School Profile/Data

Identifying Information
School ID: 107890 Name of School: Talaba Elementary School
Address: Talaba IV, Bacoor City, Cavite Barangay: Talaba IV
District: Bacoor II Municipality: Bacoor City
Division: Bacoor Region: IV-A

A. Geography
A.1 Location of the School. Check the appropriate description.
Along the highway Near a river or waterway On top of a mountain
Near the coastline By the hillside

A.2 Relative Distance of the School

Distance in kilometer Mode of Transportation

A. From the poblacion 8 PUJ

B. From the nearest public .5 Tricycle/sidecar
elementary school
C.From the nearest private .5 Tricycle/sidecar
elementary school
c.From the nearest public high 8 PUJ/Multi-cab
school
E. From the nearest private .5 Tricycle/sidecar
high school
F. From the District Office .5 Tricycle/sidecar
G. From the Division Office 5 PUJ

A.3 Incidence of crimes and other human-induced hazards

A.3.1 Check if there have been incidences of the following in the last three
years
Armed conflict as a result of organized crime (terrorism, siege, etc.)
Crime against school head/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual
Harassment, etc.)
Crime against school property (theft, robbery, arson)
Crime against student/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual
Harassment, etc.)
Crime against teacher/s (murder/homicide, physical injury, rape, sexual
Harassment, etc.
Fire (Electrical wiring failure, etc.)
Health Threat (i.e. Dengue, Malaria, Measles, food poisoning, disease
Outbreak)
Oil Spill
Security threat as a result of civilian violence (bomb threats, kidnapping
Threats, hostage taking, shooting, etc.)
Structural downfall (as a result of engineering failures)
Others. Pls. Specify: ______________

A.3.2 What are the 3 most frequent crimes/human‐induced hazards?

1st most frequent: _____Theft____________________________
2nd most frequent: ________n/a______________________
3rd most frequent: __________n/a_______________________

A.4 Incidence of natural hazards

A.4.1 Check if there have been incidences of the following in the last 3 years.
Drought Tropical Cyclones (Storm, Typhoon,
/
 Tropical Depression, etc.)
Earthquake Oil Spill
Fire (includes forest fires and fires due to natural disasters)
Flood Tsunami
Landslide Volcanic Eruption
Storm surge Others, please specify:______________

A.4.2 What are the 3 most frequent natural hazards?

1st most frequent: ________flood_____________________
2nd most frequent: _______typhoon___________________
3rd most frequent: _________n/a________________________

A.5 Result of disaster incidents

School used as an evacuation center in the last three years

B. Learning Environment

B.1 Classrooms and seats

B.1.1 Classroom quantity

Level Total No. of Classrooms
Enrollment,
Current SY
2019-2020
In Good For Total Learner:Classroom
Condition Repair/Reha Ratio
bilitation
Kindergarten 193 3 0 3 1:64
Grade 1 191 5 0 5 1:48
Grade 2 192 2 3 5 1:48
Grade 3 148 5 0 5 1:37
Grade 4 150 4 1 5 1:38
Grade 5 166 4 1 5 1:33
Grade 6 185 5 0 5 1:37
Agri Room 0 1 1
I.A. Room 0 1 1
Total 1,225 28 7 34 1:41

B.1.2 Classroom seat quantity Indicate the total number of seats in all
classrooms.

Number Learner:seat
ratio
1,225* 1:1
*150 seats (partly damaged) need repair

B.2 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) facilities

B.2.1 Water supply/source. Check as appropriate.

Local piped water Rainwater catchments Without available water
supply
Water well/deep well Natural source

Is the main source of water functional at present?

Yes No Pls. Cite reasons why:
_______
__________________________

B.2.2 Handwashing. Is there space for handwashing?

Yes If yes: with soap without soap
No
 B.2.3 Functional toilets*
Male Female
Number Ratio Number Ratio
12 1:109 13 1:100

B.2.4 Toilet Bowls

Male Female
Number Ratio Number Ratio
12 1:109 13 1:100
*6 toilets need repair

B.3Textbooks. Indicate number of textbooks per grade level and subject

Level English Filipino Math Scienc AP/
e Hekasi
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio
Kindergarten - - - - - - - - - -
Grade 1 120 1:1 273 1;1 452 0:1 - - 355 1:1
Grade 2 101 1:2 85 1;4 100 1:3 - - 105 1:4
Grade 3 90 1:3 150 1:2 240 1:1 130 1;1 130 1:2
Grade 4 125 1:2 125 1:.2 125 1:2 125 1:2 125 1:2
Grade 5 225 1:1 240 1:.1 98 1:2 170 1:1 242 1:1
Grade 6 - - - - 148 1:.2 - - 148 1;2
Total 661 873 1163 425 1105

Level MT MAPE/MSEP EPP/ ESP

TLE
Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio Number Ratio
Kindergarten - - - - - - - -
Grade 1 310 1;1 103 1:.57 - - 297 1;1
Grade 2 90 1:6 - - - - 94 1;6
Grade 3 170 1:1 193 1:1 - - 165 1:1
Grade 4 - - 125 1:2 125 1;2 125 1:2
Grade 5 - - 245 1:1 245 1:1 59 1:2
Grade 6 - - - - - - - -
Total 570 666 370 740

B.4. Library:
No. of books: 400
No. of tables: 5
No. of chairs: 30

Give additional information and qualitative descriptions of the library (on the
lighting, space, other fixtures present, etc.)

Floor Dimension: 9x7 m

4 fluorescent light
1 unit Aircon (need repair/replacement)

Talaba Elem. School library is already established but not yet functional.

B.5. Other learning facilities/materials (Example: computers, science equipment.

Insert new rows if necessary.)

Facility/Material Number Qualitative description/condition

Computers for Instruction 6 Needs repair
TV Sets 6 Only 4 of them are functional
Blackboard/Whiteboard 32 In good condition
Magnifying Glass 2 In good condition
Test Tubes 10 In good condition
Test Tube Rack 2 In good condition
 Test Tube Holder 2 In good condition
Alcohol Lamp 5 In good condition
Microscope 4 In good condition
Dissecting Microscope 4 In good condition
Graduated Cylinder 6 In good condition
Glass Funnel 8 In good condition
Spring Balance 3 In good condition
Pulleys 4 In good condition
Tuning Fork 2 In good condition
Prism 6 In good condition
Beaker 4 In good condition
Erlenmeyer Flask 4 In good condition
Funnel 4 In good condition
Tiring Rod 2 In good condition
Reagent Bottle 1 In good condition
Petri Dish 4 In good condition
Compasses 8 In good condition
Butterfly Cycle 2 In good condition
Frog Cycle 1 In good condition
Circulatory System 5 In good condition
Solar System Chart 3 In good condition
Human Torso Model 2 In good condition

B.6 Availability of electrical supply. What is the school's source of electricity?

Grid supply
Off grid supply
Solar power
Generator
Other, pls. specify: _______________
No source of electricity

B.7 Internet connectivity

B.7.1 Are there Internet service providers in the area?
Yes No

If YES, check the appropriate Internet service provider/s servicing the area:
BAYANTEL GLOBE SMART WIT
Global
(Satellite)
DIGITEL PLDT SUN
Others.Pls.specify: ______

B.7.2 Does the school subscribe to any of the Internet service provider/s listed
above?
Yes No

B.7.3 Are there Internet café/shops/WiFi‐enabled stations in the area?

Yes Pls. Specify: Barangay Hall
No

C. Teachers
C.1 Number of teachers
C.1.1 Number of nationally‐funded teachers (current SY)
Male Female Total Learner:Teacher
Ratio
5 35 39 1:31
 C.1.2. Number of locally‐funded teachers and subsidized/volunteer teachers
(current SY):
No. of Locally‐funded Teachers: 0
No. of Subsidized/ Volunteer Teachers: 0

C.2 Quality of teachers

C. 2.1 Number of Master Teachers
Position Num Carries Full-time Assigned Assigned Assigned Full‐
ber Class Teaching Grade Part‐Time to Time to
Load Levels Class Ancillary
(YES/NO) Teaching Services
(YES/NO) (YES/NO)
Master 0 - - - -
Teacher IV
Master 0 - - - -
Teacher III
Master 1 - Grades 5- Yes Yes
Teacher II 6
Master 0 - - - -
Teacher I

C.2.2 Number of teachers meeting the desired competencies based on NCBTS

SY Before Previous Previous SY: Current SY:
SY: 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018

Total No. of 37 37 37
Teachers
No. of Teachers 37 37 37
meeting the
standards
% meeting the 100% 100% 100%
standards

C.2.3 Projects/interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of

teachers
Yes No If yes, please describe
a. Does the school have NCBTS / RPMS/IPCRF/IPPD
mechanisms for sustained
school-based training?
b. Does the school use the result / The school personnel
of the NCBTS Teacher's immediately conduct necessary
Strength and Needs Assessment interventions as the needs arrive
as basis for planning?
c. Are there other interventions / INSET / SLAC/Intensive
implemented to improve Monitoring
competencies of teachers?

C. 2.4 If the response to C.2.3.b is YES, list down the top 3 training needs
mentioned and indicate the number of teachers trained on these
SY Before Previous Previous SY: Current SY:
SY: 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019
Training Needs
No. of % of No. of % of No. of % of
Teachers teachers Teachers teachers Teachers teachers
trained trained trained trained trained trained
Top 1- Utilizes ICT to enhance 37 100% 37 100% 37 100%
teaching and learning
Top 2- Designs and utilizes 37 100% 37 100% 37 100%
teaching methods that take
 into account the learning
process
Top 3- Develops and utilizes 37 100% 37 100% 37 100%
creative and appropriate
instructional plan

2.5 If teachers weren't trained based on identified needs (as seen in C.2.4), cite
reasons for the lack of training.
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

D. Children and Health Safety

D.1 Nutritional status

D.1.1 Number of malnourished children for the current SY 2018-2019

Level Wasted Severely Wasted

Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 25 13 12 14 6 8
Grade 1 7 5 2 2 2 0
Grade 2 21 10 11 38 17 21
Grade 3 7 5 2 3 2 1
Grade 4 17 9 8 36 17 19
Grade 5 11 4 7 6 3 3
Grade 6 12 11 1 7 5 2
Total 100 54 46 106 52 54
Percent of 7.91% 8.79% 7.08% 8.39 8.47% 8.31%
Total

D.1.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY addressing

malnourished children

Project/Intervention Remarks

1.Intensive monitoring on implementing 100% implemented

School Feeding Program. and liquidated

2.Orientation on Nutrition Education 100% conducted for

pupils from Kinder-
Grade 6

D.2 Health status

D.2.1 Number of children who have other health problems for the current SY.
Indicate common ailments and corresponding number of children per type of ailment
based on results of physical and dental examinations.

Types of Ailments (Current SY) 2018

Level Ailment: Ailment: Ailment: Ailment: Ailment: Ailment: Ailment: Ailment: Ailment:
Fever Flu Sore Eye Diarrhea
Kinder 2 6 13 7 0 0 0 0 0
garten
Grade 1 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
Grade 2 4 7 3 0 0 0 0 0
2
Grade 1 2 9 2 0 0 0 0 0
3
Grade 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
4
Grade 1 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0
5
Grade 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6
Total 8 19 44 17 0 0 0 0 0

2.2 Projects/interventions implemented in the previous SY addressing needs of

children with other health problems

Project/Intervention Number of Children Covered

Pupils referred to the nearest 12

heath center
Given paracetamol to pupils with 6
fever

D.3Children reported as victims of abuse and violence

D.3.1 Number of children who were recorded victims of abuse and violence
(physical, verbal, and sexual). Should be supported by data from the Guidance
Office/teachers.

Level Previous SY: Current SY:

2017-2018 2018-2019

Total Male Female Total Male Female

Kindergarten 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grade 4 0 0 1 0 0 0
Grade 5 0 0 0 0 0 1
Grade 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 1 0 0 1
Percent of Total 0 0 ,08% 0 0 .08%

D.3.2 Projects/interventions implemented for children that were victims or

suspected victims of abuse
Yes No If YES, please describe the Number of
mechanisms Children
Covered
a. Does the school have
mechanisms to promote
safe and protective / Assembly on Public 617
practices based on Awareness on Child
DepED's Policy on Child Protection Policy
Protection in School? (selected Grade 4-6 pupils)
b. Other interventions / Individual Counseling/ 1
implemented for children Meeting with the victim and
that were victims or parent
suspected victims of
abuse

E. Status of priority improvement projects or CI Projects

These projects include those implemented by the school and other stakeholders.
Duration Target Status/Accomplishments
Implementer Program/ Indicate progress of the program/
Project Title Start End project, and its effect/impact on
children's access to quality education.
School 12:30 Reading June March 80-90% of Pupils are continuously
Habit 201 2017 pupils were practicing it every 12:30
6 encouraged to noon.
read every
12:30 noon
School Bata ko, Math June March Every class Each class continuously
Tutulungan ko 201 2017 was recites multiplication table
6 encouraged to every after class hours.
recite
multiplication
table

F. Stakeholder support to education

Indicate the amount of contributions made by parents/guardians and other
stakeholders for co‐curricular activities, extra‐curricular activities, and other major
activities (such as meetings and assemblies), as well as stakeholder attendance during
these activities.

Contributions Attendance

Activity Volunteer Cash In-kind No. of No. invited Attendance

Hours attendees rate
Co-curricular Activities
Preparation for 7 hours 1600 Tarpaulin 15 15 100%
Graduation 2018 amounting to
P1,100.00
Extra-curricular Activities
Brigada Eskwela 35 hours P 10,000 P 2,000 75 154 48%
Other Major Activities
City Disaster- 2.5 hours - - 160 160 100%
Risk Awareness
Meeting

G. Fund Sources
Fund Source Amount
General Appropriations Act P 660,000.00
(School MOOE)
General Appropriations Act P 288,000.00
(Subsidy for Special Programs)
– SBFP
Local Government Unit Funds
Canteen Funds 240,000.00
Donations P 15,000.00

II. Situation of Children / Learners: Access - In and out of School

Children Not in School

1.1 Population of children in the barangay where school is located (current
SY)
Age Total Population No. of children NOT in school % of children NOT in school
4 Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total Boys Girls Total
5
6 14 16 30 1 0 1 7% 0
7 14 13 27 0 1 1 7% 7.69%
8 25 20 45 1 1 2 4% 5%
9 21 27 48 1 1 2 4.76% 3.70%
10 14 22 36 2 2 4 14% 9%
11 23 29 52 4 2 6 17% 6.89%
12 14 24 38 3 2 5 21% 8.33%
13 17 21 38 10 4 14 58% 19%
14 44 37 81 12 5 17 27% 13.51%
15 49 42 91 17 6 23 34.69% 14.28%
16 42 47 89 17 6 23 40.47% 12.76%
17 44 43 87 19 10 29 22.72% 23.25%
Grand Total 321 341 662 87 40 127

1.2 Reasons for not attending school in the current SY

No. of No. of children NOT in school according to reasons
school-aged Financial Health Child Distance Affected Affected Disability Other
children not
 Age in school Matters and Labor of school by by reasons
Nutrition from home Disaster Conflict
4
5
6 3 1 2
7 3 1 2
8 4 1 1 1 1
9 6 3 1 2
10 10 7 2 1
11 10 7 1 2
12 15 13 2
13 23 18 1 2 1 2
14 28 25 1 1 1
15 34 29 4 1
16 34 31 2 1
17 32 28 1 3
Total
Percent 202 164 20 8 4 7
of Total

1.3 Number of children in the barangay NOT in school the last two SYs,
Depending on data availability
No. of Out-of-school
Age SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018 Children Attending Other
Forms of Learning in
Previous SY
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
4
5
6 2 1
7 2 1
8 3 1
9 5 1
10 7 3
11 7 3 No data yet
12 10 5 from CBMS
13 13 10
14 17 11
15 21 13
16 23 11
17 27 15
TOTAL 137 75
*No data available

1.4 Projects/Interventions implemented to ensure that out-of-school children

are reached or mainstreamed in school

YES NO If YES, please describe the mechanism/intervention

used by the school-community
a. Does the school-community have a /
mechanism to actively seek out
children not in school and give them Proactive Child Mapping/Tracking System
access to education (e.g., family
mapping, Community-Based
Management System, etc.)?
b. Did the school use interventions in /
the previous SYs to ensure that out-of- Child Mapping / Catch-up Program / ALS
school children have access to
education?

2.Children Enrolled in School

2.1 Enrollment for the last 3 SYs
Level SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018
Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
 Kindergarten 51 59 110 80 82 162 136 107 243
Grade 1 92 86 178 70 82 152 82 82 164
Grade 2 85 106 191 100 93 193 71 81 152
Grade 3 96 106 202 97 112 209 102 97 199
Grade 4 119 103 222 99 104 203 90 101 191
Grade 5 89 88 177 135 108 243 99 99 198
Grade 6 105 108 213 90 96 186 131 100 231
Total 637 656 1293 671 677 1348 711 667 1378
Percent of
Total

2.2 Number of children with disabilities by type of disability

Level No. of Type of Disability (Current SY)
children
with Disability Disability Disability Disability Disability Disability Disability Disability
disabilities Impaired (leg)
eyesight
Kindergarten 11 11
Grade 1 10 10
Grade 2 5 5
Grade 3 4 4
Grade 4 6 6
Grade 5 9 9
Grade 6 5 5 1
Total 50 50
Percent of
Total
5%

2.3 Other Data

Level No. of Over-aged No. of IP Learners No. of Muslim No. of 4Ps Learner
Learners Learners Recipients
(SY2017)
Kindergarten - - -
Grade 1 - - 10
Grade 2 2 - - 12
Grade 3 - - 10
Grade 4 1 - - 38
Grade 5 - - 10
Grade 6 1 - - 31
Total 4 - - 111

III. Situation of Children / Learners: Access - Attendance and Retention Attendance

3.1 Number of children regularly attending classes (at least 90% attendance) for the
last three SYs
Level SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 98 45 53 149 75 74 221 122 99
Grade 1 161 83 78 137 63 74 151 77 74
Grade 2 169 75 94 173 90 83 140 65 75
Grade 3 181 86 95 190 84 106 178 91 87
Grade 4 200 107 93 184 90 94 176 83 93
Grade 5 166 84 82 226 127 99 179 89 90
Grade 6 192 95 97 168 81 87 215 125 90
Total 1160 575 592 1227 610 617 1260 652 608
Percent of 90.25 90% 90.24% 91% 91% 91% 91% 92% 91%
Total %

3.2. Percentage of children regularly attending classes (at least 90%

attendance) for the last three SYs

Level SY 2015-2016 SY 2016-2017 SY 2017-2018

Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
 Kindergarten 98 45.91% 54.08% 149 50.33% 49.66% 221 55.20% 44.79
Grade 1 161 51.55% 48.44% 137 45.98% 54.01% 151 50.99% 49%
Grade 2 169 44.37% 55.62% 173 52.02% 47.97% 140 46.42% 53.57
Grade 3 181 47.51% 52.48% 190 44.21% 55.78% 178 51.12% 48.87%
Grade 4 200 53.50% 46.50% 184 48.91% 51.08% 176 47.15% 52.84%
Grade 5 166 50.60% 49.39% 226 56.19% 43.80% 179 49.72% 50.27%
Grade 6 192 49.48% 50.52% 168 48.21% 51.78% 215 58.13% 41.86%
Total 1160 49.56% 51.03% 1227 49.71% 50.28% 1260 51.74% 48.25%
90.25% 90% 90.24% 91% 91% 91% 91% 92% 91%

3.3 In the previous SY, how many children were frequently absent (below 90%
attendance) and how many of them were recipients of the Conditional Cash Transfer
Program (Pantawid Pamilya) of DSWD?

Level Total Number of children who Number of frequently absent students that were
Enrollment were frequently absent recipients of Pantawid Pamilya
in Previous Total Male Femal Total Male Female
SY e
Kindergarten 243 22 14 8 3 2 1
Grade 1 164 13 5 8 1 1 0
Grade 2 152 12 6 6 4 3 1
Grade 3 199 21 11 10 0 0 0
Grade 4 191 15 7 8 0 0 0
Grade 5 198 19 10 9 4 2 2
Grade 6 231 16 6 10 3 1 2
Total 1378 98 59 59 15 7 6
Percent of 100% 7% 8% 8% 1.08% .98% .89%
Total

3.4 What were the reasons why children were frequently absent in the previous SY?
Please indicate number of children who are frequently absent according to reasons.

Level Total No. of Number of children who are frequently absent according to reasons (Previous SY)
Children who Financial Health Child Distance Affected Affected Other
were Matters and Labor of by by Reasons
Frequently Nutritio School Disaster Conflict
Absent in n from
Previous SY Home
Kindergarten 13 6 5 0 2 0 0 0
Grade 1 15 10 5 0 10 0 0 0
Grade 2 17 7 5 0 5 0 0 0
Grade 3 10 2 4 0 4 0 0 0
Grade 4 6 1 2 0 3 0 0 0
Grade 5 8 1 4 0 3 0 0 0
Grade 6 15 4 4 0 7 0 0 0
Total 94 31 29 0 37 0 0 0
Percent of 6.42% 2.12% 1.98% 0% 0.07% 0% 0% 0%
Total

3.5 Projects/Interventions implemented to address needs of children who are Number of Children
frequently absent Covered
School Feeding 90-100
Home Visitations 15-20
Periodic conference with parents All

4.Dropout

4.1 Number of dropouts for the last three SYs

Level 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 14 8 6 14 11 4 23
Grade 1 22 11 11 9 7 2 11
Grade 2 16 10 6 6 3 3 4
Grade 3 9 8 1 13 8 5 8
Grade 4 10 9 1 3 1 2 5
Grade 5 15 12 3 3 0 3 5
Grade 6 8 8 0 7 5 2 1
Total 94 66 28 55 35 21 57

4.3 Number of dropouts by cause

Level Total No. Number of Dropouts by Cause (Current SY) 2018-2019
of
Dropouts Financi Health Child Distanc Affecte Affecte Disabili Other
(Current al and Labor e of d by d by ty reasons
SY) Matters Nutritio school Disaste Conflic
n from r t
home
Kindergarten 38 15 15 8
Grade 1 42 20 12 10
Grade 2 24 12 10 2
Grade 3 29 9 15 5
Grade 4 13 3 7 3
Grade 5 7 2 3 2
Grade 6 10 2 3 5
Total 163 63 65 35
Percent of
Total

4.4 Projects/Interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out

4.4.a Does the school have mechanisms to: YES
- track attendance and identify children at risk
of dropping out and failing and design
remedies to keep them in school?
- anticipate and minimize disruptions of
classes especially with respect to emergencies
(disaster and conflict)
- track teachers’ attendance and ways of
ensuring their regular presence based on CSC
policy?
NO If YES, please describe the mechanisms
used by the school
/ Individual Counseling Logbook,
Home Visitation Form, SF2,
/ Make- up classes conducted
/ DTR , Teacher’s Logbook, Biometric
Attendance Machine, DTR

4.4.b What are the interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out? Number of Children
Covered
Individual Counseling 10-20
Home Visitation 10-20

IV. Situation of Children / Learners: Quality

Promotion/Graduation Rates
5.1 Number of promoted learners/graduates by grade level, for the last three
SYs
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten 110 51 51 162 80 82 243 136 107
Grade 1 178 92 86 152 70 82 164 82 82
Grade 2 191 85 106 193 100 93 152 71 81
Grade 3 202 96 106 209 97 112 199 102 97
Grade 4 222 119 103 203 99 104 191 90 101
Grade 5 177 89 88 243 135 108 198 99 99
Grade 6 213 105 108 186 90 96 231 131 100
Total 1293 637 648 1348 671 677 1378 711 667
 5.2 Promotion/graduation rates for the last three SYs
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergart 110 51 59
en
Grade 1 178 92 86
Grade 2 192 85 106
Grade 3 202 106 96
Grade 4 222 119 103
Grade 5 177 89 88
Grade 6 213 105 108
Overall 1184 596 587

Mean Percentage Scores (based on National Achievement Tests for Grade 3 and 6)
6.1 Mean Percentage Scores of NAT Grade 3 and 6, per subject for the last
three SYs
Level
English Filipino Math Science Hekasi
Grade 3
Grade 6
Level
English Filipino Math Science Hekasi
Grade 3
Grade 6
Level
English Filipino Math Science Hekasi
Grade 3
Grade 6

6.2 Projects/Interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of learners

Project MMK
Project Sa Kantina, Malusog Ka
Read Today, Lead Tomorrow

Literacy Level

7.1 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional and

independent levels for the current _Sy (English)
Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level
Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6

7.2 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional and independent
levels for the current Sy (Filipino)

Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level

Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6

4.4 Projects/Interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out

4.4.a Does the school have mechanisms to: YES
- track attendance and identify children at risk
of dropping out and failing and design
remedies to keep them in school?
- anticipate and minimize disruptions of
classes especially with respect to emergencies
(disaster and conflict)
- track teachers’ attendance and ways of
ensuring their regular presence based on CSC
policy?
NO If YES, please describe the mechanisms
used by the school
/ Individual Counseling Logbook,
Home Visitation Form, SF2,
/ Make- up classes conducted
/ DTR , Teacher’s Logbook, Biometric
Attendance Machine

4.4.b What are the interventions implemented for children at risk of dropping out? Number of Children
Covered
Individual Counseling 10-20
Home Visitation 10-20

IV. Situation of Children / Learners: Quality

Promotion/Graduation Rates
5.1 Number of promoted learners/graduates by grade level, for the last three
SYs
Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Total

5.2 Promotion/graduation rates for the last three SYs

Level
Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Kindergart
en
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Overall

Mean Percentage Scores (based on National Achievement Tests for Grade 3 and 6)
6.1 Mean Percentage Scores of NAT Grade 3 and 6, per subject for the last
three SYs
Level
English Filipino Math Science Hekasi
Grade 3
Grade 6
Level
English Filipino Math Science Hekasi
Grade 3
Grade 6
Level
English Filipino Math Science Hekasi
Grade 3
Grade 6

6.2 Projects/Interventions implemented to improve basic competencies of learners

Project MMK
Project Sa Kantina, Malusog Ka
Read Today, Lead Tomorrow

Literacy Level

7.1 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional and

independent levels for the current _Sy (English)
Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level
Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6

7.2 Number of learners who are in the frustration, instructional and independent
levels for the current Sy (Filipino)
Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level
Level
Frustration Level Instructional Level Independent Level
Level Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female
Pre-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Level Post-Test Results
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Note: The New Phil-Iri Program is still on-going.

7.3 Projects/Interventions implemented to improve reading skills of children

Read Today, Lead Tomorrow
DEAR
12:30 Reading Habit

Awards/Recognitions (Top 3)
Category Title Year Award-giving Body
of District Division Regional National International
Awardees

Regional Press 2015 

Student Conference
Division Meet-Chess 2015  
(Girls)

Drum & Lyre 2015  

Competition

Champion: District 2017  

Sports and Athletic Meet
(Volleyball-Boys)
2016 
Most Outstanding
Teacher Campus Journalism
Implementer
SPA Erwin M. Barnido
Champion: Coach Rodel 2017  
B. Andales
District Sports and
Athletic Meet
(Volleyball-Boys)
School
Head
1. Most functional 2015 
Principal’s
School Office
2. Top 1 Most 2015  
Functional Class
home (Kinder)
3. Most Functional 2015 
Feeding Center
4. Most Functional 2016 
H.E
5. Most 2016 
Outstanding
Campus
Journalism
Implementer
6. District Sports 2017 
and Athletic
Meet Champion

C. Situational Analysis

SCHOOL-COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP

Name of Type of project assisted Amount Project

partner/linkage accomplished
1.Local School electric, phone and Paid school
government unit water bills bills
(LGU)
2. LGU School Concrete Perimeter Not completed
Fence
3.DepEd/DPWH 4-storey, 8-classroom On-going
building
4.DepEd/DPWH 4-Storey,16-classroom On-going
building
5.LGU Financial support for the 8,000 completed
Drum and Lyre band’s
uniform
6.Civic spirited Financial support 10,000 School Plant
individual Box
7..MOOE Financial support Regular Student’s test
monthly papers, pupils’
basis from ID,
DepEd
8..LGU/NGO Materials and equipment Donation of
(Charity Student’s
Institution of school bags
Bacoor) and umbrellas,
ceiling Fan,
stand fan
9. SM City Books and Literatures Donation
Bacoor/ Villa
Cecilla
Academy
10.NGO (Rotary Feeding Program for Kinder Donation
Club of Bacoor) Pupils