Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Processcourse
1 Processcourse
CPT 1 : CPT 2 :
liners liners
Ventilation
DIAPHRAGMS :
Slot dimensions
Centre type
Compartment lengths
Grinding ball charges
Slegten grinding course 2
Reduction Methods
Splitting up
by impact
Nipping angle
and particle size
Shearing effect
on the grain
0 – 30 mm <5%R2.5 mm 10%>45 µ
Reduction
by impacts
by pressure
by macroscopic shearing
= CRUSHING
Reduction
by microscopic shearing
between balls and/or autogeneous
= ATTRITION.
Slegten grinding course 7
Reduction Methods
- Lifting liner
- Balls from 90 to 60 mm.
- Absorbed power: 10 kW/t
ρ = Lifting angle
φ = Foot angle
H = Media thickness
H
P = Media height ρ
E = (H × P)/J(%)
P
Smooth
MONOSTEP
Waved
DUOSTEP
BALL TRACK
• ABAB + AAAA
Mill Division
30 kWh/t
10 kWh/t 3000 kW
100 tph
40 kWh/t
10 kWh/t 3000 kW
75 tph
50 kWh/t
10 kWh/t 3000 kW
60 tph
Mill Division
Energy waste in Cpt 1
Cpt 2 too short to generate 15 kWh/t
fineness
high C.L.
Ch1 = bottle-neck
5 kWh/t
Ch2 = overgrinding
50 500 79 1999 16
40 256 50 3905 20
30 108 28 9257 26
25 63 20 15995 31 30 tons of
20 32 13 31241 39 ∅ 17 mm
17 20 9 50870 46 =
15 14 7 74052 52 1.5 millions ∅
Slegten grinding course 22
Charge calculation in Cpt 1
Main parameters
Lifting Liners
Granu A B C D Granu A B C D
∅90 3 9 18 24.5 %R20 0 2 17 42
∅80 7 31 38 38.5 %R8 3 21 49 71
∅70 40 43 36 32 %R4 17 46 70 84
∅60 50 17 8 5 %R2.5 33 63 80 90
* 10 kWh/t – hardness 120
60 => 20 % R / 90 µ
∅ 20 mm 19.2 minutes 8.5 kWh/t
∅ 30 mm 31.4 minutes 13.9 kWh/t
20 => 5 % R / 90 µ
∅ 10 mm 10.8 minutes 4.8 kWh/t
∅ 25 mm 38 minutes 16.9 kWh/t
20 => 2 % R / 90 microns
CLASSOLINE CLASSODRIFT
CLASSOGRADE CLASSODEEP
1800 Bl
2000 Bl
1000 Bl
1000 Bl
3500 Bl
1800 Bl
2000 Bl
CL = (3500-1000) ÷ (1800-1000) = 3.1
CL = (3500-1000) ÷ (2000-1000) = 2.5
Classifying Liners
Liners with a classifying effect are strongly recommended
DIAPHRAGMS
Graphic showing the S produced in cm2/gr (Blaine) per
kWh with different filling degrees of material OPTICONTROL
in 1st compartment of a grinding mill
optimal
efficiency for
R = 19%
Ratio corresponding
to the fulfilling with
material of the free
spaces between
grinding balls
OPTICONTROL
OPTICONTROL
process
OPTICONTROL,
an optimal grinding
mill efficiency
OPTICONTROL,
a high performance
working method
Air screen
Objectives :
Optidry
View from
Δ slot size varies from 20 to grinding cpt
35mm
Δ gas passage surface ↑ with
slot dimensions
Purpose:
· Fluidization / improves the flow of the material through the chamber
· Sweeping of fine particles fights the risk of coating
· Cooling of the material fights the risk of coating /
dehydration gypsum dehydration
Usual range:
Air speed Amount of air:
Open circuit : 0.8 to 1.2 m/sec
Closed circuit: 1.2 to 1.5 m/sec 0.3 to 0.45 Nm3/kg
1. Purpose:
Keep material temperature at mill outlet < 105 °C.
2. Use:
Mainly in Cpt 2
If clinker temperature higher than 80°C, water may be injected in Cpt 1
(max H2O: 1% of fresh feed rate)
Definition:
Agglomeration of fine particles (on lining and/or on grinding media)
grinding efficiency decrease
Reasons:
* Overgrinding (often in O.C., fine cement grinding and limestone addition)
* Too high outlet temperature in Cpt 2 ( > 110 °C at mill outlet)
* Fresh feed moisture (coating in Cpt 1)
Solutions:
* limit fine particles - good mill ventilation
- good separator
* Avoid outlet temperatures > 105 °C (ventilation, water injection, separator)
* Use grinding aids
* If coating is due to moisture, dry by hot clinker, hot rejects or hot gas
Slegten grinding course 43
CR&T
OPTDIVFR