You are on page 1of 13

Designation: D 6092 – 97 (Reapproved 2003)

Standard Practice for


Specifying Standard Sizes of Stone for Erosion Control1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 6092; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.

1. Scope D 4992 Practice for Evaluation of Rock to be Used for


1.1 This practice covers size designations and maximum Erosion Control2
ranges in mass or gradation for standard sizes for riprap, spalls, D 5519 Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Natural
or bedding, or both, used for slope protection of dam embank- and Manmade Riprap Materials2
ments, streambank erosion control, bridge piers and abutments. 3. Terminology
Sizes used for outer harbor structures such as breakwalls,
revetments, confined diked disposal structures (heretofore 3.1 Definitions: Definitions of other terms in this guide are
described as armor stone, cover stone, or dimension stone) for listed in Terminology D 653.
which stone sizes range between 5 and 25 tons, or that require 3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
cut dimensions for layed-up structures are beyond the scope of 3.2.1 filter/bedding stone—stone, filter stone consisting of
this practice. crushed stone ranging in size from 3⁄4 in. (19 mm) to number 40
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded sieve size, and bedding stone (often referred to as “spalls”)
as the standard. The SI units given in parentheses are for consisting of crushed stone ranging in size from 6 in. (152 mm)
information only. (maximum) to 1⁄2 in. (12.7 mm) minimum. Filter and bedding
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the may be placed in two layers beneath the riprap, that is, a filter
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the layer 8 to 10 in. (203 to 254 mm) thick and a bedding thickness
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- of 6 to 8 in. (152 to 203 mm).
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- 3.2.2 geotextiles—suitable geotextile fabrics that meet the
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. design requirements may be used instead of the above bedding
1.4 This practice offers an organized collection of informa- and spalls. Suitable cover thickness maybe required.
tion or a series of options and does not recommend a specific 3.2.3 gradation—the proportions by mass of stones distrib-
course of action. This document cannot replace education or uted within specified ranges between maximum and minimum
experience and should be used in conjunction with professional limits.
judgment. Not all aspects of this practice may be applicable in 3.2.4 riprap—stone materials generally less than two tons
all circumstances. This ASTM standard is not intended to in weight, specially selected and graded, and when properly
represent or replace the standard of care by which the placed prevents erosion through minor wave action, or strong
adequacy of a given professional service must be judged, nor currents and thereby preserves the shape of a surface, slope, or
should this document be applied without consideration of a the underlying structure.
project’s many unique aspects. The word “Standard” in the 3.2.5 standard size designation—one of a group of stones
title of this document means only that the document has been with specified gradation limits.
approved through the ASTM consensus process. 4. Summary of Practice
2. Referenced Documents 4.1 The design team shall establish the size of the mass of
2.1 ASTM Standards: graded quarry stone using acceptable design criteria. If design
D 653 Terminology Relating to Soil, Rock, and Contained criteria and economic factors permit, standard gradations
Fluids2 shown in the designated tables should be selected. Using
standard sizes, the design team shall select the appropriate
gradation; this might require the next larger size thereby
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D18 on Soil and creating an over-designed structure, but economically, a
Rock and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D18.17 on Rock for Erosion cheaper structure. Added cost may result due to the increased
Control.
Current edition approved March 10, 1997. Published May 1997.
volume of stone required, and in transporting and placing the
2
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.08. additional stone at the project site. The cost effectiveness of

Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.

1
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
TABLE 1 Standard Sizes for RiprapA
Size Designation R-1500 R-700 R-300 R-150 R-60 R-20
Particle Mass Percent Lighter Than the Mass SpecifiedB
Pounds (Kilogram)C
3000 (1400) 100 ... ... ... ... ...
1500 (680) 50 to 100 100 ... ... ... ...
1000 (450) ... ... ... ... ... ...
700 (320) 15 to 50 50 to 100 100 ... ... ...
500 (230) ... ... ... ... ... ...
300 (140) ... 15 to 50 50 to 100 100 ... ...
250 (110) 0 to 15 ... ... ... ... ...
150 (68) ... ... 15 to 50 50 to 100 100 ...
60 (27) ... 0 to 15 ... 15 to 50 50 to 100 ...
45 (20) ... ... 0 to 15 ... ... 100
30 (14) ... ... ... ... 15 to 50 ...
20 (9.1) ... ... ... 0 to 15 ... 50 to 100
10 (4.5) ... ... ... ... 0 to 15 15 to 50
2 (0.9) ... ... ... ... ... 0 to 15
A
Revised Nov 14, 1995, and modified to conform to the gradations proposed by the producers and the National Crushed Stone Association.
B
Established by determining the mass of the individual stone particles.
C
Rounded to two figures from conversion of inch-pound (U.S. Customary) units.

TABLE 2 Effect of Specific Gravity on the Weight of Stone of Various Shapes (Pounds)
Maximum Cube Sphere
Dimension, in.
Specific Gravity Specific Gravity
... 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75
42 6950 7090 7225 7350 3640 3712 3780 3850
30 2535 2584 2635 2680 1325 1353 1380 1405
20 750 766 780 390 390 401 410 415
12 160 165 168 172 85 87 88 90
6 20 20.5 21 21.5 10 11 11 11

Prolate Sphere Average of Cube and Sphere


Specific Gravity Specific Gravity
... 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75
42 3238 3300 3362 3424 5300 5401 5500 5600
30 1180 1202.5 1225 1248 1930 1968 2005 2845
20 350 356 363 370 570 583 595 405
12 75 77 78 80 123 126 128 131
6 9.4 9.6 9.8 10 15 16 16 16

using “standard grading” versus “non-standard gradings” al- bridges and stream channel banks, gabions, and slope protec-
ways should be evaluated, and standard gradations used tion for earth embankment and rock-fill dams.
whenever possible. 5.3 The design selection of stone sizes, durability, place-
ment, filter/bedding materials, or geotextiles, steepness of
5. Significance and Use slopes for placement, and layer thickness are beyond the scope
5.1 The standard size designations listed in this practice are of this guide.
provided so that the design team, consumer, and the producer
have a common reference in sizing stone materials used in 6. Manufacture
erosion control. The design team should perform a materials 6.1 The standard size designations of quarried stone for
survey, and subsequent testing to determine which quarry erosion control in this guide may be produced by any suitable
sources may have suitable in-place rock and perform suitable commercial quarrying method, and by the use of any type of
blasting and processing procedures to produce the required sizing device, shape or size of plant grizzly or screen openings,
gradations. The design team must recognize the fact that not all or combinations thereof, necessary to produce the required
sources are capable or willing to produce the required grada- sizes within the gradation limits specified in Section 6.
tions. Only those sources listed by the design team should be 6.2 Stones shall be hard, angular to subangular, and of such
considered for construction of the project. quality that they will not disintergrate on exposure to water or
5.2 The standard size designations provided in this guide are weathering during the designed life of the structure. The stone
suitable for protective surfacing and structures designed for shall be free from fractures, shale partings, deleterious mate-
erosion control. These sizes are for typical structures such as rials, and overburden soil (including clays from sink structures,
jetties, revetments, groin baffles, bulkheads, lining for that is, chimneys and stopes). The design team shall specify
drainage/irrigation ditches and for intake or outlet facilities, acceptance criteria based on the requirements for the individual

2
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
project. Additional guidance may be found in Practice D 4992 provides additional information on converting to approximate
and Test Method D 5519. dimensions for graded stone.
7.1.3 Gradation curves for each stone size are presented in
7. Standard Sizes Figs. 1-9.
7.1.4 Filter/bedding stone sizes are shown in Figs. 7-9.
7.1 Standard size designations of stone for erosion control
7.2 The stone shall be reasonably well-graded and fall
are defined on the basis of mass or equivalent sieve size. The
within the limits of the gradation curve for each size designa-
sizes are separated into riprap [R-1500 through R-20] and
tion. Gradation test results that begin on the coarse side of the
filter/bedding stone [FS-1 and FS-2] and spalls [FS-3]. curve and end up on the fine side of the curve are considered
7.1.1 Graded stone sizes are shown on Table 1, and are as “skip-graded” and will not be accepted.
based on mass.
7.1.2 Equivalent dimensions are not shown. Any calculated 8. Keywords
dimensions would have to assume shapes such as a cube, a 8.1 erosion control; filter/bedding stone; gradation; quarried
sphere, an prolate sphere, or a combination of shapes. Table 2 stone; riprap; standard size designation

3
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
4

NOTE 1—Gradations curves for each of the riprap types are plotted on the following pages. Test results for each gradation performed in the field should be plotted on the appropriate curve.
Acceptable products will plot somewhat parallel to the gradation limits. Test results of the products that start on the coarse side of the curve and end on the finer side of the curve shall be deemed
as skip graded and are unacceptable.
FIG. 1 Gradation Limits for Riprap R-1500
5
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 2 Gradation Limits for Riprap R-700


6
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 3 Gradation Curve for Riprap R-300


7
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 4 Gradation Limits for Riprap R-150


8
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 5 Gradation Limits for Riprap R-60


9
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 6 Gradation Limits for Riprap R-20


10
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 7 Gradation Limits for Bedding FS-1


11
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 8 Gradation Limits for Bedding FS-2


12
D 6092 – 97 (2003)

FIG. 9 Gradation Limits for Spalls FS-3


D 6092 – 97 (2003)

ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.

This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.

This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).

13

You might also like