd,
Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China.
[Zhao, Chongxu; Zheng, Yanshuang; Xiao, Qianlu; Zhang, Chunjin; Ma, Dongfang]
MWR, Key Lab Lower Yellow River Channel & Estuary Regul, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples
R China.
C3 Yangtze River Water Resources Protection Bureau; Chinese Academy of
Sciences
RP Zhao, CX (corresponding author), Yellow River Conservancy Commiss, Yellow River
Inst Hydraul Res, 45 Shunhe Rd, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China.; Zhao, CX
(corresponding author), MWR, Key Lab Lower Yellow River Channel & Estuary Regul,
Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China.
EM charles_zcx@163.com
FU Science and Technology Development Foundation of Yellow River Institute
of Hydraulic Research [HKF202202]; National Natural Science Foundation
of China [U2243220, 51909100, 52009047]; Fundamental Research Funds for
the Central Scientific Research Institute [HKY-JBYW-2020-03]
FX This study was sponsored by Science and Technology Development
Foundation of Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research (Grant No.
HKF202202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.
U2243220, 51909100 and 52009047) and the Fundamental Research Funds for
the Central Scientific Research Institute (Grant No. HKY-JBYW-2020-03).
CR Alcayna T., 2022, ONE EARTH, P5
Ali E. B., 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V76, P97
Alvarez M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060432
Baisong Nie, 2014, Advanced Materials Research, V1028, P287, DOI
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1028.287
Cai S. J., 2011, J SAFETY SCI TECHNOL, V7, P10
Chen HP, 2021, SCI BULL, V66, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2020.12.001
Delenne C, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V107, P171, DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.007
Duffaut P, 2019, Q J ENG GEOL HYDROGE, V52, P445, DOI 10.1144/qjegh2018-186
Enea A, 2018, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V19, P1091
[郭红民 Guo Hongmin], 2019, [长江科学院院报, Journal of Yangtze River Scientific
Research Institute], V36, P60
Khoshkonesh A., 2022, EUR PHYS J PLUS, V25, P41
Li Z., 2021, YELLOW RIVER, V43, P160
Mao J, 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6060162
Mudashiru RB, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126846
Pradel D., 2017, J VIROL METHODS, V6, P47
Pradel D., 2021, AM SOC CIVIL ENG
Qiu W., 2021, IOP C SERIES EARTH E, V783
Safarzadeh A., 2017, INT J MULTISCALE COM, V17, P77
Seiya W., 2021, J HYDRODYN
Seyedashraf O, 2018, J HYDROL, V559, P1028, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.001
Tamm O, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V155, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.062
Tedla MG, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8020089
Weilian L., 2022, MILITARY MED RES, V15, P104
Xu ST, 2021, HYDROL RES, V52, P461, DOI 10.2166/nh.2021.157
NR 24
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 12
U2 12
PU IWA PUBLISHING
PI LONDON
PA REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON,
ENGLAND
SN 1998-9563
EI 2224-7955
J9 HYDROL RES
JI Hydrol. Res.
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 54
IS 2
BP 265
EP 275
DI 10.2166/nh.2023.129
EA FEB 2023
PG 11
WC Water Resources
SC Water Resources
GA D7OW6
UT WOS:000940995600001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Sasaki, J
Kitsuya, M
AF Sasaki, Jun
Kitsuya, Makoto
TI Development and Evaluation of Regional Information Sharing System (RISS)
for Disaster Risk Reduction
SO INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Evacuation support; Information sharing; Disaster response; Multi-agent
simulation
ID SIMULATION; EVACUATION; PLAN
AB In Japan, there are many flood and tsunami disasters caused by typhoons, heavy
rains and earthquakes. In this case, the residents have an evacuation time to
evacuate to shelters after evacuation alerts from a governmental office. However,
some people don't try to evacuate soon. As a result, it is problem that some
victims of disasters are caused because without or late evacuation and supporting.
In order to prevent such a damage, we developed Regional Information Sharing System
(RISS) for disaster risk reduction. The RISS includes daily required life
information from regional government and regional shops, as well as disaster
information, shelters' condition and the information of support required people and
support teams. In this paper, we introduce the concept of RISS and its evaluation
results on a field test and the effects in a regional disaster case by multi-agent
simulation.
C1 [Sasaki, Jun] Iwate Prefectural Univ, Fac Software & Informat Sci, Takizawa,
Iwate, Japan.
[Kitsuya, Makoto] Iwate Prefectural Univ, Grad Sch Software & Informat Sci,
Takizawa, Iwate, Japan.
C3 Iwate Prefectural University; Iwate Prefectural University
RP Sasaki, J (corresponding author), Iwate Prefectural Univ, Fac Software &
Informat Sci, Takizawa, Iwate, Japan.
EM jsasaki@iwate-pu.ac.jp; g231s008@s.iwate-pu.ac.jp
FU I-O DATA Foundation
FX We would like to thank I-O DATA Foundation for support of this research.
CR [Anonymous], 1917, COMMUNITY SOCIOLOGIC
[Anonymous], 2014, P 11 INT ISCRAM C
Bernabe-Moreno J, 2018, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V17, P357, DOI
10.1142/S0219622017400016
Cesta A, 2014, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V58, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.11.011
Tissera PC, 2013, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V18, P1495, DOI
10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.317
Futagami T, 2013, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, V69, pI_1
Gelenbe E, 2012, COMPUT MATH APPL, V64, P3869, DOI 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.03.056
Gonzalez J.J., 2016, 49 HAW INT C SYST SC
Hawe GI, 2015, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V46, P336, DOI
10.1016/j.engappai.2015.06.023
Kawai Y., 2019, 33 ANN C JAP SOC ART, P1
Lim H, 2013, J E ASIA SOC TRANSPO, V10, P143
Liu Y., 2009, J NAT DISASTER SCI, V31, P69, DOI 10.2328/jnds.31.69
Liu Y., 2008, J NATURAL DISASTER S, V28, P91, DOI DOI 10.2328/JNDS.28.91
Matsumoto M., 2008, J JAPAN SOC NATURAL, V27, P319
Minamoto T, 2009, COMM COM INF SC, V61, P1
Mumtaz S, 2017, J PHYS D APPL PHYS, V50, DOI 10.1088/1361-6463/aa5bf6
Muraki Y, 2007, J JAPANESE SOC ARTIF, V22, P416
Palttala P, 2012, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V20, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
5973.2011.00656.x
Sasaki J, 2017, IFIP AICT ADV INFORM
Tsuburaoka H, 2014, TOKYO U INFORM SCI, V17, P41
TU YM, 2009, SYST DYNAM REV, V25, P135, DOI DOI 10.1002/SDR.416
Turoff M., 2004, J INFORM TECHNOLOGY, V5, P1
1, DOI 10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70173-1]
Weathernews Inc, 2011, TSUN INV GREAT E JAP
NR 24
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 0
U2 8
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
SN 1387-3326
EI 1572-9419
J9 INFORM SYST FRONT
JI Inf. Syst. Front.
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 23
IS 5
SI SI
BP 1203
EP 1211
DI 10.1007/s10796-020-10076-7
EA OCT 2020
PG 9
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Computer Science, Theory &
Methods
SC Computer Science
GA WQ2GG
UT WOS:000577088900001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Miller, RL
AF Miller, Robert L.
TI Modeling Temporal Accessibility of an Urban Road Network during an
Extreme Pluvial Flood Event
LA English
DT Article
AB This study presents a model-based framework to assess the time-varying
accessibility of a roadway network on a system-wide level during extreme flood
events. A regional MIKE 21 hydrodynamic model consisting of 1,912,576 computational
points with mesh cell resolutions ranging from 70 to 15 m is utilized to compute
regional inundation during an extreme 500-year flood scenario. This approach allows
for an explicit accounting of the impact of pluvial flooding on roadway network
accessibility. Accessibility conditioned on flood depth is then computed using a
raster approximation of the roadway network model employing the flood-fill search
method. The approach is demonstrated in the flood-prone low-gradient region of
Lafayette, Louisiana, which experienced a devastating flood event in August 2016.
The findings suggest that the main evacuation points enjoy a greater degree of
accessibility compared to medical facilities within the urban core of the city
during the flood peak. Significant improvements in network accessibility can be
made by targeted mitigation of specifically flood-prone roadway segments. However,
the analysis demonstrates the adverse impacts of such mitigation activities in low-
gradient urban floodplain systems when implementing routine drainage compensation
steps. The approach provides key insights into the role played by pluvial flooding
and flood duration on network accessibility and can help inform emergency response
and transportation systems planning and design efforts.
C1 [Miller, Robert L.] Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Dept Civil Engn, POB 43598,
Lafayette, LA 70504 USA.
C3 University of Louisiana Lafayette
RP Miller, RL (corresponding author), Univ Louisiana Lafayette, Dept Civil Engn,
POB 43598, Lafayette, LA 70504 USA.
EM robert.miller@louisiana.edu
FU Louisiana DOT and Development Louisiana Transportation Research Center
Transportation Innovation for Research Exploration (LTRC TIRE) program
[DOT-LT-1000269]; National Academies of Sciences Gulf Research
Fellowship Program
FX The author would like to thank two anonymous referees for their helpful
suggestions that led to an improved manuscript. This work was sponsored
in part by the Louisiana DOT and Development Louisiana Transportation
Research Center Transportation Innovation for Research Exploration (LTRC
TIRE) program under Grant No. DOT-LT-1000269, and by an award from the
National Academies of Sciences Gulf Research Fellowship Program.
CR Abdulla B., 2020, J INFRASTRUCT PRESER, V1, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S43065-020-
00004-Z, 10.1186/s43065-020-00004-z]
Albano R, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2847, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2847-2014
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000265]
Ashley ST, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P805, DOI 10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1
Brown VM, 2020, J HYDROMETEOROL, V21, P773, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-19-0225.1
Copstead R., 1998, WATER ROAD INTERACTI
DHI, 2017, MIKE 21 FLOW MOD MIK
Gori A, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000355
Green D, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P1, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-1-2017
Houston D., 2011, PLUVIAL RAIN RELATED
Huong TC, 2002, THIN WALL STRUCT, V40, P913, DOI 10.1016/S0263-8231(02)00057-5
Kao SC, 2020, J HYDROL X, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.hydroa.2020.100064
LADOTD, 2011, 2011 HYDR MAN
Loreti S, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-04927-3
Lu DH, 2020, INT J PAVEMENT ENG, V21, P746, DOI 10.1080/10298436.2018.1508844
Maidment D., 2009, MAPPING ZONE IMPROVI
Miller R., 2019, MODEL BASED APPROACH
Miller RL, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114726
Neal JC, 2009, J HYDROL, V368, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.026
NWS (National Weather Service), 2022, QUICKF LAF PAR LOUIS
Potter WT., 2021, DAILY ADVERTISER
10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020
Saad HA, 2021, FRONT WATER, V3, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2021.628829
Schneider CM, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P3838, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1009440108
Tabari H, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2
USCB (United States Census Bureau), 2022, CLIM INF LAK CHARL W
Wang YT, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V107, P85, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.010
Wing OEJ, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaac65
NR 29
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 6
U2 21
PI RESTON
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
PD NOV 1
PY 2022
VL 23
IS 4
AR 04022032
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000586
PG 10
(SSCI)
GA 4N3PN
UT WOS:000853931000018
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Gao, SD
Wang, Y
AF Gao, Shangde
Wang, Yan
TI Explainable deep learning powered building risk assessment model for
proactive hurricane response
SO RISK ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
DE deep learning; explainable artificial intelligence; natural hazards;
risk assessment
ID EVACUATION DECISION-MAKING; NEW-ORLEANS; PERCEPTION; SURGE; INFORMATION;
FORECAST; HAZARDS; IMPACT; WIND
AB Climate change and rapid urban development have intensified the impact of
hurricanes, especially on the Southeastern Coasts of the United States. Localized
and timely risk assessments can facilitate coastal communities' preparedness and
response to imminent hurricanes. Existing assessment methods focused on hurricane
risks at large spatial scales, which were not specific or could not provide
actionable knowledge for residents or property owners. Fragility functions and
other widely utilized assessment methods cannot model the complex relationships
between building features and hurricane risk levels effectively. Therefore, we
develop and test a building-level hurricane risk assessment with deep feedforward
neural network (DFNN) models. The input features of DFNN models cover the meta
building characteristics, fine-grained meteorological, and hydrological
environmental parameters. The assessment outcomes, that is, risk levels, include
the probability and intensity of building/property damages induced by wind and
surge hazards. We interpret the DFNN models with local interpretable model-agnostic
explanations (LIME). We apply the DFNN models to a case building in Cameron County,
Louisiana in response to a hypothetical imminent hurricane to illustrate how the
building's risk levels can be timely assessed with the updating weather forecast.
This research shows the potential of deep-learning models in integrating multi-
sourced features and accurately predicting buildings' risks of weather extremes for
property owners and households. The AI-powered risk assessment model can help
coastal populations form appropriate and updating perceptions of imminent
hurricanes and inform actionable knowledge for proactive risk mitigation and long-
term climate adaptation.
C1 [Wang, Yan] Univ Florida, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, POB 115706, Gainesville, FL
32611 USA.
Univ Florida, Florida Inst Built Environm Resilience, Coll Design Construct &
Planning, Gainesville, FL USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; University of Florida; State
University System of Florida; University of Florida
RP Wang, Y (corresponding author), Univ Florida, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, POB
115706, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.; Wang, Y (corresponding author), Univ Florida,
Florida Inst Built Environm Resilience, POB 115706, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
EM yanw@ufl.edu
RI Gao, Shangde/GRJ-9813-2022
OI Gao, Shangde/0000-0003-2218-2872
FU University of Florida faculty start-up funds
FX This material is based upon work supported by the University of Florida
faculty start-up funds. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Florida.
CR Agatonovic-Kustrin S, 2000, J PHARMACEUT BIOMED, V22, P717, DOI 10.1016/S0731-
7085(99)00272-1
Ajayi A, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2019, DOI 10.1111/risa.13425
[Anonymous], 2001, NATURAL HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2001)2:3(132
[Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARD REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:2(23)
[Anonymous], 2006, NAT HAZARD REV, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2006)7:2(82), DOI 10.1061/ASCE1527-698820067:282]
ARA, 2021, HURLOSS HURR CAT MOD
Aziz S, 2019, PALGR ST DIG BUS ENA, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_3
Baker E.J., 2012, RISK PERCEPTIONS PRE
Bishop CM., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
CERA, 2021, ACCESS CERA
Chatterjee C, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P984, DOI 10.1111/risa.12196
Cole TW, 2008, SOUTH COMMUN J, V73, P211, DOI 10.1080/10417940802219702
6988(2007)8:3(69), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(69)]
Davidson R.A., 2003, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V9, P55, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1076-
0342(2003)9:2(55), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:2(55)]
Davidson RA, 2003, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V129, P211, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2003)129:4(211)
Diederik K., 2015, 3 INT C LEARN REPR I, V1, P1
Dong YD, 2017, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V3, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000932
Gao SD, 2022, CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2022: COMPUTER APPLICATIONS,
AUTOMATION, AND DATA ANALYTICS, P1116
Gao SD, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04576-1
Graettinger A.J., 2006, C P STRUCT ENG PUBL, P1, DOI [10.1061/40889(201)57, DOI
10.1061/40889(201)57]
Guikema S, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1117, DOI 10.1111/risa.13476
Hao HY, 2021, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V35, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000970
Harirchian E, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13082060
Hatzikyriakou A, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000205
Hernandez ML, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P926, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.08.006
Jain V.K., 2005, NAT HAZARDS REV, V6, P88, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2005)6:2(88), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2005)6:2(88)]
Jiang YC, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V122, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.015
Kakareko G, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P395, DOI
10.1080/23789689.2019.1632599
Kareem A., 2006, PERFORMANCE GLASS CL
Kennedy A, 2020, J WATERW PORT COAST, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-
5460.0000590
Khajwal AB, 2020, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V6, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001062
Kim K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI [10.3390/su10041072,
10.3390/su10040072]
Kulkarni H, 2018, 2018 FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION
PROCESSING (ICINPRO) - 2018, P107
Legg MR, 2010, STRUCT SAF, V32, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.002
Leung FHF, 2003, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V14, P79, DOI 10.1109/TNN.2002.804317
Lin CY, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000390
Lin N, 2017, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V31, P2379, DOI 10.1007/s00477-016-1377-5
Lindner BL, 2018, J COASTAL RES, V34, P1484, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-17-00222.1
Masoomi H, 2018, J PERFORM CONSTR FAC, V32, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-
5509.0001172
Nateghi R, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P1795, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1270-9
National Research Council, 2013, GEOT AL WARN WORKSH, DOI [10.17226/18414, DOI
10.17226/18414]
Navy, 2021, HURR CAT
NHC,, 2017, NAT HURR CTR PROD DE
NOAA, 2021, WHAT IS STORM SURG
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), 2021, BILL DOLL WEATH
CLIM
Nofal OM, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101903
Office of Coastal Management, 2021, HURR COSTS
Park S, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V68, P981, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0674-2
Pei B, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P375, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1185-5
Pilkington SF, 2016, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V1, P63, DOI
10.1080/23789689.2016.1179529
Ribeiro MT, 2016, KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, P1135, DOI
10.1145/2939672.2939778
Robertson IN, 2007, J WATERW PORT C-ASCE, V133, P463, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
950X(2007)133:6(463)
Rutledge BT, 2021, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V481, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118724
Samikwa Eric, 2020, 2020 International Conferences on Internet of Things
(iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber,
Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE
Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics), P234, DOI 10.1109/iThings-GreenCom-CPSCom-
SmartData-Cybermatics50389.2020.00053
Sejnowski TJ, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P30033, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1907373117
Senkbeil JC, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11080804
Shi E, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P46176, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-12540-6
Spekkers MH, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2531, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2531-
2014
Spiegelhalter David, 2020, HARVARD DATA SCI REV, V2, DOI
[10.1162/99608f92.cb91a35a, DOI 10.1162/99608F92.CB91A35A]
StEER, 2021, STEER
Szczyrba L, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000460
United States Census Bureau, 2020, GROWTH COAST
Vickery PJ, 2009, J STRUCT ENG, V135, P301, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9445(2009)135:3(301)
Wang CF, 2021, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103474
Yao F, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102448
NR 73
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 10
U2 29
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0272-4332
EI 1539-6924
J9 RISK ANAL
JI Risk Anal.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 6
BP 1222
EP 1234
DI 10.1111/risa.13990
EA JUL 2022
PG 13
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Mathematics,
Interdisciplinary Applications; Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods
(SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health; Mathematics; Mathematical
Methods In Social Sciences
GA I4UT2
UT WOS:000822069700001
PM 35803597
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kurata, YB
Prasetyo, YT
Ong, AKS
Nadlifatin, R
Chuenyindee, T
AF Kurata, Yoshiki B.
Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
Ong, Ardvin Kester S.
Nadlifatin, Reny
Chuenyindee, Thanatorn
TI Factors affecting perceived effectiveness of Typhoon Vamco (Ulysses)
flood disaster response among Filipinos in Luzon, Philippines: An
integration of protection motivation theory and extended theory of
planned behavior
LA English
DT Article
DE Typhoon; Flood; Protection motivation theory; Theory of planned
behavior; Structural equation modeling
ID EVACUATION; PERCEPTION; KNOWLEDGE; EFFICACY
AB Typhoon Vamco (Ulysses) is considered one of the most devastating typhoons in
the Philippines in 2020. It caused fatalities, property destructions, and
catastrophic flooding in Metro Manila and the nearby provinces. The purpose of this
study was to assess the factors affecting the perceived effectiveness of the 2020
typhoon Vamco (Ulysses) flood disaster response among Filipinos by integrating the
Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).
567 Filipinos answered an online survey questionnaire with 75 questions (63
indicators and 11 latent variables). Structural equation modeling (SEM) showed that
geographical perspective (GL) and typhoon - flood experience and knowledge (TPE)
had significant effects on Perceived Severity (PS) and Perceived Vulnerability
(PV), which subsequently led to Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC), Subjective
Norms (SN), and Attitude (ATB). PBC, SN, and ATB were also found to have
significant effects on Intention to Follow, which subsequently led to Behavior and
Perceived Effectiveness from the 2020 Typhoon Vamco (Ulysses) flood disaster risk
response. Interestingly, government support (GR) was insignificant to an effective
flood disaster response, and 52.38% of respondents perceived that the typhoon had
more severe effects than the flood after the typhoon. This study is the first study
that analyzed the perceived effectiveness of disaster response towards 2020 Typhoon
Vamco. The findings will be very beneficial for academicians and policymakers as it
provides a robust model and results for experts to analyze natural disasters to
develop optimum disaster risk responses in mitigating the severe effects of typhoon
floods. Finally, the SEM construct can be broadened and adapted to flood disaster
response effectiveness applicable in other natural disaster-prone countries.
C1 [Kurata, Yoshiki B.; Prasetyo, Yogi Tri; Ong, Ardvin Kester S.] Mapua Univ, Sch
Ind Engn & Engn Management, 658 Muralla St, Manila 1002, Philippines.
[Kurata, Yoshiki B.; Ong, Ardvin Kester S.] Univ Santo Tomas, Dept Ind Engn, Fac
Engn, Espana Blvd, Manila 1015, Philippines.
[Kurata, Yoshiki B.; Ong, Ardvin Kester S.] Mapua Univ, Sch Grad Studies, 658
Muralla St, Manila 1002, Philippines.
[Nadlifatin, Reny] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Dept Informat Syst, Kampus ITS,
Surabaya 60111, Indonesia.
[Chuenyindee, Thanatorn] Navaminda Kasatriyadhiraj Royal Air Force Acad, Dept
Ind Engn & Aviat Management, Bangkok 10220, Thailand.
C3 Mapua University; University of Santo Tomas; Mapua University; Institut
Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
RP Prasetyo, YT (corresponding author), Mapua Univ, Sch Ind Engn & Engn Management,
658 Muralla St, Manila 1002, Philippines.
EM ybkurata@ust.edu.ph; ytprasetyo@mapua.edu.ph;
earthclubz@windowslive.com; reny.nadlifatin@gmail.com;
earthclubz@windowslive.com
RI Kurata, Yoshiki/GRY-3563-2022; Nadlifatin, Reny/GQP-4312-2022
OI Kurata, Yoshiki/0000-0003-2183-5114; Nadlifatin,
Reny/0000-0003-1265-8515; Prasetyo, Yogi Tri/0000-0003-3535-9657;
Chuenyindee, Thanatorn/0000-0003-2724-9917; Ong, Ardvin
Kester/0000-0001-9284-9826
CR Abad R. P. B., 2019, TRANSPORTATION RES I, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.trip.2019.100051,
DOI 10.1016/J.TRIP.2019.100051]
AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
American Psychological Association, 2011, MAN FLOOD REL DISTR
Arafat Y., 2018, SOCIAL ADM ASPECTS P, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811228-
1.00004-2, 10.1016/B978-0-12-811228-1.00004-2]
Armitage CJ, 2001, BRIT J SOC PSYCHOL, V40, P471, DOI 10.1348/014466601164939
Asare Matthew, 2015, Am J Health Stud, V30, P43
Asian Disaster Reduction Center, 2020, INF DIS RISK RED MEM
Bamidis P.D., 2016, PARTICIPATORY HLTH S, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-809269-9.00007-
4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809269-9.00007-4]
BANDURA A, 1982, AM PSYCHOL, V37, P122, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Cabato R., 2020, TYPHOON VAMCO BATTER
Cannon C, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2019.100210
Castalanelli MA, 2011, B ENTOMOL RES, V101, P333, DOI 10.1017/S0007485310000544
Cayabyab M., 2019, MANILA HAS NCRS MOST
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, FLOODS
Climate Links, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE RISK
Cosgrave, 2014, RESP FLOOD DIS LEARN
Croot D.G., 2010, TOP SPEC GEOGRAPHY F, V44
Crosweller M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102440
Demirel Y., 2018, COMPR ENERGY SYST, P45, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809597-
3.00505-8
Department of Health Republic of the Philippines, YOUR HLTH TYPH HEAV
FLYNN J, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P1101, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x
Gefen D., 2000, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.17705/1CAIS.00407,
10.17705/1cais.00407]
Gomez-Baggethun E, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P640, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.005
Hair J.F., 2006, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2011.02.019
Harrison L, 2007, STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING: THE ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL
BRAIN IMAGES, P508, DOI 10.1016/B978-012372560-8/50038-3
Heidenreich A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101880
Hu LT, 1999, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/10705519909540118
Hu ZW, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2205, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04538-7
Kagan J., 2021, FLOOD INSURANCE
Kagee A., 2017, INT ENCY PUBLIC HLTH, Vsecond, P35, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-
803678-5.00282-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803678-5.00282-4]
Kerr AM, 2000, J TROP ECOL, V16, P895, DOI 10.1017/S0266467400001796
Kuhlicke C, 2020, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V12, P63, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0069.1
Kurata YB, 2018, ADV INTELL SYST COMP, V596, P142, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60018-
5_15
Kusumastuti RD, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102223
LaMorte W., 2019, BEHAV CHANGE MODELS
Lobell D.B., 2010, ADV GLOBAL CHANGE RE, DOI [10.1007/978-90-481-2953-9, DOI
10.1007/978-90-481-2953-9]
Lu CS, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V180, P845, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.001
Mashi SA, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P1727, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04052-2
McCormick, 2015, J SOCIOLOGY SOCIAL W, V4, P101
McIvor D., 2007, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V16, P79, DOI [10.1108/09653560710729839,
DOI 10.1108/09653560710729839]
Mendes-Da-Silva W, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V294, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113032
Mimiaga MJ, 2009, HIV PREVENTION: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH, P203, DOI
10.1016/B978-0-12-374235-3.00008-X
Mondino E, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12082130
5196(17)30047-5, 10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30047-5]
Najafi Mehdi, 2017, PLoS Curr, V9, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.4da18e0f1479bf6c0a94b29e0dbf4a72
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce, WAT
FLOOD POLL
Nunez C., 2019, FLOODS 101
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, FLOOD PREP RESP INTR
Ong AKS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102467
PAGASA, 2020, TROP CYCL
Parida D, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102272
Parvin GA, 2016, CLIMATE, V4, DOI 10.3390/cli4040060
PILISUK M, 1987, SOC SCI J, V24, P403, DOI 10.1016/0362-3319(87)90056-5
Prasetyo Y.T., INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI [10.1016/j.ijdrr2021.102454, DOI
10.1016/J.IJDRR2021.102454]
Pulkkinen L., 1997, HUM DEV MIDDLE CHILD, V1, P189, DOI [10.4324/9781315732947-
11, DOI 10.4324/9781315732947-11]
Puzyreva K, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101980
Ravago MLV, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101913
Ready.gov, 2021, PLAN AH DIS
Righi E, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100165
Robinson PJ, 2020, WATER RESOUR ECON, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.wre.2019.100144
Sharp EN, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12665
Sniehotta FF, 2014, HEALTH PSYCHOL REV, V8, P1, DOI 10.1080/17437199.2013.869710
Steiger JH, 2007, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V42, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
Stoutjesdijk J., 2018, PHILIPPINES MANAGING
Tang JS, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15071434
Prasetyo YT, 2020, INT J INFECT DIS, V99, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.07.074
Verisk Maplecroft, 2019, 10 COUNTR VULN CLIM
Vinnell LJ, 2019, ENVIRON BEHAV, V51, P376, DOI 10.1177/0013916517752435
Warren J., TYPHOONS PHILIPPINES
Washburn C., 2010, J FAM CONSUM SCI, V102, P61
Weichselgartner J, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P107, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-
0052-7
Westcott Rachel, 2017, BMC Psychol, V5, P13, DOI 10.1186/s40359-017-0182-3
WHITE GF, 1974, NATURAL HAZARDS LOCA
WHO, 2012, GLOBAL TUBERCULOSIS REPORT 2012, P1
Williams L, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101810
World Health Organization (WHO), HLTH TOP FLOODS
Yulianto E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102557
NR 80
TC 34
Z9 34
U1 5
U2 27
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 67
AR 102670
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102670
EA NOV 2021
PG 14
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA WZ9VB
UT WOS:000720306100002
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Duijndam, SJ
Botzen, WJW
Hagedoorn, LC
Bubeck, P
Haer, T
Pham, M
Aerts, JCJH
AF Duijndam, Sem J.
Botzen, W. J. Wouter
Hagedoorn, Liselotte C.
Bubeck, Philip
Haer, Toon
Pham, My
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
TI Drivers of migration intentions in coastal Vietnam under increased flood
risk from sea level rise
SO CLIMATIC CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Migration; Adaptation; Sea-level rise; Flooding; Sustainable
livelihoods; Household survey
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; INSURANCE; DISPLACEMENT; COMMUNITIES; PERCEPTIONS;
ADAPTATION; INSIGHTS; DEMAND; HEALTH
AB Elevated flood risk due to sea level rise is expected to increase migration from
coastal areas. This presents an enormous policy challenge given the hundreds of
millions of people living in low-lying coastal areas globally. Despite its
relevance, little empirical research has been done on what drives coastal residents
to migrate or stay under increased flood risk. This study aims to improve the
knowledge base on this topic by collecting and analyzing unique survey data of
flood-prone coastal residents in Central Vietnam. To explain permanent migration
intentions under increased flood risk, we present respondents with realistic
scenarios of more frequent severe flooding and utilize a theoretical framework that
incorporates flood risk indicators as well as key indicators of sustainable
livelihoods. Results indicate that flood risk could play a major role in future
migration behavior; permanent migration intentions strongly increase under the
scenarios of increased flood risk. Several individual characteristics also play an
important role in the migration decision. Regression analyses reveal that
respondents who implemented in situ flood adaptation, and thereby reduced their
flood risk, are less inclined to migrate. Past experiences during flooding such as
evacuation or the reception of help from community members or the government are
also strong predictors of migration intentions. Of the sustainable livelihood
indicators, social capital plays the most important role, where a larger social
network inside (outside) the place of residence is negatively (positively) related
to migration intentions. We draw lessons from these insights for policymakers
aiming to anticipate the challenge of sea level rise-induced migration.
C1 [Duijndam, Sem J.; Botzen, W. J. Wouter; Hagedoorn, Liselotte C.; Haer, Toon;
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, De
Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[Botzen, W. J. Wouter] Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ, Kriekenpitpl 21-22, NL-3584 EC
Utrecht, Netherlands.
[Botzen, W. J. Wouter] Univ Penn, Risk Management & Decis Proc Ctr, Wharton Sch,
Philadelphia, PA USA.
[Bubeck, Philip; Pham, My] Univ Potsdam, Inst Environm Sci & Geog, Karl
Liebknecht Str 24-25, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany.
[Pham, My] Ctr Social Res & Dev, 2-33 Nguyen Truong St, Hue City, Vietnam.
[Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.] Deltares, Boussinesqweg 1, NL-2629 HV Delft,
Netherlands.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Utrecht University; University of
Pennsylvania; University of Potsdam; Deltares
RP Duijndam, SJ (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies
IVM, De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM sem.duijndam@vu.nl
RI Botzen, Willem Jan Wouter/L-3123-2013
OI Botzen, Willem Jan Wouter/0000-0002-8563-4963; Bubeck,
Philip/0000-0001-5163-5290; Duijndam, Sem/0000-0001-6826-1563; Aerts,
Jeroen/0000-0002-2162-5814; Haer, Toon/0000-0001-6172-2793
FU 2021 RISK Award of Munich Re Foundation; United Nations Office for
Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR); German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD,
Graduate School Scholarship Programme) [9189848]; University of Potsdam
FX Philip Bubeck partly received funding from the 2021 RISK Award of Munich
Re Foundation in collaboration with the United Nations Office for
Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). My Pham has been supported by the
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, Graduate School Scholarship
Programme; grant no. 9189848). The survey was funded by the University
of Potsdam.
CR Abu M, 2014, POPUL ENVIRON, V35, P341, DOI 10.1007/s11111-013-0191-y
Adger WN, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.009
[Anonymous], 2000, SUST LIV GUID SHEETS
Belanger D, 2011, CURR SOCIOL, V59, P59, DOI 10.1177/0011392110385970
Black R, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, pS3, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.001
Bohane H, 2020, DIPLOMAT
Botzen WJW, 2012, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V82, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.01.005
Botzen WJW, 2012, INT ECON REV, V53, P1005, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00709.x
Brewer NT, 2004, ANN BEHAV MED, V27, P125, DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7
Brocklesby M. A., 2003, Community Development Journal, V38, P185, DOI
10.1093/cdj/38.3.185
Brouwer R, 2014, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V19, P228, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X13000405
Bubeck P, 2012, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V5, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2012.01151.x
Bubeck P, 2019, STRONG ROOTS STRONG
Buchanan MK, 2019, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V11, P809, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0082.1
Cattaneo C, 2019, REV ENV ECON POLICY, V13, P189, DOI 10.1093/reep/rez008
Chang K, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01129.x
Chen J, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P981, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0313-8
Codjoe SNA, 2017, POPUL ENVIRON, V39, P128, DOI 10.1007/s11111-017-0284-0
de Haas H, 2010, INT MIGR REV, V44, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x
Demski C, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V140, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4
Duijndam SJ, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.747
Dun O, 2011, INT MIGR, V49, pe200, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00646.x
GMELCH G, 1980, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V9, P135, DOI
10.1146/annurev.an.09.100180.001031
Government of Tha Thien-Hu Province, 2022, POPULATION DISTRIBUT
Grosh M., 2000, DESIGNING HOUSEHOLD
Gulev S.K., 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, P287, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896.004, DOI
10.1017/9781009157896]
Hagedoorn LC, 2020, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V25, P482, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X20000108
Hagen B, 2013, THESIS ARIZONA STATE
Hauer ME, 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P28, DOI 10.1038/s43017-019-0002-9
Haug S, 2008, J ETHN MIGR STUD, V34, P585, DOI 10.1080/13691830801961605
Hudson P, 2021, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V14, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12680
Hudson P, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P251, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00259-w
Hunter LM, 2015, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V41, P377, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-
112223
Jamero ML, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P581, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3344,
10.1038/nclimate3344]
Junge V, 2015, WORLD DEV, V71, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.11.007
Kaczan DJ, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V158, P281, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02560-0
Nguyen KA, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V682, P31, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.069
Kirezci E, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-67736-6
Kniveton D., 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE MIGRA, DOI [10.18356/6233a4b6-en, DOI
10.18356/6233A4B6-EN]
Koerth J, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P629, DOI 10.1111/risa.12663
Lincke D, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001965
Lucas R.E, 2015, KNOMAD WORKING PAPER, P6
Mallick B, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102328
MASSEY DS, 1994, POPUL DEV REV, V20, P699, DOI 10.2307/2137660
McLeman RA, 2014, CLIMATE AND HUMAN MIGRATION: PAST EXPERIENCES, FUTURE
CHALLENGES, P1
Moftakhari HR, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P9785, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1620325114
5196(17)30047-5, 10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30047-5]
Myer L, 2008, SOC SCI MED, V66, P1828, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.025
Myers SS, 2017, LANCET, V390, P2860, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32846-5
Neumann B, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118571
Radhakrishnan M, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V149, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1999-8
Robson K, 2016, MULTILEVEL MODELING
ROGERS RW, 1975, J PSYCHOL, V91, P93, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
Seifert I, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P1691, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-1691-
2013
Serrat O, 2017, KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_5
Stark O., 2019, BEHAVIOURNAL PUBLIC, V3, P104, DOI [10.1017/bpp.2018.27, DOI
10.1017/BPP.2018.27]
Thuc T, 2016, CLIMATE CHANGE SEA L
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2017, DEL SUST EN CHANG CL
UNITAR, 2020, SAT DET WAT THUA THE
van Praag BMS, 2003, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V51, P29, DOI 10.1016/S0167-
2681(02)00140-3
Vinke K, 2020, MIGR STUD, V8, P626, DOI 10.1093/migration/mnaa029
Vitousek S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-01362-7
Wingens M, 2011, LIFE-COURSE PERSPECTIVE ON MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION, P1, DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-1545-5
Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND
EDITION, P1
Wrathall DJ, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P898, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0640-4
Zander KK, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P1639, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02846-8
NR 67
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 4
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
SN 0165-0009
EI 1573-1480
J9 CLIMATIC CHANGE
JI Clim. Change
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 176
IS 2
AR 12
DI 10.1007/s10584-022-03479-9
PG 22
GA 8G0OQ
UT WOS:000920052100001
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Cook, KL
Turowski, JM
Hovius, N
AF Cook, Kristen L.
Turowski, Jens M.
Hovius, Niels
TI Width control on event-scale deposition and evacuation of sediment in
bedrock-confined channels
SO EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS
LA English
DT Article
DE bedload transport; discharge variability; bedrock-alluvial channels;
channel width; hysteresis
ID BEDLOAD TRANSPORT RATES; BED-LOAD TRANSPORT; TEMPORAL VARIATIONS; RIVER;
EROSION; STEEP; HYSTERESIS; MORPHOLOGY; THRESHOLD; MIGRATION
AB In mixed bedrock-alluvial rivers, the response of the system to a flood event
can be affected by a number of factors, including coarse sediment availability in
the channel, sediment supply from the hillslopes and upstream, flood sequencing and
coarse sediment grain size distribution. However, the impact of along-stream
changes in channel width on bedload transport dynamics remains largely unexplored.
We combine field data, theory and numerical modelling to address this gap. First,
we present observations from the Daan River gorge in western Taiwan, where the
river flows through a 1 km long 20-50 m wide bedrock gorge bounded upstream and
downstream by wide braidplains. We documented two flood events during which coarse
sediment evacuation and redeposition appear to cause changes of up to several
metres in channel bed elevation. Motivated by this case study, we examined the
relationships between discharge, channel width and bedload transport capacity, and
show that for a given slope narrow channels transport bedload more efficiently than
wide ones at low discharges, whereas wider channels are more efficient at high
discharges. We used the model sedFlow to explore this effect, running a random
sequence of floods through a channel with a narrow gorge section bounded upstream
and downstream by wider reaches. Channel response to imposed floods is complex, as
high and low discharges drive different spatial patterns of erosion and deposition,
and the channel may experience both of these regimes during the peak and recession
periods of each flood. Our modelling suggests that width differences alone can
drive substantial variations in sediment flux and bed response, without the need
for variations in sediment supply or mobility. The fluctuations in sediment
transport rates that result from width variations can lead to intermittent bed
exposure, driving incision in different segments of the channel during different
portions of the hydrograph. (c) 2020 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
C1 [Cook, Kristen L.; Turowski, Jens M.; Hovius, Niels] GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci,
GFZ Sect 4-6, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany.
[Hovius, Niels] Potsdam Univ, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Potsdam, Germany.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Center Potsdam GFZ German Research
Center for Geosciences; University of Potsdam
RP Cook, KL (corresponding author), GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, GFZ Sect 4-6, D-
14473 Potsdam, Germany.
EM klcook@gfz-potsdam.de
RI Turowski, Jens Martin/A-6629-2009
OI Turowski, Jens Martin/0000-0003-1558-0565; Cook,
Kristen/0000-0003-2355-4877
FU Taiwan NSC [2811-M-002-092]; National Taiwan University
FX Fieldwork in Taiwan was supported by Taiwan NSC grant 2811-M-002-092 and
National Taiwan University. KLC thanks former postdoc advisor John Suppe
for support, as well as Po-Nong Li and Chia-Yu Chen for assistance in
the field. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive
feedback.
CR [Anonymous], 1976, J HYDRAUL RES, DOI [10.1080/00221687609499677, DOI
10.1080/00221687609499677]
[Anonymous], 2000, J HYDROLOGY
[Anonymous], 2001, J GEOPHYSICAL RES AL
Beer AR, 2016, EARTH SURF DYNAM, V4, P885, DOI 10.5194/esurf-4-885-2016
BULL WB, 1979, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V90, P453, DOI 10.1130/0016-
7606(1979)90<453:TOCPIS>2.0.CO;2
Bursztyn N, 2015, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V429, P90, DOI
10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.042
CARSON MA, 1987, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V113, P1489, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1987)113:12(1489)
Church M, 2006, ANNU REV EARTH PL SC, V34, P325, DOI
10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122721
Cook KL, 2014, NAT GEOSCI, V7, P682, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2224, 10.1038/NGEO2224]
Cook KL, 2013, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V38, P683, DOI 10.1002/esp.3313
Davies TR., 1988, J HYDROL NZ, V27, P113
Eaton BC, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JF000734
Finnegan NJ, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JF000569
Fuller TK, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V121, P1084, DOI 10.1002/2015JF003728
Golly A, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P1390, DOI 10.1002/esp.4582
GOMEZ B, 1991, EARTH-SCI REV, V31, P89, DOI 10.1016/0012-8252(91)90017-A
GOMEZ B, 1983, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V8, P41, DOI 10.1002/esp.3290080105
GOMEZ B, 1989, EARTH SURF PROCESSES, V14, P135, DOI 10.1002/esp.3290140205
Habersack HM, 2001, J HYDRAUL RES, V39, P125, DOI 10.1080/00221680109499813
Heimann FUM, 2015, EARTH SURF DYNAM, V3, P15, DOI 10.5194/esurf-3-15-2015
Heimann FUM, 2015, EARTH SURF DYNAM, V3, P35, DOI 10.5194/esurf-3-35-2015
HOEY T, 1992, PROG PHYS GEOG, V16, P319, DOI 10.1177/030913339201600303
Korup O, 2005, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V30, P783, DOI 10.1002/esp.1171
KUHNLE RA, 1992, EARTH SURF PROCESSES, V17, P191, DOI 10.1002/esp.3290170206
Liu ZY, 2002, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V6, P859, DOI 10.5194/hess-6-859-2002
MACKIN JH, 1948, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V59, P463
Mao LC, 2014, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V39, P964, DOI 10.1002/esp.3563
Masteller CC, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P2583, DOI 10.1029/2018GL081325
MEADE RH, 1985, ENVIRON GEOL WATER S, V7, P215, DOI 10.1007/BF02509922
Mishra J, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V123, P3147, DOI 10.1029/2017JF004387
Montgomery DR, 2001, WATER RESOUR RES, V37, P1841, DOI 10.1029/2000WR900393
Mueller DS, 2005, FHWARD03052 OFF RES
NANSON GC, 1974, AM J SCI, V274, P471, DOI 10.2475/ajs.274.5.471
Ockelford A, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P2861, DOI 10.1002/esp.4713
Ouimet WB, 2008, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V33, P1993, DOI 10.1002/esp.1650
Recking A, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006219
REID I, 1985, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V10, P33, DOI 10.1002/esp.3290100107
Richardson MT, 1995, TRANS ANNU MEET AMER, P18
Rickenmann D, 2001, WATER RESOUR RES, V37, P3295, DOI 10.1029/2001WR000319
Roth DL, 2014, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V404, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.07.019
Saletti M, 2020, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V45, P1430, DOI 10.1002/esp.4815
Sklar LS, 2004, WATER RESOUR RES, V40, DOI 10.1029/2003WR002496
Soil Conservation Service (SCS), 1972, NAT ENG HDB
Sturm TW, 2011, EVALUATION BRIDGE SC, P24
Tinkler K, 1998, GEOPH MONOG SERIES, V107, P1
Turowski JM, 2008, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V33, P353, DOI 10.1002/esp.1559
Turowski JM, 2020, EARTH SURF DYNAM, V8, P103, DOI 10.5194/esurf-8-103-2020
Venditti JG, 2014, NATURE, V513, P534, DOI 10.1038/nature13779
Whipple KX, 2004, ANNU REV EARTH PL SC, V32, P151, DOI
10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120356
Whitbread K, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V120, P779, DOI 10.1002/2014JF003295
Yanites BJ, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JF001933
Yanites BJ, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JF001601
Yanites BJ, 2010, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V122, P1192, DOI 10.1130/B30035.1
NR 55
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 4
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0197-9337
EI 1096-9837
J9 EARTH SURF PROC LAND
JI Earth Surf. Process. Landf.
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 45
IS 14
BP 3702
EP 3713
DI 10.1002/esp.4993
EA SEP 2020
PG 12
WC Geography, Physical; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
SC Physical Geography; Geology
GA OJ9UF
UT WOS:000569940500001
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Manopiniwes, W
Irohara, T
AF Manopiniwes, Wapee
Irohara, Takashi
TI Optimization model for temporary depot problem in flood disaster
response
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Humanitarian logistics; Optimization model; Temporary facility; Floods
ID RELIEF DISTRIBUTION; LOGISTICS; OPERATIONS; ALLOCATION; FACILITIES;
RIVER; HUBS
AB The objective of this research is to establish a model that characterizes
integrated humanitarian operations management in response to flood disasters,
during which an optimal framework that describes the interactions between different
elements in the relief supply chain is crucial. In principle, it is necessary to
develop a model that controls the total flow of supply distribution and evacuation
planning, as well as the location routing of facilities that handle relief supplies
from the sources all the way down the relief chain to the hands of the recipients.
The location-routing model was proposed in response to the temporary depot problem
that is particular to such disasters. To formulate this problem, the use of a
multi-period approach to describe the problem was presented, and multimodal
transportation was considered in order to more closely mimic the realistic behavior
of a flooding disaster.
C1 [Manopiniwes, Wapee] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ctr Healthcare Engn Syst,
Fac Engn, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
[Irohara, Takashi] Sophia Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Tokyo 1028554, Japan.
C3 Chiang Mai University; Sophia University
RP Manopiniwes, W (corresponding author), Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Ctr
Healthcare Engn Syst, Fac Engn, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
EM wapee.m@cmu.ac.th; irohara@sophia.ac.jp
RI Irohara, Takashi/AAD-1756-2022; MANOPINIWES, WAPEE/L-8012-2017
OI Manopiniwes, Wapee/0000-0001-6121-7316; IROHARA,
TAKASHI/0000-0003-2040-9703
FU Chiang Mai University
FX This research work was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.
CR Serrato-Garcia MA, 2016, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V6, P399, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-01-
2015-0002
Banomyong R, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V283, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10479-017-2549-5
Banomyong R, 2010, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V40, P709, DOI
10.1108/09600031011079346
Boonmee C, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V24, P485, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.017
Cavdur F, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.009
Chakravarty AK, 2018, NAV RES LOG, V65, P275, DOI 10.1002/nav.21801
Condeixa LD, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P238, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.007
CRED, 2019, NAT DIS 2018
Das R, 2014, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V4, P265, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-07-2013-0023
De la Torre LE, 2012, SOC EC PLANN SCI, V46, P88, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.SEPS.2011.06.001
Diedrichs DR, 2016, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V6, P24, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-09-2014-
0031
El-Sergany AT, 2012, ITE J, V82, P42
G Kovacs, 2020, RELIEF SUPPLY CHAIN, DOI [10.4018/978-1-60960-824-8, DOI
10.4018/978-1-60960-824-8]
Gama M, 2016, EURO J COMPUT OPTIM, V4, DOI 10.1007/s13675-015-0058-3
Garrido RA, 2015, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V75, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.12.002
Hmaidi K, 2014, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V8472, P185, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12970-
9_20
Ivanov D, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P6158, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1330572
Khayal D, 2015, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V52, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2015.09.002
Lin Y.H., 2012, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V46, P112, DOI [10.1016/j.seps.2012.01.001,
DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2012.01.001]
Maharjan R, 2018, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V8, P2, DOI 10.1108/JHLSCM-08-2017-0040
Manopiniwes W., 2015, J JPN IND MANAG ASS, V66, P142
Manopiniwes W, 2015, P 2015 IND SYST ENG, P872
Manopiniwes W, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P979, DOI
10.1080/00207543.2016.1211340
Manopiniwes W, 2014, IND ENG MANAG SYST, V13, P1, DOI 10.7232/iems.2014.13.1.001
Mejia-Argueta C, 2018, INT T OPER RES, V25, P1053, DOI 10.1111/itor.12508
Mirzapour SA, 2013, MATH PROBL ENG, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/507953
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.018
Moreno A, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V269, P1050, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.022
Raikes J, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101207
Ransikarbum K, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V182, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.030
Ransikarbum K, 2016, INT J PROD RES, V54, P49, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.977458
Rivera-Royero D, 2020, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2019.01.004
Rizeei HM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101205
Rodriguez-Espindola O, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V204, P83, DOI
10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.023
1544-2
Shao JF, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101343
Shrestha BB, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V97, P157, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03632-1
Spiess R, 2018, NATURAL DISASTERS FL
Stauffer JM, 2016, PROD OPER MANAG, V25, P192, DOI 10.1111/poms.12427
Tofighi S, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V250, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.059
Wood SH, 2008, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V12, P959, DOI 10.5194/hess-12-959-2008
Zheng YJ, 2015, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V27, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.09.041
Zhu L, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V283, P1573, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-3089-3
NR 43
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 26
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 105
IS 2
BP 1743
EP 1763
DI 10.1007/s11069-020-04374-1
EA OCT 2020
PG 21
Water Resources
GA PX9NX
UT WOS:000579324300002
OA Bronze
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yusmah, MY
Bracken, LJ
Sahdan, Z
Norhaslina, H
Melasutra, MD
Ghaffarianhoseini, A
Sumiliana, S
Farisha, AS
AF Yusmah, M. Y.
Bracken, L. J.
Sahdan, Z.
Norhaslina, H.
Melasutra, M. D.
Ghaffarianhoseini, A.
Sumiliana, S.
Farisha, A. S.
TI Understanding urban flood vulnerability and resilience: a case study of
Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Vulnerability; Resilience; FGD; Urban flooding; Pahang; Malaysia
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; DISASTER;
METAPHOR; AREA
AB Malaysia is frequently affected by the annual flooding event caused by the
seasonal monsoon which accounts for significant losses. Flood risk, exposure and
damage potential are increasing, causing the level of poverty and vulnerability to
rise. The annual occurrence of the flood hazard has forced residents to prepare
beforehand to help them spring back to their daily life faster. This study aimed to
investigate and understand the vulnerability and resilience of the victims towards
floods in Kuantan, Pahang. A qualitative approach of focus group discussion (FGD)
is used to obtain detailed and authentic information. A total of thirty-one (31)
participants who were flood victims took part in the FGD. Six groups were formed
for the FGD based on different criteria such as gender, age, education background,
occupation, monthly income and social class. Each FGD group consisted of four to
six participants. When the participants were asked to rank their top five daily
challenges, many thought that flooding is not a threat compared to food, because
flooding occurs annually and is predictable. The results showed that the
participants are well aware of the causes of the vulnerability faced by them due to
the flooding event. Reasons highlighted from the results for the flood occurrence
are the demography of the area, the location of the houses, the improper and
inaccurate information and evacuation plan, the management of the transit centre
and the lack of preparation by the community. The participants also thought that
poor dissemination of early warning information and flood control infrastructures
from the government and other related agencies caused the victims to have
insufficient time to prepare for emergencies, hence causing the recovery process to
be slower. However, from their hands-on experiences, they were able to put forward
suggestions on the resilience towards flood for future references.
C1 [Yusmah, M. Y.; Norhaslina, H.; Ghaffarianhoseini, A.; Farisha, A. S.] Univ
Malaya, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Dept Geog, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
[Bracken, L. J.] Univ Durham, Inst Hazard Risk & Resilience, Durham DH1 3LE,
England.
[Sahdan, Z.] Univ Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Dept Geog & Environm, Tanjong Malim
35900, Perak, Malaysia.
[Melasutra, M. D.] Univ Malaya, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Urban
Planning, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
[Sumiliana, S.] Drainage & Irrigat Dept, Water Resources & Hydrol Unit, Kuantan,
Pahang, Malaysia.
C3 Universiti Malaya; N8 Research Partnership; Durham University;
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris; Universiti Malaya
RP Yusmah, MY (corresponding author), Univ Malaya, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Dept
Geog, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
EM dr.safiah@um.edu.my
RI Sahdan, Zuriatunfadzliah/HLW-1178-2023; YUSOFF, SAFIAH
MUHAMMAD/B-9663-2010; Bracken, Louise/L-8198-2018
OI Sahdan, Zuriatunfadzliah/0000-0002-6070-4611; YUSOFF, SAFIAH
MUHAMMAD/0000-0002-4317-6124; Bracken, Louise/0000-0002-1268-5516
CR Adger WN, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P358, DOI 10.1639/0044-
7447(2002)031[0358:MRLTAS]2.0.CO;2
Adger WN, 1999, WORLD DEV, V27, P249, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00136-3
Ajibade I, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1714, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.009
[Anonymous], AKADEMIKA
[Anonymous], P 2 INT C HUM HAB EN
[Anonymous], 1997, QUAL INQ
[Anonymous], DIS MIT SUPP MAN MAL
[Anonymous], 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
[Anonymous], B ING
[Anonymous], 2013, FLOOD KUANTAN TOWN C
[Anonymous], FEN BANJ MAL
[Anonymous], ANN FLOOD REP PAH ST
[Anonymous], 2012, IDS WORKING PAPERS
[Anonymous], 2009, EARTHSCAN READER ADA
[Anonymous], 2015, RESILIENCE RECOVERY
[Anonymous], DISASTER PREV MANAG
[Anonymous], FLOOD FOR WARN UNPUB
[Anonymous], EVALUATING NON MONET
[Anonymous], 2007, POLICY RES WORKING P
[Anonymous], 1994, FOCUS GROUP PRACTICA
[Anonymous], ANN REPORT
[Anonymous], 2000, MODERATING FOCUS GRO
[Anonymous], 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, DOI DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232
Balica S, 2010, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V9, P321, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2010.0043
Berkes J., 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC
Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
Chan NW, 1996, GEOGR J, V162, P313, DOI 10.2307/3059653
Chan NW., 2012, EC WELFARE IMPACTS D, P503, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55022-8
Dey I., 1993, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
Dhar ON, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1021199714487
Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
Garai J, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P425, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2574-8
Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2003)4:3(136)
Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI
10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI
10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
Hussaini H.A., 2007, FLOOD DROUGHT MANAGE
Hyden LC., 2003, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V6, P305, DOI [10.1080/13645570210124865,
DOI 10.1080/13645570210124865]
Jackson J, 2006, PHILOS T R SOC A, V364, P1911, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2006.1805
James E, 2008, DEV PRACT, V18, P424, DOI 10.1080/09614520802030607
Kithiia J, 2010, CITIES, V27, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.08.001
KITZINGER J, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P299, DOI 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
Morehouse R., 1994, BEGINING QUALITATIVE
Proag V, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P369, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00952-6
Saavedra C, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.004
Simon D., 2007, International Journal of Green Economics, V1, P299, DOI
10.1504/IJGE.2007.013061
Small C, 2003, J COASTAL RES, V19, P584
Stanke C, 2012, PUBL LIBR SCI CURR D, V47, P37, DOI DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.028
Suhaila J, 2010, SAINS MALAYS, V39, P533
Swyngedouw E, 2003, ANTIPODE, V35, P898, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x
Watson RT, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY,
pIX
Williamson Fiona, 2016, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, V2, pe01248, DOI
10.1002/ehs2.1248
Willis KF, 2011, HOUSING STUD, V26, P225, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2011.549215
NR 57
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 9
U2 34
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 101
IS 2
BP 551
EP 571
DI 10.1007/s11069-020-03885-1
PG 21
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA KW4ZI
UT WOS:000521174200013
OA Green Accepted, hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Choe, T
Kim, J
Shin, M
Kim, K
Kim, M
AF Choe, Taeyoung
Kim, Jiho
Shin, Mincheol
Kim, Kwangyoung
Kim, Mucheol
TI Complex disaster response framework to reduce urban disaster
vulnerability
SO SCIENCE PROGRESS
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster response; evacuation planning; earthquake; urban flood; road
network
ID ROAD NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; RISK; CITY
AB Cities are vulnerable to a range of disasters that can occur simultaneously due
to their complexity. Therefore, an effective disaster response plan is needed to
reduce the disaster vulnerability of cities. In particular, evacuation route
management is important for reducing the losses from a disaster. Efficient disaster
response can be realized by searching for suitable evacuation routes and effective
road network management. In this paper, we propose a disaster response framework
based on a multilayered road network structure and evacuation routes based on our
road network. The suggested road structure consists of three layers for the
effective management of the network. An A* algorithm-based search for multiple
evacuation routes under different conditions in response to an individual disaster
on the configured road map provides a safe route for evacuees. As a result, the
damage caused by disasters in urban areas can be ameliorated.
C1 [Choe, Taeyoung; Kim, Jiho; Shin, Mincheol; Kim, Mucheol] Chung Ang Univ, Dept
Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul, South Korea.
[Kim, Jiho] Natl Disaster Management Res Inst, Disaster Prevent Res Div, Ulsan,
South Korea.
[Kim, Kwangyoung] Korea Inst Sci & Technol Informat, Daejeon, South Korea.
C3 Chung Ang University; National Disaster Management Research Institute
(NDMI), Republic of Korea; Korea Institute of Science & Technology
Information (KISTI)
RP Kim, M (corresponding author), Chung Ang Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul,
South Korea.
EM mucheol.kim@gmail.com
OI Kim, Mucheol/0000-0003-2682-2195
FU National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) - Korean
government (MSIT) [1711101951]; Korea Institute for Advancement of
Technology (KIAT) - Korea Government (MOTIE) [P0012724]; Chung-Ang
University Research Scholarship Grants in 2022
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work
was supported in part by the National Research Council of Science &
Technology (NST) grant by the Korean government (MSIT) (1711101951) and
in part by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant
funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0012724, The Competency
Development Program for Industry Specialist) and part by the Chung-Ang
University Research Scholarship Grants in 2022
CR Akbari V, 2017, COMPUT OPER RES, V82, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2017.01.007
Almeida LS., 2019, RISK ANAL BASED DATA, P390
Almeida LS, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101398
Astri R., 2020, J RESTI, V4, P254
Bagloee SA, 2017, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V98, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.003
Brown S, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160704008
Celik M, 2015, OPER RES, V63, P65, DOI 10.1287/opre.2014.1342
Choo KS, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12040926
Dong SJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102398
Giuliani F, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104700
Guo J, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109822
Han LD, 2006, INTERFACES, V36, P502, DOI 10.1287/inte.1060.0251
Han W., 2020, KRIHS POL BRIEF, P1
Herschelman R, 2019, 27TH ACM SIGSPATIAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2019), P480, DOI
10.1145/3347146.3359102
Hiete M., 2009, P 6 INT ISCRAM C GOT
Honiden S, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6290, P28
Hsieh YC, 2021, SCI PROGRESS-UK, V104, DOI 10.1177/00368504211063258
Hu B, 2016, CLUSTER COMPUT, V19, P2179, DOI 10.1007/s10586-016-0674-6
Kaleeswari B., 2016, INT J SCI RES SCI EN, V5, P431
Kim Gwang-Young, 2020, [Journal of Digital Contents Society,
디지털콘텐츠학회논문지], V21, P1495, DOI 10.9728/dcs.2020.21.8.1495
Kim J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103386
Kim S., 2007, P 15 ANN ACM INT S A, P1
Kita SM, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.010
Konakalla SV., 2014, A STAR ALGORITHM
Kumari SM., 2010, GLOB J COMPUT SCI TE, V9, P73
Lee KH., 2016, J KOREAN SOC DISASTE, V9, P15
Li JX, 2021, SCI PROGRESS-UK, V104, DOI 10.1177/0036850420982685
Lin AQ, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101682
Liu Q, 2019, J PARALLEL DISTR COM, V133, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.06.012
Lu QS, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3633, P291
Madkour A., 2017, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
Minhans A., 2013, J TEKNOL, V65, P41
Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, 2022, KOREA POLICY BR
0809
Mostafavi A, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P1078, DOI 10.1111/risa.13303
Muriel-Villegas JE, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V152, P151, DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.006
National Disaster Management Research Institute, 2018, APPL NAT DIS RISK AS
Pescaroli G., 2015, GLOBAL RISK FORUM DA, V2, P58
Potamias M., 2019, P 18 ACM C INFORM KN, P867
Pratiwi A. F., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering,
V854, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/854/1/012035
10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020
Quagliarini E, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103848
Redzuan A. A., 2019, IOP C SERIES MAT SCI, V615, DOI DOI
10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012002
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.032
Sabri Nor Amalina Mohd, 2015, Journal of Computer Science, V11, P330, DOI
10.3844/jcssp.2015.330.336
Shahid N, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103062
Shan SQ, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V115, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.029
Shin Seongil, 2007, [Korean Society of Transportation, 대한교통학회지], V25, P33
Song Chang-Young, 2017, [Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural
Maintenance and Inspection, 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집], V21, P45
Sularno, 2021, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V708, DOI
10.1088/1755-1315/708/1/012004
Sularno S., 2021, J KING SAUD UNIV-COM, V8, P33
Wanhee Cho，, 2015, [Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information
Studies, 한국지리정보학회지], V18, P74, DOI 10.11108/kagis.2015.18.1.074
Wu N, 2020, KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, P6, DOI 10.1145/3394486.3403043
Yang Q, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020546
Yin Chao, 2010, 2010 5th International Conference on Computer Science &
Education (ICCSE 2010), P1164, DOI 10.1109/ICCSE.2010.5593700
Yu MZ, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8050165
Yuan FX, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105079
Zhang Y, 2019, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V34, P877, DOI 10.1111/mice.12450
NR 59
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 7
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0036-8504
EI 2047-7163
J9 SCI PROGRESS-UK
JI Sci. Prog.
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 106
IS 1
DI 10.1177/00368504231152770
PG 18
WC Education, Scientific Disciplines; Multidisciplinary Sciences
SC Education & Educational Research; Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA F6SZ3
UT WOS:000983636400018
PM 36691679
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Fan, J
Huang, GW
AF Fan, Juan
Huang, Guangwei
TI Are Women More Vulnerable to Flooding Than Men in an Aging Japanese
Society?
LA English
DT Article
DE flood vulnerability; aging society; gender; physical ability; evacuation
ID GENDER-DIFFERENCES; AGE
AB It is a well-accepted notion that women are more vulnerable to natural disasters
than men, especially in developing countries. However, in developed countries, how
women's empowerment by economic and social development has reduced the gender gap
in vulnerability remains insufficiently answered. As Japan passed its golden age,
moving into an aging society, a study on how the gender difference in flood
vulnerability has evolved can contribute to a better understanding of the types and
causes of vulnerability, leading to better flood risk management in a new social
context. Following this thinking, the present study conducted a longitudinal
analysis using representative flooding cases in Japan over a period of forty years.
It found that the women's fatality rate increased with age much faster than men's
in the 1980s but reversed in a recent major flood disaster. It also revealed that
most flood disaster victims were elderly in recent years. These findings suggest
that the flood vulnerability at present is more driven by age-related physical
ability decline, much less relevant to gender. Based on the results, it proposed a
new framework for assessing flood vulnerability in an aging society. Such outcomes
can help with the better formulation of flood management policies and probing into
solutions.
C1 [Fan, Juan; Huang, Guangwei] Sophia Univ, Grad Sch Global Environm Studies,
C3 Sophia University
RP Huang, GW (corresponding author), Sophia Univ, Grad Sch Global Environm Studies,
EM huanggwx@sophia.ac.jp
CR [Anonymous], ASAHI NEWS DIGITAL
Ayeb-Karlsson S, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100237
Bertsch R, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105490
Bryant EC, 2005, CLIN BIOMECH, V20, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.006
Cabinet Office, UPD H30TYPHOON21 IND
Cabinet Office, KAIG HAK H31 HONB 0B
Corringham TW, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-15474-2
Goumrasa A, 2021, APPL GEOMAT, V13, P565, DOI 10.1007/s12518-021-00381-4
Hines R, 2007, RACE GENDER CLASS, V14, P60
Huang G., 2023, J EMERG MANAG
Huang XY, 2022, SCI ADV, V8, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abq0995
Ionescu C, 2009, ENVIRON MODEL ASSESS, V14, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10666-008-9179-x
Ishizuka Y., 2021, J JPN ASS INCL SOC, V23, P15
Kansai Airports, KANSAI AIRPORTS
Liang J, 2008, J GERONTOL B-PSYCHOL, V63, pS282, DOI 10.1093/geronb/63.5.S282
Matsuda I., 1984, COMPR URBAN STUDY, V23, P107
Milly PCD, 2002, NATURE, V415, P514, DOI 10.1038/415514a
Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare, 2021, COMPR SURV LIV COND
MLIT, MLIT
mlit, MLIT REPORT WATER RE
Neumayer E, 2007, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V97, P551, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8306.2007.00563.x
NHK, BUNK YOR JIK
PEARSON JD, 1995, J ACOUST SOC AM, V97, P1196, DOI 10.1121/1.412231
Petrucci O, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081682
pref, KUMAMOTO PREFECTURE
Qiang Y, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V232, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.039
Rentschler J, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-30727-4
Sialino LD, 2022, BMC GERIATR, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12877-022-03216-y
Smiley KT, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-31056-2
Stake R. E., 1995, ART CASE STUDY RES, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB024859
Takahashi K., LESSONS 1982 NAGASAK
Ushiyama M., 2019, J JPN SOC NAT DISAST, V38, P29, DOI [10.24762/jndsj.38.1 29,
DOI 10.24762/JNDSJ.38.1_29]
Wakabayashi K., 1987, COMPR URBAN STUDY, V30, P17
Wang T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155949
Wang Y, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V247, P712, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.102
Watson RT, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY,
pIX
White P., 2005, DEV
NR 37
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 20
IS 2
AR 1299
DI 10.3390/ijerph20021299
PG 11
(SSCI)
Health
GA 7Z3VZ
UT WOS:000915492000001
PM 36674055
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Cai, L
Li, YB
Chen, M
Zou, ZX
AF Cai Lin
Li, Yingbing
Chen Min
Zou Zixin
TI Tropical cyclone risk assessment for China at the provincial level based
on clustering analysis
SO GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
LA English
DT Article
DE Tropical cyclones; improved ST-DBSCAN; clustering analysis; risk
assessment
ID TYPHOON DISASTER
AB Accurate risk assessment is essential to help allocate the resource for disaster
relief and make the evacuation decision when hit by a Tropical Cyclone (TC). The
integrated analysis of the hazard-bearing body and the intrinsic characteristics of
TCs are promising to provide a clear pattern of the caused risks. However, in the
literature, the origin of a TC is not considered in risk assessment. In this
article, we propose a risk assessment method aided the analysis of the origins of
TCs. Specifically, in order to obtain the knowledge of potential risk, this method
first clustered the origins of TCs by an improved ST-DBSCAN algorithm and then make
an integrated analysis by combining the analysis results with the hazard-bearing
body. A case study is performed to verify the performance of the proposed method.
In the study, 1760 TCs generated in the Western North Pacific from 1949 to 2016 are
investigated. Results show that the improved ST-DBSCAN can identify regions where
TCs generated there have stronger intensities and are more likely to make landfall,
and the provincial risks are distinct among TCs generated from different areas.
Analysis of annual risk changes in provinces is performed based on the results.
These results are valuable for both TC disaster prevention and mitigation.
C1 [Cai Lin; Li, Yingbing; Chen Min; Zou Zixin] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat,
Wuhan, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University
RP Li, YB (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, Wuhan, Peoples
R China.
EM ybli@whu.edu.cn
OI LI, YingBing/0000-0002-0661-085X
FU National Key R&D Program of China: National Public Security Emergency
Platform [2018YFC0807000]
FX This research work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of
China: National Public Security Emergency Platform [2018YFC0807000].
CR [Anonymous], RISK ASSESSMENT TYPH
[Anonymous], RED DIS RISK CHALLEN
[Anonymous], RES ASSESSMENT TYPHO
[Anonymous], CHINA PUBL SECURITY
[Anonymous], TYPHOON DISASTER RIS
[Anonymous], 2001, NATURAL HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2001)2:3(132
[Anonymous], 2016, IJRCCE
[Anonymous], J TROP METEOROL
Birant D, 2007, DATA KNOWL ENG, V60, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.datak.2006.01.013
Chen HJ, 2013, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V712-715, P2469, DOI
Chen SH, 2018, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V9, P431, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2018.1447024
[陈文方 CHEN Wenfangt], 2011, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V20,
P77
Chen Xiang, 2007, Shengtaixue Zazhi, V26, P961
[丑洁明 Chou Jieming], 2018, [大气科学, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences],
V42, P357
Chu HJ, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P9451, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.114
Ester M., 1996, KDD-96 Proceedings. Second International Conference on Knowledge
Discovery and Data Mining, P226
Gao Y, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P5364, DOI 10.1002/2013JD021268
Gu CL, 2016, J TROP METEOROL, V22, P15, DOI 10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.S1.002
Gupta S, 2019, IEEE CONF COMPUT, P354, DOI 10.1109/INFCOMW.2019.8845215
Huang CF., 2005, RISK ASSESSMENT NATU
Lin YC, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P1857, DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-1001-5
Liu DQ, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P3915, DOI 10.1002/joc.6048
Masson-Delmotte V., 2018, SPECIAL REPORT EMISS, DOI
[10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/9781009157940.008,
10.1017/cbo9780511976988.002, DOI 10.2833/9937]
Pelling M., 2003, Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world
Pielke RA., 2008, NAT HAZARDS REV, V9, P29, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2008)9:1(29), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)]
Pielke RA, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P101, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2003)4:3(101)
Sajjad M, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105018
[史培军 SHI Pei-jun], 2009, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V18, P1
Shi ZC, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8030112
[谭丽荣 TAN LiRong], 2011, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V31, P1111
[唐丽丽 Tang Lili], 2012, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V21, P31
[魏章进 Wei Zhangjin], 2017, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V32, P7
Yu DJ, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P2559, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1450-7
[岳心阳 Yue Xinyang], 2014, [中国海洋大学学报. 自然科学版, Periodical of Ocean
University of China], V44, P1
Zhang CY, 2019, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V224, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.04.052
Zhang J, 2007, QUANTITATIVE METHODS
Zhang JQ, 2009, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V15, P727, DOI 10.1080/10807030903050962
[张继权 ZHANG Jiquan], 2006, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V15, P29
Zhang Li-jie, 2014, Application Research of Computers, V31, P1972, DOI
10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2014.07.011
[张丽杰 Zhang Lijie], 2011, [系统工程, Systems Engineering], V29, P112
Zhang Y, 2017, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V8, P1580, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2017.1362040
Zhao M, 2010, J CLIMATE, V23, P6382, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3837.1
Zhong S., 2018, ADV METEOROL, V2018, P1
NR 44
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 10
U2 34
PI ABINGDON
SN 1947-5705
EI 1947-5713
J9 GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK
JI Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk
PY 2020
VL 11
IS 1
BP 869
EP 886
DI 10.1080/19475705.2020.1753823
PG 18
Water Resources
GA LM9WF
UT WOS:000532597500001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Quader, MA
Khan, AU
Malak, MA
Kervyn, M
AF Quader, Mohammad Abdul
Khan, Amanat Ullah
Malak, Md. Abdul
Kervyn, Matthieu
TI Mainstreaming Decentralization and Collaboration in Disaster Risk
Management: Insights from Coastal Bangladesh
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Coastal Bangladesh; Cyclone preparedness program (CPP);
Decentralization; Disaster risk governance; Institutional linkage; Union
disaster management committee (UDMC)
ID RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; CYCLONE; IMPACTS; SYSTEM; SURGE
AB Bangladesh is renowned in disaster risk reduction (DRR) for active involvement
of community people and local disaster management institutions in DRR activities.
Our study aimed to describe the disaster risk management (DRM) institutions and
assess their functioning in six coastal unions across the three coastal zones of
Bangladesh. Both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were used. The
study focused on two key local institutions-the Union Disaster Management
Committees (UDMCs) and the Cyclone Preparedness Program (CPP)-functioning at the
union level in DRM. Such institutions have both horizontal and vertical
collaborations with other institutions. However, we argue that the UDMCs' external
dependencies in their functioning indicate their limited financial and
administrative autonomy, which is a barrier to successfully institutionalizing
disaster management. The results show that the CPP is the most successful program,
markedly increasing the trust of the people in warning dissemination and evacuation
efforts in the event of a cyclone. Although the adoption of decentralized risk
management systems has resulted in significant progress in increased rate of
evacuation and reduced death rate and damage, lack of funding and equipment,
limited coordination between institutions, lack of skilled and knowledgeable
workforce, and inappropriate power structures may reduce the effectiveness of DRR
activities prior to, during, and following disasters.
C1 [Quader, Mohammad Abdul; Kervyn, Matthieu] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Geog Earth
Syst Sci, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.
[Quader, Mohammad Abdul; Malak, Md. Abdul] Jagannath Univ, Dept Geog & Environm,
Dhaka 1100, Bangladesh.
[Khan, Amanat Ullah] Dhaka Univ, Dept Geog & Environm, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh.
[Khan, Amanat Ullah] Bangladesh Univ Profess, Dept Environm Sci, Dhaka 1216,
Bangladesh.
C3 Vrije Universiteit Brussel; University of Dhaka
RP Quader, MA (corresponding author), Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Geog Earth Syst Sci,
B-1050 Brussels, Belgium.; Quader, MA (corresponding author), Jagannath Univ, Dept
Geog & Environm, Dhaka 1100, Bangladesh.
EM mquader@vub.be
RI Quader, Mohammad Abdul/AAC-4598-2019
OI Quader, Mohammad Abdul/0000-0002-8176-3856
FU VLIR-UOS (Flemish Inter-Universities Council)
FX AcknowledgmentsWe want to extend our thanks to Elaine Newby for
proofreading. The people who participated in this research are greatly
acknowledged. We are grateful to VLIR-UOS (Flemish Inter-Universities
Council) for providing funding for the Ph.D. study of Mohammad Abdul
Quader.
CR Ahmed M., 2009, DISASTER DECENTRALIZ
Ahsan DA, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.005
Ahsan MN., 2010, CLIMATE CHANGE SOCIO
Ainuddin S, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V6, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.04.001
Alam E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102220
Allen KM, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00308.x
[Anonymous], 1996, ANN WORLD BANK C DEV
[Anonymous], 2013, APPROACHES DISASTER
[Anonymous], 1974, NATURAL HAZARDS LOCA
[Anonymous], 2007, OXFORD HDB PUBLIC MA
Bae Y, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.027
CDMP (Comprehensive Disaster Management Programme), 2010, CYCL SHELT INF MAN T
Choudhury J.R., 2008, DISASTER RISK REDUCT
Choudhury MUI, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1761, DOI
10.1080/09640568.2018.1513833
DDM (Department of Disaster Management), 2019, MIN DIS MAN REL GOV
DDM (Department of Disaster Management), 2010, MIN DIS MAN REL GOV
Demeter K., 2004, ROLE LOCAL GOVT REDU
Faguet JP, 2013, WORLD DEV, V53, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002
Fakhruddin SHM, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V12, P112, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.12.008
Garschagen M, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.030
GoB (Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh), 2021, PLANN COMM MIN
PLANN
Ha H., 2015, LAND DISASTER MANAGE, P83, DOI [10.1007/978-81-322-1976-7_6, DOI
10.1007/978-81-322-1976-7_6]
Hermansson H, 2019, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V42, P417, DOI
10.1080/01900692.2018.1466898
Jha A. K., 2013, STRONG SAFE RESILIEN, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-9805-0., DOI
10.1596/978-0-8213-9805-0]
Jones S, 2013, DISASTERS, V37, P442, DOI 10.1111/disa.12006
Karim MF, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P490, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.05.002
Messer NM., 2003, ROLE LOCAL I THEIR I
Miller MA, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.028
MoDMR, 2019, 50 YEARS CYCL PREP P
MoDMR, 2015, NAT DIS MAN POL 2015
MoDMR (Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief), 2019, STAND ORD DIS
Mohibbullah M, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V124, P433, DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.016
Nottage L., 2014, ASIA PACIFIC DISASTE, P1
Parvin GA, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100032
Paul KS., 2014, ORIENT GEOGRAPHER, V55, P57
Paul SK, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V57, P477, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9631-5
PRUDHOMME R, 1995, WORLD BANK RES OBSER, V10, P201, DOI 10.1093/wbro/10.2.201
Putra DI, 2019, J DISASTER RES, V14, P173
Quader MA, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P1532, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2021.1927205
Rahman MA, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.12.004
Rumbach A, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.026
Sabur AKMA, 2012, INDIA Q, V68, P29, DOI 10.1177/097492841106800103
Saroar MM, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10113-011-0247-4
Scott Z., 2011, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
Shaw R., 2013, DISASTER RISK REDUCT, P45, DOI [10.1007/978-4-431-54252-0_3, DOI
10.1007/978-4-431-54252-0_3]
Skidmore M, 2013, LAND ECON, V89, P101, DOI 10.3368/le.89.1.101
Treisman D, 2007, CAMB STUD COMPAR, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511619151
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), 2012, RED
VULN EXP DIS
NR 49
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2095-0055
EI 2192-6395
J9 INT J DISAST RISK SC
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 14
IS 3
BP 382
EP 397
DI 10.1007/s13753-023-00495-w
EA JUN 2023
PG 16
Water Resources
GA K5XF8
UT WOS:001016448800002
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhu, Y
Ozbay, K
Yang, H
Zuo, F
Sha, D
AF Zhu, Yuan
Ozbay, Kaan
Yang, Hong
Zuo, Fan
Sha, Di
TI Modeling and Simulation of Cascading Failures in Transportation Systems
during Hurricane Evacuations
SO JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION
LA English
DT Article
ID CAPACITY
AB Effective and timely evacuation is critical in alleviating the impact of
hurricanes. As such, evacuation models are often sought to support the preparedness
of evacuations. One important task in the modeling process is to evaluate exogenous
factors that cause transportation system capacity loss during evacuation. Typical
factors include direct damage to the roadway network due to storm surge and
cascading impacts because of other facilities failures. For example, power outage
can lead to signal failure and subway suspension. This paper aims to develop a
macroscopic simulation-based approach to study the capacity loss of the roadway
network in evacuation due to signal loss as a consequence of power outage. In
particular, to simulate the case in which traffic signals lose power, a capacity-
reduction model from signalized intersections to unsignalized (all-way stop
control) intersections was developed and calibrated using microscopic model created
in SUMO and Synchro. We used the downtown Manhattan as a case study area and
created a hypothetical power-grid network in terms of neighborhoods. Six scenarios
were built to simulate power loss of different neighborhoods. The simulation
results give insights on how cascading failures of power network affect roadway
network and evacuation process.
C1 [Zhu, Yuan] Inner Mongolia Univ, Inner Mongolia Ctr Transportat Res, Rm
A357c,Transportat Bldg, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, Peoples R China.
[Ozbay, Kaan; Zuo, Fan; Sha, Di] NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Dept Civil & Urban Engn,
15 MetroTech Ctr,6th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
[Ozbay, Kaan; Zuo, Fan; Sha, Di] NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Ctr Urban Sci & Progress
CUSP, 15 MetroTech Ctr,6th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
[Yang, Hong] Old Dominion Univ, Dept Modeling Simulat & Visualizat Engn, 4700
Elkhorn Ave, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA.
C3 Inner Mongolia University; New York University; New York University
Tandon School of Engineering; New York University; New York University
Tandon School of Engineering; Old Dominion University
RP Zhu, Y (corresponding author), Inner Mongolia Univ, Inner Mongolia Ctr
Transportat Res, Rm A357c,Transportat Bldg, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, Peoples
R China.
EM zhuyuan@imu.edu.cn; kaan.ozbay@nyu.edu; hyang@odu.edu; fz380@nyu.edu;
ds5317@nyu.edu
RI Zhu, Yuan/AAT-8119-2021
OI Yang, Hong/0000-0003-2808-8852; Zhu, Yuan/0000-0002-8133-2941
FU Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of
China [61903205]; Young Scientists Fund of Natural Science of Inner
Mongolia [2019BS07002]; NSF CRISP: Type 1: Reductionist and Integrative
Approaches to Improve the Resiliency of Multi-Scale Interdependent
Critical Infrastructure; project on A Decision-Support System for
Resilient Transportation Networks - NYU Provost Global Seed Fund Grants
FX This study was partially supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61903205) and
Young Scientists Fund of Natural Science of Inner Mongolia (grant no.
2019BS07002). This study was partially support by the project of the NSF
CRISP: Type 1: Reductionist and Integrative Approaches to Improve the
Resiliency of Multi-Scale Interdependent Critical Infrastructure, and
the project on A Decision-Support System for Resilient Transportation
Networks funded by NYU Provost Global Seed Fund Grants.
CR [Anonymous], 2011, P SIMUL 2011 3 INT C
BAASS KG, 1987, ITE J, V57, P43
Brilon W, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P32, DOI 10.3141/1920-04
Caliper, TRANSCAD TRANSP PLAN
Fotouhi H, 2017, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V163, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.026
Guler S. I., 2016, INT J TRANSP SCI TEC, V5, P257, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.IJTST.2017.03.002
Haklay M, 2008, IEEE PERVAS COMPUT, V7, P12, DOI 10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
HUSCH D, 2004, TRAFFICWARE SYNCHRO
Li J, 2015, NETW SPAT ECON, V15, P677, DOI 10.1007/s11067-014-9241-y
Manual H.C., 2010, HCM2010 TRANSPORTATI
New York Metropolitan Transportation Council, BEST PRACT MOD
NYSDOT,, FUNCT CLASS
Oricchlo V, 2008, TRANSPORT RES REC, P67, DOI 10.3141/2080-08
Prasetijo J, 2011, PROCD SOC BEHV, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.487
Wegmann H., 1991, INTERSECTIONS TRAFFI, P177, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-84537-
6_13
Zhang L, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V138, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.01.267
Zhu Y., 2016, P 2016 TRANSP RES BO
NR 18
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 6
U2 15
PU WILEY-HINDAWI
PI LONDON
SN 0197-6729
EI 2042-3195
J9 J ADV TRANSPORT
JI J. Adv. Transp.
PD APR 23
PY 2021
VL 2021
AR 5599073
DI 10.1155/2021/5599073
PG 12
WC Engineering, Civil; Transportation Science & Technology
GA SJ3XR
UT WOS:000655466200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chen, YJ
Lin, HJ
Liou, JJ
Cheng, CT
Chen, YM
AF Chen, Yun-Ju
Lin, Hsuan-Ju
Liou, Jun-Jih
Cheng, Chao-Tzuen
Chen, Yung-Ming
TI Assessment of Flood Risk Map under Climate Change RCP8.5 Scenarios in
Taiwan
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; dynamic downscaling; high-resolution; indictor-based;
risk maps
ID EXTREME RAINFALL; INTEGRATED APPROACH; GIS; VULNERABILITY;
SUSCEPTIBILITY; MITIGATION; MANAGEMENT; MODELS; TRENDS
AB Climate change has exerted a significant global impact in recent years, and
extreme weather-related hazards and incidents have become the new normal. For
Taiwan in particular, the corresponding increase in disaster risk threatens not
only the environment but also the lives, safety, and property of people. This
highlights the need to develop a methodology for mapping disaster risk under
climate change and delineating those regions that are potentially high-risk areas
requiring adaptation to a changing climate in the future. This study provides a
framework of flood risk map assessment under the RCP8.5 scenario by using different
spatial scales to integrate the projection climate data of high resolution,
inundation potential maps, and indicator-based approach at the end of the 21st
century in Taiwan. The reference period was 1979-2003, and the future projection
period was 2075-2099. High-resolution climate data developed by dynamic downscaling
of the MRI-JMA-AGCM model was used to assess extreme rainfall events. The flood
risk maps were constructed using two different spatial scales: the township level
and the 5 km x 5 km grid. As to hazard-vulnerability(H-V) maps, users can overlay
maps of their choice-such as those for land use distribution, district planning,
agricultural crop distribution, or industrial distribution. Mapping flood risk
under climate change can support better informed decision-making and policy-making
processes in planning and preparing to intervene and control flood risks. The
elderly population distribution is applied as an exposure indicator in order to
guide advance preparation of evacuation plans for high-risk areas. This study found
that higher risk areas are distributed mainly in northern and southern parts of
Taiwan and the hazard indicators significantly increase in the northern, north-
eastern, and southern regions under the RCP8.5 scenario. Moreover, the near-
riparian and coastal townships of central and southern Taiwan have higher
vulnerability levels. Approximately 14% of townships have a higher risk level of
flooding disaster and another 3% of townships will become higher risk. For higher-
risk townships, adaptation measures or strategies are suggested to prioritize
improving flood preparation and protecting people and property. Such a flood risk
map can be a communication tool to effectively inform decision- makers, citizens,
and stakeholders about the variability of flood risk under climate change. Such
maps enable decision-makers and national spatial planners to compare the relative
flood risk of individual townships countrywide in order to determine and prioritize
risk adaptation areas for planning spatial development policies.
C1 [Chen, Yun-Ju; Lin, Hsuan-Ju; Liou, Jun-Jih; Cheng, Chao-Tzuen; Chen, Yung-Ming]
Natl Sci & Technol Ctr Disaster Reduct, New Taipei 23143, Taiwan.
C3 National Science & Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR)
RP Chen, YJ (corresponding author), Natl Sci & Technol Ctr Disaster Reduct, New
Taipei 23143, Taiwan.
EM yjchen@ncdr.nat.gov.tw; buildart827@gmail.com; jjliou@ncdr.nat.gov.tw;
ctcheng@ncdr.nat.gov.tw; ymchen@ncdr.nat.gov.tw
OI Chen, Yungming/0000-0001-7265-1927
CR ACREMAN MC, 1986, J HYDROL, V84, P365, DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(86)90134-4
Alizadeh R, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V104, P162, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.030
[Anonymous], 1974, WATER RESOUR RES, DOI [10.1029/WR010i002p00211, DOI
10.1029/WR010I002P00211]
Arabameri A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V660, P443, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
Asadieh B, 2015, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V19, P877, DOI 10.5194/hess-19-877-2015
Bathrellos GD, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-5157-1
Cai SY, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12050623
Chakraborty S, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03737-7
Chen YR, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1261, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9831-7
Chen YM, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020564
Clifton CF, 2018, CLIM SERV, V10, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2018.03.001
de Moel H, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P865, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9654-z
de Moel H, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P289, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009
de Moel H, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P620, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.005
Doong DJ, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8110521
Efthimiou N, 2016, GLOBAL NEST J, V18, P164
10.4236/jgis.2015.74027
Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT
A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
Gain AK, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1499, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1911-7
Garrote J, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020329
Ghanbarpour MR, 2013, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V6, P319, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12017
Grezo H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12104144
Grip IL, 2021, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100074
Hadipour V, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092379
Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1979,
10.1038/nclimate1979]
Henny L, 2021, J CLIMATE, V34, P4711, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0999.1
10.1038/nclimate1911]
Hsu TW, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060390
Hsu WK, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P1295, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9732-9
Huang HF, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P2059, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04768-9
Huang WP, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10080988
Inanloo B, 2016, SAFETY SCI, V84, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.018
Janizadeh S, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V298, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113551
Jongman B, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P823, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.004
Kappes MS, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V32, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.07.002
Kron W., 2002, FLOOD RISK HAZARD EX, P58, DOI [10.1080/02508060508691837, DOI
10.1080/02508060508691837]
Lee TL, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P962, DOI 10.3390/su7010962
Lenderink G, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1143
Liu SC, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL040218
Liu WC, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063180
Mani P, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P1553, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0891-8
Marco J.B., 1994, COPING FLOODS, DOI [10.1007/978-94-011-1098-3_20, DOI
10.1007/978-94-011-1098-3_20]
Martinez-Casasnovas JA, 2002, GEODERMA, V105, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0016-
7061(01)00096-9
Matheswaran K, 2019, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V10, P26, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2018.1500495
Merz B, 2007, ADV NAT TECH HAZ RES, V25, P231
Ministry of the Interior, SOC DAT COMM PLATF
Mizuta R, 2012, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V90A, P233, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2012-A12
Muller A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P2107, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011
National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR), DIS POT
MAPS TAIW
Papaioannou G, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P399, DOI 10.1007/s11269-014-0817-
6
Poulos HM, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V54, P1015, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9502-0
10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043
ROBLE RG, 1994, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V21, P417, DOI 10.1029/93GL03391
Romali NS, 2018, INT J GEOMATE, V14, P125, DOI 10.21660/2018.43.3656
Sabzi HZ, 2018, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V40, P1398, DOI
10.1080/15567036.2018.1476934
Saldarriaga J, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092491
Sezen C, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10041242
Su SH, 2012, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V90, P721, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2012-510
Su YF, 2016, TERR ATMOS OCEAN SCI, V27, P649, DOI 10.3319/TAO.2016.07.14.01
Toosi AS, 2019, J HYDROL, V574, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.072
UNISDR, 2013, GAR 2013 GLOB ASS RE
van Kempen G, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P961, DOI [10.5194/nhes-21-961-
2021, 10.5194/nhess-21-961-2021]
Veijalainen N, 2010, J HYDROL, V391, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.035
Veleda S, 2017, APPL SCI-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/app7020157
Wasko C, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-08481-1
Water Resources Agency (WRA), FLOOD POT MAPS TAIW
Water Resources Agency (WRA), 2018, 2018 REN DEV DEC MAK, P93
Water Resources Bureau of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2001, HDB HYDR DES
TAIW, P7
Wei HP, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8030081
Weis SWM, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V136, P615, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1642-0
Westra S, 2013, J CLIMATE, V26, P3904, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00502.1
Yan D, 2015, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V4, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.06.006
Yildirim E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102113
Zhang JL, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abff87
Zisopoulou K, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13121693
NR 77
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 7
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 2
AR 207
DI 10.3390/w14020207
PG 17
(SSCI)
GA ZB6FJ
UT WOS:000756935400001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Obuobi-Donkor, G
Eboreime, E
Shalaby, R
Agyapong, B
Adu, MK
Owusu, E
Mao, WY
Oluwasina, F
Pazderka, H
Agyapong, VIO
AF Obuobi-Donkor, Gloria
Eboreime, Ejemai
Shalaby, Reham
Agyapong, Belinda
Adu, Medard K.
Owusu, Ernest
Mao, Wanying
Oluwasina, Folajinmi
Pazderka, Hannah
Agyapong, Vincent I. O.
TI Evaluating Community Resilience and Associated Factors One Year after
the Catastrophic Fort McMurray Flood
LA English
DT Article
DE natural disaster; flooding; mental health; resilience; Fort McMurray;
support
ID 1989 NEWCASTLE EARTHQUAKE; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; DISASTER
VICTIMS SPEAK; MENTAL-HEALTH; PSYCHOSOCIAL SEQUELAE; PSYCHOLOGICAL
RESILIENCE; IMPACT; TRAUMA; VULNERABILITY; PREVALENCE
AB Background: Resilience after natural disasters is becoming an increasingly key
area of research. In April 2020, parts of Fort McMurray were affected by severe
floods. The flooding caused the loss of properties, evacuation of some residents,
and effects on their mental health. Objective: This study explores the prevalence
and associated factors between flood experience and low resilience a year after the
2020 floods in Fort McMurray. Method: Data collection was accomplished one year
after the flood, from 24 April to 2 June 2021, using an online survey. The data
were analyzed with SPSS version 25 using univariate analysis with the chi-squared
test and binary logistic regression analysis. Results: The prevalence of low
resilience was 37.4%. Respondents under 25 years were nearly 26 times more likely
to show low resilience (OR = 0.038; 95% CI 0.004-0.384) than respondents 40 years
and above. Responders with a history of depression (OR = 0.258 95% CI: 0.089-0.744)
and a history of anxiety (OR = 0.212; CI 95% 0.068-0.661) were nearly four to five
times more likely to show low resilience than those without a history. Similarly,
respondents willing to receive mental health counselling (OR = 0.134 95% CI: 0.047-
0.378) were 7.5 times more likely to show low resilience. Participants residing in
the same house before the flood were almost 11 times more likely to show low
resilience (OR = 0.095; 95% CI 0.021-0.427) than those who relocated. Participants
who received support from the Government of Alberta were less likely to express low
resilience than those who received no or limited support (OR = 208.343; 95% CI
3.284-13,218.663). Conclusion: The study showed a low resilience rate among
respondents following the 2020 flooding in Fort McMurray. Factors contributing to
low resilience include age, history of depression or anxiety, and place of
residence after the flood. After the flood, receiving support from the government
was shown to be a protective factor. Further studies are needed to explore robust
risk factors of low resilience and measures to promote normal to high resilience
among flood victims in affected communities.
C1 [Obuobi-Donkor, Gloria; Adu, Medard K.; Agyapong, Vincent I. O.] Dalhousie Univ,
Dept Psychiat, Halifax, NS B3H4R2, Canada.
[Eboreime, Ejemai; Shalaby, Reham; Agyapong, Belinda; Owusu, Ernest; Mao,
Wanying; Oluwasina, Folajinmi; Pazderka, Hannah; Agyapong, Vincent I. O.] Univ
Alberta, Dept Psychiat, Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada.
C3 Dalhousie University; University of Alberta
RP Agyapong, VIO (corresponding author), Dalhousie Univ, Dept Psychiat, Halifax, NS
B3H4R2, Canada.; Agyapong, VIO (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Dept Psychiat,
Edmonton, AB T6G2R3, Canada.
EM vn602367@dal.ca
RI Eboreime, Ejemai/J-4321-2019; Agyapong, Vincent/HRB-6512-2023
OI Eboreime, Ejemai/0000-0001-8277-2570; Agyapong, Vincent Israel
Opoku/0000-0002-2743-0372; Oluwasina, Folajinmi/0000-0002-5120-9782;
Obuobi-Donkor, Gloria/0000-0001-5325-8054; Agyapong,
Belinda/0000-0001-7633-6529
FU Mental Health Foundation; Douglas Harden Trust Fund; Government of
Alberta
FX This study was supported by grants from the Mental Health Foundation,
the Douglas Harden Trust Fund, and the Government of Alberta.
CR Adu MK, 2022, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/bs12040096
Afifi WA, 2012, ANXIETY STRESS COPIN, V25, P329, DOI
10.1080/10615806.2011.603048
Agyapong VIO, 2022, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V16, P1326, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2021.27
Agyapong VIO, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00448
Agyapong VIO, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, pE5, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.114
Agyapong VIO, 2021, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V19, P632, DOI 10.1007/s11469-019-
00096-z
Agyapong VIO, 2019, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V17, P120, DOI 10.1007/s11469-018-
0004-8
Agyapong VIO, 2018, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00345
Agyapong VIO, 2017, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12888-017-1448-2
Agyapong VIO, 2016, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1104-2
Agyapong VIO, 2020, JMIR RES PROTOC, V9, DOI 10.2196/19292
Agyapong VIO, 2020, JMIR MENT HEALTH, V7, DOI 10.2196/22423
Association A.P, 2012, BUILD YOUR RES WHAT
Bonanno GA, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P20, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
Bonanno GA, 2007, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V75, P671, DOI 10.1037/0022-
006X.75.5.671
Bowman SL, 2011, COUNS PSYCHOL, V39, P1160, DOI 10.1177/0011000010397934
Carr VJ, 1997, PSYCHOL MED, V27, P167, DOI 10.1017/S0033291796004278
Carr VJ, 1997, PSYCHOL MED, V27, P179, DOI 10.1017/S003329179600428X
CARR VJ, 1995, PSYCHOL MED, V25, P539, DOI 10.1017/S0033291700033468
Carroll B, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.009
Chen SQ, 2020, J ANXIETY DISORD, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102297
Chou FHC, 2007, PSYCHIAT CLIN NEUROS, V61, P370, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-
1819.2007.01688.x
Davidson JRT, 2006, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V67, P9
Fletcher D, 2013, EUR PSYCHOL, V18, P12, DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
Furr JM, 2010, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V78, P765, DOI 10.1037/a0021482
GALANTE R, 1986, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V25, P357, DOI 10.1016/S0002-
7138(09)60257-0
Genereux M, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16040587
Goldmann E, 2014, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V35, P169, DOI 10.1146/annurev-
publhealth-032013-182435
Greene G, 2015, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V105, P1792, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302709
Harris PA, 2009, J BIOMED INFORM, V42, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Heinrichs M, 2005, AM J PSYCHIAT, V162, P2276, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2276
Hikichi H, 2016, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V183, P902, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwv335
IBM Corporation, 2020, SPSS STAT WIND VERS
Litz BT, 2002, CLIN PSYCHOL-SCI PR, V9, P112, DOI 10.1093/clipsy/9.2.112
Mao WY, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.658528
Marshall GN, 2007, PSYCHIAT SERV, V58, P509, DOI 10.1176/appi.ps.58.4.509
McDermott V., 2020, FORT MCMURRAY FLOODS
Mitchell TL, 2004, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V9, P245, DOI 10.1177/1359105304040890
Moosavi S, 2019, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00683
Najarian LM, 1996, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V35, P374, DOI 10.1097/00004583-
199603000-00020
Najarian LM, 2001, J TRAUMA STRESS, V14, P511, DOI 10.1023/A:1011108622795
Neria Y, 2008, PSYCHOL MED, V38, P467, DOI 10.1017/S0033291707001353
Norris FH, 2009, SOC SCI MED, V68, P2190, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.043
Pietrzak RH, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038964
Quarshie ENB, 2018, COGENT PSYCHOL, V5, DOI 10.1080/23311908.2018.1489481
Regional Municipality of Wood Buffalo, 2018, MUN CENS REP 2018
Sasaki Y, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-55953-7
Shalaby R, 2022, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/bs12010013
Shalev A.Y, 2000, STRESS MANAGEMENT DE
Shim R, 2014, PSYCHIAT ANN, V44, P22, DOI 10.3928/00485713-20140108-04
Smith BW, 2008, INT J BEHAV MED, V15, P194, DOI 10.1080/10705500802222972
Smith BW, 2013, RESILIENCE CHILDREN, P167, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_13,
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_13]
Tang BH, 2014, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-623
Tunstall Sylvia, 2006, Journal of Water and Health, V4, P365, DOI
10.2166/wh.2006.031
Wang XD, 2000, PSYCHIAT CLIN NEUROS, V54, P427, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-
1819.2000.00732.x
Watters ER, 2023, TRAUMA VIOLENCE ABUS, V24, P231, DOI 10.1177/15248380211029397
Ying LH, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0089401
NR 60
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 23
AR 16153
DI 10.3390/ijerph192316153
PG 16
(SSCI)
Health
GA 6Y8HP
UT WOS:000897329800001
PM 36498243
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lachlan, KA
Gilbert, C
Spence, PR
Hutter, E
AF Lachlan, Kenneth A.
Gilbert, Christine
Spence, Patric R.
Hutter, Emily
TI Frozen while I scan: Examining the impact of media dependencies,
socioeconomic status and rumination on preparation behaviours related to
Hurricane Dorian
SO JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE crisis communication; emergency management; human factors; media;
preparation
ID RISK; PERCEPTIONS; DEPRESSION; DISASTER; COVERAGE; RACE
AB Building on previous crisis and risk literature, this study investigates media
dependencies, information seeking, preparation behaviours and rumination tendencies
among individuals living on the Atlantic seaboard who were impacted by Hurricane
Dorian in 2019. Consistent with previous work, participants continue to perceive
television, a legacy media, as the most important source of information-both
initially and throughout the event. This study also analysed the extent to which
information seeking, preparation behaviours and rumination tendencies may be
related, drawing from recent work that has suggested that rumination tendencies may
help explain sex differences in information seeking. Results suggested that those
with higher rumination tendencies were more likely to perceive all sources of
information as very important, with the exception of television, which was heavily
relied upon by most participants. Rumination tendencies did not explain the
variance in any of the three preparation behaviours examined. Overall, most
participants had an emergency kit and an evacuation plan in place, while
socioeconomic status positively predicted home preparation.
C1 [Lachlan, Kenneth A.; Gilbert, Christine; Hutter, Emily] Univ Connecticut,
Storrs, CT USA.
[Spence, Patric R.] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA.
C3 University of Connecticut; State University System of Florida;
University of Central Florida
RP Lachlan, KA (corresponding author), Univ Connecticut, Dept Commun, 337 Mansfield
Dr Unit 1259, Storrs, CT 06269 USA.
EM Kenneth.lachlan@uconn.edu
RI Lachlan, Kenneth A/A-1326-2008
OI Lachlan, Kenneth/0000-0002-7856-2797
FU National Science Foundation [1953270]; Direct For Social, Behav &
Economic Scie; Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1953270] Funding
Source: National Science Foundation
FX National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 1953270
CR [Anonymous], 2005, GLOBAL ENV CHANGE B, DOI [10.1016/j.hazards.2006.05.001, DOI
10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2006.05.001]
[Anonymous], 2005, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, DOI [10.1016/j.hazards.2006.10.002, DOI
10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2006.10.002]
[Anonymous], 1990, SEX DIFFERENCES DEPR, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781503621640
[Anonymous], COMMUNICATION TERROR
Associated Press, 2019, ASS PRESS 1115
Blendon RJ, 2007, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V122, P167, DOI 10.1177/003335490712200206
Burke J. A., 2010, J EMERGENCY MANAGEME, V8, P27, DOI DOI 10.5055/JEM.2010.0030
Chan MPS, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V212, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.007
Chang CC, 2012, HEALTH COMMUN, V27, P111, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2011.569004
Comstock RD, 2005, DISASTERS, V29, P277, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00291.x
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555
Day AM, 2019, COMMUN STUD, V70, P352, DOI 10.1080/10510974.2019.1567566
Demuth JL, 2011, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V3, P177, DOI 10.1175/2011WCAS1061.1
Dudo AD, 2007, SCI COMMUN, V28, P429, DOI 10.1177/1075547007302211
10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335
Engel K, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V73, P859, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1116-5
Frisby CM, 2002, J BLACK STUD, V32, P489, DOI 10.1177/002193470203200501
GREENBERG BS, 1964, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V28, P225, DOI 10.1086/267239
Hammer B, 2002, WEATHER FORECAST, V17, P577, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(2002)017<0577:RTWDTM>2.0.CO;2
Helsloot I, 2004, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V12, P98, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0966-
0879.2004.00440.X
Hoekstra S, 2011, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V3, P128, DOI 10.1175/2011WCAS1076.1
Hutchins SS, 2009, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V99, pS261, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161505
Isoda Y., 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI [10.3390/ijgi8100429.Scopus, DOI
10.3390/IJGI8100429.SCOPUS]
Lachlan K, 2010, RISK ANAL, V30, P1872, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01511.x
Lachlan KA, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V54, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.027
Lachlan KA, 2014, COMMUN STUD, V65, P500, DOI 10.1080/10510974.2014.956941
Lachlan KA, 2014, COMMUN STUD, V65, P519, DOI 10.1080/10510974.2014.956940
Lachlan KA, 2009, BEHAV SCI TERROR POL, V1, P101, DOI 10.1080/19434470902771683
Lazo JK, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P785, DOI 10.1175/2008BAMS2604.1
Martin NC, 2016, J CLIN CHILD ADOLESC, V45, P335, DOI
10.1080/15374416.2014.982279
McNeish D, 2018, PSYCHOL METHODS, V23, P412, DOI 10.1037/met0000144
Miller, 2010, ETHNICALLY MARGINALI, P317
NEMA, 2020, NEMA UPD DEATH TOLL
Nolen-Hoeksema S, 2000, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V109, P504, DOI 10.1037/0021-
843X.109.3.504
NOLENHOEKSEMA S, 1993, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V102, P20, DOI 10.1037/0021-
843X.102.1.20
NOLENHOEKSEMA S, 1991, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V61, P115, DOI 10.1037/0022-
3514.61.1.115
NOLENHOEKSEMA S, 1994, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V67, P92, DOI 10.1037/0022-
3514.67.1.92
NOLENHOEKSEMA S, 1987, PSYCHOL BULL, V101, P259, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.259
Peacock WG, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P149, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2003)4:3(149)
Perse E., 2002, COMMUNICATION TERROR, P39
Reuter C, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P41, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12196
Rogers E. M., 2003, DIFFUSION INNOVATION, V5th
Rowel R, 2012, HEALTH PROMOT PRACT, V13, P124, DOI 10.1177/1524839910390312
Rufat S, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P1131, DOI
10.1080/24694452.2018.1535887
SATTLER DN, 1995, INT J STRESS MANAGE, V2, P133, DOI 10.1007/BF01740299
Sherman-Morris K, 2020, SOUTHEAST GEOGR, V60, P23, DOI 10.1353/sgo.2020.0003
Spence, 2019, 105 ANN C NAT COMM A
Spence P.R., 2020, 106 ANN C NAT COMM A
Spence P.R., 2019, J STRATEGIC INNOVATI, V14, P16, DOI DOI
10.33423/JSIS.V14I1.984
Spence P. R., 2008, J EMERGENCY MANAGEME, V6, P11, DOI [10.5055/JEM.2008.0009,
DOI 10.5055/JEM.2008.0009]
Spence P.R., 2010, J EMERGENCY MANAGEME, V8, P47, DOI DOI 10.5055/JEM.2010.0032
Spence PR, 2007, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V18, P394, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2007.0047
Spence PR, 2006, COMMUN RES REP, V23, P217, DOI 10.1080/08824090600796435
Spence PR, 2007, J BLACK STUD, V37, P539, DOI 10.1177/0021934706296192
Spitzer S.P., 1965, KENNEDY ASSASSINATIO, P99
Stokes C, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P194, DOI 10.1111/disa.12192
Treynor W, 2003, COGNITIVE THER RES, V27, P247, DOI 10.1023/A:1023910315561
Westerman D, 2014, J COMPUT-MEDIAT COMM, V19, P171, DOI 10.1111/jcc4.12041
Wozniak JD, 2020, PSYCHOL TRAUMA-US, V12, P227, DOI 10.1037/tra0000505
Xu Z, 2020, INTERNET RES, V30, P695, DOI 10.1108/INTR-12-2018-0517
NR 67
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 14
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0966-0879
EI 1468-5973
J9 J CONTING CRISIS MAN
JI J. Cont. Crisis Manag.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 29
IS 4
BP 357
EP 367
DI 10.1111/1468-5973.12362
EA MAY 2021
PG 11
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA WU1SP
UT WOS:000648561200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kumar, A
Masane, Y
Dhakhwa, S
AF Kumar, Awkash
Masane, Yash
Dhakhwa, Shraddha
TI Disaster management plan for residential-cum-commercial property in
Mumbai: a case study
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Environment; Disaster; Fire; Earthquake; Flood
ID HEALTH IMPACT; GIS
AB A residential-cum-commercial property consisting of seven buildings with
approximately 50 m height in Mumbai city of India was considered for disaster
management study. The main objective of this study was to minimize all the losses
of any kind of possible disasters like fire, lighting, cyclone, flood, earthquake
and terrorist attack. Each disaster was imposed on the project design and responses
were formulated in order to minimize the damage to lives and resources. Public
address systems and alarm systems have been installed at the project site to alert
the residents about the disasters and to give directions which are to be followed.
Fire mitigation and detection equipment are also present at the project site. In
this study, accessibility of the fire tender from each side of the buildings has
been analyzed. Assembly points for emergencies have been designated for the
project. Lightning arrestors have been installed for protection against lightning
strikes. Natural drainage network within 1 km radius from the project site has been
analyzed using geographic information system to prevent the. CCTV for security,
signages for evacuation plan and rescue equipment have been installed throughout
the project site to save lives in priority. The key findings are the losses due to
disasters could be minimized with proper planning which might have cost for
execution, operation and maintenance. This comprehensive study can be referred for
planning to minimize the loss of lives and resources in high-rise buildings in case
of disasters in urban area.
C1 [Kumar, Awkash; Masane, Yash; Dhakhwa, Shraddha] SAGE Sustainable Approach Green
Environm, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
RP Kumar, A (corresponding author), SAGE Sustainable Approach Green Environm,
Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
EM awkash.narayan@gmail.com
CR Allen MR, 2016, J ASTRON TELESC INST, V2, DOI 10.1117/1.JATIS.2.2.029001
Aydin N, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120341
Dakhil A, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P47, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00912-5
Etinay N, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.074
Gunes AE, 2000, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V126, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2000)126:3(136)
Huck A, 2020, CITIES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102573
Jaysawal D., 2014, INT J APPL SOCIOL, V4, P60
Kumar A, 2019, ASIAN J ATMOS ENVIRO, V13, P11, DOI 10.5572/ajae.2019.13.1.011
Kumar A, 2016, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V66, P470, DOI 10.1080/10962247.2016.1143887
Milenkovi M, 2016, INT SCI C ICT E BUSI, V2016, P202, DOI [10.15308/sinteza-
2016-202-207, DOI 10.15308/SINTEZA-2016-202-207]
NDMA, 2007, NAT DIST MAN GUID PR
NDMA, 2012, NAT DIS MAN GUID NAT
NDMA, 2010, NAT DIS MAN GUID INC
Patel RB, 2012, PREHOSPITAL DISASTER, V27, P194, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X12000568
Pramod P, 2006, INDIAN STREAMS RES J, DOI [10.1787/9789264009950-22-en, DOI
10.1787/9789264009950-22-EN]
Sanderson D., 2014, ASIAN J ENV DISASTER, V6, P131
Stikova E., 2016, S E EUROPEAN J PUBLI, V2016, P5, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/SEEJPH-2015-106, DOI 10.4119/UNIBI/SEEJPH-2015-106]
Su Q, 2011, ENERG ECON, V33, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.11.005
UNDP, 2012, DIS MAN IND DIS RISK
NR 19
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 22
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD AUG
PY 2021
VL 23
IS 8
BP 12598
EP 12614
DI 10.1007/s10668-020-01129-7
EA JAN 2021
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
GA SY2NV
UT WOS:000604534700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhang, Q
Chen, ZY
Li, YL
Yu, S
Wang, L
Zhou, XB
Wu, SF
AF Zhang, Qiang
Chen, Zuyu
Li, Yanlong
Yu, Shu
Wang, Lin
Zhou, Xingbo
Wu, Shuifeng
TI Quantitative assessment on landslide dam risks and mitigation: an
in-depth study on the Baige lake breach
SO ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE Dam breach; Baige barrier lake; Flood evaluation; Emergency measures
ID FLOOD; EROSION; MODEL; RIVER; INUNDATION
AB The emergency response actions against an impending barrier lake breach flood
involve multiple social and engineering approaches, such as evacuating the affected
people downstream, lowering the breach opening by excavating a diversion channel,
and regulating the downstream hydraulic structures if present. Analytical
evaluation of the breach flood under different scenarios of emergency mitigation is
crucial for a rational decision when a rescue plan is being made. This study
reviews the emergency responses undertaken for the "11.03" Baige barrier lake that
occurred in the Jinsha River of China in 2018, which involved the evacuation of
27,500 downstream people in the Shangri-La and Lijiang tourist attraction areas and
the engineering measures by excavating a diversion channel and treating the two
existing dams. The numerical model for dam breach and flood routing analysis
performed by the computer programs DB-IWHR and Hec-Ras allowed quantitative risk
assessments for various scenarios of mitigation approaches. The results showed that
the excavation of the 15-m-deep diversion channel reduced the peak flood discharge
from 39,580 to 31,000 m(3)/s. The demolition of the Suwalong cofferdam avoided a
cascade dam failure that would have created a peak flood of 22,841 m(3)/s,
resulting in a 2.25-m-high additional inundation on an area of 1.13 x 10(5) m(2).
The numerical assessment confirms the substantial reduction in the social and
economic impact achieved by pre-emptying the Liyuan Hydropower Station, which
avoided a sustained 10-h spillway discharge of 12,231 m(3)/s.
C1 [Zhang, Qiang; Chen, Zuyu; Li, Yanlong; Wang, Lin] Xian Univ Technol, State Key
Lab Ecohydraul Northwest Arid Reg, Xian 710048, Peoples R China.
[Chen, Zuyu; Yu, Shu; Wu, Shuifeng] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res,
State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
[Zhou, Xingbo] China Renewable Energy Engn Inst, Beijing 100120, Peoples R
China.
C3 Xi'an University of Technology; China Institute of Water Resources &
Hydropower Research
RP Chen, ZY (corresponding author), Xian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Ecohydraul
Northwest Arid Reg, Xian 710048, Peoples R China.; Chen, ZY (corresponding author),
China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water
Cycle River, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
EM zhang_qiang333@163.com; chenzuyu@cashq.ac.cn; liyanlong@xaut.edu.cn;
yushu@iwhr.com; ruoshuiya@163.com; zhou_xingbo@126.com; 52awu@163.com
FU National Natural Sciences Foundation of China Fund Project [41731289,
51879285]; Consultation and Evaluation project of the Chinese Academy of
Sciences [2018-Z02-A-008]; National Key R&D Program of China
[2018YFC0407103]
FX AcknowledgementsThe research work was supported by the National Natural
Sciences Foundation of China Fund Project (Grants No. 41731289 and No.
51879285). We further acknowledge support from the Consultation and
Evaluation project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2018-Z02-A-008),
the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0407103).
CR An HC, 2021, LANDSLIDES, V18, P1625, DOI 10.1007/s10346-020-01595-0
[Anonymous], 1985, OPEN CHANNEL HYDRAUL
Becker J. S., 2007, Natural Hazards Review, V8, P35, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2007)8:2(35)
Brown R, 1977, P DAM BREAK FLOOD RO
Brunner GW, 2021, HEC RAS RIVER ANAL S
Butt MJ, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P241, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0361-8
Cai YJ, 2020, SCI CHINA TECHNOL SC, V63, P1164, DOI 10.1007/s11431-019-1475-y
Cao Z, 2011, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V4, P104, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01098.x
Chang DS, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P933, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-933-2010
Chang LQ., 1934, GEOL REV, V3, P251
Chen C, 2020, J HYDROL, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124603
Chen SJ, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000285
Chen Z, 2021, CATENA, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105337
Chen ZY, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1408
Chen ZY, 2015, J HYDRAUL ENG, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000965
CHEN ZuYu, 2020, SCIENTIA SINICA TECH, V50, P763, DOI [10.1360/SST-2019-0297,
DOI 10.1360/SST-2019-0297]
Chen ZY., 2019, YANGTZE RIVER, V50, P1, DOI DOI 10.16232/J.CNKI.1001-
4179.2019.05.001
Costa JE, 1985, FLOODS DAM FAILURES
Cristofano EA, 1965, METHOD COMPUTING ERO
Dat TT, 2019, INT J EARTH SCI ENG, V12, P60, DOI DOI 10.21276/IJEE.2019.12.0106
Ding C, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112253
Evans SG, 2002, GEOLOGICAL SOC AM, V411
Fan XM, 2021, EARTH-SCI REV, V218, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103646
Fan XM, 2020, LANDSLIDES, V17, P147, DOI 10.1007/s10346-019-01313-5
Fread D.L., 1988, BREACH EROSION MODEL
9496(1995)121:1(90)
Gaucher J, 2010, J HYDRAUL ENG, V136, P901, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000274
Geospatial Date Cloud (GDC), 2020, ASTER GDEM 30M RES D
James A, 2012, LANDSLIDES, V9, P529, DOI 10.1007/s10346-012-0333-9
Lacasse S, 2009, LANDSLIDES - DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, P31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-
540-69970-5_3
Ma LP., 2019, YANGTZE RIVER, V50, P8
Macchione F, 2008, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V134, P1697, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2008)134:12(1697)
Massey CI, 2010, LANDSLIDES, V7, P303, DOI 10.1007/s10346-009-0180-5
Pappenberger F, 2005, J HYDROL, V302, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036
Patro S, 2009, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V37, P107, DOI 10.1007/s12524-009-0002-1
Peng M, 2014, ENG GEOL, V180, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.016
Peng M, 2012, LANDSLIDES, V9, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10346-011-0271-y
Sattar A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V668, P362, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.388
Shi ZM, 2017, LANDSLIDES, V14, P269, DOI 10.1007/s10346-016-0699-1
Shi ZM, 2015, ENG GEOL, V193, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.021
SINGH VP, 1988, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V114, P21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1988)114:1(21)
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2020, US MAN HEC RAS RIV A
Walder JS., 1997, IAHS AISH PUBL, V33, P217
Wang L, 2016, ENG GEOL, V209, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.027
Wang ZY, 2012, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V65, P1067, DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0863-1
Wang ZG, 2006, ADV WATER RESOUR, V29, P1528, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.009
Worni R, 2014, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V224, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.06.031
Wu WM, 2013, J HYDRAUL ENG, V139, P837, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000741
[许强 Xu Qiang], 2018, [工程地质学报, Journal of Engineering Geology], V26, P1534
Yang J., 2022, ENG GEOL, V304, DOI [10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106676, DOI
10.1016/J.ENGGEO.2022.106671]
Yang MD, 2011, ENG GEOL, V123, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.07.006
Yang QY, 2020, ENG GEOL, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105765
Yu S, 2021, ENG FAIL ANAL, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105441
Zhang LM, 2019, LANDSLIDES, V16, P1965, DOI 10.1007/s10346-019-01247-y
Zhang LM., 2016, DAM FAILURE MECH RIS, DOI 10.1002/9781118558522
Zhang SL, 2020, ENG GEOL, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105819
Zhao TL, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI [10.1007/s12665-017, 10.1007/s12665-
017-7217-1]
Zhong QM, 2021, EARTH-SCI REV, V216, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103597
Zhong QM, 2020, ENG GEOL, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105709
Zhong QM, 2018, ENG FAIL ANAL, V90, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.032
Zhong QM, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1385, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2492-9
Zhou XB, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P249, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04167-6
Zhou XB, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1933, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1940-2
Zuyu Chen, 2020, Dam Breach Modelling and Risk Disposal. Proceedings of the
First International Conference on Embankment Dams (ICED 2020). Springer Series in
Geomechanics and Geoengineering (SSGG), P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-46351-9_1
NR 65
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 8
U2 8
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 1866-6280
EI 1866-6299
J9 ENVIRON EARTH SCI
JI Environ. Earth Sci.
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 82
IS 4
AR 96
DI 10.1007/s12665-023-10778-6
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Water Resources
GA 8P3AA
UT WOS:000926396600001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Sultana, P
Thompson, PM
Wesselink, A
AF Sultana, Parvin
Thompson, Paul M.
Wesselink, Anna
TI Coping and resilience in riverine Bangladesh
LA English
DT Article
DE Bangladesh; erosion; flood; infrastructure; migration; socio-hydrology
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLOODPLAIN; VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT; FLOODS;
INSTITUTIONS; ADAPTATION; DISASTERS; TEMPORARY; HAZARDS
AB This paper investigates the impacts of two successive years of severe floods on
households, their coping strategies and resilience to riverine hazards in northern
Bangladesh. Based on focus groups and interviews with the same households after
floods in 2016 and 2017, we found a cumulative decline in assets through sale of
livestock and borrowing, and almost all households evacuated short term to higher
places. Three notable recent ways that vulnerable households use socio-hydrological
landscapes to enhance their resilience to hazards were revealed. Firstly, local
flood protection embankments were the main destination for evacuation and were
highly valued as safe places, although they breached and failed to protect the
land. Secondly, community organisations, formed mainly for livelihood enhancement,
took initiatives to provide warnings, to help households relocate during floods,
and to access relief and rehabilitation services. Thirdly, seasonal migration by
men, particularly to urban areas, is an important element of long-term coping and
resilience based on diversified livelihoods for about 70% of these rural
households. Although the unintended use of infrastructure, social capital and urban
opportunities all form part of coping and resilience strategies in hazardous
riverine landscapes, the high mobility that they are based on is not supported by
enabling policies.
C1 [Sultana, Parvin; Thompson, Paul M.] Middlesex Univ, Flood Hazard Res Ctr,
London NW4 4BT, England.
C3 Middlesex University
RP Sultana, P (corresponding author), Middlesex Univ, Flood Hazard Res Ctr, London
NW4 4BT, England.
EM parvin@agni.com
RI Sultana, Arifin/AAF-4581-2020; Wesselink, Anna J/L-1791-2013
OI Sultana, Arifin/0000-0002-1014-5284; Wesselink, Anna
J/0000-0003-1120-3359
FU Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Urbanising Deltas
of the World programme [W 07.69.110]
FX This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific
Research (NWO) Urbanising Deltas of the World programme under grant
number W 07.69.110.
CR AHSAN R, 2014, INT J CLIM CHANGE IM, V5, P1, DOI DOI
10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/V05I02/37204
[Anonymous], 2013, INT J SCI TECHNOLOGY
[Anonymous], DISASTER PREVENTION
[Anonymous], 1991, RIVERBANK EROSION FL
[Anonymous], 2011, MIGR GLOB ENV CHANG
[Anonymous], 1980, FAMINE S ASIA POLITI
[Anonymous], 2000, RIV CHARS BANGL ENV
[Anonymous], 1998, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO
[Anonymous], 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, DOI DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2472
Ayeb-Karlsson S, 2016, SUSTAIN SCI, V11, P679, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0379-z
Baqee A., 1998, PEOPLING LAND ALLAH
BRAMMER H, 1990, GEOGR J, V156, P12, DOI 10.2307/635431
Brammer H., 2004, CAN BANGLADESH BE PR
Brammer H, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V1, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2013.10.001
Brouwer R, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P313, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00884.x
Dewan C, 2015, WATER INT, V40, P401, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2015.1025196
Etzold B, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P18, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2013.833078
Ferdous MR, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P5159, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-5159-
2018
HAQUE CE, 1988, HUM ECOL, V16, P421, DOI 10.1007/BF00891651
HAQUE CE, 1993, WORLD DEV, V21, P93, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(93)90139-Z
Indra D, 2000, RETHINKING REFUGE DI, VVIII, P163
Islam M. S., 2012, Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, V5,
P251
Joarder MAM, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1511, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.026
Linton J, 2008, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V98, P630, DOI 10.1080/00045600802046619
Mamun MZ, 1996, DISASTERS, V20, P68, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1996.tb00516.x
Mirza MMQ, 2002, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V12, P127, DOI 10.1016/S0959-
3780(02)00002-X
Mutton D, 2004, DISASTERS, V28, P41, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2004.00242.x
Paul BK, 1997, GEOFORUM, V28, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(97)00004-3
Penning-Rowsell EC, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V27, pS44, DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.009
Philip S., 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, DOI [10.5194/hess-2018-379, DOI
10.5194/HESS-2018-379]
Rahman MR., 2010, JOUR SCI FOUND, V8, P55, DOI DOI 10.3329/JSF.V8I1-2.14627
Salauddin M, 2011, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V22, P620, DOI 10.1108/14777831111159743
Sivapalan M, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8426
Sultana N, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1209, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0291-5
Sultana P, 2010, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V9, P26, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2010.SI05
Sultana P, 2008, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V6, P339, DOI
10.1080/15715124.2008.9635361
Wesselink A, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1196
Yu D. J., 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P1336, DOI DOI 10.1002/2016WR019746
[No title captured]
[No title captured]
[No title captured]
NR 42
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 1
U2 23
PI ABINGDON
SN 1747-7891
EI 1878-0059
JI Environ. Hazards
PD JAN 1
PY 2020
VL 19
IS 1
SI SI
BP 70
EP 89
DI 10.1080/17477891.2019.1665981
EA SEP 2019
PG 20
GA JZ5DV
UT WOS:000486557600001
OA Green Accepted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhai, CW
Reilly, AC
Guikema, SD
AF Zhai, Chengwei
Reilly, Allison C.
Guikema, Seth D.
TI Individual learning as a driver of changes in community vulnerability
under repeated hurricanes and changing climate
SO RISK ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
DE agent-based model; hurricane mitigation; learning; repeated hazards
ID MITIGATION BEHAVIOR; DECISION-MAKING; POWER-SYSTEM; MODEL; RISK;
EVACUATION; SIMULATION; FLORIDA; IMPACT; DAMAGE
AB The risks from singular natural hazards such as a hurricane have been
extensively investigated in the literature. However, little is understood about how
individual and collective responses to repeated hazards change communities and
impact their preparation for future events. Individual mitigation actions may drive
how a community's resilience evolves under repeated hazards. In this paper, we
investigate the effect that learning by homeowners can have on household mitigation
decisions and on how this influences a region's vulnerability to natural hazards
over time, using hurricanes along the east coast of the United States as our case
study. To do this, we build an agent-based model (ABM) to simulate homeowners'
adaptation to repeated hurricanes and how this affects the vulnerability of the
regional housing stock. Through a case study, we explore how different initial
beliefs about the hurricane hazard and how the memory of recent hurricanes could
change a community's vulnerability both under current and potential future
hurricane scenarios under climate change. In some future hurricane environments,
different initial beliefs can result in large differences in the region's long-term
vulnerability to hurricanes. We find that when some homeowners mitigate soon after
a hurricane-when their memory of the event is the strongest-it can help to
substantially decrease the vulnerability of a community.
C1 [Zhai, Chengwei; Guikema, Seth D.] Univ Michigan, Dept Ind & Operat Engn, Ann
Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
[Zhai, Chengwei] One Concern Inc, Menlo Pk, CA USA.
[Reilly, Allison C.] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, College Pk, MD
USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan; University System
of Maryland; University of Maryland College Park
RP Zhai, CW (corresponding author), 855 Oak Grove Ave, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA.
EM czhai@oneconcern.com
RI Reilly, Allison/HGA-8219-2022
OI Zhai, Chengwei/0000-0002-8508-9838
FU National Academies Gulf Research Program Early-Career Research
Fellowship; National Science Foundation [1331399]; Divn Of Social and
Economic Sciences; Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1331399]
FX This research was supported by the National Academies Gulf Research
Program Early-Career Research Fellowship and National Science Foundation
(grant number 1631409) and the National Science Foundation (grant number
1331399). The support of the sponsor is gratefully acknowledged. Any
opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations presented in this
paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views
of the National Academies or National Science Foundation (contributors,
2017). In addition, Map data copyrighted OpenStreetMap contributors and
available from
CR Abebe YA, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109317
Abebe YA, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V111, P483, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.10.015
An L, 2012, ECOL MODEL, V229, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010
[Anonymous], 2013, LEARN BEHAV
[Anonymous], 1993, ANAND
[Anonymous], 2009, P 11 AMERICAS C WIND
[Anonymous], 2017, REUTERS 0903
[Anonymous], 2014, THESIS CLEMSON U
[Anonymous], 2022, OPENSTREETMAP CONTRI
[Anonymous], 2006, NAT HAZARD REV, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2006)7:2(94), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(94)]
Billari FC, 2006, CONTRIB ECON
Bonabeau E, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P7280, DOI 10.1073/pnas.082080899
Bouris, 2006, J POLIT, V68, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00382_13.x, DOI
10.1111/J.1468]
Brandi U, 2011, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT,
2ND EDITION, P23
Breen R, 1999, RATION SOC, V11, P463, DOI 10.1177/104346399011004005
Burchfield EK, 2016, WINT SIMUL C PROC, P1678, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2016.7822216
Chiew E, 2020, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V12, P31, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0139.1
Colten CE, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V48, P355, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9267-x
Dixon L., 2006, NATL FLOOD INSURANCE
English EC, 2017, J STRUCT ENG, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001750
Farmer JD, 2009, NATURE, V460, P685, DOI 10.1038/460685a
Feldman MW, 1996, ANTHROPOL SCI, V104, P209, DOI 10.1537/ase.104.209
Friedman D, 1998, SOUTHERN ECON J, V65, P366, DOI 10.2307/1060679
Gorman DM, 2006, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V96, P2055, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2005.063289
Haer T, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770
Haer T, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P1977, DOI 10.1111/risa.12740
Hamel L., 2018, ONE YEAR STORM TEXAS
Han SR, 2009, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V94, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2008.02.018
HOLLAND GJ, 1980, MON WEATHER REV, V108, P1212, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0493(1980)108<1212:AAMOTW>2.0.CO;2
Jain V.K., 2005, NAT HAZARDS REV, V6, P88, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2005)6:2(88), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2005)6:2(88)]
Jain VK, 2007, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V13, P31, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-
0342(2007)13:1(31)
Johannessen A, 2019, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V29, P144, DOI 10.1002/eet.1843
JOHNSON MK, 1987, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V38, P631, DOI
10.1146/annurev.psych.38.1.631
KAHNEMAN D, 1979, ECONOMETRICA, V47, P263, DOI 10.2307/1914185
Knutson TR, 2004, J CLIMATE, V17, P3477, DOI [10.1175/1520-
0442(2004)017<3477:IOCWOS>2.0.CO;2, 10.1175/1520-
0442(2004)017<3477:IOCWOS>2.0.CO;2]
Krause T, 2006, INT J ELEC POWER, V28, P599, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.03.002
Lee JS, 2015, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V18, DOI 10.18564/jasss.2897
Lien C, 2014, J COMMUN HEALTH, V39, P599, DOI 10.1007/s10900-013-9805-7
Logan TM, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P526, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0137-6
P2, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574234
Maryland Department of Planning, 2016, US
Mathys C, 2011, FRONT HUM NEUROSCI, V5, DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00039
Meehl GA, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P994, DOI 10.1126/science.1098704
Mendelsohn R, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P205, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1357
Meyer RJ, 2012, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V45, P25, DOI 10.1007/s11166-012-9146-4
Mileti DS, 1997, SOC PROBL, V44, P89, DOI 10.1525/sp.1997.44.1.03x0214f
Nelson BL, 1995, MANAGE SCI, V41, P1935, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.41.12.1935
Orooji F, 2017, J ARCHIT ENG, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000269
Panait L, 2005, AUTON AGENT MULTI-AG, V11, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10458-005-2631-2
Peacock WG, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P149, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2003)4:3(149)
Phillips-Wren G, 2019, J DECIS SYST, V28, P63, DOI 10.1080/12460125.2019.1646509
Pinelli JP, 2004, J STRUCT ENG, V130, P1685, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9445(2004)130:11(1685)
Plotner S.C., 2017, BUILDING CONSTRUCTIO
Prell C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
Reilly AC, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P1087, DOI 10.1111/risa.13134
Reilly AC, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0182719
Reilly AC, 2017, P IEEE, V105, P1429, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2689720
Rose A., 2007, Natural Hazards Review, V8, P97, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2007)8:4(97)
Royal A, 2017, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V55, P41, DOI 10.1007/s11166-017-9263-1
RUBINSTEIN A, 1988, J ECON THEORY, V46, P145, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(88)90154-8
RUSSELL LA, 1995, ENVIRON BEHAV, V27, P744, DOI 10.1177/0013916595276002
Siegrist M, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P771, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x
Slotter R, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12667
Smallegan SM, 2016, COAST ENG, V110, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.01.005
Staid A, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V127, P535, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1272-3
Tonn G, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P884, DOI 10.1111/risa.13428
Tonn GL, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P1258, DOI 10.1111/risa.12939
Tsurushima A, 2019, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V11463, P138, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-
22270-3_11
UNDERWOOD BJ, 1964, J VERB LEARN VERB BE, V3, P112, DOI 10.1016/S0022-
5371(64)80028-1
van de Lindt JW, 2012, J PERFORM CONSTR FAC, V26, P739, DOI
10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000270
Walsh KJE, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P997, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00242.1
Wang C, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2651-z
White M.C., 2017, NBC NEWS 0916
Yau SC, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P184, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000035
Yu DJ, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V37, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.009
Zahran S, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2627, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.021
NR 83
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 12
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0272-4332
EI 1539-6924
J9 RISK ANAL
JI Risk Anal.
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 4
BP 762
EP 782
DI 10.1111/risa.13955
EA JUN 2022
PG 21
(SSCI)
GA D4XZ5
UT WOS:000807302400001
PM 35672878
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Takenouchi, K
Yamori, K
AF Takenouchi, Kensuke
Yamori, Katsuya
TI Synergistic Integration of Detailed Meteorological and Community
Information for Evacuation from Weather-Related Disasters: Proposal of a
"Disaster Response Switch"
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT 9th Conference of the
International-Society-for-Integrated-Disaster-Risk-Management (IDRiM)
CY OCT 02-04, 2018
CL Data61, Sydney, AUSTRALIA
SP Int Soc Integrated Disaster Risk Management
HO Data61
DE Community disaster prevention; Disaster response; High-resolution
forecasting model; Japan; Meteorological information; Risk communication
ID RISK PERCEPTION; MANAGEMENT; FLOOD; MODEL
AB Meteorological information used for disaster prevention has developed rapidly in
terms of both type and specificity. The latest forecasting models can predict
weather with very high resolutions that can characterize disaster risk at the local
level. However, this development can lead to an overdependency on the information
and a wait-and-see attitude by the public. At the same time, residents share and
use various types of information for disaster response, such as local conditions,
in addition to official disaster information. Our research in Japan verified the
practicality and efficiency of synergistically integrating these types of
information by examining actual evacuation cases. The current numerical forecasting
models sufficiently identify locality from the viewpoint of various administrative
scales such as prefectures, municipalities, and school districts, but the
improvements to these models have failed to improve residents' judgment in
successful evacuation cases. We therefore analyzed the relationship between
meteorological information and residents' disaster response and confirmed that they
were strongly correlated and were contributing factors in preventing disasters. We
revealed differences between a community's disaster prevention culture and the
disaster information provided. This led us to propose a new concept in community
disaster prevention that we call the "disaster response switch," which can serve as
a data-driven risk management tool for communities when used in combination with
advanced meteorological disaster information.
C1 [Takenouchi, Kensuke; Yamori, Katsuya] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst,
Uji, Kyoto 6060011, Japan.
C3 Kyoto University
RP Takenouchi, K (corresponding author), Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst,
Uji, Kyoto 6060011, Japan.
EM takenouchi.kensuke.3x@kyoto-u.ac.jp
OI Yamori, Katsuya/0000-0002-1840-9053
CR Alcantara-Ayala I, 2016, J MT SCI-ENGL, V13, P2079, DOI 10.1007/s11629-015-3823-
0
[Anonymous], 2018, ISS REAL HEAV RAINF
Asakura Y., 2016, P 2 WORKSH NOIS US G, P24
Aulov O, 2012, P IEEE, V100, P2812, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2195629
Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
Cabinet Office, 2005, CAS COUNT HEAV RAINF
Castro CP, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P411, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2698-x
Chen LC, 2006, NAT HAZARDS, V37, P209, DOI 10.1007/s11069-005-4669-5
Chou JS, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P661, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1206-4
Dudhia J, 2014, ASIA-PAC J ATMOS SCI, V50, P121, DOI 10.1007/s13143-014-0031-8
Fang SF, 2015, INFORM SYST FRONT, V17, P321, DOI 10.1007/s10796-013-9466-1
Fukunaga H, 2014, NHK MONTHLY REPORT B, V64, P2
GDPFS (Global Data-processing and Forecasting System), 2015, 2015 GDPFS NWP REP
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, 2014, FY2014 AR SURV PREF
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, 2018, GSI TIL SEAML PHOT M
Gierlach E, 2010, RISK ANAL, V30, P1539, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01451.x
Gojmerac I, 2016, P 2016 3 INT C INF C, P1
Isouchi C, 2018, 2018 S HEAV RAINF W
Japan Meteorological Agency, 2018, BROCH JAP MET AG
Japan Meteorological Agency, 2018, SURV REP UT MET INF
Japan Meteorological Agency, 2018, MET REP DIS HEAV RAI
Japan Meteorological Agency, 2017, JOINT WMO TECHN PROG
Japan Meteorological Agency, 2020, 60 YEAR HIST NUM WEA
Japan Meteorological Agency, 2019, MET REP DIS HEAV RAI
Kakimoto R, 2013, J NATURAL DISASTER S, V32, P37
Katada T, 2010, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, VF5-1, P106
Katada T, 1998, ADV RIVER ENG, V4, P291
Katada T., 2005, P P JSCE, V786, P77
Kayano T, 2011, HOKUSEI REV SCH EC H, V39, P39
Kaziya A, 2018, DISASTER INFORM, V16, P37
Kobayashi H, 2017, DISASTER INFORM, V15, P137
Kodama M, 2014, DISASTER INFORM, V12, P64
KUROKAWA M, 1986, JPN J PSYCHOL, V57, P91, DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.57.91
Kusano F, 2015, DISASTER INFORM, V13, P96
McLennan B.J, 2018, VOLUNTAS, V31, P316
Ministry of Education Culture Sports Science and Technology, 2015, FY2015 SCH
BAS SURV
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, 2013, FY2013 SURV ADM AFF
Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism, 2018, SUMM RIV PROJ 2018
NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation), 2018, MORN CLOS UP KES NO
Oikawa Y, 2005, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, V786/IV-67, P89
Oikawa Y, 2016, DISASTER INFORM, V14, P93
Pearce L, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P211, DOI 10.1023/A:1022917721797
Qadir J., 2016, J INT HUMANITARIAN A, V1, P12
Rui Zhu, 2011, 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Technology, P3789
Saito K, 2007, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V85B, P271, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.85B.271
Sayo-cho Tropical Storm Etau Disaster Investigation Committee, 2010, INV COMM
INV REP TRO
Su Y, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P555, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1730-x
Takahagi K, 2015, INT C NETWB INFO, P505, DOI 10.1109/NBiS.2015.75
TAKAHASHI K, 2014, P ASM PRESS VESS
Takenouchi K, 2015, J NATURAL DISASTER S, V34, P243
Takenouchi K, 2018, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, VF6-74, pI_31
Tanaka K., 2015, COGNITIVE STUDIES, V22, P356
Ushiyama M, 2014, J NATURAL DISASTER S, V33, P75
Usuda Y, 2017, J DISASTER RES, V12, P1002, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2017.p1002
Wei JC, 2016, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V67, P441, DOI 10.1002/asi.23386
Xiao Y, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1663, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1918-0
Yamori K., 2009, J DISASTER INF STUD, V7, P28
Yasumoto S., 2018, J JPN SOC NAT DISAST, V37, P33
Zhang X, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P2215, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0471-3
NR 63
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 2
U2 8
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2095-0055
EI 2192-6395
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 11
IS 6
SI SI
BP 762
EP 775
DI 10.1007/s13753-020-00317-3
EA NOV 2020
PG 14
Water Resources
(SSCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
GA PG1NQ
UT WOS:000594830400001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Pervaiz, F
Hummel, MA
AF Pervaiz, Fahad
Hummel, Michelle A.
TI Effects of Climate Change and Urbanization on Bridge Flood
Vulnerability: A Regional Assessment for Harris County, Texas
LA English
DT Article
AB The failure of stream-crossing bridges during flood events can endanger human
life, impede evacuation planning and emergency response efforts, and cause long-
term disruptions to transportation systems and local and regional economies.
Expanding urban development and changing precipitation patterns due to climate
change can increase the frequency and intensity of high-flow conditions at bridge
locations, potentially exacerbating flood-related damages. Thus, there is a
critical need to evaluate how shifts in extreme precipitation and continued urban
growth will affect peak flows and hydraulic conditions experienced by bridges. This
study applies hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to investigate the individual and
combined effects of climate change and urbanization on the magnitude of peak
discharge, bridge freeboard encroachment, and flow velocity at stream-crossing
bridge locations in 19 watersheds of Harris County, Texas. The developed framework
provides a screening tool to assess the vulnerability of regional bridge
infrastructure to high-flow events and to prioritize maintenance, retrofitting, and
replacement efforts. The model results demonstrate that peak flows during a 1%
annual exceedance probability event can increase by up to 40% by 2100 when
considering the combined impacts of climate change and urbanization, with changes
in precipitation generally contributing more than changes in land use. In 16 of the
19 studied watersheds, the 1% annual exceedance probability event is projected to
occur at least twice as frequently by 2100. Across the region, an additional 36
bridges experience loss of freeboard due to the effects of urbanization and climate
change, while notable increases in flow velocity (>= 10%) are observed at 93 bridge
locations, five of which are considered scour critical. Overall, the results of
this study show that climate change and urbanization will influence the hydraulic
conditions at bridge locations and therefore should be carefully accounted for in
the design, operation, and maintenance of bridge infrastructure in the future.
C1 [Pervaiz, Fahad; Hummel, Michelle A.] Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn,
Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
C3 University of Texas System; University of Texas Arlington
RP Hummel, MA (corresponding author), Univ Texas Arlington, Dept Civil Engn,
Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
EM fahad.pervaiz@uta.edu; michelle.hummel@uta.edu
FU Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) [0-7068]
FX AcknowledgmentsThis study was supported by the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) through Project 0-7068. The authors thank the
TxDOT research team, Habib Ahmari, and Simon Chao for their insightful
discussions and feedback.
CR Alipour A, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, P54, DOI 10.3141/2604-07
[Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
[Anonymous], 1966, OPEN CHANNEL FLOW
Batchabani E, 2016, J HYDROL ENG, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001461
Bhatkoti R, 2016, J HYDROL ENG, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001448
Chow V., 1959, HDB APPL HYDROLOGY
CLARK CO, 1945, T AM SOC CIV ENG, V110, P1419
Easterling D. R., 2017, CLIMATE SCI SPECIAL, VI, DOI [10.7930/J0H993CC, DOI
10.7930/J0H993CC]
FEMA, 2019, FLOOD INS STUD HARR
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2012, EV SCOR BRIDG
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration), 2022, NAT BRIDG INV
Flint MM, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000354
Furl C, 2018, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V15, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.12.001
Green WH, 1911, J AGR SCI, V4, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0021859600001441
Harris County Flood Control District, 2021, MOD MAP MAN SYST
Harris County Texas, 2018, POP REP
Khelifa A, 2013, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V19, P138, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000109
Kiaghadi A, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2711, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04099-1
Mondoro A, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000346
Montz B. E., 2000, FLOODS, V1, P116
Naderi N., 2018, NUMERICAL SIMULATION
Nasr A, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P192, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2019.1593003
Neumann JE, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V131, P97, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1037-4
Nielsen-Gammon J., 2020, ASSESSMENT HIST FUTU
NOAA, 2022, BILL DOLL WEATH CLIM
Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
Pregnolato M, 2022, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V22, P1559, DOI 10.5194/nhess-22-1559-
2022
Rainey JL, 2021, URBAN WATER J, V18, P375, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2021.1893356
Rusca M, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001911
Sohl TL, 2014, ECOL APPL, V24, P1015, DOI 10.1890/13-1245.1
Systamatics Cambridge, 2015, CAP AR METR PLANN OR
TxDOT (Texas DOT), 2020, SCOUR EV GUID
TxDOT (Texas DOT), 2021, TXDOT BRIDG INV
US Census Bureau, 2020, COUNT POP TOT
USACE, 2016, HEC HMS US MAN VERS
USACE, 2016, HEC RAS US MAN VERS
Watson R.T., 2000, RESPONSES ECOSYST EN, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2866-7_33
Westra S, 2014, REV GEOPHYS, V52, P522, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000464
Wright L, 2012, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V17, P939, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9354-2
Zhao G, 2016, J HYDROMETEOROL, V17, P2371, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0216.1
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PI RESTON
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
PD AUG 1
PY 2023
VL 24
IS 3
AR 04023025
PG 10
(SSCI)
GA J6YC6
UT WOS:001011046300009
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wong, SD
Broader, JC
Walker, JL
Shaheen, SA
AF Wong, Stephen D.
Broader, Jacquelyn C.
Walker, Joan L.
Shaheen, Susan A.
TI Understanding California wildfire evacuee behavior and joint choice
making
SO TRANSPORTATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Evacuations; Evacuee behavior; California wildfires; Latent class choice
model; Portfolio choice model; Joint choice modeling
ID WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE; TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; EVACUATION BEHAVIOR;
DECISION-MAKING; HURRICANE; RESPONSES; STAY; ALTERNATIVES; EXPERIENCES;
SIMULATION
AB For evacuations, people must make the critical decision to evacuate or stay
followed by a multi-dimensional choice composed of concurrent decisions of their
departure time, transportation mode, route, destination, and shelter type. These
choices have important impacts on transportation response and evacuation outcomes.
While extensive research has been conducted on hurricane evacuation behavior,
little is known about wildfire evacuation behavior. To address this critical
research gap, particularly related to joint choice-making in wildfires, we surveyed
individuals impacted by the 2017 December Southern California Wildfires (n = 226)
and the 2018 Carr Wildfire (n = 284). Using these data, we contribute to the
literature in two key ways. First, we develop two latent class choice models
(LCCMs) to evaluate the factors that influence the decision to evacuate or
stay/defend. We find an evacuation keen class and an evacuation reluctant class
that are influenced differently by mandatory evacuation orders. This nuance is
further supported by different membership of people to the classes based on
demographics and risk perceptions. Second, we develop two portfolio choice models
(PCMs), which jointly model choice dimensions to assess multi-dimensional
evacuation choice. We find several similarities between wildfires including a joint
preference for within-county and nighttime evacuations and a joint dislike for
within-county and highway evacuations. Altogether, this paper provides evidence of
heterogeneity in response to mandatory evacuation orders for wildfires, distinct
membership of populations to different classes of people for evacuating or
staying/defending, and clear correlation among key wildfire evacuation choices that
necessitates joint modeling to holistically understanding wildfire evacuation
behavior.
C1 [Wong, Stephen D.] Univ Alberta, Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
[Broader, Jacquelyn C.; Shaheen, Susan A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Transportat
Sustainabil Res Ctr, Berkeley, CA USA.
[Walker, Joan L.; Shaheen, Susan A.] Univ Calif Berkeley, Civil & Environm Engn,
Berkeley, CA USA.
C3 University of Alberta; University of California System; University of
California Berkeley
RP Wong, SD (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton,
AB, Canada.
EM stephenwong@ualberta.ca; jcbroader@berkeley.edu;
joanwalker@berkeley.edu; sshaheen@berkeley.edu
OI Shaheen, Susan/0000-0002-3350-856X; Broader,
Jacquelyn/0000-0003-3269-955X; Wong, Stephen/0000-0002-3638-3651
FU State of California; Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship
Program (DDETFP); US Department of Transportation; Federal Highway
Administration; Graduate Research Fellowship Program; Transportation
Sustainability Research Center at the University of California Berkeley
FX This study was made possible through funding received by the University
of California Institute of Transportation Studies from the State of
California via the Public Transportation Account and the Road Repair and
Accountability Act of 2017 (Senate Bill 1). The authors would like to
thank the State of California for its support of university-based
research, and especially for the funding received for this project. The
ability to explore this research topic was made possible through
generous funding from the Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship
Program (DDETFP), which is administered by the Federal Highway
Administration. The authors would like to thank the US Department of
Transportation and Federal Highway Administration for their support of
this research. The opportunity to explore this topic was also made
possible by the Graduate Research Fellowship Program, which is
administered by the National Science Foundation. The Transportation
Sustainability Research Center at the University of California Berkeley
also provided generous support to this research. The authors would also
like to thank the many local agencies and community organizations across
California for their assistance in distributing the surveys. Finally,
the authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and
constructive insights and comments to improve the paper.
CR Agbonile, 2018, SACRAMENTO BEE
10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00008-0]
[Anonymous], 1985, DISCRETE CHOICE ANAL
6988(2004)5:3(115)
[Anonymous], 2017, CAL FIRE THOMAS FIRE
[Anonymous], 2011, US FOR SERV GEN TECH
[Anonymous], 2018, CAL FIRE CARR FIRE
[Anonymous], 2017, CAL FIRE CREEK FIRE
[Anonymous], 2003, CHANGE B ENV HAZARDS, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2003.04.001,
10.1016/j.hazards.2003.04.001]
Asfaw HW, 2020, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V33, P1273, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2020.1745976
Baker, 1990, EVACUATION DECISION, P18
10.1177/028072709100900210
Beloglazov A, 2016, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V60, P144, DOI
10.1016/j.simpat.2015.10.002
Benight, 2004, COLORADO WILDFIRES 2
Bian, 2017, DEV MODE DESTINATION, V94
Brathwaite T, 2018, J CHOICE MODEL, V29, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jocm.2018.01.002
Chandler J., 2017, CURBED LA
Cote DW, 2014, FOREST CHRON, V90, P498, DOI 10.5558/tfc2014-100
Cova T. J., 2005, Transactions in GIS, V9, P603, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9671.2005.00237.x
Cova TJ, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P1662, DOI 10.3390/su3101662
Cova TJ, 2009, NAT HAZARDS REV, V10, P151, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-
6988(2009)10:4(151)
Cova TJ, 2003, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V37, P579, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00007-7
Cova TJ, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN A, V34, P2211, DOI 10.1068/a34251
CUTTER S, 1982, DISASTERS, V6, P116, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1982.tb00765.x
Deka, 2010, TRANSP RES BOARD 89
Dellaert BGC, 1997, LEISURE SCI, V19, P31, DOI 10.1080/01490409709512238
Dennison PE, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P181, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9032-y
6988(2002)3:1(12)
2867(01)00014-6, 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
DRABEK TE, 1971, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V1, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.1971.tb00362.x
DRABEK TE, 1992, DISASTERS, V16, P104, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1992.tb00384.x
El Zarwi F, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.004
Fischer HW., 1995, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V4, P30, DOI [10.1108/09653569510093414,
DOI 10.1108/09653569510093414]
Fu HQ, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P17
Goodman, 2008, SOCIAL CONTEXTS RESP
GREENE M, 1981, DISASTERS, V5, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1981.tb01129.x
Grigolon AB, 2012, TOURISM MANAGE, V33, P1174, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2011.11.013
Gruntfest, 1977, WHAT PEOPLE DID BIG
6996.0000074
Intini P, 2019, J TRANSP ENG A-SYST, V145, DOI 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000221
Johnson PF, 2012, FIRE TECHNOL, V48, P137, DOI 10.1007/s10694-011-0213-1
Keeley JE, 2004, J FOREST, V102, P26
Kuligowski, 2005, NBS, DOI [10.6028/NIST.TN.1471, DOI 10.6028/NIST.TN.1471]
Kuligowski E, 2013, FIRE TECHNOL, V49, P101, DOI 10.1007/s10694-011-0245-6
Kuligowski ED, 2020, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V29, P1120, DOI 10.1071/WF20038
Kumagai Y, 2004, J FOREST, V102, P28
Larsen JC, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.003
LEIK RK, 1981, COMMUNITY RESPONSE N
Li DP, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V54, P56, DOI
6988(2003)4:4(176), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176)]
Liu SR, 2012, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V46, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.003
Los Angeles County Fire Department, 2018, INC ARCH RYE FIR
Los Angeles Fire Department, 2017, SKIRB FIR UPD
Lovreglio R., 2016, MODELLING DECI UNPUB, DOI [10.13140/rg.2.1.1695.5281/1, DOI
10.13140/RG.2.1.1695.5281/1]
Lovreglio R, 2014, SAFETY SCI, V62, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.004
MacGregor, 2007, RISK PERCEPTION ADAP, V15
McCaffrey, 2013, DIFFERENCE INFORM NE
McCaffrey, 2011, UNDERSTANDING HOMEOW
McCaffrey SM, 2009, J FOREST, V107, P9
McGee TK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.012
McLennan J, 2019, FIRE TECHNOL, V55, P487, DOI 10.1007/s10694-018-0753-8
McLennan J, 2012, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V21, P915, DOI 10.1071/WF11061
McNeill IM, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P153, DOI 10.1071/WF12213
6996.0000083
Mozumder P, 2008, FOREST POLICY ECON, V10, P415, DOI
10.1016/j.forpol.2008.02.002
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Mutch RW, 2011, FIRE TECHNOL, V47, P357, DOI 10.1007/s10694-010-0171-z
Nguyen C, 2019, FIRE TECHNOL, V55, P517, DOI 10.1007/s10694-018-0770-7
NPS, 2018, TIM CARR FIR WHISK N
Paveglio T, 2014, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V23, P435, DOI 10.1071/WF13057
Paveglio TB, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P52, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2011.635185
Paveglio TB, 2010, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V9, P379, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2010.0060
Paz de Araujo, 2011, TRANSP RES BOARD 90
Perry R.W., 1983, CITIZEN RESPONSE VOL
PERRY RW, 1982, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V10, P97, DOI 10.2224/sbp.1982.10.1.97
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Ronchi E., 2013, FIRE SCI REV, V2, P7, DOI [10.1186/2193-0414-2-7, DOI
10.1186/2193-0414-2-7]
Ronchi E., 2017, E SANCTUARY OPEN MUL
Ronchi E, 2014, FIRE TECHNOL, V50, P1545, DOI 10.1007/s10694-013-0352-7
Serna J., 2019, LOS ANGELES TIMES
Siebeneck LK, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P2267, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0474-0
Stallings R.A., 1984, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V2, P11
Strahan, 2017, FACTORS INFLUENCING
Taylor, 2005, COMMUNICATING WILDLA, V32
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.033
Vaiciulyte S, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105122
van Cranenburgh S, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V43, P105, DOI
10.1016/j.tourman.2014.01.022
van Cranenburgh S, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, P64, DOI 10.3141/2449-07
Wahlqvist J, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105145
Walpole Hugh D., 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, P29, DOI
10.1007/s10669-019-09741-3
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
6988(2004)5:4(170), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(170)]
Wolshon B, 2007, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V133, P73, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2007)133:1(73)
Wong, REVEALED PREFERENCE
Wong S.D., 2020, REV CALIFORNIA WILDF
Wong SD, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101900
Woo M, 2017, TRANSPORT RES REC, P63, DOI 10.3141/2604-08
Yu, 2020, DYNAMIC STATIC MIXTU
NR 130
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 4
U2 14
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0049-4488
EI 1572-9435
J9 TRANSPORTATION
JI Transportation
PD AUG
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 4
BP 1165
EP 1211
DI 10.1007/s11116-022-10275-y
EA APR 2022
PG 47
(SSCI)
GA L1QD9
UT WOS:000777427400001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Gao, JY
Murao, O
Pei, XD
Dong, YT
AF Gao, Jingyi
Murao, Osamu
Pei, Xuanda
Dong, Yitong
TI Identifying Evacuation Needs and Resources Based on Volunteered
Geographic Information: A Case of the Rainstorm in July 2021, Zhengzhou,
China
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster prevention; volunteered geographic information; evacuation
needs; rainstorm; latent dirichlet allocation model; random forest
ID WATERLOGGING RISK-ASSESSMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLASH-FLOOD;
IDENTIFICATION; SHANGHAI; QUALITY; IMPACT
AB Recently, global climate change has led to a high incidence of extreme weather
and natural disasters. How to reduce its impact has become an important topic.
However, the studies that both consider the disaster's real-time geographic
information and environmental factors in severe rainstorms are still not enough.
Volunteered geographic information (VGI) data that was generated during disasters
offered possibilities for improving the emergency management abilities of decision-
makers and the disaster self-rescue abilities of citizens. Through the case study
of the extreme rainstorm disaster in Zhengzhou, China, in July 2021, this paper
used machine learning to study VGI issued by residents. The vulnerable people and
their demands were identified based on the SOS messages. The importance of various
indicators was analyzed by combining open data from socio-economic and built-up
environment elements. Potential safe areas with shelter resources in five
administrative districts in the disaster-prone central area of Zhengzhou were
identified based on these data. This study found that VGI can be a reliable data
source for future disaster research. The characteristics of rainstorm hazards were
concluded from the perspective of affected people and environmental indicators. The
policy recommendations for disaster prevention in the context of public
participation were also proposed.
C1 [Gao, Jingyi; Dong, Yitong] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Architecture & Bldg
Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808579, Japan.
[Murao, Osamu] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808572,
Japan.
[Pei, Xuanda] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Sci, Dept Earth Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808578,
Japan.
C3 Tohoku University; Tohoku University; Tohoku University
RP Gao, JY (corresponding author), Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Architecture &
Bldg Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808579, Japan.
EM gao.jingyi.s4@dc.tohoku.ac.jp
RI Gao, Jingyi/GZM-5515-2022
OI Gao, Jingyi/0000-0003-1887-3240; PEI, XUANDA/0000-0001-7767-8299; Murao,
Osamu/0000-0002-5696-7857
CR Al-Hourani A, 2014, IEEE GLOB COMM CONF, P2898, DOI 10.1109/GLOCOM.2014.7037248
[Anonymous], 2017, CHINA GDP SPATIAL DI, DOI 10.12078/2017121102
[Anonymous], 2003, PRACTICAL GUIDE SUPP
Arapostathis SG, 2021, INFORM SYST FRONT, V23, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s10796-021-
10105-z
Blei DM, 2012, COMMUN ACM, V55, P77, DOI 10.1145/2133806.2133826
Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993
Bondarenko Maksym, 2020, UOSIR, DOI 10.5258/SOTON/WP00685
Breiman L., 2001, RANDOM FORESTS
Chen JF, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2671, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04630-y
de Albuquerque JP, 2015, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V29, P667, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2014.996567
Dusse F, 2016, EXPERT SYST APPL, V45, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.007
Elwood S, 2012, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V102, P571, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2011.595657
Fang J, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.027
Feng Y, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7020039
Foody GM, 2015, CARTOGR J, V52, P336, DOI 10.1080/00087041.2015.1108658
Goodchild MF, 2012, SPAT STAT-NETH, V1, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.spasta.2012.03.002
Goodchild MF, 2010, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V3, P231, DOI 10.1080/17538941003759255
Granell C, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V59, P231, DOI
Guan MF, 2016, HYDROL PROCESS, V30, P543, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10624
Guo J, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109822
Han XH, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8040185
Harrell FE, 2015, SPRINGER SER STAT, P219, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7_10
Haworth B, 2015, GEOGR COMPASS, V9, P237, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12213
Haworth BT, 2018, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/feart.2018.00183
Henan Government Provincial Situation, 2021, HENAN OVERVIEW EBOL
Horita F. E. A., 2013, USE VOLUNTEERED GEOG
Hou JM, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P2335, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04782-x
Hu HB, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V83, P485, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2325-x
Hung KC, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V68, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.01.005
Janitza S, 2013, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-119
Jonietz D, 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6070202
Kankanamge N, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101097
Klonner C, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V12, P56, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00312-8
Klonner C, 2016, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V5, DOI 10.3390/ijgi5070103
Kusumo ANL, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V88, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.07.002
Li ZK, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V754, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142424
Liang PJ, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14090963
Liao XL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V663, P644, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.290
Lin T, 2018, HABITAT INT, V71, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.013
Liu YY, 2020, ATMOS RES, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104861
Liu YY, 2019, ATMOS RES, V227, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.05.006
Ma SQ, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100974
McCallum I, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P198, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0086-5
Mendez KM, 2019, METABOLOMICS, V15, DOI 10.1007/s11306-019-1612-4
Middleton SE, 2014, IEEE INTELL SYST, V29, P9, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2013.126
Ministry of Emergency Management of the People's Republic of China,
INVESTIGATION REPORT
Moghadas M, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11020114
Olszewski R, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105614
Parker CJ, 2013, APPL ERGON, V44, P886, DOI 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.04.013
Quan RS, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V73, P1569, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1156-x
Quan RS, 2010, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V61, P1113, DOI 10.1007/s12665-009-0431-8
Rollason E, 2018, J HYDROL, V562, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.002
Senaratne H, 2017, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V31, P139, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2016.1189556
Song X, 2022, IEEE T BIG DATA, V8, P397, DOI 10.1109/TBDATA.2020.2972871
Spinsanti L, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V43, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.005
Sterlacchini S, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V9, P129, DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-
0160-2
Su BN, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P23, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2064-4
Su X, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13193924
The State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2014, CIRC STAT COUNC ADJ
Tian H, 2020, 58TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL
LINGUISTICS (ACL 2020), P4067
Tzavella K, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, pS29, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3102-1
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), SEND FRAM DIS RISK R
Wang B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102884
Wang HL, 2022, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100985
Wu WJ, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101737
Wu XD, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P305, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0153-1
Xiao Y, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V94, P833, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3427-4
Yang SN, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P77, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0082-9
Yin ZE, 2011, J GEOGR SCI, V21, P274, DOI 10.1007/s11442-011-0844-7
Yoo G, 2011, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V54, P524, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.04.001
Yu J, 2019, J MAR SCI ENG, V7, DOI 10.3390/jmse7090318
Yuan FX, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101798
Yuan JY, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.217
Zhang H, 2007, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V14, P485, DOI 10.1080/13504500709469747
Zhang JP, 2022, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V36, P2293, DOI 10.1007/s11269-022-03142-z
Zhang X, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P1831, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-1831-2022
Zhang XQ, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P3757, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0101-6
Zhang Y, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127053
Zhou L, 2017, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V8, P1886, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2017.1392368
Zhu Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103892
NR 82
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 17
U2 24
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 23
AR 16051
DI 10.3390/ijerph192316051
PG 21
(SSCI)
Health
GA 6X2WN
UT WOS:000896279700001
PM 36498120
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Liu, S
Liu, R
Tan, NZ
AF Liu, Shuang
Liu, Rui
Tan, Nengzhi
TI A Spatial Improved-kNN-Based Flood Inundation Risk Framework for Urban
Tourism under Two Rainfall Scenarios
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE GIS; Landsat TM; likelihood; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty
ID EVACUATION SIMULATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; WETLAND INUNDATION; DEEP
UNCERTAINTY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; GIS; MANAGEMENT; MODELS; AHP; INFORMATION
AB Urban tourism has been suffering socio-economic challenges from flood inundation
risk (FIR) triggered by extraordinary rainfall under climate extremes. The
evaluation of FIR is essential for mitigating economic losses, and even casualties.
This study proposes an innovative spatial framework integrating improved k-nearest
neighbor (kNN), remote sensing (RS), and geographic information system (GIS) to
analyze FIR for tourism sites. Shanghai, China, was selected as a case study.
Tempo-spatial factors, including climate, topography, drainage, vegetation, and
soil, were selected to generate several flood-related gridded indicators as inputs
into the evaluation framework. A likelihood of FIR was mapped to represent possible
inundation for tourist sites under a moderate-heavy rainfall scenario and extreme
rainfall scenario. The resultant map was verified by the maximum inundation extent
merged by RS images and water bodies. The evaluation outcomes deliver the baseline
and scientific information for urban planners and policymakers to take cost-
effective measures for decreasing and evading the pressure of FIR on the
sustainable development of urban tourism. The spatial improved-kNN-based framework
provides an innovative, effective, and easy-to-use approach to evaluate the risk
for the tourism industry under climate change.
C1 [Liu, Shuang] Huzhou Vocat & Tech Coll, Sch Tourism & Publ Management, Huzhou
[Liu, Rui] Capital Normal Univ, Coll Geospatial Informat Sci & Technol, Beijing
[Tan, Nengzhi] Huzhou Univ, Int Coll, Huzhou 313000, Peoples R China.
C3 Huzhou Vocational & Technical College; Capital Normal University; Huzhou
University
RP Liu, R (corresponding author), Capital Normal Univ, Coll Geospatial Informat Sci
& Technol, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
EM lsiuhuang@163.com; drruiliu@yeah.net; 02144@zjhu.edu.cn
FU Research on Practical Teaching Mode of Tourism Major in Higher
Vocational Education Based on CBE Mode [FG2019131]; Research on the
Design and Application of Smart Classroom Mode under the Background of
"Internet + Education" [186140055]; Seeing Beautiful China in Huzhou:
Evolution and Development of Villages in Tourist Attractions in Huzhou
[20hzghy026]
FX The study was funded by Research on Practical Teaching Mode of Tourism
Major in Higher Vocational Education Based on CBE Mode (FG2019131),
Research on the Design and Application of Smart Classroom Mode under the
Background of "Internet + Education" (186140055), and Seeing Beautiful
China in Huzhou: Evolution and Development of Villages in Tourist
Attractions in Huzhou (20hzghy026). The anonymous reviewers are
acknowledged for their valuable comments.
CR Abu-Abdullah MM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031069
[Anonymous], 2013, RISK UNCERTAINTY ASS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139047562
[Anonymous], 1982, GUIDE HYDROLOGIC ANA
[Anonymous], GEOSPATIAL DATA CLOU
Chakraborty S, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03737-7
Chen Y, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1582, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.001
Chen Y, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V538, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.094
Chen Y, 2014, ECOHYDROLOGY, V7, P1412, DOI 10.1002/eco.1467
Chen Y, 2013, WETLANDS, V33, P823, DOI 10.1007/s13157-013-0439-4
Chen Y, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V48, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.010
Luu C, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12073058
Chu H, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030795
Costache R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V712, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136492
Darabi H, 2020, HYDROL RES, V51, P127, DOI 10.2166/nh.2019.090
Das S, 2020, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V34, P1175, DOI 10.1007/s00477-020-01828-7
Das S, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P407, DOI 10.1002/joc.5819
de Moel H, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P407, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9675-6
Foody GM, 2004, J HYDROL, V292, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.045
Gao L, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V76, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.001
Gao L, 2016, ECOL MODEL, V321, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.10.016
[高涛 Gao Tao], 2014, [地球科学进展, Advance in Earth Sciences], V29, P577
Gong P, 2020, SCI BULL, V65, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.007
Hawker L, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abc216
Huang C, 2014, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V26, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2013.09.002
Huang C, 2014, INT J REMOTE SENS, V35, P365, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2013.871084
Jahandideh-Tehrani M, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-019-
8049-0
Jamali B, 2020, WATER RES, V171, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115372
Kundzewicz ZW, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V130, P37, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.020
Lai S, 2020, ADV ATMOS SCI, V37, P1405, DOI 10.1007/s00376-020-0098-3
Lesslie R, 2006, J LAND USE SCI, V1, P45, DOI 10.1080/17474230600605244
Li LY, 2015, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V164, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.009
Li LY, 2015, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V101, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.11.006
Lin KR, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124696
Liu KL, 2017, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V31, P1471, DOI 10.1007/s00477-016-1267-x
Liu KL, 2016, INT J SEDIMENT RES, V31, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.02.002
Liu R, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P756, DOI 10.1111/risa.12698
Liu R, 2016, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V30, P1575, DOI 10.1007/s00477-015-1198-y
Liu YB, 2005, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V19, P605, DOI 10.1007/s11269-005-6808-x
Liu Z, 2018, J HYDROL, V565, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.009
Lu Y, 2016, J HYDROL, V533, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.041
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
Ma ZF, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106175
Merwade V, 2008, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V23, P1300, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.03.005
Mou NX, 2020, TOURISM MANAGE, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.103955
Nigussie TA, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P1031, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03794-y
Petroselli A, 2019, HYDROL RES, V50, P379, DOI 10.2166/nh.2018.040
Quan RS, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V73, P1569, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1156-x
Rajib A, 2020, J HYDROL, V581, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124406
Sajjad M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V713, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136704
Sampson CC, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P7358, DOI 10.1002/2015WR016954
Schmidt L, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2019WR025924
Shan XM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113202
Shanghai Bureau of Statistics, SHANGHAI BUR STAT
Soil Conservation Service, SOIL CONSERVATION SE
Stephens EM, 2012, J HYDROL, V414, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.040
Suzuki T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12166316
Swain KC, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9120720
Teng J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V90, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006
Ticehurst C, 2014, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V6, P11791, DOI 10.3390/rs61211791
TOBLER WR, 1970, ECON GEOGR, V46, P234, DOI 10.2307/143141
Try S, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0226814
Wagenaar D, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1149, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1149-
2020
Wang CX, 2017, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V31, P1777, DOI 10.1007/s00477-016-1242-6
Xu DW, 2020, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V16, P104, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2018.1491073
Xu G, 2020, PHYSICA A, V560, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125162
Zhou QQ, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10121877
NR 72
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 28
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 5
AR 2859
DI 10.3390/su13052859
PG 18
(SSCI)
GA QW4MS
UT WOS:000628626200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhong, S
Pang, MH
Ho, HC
Jegasothy, E
Clayton, S
Wang, Z
Huang, CR
AF Zhong, Shuang
Pang, Minghui
Ho, Hung Chak
Jegasothy, Edward
Clayton, Susan
Wang, Zhe
Huang, Cunrui
TI Assessing the effectiveness and pathways of planned shelters in
protecting mental health of flood victims in China
LA English
DT Article
DE displacement; flooding shelter; environmental interventions; mental
health; disaster risk reduction; China
ID POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; FOLLOW-UP; LOW-INCOME; DISPLACEMENT;
RECOVERY; ASSOCIATION; DISASTER; IMPACT
AB Background. Evacuation and sheltering are commonly used strategies for disaster
risk reduction and climate change adaptation, but may negatively affect mental
health of internally displaced persons (IDPs). Recently, Chinese governments have
developed planned settlements providing integrated and intensive health services
and environmental interventions to reduce immediate disastrous impacts and support
the mental health of IDPs. Methods. Here we selected 69 planned shelters by
stratified sampling to describe the implemented interventions conducted in Anhui
Province of China after the 2016 severe floods, and we used standardized
psychological scales to survey the intervention group (IDP who lived in these
planned shelters) and the matched control group (victims living in their homes).
Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between
social-demographic characteristics, flooding exposure, environmental conditions and
the psychological diseases. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare
their prevalence of psychological diseases, and to identify its influencing factors
though comparing multiple interventions. Finally, the structural equation modeling
was used to identify their influencing pathways. Results. Compared with the control
group, the intervention group had a significantly lower risk of anxiety (OR = 0.36;
95% CI: 0.18-0.71), depression (OR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19-0.68) and post-traumatic
stress disorder (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.15-0.56). Environmental interventions
providing clean water, safe food, environmental hygiene, risk communication and
sufficient accommodation had a protective effect (standardized indirect effect = -
0.153, p < 0.01) on the risk of psychological problems, mediating the negative
effect caused by displacement and sheltering. Conclusions. How planned shelters
were used to achieve better mental health outcomes in Anhui could inform other
flood-prone areas to mitigate psychological vulnerability of IDPs.
C1 [Zhong, Shuang; Pang, Minghui] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Govt, Ctr Chinese Publ Adm
Res, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
[Zhong, Shuang; Huang, Cunrui] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy
& Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
[Ho, Hung Chak] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong, Peoples
R China.
[Jegasothy, Edward] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
[Clayton, Susan] Coll Wooster, Dept Psychol, Wooster, OH 44691 USA.
[Wang, Zhe] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Publ Hlth Emergency Ctr, Beijing,
Peoples R China.
[Huang, Cunrui] China Meteorol Adm, Shanghai Typhoon Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R
China.
[Huang, Cunrui] Shanghai Meteorol Serv, Shanghai Key Lab Meteorol & Hlth,
Shanghai, Peoples R China.
[Huang, Cunrui] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China.
C3 Sun Yat Sen University; Sun Yat Sen University; University of Hong Kong;
University of Sydney; College of Wooster; Chinese Center for Disease
Control & Prevention; China Meteorological Administration; Zhengzhou
University
RP Wang, Z (corresponding author), Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Publ Hlth
Emergency Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM wangzhe@chinacdc.cn; huangcr@mail.sysu.edu.cn
RI Clayton, Susan/T-1364-2019; Huang, Cunrui/ABI-3312-2020; Ho, Hung
Chak/W-3320-2017
OI Clayton, Susan/0000-0002-2343-6865; Ho, Hung Chak/0000-0002-6505-3504; ,
Zhong/0000-0002-2834-9875
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0606200]; National Natural
Science Foundation of China [71774179, 71503146]; Government Reform and
Construction of key base of Ministry of Education [16JJD630011]
FX This study was supported by the grants from National Key R&D Program of
China (2018YFA0606200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(71774179;71503146) and Government Reform and Construction of key base
of Ministry of Education (16JJD630011).
CR Alderman K, 2012, ENVIRON INT, V47, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003
Andrykowski MA, 1998, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V66, P586, DOI 10.1037/0022-
006X.66.3.586
Beauducel A, 2006, STRUCT EQU MODELING, V13, P186, DOI
10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
Byrne B. M., 2013, MULTIVARIATE APPL SE, VSecond
Campbell M., 2012, LANCET, V380, pS27, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60383-9, DOI
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60383-9]
Cheema JR, 2014, J MOD APPL STAT METH, V13, P53, DOI 10.22237/jmasm/1414814520
Dai WJ, 2016, BMC PSYCHIATRY, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1097-x
Dai WJ, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-2871-x
Ding GY, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065112
Fussell E, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V113, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.025
Hayes AF, 2009, COMMUN MONOGR, V76, P408, DOI 10.1080/03637750903310360
Hu SM, 2015, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2009-6
Iacobucci D, 2010, J CONSUM PSYCHOL, V20, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
Jackson DL, 2009, PSYCHOL METHODS, V14, P6, DOI 10.1037/a0014694
Longman JM, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7501-y
McDowell Ian., 2006, MEASURING HLTH GUIDE, V3rd ed., DOI
[10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195165678.001.0001, DOI
10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195165678.001.0001]
McGuire AP, 2018, J TRAUMA STRESS, V31, P223, DOI 10.1002/jts.22270
5196(17)30047-5, 10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30047-5]
Myhrvold T, 2017, J CLIN NURS, V26, P825, DOI 10.1111/jocn.13670
Nigg JM, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P113, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285889
Porter M, 2005, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V294, P602, DOI 10.1001/jama.294.5.602
Porter M, 2001, J TRAUMA STRESS, V14, P817, DOI 10.1023/A:1013054524810
Reed RV, 2012, LANCET, V379, P250, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60050-0
Sanjula Weerasinghe, 2014, PLANNED RELOCATION D
Schwartz RM, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE314, DOI 10.1016/S2542-
5196(17)30138-9
SRIWARSINI, 2014, ISSUES MENT HEALTH N, V35, P420, DOI DOI
10.3109/01612840.2013.875085
The UN Regugee Agency, 2015, GUID PROT PEOPL DIS
Uscher-Pines L, 2009, DISASTERS, V33, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01059.x
Vera Goldschmidt, 2014, GLOBAL CCCM CLUSTER
Wu JB, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V694, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133586
Xu JP, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0079045
Zhang N, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V127, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.063
Zhong S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P165, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.041
NR 35
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 8
U2 37
PI BRISTOL
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 15
IS 12
AR 125006
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/abc446
PG 15
(SSCI)
GA PA3AV
UT WOS:000595505300001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Li, QJ
Xia, JQ
Xie, ZH
Zhou, MR
Deng, SS
AF Li, Qijie
Xia, Junqiang
Xie, Zhihua
Zhou, Meirong
Deng, Shanshan
TI Hazard and vulnerability in urban inundated underground space:
Hydrodynamic analysis of human instability for stairway evacuation
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban flooding; Human instability; Hydrodynamics; Risk assessment;
Underground space
ID FLOOD RISK-ASSESSMENT; GAS-LIQUID FLOW; SKIMMING FLOWS;
NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; TRANSIENT CAVITIES; HUMAN STABILITY; FLUID METHOD;
PART 1; TURBULENCE; RECONSTRUCTION
AB Underground flooding events are being exacerbated due to the rapid expanding of
underground space in urban and the extreme precipitation events by climate change.
It is increasingly necessary to study hydrodynamics and instabilities of human on
staircases in the flood-prone underground space for risk identification and
disaster reduction. However, the turbulent complexity and complicated fluid-human
interaction still challenge the study of flow structure and the calibration of
human instability model. In this work, a hydrodynamic model coupled with the
mechanics-based method was proposed to study fluid-human interactions and hazard
risks on flooding stairways. Numerical validations show that the model can obtain
reliable solutions of flow characteristics on staircases. It is found that there
exists a jet flow downstream the rest platform and the critical region after the
3rd step downstream the platform is identified as a high risk area to cause sliding
instability. The risk of sliding instability for a child is higher than that for an
adult in jet flow region. In addition, results show that the downstream vortical
flow structure and turbulent effect are obviously enhanced because of the interdict
of jet flow by the human obstacle.
C1 [Li, Qijie; Xia, Junqiang; Zhou, Meirong; Deng, Shanshan] Wuhan Univ, State Key
Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
[Xie, Zhihua] Cardiff Univ, Sch Engn, Cardiff CF24 3AA, Wales.
C3 Wuhan University; Cardiff University
RP Xia, JQ (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources &
Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
EM xiajq@whu.edu.cn
RI Xie, Zhihua/K-2969-2017
OI Xie, Zhihua/0000-0002-5180-8427
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41890823, 51725902];
Newton Advanced Fellowships from the NSFC; UK Royal Society
[52061130219, NAF/R1/201156]; Royal Academy of Engineering through the
Urban Flooding Research Policy Impact Programme [UUFRIP/100 031]
FX This research work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41890823, 51725902); the Newton Advanced
Fellowships from the NSFC and the UK Royal Society (Grant Nos.
52061130219; NAF/R1/201156); and the Royal Academy of Engineering
through the Urban Flooding Research Policy Impact Programme (Grant No.
UUFRIP/100 031). The authors would like to express their sincere thanks
to the editor and anonymous referees for their valuable comments and
suggestions.
CR ABT SR, 1989, WATER RESOUR BULL, V25, P881
[Anonymous], LECT NOTES PHYS, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-08004-X_336
BLAKE JR, 1987, J FLUID MECH, V181, P197, DOI 10.1017/S0022112087002052
BLAKE JR, 1986, J FLUID MECH, V170, P479, DOI 10.1017/S0022112086000988
Brocchini M, 2001, J FLUID MECH, V449, P225, DOI 10.1017/S0022112001006012
Campisano A, 2017, WATER RES, V115, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.056
Chamani MR, 1999, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V125, P361, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1999)125:4(361)
CHANSON H, 1993, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V20, P422, DOI 10.1139/l93-057
CHANSON H, 1994, J HYDRAUL RES, V32, P87, DOI 10.1080/00221689409498791
Chanson H, 2001, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V127, P90
Chanson H., 1995, HYDRAULIC DESIGN STE
Chanson H., 2003, APPL MECH REV, V56, P1
Chen Q, 2002, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V128, P683, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2002)128:7(683)
Choi Y, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102213
Deen NG, 2001, CHEM ENG SCI, V56, P6341, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00249-4
Deng X, 2018, J COMPUT PHYS, V371, P945, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.03.036
Deng YH, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7162, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.064
Dong Z, 2022, CHEM ENG SCI, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116975
Eini M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101687
Emanuelsson MAE, 2014, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V7, P31, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12028
Falconer R.A., 2015, WATER MANAG, V169, P1
Felder S, 2009, ENVIRON FLUID MECH, V9, P427, DOI 10.1007/s10652-009-9130-y
Gonzalez CA, 2008, J HYDRAUL RES, V46, P65, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521843
Gonzalez CA, 2004, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V31, P33, DOI 10.1139/L03-066
Gonzalez CA, 2008, J HYDRAUL RES, V46, P24, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2008.9521937
HARLOW FH, 1965, PHYS FLUIDS, V8, P2182, DOI 10.1063/1.1761178
Hohermuth B., 2019, 38 IAHR WORLD C
Hohermuth B, 2021, J HYDRAUL RES, V59, P378, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2020.1780492
Hu XY, 2006, J COMPUT PHYS, V219, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.04.001
Hu XY, 2004, J COMPUT PHYS, V198, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.12.018
Inoue K., 2003, ANN DISASTER PREVENT, V47, P293
Ishigaki T., 2006, ANN DISASTER PREVE B, V50, P583, DOI DOI 10.2208/PROHE.50.583
Jiang LJ, 2014, J FLUID STRUCT, V46, P17, DOI
1688.2008.00217.x
Kallianiotis A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P526, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.009
Karvonen RA., 2000, USE PHYS MODELS DAM
Keller R. J., 1993, SAFETY ASPECTS DESIG
Kramer M, 2021, J HYDRAUL ENG, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001925
Kramer M, 2021, INT J MULTIPHAS FLOW, V134, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103475
Kramer M, 2020, INT J MULTIPHAS FLOW, V126, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103228
Kramer M, 2018, ENVIRON FLUID MECH, V18, P947, DOI 10.1007/s10652-018-9575-y
Li QJ, 2021, PHYS FLUIDS, V33, DOI 10.1063/5.0067226
Li QJ, 2021, PHYS FLUIDS, V33, DOI 10.1063/5.0045635
Li QJ, 2017, COMMUN COMPUT PHYS, V22, P765, DOI 10.4208/cicp.OA-2016-0117
Li ZM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101140
Lind N, 2004, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V40, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2004.tb01012.x
Liu SC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
Liu TG, 2005, J COMPUT PHYS, V204, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.012
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
Lyu HM, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8100447
Ma T, 2016, NUCL ENG DES, V299, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.08.010
Motta M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102154
Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
Nourgaliev RR, 2007, J COMPUT PHYS, V224, P836, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.031
Ohtsu I, 2004, J HYDRAUL ENG, V130, P860, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2004)130:9(860)
OSHER S, 1988, J COMPUT PHYS, V79, P12, DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2
Park K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101192
Peng J, 2018, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V74, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.002
Pfister M, 2009, 33 IAHR C
Pfister M, 2012, J HYDRAUL RES, V50, P181, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2012.657875
Pfister M, 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG, V137, P1208, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000436
Pfister M, 2010, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V136, P360, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000201
Pfister M, 2010, J HYDRAUL ENG, V136, P352, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000189
Qiao YK, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.037
Scardovelli R, 1999, ANNU REV FLUID MECH, V31, P567, DOI
10.1146/annurev.fluid.31.1.567
Shao WY, 2015, J ZHEJIANG UNIV-SC A, V16, P117, DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1400154
Shen SL, 2017, COMPUT GEOTECH, V91, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.07.014
Singh P, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.017
Smagorinsky J., 1963, MON WEATHER REV, V91, P99, DOI [10.1175/1520-
0493(1963)0912.3.CO;2, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2,
10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2]
Sun XJ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102563
Sun ZY, 2016, J COMPUT PHYS, V322, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.051
Takahashi M, 2012, J HYDRAUL RES, V50, P427, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2012.702859
Tan Y, 2018, J PIPELINE SYST ENG, V9, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000310
Tan Y, 2017, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V68, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.028
Tanir T, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102362
Terashima H, 2009, J COMPUT PHYS, V228, P4012, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.02.023
UNVERDI SO, 1992, J COMPUT PHYS, V100, P25, DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90307-K
Valdenebro JV, 2019, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V89, P38, DOI
10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.026
Valero D, 2015, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS, P2920
Vignesh TG, 2013, INT J NUMER METH FL, V73, P1, DOI 10.1002/fld.3787
Wu YX, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-7555-7
Xia JQ, 2014, J HYDRAUL RES, V52, P93, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2013.875073
Xia JQ, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P1619, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0889-2
Xiao F, 2011, J COMPUT PHYS, V230, P7086, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.012
Xu YS, 2018, J HYDROL, V563, P900, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.075
Yoneyama N, 2009, ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-
6, P107, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_21
Yu Yueyang, PSYARXIV, DOI [DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/DR9Q3, DOI 10.1007/S11270-007-
9372-6]
Zhao JW, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011
Zhou ZZ, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P7401, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019997
Zinda JA, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102528
NR 95
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 22
U2 48
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD FEB 15
PY 2022
VL 70
AR 102754
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102754
EA JAN 2022
PG 16
Water Resources
GA 0A8MJ
UT WOS:000774201100011
OA Green Accepted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Krishna, RN
Ronan, K
Spencer, C
Alisic, E
AF Krishna, Revathi N.
Ronan, Kevin
Spencer, Caroline
Alisic, Eva
TI The lived experience of disadvantaged communities affected by the 2015
South Indian floods: Implications for disaster risk reduction dialogue
LA English
DT Article
DE Poverty; DRR; Discrimination; Flood; Vulnerability; Social vulnerability
ID VULNERABILITY; PREPAREDNESS; RESILIENCE; POVERTY; CLIMATE; POOR
AB Poverty and discrimination compound vulnerability to disasters. Yet, people who
experience these are some of the least involved groups in Disaster Risk Reduction
(DRR) dialogue and research. This study aims to fill that gap by narrating the
lived experience of underprivileged flood-affected communities. We conducted in-
depth interviews (N = 48) with community members (n = 36) and staff members of
collaborating non-governmental organisations (n = 12). We also conducted focus
group discussions with staff members of the same NGOs. The results describe how
systemic issues entrenched with socio-economic and cultural factors impact a
community?s ability to prepare for floods. These communities received no warning or
timely evacuation messages, and perceived the received support as inadequate and
unfair. Communities recovered through their resourcefulness and thoughtfulness.
They resented the government for its lack of action throughout the disaster cycle.
Priorities for future efforts involve actively engaging these vulnerable groups and
tailoring DRR activities for them.
C1 [Krishna, Revathi N.; Spencer, Caroline; Alisic, Eva] Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr
MUARC, Clayton, Vic, Australia.
[Ronan, Kevin] Cent Queensland Univ CQU, Sch Human Hlth & Social Sci,
Rockhampton, Qld, Australia.
[Alisic, Eva] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth,
Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
C3 Monash University; Central Queensland University; University of
Melbourne
RP Krishna, RN (corresponding author), Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr, 21 Alliance
Lane, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia.
EM revathi.nuggehallikrishna@monash.edu
OI Krishna, Revathi N./0000-0001-5231-0746; Spencer,
Caroline/0000-0002-1128-6388
FU Monash University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship;
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (Early Career
Fellowship) [1090229]; Australia's Bushfire and Natural Hazards
Cooperative Research Centre
FX We would like to express gratitude to the community members and staff of
NGOs who participated in this study. Ms. Krishna is supported by Monash
University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship. Dr Alisic
has been supported by the Australian National Health and Medical
Research Council (Early Career Fellowship 1090229). Both Drs. Alisic and
Ronan have been supported by Australia's Bushfire and Natural Hazards
Cooperative Research Centre during this study.
CR Aldrich DP, 2010, SOC SCI QUART, V91, P1369, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6237.2010.00736.x
[Anonymous], 2006, BUILT ENV
[Anonymous], 2012, ECON POLIT WEEKLY
Ayeb-Karlsson S, 2019, DISASTERS, V43, P752, DOI 10.1111/disa.12404
Becker JS, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P179, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
Becker JS, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1710, DOI 10.1111/risa.12014
Binder SB, 2014, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V42, P799, DOI 10.1002/jcop.21654
Bolin B., 2007, HDB DISASTER RES
Burningham K, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P216, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x
Cannon T, 2015, DISASTERS CLIMATE CH
CORBIN J, 1990, Z SOZIOL, V19, P418, DOI 10.1007/BF00988593
Dept of Home Affairs G.o.I, 2011, PRIM CENS DAT HIGHL
EM-DAT, 2016, INT DIS DAT
Enarson E., 2007, HDB DISASTER RES
Finch C, 2010, POPUL ENVIRON, V31, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8
10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9
Gaillard JC, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P218, DOI 10.1002/jid.1675
Hausmann P., 2014, MIND RISK GLOBAL RAN
IAG Tamil Nadu S.I., 2015, JOINT NEEDS ASSESSME
Jain M., 2019, ARXIV
Kawasaki A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101348
Kim N, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P195, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01258.x
Krishna RN, 2018, J LOSS TRAUMA, V23, P419, DOI 10.1080/15325024.2017.1415724
Lewis James, 2012, PLoS Curr, V4, pe4f8d4eaec6af8, DOI 10.1371/4f8d4eaec6af8
Lunga W, 2019, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V11, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.648
Mashizha TM, 2019, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V11, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.571
Mercer, 2016, 2016 COST LIV SURV R
Nagaraj K, 2010, LAND LABOUR CASTE PO
P.S. Committee, 2016, DIS CHENN CAUS TORR
Rashid SF, 2000, DISASTERS, V24, P240, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00145
Rautela P, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V15, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.12.005
Ray-Bennett NS, 2009, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V8, P5, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2009.0001
Robinson OC, 2014, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V11, P25, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
Shugarman L.R., 2008, LITERARY REV, V3
Societies I.I.F.o.R.C.a.R.C., 2014, WORLD DISASTERS REPO
Strauss Anselm, 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, V17, P273
Teo MM, 2018, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V33, P38
Terpstra T, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P1658, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
Thomalla F, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x
UN-Habitat, 2016, WORLD CIT REP 2016 U, V3, P4
United Nations D.o.E.a.S.A. Population Division, 2019, WORLD URB PROSP 2018
Walkey F.H., 2005, J DISASTER TRAUMA ST
Weichselgartner Juergen., 2002, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V4, P73, DOI 10.1016/S1464-
2867(03)00003-2
Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
Wisner B., 2012, HDB HAZARDS DISASTER
NR 46
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 0
U2 5
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD FEB 15
PY 2021
VL 54
AR 102046
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102046
EA FEB 2021
PG 10
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA QU0GJ
UT WOS:000626963300001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Islam, MA
Griffin, AL
Paull, DJ
Murshed, S
AF Islam, Md Ashraful
Griffin, Amy L.
Paull, David J.
Murshed, Sanzida
TI Assessing critical infrastructure resilience in terms of its
service-providing capacity in coastal Bangladesh: A synthesis of
geospatial techniques and social responses
LA English
DT Article
DE Critical infrastructure; Tropical cyclone; Hazard; Resilience;
Spatio-temporal; Social response; Bangladesh coast
ID SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS; CYCLONE EVACUATION; TROPICAL CYCLONES;
VULNERABILITY; CLIMATE; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEM; RISKS; GIS
AB Lack of adequate infrastructure, especially in the coastal regions of developing
countries, limits the capacity of households to prevent, cope with, and recover
from the adverse effects of natural hazards. The services provided by critical
infrastructure (CI) contribute to the overall resilience of marginalized coastal
households to natural hazards. CI, in turn, may itself be resilient (or not).
Resilient CI is capable of providing services to meet the community's demand for
that service. This research developed and tested an innovative framework for
assessing CI resilience in terms of services it was capable to provide to coastal
residents in three separate phases (before, during, and after) of Cyclone Sidr,
using empirical evidence from a coastal sub-district of Bangladesh. The disaster-
phase-wise level of demand for these services was identified using GIS-based
network analysis combined with community rankings of service importance across the
disaster phases. Households were surveyed to determine whether they were able to
procure CI services in each phase. A comparison of service demand levels with
success in procuring CI services was used to assess CI resilience. The results
revealed spatio-temporal variation in the service provision of existing CI units to
households in the study area. A mixed trend was indicated: less exposed communities
contained a somewhat higher percentage of service-receiving households than more
exposed communities during the pre- and post-disaster phases, whereas the
percentage was higher in the more exposed communities during the syn-disaster
phase. This approach has the potential to determine whether the existing CI in a
community is resilient enough to support the population in the different phases of
a cyclone. The results could guide planners to bolster CI resilience for
communities, thereby also improving community resilience to natural hazards.
C1 [Islam, Md Ashraful; Paull, David J.; Murshed, Sanzida] Univ New South Wales
UNSW, Sch Sci, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia.
[Griffin, Amy L.] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
[Islam, Md Ashraful; Murshed, Sanzida] Univ Dhaka, Dept Geol, Dhaka 1000,
Bangladesh.
C3 University of New South Wales Sydney; Royal Melbourne Institute of
Technology (RMIT); University of Dhaka
RP Islam, MA (corresponding author), Univ New South Wales UNSW, Sch Sci, Canberra,
ACT 2612, Australia.
EM ashrafhimel@du.ac.bd
RI Griffin, Amy L/E-5784-2010
OI Islam, Md Ashraful/0000-0002-9491-3876; Griffin, Amy/0000-0001-6548-7970
FU University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia, through a University
International Postgraduate Award (UIPA) scholarship
FX This research was partially supported by the University of New South
Wales (UNSW), Australia, through a University International Postgraduate
Award (UIPA) scholarship awarded to the first author. Both the FGD and
household surveys were approved by the UNSW ethics panel (ID: HC180105).
The authors are indebted to the local government administration of the
study site for their valuable logistical support during the field
investigation and also the local residents who actively participated in
the household survey. We are grateful to Mehedi Hasan Peas and Mahmud Al
Noor Tushar for their great support during the FGD and household survey.
We appreciate the critiques provided by four anonymous reviewers. Their
constructive and fruitful comments have helped to sharpen the arguments
of this paper and led us to express some important points more
explicitly.
CR Aerts JCJH, 2013, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1294, P1, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12200
Akhand MH, 2000, EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS FOR NATURAL DISASTER REDUCTION, P49
Alam M.Z., 2018, COMPUT WATER ENERGY, V7, P161
[Anonymous], 2007, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00504.x
[Anonymous], 2008, CYCLONE SIDR BANGLAD, P182
[Anonymous], 2017, SMALL AR ATL BANGL P, P56
Bansal VK, 2011, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V25, P159, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-
5487.0000075
Baporikar N, 2016, INT J SYST DYN APPL, V5, P101, DOI 10.4018/IJSDA.2016100106
Baulch B, 2011, J DEV EFFECT, V3, P243, DOI 10.1080/19439342.2011.570449
Benneyworth L, 2016, INT J ENVIRON HEAL R, V26, P508, DOI
10.1080/09603123.2016.1194383
Bianchi E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102147
Brown JM, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V163, P101, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.007
Cassottana B, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106528
Cavallo A, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.001
Cimellaro GP, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101191
Collier WM, 2009, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V8, P171, DOI 10.3763/ehaz.2009.0021
Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
Feldpausch-Parker AM, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V82, P1961, DOI
10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.015
Formulation of Disaster Management Plan at Upazila Level, 2014, FORM DIS MAN
PLAN UP
Frazier AE, 2013, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V21, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2012.07.019
Gray W., 1985, TROPICAL CYCLONE GLO, V72, P3
Haraguchi M, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P133, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2015-
0015
Heglund J, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P94, DOI
10.1080/23789689.2020.1719728
Hoque MA, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V98, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.004
Hossain MN, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10708-015-9668-9
Hossain MN, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P66, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.04.003
Inderst G., 2014, I INVESTMENT INFRAST
Islam MA, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P279, DOI
10.1080/19475705.2020.1870169
Islam MA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101667
Islam MA, 2020, ARAB J GEOSCI, V13, DOI 10.1007/s12517-020-05925-3
Islam MM, 2014, MAR POLICY, V43, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.06.007
Islam R, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P361, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2568-6
Jian W, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.023
Kantamaneni K, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P139, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2413-y
Karakoc DB, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101228
Krumpal I, 2013, QUAL QUANT, V47, P2025, DOI 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
Kwok AH, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.013
Labaka L, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V103, P21, DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.005
Lam JSL, 2017, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V141, P43, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.015
Little RG, 2020, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000519
Loggins RA, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000249
Lovell ST, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y
Mallick B, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P654, DOI 10.1111/disa.12062
Mallick B, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P629, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9285-y
Marinucci GD, 2014, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V11, P6433, DOI
10.3390/ijerph110606433
Miles S. B., 2011, PROC STRUCTURES C 20, P1985, DOI [10.1061/41171(401)173, DOI
10.1061/41171(401)173]
Mitsova D, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000421
Muttarak R, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-06101-180451
Novelo-Casanova DA, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P1277, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9982-6
Pachauri Rajendra K., 2014, CONTRIBUTION WORKING
Pagan-Trinidad I., 2019, 2019 ASEE ANN C EXP
Pathirage C., 2011, INT C BUILD RES 2011
Paul SK, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V57, P477, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9631-5
Pescaroli G, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P175, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2186-3
Population and Housing Census, 2011, ZIL REP PAT, P358
Quader MA, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14080831
Rachunok B, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106658
Rahman S, 2015, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V7, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.07.004
Saja AMA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096
Sarker P, 2019, INFRASTRUCTURES-BASE, V4, DOI 10.3390/infrastructures4020030
Shammi M, 2019, HEALTHCARE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/healthcare7010050
Song K, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V242, P1970, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.057
Tapia AG, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P2032, DOI 10.1111/risa.13372
Tiernan A, 2019, POLICY DES PRACT, V2, P53, DOI 10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240
Trump BD, 2017, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P289, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_9
Van Ruiten K., 2016, E3S WEB C
World Bank, 2011, BANGL DEV SER, V67845
Yang Duck-Hye, 2006, J Med Syst, V30, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10916-006-7400-5
Zhang HJ, 2018, IEEE POW ENER SOC GE
Zou QL, 2020, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000524
NR 74
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 20
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 67
AR 102633
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102633
EA OCT 2021
PG 15
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA WU6KI
UT WOS:000716651900002
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Hong, B
Bonczak, BJ
Gupta, A
Kontokosta, CE
AF Hong, Boyeong
Bonczak, Bartosz J.
Gupta, Arpit
Kontokosta, Constantine E.
TI Measuring inequality in community resilience to natural disasters using
large-scale mobility data
SO NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
ID BILLION-DOLLAR WEATHER; URBAN RESILIENCE; HURRICANE HARVEY; BIG DATA;
CLIMATE; EVACUATION; SYSTEMS
AB While conceptual definitions provide a foundation for the study of disasters and
their impacts, the challenge for researchers and practitioners alike has been to
develop objective and rigorous measures of resilience that are generalizable and
scalable, taking into account spatiotemporal dynamics in the response and recovery
of localized communities. In this paper, we analyze mobility patterns of more than
800,000 anonymized mobile devices in Houston, Texas, representing approximately 35%
of the local population, in response to Hurricane Harvey in 2017. Using changes in
mobility behavior before, during, and after the disaster, we empirically define
community resilience capacity as a function of the magnitude of impact and time-to-
recovery. Overall, we find clear socioeconomic and racial disparities in resilience
capacity and evacuation patterns. Our work provides new insight into the behavioral
response to disasters and provides the basis for data-driven public sector
decisions that prioritize the equitable allocation of resources to vulnerable
neighborhoods. Understanding how cities respond to extreme weather is critical; as
such events are becoming more frequent. Using anonymized mobile phone data for
Houston, Texas during Hurricane Harvey in 2017, the authors find that mobility
behavior exposes neighborhood disparities in resilience capacity and recovery.
C1 [Hong, Boyeong; Bonczak, Bartosz J.; Kontokosta, Constantine E.] NYU, Marron
Inst Urban Management, New York, NY 10003 USA.
[Gupta, Arpit] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY USA.
[Kontokosta, Constantine E.] NYU, Ctr Urban Sci & Progress, Brooklyn, NY 11201
USA.
C3 New York University; New York University; New York University
RP Kontokosta, CE (corresponding author), NYU, Marron Inst Urban Management, New
York, NY 10003 USA.; Kontokosta, CE (corresponding author), NYU, Ctr Urban Sci &
Progress, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
EM ckontokosta@nyu.edu
OI Bonczak, Bartosz/0000-0003-4107-4711; Kontokosta,
Constantine/0000-0003-4831-9996
FU National Science Foundation [2028687]; NYU C2SMART, a USDOT Tier 1
University Transportation Center; Directorate For Engineering; Div Of
Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [2028687] Funding Source: National
Science Foundation
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant No.
2028687, and from NYU C2SMART, a USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation
Center. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper
are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any
supporting institution. All errors remain the authors. A preliminary
version of this paper was presented at the 2019 INFORMS (The Institute
for Operations Research and the Management Sciences) annual conference.
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
[Anonymous], 2009, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE
[Anonymous], 2009, LECT NOTES GEOINFORM
Batty Michael, 2013, Dialogues Hum Geogr, V3, P274, DOI 10.1177/2043820613513390
Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
Chow NA, 2019, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V68, P469, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm6821a1
Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
Dabson B., 2012, RES POLICY BRIEF
Deal B, 2017, J URBAN TECHNOL, V24, P29, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2017.1285018
Emanuel K, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P12681, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716222114
Ester M., 1996, KDD-96 Proceedings. Second International Conference on Knowledge
Discovery and Data Mining, P226
Freeman M, 2011, J CASES INF TECHNOL, V13, P69, DOI 10.4018/jcit.2011040105
Guy M, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6065, P42
Harris County Flood Control District, 2018, HURR HARV FIN REP
Hastie T., 2001, INTRO STAT LEARNING
Houston Health Department, 2017, HURR HARV 2017 HOUST
Hughes AL, 2009, INT J EMERG MANAG, V6, P248, DOI 10.1504/IJEM.2009.031564
Hung HC, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
Jiang S., 2013, P 2 ACM SIGKDD INT W
Jiang S, 2017, IEEE T BIG DATA, V3, P208, DOI 10.1109/TBDATA.2016.2631141
Knutson TR, 2010, NAT GEOSCI, V3, P157, DOI 10.1038/NGEO779
Kontokosta CE, 2021, J PLAN EDUC RES, V41, P382, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18793716
10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
9488(2007)133:1(18)
Liu H, 2015, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V53, P71, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060485
Marks E, 2018, 1 YEAR STORM TEXAS G
Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Mendelsohn R, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P205, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1357
Morss RE, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-
060809-100145
Murphy J.D., 2018, SERVICE ASS AUG SEPT
Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
Risser MD, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P12457, DOI 10.1002/2017GL075888
Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
Smith AB, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V77, P1829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1678-x
Smith AB, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0566-5
Toole J. L., 2012, PROC ACM SIGKDD INT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/2346496.2346498
Toole JL, 2015, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V58, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.022
Vecchi GA, 2007, NATURE, V450, P1066, DOI 10.1038/nature06423
Wang D., 2014, ENCYCL SOC NETW ANAL, V1, P1914, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-
8_293, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_293]
Wang Q, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V118, P942, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.535
Watts D., 2013, PUBL RESP AL WARN US, P22
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
6988(2004)5:4(170), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:4(170)]
Zander KK, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V56, P18, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.004
Zhang W, 2018, NATURE, V563, P384, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0676-z
NR 54
TC 39
Z9 40
U1 27
U2 95
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
EI 2041-1723
J9 NAT COMMUN
JI Nat. Commun.
PD MAR 25
PY 2021
VL 12
IS 1
AR 1870
DI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
PG 9
(SSCI)
GA RK0IP
UT WOS:000637989400021
PM 33767142
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Nurwatik, N
Hong, JH
Jaelani, LM
Handayani, HH
Cahyono, AB
Darminto, MR
AF Nurwatik, Nurwatik
Hong, Jung-Hong
Jaelani, Lalu Muhamad
Handayani, Hepi Hapsari
Cahyono, Agung Budi
Darminto, Mohammad Rohmaneo
TI Using GIS to Understand Healthcare Access Variations in Flood Situation
in Surabaya
LA English
DT Article
DE healthcare; accessibility; network analysis; vulnerability; open source
ID DISASTER; MANAGEMENT; FEATURES
AB This paper proposes to identify the variation of accessibility to healthcare
facilities based on vulnerability assessments of floods by using open source data.
The open source data comprises Open Street Map (OSM), world population, and
statistical data. The accessibility analysis is more focused on vulnerable
populations that might be affected by floods. Therefore, a vulnerability assessment
is conducted beforehand to identify the location where the vulnerable population is
located. A before and after scenario of floods is applied to evaluate the changes
of healthcare accessibility. A GIS Network Analyst is chosen as the accessibility
analysis tool. The results indicate that the most vulnerable population lives in
the Asemrowo district. The service area analysis showed that 94% of the West of
Surabaya was well-serviced in the before scenario. Otherwise, the decrement of
service area occurs at the city center in the after scenario. Thus, the disaster
manager can understand which vulnerable area is to be more prioritized in the
evacuation process.
C1 [Nurwatik, Nurwatik; Jaelani, Lalu Muhamad; Handayani, Hepi Hapsari; Cahyono,
Agung Budi; Darminto, Mohammad Rohmaneo] Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Fac Civil
Planning & Geo Engn, Dept Geomat Engn, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia.
[Hong, Jung-Hong] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Geomat, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
C3 Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember; National Cheng Kung University
RP Nurwatik, N (corresponding author), Inst Teknol Sepuluh Nopember, Fac Civil
Planning & Geo Engn, Dept Geomat Engn, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia.
EM nurwatik@its.ac.id; junghong@mail.ndw.edu.tw;
lmjaelani@geodesy.its.ac.id; hapsari@geodesy.its.ac.id;
agungbc@geodesy.its.ac.id; rohmaneo@its.ac.id
RI Jaelani, Lalu Muhamad/M-8299-2016; Budi Cahyono, Agung/C-7985-2015
OI Jaelani, Lalu Muhamad/0000-0003-2663-9016; Darminto, Mohammad
Rohmaneo/0000-0002-9567-052X; Handayani, Hepi H./0000-0002-2587-2724;
Budi Cahyono, Agung/0000-0002-3301-9969; Nurwatik,
Nurwatik/0000-0002-2006-3848
FU Directorate of Research and Community Service (DRPMITS); Institut
Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember [1212/PKS/ITS/2019]
FX This research was funded by the Directorate of Research and Community
Service (DRPMITS), Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, grant number
1212/PKS/ITS/2019.
CR Ai FL, 2016, SAFETY SCI, V90, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.022
Alamdar F, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V56, P68, DOI
Alparslan E, 2008, ENG GEOL, V96, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.10.006
[Anonymous], 2005, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, DOI [DOI
10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2003.08.002, j.compenvurbsys.2003.08.002]
Bhanumurthy V., 2015, INT J ADV ENG GLOB T, V3, P345
BMKG, 2019, PRAK MUS KEM 2019 IN, P1
BNPB, 2018, IND RES BENC IND, P1
Burdziej J, 2012, APPL GEOMAT, V4, P75, DOI 10.1007/s12518-011-0057-x
Cardona OD, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE
Carley KM, 2016, SAFETY SCI, V90, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.04.002
Chen W, 2020, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9010041
Chu HJ, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13121235
Chu J, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0249037
Dong SJ, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V80, DOI
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101443
Dong SJ, 2019, J R SOC INTERFACE, V16, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2019.0149
ESRI, 2006, GIS EM MAN IND OC EA, P1
George D., 2011, INTRO EMERGENCY MANA, VFourth, P1
Gingerich BS, 2008, HOME HLTH CARE MAN P, V20, P352, DOI
10.1177/1084822307310924
Girres JF, 2010, T GIS, V14, P435, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01203.x
Gunes AE, 2000, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V126, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9488(2000)126:3(136)
Guth J, 2020, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9010055
Huder Roger C., 2012, DISASTER OPERATIONS
Jackson SP, 2013, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V2, P507, DOI 10.3390/ijgi2020507
Jotshi A., 2009, SOC EC PLANN SCI, V43, P1
Leiser CL, 2020, UROLOGY, V139, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2020.02.004
Levinson D.R., 2014, HOSP EMERGENCY PREPA, P1
Mansourian A, 2006, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V32, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.06.017
Miraliakbari A, 2014, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V40-1, P265, DOI
10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-265-2014
Murad A, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7070254
Nichols Elizabeth N, 2014, Online J Public Health Inform, V5, P226, DOI
10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4982
Nicoara PS, 2014, GEOGR TECH, V9, P60
Pacific Humanitarian Team, 2013, EM PREP RESP PLAN GU, V1st ed., P1
Peterson A., 2007, THESIS LINKOPINGS U
Ranke U, 2016, NATURAL DISASTER RIS
Rasul A, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7030081
Rekha RS, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V27, P1163, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.078
Rovins J., 2015, RISK ASSESSMENT HDB
Russo F., 2012, WIT T INF COMMUN TEC, VVolume 44, P491, DOI DOI
10.2495/RISK120411
Sari F., 2012, P FIG WORK WEEK ROM
Saydi M., 2004, ISPRS HIGH RESOLUT E, V35, P678
Stevens FR, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0107042
Tang AP, 2009, 2009 WRI WORLD CONGRESS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL 2,
PROCEEDINGS, P355, DOI 10.1109/WCSE.2009.329
Taramelli A, 2008, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V8, P839, DOI 10.5194/nhess-8-839-2008
Tascon-Gonzalez L, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020558
UNFPA BNPB BPS, 2014, GUID US POP DAT DIS, P1
Van Westen C.J., 2013, TREATISE GEOMORPHOLO, V3, P259, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-
12-374739-6.00051-8
Wang SX, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V29, P1186, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.110
Wang Y, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0149827
Watik N, 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-3, P455, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-
XLII-3-W8-455-2019
Winn M.T., 2014, THESIS NW MISSOURI S
World Resources Institute, 2011, PAT SAF CURR GUID MU, P1
Xu HQ, 2006, INT J REMOTE SENS, V27, P3025, DOI 10.1080/01431160600589179
Yao YB, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10020063
NR 56
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 6
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2220-9964
PD APR
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 4
AR 235
DI 10.3390/ijgi11040235
PG 25
Sensing
GA 0T1YB
UT WOS:000786768400001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Haney, TJ
AF Haney, Timothy J.
TI Move out or dig in? Risk awareness and mobility plans in
disaster-affected communities
SO JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster; migration; place attachment; risk awareness
ID MITIGATION BEHAVIOR; DECISION-MAKING; FLOOD-RISK; MIGRATION; PERCEPTION;
EVACUATION; KATRINA; IMPACT; RETURN; PLACE
AB Post-disaster migration patterns have been thoroughly studied from a demographic
standpoint, but affected community residents' perceptions of ongoing risks and
their willingness to remain in an affected community remain under-researched. Using
data generated by 407 surveys and 40 interviews with residents impacted by the 2013
Calgary flood, this study analyses the effects of flood experience on residents'
worry about future floods and their ensuing short-term and medium-term mobility
plans. The results indicate that home flooding and evacuation orders are both
predictive of worry about future floods. In turn, worry about future floods as well
as age, homeownership, and place attachment are all predictive of post-disaster
mobility plans. Residents discuss how the flood either strengthened or weakened
their place attachment. The paper concludes by discussing the implications for
social science research and for public policy that aims to mitigate disaster risk.
C1 [Haney, Timothy J.] Mt Royal Univ, Ctr Community Disaster Res, Calgary, AB,
Canada.
C3 Mount Royal University
RP Haney, TJ (corresponding author), Mt Royal Univ, Ctr Community Disaster Res,
Calgary, AB, Canada.
EM thaney@mtroyal.ca
FU Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada
[435-2014-1008]
FX Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada,
Grant/Award Number: 435-2014-1008
CR Adams H, 2016, POPUL ENVIRON, V37, P429, DOI 10.1007/s11111-015-0246-3
Aitsi-Selmi A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P164, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-
0050-9
[Anonymous], 2004, CONTAMINATED COMMUNI
[Anonymous], 2017, CANADIAN VOICES CHAN
[Anonymous], BEST PRACTICES REDUC
[Anonymous], ENV FORC MIGR SOC
[Anonymous], RESP RAT CALC
[Anonymous], 2008, ENV SOC SUSTAINABILI
[Anonymous], 2007, SOCIOLOGY KATRINA PE
[Anonymous], 2014, CITIES ENV
[Anonymous], ALB FLOODS COSTL NAT
6988(2002)3:3(107)
[Anonymous], 2009, SOC EPISTEMOL
[Anonymous], COMM PROF
Asad AL, 2015, POPUL ENVIRON, V36, P279, DOI 10.1007/s11111-014-0221-4
Ausbrooks CY, 2009, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V28, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11113-008-9112-
7
10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.08.004
Bin O, 2004, LAND ECON, V80, P490, DOI 10.2307/3655805
Binder SB, 2015, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V56, P180, DOI 10.1007/s10464-015-9727-x
Boudet H, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V65, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
Briceno S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0040-y
Burningham K, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P216, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x
Chamlee-Wright E, 2009, J URBAN AFF, V31, P615, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9906.2009.00479.x
Collenteur RA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1496-6
Cross JA, 2014, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V13, P73, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2013.864594
DYNES RR, 1993, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V13, P175, DOI 10.1080/02732173.1993.9982022
Elliott JR, 2015, SOC FORCES, V93, P1723, DOI 10.1093/sf/sou120
Elliott JR, 2010, SOC SCI QUART, V91, P1187, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6237.2010.00727.x
Graif C, 2016, POPUL ENVIRON, V37, P288, DOI 10.1007/s11111-015-0243-6
HANEY T, 2013, SOCIOLOGY MIND, V3, P7, DOI DOI 10.4236/sm.2013.31002
Hawkins RL, 2011, DISASTERS, V35, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01197.x
Henderson TL, 2009, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V28, P67, DOI 10.1007/s11113-008-9114-
5
Henry J, 2013, DISASTERS, V37, P293, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01303.x
Hopkins J, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, P546, DOI 10.1111/disa.12120
Hori M, 2010, POPUL ENVIRON, V31, P64, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0094-0
Hunter LM, 2005, POPUL ENVIRON, V26, P273, DOI 10.1007/s11111-005-3343-x
Hunter LM, 2015, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V41, P377, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-
112223
Karanci AN, 2005, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V33, P243, DOI 10.2224/sbp.2005.33.3.243
Knocke ET, 2007, RISK ANAL, V27, P155, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00866.x
Koslov L, 2016, PUBLIC CULTURE, V28, P359, DOI 10.1215/08992363-3427487
Kroll-Smith S., 2015, LEFT CHANCE HURRICAN
Landry CE, 2007, SOUTH ECON J, V74, P326, DOI 10.2307/20111970
Lata S, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V110, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0062-4
Levac J, 2012, J COMMUN HEALTH, V37, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10900-011-9488-x
Litt J., 2008, NAT WOMENS STUDIES A, V20, P32, DOI DOI 10.1353/NWSA.0.0050
Lu M, 1999, POPUL ENVIRON, V20, P467, DOI 10.1023/A:1023365119874
Ludy J, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6
Marshall BK, 2004, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V24, P453, DOI 10.1080/02732170490459485
Massey Douglas S., 1999, HDB INT MIGRATION AM, P34, DOI DOI
10.7758/9781610442893.9
Morrice S, 2013, AREA, V45, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01121.x
Myers CA, 2008, POPUL ENVIRON, V29, P271, DOI 10.1007/s11111-008-0072-y
Nagel J, 2015, GENDER CLIMATE CHANG, DOI 10.4324/9781315675275
Nawyn SJ, 2016, INT J SOCIOL, V46, P81, DOI 10.1080/00207659.2016.1163991
O'Neill E, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P2158, DOI 10.1111/risa.12597
Paul BK, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, P108, DOI 10.1111/disa.12087
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Pomeroy JW, 2016, CAN WATER RESOUR J, V41, P105, DOI
10.1080/07011784.2015.1089190
Poussin JK, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V40, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.013
Reinhardt GY, 2015, POLIT RES QUART, V68, P350, DOI 10.1177/1065912915575790
Reynaud A, 2013, GENEVA PAP R I-ISS P, V38, P547, DOI 10.1057/gpp.2013.16
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Riad JK, 1996, ENVIRON BEHAV, V28, P163, DOI 10.1177/0013916596282001
Sandford R.W., 2014, FLOOD FORECAST CLIMA
Scannell L, 2013, ENVIRON BEHAV, V45, P60, DOI 10.1177/0013916511421196
Schultz J, 2013, POPUL ENVIRON, V34, P293, DOI 10.1007/s11111-012-0171-7
Siegel JM, 2003, ENVIRON BEHAV, V35, P637, DOI 10.1177/0013916503254754
Thistlethwaite J, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P197, DOI 10.1007/s00267-017-0969-2
Tierney K., 2014, SOCIAL ROOTS RISK
Tierney K, 2013, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V4, P1, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.20
TURNER BA, 1976, SOCIOL REV, V24, P753, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1976.tb00583.x
UNISDR, 2015, 3 WORLD C DIS RISK R
Wallace JW, 2016, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V9, P125, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12115
Wasserstein RL, 2016, AM STAT, V70, P129
Windsong EA, 2010, SOC SCI J, V47, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.06.009
NR 84
TC 17
Z9 17
U1 1
U2 11
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0966-0879
EI 1468-5973
J9 J CONTING CRISIS MAN
JI J. Cont. Crisis Manag.
PD SEP
PY 2019
VL 27
IS 3
BP 224
EP 236
DI 10.1111/1468-5973.12253
PG 13
WC Management
SC Business & Economics
GA IS9NA
UT WOS:000482473900003
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Garfin, DR
Thompson, RR
Holman, EA
Wong-Parodi, G
Silver, RC
AF Garfin, Dana Rose
Thompson, Rebecca R.
Holman, E. Alison
Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
Silver, Roxane Cohen
TI Association Between Repeated Exposure to Hurricanes and Mental Health in
a Representative Sample of Florida Residents
SO JAMA NETWORK OPEN
LA English
DT Article
ID PRIMARY-CARE; PTSD SCREEN; ILLNESS; TRAUMA; SUICIDALITY; DISASTERS;
RESPONSES; ANXIETY
AB IMPORTANCE During the past century, more than 100 catastrophic hurricanes have
impacted the Florida coast; climate change will likely be associated with increases
in the intensity of future storms. Despite these annual threats to residents, to
our knowledge, no longitudinal studies of representative samples at risk of
hurricane exposure have examined psychological outcomes associated with repeated
exposure.
OBJECTIVE To assess psychosocial and mental health outcomes and functional
impairment associated with repeated hurricane exposure.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this survey study, a demographically
representative sample of Florida residents was assessed in the 60 hours prior to
Hurricane Irma (wave 1: September 8-11, 2017). A second survey was administered 1
month after Hurricane Irma (wave 2: October 12-29, 2017), and a third survey was
administered after Hurricane Michael (wave 3: October 22 to November 6, 2018). Data
were analyzed from July 19 to 23, 2021.
EXPOSURE Hurricanes Irma and Michael.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were posttraumatic stress symptoms
(PTSS), global distress, worry about future events (generalized worries), and
functional impairment. Path models were used to assess associations of individual-
level factors (prior mental health, recent adversity), prior storm exposures (loss
and/or injury, evacuation), and direct, indirect, and media-based exposures to
hurricanes Irma and Michael with those outcomes. Poststratification weights were
applied to facilitate population-based inferences.
RESULTS Of 2873 individuals administered the survey in wave 1, 1637 responded
(57.0% completion rate) (894 [54.6%, weighted] women; mean [SD] age, 51.31[17.50]
years); 1478 in wave 2 (90.3% retention from wave 1) and 1113 in wave 3 (75.3%
retention from wave 2) responded. Prior mental health ailments (b, 0.18; 95% CI,
0.07-0.28), prior hurricane-related loss and/or injury (b, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-
0.17), hours of Hurricane Irma-related media exposure (b. 0.03; 95% CI, 0.02-0.04),
being in an evacuation zone during Hurricane Irma and not evacuating (b, 0.14; 95%
Cl. 0.02-0.27), and loss and/or injury in Hurricane Irma (b. 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-
0.44) were positively associated with PTSS after Hurricane Irma; most associations
persisted and were associated with responses to Hurricane Michael. Prior mental
health ailments (b. 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.17), hours of Hurricane Michael-related
media exposure (b. 0.01; 95% CI, 0.003-0.02). hurricane Irma-related PTSS (b. 0.42;
95% CI, 0.34-0.50), recent individual-level adversity (b, 0.03; 95% CI. 0.005-
0.05), being in an evacuation zone during Hurricane Irma and evacuating (b. 0.10;
95% Cl. 0.002-0.19). and direct (b, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.55) and indirect (b, 0.12;
95% CI, 0.05-0.18) Hurricane Michael-related exposures were directly associated
with Hurricane Michael-related PTSS. After Hurricane Michael, prior mental health
ailments (b, 0.17; 95% CI. 0.06-0.28), and PTSS related to hurricanes Irma (b.
0.11; 95% CI, 0.001-0.22) and Michael (b, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.47-0.69) were associated
with respondents' functional impairment. Analogous analyses using global distress
and generalized worries as mediators of functional impairment yielded a similar
pattern of results.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this survey study, repeated direct, indirect, and
media-based exposures to hurricanes were associated with increased mental health
symptoms among Florida residents who experienced hurricanes Irma and Michael,
suggesting that people were sensitized to respond with more psychological symptoms
over time. These results may inform targeted public health intervention efforts for
natural disasters.
C1 [Garfin, Dana Rose; Holman, E. Alison] Univ Calif Irvine, Sue & Bill Gross Sch
Nursing, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Garfin, Dana Rose; Silver, Roxane Cohen] Univ Calif Irvine, Program Publ Hlth,
535 Aldrich Hall, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Thompson, Rebecca R.; Holman, E. Alison; Silver, Roxane Cohen] Univ Calif
Irvine, Dept Psychol Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle] Stanford Univ, Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
[Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle] Stanford Univ, Stanford Woods Inst Environm, Stanford,
CA 94305 USA.
[Silver, Roxane Cohen] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Irvine;
University of California System; University of California Irvine;
Stanford University; Stanford University; University of California
System; University of California Irvine
RP Silver, RC (corresponding author), Univ Calif Irvine, Program Publ Hlth, 535
Aldrich Hall, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.; Garfin, DR (corresponding author), Univ Calif
Irvine, Sue & Bill Gross Sch Nursing, Program Publ Hlth, 100C Berk Hall, Irvine, CA
92697 USA.; Silver, RC (corresponding author), Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Dept
Psychol Sci, 535 Aldrich Hall, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
EM dgarfin@uci.edu; rsilver@uci.edu
OI Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle/0000-0001-5207-7489
FU National Science Foundation [SBE 1760764, BCS 1902925, SES 1811883]
FX This work was funded by grants SBE 1760764 and BCS 1902925 (Drs Silver
and Holman) and SES 1811883 (DrsWong-Parodi and Silver) from the
National Science Foundation.
CR Acierno Ron, 2007, Am J Public Health, V97 Suppl 1, pS103, DOI
10.2105/AJPH.2006.087007
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2016, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
Andridge RR, 2010, INT STAT REV, V78, P40, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
[Anonymous], 1980, ASA PROC SECTION SUR
[Anonymous], 2010, FED REGISTER
[Anonymous], 2003, VALIDITY SURVEY HLTH
Bell Melanie L, 2016, BMC Res Notes, V9, P479
Bradley VC, 2021, NATURE, V600, P695, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04198-4
Breslau N, 2008, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V65, P431, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.65.4.431
Calhoun PS, 2010, PSYCHIAT RES, V178, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.11.009
Callegaro M, 2008, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V72, P1008, DOI 10.1093/poq/nfn065
Canadian Hurricane Center, 2019, AL142018 NOAANHC
Carter R.L., 2006, RES PRACTICE ASSESSM, V1, P4
D'Andrea JM., 2018, AM J COMPUT MATH, V8, P1, DOI [10.4236/ajcm.2018.81001, DOI
10.4236/AJCM.2018.81001]
Derogatis L.R., 2001, BSI 18 BRIEF SYMPT I
Feng K., 2017, PREPRINT
Galea S, 2007, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V64, P1427, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.64.12.1427
Garfin D.R., 2016, ENCY MENTAL HLTH, V4, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-
9.00161-0, 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00161-0]
Garfin DR, 2020, PSYCHOL TRAUMA-US, V12, P320, DOI 10.1037/tra0000486
Garfin DR, 2015, PSYCHOL SCI, V26, P675, DOI 10.1177/0956797614561043
Garfin DR, 2014, PSYCHIAT SERV, V65, P1392, DOI 10.1176/appi.ps.201300500
Garfin DR, 2014, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V123, P545, DOI 10.1037/a0037374
Geng FL, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01259
Goodwin R, 2013, J PSYCHIATR RES, V47, P1099, DOI
10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.04.006
Hall BJ, 2019, EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO, V10, DOI 10.1080/20008198.2018.1558709
Holman EA, 2020, CLIN PSYCHOL SCI, V8, P111, DOI 10.1177/2167702619858300
Holman EA, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P93, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1316265110
Karaye IM, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100016
Kessler RC, 2008, MOL PSYCHIATR, V13, P374, DOI 10.1038/sj.mp.4002119
Kessler RC, 2006, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V84, P930, DOI 10.2471/BLT.06.033019
Leppold C, 2022, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V7, pE274, DOI [10.1016/S2468-
2667(21)00255, 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00255-3]
Li C, 2013, STATA J, V13, P795, DOI 10.1177/1536867X1301300407
Lowe SR, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V124, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.032
MacCallum RC, 2002, PSYCHOL METHODS, V7, P19, DOI 10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.19
May CL, 2016, PSYCHOL TRAUMA-US, V8, P233, DOI 10.1037/tra0000077
McLaughlin KA, 2011, DEPRESS ANXIETY, V28, P439, DOI 10.1002/da.20790
NORRIS FH, 1988, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V16, P665, DOI 10.1007/BF00930020
Office for Coastal Management National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association,
2019, HURR COSTS
Prins A, 2016, J GEN INTERN MED, V31, P1206, DOI 10.1007/s11606-016-3703-5
Reifels L, 2019, EPIDEMIOL PSYCH SCI, V28, P310, DOI 10.1017/S2045796017000531
Reifels L, 2018, PSYCHIATRY, V81, P158, DOI 10.1080/00332747.2017.1385049
Seery MD, 2010, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V99, P1025, DOI 10.1037/a0021344
Sellnow-Richmond D. D., 2020, HDB APPL COMMUNICATI, P443, DOI
[10.1002/9781119399926.CH26, DOI 10.1002/9781119399926.CH26]
Silver RC, 2021, NAT HUM BEHAV, V5, P4, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-00981-x
Sweeting JA, 2020, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104048
Thompson RR, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aav3502
Thompson RR, 2019, JAMA NETW OPEN, V2, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6228
Thompson RR, 2017, CLIN PSYCHOL SCI, V5, P513, DOI 10.1177/2167702617692030
Trenberth KE, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P730, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000825
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2000, NAT CTR HLTH STAT NA
von Elm E, 2007, LANCET, V370, P1453, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Wang PS, 2008, AM J PSYCHIAT, V165, P34, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07030502
Wang ZP, 2019, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V13, P1065, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2019.26
WARE JE, 1992, MED CARE, V30, P473, DOI 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
NR 55
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 5
U2 9
PU AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
PI CHICAGO
PA 330 N WABASH AVE, STE 39300, CHICAGO, IL 60611-5885 USA
SN 2574-3805
J9 JAMA NETW OPEN
JI JAMA Netw. Open
PD JUN 16
PY 2022
VL 5
IS 6
AR e2217251
DI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17251
PG 15
GA 2E7DX
UT WOS:000812387000003
PM 35708689
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chang, TY
Chen, H
Fu, HS
Chen, WB
Yu, YC
Su, WR
Lin, LY
AF Chang, Tzu-Yin
Chen, Hongey
Fu, Huei-Shuin
Chen, Wei-Bo
Yu, Yi-Chiang
Su, Wen-Ray
Lin, Lee-Yaw
TI An Operational High-Performance Forecasting System for City-Scale
Pluvial Flash Floods in the Southwestern Plain Areas of Taiwan
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE city-scale pluvial flash flood; plain area; operational high-performance
forecasting system; two-dimensional hydrodynamic model
AB A pluvial flash flood is rapid flooding induced by intense rainfall associated
with a severe weather system, such as thunderstorms or typhoons. Additionally,
topography, ground cover, and soil conditions also account for the occurrence of
pluvial flash floods. Pluvial flash floods are among the most devastating natural
disasters that occur in Taiwan, and these floods always /occur within a few minutes
or hours of excessive rainfall. Pluvial flash floods usually threaten large plain
areas with high population densities; therefore, there is a great need to implement
an operational high-performance forecasting system for pluvial flash flood
mitigation and evacuation decisions. This study developed a high-performance two-
dimensional hydrodynamic model based on the finite-element method and unstructured
grids. The operational high-performance forecasting system is composed of the
Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, the Storm Water Management Model
(SWMM), a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model, and a map-oriented visualization
tool. The forecasting system employs digital elevation data with a 1-m resolution
to simulate city-scale pluvial flash floods. The extent of flooding during
historical inundation events derived from the forecasting system agrees well with
the surveyed data for plain areas in southwestern Taiwan. The entire process of the
operational high-performance forecasting system prediction of pluvial flash floods
in the subsequent 24 h is accomplished within 8-10 min, and forecasts are updated
every six hours.
C1 [Chang, Tzu-Yin; Chen, Hongey; Fu, Huei-Shuin; Chen, Wei-Bo; Yu, Yi-Chiang; Su,
Wen-Ray; Lin, Lee-Yaw] Natl Sci & Technol Ctr Disaster Reduct, New Taipei, Taiwan.
[Chen, Hongey] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Geosci, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
C3 National Science & Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR);
National Taiwan University
RP Chen, WB (corresponding author), Natl Sci & Technol Ctr Disaster Reduct, New
Taipei, Taiwan.
EM geoct@ncdr.nat.gov.tw; hchen@ntu.edu.tw; hsfu@ncdr.nat.gov.tw;
wbchen@ncdr.nat.gov.tw; yuyc@ncdr.nat.gov.tw; wrsu@ncdr.nat.gov.tw;
yaw@ncdr.nat.gov.tw
OI Chen, Wei-Bo/0000-0003-2487-4127
FU Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan; MOST
[109-2221-E-865-001]
FX This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology
(MOST), Taiwan, grant No. MOST 109-2221-E-865-001.
CR Baptista A.M., 1978, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
Bomers A, 2019, ENVIRON FLUID MECH, V19, P1273, DOI 10.1007/s10652-019-09670-4
Casas A, 2006, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V31, P444, DOI 10.1002/esp.1278
Caviedes-Voullieme D, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V61, P206, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.016
Chawla I, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P1095, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-1095-2018
Chen W.B., 2017, PREDICTING RIVER STA
Chen WB, 2017, ENERGIES, V10, DOI 10.3390/en10050652
Chen WB, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9030203
Chen WB, 2017, MAR POLLUT BULL, V116, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.031
Chen WB, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P591, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2199-y
Chen WB, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P3182, DOI 10.3390/w6103182
Chen YM, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102100
Clark AJ, 2010, WEATHER FORECAST, V25, P1052, DOI 10.1175/2010WAF2222390.1
Costabile P, 2020, J HYDROL, V580, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231
Das S, 2008, J EARTH SYST SCI, V117, P603, DOI 10.1007/s12040-008-0056-4
Dazzi S, 2018, ADV WATER RESOUR, V111, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.023
Dilley M, 2005, DISAST RISK MANAGE, P1
Dimitriadis P, 2016, J HYDROL, V534, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020
Earnshaw R. A., 1995, VISUALIZATION USING
Emerton R, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P3327, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-3327-2018
Ghimire B, 2013, J HYDROINFORM, V15, P676, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2012.245
Guidolin M, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V84, P378, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.008
Hong SY, 2009, ATMOS RES, V93, P818, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.03.015
Horritt MS, 2006, J HYDROL, V329, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.02.016
Horritt MS, 2001, J HYDROL, V253, P239, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00490-5
Hsiao LF, 2013, J HYDROL, V506, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.046
Hsiao SC, 2019, OCEAN ENG, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106661
Hu R, 2018, J HYDROL, V560, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.078
Jang JH, 2018, J HYDROL, V562, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.010
Li L, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V122, P4786, DOI 10.1002/2016JD026279
Liu L, 2015, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V15, P381, DOI 10.5194/nhess-15-381-2015
Liu WC, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P519, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9394-z
Madala S, 2014, ATMOS RES, V139, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.12.017
Mohanty UC, 2012, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V169, P381, DOI 10.1007/s00024-011-0376-1
Osuri KK, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/srep41377
Osuri KK, 2017, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V143, P678, DOI 10.1002/qj.2956
Powers JG, 2017, B AM METEOROL SOC, V98, P1717, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00308.1
Roesner L. A., 1988, STORM WATER MANAGEME
Rossman L., 2006, STORM WATER MANAGEME
Routray A, 2010, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V106, P107, DOI 10.1007/s00703-009-0054-3
Routray A, 2016, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V54, P2285, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2498971
Sanders BF, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V126, P79, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.02.007
Savant G, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.061
Shustikova I, 2019, HYDROLOG SCI J, V64, P1769, DOI
10.1080/02626667.2019.1671982
Skamarock W., 2008, DESCRIPTION ADV RES, DOI [DOI 10.5065/D68S4MVH,
10.5065/D68S4MVH]
Srinivas CV, 2013, INT J CLIMATOL, V33, P1195, DOI 10.1002/joc.3505
Swain M, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V102, P607, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03633-0
Tanaka T, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V116, P110, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.02.018
The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 2010, FLASH FLOOD EARLY WA
Wang HV, 2014, J MAR SCI ENG, V2, P226, DOI 10.3390/jmse2010226
Wang YT, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V107, P85, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.010
Weisman ML, 2008, WEATHER FORECAST, V23, P407, DOI 10.1175/2007WAF2007005.1
Wing OEJ, 2019, J HYDROL X, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100039
Ye F, 2018, OCEAN MODEL, V127, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.05.002
Yu YC, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10060346
Zhang J., 2009, HIGH RESOLUTION QPE, P147
Zhang YL, 2008, OCEAN MODEL, V21, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2007.11.005
Zhang YLJ, 2016, OCEAN MODEL, V102, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.05.002
Zhang YLJ, 2016, OCEAN MODEL, V97, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.009
Zhang YJ, 2015, OCEAN MODEL, V85, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.10.003
Zu TT, 2008, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V55, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr.2007.10.007
NR 64
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 0
U2 8
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 4
AR 405
DI 10.3390/w13040405
PG 19
GA QR0GE
UT WOS:000624892600001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Graham, TM
Rock, MJ
AF Graham, Taryn M.
Rock, Melanie J.
TI The Spillover Effect of a Flood on Pets and Their People: Implications
for Rental Housing
SO JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Natural disaster; housing recovery; vulnerability; tenants; companion
animals
ID SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; OWNERSHIP; DIMENSIONS; HEALTH
AB When disasters strike, companion animals (pets) matter. Emergency planning for
them is a key aspect of disaster preparedness, especially considering that people
may delay evacuation out of concern for their pets. Temporary boarding options for
pets are important; however, caregivers (owners) must ultimately return to
permanent housing. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to housing recovery
in the disaster literature on pet ownership, and no studies have examined the
potential for increased vulnerability among tenants with pets. This study analyzed
online rental listings in a city that was severely flooded in 2013. In the
following year, demand for pet-friendly rental housing outweighed supply. Landlords
frequently stipulated restrictions on the allowable sizes, species, or breeds of
pets. Dogs were often banned outright. To keep their pets, prospective tenants
needed to exercise flexibility in location and pay higher surcharges. The
implications of housing insecurity for tenants with pets have broad relevance, not
just in disaster circumstances. Giving up a companion animal to secure housing can
negatively impact resilience, whereas living in unsafe environments to avoid pet
relinquishment may increase vulnerability.
C1 [Graham, Taryn M.; Rock, Melanie J.] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept
Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada.
C3 University of Calgary
RP Graham, TM (corresponding author), Cumming Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth Sci,
Teaching Res Wellness Bldg TRW 3rd Floor, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
EM grahamtm@ucalgary.ca
RI Rock, Melanie J/A-4703-2010; Rock, Melanie J/AAP-7347-2020
OI Rock, Melanie J/0000-0003-2436-3159; Rock, Melanie
J/0000-0003-2436-3159; Graham, Taryn M./0000-0002-0486-7598
FU Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Award [134849]
FX This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Doctoral Award [reference number 134849].
CR [Anonymous], 2007, TRENDS CALGARY HOUSI
[Anonymous], 2017, EMERGENCY PLANS CATS
10.2752/175303712X13316289505503
Burton B., 2014, CALGARYS RENTAL VACA
Calgary Humane Society, 2017, EM BOARD SERV
Canadian Broadcasting Company, 2013, FURR FLOOD VICT RESC
Canadian Mortgage & Housing Corporation, 2007, RENT MARK REP CALG
Carlisle-Frank P, 2005, ANTHROZOOS, V18, P59, DOI 10.2752/089279305785594270
Centre for Public Legal Education in Alberta, 2013, WHAT YOU NEED KNOW R
Coe JB, 2014, J APPL ANIM WELF SCI, V17, P253, DOI 10.1080/10888705.2014.899910
Degeling C, 2016, CRIT PUBLIC HEALTH, V26, P191, DOI
10.1080/09581596.2015.1026876
Edmonds AS, 2008, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V5
Gandia R., 2013, CALGARY SUN 0628
Gibson J., 2016, CBC NEWS
Goodbrand P. T., 2016, THESIS
Gould Charles W., 2009, HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS, V22, P169
Government of Canada, 2006, NAT RENT VAC RAT INC
Graham TM, 2014, LEISURE SCI, V36, P217, DOI 10.1080/01490400.2014.888020
Graveland B., 2016, CBC NEWS
Heath SE, 2001, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V153, P659, DOI 10.1093/aje/153.7.659
Irvine L., 2009, FILLING THE ARK
Kijiji, 2017, US KIJ MED PAG
Klingbeil A., 2014, PETS SQUEEZED OUT TI
Lo T., 2016, CANADIAN BROADC 0525
Logan S., 2016, CALGARY HERALD
Lowe SR, 2009, J TRAUMA STRESS, V22, P244, DOI 10.1002/jts.20403
MAHALSKI PA, 1988, INT J AGING HUM DEV, V27, P249, DOI 10.2190/N40Y-68JW-38TD-
AT9R
McNicholas J, 2005, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V331, P1252, DOI 10.1136/bmj.331.7527.1252
McNicholas J, 2000, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V91, P61, DOI 10.1348/000712600161673
Miles M. B., 2014, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA, V3rd
Miller Bryan, 2011, CANADIAN URBAN REGIO, P269
Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership, 2016, RENT AP VAC RAT 1971
POMEROY J, 2016, WATER, V41, P105, DOI DOI 10.1080/07011784.2015.1089190
Power ER, 2017, HOUSING STUD, V32, P336, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2016.1210095
Statistics Canada, 2013, HOUS RENT VAC RAT
Stephenson A., 2016, CALGARY HERALD
Thompson CN, 2012, SOUTHEAST GEOGR, V52, P253, DOI 10.1353/sgo.2012.0025
Travers C, 2017, J APPL ANIM WELF SCI, V20, P324, DOI
10.1080/10888705.2017.1322515
Wells DL, 2004, ANTHROZOOS, V17, P340, DOI 10.2752/089279304785643203
Westgarth C, 2014, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V11, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-83
Wood L, 2005, SOC SCI MED, V61, P1159, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.01.017
Yin R. K., 2014, ESSENTIAL GUIDE QUAL, DOI [10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108, DOI
10.1097/FCH.0B013E31822DDA9E]
NR 43
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 4
U2 27
PI ABINGDON
SN 1088-8705
EI 1532-7604
J9 J APPL ANIM WELF SCI
JI J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci.
PD JUL 3
PY 2019
VL 22
IS 3
BP 229
EP 239
DI 10.1080/10888705.2018.1476863
PG 11
WC Veterinary Sciences
(SSCI)
SC Veterinary Sciences
GA HW6RJ
UT WOS:000466817500003
PM 29860869
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Rafique, A
Burian, S
Hassan, D
Bano, R
AF Rafique, Ahmed
Burian, Steven
Hassan, Daniyal
Bano, Rakhshinda
TI Analysis of Operational Changes of Tarbela Reservoir to Improve the
Water Supply, Hydropower Generation, and Flood Control Objectives
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE reservoir management; reservoir performance; water management modeling;
climate change; water resources planning
ID UPPER INDUS BASIN; SEDIMENT EVACUATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RELIABILITY;
VULNERABILITY; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; IMPACTS
AB In this study, a model was created with the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP)
System and used to explore the benefits of altering the operations of Tarbela Dam
in terms of reliability, resilience, and vulnerability (RRV) for the three
objectives of irrigation supply, hydropower generation, and flood control.
Sensitivity analysis and logical reasoning with operators identified a feasible
operational rule curve for testing using the integrated performance analysis. The
reservoir performance for the altered operations was compared to the baseline
performance following current operations for both historical and projected future
climate and water demand conditions. Key simulation results show that the altered
operations strategy tested under historical climate and water demand conditions
would increase RRV by 17%, 67%, and 7%, respectively, for the water supply
objective and 34%, 346%, and 22%, respectively, for hydropower generation. For
projected future conditions, the proposed operations strategy would increase RRV by
7%, 219%, and 11%, respectively, for water supply and 19%, 136%, and 13% for
hydropower generation. Synthesis of the results suggests significant benefits for
reliability and resilience of water supply and hydropower are possible with slight
operational adjustments. Overall, the integrated performance analysis supports the
need to develop an optimized operations rule for Tarbela to adapt to projected
climate and demand scenarios.
C1 [Rafique, Ahmed; Burian, Steven; Hassan, Daniyal] Univ Utah, Dept Civil &
Environm Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
[Bano, Rakhshinda] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol, US Pakistan Ctr Adv Studies
Water, Jamshoro City 76062, Sindh, Pakistan.
C3 Utah System of Higher Education; University of Utah; Mehran University
Engineering & Technology
RP Rafique, A (corresponding author), Univ Utah, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Salt
Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
EM ahmed.rafique@utah.edu; steve.burian@utah.edu; u6010713@umail.utah.edu;
rakshikarim@gmail.com
RI bano, rakhshinda/ABC-6639-2021; Parween, Shama/AFQ-4232-2022
OI bano, rakhshinda/0000-0003-4679-5040; Hassan,
Daniyal/0000-0001-8812-7230
FU United States Agency for International Development through a
U.S,-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water (University of Utah)
FX This research was funded by the United States Agency for International
Development through a U.S,-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water
(University of Utah).
CR Amin A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050537
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
Arfan M, 2019, RESOURCES-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/resources8020103
Brown C., 2019, DECISION MAKING DEEP, P255, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2_12,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2_12]
Cook ER, 2013, J HYDROL, V486, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.004
Mateus MC, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-
5452.0000742, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000742]
Harrison G. P., 2006, International Journal of Power and Energy Systems, V26,
P42, DOI 10.2316/Journal.203.2006.1.203-3390
HASHIMOTO T, 1982, WATER RESOUR RES, V18, P14, DOI 10.1029/WR018i001p00014
HASSAN D, 2019, RESOURCES BASEL, V8, DOI DOI 10.3390/RESOURCES8030120
Hassan D, 2019, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V5, P1903, DOI 10.1007/s40899-019-00343-0
Hunt JR, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P244, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0417-9
Jain SK, 2008, HYDROLOG SCI J, V53, P434, DOI 10.1623/hysj.53.2.434
Khan A, 2014, J HYDROL, V509, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.028
Khan AJ, 2018, CLIMATE, V6, DOI 10.3390/cli6040089
Khan NM, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P3173, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0066-5
Khan NM, 2009, HYDROL PROCESS, V23, P730, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7173
Kim U, 2009, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V45, P1361, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2009.00369.x
Kindler J., 1989, P BALT S BALT MD US
KINDLER J, 1977, HYDROL SCI B, V22, P203
Kirsch T.D., 2012, PLOS CURR, V4, DOI 10.1371/4fdfb212d2432
Looney R, 2012, CONTEMP SOUTH ASIA, V20, P225, DOI 10.1080/09584935.2012.670203
Lutz AF, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P587, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2237,
10.1038/NCLIMATE2237]
MOY WS, 1986, WATER RESOUR RES, V22, P489, DOI 10.1029/WR022i004p00489
Mukhopadhyay B, 2014, J HYDROL, V509, P549, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.059
Naheed G., 2010, PAKISTAN J METEOROL, V7, P45
Naheed G., 2009, PAKISTAN J METEOROLO, V6, P89
Nash J.E., 1970, J HYDROL, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
Pereira LS, 2002, AGR WATER MANAGE, V57, P175, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00075-6
Qureshi AS, 2010, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V24, P1551, DOI 10.1007/s11269-009-9513-3
Rashid M. U., 2017, European Water, P323
Ray P.A., 2015, CONFRONTING CLIMATE, P1
Robinson PJ, 1997, INT J CLIMATOL, V17, P983, DOI [10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0088(199707)17:9<983::AID-JOC174>3.0.CO;2-I, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-
0088(199707)17:9<983::AID-JOC174>3.3.CO;2-9]
Sieber J., 2006, P 3 INT C ENV MOD SO
Somlyody L., 2006, International Review for Environmental Strategies, V6, P181
Tarar R.N., 2006, 69 ANN SESS P REP PU, P8
Tariq MAUR, 2012, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V47-48, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2011.08.014
Tariq S.M., 2010, PAKISTAN INDIA RELAT, P9
Tate EL, 2000, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V14, P191, DOI 10.1023/A:1026579230560
VOGEL RM, 1995, WATER RESOUR RES, V31, P645, DOI 10.1029/94WR02972
Wang WC, 2015, HYDROL PROCESS, V29, P859, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10199
Wheater H, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, pS251, DOI
10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.019
Yu W, 2013, DIR DEV, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-9874-6
Zeng RJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa5f3f
NR 45
TC 11
Z9 12
U1 6
U2 11
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 18
AR 7822
DI 10.3390/su12187822
PG 18
(SSCI)
GA OJ9KQ
UT WOS:000584273600001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Adu-Gyamfi, B
Shaw, R
AF Adu-Gyamfi, Bismark
Shaw, Rajib
TI Utilizing Population Distribution Patterns for Disaster Vulnerability
Assessment: Case of Foreign Residents in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area of
Japan
LA English
DT Article
DE migrants; disaster vulnerability; population dynamics; Tokyo
metropolitan area
ID SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; HURRICANE KATRINA; EARTHQUAKE; SEGREGATION; IMPACT
AB Foreign residents in Japan are amongst the vulnerable groups at risk to
disasters in the country. Improvement is crucial in meeting Japan's vison of zero
casualties in major disaster events. If the case of the 2005 Hurricane Katrina is
to offer an insight into migrants' characteristics in mega-disaster situations,
then a broader analysis of vulnerabilities is needed to avoid mass casualties
should the anticipated megathrust earthquake occur. Hence, this study analyzes the
vulnerabilities of foreign residents by utilizing their spatial distribution
attributes in the Tokyo metropolitan area. This study uses multiple approaches that
combine geographic information systems to analyze secondary and primary datasets.
The results reveal that foreign nationals are spatially clustered in some parts of
the metropolis, especially within a 7 km radius of Minato city. The densities in
these areas alter the earthquake community vulnerability levels from 1.23% to 2.8%
and from 5.42% to 13.46%, respectively. Although only 11% of foreign residents are
prepared for any disaster, there is a high sense of interaction amongst them and
Japanese nationals, which almost eliminates isolation within communities. This
study therefore proposes the utilization of some of these attributes in mobilizing
specifically targeted evacuation procedures, management of evacuation centers, and
disaster risk information dissemination.
C1 [Adu-Gyamfi, Bismark; Shaw, Rajib] Keio Univ SFC, Grad Sch Media & Governance,
5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 2520882, Japan.
C3 Keio University
RP Adu-Gyamfi, B; Shaw, R (corresponding author), Keio Univ SFC, Grad Sch Media &
Governance, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 2520882, Japan.
EM bismark@keio.jp; shaw@sfc.keio.ac.jp
OI Shaw, Rajib/0000-0003-3153-1800; Adu Gyamfi, Bismark/0000-0002-7410-6241
FU Keio University
FX This research was funded by the Keio University Taikichiro Mori Memorial
Research Fund 2020.
CR Aliabadi SF, 2015, ARAB J GEOSCI, V8, P10775, DOI 10.1007/s12517-015-1939-8
[Anonymous], J NATURAL DISASTER S
[Anonymous], 2017, POP DIV, V2017/5, P1
[Anonymous], 2019, WAGAYA J
[Anonymous], 2016, RES OP END INT EXP W, V21184, P1
[Anonymous], 2020, THE ASAHI SHIMBUN
Borden KA, 2007, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V4, DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1279
Bureau of Urban Development, 2018, 8 COMM EARTHQ RISK A
Campbell VA, 2009, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V99, pS294, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.162677
CLARK WAV, 1986, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V5, P95, DOI 10.1007/BF00137176
Comley P., 2011, J DIRECT DATA DIGITA, V13, P25, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2011.23, DOI 10.1057/DDDMP.2011.23]
Cordasco KM, 2007, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V18, P277, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2007.0028
Dennett A., 2010, DEMIFER DEMOGRAPHIC
Etyang O., 2020, COVID 19 PANDEMIC PO, V50, P2
Fahey E., 2019, DIVERSE NEIGHBOURHOO, DOI [10.26504/bkmnext376, DOI
10.26504/BKMNEXT376]
Ferris H., 1987, P372
Forest B, 2005, MEASURES SEGREGATION
Gomez OA, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V4, P137, DOI 10.1007/s13753-013-0015-9
Guadagno L., 2017, MIGRANTS DISASTER RI
Hiroshi O, 2008, PROBLEMS FOREIGNERS
Holand IS, 2011, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V65, P1, DOI 10.1080/00291951.2010.550167
Iceland J., 2014, RESIDENTIAL SEGREGAT
Ikeda K., 1999, J AT ENERGY SOC JAPA, V41, P457, DOI [10.3327/jaesj.41.457, DOI
10.3327/JAESJ.41.457]
ISDR/ITC/UNDP/United Nations, 2010, LOC GOV DIS RISK RED
ITO Y., 2015, B SUPPORT CENT REVIV, V3, P87
Japan Tourism Agency Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism,
2014, GUID FORM IN RESP MA
Jeong S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051651
Kataoka H, 2017, GEOGR SP, V9, P285, DOI [10.24586/jags.9.3_285, DOI
10.24586/JAGS.9.3_285]
Kawasaki A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13753-018-0159-8
Khalid H.M, 2016, P HUM FACTORS ERGON, P1513, DOI [10.1177/1541931213601347, DOI
10.1177/1541931213601347]
Kodama T, 2015, JAPANS EC, V2015, P1
Kreimer A., 2003, BUILDING SAFER CITIE
Li SB, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V140, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.469
Li W, 2010, PROF GEOGR, V62, P103, DOI 10.1080/00330120903404934
LIEBOWITZ SJ, 1995, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V11, P205
Liu W., 2017, SOCIAL NETWORK THEOR, V1, P12
Llorente-Marron M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093574
Masana T., 2011, BROADCASTING MULTICU
MASSEY DS, 1988, SOC FORCES, V67, P281, DOI 10.2307/2579183
Mendas A, 2012, SPAN J AGRIC RES, V10, P34, DOI 10.5424/sjar/2012101-293-11
Meredith L.S., 2008, ANAL RISK COMMUNICAT
Michihiro K, LOCAL GOVT JAPAN COU, V2016
Musterd S, 2011, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V57, P359
Niwa Y., 2018, URBAN REG PLAN REV, V5, P43, DOI [10.14398/urpr.5.43, DOI
10.14398/URPR.5.43]
Okamoto K., 2015, DISTRIBUTION LIVING
Public Health England, 2020, DAT UND IMP COVID 19
Rawlings L., 2009, PROMOTING NEIGHBORHO
Sakurai M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101804
Salas J, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17030962
Salas J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082191
Salas J, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.088
Sata K., 2004, SOC MED RES, V22, P21
Shibamura Y, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17124263
Singh S.R., 2014, INT J INTERDISCIPLIN, V1, P71
Squires GD, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P47, DOI 10.1080/0042098042000309694
The Cabinet Office, 2015, GOV JAP DIS MAN JAP
Travel Voice, 2020, INT VIS JAP
Twigg J., 2013, ADV NATURAL TECHNOLO, P171, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6184-1_10
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division,
2019, INT MIGR 2019 REP
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division,
2017, STESASERA415 UN DEP
Vollset SE, 2020, LANCET, V396, P1285, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2
Wang YM, 2012, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V48, P897, DOI 10.1007/s00168-010-0426-0
Weichselgartner J., 2001, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V10, P85, DOI
[10.1108/09653560110388609, DOI 10.1108/09653560110388609]
Wilson B, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P257, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-257-2018
Yamashita M., FOREIGNERS JAPAN HIT
Yin SQ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su122310134
Zoraster RM, 2010, PREHOSPITAL DISASTER, V25, P74, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X00007718
임종헌, 2016, [Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer
Sozialwissenschaften, 한독사회과학논총], V26, P150
NR 69
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 3
U2 20
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD APR
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 8
AR 4061
DI 10.3390/ijerph18084061
PG 17
(SSCI)
Health
GA RT0PX
UT WOS:000644171600001
PM 33921470
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Pal, S
Yadav, VK
Sharma, A
Ananthan, PS
Qureshi, NW
Dey, S
Jana, P
Karmakar, S
Ojha, SN
AF Pal, Sandip
Yadav, Vinod Kumar
Sharma, Arpita
Ananthan, P. S.
Qureshi, Neha W.
Dey, Suman
Jana, Prasanta
Karmakar, Sutanu
Ojha, S. N.
TI Coastal Multi-Hazard Vulnerability Mapping: A Case Study Along the Coast
of South 24 Parganas District, East Coast of India
SO JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE Multi-hazard; Coastal vulnerability; South 24 parganas; Shoreline
change; Sea level rise
ID SEA-LEVEL-RISE; INDEX
AB The present study on coastal zone of South 24 Parganas district of West Bengal
is experiencing threat from several disasters like cyclones, storms, tsunami, flood
and erosion. This area was greatly affected during 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and
during 2019 Fani cyclone. This study is focused on generating Multi-hazard
vulnerability map, which is a blended, and combined overlay of multiple hazards
those directly or indirectly affecting the coastal zone. Block-wise vulnerability
level was estimated using the parameters historical storm surge height, future sea
level rise, shoreline change rate and high-resolution coastal topography with the
aid of Remote sensing and GIS tools. The assessment result revealed that 67% of the
total district is experiencing the severe erosion. An area of totalling 2090 sq. km
is found to fall under multi-hazard zone and threatening the coastal population due
to several hazards. Multi-hazard vulnerability maps were further intervened at
block level, and study found that Patharpratima block is coming under highly
vulnerable zone (63% of total area), whereas Diamond Harbour-I block is least
vulnerable (6% of total area). These hazard maps can aid as critical area-specific
information during the disaster for quick evacuation and to prepare management
strategy and also be used to evolve a new facility and for insurance purposes.
C1 [Pal, Sandip; Yadav, Vinod Kumar; Sharma, Arpita; Ananthan, P. S.; Qureshi, Neha
W.; Dey, Suman; Ojha, S. N.] ICAR Cent Inst Fisheries Educ, Fisheries Econ Extens &
Stat Div, Seven Bunglow,Fisheries Univ Rd, Mumbai 400061, Maharashtra, India.
[Jana, Prasanta] ICAR Cent Inst Fisheries Educ, Fish Nutritu Biochem & Physiol
Div, Mumbai 400061, Maharashtra, India.
[Karmakar, Sutanu] West Bengal Univ Anim & Fishery Sci, Fac Fishery Sci, Kolkata
700094, India.
C3 Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR); ICAR - Central Institute
of Fisheries Education; Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR);
ICAR - Central Institute of Fisheries Education; West Bengal University
of Animal & Fishery Sciences
RP Yadav, VK (corresponding author), ICAR Cent Inst Fisheries Educ, Fisheries Econ
Extens & Stat Div, Seven Bunglow,Fisheries Univ Rd, Mumbai 400061, Maharashtra,
India.
EM vinodkumar@cife.edu.in
RI Yadav, Vinod/C-7267-2019
OI Yadav, Vinod/0000-0003-3466-6460
FU ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai
FX Authors are thankful to the Director, ICAR-Central Institute of
Fisheries Education, Mumbai for providing necessary supports and
facilities to carry out the study. The authors would like to thank R.S.
Mahendra, Scientist (INCOIS) for his useful suggestions and guidance for
the current study.
CR [Anonymous], STUDY SUNDARBAN
Census, 2011, DISTRICT CENSUS HDB
Chittibabu P., 2002, MAR GEOD, V25, P235, DOI DOI 10.1080/01490410290051554
Church JA, 2011, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1029/2011GL048794
Convertino, 2013, CLIMATE VULNERABILIT, P267
Dube SK, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V51, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9397-9
Dube SK, 2006, DISASTER DEV, V1, P47
EEA, 2006, VULNERABILITY ADAPTA
Ghosh T., 2014, ISLAND EROSION AFFLI, P217, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-04489-7_15,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04489-7_15]
Gornitz V., 1990, J COASTAL RES, V9, P201, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10661-017-6282-Y
Government of West Bengal, 2019, DISTRICT DISASTER MA
Habib S., 2009, INTEGRATING MULTIHAZ
Hegde AV, 2007, J COASTAL RES, V23, P1106, DOI 10.2112/04-0259.1
INCOIS, 2018, COASTAL VULNERABILIT
Kankara RS, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V116, P855, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.374
Klein R, 2008, FINANCING ADAPTATION
Kumar TS, 2010, J COASTAL RES, V26, P523, DOI 10.2112/09-1186.1
Lowe AS, 2003, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V69, P1133, DOI 10.14358/PERS.69.10.1133
Mahendra RS, 2011, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V54, P302, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.12.008
Mahendra RS, 2010, RIV ITAL TELERILEVAM, V42, P67
Mohammed KK, 2017, TURK J FISH AQUAT SC, V17, P193, DOI 10.4194/1303-2712-
v17_1_21
Mukherjee N, 2018, SPAT INF RES, V26, P163, DOI 10.1007/s41324-018-0168-0
Nicholls RJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1517, DOI 10.1126/science.1185782
Pethick JS, 2000, ENVIRON CONSERV, V27, P359
Prerna R, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P701, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1336-8
Rao AD., 2005, DEV LONG TERM HAZARD
Rao VR, 2009, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V112, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.05.015
Rao YR, 1997, MAUSAM, V48, P555, DOI [DOI 10.54302/MAUSAM.V48I4.4322,
10.54302/mausam.v48i4.4322]
Sudha, 2018, ASSESSMENT SHORELINE
Tate E, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN B, V37, P646, DOI 10.1068/b35157
Thieler E.R., 2000, 07600 US GEOL SURV, DOI [10.3133/fs07600, DOI
10.3133/FS07600]
Unnikrishnan AS, 2007, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V57, P301, DOI
10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.029
Watson C. C., 2002, SOLUTIONS COASTAL DI, V2, P172
World Bank, 2014, BUILDING RESILIENCE
World Bank, 2017, POTENTIAL BLUE EC IN
NR 35
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 12
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0255-660X
EI 0974-3006
J9 J INDIAN SOC REMOTE
JI J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 50
IS 9
BP 1701
EP 1712
DI 10.1007/s12524-022-01558-z
EA MAY 2022
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Remote Sensing
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Remote Sensing
GA 3B2KI
UT WOS:000793699300001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Takagi, H
Anh, L
Islam, MR
Hossain, TT
AF Takagi, Hiroshi
Le Tuan Anh
Islam, Md Rezuanul
Hossain, Tajnova Tanha
TI Progress of disaster mitigation against tropical cyclones and storm
surges: a comparative study of Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Japan
SO COASTAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Tropical cyclone; storm surge; Bangladesh; Vietnam; Japan; disaster
mitigation
ID MANGROVE FORESTS; 3-DIMENSIONAL INTERACTION; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT;
REDUCTION; THAILAND; WAVES
AB This study reviews the progress of disaster mitigation measures against tropical
cyclones (TCs) in three Asian countries with different historical, social, and
economic backgrounds: Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Japan. In Bangladesh, an average of
6,600 people was killed by a single TC in the 1960s, but this number had decreased
to 30 in the 2010s; this reduction was due to a clear improvement in soft measures,
such as weather forecasting, warning systems, and mass evacuation coordinated by
volunteers. In Vietnam, several strong TCs have recently made landfall, leading to
improvements in national disaster management. Although Vietnam's current disaster
management budget is smaller than those of the two other countries, large-scale
evacuation by local authorities is believed to have minimized casualties. In Japan,
shortly after Typhoon Vera in 1959, a comprehensive law on disaster prevention was
enacted, and coastal dikes were constructed nationwide, resulting in a considerable
reduction in fatalities due to TCs. However, the disaster prevention facilities
built in this period are now deteriorating, while Japan's budget for disaster
management is projected to be decreasing. The three countries have advanced their
disaster preparedness in response to past TCs and storm surges, but new challenges
have also arisen.
C1 [Takagi, Hiroshi; Hossain, Tajnova Tanha] Tokyo Inst Technol, Sch Environm &
Soc, Dept Transdisciplinary Sci & Engn, Tokyo, Japan.
[Le Tuan Anh] Ho Chi Minh City Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn Ho Chi Minh, Dept
Port & Coastal Engn, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
[Islam, Md Rezuanul] Univ Tokyo, Sch Engn, Inst Engn Innovat, Tokyo, Japan.
C3 Tokyo Institute of Technology; Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
(HCMCUT); Vietnam National University Hochiminh City; University of
Tokyo
RP Takagi, H (corresponding author), Tokyo Inst Technol, Sch Environm & Soc, Dept
Transdisciplinary Sci & Engn, Tokyo, Japan.
EM takagi@ide.titech.ac.jp
RI Takagi, Hiroshi/B-4566-2017; Islam, Dr. Md Rezuanul/AAF-7662-2020
OI Takagi, Hiroshi/0000-0002-3668-688X; Islam, Dr. Md
Rezuanul/0000-0003-4934-8924
FU Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16KK0121, 19K04964]
FX This research was financially supported by the Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science (16KK0121 and 19K04964).
CR Alam E, 2015, INT J CLIMATOL, V35, P801, DOI 10.1002/joc.4035
Alam E, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P931, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01176.x
Cao A, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V50, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.02.010
Anh L.T., 2017, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, V73, P168, DOI DOI
10.2208/JSCEJOE.73.I_168
Anh L. T., 2019, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, V75, P2019
[Anonymous], 2018, PROJ ASS EARTHQ DIS, P176
[Anonymous], 1992, NAT HAZ
[Anonymous], 2013, J ANTHR
[Anonymous], 2012, NAT AGGR GEOS DAT CO
[Anonymous], 1876, STAT ACCOUNT BENGAL
[Anonymous], 2015, ADB CAPACITY BUILDIN
Arakawa H., 1962, TENKI, V9, P334
As-Salek JA, 1998, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V28, P227, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0485(1998)028<0227:CTAFEO>2.0.CO;2
Azad MAK., 2019, ASIA PACIFIC J RURAL, V29, P135, DOI [10.1177/1018529119898036,
DOI 10.1177/1018529119898036]
Bangladesh Red Crescent Society, 2021, CYCL PREP PROGR CPP
BBS, 2011, BANGL POP HOUS CENS
BERN C, 1993, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V71, P73
Cabinet Office Government of Japan, 2019, WHIT PAP DIS MAN
Cabinet Office Japan, 2014, DISAS MANAGE
DAS PK, 1974, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V100, P437, DOI 10.1256/smsqj.42514
Dinh V.M., 2018, STORM SURGE VIETNAM
Dunn GE, 1962, MON WEATHER REV, V90, P83, DOI DOI 10.1175/1520-
0493(1962)0902.0.CO;2
Esteban M., 2015, HDB COASTAL DISASTER, P780
Esteban M, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P1507, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3365-1
Esteban M, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.007
Esteban M, 2016, COAST ENG J, V58, DOI 10.1142/S057856341640009X
Express VN., 2017, MASS EVACUATIONS SO
FLIERL GR, 1972, NATURE, V239, P213, DOI 10.1038/239213a0
FRANK NL, 1971, B AM METEOROL SOC, V52, P438, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0477(1971)052<0438:TDTCIH>2.0.CO;2
Frontier Myanmar, 2015, CONTR CAT
Furukawa T., 2015, J AFFECTIVE DISORDER, V180, P179, DOI
[10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.021, DOI 10.1016/J.JAD.2015.03.021]
GTZ, CLIM CHANG DEV VIETN, P30
Hasan F, 1999, SANDWIP STUDIES, P175
Hatake I., 1952, TOKYO METROPOLITAN N, V240
Heidarzadeh M, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04112-7
Hoshino S, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P539, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1983-4
Hossain A, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0259098
Hutchinson R.H.S., 1909, DISTRICT GAZETTEERS
IFRC, 2013, INFORM B N 3 GLIDE N
Islam M. R., 2017, J JAPAN SOC CIVIL EN, V74, P593
Islam MR, 2022, J METEOROL SOC JPN, V100, P493, DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2022-024
Islam MR, 2020, FRONT EARTH SCI-PRC, V14, P553, DOI 10.1007/s11707-020-0817-1
Islam MT, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102175
ISOZAKI I, 1970, PAP METEOROL GEOPHYS, V21, P421, DOI
10.2467/mripapers1950.21.4_421
JICA,, 2015, GRANT AGR SIGN DHAK
Joint Typhoon Warning Center, 2021, N IND OC BEST TRACK
Kohno N.Meteo-Tsunami., 2014, TENKI, V61, P58
Konishi T., 2010, TENKI, V57, P383
Kumazawa R., 2016, TENKI, V63, P3
Kusakabe M., 1960, J AGRIC METEOROL, V15, P102
Mikami T, 2016, COAST ENG J, V58, DOI 10.1142/S0578563416400052
Minderhoud PSJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7146
Miyazaki M., 2003, SEIZANDO SHOTEN, V89
Mizutani T., 1996, GEOGRAPHICAL REV JAP, V64A, P744
MLIT, STAT SURV FLOOD DAM
Mori N, 2012, COAST ENG J, V54, DOI 10.1142/S0578563412500015
NAOJ, 2019, MARUZEN, P348
Needham HF, 2015, REV GEOPHYS, V53, P545, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000477
Ngoc H. H., 2016, J SCI TECHNOLOGY INF, V2
Ogou K., 2008, TRUE FACE OKINOERABU, P26
Okuda Y.TyphoonDisaster., 1980, TENKI, V27, P31
Omori F., 1918, EARTHQUAKE INVESTIGA, V89, P19
Paul BK, 2010, GEOGR REV, V100, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2010.00040.x
Paul SK, 2011, ORIENT GEOGR, V55, P57
Press Jiji, 2021, TYPHOON CHANTHU LAND
Sarker M.A., 2018, AM J WATER SCI ENG, V4, P66
Shamsuddoha M, 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
Shimozono T, 2020, COAST ENG J, V62, P129, DOI 10.1080/21664250.2020.1744212
Suzuki T, 2020, COAST ENG J, V62, P146, DOI 10.1080/21664250.2020.1738620
Takagi H, 2017, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V10, P42, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12136
Takagi H., 2017, NAT HAZARDS EARTH SY, V2017, P1, DOI [10.5194/nhess-2017-365,
DOI 10.5194/NHESS-2017-365]
Takagi H., 2015, HDB COASTAL DISASTER, P235, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-801060-
0.00012-5, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-801060-0.00012-5]
Takagi H., 2013, CIVIL ENG, V68, P85
Takagi H., 2014, COASTAL DISASTERS CL, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-800007-
6.00001-0
Takagi H, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105753
Takagi H, 2022, FRONT EARTH SCI-PRC, V16, P206, DOI 10.1007/s11707-021-0872-2
Takagi H, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100506
Takagi H, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090959
Tasnim KM, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1619, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1387-x
Terry JP, 2012, WEATHER, V67, P72, DOI 10.1002/wea.882
Thao N.D., 2014, COASTAL DISASTERS CL, P424
Truong V. B, 2016, J WATER RESOURCES SC, V33
Valenzuela VPB, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101508
Vietnam National Museum of History,, 2020, GN 100 NAM TRUC NGUI
Vongvisessomjai S., 2009, SONGKLA J SCI TECHNO, V31, P213
Weinkle J, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P4729, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00719.1
Witvorapong N, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0130862
World Bank, 2021, LAND AR OUR WORLD DA
Ye MQ, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9be2
NR 92
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 6
U2 11
PI ABINGDON
SN 2166-4250
EI 1793-6292
J9 COAST ENG J
JI Coast Eng. J.
PD JAN 2
PY 2023
VL 65
IS 1
SI SI
BP 39
EP 53
DI 10.1080/21664250.2022.2100179
EA JUL 2022
PG 15
WC Engineering, Civil; Engineering, Ocean
SC Engineering
GA 9X8BK
UT WOS:000827471400001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Azhar, F
Pauwels, VRN
Bui, HH
AF Azhar, Fatima
Pauwels, Valentijn R. N.
Bui, Ha H. H.
TI Confirmation of vehicle stability criteria through a combination of
smoothed particle hydrodynamics and laboratory measurements
LA English
DE drag; flood hazard; flume experiments; physical model; smoothed-particle
hydrodynamics; vehicle stability
ID DUALSPHYSICS; MOTION
AB This study combines laboratory experiments and numerical modelling in a novel
manner to assess vehicle stability. Assessing vehicle stability forms the basis of
hazard classification criteria, which in turn helps in forming safety guidelines
for stream crossings and planning of evacuation routes in times of floods. These
criteria are based on theoretical and physical model studies carried out on
different vehicle models. This article demonstrates the application of a numerical
method to determine the vehicle stability threshold so that the need for a physical
model study for each kind of vehicle may be avoided. The numerical investigation is
performed using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with the vehicle oriented
perpendicular to the flow direction, as this is the most critical orientation. A
physical model study is also performed and its results are used to validate the SPH
model. The results confirm the current Australian Rainfall and Runoff (ARR) safety
criteria for stationary vehicles. It also suggests that the ARR stability curve can
shift depending on the road conditions that affect the vehicle's sliding mechanism.
C1 [Azhar, Fatima; Pauwels, Valentijn R. N.; Bui, Ha H. H.] Monash Univ, Dept Civil
Engn, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia.
C3 Monash University
RP Azhar, F (corresponding author), Monash Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Clayton, Vic
3800, Australia.
EM fatima.azhar@monash.edu
RI Bui, Ha H./AAW-8926-2021
OI Bui, Ha H./0000-0001-8071-5433; Azhar, Fatima/0000-0002-4528-7928;
Pauwels, Valentijn/0000-0002-1290-9313
FU Australian Government
FX Australian Government
CR Ahmed MA, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12616
Al-Qadami EHH, 2020, J ENG SCI TECHNOL, V15, P1384
Albano R, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.009
Altomare C, 2017, COAST ENG, V127, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.06.004
Altomare C, 2014, COMPUT STRUCT, V130, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.10.011
Amicarelli A, 2015, COMPUT FLUIDS, V116, P205, DOI
10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.04.018
Arrighi C, 2015, J FLUID STRUCT, V57, P170, DOI
Arslan T, 2013, J OFFSHORE MECH ARCT, V135, DOI 10.1115/1.4025144
Ball J., 2019, AUSTR RAINFALL RUNOF
Barreiro A, 2013, COMPUT STRUCT, V120, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.02.010
Bonham A.J., 1967, 100 U NEW S WAL WAT, V100, P30
Canelas RB, 2018, APPL OCEAN RES, V76, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.apor.2018.04.015
Crespo AJC, 2015, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V187, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.004
Fredsoe J., 2006, HYDRODYNAMICS CYLIND, VRevised ed.
GINGOLD RA, 1977, MON NOT R ASTRON SOC, V181, P375, DOI 10.1093/mnras/181.3.375
Gordon A. D., 1973, 7312 U NEW S WAL WAT
Haynes K, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V76, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.003
Jempson M. A., 2000, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
Keller R. J., 1993, 69 URB RES ASS AUSTR
LEIMKUHLER BJ, 1996, MATH APPROACHES BIOM, P161, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-
4066-2_10
LUCY LB, 1977, ASTRON J, V82, P1013, DOI 10.1086/112164
Majtan E, 2021, J HYDRAUL ENG, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001932
Malavasi S, 2003, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V129, P854, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2003)129:11(854)
Martinez-Gomariz E, 2019, RIBAGUA-REV IBEROAM, V6, P123, DOI
10.1080/23863781.2019.1685921
Martinez-Gomariz E, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P930, DOI
10.1080/1573062X.2017.1301501
Milanesi L, 2020, J HYDRAUL RES, V58, P701, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2019.1647887
Molteni D, 2009, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V180, P861, DOI 10.1016/j.cpc.2008.12.004
MONAGHAN JJ, 1992, ANNU REV ASTRON ASTR, V30, P543, DOI
10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551
Monaghan JJ, 2003, J WATERW PORT COAST, V129, P250, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
950X(2003)129:6(250)
MONAGHAN JJ, 1994, J COMPUT PHYS, V110, P399, DOI 10.1006/jcph.1994.1034
Monaghan JJ, 1999, J WATERW PORT C-ASCE, V125, P145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
950X(1999)125:3(145)
Persi E, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, pS59, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2891-6
Shah Syed Muzzamil Hussain, 2018, MATEC Web of Conferences, V203, DOI
10.1051/matecconf/201820307003
Shah SMH, 2018, AIN SHAMS ENG J, V9, P3245, DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2018.01.001
Shand TD, 2011, AUSTR RAINFALL RUNOF
Shu CW, 2011, J HYDRAUL RES, V49, P709, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2011.616318
Smith G. P., 2017, 201707 WRL U NEW S W
Smith GP, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12527
Tafuni A, 2018, COMPUT METHOD APPL M, V342, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.cma.2018.08.004
Teo F. Y., 2010, THESIS CARDIFF U
Teo FY, 2012, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V10, P149, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2012.674040
Toda K., 2013, INT C FLOOD RESILIEN
Wang ZB, 2016, APPL MATH MODEL, V40, P9625, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2016.06.030
Wendland H., 1995, Advances in Computational Mathematics, V4, P389, DOI
10.1007/BF02123482
Wong J Y., 2008, THEORY GROUND VEHICL, V3rd edn.
Xia JQ, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P1619, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0889-2
Xia JQ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9639-x
NR 48
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1753-318X
PD 2023 JAN 24
PY 2023
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12885
EA JAN 2023
PG 13
GA 8F8HQ
UT WOS:000919898000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Koyama, N
Sakai, M
Yamada, T
AF Koyama, Naoki
Sakai, Mizuki
Yamada, Tadashi
TI Study on a Water-Level-Forecast Method Based on a Time Series Analysis
of Urban River Basins-A Case Study of Shibuya River Basin in Tokyo
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE urban floods; forecast method; water level; vector auto regressive
model; time series analysis
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; RAINFALL-RUNOFF; FLOOD RISK; URBANIZATION; BEHAVIOR;
MODEL
AB In urban basins, localized torrential rain increases the water level of rivers
in an extremely short time, thereby leading to flooding within an hour. Therefore,
to achieve early evacuation, the water level should be accurately forecasted. The
outflow process in urban areas employs the sewer system to discharge the water back
to rivers. However, the data for the sewer system are not freely available, and it
requires much work and time to design a physical model based on such data. Thus, a
vector autoregressive model to develop a water level forecast system that uses
observed rainfall and water level is being used. Additionally, this model was used
to ensure information conducive to evacuation approximately 20 min in advance and
to assess its forecast accuracy, despite the very limited data-water levels at one
point and average rainfall at another-without the need to build a physical model
such as that which is used in sewer pipe calculations. Compared to the observed
water level, the calculated water level increased faster; and thus, the forecast
leaned toward safety in evacuation. Furthermore, the data from past five torrential
rainfall events to achieve a stable forecast; this method can be applied to basins
with limited observation data. Therefore, these results indicate that this method
can be applied as a water level forecast method for basins with an extremely fast
flood arrival time.
C1 [Koyama, Naoki; Yamada, Tadashi] Chuo Univ, Res & Dev Initiat, 1-13-27
Kasuga,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1128551, Japan.
[Sakai, Mizuki] Chuo Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Civil Human & Environm Engn
Course, 1-13-27,Kasuga,Bunkyo-kuu, Tokyo 1128551, Japan.
C3 Chuo University; Chuo University
RP Koyama, N (corresponding author), Chuo Univ, Res & Dev Initiat, 1-13-27
Kasuga,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1128551, Japan.
EM knaoki002@g.chuo-u.ac.jp
FU Unit for Research and Application Solution of Water-Related Disaster
Science and Information of Research and Development Initiative (RDI),
Chuo University
FX This research was supported by Unit for Research and Application
Solution of Water-Related Disaster Science and Information of Research
and Development Initiative (RDI), Chuo University.
CR AKAIKE H, 1974, IEEE T AUTOMAT CONTR, VAC19, P716, DOI 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Ali G., 2015, J STAT EC METHODS, V4, P1
[Anonymous], 2010, INN
Beven K.J., 2001, RAINFALL RUNOFF MODE
Cho M, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14142221
CIMA Foundation, 2015, INP PAP PREP GLOB AS
Danish D., 2017, MIKE URBAN MIKE URBA
Fotovatikhah F, 2018, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V12, P411, DOI
10.1080/19942060.2018.1448896
Gagliano A, 2016, INT J HEAT TECHNOL, V34, pS226, DOI 10.18280/ijht.34S206
Galloway G. E., 2018, GROWING THREAT URBAN
Hartini S., 2015, FORUM GEOGR, V29, P1, DOI [10.23917/forgeo.v29i1.786, DOI
10.23917/FORGEO.V29I1.786]
Henonin J, 2013, J HYDROINFORM, V15, P717, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2013.132
Hou JM, 2020, ECOL ENG, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105794
Hyndman R. J., 2018, FORECASTING PRINCIPL
Iwanaga Y., 2016, J JPN SOC CIV ENG SE, V72, P49
Joint Research Centre (JRC), RIV FLOOD HAZ MAPS E
Kawaike K., 2018, J JPN SOC CIV ENG SE, V74, DOI [10.2208/jscejhe.74.I_1537, DOI
10.2208/JSCEJHE.74.I_1537]
LACHENBR.PA, 1968, TECHNOMETRICS, V10, P1, DOI 10.2307/1266219
Liu X, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040815
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.282
Mair M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020146
Makoto H., 1995, J HYDRAUL ENG, V1995, P93
Ministry of Land, INFR TRANSP TOUR HAZ
Morita S., 1985, PROC JPN C HYDRAUL, V29, P19
Morooka Y, 2017, J DISASTER RES, V12, P176, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2017.p0176
Nakakita E, 2017, ADV METEOROL, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/5962356
National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management Ministry of Land
Infrastructure Transport and Tourism (NILIM) Japan, 2016, TECHNICAL DOCUMENTAT,
V909
Niedzielski T, 2007, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V21, P649, DOI 10.1007/s00477-006-
0077-y
Niedzielski T, 2017, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V31, P1555, DOI 10.1007/s00477-016-
1251-5
Qi WC, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P31, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04715-8
Rossman L.A., 2015, STORM WATER MANAGEME
Sidek LM, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su131810259
Suzuki T., 2012, ANN J CIV ENG OCEAN, V68, pI, DOI [10.2208/jscejoe.68.I_870,
DOI 10.2208/JSCEJOE.68.I_870]
Tokyo Metropolitan Government, SEW REG SYST
Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2014, TOK METR GOV BAS POL
Tokyo Metropolitan Government, COMPR INF SYST FLOOD
Wang HL, 2022, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100985
Wang SY, 2008, OCEAN MODEL, V25, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2008.06.009
Winsemius HC, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P1871, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-1871-
2013
Yaseen ZM, 2019, J HYDROL, V569, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069
Ye S, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P1997, DOI [10.1175/jhm-d-16-0207.1,
10.1175/JHM-D-16-0207.1]
NR 45
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 4
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 1
AR 161
DI 10.3390/w15010161
PG 18
GA 7R9YZ
UT WOS:000910421600001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bailie, J
Matthews, V
Bailie, R
Villeneuve, M
Longman, J
AF Bailie, Jodie
Matthews, Veronica
Bailie, Ross
Villeneuve, Michelle
Longman, Jo
TI Exposure to risk and experiences of river flooding for people with
disability and carers in rural Australia: a cross-sectional survey
SO BMJ OPEN
LA English
DT Article
DE public health; health policy; mental health
ID NATURAL DISASTERS; MENTAL-HEALTH; HURRICANE KATRINA; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
INDIVIDUALS; PTSD; DISPLACEMENT; VALIDATION
AB Objectives In this paper, we explore the exposure to risk and experiences of
people with disability and carers during a flooding event and the subsequent mental
health impacts. Design A cross-sectional survey between September and November
2017. Binary logistic regression models were used to investigate associations
between the mental health of people with disability and carers and their exposure
to the flood. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse qualitative data.
Setting Flood-affected communities in the rural area of Northern Rivers, New South
Wales, Australia, 6 months after river flooding in 2017. Participants People over
16 years and a resident in the Northern Rivers at the time of the flood were
invited to participate. Using a purposive, snowballing sampling technique
participants were drawn from a wide range of socioeconomic backgrounds and had
experienced different degrees of flood exposure. Results Of 2252 respondents, there
were 164 people with disability and 91 carers. Both groups had increased odds of
having their home flooded (people with a disability: OR 2.41 95% CI 1.71 to 3.39;
carers: OR 1.76 95% CI 1.10 to 2.84). On evacuation, respondents reported
inaccessible, conflicting and confusing information regarding flood warnings.
Essential services such as healthcare and social services were disrupted (people
with a disability: OR 3.98 95% CI 2.82 to 5.60; carers 2.17 95% CI 1.33 to 3.54)
and access to safe and mould free housing post flood event was limited. After
taking sociodemographic factors into account, respondents with a disability and
carers had greater odds of probable post-traumatic stress disorder compared with
other respondents (people with a disability: 3.32 95% CI 2.22 to 4.96; carers: 1.87
95% CI 1.10 to 3.19). Conclusion Our findings show the profound impact and systemic
neglect experienced by people with disability and carers during and after the 2017
flood event in the Northern Rivers. As people with disability will take longer to
recover, they will require longer-term tailored supports and purposeful inclusion
in flood preparedness and recovery efforts.
C1 [Bailie, Jodie; Matthews, Veronica; Longman, Jo] Univ Sydney, Univ Ctr Rural
Hlth, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
[Bailie, Jodie; Villeneuve, Michelle] Univ Sydney, Ctr Disabil Res & Policy,
Sydney, NSW, Australia.
[Bailie, Jodie] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
[Bailie, Ross] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
C3 University of Sydney; University of Sydney; University of Sydney;
University of Sydney
RP Bailie, J (corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Univ Ctr Rural Hlth, Lismore,
NSW, Australia.; Bailie, J (corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Ctr Disabil Res &
Policy, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; Bailie, J (corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Sch
Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
RI Villeneuve, Michelle/D-5124-2015; Bailie, Ross S/K-8141-2013; Bailie,
Jodie/D-6626-2018
OI Villeneuve, Michelle/0000-0001-7468-3527; Bailie, Ross
S/0000-0001-5966-3368; Bailie, Jodie/0000-0003-4393-5773; Matthews,
Veronica/0000-0002-1319-257X
FU NSW Office of Environment and Heritage; University of Sydney; Western
Sydney University; University of Wollongong; Northern NSW Local Health
District
FX The study was funded by The University of Sydney, Western Sydney
University, University of Wollongong, Northern NSW Local Health District
and the NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.
CR Alderman K, 2012, ENVIRON INT, V47, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003
Alexander D., 2015, DISABILITY DISASTER, P15
Allan RP, 2020, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1472, P49, DOI 10.1111/nyas.14337
[Anonymous], 2015, AUSTRALAS J DISASTER
[Anonymous], 2005, PRIM HEALTH CARE RES, DOI [DOI 10.1191/1463423605PC230OA,
10.1191/1463423605pc230oa]
[Anonymous], 2013, SCREENING POSTTRAUMA
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2019, DIS AG CAR AUSTR SUM
Australian Bureau of Statistics, DAT REG
Australian Government Services Australia, 2022, DISABILITY SUPPORT P
Australian Government Services Australia, 2022, RUL CAR
Bailie J, 2021, MED J AUSTRALIA, V215, P16, DOI 10.5694/mja2.51124
Berry HL, 2010, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V55, P123, DOI 10.1007/s00038-009-0112-0
Buchanan, 2020, PERSON CTR EMERGENCY
Chakraborty J, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V226, P176, DOI
10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.039
Cianconi P, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
Clemens SL, 2013, MED J AUSTRALIA, V199, P552, DOI 10.5694/mja13.10307
Cruz J, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228581
Edwards B, 2009, MED J AUSTRALIA, V190, pS61
Elo S, 2008, J ADV NURS, V62, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fernandez A, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119929
Fischer EM, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P986, DOI [10.1038/nclimate3110,
10.1038/NCLIMATE3110]
Fortune N, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182111705
Fortune N, 2020, AUST NZ J PUBL HEAL, V44, P227, DOI 10.1111/1753-6405.12983
Fox MH, 2010, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V55, P231, DOI 10.1037/a0020321
Fujii K., 2012, GREAT E JAPAN EARTHQ
Gaskin CJ, 2017, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V9, P801, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0126.1
Gibson A, 2018, J GERONTOL SOC WORK, V61, P775, DOI
10.1080/01634372.2018.1474158
Han B, 2016, GEN HOSP PSYCHIAT, V38, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.07.009
LaJoie AS, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P1031, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01181.x
Lang AJ, 2005, BEHAV RES THER, V43, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2004.04.005
Levac J, 2012, J COMMUN HEALTH, V37, P725, DOI 10.1007/s10900-011-9488-x
Longman JM, 2019, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-7501-y
Malpass A, 2019, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V34, P60
Matthews V, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17207676
Matthews V, 2019, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00367
McDermott S, 2016, DISABIL HEALTH J, V9, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.12.005
McLennan J, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P1489, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04642-8
5196(17)30047-5, 10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30047-5]
National Guideline Centre (UK), 2018, HEAD INJURY ASSESSME
North CS, 2021, BEHAV SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/bs11010004
North CS, 2013, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V310, P507, DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.107799
North CS, 2009, AM J PSYCHIAT, V166, P34, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050644
North CS, 2004, J NERV MENT DIS, V192, P823, DOI
10.1097/01.nmd.0000146911.52616.22
O'Brien BC, 2014, ACAD MED, V89, P1245, DOI 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Parise I, 2018, AUST J GEN PRACT, V47, P451, DOI 10.31128/AJGP-11-17-4412
Pertiwi P, 2019, DISABIL SOC, V34, P1419, DOI 10.1080/09687599.2019.1584092
Pickering CJ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V12, P169, DOI 10.1007/s13753-021-
00328-8
QSR International Pty Ltd, 2018, NVIVO QUAL DAT AN SO
Quaill J, 2018, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V33, P58
Reed NS, 2020, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, pE423, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30161-
4
Risk-E Business Consultants Pty Ltd, 2017, INDEPENDENT REV NSW
Rolfe MI, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V101, P631, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03887-z
Romanello M, 2021, LANCET, V398, P1619, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6
Sewell T, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep36369
Shields RE, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18073743
Smith DL, 2009, DISABIL HEALTH J, V2, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.01.001
Stanke Carla, 2012, PLoS Curr, V4, pe4f9f1fa9c3cae, DOI 10.1371/4f9f1fa9c3cae
StataCorp, 2017, STAT US GUID REL 15
Steffen W. L., 2013, CRITICAL DECADE EXTR
Stein PJS, 2022, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V10, pE24, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00542-
8
Stough LM, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P387, DOI 10.1111/disa.12161
Stough LM, 2010, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V55, P211, DOI 10.1037/a0020079
Stough LM, 2018, HDB DISASTER RES, P225, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_12
Subramaniam P, 2020, DISABIL REHABIL, V42, P3256, DOI
10.1080/09638288.2019.1583781
Thomas D. S. K., 2013, SOCIAL VULNERABILITY
Tong SL, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE124, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30062-
1
Twigg J, 2011, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V10, P248, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.594492
Villeneuve M., 2019, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V34
VILLENEUVE M, 2018, PERSON CTR EMERGENCY
Villeneuve M, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100166
Villeneuve M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101979
von Elm E, 2008, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V61, P344, DOI
[10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008, 10.2471/BLT.07.045120]
Weise J, 2020, J INTELLECT DEV DIS, V45, P184, DOI 10.3109/13668250.2019.1622659
Wisner B., 2004, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS, V2nd
NR 76
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 4
U2 6
PU BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
PI LONDON
PA BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE, TAVISTOCK SQUARE, LONDON WC1H 9JR, ENGLAND
SN 2044-6055
J9 BMJ OPEN
JI BMJ Open
PD AUG
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 8
AR e056210
DI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056210
PG 10
GA 3Y0AC
UT WOS:000843392200011
PM 35918120
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yabe, T
Rao, PSC
Ukkusuri, SV
AF Yabe, Takahiro
Rao, P. Suresh C.
Ukkusuri, Satish V.
TI Modeling the Influence of Online Social Media Information on
Post-Disaster Mobility Decisions
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE disasters; social media; network analysis; human mobility
ID DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EVACUATION; TIME; UNDERSTAND; TWITTER; NETWORK
AB Disaster risk management, including response and recovery, are essential
elements of sustainable development. With the recent increase in natural hazards,
the importance of techniques to understand, model and predict the evacuation and
returning behavior of affected individuals is rising. Studies have found that
influence from real world social ties affects mobility decisions during disasters.
Despite the rapid spread of social media platforms, little has been quantitatively
understood about the influence of social ties on online social media on such
decisions. Information provided by who at what timing influences users' decision-
making process by how much during disasters? In this study, we answer these
research questions by proposing a data-driven framework that can predict post-
disaster mobility decisions and simultaneously unravel the influence of various
information on online social media. More specifically, our method quantifies the
influence of information provided by different types of social media accounts on
the peoples' decisions to return or stay displaced after evacuation. We tested our
approach using real world data collected from more than 13 million unique Twitter
users during Hurricane Sandy. Experiments verified that we can improve the
predictive accuracy of return and displacement behavior, and also quantify the
influence of online information. In contrast to popular beliefs, it was found that
information posted by the crowd influenced the decisions more than information
disseminated by official accounts. Improving our understanding of influence
dynamics on online social media could provide policy makers with insights on how to
disseminate information on social media more effectively for better disaster
response and recovery, which may contribute towards building sustainable urban
systems.
C1 [Yabe, Takahiro; Rao, P. Suresh C.; Ukkusuri, Satish V.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch
Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
[Rao, P. Suresh C.] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
Lafayette Campus; Purdue University System; Purdue University; Purdue
University West Lafayette Campus
EM tyabe@purdue.edu; sureshrao@purdue.edu; sukkusur@purdue.edu
OI Yabe, Takahiro/0000-0001-8967-1967
FU Ford Motor Company through the Purdue-Ford Alliance Program; NSF CMMI
[1638311]; Directorate For Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, &
Manufact Inn [1638311] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX This work was funded by Ford Motor Company through the Purdue-Ford
Alliance Program. The work of T.Y. and S.V.U. is partly funded by NSF
CMMI Grant No. 1638311 CRISP Type 2/Collaborative Research: Critical
Transitions in the Resilience and Recovery of Interdependent Social and
Physical Networks.
CR [Anonymous], 2007, NAT HAZARDS REV, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2007)8:3(87)
[Anonymous], 2016, P 30 INT C NEURAL IN
[Anonymous], SOCIAL MEDIA FACT SH
10.1177/028072709100900210
Bendimerad F., 2003, WORLD BANK SEMINAR R, P57
Blake E. S., 2013, AL182012
Ceron A, 2014, NEW MEDIA SOC, V16, P340, DOI 10.1177/1461444813480466
Fischer HW., 1995, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V4, P30, DOI [10.1108/09653569510093414,
DOI 10.1108/09653569510093414]
Forrest TR, 1999, CONTEMP SOCIOL, V28, P328, DOI 10.2307/2654178
Friedman JH, 2002, COMPUT STAT DATA AN, V38, P367, DOI 10.1016/S0167-
9473(01)00065-2
Gu YM, 2016, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V67, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.011
Guo J, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P16783, DOI 10.3390/su71215847
Han Y, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8060243
Hasan S., 2011, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V45, P1590, DOI
[10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.008, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2011.07.008]
6996.0000074
Imran M., 2013, P 15 INT C INF SYST
KAUFMAN HF, 1958, AM SOCIOL REV, V23, P102, DOI 10.2307/2088638
Kipf T.N., 2017, P 2017 INT C LEARN R
Kryvasheyeu Y, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117288
Kumar D, 2018, IEEE INT CONF BIG DA, P1606, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2018.8622483
Landwehr PM, 2014, STUD BIG DATA, V1, P225, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40837-3_7
Lin L, 2018, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V97, P258, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.011
6988(2005)6:4(171), 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6:4(171)]
9488(2007)133:1(18)
10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.006
Martinez-Rojas M, 2018, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V43, P196, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.008
McBean GA, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.002
Mikolov T., 2013, ADV NEURAL INFORM PR, V26, P3111, DOI DOI
10.5555/2999792.2999959
10.1016/j.trc.2012.11.005
Phengsuwan J, 2021, FUTURE INTERNET, V13, DOI 10.3390/fi13020046
Qiu JZ, 2018, KDD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, P2110, DOI 10.1145/3219819.3220077
Rashidi TH, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V75, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.008
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Sadri AM, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P125, DOI 10.1177/0361198118773896
Sakaki T., 2010, PROC 19 INT C WORLD, P851
Signorini A, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467
Simon T, 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P609, DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.07.001
Song WP, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB
SEARCH AND DATA MINING (WSDM'19), P555, DOI 10.1145/3289600.3290989
Thelwall M, 2010, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V61, P2544, DOI 10.1002/asi.21416
Nguyen TH, 2015, EXPERT SYST APPL, V42, P9603, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.052
UNISDR, 2005, HYOG FRAM ACT 2005 2, V380
Velikovic P., 2018, P ICLR 2018 VANC BC
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
Yabe T, 2019, J COMPUT SCI-NETH, V32, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jocs.2019.02.002
Yu MZ, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8050165
Zamarreno-Aramendia G., 2020, J OPEN INNOV-TECHNOL, V6, P1, DOI
[10.3390/joitmc6040169, DOI 10.3390/JOITMC6040169]
NR 52
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 22
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 9
AR 5254
DI 10.3390/su13095254
PG 13
(SSCI)
GA SC8HL
UT WOS:000650904700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Moya, L
Mas, E
Koshimura, S
AF Moya, Luis
Mas, Erick
Koshimura, Shunichi
TI Sparse Representation-Based Inundation Depth Estimation Using SAR Data
and Digital Elevation Model
SO IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE
SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE Floods; Remote sensing; Radar polarimetry; Water pollution; Synthetic
aperture radar; Support vector machines; Estimation; Disaster
resilience; floods; inundation depth; sparse representation; synthetic
aperture radar (SAR)
ID WATER-LEVEL; FLOOD; IMAGES; RIVER; RAIN
AB Floods increase every year worldwide, and prompt information about the affected
areas is essential for early disaster response. There has been extensive
development in applying remote sensing data to identify floods. In fact, remote
sensing data are the only tool to identify the extent of large-scale floods within
hours after their occurrence. However, few studies have addressed methods to
estimate inundation depth. Inundation depth can be advantageous for identifying
areas where people may need assistance during evacuation and estimating damage
loss. We present a practical application of sparse representation that integrates a
synthetic aperture radar-based flood binary map with a digital elevation model to
estimate inundation depths. We assume that the floodwaters can be modeled as a
combination of water bodies at a state of rest. A dictionary of water bodies
computed under potential inundation levels is constructed from the digital
elevation model. Then, the actual flood extent is represented as a sparse linear
combination of the water body dictionary. The inundation depth can be estimated
because each water body from the linear combination is associated with an
inundation level. To assess our proposed procedure, we computed the inundation
depth of the flood in the town of Mabi, Okayama Prefecture, produced during the
2018 heavy rainfall. An average absolute value difference of about 60 cm between
our results and a field survey performed by a third party was observed. Two other
floods produced by the 2019 Hagibis typhoon were analyzed to illustrate the
relevant information that can provide inundation depths.
C1 [Moya, Luis] Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Dept Engn, GERDIS Res Grp, Lima
15088, Peru.
[Moya, Luis; Mas, Erick; Koshimura, Shunichi] Tohoku Univ, Int Res Inst Disaster
Sci, Sendai, Miyagi 9808579, Japan.
C3 Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru; Tohoku University
RP Moya, L (corresponding author), Pontificia Univ Catolica Peru, Dept Engn, GERDIS
Res Grp, Lima 15088, Peru.
EM lmoya@pucp.edu.pe; mas@irides.tohoku.ac.jp;
koshimura@irides.tohoku.ac.jp
RI Koshimura, Shunichi/H-1136-2012
OI Koshimura, Shunichi/0000-0002-8352-0639; Moya, Luis/0000-0003-1764-3160
FU Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Kakenhi [21H05001];
Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Japan-US Collaborative
Research Program [JPMJSC2119]; Core Research Cluster of Disaster Science
at Tohoku University; Co-creation Center for Disaster Resilience at
Tohoku University; Tough Cyberphysical AI Research Center at Tohoku
University
FX This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion
of Science (JSPS) Kakenhi under Grant 21H05001, the Japan Science and
Technology Agency (JST) Japan-US Collaborative Research Program under
Grant JPMJSC2119, the Core Research Cluster of Disaster Science, the
Co-creation Center for Disaster Resilience, and the Tough Cyberphysical
AI Research Center at Tohoku University. (Corresponding author: Luis
Moya.)
CR Adriano B, 2021, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V175, P132, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.02.016
[Anonymous], NAT COMMUN
[Anonymous], 2022, PYTHON SOFTWARE FUND
Arnesen AS, 2013, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V130, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.035
Bai YB, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13112220
Bloeschl G, 2019, NATURE, V573, P108, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1495-6
Cabinet Office of Japan, 2020, DAMAGE SITUATION REL
Chaudhary P, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V167, P252, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.07.003
Cohen S, 2018, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V54, P847, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12609
DeVries B, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111664
Elad M, SPARSE REDUNDANT REP, V1st
Feng Y, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V169, P301, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.09.011
Fujimoto W., 2019, PROC ANN C JPN SOC H, V32
Gokon H, 2019, INT GEOSCI REMOTE SE, P4845, DOI 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8899127
Grimaldi S, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111582
GSI, 2018, INFORM HEAVY RAIN JU
GSI, BASIC MAP INFORM DIG
GSI, 2020, INFORM HEAVY RAIN JU
GSI, 2019, INFORM TYPHOON NO 19
Harris CR, 2020, NATURE, V585, P357, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
Hong DF, 2021, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V178, P68, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.05.011
Hong DF, 2021, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V59, P4340, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3016820
Huang C, 2014, INT CONF AGRO-GEOINF, P71
Kramer K., 2020, COUNTING COST 2020 Y
Kramer K., 2021, COUNTING COST 2021 Y
Li Y, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11192231
Liang JY, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V159, P53, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.10.017
Liu W, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13040639
Liu W, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P1905, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-1905-2018
Martinis S, 2022, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113077
Moya L, 2021, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V59, P8288, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3046004
Moya L, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12142244
Moya L, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11192320
Nakmuenwai P, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9010078
Natsuaki R, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12060903
Nihei Y, 2019, J DISASTER RES, V14, P874, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0874
Ohara M, 2019, J DISASTER RES, V14, P912, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2019.p0912
Ohki M, 2019, IEEE J-STARS, V12, P2288, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2911596
Okada G, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13071401
Pulvirenti L, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13071342
Shen XY, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V221, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.008
Singha M, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V166, P278, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.06.011
Sui HG, 2018, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V15, P699, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2810122
Surface Dynamics Modeling Lab, FLOODWATER DEPTH EST
Touma D, 2022, SCI ADV, V8, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abm0320
Wing OEJ, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P156, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01265-6
World Weather Attribution, 2022, CLIMATE CHANGE EXACE
Yoshida K., 2019, PROC B GSI, V132, P17
Zhao J, 2021, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112338
NR 49
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 7
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 1939-1404
EI 2151-1535
J9 IEEE J-STARS
JI IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Observ. Remote Sens.
PY 2022
VL 15
BP 9062
EP 9072
DI 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3215719
PG 11
WC Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Geography, Physical; Remote
Sensing; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
SC Engineering; Physical Geography; Remote Sensing; Imaging Science &
Photographic Technology
GA 5T5DL
UT WOS:000875886900004
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Endo, Y
Yasue, T
AF Endo, Yohei
Yasue, Takaharu
TI Safety Evaluation of a RC Structure with Multiple Openings under High
Water Depth Inundations
LA English
DT Article
DE hydrostatic pressure; hydrodynamic pressure; inundation; RC structure;
hydrostatic loading test; numerical analysis
ID FLOOD IMPACT; BUILDINGS; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; PRESSURE;
DAMAGE; RISK
AB Experimental and numerical studies were conducted to examine the resistance of a
newly developed residential building to inundations. Natural disasters including
inundations have occurred frequently in recent decades. Once inundations submerge
urban areas, water may remain there for days. This can cause substantial economic
and social costs. Flood hazards have been widely discussed and investigated.
However, sufficient research contributions have not been made on the behaviour of
individual buildings under inundations. The objective of the research was to
develop a prototype residential building in which residents can stay during
inundations without the need of evacuation. A 3-m water depth was the target for
safety evaluation in this research. This paper dealt with three tasks. First,
three-point bending tests were performed on window components. Second, a
hydrostatic pressure test was carried out on a full-scale reinforced concrete (RC)
specimen. Third, taking advantage of the preceding two tasks, numerical simulations
were performed to examine the behaviour of the prototype building under hydrostatic
and hydrodynamic pressures. The experiments and numerical analyses showed that the
prototype building had sufficient resistance and waterproofness against the
inundations of a 3-m water depth. This research contributed to the improvements of
the safety of RC structures against inundations and flood-risk reduction in urban
areas.
C1 [Endo, Yohei] Shinshu Univ, Dept Architecture, 4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano 3808553,
Japan.
[Yasue, Takaharu] Mitsuya G Home, 2-11-6 Inada, Nagano 3810042, Japan.
C3 Shinshu University
RP Endo, Y (corresponding author), Shinshu Univ, Dept Architecture, 4-17-1
Wakasato, Nagano 3808553, Japan.
EM endii@shinshu-u.ac.jp; mitsuya@g-home.co.jp
OI Endo, Yohei/0000-0001-5422-8631
FU Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Tokyo) [18KK0124];
Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18KK0124] Funding Source: KAKEN
FX Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Tokyo), grant number:
18KK0124.
CR Aiello S, 2011, ENG STRUCT, V33, P3402, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.004
Akter S.T., 2013, THESIS LINNAEUS U VA
American Society of Civil Engineers, 2015, FLOOD RES DES CONSTR
[Anonymous], 2010, G3112 JIS
[Anonymous], 1994, R1601 JIS
[Anonymous], 2013, CIT COUNT HON
[Anonymous], 2008, 14704 ISO
Bandara KMK, 2012, J NATL SCI FOUND SRI, V40, P211, DOI
10.4038/jnsfsr.v40i3.4695
Becker AB, 2011, NAT HAZARDS REV, V12, P85, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000029
Behnam H, 2018, COMPUT STRUCT, V205, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.compstruc.2018.04.004
Bencardino F, 2020, FIBERS, V8, DOI 10.3390/fib8020008
Bormudoi A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P376, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.015
Brody SD, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01024.x
Cantelmo C, 2021, J HYDRAUL RES, V59, P61, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2020.1714759
Cheung Kevin C. K., 2008, Structural Engineering International, V18, P122, DOI
10.2749/101686608784218699
Cho BH, 2019, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V221, P491, DOI
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.103
Chuang WL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P1093, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04027-3
Cui J, 2018, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V160, P440, DOI
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.083
D'Ayala D., 2016, P INT C NAT HAZ INFR
D'Ayala DF, 2011, INT J ARCHIT HERIT, V5, P140, DOI 10.1080/15583050903367595
Dashti F, 2017, J STRUCT ENG, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001729
Dias W. P. S., 2006, STRUCT ENG, V84, P25
Elmer F, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P2145, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-2145-2010
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2011, COAST CONSTR MAN PRI
Ferreira D., 2019, DIANA DOCUMENTATION
Foster ASJ, 2017, COAST ENG, V128, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2017.07.006
Funari MF, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101425
Gao L, 2017, ENG GEOL, V226, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.06.012
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GIAJ), GEOSPATIAL INFORM AU
Godfrey A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P229, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.001
Gu D., 2019, 20194 POP DIV
Hammond MJ, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P14, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
Haque A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.001
Howard S, 2003, MAT DATA BOOK
Ivanov IV, 2006, INT J SOLIDS STRUCT, V43, P6887, DOI
10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.02.014
Jansen L, 2020, ENG STRUCT, V216, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110647
Japanese Ministry of Land, INFR TRANSP TOUR
Kelman I, 2004, ENG GEOL, V73, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.01.010
Koshihara M, 2017, ARCHIT TECHNOL, V11, P76
Macabuag J, 2018, P I CIVIL ENG-CIV EN, V171, P166, DOI 10.1680/jcien.17.00043
Mead SR, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P703, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-703-2017
Morison C., 2010, RESISTANCE LAMINATED
Mydin M. A. O., 2017, MALAYSIAN CONSTRUCTI, V2, P166
Nagano City Council Nagano, CIT MAP INF
Nasraoui M, 2009, DYMAT 2009: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE MECHANICAL AND
PHYSICAL BEHAVIOUR OF MATERIALS UNDER DYNAMIC LOADING, VOL 2, P1103, DOI
10.1051/dymat/2009154
Pilon P. J., 2002, GUIDELINES REDUCING
Postacchini M, 2019, J FLUID STRUCT, V88, P48, DOI
Gallo PQ, 2021, EUR J WOOD WOOD PROD, V79, P5, DOI 10.1007/s00107-020-01556-3
Rodichev Y., 2018, CHALLENGING GLASS 6, P453, DOI [10.7480/cgc.6.2168, DOI
10.7480/CGC.6.2168]
Seifert I, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P1691, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-1691-
2013
Selby RG, 1997, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V24, P460, DOI 10.1139/cjce-24-3-460
Shimadzu Corporation, 2015, AUT AGS X SER
Sogut E, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103450
Suetsugu T., 2016, REDUCTION WATER RELA
Thouret JC, 2020, EARTH-SCI REV, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103003
Thusyanithan NI, 2008, P I CIVIL ENG-CIV EN, V161, P77, DOI
10.1680/cien.2008.161.2.77
Tuns I., 2017, B TRANSILVANIA U BRA, V10, P211
Uniform Building Code, 1997, INT BUILD COD
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 2015, 111021619 USACE EM
USACE, 1988, FLOOD PROOF TESTS TE
USACE, 1990, COAST ENG, V12, P91
USACE, 1995, FLOOD PROOF REG
USACE, 1984, SHOR PROT MAN, VI
VECCHIO FJ, 1986, J AM CONCRETE I, V83, P219
Wallingford H.R., 2006, R D OUTPUTS FLOOD RI
Xiao SY, 2013, J PERFORM CONSTR FAC, V27, P550, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-
5509.0000357
Yeh H., 2005, DEV DESIGN GUIDELINE
Zhang JJ, 2016, RESULTS PHYS, V6, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.05.004
Zucca M, 2020, ENG STRUCT, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110497
NR 70
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 4
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2076-3417
J9 APPL SCI-BASEL
JI Appl. Sci.-Basel
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 11
IS 9
AR 4297
DI 10.3390/app11094297
PG 14
GA SB4GX
UT WOS:000649956000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yan, L
Pedraza-Martinez, AJ
AF Yan, Lu (Lucy)
Pedraza-Martinez, Alfonso J.
TI Social Media for Disaster Management: Operational Value of the Social
Conversation
SO PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster management; social media; humanitarian operations; data
analytics
ID HUMANITARIAN OPERATIONS; SUPPORT; ONLINE
AB Disaster relief organizations increasingly engage in social conversations to
inform social media users about activities such as evacuation routes and aid
distribution. Concurrently, users share information such as the demand for aid,
willingness to donate and availability to volunteer through social conversations
with relief organizations. We investigate the effect of this information exchange
on social engagement during disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. We
propose that the effect of information on social engagement increases from
preparedness to response and decreases from response to recovery. Some of the
information exchanged in social conversations is actionable as well. We propose,
however, that the effect of actionable information reaches its lowest point during
disaster response. To test our theory, we use Facebook data from five benchmark
organizations that responded to Hurricane Sandy in 2012. We analyze all of the
organizations' posts and users' comments during a three-week period before, during
and after Hurricane Sandy. Our findings support our theory. Furthermore, we
identify an opportunity for relief organizations to improve their use of social
media for disaster management. While relief organizations focus on informing
disaster victims about aid distribution, most users are asking about how they as
individuals can donate or volunteer. Thus, besides posting information directed to
victims, organizations should post more information targeting potential donors and
volunteers.
C1 [Yan, Lu (Lucy); Pedraza-Martinez, Alfonso J.] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch
Business, 1309 E 10th St,HH 4100, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA.
C3 Indiana University System; Indiana University Bloomington; IU Kelley
School of Business
RP Pedraza-Martinez, AJ (corresponding author), Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business,
1309 E 10th St,HH 4100, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA.
EM yanlucy@indiana.edu; alpedraz@indiana.edu
OI Pedraza-Martinez, Alfonso/0000-0002-7921-4567; Yan,
Lu/0000-0001-8408-0404
CR Aflaki A, 2016, PROD OPER MANAG, V25, P1274, DOI 10.1111/poms.12563
Alias-i, 2008, LINGPIPE 4 1 0
Altay N, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V175, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016
[Anonymous], 2012, HUFFINGTON POST
[Anonymous], 2007, ONLINE SOCIAL SUPPOR
[Anonymous], WORLD DIS REP 2013
BARRERA M, 1986, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V14, P413, DOI 10.1007/BF00922627
Berkeley.edu, ACT VERBS
Besiou M, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V269, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.046
Besiou M, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P1950, DOI 10.1111/poms.12215
Brock RL, 2009, J FAM PSYCHOL, V23, P181, DOI 10.1037/a0015402
Byrne M., 2013, SANDY RESPONSE NEW Y
Carneiro HA, 2009, CLIN INFECT DIS, V49, P1557, DOI 10.1086/630200
Choi H, 2009, PREDICTING INITIAL C, P1
CNN, 2012, CNN
CNN Library, 2014, CNN LIB
CRONENWETT LR, 1985, NURS RES, V34, P347
Destro L, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, P14, DOI 10.3141/2234-02
FEMA, 2018, SOC MED EM PREP
FEMA, 2012, HURR SAND ON WEEK LA
Feng Q, 2018, PROD OPER MANAG, V27, P1670, DOI 10.1111/poms.12836
Fessler P., 2013, THANKS NO THANKS POS
Gardner JW, 2015, J OPER MANAG, V33-34, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.003
Greenhill J., 2012, GUARD TROOPS SAVE LI
Harvard.edu, ACT VERBS
Holdeman E., 2018, SOCIAL MEDIA CHANGES
Holguin-Veras J, 2012, J OPER MANAG, V30, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2012.08.003
Holguin-Veras J, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P117, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000068
House J., 1981, WORK STRESS SOCIAL S
JHU and IFRC, 2008, J HOPK RED CROSS RED
Kadushin Charles, 2012, UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL
Kahn R. L., 1980, CONVOYS LIFE COURSE
Lodree EJ, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1109, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2477-8
Luo XM, 2013, INFORM SYST RES, V24, P146, DOI 10.1287/isre.1120.0462
Ma LY, 2015, MARKET SCI, V34, P627, DOI 10.1287/mksc.2015.0912
Maly T., 2012, BIGGEST SURPRISE HUR
Mason WA, 2007, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V11, P279, DOI 10.1177/1088868307301032
Mead R., 2012, SANDY 2 WEEKS LATER
Miller AR, 2013, INFORM SYST RES, V24, P52, DOI 10.1287/isre.1120.0466
Moe WW, 2012, MARKET SCI, V31, P372, DOI 10.1287/mksc.1110.0662
Nguyen T. D., 2017, PROC INT C WEB SOCIA, P632
NOAA, 2013, SERV ASS HURR POSTTR
NYC, 2013, HURR SAND ACT
Parker C, 2016, MANAGE SCI, V62, P2481, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2270
Pedraza-Martinez AJ, 2016, J OPER MANAG, V45, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2016.06.003
Pulizzi J., 2018, B2C CONTENT MARKETIN
Pulizzi J., 2017, B2C CONTENT MARKETIN
Purohit, 2013, 1 MONDAY, V19
Ransbotham S, 2012, MARKET SCI, V31, P387, DOI 10.1287/mksc.1110.0684
Regnier E, 2008, MANAGE SCI, V54, P16, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0764
SHUMAKER SA, 1984, J SOC ISSUES, V40, P11, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
4560.1984.tb01105.x
Starr MK, 2014, PROD OPER MANAG, V23, P925, DOI 10.1111/poms.12227
Statista, 2018, NUMB MONTHL ACT FAC
Stauffer JM, 2016, PROD OPER MANAG, V25, P192, DOI 10.1111/poms.12427
TILDEN VP, 1987, NURS CLIN N AM, V22, P613
Tomasini R., 2009, HUMANITARIAN LOGISTI
Tushman M.L., 1978, ACAD MANAGE REV, V3, P613, DOI 10.2307/257550
Van Wassenhove LN, 2012, INT T OPER RES, V19, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-
3995.2010.00792.x
Verheijden MW, 2005, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V59, pS179, DOI 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602194
Witten I.H., 2005, PRACTICAL HDB INTERN
Yale.edu, ACT VERBS
Yan L, 2014, INFORM SYST RES, V25, P690, DOI 10.1287/isre.2014.0538
Yan L, 2018, PROD OPER MANAG, V27, P9, DOI 10.1111/poms.12793
Yin R. K., 2014, ESSENTIAL GUIDE QUAL, DOI [10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108, DOI
10.1097/FCH.0B013E31822DDA9E]
Yoo E, 2016, J OPER MANAG, V45, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.007
NR 66
TC 40
Z9 40
U1 6
U2 70
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1059-1478
EI 1937-5956
J9 PROD OPER MANAG
JI Prod. Oper. Manag.
PD OCT
PY 2019
VL 28
IS 10
BP 2514
EP 2532
DI 10.1111/poms.13064
PG 19
WC Engineering, Manufacturing; Operations Research & Management Science
(SSCI)
SC Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science
GA JE0ZG
UT WOS:000490422100007
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Li, ZL
Huang, X
Ye, XY
Jiang, YQ
Martin, YG
Ning, H
Hodgson, ME
Li, XM
AF Li, Zhenlong
Huang, Xiao
Ye, Xinyue
Jiang, Yuqin
Martin, Yago
Ning, Huan
Hodgson, Michael E.
Li, Xiaoming
TI Measuring global multi-scale place connectivity using geotagged social
media data
LA English
DT Article
ID EVACUATION; MOBILITY; NETWORK; WORLD; RELATEDNESS; PATTERNS; TWITTER
AB Shaped by human movement, place connectivity is quantified by the strength of
spatial interactions among locations. For decades, spatial scientists have
researched place connectivity, applications, and metrics. The growing popularity of
social media provides a new data stream where spatial social interaction measures
are largely devoid of privacy issues, easily assessable, and harmonized. In this
study, we introduced a global multi-scale place connectivity index (PCI) based on
spatial interactions among places revealed by geotagged tweets as a spatiotemporal-
continuous and easy-to-implement measurement. The multi-scale PCI, demonstrated at
the US county level, exhibits a strong positive association with SafeGraph
population movement records (10% penetration in the US population) and Facebook's
social connectedness index (SCI), a popular connectivity index based on social
networks. We found that PCI has a strong boundary effect and that it generally
follows the distance decay, although this force is weaker in more urbanized
counties with a denser population. Our investigation further suggests that PCI has
great potential in addressing real-world problems that require place connectivity
knowledge, exemplified with two applications: (1) modeling the spatial spread of
COVID-19 during the early stage of the pandemic and (2) modeling hurricane
evacuation destination choice. The methodological and contextual knowledge of PCI,
together with the open-sourced PCI datasets at various geographic levels, are
expected to support research fields requiring knowledge in human spatial
interactions.
C1 [Li, Zhenlong; Jiang, Yuqin; Ning, Huan; Hodgson, Michael E.] Univ South
Carolina, Dept Geog, Geoinformat & Big Data Res Lab, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
[Huang, Xiao] Univ Arkansas, Dept Geosci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA.
[Ye, Xinyue] Texas A&M Univ, Dep Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning,
College Stn, TX USA.
[Martin, Yago] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Publ Adm, Orlando, FL 32816 USA.
[Li, Xiaoming] Univ South Carolina, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC
29208 USA.
C3 University of South Carolina System; University of South Carolina
Columbia; University of Arkansas System; University of Arkansas
Fayetteville; Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College
Station; State University System of Florida; University of Central
Florida; University of South Carolina System; University of South
Carolina Columbia
RP Li, ZL (corresponding author), Univ South Carolina, Dept Geog, Geoinformat & Big
Data Res Lab, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
EM zhenlong@sc.edu
RI Huang, Xiao/AAS-4608-2020; Li, Zhenlong/M-1065-2017; ye,
xinyue/A-7677-2011
OI Huang, Xiao/0000-0002-4323-382X; Li, Zhenlong/0000-0002-8938-5466; ye,
xinyue/0000-0001-8838-9476; Hodgson, Michael/0000-0002-1800-5833
FU National Science Foundation (NSF) [2028791]; National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) [R01AI127203-4S1]; University of South Carolina COVID-19
Internal Funding Initiative [135400-20-54176]
FX We wanted to thank SafeGraph for open-sourcing their mobility datasets,
Facebook SCI authors for opensourcing their SCI data, and Twitter for
providing the free public API for accessing Twitter data streams. The
study was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant
2028791, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
(NIAID) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Grant
R01AI127203-4S1, and the University of South Carolina COVID-19 Internal
Funding Initiative under Grant 135400-20-54176. The funders had no role
in the study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of
this article.
CR Amini A, 2014, EPJ DATA SCI, V3, DOI 10.1140/epjds31
[Anonymous], NEW YORK TIMES
[Anonymous], 2006, IFAC P, DOI [10.3182/20060517-3-FR-2903.00211, DOI
10.3182/20060517-3-FR-2903.00211]
[Anonymous], 2015, PEOPLE, DOI DOI 10.1111/irv.12226
Bailey M, 2018, J ECON PERSPECT, V32, P259, DOI 10.1257/jep.32.3.259
Balmer C., 2020, REUTERS
Barcus HR, 2010, GEOGR ANN B, V92B, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00353.x
Batten DF, 2001, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V35, P81, DOI 10.1007/s001680000032
Beaverstock JV, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P123, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00188
Boyle P., 2014, EXPLORING CONT MIGRA, DOI [10.4324/9781315843100, DOI
10.4324/9781315843100]
Buliung RN, 2006, GROWTH CHANGE, V37, P172, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00314.x
Calantone R. J., 1989, Journal of Travel Research, V28, P25, DOI
10.1177/004728758902800207
Carey B, 2020, NEW YORK TIMES
Cheng G, 2008, DESTINATION CHOICE M, P13
de Montjoye YA, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.286
Derudder B, 2008, J TRANSP GEOGR, V16, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2007.12.005
Fiorio L, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE (WEBSCI '17),
P103, DOI 10.1145/3091478.3091496
Gao S, 2015, SPAT COGN COMPUT, V15, P86, DOI 10.1080/13875868.2014.984300
Ghafoor H, 2014, SCI WORLD J, DOI 10.1155/2014/789247
Gonzalez MC, 2008, NATURE, V453, P779, DOI 10.1038/nature06958
Goodchild MF, 2007, GEOJOURNAL, V69, P211, DOI 10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
Hawelka B, 2014, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V41, P260, DOI
10.1080/15230406.2014.890072
Hogan B., 2020, NEW YORK POST
Hu LQ, 2020, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V47, P277, DOI 10.1080/15230406.2019.1705187
Hu YJ, 2017, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V31, P2427, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2017.1367797
Huang X, 2021, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V14, P424, DOI [10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3130424,
10.1080/17538947.2021.1886358]
Huang X, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241957
10.1080/24694452.2019.1592660
Jiang YQ, 2019, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V46, P228, DOI
10.1080/15230406.2018.1434834
Jurdak R, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0131469
Kontokosta CE, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P144, DOI
Kuchler T, 2020, J URBAN ECON, V103314, P1
Lauer SA, 2020, ANN INTERN MED, V172, P577, DOI 10.7326/M20-0504
Li LN, 2013, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V40, P61, DOI 10.1080/15230406.2013.777139
Li Z, 2019, INTRO SOCIAL SENSING, DOI [10.1080/17538947.2019.1670951, DOI
10.1080/17538947.2019.1670951]
Li ZL, 2020, JMIR RES PROTOC, V9, DOI 10.2196/24432
Lin JY, 2019, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V33, P1062, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1563302
Liu Y, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P512, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2015.1018773
Liu Y, 2014, T GIS, V18, P89, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12023
Ma XL, 2013, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2013.07.010
Macdonald K., 2007, MOBILITIES-UK, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/17450100601106153
Martin Y, 2020, POPUL ENVIRON, V42, P4, DOI 10.1007/s11111-020-00338-6
Martin Y, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000354
Massey D., 1994, SPACE PLACE GENDER
News BBC, 2020, BBC NEWS
Oreilly T., 2007, COMMUNICATION STRATE
Pereira F, 2013, FUTURE MOBILITY SURV, V9, P1
Perttunen M, 2014, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V47, P58, DOI
Pham EO, 2020, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V12, P235, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0030.1
SafeGraph, 2020, SOC DIST METR
SALT J, 1987, INT MIGR, V25, P241, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1987.tb00586.x
SANTOS A, 2011, SUMMARY TRAVEL TREND
Soliman A, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181657
Squire R. F., 2019, SAFEGRAPH
Stewart JQ, 1948, SOCIOMETRY, V11, P31, DOI 10.2307/2785468
Tranos E, 2013, J REGIONAL SCI, V53, P855, DOI 10.1111/jors.12021
Tully T., 2020, NEW YORK TIMES
U.S. Census Bureau, 2019, 2015 2019 AM COMM SU
Xu ZW, 2008, GEOJOURNAL, V73, P87, DOI 10.1007/s10708-008-9173-5
Yang Y, 2019, J TRAVEL RES, V58, P25, DOI 10.1177/0047287517741997
Ye XY, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P14, DOI 10.1007/s11769-020-1172-6
Zhang XC, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P312, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2019.1710399
NR 66
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 5
U2 20
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD JUL 19
PY 2021
VL 11
IS 1
AR 14694
DI 10.1038/s41598-021-94300-7
PG 19
(SSCI)
GA TM9BG
UT WOS:000675840600008
PM 34282241
OA Green Submitted, Green Published, gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Lee, YH
Kim, YC
Seo, H
AF Lee, Yoon-Ha
Kim, Young-Chan
Seo, Hyuncheol
TI Selecting Disaster Waste Transportation Routes to Reduce Overlapping of
Transportation Routes after Floods
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE emergency response activity; urban resilience; disaster waste
management; flood waste transportation route
ID TRAFFIC CONGESTION; URBAN; EVACUATION; MANAGEMENT; SHELTER;
PRECIPITATION; EARTHQUAKE; RECOVERY; IMPACT; CRIME
AB Disasters have been a major subject of research considering damages caused in
terms of losses of lives and properties and the functionality of critical services
in cities. Floods generate large amounts of waste, causing several functional
deteriorations, such as disrupted transportation, water supply, and wastewater
management. Hence, it is necessary to establish an effective plan to secure urban
resilience during the disaster response and recovery phases. This study proposes a
method to reduce overlaps between disaster waste transportation routes and other
emergency response activities after floods in the response and recovery phases. The
network analysis of a geographic information system was used to analyze the
supplying routes of evacuation, rescue/aid, hospital transportation, and police
services for each disaster phase to reduce the overlapping of routes. The results
showed that by using the proposed method, the average length of the disaster waste
transportation routes increased by 25.29% and 9.80% in the response and recovery
phases, respectively, whereas the length of the sections overlapping with the
routes providing critical services decreased by 47.49% and 55.57% in the response
and recovery phases, respectively. We believe that the proposed method identifies
new corresponding key issues to establish disaster waste management plans to secure
urban resilience after a disaster.
C1 [Lee, Yoon-Ha] Changshin Univ, Dept Fire & Disaster Prevent Engn, Chang Won
51352, South Korea.
[Kim, Young-Chan] Dongguk Univ, Dept Safety Engn, Gyeongju 38066, South Korea.
[Seo, Hyuncheol] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architectural Civil Environm & Energy
Engn, Daegu 41566, South Korea.
C3 Dongguk University; Kyungpook National University
RP Seo, H (corresponding author), Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Architectural Civil
Environm & Energy Engn, Daegu 41566, South Korea.
EM yhlee@cs.ac.kr; yyoungchani@gmail.com; charles@knu.ac.kr
OI Seo, HyunCheol/0000-0002-3361-2316
FU Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation
of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2020R1I1A1A01075037]; National
Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1I1A1A01075037] Funding Source: Korea
Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science
& Technology Information Service (NTIS)
FX FundingThis research was supported by Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the
Ministry of Education (No. 2020R1I1A1A01075037).
CR Alizadeh H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093691
Amal L, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P27569, DOI 10.1007/s11356-018-2826-0
Artese S, 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-2, P99, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-
XLII-2-W11-99-2019
Berktas N, 2016, EURO J COMPUT OPTIM, V4, DOI 10.1007/s13675-016-0063-1
BOLIN R, 1991, DISASTERS, V15, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x
Brodie M, 2006, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V96, P1402, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2005.084475
Brown C, 2011, WASTE MANAGE, V31, P1085, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.027
Cheng C, 2022, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V18, P1053, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2021.1916644
Cheng C, 2021, WASTE MANAGE, V119, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.023
Cheng C, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V84, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.027
Chung Y, 2012, TRANSPORT POLICY, V19, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.10.001
Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514
Crowley J, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V62, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.004
Cutter SL, 2015, NATURE, V522, P277, DOI 10.1038/522277a
DEFRA and the Environment Agency, 2006, R D OUTP FLOOD RISKS
Dias C, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102192
Esri, BARRIERS
Falcocchio JC, 2015, SPRING TRACT TRANSP, V7, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-15165-6
Farmer AK, 2018, SOCIOL INQ, V88, P193, DOI 10.1111/soin.12187
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007, DES GUID IMPR CRIT F
Francini M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P121, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.020
Gao XH, 2020, COMPUT IND ENG, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106782
Hayes JL, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101935
Hino K, 2018, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V17, P456, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2018.1461605
Hooper E, 2014, METEOROL APPL, V21, P194, DOI 10.1002/met.1348
Hu ZH, 2019, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V15, P1145, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2019.1567618
Hu ZH, 2013, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V55, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2013.05.010
Ishigaki T., 2008, P 11 ICUD SCOTL UK 3
Ishigaki T., 2005, P KOR WAT RES ASS C
Kasmalkar I, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100851
Kasmalkar IG, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aba2423
Kocatepe A, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V95, P615, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3507-5
Lee YH, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102832
Liu Y, 2021, J TRAFFIC TRANSP ENG, V8, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.jtte.2021.03.001
Molaei P., 2021, WORLD, V2, P49, DOI [10.3390/world2010004, DOI
10.3390/WORLD2010004]
Nan C, 2017, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V157, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.013
Nguyen DT, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052637
Parizi SM, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P725, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04855-x
Pramudita A, 2014, INT J URBAN SCI, V18, P218, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2014.929507
10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020
Rahill GJ, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, pS73, DOI 10.1111/disa.12051
Sabir M., 2008, WELFARE EFFECTS ADVE
Sahin H, 2016, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V53, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2015.10.003
Salimi M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101948
Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
Smith B.L, 2004, 83 ANN M TRANSP RES
Smith G.P., 2017, VEHICLE STABILITY TE
Takeda T, 2014, 2014 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON ROBOTIC INTELLIGENCE IN INFORMATIONALLY
STRUCTURED SPACE (RIISS), P74
Yin J, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2239, DOI 10.1177/2399808320971304
NR 56
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 8
U2 17
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 5
AR 2866
DI 10.3390/su14052866
PG 20
(SSCI)
GA ZT4BR
UT WOS:000769104000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chang, CM
Chao, TYS
Huang, YT
Tu, YF
Sung, TC
Wang, JD
Shih, HI
AF Chang, Chia-Ming
Chao, Tzu-Yuan Stessa
Huang, Yi-Ting
Tu, Yi-Fang
Sung, Tzu-Ching
Wang, Jung-Der
Shih, Hsin-, I
TI Maintaining Quality of Care among Dialysis Patients in Affected Areas
after Typhoon Morakot
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster; typhoon; flood; elderly; dialysis; end-stage kidney disease
ID NATIONAL-HEALTH INSURANCE; SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES; HURRICANE;
DISASTERS; HOSPITALIZATION; HEMODIALYSIS; INEQUALITIES; LESSONS; ACCESS;
SYSTEM
AB Natural disasters have negative health impacts on patients who need dialysis in
affected areas. Severely affected areas are usually rural, with limited basic
infrastructure and a population without optimal dialysis-specific care after a
disaster. A population-based longitudinal case-cohort study enrolled 715,244 adults
from the National Health Insurance Registry who lived in areas affected by a major
natural disaster, Typhoon Morakot, in 2009. The observation period was from 2008 to
2011. A total of 13,268 patients (1.85%) had a history of end-stage renal disease
(ESRD). Of the ESRD patients, 1264 patients (9.5%) received regular dialysis. Only
eight patients missed dialysis sessions in the first month after the disaster.
Compared to the moderately affected areas, the incidences of acute cerebrovascular
and cardiovascular diseases were higher in patients in severely affected areas.
Male dialysis patients aged 45-75 years had a higher mortality rate than that of
the general population. Among the affected adults receiving regular dialysis,
patients with diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.58, 95% confidence interval
(CI): 1.20-2.08) or a history of cerebrovascular disease (aHR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.12-
2.21), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma (aHR: 1.99, 95% CI:
1.24-3.17) in moderately affected areas had significantly elevated mortality rates.
Additionally, among dialysis patients living in severely affected areas, those with
a history of cerebrovascular disease (aHR: 4.52 95% CI: 2.28-8.79) had an elevated
mortality rate. Early evacuation plans and high-quality, accessible care for
cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases are essential to support affected
populations before and after disasters to improve dialysis patients' health
outcomes.
C1 [Chang, Chia-Ming] Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Geriatr & Gerontol, Tainan
70403, Taiwan.
[Chang, Chia-Ming; Huang, Yi-Ting; Tu, Yi-Fang; Shih, Hsin-, I] Natl Cheng Kung
Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
[Chao, Tzu-Yuan Stessa; Huang, Yi-Ting] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Urban
Planning, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
[Tu, Yi-Fang] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept
Pediat, Tainan 70403, Taiwan.
[Sung, Tzu-Ching] I Shou Univ, Sch Med Int Students, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.
[Wang, Jung-Der; Shih, Hsin-, I] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Publ Hlth,
Tainan 70101, Taiwan.
[Shih, Hsin-, I] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept
Emergency Med, Tainan 70403, Taiwan.
C3 National Cheng Kung University; National Cheng Kung University Hospital;
National Cheng Kung University; National Cheng Kung University; National
Cheng Kung University; National Cheng Kung University Hospital; I Shou
University; National Cheng Kung University; National Cheng Kung
University; National Cheng Kung University Hospital
RP Shih, HI (corresponding author), Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Tainan
70101, Taiwan.; Shih, HI (corresponding author), Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med,
Dept Publ Hlth, Tainan 70101, Taiwan.; Shih, HI (corresponding author), Natl Cheng
Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Tainan 70403,
Taiwan.
EM 10108040@gs.ncku.edu.tw; tychao@mail.ncku.edu.tw; alage@gs.ncku.edu.tw;
nckutu@gmail.com; vivian1223@isu.edu.tw; jdwang121@gmail.com;
n506594@mail.hosp.ncku.edu.tw
RI huang, yiting/HDM-3648-2022
OI Sung, Tzu-Ching/0000-0003-0012-9026; Huang, Yi-Ting/0000-0001-6040-6641;
Wang, Jung-Der/0000-0002-3176-4500; Shih, Hsin-I/0000-0002-1103-8675;
Chao, Tzuyuan Stessa/0000-0001-9278-4321; Chang,
Chia-ming/0000-0001-8468-5251
FU Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 103-2625-M-006-002-MY2,
MOST 105-2625-M-006-013-2, MOST 107-2625-M-006-020-]; Research Center of
National Cheng Kung University Hospital [NCKUH-10506016, NCKUH10605008]
FX This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and
Technology, Taiwan (MOST 103-2625-M-006-002-MY2, MOST
105-2625-M-006-013-2, MOST 107-2625-M-006-020-), and the Research Center
of National Cheng Kung University Hospital (NCKUH-10506016 and
NCKUH10605008).
CR Aitsi-Selmi A, 2015, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V93, P362, DOI 10.2471/BLT.15.157362
Anderson AH, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V75, P1202, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.5
[Anonymous], 2008, CLOS GAP GEN HLTH EQ
[Anonymous], 2003, IMPACTS HLTH CLIMATE
[Anonymous], 2011, J POPUL STUD
Asaria M, 2016, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V70, P637, DOI 10.1136/jech-2015-206742
Braveman P, 2014, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V129, P19, DOI 10.1177/00333549141291S206
Center for Survey Research Academia Sinica, TAIW SOC CHANG SURV TAIW SOC CHANG
SURV
Chen LW, 2007, HEALTH ECON, V16, P223, DOI 10.1002/hec.1160
Chiu YW, 2020, ATHEROSCLEROSIS, V296, P18, DOI
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.01.016
Costello A, 2009, LANCET, V373, P1693, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1,
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60929-6]
Davis JR, 2010, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V4, P30, DOI 10.1017/S1935789300002391
Davis M, 2015, CLIN J AM SOC NEPHRO, V10, P1316, DOI 10.2215/CJN.07340715
Hammond G, 2020, STROKE, V51, P2131, DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029318
Howard D, 2012, PREHOSPITAL DISASTER, V27, P325, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X12000945
Kaohsiung City Office, OFF LIST SURV KAOHS OFF LIST SURV KAOHS
Kapral MK, 2020, CAN J NEUROL SCI, V47, P301, DOI 10.1017/cjn.2020.9
Kelman J, 2015, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V65, P109, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.07.005
Kessler RC, 2007, J GEN INTERN MED, V22, P1225, DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0294-1
Kopp JB, 2007, CLIN J AM SOC NEPHRO, V2, P825, DOI 10.2215/CJN.01220307
Kraushar ML, 2015, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V9, P354, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.60
Liao PA, 2012, AGING MENT HEALTH, V16, P983, DOI 10.1080/13607863.2012.692765
Liao PA, 2012, J RURAL HEALTH, V28, P84, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00363.x
Lien C, 2014, J COMMUN HEALTH, V39, P599, DOI 10.1007/s10900-013-9805-7
Ministry of Health and Welfare, EM MED RESP TYPH MOR EM MED RESP TYPH MOR
Ministry of Health and Welfare Taiwan, 2014, POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Ministry of the Interior Taiwan, DISASTER PREVENTION
Ministry of the Interior Taiwan, SUST TAIW SUMM NAT S SUST TAIW SUMM NAT S
Murakami N, 2015, CLIN J AM SOC NEPHRO, V10, P1389, DOI 10.2215/CJN.10181014
National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction, 2010, NAT SCI
TECHN CTR DI NAT SCI TECHN CTR DI
National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction, 2013, DIS SURV AN
MOR TYPH DIS SURV AN MOR TYPH
Nicholas SB, 2015, ADV CHRONIC KIDNEY D, V22, P6, DOI 10.1053/j.ackd.2014.07.002
Pan YJ, 2017, PSYCHOL MED, V47, P2483, DOI 10.1017/S0033291717001040
Plough A, 2013, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, P1190, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301268
Sharma AJ, 2008, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V2, P27, DOI 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31816452f0
Shih HI, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186531
Smith KR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT
Stanke Carla, 2012, PLoS Curr, V4, pe4f9f1fa9c3cae, DOI 10.1371/4f9f1fa9c3cae
Taiwan Society of Nephrology, 2014, ANN REP KIDN DIS TAI ANN REP KIDN DIS TAI
The United States Renal Data System (USRDS), 2007, USRDS 2007 ANN REP A USRDS
2007 ANN REP A
Tung Bui S.C., 1999, P 32 HAW INT C SYST P 32 HAW INT C SYST
un, UN SUST DEV GOALS
Vanholder RC, 2009, KIDNEY INT, V76, P687, DOI 10.1038/ki.2009.279
Veugelers PJ, 2003, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V57, P424, DOI 10.1136/jech.57.6.424
WHO, CLIMATE CHANGE HLTH
World Health Organization/Regional Office for the Western Pacific, 2005, EM DIS
EM DIS
World Medical Association, WORLD MED ASS DECL T WORLD MED ASS DECL T
Wu TY, 2010, LONDON J PRIM CARE, V3, P115, DOI 10.1080/17571472.2010.11493315
NR 48
TC 1
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 1
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 14
AR 7400
DI 10.3390/ijerph18147400
PG 13
(SSCI)
Health
GA TN8AV
UT WOS:000676452000001
PM 34299851
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Goodrich, KA
Basolo, V
Feldman, DL
Matthew, RA
Schubert, JE
Luke, A
Eguiarte, A
Boudreau, D
Serrano, K
Reyes, AS
Contreras, S
Houston, D
Cheung, W
AghaKouchak, A
Sanders, BF
AF Goodrich, Kristen A.
Basolo, Victoria
Feldman, David L.
Matthew, Richard A.
Schubert, Jochen E.
Luke, Adam
Eguiarte, Ana
Boudreau, Dani
Serrano, Kimberly
Reyes, Abigail S.
Contreras, Santina
Houston, Douglas
Cheung, Wing
AghaKouchak, Amir
Sanders, Brett F.
TI Addressing Pluvial Flash Flooding through Community-Based Collaborative
Research in Tijuana, Mexico
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flooding; pluvial; collaborative modeling; co-production; community
ID KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; CHALLENGES; INDICATOR; TRENDS;
DAMAGE
AB Pluvial flash flooding (PFF) is a growing hazard facing cities around the world
as a result of rapid urbanization and more intense precipitation from global
warming, particularly for low-resourced settings in developing countries. We
present collaborative modeling (CM) as an iterative process to meet diverse
decision-making needs related to PFF through the co-production of flood hazard
models and maps. CM resulted in a set of flood hazard maps accessible through an
online viewer that end-users found useful and useable for understanding PFF
threats, including debris blockages and barriers to mobility and evacuation. End-
users of information included individuals concerned with general flood awareness
and preparedness, and involved in infrastructure and emergency management,
planning, and policy. CM also showed that rain-on-grid hydrodynamic modeling is
needed to depict PFF threats in ways that are intuitive to end-users. These
outcomes evidence the importance and transferability of public health rationale for
community-based research and principles used here including recognizing community
as a unit of identity, building on strengths of the community, and integrating
knowledge for the benefit of all partners.
C1 [Goodrich, Kristen A.; Eguiarte, Ana] Tijuana River Natl Estuarine Res Reserve,
Imperial Beach, CA 91932 USA.
[Goodrich, Kristen A.; Matthew, Richard A.; Schubert, Jochen E.; AghaKouchak,
Amir; Sanders, Brett F.] Univ Calif Irvine, UCI Blum Ctr Poverty Alleviat, Irvine,
CA 92697 USA.
[Basolo, Victoria; Feldman, David L.; Matthew, Richard A.; Houston, Douglas;
Sanders, Brett F.] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Social Ecol, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Feldman, David L.] Univ Calif Irvine, Water UCI, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Schubert, Jochen E.; AghaKouchak, Amir; Sanders, Brett F.] Univ Calif Irvine,
Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Luke, Adam] Zeppelin Floods, Irvine, CA 92691 USA.
[Boudreau, Dani] GHD, San Diego, CA 92123 USA.
[Serrano, Kimberly] Calif Immigrant Policy Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90014 USA.
[Reyes, Abigail S.] Univ Calif Irvine, Off Sustainabil, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
[Contreras, Santina] Ohio State Univ, Knowlton Sch Architecture, City & Reg
Planning, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
[Cheung, Wing] Palomar Coll, Dept Earth Space & Environm Sci, San Marcos, CA
92069 USA.
[AghaKouchak, Amir] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Irvine, CA 92697
USA.
University System of Ohio; Ohio State University; University of
California System; University of California Irvine
RP Goodrich, KA (corresponding author), Tijuana River Natl Estuarine Res Reserve,
Imperial Beach, CA 91932 USA.; Goodrich, KA (corresponding author), Univ Calif
Irvine, UCI Blum Ctr Poverty Alleviat, Irvine, CA 92697 USA.
EM kgoodrich@trnerr.org; basolo@uci.edu; feldmand@uci.edu;
rmatthew@uci.edu; schubert@uci.edu; aluke1@uci.edu;
aeguiarte@trnerr.org; danielle.boudreau@ghd.com;
kserrano@caimmigrant.org; abigail.reyes@uci.edu; contreras.78@osu.edu;
houston@uci.edu; wcheung@palomar.edu; amir.a@uci.edu; bsanders@uci.edu
RI Sanders, Brett/AAW-8266-2020; Sanders, Brett/K-7153-2012
OI Sanders, Brett/0000-0002-1592-5204; Houston,
Douglas/0000-0002-3901-6072; Schubert, Jochen/0000-0002-9456-6683;
Feldman, David/0000-0003-2288-5017; Cheung, Wing/0000-0002-2464-4287;
Goodrich, Kristen/0000-0002-4639-7264; Contreras,
Santina/0000-0003-4461-607X
FU National Science Foundation [DMS 1331611]
FX This research was made possible by a grant from the National Science
Foundation (award DMS 1331611), which is gratefully acknowledged.
CR Almoradie A, 2015, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V8, P19, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12076
[Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL FACILITY DISA
[Anonymous], URBANIZATION
[Anonymous], 2015, INEGI PAN SOC EST ME
[Anonymous], PROGR DEV STUDIES, DOI 10.1191/1464993403ps049ra
[Anonymous], 2002, FLOODS CLIM CHANG AD
[Anonymous], 2004, INTERNET PHONE MAIL
Basolo V, 2016, M URB AFF ASS SAN DI
Campos I, 2016, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V17, P537, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2016.1215511
Cartwright L, 2005, J CONTEMP WAT RES ED, V130, P20, DOI 10.1111/j.1936-
704X.2005.mp130001004.x
Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
Cohen B, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005
Dawson RJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P628, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.013
Di Baldassarre G, 2010, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V37, DOI 10.1029/2010GL045467
Dilling L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P680, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
Eissenberg T., 2014, PSYCHOL ASS MONIT PS, V45, P60
Evers M, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2821, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2821-2012
Falconer RH, 2009, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V2, P198, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-
318X.2009.01034.x
Feldman D, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V15, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.12.004
Fletcher TD, 2013, ADV WATER RESOUR, V51, P261, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001
Gersberg RM, 2006, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V72, P7438, DOI 10.1128/AEM.01024-06
Geuzaine C, 2009, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V79, P1309, DOI 10.1002/nme.2579
Goodrich K.A., 2018, ADDRESSING CLIMATE C, P243
Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1979,
10.1038/nclimate1979]
Hanson S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P89, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
Hinkel J, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3292, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222469111
Houston D, 2019, ENVIRON BEHAV, V51, P347, DOI 10.1177/0013916517748711
IBWC, 2020, UPD STORM DRAIN BLOC
IPCC, 2019, SPEC REP CLIM CHANG, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157964.001
Israel BA, 1998, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V19, P173, DOI
10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
Jongman B, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P823, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.004
Kim B, 2014, ADV WATER RESOUR, V68, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.013
Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
LEIFER R, 1977, ADMIN SCI QUART, V22, P235, DOI 10.2307/2391958
Lemos MC, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P722, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0
Luke A, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P1097, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
Mackay EB, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P4815, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016824
Meyer V, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1701, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
National Research Council, 2009, MAPP ZON IMPR FLOOD
Pasche E., 2009, FLOOD RISK MANAGEMEN, P132
Ponce VM, 1996, J HYDROL ENG, V1, P11, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11)
Rataj E, 2016, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12889-016-3692-7
Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
Sanders BF., 2017, OXFORD RES ENCY NATU, DOI
10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.127
Sanders BF, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001391
Sanders BF, 2010, ADV WATER RESOUR, V33, P1456, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.07.007
SCHAEFER JT, 1990, WEATHER FORECAST, V5, P570, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(1990)005<0570:TCSIAA>2.0.CO;2
Sholders M., 2003, SAN DIEGO COUNTY HYD
Soden R, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN
COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'17), P2042, DOI 10.1145/3025453.3025983
Spiekermann R, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P96, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.002
Steinfuhrer A., 2009, RECOMMENDATIONS FLOO
Sundermann L, 2014, MIND RISK GLOBAL RAN
U.S. General Services Administration San Ysidro Land Port of Entry, 2019, SAN
YSIDR LAND PORT
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2000, HYDR MOD SYST HEC HM
Voinov A, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1268, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
Wallemacq P., 2015, HUMAN COST WEATHER R
WALSH C, 2005, J N AMER BENTHOL SOC, V24
White I, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P279, DOI 10.1177/03091325110350020205
Wilkinson ME, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V161, P38, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.009
Wolsko C, 2016, POPUL ENVIRON, V37, P411, DOI 10.1007/s11111-015-0248-1
NR 63
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 0
U2 12
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 5
AR 1257
DI 10.3390/w12051257
PG 17
(SSCI)
GA MU8KA
UT WOS:000555915200036
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Virdi, RL
Chatha, SS
Singh, H
AF Virdi, Roshan Lal
Chatha, Sukhpal Singh
Singh, Hazoor
TI Performance evaluation of nanofluid-based minimum quantity lubrication
grinding of Ni-Cr alloy under the influence of CuO nanoparticles
SO ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING
LA English
DT Article
DE Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL); Nanoparticles; Grinding; Vegetable
oils; Inconel-718 alloy
ID THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT; WHEEL/WORKPIECE INTERFACE;
TRIBOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE; FRICTION COEFFICIENT; VEGETABLE-OILS; CUTTING
FLUIDS; INCONEL 718; STEEL; TI-6AL-4V; ENERGY
AB In machining processes, researchers are actively engaged in exploring minimum
quantity lubrication (MQL) as a possible alternative to traditional flood cooling
owing to economic and ecological concerns. The search for ecologically safe
lubricants has attracted the attention of scientists looking to use vegetable oil
as a lubricant. The nanofluid MQL technique with biodegradable oils as the base is
a relatively new method with the potential to replace mineral oils. In the present
study, the grinding of Inconel-718 alloy was investigated using nanofluid MQL
(NFMQL) with biodegradable oils as the base. Nanofluids are composed by dispersing
0.5% (mass fraction) and 1% (mass fraction) of CuO nanoparticles in vegetable oil.
The surface morphology, G-ratio, forces, and grinding energy were examined under
pure MQL, NFMQL, and dry and flood lubrication conditions. The experimental results
indicated that the nanofluid MQL significantly improved the machining performance.
Owing to the polishing and rolling effect of nanoparticles on the tool work
interface, a surface finish under a 0.5% (mass fraction) nanofluid was found to be
better than pure MQL-dry and flood lubrication conditions. The NFMQL technique with
1% (mass fraction) CuO nanoparticles with palm oil as the base helped in achieving
a better evacuation of chips from the grinding zone, leading to a better surface
finish with a high material removal rate along with less energy consumption
compared to flood and dry grinding.
C1 [Virdi, Roshan Lal] Punjabi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Patiala, Punjab, India.
[Chatha, Sukhpal Singh; Singh, Hazoor] Guru Kashi Punjabi Univ Campus,
Yadavindra Coll Engn, Talwandi Sabo, India.
C3 Punjabi University; Punjabi University
RP Virdi, RL (corresponding author), Punjabi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Patiala, Punjab,
India.
EM virdirl@gmail.com
OI VIRDI, ROSHAN LAL/0000-0003-0571-5374
CR Banerjee N, 2019, P I MECH ENG B-J ENG, V233, P321, DOI 10.1177/0954405417754164
Choi SUS, 2001, APPL PHYS LETT, V79, P2252, DOI 10.1063/1.1408272
Das SK, 2003, J HEAT TRANS-T ASME, V125, P567, DOI 10.1115/1.1571080
Emami M, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V66, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.018
Fang N, 2009, J MATER PROCESS TECH, V209, P4385, DOI
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.013
Gao T, 2019, TRIBOL INT, V131, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.10.025
Guo SM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V140, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.073
Hadad M, 2013, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V68, P2145, DOI 10.1007/s00170-013-4830-3
Holmberg K, 2013, TRIBOL INT, V62, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.02.003
Jia DZ, 2017, PRECIS ENG, V50, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.05.012
Kalita P., 2012, J MANUF PROCESS, V14, P160, DOI [10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.01.001,
DOI 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2012.01.001]
Krajnik P, 2011, ADV SUSTAINABLE MANU, P107, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20183-
7_16
Lawal SA, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V66, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.066
Li CH, 2008, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V44-46, P135, DOI
Malkin S, 2007, CIRP ANN-MANUF TECHN, V56, P760, DOI 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.005
Mao C, 2012, INT J PRECIS ENG MAN, V13, P1745, DOI 10.1007/s12541-012-0229-6
Marques A, 2019, J MATER PROCESS TECH, V266, P530, DOI
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.11.032
Naveena B, 2017, MATER MANUF PROCESS, V32, P1679, DOI
10.1080/10426914.2017.1328121
Ni CB, 2020, J MATER PROCESS TECH, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116518
Ogonowski S, 2018, MINERALS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/min8040138
Ozcelik B, 2011, TRIBOL INT, V44, P1864, DOI 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.07.012
Rapeti P, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P2862, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.127
Reddy NSK, 2010, INT J MACH TOOL MANU, V50, P789, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.05.007
Sadeghi MH, 2010, INT J MATER FORM, V3, P241, DOI 10.1007/s12289-009-0678-3
Setti D, 2015, INT J MACH TOOL MANU, V88, P237, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.10.005
Seyedzavvar M, 2020, ADV MANUF, V8, P344, DOI 10.1007/s40436-020-00314-1
Shabgard M, 2017, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V92, P3807, DOI 10.1007/s00170-017-0319-
9
Sharma VS, 2015, MATER MANUF PROCESS, V30, P935, DOI
10.1080/10426914.2014.994759
Shashidhara YM, 2010, TRIBOL INT, V43, P1073, DOI 10.1016/j.triboint.2009.12.065
Shaw MC, 1951, T ASME, V71, P45
Shen B, 2008, TRIBOL T, V51, P730, DOI 10.1080/10402000802071277
Shokoohi Y, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V94, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.055
Silva L. R., 2005, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. & Eng., V27, P192, DOI
10.1590/S1678-58782005000200012
Silva LR, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.033
Su Y, 2015, J NANOMATER, V2015, DOI 10.1155/2015/276753
Tawakoli T, 2010, INT J MACH TOOL MANU, V50, P698, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.04.009
Tawakoli T, 2010, INT J MACH TOOL MANU, V50, P521, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.03.005
Tawakoli T, 2011, J CLEAN PROD, V19, P2088, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.020
Thottackkad MV, 2012, INT J PRECIS ENG MAN, V13, P111, DOI 10.1007/s12541-012-
0015-5
Virdi RL, 2020, MATER TODAY-PROC, V33, P1538, DOI 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.802
Wang XM, 2020, J MANUF PROCESS, V59, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.044
Wang YG, 2018, INT J PR ENG MAN-GT, V5, P327, DOI 10.1007/s40684-018-0035-4
Wang YG, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P3571, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.110
Wang YG, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V127, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.121
Wang YG, 2016, TRIBOL INT, V99, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.03.023
Yang M, 2019, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V102, P2617, DOI 10.1007/s00170-019-03367-0
Zhang XP, 2017, PRECIS ENG, V47, P532, DOI 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.09.016
Zhang YB, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V139, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.073
Zhang YB, 2016, J MATER PROCESS TECH, V232, P100, DOI
10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.01.031
NR 49
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 9
U2 21
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2095-3127
EI 2195-3597
J9 ADV MANUF
JI Adv. Manuf.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 9
IS 4
BP 580
EP 591
DI 10.1007/s40436-021-00362-1
EA SEP 2021
PG 12
WC Engineering, Manufacturing; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
SC Engineering; Materials Science
GA WL5BO
UT WOS:000698877500001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kameshwar, S
Park, H
Cox, DT
Barbosa, AR
AF Kameshwar, Sabarethinam
Park, Hyoungsu
Cox, Daniel T.
Barbosa, Andre R.
TI Effect of disaster debris, floodwater pooling duration, and bridge
damage on immediate post-tsunami connectivity
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster debris; Flood; Seismic-tsunami; Seaside; Connectivity
ID SERVICE ACCESSIBILITY; NETWORK; EARTHQUAKE; IMPACT; MODEL
AB This study establishes a general methodology to account for the effects of the
amount of disaster debris generated, debris dispersal, the duration floodwater
pooling for events like tsunamis, and damage to infrastructure on initial and time
evolution of connectivity between critical facilities and key locations within a
community such as evacuation zones and shelters. The proposed methodology is
applied to Seaside, OR, for cascading seismic and tsunami hazards corresponding to
seven return periods ranging from 250 to 10,000 years. The post-event connectivity
is assessed for the first 72 h. The results provide insights on immediate post-
event connectivity, its evolution with time as floodwaters recede and as the debris
is cleared, and the relative effect of debris, floodwater pooling, and
infrastructure damage on connectivity. For example, the level of disconnection
caused by debris and flooding in Seaside is not always directly proportional to the
return period (magnitude) of the seismictsunami event. Results show that bridge
damage further exacerbates the lack of connectivity due to debris and floodwater
pooling, highlighting that multi-hazard and multi-infrastructure analyses are
necessary to understand connectivity for disasters.
C1 [Kameshwar, Sabarethinam] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA.
[Park, Hyoungsu] Univ Hawaii Manoa, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Honolulu, HI
96822 USA.
[Cox, Daniel T.; Barbosa, Andre R.] Oregon State Univ, Sch Civil & Construct
Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA.
C3 Louisiana State University System; Louisiana State University;
University of Hawaii System; University of Hawaii Manoa; Oregon State
University
RP Kameshwar, S (corresponding author), Louisiana State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm
Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA.
EM skameshwar1@lsu.edu
OI Kameshwar, Sabarethinam/0000-0003-0205-8022
FU National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [70NANB15H044];
Colorado State University
FX This work was partially funded by the cooperative agreement 70NANB15H044
between the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and
Colorado State University through a subaward to Oregon State University.
The content expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do
not necessarily represent the opinions or views of NIST or the U.S.
Department of Commerce.
CR Akbari V, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V257, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.043
Aksu DT, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V61, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2013.10.009
Albano R, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2847, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2847-2014
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2010, 710 ASCE
10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000265]
[Anonymous], 2007, PUBL ASS DEBR MAN GU
Balomenos GP, 2019, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V25, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-
555X.0000509
Barbosa A, 2017, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.3389/FBUIL.2017.00032
Barnes CF, 2007, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V45, P1631, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2007.890808
Bono F, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1443, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.08.002
Caterpillar T.C., 2018, SUSTAIN
Cui YP, 2016, J PERFORM CONSTR FAC, V30, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000657
Ertugay K, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V17, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.005
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2013, TSUN METH TECHN MAN
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2015, MULT LOSS EST METH E, V1
FHWA NBI, 2018, NAT BRIDG INV
Franchin P, 2006, J EARTHQ ENG, V10, P195, DOI 10.1142/S1363246906002554
Ghobarah A, 2006, ENG STRUCT, V28, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.028
Gonzalez FI, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JC005132
Goretti A, 2006, B EARTHQ ENG, V4, P159, DOI 10.1007/s10518-006-9004-3
Green D, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P1, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-1-2017
Jawdoszyn M., 2016, DRIVINGFASTNET
Kameshwar S, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106568
Kuwata Y, 2004, NAT HAZARDS, V33, P23, DOI 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000035003.29275.32
Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
Newman M., 2018, NETWORKS, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001/acprof-
9780199206650
Nistor I, 2017, J WATERW PORT COAST, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-
5460.0000371
Ozdamar L, 2004, ANN OPER RES, V129, P217, DOI
10.1023/B:ANOR.0000030690.27939.39
Ozdamar L, 2014, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V48, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2014.08.001
Park H, 2019, COAST ENG, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103541
Park H, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101076
Pramudita A, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V125, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1487
Prasetya G, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V60, P1167, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9903-8
Rueben M, 2015, J WATERW PORT COAST, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-
5460.0000267
Sohn J, 2006, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V40, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.006
Takahashi S., 2010, 1224 PARI
Taylor MAP, 2006, NETW SPAT ECON, V6, P267, DOI 10.1007/s11067-006-9284-9
Teo FY, 2012, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V10, P149, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2012.674040
Wood, 2007, VARIATIONS CITY EXPO
Xia JQ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9639-x
NR 42
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 2
U2 7
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD APR 1
PY 2021
VL 56
AR 102119
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102119
EA FEB 2021
PG 13
Water Resources
GA RH8ED
UT WOS:000636443800002
OA Bronze
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Garfin, DR
Thompson, RR
Wong-Parodi, G
AF Garfin, Dana Rose
Thompson, Rebecca R.
Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle
TI Media exposure, threat processing, and mitigation behaviors in Gulf
Coast residents facing the co-occurring threats of COVID-19 and
hurricanes
SO RISK ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; health protective behaviors; hurricanes; media; mitigation
ID RISK PERCEPTION; SOCIAL MEDIA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NATURAL DISASTERS; ACUTE
STRESS; EVACUATION; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION; RESPONSES; BELIEFS
AB The 2020 hurricane season threatened millions of Americans concurrently
grappling with COVID-19. Processes guiding individual-level mitigation for these
conceptually distinct threats, one novel and chronic (COVID-19), the other familiar
and episodic (hurricanes), are unknown. Theories of health protective behaviors
suggest that inputs from external stimuli (e.g., traditional and social media) lead
to threat processing, including perceived efficacy (self- and response) and
perceived threat (susceptibility and severity), guiding mitigation behavior. We
surveyed a representative sample of Florida and Texas residents (N = 1846) between
April 14, 2020 and April 27, 2020; many had previous hurricane exposure; all were
previously assessed between September 8, 2017 and September 11, 2017. Using
preregistered analyses, two generalized structural equation models tested direct
and indirect effects of media exposure (traditional media, social media) on self-
reported (1) COVID-19 mitigation (handwashing, mask-wearing, social distancing) and
(2) hurricane mitigation (preparation behaviors), as mediated through perceived
efficacy (self- and response) and perceived threat (susceptibility and severity).
Self-efficacy and response efficacy were associated with social distancing (p
= .002), handwashing, mask-wearing, and hurricane preparation (ps < 0.001).
Perceived susceptibility was positively associated with social distancing (p =
0.017) and hurricane preparation (p < 0.001). Perceived severity was positively
associated with social distancing (p < 0.001). Traditional media exhibited indirect
effects on COVID-19 mitigation through increased response efficacy (ps < 0.05), and
to a lesser extent self-efficacy (p < 0.05), and on hurricane preparation through
increased self-efficacy and response efficacy and perceived susceptibility (ps <
0.05). Social media did not exhibit indirect effects on COVID-19 or hurricane
mitigation. Communications targeting efficacy and susceptibility may encourage
mitigation behavior; research should explore how social media campaigns can more
effectively target threat processing, guiding protective actions.
C1 [Garfin, Dana Rose] Univ Calif Irvine, Sue & Bill Gross Sch Nursing, Irvine, CA
USA.
[Garfin, Dana Rose] Univ Calif Irvine, Program Publ Hlth, Irvine, CA USA.
[Garfin, Dana Rose] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept
Community Hlth Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA.
[Thompson, Rebecca R.] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol Sci, Irvine, CA USA.
[Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle] Stanford Univ, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Stanford Woods Inst
Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
University of California System; University of California Los Angeles;
Stanford University
RP Garfin, DR (corresponding author), Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth
Sci, 650 Charles E Young Dr South,36-071 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
EM dgarfin@ucla.edu
OI Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle/0000-0001-5207-7489
FU National Science Foundation [SES-2030139, BCS-1902925, SBE-1760764];
National Center for Atmospheric Research - National Science Foundation
[M0856145]; [K01 MD013910]
FX The authors wish to thank Wendy Mansfield and Ying Wang from Ipsos for
their contributions to the design and administration of the survey and
to Baruch Fischhoff for his contribution to the initial design of the
survey. We thank Roxane Cohen Silver and E. Alison Homan for their
contributions to the initial project (including funding acquisition)
from which this sample was drawn. This research was supported by the
National Science Foundation under grants SES-2030139, BCS-1902925, and
SBE-1760764 and the National Center for Atmospheric Research sponsored
by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No.
M0856145. Dana Rose Garfin was supported by K01 MD013910. Dana Rose
Garfin was at the University of California, Irvine at the time of data
collection and manuscript submission.
CR Akdeniz G, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00695
Allington D, 2023, PSYCHOL MED, V53, P236, DOI 10.1017/S0033291721001434
Allington D, 2021, PSYCHOL MED, V51, P1763, DOI [10.1017/S003329172000224X,
10.1017/S0033291721000593]
[Anonymous], 2003, RISK MANAGE, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240154, DOI
10.1057/PALGRAVE.RM.8240154]
Aven T, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P849, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756383
BALLROKEACH SJ, 1976, COMMUN RES, V3, P3, DOI 10.1177/009365027600300101
Beatty TKM, 2019, J ASSOC ENVIRON RESO, V6, P633, DOI 10.1086/703379
Bell Melanie L, 2016, BMC Res Notes, V9, P479
Bodas M., 2017, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V32, pS183, DOI
[10.1017/S1049023X17004885, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X17004885]
Bond L, 2011, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-943
Bridgman A., 2020, HARVARD KENNEDY SCH, P1, DOI DOI 10.37016/MR-2020-028
Brody SD, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P566, DOI 10.1111/disa.12216
Casey-Lockyer M, 2013, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V62, P393
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, PREP HURR OTH TROP S
Cho HY, 2005, HEALTH PROMOT PRACT, V6, P482, DOI 10.1177/1524839904263912
Chong YY, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186540
Cori L, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17093114
Cui B, 2017, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4364-y
de Bruin WB, 2020, AM J PREV MED, V59, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001
Delen D., 2020, JMIR PUBLIC HLTH SUR, V6, DOI [DOI 10.2196/19862, 10.2196/19862]
Ebi KL, 2020, HEALTH AFFAIR, V39, P2056, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01125
Emanuel K, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P12681, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1716222114
Fischhoff B, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V324, P139, DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.10178
Fischhoff B, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P13664, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1317504111
Folmer CPR, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0257945
Fox-Glassman KT, 2016, J MATH PSYCHOL, V75, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.003
Freberg K, 2013, PUBLIC RELAT REV, V39, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.010
Fullerton MK, 2022, J HEALTH PSYCHOL, V27, P2129, DOI 10.1177/13591053211024726
Garfin D.R., 2016, ENCY MENTAL HLTH, V4, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-
9.00161-0, 10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00161-0]
Garfin DR, 2022, JAMA NETW OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17251
Garfin DR, 2021, J EXP PSYCHOL-APPL, V27, P584, DOI 10.1037/xap0000374
Garfin DR, 2020, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V39, P355, DOI 10.1037/hea0000875
Garfin DR, 2018, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V112, P107, DOI
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.05.017
Garrett L, 2020, LANCET, V395, P942, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30600-0
Guidry JPD, 2022, GLOB HEALTH PROMOT, V29, P5, DOI 10.1177/17579759211051368
Holman EA, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abd5390
Holman EA, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P93, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1316265110
Jasour ZY, 2018, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V24, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000452
Jung JY, 2017, INT ENCY MEDIA EFFEC, P1, DOI DOI
10.1002/9781118783764.WBIEME0063
Kahn LH, 2008, J URBAN HEALTH, V85, P910, DOI 10.1007/s11524-008-9310-y
Kessler RC, 2012, EPIDEMIOL PSYCH SCI, V21, P35, DOI 10.1017/S2045796011000758
Kim HK, 2022, HEALTH COMMUN, V37, P833, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2020.1871170
Kim SC, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106428
Koetsier John., 2020, FORBES
Kofman A, 2021, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V326, P303, DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.11042
Lee M, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17092977
Lim JM, 2021, INFLUENZA OTHER RESP, V15, P45, DOI 10.1111/irv.12785
Luna S, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.006
Lyu W, 2020, HEALTH AFFAIR, V39, P1419, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818
Maclntyre CR, 2009, EMERG INFECT DIS, V15, P233, DOI 10.3201/eid1502.081167
Magnan RE, 2021, J BEHAV MED, V44, P285, DOI 10.1007/s10865-021-00202-4
Moftakhari HR, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P9785, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1620325114
Mongold E, 2021, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V20, P363, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2020.1829531
National Academy for State Health Policy, 2021, 2020 COVID 19 STAT R
Parmet WE, 2018, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V108, P1435, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304695
Reser JP, 2011, AM PSYCHOL, V66, P277, DOI 10.1037/a0023412
Rivera JD, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04217-z
Roberto AJ, 2021, J HEALTH COMMUN, V26, P264, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2021.1903628
Rogalski MA, 2017, PHILOS T R SOC B, V372, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2016.0043
Li SCS, 2020, ASIAN J COMMUN, V30, P242, DOI 10.1080/01292986.2020.1784967
Scholz U, 2021, BRIT J HEALTH PSYCH, V26, P935, DOI 10.1111/bjhp.12513
Slotter R, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12667
Smith KF, 2014, J R SOC INTERFACE, V11, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2014.0950
Smith RA, 2018, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V8, P73, DOI 10.1007/s13412-017-0456-3
Stock A, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V12, P312, DOI 10.1007/s13753-021-00350-w
Thompson RR, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aav3502
Cool CT, 2015, WEST PAC SURVEILL RE, V6, DOI [10.5365/WPSAR.2015.6.2.HYN_013,
10.5365/wpsar.2015.6.2.HYN_013]
Trenberth KE, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P730, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000825
Tsao SF, 2021, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V3, pE175, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30315-0
Ulvi O., 2019, J PUBLIC HLTH EMERGE, V3, P15, DOI [10.21037/jphe.2019.11.01, DOI
10.21037/JPHE.2019.11.01]
van Dijck J, 2020, SOC MEDIA SOC, V6, DOI 10.1177/2056305120981057
Venegas-Vera AV, 2020, REV CARDIOVASC MED, V21, P561, DOI
10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.195
Wong-Parodi G, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P747, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-17-0138.1
World Health Organization, 2020, ADV US MASKS CONT CO
Yang JW, 2021, PEERJ, V9, DOI 10.7717/peerj.11559
Zaalberg R, 2009, RISK ANAL, V29, P1759, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01316.x
Zarocostas J, 2020, LANCET, V395, P676, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X
NR 89
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 5
U2 14
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0272-4332
EI 1539-6924
J9 RISK ANAL
JI Risk Anal.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 7
BP 1370
EP 1386
DI 10.1111/risa.14032
EA OCT 2022
PG 17
(SSCI)
GA L6DH8
UT WOS:000865651700001
PM 36217752
OA Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Ian, VK
Tse, R
Tang, SK
Pau, G
AF Ian, Vai-Kei
Tse, Rita
Tang, Su-Kit
Pau, Giovanni
TI Bridging the Gap: Enhancing Storm Surge Prediction and Decision Support
with Bidirectional Attention-Based LSTM
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE storm surge; machine learning; artificial intelligence; tropical
cyclone; natural disaster; natural hazard
ID ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; FORECAST MODEL; RISK; COAST; PROGRESS;
MAXIMUM; FLOODS; WIND; TIDE
AB Accurate storm surge forecasting is vital for saving lives and avoiding economic
and infrastructural damage. Failure to accurately predict storm surge can have
catastrophic repercussions. Advances in machine learning models show the ability to
improve accuracy of storm surge prediction by leveraging vast amounts of historical
and realtime data such as weather and tide patterns. This paper proposes a
bidirectional attention-based LSTM storm surge architecture (BALSSA) to improve
prediction accuracy. Training and evaluation utilized extensive meteorological and
tide level data from 77 typhoon incidents in Hong Kong and Macao between 2017 and
2022. The proposed methodology is able to model complex non-linearities between
large amounts of data from different sources and identify complex relationships
between variables that are typically not captured by traditional physical methods.
BALSSA effectively resolves the problem of long-term dependencies in storm surge
prediction by the incorporation of an attention mechanism. It enables selective
emphasis on significant features and boosts the prediction accuracy. Evaluation has
been conducted using real-world datasets from Macao to validate our storm surge
prediction model. Results show that accuracy and robustness of predictions were
significantly improved by the incorporation of attention mechanisms in our models.
BALSSA captures temporal dynamics effectively, providing highly accurate storm
surge forecasts (MAE: 0.0126, RMSE: 0.0003) up to 72 h in advance. These findings
have practical significance for disaster risk reduction strategies, saving lives
through timely evacuation and early warnings. Experiments comparing BALSSA
variations with other machine learning algorithms consistently validate BALSSA's
superior predictive performance. It offers an additional risk management tool for
civil-protection agencies and governments, as well as an ideal solution for
enhancing storm surge prediction accuracy, benefiting coastal communities.
C1 [Ian, Vai-Kei; Tse, Rita; Tang, Su-Kit; Pau, Giovanni] Macao Polytech Univ, Fac
Appl Sci, R Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macau 999078, Peoples R China.
[Tse, Rita; Tang, Su-Kit] Macao Polytech Univ, Engn Res Ctr Appl Technol Machine
Translat & Artif, Minist Educ, R Luis Gonzaga Gomes, Macau 999078, Peoples R China.
[Pau, Giovanni] Univ Bologna, Dept Comp Sci & Engn DISI, Via Zamboni,33, I-40126
Bologna, Italy.
[Pau, Giovanni] UCLA, Comp Sci Dept, 404 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095
USA.
C3 University of Bologna; University of California System; University of
California Los Angeles
RP Ian, VK (corresponding author), Macao Polytech Univ, Fac Appl Sci, R Luis
Gonzaga Gomes, Macau 999078, Peoples R China.
EM vaikei.ian@mpu.edu.mo; ritatse@mpu.edu.mo; sktang@mpu.edu.mo;
gpau@cs.ucla.edu
FU Macao Polytechnic University-Edge Sensing and Computing: Enabling
Human-centric (Sustainable) Smart Cities [RP/ESCA-01/2020]
FX This research received no external funding.
CR Abbot J, 2014, ATMOS RES, V138, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.11.002
Bajo M, 2010, OCEAN MODEL, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2009.12.007
Battjes JA, 2002, PHILOS T R SOC A, V360, P1461, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2002.1010
Bode L, 1997, J HYDRAUL ENG, V123, P315, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1997)123:4(315)
Borah DK, 2011, HYDROL PROCESS, V25, P3472, DOI 10.1002/hyp.8075
Chen WB, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9070549
Chen WB, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1161, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0287-1
Cheng QS, 2020, THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION
PROCESSING AND RETRIEVAL (MIPR 2020), P291, DOI 10.1109/MIPR49039.2020.00067
Conner W., 1957, MON WEATHER REV, V85, P113, DOI [10.1175/1520-
0493(1957)085andlt;0113:EMFFTMandgt;2.0.CO;2, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0493(1957)085ANDLT;0113:EMFFTMANDGT;2.0.CO;2]
Costabile P, 2013, HYDROL PROCESS, V27, P554, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9237
Danso-Amoako E, 2012, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V36, P423, DOI
Das Y, 2016, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V2, DOI 10.1007/s40808-015-0067-5
de Oliveira MMF, 2009, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V48, P143, DOI
10.1175/2008JAMC1907.1
Dietrich JC, 2018, J WATERW PORT COAST, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-
5460.0000419
Dismukes D.E., 2018, NAT RESOUR, V9, P150, DOI [10.4236/nr.2018.94010, DOI
10.4236/NR.2018.94010]
Doycheva K, 2017, ADV ENG INFORM, V33, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2016.11.001
Emanuel K, 2005, NATURE, V436, P686, DOI 10.1038/nature03906
Erdil A, 2013, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V22, P1677, DOI 10.1007/s00521-012-1210-0
Feng XR, 2018, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V68, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2018.01.006
Fleming SW, 2015, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V51, P502, DOI 10.1111/jawr.12259
Gangopadhyay T, 2021, 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH
AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP 2021), P3560, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP39728.2021.9413914
HEAPS NS, 1983, GEOPHYS J ROY ASTR S, V74, P331, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-
246X.1983.tb01883.x
Heemink A.W., 1995, STORM SURGE FORECAST
HKO, HONG KONG OBS OP DAT
HOLLAND GJ, 1980, MON WEATHER REV, V108, P1212, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0493(1980)108<1212:AAMOTW>2.0.CO;2
Hoover R.A., 1957, MON WEATHER REV, V85, P167, DOI [10.1175/1520-0493-85.5.167,
DOI 10.1175/1520-0493-85.5.167]
Huang YH, 2011, MON WEATHER REV, V139, P1708, DOI 10.1175/2011MWR3560.1
Ian Vai-Kei, 2022, 2022 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition and
Artificial Intelligence (PRAI), P1229, DOI 10.1109/PRAI55851.2022.9904245
Ian VK, 2022, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF
THINGS, BIG DATA AND SECURITY (IOTBDS), P297, DOI 10.5220/0011109400003194
Jan CD, 2006, J MAR SCI TECHNOL, V11, P193, DOI 10.1007/s00773-006-0220-y
Jin X, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15040604
Jones JE, 2007, OCEAN DYNAM, V57, P401, DOI 10.1007/s10236-007-0119-0
Kim B, 2015, J HYDROL, V523, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.059
Kim G, 2001, J HYDROL, V246, P45, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00353-5
Kim S, 2019, APPL OCEAN RES, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.apor.2019.101871
Kim S, 2016, OCEAN ENG, V122, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.017
Kohno N, 2018, TROP CYCLONE RES REV, V7, P128, DOI 10.6057/2018TCRR02.04
Kourgialas NN, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V154, P86, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.034
Lee TL, 2006, OCEAN ENG, V33, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.04.012
Lee TL, 2004, OCEAN ENG, V31, P225, DOI 10.1016/S0029-8018(03)00115-X
Lee TL, 2009, ADV ENG SOFTW, V40, P1200, DOI 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.06.005
Li QL, 2022, GEODERMA, V409, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115651
Lin N, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD017126
Liu QR, 2018, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V68, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2018.01.016
Liu WC, 2016, ENVIRON FLUID MECH, V16, P721, DOI 10.1007/s10652-015-9441-0
Liu YQ, 2020, EXPERT SYST APPL, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113082
Luo QR, 2022, OCEAN ENG, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112747
Luong MT, 2015, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1508.04025, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1508.04025]
Marsooli R, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V123, P3844, DOI 10.1029/2017JC013434
Mosavi A., 2018, P INT C GLOB RES ED, P50
Nayak PC, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/2004WR003562
Nicholls RJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1517, DOI 10.1126/science.1185782
Olfateh M, 2017, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V122, P458, DOI 10.1002/2016JC012237
Pitt M., 2008, LEARNING LESSONS 200
Qin Y, 2017, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1704.02971, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1704.02971]
Quinn N, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V119, P4983, DOI 10.1002/2014JC010197
Saghafian B, 2017, HYDROLOG SCI J, V62, P1039, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2017.1296229
Sahoo B, 2019, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100196
Shi LK, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P9475, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3112131
Shrestha DL, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P1913, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-1913-
2013
SMG Macao Meteorological and Geophysical Bureau, US
Suleman MAR, 2022, IEEE ACCESS, V10, P82456, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3196381
Sztobryn M, 2003, J SEA RES, V49, P317, DOI 10.1016/S1385-1101(03)00024-8
Torres MJ, 2019, J WATERW PORT COAST, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-
5460.0000496
Tsai CP, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2313, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2313-2014
Tseng CM, 2007, OCEAN ENG, V34, P1757, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.09.005
van den Honert RC, 2011, WATER-SUI, V3, P1149, DOI 10.3390/w3041149
Verlaan M, 2005, PHILOS T ROY SOC A, V363, P1441, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2005.1578
Wang B, 2021, ACTA OCEANOL SIN, V40, P104, DOI 10.1007/s13131-021-1763-9
Wang ZF, 2017, J COASTAL RES, P86, DOI [10.2112/SI80-012.1, 10.2112/si80-012.1]
Webster PJ, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1844, DOI 10.1126/science.1116448
Welander P., 1961, ADV GEOPHYS, V8, P315, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2687(08)60343-X
WESTERINK JJ, 1992, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V118, P1373, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1992)118:10(1373)
Wu GX, 2018, COAST ENG, V140, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.08.011
Xie J, 2020, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V17, P740, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2931728
Xie K, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000369
Xu ZX, 2002, HYDROL PROCESS, V16, P2423, DOI 10.1002/hyp.1013
NR 78
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 14
IS 7
AR 1082
DI 10.3390/atmos14071082
PG 25
GA N1SC7
UT WOS:001034884200001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Suzuki, T
AF Suzuki, Takeyasu
TI Building Up a Common Recognition of City Development in the Southern
Part of Kofu Basin under the Initiative of Knowledge Brokers with the
Cooperation of Experts
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE study group; resilient to floods; sustainable city; knowledge brokers;
green infrastructure; Kofu Basin
AB Extreme weather caused by global warming has caused an increase in the number
and intensity of heavy rain disasters. Almost half the area of the Kofu Basin,
Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan, is expected to be flooded by the largest expected
rainfall in the basin. Approximately 310,000 people live in the inundation area,
and the formulation of a wide-area evacuation plan in the event of a flood is an
urgent issue. In the southern part of this area, where the estimated inundation
depth is 5-10 m, a new station of the Linear Chuo Shinkansen Line, which will start
operation in 2027, is planned, and urban development centered on the station is
expected. In order to build a sustainable city that is resilient to floods in such
a flood hazard area, the author established a study group on urban development
consisting of knowledge brokers-professors at University of Yamanashi-and experts
with the participation of local government observers. The group has proposed a
future image of sustainable Kofu Basin under the initiative of knowledge brokers
with the cooperation of experts. The group attempted to put into practice the
concept of sustainable cities presented by the author. As a result, by the unusual
town development activities of the study group, perspective drawings that provide
the participants a common recognition of the city development were successfully
created.
C1 [Suzuki, Takeyasu] Univ Yamanashi, Disaster & Environmentally Sustainable Adm
Res Ct, Kofu, Yamanashi 4008511, Japan.
C3 University of Yamanashi
RP Suzuki, T (corresponding author), Univ Yamanashi, Disaster & Environmentally
Sustainable Adm Res Ct, Kofu, Yamanashi 4008511, Japan.
EM takeyasu@yamanashi.ac.jp
FU University of Yamanashi the 2019 Regional Promotion Project Research
Grant
FX This research was funded by University of Yamanashi the 2019 Regional
Promotion Project Research Grant.
CR [Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
Chini CM, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010105
City of Portland Bureau of Envtl. Servs, 2010, PORTL GREEN INFR QUA, P2
Disaster and Environmentally Sustainable Administration Research Center
University of Yamanashi, ACH REP STUD GROUP P
Japan Institute of Construction Engineering (JICE), 111001 JICE
Japan Meteorological Agency, TYPH NORM VAL
Littke H, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P11306, DOI 10.3390/su70811306
LIU J, 2016, PORTLAND GREEN LOOP
Mega V., 2013, QUINTESSENTIAL CITIE
Meihnen F., 2019, SUSTAIN CITY, V238, P301, DOI [10.2496/SC190271, DOI
10.2496/SC190271]
Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism Japan, HAZ MAPS CAN BE OV
Nature Conservation Bureau Ministry of Environment, 2016, HDB PRACT
Ohara M, 2017, J JPN SOC NAT DISAST, V36, P91
Pennell KG, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P11985, DOI 10.1021/es4025244
Public Utilities Board Singapore, 2019, SING ACT BEAUT CLEAN, V4th
RENAUD B, 2016, ADV NATURAL TECHNOLO, P00001
Roschel L., 2019, WIT T ECOL ENV, V238, P233, DOI [10.2495/SC190211, DOI
10.2495/SC190211]
Rua M.J., 2019, SUSTAIN CITY, V238, P481, DOI [10.2495/S190421, DOI
10.2495/S190421]
Stoddard A., 2002, 13 WILLAMATTE RIVER
Suzuki T., 2016, P DISASTER INFORM ST, V14, P105
Suzuki T., 2019, 9 3 LEGAL SYSTEMS DI, P287
Suzuki T., 2019, WIT T BUILT ENV DIS, V190, P145
Suzuki T, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16142466
Yau WK, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9080577
Yigitcanlar T, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P14677, DOI 10.3390/su71114677
Yigitcanlar T, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P2570, DOI 10.3390/su7032570
NR 28
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 5
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD AUG
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 16
AR 6316
DI 10.3390/su12166316
PG 17
(SSCI)
GA OC2BK
UT WOS:000578965400001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Miguel, T
Eudave, RR
AF Ferreira, Tiago Miguel
Ramirez Eudave, Rafael
TI Assessing and Managing Risk in Historic Urban Areas: Current Trends and
Future Research Directions
SO FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE risk assessment; seismic vulnerability; fire risk; flood risk; historic
urban areas
ID VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; FIRE RISK; LANDSCAPE
AB Historic urban centres are, almost by definition, risk-prone areas. The
buildings in the historical sites are often highly vulnerable to natural and human-
made hazards, not only due to their construction and material characteristics but
also because they are usually very degraded due to ineffective maintenance and
conservation policies. Moreover, the recent world tourism boom has led to a
significant increase in the number of people who live, work and visit these areas,
which, together with land use and climate change-related impacts, make historic
centres particularly exposed areas. This paper addresses the issue of assessing and
managing risk in historic urban centres departing from the complexity of defining
the historic city and the concept of risk, providing a comprehensive discussion on
current trends and future research directions in this field. After analysing the
most suitable methodologies to assess the vulnerability of these areas to different
hazards, the focus is on data collection and organisation-related issues and how
the different vulnerability assessment outputs can be used to manage and mitigate
risk. Vulnerability and loss scenarios, evacuation and emergency planning, and
retrofit and cost-benefit analyses are some of the aspects addressed herein. This
discussion includes some considerations on the accuracy of these approaches and
aspects related to their calibration and validation, covering from empirical
calibration models to advanced artificial Intelligence-based techniques.
C1 [Ferreira, Tiago Miguel] Univ West England, Dept Geog & Environm Management,
Bristol, England.
[Ramirez Eudave, Rafael] Univ Minho, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, Guimaraes,
Portugal.
C3 University of West England; Universidade do Minho
RP Miguel, T (corresponding author), Univ West England, Dept Geog & Environm
Management, Bristol, England.
EM Tiago.Ferreira@uwe.ac.uk
RI Ferreira, Tiago Miguel/D-8112-2015
OI Ferreira, Tiago Miguel/0000-0001-6454-7927; Ramirez Eudave,
Rafael/0000-0003-0733-6685
FU MIT-RSC-Multi-risk Interactions Towards Resilient and Sustainable Cities
[MIT-EXPL/CS/0018/2019]; ERDF-European Regional Development Fund through
the Operational Program for Competitiveness and
Internationalisation-COMPETE; North Portugal Regional Operational
Program-NORTE; Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology-GCT
under the MIT Portugal Program; Portuguese Foundation for Science and
Technology (FCT) [PD/BD/150385/2019]
FX The project "MIT-RSC-Multi-risk Interactions Towards Resilient and
Sustainable Cities" (MIT-EXPL/CS/0018/2019) leading to this work is
co-financed by the ERDF-European Regional Development Fund through the
Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalisation-COMPETE
2020, the North Portugal Regional Operational Program-NORTE 2020 and by
the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology-GCT under the MIT
Portugal Program at the 2019 PT call for Exploratory Proposals in
"Sustainable Cities". Rafael Ramirez Eudave is funded by the Portuguese
Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the grant number
PD/BD/150385/2019.
CR de Carvalho NLA, 2019, RES TRANSP ECON, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2019.100744
Anglade E, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101432
Angrisano M, 2016, AESTIMUM, V69, P165, DOI 10.13128/Aestimum-20454
[Anonymous], 2016, HUL GUID MAN HER DYN
[Anonymous], 2007, CAS STUD CLIM CHANG
Athmani AE, 2015, B EARTHQ ENG, V13, P2283, DOI 10.1007/s10518-014-9717-7
Baquedano P., 2021, MASONRY CONSTRUCTION, P99, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-821087-
1.00011-9, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-821087-1.00011-9]
Bernardini G., 2022, SEISMIC VULNERABILIT, P275
Bernardini G, 2022, INT J ARCHIT HERIT, V16, P820, DOI
10.1080/15583058.2021.2001117
Blyth A, 2020, B EARTHQ ENG, V18, P2607, DOI 10.1007/s10518-020-00795-2
Chmutina K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V10, P283, DOI 10.1007/s13753-019-00232-
2
Coletti A, 2020, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V28, P178, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12309
D'Angelo G, 2019, SOFT COMPUT, V23, P11775, DOI 10.1007/s00500-018-03729-y
Donkers S, 2016, T GIS, V20, P547, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12162
Dulebenets MA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101114
Egusquiza A, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V164, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.061
Eudave R., 2021, 1 CROAT C EARTHQ ENG, P23, DOI [10.5592/CO/1CroCEE.2021.22, DOI
10.5592/CO/1CROCEE.2021.22]
Eudave R.R., 2021, GEOHAZARDS, V2, P1, DOI [10.3390/geohazards2010001, DOI
10.3390/GEOHAZARDS2010001]
Eudave RR, 2021, B EARTHQ ENG, V19, P4945, DOI 10.1007/s10518-021-01154-5
Eudave RR, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13101879
Ferreira TM, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061648
Ferreira TM, 2020, FRONT STRUCT CIV ENG, V14, P609, DOI 10.1007/s11709-020-0623-
6
Ferreira TM, 2019, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/buildings9040091
Ferreira TM, 2017, B EARTHQ ENG, V15, P2879, DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-0071-9
Ferreira TM, 2017, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V16, P329, DOI 10.1007/s11803-017-0385-x
Ferreira TM, 2013, B EARTHQ ENG, V11, P1753, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9447-2
Garcia-Hernandez M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9081346
Gavarini C, 2001, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V21, P459, DOI 10.1016/S0267-
7261(01)00027-6
Granda S, 2019, FIRE TECHNOL, V55, P105, DOI 10.1007/s10694-018-0778-z
Hadzima-Nyarko M, 2016, EARTHQ STRUCT, V11, P629, DOI 10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.629
International Organization for Standardization, 2006, 31000 ISO, P13
Julia PB, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04734-5
Kutzner T, 2020, PFG-J PHOTOGRAMM REM, V88, P43, DOI 10.1007/s41064-020-00095-z
Liu ZZ, 2020, INFORM SCIENCES, V509, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.063
Maio R, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.010
Miranda FN, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P713, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-03565-1
Mosoarca M, 2019, ENG FAIL ANAL, V101, P86, DOI
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.013
Moustafa L.H., 2016, AM ARCHIVIST, V79, P320, DOI [10.17723/0360-9081-79.2.320,
DOI 10.17723/0360-9081-79.2.320]
Pasha J, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P134743, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010176
Poljansek M., 2017, SCI DISASTER RISK MA, DOI [10.2788/842809, DOI
10.2788/842809]
Quagliarini E., 2022, LEAVING SHELTERING S, P113, DOI [10.1007/978-981-16-6269-
0_10, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-6269-0_10]
Quesada-Ganuza L, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102551
Eudave RR, 2021, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V35, P2047, DOI
10.1080/13658816.2020.1844208
Rey-Perez J, 2020, J CULT HERIT MANAG S, V10, P233, DOI 10.1108/JCHMSD-05-2018-
0036
Roca P, 2010, ARCH COMPUT METHOD E, V17, P299, DOI 10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1
S.S.N. Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti-GNDT, 1994, SCHED ESP VULN
RIL D
Salazar LGF, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031276
Santos C, 2013, J CULT HERIT, V14, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.001
Shamseddin Alizadeh, 2015, SCI J REV, DOI [10.14196/sjr.v4i1.1805, DOI
10.14196/SJR.V4I1.1805]
Neto JT, 2020, J CULT HERIT, V45, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.003
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018, EC LOSS POV DISASTER
Vicente R., 2005, P INT C 250 ANN 1755, P1
Vicente R., 2008, THESIS U AVEIRO AVEI
Vicente R, 2011, B EARTHQ ENG, V9, P1067, DOI 10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3
World Bank, 2021, FIN RISK OPP BUILD R, DOI [10.1596/35685, DOI 10.1596/35685]
Zhao HT, 2020, INFORM SCIENCES, V509, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.ins2019.08.069,
10.1016/j.ins.2019.08.069]
NR 57
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 20
PI LAUSANNE
EI 2296-6463
J9 FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ
JI Front. Earth Sci.
PD MAR 15
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 847959
DI 10.3389/feart.2022.847959
PG 17
SC Geology
GA 0I0TT
UT WOS:000779141200001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Bell, SA
Dickey, S
Rosemberg, MA
AF Bell, Sue Anne
Dickey, Sarah
Rosemberg, Marie-Anne
TI "You get three different hats on and try to figure it out:" home based
care provision during a disaster
SO BMC NURSING
LA English
DT Article
DE Home based care; Aging; Disaster; Health care quality
ID PREPAREDNESS; EVACUATION
AB Background Home based care is a vital, and growing, part of the health care
system that allows individuals to remain in their homes while still receiving
health care. During a disaster, when normal health care systems are disrupted, home
based care remains a vital source of support for older adults. The purpose of this
paper is to qualitatively understand the barriers and facilitators of both patients
and providers that influence the provision of home based care activities in two
hurricane affected communities. Methods Using qualitative inquiry informed by the
social ecological model, five focus groups were conducted with home based care
providers (n = 25) in two settings affected by Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Harvey.
An open-source database of home health agencies participating in Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services programs was used to identify participants. Data
were manually coded and larger themes were generated from recurring ideas and
concepts using an abductive analysis approach. Results Twenty five participants
were included in one of five focus groups. Of the 22 who responded to the
demographic survey, 65 % were registered nurses, 20 % were Licensed Vocational
Nurses (LVN), and 15 % were other types of health care providers. 12 % of the
sample was male and 88 % was female. Five themes were identified in the analysis:
barriers to implementing preparedness plans, adaptability of home based care
providers, disasters exacerbate inequalities, perceived unreliability of government
and corporations, and the balance between caring for self and family and caring for
patients. Conclusions This study provides qualitative evidence on the factors that
influence home based care provision in disaster-affected communities, including the
barriers and facilitators faced by both patients and providers in preparing for,
responding to and recovering from a disaster. While home based care providers faced
multiple challenges to providing care during and after a disaster, the importance
of community supports and holistic models of care in the immediate period after the
disaster were emphasized. We recommend greater inclusion of home health agencies in
the community planning process. This study informs the growing body of evidence on
the value of home based care in promoting safety and well-being for older adults
during a disaster.
C1 [Bell, Sue Anne; Dickey, Sarah; Rosemberg, Marie-Anne] Univ Michigan, Sch
Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan
RP Bell, SA (corresponding author), Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, 400 North Ingalls
Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
EM sabell@umich.edu
OI Bell, Sue Anne/0000-0002-6890-2006
FU National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health
[K23AG059890]
FX Research reported in this publication was supported by National
Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under award
number K23AG059890 (Bell, PI). The content is solely the responsibility
of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of
the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study
design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.
CR Academies N, 2015, FUT HOM HLTH CAR
[Anonymous], 2012, J GASTROINTESTINAL L, V21, P72
[Anonymous], 1981, ECOLOGY HUMAN DEV EX, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTV26071R6
Bell SA, 2019, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, P1
Bell SA, 2020, GERONTOLOGIST, V60, pE535, DOI 10.1093/geront/gnz123
Bell SA, 2019, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V34, P95, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X18001231
Bell SA, 2018, ANN EMERG MED, V71, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.042
Bouckaert G, 2003, INT REV ADM SCI, V69, P329, DOI 10.1177/0020852303693003
Cangialosi J. P., 2018, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
Centers for Disease Control, 2020, SOC EC MOD FRAM PREV
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2017, EM PREP RUL
Choi J, 2020, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V11, P12, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12185
Claver ML, 2015, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V30, P337, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X15004847
Ejeta Luche Tadesse, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829
Fairchild AL, 2006, HEALTH AFFAIR, V25, P958, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.958
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2019, DIS DECL
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, 2018 2022 STRAT PLAN
Ministry of Government Legislation, 2019, LONG TERM CARE INSUR
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2017, HLTH PEOPL 2020 OLD
Texas Hospital Association, 2018, TEX HOSP ASS HURR HA
Timmermans S, 2012, SOCIOL THEOR, V30, P167, DOI 10.1177/0735275112457914
U.S. Census Bureau, 2017, AM COMMUNITY SURVEY
Wyte-Lake T, 2020, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09888-8
Wyte-Lake T, 2019, J AM GERIATR SOC, V67, P1754, DOI 10.1111/jgs.16010
Wyte-Lake T, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P56, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2016.145
Wyte-Lake T, 2016, GERONTOLOGY, V62, P263, DOI 10.1159/000439168
Zelinsky D.A., 2018, HURRICANE HARVEY
NR 28
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 0
U2 5
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1472-6955
J9 BMC NURS
JI BMC Nurs.
PD AUG 31
PY 2021
VL 20
IS 1
AR 155
DI 10.1186/s12912-021-00676-2
PG 8
WC Nursing
(SSCI)
SC Nursing
GA UL1BX
UT WOS:000692395700001
PM 34461891
OA Green Published, Green Submitted, gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Morgado, Y
Areu-Rangel, OS
Silva, R
Miyashita, T
Mori, N
Tomiczek, T
AF Morgado, Yesenia
Areu-Rangel, Omar S.
Silva, Rodolfo
Miyashita, Takuya
Mori, Nobuhito
Tomiczek, Tori
TI Using the SPRC methodology to assess tsunami risk in Zihuatanejo, Mexico
SO COASTAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Zihuatanejo; tsunami; flood hazard; risk assessment; SPRC methodology
ID LOSS ESTIMATION CURVES; RESIDENTIAL AREAS; FLOOD; ESTUARY; IMPACT
AB The increase in the magnitude of natural disasters has led to the development of
risk assessment methodologies to indicate risk levels in qualitative terms. Among
these, the Source-Pathway-Receptor-Consequence (SPRC) methodology assesses the risk
from the source of the hazard to the possible consequences. In the present work, an
economic evaluation was carried out on the substantial damages directly associated
with the floods generated by a 10 m high tsunami off the coast of Zihuatanejo,
Mexico. This event was identified as the worst-case scenario of tsunamis associated
with a 8.4 Mw earthquake. The method followed was the SPRC, with an economic
evaluation, applied to street level in Zihuatanejo. The economic costs were
obtained from the results of this work using a criterion to characterize the
percentage of damage to various types of housing and goods associated with
different levels of flooding. This work is intended as a basis for the better
planning of urban development, considering possible economic damage from tsunamis.
It also provides a more objective perspective for distributing funds for mitigating
natural disasters, allowing aid to be directed to the areas and types of housing
with greatest risk from the flooding.
C1 [Morgado, Yesenia; Areu-Rangel, Omar S.; Silva, Rodolfo] Univ Nacl Autonoma
Mexico, Inst Ingn, Mexico City, Mexico.
[Miyashita, Takuya; Mori, Nobuhito] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst,
Kyoto, Japan.
[Mori, Nobuhito] Swansea Univ, Sch Engn, Swansea, Wales.
[Tomiczek, Tori] United States Naval Acad, Dept Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn,
Annapolis, MD USA.
C3 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; Kyoto University; Swansea
University
RP Areu-Rangel, OS (corresponding author), Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ingn,
Mexico City, Mexico.
EM oareu@outlook.com
RI Mori, Nobuhito/B-8627-2008
OI Mori, Nobuhito/0000-0001-9082-3235; Morgado, Yesenia/0000-0003-2383-8845
FU Centro Mexicano de Innovacion en Energia del Oceano (CEMIE-Oceano) -
CONACYT-SENER Sustentabilidad Energetica [FSE-2014-06-249795]
FX This work was partially financed by Centro Mexicano de Innovacion en
Energia del Oceano (CEMIE-Oceano) funded by the CONACYT-SENER
Sustentabilidad Energetica, under the project FSE-2014-06-249795. The
authors thank researchers who have contributed to this study through
data and discussions: Edgar Mendoza Baldwin and Yandy Rodriguez Cueto.
The authors thank Ito. Eri et al. (2021) for allowing us to use a figure
from their article Method to extract difficult-to-evacuate areas by
using tsunami evacuation simulation and numerical analysis.
CR [Anonymous], 1979, PERSPECTIVE ENV POLL
[Anonymous], 2003, FLOODRISKNET NEWSLET
Areu-Rangel OS, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020304
Balica SF, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V41, P84, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.002
Baro-Suarez JE, 2007, ING HIDRAUL MEX, V22, P91
Baro-Suarez JE, 2007, ING HIDRAUL MEX, V22, P71
Bermudez M, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P2770, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019903
Blade E, 2014, REV INT METOD NUMER, V30, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.rimni.2012.07.004
Bonasia R, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS1116, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12312
Boyle SJ, 1998, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V124, P89, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9496(1998)124:2(89)
Burzel A., 2010, CLIN INFECT DIS, V1, P2, DOI [10.9753/icce.v32.management.9,
DOI 10.9753/ICCE.V32.MANAGEMENT.9]
Castro N. G., 2017, REV GEOGR VENEZ, V58 (2), P264
Cea Luis., 2020, BENCHMARKING IBER CA, P52, DOI [10.17979/spudc.9788497497640,
DOI 10.17979/SPUDC.9788497497640]
CENAPRED, 2001, DIAGNOSTICO PELIGROS, P232
Ch┬u├vez V., 2021, J INFRASTRUCT PRESER, V2, P7, DOI [10.1186/s43065-021-00026-
1, DOI 10.1186/S43065-021-00026-1]
Clarke S., 2011, USE SOURCE PATHWAY R
CONAPO, 2010, IND MARG URB, P50
CONASAMI, 2020, SAL MIN 2020
C┬u┬Erdova de Horta D., 2021, J THROMB THROMBOLYS, V42, P54
Cui LF, 2015, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V156, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.06.015
Environment Agency Corporate Affairs, 2004, ENV AG GUID ASS RISK, P73
Escudero M., 2015, PROPUESTA DE INDICAD
Estrada F., 1996, APUNTES CURSO PLANIF
Evans E.P., 2004, FORESIGHT FLOOD COAS, V1, P366
Farreras S., 2005, TSUNAMIS
Farreras Salvador., 2005, SCIENCE, P42
FDMA, 2002, GUID TSUN EV PLAN DE
Fraga I, 2019, HYDROL PROCESS, V33, P160, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13319
GEBCO British Oceanographic Data Centre (BODC)and National Oceanography Centre,
2014, GEN BATHYMETRIC CHAR
Goda K, 2016, COAST ENG J, V58, DOI 10.1142/S0578563416500108
Guerrero C. d., 2020, TABLAS VALORES UNITA
Horrillo-Caraballo A., 2012, COASTAL DEFENCE EVAL
Horrillo-Caraballo JM, 2013, J COASTAL RES, P1939, DOI 10.2112/SI65-328.1
Huang CJ, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P2449, DOI 10.3390/w6082449
Huerta B., 2006, CARACTERIZACION DANO
Imamura F., 1996, LONG WAVE RUNUP MODE, P25, DOI DOI 10.1142/3327
INEGI, 2009, TOP
INEGI, 2018, ENC NAC INGR GAST HO
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI), 2020, CENS POBL VIV 2020
Ito E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102486
Jaimes MA, 2016, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V119, P68, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.10.007
Jara Nelson., 2017, REV FACULTAD CIENCIA, V18, P1
Jelinek R, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V60, P273, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0009-0
Jel┬u┬inek R., 2008, JRC SCI TECHNICAL RE, V48713, P9
Jongejan RB, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P252, DOI 10.1111/risa.12285
Kanchanarat S., 1989, THESIS ASIAN I TECHN
Kates Robert William., 1965, DEP GEOGRAPHY RES PA, V98
KESTNER FJT, 1979, GEOGR J, V145, P472, DOI 10.2307/633221
Koshimura S, 2009, J DISASTER RES, V4, P479, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2009.p0479
Kostoglodov V., 1999, CIEN ANOS SISMICIDAD
Lekuthai A, 2001, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V15, P343, DOI 10.1023/A:1014489329348
Liang DF, 2007, J HYDROL, V337, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.045
Lopardo R., 2000, ING AGUA, V7, P11, DOI [10.4995/ia.2000.2833, DOI
10.4995/IA.2000.2833]
Mexico G. d., 2020, TABLAS SALARIOS MINI
Miyashita T, 2020, COAST ENG J, V62, P413, DOI 10.1080/21664250.2020.1780676
Mori N., 2017, FRONTIERS BUILT ENV, V3, P34, DOI [10.3389/fbuil.2017.00034, DOI
10.3389/FBUIL.2017.00034]
Nakano G, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101803
Neelz S., 2007, P C INT ASS HYDR RES, V1, P41
NOAA, 2020, NAT HAZ MAP
OKADA Y, 1992, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V82, P1018
Okumura N, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P1451, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2928-x
Oumeraci H, 2015, COAST ENG J, V57, DOI 10.1142/S057856341540001X
Paoli C., 1998, 18 CONGRESO LATINOAM, V1, P535
Sayers P. B., 2002, RISK PERFORMANCE UNC
Scottish Government, 2010, ENV REPORT, V1
SECTUR, 2013, AG COMP DEST TUR MEX
SEDESOL, 2010, IND IND SOC MUN ZIH
SEMAR, 2021, HIST TSUN LOC OC MEX
SEMAR, 2016, CART NAUT
Silva R, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.616321
Silva R, 2019, ESTUAR COAST, V42, P1695, DOI 10.1007/s12237-019-00559-5
Silva Rodolfo., 2014, CARACTERIZACION ZONA, P118
SMITH DI, 1994, WATER SA, V20, P231
Smith K, 2001, ENV HAZARDS ASSESSIN, V3rd
Sneddon J, 2009, ENVIRON POLLUT, V157, P2663, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.004
SNIM, 2010, SIST NAC INF MUN GOB
street view, 2022, GOOGL MAPS
Street view, 2022, STREET VIEW 0106
Suarez G, 2009, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V99, P892, DOI 10.1785/0120080201
Suppasri A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P173, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-173-2011
Suppasri A, 2012, COAST ENG J, V54, DOI 10.1142/S0578563412500088
Trabajo, 2022, SALARIO MINIMO
Tsakiris G., 2009, EUROPEAN WATER, V2526, P39
White G. F., 1964, 93 U CHIC DEP GEOGR
WHITE GF, 1945, 29 U CHIC DEP GEOGR
Yavuz C, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P1413, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04226-y
NR 88
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PI ABINGDON
SN 2166-4250
EI 1793-6292
J9 COAST ENG J
JI Coast Eng. J.
PD APR 3
PY 2023
VL 65
IS 2
BP 256
EP 276
DI 10.1080/21664250.2023.2172992
EA FEB 2023
PG 21
WC Engineering, Civil; Engineering, Ocean
SC Engineering
GA F2AR7
UT WOS:000933006000001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Haney, TJ
Gray-Scholz, D
AF Haney, Timothy J.
Gray-Scholz, Daran
TI Flooding and the 'new normal': what is the role of gender in experiences
of post-disaster ontological security?
SO DISASTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE Canada; disaster; gender; landmarks; ontological security; routines;
stability
ID PLACE; HOME; COMMUNITY; RECOVERY; HEALTH; SENSE; DISRUPTION; NARRATIVES;
ISSUES; IMPACT
AB Disaster researchers have long analysed disruption to affected residents'
ontological security, often represented by routines and familiar landmarks.
Surprisingly little of this work, though, assesses who is most likely to experience
feelings of disruption. Using a representative set of survey data, complemented by
follow-up interview data from 40 residents affected by the Southern Alberta Flood
of June 2013, this paper explores how demographic characteristics, such as gender
and place attachment, impact on residents' sense of disruption and loss. The
findings indicate that women and people with stronger emotional and social ties to
their neighbourhoods are most likely to experience disrupted ontological security;
home flooding and evacuation orders are also significant predictors. The
qualitative interview data reveal that many participants felt unsettled and
disrupted by myriad factors, such as ongoing construction, which prevented them
from establishing a 'new normal'. The paper concludes by discussing the
implications of these findings for policymakers and service providers.
C1 [Haney, Timothy J.] Mt Royal Univ, Sociol, 4825 Mt Royal Gate SW, Calgary, AB
T3E 6K6, Canada.
[Haney, Timothy J.] Mt Royal Univ, Governors Res Chair Resilience & Sustainabil,
Calgary, AB, Canada.
[Gray-Scholz, Daran] Mt Royal Univ, Ctr Community Disaster Res, Calgary, AB,
Canada.
C3 Mount Royal University; Mount Royal University; Mount Royal University
RP Haney, TJ (corresponding author), Mt Royal Univ, Sociol, 4825 Mt Royal Gate SW,
Calgary, AB T3E 6K6, Canada.
EM thaney@mtroyal.ca
CR Adams Vincanne, 2013, MARKETS SORROW LABOR
Akerkar S, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V23, P218, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.014
Aldrich D.P., 2012, BUILDING RESILIENCE
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2016, AAPOR RESP RAT CALC
[Anonymous], 2004, CONTAMINATED COMMUNI
[Anonymous], 2016, SOCIOLOGY HOME BELON
[Anonymous], HOUSING STUDIES
[Anonymous], 1998, CRAFT INQUIRY THEORI, DOI DOI 10.2307/1319252
[Anonymous], NAT HAZARDS REV
Ausbrooks CY, 2009, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V28, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11113-008-9112-
7
Burley D, 2007, ORGAN ENVIRON, V20, P347, DOI 10.1177/1086026607305739
Caia G, 2010, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V30, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.005
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 2013, ALB FLOODS COSTL NAT
Carroll B, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.08.009
Chamlee-Wright E, 2011, SOCIOL REV, V59, P266, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
954X.2011.02008.x
Chamlee-Wright E, 2009, J URBAN AFF, V31, P615, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
9906.2009.00479.x
Connell R., 1995, MASCULINITIES
Dupuis A, 1998, SOCIOL REV, V46, P24, DOI 10.1111/1467-954X.00088
Erikson Kai T., 1976, EVERYTHING ITS PATH
ERIKSON KT, 1976, SOCIETY, V13, P58, DOI 10.1007/BF02802909
Fletcher S., 2016, CHILD YOUTH ENV, V26
Gibbs L, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.006
Giddens A., 1991, MODERNITY SELF IDENT
Gorman-Murray A, 2014, HOME CULT, V11, P237, DOI
10.2752/175174214X13891916944751
HANEY T, 2013, SOCIOLOGY MIND, V3, P7, DOI DOI 10.4236/sm.2013.31002
Haney TJ, 2017, SOC CURR, V4, P594, DOI 10.1177/2329496516669351
Hawkins RL, 2011, DISASTERS, V35, P143, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01197.x
Henderson TL, 2009, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V28, P67, DOI 10.1007/s11113-008-9114-
5
Hiscock R., 2001, HOUS THEORY SOC, V18, P50, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090120617, DOI 10.1080/14036090120617]
Kearns A, 2000, HOUSING STUD, V15, P387, DOI 10.1080/02673030050009249
Kent J, 2016, SOCIOL RES ONLINE, V21, DOI 10.5153/sro.3860
Ladd AE., 2007, J PUBLIC MANAGEMENT, V13, P51
Maxwell J. A., 2005, QUALITATIVE RES DESI
Miles M. B., 2014, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA, V3rd
Milnes T., 2017, ENVIRON SOCIOL, V3, P260, DOI [DOI
10.1080/23251042.2017.1295837, https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1295837]
Peek L., 2008, CHILDREN YOUTH ENV, V18, P1, DOI DOI
10.7721/CHILYOUTENVI.18.1.0001
Peek L, 2011, J FAM ISSUES, V32, P1371, DOI 10.1177/0192513X11412496
Phillips B., 2014, QUALITATIVE DISASTER
Reid K, 2015, GEOFORUM, V58, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.005
Sandford R.W., 2014, FLOOD FORECAST CLIMA
Silver A, 2015, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V42, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.004
Sima L, 2017, J OCCUP SCI, V24, P128, DOI 10.1080/14427591.2017.1306790
Stedman RC, 2003, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V16, P671, DOI 10.1080/08941920309189
Tapsell SM, 2008, HEALTH PLACE, V14, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.05.006
Windsong EA, 2010, SOC SCI J, V47, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.soscij.2009.06.009
NR 48
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 0
U2 16
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0361-3666
EI 1467-7717
J9 DISASTERS
JI Disasters
PD APR
PY 2020
VL 44
IS 2
BP 262
EP 284
DI 10.1111/disa.12372
PG 23
GA KU3ZH
UT WOS:000519649200003
PM 31231817
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Cumbane, SP
Gidofalvi, G
AF Cumbane, Silvino Pedro
Gidofalvi, Gyozo
TI Spatial Distribution of Displaced Population Estimated Using Mobile
Phone Data to Support Disaster Response Activities
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster response; mobile Call Detail Records (CDRs); displaced
population
ID EMERGENCY SHELTERS; EVACUATION
AB Under normal circumstances, people's homes and work locations are given by their
addresses, and this information is used to create a disaster management plan in
which there are instructions to individuals on how to evacuate. However, when a
disaster strikes, some shelters are destroyed, or in some cases, distance from
affected areas to the closest shelter is not reasonable, or people have no
possibility to act rationally as a natural response to physical danger, and hence,
the evacuation plan is not followed. In each of these situations, people tend to
find alternative places to stay, and the evacuees in shelters do not represent the
total number of the displaced population. Knowing the spatial distribution of total
displaced people (including people in shelters and other places) is very important
for the success of the response activities which, among other measures, aims to
provide for the basic humanitarian needs of affected people. Traditional methods of
people displacement estimation are based on population surveys in the shelters.
However, conducting a survey is infeasible to perform at scale and provides low
coverage, i.e., can only cover the numbers for the population that are at the
shelters, and the information cannot be delivered in a timely fashion. Therefore,
in this research, anonymized mobile Call Detail Records (CDRs) are proposed as a
source of information to infer the spatial distribution of the displaced population
by analyzing the variation of home cell-tower for each anonymized mobile phone
subscriber before and after a disaster. The effectiveness of the proposed method is
evaluated using remote-sensing-based building damage assessment data and
Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) from an individual's questionnaire survey
conducted after a severe cyclone in Beira city, central Mozambique, in March 2019.
The results show an encouraging correlation coefficient (over 70%) between the
number of arrivals in each neighborhood estimated using CDRs and from DTM. In
addition to this, CDRs derive spatial distribution of displaced populations with
high coverage of people, i.e., including not only people in the shelter but
everyone who used a mobile phone before and after the disaster. Moreover, results
suggest that if CDRs data are available right after a disaster, population
displacement can be estimated, and this information can be used for response
activities and hence contribute to reducing waterborne diseases (e.g., diarrheal
disease) and diseases associated with crowding (e.g., acute respiratory infections)
in shelters and host communities.
C1 [Cumbane, Silvino Pedro; Gidofalvi, Gyozo] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Urban
Planning & Environm, Div Geoinformat, Teknikringen 10A, SE-11428 Stockholm, Sweden.
[Cumbane, Silvino Pedro] Eduardo Mondlane Univ, Dept Math & Informat, Div Geog
Informat Sci, Julius Nyerere St, Maputo 3453, Mozambique.
C3 Royal Institute of Technology; Eduardo Mondlane University
RP Cumbane, SP (corresponding author), KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Urban Planning
& Environm, Div Geoinformat, Teknikringen 10A, SE-11428 Stockholm, Sweden.;
Cumbane, SP (corresponding author), Eduardo Mondlane Univ, Dept Math & Informat,
Div Geog Informat Sci, Julius Nyerere St, Maputo 3453, Mozambique.
EM silvino@kth.se; gyozo@kth.se
OI Cumbane, Silvino Pedro/0000-0001-7218-9082; /0000-0003-1164-8403
CR [Anonymous], 2020, DTM DISPLACEMENT TRA
[Anonymous], 2020, WORLD POPULATION REV
Avwunudiogba A., 2020, CHALL REFUG INTERNAL, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-
56650-0_2, 10.1007/978-3-030-56650-0_2]
Balistrocchi M, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P3485, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-
3485-2020
BEIRA, 2019, BEIRA MUN REC RES PL
Bengtsson L, 2011, PLOS MED, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001083
Calabrese F, 2011, IEEE PERVAS COMPUT, V10, P36, DOI 10.1109/MPRV.2011.41
Chen W, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15061261
Chen X, 2012, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V36, P207, DOI
Conti M, 2014, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V52, P85, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2014.6710069
Cumbane SP, 2019, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8090387
Devi S, 2019, LANCET, V393, P1585, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30892-X
Deville P, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P15888, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1408439111
DTM, 2019, MOZ BAS ASS ROUND 1
Flowerdew R., 1991, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI, V70, P303, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01434424
Forquilha S., 2017, BEIRA CLIVAGENS PART
Gray C, 2014, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V104, P594, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.892351
Hamilton K, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101561
HDX, 2020, MOZ ADM LEV 4 BEIR D
Hori M, 2009, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V28, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11113-008-9118-1
Hoteit S, 2014, COMPUT NETW, V64, P296, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2014.02.011
Hu ZH, 2014, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V69, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2014.08.004
INGC, 2019, INGC MOZ TROP CYCL I
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, 2015, GLOBAL ESTIMATES 201
IOM, 2019, MOZ BAS ASS CYCL ID
Iqbal MS, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V40, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.01.002
JICA, 2014, COMPR URB TRANSP MAS
Kubicek P, 2019, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V12, P1319, DOI
10.1080/17538947.2018.1548654
Li MX, 2019, IEEE INT CONF MOB DA, P473, DOI 10.1109/MDM.2019.00008
Lin J, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104540
Maloa JM, 2019, URBE-CURITIBA, V11, DOI 10.1590/2175-3369.011.e20180101
Mawson AR, 2005, PSYCHIATRY, V68, P95, DOI 10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.95
Nkamate C., 2017, PLANO REASSENTAMENTO
Okabe A., 2009, SPATIAL TESSELLATION, V501
Osaragi T, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V68, P1385, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0175-8
REACH, 2019, MOZ BEIR CIT POP 201
REACH, 2019, MOZ ID RESP AR BAS A
Sae J, 2016, MOB INF SYST, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/4816325
Swisher R., 2016, NEIGHBOURHOOD
Vorst HCM, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.004
Wang YX, 2020, INFORM SYST FRONT, V22, P1539, DOI 10.1007/s10796-020-10057-w
Wilson Robin, 2016, PLoS Curr, V8, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.d073fbece328e4c39087bc086d694b5c
Yabe T., 2016, P 5 INT WORKSH URB C
Yore R, 2021, DISASTERS, V45, P691, DOI 10.1111/disa.12434
Yu J, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P413, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0111-8
Yuan HH, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.010
Zhang GY, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12162572
Zhu Yifan, 2020, E3S Web of Conferences, V194, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202019405056
NR 49
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 9
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2220-9964
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 10
IS 6
AR 421
DI 10.3390/ijgi10060421
PG 23
Sensing
(SSCI)
GA TA1BK
UT WOS:000666988800001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Mishra, M
Acharyya, T
Pattnaik, N
Dash, MK
Das, PP
Mishra, SK
AF Mishra, Manoranjan
Acharyya, Tamoghna
Pattnaik, Namita
Dash, Manoj Kumar
Das, Prabhu Prasad
Mishra, Shailendra Kumar
TI The long-term frequency and intensity of cyclonic storms and associated
losses in Odisha, India
LA English
DT Article
DE Tropical cyclones; frequency; intensity; economic and human losses;
Odisha coast
ID TROPICAL CYCLONES; VULNERABILITY; MITIGATION; MANAGEMENT; HAZARD; ORISSA
AB We investigated long-term (1890-2020) frequency changes in depressions (D),
cyclonic storms (CS) and severe cyclonic storms (SCS), along Odisha coast. We
reviewed the fatalities, damage to properties and livestock and linked with the
existing cyclone disaster management policy of the state. The decadal frequencies
of D and CS show marked declining pattern after reaching their peak in 1930-1939
and 1890-1899, respectively. On an average, the SCS hits slightly more than two
times per decade. No notable change in the long-term frequency of SCS was noticed,
though last five decades (1970-2020) witnessed an upsurge in % contribution of SCS
(13%) to the total atmospheric disturbances, and the maximum contribution (20%) was
in the latest decade (2010-2020). Human fatalities exceeded more than 5000 in 1895,
1967, 1971, 1972, and 1999 cyclones. Establishment of SDMA (State Disaster
Management Authority), efficient forecasting and evacuation strategies have
successfully brought down the fatalities, but the loss of livestock, biodiversity,
livelihoods, and infrastructure remains a concern. Decision-makers should strive to
increase the resilience of at-risk communities through planting protective mangrove
cover, educating and ensuring better living conditions, and implementing 4R
(Robustness, Redundancy, Resourcefulness and Rapid response) resilience principles
for the infrastructure.
C1 [Mishra, Manoranjan] Berhampur Univ, Dept Nat Resources Management &
Geoinformat, Berhampur, Odisha, India.
[Acharyya, Tamoghna] XIM Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Harirajpur, Odisha, India.
[Pattnaik, Namita] Govt Autonomous Coll, Dept Geog, Angul, Odisha, India.
[Dash, Manoj Kumar] Indian Inst Informat Technol & Management, Morena Link Rd,
Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
[Das, Prabhu Prasad] Maharaja Sriram Chandra BhanjaDeo Univ, Dept Geol, Keonjhar
Campus, Keonjhar, Odisha, India.
[Mishra, Shailendra Kumar] Univ Allahabad, Dept Anthropol, Allahabad, Uttar
Pradesh, India.
C3 Berhampur University; ABV-Indian Institute of Information Technology &
Management, Gwalior; University of Allahabad
RP Mishra, M (corresponding author), Berhampur Univ, Dept Nat Resources Management
& Geoinformat, Berhampur, Odisha, India.
EM geo.manu05@gmail.com
RI MISHRA, MANORANJAN/GQQ-5018-2022
OI MISHRA, MANORANJAN/0000-0003-4545-7218
CR Acharyya T, 2020, J COAST CONSERV, V24, DOI 10.1007/s11852-020-00754-8
[Anonymous], 2011, CENS DAT
[Anonymous], 2002, MAUSAM, DOI DOI 10.54302/MAUSAM.V53I2.1639
Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE
CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
Bhardwaj P, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V139, P615, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-02989-
4
Bhardwaj P, 2019, INT J CLIMATOL, V39, P5452, DOI 10.1002/joc.6165
Chan JCL, 2012, INT J CLIMATOL, V32, P1946, DOI 10.1002/joc.2410
Chittibabu P, 2004, NAT HAZARDS, V31, P455, DOI
10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000023362.26409.22
Christian P, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-02364-8
Das, 2007, 2507 SANDEE
Das I.P., 2021, RESILIENT INFRASTRUC, P55, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
16-6978-1_5, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-6978-1_5]
Das S, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P950, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01241-7
Das S, 2013, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V134, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.09.021
De U. S., 1999, DECCAN GEOGRAPHER, V37, P5
Debata Subrat, 2019, Journal of Threatened Taxa, V11, P14895, DOI
10.11609/jott.5480.11.14.14895-14898
Dube S.K., 2002, P WORKSH FOR MIT MET, P62
Emanuel K, 2005, NATURE, V436, P686, DOI 10.1038/nature03906
Fanchiotti M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101790
Gupta S., 2018, P INT C REM SENS DIS, P359, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
319-77276-9_32, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-77276-9_32]
Hanna E, 2003, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V30, DOI 10.1029/2002GL015797
Joseph P.V., 1999, P TROPMET 99, P364
Kang NY, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41561-y
Kar N, 2022, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V16, P670, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.368
Khuntia HK, 2021, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V149, DOI 10.1017/S0950268821001266
Kolathayar S., 2022, LECT NOTES CIVIL ENG, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-
16-6978-1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-6978-1]
Kossin JP, 2018, NATURE, V558, P104, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0158-3
Malakar P, 2020, EARTH SPACE SCI, V7, DOI 10.1029/2019EA000978
Mishra M., 2016, INT J ENV GEOINF, V3, P11, DOI [10.30897/ijegeo.304479, DOI
10.30897/IJEGEO.304479]
Mishra M., 2019, MENTAL MODEL MAPPING, P125
Mishra M, 2021, J COAST CONSERV, V25, DOI 10.1007/s11852-021-00827-2
Mishra M, 2021, CURR SCI INDIA, V120, P1721, DOI 10.18520/cs/v120/i11/1721-1727
Mishra M, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P3991, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2021.1882005
Mishra M, 2019, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V78, DOI 10.1007/s12665-019-8336-7
Mishra T., 2020, DEV COASTAL ZONES DI, P281, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
981-15-4294-7_19, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-4294-7_19]
Mohanty PK, 2008, J COASTAL RES, V24, P13, DOI 10.2112/04-0255.1
Mohanty SK, 2020, CLIMATE, V8, DOI 10.3390/cli8060073
Mooley D. A., 1983, Mausam, V34, P139
Moon IJ, 2019, NATURE, V570, pE3, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1222-3
Murty PLN, 2016, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V183, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2016.10.013
Nalla V, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102163
Peduzzi P, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P289, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1410
Peduzzi P, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1149, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1149-2009
Pruitt JN, 2019, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V34, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.009
Rao DVB, 2019, J EARTH SYST SCI, V128, DOI 10.1007/s12040-019-1227-1
Sahoo B, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V206, P1166, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.075
Sahoo B, 2015, AQUAT PR, V4, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.052
Sahu N. C., 2012, ASIAN J ENV DISASTER, V4, P183, DOI
[10.3850/S1793924012001137, DOI 10.3850/S1793924012001137]
Sahu S. C., 2015, Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, V6, P280
Shepherd JM, 2007, GEOGR COMPASS, V1, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2006.00002.x
Sil S., 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, P1, DOI [10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8, DOI
10.1038/S41598-020-79139-8]
Singh K, 2020, J EARTH SYST SCI, V129, DOI 10.1007/s12040-020-1344-x
Singh OP, 2000, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V75, P11, DOI 10.1007/s007030070011
SINGH OP, 1999, 2 SMRC
Srivastav AK., 2000, MAUSAM, V51, P113, DOI DOI 10.54302/MAUSAM.V51I2.1766
Watson R, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS, pIX
Yadav DK, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.003
NR 56
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 4
PI ABINGDON
SN 1747-7891
EI 1878-0059
JI Environ. Hazards
PD JAN 1
PY 2023
VL 22
IS 1
BP 65
EP 78
DI 10.1080/17477891.2022.2069665
EA APR 2022
PG 14
GA D4LD8
UT WOS:000789746700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Shi, XW
Chen, BR
Liang, YY
Zhang, B
Ye, T
AF Shi, Xianwu
Chen, Bingrui
Liang, Yingyu
Zhang, Bei
Ye, Tao
TI Inundation simulation of different return periods of storm surge based
on a numerical model and observational data
SO STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Storm surge; Typical return periods; Inundation simulation; Zhoushan
city
AB China is among the countries most severely affected by storm surge disasters,
with substantial economic losses and human casualties inflicted on its coastal
areas. Computing inundation from storm surges for various typical return periods
(TRPs) can serve as the scientific basis for preparing evacuation maps kin the case
of storm surge disasters, conducting spatial planning of coastal cities, and
formulating emergency plans. Zhoushan City in Zhejiang Province, China, was
selected as the representative case for this study. A high-precision storm surge
numerical model was established and historical observation data were used to
calculate the probability distribution curves of extreme tidal levels at two
representative tide stations within the study area. First, based on historical
typhoon and extratropical-cyclone events affecting the study area, a dataset
including weather events was used, and extreme tidal levels for the two
representative tide stations were deployed to identify weather events that could
cause a storm surge for different return periods. Numerical modeling was then used
to generate the resulting inundation range and water depth distribution,
establishing a method for calculating inundation from storm surge for various TRPs.
The proposed method could easily be adopted in various coastal counties and serve
as an effective tool for decision-making in storm surge disaster risk mitigation
efforts.
C1 [Shi, Xianwu] Natl Marine Hazard Mitigat Serv, Beijing 100194, Peoples R China.
[Chen, Bingrui; Liang, Yingyu; Zhang, Bei] State Ocean Adm China, East China Sea
Marine Forecasting Ctr, Shanghai 200081, Peoples R China.
[Ye, Tao] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Normal University
RP Chen, BR (corresponding author), State Ocean Adm China, East China Sea Marine
Forecasting Ctr, Shanghai 200081, Peoples R China.
EM cu238@163.com
FU National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFC1508903];
National Natural Science Foundation of China [41701596]
FX This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and
Development Project of China (2018YFC1508903) and the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (41701596).
CR Bunya S, 2010, MON WEATHER REV, V138, P345, DOI 10.1175/2009MWR2906.1
Dietrich JC, 2012, J SCI COMPUT, V52, P468, DOI 10.1007/s10915-011-9555-6
Irish JL, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V51, P183, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9381-4
Liu YL., 2016, HAIYANG XUEBAO, V38, P60, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.0253-
4193.2016.03.006
Ministry of Natural Resources of China, 2020, CHINESE MARINE DISAS
Resio DT, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V51, P163, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9379-y
Scheffner NW, 1996, J WATERW PORT C-ASCE, V122, P93, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
950X(1996)122:2(93)
Shi XW, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P2777, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-2777-2020
Shi XW, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V100, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03793-z
Shi XW, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P237, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1838-z
[石先武 Shi Xianwu], 2013, [地球科学进展, Advance in Earth Sciences], V28, P866
Toro GR, 2010, OCEAN ENG, V37, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.09.005
Toro GR, 2010, OCEAN ENG, V37, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.09.004
Vitousek S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-01362-7
Wu SH, 2017, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V31, P2573, DOI 10.1007/s00477-016-1327-2
Yang X, 2019, OCEAN ENG, V171, P533, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.11.039
Yin J, 2015, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V29, P1063, DOI 10.1007/s00477-014-0939-7
NR 18
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 4
U2 27
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 1436-3240
EI 1436-3259
J9 STOCH ENV RES RISK A
JI Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess.
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 35
IS 10
BP 2093
EP 2103
DI 10.1007/s00477-021-02010-3
EA MAR 2021
PG 11
WC Engineering, Environmental; Engineering, Civil; Environmental Sciences;
Statistics & Probability; Water Resources
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Mathematics; Water
Resources
GA UN1MC
UT WOS:000633748300001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Jung, W
Kyprioti, AP
Adeli, E
Taflanidis, AA
AF Jung, WoongHee
Kyprioti, Aikaterini P.
Adeli, Ehsan
Taflanidis, Alexandros A.
TI Exploring the sensitivity of probabilistic surge estimates to forecast
errors
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Storm surge predictions; Landfalling storms; Probabilistic surge
estimation; Storm forecast errors; Variance-based global sensitivity
analysis; Sobol' indices
ID STORM-SURGE; HURRICANE; ADVANCEMENTS; INUNDATION; PREDICTION; DESIGN;
MODELS
AB Statistical predictions of storm surge are critical for guiding evacuation and
emergency response/preparedness decisions during landfalling storms. The
probabilistic characteristics of these predictions are formulated by utilizing
historical forecast errors to quantify relevant uncertainties in the National
Hurricane Center advisories. This ultimately leads to the description of
probability distributions quantifying the deviation from the nominal advisory for
four different storm features: intensity, size, cross-track variability and along-
track variability. Propagation of the uncertainty in these four storm features,
serving as input to a numerical model for calculating storm surge, leads to the
definition of the statistical surge estimates. This work investigates the
application of variance-based global sensitivity analysis (GSA), quantified through
the estimation of Sobol' indices, to explore the importance of the forecast errors
in the peak storm surge predictions. This GSA can assist in better understanding
the impact of the different forecast errors for typical storms, and can also offer
important insights for a specific storm, regarding the characteristics that
influence the probabilistic surge predictions across its different advisories, as
the storm comes closer to landfall. An efficient GSA implementation is presented
here to address two key challenges of the specific problem: (i) the need to perform
the GSA for a multi-dimensional output, corresponding to the surge for multiple
locations within the geographic domain of interest that will be affected by a
specific storm, and (ii) the restriction to use only a small number of hydrodynamic
numerical simulations, since the associated computational burden of such
simulations is significant. For addressing these challenges, dimensionality
reduction through Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a probability-based
estimation of the variance of conditional expectations are combined to provide the
necessary efficiency in the proposed GSA framework. The development of aggregated
importance indices across the entire geographic domain is also discussed,
incorporating the importance of the surge for each separate location (within this
domain) using a variance-based weighting. This formulation is compared with an
alternative, computationally efficient, definition of the aggregated importance,
based on the readily available PCA information. A demonstration of this framework's
utility considering different historical storms (using National Weather Service
advisories and forecast errors for past events) is provided, establishing
comparisons across them and across multiple advisories for each storm.
C1 [Jung, WoongHee; Kyprioti, Aikaterini P.; Adeli, Ehsan; Taflanidis, Alexandros
A.] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556
USA.
C3 University of Notre Dame
RP Taflanidis, AA (corresponding author), Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm
Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
EM a.taflanidis@nd.edu
RI Taflanidis, Alexandros/A-3393-2012
OI Taflanidis, Alexandros/0000-0002-9784-7480; Kyprioti, Aikaterini
(Katerina) P./0000-0002-2346-1307
FU National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
[NA19OAR0220089]
FX This research was funded by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), under the grant number NA19OAR0220089. The views
and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not
represent NOAA's official position.
CR ALLE AR, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES ATMOSP, V125
Ayyad M, 2021, J ENG MECH, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001984
Bishop Christopher M., 2006, PATTERN RECOGNITION, V4, DOI DOI
10.1117/1.2819119.ARNING
Blake ES., 2018, WEATHERWISE, V71, P28, DOI [DOI 10.1080/00431672.2018.1448147,
10.1080/00431672.2018.1448147]
Chen JH, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P4495, DOI 10.1029/2019GL082410
Chen W, 2005, J MECH DESIGN, V127, P875, DOI 10.1115/1.1904642
Dangendorf S, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P5946, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1616007114
Fu GT, 2012, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V138, P196, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-
5452.0000171
Gonzalez T, 2018, 33 C HURR TROP MET P
Homma T, 1996, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6
Hu Z, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V187, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.003
Hu Z, 2016, STRUCT MULTIDISCIP O, V53, P501, DOI 10.1007/s00158-015-1347-4
Iooss B., 2015, REV GLOBAL SENSITIVI, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7547-8_5
Irish JL, 2008, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V38, P2003, DOI 10.1175/2008JPO3727.1
Javeline D, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V152, P259, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2257-4
Jelesnianski C.P., 1973, PRELIMINARY VIEW STO
Jelesnianski C. P, 1992, NOAA TECHNICAL REPOR, P0
Jia GF, 2016, J ENG MECH, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001061
Jia GF, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2111-1
Jolliffe L. T., 1986, PRINCIPAL COMPONENT
JUNG W, 2022, RELIAB ENG SYST SAF
Kennedy AB, 2012, OCEAN MODEL, V52-53, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.04.009
Kijewski-Correa T, 2020, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V6, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2020.549106
Klotzbach PJ, 2018, MON WEATHER REV, V146, P3425, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0078.1
Knaff JA, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P71, DOI 10.1175/WAF965.1
Kyprioti AP, 2021, J MAR SCI ENG, V9, DOI 10.3390/jmse9121322
Kyprioti AP, 2021, COAST ENG, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103855
Li CZ, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V153, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.012
Li M, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106725
Lim YK, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-34343-5
Luettich R. A., 1992, REPORT 1 THEORY METH, P146
Marshall JS., 2019, DES SAFE, DOI 10.17603/ds2-4616-1e25
McNicholas PD, 2008, STAT COMPUT, V18, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11222-008-9056-0
Moon TK, 1996, IEEE SIGNAL PROC MAG, V13, P47, DOI 10.1109/79.543975
Nadal-Caraballo NC, 2020, J COASTAL RES, P1211, DOI 10.2112/SI95-235.1
Pasch RJ., 2020, WEATHERWISE, V73, P32, DOI [10.1080/00431672.2020.1738892, DOI
10.1080/00431672.2020.1738892]
Peng MC, 2004, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V59, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2003.07.010
950X(2007)133:6(463)
Rohmer J, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1765, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2513-8
Saltelli A, 2002, RISK ANAL, V22, P579, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.00040
Saltelli A., 2008, GLOBAL SENSITIVITY A
Saltelli A, 2010, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V181, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018
Sobol I.M., 1990, MATEMATICHESKOE MODE, V2, P112, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0378-
4754(00)00270-6
Sobol IM, 2001, MATH COMPUT SIMULAT, V55, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-
6
Sochala P, 2020, COMPUTAT GEOSCI, V24, P109, DOI 10.1007/s10596-019-09898-5
Sudret B, 2008, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V93, P964, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002
Taylor AA, 2008, 19 C PROB STAT
Vetter C, 2014, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V58, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.12.002
Wood KM, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P10072, DOI 10.1029/2019GL083657
Zhang CG, 2019, ACTA OCEANOL SIN, V38, P48, DOI 10.1007/s13131-018-1081-z
NR 53
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 4
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 115
IS 2
BP 1371
EP 1409
DI 10.1007/s11069-022-05598-z
EA SEP 2022
PG 39
Water Resources
GA G5FC8
UT WOS:000857781800003
OA Green Submitted
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Issakhov, A
Borsikbayeva, A
Issakhov, A
AF Issakhov, Alibek
Borsikbayeva, Aliya
Issakhov, Assylbek
TI Dam-Break Flow on Mobile Bed Through an Idealized City: Numerical Study
SO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood zones; VOF method; Modified Navier-Stokes equation; Idealized city
ID SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; FLUID-FLOW;
SPH-DEM; VOLUME; SIMULATION; WAVES; MODEL; ALGORITHMS; EQUATIONS
AB This paper presents a numerical simulation of a three-phase flow (water, air,
and mud) formed during a dam break. For the connection between all phases, the
mathematical model was modified to take into account the non-Newtonian and
Newtonian fluids. The equations in the mathematical model are discretized by the
finite volume method and the relationship between all phases is achieved using the
volume of fluid (VOF) method. Modified Navier-Stokes equations for accounting for
non-Newtonian and Newtonian fluids are solved by the Pressure-Implicit with
Splitting of Operators (PISO) numerical algorithm. To validate the mathematical
model and numerical algorithm, the paper demonstrates a comparative analysis of the
results with the laboratory experiment. The model tested in this way has confirmed
its reliability, accuracy and reasonableness. Additionally, a three-dimensional
numerical simulation of the water flow movement in combination with a sedimentary
layer in a narrowing channel was considered. A rough estimate of the mud flow
behavior in relation to the urbanized area located at the end of the channel is
given. When analyzing the numerical results, it can be concluded that an increase
in the height of the mud layer leads to a deceleration of the moving flow, which
can subsequently be used for the timely evacuation of the population. It should be
noticed that the analysis of the comparative graphs showed the deceleration of the
water flow by more than 0.2 s for a moving layer depth of 0.025 m and when using a
mixed arrangement of the sediment. And also from the obtained results, we can note
at least two times decrease in the maximum pressure value that in the presence of
sediments.
C1 [Issakhov, Alibek; Borsikbayeva, Aliya] Al Farabi Kazakh Natl Univ, Alma Ata,
Kazakhstan.
[Issakhov, Alibek; Issakhov, Assylbek] Kazakh British Tech Univ, Alma Ata,
Kazakhstan.
[Issakhov, Alibek] Int Informat Technol Univ, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan.
C3 Al-Farabi Kazakh National University; Kazakh British Technical
University; International Information Technology University
RP Issakhov, A (corresponding author), Al Farabi Kazakh Natl Univ, Alma Ata,
Kazakhstan.; Issakhov, A (corresponding author), Kazakh British Tech Univ, Alma
Ata, Kazakhstan.; Issakhov, A (corresponding author), Int Informat Technol Univ,
Alma Ata, Kazakhstan.
EM alibek.issakhov@gmail.com
RI issakhov, alibek/N-4476-2014; Issakhov, Assylbek/ABE-7081-2021
OI issakhov, alibek/0000-0002-1937-8615;
FU Ministry of education and science of the Republic of Kazakhstan
[AP09058406]
FX This work is supported by the grant from the Ministry of education and
science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (AP09058406).
CR Aureli F, 2000, J HYDRAUL RES, V38, P197, DOI 10.1080/00221680009498337
Bahmanpouri F, 2021, J HYDROL, V594, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125645
Barati R, 2018, INT J SEDIMENT RES, V33, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.04.003
BELL SW, 1992, J HYDRAUL RES, V30, P225, DOI 10.1080/00221689209498936
BELLOS CV, 1992, J HYDRAUL RES, V30, P47, DOI 10.1080/00221689209498946
Crespo AJC, 2015, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V187, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.004
Demir A, 2019, J ZHEJIANG UNIV-SC A, V20, P258, DOI 10.1631/jzus.A1800520
Diaz MJC, 2008, COMPUT FLUIDS, V37, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.07.017
Formentin SM., 2016, COAST ENG P, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.9753/ICCE.V35.STRUCTURES.3
Gerlach D, 2006, INT J HEAT MASS TRAN, V49, P740, DOI
10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2005.07.045
Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh M, 2022, IJST-T CIV ENG, V46, P1515, DOI 10.1007/s40996-021-
00708-6
Gotoh H, 2000, COAST ENG
Goutiere L, 2011, J HYDRAUL RES, V49, P367, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2010.548969
Gregoretti C, 2010, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V136, P868, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-
7900.0000259
He Y, 2018, POWDER TECHNOL, V338, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.043
Hosseini K, 2019, POWDER TECHNOL
Hu H, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V102, P1515, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03979-w
ISSA RI, 1986, J COMPUT PHYS, V62, P40, DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(86)90099-9
Issakhov A, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132581
Issakhov A, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101112
Issakhov A, 2021, J HYDROL, V598, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126212
Issakhov A, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P463, DOI 10.1007/s11269-019-02426-1
Issakhov A, 2019, INT J HEAT MASS TRAN, V136, P1030, DOI
10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.034
Issakhov A, 2018, INT J MULTIPHAS FLOW, V109, P191, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.08.003
JANG DS, 1986, NUMER HEAT TRANSFER, V10, P209, DOI 10.1080/10407788608913517
Kamra MM, 2019, J FLUID STRUCT, V86, P185, DOI
Kamra MM, 2018, J HYDRODYN, V30, P682, DOI 10.1007/s42241-018-0074-x
Khankandi AF, 2012, J HYDRAUL RES, V50, P376, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2012.690974
Khosravi K, 2021, INT J SEDIMENT RES, V36, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2020.08.005
Kocaman S, 2020, J MAR SCI ENG, V8, DOI 10.3390/jmse8110905
Kocaman S, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041124
Koshizuka S., 1995, Proceedings of the International Conference, Mathematics and
Computations, Reactor Physics, and Environmental Analyses, P1514
Li YL, 2020, OCEAN ENG, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106794
Luo J, 2017, AIP CONF PROC, V1914, DOI 10.1063/1.5016688
Marsooli R, 2014, ADV WATER RESOUR, V70, P104, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.020
Memarzadeh R, 2018, J HYDRODYN, V30, P928, DOI 10.1007/s42241-018-0111-9
MILLER S, 1989, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V115, P1465, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1989)115:11(1465)
Mirauda D, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041142
Monaghan JJ, 2012, ANNU REV FLUID MECH, V44, P323, DOI 10.1146/annurev-fluid-
120710-101220
Munoz DH, 2020, ADV WATER RESOUR, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103510
Oguzhan S, 2020, J HYDROL HYDROMECH, V68, P231, DOI 10.2478/johh-2020-0026
Ozmen-Cagatay H, 2014, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V8, P304, DOI
10.1016/j.jher.2014.01.005
Ozmen-Cagatay H, 2012, J FLUID ENG-T ASME, V134, DOI 10.1115/1.4007154
Pilliod JE, 2004, J COMPUT PHYS, V199, P465, DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.12.023
Razavitoosi SL, 2014, INT J SEDIMENT RES, V29, P344, DOI 10.1016/S1001-
6279(14)60049-4
Robinson M, 2014, INT J MULTIPHAS FLOW, V59, P121, DOI
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2013.11.003
Rowan T, 2020, APPL MATH MODEL, V88, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2020.06.052
Shahheydari H, 2015, KSCE J CIV ENG, V19, P1174, DOI 10.1007/s12205-013-0749-3
Shakibaeinia A, 2011, ADV WATER RESOUR, V34, P794, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.04.011
Soares-Frazao S, 2008, J HYDRAUL RES, V46, P648, DOI 10.3826/jhr.2008.3164
Soares-Frazao S, 2012, J HYDRAUL RES, V50, P364, DOI
10.1080/00221686.2012.689682
Spinewine B, 2007, J HYDRAUL RES, V45, P73, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2007.9521834
Tajnesaie Mohanna, 2020, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, V26, P187, DOI
10.1080/09715010.2018.1469053
Van Emelen S, 2015, J HYDRAUL RES, V53, P60, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2014.939111
Vashahi F, 2019, FLUID DYN RES, V51, DOI 10.1088/1873-7005/ab2546
Wang B, 2020, J HYDROL, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124598
Wu H, 2020, ENG GEOL, V265, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105428
Xia JQ, 2010, ADV WATER RESOUR, V33, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.11.004
Yang QY, 2020, ENG GEOL, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105765
Yang S, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13236280
Zhang T, 2018, COMPUT FLUIDS, V160, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.10.013
Zhang XT, 2020, OCEAN ENG, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107729
NR 65
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 9
U2 16
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
SN 0920-4741
EI 1573-1650
J9 WATER RESOUR MANAG
JI Water Resour. Manag.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 36
IS 11
BP 4425
EP 4446
DI 10.1007/s11269-022-03253-7
EA AUG 2022
PG 22
WC Engineering, Civil; Water Resources
SC Engineering; Water Resources
GA 4G9EM
UT WOS:000836109200001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kocaman, S
Tavus, B
Nefeslioglu, HA
Karakas, G
Gokceoglu, C
AF Kocaman, Sultan
Tavus, Beste
Nefeslioglu, Hakan A.
Karakas, Gizem
Gokceoglu, Candan
TI Evaluation of Floods and Landslides Triggered by a Meteorological
Catastrophe (Ordu, Turkey, August 2018) Using Optical and Radar Data
SO GEOFLUIDS
LA English
DT Article
ID RANDOM FOREST; HEAVY RAINFALL; SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT; MODELS;
IMAGES; CLASSIFICATION; COMBINATION; EXTRACTION; EVENT; TREE
AB This study explores the potential of photogrammetric datasets and remote sensing
methods for the assessment of a meteorological catastrophe that occurred in Ordu,
Turkey in August 2018. During the event, flash floods and several landslides caused
losses of lives, evacuation of people from their homes, collapses of infrastructure
and large constructions, destruction of agricultural fields, and many other
economic losses. The meteorological conditions before and during the flood were
analyzed here and compared with long-term records. The flood extent and the
landslide susceptibility were investigated by using multisensor and multitemporal
data. Sentinel-1 SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar), Sentinel-2 optical data, and
aerial photogrammetric datasets were employed for the investigations using machine
learning techniques. The changes were assessed both at a local and regional level
and evaluated together with available damage reports. The analysis of the rainfall
data recorded during the two weeks before the floods and landslides in heavily
affected regions shows that the rainfall continued for consecutive hours with an
amount of up to 68 mm/hour. The regional level classification results obtained from
Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data by using the random forest (RF) method exhibit 97%
accuracy for the flood class. The landslide susceptibility prediction performance
from aerial photogrammetric datasets was 92% represented by the Area Under Curve
(AUC) value provided by the RF method. The results presented here show that
considering the occurrence frequency and immense damages after such events, the use
of novel remote sensing technologies and spatial analysis methods is unavoidable
for disaster mitigation efforts and for the monitoring of environmental effects.
Although the increasing number of earth observation satellites complemented with
airborne imaging sensors is capable of ensuring data collection requirement with
diverse spectral, spatial, and temporal resolutions, further studies are required
to automate the data processing, efficient information extraction, and data fusion
and also to increase the accuracy of the results.
C1 [Kocaman, Sultan; Tavus, Beste; Karakas, Gizem] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Geomat
Engn, TR-06800 Beytepe, Turkey.
[Nefeslioglu, Hakan A.; Gokceoglu, Candan] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Geol Engn, TR-
06800 Beytepe, Turkey.
C3 Hacettepe University; Hacettepe University
RP Kocaman, S (corresponding author), Hacettepe Univ, Dept Geomat Engn, TR-06800
Beytepe, Turkey.
EM sultankocaman@hacettepe.edu.tr
RI Nefeslioglu, Hakan/B-7461-2016; Gokceoglu, Candan/E-3259-2013; Kocaman,
Sultan/L-4892-2015
OI Nefeslioglu, Hakan/0000-0003-1117-6012; Gokceoglu,
Candan/0000-0003-4762-9933; Kocaman, Sultan/0000-0002-2775-7914; TAVUS,
BESTE/0000-0001-9351-9423
CR AFAD, 2020, MIN INT DIS EM MAN P
Akbas B., 2011, 1 1 250 000 OLCEKLI
Akbas B., 2011, GEOLOGICAL MAP TURKE
Akgun A, 2012, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V38, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.012
AMS, 2000, GLOSSARY METEOROLOGY
[Anonymous], 2003, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0303-2434(03)00003-5
Bazi Y, 2005, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V43, P874, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2004.842441
Bessette-Kirton EK, 2020, LANDSLIDES, V17, P2795, DOI 10.1007/s10346-020-01445-z
Billi P, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P1373, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1554-0
Breiman L, 2001, MACH LEARN, V45, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1010933404324
Breugem AJ, 2020, EARTH-SCI REV, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103171
Can T, 2005, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V72, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.05.011
Chen JC, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V102, P887, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03938-5
Chen W, 2017, CATENA, V151, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.032
Chu L, 2019, GEOSCI J, V23, P341, DOI 10.1007/s12303-018-0038-8
Comin AN, 2021, METEOROL ATMOS PHYS, V133, P141, DOI 10.1007/s00703-020-00747-0
CRED UNDRR, 2020, HUM COST DIS OV LAST
Cruden D.M., 1996, TRANSP RES BOARD SPE, V247, P36
Demir A., 2016, TURK PRES 4 UL TASK
Diakakis M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101542
Bui D, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10101527
Dou J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V662, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221
ESA, 2020, SENT 2020
ESA, 2020, SENT 2 2020
ESASNAP, 2020, SENT APPL PLATF
European Space Agency (ESA), 2020, COP OP ACC HUB
Fan XY, 2020, LANDSLIDES, V17, P2161, DOI 10.1007/s10346-020-01454-y
Feyisa GL, 2014, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V140, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.029
Giustarini L, 2013, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V51, P2417, DOI
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2210901
Gokceoglu C, 2005, ENG GEOL, V81, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.07.011
Hong HY, 2016, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V259, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012
Jaybhay J., 2015, SIGNAL IMAGE PROCESS, V6, P71, DOI [10.5121/sipij.2015.6306,
DOI 10.5121/SIPIJ.2015.6306]
Jyoteeshkumar P, 2020, CURR SCI INDIA, V118, P1968, DOI
10.18520/cs/v118/i12/1968-1979
Karakas G., 2020, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V43, P1229, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-
XLIII-B3-2020-1229-2020, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLIII-B3-2020-1229-2020]
Ko BC, 2015, SENSORS-BASEL, V15, P13763, DOI 10.3390/s150613763
Lal P, 2020, REMOTE SENS LETT, V11, P436, DOI 10.1080/2150704X.2020.1730468
Lee JS, 2009, OPT SCI ENG-CRC, P1
Lee JS, 2009, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V47, P202, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002881
Li LC, 2020, HYDROL RES, V51, P484, DOI 10.2166/nh.2020.095
Li ZN, 2020, LANDSLIDES, V17, P2603, DOI 10.1007/s10346-020-01441-3
Ma SY, 2020, LANDSLIDES, V17, P1441, DOI 10.1007/s10346-020-01374-x
Matgen P, 2011, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V36, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.009
Mbow C., 2008, AFRICAN J ENV SCI TE, V2, P75
Mishra K, 2020, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V350, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106861
Nagler T, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8040348
Nakmuenwai P, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9010078
Nandi I, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P1157, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1568-y
Nefeslioglu HA, 2012, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V14, P40, DOI
10.1016/j.jag.2011.08.005
Nefeslioglu HA, 2011, MATH PROBL ENG, V2011, DOI 10.1155/2011/280431
News, 2018, ONLINE NEWS PORTAL T
Oberstadler R, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P1415, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-
1085(199708)11:10<1415::AID-HYP532>3.0.CO;2-2
Ocakoglu F, 2002, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V42, P329, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00094-0
Pandzic M, 2016, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V41, P489, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-
B1-489-2016
Park SJ, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aba5b3
Garcia-Garrido JP, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11050544
Pulvirenti L, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P990, DOI
10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.002
Pulvirenti L, 2013, IEEE J-STARS, V6, P1807, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2219509
Quesada-Roman A, 2020, GEOGR TIDSSKR-DEN, V120, P142, DOI
10.1080/00167223.2020.1822195
Schmitt TG, 2004, J HYDROL, V299, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.012
Sevgen E, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19183940
Sghaier MO, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10020237
Shahabi H, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep09899
SWETS JA, 1988, SCIENCE, V240, P1285, DOI 10.1126/science.3287615
Tavus B., 2020, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMME, V43, P641, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-
XLIII-B3-2020-641-2020
Tavus B., 2019, INT J ENV GEOINFORMA, DOI [10.30897/ijegeo.666212, DOI
10.30897/IJEGEO.666212]
Tavus B., 2018, ISPRS ARCH, VXLII-5, P575, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-5-
575-2018, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-5-575-2018]
Tong XH, 2018, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V136, P144, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.006
Trimble, 2020, INPH PHOT SUIT 2020
Uyeturk CE, 2020, ENG GEOL, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105318
Xu HQ, 2006, INT J REMOTE SENS, V27, P3025, DOI 10.1080/01431160600589179
Yanar T, 2019, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42-3, P469, DOI 10.5194/isprs-archives-
XLII-3-W8-469-2019
Yanar T, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9020114
NR 72
TC 34
Z9 34
U1 3
U2 14
PU WILEY-HINDAWI
PI LONDON
SN 1468-8115
EI 1468-8123
J9 GEOFLUIDS
JI Geofluids
PD DEC 23
PY 2020
VL 2020
AR 8830661
DI 10.1155/2020/8830661
PG 18
WC Geochemistry & Geophysics; Geology
SC Geochemistry & Geophysics; Geology
GA PS4YR
UT WOS:000607929100001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Simonovic, SP
Kundzewicz, ZW
Wright, N
AF Simonovic, Slobodan P.
Kundzewicz, Zbigniew W.
Wright, Nigel
TI Floods and the COVID-19 pandemic-A new double hazard problem
SO WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; floods; management; multihazard; natural disasters; resilience
ID RESILIENCE; REDUCTION; CHINA; RISK
AB The coincidence of floods and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a genuine
multihazard problem. Since the beginning of 2020, many regions around the World
have been experiencing this double hazard of serious flooding and the pandemic.
There have been 70 countries with flood events occurring after detection of the
country's first COVID-19 case and hundreds of thousands of people have been
evacuated. The main objective of this article is to assess challenges that arise
from complex intersections between the threat multipliers and to provide guidance
on how to address them effectively. We consider the limitations of our knowledge
including "unknown unknowns." During emergency evacuation, practicing social
distancing can be very difficult. However, people are going to take action to
respond to rising waters, even if it means breaking quarantine. This is an
emergency manager's nightmare scenario: two potentially serious emergencies
happening at once. During this unprecedented year (2020), we are experiencing one
of the most challenging flood seasons we have seen in a while. Practical examples
of issues and guides for managing floods and COVID-19 are presented. We feel that a
new approach is needed in dealing with multiple hazards. Our main messages are: a
resilience approach is needed whether in response to floods or a pandemic;
preparation is vital, in addition to defense; the responsible actors must be
prepared with actions plans and command structure, while the general population
must be involved in the discussions so that they are aware of the risk and the
reasons for the actions they must take.
C1 [Simonovic, Slobodan P.] Univ Western Ontario, Inst Catastroph Loss Reduct,
London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
[Kundzewicz, Zbigniew W.] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Agr & Forest Environm, Poznan,
Poland.
[Wright, Nigel] Nottingham Trent Univ, Sch Architecture Design & Built Environm,
Nottingham, England.
C3 Western University (University of Western Ontario); Polish Academy of
Sciences; Nottingham Trent University
RP Simonovic, SP (corresponding author), Univ Western Ontario, Inst Catastroph Loss
Reduct, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.; Simonovic, SP (corresponding author), Univ
Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
EM simonovic@uwo.ca
RI Wright, Nigel/ABO-7247-2022; Simonovic, Slobodan/R-7250-2017
OI Wright, Nigel/0000-0002-1289-2830; Simonovic,
Slobodan/0000-0001-5072-2915
FU Royal Society [NAF\R2\180862]; National Science Centre of Poland
[2017/27/B/ST10/00924]; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction;
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; EPSRC
[EP/P004261/2, EP/I030735/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX Royal Society for an Advanced Newton Fellowship, Grant/Award Number: NAF
\R2\180862; National Science Centre of Poland, Grant/Award Number:
2017/27/B/ST10/00924; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction; Natural
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
CR Agrawal N, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12051254
Alexander D, 2020, WORKING PAPER
[Anonymous], 2016, INT J SAFETY SECURIT, DOI [10.2495/SAFE-V6-N2-85-95, DOI
10.2495/SAFE-V6-N2-85-95]
Ansell C, 2019, ADMIN SOC, V51, P1079, DOI 10.1177/0095399717747655
Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Du SQ, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P715, DOI 10.5194/nhess-19-715-2019
Guo YM, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE443, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30203-5
Han J, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142491
Hegger DLT, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08854-210452
ICHARM, 2020, NEWSLETTER
Irwin S, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8090377
Keulertz M, 2020, WATER INT, V45, P430, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2020.1779515
Klemes V., 2002, RISK RELIABILITY UNC, P22
Kong JJ, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P1141, DOI 10.1111/risa.13222
Kramarz T., 2020, PANDEMICS FLOODS INE
Kundzewicz ZW, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V130, P37, DOI
10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.020
Kundzewicz ZW, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P12321, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1818227115
Kundzewicz ZW, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071399
Latour B, 2000, BRIT J SOCIOL, V51, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x
Linstone H. A., 1978, FUTURES RES NEW DIRE, P133
McDonald T, 2020, ECOL MANAG RESTOR, V21, P73, DOI 10.1111/emr.12415
Neal MJ, 2020, WATER INT, V45, P435, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2020.1773648
Peck A., 2013, 083 U W ONT DEP CIV
Priest SJ, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08913-210450
Reynolds I., 2020, BLOOMBERG
Schardong A., 2019, INT J SAFETY SECURIT, V9, P13, DOI 10.2495/SAFE-V9-N1-13-25
Shen XY, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142634
Simonovic S. P., 2013, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V3,
P378, DOI 10.9734/BJECC/2013/2504
Simonovic S. P., 2011, SYSTEMS APPROACH MAN, P308
Simonovic SP, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041208
Simonovic SP, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P8630, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019551
Staddon C, 2020, WATER INT, V45, P416, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2020.1769345
Wang F, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P3199, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02608-2
Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
Willner SN, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aao1914
Xia J., 2020, ICFM WEBINAR 2 FLOOD
NR 39
TC 45
Z9 45
U1 1
U2 22
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 2049-1948
J9 WIRES WATER
JI Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Water
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 8
IS 2
AR e1509
DI 10.1002/wat2.1509
EA JAN 2021
PG 18
(SSCI)
GA QG1GA
UT WOS:000606429700001
PM 33786171
OA Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Blue, SA
AF Blue, Sarah A.
TI Gendered constraints on a strategy of regional mobility: Latino/a
migration to post-Katrina New Orleans
SO AREA
LA English
DT Article
DE gender; immigration; mobility; natural disaster; New Orleans; niche
employment
ID IMMIGRANTS; GEOGRAPHIES; AGENCY; WORK
AB In August 2005, rising waters from Hurricane Katrina compromised several of New
Orleans' levees, causing extensive flooding that, in the face of government
inaction, resulted in the deaths of 1,400 people and a large-scale evacuation of
the city. As long-term residents of the city evacuated, New Orleans witnessed an
influx of new Latino/a immigrants who arrived to demolish irreparable structures,
clear toxic debris, and rebuild. Disaster recovery work draws on construction and
low-skilled service sectors, which are already niches for undocumented Latino/a
labour in the USA. Migration to disaster recovery sites is a potentially lucrative
strategy for undocumented migrants, who use their mobility to seek better
employment. By highlighting differences in gendered labour experiences in a
neoliberal disaster-recovery context, this study illustrates how migrant-labour
niches and a lack of reproductive support systems constrain opportunities and shape
migrants' mobility strategies. Through a perspective of constrained agency, it
considers how migrants' experiences differ according to gender as they negotiate
labour and care possibilities. The constraints on migrant aspirations are explored
through interview and survey data collected from 256 Latino/a migrants to post-
Katrina New Orleans who were working between 2006 and 2008. The paper argues that
while disaster recovery sites create opportunity for some of the most vulnerable
workers, gendered immigrant employment niches and the absence of reproductive
support constrain women's success.
C1 [Blue, Sarah A.] Texas State Univ, Dept Geog, San Marcos, TX 78666 USA.
C3 Texas State University System; Texas State University San Marcos
RP Blue, SA (corresponding author), Texas State Univ, Dept Geog, San Marcos, TX
78666 USA.
EM sblue@txstate.edu
OI Blue, Sarah/0000-0001-9044-4737
FU National Science Foundation [0723397]; Direct For Social, Behav &
Economic Scie; Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0723397]
FX National Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 0723397
CR Abrego Leisy., 2017, J MIGRATION HUMAN SE, V5, P694
Abrego LJ, 2018, WOMEN STUD INT FORUM, V67, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.wsif.2017.12.004
Anderson B, 2010, WORK EMPLOY SOC, V24, P300, DOI 10.1177/0950017010362141
[Anonymous], 2010, MISSING LINKS LABOUR
[Anonymous], 2010, SOCIOLOGY KATRINA PE
Baglioni E, 2018, J ECON GEOGR, V18, P111, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbx013
Blue SA, 2011, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V17, P489, DOI 10.1002/psp.627
Buckley M, 2017, GEOFORUM, V78, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.012
Calnan R, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P2561, DOI 10.1177/0042098016650567
Carswell G, 2013, GEOFORUM, V44, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.008
Castree N, 2007, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V31, P853, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
2427.2007.00761.x
Coe NM, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P211, DOI 10.1177/0309132510366746
Drever AI, 2011, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V17, P89, DOI 10.1002/psp.597
Elliott JR, 2015, SOC FORCES, V93, P1723, DOI 10.1093/sf/sou120
Fussell E, 2009, HISPANIC J BEHAV SCI, V31, P375, DOI 10.1177/0739986309339735
Herod A, 1997, ANTIPODE, V29, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00033
Katz C, 2008, GENDER PLACE CULT, V15, P15, DOI 10.1080/09663690701817485
Kelly P., 2012, WILEY BLACKWELL COMP
Klein N., 2014, THIS CHANGES EVERYTH
Kofman E, 2012, SOC POLIT, V19, P142, DOI 10.1093/sp/jxr030
Lewis H, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P580, DOI 10.1177/0309132514548303
Menjivar C, 2012, AM J SOCIOL, V117, P1380, DOI 10.1086/663575
Peck J, 2006, URBAN GEOGR, V27, P681, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.27.8.681
Pratt G, 2012, FAMILIES APART: MIGRANT MOTHERS AND THE CONFLICTS OF LABOR AND
LOVE, P1
Rogaly B, 2009, GEOGR COMPASS, V3, P1975, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00290.x
Schwiter K, 2018, SOC CULT GEOGR, V19, P379, DOI 10.1080/14649365.2015.1059473
Sisk B, 2014, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V33, P309, DOI 10.1007/s11113-013-9311-8
Smith BE, 2008, T I BRIT GEOGR, V33, P60, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00287.x
SMITH N, 2005, UNDERSTANDING KATRIN
Trujillo-Pagan N, 2012, RACE CLASS, V53, P54, DOI 10.1177/0306396811433986
NR 30
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 6
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0004-0894
EI 1475-4762
J9 AREA
JI Area
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 53
IS 1
BP 175
EP 182
DI 10.1111/area.12687
EA DEC 2020
PG 8
WC Geography
SC Geography
GA QN5EG
UT WOS:000596701700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Khalafzai, MAK
McGee, TK
Parlee, B
AF Khalafzai, Muhammad-Arshad K.
McGee, Tara K.
Parlee, Brenda
TI Spring flooding and recurring evacuations of Kashechewan First Nation,
northern Ontario, Canada
LA English
DT Article
DE Floods; Evacuations; First Nation; Indigenous community; Climate change;
Vulnerability and resilience; Canada
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION;
WILDFIRES; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; CAPACITY; HAZARDS; IMPACT
AB Floods and evacuations due to flooding can increase vulnerability and affect
community resilience. This article examines how the Kashechewan First Nation,
located in the flood-prone Subarctic southwestern James Bay region of Canada, is
affected by the frequent risk of spring flooding. Kashechewan, an isolated and
remote Indigenous community, is located along the Albany River in northern Ontario.
Kashechewan First Nation has been evacuated 14 times to at least 22 host
communities across Ontario since 2004 (consecutively from 2004 to 2008 and 2012-
2019) because of actual flooding events or flooding risk and the potential failure
of the dike that surrounds the community. Through a collaboration with the First
Nation, qualitative semi-structured interviews were completed with 41 participants.
Results show that spring flood risk has significantly increased the community's
physical and socio-cognitive vulnerability. Flooding frequently impacts community
infrastructure, traditional spring hunting and harvesting, and the local economy.
It also significantly increases the stress and anxiety of residents every year as
spring approaches. Dealing with the regular flooding risk and recurring emergency
experiences have improved the community's disaster preparedness and coping
capacity, but residents' evacuation experiences negatively affect their well-being
during and after the evacuations. The short-term responses to the physical
vulnerability of people frequently experiencing the elevated hazards risks help
increasing specific resilience-building and coping capacity in the short-run.
However, such short-term responses can also produce greater vulnerability in the
long-term. Similarly, if the long-term adaptation responses for resilience-building
do not consider the short-term coping capacities and community-specific ground
realities, they can significantly increase the physical vulnerability of residents.
C1 [Khalafzai, Muhammad-Arshad K.; McGee, Tara K.] Univ Alberta, Dept Earth &
Atmospher Sci, 1-26 Earth Sci Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
[Parlee, Brenda] Univ Alberta, Agr Life & Environm Sci, Resource Econ & Environm
Sociol, 507 Gen Serv Bldg,9007-116 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada.
C3 University of Alberta; University of Alberta
RP Khalafzai, MAK (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci,
1-26 Earth Sci Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
EM khalafza@ualberta.ca; tmcgee@ualberta.ca; brenda.parlee@ualberta.ca
FU Northern Scientific Training Program (NSTP); U Alberta North, the
University of Alberta; Human Geography Program, Earth and Atmospheric
Sciences Department, the University of Alberta
FX Special thanks to Kashechewan Chief Leo Friday, the Kashechewan First
Nation and community leaders, all community members and to those who
participated in survey research. The Northern Scientific Training
Program (NSTP) and U Alberta North, the University of Alberta, and Human
Geography Program, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department, the
University of Alberta have provided the financial support for this
research project.
CR Abdelnour R., 2013, 17 WORKSH RIV IC EDM
Aguirre B., 1983, MASS EMERGENCIES DIS, V1, P415
Aldiabat KM, 2018, QUAL REP, V23, P245
[Anonymous], 2002, PAP PROC APPL GEOGR
[Anonymous], 2004, UNHEALTHY HLTH POLIC
[Anonymous], 2007, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781526441867
[Anonymous], SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE
[Anonymous], 2007, DIGITAL J KASHECHEWA
[Anonymous], INTERPRETATIONS CALA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780429329579-14
[Anonymous], 2006, HAZARDS VULNERABILIT
[Anonymous], 2003, QUALITATIVE RES PRAC
Asfaw HW, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101300
Asfaw HW, 2019, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V18, P361, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2019.1608147
Asfaw HW, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.005
Ballard M, 2013, CAN J NONPROFIT SOC, V4, P43
Barei A., 2012, THESIS ONTARIO CANAD
Beltaos S, 2007, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V34, P703, DOI 10.1139/L06-021
Berke PR, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P192, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285533
Berkes F, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P1251, DOI 10.1890/1051-
0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
Bhagwandass S., 2016, STATE ENV MIGRATION
BLAIKIE P, 1994, NATURAL HAZARDS PEOP
Boon HJ, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V71, P683, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0935-0
Brannen Julia., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P173, DOI
[10.1080/13645570500154642, DOI 10.1080/13645570500154642]
Brattberg E, 2011, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V8, DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1869
Burrell C. B., 1995, RIVER ICE JAMS
Canadian Encyclopaedia, 2018, CREE REL SPIR
Canadian Encyclopedia, 2015, ALB RIV
Cannon T., 2014, COMPANION DEV STUDIE, V3rd
Chester D., 2009, SCOT J THEOLOGY, V51, P485
Chester D. K., 1993, VOLCANOES SOC
Cola R.M., 1996, FIRE MUD ERUPTIONS L
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Davies M., 2012, RESILIENCE NEW UTOPI
De Lange HJ, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P3871, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009
Deshmukh A, 2011, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V1, P156, DOI 10.1108/20441241111180415
Donnelly R. C., 2015, DESCRIPTION APPL NEW
Du WW, 2010, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V25, P265, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X00008141
Endfield GH, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3676, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1114831109
Ford JD, 2004, ARCTIC, V57, P389, DOI 10.14430/arctic516
Gaillard J., 2007, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V16, P522, DOI [DOI
10.1108/09653560710817011, 10.1108/09653560710817011]
Gerard L. R., 1995, RIVER ICE JAMES, P1
Government of Ontario Connected Communities Healthier Together, 2017 ANN REP
CHIEF M
Grafton RQ, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P907, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0376-1
Gray R., 2005, WATER CRISIS EVACUAT
Hay R, 1998, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V18, P5, DOI 10.1006/jevp.1997.0060
Ho E, 2005, POLAR GEOGR, V29, P291, DOI 10.1080/789610144
Kariippanon A.K., 2017, SAGE RES METHODS CAS, P1
Kelly PM, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V47, P325, DOI 10.1023/A:1005627828199
Khalafzai M.-A.K., 2020, FREQUENT SPRING FLOO, DOI [10.7939/r3-jaks-zn74, DOI
10.7939/R3-JAKS-ZN74]
Khalafzai MAK, 2020, ARCTIC, V73, P433, DOI 10.14430/arctic71586
Kovach M, 2010, FIRST PEOPLES CHILD, V5, P40
Lindell MK, 1992, BEHAV FDN COMMUNITY
Louis RP, 2007, GEOGR RES-AUST, V45, P130, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x
Maru YT, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P337, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007
McCarthy DDP, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16, DOI 10.5751/ES-04255-160318
McNeill K., 2017, CSBE SSCGAB 2017 ANN
Mercer J, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P247, DOI 10.1002/jid.1677
Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
Mudavanhu C., 2014, J DISASTER RISK STUD, V6
Nafziger J, 2016, COLD REG SCI TECHNOL, V123, P71, DOI
10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.11.014
NAV-Canada, 2002, GRAPH AR FOR 33
Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI
10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
Newton J., 2005, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V10,
P541, DOI 10.1007/s11027-005-0060-9
Newton J, 1995, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V39, P112, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-
0064.1995.tb00406.x
NRDC (Natural Resource Defence Council), 2016, IMPR CLIM CHANG PREP
Ohmagari K, 1997, HUM ECOL, V25, P197, DOI 10.1023/A:1021922105740
Peek L., 2008, CHILDREN YOUTH ENV, V18, P1, DOI DOI
10.7721/CHILYOUTENVI.18.1.0001
Perry R.W., 2007, HDB DISASTER RES, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_1
Pope A. W., 2006, REPORT KASHECHEWAN I
Public Safety Canada, 2019, CAN DIS DAT
Rose A, 2004, DISASTER PREVENTION, V13, P307, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560010361366
Scharbach J, 2016, HUM ORGAN, V75, P59, DOI 10.17730/0018-7259-75.1.59
Shimo A., 2017, GLOBE MAIL
Shrubsole D., ICLR RES PAPER SERIE, V5
Smith B, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P223, DOI 10.1023/A:1005661622966
Tally S, 2013, ADM POLICY MENT HLTH, V40, P348, DOI 10.1007/s10488-012-0425-9
Thistlethwaite J., 2020, 159 CTR INT GOV INN, p6C2
Tierney K. J, 2001, FACING UNEXPECTED DI
Tobin GA, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P700, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.12.008
Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2), 2014, ETH COND RES INV HUM
UNU (United Nations University), 2013, WHY TRAD KNOWL HOLDS
Warren John A, 2005, Int J Circumpolar Health, V64, P487
Wolfe P, 2006, J GENOCIDE RES, V8, P387, DOI 10.1080/14623520601056240
Yohe G, 2002, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V12, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00026-7
NR 94
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 9
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 63
AR 102443
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102443
EA JUL 2021
PG 14
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA UD7YG
UT WOS:000687419800007
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kyprioti, AP
Adeli, E
Taflanidis, AA
Westerink, JJ
Tolman, HL
AF Kyprioti, Aikaterini P.
Adeli, Ehsan
Taflanidis, Alexandros A.
Westerink, Joannes J.
Tolman, Hendrik L.
TI Probabilistic Storm Surge Estimation for Landfalling Hurricanes:
Advancements in Computational Efficiency Using Quasi-Monte Carlo
Techniques
SO JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE landfalling storms; probabilistic storm surge estimation; forecast
errors; quasi-Monte Carlo
ID PREDICTION
AB During landfalling tropical storms, predictions of the expected storm surge are
critical for guiding evacuation and emergency response/preparedness decisions, both
at regional and national levels. Forecast errors related to storm track, intensity,
and size impact these predictions and, thus, should be explicitly accounted for.
The Probabilistic tropical storm Surge (P-Surge) model is the established approach
from the National Weather Service (NWS) to achieve this objective. Historical
forecast errors are utilized to specify probability distribution functions for
different storm features, quantifying, ultimately, the uncertainty in the National
Hurricane Center advisories. Surge statistics are estimated by using the
predictions across a storm ensemble generated by sampling features from the
aforementioned probability distribution functions. P-Surge relies, currently, on a
full factorial sampling scheme to create this storm ensemble, combining
representative values for each of the storm features. This work investigates an
alternative formulation that can be viewed as a seamless extension to the current
NHC framework, adopting a quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) sampling implementation with
ultimate goal to reduce the computational burden and provide surge predictions with
the same degree of statistical reliability, while using a smaller number of sample
storms. The definition of forecast errors adopted here directly follows published
NWS practices, while different uncertainty levels are considered in the examined
case studies, in order to offer a comprehensive validation. This validation,
considering different historical storms, clearly demonstrates the advantages QMC
can offer.
C1 [Kyprioti, Aikaterini P.; Adeli, Ehsan; Taflanidis, Alexandros A.; Westerink,
Joannes J.] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN
46556 USA.
[Tolman, Hendrik L.] NOAA DOC, Off Sci & Technol Integrat, Natl Weather Serv,
Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA.
C3 University of Notre Dame; National Oceanic Atmospheric Admin (NOAA) -
USA
RP Taflanidis, AA (corresponding author), Univ Notre Dame, Dept Civil & Environm
Engn & Earth Sci, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA.
EM akypriot@nd.edu; eadeli@nd.edu; a.taflanidis@nd.edu; jjw@nd.edu;
Hendrik.Tolman@NOAA.gov
RI Taflanidis, Alexandros/A-3393-2012
OI Taflanidis, Alexandros/0000-0002-9784-7480; Kyprioti, Aikaterini
(Katerina) P./0000-0002-2346-1307
FU National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
[NA19OAR0220089]
FX This research was funded by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), grant number NA19OAR0220089. The views and
opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not
represent NOAA.
CR Al Kajbaf A, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106184
[Anonymous], GEOLOGICAL SOC AM MA
[Anonymous], REGIONAL MESOSCALE M
Bass B, 2018, J HYDROL, V558, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.014
Blake ES., 2018, WEATHERWISE, V71, P28, DOI [DOI 10.1080/00431672.2018.1448147,
10.1080/00431672.2018.1448147]
Caflisch R. E., 1998, Acta Numerica, V7, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0962492900002804
Chen JH, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P4495, DOI 10.1029/2019GL082410
Dangendorf S, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P5946, DOI
10.1073/pnas.1616007114
Forbes C, 2014, J MAR SCI ENG, V2, P437, DOI 10.3390/jmse2020437
Gonzalez T, 2018, 33 C HURR TROP MET P
Javeline D, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V152, P259, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2257-4
Jelesnianski C.P., 1973, PRELIMINARY VIEW STO
Jelesnianski C.P., 1992, SLOSH SEA LAKE OVERL, V48
Jia GF, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2111-1
Kennedy A., **DATA OBJECT**, DOI 10.17603/ds2-32yf-s071
Kijewski-Correa T, 2020, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V6, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2020.549106
Klotzbach PJ, 2018, MON WEATHER REV, V146, P3425, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-18-0078.1
Knaff JA, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P71, DOI 10.1175/WAF965.1
Kyprioti AP, 2021, COAST ENG, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.103855
Kyprioti AP, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P531, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04322-z
Lemieux C, 2009, SPRINGER SER STAT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-78165-5_1
Lim YK, 2018, SCI REP-UK, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-34343-5
Luettich R. A, 1992, DRP926
Marshall Justin, 2019, DesignSafe, DOI 10.17603/DS2-4616-1E25
Nadal-Caraballo NC, 2020, J COASTAL RES, P1211, DOI 10.2112/SI95-235.1
Pasch RJ., 2020, WEATHERWISE, V73, P32, DOI [10.1080/00431672.2020.1738892, DOI
10.1080/00431672.2020.1738892]
Robert C., 2004, SPRINGER TEXTS STAT, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2_7, DOI
10.1007/978-1-4757-4145-2]
950X(2007)133:6(463)
Sebastian A, 2014, COAST ENG, V88, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.03.002
Taylor AA, 2008, 19 C PROB STAT
Wood KM, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P10072, DOI 10.1029/2019GL083657
NR 34
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 3
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2077-1312
J9 J MAR SCI ENG
JI J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 9
IS 12
AR 1322
DI 10.3390/jmse9121322
PG 23
WC Engineering, Marine; Engineering, Ocean; Oceanography
SC Engineering; Oceanography
GA 3K7TI
UT WOS:000834277900001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Chandra, J
Paul, D
Uniyal, A
AF Chandra, Jyoti
Paul, Debajyoti
Uniyal, Abhinav
TI Petrography and geochemistry of carbonatite breccia from Amba Dongar
carbonatite complex, Gujarat in the Deccan Large Igneous Province
suggest mantle origin
SO JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Carbonatite breccia; carbonatite clast; Deccan flood basalt; major and
trace elements; stable C and O isotopes
ID ISOTOPIC COMPOSITIONS; ALKALINE COMPLEXES; STABLE-ISOTOPES;
TRACE-ELEMENTS; OXYGEN; ROCKS; INDIA; EVOLUTION; FENITIZATION;
INCLUSIONS
AB This study reports petrography, geochemistry, and delta C-13 and delta O-18
composition of carbonatite clasts in carbonatite breccias from the Amba Dongar
carbonatite (ADC) complex in the Deccan Large Igneous Province. Petrography reveals
early-emplacement of calcio- and ferro-carbonatite. The mineralogy and elemental
abundances of calcio- and ferro-carbonatite clasts in breccias are similar to those
of the later-formed ring dyke carbonatites, indicating a common source. In the
delta C-13-delta O-18 space, calciocarbonatite clasts and carbonatites of main ring
dyke of Amba Dongar plot within the extended primary carbonatite field, indicating
its mantle origin. Positive delta O-18 (>+10 parts per thousand) values of clasts
show the role of recycled crust and hydrothermal alteration. We propose a model for
the origin of carbonatite breccia and later-formed ring dyke of ADC, in which a
parental carbonated silicate melt forms carbonatite melt and silicate melt through
liquid immiscibility at crustal depths, and intrusion of these melts forming dykes
causes up-doming (stages I-III). In stages IV-VI, episodic evacuation of the
carbonatite magma chamber initiates caldera subsidence leading to extensive
brecciation of early-formed carbonatites. Later, the lateral spread of the magma
chamber leads to the formation of the carbonatite ring dyke.
C1 [Chandra, Jyoti; Paul, Debajyoti; Uniyal, Abhinav] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur,
Dept Earth Sci, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India.
[Chandra, Jyoti] CSIR, Natl Geophys Res Inst, Uppal Rd, Hyderabad 500007,
Telangana, India.
[Uniyal, Abhinav] Geol Survey India, Gandhinagar 382010, Gujarat, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
Technology (IIT) - Kanpur; Council of Scientific & Industrial Research
(CSIR) - India; CSIR - National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI);
Geological Survey India
RP Chandra, J (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Earth Sci,
Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India.; Chandra, J (corresponding author), CSIR, Natl
Geophys Res Inst, Uppal Rd, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
EM jyoti.chandraocean@gmail.com
RI Paul, Debajyoti/CAG-6683-2022; Chandra, Jyoti/IVH-4877-2023
OI Chandra, Jyoti/0000-0002-5646-9743
CR Amores-Casals S, 2020, MINERALS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/min10010005
Amores-Casals S, 2019, MINERALS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/min9100601
Andersson M, 2013, SCI REP-UK, V3, DOI 10.1038/srep01677
[Anonymous], 2002, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, DOI [DOI 10.1029/2002EO000190, DOI
10.1029/2002E0000190]
[Anonymous], 1989, CARBONATITES GENESIS
BASU AR, 1993, SCIENCE, V261, P902, DOI 10.1126/science.261.5123.902
Bell K, 2001, GEOL S AM S, P267
Bell K, 2004, PHOSCORITES CARBONAT, V10
Bhattacharya SK, 1997, J GEOL SOC INDIA, V50, P289
Bizimis M, 2003, CONTRIB MINERAL PETR, V145, P281, DOI 10.1007/s00410-003-0452-3
Chandra J, 2019, J PETROL, V60, P1119, DOI 10.1093/petrology/egz026
Chandra J, 2018, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V463, P137, DOI 10.1144/SP463.3
Coplen T B, 1988, CHEM GEOL ISOTOPE GE, V72
DEANS T, 1972, T I MIN METALL, V81, pB1
Deines P, 1989, CARBONATITES GENESIS
Demeny A, 1998, LITHOS, V44, P101, DOI 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00050-4
Dhote P, 2021, ORE GEOL REV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104215
Elliott HAL, 2018, ORE GEOL REV, V93, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.12.003
Ernst RE, 2010, MINER PETROL, V98, P55, DOI 10.1007/s00710-009-0074-1
Fosu BR, 2020, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V274, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.gca.2020.01.020
Gittins J., 1989, CARBONATITES GENESIS, P580
GREEN DH, 1988, NATURE, V336, P459, DOI 10.1038/336459a0
Gwalani LG, 2010, MINER PETROL, V98, P123, DOI 10.1007/s00710-009-0102-1
GWALANI LG, 1993, MINER PETROL, V47, P219
Halama R, 2005, J PETROL, V46, P191, DOI 10.1093/petrology/egh069
Harmer RE, 2016, EPISODES, V39, P381, DOI 10.18814/epiiugs/2016/v39i2/95784
Harmer RE, 1998, J PETROL, V39, P1895, DOI 10.1093/petrology/39.11.1895
Keith M. L., 1964, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, V28, P1787, DOI
10.1016/0016-7037(64)90022-5
Keller J, 1995, CARBONATITE VOLCANIS
KRESTEN P, 1988, CHEM GEOL, V68, P329, DOI 10.1016/0009-2541(88)90030-7
KRESTEN P, 1980, LITHOS, V13, P153, DOI 10.1016/0024-4937(80)90016-X
MAHONEY JJ, 1985, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V72, P39, DOI 10.1016/0012-
821X(85)90115-3
Meert JG, 2007, PRECAMBRIAN RES, V154, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.precamres.2006.12.008
Mitchell RH, 2005, CAN MINERAL, V43, P2049, DOI 10.2113/gscanmin.43.6.2049
MOROGAN V, 1988, CONTRIB MINERAL PETR, V100, P169, DOI 10.1007/BF00373583
Nasir S, 2011, CONTRIB MINERAL PETR, V161, P47, DOI 10.1007/s00410-010-0521-3
Palme H, 2014, TREATISE GEOCHEMISTR, V3, P139
Palmer DAS, 1996, ECON GEOL BULL SOC, V91, P934, DOI 10.2113/gsecongeo.91.5.934
Paul D, 2007, RAPID COMMUN MASS SP, V21, P3006, DOI 10.1002/rcm.3185
Paul D, 2007, INT J MASS SPECTROM, V262, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.ijms.2006.11.006
Paul D, 2020, EPISODES, V43, P249, DOI 10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020015
Ray J S., 1997, THESIS U BARODA GUJA
Ray JS, 2006, INT GEOL REV, V48, P17, DOI 10.2747/0020-6814.48.1.17
Ray JS, 2004, P INDIAN AS-EARTH, V113, P519
Ray JS, 2003, INT GEOL REV, V45, P857, DOI 10.2747/0020-6814.45.9.857
Ray JS, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P1917, DOI 10.1029/1999GL900390
Ray JS, 1999, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V104, P29471, DOI 10.1029/1999JB900262
Ray JS, 2000, J ASIAN EARTH SCI, V18, P177, DOI 10.1016/S1367-9120(99)00030-9
Ray JS, 2000, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V64, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00181-7
Ray JS, 1998, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V62, P3301, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00237-
3
Ray JS, 2009, J PETROL, V50, P1955, DOI 10.1093/petrology/egp063
ROBERTSON AHF, 1979, GEOL MAG, V116, P203, DOI 10.1017/S0016756800043612
SANTOS RV, 1995, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V59, P1339, DOI 10.1016/0016-
7037(95)00048-5
SARKAR A, 1992, CURR SCI INDIA, V62, P368
Satyanarayanan M, 2018, ATOM SPECTROSC, V39, P1, DOI 10.46770/AS.2018.01.001
Sen G, 2009, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V277, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.10.002
SIMONETTI A, 1995, CHEM GEOL, V122, P185, DOI 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00004-6
Srivastava RK, 1997, MINER PETROL, V61, P47, DOI 10.1007/BF01172477
Srivastava RK., 1996, INT GEOL REV, V38, P419, DOI [10.1080/00206819709465344,
DOI 10.1080/00206819709465344]
Streckeisen A., 1980, GEOL RUNDSCH, V69, P194, DOI [10.1007/BF01869032, DOI
10.1007/BF01869032]
SUKHESWALA RN, 1967, CURR SCI INDIA, V36, P14
SWEENEY RJ, 1994, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V128, P259, DOI 10.1016/0012-
821X(94)90149-X
TANDON SK, 1995, PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL, V117, P153, DOI 10.1016/0031-
0182(94)00128-U
TAYLOR HP, 1967, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V31, P407, DOI 10.1016/0016-
7037(67)90051-8
Thi TN, 2014, MINER PETROL, V108, P371, DOI 10.1007/s00710-013-0301-7
Van Gosen B. S., 2017, RARE EARTH ELEMENTS
Veksler IV, 1998, J PETROL, V39, P2015, DOI 10.1093/petrology/39.11.2015
Viladkar S. G., 1981, B GEOL SOC FINLAND, V53, P17, DOI DOI
10.17741/BGSF/53.1.003
Viladkar SG, 2000, GONDWANA RES, V3, P415, DOI 10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70299-9
Viladkar SG., 2014, COMUNICACOE GEOLOGIC, V101, P1
Viladkar SG, 2016, J GEOL SOC INDIA, V87, P709, DOI 10.1007/s12594-016-0443-4
Viladkar SG, 2010, J GEOL SOC INDIA, V75, P495, DOI 10.1007/s12594-010-0048-2
von Eckermann H, 1960, ARKIV MINERALOGI GEO, V40, P529
von Eckermann H, 1948, ALKALINE DISTRICT AL
Woolley AR, 2008, CAN MINERAL, V46, P741, DOI 10.3749/canmin.46.4.741
Woolley AR, 1989, CARBONATITES GENESIS, P1
Wyllie P J, 1987, MAGMATIC PROCESSES P, V1
NR 77
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 8
PU INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
PI BANGALORE
PA C V RAMAN AVENUE, SADASHIVANAGAR, P B #8005, BANGALORE 560 080, INDIA
SN 2347-4327
EI 0973-774X
J9 J EARTH SYST SCI
JI J. Earth Syst. Sci.
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 131
IS 2
AR 116
DI 10.1007/s12040-022-01861-w
PG 25
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Multidisciplinary Sciences
SC Geology; Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA 1C5OS
UT WOS:000793168900002
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Mitchell, M
Hendricks, J
Schatt, D
AF Mitchell, Molly
Hendricks, Jessica
Schatt, Daniel
TI Road network analyses elucidate hidden road flooding impacts under
accelerating sea level rise
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE road flooding; sea level rise; network analysis; community impacts;
climate change
ID US EAST-COAST
AB Introduction: As sea level rises and coastal communities simultaneously grow,
road flooding has the potential to significantly disrupt travel along road networks
and make houses, businesses, and critical facilities difficult to reach. The
impacts of tidal and storm surge flooding on roadways present challenging social
and economic considerations for all coastal jurisdictions. Maintenance, public and
private accessibility, evacuation routes, emergency services are just a few of the
common themes local governments are beginning to address for low-lying roadways
currently known to flood. Continuation of these services allows a community to
thrive, to maintain or increase its tax base, and to ensure the safety and well-
being of its citizenry.Methods: A traditional approach to analyzing road flood
overlays flooding areas on roadways and focuses only on impacts within the actual
zone of inundation. However, road flooding can also cut-off access to non-flooded
roads and properties, closing the transportation corridor into or out of their
downstream dwelling/service areas and other areas that may be impacted. In this
study, we examined changing road inaccessibility under accelerating sea level rise
for urban and rural localities.Results: Inaccessibility of roads and properties
increased nearly twice as much as would be suggested by the length of flooded
roads. Overall vulnerability of a locality was primarily dependent on its
elevation; however, the redundancy of the road network appears to affect the rate
at which properties became inaccessible. Areas with complex and redundant road
networks-maintained access to coastal properties longer, suggesting increased
resilience in the near term.Discussion: Road inaccessibility will impact property
values and emergency response times but understanding the connection between
flooding areas and inaccessible properties allows prioritization of road upgrades,
improving overall coastal resilience.
C1 [Mitchell, Molly; Hendricks, Jessica; Schatt, Daniel] William & Mary, Virginia
Inst Marine Sci, Ctr Coastal Resources Management, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA.
C3 William & Mary; Virginia Institute of Marine Science
RP Mitchell, M (corresponding author), William & Mary, Virginia Inst Marine Sci,
Ctr Coastal Resources Management, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA.
EM molly@vims.edu
FU Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at the Department of
Environmental Quality of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NA19NOS4190163, NA20NOS4190207]
FX This work was funded by the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program at
the Department of Environmental Quality through Grant #NA19NOS4190163
and #NA20NOS4190207 of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, under the Coastal Zone Management Act of
1972, as amended.
CR Allen T, 2021, J MAR SCI ENG, V9, DOI 10.3390/jmse9111196
de Almeida BA, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111115
Boon JD, 2018, 467 COLL WILL MAR, DOI [10.21220/V5T17T, DOI 10.21220/V5T17T]
Boon JD, 2015, J COASTAL RES, V31, P1295, DOI 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00041
Brown S, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160704008
Church JA, 2011, SURV GEOPHYS, V32, P585, DOI 10.1007/s10712-011-9119-1
Ezer T, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P362, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000252
Ezer T, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P5439, DOI 10.1002/2013GL057952
Ezer T, 2012, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V39, DOI 10.1029/2012GL053435
Fant C, 2021, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V27, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000652
Hammond MJ, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P14, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
Jacobs JM, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P1, DOI 10.1177/0361198118756366
Kopp RE, 2013, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V40, P3981, DOI 10.1002/grl.50781
Lenton TM, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P1786, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0705414105
Marra J.J, 2018, 086 NOAA NOS COOPS, DOI DOI 10.7289/V5/TR-NOS-COOPS-086
Miller KG, 2013, EARTHS FUTURE, V1, P3, DOI 10.1002/2013EF000135
Mitchell M, 2013, RECURRENT FLOODING S
Mitchell M, 2021, FRONT MAR SCI, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2021.631757
OpenStreetMap contributors, 2015, PLANET DUMP
10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.020
Sallenger AH, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P884, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1597,
10.1038/nclimate1597]
Sevtsuk A., 2012, REV INT G OMATIQUE, V22, P287, DOI DOI 10.3166/RIG.22.287-305
Suarez P, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.007
Susilawati Taylor M. A. P., 2008, 31 AUSTRALASIAN TRAN, P475
Sweet WV, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P579, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000272
U.S. Climate Change Science Program, 2009, COAST SENS SEA LEV R
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), 2022, USGS NAT STRUCT DAT
Versini PA, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P793, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-793-2010
VGIN(Virginia Geographic Information Network), 2022, VIRG BUILD FOOTPR 20
Webb B, 2018, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
Zervas, 2017, GLOBAL REGIONAL SEA, P75, DOI DOI 10.7289/V5/TR-NOS-COOPS-083
NR 32
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 16
U2 16
PI LAUSANNE
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD MAR 1
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1083282
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1083282
PG 9
WC Environmental Sciences
GA 9Y4BQ
UT WOS:000950404300001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Rahimi, M
Shafieezadeh, A
AF Rahimi, Mehrzad
Shafieezadeh, Abdollah
TI Multistate Overflow Fragility Models for Homogenous Inland Levees with
Noncohesive Sediments
SO ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART
A-CIVIL ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE Levees; Breach analysis; Overflowing; Fragility analysis; Levee risk
analysis; River flooding
AB Existing efforts for analyzing the overflow fragility of inland levees have
focused primarily on breach and incorporated simplified definitions of breach for
that purpose. The intermediate events that are precursors of a breach have not been
analyzed, and several key performance measures including the duration of overflow,
discharge rate, and time to the intermediate and breach events, which can inform
decisions on evacuation and recovery planning, have not been investigated. This
study, for the first time, provides a set of two-dimensional fragility models with
an initial water level before surge and peak surge elevation as intensity measures.
Fragility models are developed for the class of homogenous levees with noncohesive
sediments. Breach formation is modeled through the Dam/Levee Breach model, and
failure probabilities are derived using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). Unlike
existing fragility models, the new class of fragility models accurately represents
key performance failure events in levees including initiation of a breach, local
geotechnical instabilities, and breach development. These models can be used in
risk analysis frameworks to probabilistically account for local geotechnical
failures and breach scenarios. Furthermore, probabilistic models for the time of
peak discharge rate, breach peak outflow, and volume of water outflow are developed
based on stochastic simulations of the flood performance of levees. A power model
is investigated for representing breach peak outflow and is compared with previous
deterministic models. The proposed model for breach peak outflow can be integrated
with hydraulic inundation modeling to probabilistically estimate the inundated area
downstream of levees.
C1 [Rahimi, Mehrzad] Rice Univ, Rice Acad Fellows, Dept Civil & Environm Engn,
Houston, TX 77005 USA.
[Shafieezadeh, Abdollah] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn,
Risk Assessment & Management Struct & Infrastruct, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.
C3 Rice University; University System of Ohio; Ohio State University
RP Rahimi, M (corresponding author), Rice Univ, Rice Acad Fellows, Dept Civil &
Environm Engn, Houston, TX 77005 USA.
EM mr77@rice.edu; shafieezadeh.1@osu.edu
FU US National Science Foundation (NSF); [CMMI-1563372]
FX AcknowledgmentsThis research has been funded by the US National Science
Foundation (NSF) through Awards CMMI-1563372. Any opinions, findings,
and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of
the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
CR Altarejos-Garcia L., 2014, RISK RELIABILITY GEO, P437
[Anonymous], 2005, RELIABILITY STAT GEO
Bhunya PK, 2003, J HYDROL ENG, V8, P226, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-
0699(2003)8:4(226)
CIRIA (Construction Industry Research and Information Association), 2014, INT
LEV HDB, V1st ed.
D'Oria M, 2019, WATER RESOUR RES, V55, P8740, DOI 10.1029/2019WR025369
FEMA, 2018, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNE
Foster M, 2000, CAN GEOTECH J, V37, P1000, DOI 10.1139/cgj-37-5-1000
Fukuoka S, 2021, J HYDRAUL ENG, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001829
Hanson GJ, 2005, T ASAE, V48, P1783, DOI 10.13031/2013.20012
International Commission on Large Dams ICOLD, 1995, BULLETIN, V99, P76
Lendering K, 2018, GEORISK, V12, P203, DOI 10.1080/17499518.2018.1426865
Marsooli R, 2015, J HYDRAUL ENG, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000947
McKenna G, 2021, TRANSP GEOTECH, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100431
Morris Mark, 2018, Dams and Reservoirs, V28, P150, DOI 10.1680/jdare.18.00031
NLD (National Levee Database), 2021, LEV NAT
Rahimi Mehrzad, 2019, Geo-Congress 2019. Soil Erosion, Underground Engineering,
and Risk Assessment. Selected Papers from Sessions of the Eighth International
Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, P148
Rahimi M, 2020, INT J GEOMECH, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001613
Rossi N, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13050738
Schweckendiek T., 2016, DELTARES REP
SCS (Soil Conservation Service), 1981, TECHNICAL RELEASE
Sheppard D. M., 2003, DESIGN STORM SURGE H
Simm J., 2017, PROC 26 INT C LARGE
Singh SK, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P380, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-
0699(2000)5:4(380)
Singh V., 1996, DAM BREACH MODELING, V17
Temple D. M., 2006, PROC 2006 ASAE ANN M
USACE, 2018, LEVEE SAFETY PROGRAM
USACE, 2006, REHABILITATION INSPE
USBR (US Bureau of Reclamation), 1982, RECLAMATION PLANNING
Vahedifard F, 2020, J GEOTECH GEOENVIRON, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-
5606.0002399
Visser P.J., 1998, 981 DELFT U TECHN
Vrouwenvelder A. C. W. M., 2001, 98CONR1431 TU DELFT
Wahl TL, 1998, DSO98004 US BUR RECL
Wood D, 2020, ADV WATER RESOUR, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103501
Wu W., 2016, INTRO DLBREACH A SIM
Wu WM, 2013, J HYDRAUL ENG, V139, P837, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000741
NR 35
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PI RESTON
SN 2376-7642
J9 ASCE-ASME J RISK U A
JI ASCE-ASME J. Risk. Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A.-Civ. Eng.
PD MAR 1
PY 2023
VL 9
IS 1
AR 04023001
DI 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-927
PG 14
WC Engineering, Civil
SC Engineering
GA 7Y1OY
UT WOS:000914658900002
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Magilligan, FJ
James, LA
Lecce, SA
Dietrich, JT
Kupfer, JA
AF Magilligan, Francis J.
James, L. Allan
Lecce, Scott A.
Dietrich, James T.
Kupfer, John A.
TI Geomorphic Responses to Extreme Rainfall, Catastrophic Flooding, and Dam
Failures across an Urban to Rural Landscape
SO ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS
LA English
DT Article
DE breached dams; floods; floodplains; infrastructure; urban hydrology
ID FLOODPLAIN SEDIMENTATION; UNITED-STATES; STREAM POWER; RIVER;
URBANIZATION; REMOVAL; INFRASTRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY; MAGNITUDE; SANDHILLS
AB The extreme rainfall of October 2015 in South Carolina generated numerous dam
failures and spawned the flood of record at most U.S. Geological Survey stream
gauges. Detailed field sampling and systematic image analysis are used to document
the immediate and sustained geomorphic adjustments at four failed dams within the
urbanized Gills Creek watershed. That urban focus is augmented with a similar
analysis at five failed dams in more rural settings where less urban infrastructure
exists. We also document the magnitude and type of geomorphic adjustments
throughout the Gills Creek watershed unrelated to dam failures. Despite the extreme
rainfall and associated flooding, the geomorphic effects were limited and
localized, manifesting primarily at dam failures but not progressing significantly
downstream, especially along Gills Creek, where the combination of intact dams,
frequent urban roughness elements, thick floodplain vegetation, and numerous
wetlands explains the lack of significant morphologic adjustments or major
deposition. Dam failures in rural settings showed greater overbank deposition but
the geomorphic effects were still limited to dam proximal locations because of the
thick vegetal cover below the dam. Because these dams in rural and urban settings
were constructed to maximize waterfront property, low gradient sites were selected;
therefore, the geomorphic effects were unlike planned dam removals where massive
headcutting, knickpoint migration, and sediment evacuation tend to occur. The most
significant effect of the dam failures was the shift from an initial braided
channel to a single thread channel within the emptied reservoirs, which occurred
quickly, often within the first few months.
C1 [Magilligan, Francis J.] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Geog, Hanover, NH 03755 USA.
[James, L. Allan; Kupfer, John A.] Univ South Carolina, Dept Geog, Columbia, SC
29208 USA.
[Lecce, Scott A.] East Carolina Univ, Dept Geog Planning & Environm, Greenville,
NC 27858 USA.
[Dietrich, James T.] Univ Northern Iowa, Dept Geog, Cedar Falls, IA 50614 USA.
C3 Dartmouth College; University of South Carolina System; University of
South Carolina Columbia; University of North Carolina; East Carolina
University; University of Northern Iowa
RP Magilligan, FJ (corresponding author), Dartmouth Coll, Dept Geog, Hanover, NH
03755 USA.
EM magilligan@dartmouth.edu; AJames@sc.edu; lecces@ecu.edu;
james.dietrich@uni.edu; kupfer@sc.edu
RI Dietrich, James T/J-9832-2012; James, L. Allan/J-6206-2015; Kupfer, John
A/H-4066-2011
OI Dietrich, James T/0000-0002-2432-5243; James, L.
Allan/0000-0002-2623-1216; Magilligan, Francis/0000-0002-0082-5526;
LECCE, SCOTT/0000-0001-5060-7319
FU National Science Foundation (NSF) [BCS-1615154]; Office of the Vice
President, University of South Carolina
FX This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF
Award BCS-1615154) and by the Office of the Vice President, University
of South Carolina.
CR [Anonymous], 2009, MEGAFLOODING EARTH M, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511635632.008
[Anonymous], 2014, 3 NATL COMMUNICATION
[Anonymous], 2013, IABSE S REPORT
Bellmore J. R., 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, P1, DOI [10.1002/wat2.1164, DOI
10.1002/WAT2.1164]
Bellmore J. R., 2015, USGS DAM REMOVAL SCI, DOI [10.5066/F7K935KT, DOI
10.5066/F7K935KT]
Blanton P, 2009, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V112, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.008
Buraas EM, 2014, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V39, P1778, DOI 10.1002/esp.3562
Chin A, 2005, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V69, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.10.009
COLE J, 2017, ASCE, V22, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001459
Costa J.E., 1995, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V89, P45, DOI DOI 10.1029/GM089P0045
COSTA JE, 1988, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V100, P1054, DOI 10.1130/0016-
7606(1988)100<1054:TFAFON>2.3.CO;2
Dietrich J., 2015, THESIS
Doyle MW, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P286, DOI 10.1126/science.1149852
Doyle MW, 2009, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V34, P349, DOI
10.1146/annurev.environ.022108.180216
Doyle MW, 2002, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V38, P1567, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-
1688.2002.tb04365.x
Dury G. H., 1973, FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOG, P91
Feaster T. D., 2015, PRELIMINARY PEAK STA
Foley MM, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P5229, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020457
Foley MM, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0180107
Fonstad MA, 2013, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V38, P421, DOI 10.1002/esp.3366
Gartner JD, 2015, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V251, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.023
Gartner JD, 2015, GEOLOGY, V43, P983, DOI 10.1130/G36969.1
Gomez B, 1997, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V22, P923, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-
9837(199710)22:10<923::AID-ESP763>3.0.CO;2-E
Grant GE, 2015, ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL 3: RIVER
BASINS, RESERVOIR SEDIMENTATION AND WATER RESOURCES, P31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-
09054-2_7
HAMMER TR, 1972, WATER RESOUR RES, V8, P1530, DOI 10.1029/WR008i006p01530
HDR Engineering Inc of the Carolinas, 2016, GILLS CREEK WAT ASS
Homer C, 2015, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V81, P345, DOI 10.14358/PERS.81.5.345
Huang HP, 2017, J HYDROMETEOROL, V18, P1783, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0195.1
Hung CLJ, 2018, ANTHROPOCENE, V23, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ancene.2018.08.001
Kupfer JA, 2015, RIVER RES APPL, V31, P1299, DOI 10.1002/rra.2828
Lecce SA, 2004, PHYS GEOGR, V25, P334, DOI 10.2747/0272-3646.25.4.334
Lisenby PE, 2018, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V43, P4, DOI 10.1002/esp.4096
MACDONALD TC, 1984, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V110, P567, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1984)110:5(567)
Magilligan FJ, 2016, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V252, P158, DOI
10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.027
Magilligan FJ, 2015, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V228, P175, DOI
10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.016
Magilligan FJ, 1998, J GEOL, V106, P87, DOI 10.1086/516009
MAGILLIGAN FJ, 1992, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V5, P373, DOI 10.1016/0169-555X(92)90014-F
Major J. J., 2012, GEOMORPHIC RESPONSE
Major J.J., 2017, GRAVEL BED RIVERS PR
Miller JD, 2017, J HYDROL, V552, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.025
Milly PCD, 2005, NATURE, V438, P347, DOI 10.1038/nature04312
Mizzell H., 2016, J S C WATER RESOUR, V3, P3
Musser J.W., 2015, FLOOD INUNDATION MAP, P81
O'Connor JE, 2015, SCIENCE, V348, P496, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa9204
Phillips JD, 2009, PROG PHYS GEOG, V33, P17, DOI 10.1177/0309133309103889
Pizzuto J, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P683, DOI 10.1641/0006-
3568(2002)052[0683:EODROR]2.0.CO;2
RITTER DF, 1986, GEOLOGY, V14, P472, DOI 10.1130/0091-
7613(1986)14<472:LCDOTG>2.0.CO;2
Sawaske SR, 2012, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V151, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.01.013
SIMON A, 1986, PAPER PRESENTED AT T, P24
Smith GHS, 2010, GEOLOGY, V38, P579, DOI 10.1130/G30861.1
Smith SV, 2002, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V299, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00222-X
Surian N, 2003, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V50, P307, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00219-2
Surian N, 2016, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V272, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.002
Swezey CS, 2016, QUATERNARY RES, V86, P271, DOI [10.1016/j.ygres.2016.08.007,
10.1016/j.yqres.2016.08.007]
Tabrizi AA, 2017, J HYDRAUL ENG, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001315,
10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001315]
*US CENS BUR, 2018, ANN EST RES POP APR
Walder JS, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P6701, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016620
Walder JS, 1997, WATER RESOUR RES, V33, P2337, DOI 10.1029/97WR01616
Xian G, 2011, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V77, P758
NR 61
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 0
U2 19
PI ABINGDON
SN 2469-4452
EI 2469-4460
J9 ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR
JI Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.
PD MAY 4
PY 2019
VL 109
IS 3
BP 705
EP 729
DI 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507814
PG 25
WC Geography
SC Geography
GA HU1PH
UT WOS:000465043800002
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Neupane, N
Paudel, S
Sapkota, R
Joshi, YP
Rijal, Y
Chalise, A
AF Neupane, Nilhari
Paudel, Shishir
Sapkota, Regan
Joshi, Yadav Prasad
Rijal, Yashoda
Chalise, Anisha
TI Enhancing the resilience of food production systems for food and
nutritional security under climate change in Nepal
SO FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; climate change; food security; malnutrition; nutrition;
resilient
AB BackgroundClimate change in Nepal has posed a considerable challenge to
agricultural productivity and has threatened food and nutritional security at
multiple levels. This study aims to assess the impacts of climate change on
national food production and food and nutritional security as well as document
issue-based prioritized adaptation options for a resilient food production system.
MethodsThis study considers temperature, precipitation, and their anomalies as the
key factors affecting food production in Nepal. Nationwide precipitation trends
along with their association with the annual production of major cereal crops in
Nepal were assessed using data from the last three decades (1990-2018). The annual
productions of the major cereal crops were summed and normalized to calculate the
production index scores in the districts. Scores were plotted and visualized into
maps using the Geographical Information System. In three ecological regions, the
distribution of flood and extreme rainfall events and cases of malnutrition from
2005 to 2018 were plotted. The effects of climate change and highest priority
adaptation options at the district level were documented through a review of
national policies and literature studies and qualitative research based on Focus
Group Discussions (FGDs). ResultsBetween 1990 and 2018, the overall average
production of major cereal crops in Nepal was increased by around 2,245 MT
annually. In the district level index analysis, the highest production score was
found for Jhapa and Morang while the lowest production score was found for Humla.
Cases of malnutrition in some districts coincided with flood and heavy rainfall
events, indicating that climate change and extreme climatic events have a role to
play in food production and security. Growing drought-tolerant crops, changes in
crop cycle, riverbed farming practices, developing short-term strategies, such as
contingency crop planning, changing planting dates, planting short duration
varieties, schemes evacuation, and long-term strategies, such as encouraging out-
migration of population to safer locations, resettlement programs with
transformative livelihood options, and sustainable agricultural practices were
found to be key prioritized adaptation measures for a resilient food production
system. ConclusionIn Nepal, climate change and the increasing frequency and
magnitude of extreme climatic events adversely affect the food production system,
which has become a serious threat to food and nutritional security. The
implementation of evidence-based practices to build a resilient food system
specific to climate-vulnerable hotspots at the district and local levels is the
nation's current need.
C1 [Neupane, Nilhari; Sapkota, Regan; Joshi, Yadav Prasad] Nepal Open Univ, Fac Sci
Hlth & Technol, Lalitpur, Nepal.
[Paudel, Shishir] Cent Inst Sci & Technol CiST, Dept Publ Hlth, Kathmandu,
Nepal.
[Sapkota, Regan] Policy Initiat Nepal PIN, Lalitpur, Nepal.
[Joshi, Yadav Prasad] Manmohan Mem Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Kathmandu,
Nepal.
[Rijal, Yashoda] Univ Siegen, Dept Sociol, Siegen, Germany.
[Chalise, Anisha] Hlth & Populat Act CREHPA, Ctr Res Environm, Kathmandu, Nepal.
C3 Universitat Siegen
RP Joshi, YP (corresponding author), Nepal Open Univ, Fac Sci Hlth & Technol,
Lalitpur, Nepal.; Joshi, YP (corresponding author), Manmohan Mem Inst Hlth Sci,
Dept Publ Hlth, Kathmandu, Nepal.
EM yadavjoshi@gmail.com
RI Paudel, Shishir/AAE-3100-2021
OI Paudel, Shishir/0000-0003-3077-6697
CR Alexandratos N., 2012, WORLD AGR 2030 2050, DOI [DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.288998,
10.22004/ag.econ.288998]
[Anonymous], 2009, RES GUID GEND CLIM C
[Anonymous], 2009, J FOR LIVELIHOOD
[Anonymous], 2009, J AGR ENV, DOI DOI 10.3126/AEJ.V9I0.2119
[Anonymous], 2007, HUMAN DEV REPORT 200
Atanga RA, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V5, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2021.706721
Bajracharya SR, 2020, INVENTORY GLACIAL LA
Bhatta LD, 2019, J MT SCI-ENGL, V16, P1133, DOI 10.1007/s11629-018-5146-4
Chaudhary P, 2011, BIOL LETTERS, V7, P767, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0269
Chemjong B., 2020, RUPANTARAN MULTIDISC, V4, P31, DOI
10.3126/rupantaran.v4i1.34015
Chinnakali P, 2014, J HEALTH POPUL NUTR, V32, P227
Conway K, 2020, AM J CLIN NUTR, V112, p844S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa218
Dahal N, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7010003
Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM), 2017, OBSERVED CLIMATE TRE
DoHS, 2021, ANN REP 2019 20 DEP
Eriksson M., 2009, The changing Himalayas: impact of climate change on water
resources and livelihoods in the greater Himalayas
Food and Agriculture Organization, 2015, CLIMATE CHANGE FOOD
Food and Agriculture Organization, 2008, FOOD SEC INF ACT PRA
Gregory PJ, 2005, PHILOS T R SOC B, V360, P2139, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2005.1745
Group W.B, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE KNOWL
Gurung G., 2012, J INT DEV COOPER, V18, P113
Hussain A, 2016, FOOD SECUR, V8, P921, DOI 10.1007/s12571-016-0607-5
Jalsrot Vikas Sanstha (JVS)/GWP Nepal, 2015, STOCKT CLIM VULN AGR
Kattel R. R., 2022, CLIMATE CHANGE COMMU, P159
Khadka M., 2014, HDB CLIM CHANGE ADAP, V10, P978, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-40455-
9_78-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40455-9_78-1]
Maharjan S.K., 2017, SCIENTIA RICERCA INN, V2, P316
Maharjan Shree Kumar, 2020, Preprints, DOI [10.20944/preprints202004.0478,
10.20944/preprints202004.0478.v1, DOI 10.20944/PREPRINTS202004.0478.V1]
Ministry of Finance, 2021, EC SURV REP 2020 2
Ministry of Forestry and Environment, 2021, VULNERABILITY RISK A
MoALD, 2021, STAT INF NEPL AGR 20
MoEF, 2004, NEP IN NAT COMM C PA
MoFE, 2021, VULNERABILITY RISK A
MoFE, 2019, CLIMATE CHANGE SCENA
MoHA, 2022, NEP DIS RISK RED POR
Nepal A. K., 2022, ENV CHALLENGES, P100, DOI
[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100437, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100437]
NPC, 2021, NEP MULT POV IND AN
Pant K. P., 2012, Journal of Agriculture and Environment, V13, P9
Paudel B, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109711
Rai MK, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030889
Rasul G., 2021, ENV CHALLENGES, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.envc.2021.100027, DOI
10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100027]
Rasul G, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P297, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1617099
Schnitter R, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16142531
Shrestha AB, 2010, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V1, P157, DOI 10.1080/19475701003668968
Shrestha N, 2013, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V19, P767, DOI
10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.085
Shrestha UB, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V154, P315, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02418-5
Thakur S. B., 2017, Journal of Agriculture and Environment, V18, P120
Thapa S, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P713, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1855099
USAID, 2021, NEP NUTR PROF
Walker T., 2019, RISK VULNERABILITY N, DOI [10.1596/33365, DOI 10.1596/33365]
NR 49
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 4
PI LAUSANNE
EI 2571-581X
J9 FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S
JI Front. Sustain. Food Syst.
PD OCT 5
PY 2022
VL 6
AR 968998
DI 10.3389/fsufs.2022.968998
PG 11
WC Food Science & Technology
SC Food Science & Technology
GA 5N0OP
UT WOS:000871491000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Gumber, S
Ghosh, S
AF Gumber, Siddharth
Ghosh, Satyajit
TI Quick Predictions of Onset Times and Rain Amounts from Monsoon Showers
over Urban Built Environments
SO ATMOSPHERE
LA English
DT Article
DE planetary boundary layer; urban meteorology; auto-conversion; accretion;
flooding alerts
ID CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEI; SEA-SALT; PARAMETERIZATION; TURBULENCE;
MODEL; PRECIPITATION; MICROPHYSICS; RADIATION; AEROSOLS; CYCLONE
AB Predicting the onset times of precipitation over densely populated cities for
the purposes of timely evacuation is a challenge. This paper explored a flooding
event over an urban built environment in a South Asian mega city, Chennai, where
extant urban planning models rely on predicted rainwater amounts for early warning
and impact assessment studies. However, the time duration of flooding events is
related to the nature of the urban sprawl in the built environment. Any evacuation
measure is invariably tied down to the time duration over which the precipitation
event occurs, and therefore to the expected time of a precipitation event to begin.
In this context, a crucial parameter useful to municipal authorities is the onset
time of precipitation. This study used optimised analytical formulations to predict
this time, and the derived analytical expressions for the case study yielded
comparable times estimated from a computer-intensive full-scale large eddy model
within an accuracy of 2%. It is suggested that municipal authorities (who are non-
experts in fluid mechanics) use this early prediction for the purposes of quick
alerts to a congested city's most vulnerable citizens within urban sprawls.
However, for the procedure to work at its best, it involves a two-stage procedure.
The first step involves the use of a parcel model to obtain the expected cloud
droplet spectral spreads based on the prevailing dynamical characterisations. The
second step involves an optimisation procedure involving cloud spectral properties
from the first step to quantify both the auto-conversion rates and the threshold.
Thereafter, an onset time calculation based on cloud properties is estimated. These
new results are cast in closed form for easy incorporation into meteorological
applications over a variety of urban scales. Rain mass amounts were also predicted
analytically and used to configure Aeronautical Reconnaissance Coverage Geographic
Information System (ARCGIS) to compute low drainage flow rates over the vulnerable
parts of Chennai city. It was found that heavy precipitation over the North Chennai
region yielded discharge rates to the tune of similar to 250 m(3)s(-1) during a 24
h period, causing intense flooding in the low-lying areas around the Cooum River
basin with a large population density, with estimates sufficiently corroborating
observations.
C1 [Gumber, Siddharth; Ghosh, Satyajit] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn,
Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India.
[Ghosh, Satyajit] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire,
England.
C3 Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT); VIT Vellore; N8 Research
Partnership; White Rose University Consortium; University of Leeds
RP Ghosh, S (corresponding author), Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Vellore
632014, Tamil Nadu, India.; Ghosh, S (corresponding author), Univ Leeds, Sch Earth
& Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England.
EM siddharth.gumber@vit.ac.in; satyajitg@vit.ac.in
RI Gumber, Siddharth/AGP-6654-2022
OI Gumber, Siddharth/0000-0002-1648-1537
CR [Anonymous], 2015, NASA MODIS ADAPTIVE, DOI [DOI 10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_M3.006,
10.5067/MODIS/MOD08_M3.006]
[Anonymous], 2003, P 3 INT C ENV HLTH C
[Anonymous], 2017, INDIA TODAY
BAKER MB, 1993, TELLUS B, V45, P458, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0889.45.issue5.1.x
Bera S, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V124, P13127, DOI 10.1029/2019JD031078
Berry E. X., 1968, PREPRINTS 1 NATL C W, P81
BOUCHER O, 1995, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V100, P16395, DOI 10.1029/95JD01382
BRIEGLEB BP, 1992, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V97, P7603, DOI 10.1029/92JD00291
Chen SS, 2018, J ATMOS SCI, V75, P203, DOI 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0123.1
Easton M., 2017, BBC NEWS
Esri GIS Mapping Software, 2021, LOC INT SPAT AN
Ghosh S, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P2659, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.2082
Ghosh S, 1998, ANN GEOPHYS-ATM HYDR, V16, P628, DOI 10.1007/s00585-998-0628-2
Ghosh S, 2005, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V5, P755, DOI 10.5194/acp-5-755-2005
Ghosh S, 2016, ATMOS SCI LETT, V17, P208, DOI 10.1002/asl.644
Ghosh S, 2014, ATMOS SCI LETT, V15, P157, DOI 10.1002/asl2.486
Ghosh S, 2001, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V28, P3883, DOI 10.1029/2001GL013113
Ghosh S., 1991, ADV TURBULENCE, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-84399-0_44, DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-84399-0_44]
Ghosh S, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V134, P1083, DOI 10.1007/s00704-017-2321-4
Grosvenor DP, 2018, REV GEOPHYS, V56, P409, DOI 10.1029/2017RG000593
Gulev S.K., 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, P287, DOI [10.1017/9781009157896.004, DOI
10.1017/9781009157896]
Gumber S, 2020, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V139, P1479, DOI 10.1007/s00704-019-03042-0
Hamdy O, 2016, GEOSCIENCES, V6, DOI 10.3390/geosciences6040047
Hoffmann F, 2017, J ATMOS SCI, V74, P2125, DOI 10.1175/JAS-D-16-0220.1
Hong SY, 2006, MON WEATHER REV, V134, P2318, DOI 10.1175/MWR3199.1
Huffman, 2019, GPM IMERG FINAL PREC, DOI [DOI 10.5067/GPM/IMERG/3B-HH/06,
10.5067/GPM/IMERG/3B-HH/06]
IMD (Indian Meteorological Department, 2015, HEAV RAINF SE IND NO
Jayaraman N., BBC NEWS
JOHNSON DB, 1982, J ATMOS SCI, V39, P448, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0469(1982)039<0448:TROGAU>2.0.CO;2
Jonas PR, 1996, ATMOS RES, V40, P283, DOI 10.1016/0169-8095(95)00035-6
Kain JS, 2004, J APPL METEOROL, V43, P170, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0450(2004)043<0170:TKCPAU>2.0.CO;2
Kessler E., 1969, METEOROL MONOGR, DOI [10.1007/978-1-935704-36-2, 10.1007/978-
1-935704-36-2_1]
Konrad C.P., 2016, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
KUMAR CRS, 2019, ENVIRONMENTASIA, V12, P62, DOI DOI 10.14456/ea.2019.46
Li KB, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P5455, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-5455-2021
LIOU KN, 1989, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V94, P8599, DOI 10.1029/JD094iD06p08599
Liu SC, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL040218
Manton M.J., 1977, 266 COL STAT U FORT
MARTIN GM, 1994, J ATMOS SCI, V51, P1823, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0469(1994)051<1823:TMAPOE>2.0.CO;2
Muthusamy Seenirajan, 2017, Journal of Geographic Information System, V9, P126,
DOI 10.4236/jgis.2017.92009
Devi NN, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102875
Noh Y, 2018, J ATMOS SCI, V75, P4031, DOI 10.1175/JAS-D-18-0080.1
O'Dowd CD, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P1311, DOI 10.1029/1999GL900231
Phadtare J, 2018, MON WEATHER REV, V146, P943, DOI 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0473.1
Prabha TV, 2012, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V117, DOI 10.1029/2011JD016837
Pradhan M, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-12594-y
RAMANATHAN V, 1986, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V91, P8649, DOI 10.1029/JD091iD08p08649
Rap A, 2009, J ATMOS SCI, V66, P105, DOI 10.1175/2008JAS2626.1
Rosenfeld D, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P5828, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1514044113
Safai PD, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V431, P323, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.058
Saini I, 2013, INT J REMOTE SENS, V34, P4933, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2013.783249
Schicker I., 2011, ANTARCT RES SER, V2011
Skamarock W., 2008, NCARTN475STR, p1002KB, DOI [10.5065/D68S4MVH, DOI
10.5065/D68S4MVH]
Subramanya K., 2020, ENG HYDROLOGY, V5th
TRIPOLI GJ, 1980, J APPL METEOROL, V19, P1037, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0450(1980)019<1037:ANIOSF>2.0.CO;2
TRMM Science Team, 2015, TRMM TMPA RAINF EST
Vendrasco EP, 2020, WEATHER FORECAST, V35, P2345, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-20-0017.1
Wilson JW, 2010, WEATHER FORECAST, V25, P1691, DOI 10.1175/2010WAF2222417.1
Yin JF, 2015, J METEOROL RES-PRC, V29, P82, DOI 10.1007/s13351-015-4091-1
NR 60
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 5
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4433
J9 ATMOSPHERE-BASEL
JI Atmosphere
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 13
IS 3
AR 370
DI 10.3390/atmos13030370
PG 19
GA 0E7RV
UT WOS:000776875000001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Misuri, A
Cruz, AM
Park, H
Garnier, E
Ohtsu, N
Hokugo, A
Fujita, I
Aoki, S
Cozzani, V
AF Misuri, Alessio
Cruz, Ana Maria
Park, Hyejeong
Garnier, Emmanuel
Ohtsu, Nobuhito
Hokugo, Akihiko
Fujita, Isamu
Aoki, Shin-ichi
Cozzani, Valerio
TI Technological accidents caused by floods: The case of the Saga
prefecture oil spill, Japan 2019
LA English
DT Article
DE Oil spill; Ironworks factory; Natech; Emergency response; Climate
change; Environmental pollution
ID HAZARDOUS-MATERIALS RELEASES; HURRICANES KATRINA; GAS FACILITIES;
OFFSHORE OIL; EARTHQUAKE; RISK; SUBSTANCES; RECREANCY; DISASTER; IMPACT
AB This study investigates an oil spill which involved an ironworks factory in Saga
prefecture, during the severe flooding that hit southwestern Japan in late August
2019. The aim of the study is to provide an overview of the accident, highlighting
the causes and the consequences of this compound disaster. Furthermore, the study
analyses the emergency response and clean-up activities in order to identify
lessons learned, and propose recommendations for future flood triggered oil spills.
The work presented is based on the integration of information available in
newspaper articles, government documents and reports, and data and interviews
collected during two field trips in the affected area. The permanence of oil and
the strong oil odour in adjacent crops as well as on irrigation canals and
citizens' houses was revealed during the first field trip, about one month after
the accident. The analysis of the documentation on metal working oil revealed that
it might have long-lasting impact in terms of environmental pollution. The presence
of oil impacted also the implemented emergency response actions, since vertical
evacuation, practiced by many residents during the disaster, actually put many of
them in more danger as they ended up trapped in oil-covered floodwaters with strong
vapours that were reported to cause nausea and skin irritation. Remarkably, it was
also found that a previous oil spill had already occurred at the same site
following a severe flooding event, highlighting the need to improve preparedness
and develop more effective strategies for accident prevention. Disaster
preparedness that specifically considers both the natural hazard and the potential
for related technological scenarios should be enhanced, in particular regarding
chemical accidents triggered by floods. Japan, as well as other parts of the World,
is experiencing stronger rainfall events due to a changing climate leading to
unprecedented flooding. Therefore, industry, government and citizens should
consider the possibility of an increase of weather-related compound disasters in
planning and implementation of climate change adaptation strategies.
C1 [Misuri, Alessio; Cozzani, Valerio] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat
Engn, Bologna, Italy.
[Misuri, Alessio; Cruz, Ana Maria; Park, Hyejeong] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent
Res Inst, Kyoto, Japan.
[Garnier, Emmanuel] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, CNRS, Chronoenvironm Lab,
Besancon, France.
[Ohtsu, Nobuhito] Govt Japan, Natl Res Inst Fire & Disaster, Fire & Disaster
Management Agcy, Tokyo, Japan.
[Hokugo, Akihiko] Kobe Univ, Res Ctr Urban Safety & Secur, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
[Fujita, Isamu] Natl Res & Dev Agcy, Port & Airport Res Inst, Yokohama,
Kanagawa, Japan.
[Aoki, Shin-ichi] Osaka Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
C3 1EUROPE; University of Bologna; Kyoto University; Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universite de Franche-Comte; Kobe
University; Port & Airport Research Institute; Osaka University
RP Cruz, AM (corresponding author), Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto,
Japan.
EM cruznaranjo.anamaria.2u@kyoto-u.ac.jp
OI Misuri, Alessio/0000-0002-0441-9947; Park, Hyejeong/0000-0002-2848-8728
FU Natural Disaster Research Council, Japan; Japan Society for the
Promotion of Science [Kaken Grant] [17K01336]; MIUR -Italian Ministry
for Scientific Research under the PRIN 2017 program [2017CEYPS8];
Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K01336] Funding Source: KAKEN
FX The authors wish to inform that the present work has been partly funded
by the Natural Disaster Research Council, Japan; the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science [Kaken Grant 17K01336, April 2017-March 2021];
and the MIUR -Italian Ministry for Scientific Research under the PRIN
2017 program [Grant 2017CEYPS8].
CR [Anonymous], 2019, NHK NEWS
[Anonymous], MIL ENG, DOI DOI 10.2307/44566124
[Anonymous], 2009, PHYS METALL PRINC
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB ALUMINUM
[Anonymous], 2019, TELLERREPORT SAGA OI
[Anonymous], 2019, JAPAN TIMES
[Anonymous], 1990, OMACHI NEWSPAPER, P2
[Anonymous], 2018, NATCATSERVICE REL NA
[Anonymous], 1993, HDB QUENCHANTS QUENC
Araki Y, 2021, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104352
Camila SPM, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V116, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.033
Cope MR, 2020, J RURAL STUD, V74, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.019
Cruz AM, 2008, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V21, P620, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.008
Cruz AM, 2009, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V22, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.08.007
Cruz AM, 2006, J RISK RES, V9, P483, DOI 10.1080/13669870600717657
Cruz AM, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V121, P41, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0891-4
Dave D., 2011, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, V7, P423, DOI
10.3844/ajessp.2011.424.440
Economie FGG, 2020, OIL SPILL FARML OM L
Edenhofer B, 2015, WOODH PUBL SER METAL, P485, DOI 10.1533/9780857096524.3.485
Environmental Agriculture Administration Standing Committee, 2018, OIL SPILL ACC
RYUO C
Floodlist, 2019, JAP 2 PEOPL DEAD 100
French Ministry of Ecology Sustainable Development, 2013, NATECH RISK TECHN AC
FREUDENBURG WR, 1993, SOC FORCES, V71, P909, DOI 10.2307/2580124
Freudenburg WR, 2000, RISK IN THE MODERN AGE, P107
Garnier E, 2019, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V28, P778, DOI 10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0303
Gill DA, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P1911, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1280-7
Girgin S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101072
Idemitsu, 2014, SAF DAT SHEET DAPHN
Infrastructure Development Institute-Japan, 1999, RIV LAW COMM ART
IPCC, 2018, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009157940, DOI
10.1017/9781009157940.005]
ITOPF, 2011, US BOOMS OIL POLL RE
JMA, 2019, SPEC WARN DUE HEAV R
Kouhoku Town, 2019, KOUH TOWN WEBS
Krausmann E, 2017, NATECH RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT: REDUCING THE RISK OF
NATURAL-HAZARD IMPACT ON HAZARDOUS INSTALLATIONS, P1
Krausmann E, 2008, NAT HAZARDS, V46, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11069-007-9203-5
Krausmann E, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101163
Kumasaki M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101855
Lindell MK, 1996, J HAZARD MATER, V50, P31, DOI 10.1016/0304-3894(96)01764-5
Lindell MK, 1997, RISK ANAL, V17, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00854.x
Luo XL, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P735, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00314-6
MACKENZIE D, 2009, HEAT TREATING PROGR, V9, P28
MAHB, 2020, NAT RISK MAN
Mainichi, 2019, HEAV RAINS NO KYUSH
Misuri A, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107634
MLIT, 2019, ROKK RIV EM FLOOD CO
MLIT, 2011, NEW CONT PLAN TAK OF
MLIT, 2016, EXP FLOOD IN AR MAP
MLIT, 2015, NOT 896 2015 JUL 17
MLIT, 2021, ROKK RIV
National Statistics Center, 2019, E STAT PORT SIT OFF
Nayak S, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V51, P4385, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3866-8
Nishinippon Shimbun, 2019, OIL SPILL MEAS 30 YE
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) National Centers for
Environmental Information, 2018, US BILL DOLL WEATH C
Nuka, 2014, SPILL TACT AL RESP
OECD, 2006, JAP FLOODS
Qin RS, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101453
RASMUSSEN K, 1995, J HAZARD MATER, V40, P43, DOI 10.1016/0304-3894(94)00079-V
Ritchie LA, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P655, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.690066
Ruckart PZ, 2008, J HAZARD MATER, V159, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.124
Ruckart PZ, 2004, J HAZARD MATER, V115, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.004
Saga Prefecture, 2019, DAM REL AGR FOR FISH
Saga Prefecture, 2020, DAM CAUS HEAV RAIN S
Saga Shimbun, 2019, OIL SPILL IR 110000
Saga Shimbun, 2019, SAG IR FIND 54000 LI
Saga Shimbun, 2019, OIL SPILLS OUT IR FA
Saga Shimbun, 2019, OIL REC P STEAD HUM
Saga Tekkosho Co. Ltd, 2019, OM FACT DAT
Schott T., 2012, SAFFIR SIMPSON HURRI, P1
Sengul H, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P723, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2012.01272.x
SHOWALTER PS, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P169, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00042.x
Takezawa M., 2011, MEASURES MITIGATION, P73, DOI [10.2495/978-1-84564-560-1/04,
DOI 10.2495/978-1-84564-560-1/04]
Tellerreport, 2019, TELLERREPORT RECOVER
Toshiyuki A, 2009, 5 US JAP C FLOOD CON
Totten GE, 2007, STEEL HEAT TREATMENT, V2
Town O, 2019, OMACHI WEBSITE
Tsukasa M, 2019, WATER DISASTER COUNT
U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board., 2018, ORG PER DEC REL FIR
Umitonagisa.org, 2019, CORR KNOWL OIL SORB
UN, 2019, GLOB HARM SYST CLASS
UNDRR-APSTAAG, 2020, ASIA PACIFIC REGIONA, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.17353.77922, DOI
10.13140/RG.2.2.17353.77922]
World Economic Forum, 2020, GLOB RISKS REP
Yamawaki H, 2002, SMALL BUS ECON, V18, P121, DOI 10.1023/A:1015134028335
Yoshida K, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P9910, DOI 10.1002/2017GL075058
NR 89
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 12
U2 32
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 66
AR 102634
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102634
EA OCT 2021
PG 12
Water Resources
GA WM4MG
UT WOS:000711060300007
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Verma, D
Berwal, P
Khan, MA
Alharbi, RS
Alfaisal, FM
Rathnayake, U
AF Verma, Deepak
Berwal, Parveen
Khan, Mohammad Amir
Alharbi, Raied Saad
Alfaisal, Faisal M.
Rathnayake, Upaka
TI Design for the Prediction of Peak Outflow of Embankment Breaching Due to
Overtopping by Regression Technique and Modelling
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE embankment; overtopping; peak outflow; breaching; hydraulic parameters;
laboratory water channel
ID DAM BREACH
AB The study of embankment breaching is not an easy practice, as it includes
various parameters to meet the suitability of the design approach, especially when
we consider it for the long term. Embankment breach studies generally include the
prediction of different breach parameters. The important physical and hydrodynamic
parameters of the flood wave generated from the embankment failure are breach
width, breach slope, formation time, peak outflow, and time to failure. Out of
these parameters, peak outflow is a very important breach parameter, as it deflects
the magnitude of destruction on the downstream side of the embankment and affects
the evacuation plans for the downstream population. The prediction of breach peak
outflow due to overtopping of the embankment is very essential for dam failure
prevention and mitigation, as well as for the design of an early warning system.
Many researchers have used dam failure data, comparative studies, experimental
studies, or regression techniques to develop various models for predicting peak
outflow. The present paper analyzes the results of the design for forty experiments
carried out in two different laboratory water channels (flumes). Different
embankment models are overtopped with the objective of studying the breach behavior
during overtopping. The study was inspired by reports in the open literature of
embankment failures that resulted in catastrophic conditions. With experimental
data, an efficient model is developed for predicting breach peak outflow (Q(p)) by
correlating with other independent embankment breach parameters for cohesive as
well as non-cohesive embankments. The model is validated with historical and
laboratory data compiled in the past. For the validation of current investigational
work, the experimental data of the present study are compared with the model
already developed by other researchers. From the study and analysis, it is observed
that breach peak outflow depends upon hydraulic, geometric, and geotechnical
parameters of embankments. Being a phenomenon that is active for a short duration
only, the manual measurement of various parameters of the modeling process poses
some limitations under laboratory conditions.
C1 [Verma, Deepak] Maharshi Dayanand Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Rohtak 124001, India.
[Berwal, Parveen; Khan, Mohammad Amir] Galgotias Coll Engn & Technol, Civil Engn
Dept, Greater Noida 201310, India.
[Alharbi, Raied Saad; Alfaisal, Faisal M.] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil
Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
[Rathnayake, Upaka] Atlantic Technol Univ, Fac Engn & Design, Dept Civil Engn &
Construct, Sligo F91 YW50, Ireland.
C3 Maharshi Dayanand University; Galgotias College of Engineering &
Technology (GCET); King Saud University
RP Verma, D (corresponding author), Maharshi Dayanand Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Rohtak
124001, India.; Berwal, P; Khan, MA (corresponding author), Galgotias Coll Engn &
Technol, Civil Engn Dept, Greater Noida 201310, India.
EM 21deepakverma@gmail.com; parveenberwal@gmail.com; amirmdamu@gmail.com
RI Rathnayake, Upaka Sanjeewa/S-2435-2019; Berwal, Parveen/IAQ-4767-2023
OI Rathnayake, Upaka Sanjeewa/0000-0002-7341-9078; Berwal,
Parveen/0000-0003-2422-3391; amir khan, Mohammad/0000-0003-1550-0393
FU King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP2023R310]
FX This research was funded by Researchers Supporting Project Number
RSP2023R310, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
CR Aamir M., 2022, CURRENT DIRECTIONS W, VVolume 7, P71
Aamir M, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14142223
Adamo N., 2020, J EARTH SCI GEOTECH, V10, P191
Alhasan Z., 2015, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae
Brunensis, V63, P717, DOI 10.11118/actaun201563030717
[Anonymous], 1978, LESSONS DAM INCIDENT
Ashraf Muhammad, 2018, Water Science, V32, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.wsj.2018.05.002
Chinnarasri C, 2004, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V21, P247, DOI
10.1080/10286600412331328622
Cui P, 2013, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V182, P173, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.11.009
Dhiman S, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V98, P783, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03731-z
Froehlich D.C., 1987, P 1987 ASCE NAT C HY, P570
Froehlich DC, 1995, WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P887
9496(1995)121:1(90)
Gaagai A., 2020, Journal of Water and Land Development, P75, DOI
10.24425/jwld.2019.127048
Gaagai A, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14050767
Ge W, 2021, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001311
Ge W, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P4063, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1728-0
Hasson M., 2004, BREACH FORMATION LAB
Hatje V, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-11143-x
Kirkpatrick GW, 1977, ENG FDN C, P395
Kruse E., 2018, ENCYCL EARTH SCI SER, pPartF3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-12127-
7_32-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_32-2]
MACDONALD TC, 1984, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V110, P567, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(1984)110:5(567)
Pandey M, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12812
Pickert G, 2011, J HYDRAUL RES, V49, P143, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2011.552468
Pu JH, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13030379
Tabrizi AA, 2017, J HYDRAUL RES, V55, P236, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2016.1238014
Vanani HR, 2022, APPL WATER SCI, V12, DOI 10.1007/s13201-022-01702-7
Verma D., 2018, P 9 INT C SCOUR ER I, P255
Verma DK, 2017, INT J ENG-IRAN, V30, P479, DOI 10.5829/idosi.ije.2017.30.04a.04
Verma D.K., 2021, DISASTER ADV, V14, P74
Verma D, 2014, RIVER FLOW 2014, P1655
Viseu T, 2009, DAM-BREAK PROBLEMS, SOLUTIONS AND CASE STUDIES, P211
Von Thun J.L., 1990, GUIDANCE BREAC UNPUB, P17
Wahl T.L., 2007, PAP735 USBR
Wahl TL, 2004, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V130, P389, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-
9429(2004)130:5(389)
Wang B, 2018, J HYDROL, V562, P692, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.049
Wu MM, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040821
Wu W., 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG, V137, P1549, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)hy, DOI
10.1061/(ASCE)HY]
Zhao G., 2016, THESIS U TECHNOLOGY
NR 40
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 2
U2 2
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 6
AR 1224
DI 10.3390/w15061224
PG 17
GA A9PP9
UT WOS:000958368700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Parsons, M
Lykins, AD
AF Parsons, Melissa
Lykins, Amy D.
TI Cultural worldviews and the perception of natural hazard risk in
Australia
LA English
DT Article
DE Risk perception; cultural theory; disaster risk reduction; cultural
worldviews of risk
ID SELF-EVACUATION
AB The cultural theory of risk proposes that risk perception is biased by sociality
and the maintenance of four ways or life, or cultural worldviews: hierarchism,
egalitarianism, individualism or communitarianism. This study examined whether
cultural worldviews influenced the perception of the risk of bushfire, flood, storm
and earthquake in Australia. A sample of 503 participants completed two
questionnaires: cultural worldviews and natural hazard risk perception. Only 30% of
respondents held strongly hierarchical, egalitarian, individualist or communitarian
worldviews. Several aspects of natural hazard risk perception were predicted by
cultural worldviews, but associations were weak. Individualists perceived greater
risk of, and responsibility for, natural hazards possibly because they perceive
them to be a disruptive threat that limits freedom. Egalitarians perceived greater
risk from bushfire or storm, possibly because they understand the potential for
social impacts from these events and favour collective response. Notions of control
and mitigation of natural hazards were associated with hierarchism.
Communitarianism was not a predictor of natural hazard risk perception. However,
most people don't view natural hazards as a threat to their sociality and way of
life. Single heuristics, such as the cultural theory of risk, are unlikely to
capture the complexity of natural hazard risk perception in Australia.
C1 [Parsons, Melissa] Univ New England, Sch Humanities Arts & Social Sci, Armidale,
NSW 2351, Australia.
[Lykins, Amy D.] Univ New England, Sch Psychol, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
C3 University of New England; University of New England
RP Parsons, M (corresponding author), Univ New England, Sch Humanities Arts &
Social Sci, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
EM melissa.parsons@une.edu.au
RI Lykins, Amy/GNW-6014-2022
OI Parsons, Melissa/0000-0002-3918-7306; Lykins, Amy/0000-0003-2930-3964
FU University of New England
FX This study was supported by a grant from the University of New England.
CR [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
[Anonymous], RISK HLTH SAFETY ENV
[Anonymous], 2013, PREPARING DISASTER B
[Anonymous], HLTH RISK SOC
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS, 2011, AUSTR STAT GEOGR STA
Bevere L., 2021, NATURAL CATASTROPHES
Bouyer M, 2001, RISK ANAL, V21, P457, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.213125
Brenot J, 1998, RISK ANAL, V18, P729
Brun W., 1992, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, V5, P117, DOI
10.1002/bdm.3960050204
Burton I., 1978, ENV HAZARD
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), 2021, CRED CRUNCH
DAKE K, 1992, J SOC ISSUES, V48, P21, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01943.x
DAKE K, 1991, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V22, P61, DOI 10.1177/0022022191221006
Douglas Mary, 1978, 34 ROYAL ANTHR I GRE
Eiser JR, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V1, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002
Ejeta Luche Tadesse, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI
10.1371/currents.dis.31a8995ced321301466db400f1357829
Handmer J, 2018, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V33, P40
Kahan D., 2012, HDB RISK THEORY EPIS, P725, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_28
Kemper, 2017, EUR, V28556, pEN
KINGSTON PW, 1983, CONTEMP SOCIOL, V12, P414, DOI 10.2307/2067477
Koksal K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.09.017
Marris C, 1998, RISK ANAL, V18, P635
McIvor D., 2007, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V16, P79, DOI [10.1108/09653560710729839,
DOI 10.1108/09653560710729839]
McIvor D, 2009, J PAC RIM PSYCHOL, V3, P39, DOI 10.1375/prp.3.2.39
McLennan B, 2015, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V24, P162, DOI 10.1071/WF12201
McLennan BJ, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P1, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.608835
McNeill IM, 2016, J PERS, V84, P36, DOI 10.1111/jopy.12135
McNeill IM, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1829, DOI 10.1111/risa.12037
Parsons M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102422
Rippl S., 2002, J RISK RES, V5, P147, DOI DOI 10.1080/13669870110042598
Siegrist M, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2100411118
Sjoberg L, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P1, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.00001
Strahan K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P307, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.016
Strahan KW, 2019, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V18, P146, DOI
10.1080/17477891.2018.1512468
Thompson M., 1990, CULTURAL THEORY
Tierney KJ, 1999, SOCIOL FORUM, V14, P215, DOI 10.1023/A:1021414628203
United Nations, 2009, UNISDR TERM DIS RISK
University of Cambridge, 2020, NEW APPR HELP BUS TA
van der Linden S, 2016, SCI COMMUN, V38, P128, DOI 10.1177/1075547015614970
Victorian Government, 2021, BE EM PREP FIR
Whittaker J, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101476
Whittaker J, 2013, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V22, P841, DOI 10.1071/WF12010
WILDAVSKY A, 1990, DAEDALUS, V119, P41
Xue W, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V40, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.002
NR 48
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 9
PI ABINGDON
SN 1747-7891
EI 1878-0059
JI Environ. Hazards
PD JAN 1
PY 2023
VL 22
IS 1
BP 29
EP 50
DI 10.1080/17477891.2022.2050668
EA APR 2022
PG 22
GA D4LD8
UT WOS:000777946800001
OA hybrid
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Zhang, HX
Hu, Y
Zhu, J
Fu, L
Xu, BL
Li, WL
AF Zhang, Huixin
Hu, Ya
Zhu, Jun
Fu, Lin
Xu, Bingli
Li, Weilian
TI A gaze-based interaction method for large-scale and large-space disaster
scenes within mobile virtual reality
SO TRANSACTIONS IN GIS
LA English
DT Article
ID SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; EVACUATION; EARTHQUAKE; SIMULATION; NAVIGATION
AB A three-dimensional (3D) visualization of disaster scenes based on mobile
virtual reality (VR) can improve the application scenarios and emergency service
capabilities of traditional 3D visualization of disaster scenes. Because a
smartphone needs to be placed into a mobile head-mounted display, conventional
touch scene interaction cannot be used by mobile VR, and the user's gaze usually
serves as the default scene interaction method. However, the existing gaze-based
interaction methods for mobile VR scenes are passive scene interaction methods and
cannot meet the basic interaction requirement for actively roaming through and
exploring large-scale and large-space disaster scenes. Therefore, this study
focuses on gaze-based mobile VR interactions to satisfy the various interaction
requirements of large-scale and large-space disaster scenes. First, a dynamic user
interface (UI) generation method for gaze interaction in large-scale and large-
space disaster scenes is proposed to solve the problem of the active exploration of
mobile VR disaster scenes. Second, disaster scene exploration and disaster
information query methods based on a dynamic UI and gaze are proposed. Finally,
using a flood disaster as an example, a prototype system and associated experiments
are discussed. As indicated by the experimental results, the gaze-based mobile VR
interaction methods addressed in this study can effectively support users in
actively roaming through and exploring large-scale and large-space disaster scenes,
disaster simulation analysis, and the interactive querying of disaster information
within mobile VR, making the effective interaction of mobile VR disaster scenes
possible.
C1 [Zhang, Huixin] Chengdu Normal Univ, Coll Phys & Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
[Hu, Ya; Zhu, Jun; Fu, Lin; Li, Weilian] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci &
Environm Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China.
[Xu, Bingli] Army Acad Armored Forces, Dept Informat & Commun, Beijing, Peoples
R China.
C3 Chengdu Normal University; Southwest Jiaotong University
RP Li, WL (corresponding author), Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Fac Geosci & Environm
Engn, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China.
EM vgewilliam@my.swjtu.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Huiming/HZH-4348-2023; Zhang, Hui/HHN-8494-2022
FU Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2020JDTD0003]; Chengdu Normal
University Scientific Research Project [CS20ZB02]; National Natural
Science Foundation of China [42171397, U2034202, 41871289, 41771442]
FX Sichuan Science and Technology Program, Grant/Award Number:
2020JDTD0003; Chengdu Normal University Scientific Research Project,
Grant/Award Number: CS20ZB02; National Natural Science Foundation of
China, Grant/Award Number: 42171397, U2034202, 41871289 and 41771442
CR Atienza R, 2016, IEEE REGION 10 SYMP, P110, DOI
10.1109/TENCONSpring.2016.7519387
Catulo R, 2018, J CULT HERIT, V32, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2017.11.014
Cesium, 2021, CESIUMJS
Chen M, 2018, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V11, P329, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2017.1419452
Cheng RZ, 2019, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V111, P13, DOI
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.019
Feng ZA, 2020, ADV ENG INFORM, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101118
Feng ZN, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104837
Fujimi T, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101690
Guo YK, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9120750
Han S, 2017, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/sym9020022
[胡亚 Hu Ya], 2018, [测绘学报, Acta Geodetica et Cartographica Sinica], V47, P1123
Hu Y, 2018, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7060215
Huang KT, 2019, CYBERPSYCH BEH SOC N, V22, P105, DOI 10.1089/cyber.2018.0150
Jacquinod F, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8020084
Jeong K, 2016, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/sym8110120
Kim M, 2017, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/sym9090189
Kim SK, 2020, INTELL AUTOM SOFT CO, V26, P99, DOI 10.31209/2019.100000131
Kim YR, 2020, ELECTRONICS-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3390/electronics9091448
Levin E, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9070433
Li JW, 2018, INT J PATTERN RECOGN, V32, DOI 10.1142/S021800141850026X
Li WL, 2021, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V35, P1521, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2020.1833016
Li WL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V101, P409, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03879-z
Li WL, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8030104
Lin J, 2020, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103136
Liu MW, 2017, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V31, P1891, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2017.1334897
Lu XZ, 2020, ADV ENG SOFTW, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2020.102792
Mossel A, 2021, VIRTUAL REAL-LONDON, V25, P745, DOI 10.1007/s10055-020-00487-x
Noguera JM, 2012, INFORM SCIENCES, V215, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2012.05.010
Park KB, 2019, MULTIMED TOOLS APPL, V78, P6211, DOI 10.1007/s11042-018-6403-9
Patel DP, 2013, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V27, P2353, DOI 10.1007/s11269-013-0291-6
Powell W, 2016, 2016 IEEE 2ND WORKSHOP ON EVERYDAY VIRTUAL REALITY (WEVR), P5,
DOI 10.1109/WEVR.2016.7859536
Reality Labs, 2020, OCULUS QUEST 2
Redweik P, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V8, P308, DOI 10.1007/s13753-017-0141-x
Shen Z, 2019, INT CONF COMP SCI ED, P415, DOI 10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845390
Skakun S, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P1521, DOI 10.1111/risa.12156
Tibaldi A, 2020, B VOLCANOL, V82, DOI 10.1007/s00445-020-01376-6
Wallemacq P., 2018, EC LOSSES POVERTY DI, DOI [10.13140/rg.2.2.35610.08643, DOI
10.13140/RG.2.2.35610.08643]
Wang C, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101139
Winkler D, 2018, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V77, P518, DOI 10.2166/wst.2017.567
Wu YX, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8110520
Yin YP, 2017, SCI CHINA TECHNOL SC, V60, P1762, DOI 10.1007/s11431-017-9148-2
Zhang YH, 2020, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V13, P1637, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2020.1773950
Zhang YH, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8050209
Zhi GZ, 2019, J HYDROL, V577, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123988
Zhu J, 2015, IEEE J-STARS, V8, P105, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2340399
NR 46
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 11
U2 41
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 1361-1682
EI 1467-9671
J9 T GIS
JI Trans. GIS
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 26
IS 3
BP 1280
EP 1298
DI 10.1111/tgis.12914
EA MAR 2022
PG 19
WC Geography
SC Geography
GA 1J9JC
UT WOS:000771714600001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Kusumastuti, RD
Nurmala, N
Arviansyah, A
Wibowo, SS
AF Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah
Nurmala, N.
Arviansyah, A.
Wibowo, Sigit Sulistiyo
TI Indicators of community preparedness for fast-onset disasters: a
systematic literature review and case study
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Community preparedness; Indicators; Earthquake; Fast-onset disaster;
Indonesia
ID HUMANITARIAN LOGISTICS; HOUSEHOLD PREPAREDNESS; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT;
RELIEF; FLOOD; AID; INTERVIEW; MODEL; EARTHQUAKES
AB This paper aims to identify indicators of community preparedness for disasters
and apply these indicators to a critical case study context, namely the local
communities in two districts of Lombok Island of Indonesia, which were stricken by
earthquakes in 2018 and 2019. Community preparedness indicators are identified
through a systematic literature review (SLR) and in-depth interviews with
governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. These indicators are grouped into
capability, coordination and networking, legal and institutional support,
facilities and infrastructure, disaster management plan, and early warning system.
Preparedness is then assessed using these indicators as a framework for conducting
interviews and observations in the two districts. Results from the case study
indicate that most villages are relatively prepared for disasters because they
conduct regular meetings concerning disaster preparedness, participate in disaster
simulations, and receive socialization/education from the government and
humanitarian organizations, including the Indonesian Red Cross. Most villages also
have disaster preparedness infrastructure in place, such as disaster risk maps,
evacuation routes, and a standard operating procedure to follow in the event of a
disaster. This preparedness was reflected in the involvement of communities in the
early response to the 2019 earthquake. However, further enhancement is still needed
to ensure that all disaster-prone villages have the required disaster preparedness
infrastructure, and the communities are actively involved in disaster preparedness
activities. This research contributes to better understanding disaster preparedness
at the community level in a critical case study context. The results are valuable
for governmental and non-governmental agencies to optimize the pre- and post-
disaster planning.
C1 [Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah; Nurmala, N.; Arviansyah, A.; Wibowo, Sigit Sulistiyo]
Univ Indonesia, Dept Management, Fac Econ & Business, UI Campus, Depok 16424,
Indonesia.
C3 University of Indonesia
RP Kusumastuti, RD (corresponding author), Univ Indonesia, Dept Management, Fac
Econ & Business, UI Campus, Depok 16424, Indonesia.
EM ratih.dyah@ui.ac.id
RI ; Wibowo, Sigit/O-4358-2018
OI Nurmala, N/0000-0002-0314-4195; Wibowo, Sigit/0000-0002-2031-0124;
Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah/0000-0001-9827-7718
FU Universitas Indonesia [NKB-0187/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019]
FX The research is funded by Universitas Indonesia, contract number
NKB-0187/UN2.R3.1/HKP.05.00/2019. We would like to thank all informants
in Jakarta and Lombok for the invaluable information that makes this
research possible.
CR AKA F, 2017, NAT HAZARDS
Alshehri SA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P2221, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1423-x
Bakir PG, 2004, NAT HAZARDS, V33, P405, DOI 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000048466.57378.ed
Beamon BM, 2008, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V21, P4, DOI 10.1108/09513550810846087
Becker JS, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P107, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0238-x
BNPB, 2018, DES KELUR TANGG BENC
BNPB, 2021, DATA INF BENC IND
BPS Lombok Timur, 2019, KAB LOMB TIM DAL ANG
BPS NTB, 2018, BAD PUS STAT PROV NU
Burton C. G., 2012, DEV METRICS COMMUNIT
Campbell AM, 2008, TRANSPORT SCI, V42, P127, DOI 10.1287/trsc.1070.0209
Castillo-Montoya M, 2016, QUAL REP, V21, P811
Chandes J, 2010, J MANUF TECHNOL MANA, V21, P320, DOI 10.1108/17410381011024313
Chatterjee R, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P177, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0055-
4
Cox RS, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P220, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550297
Cui K, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15030407
Day S, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P1219, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1899-z
Denyer D., 2009, SAGE HDB ORG RES MET, P671, DOI DOI 10.1080/03634528709378635
Djalante R, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V62, P779, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0106-8
Doocy S, 2013, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V22, P326, DOI 10.1108/DPM-10-2012-0108
Fatemi F, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V77, P177, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1601-5
Hale T., 2005, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics
Management, V35, P195, DOI 10.1108/09600030510594576
Henly-Shepard S, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P343, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1328-8
Hicks EK, 2006, SOCIETY, V43, P42, DOI 10.1007/BF02687574
Hyvarinen J, 2015, SOCIETIES, V5, P583, DOI 10.3390/soc5030583
Islam R, 2016, REV MECHANISM FLOOD, V6
Islam R, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1707, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1797-4
Ito S, 2014, HEALTH SERV INSIGHTS, V7, P13, DOI 10.4137/HSI.S13433
Johnston I, 2014, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V23, P123, DOI 10.1108/DPM-06-2013-0096
Kelman I, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P117, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0046-5
Kendall E, 2011, AUST HEALTH REV, V35, P520, DOI 10.1071/AH11000
Kovacs G., 2007, INT J PHYS DISTRIB L, V37, P99
Lippmann A.L., 2011, INT LAW POLICY REV, V1, P69
Lumbroso D, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P341, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9671-x
MacQueen KM, 2001, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V91, P1929, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.91.12.1929
Manyena SB, 2015, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V24, P38, DOI 10.1108/DPM-04-2014-0075
Maon F, 2009, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V14, P149, DOI 10.1108/13598540910942019
Marfai MA, 2008, ENVIRON GEOL, V56, P335, DOI 10.1007/s00254-007-1169-9
Martin ML., 2011, ALL COMMUN APP DISAS, V7, P26
McNamara KE, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V123, P121, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1047-2
Miao X, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0753-4
Noy I, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10082850
O'Brien G, 2010, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V19, P498, DOI 10.1108/09653561011070402
Oloruntoba R, 2006, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V11, P115, DOI 10.1108/13598540610652492
Oloruntoba R, 2015, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V20, P708, DOI 10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0244
Oloruntoba R, 2009, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V39, P486, DOI
10.1108/09600030910985839
Onuma H, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004
Ostadtaghizadeh A, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V83, P1843, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2377-y
Paton D, 2001, NAT HAZARDS, V24, P157, DOI 10.1023/A:1011882106373
Rangel-Buitrago N, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V189, DOI
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105134
Rasanen A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101485
1544-2
Ronoh S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P38, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0042-9
Salmeron J, 2010, PROD OPER MANAG, V19, P561, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-
5956.2009.01119.x
Sarabia MM, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101732
Seneviratne K, 2010, INT J STRATEG PROP M, V14, P376, DOI 10.3846/ijspm.2010.28
SHELLEY M, 1984, J AM STAT ASSOC, V79, P240, DOI 10.2307/2288384
Sheppard A, 2013, J HUMANIT LOGIST SUP, V3, P22, DOI 10.1108/20426741311328493
Stewart M, 2017, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V32, P387, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X17006380
Sutton J, 2006, DISASTER PREPAREDNES
Syeda MH, 2016, REBUILDING LIVES NAT, V53
TAGLIACOZZO S, 2016, NAT HAZARDS
Takao K, 2004, J RISK RES, V7, P775, DOI 10.1080/1366987031000075996
Tanwattana P, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P798, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.010
Tasic J, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P395, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2015-0163
Tatham PH, 2010, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V40, P609, DOI 10.1108/09600031011079283
Thome AMT, 2016, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V27, P408, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2015.1129464
Thomas A.S., 2005, FRITZ I, V15, P1
Tomasini RM, 2009, INT T OPER RES, V16, P549, DOI [10.1111/j.1475-
3995.2009.00697.x, 10.1111/J.1475-3995.2009.00697.x]
UNDRR, 2021, DISASTER RISK REDUCT
UNDRR, 2021, PREP
UNDRR, 2021, SCALLOP BUSINESS IS
Van Wassenhove LN, 2006, J OPER RES SOC, V57, P475, DOI
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602125
Viverita, 2014, SOUTH EAST ASIAN J M, V8, P13, DOI 10.21002/seam.v8i1.3099
Walden VM, 2010, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V19, P283, DOI 10.1108/09653561011052466
White MD, 2006, LIBR TRENDS, V55, P22, DOI 10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Xu JP, 2013, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V22, P75, DOI 10.1108/09653561311301998
Yeong ML, 2018, QUAL REP, V23, P2700
Yin RK, 2012, VERY BRIEF REFR CAS
Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
NR 84
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 27
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 110
IS 1
BP 787
EP 821
DI 10.1007/s11069-021-04970-9
EA AUG 2021
PG 35
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA YQ3EI
UT WOS:000685377600003
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Sri-on, J
Vanichkulbodee, A
Sinsuwan, N
Rojsaengroeng, R
Kamsom, A
Liu, SW
AF Sri-on, Jiraporn
Vanichkulbodee, Alissara
Sinsuwan, Natchapon
Rojsaengroeng, Rapeeporn
Kamsom, Anucha
Liu, Shan Woo
TI Disaster preparedness among Thai elderly emergency department patients:
a survey of patients' perspective
SO BMC EMERGENCY MEDICINE
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster preparedness; Elderly; Emergency department
ID FLOOD; ADULTS; IMPACT; EARTHQUAKE; HOSPITALS; RISK
AB Background In disaster situations, the elderly are considered to be a
particularly vulnerable population. Preparedness is the key to reduce post-disaster
damage. There is limited research in middle-income countries on how well elderly
emergency department (ED) patients are prepared for disaster situations. The
objective of this study was to determine the attitudes and behavior of elderly ED
patients toward disaster preparedness. Methods This study was a cross-sectional
face-to-face survey at one urban teaching hospital in Bangkok, Thailand between
August 1st and September 30th, 2016. Patients aged 60 and older who presented to
the ED were included to this study. We excluded patients who had severe dementia
[defined as Short Portable Mental State Questionnaires (SPMSQ) > 8], were unable to
speak Thai, had severe trauma and/or needed immediate resuscitation. The survey
instruction was adapted from previous disaster surveys. This study was approved by
the Vajira Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results A total of 243 patients were
enrolled. Most of them were female [154 patients (63.4%)]. The median age was 72
[Interquartile range (IQR) 66-81] years and the most common underlying diseases
were hypertension [148 patients (60.9%)] and diabetes [108 patients (44.4%)]. The
majority of patients [172 patients (72.4%)] reported that they had had some
teaching about disaster knowledge from a healthcare provider and had experienced a
disaster [138 patients (56.8%)]. While 175/197 (81.8%) patients who had underlying
diseases reported that they had a medication supply for disaster situations, only
61 (25.1%) patients had an emergency toolbox for disasters. Most patients (159,
65.4%) did not know the emergency telephone number, and 133 (54.7%) patients
reported transportation limitations. Conclusions While most Thai elderly ED
patients reported having a medication supply for disaster situations, many lacked
comprehensive plans for a disaster situation. Work needs to be done to improve the
quality of preparedness in disaster situations among elderly patients. Future
research should focus on preparedness knowledge regarding evacuation, and
shelter/residence for older patients.
C1 [Sri-on, Jiraporn; Vanichkulbodee, Alissara; Sinsuwan, Natchapon; Rojsaengroeng,
Rapeeporn] Navamindradhiraj Univ, Vajira Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Bangkok,
Thailand.
[Kamsom, Anucha] Navamindradhiraj Univ, Vajira Hosp, Dept Biostat, Bangkok,
Thailand.
[Liu, Shan Woo] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency Med,
Boston, MA 02115 USA.
C3 Harvard University; Harvard Medical School; Massachusetts General
Hospital
RP Sri-on, J (corresponding author), Navamindradhiraj Univ, Vajira Hosp, Dept
Emergency Med, Bangkok, Thailand.
EM Jiraporn.rew@gmail.com
OI Sri-on, Jiraporn/0000-0002-8853-2567; Vanichkulbodee,
Alissara/0000-0002-3938-1651
FU Vajira Research Foundation Grant for Research Development
FX Funding support for this study was received from a Vajira Research
Foundation Grant for Research Development. The funder of the study had
no role in study design, data collection, data analysis or writing a
manuscript.
CR Al-rousan TM, 2014, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V104, P506, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301559
[Anonymous], 2012, ID VULN OLD AD LEG O
Ashkenazi I, 2016, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V31, P492, DOI
10.1017/S1049023X16000613
Cherniack E Paul, 2008, Am J Disaster Med, V3, P133
Daugherty JD, 2012, GERONTOLOGY, V58, P322, DOI 10.1159/000336032
Fernandez Lauren S, 2002, Prehosp Disaster Med, V17, P67
GOENJIAN AK, 1994, AM J PSYCHIAT, V151, P895
Gotanda H, 2015, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V30, P496, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X15005087
Guerena-Burgueno F, 2006, MIL MED, V171, P8
Jia ZB, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-172
Lin MR, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P379, DOI 10.1023/A:1015543113448
Morin VM, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P693, DOI 10.1111/disa.12174
O'Sullivan TL, 2009, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V134, P197, DOI 10.1093/rpd/ncp076
Paganini M, 2016, SCAND J TRAUMA RESUS, V24, DOI 10.1186/s13049-016-0292-6
Perry RW, 2003, DISASTERS, V27, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x
Rattanakanlaya K, 2016, AUSTRALAS EMERG NURS, V19, P191, DOI
10.1016/j.aenj.2016.07.003
The Goverment of Thailand, 2011, 24 7 EM OP CTR FLOOD
Thieken AH, 2007, HYDROLOG SCI J, V52, P1016, DOI 10.1623/hysj.52.5.1016
Torti Jacqueline, 2012, J Glob Health, V2, P020304, DOI 10.7189/jogh.02.020304
True NA, 2013, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V28, P127, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X12001811
Wattanapisit Apichai, 2018, Asia Pac Fam Med, V17, P9, DOI 10.1186/s12930-018-
0046-x
Yoda T, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P300, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2016.148
NR 24
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 4
PU BMC
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON N1 9XW, ENGLAND
SN 1471-227X
J9 BMC EMERG MED
JI BMC Emerg. Med.
PD OCT 23
PY 2019
VL 19
IS 1
AR 58
DI 10.1186/s12873-019-0269-7
PG 7
WC Emergency Medicine
SC Emergency Medicine
GA JG6BC
UT WOS:000492155600001
PM 31646965
OA Green Published, Green Submitted, gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Burger, J
Gochfeld, M
AF Burger, Joanna
Gochfeld, Michael
TI Involving community members in preparedness and resiliency involves
bi-directional and iterative communication and actions: a case study of
vulnerable populations in New Jersey following superstorm Sandy
SO JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Conceptual model; community involvement; risks; perceptions; hurricanes;
Superstorm Sandy; preparedness; stakeholders
ID HURRICANE SANDY; RISK PERCEPTION; PUBLIC-HEALTH; MEDICAL NEEDS;
EVACUATION; ACCESS; DISASTERS; RESPONSES; LESSONS; POLICY
AB Recent increases in hurricanes and other weather events have brought to light
the importance of understanding what people think should be done to improve
recovery and resiliency in their communities. While most studies focus only on
perceptions of concerns, effects, medical issues and personal preparedness, herein
subjects in New Jersey were interviewed to determine future actions they intend to
follow, the actions they think agencies or others should be taking, and present a
conceptual model for involvement of vulnerable community members in their own
protection for future catastrophic events. The emphasis was on government and
community actions. It is a bottom-up approach rather than a top-down approach to
reduction of future risk. The case study involved subjects interviewed immediately
following Sandy (general affected public; N = 756) and 2-3 years after Sandy
(vulnerable population, N = 586). Concerns of subjects within 100 days related to
friends family, safety and survival, food and water and medical concerns as well as
recovery, repairs on their property, and community safety. Two to three years
later, subjects remembered being significantly more concerned about family,
friends, safety and survival, food and water and medical concerns than subjects
interviewed within 100 days. Memories (or concern) also faded with respect to
future preparedness; significantly more subjects interviewed 2-3 years after Sandy
were going to do nothing, were less concerned about protecting family, community,
and possessions than subjects interviewed within 100 days of Sandy. In contrast,
the same percentage were going to evacuate and buy supplies, so it is not just a
matter of forgetting the whole event. The data from open-ended questions indicated
that subjects believed that recovery and preparation for a future severe storm
event involved complicated and iterative activities of many different individuals,
organizations, and governmental agencies. Thus we present an iterative, interactive
model, and provide examples of how subjects viewed the interactions necessary to
provide resiliency to their communities. We discuss the value-added of a bottoms-up
approach to understanding risk reduction, preparedness and resiliency.
C1 [Burger, Joanna] Rutgers State Univ, Div Life Sci, Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Burger, Joanna; Gochfeld, Michael] Rutgers State Univ, Environm & Occupat Hlth
Sci Inst, Piscataway, NJ USA.
[Gochfeld, Michael] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Piscataway, NJ USA.
C3 Rutgers State University New Brunswick; Rutgers State University New
Brunswick; Rutgers State University New Brunswick; Rutgers State
University Medical Center
RP Burger, J (corresponding author), Div Life Sci, 604 Allison Rd, Piscataway, NJ
08854 USA.
EM burger@biology.rutgers.edu
OI Burger, Joanna/0000-0002-8877-2966
FU NIEHS Center of Excellence (CEED) [P30ES005022]; Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention Public Health Preparedness and Response Research
to Aid Recovery from Hurricane Sandy [CDC-RFA-13-001]; New Jersey
Medical School, Rutgers University; New Jersey Department of Human
Services, the Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University; NIEHS
Center; Rutgers University
FX The first study was partially supported by an NIEHS Center of Excellence
(CEED, P30ES005022). The second study was supported by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Preparedness and Response
Research to Aid Recovery from Hurricane Sandy (CDC-RFA-13-001) grant to
New Jersey Department of Health, which included collaboration with the
New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, New Jersey Department of
Human Services, the Division of Life Sciences, Rutgers University, and
the NIEHS Center. Both were supported by Rutgers University. The project
and protocol were approved by the New Jersey Primary Care Association
(NJPCA), the Directors of the participating Federally Qualified Health
Centers, the Rutgers Institutional Review Board (Protocol E14-319,
Notice of Exemption), and the New Jersey Department of Health. We thank
K. Grant Davis (then CEO of New Jersey Primary Care Association), the
Executive Board, and the Center Directors and staff of the Federally
Qualified Health Centers for allowing the interviewing of their
patients, as well as Clarimel Cepeda, Marta Hernandez, Ahmend Nezar,
Alan Perez, and Ana Quintero for aid in interviewing, and all those
patients who consented to be interviewed. This article represents the
views of the authors, and not the funding agencies or the NJPCA.
CR Abramson D. M., 2015, HURRICANE SANDY PLAC
Barnegat Bay Beat (BBB), 2012, BARN BAY PARTN Q PUB, V20-27
Birkland T, 2008, PUBLIUS J FEDERALISM, V38, P692, DOI 10.1093/publius/pjn020
Born CT, 2011, J AM ACAD ORTHOP SUR, V19, pS44, DOI 10.5435/00124635-201102001-
00010
Bukvic A, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P101, DOI 10.1111/disa.12186
Bukvic Anamaria, 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P264, DOI
10.1007/s10669-015-9546-5
Burger J., 2019, DISASTERS
10.1080/15287394.2019.1568329
10.1080/15287394.2017.1297275
Burger J, 2014, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V13, P200, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2014.902801
Burger J, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V481, P611, DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.048
Collini K, 2008, COASTAL COMMUNITY RE
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), 2008, AN RISK COMM STRAT A
2867(01)00014-6, 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
Drews C, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0122113
*FEMA, 2004, AR YOU READ IN DEPTH
Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT
Freedman A, 2013, HEEDING SANDYS LESSO
Grannis J., 2011, ADAPTATION TOOL KIT
Greenberg MR, 2013, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V103, pE85, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301198
Halpin S. H, 2013, IMPACT SUPERSTORM SA
Hamama-Raz Y, 2015, PSYCHIAT QUART, V86, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11126-014-9333-3
Homeland Security (HS), 2015, NAT PREP GOAL
IPCC, 2018, SPEC REP GLOB WARM 1, DOI 10.1017/9781009157926.005
Kessler RC, 2008, INT J METH PSYCH RES, V17, pS6, DOI 10.1002/mpr.269
Kim S, 2017, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V107, P1304, DOI [10.2105/AJPH.2017.303826,
10.2105/ajph.2017.303826]
Lin N, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P12071, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1604386113
Lurie N, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V368, P1251, DOI 10.1056/NEJMsb1209510
McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
Mochizuki J, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P219, DOI 10.1111/risa.12602
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2012, COMM US POP
LIV COAS
National Research Council (NRC), 2008, PAN PUBL PART ENV AS
Neria Y, 2012, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V308, P2571, DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.110700
New Jersey Office of Emergency Management (NJOEM), 2007, YOUR KIT YOUR KIT YO
New Jersey Office of Emergency Management (NJOEM), 2007, HURR TROP STORMS
New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC), 2013, CLIM CHANG INF 2013
North CS, 2012, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V102, pE40, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300689
Pizzi MA, 2015, AM J OCCUP THER, V69, DOI 10.5014/ajot.2015.015990
Powell T, 2012, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V308, P2569, DOI 10.1001/jama.2012.108940
Red Cross, 2017, PREP EM
Reynolds B, 2005, J HEALTH COMMUN, V10, P43, DOI 10.1080/10810730590904571
Reynolds J, 2014, LESSONS 9 11 ATTACKS
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Simon R, 2001, CRIT CARE, V5, P318, DOI 10.1186/cc1060
Statistical Analysis System (SAS), 2015, STAT ANAL
Stewart AE, 2015, J MAR SCI ENG, V3, P630, DOI 10.3390/jmse3030630
Swerdel JN, 2016, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V10, P188, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2015.169
Trumbo C, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P1907, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01633.x
U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), 2010, IMP PRED COAST CHANG
Williams BL, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P1019, DOI 10.1023/A:1007095808381
NR 55
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 0
U2 14
PI ABINGDON
SN 1366-9877
EI 1466-4461
J9 J RISK RES
JI J. Risk Res.
PD APR 2
PY 2020
VL 23
IS 4
BP 541
EP 556
DI 10.1080/13669877.2019.1593221
EA MAR 2019
PG 16
WC Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
GA LK7EV
UT WOS:000466233800001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Guilinger, JJ
Gray, AB
Barth, NC
Fong, BT
AF Guilinger, James J.
Gray, Andrew B.
Barth, Nicolas C.
Fong, Brandon T.
TI The Evolution of Sediment Sources Over a Sequence of Postfire
Sediment-Laden Flows Revealed Through Repeat High-Resolution Change
Detection
SO JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-EARTH SURFACE
LA English
DT Article
DE wildfire; SfM; lidar; debris flow; pyrogeomorphology; runoff
ID STRUCTURE-FROM-MOTION; DEBRIS-FLOW; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; EROSIONAL
PROCESSES; TERRESTRIAL LIDAR; WATER REPELLENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
WILDFIRE; FIRE; INITIATION
AB Postfire debris flows are particularly complex to study because they do not form
discrete initiation locations and commonly involve multiple simultaneously
operating erosional processes. Although recent work has begun to elucidate a more
mechanistic understanding of postfire debris flows, there is still a paucity of
detailed sediment budgets characterizing these events. In this study, we seek to
understand how postfire sediment sources and erosional processes change over
multiple storm cycles. To do this, we performed repeat high-resolution change
detection in a headwater catchment burned by the 2018 Holy Fire in the Santa Ana
Mountains, California, USA. This included terrestrial laser scanning in a zero-
order catchment (0.95 ha) and unmanned aerial vehicle structure from motion of a
headwater channel network (up to 6.5 ha). During the initial storm events that
produced runoff-generated debris flows, we found that the evacuation of dry ravel
and prefire colluvium accounted for half of the eroded material. These initial
flows also acted to clear out much of the material stored within downstream
headwater channel networks. In subsequent storm events of equal or greater rainfall
intensity, total erosion from the study site was subdued, and the relative
importance of shallow hillslope erosion from interrill and rill erosion was
increased, as has been noted in similar studies in the region. Overall, this
suggests that channel sediment supplies may be more rapidly depleted than hillslope
sources, which may drive a trend of decreasing sediment fluxes over time from
burned headwater catchments subject to repeated runoff events.
C1 [Guilinger, James J.; Gray, Andrew B.; Fong, Brandon T.] Univ Calif Riverside,
Dept Environm Sci, Riverside, CA 92521 USA.
[Barth, Nicolas C.] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Riverside,
CA USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Riverside;
University of California System; University of California Riverside
RP Guilinger, JJ (corresponding author), Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Environm Sci,
Riverside, CA 92521 USA.
EM jguil009@ucr.edu
OI Fong, Brandon/0000-0001-6495-6464; Gray, Andrew/0000-0003-2252-7367;
Guilinger, James/0000-0002-6543-2686
FU UC ANR CIWR [SA15-2997-CA364B]; USDA NIFA Hatch Project
[CA-R-ENS-5120-H]; USDA Multi-State Project [W4188]; UCR AES Mission
Funding program
FX This project was supported in part by UC ANR CIWR Grant
SA15-2997-CA364B, USDA NIFA Hatch Project Number CA-R-ENS-5120-H, USDA
Multi-State Project W4188, and the UCR AES Mission Funding program. We
acknowledge the insightful comments of associate editor Joel Sankey,
Stephen DeLong, and two anonymous reviewers that greatly improved this
manuscript. Thanks to Francis Rengers and Keith Williams for providing
insights into the nontrivial task of coregistering multitemporal TLS
data. We thank the UCR Earth and Planetary Sciences Department for
allowing us access to field vehicles. We also thank the Cleveland
National Forest for assisting in site selection and allowing flexible
and expedited access to the burn closure area, in particular the
following USFS employees: Victoria Stempniewicz, Jake Rodriguez, Emily
Fudge, Peter Wohlgemuth, and Darrell Vance. Additionally, we thank
Michelle Gutierrez, Kristen Briseno, Shannon Tarby, Thien Pham, Nathan
Jumps, and Julianna McDonnell for assistance in the field. We
acknowledge UNAVCO (Keith Williams and Christopher Crosby) for allowing
us seasonal use of their loaned TLS units. Thanks to Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Keith Ream, Josh Tremba,
and Jason Uhley) for provision of their debris basin timelapses
(http://rcflood.org/datacollection/holy-cranston-movies.html).We also
thank chief editor Dr. Amy East for handling this manuscript.
CR [Anonymous], 2018, MET PRO VERS 1 6 0
[Anonymous], 2003, PREDICTION GEOMORPHO
[Anonymous], 2013, TREATISE GEOMORPHOLO, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-
6.00156-1, 10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00156-1]
[Anonymous], 1981, WATER REPELLENT SOIL
[Anonymous], 2018, MAPS MADE EASY MAP P
[Anonymous], 2019, CLOUDCOMPARE VERSION
Atchley AL, 2018, VADOSE ZONE J, V17, DOI 10.2136/vzj2018.05.0099
Barnhart K. R., 2019, 7 INT C DEBR FLOW HA, P1
Brasington J, 2003, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V53, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00320-3
Brodu N, 2012, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V68, P121, DOI
10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.01.006
CALFire, 2019, FOR RES ASS PROGR FR
Cannon SH, 2005, S-P BKS GEOPHYS SCI, P363
Cannon SH, 2001, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V39, P171, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00108-2
Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, 2019, WAT YEAR 2019 ATM RI
DeLong SB, 2018, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V300, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.028
DeLong SB, 2012, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V37, P262, DOI 10.1002/esp.2234
Dettinger MD, 2011, WATER-SUI, V3, P445, DOI 10.3390/w3020445
DiBiase RA, 2020, GEOLOGY, V48, P189, DOI 10.1130/G46847.1
Dietrich WE, 2001, WATER SCI APPL, V2, P195
DIETRICH WE, 1984, J GEOL, V92, P147, DOI 10.1086/628845
DIETRICH WE, 1986, HILLSLOPE PROCESSES, P361
Doerr SH, 2006, J HYDROL, V319, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.06.038
Ebel BA, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011470
Ellett NG, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P3128, DOI 10.1002/esp.4728
FLORSHEIM JL, 1991, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V103, P504, DOI 10.1130/0016-
7606(1991)103<0504:FSTIRT>2.3.CO;2
Fonstad MA, 2013, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V38, P421, DOI 10.1002/esp.3366
Fryirs K, 2013, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V38, P30, DOI 10.1002/esp.3242
Gabet EJ, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V108, DOI 10.1029/2001JB001686
Gabet EJ, 2008, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V101, P666, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.03.005
Gabet EJ, 2008, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V96, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.03.016
Gregoretti C, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P2248, DOI 10.1002/hyp.6821
Horseman J., 2019, VALENTINES DAY STORM
Hubbert KR, 2006, GEODERMA, V130, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.02.001
Iverson RM, 2000, WATER RESOUR RES, V36, P1897, DOI 10.1029/2000WR900090
Iverson RM, 1997, REV GEOPHYS, V35, P245, DOI 10.1029/97RG00426
James MR, 2020, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V45, P2251, DOI 10.1002/esp.4878
James MR, 2017, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V42, P1769, DOI 10.1002/esp.4125
Kean JW, 2019, GEOSPHERE, V15, P1140, DOI [10.1130/GES02048.1,
10.1130/GES02048.1.]
Kean JW, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V118, P2190, DOI 10.1002/jgrf.20148
Kean JW, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2011WR011460
Kean JW, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V116, DOI 10.1029/2011JF002005
Kinoshita AM, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/1/014003
Lamb MP, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JF001878
Lane SN, 2003, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V28, P249, DOI 10.1002/esp.483
Larsen IJ, 2006, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V81, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.002
Larsen IJ, 2009, SOIL SCI SOC AM J, V73, P1393, DOI 10.2136/sssaj2007.0432
Lave J, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JF000023
McCoy SW, 2010, GEOLOGY, V38, P735, DOI 10.1130/G30928.1
McGuire L.A., 2019, DEBRIS FLOW HAZARDS, P516, DOI [10.25676/11124/173177, DOI
10.25676/11124/173177]
McGuire LA, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P7310, DOI 10.1002/2017GL074243
McGuire LA, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V121, P2211, DOI 10.1002/2016JF003867
MONTGOMERY DR, 1994, WATER RESOUR RES, V30, P1153, DOI 10.1029/93WR02979
MONTGOMERY DR, 1993, WATER RESOUR RES, V29, P3925, DOI 10.1029/93WR02463
Moody JA, 2001, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V26, P1049, DOI 10.1002/esp.253
Moody JA, 2015, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V40, P1043, DOI 10.1002/esp.3704
Moody JA, 2013, EARTH-SCI REV, V122, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.03.004
Moody JA, 2012, HYDROL PROCESS, V26, P3312, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9424
Moody JA, 2012, CATENA, V93, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2012.01.006
Moody JA, 2009, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V18, P96, DOI 10.1071/WF07162
Morton D. M., 2006, GEOLOGIC MAP SAN BER
Murphy BP, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P2126, DOI 10.1002/esp.4635
Murphy BP, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1492, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001006
National Weather Service, 2018, NWS SAN DIEG DEBR FL
NOAA, 2019, 14 POINT PREC FREQ A
Nourbakhshbeidokhti S, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11050586
Nyman P, 2020, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V45, P1155, DOI 10.1002/esp.4785
Nyman P, 2013, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V118, P2451, DOI 10.1002/jgrf.20152
Oakley NS, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P3037, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-3037-
2018
Onda Y, 2008, CATENA, V72, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2007.02.003
Orem CA, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V121, P843, DOI 10.1002/2015JF003663
Orem CA, 2015, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V232, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.006
Passalacqua P, 2015, EARTH-SCI REV, V148, P174, DOI
10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012
Pierce J, 2008, INT J WILDLAND FIRE, V17, P84, DOI 10.1071/WF07027
Pierce JL, 2004, NATURE, V432, P87, DOI 10.1038/nature03058
POESEN J., 2011, HDB EROSION MODELLIN, P360, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444328455.CH19
Prancevic JP, 2014, GEOLOGY, V42, P191, DOI 10.1130/G34927.1
Radeloff VC, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P3314, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718850115
Ralph FM, 2019, B AM METEOROL SOC, V100, P269, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0023.1
Rapstine TD, 2020, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V125, DOI 10.1029/2019JF005348
RENEAU SI, 1990, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V102, P969, DOI 10.1130/0016-
7606(1990)102<0969:LQHOCD>2.3.CO;2
Rengers F., 2018, INT C GEOMORPHOMETRY, V5, P1
Rengers FK, 2019, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V44, P3078, DOI 10.1002/esp.4697
Rengers FK, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V121, P588, DOI 10.1002/2015JF003600
Roering JJ, 2005, GEOLOGY, V33, P349, DOI 10.1130/G21260.1
Sankey JB, 2017, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V44, P8884, DOI 10.1002/2017GL073979
Santi P., 2013, TREATISE GEOMORPHOLO, P262
Santi PM, 2008, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V96, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.022
Schmidt K., 2011, DEBRIS FLOW HAZARDS, P583
Schwartz J. Y., 2018, BURNED AREA EMERGENC
Shakesby RA, 2006, EARTH-SCI REV, V74, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006
Singer MJ, 1998, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V24, P79, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00102-5
Staley DM, 2017, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V278, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.10.019
Staley DM, 2014, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V214, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.015
Swanson F.J., 1981, FIRE REGIMES ECOSYST, P401
Tang H, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH, V124, P1572, DOI 10.1029/2018JF004837
Tarboton DG, 1997, WATER RESOUR RES, V33, P309, DOI 10.1029/96WR03137
Taylor A. R., 2006, GEOMORPHOLOGY GEOCHR, P257
Tillery AC, 2020, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V45, P1051, DOI 10.1002/esp.4761
USGS, 2018, EM ASS POST FIR DEBR
Wagenbrenner JW, 2014, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V39, P865, DOI 10.1002/esp.3488
Warrick JA, 2012, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V124, P1130, DOI 10.1130/B30451.1
Warrick JA, 2015, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V4, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.08.004
Wells W.G., 1987, DEBRIS FLOWSAVALANCH, V7, P105, DOI DOI 10.1130/REG7-P105
Wester T, 2014, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V206, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.011
Westerling AL, 2006, SCIENCE, V313, P940, DOI 10.1126/science.1128834
Westoby MJ, 2012, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V179, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021
Wheaton JM, 2010, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V35, P136, DOI 10.1002/esp.1886
Williams AP, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P892, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001210
Wohlgemuth P. M., 2008, General Technical Report - Pacific Southwest Research
Station, USDA Forest Service, P115
World Health Organization, 2017, DEPR OTH COMM MENT D
NR 110
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 1
U2 17
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
SN 2169-9003
EI 2169-9011
J9 J GEOPHYS RES-EARTH
JI J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 125
IS 10
AR e2020JF005527
DI 10.1029/2020JF005527
PG 23
SC Geology
GA ON1DO
UT WOS:000586451100007
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wu, SN
Lei, Y
Jin, W
AF Wu, Shengnan
Lei, Yu
Jin, Wen
TI An Interdisciplinary Approach to Quantify the Human Disaster Risk
Perception and Its Influence on the Population at Risk: A Case Study of
Longchi Town, China
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster risk reduction; disaster risk perception; the population at
risk; agent-based modeling
ID FLOOD-RISK; EVACUATION; VULNERABILITY
AB Understanding disaster risk perception is vital for community-based disaster
risk reduction (DRR). This study was set to investigate the correlations between
disaster risk perception and the population at risk. To address this research
question, the current study conducted an interdisciplinary approach: a household
survey for measuring variables and constructed an Agent-based model for simulating
the population at risk. Therefore, two correlations were defined, (1) between risk
perception and willingness to evacuate, and (2) between willingness to evacuate and
the population at risk. The willingness to evacuate was adopted as a mediator to
determine the relationship between risk perception and the population at risk. The
results show that the residents generally have a higher risk perception and
willingness to evacuate because the study area frequently suffered from debris flow
and flash floods. A positive correlation was found between risk perception and
willingness to evacuate, and a negative correlation to the population at risk.
However, a marginal effect was observed when raising public risk perception to
reduce the number of the population at risk. This study provides an
interdisciplinary approach to measuring disaster risk perception at the community
level and helps policymakers select the most effective ways to reduce the
population at risk.
C1 [Wu, Shengnan] Chongqing Econ & Social Dev Res Inst, Chongqing 400041, Peoples R
China.
[Lei, Yu] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Key Lab Mt Hazards &
Earth Surface Proc, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China.
[Lei, Yu] Chinese Acad Sci, China Pakistan Joint Res Ctr Earth Sci, Higher Educ
Commiss CAS HEC, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
[Lei, Yu] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
[Jin, Wen] Minist Emergency Management, Natl Disaster Reduct Ctr China, Beijing
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Mountain Hazards &
Environment, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, CAS
RP Lei, Y (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Key
Lab Mt Hazards & Earth Surface Proc, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China.; Lei, Y
(corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, China Pakistan Joint Res Ctr Earth Sci,
Higher Educ Commiss CAS HEC, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.; Lei, Y (corresponding
author), Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
EM leiyu@imde.ac.cn
OI Lei, Yu/0000-0002-2224-3260
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41941017]; Chongqing
Social Science Foundation [2021SZ32]; Sichuan Science and Technology
Program [2021YFH0009]; Chinese Academy of Sciences Presidents
International Fellowship Initiative [2020FYC0004]
FX This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of
China: 41941017; Chongqing Social Science Foundation: 2021SZ32; Sichuan
Science and Technology Program: 2021YFH0009; Chinese Academy of Sciences
Presidents International Fellowship Initiative: 2020FYC0004.
CR Aerts JCJH, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
[Anonymous], 2005, LANDSLIDE RISK MANAG
10.1177/028072709100900210
Brewer NT, 2004, ANN BEHAV MED, V27, P125, DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7
Buchele B, 2006, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V6, P485
Chen X., 2020, FANGFANHUAJIE ZHONGD
Chen Y., 2021, J SW PET U SOC SCI E, V23, P24, DOI [10.11885/j.issn.1674-
5094.2021.06.02.03, DOI 10.11885/J.ISSN.1674-5094.2021.06.02.03]
Conner M, 2015, EBOOK PREDICTING CHA
CRED The Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, 2021, DIS NUMB
WORLD RELIE
GAR, GLOBAL ASSESSMENT RE
Green DG, 2005, ECOL COMPLEX, V2, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2004.11.006
Gregg CE, 2004, J VOLCANOL GEOTH RES, V130, P179, DOI 10.1016/S0377-
0273(03)00288-9
Gustafson PE, 1998, RISK ANAL, V18, P805, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01123.x
Houts P. S., 1984, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V2, P27
[黄河 Huang He], 2015, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V34, P1875
6996.0000074
Lei Y, 2022, ENG GEOL, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106803
Lepesteur M, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V87, P389, DOI
10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.026
Liu ZJ, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14041026
National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China, 2010, 6 NAT POP
CENS PEOPL
Noferini L, 2007, ENG GEOL, V95, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.09.002
Qasim S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.001
Qiu HJ, 2022, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V13, P1663, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2022.2097451
1816.1999.tb00132.x
Shaw D.G., 2006, EXECUTIVE REPORT SUR
Tang JT, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V13, P261, DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00405-6
Wang WP, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1780, DOI 10.1111/risa.13507
Wang WP, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-10063-w
2867(01)00013-4, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00013-4]
[吴姣姣 Wu Jiaojiao], 2021, [山地学报, Mountain Research], V39, P552
Wu SN, 2020, J MT SCI-ENGL, V17, P1553, DOI 10.1007/s11629-019-5933-6
Wu SN, 2022, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.818913
Zeng Z., 2021, J HANGZHOU NORM U HU, V43, P125, DOI [10.19925/j.cnki.issn.1674-
2338.2021.05.014, DOI 10.19925/J.CNKI.ISSN.1674-2338.2021.05.014]
Zhang GT, 2019, HYDROL PROCESS, V33, P3195, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13551
[祝雪花 Zhu Xuehua], 2012, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V27, P62
NR 45
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 10
U2 11
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 24
AR 16393
DI 10.3390/ijerph192416393
PG 15
(SSCI)
Health
GA 7G3JB
UT WOS:000902424100001
PM 36554281
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Liang, D
Cong, Z
Cao, GF
AF Liang, Daan
Cong, Zhen
Cao, Guofeng
TI Examination of Diffusion Patterns of Tornado Warning Using an
Agent-Based Model and Simulation
LA English
DT Article
DE Communications; decision-making; Emergency response; Societal impacts;
Vulnerability; Wind effects
ID FLOOD WARNINGS; EVACUATION; BEHAVIOR; PEOPLE; COMMUNICATION;
HETEROGENEITY
AB Timely communication of warnings is essential to protection of lives and
properties during tornado outbreaks. Both official and personal channels of
communication prove to have considerable impact on the overall outcome. In this
study, an agent-based model is developed to simulate warning's reception-
dissemination process in which a person is exposed to, receives, and sends
information while interacting with others. The model is applied to an EF5 tornado
(EF indicates enhanced Fujita scale) that struck Moore, Oklahoma, in 2013. The
parameters are calibrated using publicly available data or a poststorm telephone
survey or were derived from literature reviews, expert judgement, and sensitivity
analysis. The result shows a reasonable agreement between modeled and observed
reception rates for older and younger adults and for different channels, with
errors of less than 20 percentage points. Similar agreement is also seen for the
average numbers of warning sources. The subsequent simulation indicates that, in
the absence of tornado sirens, the overall reception rates for younger and older
adults would drop from the baseline by 17 and 6 percentage points, respectively.
Concurrently, there is a large decline in the number of warning sources. When a
persons' social network is enlarged, the reception rate for older adults improves
from 77% to 80%, whereas for younger adults it stays unchanged. The impact of
increased connectivity is more pronounced when people are not watching television
or a tornado siren is not available. Significance StatementEvery year, tornadoes
cause significant property damage and numerous casualties in the United States.
This study aims to understand how tornado warnings reach the at-risk public through
various communication channels. Using the agent-based model and simulation, we are
able to reconstruct the dynamic patterns of warning's reception-dissemination
process for older and younger adults within a historical EF5 tornado. Further
analysis confirms the importance of tornado sirens in not only alerting more
residents about the dangerous weather condition but also prompting protective
actions. In the meantime, an increase in social connectivity among residents would
compensate for the lack of exposure to television and tornado siren. Future work
should investigate the robustness of this model and its parameters when applied to
other tornado outbreaks.
C1 [Liang, Daan] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL
35487 USA.
[Cong, Zhen] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Social Work, Arlington, TX USA.
[Cao, Guofeng] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Geog, Boulder, CO USA.
C3 University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa;
University of Texas System; University of Texas Arlington; University of
Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder
RP Liang, D (corresponding author), Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm
Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
EM daan.liang@ua.edu
RI Cao, Guofeng/HCI-4257-2022
OI Cong, Zhen/0000-0002-1949-056X
FX Acknowledgments. This material is based upon work supported by the
National Science Foundation under Grant CMMI 1663264. Any opinions,
findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material
are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of
the National Science Foundation. Review and suggestions by Dr. Susan
Jasko are greatly appreciated.
CR Aguirre BE, 2011, CONTEMP SOC SCI, V6, P415, DOI 10.1080/21582041.2011.609380
American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2016, STAND DEF FIN DISP C
American Research Group, 2017, MARG ERR CALC
[Anonymous], 1998, J CLIN ONCOL, DOI DOI 10.1177/028072709801600303
[Anonymous], 2014, NIST NCSTAR, DOI DOI 10.6028/NIST.NCSTAR.3
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB WARNINGS
[Anonymous], 1998, INDIVIDUAL STRATEGY, DOI DOI 10.1515/9780691214252
[Anonymous], 2011, INT J RES MARK, DOI [DOI 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002,
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.04.002]
Ashley WS, 2007, WEATHER FORECAST, V22, P1214, DOI 10.1175/2007WAF2007004.1
BARABASI AL, 2003, LINKED EVERYTHING CO
BASS FM, 1969, MANAGE SCI, V15, P215, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.15.5.215
BERNARD HR, 1990, SOC NETWORKS, V12, P179, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(90)90005-T
Bohlmann JD, 2010, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V27, P741, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2010.00748.x
Breznitz S., 1984, CRY WOLF PSYCHOL FAL
Brooks HE, 2002, WEATHER FORECAST, V17, P354, DOI 10.1175/1520-
0434(2002)017<0354:DITMOC>2.0.CO;2
Brotzge J, 2013, B AM METEOROL SOC, V94, P1715, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00147.1
Brotzge J, 2011, WEATHER FORECAST, V26, P534, DOI 10.1175/WAF-D-10-05004.1
Casteel MA, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P25, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.036
Cong Z, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P233, DOI 10.1111/disa.12241
Cong Z, 2017, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V11, P168, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2016.97
Cosley D., 2010, AAAI INT C WEBL SOC, P26
Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
Drabek TE, 1999, SOC SCI J, V36, P515, DOI 10.1016/S0362-3319(99)00021-X
Du E, 2017, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V53, P316, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12475
Epstein J. M., 1999, Complexity, V4, P41, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-
0526(199905/06)4:5<41::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-F
Frias-Martinez E., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Third International
Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and IEEE Third International
Conference on Social Computing (PASSAT/SocialCom 2011), P57, DOI
10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.142
Garcia R, 2011, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V28, P148, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
5885.2011.00788.x
Ha V, 2012, PHYSICA A, V391, P2740, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.034
Hawe GI, 2012, ACM COMPUT SURV, V45, DOI 10.1145/2379776.2379784
Hayden M. H., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P211, DOI
10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.07.001
Heath B, 2009, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V12, pA143
Hethcote HW, 2000, SIAM REV, V42, P599, DOI 10.1137/S0036144500371907
Hofferth S. L., 2020, AM TIME USE SURVEY D, DOI [10.18128/D060.V2.8;2.8,
10.18128/D060.V2.8.28]
Hui Cindy, 2010, International Journal of Agent Technologies & Systems, V2, P31,
DOI 10.4018/jats.2010070103
IPUMS, 2020, ATUS EXTR BUILD
Juarez C., DECADES DEBATE LUBBO
Kerluke J.L., 1994, COMPLEXIFICATION EXP
KILLWORTH PD, 1984, CURR ANTHROPOL, V25, P381, DOI 10.1086/203158
Killworth PD, 2003, SOC NETWORKS, V25, P141, DOI 10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00040-0
Killworth PD, 2006, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V35, P84, DOI 10.1177/0049124106289160
Kuligowski E.D., 2013, NIST SPECIAL PUBL, V1164, DOI [10.6028/NIST.SP.1164, DOI
10.6028/NIST.SP.1164]
Lasswell H. D., 1948, COMMUNICATION IDEAS, P136
P2, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2005.1574234
Manley M, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P8300, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.169
MARSDEN PV, 1987, AM SOCIOL REV, V52, P122, DOI 10.2307/2095397
MAYHORN CB, 2012, WARNING ELDERLY UNDE
Mayhorn CB, 2014, SAFETY SCI, V61, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.014
McCarty C, 2001, HUM ORGAN, V60, P28, DOI 10.17730/humo.60.1.efx5t9gjtgmga73y
McCormick TH, 2010, J AM STAT ASSOC, V105, P59, DOI 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08518
Miles SB, 2019, NAT HAZARDS REV, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000313
Mileti D., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN REA
Nagarajan M, 2012, EUR J OPER RES, V220, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.026
Nagarajan M, 2010, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V3, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.014
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2014, NWS CENTR
REG SERV A
Nejat A, 2012, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V27, P748, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-
8667.2012.00787.x
Neuwirth K, 2000, RISK ANAL, V20, P721, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.205065
NOAA, 2021, STORM EV DAT
NOAA, 2011, TORN 101 ESS GUID TO
NOAA, 2021, US TORN CLIM
North MJ, 2010, COMPLEXITY, V15, P37, DOI 10.1002/cplx.20304
NWS, 2021, OUTD WARN SIR FREQ A
NWS, 2013, TORN OUTBR MAY 20 20
O'Shea T, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P2281, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-2281-2020
Onnela JP, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7332, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610245104
PARKER DJ, 1998, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V6, P45, DOI DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.00067
POOL ID, 1978, SOC NETWORKS, V1, P5, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90011-4
RAILSBACK S. F., 2011, AGENT BASED INDIVIDU
Railsback SF, 2006, SIMUL-T SOC MOD SIM, V82, P609, DOI 10.1177/0037549706073695
Ren CJ, 2009, L N INST COMP SCI SO, V5, P1451
Ripberger JT, 2015, B AM METEOROL SOC, V96, P577, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00213.1
Rogers E.M., 1983, DIFFUSION INNOVATION, Vthird
Simmons KM, 2009, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V1, P38, DOI 10.1175/2009WCAS1005.1
Stokoe RM, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V17, P137, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.04.004
Swanson J, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P472, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336
Tan L, 2015, INFORM SCIENCES, V295, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2014.09.029
Tang WW, 2010, GEOGR COMPASS, V4, pCP7, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00337.x
U.S. Census Bureau, 2017, AV NUMB PEOPL PER HO
Wagner N, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P2807, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.013
Wang Y., 2012, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V46, P281, DOI DOI
10.1016/J.SEPS.2012.07.002
Wilensky U., 1998, NETLOGO FLOCKING MOD
Zhang L, 2009, J MATH BIOL, V58, P545, DOI 10.1007/s00285-008-0211-1
Zheng T, 2006, J AM STAT ASSOC, V101, P409, DOI 10.1198/016214505000001168
NR 87
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 4
PI BOSTON
PA 45 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA 02108-3693, UNITED STATES
SN 1948-8327
EI 1948-8335
J9 WEATHER CLIM SOC
PD APR
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 2
BP 521
EP 533
DI 10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0089.1
PG 13
(SSCI)
GA 2I3UA
UT WOS:000814906100013
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Matthews, L
Scott, D
Andrey, J
Mahon, R
Trotman, A
Burrowes, R
Charles, A
AF Matthews, Lindsay
Scott, Daniel
Andrey, Jean
Mahon, Roche
Trotman, Adrian
Burrowes, Ravidya
Charles, Amanda
TI Developing climate services for Caribbean tourism: a comparative
analysis of climate push and pull influences using climate indices
SO CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate indices; Optimization; Climate services; Beach tourism; Weather
sensitivity; Caribbean
ID DECISION-MAKING; HURRICANE EVACUATION; INFORMATION; DEMAND;
VULNERABILITY; IMPACTS; EUROPE; ISLAND
AB Climate indices have a long history of use to combine multi-faceted climate
information for tourism resource evaluation. Traditionally, indices have been used
to assess tourists' sensitivity to destination climatic pull factors, not tourists'
sensitivity to source market climate as a push factor for seasonality-driven
markets. This study addresses this gap by using tourism climate indices to assess
the influence of climatic push and pull factors for seasonal fluctuations in
arrivals to Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, and Saint Lucia, from the province of
Ontario, Canada (from January 2008 to December 2017). Building on the conceptual
foundation of the Holiday Climate Index:Beach (HCI:Beach), this study uses an
optimization algorithm to develop two indices: (1) an optimized in-situ index that
estimates the climatic pull-factor of the destination, and (2) an optimized ex-situ
index that estimates the climatic push-factor from the source market. Findings
reveal the optimized ex-situ (push) index explains 83% (R-2 = 0.830) of the
variability in total monthly arrivals from Ontario and has greater predictive
accuracy than the in-situ (pull) index. The research advances understanding of
climatic influences on Caribbean tourism arrivals and provides the foundation for
new seasonal forecast-based Climate Services (CS) for destination managers and
marketers.
C1 [Matthews, Lindsay; Scott, Daniel; Andrey, Jean] Univ Waterloo, Fac Environm,
Waterloo, ON, Canada.
[Mahon, Roche; Trotman, Adrian] Caribbean Inst Meteorol & Hydrol CIMH, St James,
Barbados.
[Burrowes, Ravidya] ESSA Technol, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[Charles, Amanda] Caribbean Tourism Org CTO, Bridgetown, Barbados.
C3 University of Waterloo
RP Matthews, L (corresponding author), Univ Waterloo, Fac Environm, Waterloo, ON,
Canada.
EM lindsay.matthews@uwaterloo.ca
OI Scott, Daniel/0000-0001-7825-9301; Matthews, Lindsay/0000-0002-6633-3049
FU MITACs Accelerate Program; Caribbean Tourism Organization (CTO);
Environment and Climate Change Canada
FX Financial support through the MITACs Accelerate Program is also
recognized. Tourism arrivals data for this research was provided by the
Caribbean Tourism Organization (CTO). Climate data was provided by the
Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (CIMH), as well as
Environment and Climate Change Canada
CR Albright R, 2011, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V17, P2478, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-
2486.2011.02404.x
Amelung B., 2006, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, V14, P349, DOI
10.2167/jost549.0
Amelung B., 2007, Journal of Travel Research, V45, P285, DOI
10.1177/0047287506295937
Amelung B, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V41, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.10.002
Anderson GB, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V121, P1111, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1206273
[Anonymous], 1999, TOURISM ECON, DOI DOI 10.1177/135481669900500101
[Anonymous], 1998, TOURIST REV, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB058278
[Anonymous], 2016, 771 EARTH PERSPECTIV, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40322-016-0034-Y
Bosello F, 2007, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V37, P549, DOI 10.1007/s10640-006-9048-5
Cahyanto I, 2014, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V2, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.10.003
Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (CIMH), 2018, DEV SEAS FOR CAP
APP
Caribbean Tourism Organization (CTO), 2020, CAR SUST TOUR POL FR
Caribbean Tourism Organization (CTO) Caribbean Hotel and Tourism Association
(CHTA) Caribbean Institute for Meteorology and Hydrology (CIMH), 2020, CAR TOUR
CLIM B
Chebana F, 2013, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V57, P631, DOI 10.1007/s00484-012-0590-2
Chen F, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P648, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0892-8
Damm A, 2020, CLIM SERV, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.02.001
de Freitas CR, 2008, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V52, P399, DOI 10.1007/s00484-007-0134-3
de Freitas CR, 2003, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V48, P45, DOI 10.1007/s00484-003-0177-z
Eugenio-Martin JL, 2010, TOURISM MANAGE, V31, P744, DOI
10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.015
Goh C, 2012, ANN TOURISM RES, V39, P1859, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2012.05.027
Gossling S, 2016, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/atmos7010010
Gossling S, 2012, ANN TOURISM RES, V39, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.002
Grillakis Manolis G., 2016, Climate Services, V1, P30, DOI
10.1016/j.cliser.2016.01.002
Hamilton J. M., 2006, TOURISM GLOBAL ENV C, V229
Hamilton JM, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P253, DOI
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.009
Hein L, 2009, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V1, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.011
Ho HC, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V544, P929, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.021
Jacob D, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P264, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000710
Kirchhoff CJ, 2013, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V38, P393, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-
022112-112828
Kossin J.P., 2017, CLIMATE SCI SPECIAL, P257, DOI [10.7930/J07S7KXX, DOI
10.7930/J07S7KXX]
Kulendran N, 2012, TOUR ANAL, V17, P121, DOI 10.3727/108354212X13388995267706
Laframboise M.N., 2014, 14229 INT MON FUND
Li HY, 2018, J TRAVEL RES, V57, P178, DOI 10.1177/0047287516687409
Mackay EA, 2017, WORLDW HOSP TOUR THE, V9, P44, DOI 10.1108/WHATT-11-2016-0069
Mahon R., 2018, SOCIAL EC STUDIES, V67
Martin BG, 2005, ANN TOURISM RES, V32, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2004.08.004
Matthews L., 2017, P TRANSP RES BOARD S
Matthews L, 2021, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V65, P749, DOI 10.1007/s00484-019-01799-7
Matthews L, 2017, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V9, P521, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0103.1
Matthews L, 2017, J COLD REG ENG, V31, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000130
MIECZKOWSKI Z, 1985, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V29, P220, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-
0064.1985.tb00365.x
Moore WR, 2010, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V13, P495, DOI 10.1080/13683500903576045
Mycoo MA, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P2341, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1248-8
Nerem RS, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P2022, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1717312115
Ridderstaat J, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V41, P245, DOI
10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.005
Rossello-Nadal J, 2014, TOURISM MANAGE, V42, P334, DOI
10.1016/j.tourman.2013.11.006
ROTMANS J, 1994, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V4, P97, DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(94)90047-7
Rutty M, 2013, CLIM RES, V57, P259, DOI 10.3354/cr01183
Rutty M, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11040412
Rutty M, 2016, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/atmos7020030
Rutty M, 2015, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V59, P37, DOI 10.1007/s00484-014-0820-x
Ryan C, 1998, ANN TOURISM RES, V25, P169, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00066-2
Scott D, 2004, CLIMATE RES, V27, P105, DOI 10.3354/cr027105
Scott D, 2010, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V1, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.011
Scott D, 2019, CONSULTANCY DEV CLIM
Scott D., 2019, RES AGENDA SUSTAINAB, DOI [10.4337/9781788117104, DOI
10.4337/9781788117104]
Scott D., 2001, P 1 INT WORKSH CLIM
Scott D, 2019, ANN TOURISM RES, V77, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2019.05.007
Scott D, 2016, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/atmos7060080
Scott D, 2012, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V20, P883, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2012.699063
Scott D, 2008, CLIM RES, V38, P61, DOI 10.3354/cr00774
Scott DJ, 2011, CLIM RES, V47, P111, DOI 10.3354/cr00952
Spencer Andrew, 2019, TRAVEL TOURISM CARIB, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-69581-5_1,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69581-5_1]
Steiger R, 2016, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/atmos7050063
Sweet W. V., 2017, GLOBAL REGIONAL SEA
UNWTO, 1995, TOURISM ANAL HDB, DOI 10.18111/9789284418145
Vaughan Catherine, 2016, Climate Services, V4, P65, DOI
10.1016/j.cliser.2016.11.004
Villegas J, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P97, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0119-3
Weaver CP, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P39, DOI 10.1002/wcc.202
Weijerman M, 2018, J APPL ECOL, V55, P1823, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13105
World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2011, REP HIGH LEV TASK FO
WTTC, 2016, TRAV TOUR EC IMP 201
Wu DCG, 2017, INT J CONTEMP HOSP M, V29, P507, DOI [10.1108/ijchm-05-2015-0249,
10.1108/IJCHM-05-2015-0249]
NR 74
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 3
U2 23
PI ABINGDON
SN 1368-3500
EI 1747-7603
J9 CURR ISSUES TOUR
JI Curr. Issues Tour.
PD JUN 3
PY 2021
VL 24
IS 11
BP 1576
EP 1594
DI 10.1080/13683500.2020.1816928
EA SEP 2020
PG 19
WC Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism
GA SD8HE
UT WOS:000567964700001
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Villarreal, M
Meyer, MA
AF Villarreal, Melissa
Meyer, Michelle A.
TI Women's experiences across disasters: a study of two towns in Texas,
United States
SO DISASTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE childcare; disaster recovery; gender; therapeutic community; women
ID TECHNOLOGICAL DISASTER; HURRICANE EVACUATION; GENDER; RISK; PERCEPTION;
KATRINA; STRESS; RACE
AB Gender, although gaining attention, remains under-researched in disaster risk
reduction protocols and response and recovery efforts. This study examines women's
experiences of two disasters in small towns in the United States, utilising
qualitative interviews with residents of Granbury and West, Texas, during the first
year of disaster recovery. Granbury was struck by an EF-4 tornado on 15 May 2013,
whereas an explosion occurred at a local fertiliser facility in West on 17 April
2013. The paper explores how women's experiences of inter-gender power dynamics in
decision-making, the prioritisation of childcare, and women's participation in the
community affect their post-disaster recovery. Previous research highlights
different forms of human response and recovery vis-a-vis 'natural' and
technological disasters, with less attention paid to gender differences. The
results point to the persistent, and similar, effect of gender stratification on
women's experiences across different types of disasters in the US and the continued
importance of gender-sensitive disaster policies and programmes.
C1 [Villarreal, Melissa] Univ Colorado Boulder, Nat Hazards Ctr, Dept Sociol,
Boulder, CO USA.
[Meyer, Michelle A.] Texas A&M Univ, Hazard Reduct & Recovery Ctr, Landscape
Architecture & Urban Planning, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
C3 University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder; Texas A&M
University System; Texas A&M University College Station
RP Villarreal, M (corresponding author), Univ Colorado Boulder, Nat Hazards Ctr,
UCB 327,Ketchum 195, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.; Villarreal, M (corresponding author),
Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Sociol, UCB 327,Ketchum 195, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
EM melissa.villarreal@colorado.edu
RI Meyer, Michelle/GLU-4412-2022
OI Villarreal, Melissa/0000-0003-0690-5612
CR Acar F., 2001, UN DIV ADV WOM EXP W
Agarwal B, 2000, CAMB J ECON, V24, P283, DOI 10.1093/cje/24.3.283
Alway J, 1998, SYMB INTERACT, V21, P175, DOI 10.1525/si.1998.21.2.175
[Anonymous], 2015, CHILDREN OF KATRINA
[Anonymous], 2001, GLOBAL ENV CHANGE B, DOI [10.3763/ehaz.2001.0301, DOI
10.3763/EHAZ.2001.0301, DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00009-2]
[Anonymous], 2015, WORKING AM
[Anonymous], 1999, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOM, DOI 10.1177/10778019922181464
[Anonymous], 2009, WOMEN GENDER DISASTE
[Anonymous], 2013, SOCIAL VULNERABILITY
6988(2002)3:3(107)
[Anonymous], 2010, INT J MASS EMERG DIS
[Anonymous], NEW YORKER
[Anonymous], 2010, DEC CENS POP HOUS
[Anonymous], 1995, LEARNING STRANGERS
Barber K., 2015, RETHINKING DISASTER, P53
Beck L., 2013, NBC 5 0515, P5
BIERNACKI P, 1981, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V10, P141, DOI 10.1177/004912418101000205
Brunsma D, 2008, SOC FORCES, V87, P983
Chan KL, 2011, VIOLENCE VICTIMS, V26, P364, DOI 10.1891/0886-6708.26.3.364
Collins Patricia Hill., 1990, BLACK FEMINIST THOUG, V138
COOK JA, 1986, SOCIOL INQ, V56, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1986.tb00073.x
Davidson DJ, 1996, ENVIRON BEHAV, V28, P302, DOI 10.1177/0013916596283003
Dewan S, 2008, THE NEW YORK 1204
DRABEK TE, 1969, SOC PROBL, V16, P336, DOI 10.1525/sp.1969.16.3.03a00070
Drolet J., 2015, GENDER DEV, V23, P433, DOI [10.1080/13552074.2015.1096040, DOI
10.1080/13552074.2015.1096040]
Eagly AH, 2005, LEADERSHIP QUART, V16, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007
10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335
Enarson E., 2001, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V3, P133, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-
2867(02)00006-2
Enarson E., 2018, HDB DISASTER RES, P205, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_11
Enarson E., 1997, HURRICANE ANDREW ETH, P116
Enarson E, 1998, GENDERED TERRAIN DIS, P1
Enarson E. A., 2006, HDB DISASTER RES, P130
Erickson RJ, 2001, SOC PSYCHOL QUART, V64, P146, DOI 10.2307/3090130
Eriksen C, 2014, GEOGR RES-AUST, V52, P23, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12046
Finucane ML, 2000, HEALTH RISK SOC, V2, P159, DOI 10.1080/713670162
Frankland P, 2013, WOMEN PIONEERS OF THE LOUISIANA ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT, P1
Frantz V., 2017, TORNADO SAFETY CAUGH
Furedi F, 2007, AREA, V39, P482, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00764.x
Galea S, 2008, INT J METH PSYCH RES, V17, pS21, DOI 10.1002/mpr.267
Ganapati NE, 2013, ADMIN SOC, V45, P72, DOI 10.1177/0095399712471491
Ganapati NE, 2012, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V72, P419, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-
6210.2011.02526.x
Gill DA, 1998, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V11, P795, DOI 10.1080/08941929809381119
Henrici J.M., 2010, D492 IWPR
Horton L., 2012, GENDER DEV, V20, P295, DOI DOI 10.1080/13552074.2012.693284
Isserles R.G., 2008, J ASS RES MOTHERING, V10, P33
Jenkins P., 2012, WOMEN KATRINA GENDER, P169
Juran L, 2012, INDIAN J GEND STUD, V19, P1, DOI 10.1177/097152151101900101
Kinateder Max T, 2015, Fire Sci Rev, V4, P1
Kung YW, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P1535, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01760.x
Lovell DM, 2013, COMMUNITY DEV, V44, P426, DOI 10.1080/15575330.2013.820765
Luft R., 2012, DISPLACED LIFE KATRI, P233
Luxton M, 2015, CAN REV SOCIOL, V52, P212, DOI 10.1111/cars.12073
Marshall C., 2014, DESIGNING QUALITATIV
McLaughlin Eliott C., 2014, CNN
Morioka R, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V107, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.014
Noel G.E., 1998, GENDERED TERRAIN DIS, P213
Parkinson D, 2011, HEALTH PROMOT J AUST, V22, pS42, DOI 10.1071/HE11442
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.004
Phillips B., 2014, QUALITATIVE DISASTER
QUARANTELLI EL, 1977, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V3, P23, DOI
10.1146/annurev.so.03.080177.000323
Ritchie LA, 2007, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V27, P103, DOI 10.1080/02732170601001037
Ritchie LA, 2012, SOCIOL INQ, V82, P187, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00416.x
Saito M, 2012, SOC SCI MED, V75, P940, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.006
Saldana J., 2016, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
Sherman MF, 2011, FIRE SAFETY J, V46, P414, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2011.07.001
Solnit Rebecca, 2009, PARADISE BUILT HELL
STACEY J, 1985, SOC PROBL, V32, P301, DOI 10.1525/sp.1985.32.4.03a00010
Taylor E, 2011, OCCUP THER MENT HEAL, V27, P3, DOI 10.1080/0164212X.2011.543454
Terasaka A, 2015, INT J CHILD YOUTH FA, V6, P111
Tyler M, 2013, J RURAL STUD, V30, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.01.002
Weisell K., 2017, 4 YEARS LATER W CONT
Williams J, 2000, UNBENDING GENDER WHY
NR 78
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 2
U2 15
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0361-3666
EI 1467-7717
J9 DISASTERS
JI Disasters
PD APR
PY 2020
VL 44
IS 2
BP 285
EP 306
DI 10.1111/disa.12375
PG 22
GA KU3ZH
UT WOS:000519649200004
PM 31231814
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Adekola, J
Renaud, F
Hill, C
AF Adekola, Josephine
Renaud, Fabrice
Hill, Carol
TI Risk Information Sources for Snow Disaster Risk Preparedness in Scotland
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster preparedness; Heavy snow; Risk information sources; Risk
perception; Scotland
ID HURRICANE EVACUATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTION; CRISIS;
MANAGEMENT; INTERNET; SEEKING; EXPERIENCE; JUDGMENT
AB Heavy snow disruptions are common and costly occurrences in the UK, including
Scotland. Yet, heavy snow remains an underresearched aspect of disaster risks in
Scotland. This study critically examined the 2018 heavy snow event in Scotland
referred to as the "Beast from the East" (BfE) in order to explore the different
sources of information used by the public in preparation for and response to heavy
snow emergencies. Our study also examined the effectiveness of BfE risk
communication between authorities and the public and sought to determine if there
is a relationship between risk information received and the intention to mitigate
risk. Data were collected through a semistructured survey from (n = 180) residents
of the Annandale and Eskdale region of Dumfries and Galloway, Scotland. Our
analysis shows that public authority information sources were the most sought-after
information sources, followed by online and web sources. We found statistically
significant differences between groups (such as age, gender, and
mobility/disability) in terms of using risk information sources. Further analysis
shows that the relationship between information received and the intention to
mitigate risks is not linear but influenced by intervening variables such as work
pressures, financial commitment, and stakeholders' expectations. We argue that
where full adherence to official risk advice is required, policymakers should
carefully consider issues around these three factors.
C1 [Adekola, Josephine] Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch, Glasgow G12 8QQ,
Lanark, Scotland.
[Adekola, Josephine; Renaud, Fabrice; Hill, Carol] Univ Glasgow, Sch
Interdisciplinary Studies, Dumfries DG1 4ZL, Scotland.
C3 University of Glasgow; University of Glasgow
RP Adekola, J (corresponding author), Univ Glasgow, Adam Smith Business Sch,
Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland.; Adekola, J (corresponding author), Univ
Glasgow, Sch Interdisciplinary Studies, Dumfries DG1 4ZL, Scotland.
EM Josephine.Adekola@Glasgow.ac.uk
FU Scottish Funding Council
FX This research is partly funded by the Scottish Funding Council, as part
of the National Centre for Resilince. This research received no external
funding.
CR Abunyewah M, 2019, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V11, P100, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2019-
0059
Adekola J., 2020, POWER RISK POLICYMAK, P103
Adekola J, 2019, J RISK RES, V22, P1294, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2018.1473463
[Anonymous], 2002, RISK MANAG
6988(2005)6:4(165)
Austin L, 2012, J APPL COMMUN RES, V40, P188, DOI 10.1080/00909882.2012.654498
Berget G, 2021, J DOC, V77, P381, DOI 10.1108/JD-04-2020-0049
Booker CL, 2018, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12889-018-5220-4
Breakwell GW, 2000, BRIT MED BULL, V56, P110, DOI 10.1258/0007142001902824
Bronfman NC, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0214249
10.1080/15287394.2013.844087
CDAC (Communicating with Disaster Affected Communities), 2019, COMM COMM AFT
CYCL I
Cliff BJ, 2009, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V24, P512, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X00007433
Covello VT, 2003, J HEALTH COMMUN, V8, P5, DOI 10.1080/10810730390224802
Covello VT., 2012, EFFECTIVE RISK COMMU
Crichton Institute, 2014, DUMFR GALL REG STRAT
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.010
DeYoung SE, 2016, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V24, P275, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12123
Dumfries and Galloway Council, 2020, REP CURR POS POV DEP
Dumfries and Galloway Council Integration Joint Board, 2018, HLTH SOC CAR STRAT
N
Fitzpatrick C., 1994, DISASTERS COLLECTIVE, P71
Frewer LJ, 2003, RISK ANAL, V23, P1117, DOI 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00385.x
Greening K, 2019, WEATHER, V74, P79, DOI 10.1002/wea.3467
Grein TW, 2000, EMERG INFECT DIS, V6, P97, DOI 10.3201/eid0602.000201
Griffin RJ, 2004, MEDIA PSYCHOL, V6, P23, DOI 10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_2
Guardian, 2018, GUARDIAN
Hansson S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101931
Hill C., 2015, POVERTY DEPRIVATION
Holmes BJ, 2009, J RISK RES, V12, P793, DOI 10.1080/13669870802648486
Huber DG., 2011, EXTREME WEATHER CLIM
IOM (International Organization for Migration), 2014, COMM COMM CAS STUD
Jin Y, 2014, COMMUN RES, V41, P74, DOI 10.1177/0093650211423918
Kasperson J. X., 2012, SOCIAL CONTOURS RISK
Konig R, 2018, UNIVERSAL ACCESS INF, V17, P621, DOI 10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5
Lawrence J, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P1773, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1288-z
Madhuri, 2015, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V17, P1287, DOI 10.1007/s10668-014-9605-y
*MET OFF, 2018, WEATH WARN GUID
Mohta R., 2020, INDIAN J GERONTOLOGY, V34, P413
Pallant J., 2013, SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL
Palttala P, 2012, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V20, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
5973.2011.00656.x
Paul BK, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P337, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01132.x
Rakib MA, 2017, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V18, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2017.10.002
Rundblad G, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-641
Ryan B, 2018, LIBR INFORM SCI RES, V40, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.lisr.2018.05.001
Ryan B, 2013, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V22, P229, DOI 10.1108/DPM-05-2012-0059
Shannon C. E., 1949, MATH THEORY COMMUNIC, DOI DOI 10.1145/584091.584093
Shaw LH, 2002, CYBERPSYCHOL BEHAV, V5, P157, DOI 10.1089/109493102753770552
Siegel S., 1988, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B
Simonova I, 2020, INT J INNOV LEARN, V27, P467, DOI 10.1504/IJIL.2020.107610
Slovic P, 2010, FEELING RISK NEW PER
Sommerfeldt EJ, 2015, J APPL COMMUN RES, V43, P1, DOI
10.1080/00909882.2014.982682
Spence PR, 2011, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V19, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-
5973.2011.00650.x
Sutton JN., 2008, BACKCHANNELS FRONT L
van Deursen AJAM, 2015, EUR J COMMUN, V30, P171, DOI 10.1177/0267323115578059
Williams BD, 2018, QUAL QUANT, V52, P537, DOI 10.1007/s11135-017-0594-4
Wolbring G., 2009, J MEDIA CULT, V12, DOI DOI 10.5204/MCJ.173
Yang F, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101379
Yu JL, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135354
NR 69
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 9
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
SN 2095-0055
EI 2192-6395
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 12
IS 6
BP 854
EP 866
DI 10.1007/s13753-021-00386-y
EA DEC 2021
PG 13
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA XU1OV
UT WOS:000730493200001
OA gold, Green Accepted, Green Published
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Yang, YD
Ren, HQ
Zhang, H
AF Yang, Yaodong
Ren, Huaqing
Zhang, Han
TI Understanding Consumer Panic Buying Behaviors during the Strict Lockdown
on Omicron Variant: A Risk Perception View
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Omicron variant; panic buying; media exposure; cognitive-affective
processes; risk perception
ID FLOOD RISK; MEDIA; PREPAREDNESS; INFORMATION; EVACUATION; INTENTIONS;
BELIEFS; CRISIS; MODEL; FLU
AB Panic buying has been globally observed, leading to substantial stock-outs and
supply chain disruptions, thus inducing additional panic buying. Regarding panic
buying behavior as an intuitive over-protective measure during the strict lockdown
and seal-off management in China, this study presented a synthetic conceptual model
by integrating the protective action decision model (PADM). We examined inductively
the relationships among media exposure, cognitive-affective risk perception,
stakeholder perception, protective perception, and panic buying behavior using a
survey of 517 participants who experienced panic buying during the Omicron epidemic
in China. Results suggest that traditional media exposure could attenuate people's
affective risk perception, whereas social media exposure increases the degree of
cognitive and affective aspects of risk perception. Furthermore, we detect that
cognitive and affective risk perceptions positively affect people's panic-buying
behaviors. The effects of stakeholder and protective perceptions on panic buying
were also examined.
C1 [Yang, Yaodong] Anhui Univ, Sch Econ, Hefei 230039, Peoples R China.
[Ren, Huaqing] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Publ Affairs, Nanjing 210094,
Peoples R China.
[Zhang, Han] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 210094,
Peoples R China.
C3 Anhui University; Nanjing University of Science & Technology; Nanjing
University of Science & Technology
RP Zhang, H (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ &
Management, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China.
EM njuzhanghan@njust.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; Fundamental Research Funds
for the Central Universities; Initial Research Funds for Young Teachers
of Nanjing University of Science and Technology; Postgraduate Research &
Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province; [72002102];
[30920010017]; [JGQN2004]; [KYCX22_0567]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China grants (#72002102), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
Universities (#30920010017), Initial Research Funds for Young Teachers
of Nanjing University of Science and Technology (#JGQN2004), and the
Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province,
Grant Numbers: KYCX22_0567.
CR Altarawneh L, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P1203, DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.155
[Anonymous], 2020, PEDIATR MED RODZ, V16, P9, DOI 10.15557/PiMR.2020.0003
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.061
Brewer NT, 2007, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V26, P136, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
Chen Y, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15010063
Cheng P, 2020, TRANSPORTATION, V47, P2067, DOI 10.1007/s11116-019-10001-1
Choi DH, 2017, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V72, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.004
Ding HL, 2009, TECH COMMUN Q, V18, P327, DOI 10.1080/10572250903149548
EPSTEIN S, 1994, AM PSYCHOL, V49, P709, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
Fung TKF, 2011, J HEALTH COMMUN, V16, P889, DOI 10.1080/10810730.2011.561913
Gaube S., 2019, PERCEIVED SAFETY MUL, P101, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-11456-5_7,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-11456-5_7]
Grabowski F, 2022, VIRUSES-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/v14020294
Haas C, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P660, DOI 10.1111/risa.13481
Han G, 2014, HEALTH COMMUN, V29, P109, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2012.723267
Heilmann S., 2017, CHINAS POLITICAL SYS, P46
Islam T, 2021, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102357
Kolbitsch J, 2006, J UNIVERS COMPUT SCI, V12, P187
KONE D, 1994, RISK ANAL, V14, P21, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00024.x
Kruglanski AW, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, P323
Lee JEC, 2009, RISK ANAL, V29, P1265, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01264.x
Leung CC, 2020, LANCET, V395, P945, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30520-1
Li PP, 2022, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.822300
Liu Y, 2019, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V64, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.013
Loewenstein GF, 2001, PSYCHOL BULL, V127, P267, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.267
Mefsin Yonatan M, 2022, Emerg Infect Dis, V28, P1856, DOI 10.3201/eid2809.220613
Meyer R, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1532, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01935.x
Nerb J, 2001, COGNITION EMOTION, V15, P521, DOI 10.1080/02699930143000013
Ng YJ, 2018, J RISK RES, V21, P1487, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2017.1313762
Niu CH, 2022, J RISK RES, V25, P21, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2020.1819385
Oh SH, 2021, HEALTH COMMUN, V36, P972, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2020.1724639
Omicron, MAK HONG KONGS COVID
Prentice C, 2022, INT J CONSUM STUD, V46, P132, DOI 10.1111/ijcs.12649
Ridgway NM, 2008, J CONSUM RES, V35, P622, DOI 10.1086/591108
Swinbourne A., 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-
6996.0000417, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000417]
Terpstra T, 2013, ENVIRON BEHAV, V45, P993, DOI 10.1177/0013916512452427
Terpstra T, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P1658, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
Trumbo C.W., 2013, COMMUNICATION ENGAGE
van der Linden S, 2014, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V44, P430, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2008
Vyncke B, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P570, DOI 10.1111/risa.12618
Wang F, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P207, DOI 10.1111/disa.12240
Wei JC, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P114, DOI 10.1111/risa.12446
Wesseler J., 2019, Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, V18,
DOI 10.1515/jafio-2019-0055
Wu JT, 2020, LANCET, V395, P689, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-9
Yang HB, 2022, VACCINES-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/vaccines10091392
Yang QH, 2015, HEALTH EDUC, V115, P438, DOI 10.1108/HE-05-2014-0066
Yuen KF, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17103513
Zheng R, 2021, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102238
PEOPLES DAILY ONLINE
NR 64
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 14
U2 15
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 2071-1050
JI Sustainability
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 24
AR 17019
DI 10.3390/su142417019
PG 19
(SSCI)
GA 7G5YP
UT WOS:000902599700001
OA gold
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Wu, JJ
Yang, X
Deng, X
Xu, DD
AF Wu, Jiaojiao
Yang, Xue
Deng, Xin
Xu, Dingde
TI Does disaster knowledge affect residents' choice of disaster avoidance
behavior in different time periods? Evidence from China's earthquake-hit
areas
LA English
DT Article
DE Disaster knowledge; Disaster avoidance decision making; Different
periods of disaster; Earthquake; China
ID EVACUATION DECISION-MAKING; RISK PERCEPTION; PREPAREDNESS; MITIGATION;
PLACE; FLOOD; MODEL; INFORMATION; PREDICTORS; EXPERIENCE
AB Based on the survey data of 327 peasant households in Wenchuan and Lushan
earthquakes in China, this study analyzed the characteristics of residents'
disaster knowledge and their disaster avoidance behavior before, during and after
the earthquake, and constructed the binary Logit model and the disordered multi-
classification logistic regression model to explore the impact of disaster
knowledge on residents' disaster avoidance behavior in different periods. The
results show that:(1) Generally speaking, the residents have strong disaster
knowledge. Among them, 55% of the residents have good basic knowledge of disasters,
66% and 68% of the residents have sufficient knowledge of emergency response skills
and resistance skills, respectively. (2) Before the earthquake, residents'
awareness of disaster preparedness was poor; When an earthquake occurs, the number
of residents who choose to leave their houses immediately (60%) is the largest,
while the number of residents who choose to continue to do things (5%) is the
least. After the earthquake, the highest percentage of residents (40%) chose to
evacuate again to a safer place, while the lowest percentage (7%) chose to continue
with their work. (3) The regression results show that the stronger the disaster
knowledge is, the better the disaster preparedness will be. When a disaster occurs,
compared with the residents who evacuate their houses immediately, the residents
who do not have sufficient knowledge of the disaster are more willing to continue
to do things. Residents without adequate disaster knowledge are more likely to stop
doing things and stay put than to evacuate their homes immediately. After a
disaster occurs, residents with less knowledge of the disaster are more likely to
stay put and wait for the latest information and confirmation that their families
are safe than those who evacuate again to a safer place. Residents with stronger
disaster knowledge were more likely to continue their work than those who had to
evacuate again to a safer place.
C1 [Wu, Jiaojiao; Yang, Xue; Xu, Dingde] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu
[Deng, Xin] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Econ, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
[Xu, Dingde] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Sichuan Ctr Rural Dev Res,
C3 Sichuan Agricultural University; Sichuan Agricultural University;
Sichuan Agricultural University
RP Xu, DD (corresponding author), Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu
EM dingdexu@sicau.edu.cn
RI Xu, Dingde/GNP-8560-2022; Deng, Xin/AAU-5244-2020; Xu,
Dingde/A-2084-2013
OI Xu, Dingde/0000-0001-6359-6540
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41801221]; Undergraduate
research interest cultivation program in 2021 of Sichuan agricultural
university [2021489, 2021488]; Special Program for Cultivating Excellent
Young Talents under the Dual Support Plan of Sichuan Agricultural
University
FX We gratefully acknowledge financial support from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (41801221) , Special Program for Cultivating
Excellent Young Talents under the Dual Support Plan of Sichuan
Agricultural University and Undergraduate research interest cultivation
program in 2021 of Sichuan agricultural university (2021489; 2021488) .
The authors also extend great gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and
editors for their helpful review and critical comments.
CR Adeola FO, 2009, ENVIRON BEHAV, V41, P459, DOI 10.1177/0013916508316651
Anton CE, 2016, ENVIRON MANAGE, V57, P148, DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0597-7
Beniston M, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V59, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1024458411589
Bianchini V, 2017, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V13, P10, DOI
10.2174/1745017901713010010
Bianchini V, 2015, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V11, P140, DOI
10.2174/1745017901511010140
C.N.S. Bureau, 2019, CHIN STAT YB 2019
Doyle EEH, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P637, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.008
Guo SL, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V73, P1679, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1165-9
Heller K, 2005, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V35, P399, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.2005.tb02127.x
Hough SE, 2010, NAT GEOSCI, V3, P778, DOI [10.1038/ngeo988, 10.1038/NGEO988]
6996.0000074
Kappes M.S., 2010, SINGLE TO MULTIHAZAR
Li TT, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0214367
Lindell M. K., 2013, CITIES RISK LIVING P, P109, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-
6184-1_7
Lo AY, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1979, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1815-6
Massazza A, 2021, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V130, P248, DOI 10.1037/abn0000663
Massazza A, 2021, QUAL HEALTH RES, V31, P323, DOI 10.1177/1049732320968791
Mimura N, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P803, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9297-7
Mossoux S, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P135, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-135-2016
Peng L, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P469, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1445613
Priebe S, 2009, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V44, P393, DOI 10.1007/s00127-008-0441-y
Qing C, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102252
Roncone R, 2013, SPRINGERPLUS, V2, DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-636
Salvati P, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2589, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2589-
2014
Shan B, 2017, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V60, P2181, DOI 10.1007/s11430-017-9125-2
Spittal MJ, 2008, ENVIRON BEHAV, V40, P798, DOI 10.1177/0013916507309864
Su T, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0067041
Tang JS, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15071434
Xue KJ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18042106
Yang YQ, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V87, P1847, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2852-0
Yin YP, 2009, LANDSLIDES, V6, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10346-009-0148-5
Yong ZL, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17145254
Zhou WF, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105350
Zhuang LM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102593
Zifa W, 2008, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V7, P225, DOI 10.1007/s11803-008-0856-1
Zimmermann M, 2015, MT RES DEV, V35, P195, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00006.1
NR 53
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 3
U2 23
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
SN 2212-4209
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 67
AR 102690
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102690
PG 14
Water Resources
(SSCI)
GA ZI9MK
UT WOS:000761936000004
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Allan, JN
Ripberger, JT
Wehde, W
Krocak, M
Silva, CL
Jenkins-Smith, HC
AF Allan, Jinan N.
Ripberger, Joseph T.
Wehde, Wesley
Krocak, Makenzie
Silva, Carol L.
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.
TI Geographic Distributions of Extreme Weather Risk Perceptions in the
United States
SO RISK ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
DE Extreme weather; geography; risk perceptions
ID FLOOD-RISK; MULTILEVEL REGRESSION; DISASTER SUBCULTURES; EVACUATION;
NORTH; VULNERABILITY; PREPAREDNESS; PROBABILITY; TELEPHONE; HAZARDS
AB Weather and climate disasters pose an increasing risk to life and property in
the United States. Managing this risk requires objective information about the
nature of the threat and subjective information about how people perceive it.
Meteorologists and climatologists have a relatively firm grasp of the historical
objective risk. For example, we know which parts of the United States are most
likely to experience drought, heat waves, flooding, snow or ice storms, tornadoes,
and hurricanes. We know less about the geographic distribution of the perceived
risks of meteorological events and trends. Do subjective perceptions align with
exposure to weather risks? This question is difficult to answer because analysts
have yet to develop a comprehensive and spatially consistent methodology for
measuring risk perceptions across geographic areas in the United States. In this
project, we propose a methodology that uses multilevel regression and
poststratification to estimate extreme weather and climate risk perceptions by
geographic area (i.e., region, state, forecast area, and county). Then we apply the
methodology using data from three national surveys (n= 9,542). This enables us to
measure, map, and compare perceptions of risk from multiple weather hazards in
geographic areas across the country.
C1 [Allan, Jinan N.; Ripberger, Joseph T.; Krocak, Makenzie; Silva, Carol L.;
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.] Natl Inst Risk & Resilience, 201 Stephenson Pkwy,Suite
2300,5 Partners Pl, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
[Allan, Jinan N.] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Psychol, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
[Ripberger, Joseph T.; Silva, Carol L.; Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.] Univ Oklahoma,
Dept Polit Sci, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
[Wehde, Wesley] East Tennessee State Univ, Dept Polit Sci Int Affairs & Publ
Adm, Johnson City, TN USA.
[Krocak, Makenzie] Cooperat Inst Mesoscale Meteorol Studies, Norman, OK USA.
[Krocak, Makenzie] NOAA, Storm Predict Ctr, Norman, OK USA.
C3 University of Oklahoma System; University of Oklahoma - Norman;
University of Oklahoma System; University of Oklahoma - Norman; East
Tennessee State University; National Oceanic Atmospheric Admin (NOAA) -
USA
RP Allan, JN (corresponding author), Natl Inst Risk & Resilience, 201 Stephenson
Pkwy,Suite 2300,5 Partners Pl, Norman, OK 73019 USA.
EM jnallan@ou.edu
RI Silva, Carol/AAH-2181-2020; Krocak, Makenzie/ABA-3893-2020
OI Krocak, Makenzie/0000-0002-0943-8725; Wehde, Wesley/0000-0002-1616-5673;
Silva, Carol/0000-0001-7171-6944; Allan, Jinan/0000-0001-9815-6019;
Ripberger, Joseph/0000-0003-0343-8262; Jenkins-Smith,
Hank/0000-0002-5204-2726
FU OU Office of the Vice President for Research; National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Project OAR-USWRP-R2O, "FACETs Probability of
What? Understanding and Conveying Uncertainty through Probabilistic
Hazard Services"; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[NA18OAR4590376]; Projekt DEAL
FX Data collection for this project was funded by the OU Office of the Vice
President for Research. Data analysis was funded by National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Project OAR-USWRP-R2O, "FACETs Probability of
What? Understanding and Conveying Uncertainty through Probabilistic
Hazard Services," and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Project NA18OAR4590376, "Communicating Forecast Uncertainty and
Probabilistic Information: Experimenting with Social Observation Data in
the Hazardous Weather Testbed."; Open access funding enabled and
organized by Projekt DEAL.
CR ANDERSON WA, 1965, SOME OBSERVATIONS DI
[Anonymous], 2007, J EMPIRICAL LEG STUD, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1740-
1461.2007.00097.X
[Anonymous], 1973, 9 U DEL DIS RES CTR
[Anonymous], 1996, DISASTER PREV MANAG
Baker R., 2013, J SUVERY STATE METHO, V1, P90, DOI [DOI 10.1093/JSSAM/SMT008,
https:/doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008]
Bankoff G, 2017, TRANSCULT RES, P45, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49163-9_2
Berrens RP, 2003, POLIT ANAL, V11, P1, DOI 10.1093/pan/11.1.1
Burton I., 1993, ENV HAZARD, V2
Buttice MK, 2013, POLIT ANAL, V21, P449, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpt017
Champ PA, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P816, DOI 10.1111/risa.12465
Chang L, 2009, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V73, P641, DOI 10.1093/poq/nfp075
Demuth JL, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P1921, DOI 10.1111/risa.12983
2867(01)00014-6, 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00014-6]
Goodrich B., 2018, RSTANARM BAYESIAN AP
Howe PD, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P6743, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1813145116
Lax JR, 2009, AM J POLIT SCI, V53, P107, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00360.x
MacInnis B, 2018, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V82, P707, DOI 10.1093/poq/nfy038
Mileti D. S., 1990, ORNL6609
MILETI DS, 1992, SOC PROBL, V39, P40, DOI 10.1525/sp.1992.39.1.03x0062j
Murphy Sheila T, 2009, Disaster Med Public Health Prep
O'Neill E, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P2158, DOI 10.1111/risa.12597
Perry RW, 2003, DISASTERS, V27, P336, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x
Plapp T, 2006, PROC MONOGR ENG WATE, P101
Ramasubramanian Madhuri, 2019, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society Annual Meeting, V63, P1629, DOI 10.1177/1071181319631504
Royal A, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P1088, DOI 10.1111/risa.13240
Rundmo T, 2004, EVALUATION PSYCHOMET, V10, P665
Rustemli A, 1999, J SOC PSYCHOL, V139, P91, DOI 10.1080/00224549909598364
Silva C., 2017, ESTABLISHING BASELIN
Silva C., 2018, REFINING BASELINE PU
Silva C. L., 2019, CONTINUING BASELINE
SIMS JH, 1972, SCIENCE, V176, P1386, DOI 10.1126/science.176.4042.1386
Smith A., 2018, US BILLION DOLLAR WE
Sunstein CR, 2003, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V26, P121, DOI 10.1023/A:1024111006336
Tanner A, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P548, DOI 10.1111/risa.12851
TVERSKY A, 1973, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V5, P207, DOI 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
United States Census Bureau, 2018, ANN COUNT RES POP ES
United States Drought Monitor (USDM), 2021, US DROUGHT MON
Wallace JW, 2016, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V9, P125, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12115
Weinstein ND, 2000, J SOC CLIN PSYCHOL, V19, P372, DOI
10.1521/jscp.2000.19.3.372
Whitmarsh L, 2008, J RISK RES, V11, P351, DOI 10.1080/13669870701552235
Zhang XY, 2015, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V182, P127, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwv002
NR 56
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 5
U2 31
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0272-4332
EI 1539-6924
J9 RISK ANAL
JI Risk Anal.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 40
IS 12
BP 2498
EP 2508
DI 10.1111/risa.13569
EA JUL 2020
PG 11
(SSCI)
GA PG4EZ
UT WOS:000563946700001
PM 32722870
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU MacPherson-Krutsky, CC
Lindell, MK
Brand, BD
AF MacPherson-Krutsky, Carson C.
Lindell, Michael K.
Brand, Brittany D.
TI Residents' information seeking behavior and protective action for
earthquake hazards in The Portland Oregon Metropolitan Area
SO RISK ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
DE Information seeking; protective action; risk perception; seismic hazard
ID HURRICANE EVACUATION EXPECTATIONS; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; RISK
PERCEPTIONS; HOUSEHOLD PREPAREDNESS; FIRE PREPAREDNESS; DIFFERENT
REGIONS; MODEL; PREDICTORS; ADJUSTMENT; EXPERIENCE
AB Though significant research exists on earthquake hazard adjustment adoption more
generally, research focused on how information seeking influences planned or actual
preparedness behavior is rare, limiting our understanding of how information
seeking translates into preparedness. To address this gap, our study tests a
proposed model of household seismic hazard adjustment using questionnaire responses
of roughly 400 households living in the Portland, OR metropolitan region. The
proposed model includes components of the Protective Action Decision Model (PADM)
with specific emphasis on past information seeking behavior, preparedness behavior,
intentions to seek information, and intentions to take protective action. Other
components include risk perception, earthquake experience, affective response,
seismic risk zone residency, and demographics. Consistent with previous research,
this study finds information seeking behavior to be the strongest influence on
preparedness with other important influences being risk perception, affective
response, and intentions to prepare. We find weak ties between risk zone residency
and earthquake risk perception, though this may be because our sample has little
experience with earthquakes and the majority live in the same earthquake risk
zones. Importantly, longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether
information seeking and intentions to prepare eventually result in household
protective action.
C1 [MacPherson-Krutsky, Carson C.; Lindell, Michael K.; Brand, Brittany D.] Boise
State Univ, Dept Geosci, 1910 Univ Ave, Boise, ID 83725 USA.
C3 Idaho; Boise State University
RP MacPherson-Krutsky, CC (corresponding author), Boise State Univ, Dept Geosci,
1910 Univ Ave, Boise, ID 83725 USA.
EM carsonmacpherson@boisestate.edu
OI MacPherson-Krutsky, Carson/0000-0003-1391-3469; Brand,
Brittany/0000-0002-1609-7877
FU National Science Foundation, Division of Civil, Mechanical and
Manufacturing Innovation [HDBE/1663642]
FX National Science Foundation, Division of Civil, Mechanical and
Manufacturing Innovation, Grant/Award Number: HDBE/1663642
CR Ablah E, 2009, BIOSECUR BIOTERROR, V7, P317, DOI 10.1089/bsp.2009.0022
Aerts JCJH, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
Ajzen I, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, P173
AJZEN I, 1991, ORGAN BEHAV HUM DEC, V50, P179, DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
6988(2004)5:3(115)
10.1177/028072709100900210
Bauer J.M., 2018, O1802 DOGAMI
Becker JS, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P179, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
BENJAMINI Y, 1995, J R STAT SOC B, V57, P289, DOI 10.1111/j.2517-
6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bourque LB, 2012, ENVIRON BEHAV, V44, P374, DOI 10.1177/0013916510390318
Brody SD, 2017, J RISK RES, V20, P760, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2015.1119179
Burton I., 1993, ENV HAZARD, V2
Campbell N., 2020, PRINCIPLES RISK COMM
Demuth JL, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P1921, DOI 10.1111/risa.12983
DOOLEY D, 1992, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V22, P451, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.1992.tb00984.x
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.008
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2019, MEMBERSHIP MANAGEMEN, V12, P8,
DOI [10.1002/mmr.30560, DOI 10.1002/MMR.30560]
Glickman ME, 2014, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V67, P850, DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012
Goltz JD, 2020, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V110, P1589, DOI 10.1785/0120200159
Goltz JD, 2020, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V36, P1231, DOI 10.1177/8755293019899958
Goodall CE, 2013, HEALTH COMMUN, V28, P63, DOI 10.1080/10410236.2012.689096
Hake C.A.V., 1976, EARTH INF BULL, V8, P30
Hart W, 2009, PSYCHOL BULL, V135, P555, DOI 10.1037/a0015701
Heller K, 2005, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V35, P399, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.2005.tb02127.x
HILL RJ, 1977, CONTEMP SOCIOL, V6, P244, DOI 10.2307/2065853
Howell JL, 2012, PSYCHOL SCI, V23, P141, DOI 10.1177/0956797611424164
Hudson P, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P642, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2019.1617339
HWANG SN, 2001, INT J MASS EMERG DIS, V19, P85
Joffe H, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P1943, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2528-1
Jones LM, 2011, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V27, P575, DOI 10.1193/1.3586819
Kahlor LA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101147
Kahlor L, 2010, HEALTH COMMUN, V25, P345, DOI 10.1080/10410231003775172
1816.2007.00191.x
Kohut A., 2012, ASSESSING REPRESENTA
Kreuter F, 2013, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V645, P23, DOI 10.1177/0002716212456815
Kruglanski AW, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, P323
Li YW, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.008
Lindell M.K., 2022, QUASIEXPERIMEN UNPUB
Lindell M.K., 1997, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V15, P327
Lindell M. K., 2013, CITIES RISK LIVING P, P109, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-
6184-1_7
Lindell M.K., 2008, ENCY ED PSYCHOL, P206
Lindell M.K., 2019, SOCIAL SCI EVALUAT 2
Lindell M. K., 2000, INT J MASS EMERGENCI, V18, P317
Lindell M.K., 2020, ROUTLEDGE HDB URBAN, P3
Lindell MK, 2020, FRONT COMP SCI-SWITZ, V2, DOI 10.3389/fcomp.2020.00027
Lindell MK, 2017, J RISK RES, V20, P887, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2015.1121906
Lindell MK, 2013, CURR SOCIOL, V61, P797, DOI 10.1177/0011392113484456
4_22
Lindell MK., 2006, FUNDAMENTALS EMERGEN
MacPherson-Krutsky CC, 2022, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V38, P1223, DOI
10.1177/87552930211057582
MacPherson-Krutsky CC, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101487
Madin I.P., 2013, O1306 DOGAMI
McClure J, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V16, P192, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.003
McClure J, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P635, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1338-6
Mcgee TK, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P308, DOI 10.1080/08941920801910765
Mileti D, 2004, PUBLIC HAZARDS COMMU
MILETI DS, 1992, RISK ANAL, V12, P393, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00691.x
Mileti DS, 1997, SOC PROBL, V44, P89, DOI 10.1525/sp.1997.44.1.03x0214f
Nakayachi K, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13090866
Nunnally J. C., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V2nd ed., DOI DOI 10.1037/018882
Onuma H, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V21, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.11.004
Ott L., 2016, INTRO STAT METHODS D
Peers JB, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101955
Perez-Fuentes G, 2016, SPRINGER P MATH STAT, V185, P257, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-
43709-5_13
Rogers R. W., 1983, SOCIAL PSYCHOPHYSIOL, P153, DOI DOI 10.1093/DEAFED/ENT031
ROGERS RW, 1975, J PSYCHOL, V91, P93, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
Solberg C, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1663, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1663-
2010
State Interagency Hazard Mitigation Team, 2020, 2020 OR NAT HAZ MIT
State Interagency Mitigation Team (SIMT), 2020, 2020 OR NAT HAZ MIT
Sun L, 2020, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V28, P122, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12286
Tekeli-Yesil S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101734
Turner R., 1986, WAITING DISASTER EAR
U.S. Census Bureau, 2018, OR STAT MULT CLACK W
United States Geological Survey, 2020, EARTHQ CAT SEARCH
Vinnell LJ, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101721
Viscusi WK, 2006, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V33, P13, DOI 10.1007/s11166-006-0169-6
Wald DJ, 1999, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V15, P557
Wei HL, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.014
WEINSTEIN ND, 1993, HEALTH PSYCHOL, V12, P235, DOI 10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.235
WITHEY SB, 1962, MAN SOC DISASTER, P93
Wood MM, 2018, ENVIRON BEHAV, V50, P535, DOI 10.1177/0013916517709561
Yang ZJ, 2014, J COMMUN, V64, P20, DOI 10.1111/jcom.12071
NR 103
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 7
U2 20
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
SN 0272-4332
EI 1539-6924
J9 RISK ANAL
JI Risk Anal.
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 2
BP 372
EP 390
DI 10.1111/risa.13916
EA APR 2022
PG 19
(SSCI)
GA D9DZ4
UT WOS:000778192200001
PM 35381621
DA 2023-08-12
ER
PT J
AU Xue, KJ
Guo, SL
Liu, Y
Liu, SQ
Xu, DD
AF Xue, Kaijing
Guo, Shili
Liu, Yi
Liu, Shaoquan
Xu, Dingde
TI Social Networks, Trust, and Disaster-Risk Perceptions of Rural Residents
in a Multi-Disaster Environment: Evidence from Sichuan, China
LA English
DT Article
DE social networks; trust; risk perception; multiple disasters; China
ID GORGES RESERVOIR AREA; FLOOD RISK; EARTHQUAKE SURVIVORS; NATURAL
DISASTER; LANDSLIDE RISK; SELF-EFFICACY; PREPAREDNESS; HOUSEHOLDS;
EVACUATION; RESPONSES
AB Individual perception of disaster risk is not only the product of individual
factors, but also the product of social interactions. However, few studies have
empirically explored the correlations between rural residents' flat social
networks, trust in pyramidal channels, and disaster-risk perceptions. Taking
Sichuan Province-a typical disaster-prone province in China-as an example and using
data from 327 rural households in mountainous areas threatened by multiple
disasters, this paper measured the level of participants' disaster-risk perception
in the four dimensions of possibility, threat, self-efficacy, and response
efficacy. Then, the ordinary least squares method was applied to probe the
correlations between social networks, trust, and residents' disaster-risk
perception. The results revealed four main findings. (1) Compared with scores
relating to comprehensive disaster-risk perception, participants had lower
perception scores relating to possibility and threat, and higher perception scores
relating to self-efficacy and response efficacy. (2) The carrier characteristics of
their social networks significantly affected rural residents' perceived levels of
disaster risk, while the background characteristics did not. (3) Different
dimensions of trust had distinct effects on rural residents' disaster-risk
perceptions. (4) Compared with social network variables, trust was more closely
related to the perceived level of disaster risks, which was especially reflected in
the impact on self-efficacy, response efficacy, and comprehensive perception. The
findings of this study deepen understanding of the relationship between social
networks, trust, and disaster-risk perceptions of rural residents in mountainous
areas threatened by multiple disasters, providing enlightenment for building
resilient disaster-prevention systems in the community.
C1 [Xue, Kaijing; Liu, Shaoquan] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm,
9,Block 4,Renminnan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China.
[Xue, Kaijing] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, 19A Yuquan Rd, Beijing 100049, Peoples R
China.
[Guo, Shili] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, China Western Econ Res Ctr,
[Liu, Yi] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
[Xu, Dingde] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Sichuan Ctr Rural Dev Res, 211
Huimin Rd, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Mountain Hazards &
Environment, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, CAS; Southwestern University of Finance & Economics
- China; Sichuan Agricultural University; Sichuan Agricultural
University
RP Liu, SQ (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm,
9,Block 4,Renminnan Rd, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China.; Xu, DD (corresponding
author), Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Management, Sichuan Ctr Rural Dev Res, 211 Huimin
Rd, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China.
EM kaijingxue@imde.ac.cn; guoshili@swufe.edu.cn; lyx1@stu.sicau.edu.cn;
liushq@imde.ac.cn; dingdexu@sicau.edu.cn
RI Xu, Dingde/GNP-8560-2022; Xu, Dingde/A-2084-2013
OI Xu, Dingde/0000-0001-6359-6540; Xue, Kaijing/0000-0002-1679-7240
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41801221]
FX This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant No. 41801221).
CR ACOCK AC, 1993, SOC NETWORKS, V15, P309, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(93)90010-I
Adeola FO, 2009, ENVIRON BEHAV, V41, P459, DOI 10.1177/0013916508316651
Ahsan DA, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.005
[Anonymous], 2009, FLOOD PREPAREDNESS T
Anzellini V., 2020, GLOBAL REPORT INTERN, P1
Ardaya AB, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P227, DOI
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.006
Armas I, 2006, RISK ANAL, V26, P1223, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00810.x
Armas I, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V50, P269, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9337-0
Babcicky P, 2017, J RISK RES, V20, P1017, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2016.1147489
Beniston M, 2003, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V59, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1024458411589
Bernardo F, 2013, ESTUD PSICOL-MADRID, V34, P323, DOI 10.1174/021093913808349253
Bevere L., 2020, NATURAL CATASTROPHES, V4
Borgatti, 2009, COMPLEX THEORY TECH, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_491, DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_491]
Borgatti SP, 2009, J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V45, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-
493X.2009.03166.x
Bronfman NC, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P307, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2080-4
[陈容 Chen Rong], 2013, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V28, P133
Damm A, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P165, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0694-y
DEVILLIERS GD, 1994, WATER SA, V20, P9
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.008
Dunning D, 2012, J ECON PSYCHOL, V33, P686, DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2011.09.005
Everett, 1998, CONNECTIONS, V21, P1
Fang YP, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V38, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.007
FIORE J, 1983, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V11, P423, DOI 10.1007/BF00894057
Gray-Scholz D, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P2543, DOI 10.1111/risa.13357
Grothmann T, 2006, NAT HAZARDS, V38, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11069-005-8604-6
Han ZQ, 2021, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V20, P132, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2020.1725410
Han ZQ, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P437, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2699-9
Hu R., 2013, SOCIOL REV CHINA, V1, P49
Inkpen AC, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P146, DOI [10.2307/20159100,
10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445]
Israel, 2009, SOCIAL NETWORKS SOCI, P189
Jack SL, 2005, J MANAGE STUD, V42, P1233, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00540.x
Johnston D, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V35, P173, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-2419-8
Koku E, 2020, AIDS BEHAV, V24, P206, DOI 10.1007/s10461-019-02637-y
Lazega E, 1995, REV FR SOCIOL, V36, P781, DOI 10.2307/3322457
Lee J., 2010, P PAC AS C INF SYST
Li LJ, 2004, MOD CHINA, V30, P228, DOI 10.1177/0097700403261824
Liaocheng Statistical Bureau, 2019, NB S LIAOCHENG STATI
Lin, 1998, CONNECT, V22, P8279
Liu SQ, 2014, J RURAL STUD, V33, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.11.001
Louch H, 2000, SOC NETWORKS, V22, P45, DOI 10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00015-0
Mayo R, 2015, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V26, P283, DOI 10.1080/10463283.2015.1117249
MCALLISTER DJ, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P24, DOI 10.5465/256727
Mccarty, 2018, SOCIAL NETWORKS DISA, P151
Mertens K, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V75, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.028
Miller E, 2008, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V21, P244, DOI 10.1080/08941920701818258
MULILIS JP, 1990, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V20, P619, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.1990.tb00429.x
Murray M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101115
Nunkoo R, 2012, ANN TOURISM RES, V39, P997, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.017
Pado T., 2008, COMMUNITY ATTITUDES
Palm R, 1998, APPL GEOGR, V18, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0143-6228(97)00044-1
PONZO M, 2010, J SOCIAL EC, V39, P89, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2009.07.007
Reininger BM, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V83, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.037
Salvati P, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P2589, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-2589-
2014
Schaubroeck J, 2011, J APPL PSYCHOL, V96, P863, DOI 10.1037/a0022625
Scherer CW, 2003, RISK ANAL, V23, P261, DOI 10.1111/1539-6924.00306
Siegrist M, 2005, J RISK RES, V8, P145, DOI 10.1080/1366987032000105315
Steffen W., 2004, GLOBAL CHANGE EARTH, P1
Tanner A, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P548, DOI 10.1111/risa.12851
ter Huurne EFJ, 2009, J RISK RES, V12, P809, DOI 10.1080/13669870902726091
Vigoda-Gadot E, 2010, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V40, P2829, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-
1816.2010.00683.x
Wendy M., 2007, P CHI 2007 C HUM FAC, P2219
WIEGMAN O, 1995, BASIC APPL SOC PSYCH, V16, P227, DOI
10.1207/s15324834basp1601&2_14
Wu JJ, 2019, INTERACT J MED RES, V8, DOI 10.2196/11750
Wu XH, 2017, INT J COMMUN-US, V11, P3975
Xie FT, 2022, J RURAL STUD, V93, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.039
Xu DD, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2865, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04106-5
Xu DD, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104164
Xu DD, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P4850, DOI 10.3390/su7054850
Xue KK, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11154134
Yan, 2008, RES CONSUMERSCOGNITI, P170
Yang J, 2010, SOC BEHAV PERSONAL, V38, P1219, DOI 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.9.1219
Zaalberg R, 2009, RISK ANAL, V29, P1759, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01316.x
Zeng XY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101971
Zhang MH, 2008, ADV INTEL SYS RES, P345
Zhang X, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P2215, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0471-3
Zhang Y.Q., 2016, THESIS HUNAN U SCI T
Zhou WF, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P255, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04460-4
Zimmermann M, 2015, MT RES DEV, V35, P195, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-15-00006.1
NR 97
TC 27
Z9 27
U1 8
U2 56
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
EI 1660-4601
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 4
AR 2106
DI 10.3390/ijerph18042106
PG 25
(SSCI)
Health
GA QP1EV
UT WOS:000623580600001
PM 33671496
DA 2023-08-12
ER
EF

Ecr

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ecr

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science

You might also like