Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
TABLE 1 Standard Sizes for RiprapA
Size Designation R-1500 R-700 R-300 R-150 R-60 R-20
Particle Mass Percent Lighter Than the Mass SpecifiedB
Pounds (Kilogram)C
3000 (1400) 100 ... ... ... ... ...
1500 (680) 50 to 100 100 ... ... ... ...
1000 (450) ... ... ... ... ... ...
700 (320) 15 to 50 50 to 100 100 ... ... ...
500 (230) ... ... ... ... ... ...
300 (140) ... 15 to 50 50 to 100 100 ... ...
250 (110) 0 to 15 ... ... ... ... ...
150 (68) ... ... 15 to 50 50 to 100 100 ...
60 (27) ... 0 to 15 ... 15 to 50 50 to 100 ...
45 (20) ... ... 0 to 15 ... ... 100
30 (14) ... ... ... ... 15 to 50 ...
20 (9.1) ... ... ... 0 to 15 ... 50 to 100
10 (4.5) ... ... ... ... 0 to 15 15 to 50
2 (0.9) ... ... ... ... ... 0 to 15
A
Revised Nov 14, 1995, and modified to conform to the gradations proposed by the producers and the National Crushed Stone Association.
B
Established by determining the mass of the individual stone particles.
C
Rounded to two figures from conversion of inch-pound (U.S. Customary) units.
TABLE 2 Effect of Specific Gravity on the Weight of Stone of Various Shapes (Pounds)
Maximum Cube Sphere
Dimension, in.
Specific Gravity Specific Gravity
... 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75 2.60 2.65 2.70 2.75
42 6950 7090 7225 7350 3640 3712 3780 3850
30 2535 2584 2635 2680 1325 1353 1380 1405
20 750 766 780 390 390 401 410 415
12 160 165 168 172 85 87 88 90
6 20 20.5 21 21.5 10 11 11 11
using “standard grading” versus “non-standard gradings” al- bridges and stream channel banks, gabions, and slope protec-
ways should be evaluated, and standard gradations used tion for earth embankment and rock-fill dams.
whenever possible. 5.3 The design selection of stone sizes, durability, place-
ment, filter/bedding materials, or geotextiles, steepness of
5. Significance and Use slopes for placement, and layer thickness are beyond the scope
5.1 The standard size designations listed in this practice are of this guide.
provided so that the design team, consumer, and the producer
have a common reference in sizing stone materials used in 6. Manufacture
erosion control. The design team should perform a materials 6.1 The standard size designations of quarried stone for
survey, and subsequent testing to determine which quarry erosion control in this guide may be produced by any suitable
sources may have suitable in-place rock and perform suitable commercial quarrying method, and by the use of any type of
blasting and processing procedures to produce the required sizing device, shape or size of plant grizzly or screen openings,
gradations. The design team must recognize the fact that not all or combinations thereof, necessary to produce the required
sources are capable or willing to produce the required grada- sizes within the gradation limits specified in Section 6.
tions. Only those sources listed by the design team should be 6.2 Stones shall be hard, angular to subangular, and of such
considered for construction of the project. quality that they will not disintergrate on exposure to water or
5.2 The standard size designations provided in this guide are weathering during the designed life of the structure. The stone
suitable for protective surfacing and structures designed for shall be free from fractures, shale partings, deleterious mate-
erosion control. These sizes are for typical structures such as rials, and overburden soil (including clays from sink structures,
jetties, revetments, groin baffles, bulkheads, lining for that is, chimneys and stopes). The design team shall specify
drainage/irrigation ditches and for intake or outlet facilities, acceptance criteria based on the requirements for the individual
2
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
project. Additional guidance may be found in Practice D 4992 provides additional information on converting to approximate
and Test Method D 5519. dimensions for graded stone.
7.1.3 Gradation curves for each stone size are presented in
7. Standard Sizes Figs. 1-9.
7.1.4 Filter/bedding stone sizes are shown in Figs. 7-9.
7.1 Standard size designations of stone for erosion control
7.2 The stone shall be reasonably well-graded and fall
are defined on the basis of mass or equivalent sieve size. The
within the limits of the gradation curve for each size designa-
sizes are separated into riprap [R-1500 through R-20] and
tion. Gradation test results that begin on the coarse side of the
filter/bedding stone [FS-1 and FS-2] and spalls [FS-3]. curve and end up on the fine side of the curve are considered
7.1.1 Graded stone sizes are shown on Table 1, and are as “skip-graded” and will not be accepted.
based on mass.
7.1.2 Equivalent dimensions are not shown. Any calculated 8. Keywords
dimensions would have to assume shapes such as a cube, a 8.1 erosion control; filter/bedding stone; gradation; quarried
sphere, an prolate sphere, or a combination of shapes. Table 2 stone; riprap; standard size designation
3
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
4
NOTE 1—Gradations curves for each of the riprap types are plotted on the following pages. Test results for each gradation performed in the field should be plotted on the appropriate curve.
Acceptable products will plot somewhat parallel to the gradation limits. Test results of the products that start on the coarse side of the curve and end on the finer side of the curve shall be deemed
as skip graded and are unacceptable.
FIG. 1 Gradation Limits for Riprap R-1500
5
D 6092 – 97 (2003)
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
13