Professional Documents
Culture Documents
27th CIPA International Symposium “Documenting the past for a better future”, 1–5 September 2019, Ávila, Spain
KEY WORDS: Petroglyphs, Iron Age, open-air rock art, 3D models, web mapping, open-source libraries, aerial and terrestrial
photogrammetry
ABSTRACT:
The application of geometric recording data and representation of open-air rock art is intrinsically so heterogeneous that new online
web platforms are required for a more efficient analysis to link all the geo-referenced information and facilitate its scientific study.
From 2015 to 2018, three geometric documentation campaigns led by the Departamento de Ingeniería Topográfica y Cartografía of
the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain) were completed in the area of Khatm al Melaha (Emirate of Sharjah, United Arab
Emirates) along the Gulf of Oman.
More than 370 rock art engraved motifs were documented in this area close to the southwest border with the Sultanate of Oman. All
those figures were picked in 149 stone blocks with different dimensions and morphologies, distributed along the slope of an isolated
58-meter-high elevation.
The aim of this project was to establish a protocol for the recording, analysis, preservation and prevention of this set of open-air rock
art engravings with the following actions: developing an aerial and terrestrial recording data documentation, creating and developing
a web platform called threeDcloud for visualizing three-dimensional models and web mapping, and integrating a data base by means
of different JavaScript open-source libraries.
1. INTRODUCTION isolated slope (Figure 2). Some of those decorated boulders are
in secondary condition, having rolled down the hill (natural
In this paper we propose a primary methodology procedure that degradation processes) or having been used for some of the
allows integrating into web access of data recorded from the modern human structures documented in the area (Figure 1. A).
archaeological area of Khatm al Melaha (Emirate of Sharjah, Despite the high concentration of rock art panels, associated
United Arab Emirates), combining different geomatic archaeological finds were scarce: only two small undecorated
techniques at different scales from a broad yet technical handmade pottery fragments, a couple of flint flakes, and a hand
perspective. In order to improve scientific analysis, the mill fragment were found in an examination of the surface area.
documenting process should always consider every aspect of In order to understand this rock art concentration from a visual
recording as well as preventive control, conservation and perspective, in its location it’s easy to see the N-S
interpretation. Along these lines, some open–access, web–based communication route parallel to the Gulf of Oman, as well as
2D and 3D JavaScript libraries have been created to unify, the E-W route to the interior through the Wadi al-Hilu, currently
simplify and analyse their different uses through a web platform connected by the Sharjah-Kalba highway (Jasim et al., 2016).
called threeDcloud. Apart from those artefacts, a large shell midden was found at
The use of new technologies for recording and identifying open- the foot of the hill facing East, and some circular structures (in
air rock art in nature is so diverse and the techniques applied are varying conditions) mainly along the Eastern side of the slope
often so complex that they hinder interdisciplinary but also at the top of the elevation and on the western side. Even
understanding, failing to provide a standardised methodology. though they haven’t yet been defined as funeral graves, some
New development techniques are hence needed. Procedures other nearby rock art areas have, as it is the case of Fujairah
should be standardised to provide scientific analysis, as well as (Ziolkowski, 1998, 2007; Ziolkowski and Hassan, 2000).
dissemination and understanding of the generated data and its Despite being in its preliminary phase, the project has so far
possibilities. seen the following achievements:
Three geometric surveys were carried out between 2015 and
2018 in the archaeological area of Khatm al Melaha (Emirate of 1) The creation of a wide catalogue of documentation with
Sharjah, United Arab Emirates) along the Gulf of Oman, led by strong possibilities of dissemination, such as a 2D and 3D
the Departamento de Ingeniería Topográfica y Cartografía, online repository data.
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain). More than 370 rock
art engravings were documented in this area close to the 2) The integration into web access of interrelated models at
southwestern border with the Sultanate of Oman (Figure 1). different scales.
The engravings were carved on 149 stone blocks of different
dimensions and morphologies spread along a 58-meter high
__________________________
* Corresponding author
3) The integgration of geoomatic techniq ques for preveentive for thhis site, the folllowing geomattic techniques have
h been usedd
control, conserrvation and inteerpretation of open-air rock artt. in alll three completed campaigns:
ure 4. In-site wo
Figu ork methodologgy with an Eyessmap tablet and
SteereoTargets (Ovvejero, 2016).
In 20
016, a documen nting campaignn was completeed with a fixed--
wingg eBee drone (from
( senseFlyy model) with visible
v spectrall
sensoor. The adaptability to DSSM of this drone d allowedd
geneerating a 3.6 65-centimetre/pipixel GSD of o the wholee
archaaeological site (72 ha.) at a 1120-metre heig ght. The sensorr
used
d was a G9X Canon
C camera w with a 20-mp resolution.
r Thee
focus was to gen nerate a 3D-m model and a high-resolutionn
ophoto of the working
ortho w area (Fiigure 5). Severral GCP controll
pointts we distributted all over thhe site at differrent heights inn
orderr to monitor the final model. The absolute camera
c positionn
(meaan uncertainty) was 0.024(X) 00.025(Y) 0.039(Z).
3. DATA ACQUISITIO
ON
the geometric
g recorrding data (that is, digitally pro
ocessed imagess
and digital tracing)) yields a coheerent workflow that combiness
the results
r of each documenting
d prrocess.
Moreeover, our goal is to present noot just an image of an isolatedd
tracinng, but to high
hlight the imagee of a tracing with
w its originall
conteext (Figure 7). Such treatmentt of the tracing gives essentiall
inforrmation for glo obal studies off rock panels: its connectionn
with the volumetricc component off the shelter (wh hich determiness
the reading of th he representedd setting), the definition off
preseervation elemen nts, both naturral (cracks, fisssures, flacking,,
etc) or
o anthropic; orr even those rellated with widespread.
4. DIGIT
TAL TRACING
were edited with Photoshop, using several tools such as Magic Since the end of 20th century some debates have taken place
Wand, Lace Tool and Colour Range Command, depending on about the idea of style in archaeology, its main line being the
the specific needs of each area of the image. Those pixels that discussion about the following questions: how should
do not correspond with the engraved area are eliminated, and conceptual style be differentiated? How should function and
the image is isolated in a particular layer to show the rock art technology be distinguished in operational contexts? Which
engraving separated from its physical support. factors determine a style? How important is the context in
Additionally, a copy of the original image is created with determining a style? What characteristics of a given style are
lowered opacity in a different layer. The tracing previously more or less important when reconstructing processes from the
created is superimposed onto this image, thus highlighting the past as well as ancient conditions and social units? (Carr and
engraving while presenting visual information about the Neitzel, 1995: 6).
physical support in which it was created (Figures 7.3 and 7.5). To our view, the main line of the debate should focus in
There are multiple possibilities of quickly modifying the tracing establishing those attributes that better differentiate a group of
once obtained, being a versatile method that allows for a variety given representations so as to recognize those elements,
of results depending on the needs (Figures 7.4 and 7.5). qualities, proprieties and particularities that delimit a “style”. A
Alternatively, other automatized systems such as Meshlab and number of questions then arouse. Would it be possible to isolate
DStretch were tested on the 3D model texture highlighting the a given number of attributes and compare them, in order to
latter (Figure 6). interpret their ideological meaning through the contextual
associations in the archaeological language? Do the structural
aspects of a style always indicate a specific ethnic or cultural
5. ABOUT OPEN-AIR ROCK ART: CONNECTIONS group, or can those aspects only reflect a wide range of social
BETWEEN ROCK ART AND LANDSCAPE groups?
TOPOGRAPHY By delimiting stylistic spans in our field we will realise the
existence of ethnic regions that have their own characteristics in
Even though there are some studies relating to rock-art in different levels (the form of the representations, the connection
Arabia (Anati, 1968a, 1968b, 1968c, 1972, 1974; Bednarik and among them, the artistic topic, the archaeological and cultural
Khan, 2005, 2017; Khan, 2007, 2013; Newton and Zarins, context, dates, etc.). We hope that the understanding of these
2000), those located in the United Arab Emirates are less regions will help contribute to the general context of rock-art in
numerous (Ziolkowski, 1998, 2007; Ziolkowski and Hassan, the Arabic Peninsula, its origin and evolution with consistency
2000). Despite being in its preliminary stage, this project has an in both time and space.
inductive approach that goes from the particular to the general, From more traditional views—mostly historicist—the term
classifying the rock-art motifs according to a distinctive “style” has been defined in material and contextual terms that
classification in order to compare it to those from other areas. are obviously more appropriate for historicist epistemology.
Therefore, in this initial phase of the project, we have tried to Once those parameters were overcome, and perhaps as a
classify the documented study at Khatm al Melaha according to reaction to subsequent postulates such as those of the New
four different parameters: style, technique, topic and colour of Archaeology, at the end of the 20th century more modern views
the patina, all of them concerning the particularities of the appeared. These views understood the debate about the
region. terminology from a rather theoretical perspective, by which
styles are seen as an active expression directed to obtaining
5.1 Style meaning as much as cultures and social groups are, too. They
Ascribing a specific artistic style to one culture or historical vary depending on both the context and the historical moment,
period seems a rather confusing task. In the debate about the and all of them highlight certain restrictions that determine each
appropriateness of the term “art” for graphic prehistoric style as a process, whether this is material, economical, social,
representations, the discussion about the concept “style” has ecological... (Conkey, Soffer, 1997; Hodder, 1990). This line
some interest. has been followed by other researchers who understand “style”
The idea of style appears somewhat confusing for as an intentional, structured system of selecting certain
archaeologists and pre-historians, being “one of the most dimensions of form, process or principle, function, significance,
difficult concepts in the lexicon of art and one of the chief areas and affect from among known, alternative possibilities to create
of debate in Aesthetics and Art History” (Turner, 1996). pleasing variability within a behavioral-artifactual corpus
Nevertheless, we consider that this term is essential for (Roe, 1995: 31).
interpretation as well as for many other fields, such as art Indeed, “art is a very difficult word to use successfully” and “the
history, social studies, etc. Understanding the term as a coherent use of art as a descriptive term in relation to petroglyphs,
system of qualities in a certain period, it is also worth engravings, carvings, etc. is fraught with confusion and
highlighting that, for prehistoric rock-art, the term should refer subjectivity” (Ziolkowski, 1998: 23). It is for this reason that we
to a wider social group and not to an individual personality. use the term “style” with caution even though we believe it
As we see it, rock-art studies should look into a way of should not be forgotten (Clegg, 1993: 102).
examining the morphological variations of representations to Along these lines, considering our observations in our small
see what type of results about prehistoric societies would a area of study we have established four different styles, two of
stylistic analysis render. We should inquire what type of formal which also have specific characteristics that classify in two sub-
variables constitute a specific style and try to define the status styles. According to the morphological characteristics of the
of the cultural, social and material processes that circumscribe it engravings, these would be classified as follows:
and materialize it as a cultural characteristic (Roe, 1995: 27). 1. Schematic; 2.1. Synthetic, 2.1. Synthetic hypertrophied; 3.1.
The challenge is to set those goals that let us single out groups Stylised, 3.2. Stylised hypertrophied; 4. Abstract or Symbolic.
of attributes that can be used to identify certain processes from
the past (Carr and Neitzel, 1995). We should understand style This project aims to establish connections between the stylistic
not only as a means of doing something but rather as the phases mentioned and those that have been noted in former
representation of an idea, since the term surpasses its technical studies with a time-cultural value: Islamic, literate, herding and
specifications. hunting, early hunters (Anati, 1968a, 1968b, 1968c, 1972,
1974). Given tthe preliminaryy state of this annalysis, we cann only ptation in the th
adap hreeDcloud webb platform. Larg
ge point clouds
note some suuggestions, sincce we must waait to obtain rresults ob
btained by photo ogrammetry tecchniques with a professional
from the w whole study (style,
( superimmpositions, paatinas, eBee mapping
m drone (G
GSD 3.65 cm/p px.)
themes...) to establish sequennces that are sup
pposedly valid.
In any case, tthe purpose off this first part of the projectt is to
identify and develop a daata integration process from m the - Weeb mapping GIS with the inteegration of the orthophoto andd
different docuumenting systtems applied. Consequently,, this eachh of the blocks documented inn different layer types (Figuree
article aims too estimate how to generate a 2D D and 3D repo sitory 9). This
T enables anaalysing the diffeferent styles and
d morphologiess
that allows reesearch about common stylistic patterns oof the of thhe rock art sto one blocks thrroughout the entire
e recordedd
engravings, sttatistics of loccation and detaailed study off each archaaeological site.
engraving throough a web paage. It also aim ms to find the most
appropriate mmethod to integrrate interrelatedd models at difffferent
scales throughh the threeDclooud platform without
w the neeed of
additional sofftware or pluggins and, ultim mately, the findd the
combination of all these geomatic tech hniques that leet us
progress in preeventive controol, preservation and the interprreting
of rock-art.
6. RESULTS
R
AC
CKNOWLED
DGEMENTS
Khan, M., 2007. Rock art of Saudi Arabia across twelve Sanz de Sautuola, M., 1880. Breves apuntes sobre algunos
thousands years. Riyadh, Saudi Commission for Tourism and objetos prehistóricos de la provincial de Santander. Imp. y lit.
Antiquities. de Telesforo Martínez. Santander.
Khan, M., 2013. Rock Art of Saudi Arabia. Arts, 2, pp. 447- Sapirstein, P., 2018. A high-precision photogrammetric
475. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts2040447 recording system for small artifacts. Journal of Cultural
Heritage, 31, pp. 33-45.
Le Quellec, J.L., Duquesnoy, F. and Defrasne, C., 2015. Digital
image enhancement with DStretch®: Is complexity always Sauvet, G., 2011. Prólogo. In: González-Pumariega Solís, M.
necessary for efficiency?. Digital Applications in Archaeology 2011. La cueva de El Pindal 1911-21011. Estudio de su arte
and Cultural Heritage 2, pp. 55-67. rupestre cien años después de «Les Cavernes cantabriques de la
région cantabrique». Mensula Ediciones, pp. 13-15.
Le Quellec, J.L., Harman, J., Defrasne, C. and Duquesnoy, F.,
2013. DStretch® et l’amélioration des images numériques: Schütz, M., 2016. Potree: Rendering Large Point Clouds in
applications à l’archéologie des images rupestres. Les Cahiers Web Browsers. Faculty of Informatics at the Vienna University
de l’AARS 16, pp. 177-198. of Technology.
Lorblanchet, M., 1993. Finalité du relevé. In: GRAPP. L’art threeDcloud. Available online: http://www.threedcloud.com/
parietal paleolithique. Techniques et methodes d’étude. (accessed on 2 May 2019).
Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche. pp.
329-337. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Earth Resources Observation
and Science (EROS) Center. Declassified images of the
Newton, L.S. and Zarins, J., 2000. Aspects of Bronze Age art CORONA program. Available online:
of southern Arabia: The pictorical landscape and its relation to https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov (accessed on 2 May 2019).
economic and socio-political status. Arabian Archaeology and
Epigraphy, 11, pp. 154-179. Ziolkowski, M.C., 1998. A study of the petroglyphs from Wadi
al-Hayl, Fujairah, United Arab Emirates (1). Arabian
Otero, X., Farjas, M. and Santos, M., 2016. La historia en el Archaeology and Epigraphy, 9, pp. 13-89.
paisaje: diferentes lugares y análogas representaciones. Análisis
e interpretación con las nuevas tecnologías de modelización Ziolkowski, M.C., 2007. Rock on art: petroglyph sites in the
virtual. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on United Arab Emirates. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy,
Archaeology, Computer Graphics, Cultural Heritage and 18, pp. 208-238.
Innovation, ARQUEOLÓGICA 2.0, Universitat Politècnica de
València, Valencia, pp. 321-323. Ziolkowski, M.C. and Hassan, S.A.M., 2000. Three
petroglyphs from the Emirate of Fujairah, United Arab
Otero, X., Farjas, M., Santos, M. and Angás, J., 2017. Emirates. Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies, 30,
Diferentes paisajes y análogas representaciones. Interpretación pp. 257-265.
arqueológica con tecnologías de ingeniería inversa. In: Primer
Congreso en Ingeniería Geomática; Universitat Politècnica de
València, Valencia, pp. 8-14.