Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Society for Buddhist-Christian Studies and University of Hawai'i Press are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Buddhist-Christian Studies
James M. Hanson
Southern Illinois University- Carbondale
Historical evidence indicates that Jesus knew about Buddhism, simply because bo
he and it were in Judea during the same time. Other evidence, while perhaps ap
ryphal, indicates that he spent most of his so-called lost years outside Judea, poss
bly in Kashmir to study Buddhism exclusively.
I owe thanks to the barbed but benign comments of my friend, Dale Bengtso
Regarding Buddhism in Judea, Jesus did not live in a pastoral, ethnically isolate
place and time. On the contrary, non-Jewish political and cultural influences p
meated Judea, which was an important shipping center for trade between India an
the West and the military gateway to invade Egypt via land. Both land and sea tra
routes had run through Jerusalem for centuries. Overland routes extending to Pers
and western India were especially active after Alexander's invasion of western Indi
360 years earlier; most of the routes, whether connecting to wealthy cities in Egy
or in Greece and Rome, came through Jerusalem, where goods for Greece and Rom
were shipped via the Mediterranean Sea. Sea routes from Bombay and the mouth
Most accounts of Jesus in India derive from a book titled The Unknown Life o
Christ, written by Nicholas Notovitch, a Russian doctor who claimed to v
monastery of Himmis near Leh, Ladakh (Kashmir) in 1888.10 Notovitch sai
This post-crucifixion argument differs from the "lost years" argument. It has Jesus
surviving a Roman persecution, leaving India for no obvious reason, living for more
than one hundred years, and so on, and it contradicts numerous sources and testi-
monies that Jesus did die on the cross. The argument that Jesus went to India as a
young man encounters none of these difficulties and contradicts nothing except
vague references, and it in fact explains the otherwise unexplained biblical silence
about Jesus' lost years. The critics, of course, are happy to merge the two arguments
and use the latter to discredit the former argument.
However, the main problem with Jesus being in India is that its chief source,
Notovitch, probably was a fraud. As already stated, the abbot of the Himmis mon-
astery, when later interviewed by J. Archibald Douglas, denied that Notovitch ever
visited the monastery. Pali was never used in that area, although Notovitch says this
was the language translated for him into French. Himmis had been visited previously
by other Westerners who never heard mention of Issa. Jesus' presence in India is not
mentioned in any of the established sutras.29 And most importantly, the sources
cited by Hassnain and other supporters are all dated well after Jesus' life. Almost cer-
tainly, Jesus traveled beyond Judea, but probably not to Kashmir.
Setting aside the historical evidence, the textual evidence is convincing by itself alone.
Most of what Jesus said, which, if even confined to the gospels of Matthew, Mark,
Luke, and John, was said five hundred years earlier by Buddha. Much of what Jesus
did was done five hundred years earlier by Buddha. So, schooled as a Buddhist, Jesus
spoke and acted like a Buddhist. Jesus was the most important source for the bibli-
cal accounts of his life, which he gave to Peter and which Peter gave to Matthew and
Luke.
Indeed, but for inevitable differences in translations, what Jesus said may have
been identical with what he read and heard of Buddha and Veda texts. The languages
of Pall (which Buddha spoke) or Sanskrit (found in most Buddhist documents) had
JESUS: "If anyone strikes you on the cheek, offer the other also."
BUDDHA: "If anyone should give you a blow with his hand, with a stick, or
with a knife, you should abandon all desires and utter no evil words."34
JESUS: "Love your enemies, do good to those who hate, bless those who curse
you, pray for those who abuse you."
BUDDHA: "Hatreds do not cease in this world by hating, but by love: this is an
eternal truth. Overcome anger by love, overcome evil by good."35
JESUS: "This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved
you.
BUDDHA: "Let your thoughts of boundless love pervade the whole world."36
JESUS: "Let anyone among you who is without sin be the first to cast a stone
at her."
BUDDHA: "Do not look at the faults of others or what others have done or not
done; observe what you yourself have done and have not done."37
JESUS: "You father in heaven makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good,
and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous."
BUDDHA: "The light of the sun and the moon illuminates the whole world,
both him who does well and him who does ill, both him who stands high
and him who stands low."38
JESUS: "If you wish to be perfect, go sell your possessions, and give the
money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven."
BUDDHA: "The avaricious do not go to heaven, the foolish do not extol char-
ity. The wise one, however, rejoicing in charity, becomes thereby happy in
the beyond." 39
The Hebrew prophecy of the Messiah reflects ancient Indian legends. Jesus' sec-
ond coming to abolish evil corresponds with the legend of Krishna, who will return
and save the world from evil and the destructive acts of Shiva. According to Serrano,
"Three hundred years before the birth of Christ the story of Krishna had already been
compiled in India, and had begun to influence the Essenes in the Middle East."40
He outlines the parallel Krishna/Messiah legends: "Christ may have evolved from
Krishna, the Hindu God-Avatar of Vishnu. Like Krishna, Christ was born of a vir-
The most accepted explanation for the textual similarities is the universali
menical, or humanist argument that the spiritual condition of humankind is b
the same. To wit, whether we follow Jesus, Buddha, Lao Tzu, or Zarathustra,
have the same three-pound brain, body and senses, the same emotions and ne
the same basic experiences of suffering, caring for others, fearing death, and
to a higher being. The psychoreligious sameness is manifest in Sigmund Freu
contents of civilizations, Carl Jung's archetypes, Joseph Campbell's hero lege
William James's varieties of religious experience, to name but a few of ma
sources.
BIBLICAL SILENCE
The biblical silence about Jesus' lost years is one of the stran
It is a total silence about one of the greatest moralists in hum
enteen years of Jesus' life between the ages of twelve and tw
for his birth and a singular account of Jesus as a twelve-year
is silence about all but the last three years of his life. Why? W
disciples and his thousands of followers not comment on his
his thirty-two years?
Surely they did comment. Hundreds, even thousands, of ac
the form of prayers, sermons, letters, or what became dispa
By the second century CE, the church of Christ was destroy
dence of the life of Christ that did not support its doctrin
tinued its purging with more or less fervor throughout the
activity continued at the turn of the twentieth century wh
Jesus' travels as a young man was raised first by Notovitch.
ities destroyed documents at the Himmis Monastery and
Tun-huang caves in central Asia.50
At stake throughout the centuries was the critical church d
a Jew who started his own religion as the Son of God. Any
this view was condemned as "apocrypha" and destroyed or re
gospels were rewritten to provide the impression that Jesus ne
ple is Luke's reference to Jesus during the lost years. The or
read: "And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, and w
day of his showing in Judea." It now reads: "And the child g
in spirit, filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was up
The church's later concerns about Jesus' Jewishness and h
vailed during his life and ministry. Jesus' identity as a Jew
God was critical to his credibility as a leader and to the survi
ical movement. The Jews who followed him exposed their li
occupying Roman authorities that persecuted thousands and
AD 70. To be followed, Jesus had to be seen as the Jewish Me
ish folklore, as Jesus himself emphasized repeatedly, not a
Maitreya. His travel and exposure to Buddhist ideas could no
could the records of Buddhist influence upon the Essenes a
before and during Jesus' time. Hence the inexplicable lost ye
CONCLUSION
NOTES
1. Will Durant, The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, Part One (N
Simon and Schuster, 1935), vol. 1, p. 449.
2. Miiller quoted in John R. Remsburg, The Christ: A Critical Review and Analys
Evidences of His Existence (New York: Truth Seeker Company, 1909), p. 510.
3. S. M. Melamed, Spinoza and Buddha:Visions of a Dead God (University o
Press, 1933), pp. 312-313.
4. Ibid, p. 324.
5. Yvette Rosser, "Buddhism in Christianity," International Internet Association, May 23,
1995, <http://www.indunet.org/alt_hindu/ 1995_May_2/msg00015.html>.
6. Jacques Derrida, The Gift ofDeath, trans. David Wills (Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1995), pp. 100-109.
7. Migel Serrano, The Serpent ofParadise: The Story ofan Indian Pilgrimage (London: Rider
and Company, 1963), p. 144.
ADDITIONAL READINGS