SUMMER INTERNSHIP REPORT

BY: YASH DHAKARE

B.A. LL.B (HONS),3RD SEMESTER
ENROLLMENT NO. : A61011121067

AMITY UNIVERSITY GWALIOR

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF:-

Dr. SURBHI TIWARI

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR , ALS
AUMP
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY SPECIAL THANKS OF

GRATITUDE TO AMITY UNIVERSITY GWALIOR AND MY
TEACHERS, WHO GAVE ME THE GOLDEN OPPURTUNITY
TO DO THIS WONDERFUL INTERNSHIP.
I AM HIGHLY OBLIGED TO ADVOCATE FOR HIS
GUIDANCE AND CONSTANT SUPERVISION AS WELL AS
FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY INFORMATION REGARDING
THE LAW AND ALSO GAVE ME CONSTANT SUPPORT IN
UNDERSTANDING THE VARIOUS UNEXPLORED PARTS OF
LAW .
LASTLY , MY HEARTFUL THANKS TO MY PARENTS AND
FRIENDS WITH WHO’S CO-OPERATION AND SUPPORT
THIS INTERSHIP WAS SUCCESFUL.
************
 DECLARATION
I, YASH DHAKARE HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS
REPORT IS MY ORIGINAL WORK AND THE PROJECT
HAS NOT FORMED THE BASIS FOR THE AWARD OF
ANY DEGREE , ASSOCIATION, FELLOWSHIP , OR ANY
OTHER SIMILAR TITLES. THIS IS AN OUTCOME OF MY
OWN EFFORT .
IF ABOVE STATED STATEMENT FOUND FALSE , I
SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE.

SIGNATURE
AMITY LAW SCHOOL
MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT

1: COMMENCEMENT DATE: 04/07/2022-

06/08/2022
2:PROGRAMME: B.A. LL.B (HONS)
3: SEMESTER :3RD SEM
4: STUDENT NAME : YASH DHAKARE
5: ENROLLMENT NO. : A601011121067
7: FACULTY: Dr . SURBHI TIWARI
8: TITLE OF THR NTCC COURSE : SUMMER
INTERNSHIP
S. TOPIC PAGE
NO. NO.
1 REPORT ON 04/07/22
2 REPORT ON 05/07/22
3 REPORT ON 06/07/22
4 REPORT ON 07/07/22
5 REPORT ON 08/07/22
6 REPORT ON 11/07/22
7 REPORT ON 12/07/22
8 REPORT ON 13/07/22
9 REPORT ON 14/07/22
10 REPORT ON 15/07/22
11 REPORT ON 16/07/22
12 REPORT ON 18/07/22
13 REPORT ON 19/07/22
14 REPORT ON 20/07/22
15 REPORT ON 21/07/22
16 REPORT ON 22/07/22
17 REPORT ON 25/07/22
18 REPORT ON 26/07/22
19 REPORT ON 27/07/22
20 REPORT ON 28/07/22
21 REPORT ON 29/07/22
22 REPORT ON 30/07/22
23 REPORT ON 01/08/22
24 REPORT ON 02/08/22
25 REPORT ON 03/08/22
26 REPORT ON 04/08/22
27 REPORT ON 05/08/22
28 REPORT ON 06/08/22
29 INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE
30 PROBLEMS FACED DURING INTERNSHIP
31 1ST WEEK REPORT
32 2ND WEEK REPORT
33 3RD WEEK REPORT
34 4TH WEEK REPORT
35 5TH WEEK REPORT
36 IMPORTANT CASES
37 INTERNSHIP CERTIFICATE
DAY 1:
DATE :- 04/07/22
IT WAS A 1ST TIME FOR ME VISITING ANY COURT . I WENT
TO AGRA DISTRICT COURT . 1ST FEW DAYS WERE ONLY
ABOUT BASIC FUNDAMENTAL KNOWLEDGE ABOUT BASIC
VOCABULARY USED IN COURT, SHORT FORMS , LOCATION
OF DIFFERENT COURT .
I DIDN’T ANY CASE , GREAT NUMBER OF CLIENT VISITED
THE CHAMBER BUT IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR ME TO GET
WHAT THEY WERE SAYING.
THE LEARNING FOR THE 1ST DAY WHICH I GOT LISTENING
AND ABSORBING THINGS IS MOST DIFFICULT AND
IMPORTANT TASK FOR A NEW LAWYER.

DAY 2:
DATE:- 05/07/22
LEARN ABOUT ADVOCATES DIARY .HOW TO MAINTAIN
THAT DIARY , ITS IMPORTANCE AND MEANING TO DAY TO
DAY WORKING .
FILED THE DATES FOR THE FIRST TIME . UNDERSTAND
ABOUT CASE NO. , COURT NO. , PERVIOUS DATE, NEXT
DATE , ETC

DAY 3:
DATE:- 06/07/22
BESIDE FILING DATES , I LEARNED ABOUT TYPES OF
CASES , TYPES OF OFFENCES & TYPES OF CUSTODY .
BASICALLY CASES ARE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL BY NATURE
BUT IN REALITY TYPES OF CASES ARE STATE CASE AND
COMPLAINT CASES.
SIMILARLY , OFFENCES HAS TWO TYPES COGNIZABLE (
HENIOUS IN NATURE ) & NON- COGNIZABLE( NOT
HENIOUS IN NATURE )
SIMILARLY , CUSTODY ARE OF TWO TYPES JUDICIAL
CUSTODY AND POLICE CUSTODY.

DAY 4:
DATE:- 07/07/22
1ST TIME VISTED THE ACTUAL COURT . I VISTED FAMILY
COURT AND LEARNED HOW CASES ARE FILED HOW THE
DATE OF HEARING IS RECIVED .
CASE: SARTHAK SINGH SHIKARWAR V. GUDDI
IT WAS FILED UNDER SECTION 13 OF HINDU MARRIAGE
ACT .
JUDGE:- JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR MISHRA
PURPOSE WAS TO SEEK DIVORCE . WE WERE FROM
PLAINTIFF SIDE.

DAY: 5
DATE:- 08/07/22
I READ VARIOUS SECTION IN REGARD OF HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT .
SECTION 13: DIVORCE
SECTION 13B: MUTUAL DIVORCE
125 CRPC : MAINTIANCE
154 CRPC : FIR
173 CRPC : CHARGESHEET
169 CRPC : FR
FILED CASES IN DIARY AND UNDERSTAND THE
IMPLICATION VARIOUS SECTION AND HOW THEY ARE
CHAREGED.

DAY: 6
DATE :- 11/ 07/22
WENT FOR THE LISTENING AN ARGUMENT FOR THE 1ST
TIME .
CASE:- BHAGWAN SINGH V. SMT PRAGYA
CASE NO. :- 1264/19
JUDGE – JUSTICE SHIVAM VERMA
SECTION APPLIED : ( 406, 504, 506, 384, 120B ) IPC
WE WERE FROM PLAINTIFF SIDE. AGRUMENT WAS IN
REGARD OF THE CAR TAKEN MISAPPROPRIATELYY FROM
BHAGWAN SINGH.
FILED DATES IN DIARY AND READ OTHER CASES IN
REGARD OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SECTIONS.

DAY: 7
DATE :- 12/07/22
MADE DETAIL STUDY OB VARIOUS SECTION OF IPC AS DAY
6 REVISION .
1: 406IPC- PUNISHMENT FOR CRIMINAL BREACH OF
TRUST .( 3 YRS OF IMPRISONMENT / FINE OR BOTH )
2: 504IPC - INTENTIONAL INSULT / PROVOCATION
3: 506IPC - PUNSIHMENT FOR CRIMINAL INTIMIDATION
(2YRS OF IMPRISONMENT / FINE OR BOTH )
4: 384IPC – PUNISHMENT FOR EXTORTION
( 3YRS IMPRISONMENT/ FINE OR BOTH )
5: 120B – PUNSIHMENT FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY
( AS PER SUB SECTION APPLIED )
LEARNED HOW DRAFT A NOTICE AND APPLICATION FOR
ADDRESSING PARTIES.

DAY: 8
DATE :- 13/07/22
A:LEARNED THE CASE REGARDING DOWRY PREVENTION
ACT 1985
B:CASE : STATE V. MUQIM
CASE NO. : 609/21
JUDGE : JUSTICE NIRAJ GAUTAM
STATUS : REDEMING THE DEMAND OF BAIL AGAINST
DEFENDANT.
SECTION APPLIED : (498A , 304B , 302 )IPC
FACTS : WE WERE FROM COMPLAINENT SIDE , THIS WAS
MY 1ST STATE CASE.
1: ROOBI MARRIED TO RESPONDANT 6/7 YEARS AGO .
2: SHE FACED HARRASMENT , MENTAL AND PHYSICAL
(498A). FOR THE DEMAND OF DOWARY.
3: WITH IS MARRIAGE THEY BOTH HAD 2 DAUGHTER
4: SHE WAS MURDERED
5: POST MARTUM REPORT SHOWED MARK ON NECK AND
REASON WAS ASPHYXIA( UNABKE TO BREATHE)
6: THE FIR WAS FILED BY HER FATHER IN SIKANDAR P/O ,
AGRA

DAY 9 :
DATE :- 14/07/22
A: READ POSTMARTUM REPORT FOR THE 1 ST TIME .
B: LEARNED VARIOUS HINDI LEGAL VOCABLURY. AND
TRANSALATED THEM INTO ENGLISH .
C: LEARN HOW TO PICK OUT THE IMPORTANT POINT OF
FACTS NEEDED IN AM ARGUMENT FOR A CASE.
D: LEARNED THE DIFFERNCE BETWEEN CHARGESHEET
AND FINAL REPORT.

DAY : 10
DATE :- 15/07/22
SECOND MURDER CASE WHICH I READ .
CASE: STATE V. RAGHUVIR SINGH &ORS.

CASE NO. : 436/19

CRIME NO. : 26/19
COURT : DISTRICT JUDGE
JUDGE:
STATUS : EVIDENCE
PARTY : DEFENCE COUNCIL
SECTON APPLIED : 302 IPC
FACTS
DISEASED :- RAHUL SHARMA ( MURDERED)/ AGE -
22YERS/PROF- TEACHER IN A SCHOOL
FIR WAS FILED ON 16/08/19
FACTS SAYS :- RAHUL WAS BEING CALLED BY A LADY
COOK IN THE AFTERNOON TIME , ON HER ADVICE HE
AGREED TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE UNFAIR DEDUCTION OF
Rs250/- FROM HIS SALARY.
ON INQURING FROM RAGHUVIR ( PRINCIPLE) ABOUT THE
ABOVE STATED FACT , HE CALLED SATENDAR FRROM THE
NEARBY VILLAGE AND AS RAHUL TO MAKE HIM THE
POLITICAL LEADER OF THE VILLAGE , TILL HE COULD
REACT TO THE STATEMENT SATENDAR BURSTED HIS FACE
BY HITTING A BRICK AND DESTROIED HIS FACE BY
CONTINOUS HITTING AND MURDERED HIM.

ON THIS DATE WE WENT FOR SUBMITTING OUR

EVIDENCES AND FILE A APPLICATION FOR BAIL.
I LEARNED HOW THE SECTIONS ARE APPIED WHEN IT IS A
STATE CASE.

DAY : 11
DATE :- 16/07/22
I TRANSALATED THE HINDI AFFIDAVIT TO ENGLINSH
AFFIDAVIT .
CASE: ANIL SINGH V. VIKASH AGWARWAL
I LEARNED VARIOUS HINDI VOCABLURY AND LEARN HOW
ENGLISH AFFIDAVIT ARE WRITTEN

DAY : 12
DATE 18/07/22
CASE : MS. USHA DEVI V NATIONAL INSURNCE CO.
CASE: 316/18
CASE RELATED TO MATERIAL ADVERESE CHANGES
SECTION APPLIED : ( 279, 304A, 338 ) IPC
DEMAND WAS MADE FOR THE INSURANCE FROM THE
CO.
B: WENT TO MEDIATION CENTER IN AGRA DISTRICT
COURT.

DAY : 13
DATE :- 19/07/22
I READ 1ST RAPE CASE OF MY LIFE.
CASE: STATE V. DHARMANDAR
CASE NO. : 7839/20
CRIME NO.: 69/20
SECTION APPLIED : 376IPC , SECTION 3&4 OF POCSO 2012
SECTION 3 : PENETRATION SEXUAL ASSUALT
SECTION 4 : PUNISHMENT FOR PENTRATION SEXUAL
ASSAULT
FACTS : COMPLAIN WAS FILED BY A FATHER OF 14 YEAR
OLD.
FIR SAID : WHEN THE BOTH THE PARENTS OF THE GIRL
WERE OUT OF HOME THE NEIGHBOUR ( MOTHER OF
DHARMANDAR ) CALLED HER TO HER HOUSE AND
LOCKED HER IN A ROOM WITH DHARMANDAR IN ROOM ,
WHERE HE RAPED HER AND TOLD HER THAT IF SHE TOLD
THIS TO ANY ON WOULD KILL HER PARENTS .
WE WERE FROM ACCUSED SIDE . AT THIS DATE WE DID
CROSS EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCES.

DAY : 14
DATE :- 20/07/22
FILED A RTI.
READ THE CASE AND NOTED THE FACTS IN WHICH RTI
WAS TO FILED AND THEM DRAFTED THE APPLICATION IN
NAME OF RTO AGRA.
CASE:- OMPAL V. SMT USHA DEVI.
SECTION APPLIED WERE : ( 420 , 407 ,302 , 504 , 506 , 468
, 469 , 471 , 384 )IPC
STATUS : ORDER .
QUESTION FORMED:
1: NAME OF THE OFFICER WHO VERIFIED THE
DOCUMENTS
2: PHOTO OF SHUSILA ( CAR OWNER)
3: WAS THERE RTO OFFICER PERSENT OR NOT

DAY : 15
DATE :- 21/04/22
CASE : STATE V. MOHIT
CRIME NO. 01017166/2019
SECTION APPLIED :- ( 376 ,506B , 120B , 357 ) SEC 3&4 OF
POCSO ACT 2012
FACTS
FIR NOT BEING FULLY MATCHED WHICH THE STATEMENT
MADE BY THE VICTIM INFORNT OF COURT
STATUS : APPLICATION FOR BAIL

DAY : 16
DATE :- 22/07/22
CASE : SMT ZAHIDA BEGUM &ORS V. UP STATE & ORS
CASE NO. : 4889/19
STATUS : REVISION
COURT: DISTRICT JUDGE COURT
UNDER SECTION : LIMITATION ACT SECTION 5, (406,
506)IPC & 397CRPC
REVISION PERIOD IS BASICALLY OF 90 DAYS BUT IF THIS
PERIOD SURPASS THAN SECTION 5 OF LIMITATION ACT
HAS T0 BE APPLIED

DAY : 17
DATE :-25/07/22

READ 1ST CASE IN RELATION TO NEGOTIABLE

INSTRUMENT ACT
CASE : RAMVEER SINGH V. AAKASH SINGH SIKARWAR
CASE NO. : 7366/19
COURT : ACJM
STATUS : WARRANT
UNDER SECTION : 138 NI ACT
FACTS
CHEQUE AMOUNTING Rs1,00,000/- ISSUED ON 15/06/18
BOUNCED ON 18/06/18, NOTICED WAS ISSUED ON
09/07/18 NO RESPONSE FROM THE ACCUSED PARTY .
TOTAL DUE ON THE PARTY WAS Rs . 7,50, 000.
DAY : 18
DATE : 26/07/22

STATE V. VINOD & ORS

1ST CASE IN RELATION TO SCST ACT
UNDER SECTION : ( 323 , 504, 506, ) IPC SECTION 3(1)
SCST ACT
STATUS: EVIDENCE
B: LEARNED ABOUT NON BAILABLE WARRANT.

DAY : 19
DATE : 27/07/22
CASE: STATE V. RAMPAL
CASE NO. : 1472/14
COURT : ACJM(4)
SECTION APPLIED : ( 376A/B, 506 ) IPC , SECTION 6 OF
POCSO ACT.
STATUS : EVIDENCE
PARTY : DEFENSE COUNCIL
B: READ ABOUT U.P STAMP DUTY ACT

DAY : 20
DATE : 28/07/22
LEARN ABOUT PROTEST PETITION.
1: NOT DEFINED UNDER ANY ACT.
2: EVOLVEDTHROUGH JUDICIAL PROUNCEMENTS
3: IT IS A RIGHT OF A VITICM UNDER CRIMINAL LAW.
4: ALL PROTEST PETITION ARE NOT COMPLAINS
NEED :- IF ONE IS NOT STAISFIED WITH THE POLICE
COMPLAINT FILED OR SUBMITTED BY CONCERNED
AUTHORITY IN THE COURT.
IN ALL IT IS A PETITION AGAINST NEGATIVE POLICE
REPORT

DAY :21
DATE : 29/07/22
CASE : STATE V. VISAHAL DAS & ORS
CASE NO. : 857/22
CRIME NO.: 207/22
SECTION APPLIED : SECTION 8& 20 NDPS ACT 1982
CASE IN RELATION TO NARCOTIC DRUGS AND
PSHYCOTROPHIC SUBSTANCES ACT.
STATUS : CHARGE SHEET FIILING ( 173) CRPC
FACTS
ACCUSED CAUGHT WITH DRUGS WEGHT:
VISHAL DAS :- 930g
RAMESH :- 840g
FIR WAS FILED BY : SATISH KUMAR

DAY : 22
DATE : 30/07/22
READ THE CASE RELATED TO DEFAMATION :
CASE : ABDESH UPADHAYE V. AMIT TIWARI
STATUS ; STATEMENT UNDER 200CRPC
DEMAND OF ; 1.2CR + 11,000( NOTICE FEE)
B:LEARN ABOUT DINE DECLARATION ( STATEMENT MADE
WHEN THE PERSON IS ON DEATH BED TAKEN ONLY BY
EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE)
C: LEARN HINDI LEGAL VOCABLURY AND VARIOUS OTHER
RELATED SECTIONS

DAY 23
DATE : 01/08/22
LEARN ABOUT STAMP PAPER
IT IS A INSTRUMENT OF STATE TO COLLECT DUITES FROM
CITIZEN
THERE TWO TYPES OF STAMP PAPER:
1: JUDICIAL
2: NON JUDICIAL.
CASE : RICHA KARLA V. MANJOOT SINGH
DIVORCE JUDGEMENT.

DAY : 24
DATE : 02/08/22
CASE : STATE V. VERENDAR SINGH & ORS
LEARN BASICS OF FILLING.
DRAFTED AN AFFIDAVIT FOR THE 1ST TIME . LEARN TO
TAKE DATES AND FIND THE LOST FILE .
LEARN ABOUT VARIOUS HERARCHY IN COURT.

DAY :25
DATE 03/08/22
LEARN ABOUT HOW DEAL WITH A CLIENT , HOW TO
UNDERSTAND THE MENTALITY OF A CLIENT.
LEARN HOW LEGAL ADVICE CAN CHANGE THE PERSON ,
HOW TO UNDERSTAND A PERSON WHAT IS RIGHT AND
WRONG AT THAT POINT.
CASE: STATE V. ARJUN & ORS
CASE FILLING.

DAY :26
DATE 04/08/22
WENT TO ARITRATION CELL
CASE : KATAK MAHINDRA BANK V. MOHAMMAD ARIF
LEARN THE DIIFERNCE OF PROCESS IN VARIOUS COURT.
LEARN NEW HINDI LEGAL VOCABLURY.
DAY :27
DATE : 05/08/22
CASE: STATE V SACHIN PARIHAR &ORS
CASE NO: 6776/22
COURT : CJM ( CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE)
SECTION APPLIED :- ( 420, 411, 414, 467, 468, 471)IPC
WENT FOR CASE : STATE V.MUQIM
LEARN THE CONCEPT OF X PARTY.

DAY: 28
DATE: 06/08/22
JAI KISHAN V. RAMKARAN KATARA & ORS
SECTION APPLIED : ( 420, 467, 468, 469, 120B)IPC
156(3)CRPC
FACTS
A PLOT OF 800HECT WAS SOLD BY THE ACCUSED TO
DIIFERENT PERSON AND HE HIMSELF WAS NOT A REAL
OWNER.
 INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE
MY INTERNSHIP WAS INDEED FRUITFUL, FULL OF NEW
AND EXPLORED SECTORS OF LAW .
BEING A LAW SUDENT THIS 1ST EXPERIENCE WAS REALY
DIFFICULT BUT INDEED DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS
WRITTEN IN BARE LAWS. INITIALLY WORKING UNDER THE
UNKNOWN PERSON AND NEW ATMOSPHERE WAS
DIFFICULT TO ABSORB BUT WITH TIME , I MYSELF
MOLDED WITH THE DUE PROCESS. UNDERSTAND HOW
AND WHEN ASK FOR WORK AND PROBLEMS WHERE TO
ACCOMPANY . HOW TO DRESSUP , HOW TO BEHAVE,
WHEN TO ASK THE PROBLEMS AND MOST IMPORTANT
THE IMPORTANCE OF MAINTAINING THE DAY TO DAY
DIARY AND REPORT .
ON CONCLUDING MY EXPERIENCE I WOULD ONLY SAY ,
COLLEGE EDUCATION IN IMPORTANT FOR A LAW BUT
THESE PRACTICAL KNOWLEGDE IN MORE IMPORTANT
FOR OUS TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATION OF LAWS
WE LEARN , THIS INTERNSHIP INDEED HAS SUCCESSFULLY
MOLDED MYSELF IN TRUE LAW STUDENT AND LASTLY MY
GOALS TO ACHIEVE HAS BEEN TRUELY UNCLOUDED NOW.
 PROBLEMS FACED IN
INTERNSHIP

1: TO UNDERSTAND THE PROCESS OF

COURT.
2: IN UNDERSTANDING THE LANGUAGE.
3:I IN UNDERSTANDING THE WORKING
OF DIFFERENT COURTS.
4: IN FILLING
5: IN UNDERSTAND MENTALITY OF
CLIENTS
1 WEEK
ST

INTERNSHIP REPORT
AMITY LAW SCHOOL
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT(WPR)
1: COMMENCEMENT DATE: 04/07/2022-
08/07/2022
2:PROGRAMME: B.A. LL.B (HONS)
3: SEMESTER :3RD SEM
4: STUDENT NAME : YASH DHAKARE
5: ENROLLMENT NO. : A601011121067
6:
7: FACULTY: Dr. SURBHI TIWARI
8: TITLE OF THR NTCC COURSE : SUMMER
INTERNSHIP
9:TASKS COMPLETED:
1: AS THE 1ST WEEK OF MY INTERNSHIP COMES TO
AN END , THIS WEEK HAS BEEN FULL OF
DIFFICULTIES AND NEW CHALLENGES FOR ME .
COME OUT OF COMFORT ZONE AND FACING THE
REALTY , NOT MANY THINGS WERE LEARNED BUT
REALLY CAME ACROSS LOT OF NEW TERMS AND
PRICIPLES. CAME ACROSS LOT OF CLIENTS AND
CASES. LEARNED FILLING AND MAINTAING THE
IMPORTANCE OF DIARY IN LAWYERS LIFE.
2: LEARNED GOOD AMOUNT OF HINDI LEGAL
VOCABULARY.
3: RESEARCHED ON VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CRPC
AND IPC.
4: LASTLY AND MOST IMPORTANTLY LEARNED
COURT ATTICATES.
2 WEEK INTERNSHIP
ND

REPORT
AMITY LAW SCHOOL
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT(WPR)
1: COMMENCEMENT DATE: 11/07/2022-
16/07/2022
2:PROGRAMME: B.A. LL.B (HONS)
3: SEMESTER :3RD SEM
4: STUDENT NAME : YASH DHAKARE
5: ENROLLMENT NO. : A601011121067
7: FACULTY: Dr . SURBHI TIWARI
8: TITLE OF THR NTCC COURSE : SUMMER
INTERNSHIP
1: 2ND WEEK WAS INTERESTING READ
DIIFERENT CASE LAWS , WENT FOR
ARUGUMENTS , EVIDENCE , DISTRICT JUDGE
COURT AND LEARN ABOUT CROSS
EXAMINATION EVIDENCES.
2: READ VARIOUS CASES OF (504,506 )IPC,
LEARN HINDI LEGAL VOCABULARY.
3: LEARN HOW THE CASES ARE FILED IN COURT.
4: LEARN ABOUT CONTEMPT OF COURT.
5: DID HINDI TO ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF
AFFIDAVIT.
3 WEEK INTERNSHIP
RD

REPORT
AMITY LAW SCHOOL
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT(WPR)
1: COMMENCEMENT DATE: 18/07/2022-
22/07/2022
2:PROGRAMME: B.A. LL.B (HONS)
3: SEMESTER :3RD SEM
4: STUDENT NAME : YASH DHAKARE
5: ENROLLMENT NO. : A601011121067
7: FACULTY: Dr . SURBHI TIWARI
8: TITLE OF THR NTCC COURSE : SUMMER
INTERNSHIP
THIS WEEK WAS FULL NEW TASK AND JOB
TO PERFORM . WENT TO DIFFERENT
COURTS FOR TAKING DATES.LEARNED
VARIOUS TERMS LIKE PROTEST PETITION.
FILED RTI .
LISTEN RECORDING OF EVIDENCE AND
CROSS EXAMINATION
READ DIFFERENT SECTION OF IPC AND
CRPC, ALONG WITH CASES .
LEARNED HINDI LEGAL VOCABULARY AND
READ DIFFERNCE OF LANGUAGE IN HINDI
AFFIDAVIT AND ENGLISH AFFIDAVIT.
4 WEEK INTERNSHIP
TH

REPORT
AMITY LAW SCHOOL
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT(WPR)
1: COMMENCEMENT DATE: 25/07/2022-
30/07/2022
2:PROGRAMME: B.A. LL.B (HONS)
3: SEMESTER :3RD SEM
4: STUDENT NAME : YASH DHAKARE
5: ENROLLMENT NO. : A601011121067
7: FACULTY: Dr . SURBHI TIWARI
8: TITLE OF THR NTCC COURSE : SUMMER
INTERNSHIP
1:THIS WEEK WAS ASLO SIMILAR TO 3RD WEEK .
DID RESEARCH ON VARIOUS TOPICS OF LAW .
2:READ CASES OF DEFAMATION , WENT FOR
ARBITRATION.
3:LEARN ABOUT INTERNAL WORKING OF
DIFFERENT COURTS. READ CASES IN RELATION
SECTION (420,467,468,469,471, 120B) IPC
4:LEARN HOW TO SHORTLIST THE IMPORTANT
FACTS.
5:LEARN HOW TO DRAFT APPLICATIONS .
6:WENT FOR JUDGEMENT PROCESS, AND LEARN
HOW THE TIME SLOTS ARE DIVIDED FOR
SMOOTH WORKING OF COURT.
5 WEEK INTERNSHIP
TH

REPORT
AMITY LAW SCHOOL
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT(WPR)
1: COMMENCEMENT DATE: 01/08/2022-
06/08/2022
2:PROGRAMME: B.A. LL.B (HONS)
3: SEMESTER :3RD SEM
4: STUDENT NAME : YASH DHAKARE
5: ENROLLMENT NO. : A601011121067
7: FACULTY: Dr .SURBHI TIWARI
8: TITLE OF THR NTCC COURSE : SUMMER
INTERNSHIP.
THIS WAS THE WEEK OF CONCLUDING MY
INTERNSHIP.
I REVISIED MY DIARY WHOLE WEEK ,AND
CLEARED MY PROBLEMS. I GOT NOT ALL BUT
SOME OF THE WORKING PROCESS OF THE
COURTS . DRAFTED MY 1ST APPLICATION TO
NOTIFY PARTY .
READ CASE FILE IN REALTION OF SECTONS
(147,148,149)IPC.
WENT FOR JUDGEMENT IN FAMILY ( DIVORCE)
MATTER.
THIS WEEK WAS REALLY GREAT AS THE
WORKING WAS FAMILIAR .
Two important cases
reassuring summer internship

CASE 1:
:CASE RELATED TO DOWRY AND DEATH.
IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE ADDDITIONAL
DISTRICT JUDGE , DISTRICT AGRA .
NAME OF THE JUDGE : JUSTICE NIRAJ GAUTAM
CASE NO. : 609/21
PETITINOR
SECTION APPLIED : (498A, 304B , 302)IPC
STATE VERSUS MUQIM & ORS
FACTS OF THE CASE :
ROOBI MARRIED TO DEFENDANT ALTEAST 6 TO
7 YEARS AGO. PARENTS OF ROOBI SPENT ABOVE
THEIR CAPACITY IN THE WEDDING , AS PER THE
DEMAND OF DEFENDANT AND HIS FAMILY THE
GIFTED THEM WITH ALL THE NECESSARY ITEM
USEFUL FOR ONE HOUSEHOLD , OTHER THAN
THE ITEMS OF NEED THEY GIFTED THEIR
DAUGHTER WITH TWO GOLD RINGS , ONE
GOLD CHAIN AND THREE PAIRS OF EARRING ON
THE WEDDING DAY . APPROXIMATELY THEY
SPENT AROUND Rs. 5,00,000/- IN THEIR
WEDDING . WEDDING WAS SUCCESSFULLY
COMMENCED WITH THE APPROVAL OF BOTH
THE PARTIES .
BUT WITHIN SIX MONTH OF THE WEDDING THE
DEFENDANT ( MUQIM ) AND HIS MOTHER AND
FATHER STARTED MENTAL HARRASMENT WITH
ROOBI ( MUQIM WIFE ) . THEY DEMANDED FOR
A BIKE, AND STARTED THREATING ROOBI THAT
IF SHE DOES NOT ASK FOR A BIKE THEY WILL
THROW HER OUT OF THEIR HOUSE.
ROOBI PARENTS GAVE THEM A BIKE WORTH
Rs.60,000/- , EVERY THING WENT SMOTHLY FOR
A YEAR THEY ROOBI AND MUQIM HAD
DAUGHTER AFTER 1 ½ YEAR OF MARRIAGE.
AFTER THE BIRTH THEY STARTED HARRASING
FOR MONEY AND OTHER ITEMS. ON 22/04/21
506THEY MURDERED HER.
THEY FIR WAS FILLED BY ROOBI’S FATHER
AHMAD KHAN.
THE POSTMARTUM REPORT SAYS”THERE WERE
MARK ON NECK AND THE CLEAR REASON OF
DEATH WAS ASPHYXIA i.e UNABLE TO
BREATHEOR UNCONSCIOUSNESS”

STATUS:
REEDEMING THE DEMAND OF BAIL AGAINST
DEFENDANT.
2ND CASE :
CASE IN RELATION MISREPRESNTATION AND
FORGERY.
IN THE HON’ABLE COURT OF CHIEF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE JUNIOR
DIVISON AGRA
CASE NO. : 168/22
SECTION APPLIED : (420 , 467 , 302 , 504 , 506 , 468 ,
469 , 471 , 384 ) IPC, 156(3) CRPC.
COMPLAINENT
OMPAL SINGH VERSUS SMT USHA
DEVI &ORS
FACTS:
THIS CASE WAS FILED BY OMPAL SINGH B/O LATE
SHUSLIA DEVI R/O A143 SECTOR 4 AWAS VIKAS COLONY ,
SIKANDARA , AGRA . SHE WAS A NURSE IN AGRA MENTAL
HOSPITAL. SHE USE TO LIVE ALONG WITH HER COUSIN
SISTER SMT. USHA DEVI AND HER DAUGHTER AVNI.
ON 02/10/21 SHE WAS ADMITTED TO GOBAL HOSPITAL
AGRA BECAUSE OF SERIOUS ILLNESS . OMPAL SINGH WAS
NOT IN TOWN SHE WAS ADMITTED BY HER COUSIN
SISTER SMT USHA DEVI . AFTER NO IMPORVEMENT IN
HER HEALTH SHE WAS SHIFTED TO PUSPANJALI HOSPITAL
AGRA ON 05/10/21.
AS HER CONDITION WAS NOT IMPROVING SMT USHA
DEVI DISCHARGE HER ON 015/10/21 WITHOUT OMPAL
SINGH ADVICE . ON 16/10/21 SHE PASSES AWAY. ALL THE
PASSBOOK ,ATM AND CHEQUE BOOK OF LATE SHUSLIA
DEVI WAS WITH SMT USHA DEVI AND HER DAUGHTER
AVNI.
ON EVENING OF 16/10/21 AMOUNT OF Rs. 19000/- WAS
WITHDRAWAL FROM LATE SHUSLIA DEVI SBI ATM.
AND ON 17/10/21 A CHEQUE NO. 196546 OF SBI
AMOUNTING Rs. 5,56,385 /- WAS ISSUED IN THE NAME
OF VIMAL MOTORS PVT Ltd. ALONG WITH THE CHEQUE
Rs. 21000/- WAS AGAIN WITHDRAWAL FROM HER SBI
ATM.
WITH THE INTENTION OF FRAUD SMT USHA DEVI & HER
DAUGHTER AVNI CREATED A FALSE SIGNATURE OF LATE
SUSHILA DEVI AND PURCHASED KIGER RXT PETROL FROM
VIMAL MOTORS PVT LTD . WHICH WAS RAGISTERED ON
26/10/21 IN RTO OFFICE , AGRA.
THERE WERE CONTINOUS TRANSFER OF MONEY FROM
LATE SHUSILA DEVI’ S ACCOUNT, UNTIL HER BROTHER
OMPAL CAME TO ABOUT THE SAME.
STATUS:
RTI WAS BEING FILED IN RTO OFFICE , AGRA.
AND EVIDENCE WERE BEING SUBMITTED IN HON’ABLE
COURT OF CJMJ AGRA.