Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IELTS - Writing Task 2 - Tips 1-10
IELTS - Writing Task 2 - Tips 1-10
001155 - IELTS
WRITING TASK 2
Lecturer: Tran Khanh Nhi
About the IELTS writing task two
u Three characteristics
1. Control of the message
2. Writing’s natural complexity
3. Its predictable type in IELTS
✓ Create tips to prepare ourselves
✕ Complexity for even English native users
Category Sub-category
Lexical Resource 1.Uses a range of words
2.Uses those words accurately
Grammatical Range & 1.Uses a range of grammar
Accuracy 2.Uses that grammar accurately
Conclusion
It is your decision.
City centers are very crowded with cars. They often cause a
great deal of pollution. Cars should be banned from all these
centers.
u Answers
C. A large number of deaths are caused by road accidents.
Why do so many road accidents occur? Make
recommendations that would help to reduce their
number. (straightforward)
D. Modern life is very stressful. People have to manage
their time and other resources very carefully. How can
they have less stress when they are so busy? (ask you to
“give suggestions”)
→ Discussion questions
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 27
Tip 4 – Identify the essay type
u Answers
E. Work is taking a more important role in people’s lives.
Why are people working so much? Do you think this
trend is good or bad?
→ Mixed questions (discuss and give an opinion/argue a
side)
u 2.
Which of the following lines (1, 2, or 3) best
shows the way each paragraph makes its point?
1. 2. 3.
u 3.
Which of the paragraphs do you think would be
the best in an IELTS test, and in western
universities?
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 34
Tip 5 – The ‘exam attack’ approach
u 2.
Which of the following lines (1, 2, or 3) best
shows the way each paragraph makes its point?
u 2.
Which of the following lines (1, 2, or 3) best
shows the way each paragraph makes its point?
u 2.
Which of the following lines (1, 2, or 3) best
shows the way each paragraph makes its point?
u 3.
Which of the paragraphs do you think would be the
best in an IELTS test, and in western universities?
• Straight line logic
→ Either give direct opinion (agree or disagree)
→ or look at both sides of the issues
u Questions
1. What are the differences between the following two
essay structures?
2. Which do you think is better?
3. Which would be better if you ran out of time at Point 1
or Point 2 (as shown)?
u Suggestion
An opinion-led essay is a better ‘exam attack’ approach
since even if we run out of time, it still creates a
strong, coherent, and purposeful piece of writing.
• •
• •
Conclusion
Tip 6 – Planning and organizing
evasion ones
Tip 7 – Write in formal style
u Sample ‘Banning Cars’ Essay
We have got more cars than ever on the roads, e.g. in city centers. It’s pretty
much like this everywhere. Anyhow, although it’s like this, I reckon that cars
shouldn’t be banned from city centers. Do u agree?
Firstly, it’d be impractical. It’d be like paying $300 per person. It’d cause us
too many problems, e.g. during the rush hour. In the rush hour, you’ve got to
be able to get to all things, that’s for sure. This is even things in city centers,
etc.
Secondly, it’d be far too unpopular. There are lots of cars on the roads. All of
us, especially kids, like cars a lot. They are No.1. We have got really caught
up on cars, like taxis, trucks, etc. The number of cars is gonna get greater
every year. We can’t choose anything anymore. We have to just sort of put up
with cars.
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 53
Tip 7 – Write in formal style
✗ ✓
not any no
not much little
not many few
u Pros
- Well written → high score
u Cons
- The difficulty of thinking of three reasons
- One-sided argument → not adult or deep
- A lack of preparation for argue-both-sides requirement
- Repetitive grammar structures
centers.
The second reason why city centers should not ban cars is that it
would be far too unpopular. [And so on].
However, banning cars would reduce pollution. This would make
the centers cleaner [and so on].
Con.
Huh? But I thought the writer didn’t want cars banned? So why
does he write that cars cause pollution, and that banning them
would have good results? Huh? I don’t understand!
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 87
Hint 1: Balancing the argument
It might be argued…
One may argue… that banning cars
The point could be made… should reduce
It is possible to argue… pollution.
Refuting signpost
this - over-simplifying/too simplistic
argument is - dubious/not convincing
- (somewhat) suspect
- rather weak/not strong
;however
these - overlook the fact that
people - see the world too simply
- are overly idealistic
- ignore social reality
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 99
Hint 3: How to counter-argue
2. Refuting/Countering → Adding a Refuting Signpost →
Support + Examples
Environmentalists could claim that banning cars
Countering
from city centers would reduce pollution;
Refuting however, this argument is dubious.
signpost
The surrounding factories and industry, as well as
cars just outside the central regions, will
Support +
continue to produce emissions, and these will
Examples
simply drift across and equally contaminate the
air. For example,…
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 100
Hint 3: How to counter-argue
3. Countering/Refuting → Conceding Statement → Support +
Examples
u Reason 2: Misremembering
• Remember sample sentences wrongly
→ It’s impossible to understand
• E.g. (2) While there are certainly valid disagreement
to the contrary, opposing people with different
perspectives will often not argue.
u Reason 3: Meaningless
• Long sentences of nothing → fluff
E.g. (3) A variety of different arguments have been put
forward about this issue,…
(4) As to whether it is a blessing or a curse,… ;
nevertheless, I have developed my point of view
on what constitutes the best answer
(5) By way of conclusion, I think this issue is so
complicated that it is difficult to say whether the
001155 - Tran Khanh Nhi 3/16/22 114
u Reason 4: Untruths
• The sentences are NOT true. → NOT a good message
• E.g.
- ‘There are erupting arguments about this.’
→ Are there actually arguments?
- ‘This is an absolutely pivotal point.’
→ Is it an ‘absolutely pivotal point’?
u Reason 5: Dishonesty
E.g. ‘There is a rising controversy about this.’
‘There are compelling reasons to explore this
issue in depth.’
→ Do students actually believe there is a
controversy or there are ‘compelling reasons’?
u Reason 7: Incoherence
• By introducing large amounts of memorized material, the
essay is not written by a single mind writing honestly, but
from many people creating it dishonestly.
• Do you think these parts ‘fit together well’?